<?xml version="1.0"?>
<records xmlns:eric='http://www.eric.ed.gov' xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'><record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Music Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Usability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Music Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Use Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Upitis, Rena</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Boese, Karen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Abrami, Philip C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Anwar, Zaeem</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Digital Resource Exchange About Music (DREAM) is a virtual space for exchanging information about digital learning tools. The purpose of the present study was to determine how users responded to DREAM in the first four months after its public release. This study is the second phase of usability research on DREAM, and was conducted to guide future development of the tool. Research questions were designed to determine patterns of use for DREAM, the most popular resources, and gaps in the DREAM resources, in order to guide further design and content development. The primary data sources were site analytics, supplemented by an online survey and feedback from teachers who took part in a DREAM workshop. Results indicated that DREAM is steadily gaining users, and that the tool is effective and satisfying for music teachers as a way of keeping abreast about digital learning tools, especially for resources for ear training and sight reading. The paper concludes with suggestions for design enhancements and ways of broadening the user base. [For the full proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562458</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Digital Resource Exchange About Music (DREAM): Phase 2 Usability Testing</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>19</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Güllü, Fatih</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kuusik, Rein</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Laanpere, Mart</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Estonia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Estonia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this study we presented new EES Model-2 extended from EES model for more productive implementation in e-learning process design and modelling in higher education. The most updates were related to uppermost instructional layer. We updated learning processes object of the layer for adaptation of educational process for young and old people, taking into account interests and abilities of students of the different age groups. Important added objects of the uppermost layer are cultural diversity and language. We updated communication object of the instructional layer and added human and social factor. The methods of study of instructional layer were updated with selective object &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot;. We added to E-paradigm layer an object &amp;quot;combination&amp;quot; that explains by combination of synchronous and asynchronous objects. Our study has high significance for increase of quality of e-learning in higher education in specific cases. We strongly recommend application of this updated EES Model-2 to support high educational standards of higher education and provide rights of students with different needs and abilities. [For the full proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562464</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Electronic Education System Model-2</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adoption (Ideas)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Buc, Sanjana</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Divjak, Blaženka</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The diffusion of innovation (DOI) is critical for any organization and especially nowadays for higher education institutions (HEIs) in the light of vast pressure of emerging educational technologies as well as of the demand of economy and society. DOI takes into account the initial and the implementation phase. The conceptual model of DOI in higher education (HE), where e-learning is considered as innovation, will be elaborated in the poster. [For the complete proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562467</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Innovation Diffusion Model in Higher Education: Case Study of E-Learning Diffusion</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>3</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrated Learning Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adoption (Ideas)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Marques, Bertil P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Villate, Jaime E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vaz de Carvalho, Carlos</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Portugal</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Portugal</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The results of several studies conducted to analyze the quantitative and qualitative use of learning technologies in Higher Education in Portugal showed that, in general, these technologies are not used systematically and effectively and e-learning platforms tend to be relegated to repositories of contents rather than as full-fledged tools actively enabling and promoting learning. Several gaps were also identified at the management, pedagogical and technical levels. Following best-practice in this domain, a holistic intervention including these three levels is crucial to achieve positive results. Therefore, following these studies, a set of guidelines and recommendations was created to raise the level of technology adoption in higher education and improve the educational performance of each institution by raising teaching/learning levels so that they are in accordance with the Bologna paradigm. This way it is possible to have a systematic approach, expanding the intervention to the entire institutional campus and resulting in an effective learning platform usage by teachers and students. [For the full proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562470</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Proposal to Enhance the Use of Learning Platforms in Higher Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer System Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Commercialization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Suciu, George</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Todoran, Gyorgy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vulpe, Alexandru</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Suciu, Victor</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bulca, Cristina</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cheveresan, Romulus</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Innovation in Internet of Things (IoT) requires more than just creation of technology and use of cloud computing or big data platforms. It requires accelerated commercialization or aptly called go-to-market processes. To successfully accelerate, companies need a new type of product development, the so-called validated learning process. Furthermore, the development of the IoT paradigm has advanced the research on Machine to Machine (M2M) communications and has enabled novel acceleration platforms. However, there is a need for converging currently decentralized cloud systems, general software for processing big data and IoT systems. The paper describes a cloud platform that will bring together several services and instruments that the companies usually rely on in their go-to-market process. The main contribution of this paper consists in the integration of several services in the platform. The proposed platform will allow companies to bring their products to market faster and in a more successful manner, will be accessed via the Internet and will host the tools and virtual environments needed for the go-to-market accelerated process. Finally, is presented the acceleration results of a Cloud IoT architecture for processing big data from M2M telemetry. [For the complete proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562471</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Cloud Computing and Validated Learning for Accelerating Innovation in IoT</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Medical Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethical Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cartoons</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novels</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Premedical Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Weber, Alan S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Qatar</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Qatar</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Although used as a common pedagogical tool in K-12 education, online graphic narrative (&amp;quot;comics&amp;quot;) software has not generally been incorporated into advanced professional or technical education. This contribution reports preliminary data from a study on the use of cloud-based graphics software Pixton.com to teach basic medical ethics concepts and the human dimension of medical ethics dilemmas in a premedical program at an American medical college in the State of Qatar. Qualitative and quantitative end-of-semester data (open-ended and 7-point Likert scale questions) were collected from randomized control and study groups from 22 total students in a 4-week medical ethics module, half of whom wrote an argumentative essay on a contemporary medical ethics dilemma and the other half who created a 10-15 panel graphic narrative consisting of a real-life doctor-patient-family encounter involving a contemporary ethical issue. [For the full proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562472</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Use of Cloud-Based Graphic Narrative Software in Medical Ethics Teaching</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Usability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Based Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperating Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Genç, Zülfü</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mann Whitney U Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Kruskal Wallis Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Bartletts Test of Sphericity</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>With advances in information and communication technologies, the classical nature of educational institutions has changed. One innovative effort within teacher training is the Web-Based School Experience System (WBSES) developed by the researcher. In this study, the usability of an existing WBSES is evaluated from both teachers&apos; (n = 13) and students&apos; (n = 96) perspectives. A non-experimental survey method was applied to collect participant opinions. A usability questionnaire was designed, and analysis yielded five significant factors for the system: usefulness, helpfulness, visual effectiveness, customizability, and smoothness. To obtain more in-depth information, participants were asked to delineate their responses to five open-ended questions. Generally, students and teachers liked the tool in terms of its usability, but they also provided recommendations for design issues. [For the full proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562475</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Usability of a Web-Based School Experience System: Opinions of IT Teachers and Teacher Candidates</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Music Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Music Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Dissemination</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Upitis, Rena</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Boese, Karen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Abrami, Philip C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Canada</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Canada</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Digital Resource Exchange About Music (DREAM) is an online tool for exchanging information about digital learning tools for music education. DREAM was designed by our team to encourage music teachers to learn about digital resources related to learning to play a musical instrument, both in classroom and independent music studio settings. In addition to enabling music teachers to learn about resources, DREAM allows music teachers to evaluate the resources based on their own experiences using the resources, to read about other teachers&apos; views of the resources, and to add resources to the learning objects repository. During the demonstration of DREAM, we will showcase some of the resources and discuss the evolution of the design of DREAM. We will encourage participants to explore DREAM on the devices we provide and/or on their own laptops, tablets, or smartphones. [For the full proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562477</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Demonstrating DREAM: A Digital Resource Exchange about Music</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>3</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Steiner, Christina M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kickmeier-Rus, Michael D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Albert, Dietrich</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Digital learning games are useful educational tools with high motivational potential. With the application of games for instruction there comes the need of acknowledging learning game experiences also in the context of educational assessment. Learning analytics provides new opportunities for supporting assessment in and of educational games. We give an overview of current learning analytics methods in this field and reflect on existing challenges. An approach of providing reusable software assets for interaction assessment and evaluation in games is presented. This is part of a broader initiative of making available advanced methodologies and tools for supporting applied game development. [For the complete proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562478</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Making Sense of Game-Based User Data: Learning Analytics in Applied Games</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blended Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prior Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Style</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Programming</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mironova, Olga</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Amitan, Irina</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vendelin, Jelena</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vilipõld, Jüri</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Saar, Merike</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The present paper introduces some strategies used in teaching an Informatics course for non-IT first year university students. The strategies were developed during several years, using the main principles of flexible and blended learning. The methodology has been based on the results of experiments with students from social sciences, economics and technical faculties. Numerous tests were carried out to find out the level of prior knowledge and the preferred learning styles of each student. According to the results, students were divided into separate groups within an e-learning environment. The authors considered three main aspects: student&apos;s background, the level of knowledge and the most suitable style of learning. The success of the experiment presented in this paper is demonstrated by comparing the academic results of the test group who was taught using the new strategy with the reference group, taught in a common way. [For the full proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562482</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Maximizing and Personalizing E-Learning Support for Students with Different Backgrounds and Preferences</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Response to Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emergent Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Fluency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Al Otaiba, Stephanie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Connor, Carol M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Folsom, Jessica S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wanzek, Jeanne</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Greulich, Luana</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schatschneider, Christopher</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wagner, Richard K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This randomized control study compares the efficacy of two response-to-intervention (RTI) models: (1) Dynamic RTI, which immediately refers grade 1 students with the weakest skills to the most intensive intervention supports (Tier 2 or Tier 3); and (2) Typical RTI, which starts all students in Tier 1 and after 8 weeks, decides whether students who did not respond to general instruction in Tier 1 should move to Tier 2. The study asks: (1) What are the effects of Dynamic RTI and Typical RTI on student reading outcomes by the end of first grade?; and (2) Does assignment to specific tiers predict gains on standardized assessments, and does this differ when comparing Dynamic and Typical RTI groups? The setting is seven schools in a school district in a mid-size city in the southeast in their first year of RTI implementation. Approximately 500 students participated in the study; less than 3% were Limited English Proficient, and student socioeconomic status varied across schools. Matched pairs of students within classrooms were assigned to either Dynamic or Typical RTI. The only difference between conditions was &amp;quot;when&amp;quot; students were provided supplemental intervention sessions. Reading assessments included letter-sound, word, passage reading, and teacher-reported severity of reading difficulties. Results of the analysis revealed that: (1) Students in the Dynamic RTI group had statistically significantly higher Spring Reading scores than did students in Typical RTI, with an effect size of 0.36; (2) Tier 2 students in the Dynamic RTI condition had significantly higher reading outcomes scores compared to students initially eligible for Tier 2 in Typical RTI; and (3) Students initially eligible for Tier 3 had the weakest scores over the school year, but students initially eligible for Tier 3 who received the Tier 3 intervention immediately because they were in Dynamic RTI achieved higher Brief Reading scores compared to Tier 3 students in Typical RTI who had to wait until the beginning of Session 3. Dynamic RTI protocols, such as the one used in this study, suggest that there is no reason to delay intervention; that any effect of false negatives is negligible; and that, broadly implemented, Dynamic RTI, including a foundation of effective Tier 1 instruction, can improve reading outcomes for all children. The study was conducted for a full school year, and was unique relative to prior RTI investigations in allowing movement across tiers every 8 weeks in tandem with report card periods and in allowing fast tracking to Tier 3 for the most needy students. Table and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562485</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>To Wait in Tier 1 or Intervene Immediately: A Randomized Experiment Examining First Grade Response to Intervention (RTI) in Reading</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Communication Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrated Learning Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inclusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lalla, Sharon</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A myriad of cultural differences can take educators in a multitude of directions when planning intentional design strategies in an online course to become more inclusive of international student needs. The topic of cultural diversity is a complex discussion. Nevertheless, there are ways educators can begin to practice culturally inclusive strategies. Using Hall&apos;s (1976) low-context communication style, this paper addresses two components of the online course, the syllabus and the learning management system, and offers suggestions for beginning the journey toward culturally inclusive pedagogical practices to address barriers in the curriculum for international students. [For the full proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562487</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Practicing Low-Context Communication Strategies in Online Course Design for International Students Studying in the U.S.</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grade Repetition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Promotion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mariano, Lou</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Martorell, Paco</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Requiring a failing student to repeat a grade is, of course, not a novel idea. The theory behind test-based promotion policies is that students who fail to demonstrate a sufficient understanding of their current grade&apos;s curriculum lack the prerequisite proficiency to fully engage in the following grade. This view recognizes the cumulative nature of the curriculum across grades. However, very little causal evidence exists on whether grade retention generates negative behavioral outcomes. This study examines the impact of grade retention under a comprehensive student promotion policy instituted by the New York City Department of Education (NYCDOE). Building off earlier work that examined impacts on test scores, the current study aims to examine effects on various measures of behavioral outcomes using a quasi-experimental regression discontinuity research design. Data analyses are ongoing and the authors could not draw firm conclusions by the time of the SREE conference in March 2015, however, they expect to have solid results at a future date that will shed light on whether or not grade retention leads to the behavioral problems that critics of the policy contend that it does. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562493</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Causal Effects of Grade Retention on Behavioral Outcomes</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>21</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Catholic Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Support Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structural Equation Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Causal Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Torrente, Catalina</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nathanson, Lori</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rivers, Susan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brackett, Marc</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Children&apos;s social-emotional skills, such as conflict resolution and emotion regulation, have been linked to a number of highly regarded academic and social outcomes. The current study presents preliminary results from a causal test of the theory of change of RULER, a universal school-based approach to social and emotional learning (SEL). Specifically, the authors examine RULER impacts on the quality of classroom climates, the hypothesized setting-level mediating mechanism linking RULER to improved student outcomes. These analyses will provide a more precise understanding of the pathways through which RULER, a specific SEL program, contributes to children&apos;s positive development, and will also expand our understanding of the intervening mechanisms underlying effective educational interventions more generally. Data for this study come from the first randomized control trial (RCT) of The RULER Approach. The RCT took place in 62 primary schools in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn in Brooklyn and Queens, NY. The effective sample for these analyses includes 24 classrooms (12 in each treatment condition) nested in 19 schools. At baseline, schools in the full sample ranged in size from 178 to 656 students (M = 325.92, SD = 97.06), and the number of students per teacher ranged from 17 to 35. First stage results from the instrumental variable analysis show significant intervention impacts on classroom emotional support after one year of intervention (b = 0.35, p &amp;lt; 0.05). Second stage results confirm that emotional support after a year of implementation has a marginally significant causal impact on classroom organization. Unexpectedly, emotional support does not have a statistically significant causal impact on instructional support. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562494</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Testing Causal Impacts of a School-Based SEL Intervention Using Instrumental Variable Techniques</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Style</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prior Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Beckmann, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bertel, Sven</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zander, Steffi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Germany</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mann Whitney U Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Signed Ranks Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Germany</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Adaptive e-Learning systems are able to adjust to a user&apos;s learning needs, usually by user modeling or tracking progress. Such learner-adaptive behavior has rapidly become a hot topic for e-Learning, furthered in part by the recent rapid increase in the use of MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). A lack of general, individual, and situational data about student populations currently hampers the infusion of effective adaptive behavior into existing e-Learning platforms. This contribution presents original research on using differences in individual learning styles. Factors related to performance, motivation, satisfaction, and previous knowledge were targeted and used to assess the effectiveness of the approach. We discuss alternative bases for adaptation (e.g. cognitive styles), style distributions in student populations, and conclude with repercussions for adaptive behavior in HCI in general. [For the full proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562495</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Performance &amp;amp; Emotion--A Study on Adaptive E-Learning Based on Visual/Verbal Learning Styles</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>34</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stereotypes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discipline</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Referral</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schmidt, Alex</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Canela, Carlos</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Social psychological interventions in schools have gained popularity in education research for their ability to often dramatically increase student academic performance through simple exercises. Many of these interventions are designed to address stereotype threat, which is defined as &amp;quot;being at risk of confirming, as self-characteristic, a negative stereotype about one&apos;s group&amp;quot; (Steele &amp;amp; Aronson, 1995, p. 797). One of the social psychological interventions with the most drastic impact on the performance of students potentially affected by stereotype threat (i.e., African American students) was a set of self-affirmation exercises administered in racially diverse middle schools by Cohen and his colleagues (Cohen, Garcia, Apfel, &amp;amp; Master, 2006; Cohen, Garcia, Purdie-Vaughns, Apfel, &amp;amp; Brzustoski, 2009). The intervention, a brief writing exercise about why a value the student selected (e.g., friendship) is important to him or her, resulted in a 40 percent decrease in the racial grade point average gap in the year of administration (Cohen, Garcia, Apfel, &amp;amp; Master, 2006), as well as long-term increases in the grade point averages of African American students (Cohen, Garcia, Purdie-Vaughns, Apfel, &amp;amp; Brzustoski, 2009). While Cohen and his colleagues&apos; (2006; 2009) self-affirmation intervention focused on academic achievement outcomes, there is evidence suggesting the intervention may also be able to elicit positive behavioral responses in students by supplementing their levels of self-control. Based on these findings, the authors sought to determine if a self-affirmation intervention can influence the behavior of middle school students over the course of three years, focusing on a measure of behavior that is both common in middle/high school settings and potentially related to students&apos; ability to self-regulate: the number of office discipline referrals (ODRs) students receive over the course of a school year. For now, the authors found no strong evidence to suggest that self-affirmation exercises should be adopted as a strategy to address office discipline referral receipt in schools. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562496</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Behavioral Outcomes of a Self-Affirmation Intervention for Middle School Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Style</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pattern Recognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrated Learning Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Context Effect</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fatahi, Somayeh</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moradi, Hadi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Farmad, Elaheh</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Iran</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Myers Briggs Type Indicator</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Iran</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Myers Briggs Type Indicator</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Learning Style (LS) is an important parameter in the learning process. Therefore, learning styles should be considered in the design, development, and implementation of e-learning environments. Consequently, an important capability of an e-learning system could be the automatic determination of a student&apos;s learning style. In this paper, a set of features which are important in extracting the learning style automatically from students&apos; behavior has been determined. These features, which are recognized based on Myers-Briggs Type Indicator&apos;s (MBTI), play a key role in predicting learning styles in an online course. The features are determined and ranked using pattern recognition techniques, such as K-means clustering algorithm, to show which features can be better to separate learning style dimensions. The results show several features can be used to predict learning styles with high precision. [For the complete proceedings, see ED562095.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562499</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Behavioral Feature Extraction to Determine Learning Styles in e-Learning Environments</dc:title>
<dc:source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Jul 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>International Association for the Development of the Information Society. e-mail: secretariat@iadis.org; Web site: http://www.iadisportal.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Opinion Papers</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>ICF International</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this webinar, Dr. Ronald Ferguson, creator of the Tripod Project and Senior Lecturer at Harvard University Graduate School of Education, discussed the use of student surveys as an approach to measuring teacher effectiveness. This Q&amp;amp;A addressed the questions participants had for Dr. Ferguson following the webinar. The webinar recording and PowerPoint presentation are also available.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562500</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using Student Surveys to Monitor Teacher Effectiveness: Q&amp;amp;A with Dr. Ronald Ferguson. REL Mid-Atlantic Teacher Effectiveness Webinar Series</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-06-27</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Available from: ICF International. 11785 Beltsville Drive Suite 300, Calverton, MD 20705. Tel: 301-572-0889; Tel: 866-735-6239; e-mail: info@relmidatlantic.org; Web site: http://www.relmidatlantic.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Text Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Area Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Area Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suburban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author' id='ORCID' link='http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4140-9075'>Albro, Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Williams, Joanna P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wijekumar, Kausalai</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Meyer, Bonnie J. F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harris, Karen R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Content area reading comprehension and writing have been a challenge for children in the U.S. schools for many years as evidenced by state and national assessments. One promising solution to the problem is text structure based instruction that promotes strategic selection, encoding, retrieval, and use of information for myriads of activities within the learning environment and beyond. The text structure based instruction has been researched extensively since 1975 (Meyer, 1975; Meyer, Brandt, and Bluth 1980; Meyer, Middlemiss, Theodorou, Brezinski, McDougall, and Bartlett 2002; Meyer, Wijekumar, Middlemiss, Higley, Lei, Meier, and Spielvogel 2010; Williams, Hall, Lauer, Stafford, DeSisto, and deCani 2005; Williams, Stafford, Lauer, Hall, and Pollini 2009) and has received considerable attention with the adoption of the Common Core State Standards by many states. The goal of this panel presentation is to showcase how text structure instruction can be designed for early and upper elementary school children and middle grade students. Brief descriptions of each presentation are provided and all other sections of the structured abstract presenting information about the large scale randomized controlled efficacy trials on the web-based intelligent tutoring system for the structure strategy (ITSS). ITSS is a web-based intelligent tutoring system designed to provide modeling, practice, assessment, scaffolding, and feedback to the learner. The study also posed exploratory questions to study whether the effect of ITSS delivered instruction about the structure strategy on reading comprehension varies depending on other factors, such as gender, initial reading comprehension proficiency, and locale. Children in the ITSS classrooms at all grade levels statistically significantly outperformed the children in control classrooms on all researcher designed measures of reading comprehension (e.g., comparison main idea quality, signaling word knowledge). Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562504</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Many Facets and Applications of Text Structure in Supporting Educational Trajectories of Elementary and Middle Grade Children in Content Area Reading Comprehension and Writing</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transitional Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Aloud to Others</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brotherson, Sean E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hektner, Joel M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hill, Brent D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Saxena, Divya</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Dakota</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Dakota</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In the world of early childhood care and education, the preparation of children to enter school successfully and perform well in their learning environments has become a subject of significant interest and concern (McLanahan, 2005). The term &amp;quot;school readiness&amp;quot; is generally used to describe the process of ensuring that children are prepared by parents and society for a successful school experience. Clearly defined, school readiness embraces the combination of knowledge, skills, and behaviors that a child should learn and be able to do as they enter the school environment. Areas of a child&apos;s growth and well-being that receive attention in school readiness include physical abilities and motor development; social and emotional development; motivation and desire for learning; cognitive development and early academic skills; creativity and imagination; and language and literacy development (Minnesota Department of Education, 2007). While a variety of early education programs exist ranging from Head Start to other models, the authors are interested in the outcomes associated with a family-centered intervention that brings parents and pre-kindergarten children together to advance school readiness and parent education. This program is entitled the Gearing Up for Kindergarten program and to date only a single study has examined its influence on parent outcomes. The purpose of this study was to gather information on basic demographics of program participants, parent perceptions of the general value and impacts of the program related to child school readiness, and teacher perceptions of the impacts of the program related to child school readiness. The essential question for study was how program participants in Gearing Up for Kindergarten compare to children in a non-experimental group on selected school readiness outcomes as assessed by both parents and teachers. Results indicate that the Gearing up for Kindergarten program appears to be effective at increasing the academic skills of children, making them better prepared to start kindergarten. The program is also related to increases in the amount of reading parents do with their children, which undoubtedly plays a role in the increased academic readiness seen in their children. Figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562505</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Targeting the Transition to Kindergarten: Academic and Social Outcomes for Children in the Gearing up for Kindergarten Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clearinghouses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Synthesis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Valentine, Jeff</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lau, Timothy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Following the theme of the first two presentations, this presentation will focus on the choices available for research synthesis when summarizing research evidence. The presenters will describe the current research synthesis practice of the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) as well as several alternative models, including inverse-variance weighted fixed effect and random effects meta-analysis and Bayesian meta-analysis. The presenters will begin with an overview of the context of the WWC&apos;s intervention reports, with specific attention to the method used to synthesize the results of multiple studies and the context in which synthesis occurs. The data used for the illustration will be derived from published WWC intervention reports in which at least one synthesis across two or more studies was reported. Given that most of the syntheses that the public-policy clearinghouses do involve only a very small number of studies, they could consider not doing any syntheses at all unless the number of studies reaches some minimum threshold (e.g., five studies). However, consumers really would like to know something about the typical effect, even if the number of studies is small, and are likely to adopt idiosyncratic rules to help them do this. Alternatively, the clearinghouses could take a different approach to synthesis either in place of or as an adjunct to current practice.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562507</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Synthesizing Evidence: Synthesis Methods for Evidence Clearinghouses</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Active Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Meyers, Coby</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Molefe, Ayrin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brandt, Chris</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Missouri</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Missouri</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Despite years of implementing standards-based accountability systems, many teachers today lack the necessary preparation to develop standards-based instructional strategies and to inform decisions utilizing student assessments. The eMINTS (&amp;quot;Enhancing Missouri&apos;s Instructional Networked Teaching Strategies&amp;quot;) National Center at the University of Missouri (UM), in partnership with the Missouri Department of Higher Education (DHE), offers the eMINTS professional development (PD) program to teams of educators, especially those serving high-need students. eMINTS PD generates building wide reform by helping teachers master the translation of any state standards and information from assessments into engaging classroom practices that employ technology. The program is based on four underlying research-based components: &amp;quot;inquiry-based learning,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;high-quality lesson design,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;community of learners,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;technology integration,&amp;quot; and addresses issues identified as barriers in the consistent use of standards-based instruction and technology. The program provides teachers with more than 250 hours of PD spanning two years and support that includes monthly classroom visits. As part of refining and improving eMINTS PD, eMINTS staff integrated the Intel® Teach Elements Program recently, adding a third year of PD to help teachers sustain and build on the first two years of eMINTS PD. The third year combines online and face to face training for teachers to expand their use of project-based learning. Teachers also gain access to Intel&apos;s suite of online tools designed to involve students in 21st century higher-order thinking and problem solving. The current report focuses on the impact after the second year of implementation of the eMINTS program. It addresses the following research questions: (1) What is the impact of the eMINTS Comprehensive Program on the performance of Grades 7 and 8 students in mathematics and communication arts?; (2) What is the impact of the eMINTS Comprehensive Program on the 21st century skills, including communication, technology literacy, and critical thinking, of Grades 7 and 8 students?; and (3) What is the impact of the eMINTS Comprehensive Program on the academic engagement of Grades 7 and 8 students? The study focused on grade 7 and 8 students in 60 high-poverty rural Missouri schools. This study used a cluster randomized design that randomly assigned 60 high-poverty rural Missouri middle schools to one of three groups in Fall 2010 (Year 0). Estimated impacts after the second year of implementation on all student achievement outcomes--mathematics, communication arts, and 21st century skills--were not statistically significant. Impacts on student engagement are negative (with a 0.25 effect size) and statistically significant, indicating that student engagement was lower in eMINTS schools than in the control schools. A table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562508</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of the &amp;quot;Enhancing Missouri&apos;s Instructional Networked Teaching Strategies&amp;quot; (eMINTS) Program on Student Achievement, 21st-Century Skills, and Academic Engagement--Second-Year Results</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>State Departments of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Strategic Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Capacity Building</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence Based Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technical Assistance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gross, Betheny, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jochim, Ashley, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Michigan</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Michigan</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Edvance Research, Inc., Building State Capacity and Productivity Center (BSCP Center)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;The SEA of the Future&amp;quot; is an education publication series examining how state education agencies can shift from a compliance to a performance-oriented organization through strategic planning and performance management tools to meet growing demands to support education reform while improving productivity. This volume, the fifth in the series, draws on the experiences of state agency staff from Massachusetts, Michigan, and Tennessee, as well as the work of the Regional Comprehensive Centers, to explore how state education agencies can bolster their ability to use research and data to drive key spending, policy, and program decisions. Volume 5 includes practical tools state agencies can use to assist with research and data. Following an introduction by Ashley Jochim, this report contains the following essays: (1) Better Policy through Research: Pursuing High-Impact Research in State Education Agencies (Carrie Conaway)--features a sample policy analyst job description and a research office organizational chart; (2) Making Research Matter for the SEA (Nathaniel Schwartz)--describes how to build a research team within the SEA, and provides a framework and practical guidance on how research fits in the policy cycle; (3) Building Productive Research Partnerships (Venessa Keesler)--includes a case study of a research partnership: the Michigan Consortium for Educational Research; and (4) Technical Assistance to Support Evidence-Based Policymaking: A Conversation with the Regional Comprehensive Centers (facilitated by Bethany Gross)--provides a sample blueprint for states looking to create a research office, and Comprehensive Center leaders Kathleen Dempsey, Caitlin Howley, and Paul Kohler discuss their experiences in building evidence-based policy. [For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Improvement. Volume 1,&amp;quot; see ED562516. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Prioritizing Productivity. Volume 2,&amp;quot; see ED562514. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Building the Productivity Infrastructure. Volume 3,&amp;quot; see ED562515. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Uncovering the Productivity Promise of Rural Education. Volume 4,&amp;quot; see ED562510.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562509</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The SEA of the Future: Building Agency Capacity for Evidence-Based Policymaking. Volume 5</dc:title>
<dc:source>Building State Capacity and Productivity Center</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-11-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Administrators</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>67</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Building State Capacity and Productivity Center. Edvance Research, Inc. 9901 1H 10 West Suite 1000, San Antonio, TX 78230. Tel: 210-558-1902; e-mail: info@BSCPcenter.org; Web site: http://www.bscpcenter.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>S283B120042</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>State Departments of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Strategic Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Productivity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State School District Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gross, Betheny, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jochim, Ashley, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Edvance Research, Inc., Building State Capacity and Productivity Center (BSCP Center)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;The SEA of the Future&amp;quot; is an education publication series examining how state education agencies can shift from a compliance to a performance-oriented organization through strategic planning and performance management tools to meet growing demands to support education reform while improving productivity. This is the fourth volume in the series. Like their urban counterparts, rural schools and districts are being asked to stretch their dollars further but with limited economies of scale, difficult teacher labor markets, and inadequate access to time and money-saving technologies. While rural schools and districts educate millions of American students, they do so with less support and attention than their urban and suburban counterparts. Regardless, there are examples of rural districts and schools that are innovating how they deliver services to students, recruit teachers, use technology, and serve special populations. This volume details those efforts, provides potential solutions to challenges, and compels state leaders to keep the unique needs of rural education in mind when crafting policies that are designed with urban and suburban districts in mind. Following an introduction by Betheny Gross and Ashley Jochim, this report contains the following essays: (1) States Could Do More for Rural Education (Paul T. Hill); (2) Promoting Productivity: Lessons from Rural Schools (Marguerite Roza); (3) How Technology Can Boost Productivity in Rural School Systems (Rural Education and Technology Consensus Panel); and (4) How States Can Help Rural LEAs Meet the Needs of Special Populations (Tessie Rose Bailey and Rebecca Zumeta). [For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Improvement. Volume 1,&amp;quot; see ED562516. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Prioritizing Productivity. Volume 2,&amp;quot; see ED562514. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Building the Productivity Infrastructure. Volume 3,&amp;quot; see ED562515. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Building Agency Capacity for Evidence-Based Policymaking. Volume 5,&amp;quot; see ED562509.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562510</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The SEA of the Future: Uncovering the Productivity Promise of Rural Education. Volume 4</dc:title>
<dc:source>Building State Capacity and Productivity Center</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>60</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Building State Capacity and Productivity Center. Edvance Research, Inc. 9901 1H 10 West Suite 1000, San Antonio, TX 78230. Tel: 210-558-1902; e-mail: info@BSCPcenter.org; Web site: http://www.bscpcenter.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>S283B120042</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>International Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developing Nations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Utilization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Out of School Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cresswell, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schwantner, Ursula</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Waters, Charlotte</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn>ISSN-1990-8539</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (France)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>World Bank</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>International Bank for Reconstruction and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report reviews the major international and regional large-scale educational assessments, including international surveys, school-based surveys and household-based surveys. The report compares and contrasts the cognitive and contextual data collection instruments and implementation methods used by the different assessments in order to identify practices that are recognised as being effective. It also identifies assessment practices that are particularly likely to be useful for developing countries. The findings of this report are being used by the OECD to support its efforts to make PISA more relevant to a wider range of countries, and by the World Bank as part of its on-going dialogue with its client countries regarding participation in international large-scale assessments. The contents are as follows: Chapter 1. Overview: Lessons from international large-scale assessments in education; Chapter 2. Methodology for the review of international large-scale assessments in education; Chapter 3. Component skills and cognitive instruments used in educational assessments; Chapter 4. Contextual data collection instruments used in educational assessments; Chapter 5. Implementation procedures and approaches to including out-of-school children in educational assessments; Chapter 6. Analysis, reporting and use of data from international large-scale assessments in education. Also included are the Annexes: (1) General information about the international surveys reviewed and (2) Sample items from selected international assessments; (3) Sample items from selected international assessments; and (4) Overview tables of contextual data collection instruments. [This report was produced with the support of the World Bank through its Russia Education Aid for Development (READ) Trust Fund programme, as part of its contribution to the PISA for Development project. PISA for Development is an initiative of the OECD, development partners and participating countries that aims to identify how PISA can best support evidence-based policy making in emerging and developing economies and contribute to the UN-led definition of global learning goals for the post-2015 agenda.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562511</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Review of International Large-Scale Assessments in Education: Assessing Component Skills and Collecting Contextual Data. PISA for Development</dc:title>
<dc:source>OECD Publishing</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-92-64-24834-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>244</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. Tel: +33-145-24-8200; Fax: +33-145-24-8500; Web site: http://www.oecd.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264248373-en</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>287</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>State Departments of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Strategic Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Productivity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Government Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Retirement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Retirement Benefits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gross, Betheny, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jochim, Ashley, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Edvance Research, Inc., Building State Capacity and Productivity Center (BSCP Center)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;The SEA of the Future&amp;quot; is an education publication series examining how state education agencies can shift from a compliance to a performance-oriented organization through strategic planning and performance management tools to meet growing demands to support education reform while improving productivity. This volume, the second in the series, examines how state leaders, challenged with having to make decisions on how to use limited resources, are faced with an uneasy zero-sum game: every dollar they put into one program is a dollar not spent in another. When state education agency (SEA) chiefs suggest that public funds can be better spent, they are criticized, often unfairly. In short, leaders need to talk about how to better spend money in schools and districts; they need to prioritize productivity. Following an overview by Betheny Gross, this volume contains the following essays: (1) Leveraging Productivity for Progress: An Imperative for States (Marguerite Roza); (2) Getting Beyond the Data: The State Role in Fostering Continuous Improvement (Data Quality Campaign); (3) Next-Generation Teacher Evaluation Reform: Taking on Teacher Quality from the Statehouse (Betheny Gross and Ashley Jochim); and (4) Teacher Retirement Benefits: Defining a More Active Role for SEAs and Their Chiefs (Marguerite Roza and Michael Podgursky). [For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Improvement. Volume 1,&amp;quot; see ED562516. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Building the Productivity Infrastructure. Volume 3,&amp;quot; see ED562515. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Uncovering the Productivity Promise of Rural Education. Volume 4,&amp;quot; see ED562510. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Building Agency Capacity for Evidence-Based Policymaking. Volume 5,&amp;quot; see ED562509.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562514</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The SEA of the Future: Prioritizing Productivity. Volume 2</dc:title>
<dc:source>Building State Capacity and Productivity Center</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-11-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>45</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Building State Capacity and Productivity Center. Edvance Research, Inc. 9901 1H 10 West Suite 1000, San Antonio, TX 78230. Tel: 210-558-1902; e-mail: info@BSCPcenter.org; Web site: http://www.bscpcenter.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>S283B120042</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>State Departments of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Strategic Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Productivity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State School District Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Financial Support</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Autonomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gross, Betheny, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jochim, Ashley, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Edvance Research, Inc., Building State Capacity and Productivity Center (BSCP Center)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;The SEA of the Future&amp;quot; is an education publication series examining how state education agencies can shift from a compliance to a performance-oriented organization through strategic planning and performance management tools to meet growing demands to support education reform while improving productivity. This volume, the third in the series, introduces the &amp;quot;productivity infrastructure.&amp;quot; The productivity infrastructure constitutes the building blocks for an SEA committed to supporting productivity, innovation, and performance--from the state chief to the classroom. Following an introduction by Betheny Gross, this volume contains the following essays: (1) How State Education Agencies Can Help Districts and Schools Become More Productive (Paul T. Hill); (2) Funding for Students&apos; Sake: How to Stop Financing Tomorrow&apos;s Schools Based on Yesterday&apos;s Priorities (Larry Miller, Marguerite Roza, and Suzanne Simburg); (3) Accelerating Productivity through Autonomy (Kelly Hupfeld); and (4) A State Information System to Support Improvements in Productivity (Marguerite Roza). [For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Improvement. Volume 1,&amp;quot; see ED562516. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Prioritizing Productivity. Volume 2,&amp;quot; see ED562514. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Uncovering the Productivity Promise of Rural Education. Volume 4,&amp;quot; see ED562510. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Building Agency Capacity for Evidence-Based Policymaking. Volume 5,&amp;quot; see ED562509.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562515</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The SEA of the Future: Building the Productivity Infrastructure. Volume 3</dc:title>
<dc:source>Building State Capacity and Productivity Center</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>49</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Building State Capacity and Productivity Center. Edvance Research, Inc. 9901 1H 10 West Suite 1000, San Antonio, TX 78230. Tel: 210-558-1902; e-mail: info@BSCPcenter.org; Web site: http://www.bscpcenter.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>S283B120042</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>State Departments of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Strategic Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resource Allocation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Officials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Legislators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State School District Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gross, Betheny, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jochim, Ashley, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Edvance Research, Inc., Building State Capacity and Productivity Center (BSCP Center)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;The SEA of the Future&amp;quot; is an education publication series examining how state education agencies can shift from a compliance to a performance-oriented organization through strategic planning and performance management tools to meet growing demands to support education reform while improving productivity. This inaugural edition of &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future&amp;quot; examines how SEAs can better manage their relationships with districts and schools, identifies strategies for aligning resources with goals, and considers how outsiders--governors, legislators, philanthropies, and reform advocates--can support the transition. The following essays provide the basis of this examination: (1) Building a Better System of Support (Sam Redding); (2) Doing More with Less: Three Strategies for Improved Resource Alignment (Patrick Murphy and Ashley Jochim); and (3) Where to Start? What Governors, Legislators, and Others Can Do (Paul Hill). Individual essays contain references. [For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Prioritizing Productivity. Volume 2,&amp;quot; see ED562514. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Building the Productivity Infrastructure. Volume 3,&amp;quot; see ED562515. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Uncovering the Productivity Promise of Rural Education. Volume 4,&amp;quot; see ED562510. For &amp;quot;The SEA of the Future: Building Agency Capacity for Evidence-Based Policymaking. Volume 5,&amp;quot; see ED562509.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562516</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The SEA of the Future: Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Improvement. Volume 1</dc:title>
<dc:source>Building State Capacity and Productivity Center</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>42</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Building State Capacity and Productivity Center. Edvance Research, Inc. 9901 1H 10 West Suite 1000, San Antonio, TX 78230. Tel: 210-558-1902; e-mail: info@BSCPcenter.org; Web site: http://www.bscpcenter.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>S283B120042</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Misconceptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Renwick, Matt</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>ASCD</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>What&apos;s keeping your school behind the technology curve? Is it a fear of the unfamiliar? Expenses? Or some other myth? Have you considered how students with special needs or students learning a second language may benefit from using digital tools? If you&apos;ve fallen for the perception that technology is too expensive, unnecessary for real learning, or a distraction in the classroom, then you need this book. You use technology in your job. Why not help your students use it in theirs? Educator Matt Renwick debunks five common myths about technology and helps you consider how to fund and manage the devices and create a supportive, schoolwide program. Renwick uses his school&apos;s experiences and examples as a foundation to explain how you can assess and answer your students&apos; technology needs in terms of access, purpose, and audience--and why you and your school cannot afford to keep students from using technology in their education. This book contains the following chapters: (1) Technology: Necessary or nice?; (2) Myth 1: Technology is easy to learn and use; (3) Myth 2: Technology is expensive; (4) Myth 3: Technology should be in the hands of every student; (5) Myth 4: Technology improves student learning; (6) Myth 5: Technology is a distraction; and (7) Encore.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562517</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>5 Myths about Classroom Technology: How Do We Integrate Digital Tools to Truly Enhance Learning?</dc:title>
<dc:source>ASCD</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4166-2127-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Teachers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>56</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ASCD. 1703 North Beauregard Street, Alexandria, VA 22311-1714. Tel: 800-933-2723; Tel: 703-578-9600; Fax: 703-575-5400; Web site: http://www.ascd.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://www.ascd.org/Publications/Books/Overview/Five-Myths-About-Classroom-Technology.aspx</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Work Study Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mayer, Alexander K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Richburg-Hayes, Lashawn</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Diamond, John</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pell Grant Program</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>Pell Grant Program</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>MDRC</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>MDRC is pleased to provide testimony on college access and completion to the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. Access to college has increased substantially over the last 50 years, but student success--defined as the combination of academic success and degree or certificate completion--has not kept pace. Student success, moreover, generally correlates with students&apos; financial resources: Students from high-income families attend and complete college at higher rates than low-income students. It is challenging to determine whether financial aid does in fact improve student success, because the factors associated with financial need, such as low family income, are also associated with a lack of academic success, making it difficult to isolate the effect of additional financial aid on student achievement. The authors recommend encouraging financial aid innovation paired with evaluation research, especially randomized controlled trials. This testimony focuses on: (1) Year-round financial aid: The authors describe existing research that suggests year-round financial aid could improve access and completion. They also describe strategies to test such a change rigorously before implementing it more broadly. (2) Federal Work-Study and satisfactory academic progress requirements: The authors briefly describe two other innovations that could help improve access and completion, namely, retargeting and realigning Federal Work-Study and restructuring the notification of &amp;quot;satisfactory academic progress&amp;quot; (SAP) requirements in the Pell Grant program. (3) Clarifying opportunities for innovation: The Department of Education could grant waivers more readily if innovations were paired with evaluation research and could clarify where institutions currently have flexibility that does not require a waiver. Financial aid is an important tool with great potential to improve academic success and postsecondary completion, but there is much to learn about whether new innovations will prove effective. A growing body of work, however, demonstrates that randomized controlled trials--the most reliable method to determine a program or policy&apos;s effectiveness--can be effectively applied to financial aid programs to inform policy. Using this type of rigorous evaluation is critical to ensuring that new innovations in the financial aid system are effective, before investments are made to extend new practices more broadly.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562518</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Promoting Innovation to Improve College Access and Completion: Testimony Submitted to the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance</dc:title>
<dc:source>MDRC</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-09-11</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>MDRC. 16 East 34th Street 19th Floor, New York, NY 10016-4326. Tel: 212-532-3200; Fax: 212-684-0832; e-mail: publications@mdrc.org; Web site: http://www.mdrc.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Climate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Labor Market</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Human Capital</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Belfield, Clive</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Arkansas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Arkansas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Center for Analysis of Postsecondary Education and Employment (CAPSEE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Great Recession was one of the sharpest economic downturns of the past century, with significant impacts across the U.S. labor market. Over past decades, one key feature of the U.S. labor market has been the high and stable returns to education. In this paper I estimate the returns to education for large samples of young workers in Arkansas over the period before, during, and after the Great Recession. I use linked education and Unemployment Insurance earnings data on almost 1 million individuals within the state. From both cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis, I find very modest effects of the Great Recession on the earnings gaps of workers with different levels of education. Over the period 2001 to 2012, there were large and stable returns to postsecondary education relative to high school completion, and these gaps were largely unaffected by the Great Recession. I do find employment shocks that differ by education level: for persons without a college education, employment shocks were stronger and they persisted beyond the end of the recession. Adjusting for these employment shocks, earnings gaps by education level increased over the period after 2007. I also find evidence that those who graduated from college during the Great Recession gained less than those who graduated before 2007. As with earlier recessions, postsecondary education served as an effective buffer against labor market shocks. The following are appended: (1) Tables; and (2) Figures.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562519</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Weathering the Great Recession with Human Capital? Evidence on Labor Market Returns to Education from Arkansas. A CAPSEE Working Paper</dc:title>
<dc:source>Center for Analysis of Postsecondary Education and Employment</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-11-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>44</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Center for Analysis of Postsecondary Education and Employment. Teachers College, Columbia University, 525 West 120th Street Box 174, New York, NY 10027. Tel: 212.678.3091; e-mail: capsee@columbia.edu; Web site: http://capseecenter.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>31</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1183'>R305C110011</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Perin, Dolores</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Raufman, Julia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kalamkarian, Hoori Santikian</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (South)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Nelson Denny Reading Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Flesch Kincaid Grade Level Formula</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Flesch Kincaid Grade Level Formula</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Nelson Denny Reading Tests</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Columbia University, Community College Research Center</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper reports findings from a researcher-practitioner partnership that assessed the readiness for postsecondary reading and writing demands of 211 students in developmental reading and English courses in two community colleges. An assessment battery was designed for the study, comprising two standardized tests and five projectdeveloped tasks. The project-developed measures were two text-based writing tasks similar to those typically assigned in college classrooms (a summarization task and a persuasive essay), a self-efficacy scale, a teacher judgment questionnaire, and a qualitative student retrospective report. The text-based writing measures were keyed to high-enrollment, introductory-level general education courses that had significant literacy demands. The results pointed to areas where students needed improvement in order to be ready for literacy tasks at the introductory postsecondary level. There was a discrepancy between the relatively low reading and writing skills as assessed through performance tasks and relatively high student self-efficacy ratings and teacher judgments. This finding suggests the possibility of an unrealistic amount of confidence in students&apos; ability to perform college-level reading and writing tasks. Correlations between assessment measures tended to be moderate, suggesting that the measures were tapping different skills. A series of hierarchical regressions modeling the text-based writing skills suggested that improvement in text-based summarization may require particular attention to reading comprehension skills, while improvement in text-based persuasive essay writing may depend more on developing general writing skills. Students&apos; retrospective reports indicated that although participants had some difficulty stating the requirements of the summarization task, they described appropriate strategies to complete it. Overall, the study&apos;s findings point to the need to examine approaches to instruction, curriculum, course structure, and placement policy that may improve students&apos; college readiness. The following are appended: (1) Examples of Student Writing; and (2) Student Self-Efficacy Ratings and Teacher Judgments.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562521</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Developmental Reading and English Assessment in a Researcher-Practitioner Partnership. CCRC Working Paper No. 85</dc:title>
<dc:source>Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>86</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Community College Research Center. Available from: CCRC Publications. Teachers College, Columbia University, 525 West 120th Street Box 174, New York, NY 10027. Tel: 212-678-3091; Fax: 212-678-3699; e-mail: ccrc@columbia.edu; Web site: http://www.tc.columbia.edu/ccrc</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>135</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Utilization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Interpretation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brookhart, Susan M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>ASCD</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this book, best-selling author Susan M. Brookhart helps teachers and administrators understand the critical elements and nuances of assessment data and how that information can best be used to inform improvement efforts in the school or district. Readers will learn: (1) What different kinds of data can--and cannot--tell us about student learning; (2) What different analyses reveal about changes in student achievement; (3) How to interpret, use, and share relevant data; and (4) How to create a model to go from problem to solution in a data-based decision-making process. With easy-to-understand explanations, supplemented by examples and scenarios from actual schools, this book offers a path to better understanding, more accurate interpretation of assessment results, and--most important--more effective use of data to improve teaching and learning. Following an Acknowledgments section this book contains the following chapters: (1) An Introduction to Different Kinds of Data; (2) Large-Scale Accountability Assessments; (3) Interim/Benchmark Assessments and Common Formative Assessments; (4) Classroom Grades; (5) Classroom Formative Assessment Strategies; (6) Putting It All Together: Basing Decisions on Data; (7) But Did They Learn Anything? Evaluating the Results of Your Decisions; and (8) Different Kinds of Data. The following are appended: (1) Related ASCD Resources: Student Assessment and Data; and (2) An ASCD Study Guide for How to Make Decisions with Different Kinds of Student Assessment Data.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562522</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How to Make Decisions with Different Kinds of Student Assessment Data</dc:title>
<dc:source>ASCD</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4166-2103-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Teachers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Administrators</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>140</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ASCD. 1703 North Beauregard Street, Alexandria, VA 22311-1714. Tel: 800-933-2723; Tel: 703-578-9600; Fax: 703-575-5400; Web site: http://www.ascd.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://www.ascd.org/Publications/Books/Overview/How-To-Make-Decisions-With-Different-Kinds-of-Student-Assessment-data.aspx</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>67</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Monte Carlo Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Deke, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dragoset, Lisa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Does receipt of School Improvement Grants (SIG) funding to implement a school intervention model have an impact on outcomes for low-performing schools? This study answers this question using a regression discontinuity design (RDD) that exploits cutoff values on the continuous variables used to define SIG eligibility tiers, comparing outcomes in schools that just met the eligibility criteria to outcomes in schools that just missed the eligibility cutoff (while controlling for the variable used to determine tier assignment). The sample includes 1,100 low-performing schools in about 60 districts in 21 states and the District of Columbia (DC). Using student-level data, researchers assess whether SIG affected student mobility, and calculate &amp;quot;mobility-robust&amp;quot; impacts using students slated to attend study schools in the implementation year based on the school they attended the prior year. This approach yields impacts on student achievement that are not conflated with impacts on student mobility. For comparison, researchers also calculate &amp;quot;place-based&amp;quot; impacts using students who attended study schools in the implementation year. Education researchers can benefit from this large-scale RDD that tackles a host of methodological issues simultaneously (including multiple sites, multiple assignment variables, fuzziness, clustering of individuals within schools, and standard errors that take into account the bandwidth selection method). Findings and conclusions will be presented in a future Institute of Education Sciences (IES) report. Tables and exhibits are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562523</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of School Improvement Grants on Achievement: Plans for a National Evaluation Using a Regression Discontinuity Design</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Researchers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Values Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Berg, Juliette K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Aber, J. Lawrence</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A positive school climate is characterized by a supportive, orderly, and fair interpersonal climate. Children&apos;s perceptions of interpersonal climate and school safety are associated with several academic and behavioral adjustment outcomes. The current study has two goals: (1) to better understand the contribution of school interpersonal climate to children&apos;s school success; and (2) to examine whether the impact of the whole-school implementation of social and character development (SACD) programs are moderated by interpersonal climate. The study asks: (1) Is there a direct relationship between school interpersonal climate at the start of 3rd grade as perceived by children and teachers and modeled at the individual and school levels and children&apos;s school engagement and academic competence/motivation at the end of 5th grade?; (2) Do school-aggregated child and teacher perceptions of interpersonal climate moderate the relationship between children&apos;s individual perceptions of climate and the outcomes?; (3) Is there an impact of SACD programs on engagement and academic competence?; and (4) Do school-aggregated child and teacher perceptions of interpersonal climate moderate the impact of SACD programs on school engagement and academic competence? This study used data from a three-year, multi-site, school-randomized evaluation of Social and Character Development (SACD) Programs in 83 elementary schools in 7 sites and 6 states funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) and Centers for Disease Control. The child sample consisted of 4,245 children in 320 classrooms at baseline. In each site, a research team randomized 10 to 18 schools to the business-as-usual approach to implement the SACD program. The randomization employed a matched pair design with stratified sampling. As part of the evaluation, a common set of student outcomes including social and emotional competence, behavior, academics, and perceptions of school climate were collected across sites. Data included survey data from students, primary caregivers, teachers, and interview responses from principals. In addition, each site collected its own set of site-specific data. Three-level hierarchical linear modeling with fixed effects in which children were nested in teachers and schools was used to account for the multilevel nature of the data. Findings reveal that: (1) children who experienced a lack of community were less engaged and had more difficulty academically; (2) teachers&apos; perceptions of support and safety in school were also related to academic outcomes; (3) cross-level interaction pointed to the importance of considering the fit between the child and the school environment--children who had a good fit (i.e., perceived a more negative climate in the context of a school with a more negative climate) actually reported being more engaged, compared to children who had a poor fit (i.e., perceived a negative climate in the context of a less negative climate); and (4) SACD programs did not directly improve academic outcomes. Limitations of this study include low intraclass correlations and reliabilities at the school levels for the study outcomes, suggesting low power to detect group-level effects. Tables and figures are appended. [For the IES NCER report on SACD Programs that provided data for this study, see ED512329.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562524</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Direct and Moderating Role of School Interpersonal Climate on Children&apos;s Academic Outcomes in the Context of Whole-School, Social-Emotional Learning Programs</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Human Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Facilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Financial Support</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Governance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nusche, Deborah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Miron, Gary</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Santiago, Paulo</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Teese, Richard</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Belgium</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Belgium</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2413-4333</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (France)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report for the Flemish Community of Belgium forms part of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in Schools and explores how resources can be governed, distributed, utilised and managed to improve the quality, equity and efficiency of school education. This report considers four types of resources: financial resources, such as public funding of individual schools; human resources, such as teachers, school leaders and education administrators; physical resources, such as location, buildings and equipment; and other resources such as learning time. The policy recommendations attempt to build on and strengthen reforms that are already underway in the Flemish Community of Belgium. This report contains four chapters and respective annexes as follows: Chapter 1: School Education in the Flemish Community of Belgium; Chapter 2: Funding of School Education in the Flemish Community of Belgium and Annexes: (1) Funding flows in the Flemish Community of Belgium; (2) Calculation of the Operating Grant for a Sample Elementary School; and (3) Calculation of Staffing Hours and ICT Points for a Sample Secondary School; Chapter 3: Provision of School Places in the Flemish Community of Belgium; and Chapter 4. The Teaching Workforce in the Flemish Community of Belgium, and Annexes: (1) Number of School Staff, by Level, Type of Education and School Network, 2008, 2011, 2014; (2) Main Features of the Teaching Profession: Initial Education, Employment Status and Teacher Evaluation. The report concludes with additional annexes: (1) The OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in School; (2) Composition of the Review Team; and (3) Visit Programme. (Individual chapters also contain notes.)</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562525</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>OECD Reviews of School Resources: Flemish Community of Belgium</dc:title>
<dc:source>OECD Publishing</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-92-64-24758-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>182</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. Tel: +33-145-24-8200; Fax: +33-145-24-8500; Web site: http://www.oecd.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264247598-en</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>152</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Value Added Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alternative Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Polikoff, Morgan S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McEachin, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Academic Performance Index (API) is the centerpiece of California&apos;s state assessment and accountability system. With the recent passage of SB1458 and the pending reauthorization of both state and federal accountability legislation, there is now an unprecedented opportunity to improve the API for next generation accountability in California. In this policy brief Morgan S. Polikoff and Andrew McEachin draw on their own previous work and more than a decade&apos;s worth of research on effective accountability policy design to describe the lessons that have been learned and to propose policy changes that would improve the API. The research literature on accountability systems has produced a number of key findings with regard to API and API-like measures of school performance. For instance, the API is heavily influenced by student demographics, as are other status measures of achievement. Year-to-year changes in API, often heralded by schools and the media, are highly unstable and do not reflect sustained improvement. The API is biased against small schools and high schools and in favor of larger schools and elementary schools. Perhaps most importantly, the API is too narrowly focused on test-based measures of performance. Fortunately, many of these problems are relatively simple to fix, as the operation of current accountability systems in other states and some school districts has made clear. The authors conclude with a number of recommendations for improving the API, including a) tracking the achievement of individual students across years; b) using multiple years of school-level data to measure growth in achievement; c) incorporating both growth and levels of achievement in identifying schools for intervention/support; and d) exploring alternative measures of school performance. While these solutions will not solve all of California&apos;s educational problems, they will certainly help make our state&apos;s assessment and accountability systems more effective in determining where to target improvement efforts.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562526</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Fixing the Academic Performance Index. Policy Brief 13-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>California Education Policy Fund (CEPF)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>James Irvine Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Stuart Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 3653 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1670. Tel: 510-642-7223; Fax: 510-642-9148; e-mail: pace@berkeley.edu; Web site: http://www.edpolicyinca.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Value Added Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bacher-Hicks, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chin, Mark</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kane, Thomas J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Staiger, Douglas O.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (East)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Policy changes from the past decade have resulted in a growing interest in identifying effective teachers and their characteristics. This study is the third study to use data from a randomized experiment to test the validity of measures of teacher effectiveness. The authors collected effectiveness measures across three school years from three broad areas: value-added, classroom observation, and student surveys. In the first two years, they collected non-experimental estimates of these measures and, in the third year, they designed a randomized experiment to test the validity of these estimates. Using these data, they answer two questions: (1) Does a combination of these three distinct non-experimental measures identify teachers who, on average, produce higher student achievement gains following random assignment?; and (2) Does the magnitude of the gains correspond with what we would have predicted based on their non-experimental estimates of effectiveness? The analysis sample consisted of 66 fourth- and fifth-grade teachers from four large East coast school districts in the 2010-2011 through 2012-2013 school years. To answer the research questions, the authors first constructed the best linear combination of non-experimental student test score, survey, and classroom observation data from the first two years of the study (2010-11 and 2011-12) to predict teachers&apos; average contribution to student growth on state standardized math tests another year. They used these predicted outcomes as their non-experimental estimates of teachers&apos; contributions to student test score growth in 2012-13. Then, they examined actual student growth in 2012-13 (the third year of the study in which re randomly assigned students to teachers) and compared their non-experimental prediction of growth to actual growth. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562533</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validating Components of Teacher Effectiveness: A Random Assignment Study of Value-Added, Observation, and Survey Scores</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Financial Support</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Seidenfeld, David</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Prencipe, Leah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Handa, Sudhanshu</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hawkinson, Laura</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Zambia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Zambia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Little research has been conducted on unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) despite their growing prevalence in Africa, including South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Malawi, Lesotho, and Uganda. In this study, researchers implemented a randomized control trial with over 2,500 households to investigate the impact of Africa&apos;s child grant program on a range of protective and productive outcomes. The participants include over 3,000 children aged 3-7, one of the largest longitudinal samples of young children in a cash transfer evaluation, which allows researchers to estimate effects of the program on early childhood development (ECD) outcomes. The study includes a number of ECD indicators such as availability of learning materials, adult support for learning and school readiness, non-adult care, and pre-school attendance, with this study being the first time these indicators are studied in an evaluation of a cash transfer program in Africa. Researchers selected ECD indicators from UNICEF&apos;s Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS). Program impacts on individuals and households are estimated using a differences-in-differences (DD) statistical model that compares change in outcomes between baseline and follow-up, and between treatment and control groups. Findings reveal that the program increases the number of households with three or more books by 1.5 percentage points, from 1.5 percent of households to three percent of households. This effect holds for all subgroups except for small households. Children who grow up in households where books are available are likely to receive, on average, three more years of schooling than children from homes with no books. This relationship holds regardless of a caregiver&apos;s level of education, occupation or class, and it applies to rich and poor countries alike. However, the program has no effect on those who do not own any books prior to receiving the grant. For the full sample, the CGP impacts the child&apos;s ability to follow directions by 10.5 percentage points, with 65 percent of children in beneficiary households following directions. This study suggests that there is reason to believe that UCTs can affect early child development, and that more research should pursue this line of inquiry.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562535</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of an Unconditional Cash Transfer on Early Child Development: The Zambia Child Grant Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Merit Pay</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Salaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developing Nations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Incentives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Loyalka, Prashant</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sylvia, Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Chengfang</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chu, James</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rozelle, Scott</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>China (Gansu Province)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>China (Shaanxi Province)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>China</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Growing evidence suggests that teachers in developing countries often have weak or misaligned incentives for improving student outcomes. In response, policymakers and researchers have proposed performance pay as a way to improve student outcomes by tying concrete measures like achievement scores to teacher pay. While evidence from randomized experiments generally indicates that performance pay programs are effective at improving student achievement in developing countries, there has been considerable variation in how much these programs affect student achievement. The goals of this study are to: (1) examine the impacts of different teacher performance pay designs on student achievement, both for the average student and for students across the baseline achievement distribution; and (2) examine the mechanisms through which different teacher performance pay designs affect student achievement (for the average student and for students across the baseline achievement distribution). The sample includes a total of 8,892 students and their grade 6 mathematics teachers from 216 schools from 16 nationally-designated &amp;quot;poverty&amp;quot; counties in Yulin Prefecture (Shaanxi Province) and Tianshi Prefecture (Gansu Province) in rural, northwest China. To test the impacts of the different teacher performance pay designs, researchers designed a cluster-randomized controlled trial. In this trial, schools were randomly allocated to 4 different treatment arms: (1) control--no teacher incentive pay; (2) levels incentive--performance pay contract stipulating rewards based on student achievement levels on endline tests; (3) gains incentive--performance pay contract based on student achievement gains from baseline and endline tests; and (4) pay-for-percentile incentive--performance pay contract stipulating rewards based on student growth percentiles. Surveys were used to collect information from the students, teachers, and school administrators. Findings reveal that: (1) Only &amp;quot;pay-for-percentile&amp;quot; incentives had a positive, statistically significant impact on average student achievement; (2) Teacher incentives based on &amp;quot;levels&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;gains&amp;quot; were ineffective; (3) &amp;quot;Gains&amp;quot; incentives led teachers to only focus on certain types of students, which led to negligible learning (on average) across all students; and (4) Pay-for-percentile incentives led to score gains across all students (on average). The results of this study may have important implications for how Teacher Performance Pay Policy can be implemented in China and in other developing countries.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562536</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teaching to the Tails: Teacher Performance Pay and the Distribution of Student Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Personnel Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Violence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sexual Abuse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sexual Harassment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Weapons</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Law Enforcement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lawyers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morse, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sponsler, Brian A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fulton, Mary</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>NASPA - Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Education Commission of the States</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>NASPA--Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education and Education Commission of the States (ECS) have partnered to address legislative developments and offer considerations for leaders in higher education and policy on two top-level safety issues facing the higher education community: campus sexual violence and guns on campus. The first in a series jointly released by NASPA and ECS, this publication looks at recent state legislation on campus sexual violence. By offering in-depth analyses of state legislation and framing key issues and considerations for leaders in higher education and policy across the states, NASPA and ECS look to support constructive dialogue toward effective action on campus safety. The following are appended: (1) State Legislation in the Four Primary Policy Areas: Enacted, 2013-2015; and (2) Four Primary Policy Areas by State: Legislation that Died or Was Vetoed, 2013-2015. A list of NASPA resources on campus sexual violence law and policy is included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562539</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>State Legislative Developments on Campus Sexual Violence: Issues in the Context of Safety</dc:title>
<dc:source>NASPA - Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>NASPA - Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education. 1875 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 418, Washington, DC 20009. Tel: 202-265-7500; Fax: 202-797-1157; Web site: http://www.naspa.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>https://www.naspa.org/images/uploads/main/ECS_NASPA_BRIEF_DOWNLOAD3.pdf</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Budgets</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Funding Formulas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Long Range Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expenditures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Involvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Recruitment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>After years of painful budget cuts, new revenues will begin to flow to California school districts in 2014. Thanks to the voters&apos; approval of Proposition 30 and the adoption of the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), nearly all districts can expect budget increases over the next several years. In this report PACE offers guidance on research-based strategies for LCFF implementation. They begin with three key principles that must guide any long-term strategy for improvement in California&apos;s education system. PACE then identifies four key areas for the investment of new resources where research suggests that additional spending can produce real gains in the performance of schools and students.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562541</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>2020 Vision: Rethinking Budget Priorities under the LCFF</dc:title>
<dc:source>Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 3653 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1670. Tel: 510-642-7223; Fax: 510-642-9148; e-mail: pace@berkeley.edu; Web site: http://www.edpolicyinca.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Finance Reform</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Policy Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Funding Formulas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School District Autonomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Incentives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resource Allocation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Government Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Government</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Perry, Mary</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>For decades, when California&apos;s state leaders have wanted to see local school districts respond to shifts in policy and expectations they relied on the state-controlled school finance system to leverage local change. Through the use of categorical programs and earmarked funding, they created incentives for districts that complied and penalties for those that did not. The result: a school finance system that has been roundly criticized as irrational, inequitable, excessively complicated, overly centralized, and inefficient at allocating resources. In 2012, Governor Jerry Brown proposed to transform California&apos;s school finance policies by introducing a new funding formula that would give local districts more control over their funding and provide additional funds to school districts based on student need. Despite broad consensus that school finance reform is needed the Legislature declined to act on the Governor&apos;s proposal. As the 2013 legislative session begins, the governor is once again proposing K-12 finance reform. In broad strokes, his proposed Local Control Funding Formula would provide a uniform base amount for each student a school district serves, adjusted by grade span, and with extra funding based on student needs. (See box below.) Intended both to simplify the state&apos;s approach to school district funding and to give more control and flexibility to local education leaders, the proposal raises a number of challenging questions that are examined in this report: (1) How can the state balance its need to create a school finance system that is more rational and transparent with its interest in better results for all students?; (2) Is it possible to provide funding with few or no strings attached and still have meaningful incentives and accountability systems that result in improved local educational practices and student outcomes?; and (3) What changes in how state policymakers allocate funds to local education agencies would most effectively further their aspirational goals for schools?</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562542</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>School Finance Reform: Can It Support California&apos;s College- and Career-Ready Goal? Report 2</dc:title>
<dc:source>Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 3653 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1670. Tel: 510-642-7223; Fax: 510-642-9148; e-mail: pace@berkeley.edu; Web site: http://www.edpolicyinca.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College School Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Utilization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Core Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bilingual Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Umansky, Ilana M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reardon, Sean F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hakuta, Kenji</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thompson, Karen D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Estrada, Peggy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hayes, Katherine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Maldonado, Hilda</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tandberg, Susan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Goldenberg, Claude</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Recent policy changes in California&apos;s education system have opened up a unique opportunity to improve educational opportunities for the state&apos;s 1.4 million English learner students (ELs). The implementation of new state standards including new English Language Development standards will require major changes in teaching and learning for all students including ELs, while the Local Control Funding Formula gives districts that educate large numbers of ELs additional resources to improve the services that they provide. To take full advantage of these opportunities policymakers and educators should rely on the best available evidence to shape state and district policies and to inform classroom instructional practice for EL students. In this policy brief, Ilana Umansky and her co-authors review research findings from three university-school district research partnerships and present recommendations for changes in policy and practice to expand opportunities for EL students. They draw three main conclusions. First, California must improve the ways in which students who need language supports are classified and reclassified, in order to improve alignment across districts in the state, and alignment between classification and services. Second, state and local officials must become more systematic in how data on ELs are collected and used, by tracking students&apos; progress over longer time periods and by including all students who were ever ELs in accountability metrics. Finally, and most importantly, the state must improve ELs&apos; educational opportunities in school by expanding access to core content, bilingual instruction, and well-prepared teachers. Changes along these lines would not necessarily require large new investments, but they could yield substantial benefits for large numbers of California students.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562543</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Improving the Opportunities and Outcomes of California&apos;s Students Learning English: Findings from School District-University Collaborative Partnerships. Policy Brief 15-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>California Education Policy Fund (CEPF)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Dirk and Charlene Kabcenell Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Noyce Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Stuart Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Silver Giving Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>S.H. Cowell Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>William T. Grant Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. 3653 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1670. Tel: 510-642-7223; Fax: 510-642-9148; e-mail: pace@berkeley.edu; Web site: http://www.edpolicyinca.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>36</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1166'>R305A110670</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1203'>R305A110512</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gul, Showkeen Bilal Ahmad</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Qasem, Mamun Ali Naji</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bhat, Mehraj Ahmad</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2278-2435</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this paper an attempt was made to analyze the effect of items direction (positive or negative) on the Alpha Cronbach reliability coefficient and the Split Half reliability coefficient in Likert scale. The descriptive survey research method was used for the study and sample of 510 undergraduate students were selected by used random sampling technique. A scale developed by Sobhei Hamdan &amp;amp; Mohammed Jehad (2007) was used by the investigator to access attitude of students towards undergraduate study. The findings of the study revealed that: (1) there is no effect of items direction (positive, negative, half positive and half negative and randomly) on the Alpha Cronbach reliability coefficients in Likert scale, and (2) the results also indicated that there is no effect of items direction (positive, negative, half positive and half negative and randomly) on the Spilt Half reliability coefficients in Likert scale.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562545</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effect of Items Direction (Positive or Negative) on the Reliability in Likert Scale. Paper-11</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Education India Journal v4 n4 p187-200 Nov 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-11-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>35</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Based Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disability Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Valladolid, Violeta C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Philippines</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Philippines</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2094-5876</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The role of classroom teachers in the early detection of learning difficulty/disability in school children cannot be ignored. When it comes to young children&apos;s literacy learning, there is substantial consensus that the teacher is the primary assessment agent (Johnston &amp;amp; Rogers, 2002). But classroom teachers also have a lot of responsibilities in school. As such, they need an assessment and identification approach that they can easily employ. Progress monitoring is one of the feasible and practicable methods in identifying students at-risk. Progress monitoring is a set of assessment procedures for determining the extent to which students are benefiting from classroom instruction and for monitoring effectiveness of curriculum (Johnson, Mellard, Fuchs, &amp;amp; McKnight, 2006). It makes use of Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM), which has been demonstrated by research to effectively gather student performance data to support a wide range of educational decisions, such as screening to identify students with learning disability, evaluating referral interventions, and determining eligibility for and placement in remedial and special education programs (Deno, 2003). This study aimed to develop and validate a set of curriculum-based measurement (CBM) tools to identify students at-risk of reading difficulty in public schools. This study is relevant since the Philippine public school system is in dire need for an alternative method to identify and help students who are at-risk of reading difficulty that is not only valid and relevant, but also cost-effective, teacher-driven, and easily-implemented. The development and validation of CBMs for this study followed the following stages: (1) definition of criterion and performance standards (i.e., &amp;quot;what to measure?&amp;quot;), (2) development of CBM-ORF passages (i.e., &amp;quot;how to measure?&amp;quot;), and (3) assessment of the reliability and validity of the CBM (i.e., how technically adequate are the measures?)</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562546</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Development and Validation of Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) for Identifying Students with Reading Difficulties</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review v6 n1 p2-10 Jul 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>24</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Specialists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literary Genres</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Indo European Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reader Text Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Books</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Profiles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grounded Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Discourse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competency Based Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Witte, Theo</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rijlaarsdam, Gert</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schram, Dick</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Netherlands</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Netherlands</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teachers encounter immense variety in literary competence among students in their secondary school classrooms. Yet, little is known about how they perceive and deal with this variety. Moreover, little is known about the literary development that students undergo during their school career and the different levels of development that can be identified. The aim of the present study is to design an instrument that can help to describe relevant differences in literary competence between students and to specify the individual literary development process of students in upper secondary education (aged 15-18). To tie in with teaching practice, we designed a research method by which we could explore the shared pedagogical content knowledge of a diverse group of six expert teachers. With the aid of questionnaires and panel discussions, data was collected on the following question: what does a student with a particular level of literary competence demonstrate with a particular literary text? The data analysis resulted in 14 indicators of literary competence which we then used to describe six successive competence levels. These levels are validated by both developmental theory and the practice of literature teaching. The following is appended: &amp;quot;Data matrix: Teachers&apos; pedagogical content knowledge about levels of literary competence in upper secondary education.&amp;quot;</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562547</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Empirically Grounded Theory of Literary Development. Teachers&apos; Pedagogical Content Knowledge on Literary Development in Upper Secondary Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature v12 p1-33 2012</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>33</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>66</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Astronomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cohort Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personal Narratives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>O&apos;Donnell, Hugh</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Scotland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mann Whitney U Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United Kingdom (Scotland)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2055-8198</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Literacy remains an area of concern in early secondary education in Scotland (ages 12-14), with recent research suggesting a continued decline in attainment levels. As literacy underpins learning, interdisciplinary and collaborative approaches to teaching literacy are now being emphasized through the new Curriculum for Excellence that aims to address this issue. It is not clear, however, what types of learning activity are most appropriate for implementing this new, more cooperative approach. One candidate is the use of educational games and reflective writing. So, to what extent do learners demonstrate transferable literacy skills through engaging with educational games? This paper evaluates the effectiveness of the multi-user simulation game, Mars Colony Challenger (MCC), which portrays a scientifically accurate Mars colonisation mission in a way that aims to facilitate both scientific and literary development. A class of secondary school pupils (n = 28) used the game within the context of a science class on &amp;quot;The Three States of Matter&amp;quot;. They then produced written narratives that captured the experiential learning undertaken. Comparing these narratives with the remaining pupils in the cohort, who had not used MCC in their science class, revealed a statistically significant difference in literacy ability. Further qualitative analysis of the narratives themselves highlighted a high level of engagement and inspiration evoked through the experience. Consequently, these results highlight the efficacy of MCC as a means of literacy development, and they suggest a means to elicit greater frequency of opportunity for pupil engagement with, and subsequent assessment of, literacy competencies.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562548</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Games-Based Learning as an Interdisciplinary Approach to Literacy across Curriculum for Excellence</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Press Start v2 n2 p75-98 Dec 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>39</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Locus of Control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goodness of Fit</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gadiana, Leny G.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>David, Adonis P.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Philippines</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Rasch Scaled Scores</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Philippines</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2094-5876</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Locus-of-Hope Scale (LHS) was developed as a measure of the locus-of-hope dimensions (Bernardo, 2010). The present study adds to the emerging literature on locus-of-hope by assessing the psychometric properties of the LHS using Rasch analysis. The results from the Rasch analyses of the four subscales of LHS provided evidence on the reliability, validity, and measurement precision of the LHS.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562549</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Rasch Analysis of the Locus-of-Hope Scale. Brief Report</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review v6 p32-37 Jul 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Public School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Burnout</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Depression (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fatigue (Biology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Symptoms (Individual Disorders)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stress Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comorbidity</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schonfeld, Irvin Sam</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bianchi, Renzo</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Ohio</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Missouri</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Arkansas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Washington</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New Jersey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Idaho</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New Hampshire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Indiana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Maine</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Minnesota</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Montana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Nebraska</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Rhode Island</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wyoming</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Arkansas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Idaho</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Indiana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Maine</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Minnesota</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Missouri</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Montana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Nebraska</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Hampshire</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Jersey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Ohio</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Rhode Island</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Washington</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wyoming</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-1097-4679</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the overlap in burnout and depression. Method: The sample comprised 1,386 schoolteachers (mean [M][subscript age] = 43; M[subscript years taught] = 15; 77% women) from 18 different U.S. states. We assessed burnout, using the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure, and depression, using the depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire. Results: Treated dimensionally, burnout and depressive symptoms were strongly correlated (0.77; disattenuated correlation, 0.84). Burnout and depressive symptoms were similarly correlated with each of 3 stress-related factors, stressful life events, job adversity, and workplace support. In categorical analyses, 86% of the teachers identified as burned out met criteria for a provisional diagnosis of depression. Exploratory analyses revealed a link between burnout and anxiety. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that past research has underestimated burnout-depression overlap. The state of burnout is likely to be a form of depression. Given the magnitude of burnout-depression overlap, treatments for depression may help workers identified as &amp;quot;burned out.&amp;quot;</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562550</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Burnout and Depression: Two Entities or One?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Journal of Clinical Psychology v72 n1 p22-37 Jan 2016</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>98</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Teaching Centers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>User Needs (Information)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Searching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bozdogan, Aykut Emre</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bozdogan, Kerem</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2148-6123</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Science centres which have a considerable importance and functions in developed countries are intended to be popularized in Turkey. At this point considering the fact that the first contact between science centres and visitors is usually provided with websites, it is quite important that the content of these websites should be designed and developed to meet the needs of the visitors. From this point of view, the aim of this study is to examine the websites of the science centres in Turkey and to reveal at what level they meet the needs of the visitors. The research study was carried out via descriptive survey method and between September 14 and September 18, 2015 the key word &amp;quot;science centre&amp;quot; was searched on Google. Out of the science centres found, twelve science centres were included in the study. During the process of analysis of the documents obtained, two researchers examined every single data on the website separately and then they combined and tabulated them. Within this context, four main titles were obtained: a) information and news b) activities and the documents, c) Visuals, and d) Contact, Appointment, and Booking. At the end of the study, it was determined that under some circumstances the websites of the science centres were useful, where as they were inadequate under some conditions.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562551</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examination and Evaluation of Websites of Science Centres in Turkey</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Participatory Educational Research (PER) Spec Iss 2016-II p71-79 Feb 2016</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>United States History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Qualities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schenck, Andrew D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Late in the 19th century, American communities were in a state of flux. As northern abolitionists fought against slavery, relationships among diverse members of society rapidly changed, forcing historical figures to adopt new leadership strategies. Like communities of the pre- and post-Civil War era, modern educational contexts reveal growing diversity (immigration) and rapid societal change (emergence of a large adult learner population and changes in communication), suggesting that analogous leadership skills may be needed to navigate diverse ethnic and social circles. The purpose of this study was to examine historical traits and behaviors conducive to leadership of diverse populations. Due to tremendous success in assisting runaway slaves, as well as service in a variety of capacities (conductor of the underground railroad, nurse, career trainer, and military captain), Harriet Tubman was deemed an ideal candidate for examination. Her experiences and behaviors were analyzed in detail, resulting in a number of recommendations for leadership training and governance of today&apos;s American schools.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562552</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Gleaning Valuable Insights for Modern Educational Leadership from the Life of Harriet Tubman</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-18</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>25</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expenditure per Student</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rice, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huang, Min</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Nevada</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Nevada</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory West (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>WestEd</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Clark County School District (CCSD) asked the Western Regional Education Laboratory (REL West) to examine the relationship between spending per pupil and Nevada School Performance Framework (NSPF) index scores in the district&apos;s schools. Data were examined from three school years (2011/12, 2012/13, 2013/14) and for three types of schools (elementary, middle, and high schools). One set of analyses examined whether more spending per pupil was linked to higher NSPF index scores, without first accounting for how school characteristics are linked to NSPF index scores. In this case, when not adjusting for the additional costs of educating students in special programs, more spending per pupil in elementary schools was significantly linked with lower NSPF index scores. In addition, when adjusting for the additional costs of educating students in special programs, more spending per pupil in elementary schools in 2014 was significantly linked with higher NSPF index scores in the same year. Otherwise, there was no consistent relationship between spending per pupil and NSPF index scores across school years or types of schools. A second set of analyses examined whether a greater difference in actual versus predicted (based on school characteristics) spending per pupil was linked to higher NSPF index scores. There was no consistent relationship between the differences in actual versus predicted spending per pupil, and NSPF index scores, either across school years or types of schools. This was the case whether or not spending per pupil was adjusted for the additional costs of educating students in special programs. A third set of analyses examined whether more spending per pupil was linked to higher NSPF index scores, after accounting for how school characteristics are linked to index scores. Again, more spending per pupil was not significantly associated with NSPF index score across types of schools, whether or not spending per pupil was adjusted for the additional costs of educating students in special programs. This was the case whether index scores were examined year-by-year or whether the changes in index scores were examined over three consecutive years. All the findings are correlational; therefore, they cannot speak to whether variations in school performance are caused by variations in spending per pupil. The following are appended: (1) Details on the analytic methods; and (2) Additional analyses for question 3.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562553</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between Schools&apos; Costs per Pupil and Nevada School Performance Framework Index Scores in Clark County School District</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory West</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory West. Available from: WestEd. 730 Harrison Street, San Francisco, CA 94107-1242. Tel: 877-493-7833; Tel: 415-565-3000; Fax: 415-565-3012; Web site: https://relwest.wested.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES12C0002</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hearing Impairments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Deafness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disability Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clinical Diagnosis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comorbidity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Symptoms (Individual Disorders)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communication Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Listening Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Alzahrani, Amsa N.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Autism spectrum disorders are lifelong conditions that affect children&apos;s social and communication skills. Dual diagnoses pose additional challenges mainly because of the difficulties that come with making accurate decisions. It is intriguing to note that children with hearing impairments are more likely to have autism as opposed to members of the general public. As a result of this, it is critical for hearing impairments to be identified at an early age. Parents of such children may feel confused about the dual diagnoses of autism as well as that of deafness. Therefore, the intention of this research brief is to provide parents and families about the signs and symptoms of deafness and autism. It also provides them some recommendation about the intervention strategies that could be used with their children.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562554</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Hearing Loss and Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD): Information for New First Parents and Families</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Urban Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conflict</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Banraba, Boboya James Edimond</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Sudan (South)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Sudan</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper attempts to examine the contemporary status of an education system. The paper takes the case of the Republic of South Sudan. The key issues the paper will examine are the education enrollment and completion rates while paying particular attention to inequalities in both access and quality among racial or ethnic groups, males and females, and rural and urban areas. Furthermore, the paper will also look at if there are programs and policies in South Sudan which improve educational opportunities for poor or marginalized communities given the actuality that the country is in state of conflict. Finally the paper will also gauge some of the evaluation mechanisms put in place on the education sector.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562555</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining the Contemporary Status of an Education System: The Case of the Republic of South Sudan</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>19</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Literature Reviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Medical Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diseases</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Screening Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mayo-Gamble, Tilicia L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Information Analyses</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Individuals with sickle cell disease experience a life-time of morbidity as well as a decreased lifespan. Since African Americans are disproportionately affected by the disease, sickle cell contributes to growing health disparities within this population. Thus, addressing issues related to the disease presents an increased need for health education programming. A narrative literature review was conducted to assess the application of the health belief model in sickle cell trait screening research. Research articles were identified through an interdisciplinary search of peer-reviewed manuscripts. Articles including the following three criteria were selected for review: (1) use of the health belief model, (2) application to sickle cell disease/sickle cell trait, and (3) practical implementation in the field of public health education. Findings from this review indicate that the health belief model is not effective in all sickle cell trait screening interventions. Additional theories of health behavior should be considered when designing health education programs and interventions geared toward sickle cell screening.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562556</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Review of the Literature: Use of the Health Belief Model in Sickle Cell Research</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>The Health Education Monograph Series v31 n1 p37-41 2014</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influence of Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Economy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discovery Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Benefits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web 2.0 Technologies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gul, Showkeen Bilal Ahmad</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The focus of the paper is to explore how e-learning revolutionises education. Education is one domain that has accompanied civilization throughout the centuries, adapting its tools to fulfill the expectations of students and the needs of teachers. One of the basic requirements for education in the 21st century is to prepare populations for participation in a knowledge-based economy, including the social and cultural perspectives. E-learning is a cornerstone for building inclusive knowledge societies. E-learning is the use of electronic educational technology in learning and teaching. The present study explored how e-learning revolutionises educational systems. E-Learning is learning that utilizes electronic technologies to access educational curriculum outside of traditional classrooms.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562557</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>E-Learning Revolutionise Education: An Exploratory Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the E-Learning: A Boom or Curse Conference (Punjab, India, Feb 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-93-80748-87-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Literature Appreciation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Taxonomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competency Based Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Material Selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Witte, Theo</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sâmihaian, Florentina</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Germany</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Portugal</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Czech Republic</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Finland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Netherlands</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Romania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Czech Republic</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Finland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Germany</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Netherlands</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Portugal</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Romania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study is a comparative analysis of literary curricula in six European countries and is part of the project LiFT-2, funded by Comenius&apos; Life Long Learning Programme of the European Commission. The result of this project, that involved almost 4,500 teachers, is a European literary framework for secondary education which can be described as a developmental competence-based taxonomy for teachers. This article aims to identify tendencies in the field of teaching literature in Europe on the basis of the formal curricula of the participating countries, and to examine how the teachers working with those curricula could benefit from the framework. In the conclusion, the authors emphasize the role of LiFT-2 instruments for a more structured approach to developing literary competences within the curricula for literature in different European countries.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562558</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Is Europe Open to a Student-Oriented Framework for Literature? A Comparative Analysis of the Formal Literature Curriculum in Six European Countries</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature v13 p1-22 2013</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>48</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Apprenticeships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adoption (Ideas)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sociology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Businesses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Leemann, Regula Julia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Imdorf, Christian</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Switzerland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Switzerland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In training networks, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises pool their resources to train apprentices within the framework of the dual VET system, while an intermediary organisation is tasked with managing operations. Over the course of their apprenticeship, the apprentices switch from one training company to another on a (half-) yearly basis. Drawing on a case study of four training networks in Switzerland and the theoretical framework of the sociology of conventions, this paper aims to understand the reasons for the slow dissemination and reluctant adoption of this promising form of organising VET in Switzerland. The results of the study show that the system of moving from one company to another creates a variety of free-rider constellations in the distribution of the collectively generated corporative benefits. This explains why companies are reluctant to participate in this model. For the network to be sustainable, the intermediary organisation has to address discontent arising from free-rider problems while taking into account that the solutions found are always tentative and will often result in new free-rider problems.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562559</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Cooperative VET in Training Networks: Analysing the Free-Rider Problem in a Sociology-of-Conventions Perspective</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training v2 n4 p184-207 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>31</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Sample Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Custer, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Rasch Scaled Scores</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines the relationship between sample size and item parameter estimation precision when utilizing the one-parameter model. Item parameter estimates are examined relative to &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; values by evaluating the decline in root mean squared deviation (RMSD) and the number of outliers as sample size increases. This occurs across three conditions. The first condition utilizes one test level of 40 items without missing data. The second incorporates missing data and the third utilizes a vertical scale across three levels. When test levels were calibrated individually, the majority of RMSD and outlier-reduction improvement was achieved once a sample size of 400 examinees had been reached. Incremental increases to sample size beyond a threshold of 500 examinees added little gain to estimation precision. With the vertical-scaling condition, the majority of RMSD and outlier-reduction improvement was seemingly reached with a sample size of approximately 300 examinees per level with 500-600 examinees per common item linking set. However, when compared to conditions one and two, a similar level of estimation precision was not reached until a sample size of approximately 400-450 examinees per each of the three levels. Supplemental tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562560</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Sample Size and Item Parameter Estimation Precision When Utilizing the One-Parameter &amp;quot;Rasch&amp;quot; Model</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association (Evanston, IL, Oct 21-24, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>18</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Positive Behavior Supports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Efficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McIntosh, Kent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Turri, Mary G.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Because of its widespread adoption and implementation (in over 13,000 schools in the US; Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, 2010), there has been increasing attention to how School-wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) systems can be sustained. Sustained implementation can be defined as &amp;quot;continued use of an intervention or prevention program, with ongoing implementation fidelity to the core program principles, after supplemental resources used to support initial training and implementation are withdrawn&amp;quot; (Han &amp;amp; Weiss, 2005, p. 666). The term sustainability regards a practice&apos;s potential for durable implementation with high fidelity, when considering features of the practice, its implementation, and the context of implementation. Though it can be tempting to consider sustainability as deriving entirely from the behavioral principle of maintenance, sustainability includes not only maintenance, but also ongoing adaptations to enhance a practice&apos;s effectiveness, efficiency, and contextual fit (Elias, Zins, Graczyk, &amp;amp; Weissburg, 2003; McLaughlin &amp;amp; Mitra, 2001). This process of adaptation is known as continuous regeneration (McIntosh, Horner, &amp;amp; Sugai, 2009). Given the importance of sustainability to continued positive outcomes for stakeholders and wise use of resources, there is an urgent need to explore theories of sustainability and glean practical information to make practices, including SWPBS, more sustainable. [In C. R. Reynolds, K. J. Vannest &amp;amp; E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), &amp;quot;Encyclopedia of special education: A reference for the education of children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities and other exceptional individuals&amp;quot; (4th ed., pp. 2061-2064). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562561</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Positive Behavior Support: Sustainability and Continuous Regeneration</dc:title>
<dc:source>Grantee Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1360'>R324A120278</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lockwood, J. R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Castellano, Katherine E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2330-443X</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This article suggests two alternative statistical approaches for estimating student growth percentiles (SGP). The first is to estimate percentile ranks of current test scores conditional on past test scores directly, by modeling the conditional cumulative distribution functions, rather than indirectly through quantile regressions. This would remove the need for post hoc procedures required to ensure monotonicity of the estimated quantile functions, and for inversion of those functions to obtain SGP. We provide a brief empirical example demonstrating this approach and its potential benefits for handling discreteness of the observed test scores. The second suggestion is to estimate SGP directly from longitudinal item-level data, using multidimensional item response theory models, rather than from test scale scores. This leads to an isomorphism between using item-level data from one test to make inferences about latent student achievement, and using item-level data from multiple tests administered over time to make inferences about latent SGP. This framework can be used to solve the bias problems for current SGP methods caused by measurement error in both the current and past test scores, and provides straightforward assessments of uncertainty in SGP. We note practical problems that need to be addressed to implement our suggestions.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562562</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Alternative Statistical Frameworks for Student Growth Percentile Estimation</dc:title>
<dc:source>Grantee Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Statistics and Public Policy v2 n1 p1-10 May 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>67</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1477'>R305D140032</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence Based Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Creative Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Check Lists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Homework</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Maps</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Team Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grouping (Instructional Purposes)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Churches, Richard</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McAleavy, Tony</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United Kingdom</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wales</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United Arab Emirates</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United Arab Emirates</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United Kingdom</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United Kingdom (Wales)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>CfBT Education Trust (United Kingdom)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This publication contains 12 (A3 open-out) poster-style reports of teacher experimental research. The style of presentation parallels the type of preliminary reporting common at academic conferences and postgraduate events. At the same time, it aims to act as a form of short primer to introduce teachers to the basic options that there are when conducting this type of research. This said, the determined teacher-researcher would be advised to extend their reading further to full-scale textbooks such as Richard Churches and Eleanor Dommett&apos;s Teacher-led research: how to design and implement randomised controlled trials and other forms of experimental research which clearly explains how to choose and conduct the right statistical tests. CfBT Education Trust also offers an in-depth training programme over two days with access to statistical software and support for teachers when conducting and writing up their research. Most of the teachers in this report followed this programme in Wales, or in one case Dubai. Others, associated with Kyra Teaching School Alliance (led by Mount Street Academy, part of the CfBT Schools Trust), attended the Department for Education/National College for Teaching and Leadership training that Richard Churches delivered as part of the Closing the Gap: Test and Learn programme in England. [The teacher-researchers contributing to this document are as follows: Kate Andrews, Simon Andrews, David Ashton, Timm Barnard-Dadds, Sarah Baugh-Williams, Bridie Bear, Ceri Bibby, Wendy Blyth, Allison Davies, Rachel Elphick, Dean Flood, Emmet Glackin, Gavin Jones, Graeme Jones, Daniel Lear, Matthew Maughan, Jess Moore, Charlotte Morris, Theresa Peacock, James Siddle, Alison Turner, and Rob Wilson.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562564</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evidence That Counts--What Happens When Teachers Apply Scientific Methods to Their Practice: Twelve Teacher-Led Randomised Controlled Trials and Other Styles of Experimental Research</dc:title>
<dc:source>CfBT Education Trust</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-09-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-909437-69-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>45</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>CfBT Education Trust. 60 Queens Road, Reading, RG1 4BS, England. Tel: +44-11-8902-1296; Fax: +44-11-8902-1895; e-mail: researchenquiries@cfbt.com; Web site: http://www.cfbt.com/research</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Robustness (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Monte Carlo Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lockwood, J. R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCaffrey, Daniel F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Regression, weighting and related approaches to estimating a population mean from a sample with nonrandom missing data often rely on the assumption that conditional on covariates, observed samples can be treated as random. Standard methods using this assumption generally will fail to yield consistent estimators when covariates are measured with error. We review approaches to consistent estimation of a population mean of an incompletely observed variable using error-prone covariates, noting difficulties with applying these methods. We consider the application of Simulation-Extrapolation (SIMEX) as a simple and effective alternative. We provide technical conditions under which SIMEX will lead to a consistent estimator of a population mean and argue why it may function well in common settings. We use a simulation study to demonstrate its potential for removing nearly all of the bias in regression, weighting and doubly robust estimators for a population mean while maintaining precision competitive with what would be obtained without measurement error. We also discuss and evaluate options for estimating the standard error of the SIMEX mean estimator. Finally, we present an empirical example of estimating middle school effects on student achievement.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562566</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Simulation-Extrapolation for Estimating Means and Causal Effects with Mismeasured Covariates</dc:title>
<dc:source>Grantee Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Observational Studies v1 p241-290 Oct 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>50</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>65</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1477'>R305D140032</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Positive Behavior Supports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hubbuch, Chris</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stucker, Keelie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Missouri</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Missouri</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Schools implementing positive behavioral interventions and supports work to establish and maintain fidelity of school-wide systems and practices. Depending on the mobility rate of the student population, initial efforts may not be enough to adequately support and personalize the induction experience for highly mobile students. This monograph will share a framework for a student induction model specifically designed to meet the needs of highly mobile students. The Transfer Student Induction Model, or TSIM was developed and implemented on the middle school level in Excelsior Springs, Missouri in 2010. TSIM was designed to support the specific social, emotional, and academic needs of highly mobile students. This model was carefully designed as a Tier 1 support with practical steps that protect existing school climate. Several structures and steps are suggested to implement this model with fidelity. This model was designed to be implemented using existing school personnel. TSIM is informed by educational research, tested by practitioners in the field, and easily adapts to different grade levels and community demographics.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562567</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Transfer Student Induction Model: Providing a Path to Connection</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>36</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>29</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Adjustment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Adjustment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Urban Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gul, Showkeen Bilal Ahmad</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>India</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>India</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2231-4113</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The study examined the impact of socio-emotional adjustment on academic achievement of adolescent girls of Jammu and Kashmir. The purpose of the investigation was to study the relationship and effect of socio-emotional adjustment on academic achievement among adolescent girls. The descriptive survey research method was used for the study and the sample of 250 participants were randomly selected from ten higher secondary schools. The socio-emotional adjustment scale developed by Najam and Simeen (1991) adopted and revised by the investigator, and the academic achievement of previous year examination was used. The finding of the study revealed that: (1) there is a positive and significant correlation between socio-emotional adjustment and academic achievement of adolescent girls; (2) The socio-emotional adjustment of adolescent girls has a significant effect on their academic achievement; and (3) there was significant difference between rural and urban adolescent girls in their socio-emotional adjustment.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562568</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Impact of Socio-Emotional Adjustment on Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls in Jammu and Kashmir</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Sodha Pravaha v5 n3 p21-28 Jul 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Competency Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sathy, Viji</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper presents and reviews gender, racial/ethnic, language, and socioeconomic subgroup performance differences on the SAT® over nearly the last two decades. Theories on the existence of subgroup differences are examined. Substantial revisions to the SAT were made in 1994, and again in 2005. The short-term and long-term impact of these revisions on subgroup differences is evaluated. Furthermore, the trends in subgroup differences on the SAT are compared to those documented for other large-scale standardized tests (i.e., the ACT Assessment, National Assessment of Educational Progress), as well as those found in high school grades. This documentation of trends in subgroup differences on the SAT can be a useful resource for individuals interested in standardized tests as well as those studying how students&apos; experiences might account for differences on the test. The following are appended: (1) Student Descriptive Questionnaire Questions; and (2) Tables.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562569</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Historical View of Subgroup Performance Differences on the SAT Reasoning Test™. Research Report No. 2006-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>54</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>59</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sentences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Paragraph Composition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Milewski, Glenn B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Johnsen, Daniel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Glazer, Nancy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kubota, Melvin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The current paper presents the results of a large-scale, national, reading and writing curriculum survey and evaluates the alignment of the survey results to the reading and writing skills measured by the new SAT®. It was hypothesized that the skills measured by the writing and critical reading sections of the new SAT would be aligned to the curricula reflected in the survey responses. A strong alignment would provide important validity evidence for the new SAT. A total of 2,351 high school and college teachers in the United States were asked about reading and writing skills, student proficiency in reading and writing, assignments, and background information. The results demonstrate a strong link between the skills measured by the new SAT and high school and college curricula and instructional practice. Limitations and next steps are discussed. The following are appended: (1) Sample SAT Items; and (2) Essay Scoring Guide.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562570</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Survey to Evaluate the Alignment of the New SAT® Writing and Critical Reading Sections to Curricula and Instructional Practices. Research Report No. 2005-1. ETS RR-05-07</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>38</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Research Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Format</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lawrence, Ida M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rigol, Gretchen W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Van Essen, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jackson, Carol A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper provides an historical perspective on the content of the SAT. The review begins at the beginning, when the first College Board SAT (the Scholastic Aptitude Test) was administered to 8,040 students on June 23, 1926. At that time, the SAT consisted of nine subtests: Definitions, Arithmetical Problems, Classification, Artificial Language, Antonyms, Number Series, Analogies, Logical Inference, and Paragraph Reading. Over the years, the SAT has evolved in the way it measures what is now referred to as verbal and mathematical reasoning. With each redesign of the SAT, a variety of considerations were taken into account, including fairness issues, scaling issues, cost, public perception, face validity, changes in the test taking population, changes in patterns of test preparation, and changes in the college admission process. This paper describes the reasons for the various changes while emphasizing that the value of SAT scores rests on its high technical quality, and on the assumption that scores would maintain their meaning over time. A scholastic aptitude test is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562571</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Historical Perspective on the Content of the SAT®. Research Report No. 2003-3. ETS RR-03-10</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2003-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>26</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standard Setting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiley, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 2011, the College Board released its SAT college and career readiness benchmark, which represents the level of academic preparedness associated with a high likelihood of college success and completion. The goal of this study, which was conducted in 2008, was to establish college success criteria to inform the development of the benchmark. The College Board convened a panel comprised of experts in educational policy and higher education to review data showing the relationship between SAT scores and college performance. Panelists were asked to provide two sets of ratings on what first-year college GPA (FYGPA) should be used to define the criterion for success in the first year of college; and two sets of ratings to define the probability level for a successful student attaining that FYGPA (probability of mastery). The mean FYGPA rating from the second round was 2.62 (with a median of 2.67), and the mean and median rating for probability of mastery was 70%. The SAT score associated with the panelists&apos; final ratings was approximately 1580. Three appendices are included: (1) Sample Rating Form; (2) Percentage of Students in the SAT Validity Study Earning Different FYGPA by SAT Score Category, and by Gender and Ethnic Subgroups (table); and (3) Standard-Setting Evaluation Survey.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562572</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Standard-Setting Study to Establish College Success Criteria to Inform the SAT® College and Career Readiness Benchmark. Research Report 2012-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>28</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>25</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fatigue (Biology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Length</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hunger</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Jinghua</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Allspach, Jill R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Feigenbaum, Miriam</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Oh, Hyeon-Joo</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burton, Nancy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study evaluated whether the addition of a writing section to the SAT Reasoning Test™ (referred to as the SAT® in this study) would impact test-taker performance because of fatigue caused by increased test length. The study also investigated test-takers&apos; subjective feelings of fatigue. Ninety-seven test-takers were randomly assigned to three groups: the first group took a current SAT with no essay; the second group took a pseudo new SAT composed of the current SAT plus an essay, with the essay appearing in the first section of the test; and the third group also took the pseudo new SAT with an essay, but with the essay in the last section. Test-taker performance on the verbal and math sections and the essay was then evaluated and compared. The results indicated that while the extended testing time for the new SAT may cause test-takers to feel fatigued, fatigue did not affect test-taker performance. Appended are: (1) SAT Fatigue Study Survey; and (2) SAT I Fatigue Study Survey.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562573</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Study of Fatigue Effects from the New SAT®. Research Report No. 2004-5. ETS RR-04-46</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2004-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questioning Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Handbooks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelley, Patrick</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Guides - Classroom - Teacher</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This refreshingly frank handbook shows teachers how to close the achievement gap in their classrooms by teaching students innovative paths to academic success. Drawing on over 20 years&apos; experience, Kelley presents straightforward strategies for helping learners improve their grades and test scores and experience greater school engagement--all while streamlining the teacher&apos;s work to yield maximum efficiency. Strategies include team-grading essays, using Socratic seminars and sworn statements, allowing for re-dos, and ruthlessly pruning assignments, among others. Often humorous and irreverent in tone, this guide will be the talk of the break room. Includes online digital content.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562574</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teaching Smarter: An Unconventional Guide to Boosting Student Success</dc:title>
<dc:source>Free Spirit Publishing</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-57542-492-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Teachers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>224</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Free Spirit Publishing. 217 Fifth Avenue North Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Tel: 800-735-7323; Tel: 612-338-2068; Fax: 866-419-5199; Fax: 612-337-5050; e-mail: help4kids@freespirit.com; Web site: http://www.freespirit.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://www.freespirit.com/teaching-strategies-and-professional-development/teaching-smarter-patrick-kelley/</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academically Gifted</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Underachievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asperger Syndrome</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Galbraith, Judy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Delisle, Jim</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Guides - Non-Classroom</dc:type>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Gifted kids are so much more than test scores and grades. Still, it&apos;s sometimes difficult to see past the potential to the child who may be anxious, lonely, confused, or unsure of what the future might bring. This book, now fully revised with updated information and new survey quotes, offers practical suggestions for addressing the social and emotional needs of gifted students. The authors present ways to advocate for gifted education; help gifted underachievers, perfectionists, and twice-exceptional students; and provide all gifted kids with a safe, supportive learning environment. Complete with engaging stories, strategies, Q&amp;amp;As, essays, activities, resources, and discussions of ADHD, Asperger&apos;s, and the Common Core, this book is for anyone committed to helping gifted students thrive. Online digital content includes reproducible forms from the book.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562575</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>When Gifted Kids Don&apos;t Have All the Answers: How to Meet Their Social and Emotional Needs. Revised and Updated Edition</dc:title>
<dc:source>Free Spirit Publishing</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-57542-493-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Teachers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Counselors</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Parents</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>288</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Free Spirit Publishing. 217 Fifth Avenue North Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Tel: 800-735-7323; Tel: 612-338-2068; Fax: 866-419-5199; Fax: 612-337-5050; e-mail: help4kids@freespirit.com; Web site: http://www.freespirit.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://www.freespirit.com/gifted-and-special-education/when-gifted-kids-dont-have-all-the-answers-jim-delisle-judy-galbraith/</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Administrator Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent School Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Guides</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kessler, Susan Stone</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Snodgrass, April M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Davis, Andrew T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Guides - Non-Classroom</dc:type>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This hands-on school leadership guide for new and veteran principals and administrators offers practical advice for leading a school successfully. Want honest student input? Try texting. Got a group of angry parents? Arrange one-on-one meetings--you&apos;ll avoid a mob scene and give each family the attention it deserves. Trying to make a teacher feel appreciated? Shoot a quick email after stopping by his classroom and describe something cool you saw him do. It takes ten seconds but has a big impact. These tips and hundreds more are the collective wisdom of three experienced principals who know how to connect with kids, staff, families, and stakeholders, and help students succeed.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562576</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Principal&apos;s Survival Guide: Where Do I Start? How Do I Succeed? When Do I Sleep?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Free Spirit Publishing</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-57542-491-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Administrators</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>208</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Free Spirit Publishing. 217 Fifth Avenue North Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Tel: 800-735-7323; Tel: 612-338-2068; Fax: 866-419-5199; Fax: 612-337-5050; e-mail: help4kids@freespirit.com; Web site: http://www.freespirit.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://www.freespirit.com/teaching-strategies-and-professional-development/principals-survival-guide-susan-stone-kessler-april-snodgrass-andrew-davis/</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Extracurricular Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Logical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structural Equation Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goodness of Fit</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Context Effect</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Everson, Howard T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Millsap, Roger E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper explores the complex, hierarchical relationship among school characteristics, individual differences in academic achievement, extracurricular activities, and socioeconomic background on performance on the SAT Reasoning Test™ verbal and mathematical sections. Using multilevel structural equation models (SEMs) with latent means, data from a national sample of college-bound high school students were analyzed. A nested series of structural equation models were fit simultaneously to eight subgroups (disaggregated by both gender and ethnicity) of high school students. Analyses suggest that multilevel structural equation models provide a reasonably good fit to the data, that family background influences SAT® scores directly and indirectly, that learning opportunities in and outside the school curriculum are related to SAT performance, and that the characteristics of the schools matter when it comes to performance on the SAT. The paper&apos;s main contention is that context matters and that researchers ought to move beyond analyses of individual differences when attempting to understand performance on large-scale standardized tests. An appendix contains 2 tables.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562577</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Beyond Individual Differences: Exploring School Effects on SAT® Scores. Research Report No. 2004-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2004-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>45</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Dual Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time to Degree</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Databases</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wyatt, Jeffrey N.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Di Giacomo, F. Tony</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Educators are increasingly focused on ensuring that students experience a rigorous curriculum in high school and graduate college and career ready. One way of introducing rigorous course work is to have students take college-level work, often in the form of either an AP® course and exam or a dual enrollment course. This study compared the outcomes of students who participated in either program and graduated high school in 2006. The outcomes investigated were four-year college enrollment, persistence at a four-year institution, graduation in four years, and graduation in six years, as well as first-year college grades. The results indicated that AP students who had obtained at least one score of 3 or higher on an AP Exam considerably outperformed on all examined outcomes except for four-year college enrollment, which was highest for students who had taken a dual enrollment course affiliated with a four-year college. AP students whose highest exam score was less than 3 performed as well or better than did students who took a dual enrollment course affiliated with a two year college for all outcomes. AP students whose highest exam score was lower than 3 outperformed students who took a dual enrollment course affiliated with a four-year college on some outcomes and underperformed on others. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562578</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Comparison of the College Outcomes of AP® and Dual Enrollment Students. Research Report 2015-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>36</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>42</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Format</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lawrence, Ida</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rigol, Gretchen W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Van Essen, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jackson, Carol A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper describes the various ways in which the SAT has evolved since its introduction in 1926. Some of the modifications have involved changes in the types of questions used to measure verbal and mathematical skills. Other modifications focused on liberalizing time limits to ensure that speed of responding to questions has minimal effect on performance. There were changes in the actual administration of the test, such as allowing students to use calculators on the math sections. Still other revisions have stemmed from a concern that certain types of questions might be more susceptible to pretest coaching. All of these changes were intended to update the SAT so that it remains fair for an increasingly diverse group of test-takers, while at the same time enhancing its effectiveness as an admission tool.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562579</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Historical Perspective on the SAT® 1926-2001. Research Report No. 2002-7</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Delivery Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mastery Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Length</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Navigation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Luecht, Richard M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sireci, Stephen G.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Over the past four decades, there has been incremental growth in computer-based testing (CBT) as a viable alternative to paper-and-pencil testing. However, the transition to CBT is neither easy nor inexpensive. As Drasgow, Luecht, and Bennett (2006) noted, many design engineering, test development, operations/logistics, and psychometric changes are required to develop a successful operational program. Early research on CBT almost exclusively focused on theoretical issues such as improving measurement efficiency by achieving adequate levels of test score reliability using as few items as possible. However, it was soon evident that practical issues--such as ensuring content representation, making sure all examinees have sufficient time to complete the test, implementation of new item types, and controlling the degree to which items were exposed to examinees--needed to be addressed, too. In the past few years, research on CBT has focused on developing models that achieve desired levels of measurement efficiency while simultaneously satisfying other important goals, such as minimizing item exposure and maintaining content validity. In addition, there has been a growing awareness among practitioners that basic CBT research using small samples or simulation studies needs to be vetted using cost-benefit analysis, as well as engineering design and implementation criteria to ensure that feasibility, scalability, and efficiency are evaluated in more concrete ways than by merely reporting a reduction of error variances for theoretical examinee scores (Luecht, 2005a, 2005b).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562580</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Review of Models for Computer-Based Testing. Research Report 2011-12</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>56</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>132</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Beatty, Adam S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sackett, Paul R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kuncel, Nathan R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kiger, Thomas B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rigdon, Jana L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shen, Winny</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Walmsley, Philip T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In recent decades, there has been an increasing emphasis placed on college graduation rates and reducing attrition due to the social and economic benefits, at both the individual and national levels, proposed to accrue from a more highly educated population (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011). In the United States in particular, there is a concern that declining college graduation rates relative to the rest of the world&apos;s population will reduce economic competitiveness (Callan, 2008). As such, in addition to research on how to increase educational performance in elementary and secondary schools, educational researchers are also interested in the determinants of performance and persistence at the collegiate level. One method hypothesized to promote increased college graduation rates is to raise the standards in the nation&apos;s high schools in order to better prepare students for college. Indeed, data from many converging sources suggests high school graduates are not prepared for higher-level college curriculum (Achieve, 2005). As such, many state institutions have attempted to set standards for rigor in order to ensure students are prepared for college study. Against this backdrop, the College Board has recently developed a measure of academic rigor, termed the Academic Rigor Index (ARI), for the purpose of examining how well a student is prepared for college study both within and across broad content domains (Wiley, Wyatt, &amp;amp; Camara, 2010). The ARI awards 0 to 5 points in each of five areas (English, mathematics, science, social science/history, and foreign/classical languages) based on students&apos; self-reported course-taking and sums these to create an overall index on a 0-25-point scale. The 25 credited activities are drawn from a larger set of course-taking variables. Each individual credited activity&apos;s inclusion in the index is empirically supported by links to subsequent collegiate performance. The decisions to award an equal number of possible points in each of the five areas, and to weight each area equally in computing the total score, were not empirically based, and thus the degree to which relaxing the equal point per area and equal weight per area constraints could improve the predictive power of the ARI is not known. The purpose of the present paper is to compare the ARI with alternative scoring procedures that remove these constraints. An appendix contains supplemental tables.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562581</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Comparison of Alternate Approaches to Creating Indices of Academic Rigor. Research Report 2012-11</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>32</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>25</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Calculus</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advocacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Dissemination</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Committees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Workshops</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Asera, Rose</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Commissioned by the College Board&apos;s National Task Force on Minority High Achievement, this report presents a history of the Emerging Scholars Program, a proven strategy for increasing the number of underrepresented minority students who achieve at high levels in freshman calculus (and in initial freshman courses in several of the sciences, including chemistry, physics, and biology), and discusses the lessons that have been learned over the years from efforts to disseminate the Emerging Scholars Program to a number of institutions.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562582</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Calculus and Community: A History of the Emerging Scholars Program. A Report of the National Task Force on Minority High Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2001-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>50</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>16</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Eligibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Strategic Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conferences (Gatherings)</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This document summarizes the discussions that occurred during the third conference on admissions models on August 23-24, 2001, in Vancouver, Canada. This monograph builds on the work of the first two College Board conferences on admissions models, which culminated in the 1999 publication of &amp;quot;Toward a Taxonomy of the Admissions Decision-Making Process.&amp;quot; A roster of participants is included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562583</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Best Practices in Admissions Decisions: A Report on the Third College Board Conference on Admission Models</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>33</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Metacognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Construct Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Generalizability Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropouts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Interests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tobias, Sigmund</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Everson, Howard</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report describes 12 studies dealing with the knowledge monitoring component of metacognition. It is assumed that knowledge monitoring is basic to other metacognitive activities, such as evaluating learning, selecting appropriate strategies, or planning, because distinguishing between what students know and do not know ought to be a prerequisite for these other higher-level activities. The 12 studies, 10 in the verbal domain and 2 in mathematics, used various versions of a knowledge monitoring assessment (KMA) that evaluates the discrepancy between students&apos; estimates of their knowledge in a domain and their demonstrated knowledge in that domain on a multiple-choice test. The results provide a good deal of support for the construct validity of the KMA and suggest that it has considerable generalizability over different types of content and varying student populations. Since the KMA may be group or computer administered and is objectively scored, it has substantial advantages over other means of evaluating metacognition. Suggestions for further research using the procedure are made.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562584</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessing Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring. Report No. 96-01</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1996-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>41</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>100</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Loan Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Part Time Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Full Time Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ekstrom, Ruth B.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>High school seniors who answered that they would choose to borrow, when asked what they would do if college costs were $1,500 more than they, their family, and a scholarship could provide, were significantly more likely to attend college in the next four years than were students who answered that they would choose other options (delaying college entrance, attending a less expensive college, or getting a job). This held true even after controlling for other variables such as educational aspirations, tested achievement, influence from others, and socioeconomic status. This finding supports the contention that students who are reluctant to borrow are less likely to enroll in postsecondary education. Among the students who did enroll in college, willingness to borrow was significantly associated with attendance at a four-year college rather than a two-year college and with full-time rather than part-time attendance. This may mean that recent changes in financial aid packaging, with fewer grants and more loans, have had an effect not only on college enrollments but also on the type of college that students attend and on the proportion of students enrolling in college on a part-time basis. The results also suggest that, all else being equal, students who are knowledgeable about financial aid sources may be more likely to enroll in college than are students with less knowledge of these sources.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562585</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Attitudes toward Borrowing and Participation in Postsecondary Education. Report No. 92-6. ETS RR No. 92-36</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1992-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>40</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morgan, Rick</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Since 1964, colleges have been sending data to the College Board Validity Study Service in order to determine the degree to which measures used in admissions predict college performance. These studies have allowed for the monitoring of general trends in the relationship of SAT scores and high school grades with freshman grades. Beginning in the early-1970s and continuing to the mid-1970s, the observed average correlations of SAT scores with freshman grades increased dramatically. In the decade that followed, the strength of this relationship gradually declined. In order to determine to what extent the observed variations in the average correlations might be associated with the composition of colleges conducting validity studies each year, validity data were analyzed for the enrolling classes of 1976 to 1985. Estimates of change, based on a repeated measures estimation approach utilizing data from colleges conducting more than one predictive validity study within the 10-year period, and correcting for the restriction of range in SAT scores and high school record, indicated a general linear trend from 1976 to 1985. The correlations of SAT scores with first-year college grades declined from about 0.51 to about 0.47, for a change of approximately 0.04. There was less change during this period for private colleges, small colleges, and more selective colleges. The following are appended: (1) Yearly Estimates; Standard Errors of Yearly Estimates; and (2) Number of Colleges for Each Pairwise Set of Years.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562586</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Analyses of the Predictive Validity of the SAT® and High School Grades from 1976 to 1985. Report No. 89-7. ETS RR No. 89-37</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1989-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Research Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Publications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Format</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - Directories/Catalogs</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>College Level Examination Program</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>College Level Examination Program</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This catalog lists research reports, research notes, and other publications available from the College Board&apos;s website. The catalog briefly describes research publications available free of charge. Introduced in 1981, the Research Report series includes studies and reviews in areas such as college admission, special populations, subgroup differences, postsecondary readiness and success, and learning and cognition. Extensive research on specific College Board programs such as the SAT, the Advanced Placement Program, PSAT/NMSQT, and ACCUPLACER is provided. Many historical reports, statistical reports, data tables, and policy reports are also available. A subject index, author index, and title index are also provided.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562587</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Catalog of Research Reports</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>68</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Borman, Geoffrey D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stringfield, Sam</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rachuba, Laura</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Commissioned by the College Board&apos;s National Task Force on Minority High Achievement, this report documents recent national progress in advancing the achievements of elementary-aged minority children, the potential for replicable whole-school reform designs to contribute to this advancement, and the individual, classroom, and school characteristics that distinguish those minority students who attain high levels of achievement. The primary focus is on the progress of Latino and African-American students who begin their academic careers at relatively high achievement levels. The analyses are based on data from the national study Prospects and its companion study of exemplary school programs, Special Strategies. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562588</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Advancing Minority High Achievement: National Trends and Promising Programs and Practices. A Report Prepared for the National Task Force on Minority High Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2000-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>118</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>61</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Supply and Demand</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rigol, Gretchen W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report represents the third phase in the College Board Admissions Models Project. The first two phases of the project are summarized in two monographs: &amp;quot;Toward a Taxonomy of the Admissions Decision-Making Process&amp;quot; (1999) identifies nine different philosophical approaches to admissions and related selection criteria; and &amp;quot;Best Practices in Admissions Decisions&amp;quot; (2002) builds on the Taxonomy and outlines various components of a best practices model for admissions decision-making. The purpose of this phase of the project was to examine exactly how institutions make admissions decisions. Information from more than 100 institutions, representing all levels of selectivity, forms the basis for this report. The following are appended: (1) Institutional Statements Regarding Admissions Policies and Institutional Enrollment Goals; (2) Summary of Application Components; (3) Sample Essay (or personal statement) Topics; (4) Factors that May Be Used in Making Admissions Decisions Based on internal evaluation guidelines; (5) What Colleges Tell Students about what They Look for; and (6) Tables from &amp;quot;Trends in College Admission 2000.&amp;quot;</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562589</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Admissions Decision-Making Models: How U.S. Institutions of Higher Education Select Undergraduate Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2003-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>96</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Calculators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Scheuneman, Janice</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study showed that almost all of the students brought calculators to the administration of the SAT I test in November 1996 and 1997 and continue to do so today. The number who actually used the calculators on the test and the extent to which they used them varied across students. Performance on the math sections of the exam was associated with the extent of calculator use, with those using calculators on about a third to a half of the items averaging higher scores than those using calculators more or less frequently. Performance differences associated with type of calculator used were also observed.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562590</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Calculator Use and the SAT® I Math. Research Notes. RN-16</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Logical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Jinghua</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Feigenbaum, Miriam</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cook, Linda</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explored possible configurations of the new SAT® critical reading section without analogy items. The item pool contained items from SAT verbal (SAT-V) sections of 14 previously administered SAT tests, calibrated using the three-parameter logistic IRT model. Multiple versions of several prototypes that do not contain analogy items were assembled. Item statistics and test statistics for the simulated forms were compared to the average of 13 forms of the SAT-V. These statistics included: IRT scaled score reliability, scaled score standard error of measurement, conditional scaled score standard error of measurement, r-biserial, and equated deltas. The results indicated that it is possible to maintain measurement precision for the new SAT critical reading section without analogy items, but it may be necessary to modify the distribution of item difficulty in order to obtain adequate precision at the ends of the score scale.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562591</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Simulation Study to Explore Configuring the New SAT® Critical Reading Section without Analogy Items. Research Report No. 2004-2. ETS RR-04-01</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2004-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adaptive Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Delivery Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Banks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patelis, Thanos</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Because different types of computerized tests exist and continue to emerge, the term &amp;quot;computer-based testing&amp;quot; does not encompass all of the various models that may exist. As a result, test delivery model (TDM) is used to describe the variety of methods that exist in delivering tests to examinees. The criterion that is used to distinguish between the various TDMs is the extent to which the test is adaptive to an examinee&apos;s performance during the test session. On one side of the continuum, there are linear tests that do not change in light of the examinee&apos;s performance. On the other side of this continuum, there are tests in which each item presented is dependent on the examinee&apos;s performance (adaptive). Types of TDMs and the architecture of a computer-based testing system are described.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562592</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Overview of Computer-Based Testing. Research Notes. RN-09</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2000-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Block Scheduling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Factors (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Biology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Calculus</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>United States History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>History Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Literature</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The instructional schedule does affect student grades on the four AP Examinations in this study after they have been adjusted for group differences in student ability. The results from this study generally suggest that students, on average, obtain higher AP grades when instruction is given over an entire year rather than in a semesterized block schedule format. These results are consistent across the four AP Examinations and are found on 15 of the 16 comparisons between year-long and semester block courses. The remaining results differ by examination and subject.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562593</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Block Schedules and Student Performance on AP® Examinations. Research Notes. RN-03</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1998-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 2005, the College Board added a required writing section to the SAT, and ACT added an optional writing test to the ACT. Before 2005, ACT and the College Board had periodically produced concordance tables to assist admission officers who wanted to understand how students of comparable ability would score on the two college entrance examinations. Given the changes to both tests, the College Board and ACT are now providing updated concordance tables that are based on the current versions of the two tests.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562594</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>ACT and SAT® Concordance Tables. Research Notes. RN-40</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>2</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 11</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ewing, Maureen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huff, Kristen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Andrews, Melissa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>King, Kinda</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 11</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In connection with the new SAT that was introduced in March 2005, research has been under way to investigate the feasibility of providing examinees with score reports that contain feedback on skills measured by the critical reading, mathematics, and writing sections of the test. The main purpose of this study was to estimate the reliability of the SAT skill scores. Findings showed that with the exception of writing skills, most skills exhibited acceptable internal consistency and alternate-form reliability estimates.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562595</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessing the Reliability of Skills Measured by the SAT®. Research Notes. RN-24</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Definitions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Di Giacomo, F. Tony</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Linn, Dane</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Monthey, Wanda</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pack, Catherine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wyatt, Jeffrey</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In recent decades, the United States economy has undergone a dramatic shift to a knowledge-based economy that, when coupled with simultaneous, rapid globalization, has created a greater demand for a more educated and skilled workforce. The share of U.S. jobs requiring some level of postsecondary education is expected to grow to 63% in the next decade. By 2018, the United States will need 22 million new college degrees and at least 4.7 million new workers with postsecondary certificates, but it will produce three million fewer degrees than are needed. Evidence suggests that a substantial fraction of the student population in the United States is insufficiently prepared for postsecondary education, which results in a great cost to the nation. Students&apos; performance on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a nationally representative assessment, is an indication of the challenges that states face in trying to prepare students for postsecondary education. For example, 2009 NAEP data indicate that just 38% of U.S. 12th-graders performed at or above proficient in reading, and only 26% performed at or above proficient in math. Data from international academic assessments indicate that students in the United States are being outperformed by other developed nations. On the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), 15-year-olds in the United States ranked 17th in reading and 31st in mathematics. Secondary and postsecondary institutions must address the academic rigor of their programs and why students are not successfully completing postsecondary programs. This brief is intended to support policymakers in achieving the goal that every student graduating from high school is ready for both college and career.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562596</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Academic Readiness Indicators: Implications for State Policy. Policy Brief 2013-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Policymakers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wang, Xiang Bo</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>China</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>China</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report provides an introduction to the system and culture of the college entrance examination (CEE) of China. College entrance examinations in China (and in several other Asian countries such as Korea and Japan) are so important that they are commonly dubbed &amp;quot;once in a lifetime&amp;quot; or a &amp;quot;one-test-to-determine-a-life&amp;quot; for most high school graduates. Given the high-stakes nature of the CEE, test security is paramount to the Chinese government at all levels. Because all information related to CEE tests and items is considered a national secret, test security is closely monitored, and violations are investigated and prosecuted swiftly and forcefully by China&apos;s Ministries of Education, Public Security, Communication, and Justice. As a result, both the national and provincial educational examination authorities have been actively engaged in experimenting with testing reforms and technical innovations as well as learning about psychometrics from abroad. It is the author&apos;s hope that Chinese officials will share the results of further reforms and innovations so that the rest of the world can both learn and benefit from its experience.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562597</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Introduction to the System and Culture of the College Entrance Examination of China. Research Notes. RN-28</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2006-11-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>21</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Process Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Genç, Murat</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of scientific studies on students&apos; scientific literacy and attitude towards science course. For the study, a middle school science study group was established by randomly selecting 30 students from the 6th, 7th, and 8th grades. Participating students were given information about the programme. Students worked regularly for 12 weeks on topics of scientific research and held discussions on them. Students did research on information they collected during interviews. As a result, many students involved in the science group studies were able to increase their skills through discussion and exchange of views. Before the application, the students in the program were given a test which incorporated scientific literacy and attitude towards science course. Their attitudes about science were assessed and scored using a questionnaire. During the program of study, students were provided with discussion topics by the researcher. An additional goal was to encourage student participation in scientific processes. Twelve weeks after the application, the students were given the same questionnaire and test again. The data obtained were analysed using an SPSS program. Statistical results indicated that the students&apos; scientific literacy had increased significantly, and that their attitudes towards science were more positive. In terms of both gender and class level of the students, a significant difference emerged after the application, when compared to before the application.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562598</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effect of Scientific Studies on Students&apos; Scientific Literacy and Attitude</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Faculty of Education v34 n1 p141-152 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>40</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smith, Jonathan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board Advocacy &amp; Policy Center</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The goal of this research brief is to highlight new causal evidence on how the number of colleges to which students apply affects their college enrollment decisions. Using a 2004 sample of students who applied to at least one four-year college, this research brief finds that applying to more colleges causally increases students&apos; probabilities of enrolling in a four-year college, especially for those lower-income students applying to only one or two colleges. A Technical Appendix is included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562599</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Can Applying to More Colleges Increase Enrollment Rates? Research Brief</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Opinion Papers</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>ICF International</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this webinar, Dr. William Schmidt of Michigan State University discussed helpful instructional tools for promoting the higher order conceptual thinking found in the Common Core Standards. The PowerPoint presentation and webinar recording are also available.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562600</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Mathematics Instruction and the Common Core: Where Do We Go from Here? Q&amp;amp;A with William Schmidt, Ph.D. REL Mid-Atlantic Webinar</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-10-01</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>3</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Available from: ICF International. 11785 Beltsville Drive Suite 300, Calverton, MD 20705. Tel: 301-572-0889; Tel: 866-735-6239; e-mail: info@relmidatlantic.org; Web site: http://www.relmidatlantic.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Base for Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Intelligences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Program Divisions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culturally Relevant Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grouping (Instructional Purposes)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competency Based Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Opinion Papers</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>ICF International</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this webinar, Dr. Carol Tomlinson of the University of Virginia presented the research base supporting the practice of differentiation and described the characteristics of effective differentiation. She led a discussion of how quality preparation can build and strengthen teachers&apos; knowledge and skills in implementing differentiated instruction strategies. The webinar and PowerPoint presentation are also available. A brief list of resources is included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562601</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effective Differentiation: A Guide for Teachers and Leaders. Q&amp;amp;A for Carol A. Tomlinson, Ed.D. REL Mid-Atlantic Educator Effectiveness Webinar Series</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-09-17</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Available from: ICF International. 11785 Beltsville Drive Suite 300, Calverton, MD 20705. Tel: 301-572-0889; Tel: 866-735-6239; e-mail: info@relmidatlantic.org; Web site: http://www.relmidatlantic.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Response to Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inclusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Schedules</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Opinion Papers</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>ICF International</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this webinar, Janice A. Dole, Professor and Director of the Reading and Literacy Program in the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Utah, discussed different strategies for delivering literacy instruction to meet a range of student needs, including the ways in which teachers can collaborate with reading specialists to achieve this purpose. The PowerPoint presentation and webinar recording are available.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562602</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effective Literacy Interventions: Q&amp;amp;A with Janice Dole, Ph.D. REL Mid-Atlantic Educator Effectiveness Webinar Series</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-10-29</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Available from: ICF International. 11785 Beltsville Drive Suite 300, Calverton, MD 20705. Tel: 301-572-0889; Tel: 866-735-6239; e-mail: info@relmidatlantic.org; Web site: http://www.relmidatlantic.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Family Involvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family School Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>After School Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immigrants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communication Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Opinion Papers</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>ICF International</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this webinar, Dr. Joyce Epstein, Director of the Center on School, Family, and Community Partnerships and the National Network of Partnership Schools, discussed what the research says about effective family engagement. The webinar and PowerPoint presentation are also available. A brief list of resources is included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562603</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Engaging Families in Partnership Programs to Promote Student Success: Q&amp;amp;A for Dr. Joyce L. Epstein. REL Mid-Atlantic Educator Effectiveness Webinar Series</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-08-27</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Available from: ICF International. 11785 Beltsville Drive Suite 300, Calverton, MD 20705. Tel: 301-572-0889; Tel: 866-735-6239; e-mail: info@relmidatlantic.org; Web site: http://www.relmidatlantic.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developed Nations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Numeracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Salaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expenditure per Student</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stephens, Maria</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Warren, Laura K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harner, Ariana L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Argentina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Australia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Brazil</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Canada</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>China</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>France</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Germany</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>India</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Indonesia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Italy</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mexico</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>South Korea</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Russia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>South Africa</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United Kingdom</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Japan</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Argentina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Australia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Brazil</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Canada</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>China</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>France</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Germany</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>India</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Indonesia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Italy</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Japan</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Mexico</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Russia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Africa</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Korea</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United Kingdom</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Center for Education Statistics (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>American Institutes for Research</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The &amp;quot;Comparative Indicators of Education&amp;quot; report series has been published on a biennial basis since it began in 2002, although this year&apos;s is the first to expand its focus to the G-20 countries, having previously been focused on the G-8 countries. &amp;quot;Comparative Indicators of Education in the United States and Other G-20 Countries: 2015&amp;quot; is a comparison of the education system in the United States with those in the other Group of 20 (G-20) countries: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. The G-20 countries, which are among the most economically developed, represent 85 percent of the world&apos;s economy and two-thirds of its population. These countries are some of the United States&apos; largest economic partners. The report draws on the most current information about education from the International Indicators of Education Systems (INES) project at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), as reported in the &amp;quot;Education at a Glance&amp;quot; series, as well as international assessments that range from grade 4 through adulthood. These international assessments include the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), which assesses fourth-graders in reading; the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), which assesses fourth- and eighth-graders in mathematics and science; the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), which assesses 15-year-old students (regardless of grade) in mathematics, reading, science, and, occasionally, other subjects; and the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), which assesses adults, ages 16 to 65, in literacy, numeracy, and problem solving in technology-rich environments. Findings are organized into five major sections: (1) population and school enrollment; (2) academic performance; (3) contexts for learning; (4) expenditure for education; and (5) education returns: educational attainment and income. An appendix presents: The Education Systems of the G-20 Countries.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562604</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Comparative Indicators of Education in the United States and Other G-20 Countries: 2015. NCES 2016-100</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Center for Education Statistics</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>154</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Center for Education Statistics. Available from: ED Pubs. P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398. Tel: 877-433-7827; Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES12D0002</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link>http://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2016100</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Databases</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this research study was to determine benchmark scores on the SAT that predict a 65 percent probability or higher of getting a first-year college grade point average of either 2.7 or higher or 2.0 or higher, to use these benchmarks to describe the level of college readiness in the nation and in certain demographic subgroups, and to examine how the benchmarks vary according to certain college characteristics. Additional tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562605</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Determining SAT® Benchmarks for College Readiness. Research Notes. RN-30</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Williams, Frank E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>While the results demonstrate that SAT scores still correlated more strongly, on average, with socioeconomic status (SES) than high school grade point average (GPA) and rank, this does not indicate that this is a problem with the test; more likely it is a societal reflection of disparate resources. That is, higher-SES families have more resources to provide their children with additional or richer educational opportunities, along with various other factors that could translate into higher academic performance.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562606</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining the Relationship between the SAT®, High School Measures of Academic Performance, and Socioeconomic Status: Turning Our Attention to the Unit of Analysis. Research Notes. RN-36</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Parent Teacher Conferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gifted</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Educational Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Teacher Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Danielian, Jeff</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Langley, Susan Dulong</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Association for Gifted Children</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;Connecting for High Potential&amp;quot; sheds light on questions from teachers and parents on many subject matters, however, rarely is there an opportunity to explore how the &amp;quot;other side&amp;quot; might be facing the issue. An ongoing goal of the National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC) is for teachers and parents to develop a broader understanding of their students&apos; potential (and one another) which will enable them to build stimulating learning environments that tap into a child&apos;s high potential. This resource for parents, teachers, and community members is designed to provide practical advice for working together to support gifted children&apos;s continued growth in educational settings. Presented in this issue is the &amp;quot;Parent/Teacher Conference.&amp;quot; While it can differ greatly depending on the student, the parent(s), the teacher and the issues at hand, it offers one of the best opportunities to create a school/home plan to help students succeed.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562607</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Connecting for High Potential... &amp;quot;The Parent/Teacher Conference.&amp;quot; CHP Issue 24</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Association for Gifted Children</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>3</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Association for Gifted Children. 1331 H Street NW Suite 1001, Washington, DC 20005. Tel: 202-785-4268; Fax: 202-785-4248; e-mail: nagc@nagc.org; Web site: http://www.nagc.org/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kerns, Mary-Margaret</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The College Board developed a program in the content areas of English and mathematics designed to prepare students for challenging content as early as grade 6 and extending through high school. Conceived with the goal of creating high-quality professional development activities with associated instructional strategies embedded in instructional materials rich in content and cognitive demand, the resulting Textual Power and Mathematics with Meaning instructional materials and professional development ultimately sought to improve student engagement and achievement in the classroom. The findings associated with the evaluations of Textual Power and Mathematics with Meaning in years 1 and 2 of the pilot informed the development of their current forms in the SpringBoard Program. The following tables are appended: (1) Sample and Response Rates, Introductory Survey; (2) Number of Reflections Surveys Completed by Teachers; (3) Sample and Response Rates, Final Survey; (4) Regional and School Characteristics of Site Visit Schools; (5) Percentages of Types of Students in Classes Observed; (6) Collected Sample Distribution; (7) HLM Coefficient Estimates for District A High School; (8) Regional and School Characteristics of Site Visit Schools; (9) Numbers of English Observations with Descriptive Information, 2003 and 2004; (10) Numbers of Mathematics Observations with Descriptive Information, 2003 and 2004; (11) HLM Coefficient Estimates for District A High School; and (12) HLM Coefficient Estimates for District A Middle School.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562608</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluation of SpringBoard® English Textual Power™ and Mathematics with Meaning™ Pilot Program. Research Notes. RN-21</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2004-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>2</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Logical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equated Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Melican, Gerald J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report synthesizes the research to date addressing the construct comparability of the SAT Reasoning Test and prior SAT I: Reasoning Test and the series of research studies addressing the equatability and subpopulation invariance of the SAT and SAT I.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562609</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Comparability of Scores on the New and Prior Versions of the SAT Reasoning Test™. Research Notes. RN-31</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academically Gifted</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advocacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Needs Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Danielian, Jeff</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Langley, Susan Dulong</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Association for Gifted Children</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;Connecting for High Potential&amp;quot; sheds light on questions from teachers and parents on many subject matters, however, rarely is there an opportunity to explore how the &amp;quot;other side&amp;quot; might be facing the issue. An ongoing goal of the National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC) is for teachers and parents to develop a broader understanding of their students&apos; potential (and one another) which will enable them to build stimulating learning environments that tap into a child&apos;s high potential. This resource for parents, teachers, and community members is designed to provide practical advice for working together to support gifted children&apos;s continued growth in educational settings. Presented in this issue is &amp;quot;Finding a Program or Advocating for One that Works.&amp;quot; Challenges exist in finding the right academic fit for exceptional learners. This resource offers teachers and parents ways to think critically and plan creatively to share information with key stakeholders to effect changes in programs and services to benefit exceptional learners.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562610</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Connecting for High Potential... &amp;quot;Finding a Program or Advocating for One That Works.&amp;quot; CHP Issue 23</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Association for Gifted Children</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-06-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>3</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Association for Gifted Children. 1331 H Street NW Suite 1001, Washington, DC 20005. Tel: 202-785-4268; Fax: 202-785-4248; e-mail: nagc@nagc.org; Web site: http://www.nagc.org/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Position Papers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gifted</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Association for Gifted Children</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Since the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, a major objective of federal and state education policy has been to narrow K-12 achievement gaps. This position statement notes that the available data suggest that the singular focus on the most struggling learners has resulted in meaningful progress in closing minimum-competency achievement gaps. However, at the same time, schools have not addressed gaps between groups of students at advanced levels of achievement, commonly referred to as &amp;quot;excellence gaps.&amp;quot; Reducing and eventually eliminating excellence gaps is an issue of equity and social justice, community development, economic advancement, and national security. This position statement from the National Association for Gifted Children provides recommendations and calls on policymakers and educators to set a goal of closing achievement gaps at every level of achievement.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562611</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Addressing Excellence Gaps in K-12 Education. Position Statement</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Association for Gifted Children</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>2</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Association for Gifted Children. 1331 H Street NW Suite 1001, Washington, DC 20005. Tel: 202-785-4268; Fax: 202-785-4248; e-mail: nagc@nagc.org; Web site: http://www.nagc.org/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academically Gifted</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expertise</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Specialists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regular and Special Education Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Referral</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Talent Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accreditation (Institutions)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Style</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Base for Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culturally Relevant Education</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Association for Gifted Children</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Council for Exceptional Children</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC), in collaboration with the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC), and the Association for the Gifted (CEC-TAG), has developed national standards for teacher preparation programs in gifted and talented education. Typically, these programs are at the masters level, but they may also be endorsement programs, or less frequently, teacher preparation programs at the undergraduate level. The programs develop expertise in gifted and talented education, which is needed in specialized programs for gifted students, and is also needed at the building and district level to coordinate programs and services. Gifted education specialists also collaborate with other educators to ensure that general education teachers are able to support advanced students in their classrooms and to refer students for further testing as part of the overall identification process. The standards are the basis for state standards in gifted education and are also used at the national level as part of the teacher preparation accreditation process. The 2013 standards include 7 standards and 28 individual elements. The previous standards were approved in 2006.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562612</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>NAGC-CEC Teacher Preparation Standards in Gifted and Talented Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Association for Gifted Children</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Association for Gifted Children. 1331 H Street NW Suite 1001, Washington, DC 20005. Tel: 202-785-4268; Fax: 202-785-4248; e-mail: nagc@nagc.org; Web site: http://www.nagc.org/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time to Degree</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Native Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Marini, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The current study examines the relationship between the SAT® College Readiness Benchmark with the outcome of graduation from college in either four or six years. The results indicate that the SAT benchmark is indeed differentiating between those students who graduate within four years and those who do not, as well as between those who graduate within six years and those who do not. The data were further disaggregated by student characteristics of gender, ethnicity, best spoken language, household income, and highest parental education. Even within student subgroups, differences in graduation rates for students who were college ready versus those who did not meet the SAT benchmark persisted. The results from the current study provide additional validity evidence for the use of the benchmark as a measure of college readiness and as a crucial tool in guiding educational interventions and policy that promote college success for all students.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562613</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Does College Readiness Translate to College Completion? Research Note 2013-9</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>25</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cutting Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culture Fair Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Barbuti, Sandra M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of the study is to examine the differential validity and prediction of the SAT using a nationally representative sample of first-year college students admitted with the revised version of the SAT. The findings demonstrate that there are similar patterns of differential validity and prediction by gender, race/ethnicity, and best language subgroups on the revised SAT compared with previous research on older versions of the test. The following are appended: (1) Uncorrected Correlations between SAT Scores and HSGPA and First-Year GPA by Subgroups; (2) Correlation of SAT Scores and HSGPA with FYGPA for American Indian Students at Different Minimum Cut Points; and (3) Average Overprediction (-) and Underprediction (+) of FYGPA for SAT Scores and HSGPA by Subgroups (Unstandardized Residuals).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562614</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Differential Validity and Prediction of the SAT®. Research Report No. 2008-4</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>17</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Gifted</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Identity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Specialists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Association for Gifted Children</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Council for Exceptional Children</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>After mastering initial standards for the preparation of teachers of the gifted, many educators in gifted education continue their professional growth toward mastery of advanced professional standards at the post baccalaureate levels. For some this means deepening their understandings and expertise and adding new responsibilities for leadership within the classroom. Regardless of the specific role, educators in advanced roles share an array of functions and responsibilities in common. Reflecting this commonality, the advanced standards in gifted education were developed by standards experts at the National Association for Gifted Children, the Council for Exceptional Children, and the Association for the Gifted. These content and teacher preparation experts conducted an extensive study of advanced teaching standards, including National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, state standards, knowledge and skill standards that are expected of all special educators in advanced roles, and standards used by the Council for Accreditation of Educator Preparation as part of the school/college of education accreditation process. The adopted advanced standards contain seven standards and 28 elements.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562615</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Advanced Standards in Gifted Education Teacher Preparation</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Association for Gifted Children</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Association for Gifted Children. 1331 H Street NW Suite 1001, Washington, DC 20005. Tel: 202-785-4268; Fax: 202-785-4248; e-mail: nagc@nagc.org; Web site: http://www.nagc.org/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scaling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Inflation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dual Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Honors Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined the relationship between students&apos; self-reported high school grade point average (HSGPA) from the SAT Questionnaire and their HSGPA provided by the colleges and universities they attend. The purpose of this research was to offer updated information on the relatedness of self-reported (by the student) and school-reported (by the college/university from the high school transcript) HSGPA, compare these results to prior studies, and provide recommendations on the use of self-reported HSGPA. Results from this study indicated that even though the correlation between the self-reported and school-reported HSGPA is slightly lower than in prior studies (r = 0.74), there is still a very strong relationship between the two measures. The following tables and figure are appended: (1) HSGPA Grading Scales Across Higher Education Institutions in the Study; (2) Recoding of School- and Self-Reported HSGPA; (3) Descriptive Statistics for the Academic Measures (N = 40,301); (4) Self-Reported Versus School-Reported HSGPA Accuracy: Correlations, Percentage of Exact HSGPA Match, Underreporting and Overreporting of HSGPA in Grade Steps by Race/Ethnicity, Parental Income, Parental Education Level and SAT Score Band; (5) Accuracy of Self-Reported HSGPA by HSGPA Value; (6) Percentage of Exactly Matching, Underreporting and Overreporting of HSGPA by Demographic Characteristics in the SAT Score Band; and (7) Self-Reported HSGPA Item on the SAT Questionnaire (2005-2006).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562616</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining the Accuracy of Self-Reported High School Grade Point Average. Research Report No. 2009-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>18</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nutrition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Departments of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compliance (Legal)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Food</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Association of State Boards of Education</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFK) requires the Secretary of Agriculture to establish standards for foods sold in schools other than those provided as part of the National School Lunch Program or School Breakfast Program. According to the HHFK, these standards are to be consistent with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and the development process should take into account existing state, local, and voluntary standards and the practical application of the standards. This Legislative Brief outlines the proposed standards that USDA published in the Federal Register on February 8, 2013. The proposed standards apply to: (1) All foods sold outside of the school meals programs; (2) The full school day (midnight before to 30 minutes after the end of the official school day); and (3) The entire school campus (all areas of the property under the jurisdiction of the school that are accessible to students).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562617</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Proposed Rule: Nutrition Standards for All Foods Sold in School. Legislative Brief 13-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Association of State Boards of Education</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>3</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Association of State Boards of Education. 2121 Crystal Drive Suite 350, Arlington, VA 22202. Tel: 703-684-4000; Fax: 703-836-2313; e-mail: boards@nasbe.org; Web site: http://www.nasbe.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://www.nasbe.org/wp-content/uploads/Legislative-Brief-Competitive-Foods-Standards1.pdf</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asian American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Egalite, Anna J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kisida, Brian</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Winters, Marcus A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Harvard University, Program on Education Policy and Governance</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Previous research suggests that there are academic benefits when students and teachers share the same race/ethnicity because such teachers can serve as role models, mentors, advocates, or cultural translators. In this paper, we obtain estimates of achievement changes as students are assigned to teachers of different races/ethnicities from grades 3 through 10 utilizing a large administrative dataset provided by the Florida Department of Education that follows the universe of test-taking students in Florida public schools from 2001-02 through 2008-09. We find small but significant positive effects when black and white students are assigned to race-congruent teachers in reading (0.004 to 0.005 standard deviations) and for black, white and Asian/Pacific Island students in math (0.007 to 0.041 standard deviations). We also examine the effects of race matching by students&apos; prior performance level, finding that lower-performing black and white students appear to particularly benefit from being assigned to a race-congruent teacher. An appendix provides a test of the authors&apos; hypothesis and supplemental tables.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562618</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Representation in the Classroom: The Effect of Own-Race Teacher Assignment on Student Achievement. Program on Education Policy and Governance Working Papers Series. PEPG 14-07</dc:title>
<dc:source>Program on Education Policy and Governance</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>37</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Program on Education Policy and Governance. Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, 79 John F. Kennedy Street, Taubman 304, Cambridge, MA 02138. Tel: 617-495-7976; Fax: 617-496-4428; e-mail: pepg@fas.harvard.edu; Web site: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/pepg</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>51</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Memory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metacognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Affective Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Delgado, Jane</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>SpringBoard is a comprehensive instructional program in English language arts and mathematics that reflects powerful, research-based understandings about how people learn. This report presents a model of learning based on cognitive science with particular attention to the role of memory and language. The instructional framework of strategic learning that follows from this model provides the basis for the SpringBoard program&apos;s incorporation of rigorous content and training in strategic activities and skills. Finally, the research base for the SpringBoard program is reviewed and summarized, first for the program overall and then for each set of strategies incorporated in the instructional design: reading, writing, oral proficiency, collaboration, and problem solving.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562619</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Engaging Strategies for All Students: The SpringBoard® Example. Research Notes. RN-23</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>65</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Engelhard, George, Jr.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wind, Stefanie A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chajewski, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Rasch Scaled Scores</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study is to illustrate the use of explanatory models based on Rasch measurement theory to detect systematic relationships between student and item characteristics and achievement differences using differential item functioning (DIF), differential group functioning (DGF), and differential person functioning (DPF) techniques. The major focus of the analyses in this study was to demonstrate a set of methodological techniques that can be used to better understand subgroup performance on a large-scale writing assessment, rather than to conduct bias or sensitivity reviews. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562620</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Differential Item and Person Functioning in Large-Scale Writing Assessments within the Context of the SAT®. Research Report 2013-6</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>50</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>57</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Documentaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Charter Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Levine, Arthur</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Swail, Watson Scott</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Opinion Papers</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Policy Institute</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>On March 21 2013, the &amp;quot;Educational Policy Institute&amp;quot; held the first day of the EPI Forum on Education &amp;amp; the Economy in Orlando, Florida. The Forum was designed to discuss critical issues related to the nexus of education and the workforce. This document presents the transcribed session that featured two of the authors of the Teachers College Press publication, &amp;quot;Finding Superman: Debating the Future of Public Schools in America&amp;quot; (2012). The book was a response to Davis Guggenheim&apos;s documentary, &amp;quot;Waiting for &amp;quot;Superman,&amp;quot;&amp;quot; released in 2010. Watson Scott Swail, President and CEO of the Educational Policy Institute, served as editor of the book and wrote the introductory chapter, &amp;quot;Finding Superman&amp;quot;. Arthur Levine, President of the Woodrow Wilson Foundation, wrote a chapter titled &amp;quot;The Potential Impact of Waiting for &amp;quot;Superman&amp;quot; on Schooling in America.&amp;quot; The Forum provided an opportunity to talk about their respective chapters and engage in an interesting conversation about education and international competition.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562621</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Finding Superman &amp;amp; Global Competitiveness: A Conversation with Arthur Levine &amp;amp; Watson Scott Swail. Policy Perspectives</dc:title>
<dc:source>Educational Policy Institute</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-08-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Educational Policy Institute. 6900 Wisconsin Avenue Suite 606, Bethesda, MD 20815. Tel: 202-657-5207; e-mail: info@educationalpolicy.org; Web site: http://www.educationalpolicy.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Vouchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immigrants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chingos, Matthew M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Peterson, Paul E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Harvard University, Program on Education Policy and Governance</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>We provide the first experimental estimates of the long-term impacts of a voucher to attend private school by linking data from a privately sponsored voucher initiative in New York City, which awarded the scholarships by lottery to low-income families, to administrative records on college enrollment and degree attainment. We find no significant effects on college enrollment or four-year degree attainment of the offer of a voucher. However, we find substantial, marginally significant impacts for minority students and large, significant impacts for the children of women born in the United States. Negative point estimates for the children of non-minority and foreign-born mothers are not statistically significant at conventional levels. The information needed to match students to administrative data on postsecondary outcomes was available for 99 percent of the sample. We find evidence of substantial bias due to attrition in the original evaluation, which relied on data collected at follow-up sessions.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562622</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Experimentally Estimated Impacts of School Vouchers on College Enrollment and Degree Attainment. Program on Education Policy and Governance Working Papers Series. PEPG 15-01</dc:title>
<dc:source>Program on Education Policy and Governance</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>William E. Simon Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Searle Freedom Trust</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>41</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Program on Education Policy and Governance. Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, 79 John F. Kennedy Street, Taubman 304, Cambridge, MA 02138. Tel: 617-495-7976; Fax: 617-496-4428; e-mail: pepg@fas.harvard.edu; Web site: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/pepg</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>29</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Mission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Community Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Community Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conference Papers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcome Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Swail, Watson Scott</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Europe</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Policy Institute</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This EPI Policy Perspectives covers a presentation given at the European University Association Annual Convention (March 20, 2009, in Prague, Czech Republic) that addresses the Bologna process in the European Union. The process raised many questions regarding the role of the university, and the entire tertiary/postsecondary system of education. The issues being discussed in the EU are not only pertinent in the European arena, but are living issues being debated around the world. Three questions of note were addressed by Watson Swail in his presentation: (1) What is the purpose of the university?; (2) What role does research play?; and (3) How does the institution interact with community and contribute to the local, regional, and global economy and society?</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562623</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Facing Global Challenges: A European University Perspective. Policy Perspectives</dc:title>
<dc:source>Educational Policy Institute</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-08-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Educational Policy Institute. 6900 Wisconsin Avenue Suite 606, Bethesda, MD 20815. Tel: 202-657-5207; e-mail: info@educationalpolicy.org; Web site: http://www.educationalpolicy.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developed Nations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Wages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Government Employees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hanushek, Eric A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Piopiunik, Marc</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiederhold, Simon</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Australia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Austria</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Belgium</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Canada</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Czech Republic</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Denmark</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Estonia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Finland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>France</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Germany</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Ireland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Italy</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Japan</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Korea</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Netherlands</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Norway</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Poland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Russia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Slovakia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Spain</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Sweden</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United Kingdom</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Australia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Austria</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Belgium</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Canada</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Czech Republic</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Denmark</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Estonia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Finland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>France</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Germany</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Ireland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Italy</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Japan</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Netherlands</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Norway</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Poland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Russia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Slovakia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Korea</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Spain</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Sweden</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United Kingdom</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Harvard University, Program on Education Policy and Governance</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Differences in teacher quality are commonly cited as a key determinant of the huge international student performance gaps. However, convincing evidence on this relationship is still lacking, in part because it is unclear how to measure teacher quality consistently across countries. We use unique international assessment data to investigate the role of teacher cognitive skills as one main dimension of teacher quality in explaining student outcomes. Our main identification strategy exploits exogenous variation in teacher cognitive skills attributable to international differences in relative wages of nonteacher public sector employees. Using student-level test score data, we find that teacher cognitive skills are an important determinant of international differences in student performance. Results are supported by fixed-effects estimation that uses within-country between-subject variation in teacher skills.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562624</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Value of Smarter Teachers: International Evidence on Teacher Cognitive Skills and Student Performance. Program on Education Policy and Governance Working Papers Series. PEPG 14-06</dc:title>
<dc:source>Program on Education Policy and Governance</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Fritz Thyssen Foundation (Germany)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>55</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Program on Education Policy and Governance. Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, 79 John F. Kennedy Street, Taubman 304, Cambridge, MA 02138. Tel: 617-495-7976; Fax: 617-496-4428; e-mail: pepg@fas.harvard.edu; Web site: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/pepg</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>43</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Attrition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Proprietary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Raisman, Neal</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Policy Institute</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report, an analysis of 1669 U.S. institutions, is a first-time study of the relationship of attrition to revenues lost in four-year public, private, and for-profit colleges and universities on an annual basis. The report is the result of a study investigating the financial impact of attrition on four-year colleges and universities. Other studies of attrition and graduation rates report on the number of students lost to attrition but do not deal with the effects of the attrition on the schools&apos; fiscal situation. Realizing that every student who attends a college or university represents direct revenue to the school through tuition paid directly to the school, or through a public formula that pays X number of dollars on a per student basis to the college or university, it appears apparent that when a student leaves the school the revenue received through tuition is lost either immediately or when the formulas are recalculated. Thus, a study of the relationship of attrition to dollars lost would indicate the effects of attrition on a school&apos;s revenues and thus its fiscal condition. The study is based on data collected from colleges and universities directly, through IPEDS, the Educational Trust, college and university websites and reporting, as well as the College Board &amp;quot;Annual Survey of Colleges 2010.&amp;quot;</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562625</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Cost of College Attrition at Four-Year Colleges &amp;amp; Universities. Policy Perspectives</dc:title>
<dc:source>Educational Policy Institute</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>269</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Educational Policy Institute. 6900 Wisconsin Avenue Suite 606, Bethesda, MD 20815. Tel: 202-657-5207; e-mail: info@educationalpolicy.org; Web site: http://www.educationalpolicy.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>National Competency Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pilot Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Word Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Text Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>White, Sheida</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, Young Yee</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chen, Jing</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Fei</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Center for Education Statistics (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined whether or not fourth-graders could fully demonstrate their writing skills on the computer and factors associated with their performance on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) computer-based writing assessment. The results suggest that high-performing fourth-graders (those who scored in the upper 20 percent in the computer- and paper-based writing assessments on the NAEP) write better on the computer than on paper and can fully demonstrate their writing proficiency in a computer-based assessment. There are, however, indications that low-performing fourth-graders (i.e., those in the bottom 20 percent) and middle-performing fourth-graders (representing the middle 60 percent) may have performed less well on the computer than on paper. This suggests a potential differential effect of writing on the computer on writing performance that might have contributed to the widened achievement gap between high- and non-high-performing (i.e., low- and middle-performing) students in the 2012 computer-based pilot assessment, compared to the 2010 paper-based pilot assessment. Unequal prior exposure to writing on the computer and preference for mode of writing (paper vs. computer) appear to be associated with this widening of the achievement gap. For example, about 94 percent of high-performing students in 2012 reported having access to the Internet at home, compared to about half (52 percent) of low-performing students. The score difference between those with access to the Internet at home and those without was substantive, with an effect size of 0.87. The statistics presented in this report are estimates based on a NAEP pilot assessment conducted with a nationally representative sample of 10,400 grade 4 students. As a pilot assessment, the sample was not adjusted to account for nonresponse bias. As a result, the sample may not completely represent the grade 4 population. The following are appended: (1) Exact text of questions in the 2012 NAEP Writing Contextual Questionnaires; (2) Tables; (3) Tables for Chapter 3; (3) Tables for Chapter 4; (4) Tables for Chapter 5; and (5) Figures. [The American Institutes for Research provided technical and editorial services.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562627</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Performance of Fourth-Grade Students in the 2012 NAEP Computer-Based Writing Pilot Assessment: Scores, Text Length, and Use of Editing Tools. Working Paper Series. NCES 2015-119</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Center for Education Statistics</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>150</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Center for Education Statistics. Available from: ED Pubs. P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398. Tel: 877-433-7827; Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link>http://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2015119</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Adult Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bullying</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grouping (Instructional Purposes)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Doctoral Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Group Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Informal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Historic Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Elufiede, Oluwakemi, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Flynn, Bonnie, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Collected Works - Proceedings</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Adult Higher Education Alliance (AHEA)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This document contains the proceedings of The Adult Higher Education Alliance 35th Annual Conference. The theme of the conference was Adult and Higher Education in the Contemporary World: Its Role In Cultural Literacy. The conference was held on March 10-11, 2015. The event was hosted by and held at the College of Education and Human Performance, Morgridge International Reading Center, University of Central Florida, in Orlando, Florida. Papers in these proceedings include: (1) Bullies in the Academy (Patricia Coberly-Holt and Caroline Braun); (2) Community Education: Cultural Diversity Exemplified through Collaborative Learning Activities in an Adult Peer-to-Peer Writing Group (Oluwakemi Elufiede and Tina Murray); (3) The Life, Death, and Rebirth of the Cohort (Bonnie Flynn and Robert Benway); (4) The Political Culture of Adult Education and the Doctorate (Tom Heaney and Wendy Yanow); (5) Establishing the Reliability of an Instrument to Measure Students&apos; Perception of Quality Service (Larchin Leslie, Mathias R. Vairez, Jr., and Tremaine Leslie); (6) Writing Groups: A Recipe for Successful Scholarly Writing (Marilyn Lockhart); and (7) Public Pedagogy of a Victoria Brothel: An Informal Learning Case Study (Margaret A. Voelkel and Rosa M. Henehan). Sections about the authors and the purpose of the Adult Higher Education Alliance are also included. (Individual papers contain references.)</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562628</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Proceedings of the Adult Higher Education Alliance Annual Conference (35th, Orlando, Florida, March 10-11, 2015)</dc:title>
<dc:source>Adult Higher Education Alliance</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>67</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Adult Higher Education Alliance. P.O. Box 2093, Minneola, FL 34755. Tel: 407-673-3773; e-mail: AHEA.Main.Email@gmail.com; Web site: http://www.ahea.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance Based Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Parsi, Ace</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Darling-Hammond, Linda</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Association of State Boards of Education</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education (SCOPE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Employers, postsecondary institutions, and civic leaders are urging greater focus on 21st century skills essential for college, career, and civic success: problem solving, interpersonal skills, and collaboration, among others. In response to these demands, states across the country are working to realign policies--on learning standards, assessments, and human capital strategies--to set a new course for their state education systems. Many states are reconsidering their assessment strategies and asking whether existing assessments are designed to be the barometer, resource, and engine for learning necessary to support the new demands on students. To address gaps in existing assessments, many states are considering the role of performance assessments--assessments that require students to craft solutions to problems by constructing an answer, producing a product, or performing an activity rather than selecting from a list of multiple-choice answers--within their statewide assessment strategies. By requiring students to complete multifaceted tasks, these assessments can better support 21st century learning. This report is intended to familiarize state boards of education with performance assessments and help state board members and other policymakers address some of the thorniest issues around these assessments: purpose, sustainability, reliability, accountability, policy alignment, equity, professional practice, and implementation. The report ends with a set of discussion questions so that each state can begin to analyze barriers and opportunities toward effective implementation of these assessments.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562629</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Performance Assessments: How State Policy Can Advance Assessments for 21st Century Learning. White Paper</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Association of State Boards of Education</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>William and Flora Hewlett Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Policymakers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>18</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Association of State Boards of Education. 2121 Crystal Drive Suite 350, Arlington, VA 22202. Tel: 703-684-4000; Fax: 703-836-2313; e-mail: boards@nasbe.org; Web site: http://www.nasbe.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://www.nasbe.org/wp-content/uploads/Parsi-LDH-Performance-Assessment_Jan2015.pdf</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKillip, Mary E. M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mackey, Philip E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report shows college enrollment and graduation trends among Latino SAT® takers who finished high school in 2004 and 2010 by various student characteristics including aspirations, self-perceived ability, and academic achievements. In every case, students in the top categories (high aspirations, high perceived ability, high assessed ability) were the most likely to enroll in four-year colleges within one year after graduating from high school in 2004 and in 2010. Students in these top categories among the 2004 cohort were also more likely to have graduated from a four-year college six years later. We found patterns seen previously in research: Females and students whose parents went to college tended to have more positive college outcomes. Additionally, we found an increase in SAT participation, Advanced Placement Program® (AP®) participation, two-year college enrollment, and an increase in students with high aspirations and self-perceived ability. These positive trends, combined with the finding that relationships between student characteristics and college enrollment in 2010 were quite similar to the relationships seen in 2004, suggest that an increased number of Latino students may graduate with college degrees in the coming years. We also find an increased proportion of Latino SAT takers who report bilingualism, suggesting that we may see an increased number of college graduates who are bilingual in the coming years as well.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562630</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>College Access and Success among High School Graduates Taking the SAT®: Latino Students. Research Note 2013-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Feasibility Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Use Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Advising</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Counseling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stricker, Lawrence J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rock, Donald A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burton, Nancy W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study appraised the validity of SAT scores, in combination with grades in high school courses and the number and difficulty level of these courses, in predicting college grades in various fields of study, with the objective of providing SAT takers with predictions of their academic performance in different fields for guidance purposes. The possible impact of this feedback on the flow of students into specific major fields was also assessed. Data on an entering class at a large state university provided the basis for the study. The SAT and collateral variables were able to predict college grades in different academic areas by taking into account marked variations in grade distributions among fields of study. These predictions could be potentially useful in academic guidance. Students&apos; predicted grades in the various fields and their intended majors were unrelated. Most students received their highest predicted grades in the humanities, although few intended to major in this area. Hence, such feedback would probably stimulate students to take courses or major in the humanities. Table A-1--Standardized Regression Coefficients for Predicting Actual and Imputed GPAs for Three Fields of Study--is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562631</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Feasibility of Using the SAT® in Academic Guidance. Report No. 95-1. ETS RR No. 95-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1995-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>30</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Style</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Word Problems (Mathematics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Format</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Aptitude</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Katz, Irvin R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Friedman, Debra E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bennett, Randy Elliot</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Berger, Aliza E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New Jersey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Jersey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study investigated the strategies subjects adopted to solve STEM-equivalent SAT-Mathematics (SAT-M) word problems in constructed-response (CR) and multiple-choice (MC) formats. Parallel test forms of CR and MC items were administered to subjects representing a range of mathematical abilities. Format-related differences in difficulty were more prominent at the item level than for the test as a whole. At the item level, analyses of subjects&apos; problem-solving processes appeared to explain differences as well as similarities. Although there may be good reasons for using constructed-response items in large-scale testing programs, multiple-choice questions of the sort studied here should provide measurement that is generally comparable to stem-equivalent constructed-response items. An appendix presents &amp;quot;Item Stems and Multiple-Choice Options for Each Item Pair.&amp;quot;</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562632</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Differences in Strategies Used to Solve STEM-Equivalent Constructed-Response and Multiple-Choice SAT®-Mathematics Items. Report No. 95-3. ETS RR No. 96-20</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1996-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>23</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>19</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKillip, Mary E. M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mackey, Philip E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report shows college enrollment and graduation trends among African American SAT® takers who finished high school in 2004 and 2010 by various student characteristics, including aspirations, self-perceived ability, and academic achievements. In every case, students in the top categories were the most likely to enroll in four-year colleges within one year after graduating from high school in 2004 and in 2010. Students in these top categories among the 2004 cohort were also more likely to graduate from a four-year college six years later. Also, African American females and students whose parents went to college tended to be more likely to enroll and graduate from college, although we did see increases in the proportion of males participating in the SAT as well as increases in examinees whose parents had a college degree. Additionally, we found an increase in SAT participation, Advanced Placement Program® (AP®) participation, two-year college enrollment, and an increase in SAT takers with high aspirations and self-perceived ability. These positive trends, combined with the finding that relationships between student characteristics and college enrollment in 2010 were often quite similar to the relationships seen in 2004, suggest that an increased number of African American students may graduate with college degrees in the coming years.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562633</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>College Access and Success among High School Graduates Taking the SAT®: African American Students. Research Note 2013-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interrater Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admissions Officers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Milewski, Glenn B.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In order for individualized review in college admissions to be fair, issues of consistency and reliability must be considered. There are a number of ways to assess interrater reliability, including calculating the composite reliability of readers, computing the proportion of times that readers make consistent ratings, and evaluating reader severity.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562634</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Consistency and Reliability in the Individualized Review of College Applicants. Research Notes. RN-20</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2004-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Biological Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Genetics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Aptitude</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sex Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sex Stereotypes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socialization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Neurological Organization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Neuropsychology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wilder, Gita Z.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report offers a broad overview of the three major categories of explanations of gender patterns in cognitive functioning. Two of the major categories are biological and psychosocial. The third category, explanations that have been attributed to differences in the educational experiences of men and women, is treated separately because while such explanations are most appropriately considered a subset of psychosocial factors, they have special significance in the context of assessing cognitive ability.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562635</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Correlates of Gender Differences in Cognitive Functioning. Report No. 96-03</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1996-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>31</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>212</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scaling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equated Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dorans, Neil J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Distinctions were made between three classes of statistical linkage: equivalence, concordance, and prediction. These distinctions were based on rational content considerations and empirical statistical relationships. A large database involving SAT I and ACT scores was used to determine which type of linkage was best suited for different scores and composite scores.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562636</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Distinctions among Classes of Linkages. Research Notes. RN-11</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2000-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_cited>ED565632</eric:ies_cited>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Group Membership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Definitions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cluster Grouping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiracial Persons</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wendler, Cathy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Feigenbaum, Miriam</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Escandón, Mérida</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Student Descriptive Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Student Descriptive Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The SAT Program undertook two studies aimed at evaluating the impact of allowing students to indicate more than one ethnic/racial category. Results of this study indicated that there is little impact on DIF [differential item functioning] analyses when different definitions of ethnic/racial classifications are used compared to traditionally defined classifications. Until the percentage of students representing multiple ethnic/racial categories increases, it is unlikely that current testing practices need to be modified.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562637</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Defining Group Membership: The Impact of Multiple versus Single Ethnic/Racial Categories on Testing Practices. Research Notes. RN-13</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2001-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent School Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Community Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Parsi, Ace</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Delaware</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Kentucky</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Kansas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>West Virginia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Connecticut</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Maryland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Connecticut</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Delaware</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Kansas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Kentucky</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Maryland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>West Virginia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Association of State Boards of Education</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Education is a $600 billion-a-year enterprise, but the investments states make in education will not benefit students unless they are physically and mentally present in the classroom. Too many students are not. In this report, the National Association of State Boards of Education asks policymakers to promote student engagement through a suite of policy changes. The report explores the behavioral, emotional, and cognitive dimensions of student engagement and the role peers, educators, school environments, parents and communities play in helping students become invested in their own learning. The report finds that an educational system that more meaningfully engages students will require state policymakers to act. Five policy actions are recommended: (1) Promote measures of educational success that emphasize student engagement; (2) Back an educator preparation, learning, and support continuum that empowers school leaders, teachers, and other staff to facilitate more engaging experiences for students; (3) Advance school climate guidelines that build an environment more conducive to student engagement; (4) Invest in school structures that help personalize student learning and thereby expand student engagement; and (5) Encourage collaboration between schools, parents and other community stakeholders to address students&apos; comprehensive needs. Several states have made great progress toward these goals: Illinois routinely gathers student feedback on school learning conditions and climate, while Maryland is developing a statewide measurement system to assess school safety and student engagement. North Carolina and Delaware have established professional learning communities that foster teacher collaboration. Kansas has made headway on developing social, emotional and character development standards. Kentucky and others have invested in personalized learning strategies, and West Virginia and Connecticut seek out constructive community partnerships and have established structures for more open communications. An appendix provides video links.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562639</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A State of Engagement: NASBE Study Group on Student Engagement</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Association of State Boards of Education</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>32</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Association of State Boards of Education. 2121 Crystal Drive Suite 350, Arlington, VA 22202. Tel: 703-684-4000; Fax: 703-836-2313; e-mail: boards@nasbe.org; Web site: http://www.nasbe.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://www.nasbe.org/wp-content/uploads/StudentEngagementStudyGroupReport_March-2015_FINAL1.pdf</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fatigue (Biology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Environmental Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Timed Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ackerman, Phillip L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kanfer, Ruth</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wolman, Stacey D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The current study was designed to examine performance effects and fatigue effects associated with different total SAT testing times. In addition, the researchers examined personality, motivation, and other determinants of individual differences in examinee fatigue before, during, and after testing.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562640</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of Total SAT® Test Time on Performance and Fatigue. Research Notes. RN-37</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Format</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equated Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Formulas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Interpretation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lawrence, Ida M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schmidt, Amy Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The SAT® I: Reasoning Test is administered seven times a year. Primarily for security purposes, several different test forms are given at each administration. How is it possible to compare scores obtained from different test forms and from different test administrations? The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the statistical procedures used to produce comparable scores on different forms of the SAT I.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562641</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Ensuring Comparable Scores on the SAT® I: Reasoning Test. Research Notes. RN-14</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2001-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Data</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Milewski, Glenn B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In recent years, conflicting reports have circulated about the number of colleges and universities that have made standardized tests optional, rather than required, for admission. The National Center for Fair and Open Testing, or FairTest, has widely publicized a list of 391 colleges and universities that, it claims, do not require admissions tests for admitting substantial numbers of students into bachelor degree programs. In this study, the number of such institutions are reanalyzed by examining colleges and universities that have SAT or ACT optional policies for making admissions decisions. Additionally, the characteristics of institutions on the FairTest list--including the type of institutions and the competitiveness of their admissions policies--are compared with all four-year U.S. colleges.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562642</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Colleges and Universities That Do Not Require SAT® or ACT Scores. Research Notes. RN-18</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-09-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Timed Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 11</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bridgeman, Brent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cline, Frederick</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 11</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study took an experimental approach to evaluating test speededness. In order to assess the benefits of extra time (or the penalty of strict time limits) on new SAT scores, sections that were designed to be administered with a 25-minute time limit were administered with a 40-minute time limit (or slightly more than time and a half) as part of the SAT field trial that was administered to thousands of eleventh-grade students in the spring of 2003.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562643</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of Extra Time on Performance on New SAT® Questions. Research Notes. RN-33. ETS RM-07-02</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-08-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cohort Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKillip, Mary E. M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mackey, Philip E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report shows college enrollment and graduation trends among Native American SAT® takers who finished high school in 2004 and 2010 by various student characteristics, including aspirations, self-perceived ability, and academic achievements. In every case, students in the top categories (high aspirations, high perceived ability, high assessed ability) were the most likely to enroll in four-year colleges within one year after graduating from high school in 2004 and in 2010. Students in these top categories among the 2004 cohort were also more likely to graduate from a four-year college six years later. We found patterns seen in previous research: Female students and students whose parents went to college tended to have more positive college outcomes. Additionally, we found some positive trends among Native American SAT takers when comparing 2004 with 2010: increases in Advanced Placement Program® (AP®) participation and scores of 3 or higher, in four-year college enrollment, and in the number of students whose parents have college degrees. These positive trends, combined with the finding that relationships between student characteristics and college enrollment in 2010 were often quite similar to the relationships seen in 2004, suggest that an increased number of Native American students may graduate with college degrees in the coming years.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562645</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>College Access and Success among High School Graduates Taking the SAT®: Native American Students. Research Note 2013-4</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asian American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKillip, Mary E. M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mackey, Philip E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report shows college enrollment and graduation trends among Asian American SAT® takers who finished high school in 2004 and 2010 by student characteristics, including aspirations, self-perceived ability, and academic achievements. In every case, students in the top categories (high aspirations, high-perceived ability, high-assessed ability) were the most likely to enroll in four-year colleges within one year after graduating high school in 2004 and in 2010. Students in these top categories among the 2004 cohort were also more likely to graduate from a four-year college six years later. We find positive trends among Asian American SAT takers when comparing 2004 to 2010. Asian American students participated at a high rate on the SAT and AP® in both years, with increases from 2004 to 2010 in these participation rates as well as in the proportion of students scoring a 3 or higher on an AP Exam. Asian American SAT takers have high and stable college enrollment rates, and we found an increase among SAT takers in students with high aspirations and self-perceived ability. These positive trends, combined with the finding that relationships between student characteristics and college enrollment in 2010 were often quite similar to the relationships seen in 2004, suggest that an increased number of Asian American students may be graduating with college degrees in the coming years. We also find an increased proportion of Asian American SAT takers who report bilingualism, suggesting that we may see an increased number of college graduates who are bilingual in the coming years as well.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562646</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>College Access and Success among High School Graduates Taking the SAT®: Asian American Students. Research Note 2013-8</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Marini, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Study evaluated the predictive validity of various operationalizations of AP® Exam and course information that could be used to make college admission decisions. The incremental validity of different AP variables, above and beyond traditional admission measures such as SAT® and high school grade point average (HSGPA), in predicting first-year grade point average (FYGPA) was also explored. The AP variables examined included the following: the number of AP Exams a student took, the number of AP Exams a student took on which he or she received a score of 3 or higher, the proportion of the number of AP Exams the student took in relation to the number of AP courses offered at his or her high school, his or her average AP score, followed by the number of AP scores the student received that were greater than or equal to 3. With regard to the incremental validity of the different AP predictors above and beyond HSGPA and SAT scores to predict FYGPA, we found that the AP Average score variable produced the greater increment. This report discusses the practical implications of these results in using AP information, in addition to traditional admission measures to improve admission decisions. The following are appended: (1) Descriptive Statistics of Study Variables; (2) Subgroup Differences by AP Measures; (3) Raw and Corrected Correlations between Predictors and FYGPA; (4) Incremental Validity of AP Measures above and beyond SAT and HSGPA to Predict FYGPA; (5) Scatterplots of mean FYGPA by the six AP variables; and (6) Mean FYGPA by AP Average Score for all students with a HSGPA = 4.00 and SAT CR+M+W = 1800.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562647</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Considering Practical Uses of Advanced Placement® Information in College Admission. Research Note 2014-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>48</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizenship Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Counseling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schmitt, Neal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Billington, Abigail</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Keeney, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reeder, Matthew</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pleskac, Timothy J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sinha, Ruchi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zorzie, Mark</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Noncognitive attributes as the researchers have measured them do correlate with college GPA, but the incremental validity associated with these measures is relatively small. The noncognitive measures are correlated with other valued dimensions of student performance beyond the achievement reflected in college grades. There were much smaller differences between males and females and ethnic subgroups compared to the differences displayed by cognitive predictors; use of a battery of admission tools that includes both sets or measures will usually result in a more demographically diverse student body at little or no decrement in average student performance. The following are appended: (1) Conceptual Definitions of Student Performance Dimensions Represented in the Biodata Scales, the SJT and the Self-Rating BARS Instrument; (2) Means, Standard Deviations and Intercorrelations between Measures of the Biodata Dimensions and SJI; (3) Comparison of Applicants to Incumbent Students in Previous Data Collection; (4) Correlations between Predictor and Outcome Variables (Combined Meta-analytically) in the 2004 and 2007 Samples and the Intercorrelations between the Outcomes; (5) Incremental Validity of Biodata and SJT: Hierarchical Regression Results; (6) Meta-analytic Findings for Subgroup Differences from Three Samples; (7) Demographic Composition: Percent of Ethnic Subgroups Admitted under Various Levels of Selectivity Using Composites of Cognitive or Both Cognitive and Noncognitive Measures; (8) Means and Standard Deviations of the Clusters on Attitudinal, Behavioral and Performance Outcomes; and (9) Profile of cognitive and noncognitive dimensions for the five clusters of students.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562648</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Development and Validation of Measures of Noncognitive College Student Potential. Research Report 2011-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>44</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>64</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Individual Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equated Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Norm Referenced Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schneider, Dianne</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dorans, Neil</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper describes how results on the ACT and SAT I can be compared through statistical linking procedures.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562649</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Concordance between SAT® I and ACT™ Scores for Individual Students. Research Notes. RN-07</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1999-06-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Talent Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cohort Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wendler, Cathy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ninneman, Anne</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Feigenbaum, Miriam</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The SAT is designed to measure the verbal and math reasoning abilities of high school juniors and seniors. These abilities develop over a long period of time and are independent of a particular school curriculum. The performance of seventh and eighth graders on the SAT is amazing, especially when considering their age. Although these students do, on average, perform slightly less well than students belonging to the group for whom the test is designed, many of them score as well as, or better than, many high school students. The use of the SAT by talent identification programs does not seem to penalize students who choose to take the test. For many talent identification programs, the SAT provides an additional mechanism to identify, guide, and reward young students who have exceptional academic talent.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562650</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluating the Appropriateness of the SAT® I: Reasoning Test for Seventh and Eighth Graders. Research Notes. RN-12</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2001-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ability Grouping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grouping (Instructional Purposes)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transfer Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Utilization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ozmusul, Mustafa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baskan, Gulsun Atanur</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this study, the question &amp;quot;According to PISA 2009 data, what is the situation of the school policies and practices at upper secondary schools in Turkey?&amp;quot; was answered. Study group included 150 principals at upper secondary schools, which were taken into PISA 2009 Turkey sample. The data related to school policies and practices used in this study were derived from OECD database of which were the responses of school principals to the questions placed in the part F of the PISA 2009 school questionnaire. The dimensions of study are as follows: The considered factors in admitting students to school; grouping students; the reasons for transferring students; using assessment of student data in declaration/transparency and monitoring-developing; the methods for monitoring the practice of teachers; using assessment of student data in evaluation of teachers&apos; and principal&apos;s performance. Using data from the PISA 2009, the findings suggest that equity is not taken sufficiently into account for school policies and practices, and administrative accountability is used predominantly rather than professional accountability.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562651</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>School Policies and Practices at Upper Secondary Schools in Turkey According to PISA 2009 Data</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) v3 n4 p186-199 Dec 2013</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-12-01</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>72</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>American Indian Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Location</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Apthorp, Helen S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>South Dakota</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>North Dakota</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wyoming</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Kansas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Colorado</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Nebraska</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Missouri</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Colorado</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Kansas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Missouri</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Nebraska</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Dakota</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Dakota</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wyoming</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory Central (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Marzano Research Laboratory</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report provides descriptive information about the location and native language use of schools in the REL Central Region with high enrollment of American Indian students, whether Bureau of Indian Education schools or non-Bureau of Indian Education high-density American Indian schools (schools with 25 percent or more American Indian student enrollment). Of the 208 schools with high American Indian student enrollment (33 BIE and 173 HDAI schools), 83% are located in the region&apos;s rural areas. The schools located in counties with the highest concentration of Native North American language speakers are in South Dakota, Wyoming, and Colorado.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562652</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Where American Indian Students Go to School: Enrollment in Seven Central Region States. REL 2016-113</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory Central</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Policymakers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Practitioners</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Researchers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory Central. Available from: Institute of Education Sciences. 555 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20208. Tel: 800-872-5327; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>24</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES12C0007</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=4493</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Format</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harlacher, Jason</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Guides - Non-Classroom</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory Central (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Marzano Research Laboratory</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Educators have many decisions to make and it&apos;s important that they have the right data to inform those decisions and access to questionnaires that can gather that data. This guide, developed by REL Central and based on work done through separate projects with the Wyoming Office of Public Instruction and the Nebraska Department of Education, provides educators with a process for developing questionnaires. Principals, superintendents, state-level personnel, or other school or district personnel can use this guide when they need to make a decision about an education policy or practice but (1) lack the information needed to make that decision and (2) lack a preexisting questionnaire that can be used to gather the information. This guide can help these educators collect information about attitudes, perceptions, or factual information to inform their decisions.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562653</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Educator&apos;s Guide to Questionnaire Development. REL 2016-108</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory Central</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Administrators</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory Central. Available from: Institute of Education Sciences. 555 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20208. Tel: 800-872-5327; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES12C0007</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=4496</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scaling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equated Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Process Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dorans, Neil J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Correspondences between ACT[superscript TM] and SAT[superscript R] I scores are presented from a conceptual framework that distinguishes among three kinds of correspondences, namely, equating, scaling, and prediction. Construct similarity plays an important role in determining the nature and degree of correspondence that can be achieved. This report also maintains that statistical indices in conjunction with rational considerations are needed to determine whether the highest level of correspondence attainable between scores from two admission tests is the conceptual and statistical exchangeability sought by equating, the distributional similarity achieved by scaling, or the association attained by prediction. Relationships among the different scales of the ACT and SAT I are described in the context of the conceptual framework developed herein. Sums of scores, composites of scores, and individual scores are examined. Different types of correspondences between different sets of scores from these two admission tests are amenable to different interpretations.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562654</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Correspondences between ACT[superscript TM] and SAT[superscript R] I Scores. College Board Report No. 99-1. ETS RR No. 99-2</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1999-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Portfolio Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fercsey, Andrea</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Luna, Carmen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ponte, Eva</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Aliaga, Pablo</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Portfolios are one of the assessment tools used in Pacesetter® Spanish. In Phase I of this study, conducted in 1995-96, a first attempt was made to develop a standardized portfolio assessment system. As part of this system, a set of guidelines and an assessment matrix were prepared. In Phase II of our research, in consultation with participating teachers, a revised set of guidelines and a revised assessment matrix were distributed to all schools implementing the Pacesetter Spanish course in 1997. A new set of benchmark portfolios was identified, and a set of sample portfolios was prepared for use in subsequent professional development sessions for Pacesetter Spanish teachers. In general, the results of our findings are encouraging. Initiating national and/or regional portfolio scoring sessions would greatly enhance the validity and reliability of the portfolio component as an integral part of the Pacesetter Spanish program. The following are appended: (1) Draft Cover Sheet: Pacesetter Spanish Portfolio Assessment; (2) Assessment Matrix; (3) Student Scoring Sheet Form; (4) Portfolio Score Tables; (5) Transcription of Comments Written in Scoring Sheets; (6) Preparation for Portfolio Assessment Scoring Sessions; (7) Cover Sheet: Pacesetter Spanish Portfolio Assessment; (8) Scoring Rubrics for Each Aspect of the Portfolio Assessment System; and (9) Rater Comments about Rubrics and Portfolios.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562655</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Developing a Portfolio Assessment: Pacesetter® Spanish. Report No. 99-2</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1999-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>99</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>23</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Stratification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Class Rank</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Medical Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Competency Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Law Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schmidt, Amy Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Graduate Record Examinations</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Graduate Management Admission Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Medical College Admission Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Law School Admission Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Graduate Management Admission Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Graduate Record Examinations</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Law School Admission Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Medical College Admission Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Group differences among ethnic and racial groups on a series of educational measures and outcomes are examined. African-American and Hispanic students perform substantially lower than white and Asian students on the SAT I. These substantial differences also exist on a variety of other admissions tests used for undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs. Similar differences are found on national testing programs such as NAEP and NELS, as well as on a variety of performance assessments. These results are consistent with differences in high school grades, the rigor and intensity of high school curriculum, college performance, and graduation among these groups. Differences in socioeconomic status (e.g., parental education and family income) are examined across these measures within and across ethnic and racial groups, and account for a large portion of the group differences found across these educational measures and outcomes. The report provides a comparison of group differences across a variety of measures and discusses the impact of social stratification and academic preparation on these differences. An appendix contains additional tables and figures.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562656</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Group Differences in Standardized Testing and Social Stratification. Report No. 99-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1999-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>21</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>43</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Timed Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Graduate Record Examinations</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Test of English as a Foreign Language</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Graduate Record Examinations</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Test of English as a Foreign Language</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Previous research on differences in the reliability, validity, and difficulty of essay tests given under different timing conditions has indicated that giving examinees more time to complete an essay may raise their scores to a certain extent, but does not change the meaning of those scores, or the rank ordering of students. There is no evidence suggesting that giving less time to complete an essay advantages or disadvantages any particular ethnic or language sub-group, or ability level.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562657</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Comparing Essays Written under Different Timing Conditions. Research Summary. RS-08</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2003-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>3</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Interpretation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bachelors Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research describes data on college persistence, educational attainment, and remediation, and explains the difficulty in interpreting this data.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562658</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>College Persistence, Graduation, and Remediation. Research Summary. RS-09</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2003-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Formulas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>To obtain information on current high school grading policies, additional questions were included on the College Board&apos;s High School Profile in 1997. Results of the survey provide insight into the following grading policies across high schools: a large majority of schools (91 percent) use the traditional grading system A-F, or numeric grades; 92.2 percent use the same grading system for all academic courses; 90.1 percent report GPA; and 81.3 percent calculate a high school class rank. However, even with the high agreement on these general grading practices, a substantial number and proportion of schools (between 8 and 19 percent) do vary from the majority on one or more of these standard grading issues, which raises a number of concerns regarding the comparability of grading practices, and the comparability of grades, across schools and districts.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562659</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>High School Grading Policies. Research Notes. RN-04</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1998-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tutorial Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Powers, Donald E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The relationship between coaching and subsequent performance on the SAT I is a complex issue. Overall, anecdotal reports from one or two students and even studies that gauge the effects of coaching by examining the score gains for students who have enrolled in these programs are highly misleading and will not present an accurate picture of the true effects of coaching. Collectively, these studies indicate that coaching does have some benefit. However, though consistent, the effect is small. A typical student enrolling in a formal test preparation program can expect a total score gain of between 25 to 32 total points on the verbal and math sections beyond what they could expect to gain without attending such a program.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562660</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Coaching and the SAT® I. Research Notes. RN-06</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1999-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asian American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature Reviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Young, John W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research report is a review and analysis of all of the published studies during the past 25+ years (since 1974) in the area of differential validity/prediction and college admission testing. More specifically, this report includes 49 separate studies of differences in validity and/or prediction for different racial/ethnic groups and/or for men and women. All of the studies that were reviewed originated as journal articles, book chapters, conference papers, or research/technical reports. The breadth of studies range from single-institution studies based on a single cohort of several hundred students to large-scale compilations of results across hundreds of institutions that included several thousand students in all. The typical research design in these studies used first-year grade point average (FGPA) as the criterion and test scores (usually SAT® scores) and high school grades as predictor variables in a multiple regression analysis. Correlation coefficients were also usually reported as evidence of predictive validity. The main contribution of this report is contained in sections 3 and 4 with a focus on racial/ethnic differences and on sex differences, respectively. With regard to racial/ethnic differences, the minority groups that have been studied include Asian Americans, blacks/African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Some studies used a combined sample of minority students that was usually composed primarily of African American and Hispanic students. Overall, there was no common pattern to the results for validity and prediction for the different minority groups. Correlations between predictors and criterion were different for each minority group with generally lower values (for both blacks/African Americans and Hispanics) or similar values (for Asian Americans) when compared to whites. Too few studies of Native Americans or of combined samples of minority students are available to reliably determine typical validity coefficients for these groups. In terms of grade prediction, the common finding was one of over-prediction of college grades for all of the minority groups (except for Asian Americans), although the magnitude differed for each group. With Asian American students, studies that employed grade adjustment methods found that under-prediction of grades occurred. With respect to sex differences, the correlations between predictors and criterion were generally higher for women than for men. In terms of prediction, the typical finding in these studies was that women&apos;s college grades were under-predicted. However, in the most selective universities, the correlations for men and women appear to be equal, while the degree of under-prediction for women&apos;s grades appears to be somewhat less than in other institutions. Compared to earlier research on this topic, sex differences in validity and prediction appear to have persisted, although the magnitude of the differences seems to have lessened. The concluding section of the report provides a summary of the results, states several conclusions that can be drawn from the research reviewed, and postulates a number of different avenues for further research on differential validity/prediction that could yield useful additional information on this important and timely topic. Descriptions of Studies Cited in Sections 3 and 4 are appended. [This report was written with the assistance of Jennifer L. Kobrin. A list of Differential Validity/Prediction Studies Cited in Sections 3 and 4 is included.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562661</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Differential Validity, Differential Prediction, and College Admission Testing: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis. Research Report No. 2001-6</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2001-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>50</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>128</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reflection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web 2.0 Technologies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Portfolios (Background Materials)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Oriented Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Documentation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Abdullah, Mohamed</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The study aims to investigate are using Web 2.0 applications promoting reflective thinking skills for higher education student in faculty for education. Although the literature reveals that technology integration is a trend in higher education and researchers and educators have increasingly shared their ideas and examples of implementations of Web 2.0 applications in educational domains, few studies have focused on what happened in the mind when we use Web 2.0 applications as effective teaching and learning tools. This study focused on the impact of the use of Web 2.0 (Google Application) (sites applications, drive, Picasa) through the production of (web folio) on the internet and studies the relationship between creating web portfolio and reflective thinking skills. Results show that the students have improved their skills in reflective thinking. The following are appended: (1) the Questionnaire for Reflective Thinking; and (2) The wording of items within each scale.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562662</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Promoting Reflective Thinking Skills by Using Web 2.0 Application</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>16</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>201025553779</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Public School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Teacher Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Scholastic Inc.</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This third edition of &amp;quot;Primary Sources&amp;quot; represents a joint project of Scholastic and the Bill &amp;amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. It reports the views of more than 20,000 public school teachers on important issues related to their profession. Fielded in July 2013, the survey asks teachers about their motivation, new learning standards, teacher evaluations, how they collaborate within and beyond school walls and how they are using technology. The goal of &amp;quot;Primary Sources&amp;quot; is to place teachers&apos; voices at the center of the conversation on education by sharing their thoughts and opinions with policymakers, the media, the field of education and the public. This year&apos;s report seeks to: (1) Showcase the daily work and challenges of teachers in an era of change and provide insights into their perspectives on their work, craft and students; (2) Explore teachers&apos; views on the Common Core State Standards; (3) Identify how teacher evaluations can be most helpful to teachers&apos; growth and practice as evaluation systems evolve; and (4) Display how teachers seek to connect with peers, parents and communities to ensure student success. As was the case with the previous two editions of &amp;quot;Primary Sources&amp;quot; (2009, 2011), the results of this survey demonstrate teachers&apos; commitment to student success. A key finding from this research is the strong correlation between teachers&apos; job satisfaction and feeling that their voices are heard. This report is offered as a resource to bring teachers&apos; voices directly to administrators, district leaders, union leaders, legislators, parents and education advocates. Two appendices are included: (1) Full Survey Results; and (2) Common Core State Standards Data By Total in CCSS Adoption States, Grade Level and Subjects Taught. [For a 2014 update to this report, see ED562670.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562664</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Primary Sources: America&apos;s Teachers on Teaching in an Era of Change. Third Edition</dc:title>
<dc:source>Scholastic Inc. and the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>216</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Scholastic Inc. and the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. 557 Broadway, New York, NY 10012. Tel: 212-343-6857; Fax: 212-343-4913; Web site: http://www.scholastic.com/primarysources</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effective Schools Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cutting Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Niu, Sunny</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Li, Jun</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Merriman, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Matos-Elefonte, Haifa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this study, we compare SpringBoard® (SB) schools that had continuously used the SB English Language Arts (ELA) curriculum for at least three years with comparable non-SB schools. For high schools, the outcomes examined were school-level AP® participation and performance for a) all AP subjects, b) ELA and social science AP subjects, and c) ELA only subjects. AP performance was defined as the percentage of students among graduating seniors scoring 3 or higher in at least one AP Exam. We report comparison results for all students in schools, and for three subgroups--black, Hispanic, and first-generation college-going students. For middle schools, the outcome examined was school-level FCAT reading scores among eighth-graders.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562665</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Florida SpringBoard® Schools Efficacy Study. Statistical Report 2015-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflective Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Microteaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lesson Plans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journal Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Töman, Ufuk</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Odabasi Çimer, Sabiha</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Çimer, Atilla</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-1309-6249</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this study, we investigate of science and technology pre-service teachers&apos; opinions about the methods developed reflective thinking and we determined at the level of reflective thinking. This study is a descriptive study. Open-ended questions were used to determine the views of pre-service teachers. Questions used in the statistical analysis of data for obtained student&apos;s through. Solution to the problems encountered in practice as a method for the production of research so descriptive research approaches used in the survey method. This study was applied Department of Science Teaching at the Faculty of Education students in the third class. Department of Science Teaching 32 students participated the study in Bayburt University. The 32 students in the sample and all of the mare 18 female and 14 male. The findings of the study about students opinion for reflective thinking skills that most of the prospective science teachers&apos; technical reflective thinking skills were better than critical reflective thinking skills. In the area of critical reflective thinking skills is not at all note worthy. In addition, pre-service teachers have expressed their positive contributions to the teaching skills of the methods developed for reflective thinking. Work towards the development of pre-service teachers&apos; reflective thinking skills are complemented by recommendations. Key Words: The methods developed reflective thinking, Descriptive reflective thinking, Critical reflective thinking, Pre-service science teachers.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562666</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Analysis of Pre-Service Science Teachers&apos; Views about the Methods Which Develop Reflective Thinking</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications v5 n4 Article 16 p162-172 Oct 2014</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>19</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academically Gifted</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Centers (Classroom)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrichment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Facilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Al-Zoubi, Suhail Mahmoud</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bani Abdel Rahman, Majdoleen Sultan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2149-8342</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study aimed to identify talented students&apos; levels of satisfaction with the performance of the gifted centers. The sample of the study consisted of (142) gifted and talented students enrolled in the Najran Centers for Gifted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A questionnaire was developed and distributed to the sample of the study. The results revealed that talented students were highly satisfied with the administration and teachers, whereas they were only moderately satisfied with enrichment activities, teaching methods, student relationships and facilities and equipment. Moreover, results also showed that there were no significant differences could be attributed to gender or to the level of schooling.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562667</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Talented Students&apos; Satisfaction with the Performance of the Gifted Centers</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists v4 n1 p1-20 Dec 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>102</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Jinghua</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schuppan, Fred</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Walker, Michael E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explored whether the addition of the items with more advanced math content to the SAT Reasoning Test™ (SAT®) would impact test-taker performance. Two sets of SAT math equating sections were modified to form four subforms each. Different numbers of items with advanced content, taken from the SAT II: Mathematics Level IC Test (Math IC), were embedded in the subforms. The number of Math IC items in a 25-item subform ranged from zero to six. The subforms were spiraled to obtain approximately equal numbers of examinees of roughly equal ability for all subforms. The Math IC items turned out to be more difficult than the SAT math items they replaced; therefore, there was a negative relationship between mean performance and number of Math IC items in the subforms. To examine possible indirect context effects of Math IC items, the 19 common SAT items across the subforms within a set were examined. When this was done, interset differences in performance disappeared. This finding supports the notion that test-taker performance is not affected by the mere presence of Math IC items. Rather, the effects of these items appear to be linked directly to the difficulty level of the items.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562668</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluating SAT® II: Mathematics IC Items in the SAT I Population. Research Report No. 2005-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>18</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Merit Scholarships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selection Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recognition (Achievement)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competitive Selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cohort Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Marini, Jessica P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The current study examined the validity of the selection process used for the National Merit Scholarship Program (NMSP) to identify scholarship winners. Namely, this study examined whether students who advanced to higher NMSP recognition levels (Commended Students, Semifinalists, and various levels of award winners) had higher college performance, as indexed by first-year college grades and second-year retention rates. Based on a sample of nearly 400,000 college students, the results indicated that students who advance to higher NMSP recognition levels did earn higher FYGPAs and were more likely to return for their second year of college. In sum, these findings provide validity evidence in support of the NMSP selection process for identifying students who are most likely to succeed in college and deserving of a National Merit Scholarship.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562669</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examination of College Performance by National Merit Scholarship Program Recognition Level. Research Report 2011-10</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Followup Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>District of Columbia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>District of Columbia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Scholastic Inc.</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Scholastic and the Bill &amp;amp; Melinda Gates Foundation fielded the third edition of the &amp;quot;Primary Sources&amp;quot; survey of America&apos;s teachers in July 2013 (see ED562664). Twenty thousand pre-K through grade 12 public school teachers responded, sharing their perspectives on issues important to their profession, including the Common Core State Standards. The results documented teachers&apos; enthusiasm for implementation of the standards, even as they acknowledged challenges ahead. In July 2014, Scholastic and the Bill &amp;amp; Melinda Gates Foundation invited the same teachers who responded to the 2013 survey, and who teach in the more than 40 states where the Common Core State Standards are being implemented, to take a follow-up survey to indicate how implementation is going in their schools and classrooms. The teachers were also asked what impact, if any, the standards are having on their classrooms, students and families. More than 1,600 pre-K through grade 12 teachers responded from 43 states and the District of Columbia. In the 2014 follow-up survey, key findings include: (1) Teachers are now more likely to report feeling prepared to teach to the Common Core (79% in 2014 vs. 71% in 2013); they are also now more likely to say implementation is going well in their schools (68% in 2014 vs. 62% in 2013); (2) Further, teachers are beginning to see positive changes in their own classrooms, particularly those who have had more experience with the standards; (3) Eighty-four percent (84%) of teachers who have experienced more than one year of full implementation with the Common Core also say they are enthusiastic about the implementation of the new standards; (4) Fewer teachers overall this year than last say that they are enthusiastic about Common Core implementation (68% in 2014 vs. 73% in 2013); teachers are now also more likely to say implementation is challenging (81% in 2014 vs. 73% in 2013); and (5) Teachers continue to need support and resources, identifying Common Core-aligned instructional materials (86%), quality professional development (84%) and additional planning time (78%) and opportunities to collaborate (78%) as critical to ensure successful implementation. An appendix presents survey results, by total.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562670</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Primary Sources. Update: Teachers&apos; Views on Common Core State Standards</dc:title>
<dc:source>Scholastic Inc. and the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>44</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Scholastic Inc. and the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. 557 Broadway, New York, NY 10012. Tel: 212-343-6857; Fax: 212-343-4913; Web site: http://www.scholastic.com/primarysources</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Competency Based Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metacognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>World Views</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Di Giacomo, F. Tony</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fishbein, Bethany G.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Monthey, Wanda</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pack, Catherine</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Every year in the United States, millions of students graduate with some type of postsecondary credential--certificate, associate, or bachelor&apos;s degree--and discover they are not, or are identified as not being, adequately prepared to compete in the increasingly global economy. A recent McKinsey &amp;amp; Company study, Education to Employment, reported that less than half of U.S. student respondents believe their postsecondary studies improved their employment opportunities and half of U.S. employer respondents say a skills shortage is a leading reason for entry-level vacancies--and this trend is worldwide. By 2018, the United States will need approximately 22 million new Associate&apos;s degrees or greater to fill new and replacement job projections, but will have three million fewer postsecondary degrees than needed. This reality brings forward the question: How do we ensure that those with a postsecondary credential are prepared for a rapidly changing and globalized economy? A first and necessary step is the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), which, at this time, have been adopted by forty-five states, the District of Columbia, four territories, and the Department of Defense. As is well-documented, CCSS raises college and career readiness expectations for all students in the United States. Curricula, assessments, and teaching, however, will need to include and integrate global competency skills to ensure that students are prepared to succeed in the workforce. Toward that end, this brief is intended to support educators in preparing the next generation of students for college and career in an interconnected and hyper changing world by highlighting key, relevant concepts germane to comparative education.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562671</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Global Competency Education. Research Brief 2013-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Practitioners</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Timed Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fatigue (Biology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Logical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Environmental Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Laitusis, Cara Cahalan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morgan, Deanna L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bridgeman, Brent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zanna, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stone, Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined operational data from the SAT Reasoning Test™ to determine if students who tested under extended-time conditions were suffering from excessive fatigue relative to students who tested under standard-time conditions. Excessive fatigue was defined by significant (a) increases in differential item functioning (DIF) and (b) decreases in item completion rates, for items at the end of testing compared to the beginning of testing. Both of these factors were examined by comparing the performance of students who tested under standard time to students who tested with extended time on items administered early (section position 2 or 3) and different items administered late (section position 8, 9, or 10) during the 10-section test administration. The sample included students with learning disabilities and/or Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) who tested with extended time (time and a half or double time) and students without disabilities who tested under standard-time conditions. Analyses were conducted on the critical reading and writing sections of the SAT® and examined item difficulty as well as item completion rates. Results indicated few changes in levels of DIF (early in the test compared to late in the test). In addition, item completion rates for students who received extra time were comparable to (or in some cases higher than) test-takers without disabilities who tested under standard time on both early and late sections. The following tables are appended: (1) DIF Results by Item for Form 1 Writing (Standard and Time and a Half); (2) DIF Results by Item for Form 1 Writing (Standard and Double Time); (3) DIF Results by Item for Form 2 Critical Reading (Standard and Time and a Half); and (4) DIF Results by Item for Form 3 Critical Reading (Standard and Double Time).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562672</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examination of Fatigue Effects from Extended-Time Accommodations on the SAT Reasoning Test™. Research Report No. 2007-1. ETS RR-07-31</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Persons</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emergent Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harrington, Julie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>South Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this quantitative study was to determine what, if any, impact that attending a four year old kindergarten program had on five year old kindergarteners reading ability as measured by Dominie testing, compared to those five year olds who did not attend a four year old program at Inman Elementary School. The significance of this study was to not only determine if there is a difference in aptitude and ability in the area of basic reading skills, concepts about print, but to find the strengths in the curriculum content taught in our preschool program at Inman Elementary School. The researcher strived to use the information gained through this study to build a more comprehensive curriculum for the four year old program and promote progress in school readiness. There is a great deal of money, time, and effort put into these preschool programs nation-wide. Is it worth it? Are the results truly showing a benefit or is just an academic daycare at its best? A copy of the research proposal is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562673</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Benefits of Preschool: Do Children Who Attend Preschool Prior to Kindergarten Achieve Higher Test Scores</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-08-15</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>29</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Childhood Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Aloud to Others</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Habits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recreational Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Child Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Material Selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Marital Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Role</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Scholastic Inc.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>YouGov, Harrison Group</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report presents the 4th Edition of Scholastic&apos;s biannual study of children&apos;s and parents&apos; attitudes and behaviors about reading. Much has changed since the first &amp;quot;Kids &amp;amp; Family Reading Report&amp;quot; was issued in 2006, but literacy remains the critical skill needed for school success. Today&apos;s children are growing up in a world full of digital information, which makes it even more important for them to know how to analyze, interpret and understand complex texts, to separate fact from opinion, and to develop a deep respect for logical thinking. This edition of the Kids &amp;amp; Family Reading Report takes a closer look at the ways in which the increasingly popular use of digital devices, both at home and in the classroom, impacts children&apos;s and parents&apos; reading behaviors. It was found that the percent of children who have read an ebook has almost doubled since 2010 (25% vs. 46%). Yet it was also heard that parents are concerned that digital devices are distracting children from reading. Among parents of children in every age group, nearly half feel their children do not spend enough time reading books for fun--the kind of reading practice that is critical for children to build stamina, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension. The challenge is to harness the power of technology and kids&apos; interest in ebooks to build better readers, and clearly the opportunity is there. Of the children who have read an ebook, one in five says they are reading more books for fun--especially boys, who tend to be less frequent readers than girls. In addition, almost half of all children age 6 to 17 say they would read more books for fun if they had greater access to ebooks. Whether children read print books or ebooks, the more children read, the better readers they become, and the better readers they become, the more they enjoy reading. But reading practice cannot only occur in the classroom; children need access to books and time to read at home every day. This report found that having reading role-model parents or a large book collection at home has a greater impact on kids&apos; reading frequency than does household income. Furthermore, every child should be able to choose and own the books they want to read, for that choice builds literacy confidence--the ability to read, write, and speak about what they know, how they feel, and who they are. The formula for every child to become a successful reader is simple: (1) have books available at home at all times and be a reading role model; (2) allow children to read the books they choose to read; and (3) set aside time--20 minutes or more each day--to read books for fun. With these practices, any child will not only become a fluent, skilled reader, but will also develop a love of books and reading that will last a lifetime. The following are appended: (1) Methodology; (2) Demographics of the Sample; (3) Subgroup Sample Sizes; and (4) Survey Results.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562674</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Kids &amp;amp; Family Reading Report™. 4th Edition</dc:title>
<dc:source>Scholastic Inc.</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>136</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Scholastic Inc. 557 Broadway, New York, NY 10012. Tel: 212-343-6857; Fax: 212-343-4913; Web site: http://www.scholastic.com/primarysources</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time on Task</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interrater Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Swanson, Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wanzek, Jeanne</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCulley, Lisa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stillman-Spisak, Stephanie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vaughn, Sharon</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Simmons, Deborah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fogarty, Melissa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hairrell, Angela</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn>ISSN-1057-3569</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study reports vocabulary and reading comprehension instructional practices implemented in middle and high school social studies and language arts classrooms. It also describes text reading practices. We conducted 137 observations of 11 social studies and 9 language arts teachers over the course of 1 academic year. We observed instructional practices supportive of vocabulary and reading comprehension to differing degrees in social studies and language arts. The proportion of time spent reading text was roughly the same across the 2 subjects, with differences by text type, reading mode, and grade level within both subject areas. [At time of submission to ERIC this article was in press with &amp;quot;Reading and Writing Quarterly.&amp;quot;]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562675</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Literacy and Text Reading in Middle and High School Social Studies and English Language Arts Classrooms</dc:title>
<dc:source>Grantee Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>28</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.910718</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>53</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=992'>R305F100013</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Extracurricular Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structural Equation Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economically Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Everson, Howard T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Millsap, Roger E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report presents evidence that links participation in extracurricular activities (ECAs) in high school with higher SAT Reasoning Test™ (SAT®) scores. Using structural equation models (SEMs) with latent means, we analyzed data from a national sample of college-bound high school students. A series of structural equation models--isolating the influence of ECAs on SAT verbal and mathematics scores--were fit simultaneously to eight subgroups (disaggregated by both gender and ethnicity) of high school students. The SEMs analyses suggest: (1) that often observed group differences in SAT scores shrink, and (2) that students&apos; levels of participation in ECAs in high school are related to meaningful gains in SAT scores, once the influences of socioeconomic background and academic achievement are controlled statistically. These analyses suggest that participation in ECAs benefits minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged students as much as, or more than, economically advantaged white students. These findings support the conclusion that supplementary education programs benefit minorities and disadvantaged high school students who are often ill-served by traditional academic curricula.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562676</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Everyone Gains: Extracurricular Activities in High School and Higher SAT® Scores. Research Report No. 2005-2</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goodness of Fit</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scaling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Screening Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Marini, Jessica P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is a common misperception that test scores do not predict above a minimum threshold (Sackett, Borneman, &amp;amp; Connelly, 2008). That is, test scores may be useful for identifying students with very low levels of ability; however, higher scores are considered unrelated to higher performance for those above a certain threshold. This study aims to examine whether this is true for the Preliminary SAT/National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test (PSAT/NMSQT), which is used for that very purpose -- to differentiate among very high performing students. The linearity of the relationship between PSAT/NMSQT scores and first-year college GPA (FYGPA) was explored in this paper, using a regression approach. This relationship was explored over the entire range of the PSAT/NMSQT score scale, known as the Selection Index, ranging from 60 to 240 as well as the upper end of the score scale (= 200), where initial screening decisions are made for scholarship programs conducted by National Merit Scholarship Corporation (NMSC). For the full PSAT/NMSQT scale, the addition of a quadratic term improved model fit; however, the effect size was small as indexed by the change in the squared multiple correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.001. That is, including PSAT/NMSQT Selection Index2 in the model accounted for an additional 0.1% of variance in FYGPA. As for the subset of students who had a PSAT/NMSQT score of 200 or higher, the results indicated a strong linear relationship, which suggests that even among very high-scoring students, the PSAT/NMSQT score scale differentiates between students in terms of academic success measured by grades earned in the first year of college. In sum, the results of this study support the use of the PSAT/NMSQT as a screening tool for selecting Merit Scholarship winners.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562677</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining the Linearity of the PSAT/NMSQT®-FYGPA Relationship. Research Report 2011-7</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Childhood Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Aloud to Others</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Habits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recreational Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Independent Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Child Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Material Selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Marital Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Scholastic Inc.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>YouGov</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report presents the 5th Edition of Scholastic&apos;s biannual study of children&apos;s and parents&apos; attitudes and behaviors about reading. The latest research touches on reading aloud to children of all ages, the impact of reading independently for fun at school and at home, the importance of frequent reading, and the books children want most to read. Frequent readers are defined as children who read books for fun 5 or more days a week, compared to infrequent readers, who read less than one day a week. Children who read frequently say they enjoy reading, have parents who are frequent readers, and strongly believe that reading for fun is important. Among older frequent readers, this can lead to reading up to eight times as many books annually as infrequent readers, and, to stronger results in school. Independent reading is supported widely by teachers. The research found that 33% of children ages 6 to 17 say their class has a designated time during the school day to read independently, but only 17% do this every or almost every school day. This opportunity is particularly important for children from lower-income homes who are more likely than their higher-income peers to read books for fun in school and far less likely to read books outside of school. While both children and parents agree that reading skills are the most important skills kids can have, children are reading somewhat less often than they did four years ago. In the home, especially for older children, reading competes with games on smartphones or computers, while at school, the majority of kids do not have a dedicated time for independent reading. It is known that reading aloud to a young child is a wonderful bonding moment, but the research also shows that reading aloud to children all the way up to age 11 is a powerful predictor that children will become frequent readers. While 73% of parents with children ages 0 to 5 say they started reading aloud to their children before age one, only 30% say they began before the age of 3 months, in accord with the recent recommendation from the American Academy of Pediatrics that parents read aloud to children starting at birth. Kids love it: 83% of children of all ages surveyed say they loved or liked a lot being read aloud to and 40% of kids ages 6 to 11 whose parents have stopped reading aloud to them say they wish their parents had continued. Kids ages 6 to 17 report that they want books that make them laugh (70%), and 91% agree &amp;quot;my favorite books are the ones that I have picked out myself.&amp;quot; For Scholastic, it is encouraging that many children in the study rate school book clubs and school book fairs as important ways to find books they want to choose, read, and own--second only to finding books though the library. The following are appended: (1) Methodology; (2) Demographics of the Sample; (3) Subgroup Sample Sizes; and (4) Expanded Survey Responses. [For &amp;quot;Kids &amp;amp; Family Reading Report™. 4th Edition,&amp;quot; see ED562674.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562678</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Kids &amp;amp; Family Reading Report™. 5th Edition</dc:title>
<dc:source>Scholastic Inc.</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>108</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Scholastic Inc. 557 Broadway, New York, NY 10012. Tel: 212-343-6857; Fax: 212-343-4913; Web site: http://www.scholastic.com/primarysources</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Accommodations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Copeland, Tina</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rothschild, Brian</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Tests administered with accommodations to persons with disabilities have been considered nonequivalent to tests administered under standardized conditions to nondisabled test takers. This study examined the score change patterns for learning disabled students completing extended-time administrations of the SAT I: Reasoning Test in comparison to nondisabled students retesting under standard-time administrations. Results illustrate that learning disabled students generally performed about 0.5 of a standard deviation below nondisabled test takers. However, the mean score gain for learning disabled students first completing a standard-time SAT and retesting under an extended-time SAT was more than three times as large as the mean score gain for both nondisabled students testing under standardized conditions and learning disabled students testing with extended time on both occasions. An appendix contains supplementary tables. [This research was funded through the Joint Staff Research and Development Committee of ETS and the College Board.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562679</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of Extended Time on the SAT® I: Reasoning Test Score Growth for Students with Learning Disabilities. Research Report No. 1998-7</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>26</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>29</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Timed Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bridgeman, Brent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Trapani, Catherine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Curley, Edward</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The impact of allowing more time for each question on SAT® I: Reasoning Test scores was estimated by embedding sections with a reduced number of questions into the standard 30-minute equating section of two national test administrations. Thus, for example, questions were deleted from a verbal section that contained 35 questions to produce forms that contained 27 or 23 questions. Scores on the 23-question section could then be compared to scores on the same 23 questions when they were embedded in a section that contained 27 or 35 questions. Similarly, questions were deleted from a 25-question math section to form sections of 20 and 17 questions. Allowing more time per question had a minimal impact on verbal scores, producing gains of less than 10 points on the 200-800 SAT scale. Gains for the math score were less than 30 points. High-scoring students tended to benefit more than lower-scoring students, with extra time creating no increase in scores for students with SAT scores of 400 or lower. Ethnic/racial and gender differences were neither increased nor reduced with extra time. Item-Level Results for Study 2 are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562680</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effect of Fewer Questions per Section on SAT® I Scores. Research Report No. 2003-2. ETS RR-03-08</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2003-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Labor Market</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metacognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Economy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Creativity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lifelong Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizenship Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Balistreri, Sarah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Di Giacomo, F. Tony</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Noisette, Ivanley</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ptak, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Following the completion of this century&apos;s first decade, educators, policymakers, and researchers are attempting to predict future needs. However, is it possible to know what the education and global landscape will look like at the end of this century? Certainly, in 1900 one could not have comprehended the myriad innovations that would occur by the year 2000. What we know is this: The skills to survive and thrive in this century have transitioned from a memorizing or banking perspective to that of accessing, navigating, and filtering. Moreover, the primacy of technology to our daily lives and events and phenomena across the globe cause many to rethink how best to prepare students in an education system born out of Prussian and industrial-era influences. Of additional importance for American education, comparative assessments demonstrate that other nations have surpassed the U.S. when it comes to preparing their students. This dynamic must inspire innovative solutions to improve American education. But, because demographic, linguistic, vocational, economic, and political variables differ from country to country, we cannot simply copy systems that outrank or outperform the U.S. Also, solutions must be developed to support a balance between competitive and collaborative reform efforts. While many obstacles exist, including cultural, economic, and political considerations, with the appropriate framework, organizations such as the College Board can support U.S. education systems (at the local, state, and federal levels) to maintain relevancy amid a shifting paradigm. Moreover, organizations such as the College Board can concurrently increase access and equity to provide more students with greater opportunities to learn and then contribute to the national well-being. As this paper will explore, at the heart of this movement will be the adoption of global skills in curricula, assessments, and pedagogy. Thus, while we may not know what the education and global landscape will look like in 2100, students who benefit from this reform movement globally will be prepared to excel and succeed. Appendices include: (1) International student origins; (2) 10-year job trends underscore shift to service sector; (3) Global Literacy Education in Practice; (4) Examples of assessment measures; and (5) Major Frameworks for 21st Century Learning.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562681</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Global Education: Connections, Concepts, and Careers. Research in Review 2012-4</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>37</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>66</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hurwitz, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board Advocacy &amp; Policy Center</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>New evidence on how students&apos; choice of postsecondary institution is sensitive to grant aid offers from the colleges and universities. Institutional aid sensitivity is largest for students from the least wealthy families but does not vary by race/ethnicity or measured academic ability. A technical appendix is included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562682</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Does Institutional Grant Aid Impact College Choice? Research Brief</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-06-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Arizona</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Missouri</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Michigan</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Ohio</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Iowa</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Delaware</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New Jersey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Minnesota</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New Mexico</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Nevada</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Kentucky</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Arizona</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Delaware</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Iowa</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Kentucky</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Michigan</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Minnesota</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Missouri</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Nevada</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Jersey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Mexico</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Ohio</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Scholastic Inc.</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In school districts across the nation, diverse student groups have been experiencing significant gains in reading performance after using READ 180. This compendium of READ 180 research contains 40 studies. The studies take place in a variety of settings in school districts across the country from 1999 to 2012. Summarized are correlational and descriptive studies, as well as randomized or quasi-experimental studies. Reports on reading gains for the general student population and in some cases for specific demographic groups of students are provided. The studies in this compendium show that READ 180 meets the literacy needs of even the most challenged students, and the findings of these studies have been integral in informing new and better versions of the program, including the most recent READ 180 Next Generation. An index is included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562683</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Compendium of Read 180® Research: 15 Years of Evidence-Based Results for America&apos;s Struggling Readers</dc:title>
<dc:source>Scholastic Inc.</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>51</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Scholastic Inc. 557 Broadway, New York, NY 10012. Tel: 212-343-6857; Fax: 212-343-4913; Web site: http://www.scholastic.com/primarysources</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>48</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wyatt, Jeffrey N.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Research has consistently shown that traditional admission measures--SAT® scores and high school grade point average (HSGPA)--are valid predictors of early college performance such as first-year grades; however, their usefulness to predict later college outcomes has been questioned, especially for the SAT. This study builds on previous research showing that both SAT scores and HSGPA are predictive of a more distal measure of college success--college graduation within four years. Moreover, each measure provided unique information to the prediction of graduation, indicating the utility of using both measures in the admission process to elect applicants who are most likely be successful. Finally, the relationships between SAT and HSGPA with four-year graduation rates by institutional control and selectivity (i.e., undergraduate admittance rate) were also investigated. The findings demonstrate the usefulness of traditional admission measures for predicting long-term college outcomes.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562684</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Useful Are Traditional Admission Measures in Predicting Graduation within Four Years? Research Report 2013-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>28</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>48</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Indexes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonparametric Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gierl, Mark J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tan, Xuan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wang, Changjiang</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The results of this study conclude that there is a multidimensional basis for test score inferences on the mathematics and critical reading sections of the SAT. Results from the exploratory analyses indicate that the data are multidimensional, as mathematics displayed two dimensions and critical reading displayed three dimensions. The correlations between the dimensions were moderate in both test sections. Appended are: (1) Appendix A (a short description of each primary mathematics skill); and (2) Appendix B (a short description of each critical reading skill).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562685</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Identifying Content and Cognitive Dimensions on the SAT®. Research Report No. 2005-11</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>37</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>62</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Mission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Malcom-Piqueux, Lindsey E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lee, John Michael, Jr.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Higher Education Act Amendments 1992</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Higher Education Act Title III</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>Higher Education Act Amendments 1992</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:keywords_law>Higher Education Act Title III</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board Advocacy &amp; Policy Center</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This brief presents information about the characteristics of the nation&apos;s Hispanic-serving institutions (HSIs) and their students, as well as the HSIs&apos; contributions to the educational attainment of the Latino population. The brief concludes by outlining some of the challenges faced by HSIs as they aim to meet their implied mission of serving Latino students.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562686</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Hispanic-Serving Institutions: Contributions and Challenges. Policy Brief</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>16</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kurlaender, Michal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Howell, Jessica S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board Advocacy &amp; Policy Center</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This brief gives an overview of the prevalence, causes, and consequences of college remediation, which aims to improve basic literacy skills among college students.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562687</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Collegiate Remediation: A Review of the Causes and Consequences. Literature Brief</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-09-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>53</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Debt (Financial)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Loan Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Loan Repayment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Money Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Loan Default</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baum, Sandy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schwartz, Saul</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Canada</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Canada</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Institute for College Access &amp; Success, Project on Student Debt</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many discussions of student loan repayment focus on those students for whom repayment is a problem and conclude that the reliance on debt to finance postsecondary education is excessive. However, from both a pragmatic perspective and a logical perspective, a more appropriate approach is to develop different benchmarks for students in different circumstances in order to differentiate between those students whose repayment requirements are excessive and those for whom debt burdens are manageable. The purpose of this report is to establish a range of empirically derived thresholds for manageable student debt in order to: (a) provide good advice to students as they make decisions about financing their postsecondary educations, and (b) inform the design of loan forgiveness and debt management programs intended to relieve excessive debt burdens.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562688</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Much Debt Is Too Much? Defining Benchmarks for Manageable Student Debt</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2006-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>30</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Adjustment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropout Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 10</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 11</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bernstein, Larry</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Edmunds, Julie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fesler, Lily</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 10</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 11</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Students entering high school in 9th grade face a formidable challenge. The transition to high school from 8th grade brings with it increased risks for all students. For example, students in 9th grade are anywhere from three to five times more likely to fail a class than students in any other grade. Similarly, ninth grade retention rates are higher than in any other grade. More importantly, research indicates that 70 to 80 percent of students failing in 9th grade will eventually dropout of high school. Early College High Schools (ECHS) are a new model merging high school and college designed to increase the number of students who graduate from high school and enroll and succeed in college. This paper presents results from a longitudinal, experimental study of ECHS, tracking students from 9th grade through graduation from high school and enrollment in college. This paper will examine impacts of the ECHS model on &amp;quot;underprepared&amp;quot; students, defined as those students who did not pass the 8th grade state exams in either or both reading and math. &amp;quot;Prepared&amp;quot; students, on the other hand, are those passing both exams. In this paper, the authors report on the impact of the model on the performance gaps between underprepared and prepared students from 9th-11th grades. This paper addresses the following specific research questions: (1) Are underprepared students more likely to be from traditionally underrepresented groups such as first generation, minority and free/reduced price lunch students?; (2) What is the impact of the ECHS model on these students&apos; academic performance?; and (3) How does that impact compare to the impact on students who are prepared? This study focuses on ECHSs as implemented in North Carolina. North Carolina has the largest concentration of ECHSs in the country, with over 70 across the state; all managed by the same entity, the North Carolina New Schools. The 19 schools that are a part of this study are geographically distributed throughout the state; they include schools in rural and urban areas, schools with predominantly white populations and schools with predominantly African American populations. Results from this experimental study show that it is possible for schools to have an impact on students entering high school at-risk for academic failure and dropout. These data suggest to us that the reduction or elimination of performance gaps in the early college is a product of a purposeful implementation of a high quality learning environment with high expectations, rigorous courses and instruction, positive relationships, extensive student support, and teachers taking responsibility for student learning. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562689</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Closing the Performance Gap: The Impact of the Early College High School Model on Underprepared Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonparametric Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Monte Carlo Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Barrera-Osorio, Felipe</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Filmer, Deon</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McIntyre, Joe</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Cambodia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Cambodia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and regression discontinuity (RD) studies both provide estimates of causal effects. A major difference between the two is that RD only estimates local average treatment effects (LATE) near the cutoff point of the forcing variable. This has been cited as a drawback to RD designs (Cook &amp;amp; Wong, 2008). Comparisons of RCT estimates of average treatment effect (ATE) and RD estimates of LATE are rare because few studies have both randomized assignment and a forcing variable. Using a study which is amenable to analysis both as an RCT and an RD, the authors compare the RCT estimate of ATE to the RD estimate of LATE. They also explore how the RD estimate of average treatment effect depends on econometric specifications, including for parametric and non-parametric estimators, and for various bandwidths. Finally, they use Monte Carlo simulation based on observed data to explore the performance of RD estimators with a forcing variable which is standardized within schools by choosing a different cutoff in each school. Findings can be used to inform decisions about which estimators to use in doing regression discontinuity, as well as providing evidence of how well RD estimators approximate RCT estimators. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562690</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Empirical Comparison of Randomized Control Trials and Regression Discontinuity Estimations</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nonprofit Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropout Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Penner, Emily K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Children enter school with vastly different skill levels and formal schooling often magnifies these disparities over time. Widening achievement gaps between high- and low-income children have grown substantially in the last 50 years. Further, the opportunity gap facing most low-income students contributes to a host of academic and social challenges including: lower performance in math and reading, increased truancy and incarceration, less higher-level course taking, and lower graduation and college entrance rates than their higher-income peers, and these disparities are not new. Teach For America (TFA) was founded with the purpose of addressing these educational inequities. Early on in its existence, TFA became focused on &amp;quot;closing the achievement gap&amp;quot; for students in the schools it serves, and put a large stake in promoting, &amp;quot;significant gains,&amp;quot; (defined as 1.5 to 2 grade levels of improvement in core subject areas) for its students (Teach For America, 2013). For many of the students it serves, this target aimed to get students caught up to grade level standards. The research on TFA&apos;s short term impacts is mixed, although experimental and quasi-experimental evidence finds that TFA teachers are more effective than non-TFA teachers in many settings, particularly in high school math and science, and elementary math. This study extends existing research on short-term TFA impacts to examine whether TFA has any relationship with students&apos; long-term academic outcomes. Specifically, I examine whether having a TFA teacher in elementary, middle, or high school is associated with improved student educational outcomes at the end of high school. The author examined the relationship between TFA and long-term student attainment using administrative data from the state of North Carolina. TFA places teachers in two regions in North Carolina. Eastern North Carolina, which encompasses rural and urban areas, opened in 1990 and was one of TFA&apos;s charter locations. Charlotte, which is a primarily urban region, has had corps members since 2004. Analyses for this study concentrate on the students in grades 3-12 and their teachers. The author examined the relationship between having a TFA teacher and end of high school attainment by comparing students who had TFA teachers with students who had the possibility of being in a TFA teacher&apos;s classroom but were not. To do so, the author compared students within schools, grades, and years that have TFA teachers using fixed effects. Results suggest different patterns for students who have TFA teachers in grades 3-8 versus 9-12. Among students who ever have a TFA teacher in high school, there is a negative association with dropping out, a decline of 0.012 standard deviations. There is also a positive association of having a TFA teacher and graduating high school, an increase of 0.034 standard deviations, compared with students who were in the same schools, grades, and subjects, but did not have a TFA teacher. In contrast, in elementary and middle school, there is no evidence of a relationship between having a TFA teacher and long term outcomes. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562691</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Does Teach for America Have Long-Term Impacts?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>31</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>After School Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature Reviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Utilization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selection Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Work</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Search Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Maynard, Brandy R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Peters, Kristen E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vaughn, Michael G.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sarteschi, Christine M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Over the past 2 decades, the number of after-school programs (ASP) and the number of students attending ASPs has markedly increased. Although several reviews and meta-analyses have examined the outcomes of ASPs, ASP intervention study reviews have not specifically examined intervention fidelity. Establishing intervention fidelity is critically important to interpreting the effects, or lack thereof, of interventions. Given the popularity of ASPs and the growing body of intervention research resulting in ambiguous findings, it seems prudent to examine whether investigators have attended to fidelity. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine whether and to what extent researchers addressed intervention fidelity in ASP intervention research. The following research questions guided this review: (1) What proportion of after-school intervention studies report key components of fidelity (i.e., strategies to enhance fidelity, measure fidelity, and use fidelity data)?; and (2) Does the presence of fidelity measurement differ by study or intervention characteristics? Fifty-five studies (15 RCT and 40 QED) were included in this review. Published and unpublished studies conducted between 1980 and 2012 were eligible for inclusion if they examined the effects of an ASP on social, emotional, behavioral, or academic outcomes with primary or secondary students using a randomized or quasi-experimental research design. This study examined the extent to which fidelity was addressed in outcome research of after-school program interventions, defined as &amp;quot;an organized program offering one or more activities that: (1) occurred during at least part of the school year; (2) happened outside of normal school hours; and (3) was supervised by adults&amp;quot;. 40 of the 55 studies attended to at least some aspects of intervention fidelity; however, the extent to which those studies engaged in various aspects of intervention fidelity varied. While the majority of studies attended to at least one aspect of intervention fidelity, the use of multiple fidelity components was much less frequent. About half of the studies incorporated two components, 31% incorporated three components, 18% incorporated four components, and just 15% incorporated at least five components. No studies incorporated six or more fidelity components. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562692</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Fidelity in After-School Program Intervention Research: A Systematic Review</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>16</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Organization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Science Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Walters, Kirk</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stachel, Suzanne</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper describes the content, organization and rigor of the f2f and online summer algebra courses that were delivered in summers 2011 and 2012. Examining the content of both types of courses is important because research suggests that algebra courses with certain features may be better than others in promoting success for struggling students. One key finding from the literature is that algebra students should have ongoing opportunities to develop procedural fluency and conceptual understanding and engage in meaningful problem solving opportunities, rather than focusing exclusively on skill development and symbolic manipulation. Another reason it is important to examine the content of summer credit recovery courses, in particular, is due to the perception that these courses may get &amp;quot;watered down,&amp;quot; rewarding students who show up for summer school but who may not have mastered the material. More specifically, the paper will address the following research questions: (1) How did the online and f2f Algebra IB courses compare in terms of the difficulty of the content? (e.g. what proportion of time in each type of course was devoted to second semester algebra, first semester algebra and pre-algebra topics?); (2) How did the online and f2f Algebra IB courses compare in terms of the nature of the content? (e.g. developing procedural skills, conceptual understanding and problem solving); (3) How did the online and f2f Algebra IB courses compare in terms of the coherence and sequencing of topics?; and (4) How did the online and f2f Algebra IB courses compare in terms of grading expectations? [What proportion of online and f2f students&apos; grades were based on assessments (quizzes, tests) and other criteria (effort, participation, behavior, etc.)]? The authors will draw from several different sources of data that were collected in both conditions in both summers to answer the paper&apos;s research questions. These include archival data generated from the online course, course materials (syllabi, annotated tables of contents), and teacher surveys. The initial results suggest that the online course (in both summers), in comparison to the f2f courses, was more rigorous in terms of the algebra content that students were expected to learn, more coherent in terms of how topics were sequenced, and more demanding in terms of the criteria used to calculate grades. More specifically, the online course content was considered typical of second semester algebra and included a fixed set of topics that were organized sequentially within and across 5 units.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562693</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Paper 3: Content and Rigor of Algebra Credit Recovery Courses</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>3</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Extended School Day</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrichment Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rulf Fountain, Alyssa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gamse, Beth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Expanded Learning Time (ELT) is seen as one promising approach for improving academic achievement, particularly in the nation&apos;s chronically low-performing schools. Since 1995, Citizen Schools (CS) has developed and supported the implementation of its own ELT model. The CS ELT model uses an additional shift of educators and community volunteers to engage middle school students in hands-on apprenticeships, while simultaneously providing individualized supports to ensure academic and future success. Theory suggests that as a result of ELT, students may become more engaged in school because of additional enrichment and learning opportunities, develop better communication skills due to more time with teachers and peers, and be less likely to engage in disruptive behavior because of less idle time. Ultimately, student achievement may improve as a result of additional learning time. The authors are conducting a five-year evaluation of the CS ELT model that includes an implementation and outcomes component to assess the operation and effects of ELT programming on middle school students. The implementation component of the study incorporates surveys, interviews, and site visits to assess how schools integrate ELT into their school days, organizationally and instructionally. This paper focuses specifically on how to characterize implementation systematically and in such a way as to explain variation in student achievement results.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562694</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Creating a Fidelity Index to Measure Program Implementation</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Response Style (Tests)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McIntyre, Joe</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Northeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Proper survey design is essential to obtain reliable, replicable data from research subjects. One threat to inferences drawn from surveys is anchoring-and-adjusting. Tversky and Kahnemann (1974) observed that participants&apos; responses to questions depended systematically on irrelevant information they received prior to answering. It is important for survey designers to have tools that can detect anchoring-and-adjusting. Using non-experimental data, the author will try to determine if respondents are anchoring and adjusting by looking for evidence that responses to adjacent items are more likely to be identical than they should be. In this study the author analyzes scale data from two different settings. One set of scales comes from an online survey administered through the &amp;quot;Survey Monkey website.&amp;quot; The second set comes from a survey administered in person to undergraduates and graduates students at a private university in the Northeast. All participants were better educated than people in the country as a whole and one set of participants all had internet access. Thus, it is not appropriate to generalize the results to the population at large. It is possible to find evidence of anchoring-and-adjusting using non-experimental approaches. There is more evidence of anchoring-and-adjusting on uninterrupted scales than on interrupted scales. Further research is needed to determine what sorts of scales elicit more anchoring-and-adjusting, and which sorts of populations anchor-and-adjust more frequently. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562695</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Detecting Anchoring-and-Adjusting in Survey Scales</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Protocol Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcome Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vig, Rozy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Taylor, Megan W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Star, Jon R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chao, Theodore</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The concept of &amp;quot;implementation fidelity&amp;quot; is broadly used to capture the extent to which an intervention is executed as intended by the designers of the intervention (Century, Rudnick, &amp;amp; Freeman, 2010; Huntley, 2005, McNaught, Tarr, &amp;amp; Sears, 2010, Munter, 2010). Though implementation fidelity instruments are often used to assess variability in teachers&apos; implementations of an intervention and can be related to measures of student learning, the form and goals of the work involved in developing, implementing, and evaluating fidelity instruments vary from study to study. This research report discusses two research projects that shed light on two challenges associated with assessing implementation fidelity.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562696</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessing Implementation Fidelity: Challenges as Seen through the Lens of Two Experimental Studies</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developing Nations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>War</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Burnout</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pilot Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wolf, Sharon</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Aber, John Lawrence</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Torrente, Catalina</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rasheed, Damira</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCoy, Marissa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Congo Republic</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Congo Republic</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A wealth of research, primarily in high income countries, has accumulated in recent years evaluating teacher effectiveness and the processes through which teachers&apos; performance and job satisfaction can be improved (e.g., Pianta, Mashburn, Downer, Hamre &amp;amp; Justice, 2008; Ross, 1992; 1995). Much less is known about how these processes operate for teachers in low-income countries, where schools may be located in high conflict areas with low resources that can pose strains on teachers, students and their interactions. In the past several years, there has been a growing interest in rigorous evaluation research in developing countries to help inform policy and practice. This paper applies rigorous methodology to consider the question of whether and how an intervention can improve teachers&apos; motivation, job satisfaction and professional development in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The current study is part of OPEQ (Opportunities for Equitable Access to High Quality Basic Education), a 5-year project aimed at improving teachers&apos; motivation and performance, and elementary school children&apos;s numeracy, literacy and socio-emotional wellbeing in 3 provinces of the DRC (i.e., Katanga, North Kivu and South Kivu), through curriculum development, teacher training and community mobilization. The main purpose of the current paper is to better understand teacher practices and classroom processes in low-income, war-afflicted countries such as the DRC. It presents baseline information on teachers&apos; criticism of school, burnout, motivation and job satisfaction; examines how these processes can be affected by an intervention that targets teachers&apos; and students&apos; social emotional needs, and provides instructional support to teachers in math and reading; and presents preliminary impacts on teachers&apos; burnout, motivation and job satisfaction after one pilot year of program implementation. An appendix contains a table and figure.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562697</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Cluster Randomized Trial of a Large-Scale Education Initiative in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Pilot Year Impacts on Teacher Development</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interrater Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance Based Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pilot Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Manzeske, David P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Eno, Jared P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stonehill, Robert M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cumming, John M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>MacGillivary, Heather L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (West)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Elementary Secondary Education Act</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:keywords_law>Elementary and Secondary Education Act</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Federal policies (e.g., 2002 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act [ESEA] and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) posit that teacher quality is a potential leverage point for improving student achievement (U.S. Department of Education, 2010). Moreover, in the Race to the Top competition, teacher effectiveness must be based, in part, on teacher performance measured by classroom observations. This has driven many districts to adopt teacher classroom observation rubrics to meet the Race to the Top requirement. Without clear guidance on how to rate teachers and without proper calibration activities, scores on these rubrics can become upwardly biased, leading to an inability to distinguish among teachers at different performance levels (see, for example, Weisberg, Sexton, Mulhern, &amp;amp; Keeling, 2009). When a rubric is used inconsistently, teachers may not receive useful feedback, and the rubric could lack teacher buy-in, resulting in views that the evaluation does not provide credible information. In partnership with district central office staff, a study was conducted in a set of 20 elementary and middle schools in the western United States to investigate the use of a classroom observation rubric within the context of a district&apos;s pilot teacher performance evaluation system. The district wanted to know whether peer raters would use the observation rubric differently compared with principals, whether interrater reliability differed by rater type, and whether district-selected raters, on average, were more or less lenient than principals in rating other teachers. Supplemental tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562698</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessing Teacher Effectiveness through Dual-Rater Classroom Observations: Researchers and District Staff Partnering to Create Calibrated Performance Evaluations</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid Officers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Eligibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Debt (Financial)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Salaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators (NASFAA)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report first describes the aid application procedures aid administrators used to determine award eligibility, and the use of professional judgment to adjust students&apos; aid application data. Next, the report describes the number of students who received financial aid, the funding and distribution of institutional scholarships, and student loan borrowing and cumulative debt. The study then shows the percentage of aid applicants who had financial need and the proportion of need met by total financial aid. The final section of the report describes the salary by type of institution, and technology used by aid offices to process applications. The following are appended: (1) Undergraduate Admissions Selectivity Definitions; and (2) 2001 Survey of Undergraduate Financial Aid Policies, Practices, and Procedures (SUFAPPP).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562699</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Financial Aid Professionals at Work in 1999-2000: Results from the 2001 Survey of Undergraduate Financial Aid Policies, Practices, and Procedures</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>46</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>National Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Information</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Utilization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Velez, Melissa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sahni, Sarah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rulf-Fountain, Alyssa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gamse, Beth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Mahalanobis Distance Function</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>One of the primary obstacles facing education researchers today is the struggle to obtain student-level data from states, districts, and schools. Researchers typically face one of two scenarios; they must either (1) work with contractors hired by the state or district to handle data requests who can be prohibitively expensive or (2) invest significant amounts of time making data requests from overworked school district staff that can take a year or longer. Due to budget cuts and waning resources, district staff juggle many competing demands and typically prioritize district-level needs above those of external evaluators. It is becoming increasingly clear the research community must look for methodological alternatives that allow the continuation of rigorous research about what works in education. This study explores the possibility of using publicly available school-level data instead of student-level data to conduct an impact analysis of a national education intervention. The authors use a national evaluation of an Expanded Learning Time (ELT) initiative in middle schools across the country as a case-study for these methods. One table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562700</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Comparison of Student-Level and School-Level Data in a National Impact Evaluation</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cluster Grouping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimenter Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Robustness (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Citkowicz, Martyna</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Polanin, Joshua R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Meta-analyses are syntheses of effect-size estimates obtained from a collection of studies to summarize a particular field or topic (Hedges, 1992; Lipsey &amp;amp; Wilson, 2001). These reviews are used to integrate knowledge that can inform both scientific inquiry and public policy, therefore it is important to ensure that the estimates of the effect sizes are both robust and free of bias. One such scenario under which bias can occur is from a failure to account for clustering. Clustering occurs when, for example, schools are assigned to conditions and students are grouped together within each school. Occasionally, study designs are such that clustering exists in one condition but not the other. These studies may be referred to as one-group cluster-randomized designs or partially clustered designs. Despite recent advances, researchers do not yet have an understanding of the degree to which &amp;quot;not&amp;quot; accounting for clustering will bias the overall meta-analytic mean effect and its variance. The purpose of this study is to investigate the consequences of not accounting for one-group clustering in meta-analyses. The authors conducted a series of simulations in order to find out how distorted meta-analytic results can be when analysts fail to correct effect sizes for one-group clustering. The results of these analyses, in addition, demonstrate the extent to which researchers may be confident in previously conducted meta-analyses that did not have the tools to adjust the effects and variance in such designs. Data tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562701</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Consequences of Not Accounting for One-Group Clustering in Meta-Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Monte Carlo Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Maximum Likelihood Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bayesian Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>May, Henry</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Interest in variation in program impacts--How big is it? What might explain it?--has inspired recent work on the analysis of data from multi-site experiments. One critical aspect of this problem involves the use of random or fixed effect estimates to visualize the distribution of impact estimates across a sample of sites. Unfortunately, unless the sample sizes within sites are enormous (e.g., &amp;gt;1,000), the shape of the distribution of estimates is dominated by the normal distribution as a result of imperfect reliability in site-specific estimates. The Central Limit Theorem explains why this occurs and why the problem is unavoidable. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the scope and severity of this problem, and to provide cautionary guidance regarding the interpretation of distributions of site-specific impact estimates in multi-site experiments. Furthermore, the paper explores methods for recovering the distribution of true site-specific impacts when that distribution is non-normal. For illustrative purposes, data from the multi-site randomized trial under the Reading Recovery Investing in Innovation (i3) Scale-Up is used in addition to generalized Monte Carlo simulation. Reading Recovery is an early reading intervention for first-graders who are reading substantially below grade level. Data figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562702</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Distortions in Distributions of Impact Estimates in Multi-Site Trials: The Central Limit Theorem Is Not Your Friend</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Failure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Core Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cohort Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Repetition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Heppen, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sorensen, Nicholas</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Allensworth, Elaine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Walters, Kirk</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stachel, Suzanne</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Michelman, Valerie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The consequences of failing core academic courses during the first year of high school are dire. In the Chicago Public Schools (CPS), only about one-fifth of off-track freshmen--students who fail more than one semester of a core academic course and/or fail to earn enough credits to be promoted to 10th grade--graduate high school, compared with over 80% of on-track freshmen (Allensworth &amp;amp; Easton, 2005, 2007). Failure of Algebra I is particularly problematic. In CPS, only 13% of students who fail both semesters of Algebra I in 9th grade graduate in 4 years, and the largest share of 9th grade algebra failures occur in the second semester of the course. Elucidating the ways that students can get back on track is of the utmost policy importance. Credit recovery is one strategy to deal with high failure rates. The primary goal of credit recovery programs is to give students an opportunity to retake classes that they failed in an effort to get them back on track and keep them in school (Watson &amp;amp; Gemin, 2008). As schools across the nation struggle to keep students on track and re-engage students who are off track, online learning has emerged as a promising and increasingly popular strategy for credit recovery. Despite the growing use of online courses for credit recovery, the evidence base is thin. This paper describes the design, implementation, and results of a randomized control trial that was designed to address this gap. The primary intent of the proposed paper is to share findings to date for the two cohorts of students who participated in two Algebra I credit recovery courses (one online and one face-to-face) as part of this trial--first time freshmen in 2010-11 at 15 CPS high schools and first-time freshmen at 13 CPS high schools in 2011-12. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562703</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Efficacy of Online Algebra I for Credit Recovery for At-Risk Ninth Graders: Consistency of Results from Two Cohorts</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>National Center for Education Research (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Improvement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cluster Grouping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>DiPerna, James C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lei, Puiwa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bellinger, Jill</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cheng, Weiyi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teaching children to get along with others, care about themselves, and actively participate in learning are three of the most important outcomes of the schooling process. Yet children in some schools are not achieving these outcomes, and many educators have not received adequate training to create instructional environments that facilitate these outcomes. As a consequence, some schools have become places where children feel uncomfortable, unsupported, and ultimately, uninterested in learning. The genesis of ineffective instructional environments and underachieving students is complex and varies across individuals and schools/communities. Consequently, the solutions to improving learning, preventing or reducing inappropriate behavior, and facilitating the prosocial development of students require multifaceted and sustained interventions. The Social Skills Improvement System (SSIS) is a comprehensive program that integrates multiple levels of assessment and intervention to improve children&apos;s social skills and engagement in classroom learning. The Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS-CIP) is the universal component of the SSIS, and it has been developed to help students learn the 10 social skills that teachers have identified as most critical to classroom success. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the SSIS-CIP using a &amp;quot;Multi-Site Cluster Randomized Trial&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;CRT&amp;quot;). Specifically, the authors hypothesized that children in classrooms implementing SSIS-CIP would demonstrate improved social skills compared to children in non-implementing (business-as-usual) classrooms. In addition, children in SSIS-CIP classrooms were expected to demonstrate increased academic engagement during classroom instruction.The study was conducted in two Pennsylvania school districts located in opposite ends of the state. One is a small urban district, while the other is a small rural district that is similar in size to many of the other rural districts within the state. Specifically, 6 schools (4 from the larger urban district, 2 from the smaller district) participated in the study. Child-level data were collected before and after SSIS-CIP implementation in the classrooms randomly assigned to the &amp;quot;treatment&amp;quot; condition. Specifically, two measures were used to assess key outcome variables related to students&apos; classroom behavior (Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scale, Cooperative Learning Observation Code for Kids). In addition, the Classroom Assessment Scoring System was used to assess the instructional environment in each participating classroom before and after treatment implementation. Finally, structured observations were used to assess fidelity of implementation of the SSIS-CIP curriculum in classrooms randomly assigned to the intervention condition. Based on the results of this study, the SSIS-CIP yields small-medium positive effects (increases) in prosocial behavior (overall, communication, cooperation, responsibility, empathy, social engagement, social skills intervention composite). In addition, SSIS-CIP positively impacted academic engagement and motivation, suggesting there may be academic benefits from its implementation. Across all of these variables, the effects of SSIS-CIP appear to be more specific to those children with more severe deficits in these areas prior to SSIS-CIP implementation. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562704</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Efficacy of the Social Skills Improvement System--Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS-CIP) in the Primary Grades</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Locus of Control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Taylor, James</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The &amp;quot;Study of Deeper Learning: Opportunities and Outcomes&amp;quot;, funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, is a &amp;quot;proof-of-concept&amp;quot; study to determine whether students attending high schools with a mature and at least moderately well-implemented approach to promoting deeper learning experience greater deeper learning opportunities and outcomes than they would have had they not attended these schools. The study includes a set of high schools belonging to networks that are aligned with a deeper learning approach. The purpose of this paper is to provide quasi-experimental empirical evidence on whether or not students who experienced these network schools&apos; approaches achieved better outcomes than they would have otherwise. Specifically, did students attending these network schools: (1) score higher on measures of content knowledge and critical thinking skills associated with the OECD PISA-based Test for Schools; (2) report higher levels of intra- and inter-personal competencies and dispositions; (3) attain a higher rate of graduation; or (4) attain a higher rate of post-secondary matriculation than they would have if they had not attended the network schools? This analysis relies on student-level data from schools located in six districts across two states: California and New York. The primary findings include: (1) Students in participating network high schools scored significantly higher on the OECD PISA-based Test for Schools in reading, mathematics, and science than students in the paired non-network schools. Effect sizes for all three test subjects were similar in magnitude, with the scores of students attending network schools exceeding the scores of students in non-network schools by approximately 0.11 standard deviations; and (2) Network students reported higher levels of academic engagement, motivation to learn, self-efficacy and collaboration skills relative to similar students who attended comparison schools. Effect sizes ranged from 0.12 standard deviations (for motivation to learn) to 0.20 standard deviations (for academic engagement). On the other intrapersonal competencies (perseverance, self-management, creative thinking skills, and locus of control) there were no significant differences between network and comparison students. Exhibits are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562705</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evidence of Deeper Learning Outcomes: Findings from the Study of Deeper Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>2</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Science Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cohort Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Extended School Day</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Allensworth, Elaine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Michelman, Valerie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nomi, Takako</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Heppen, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In Chicago, over a quarter of students fail at least one semester of algebra in their ninth grade year, and only 13% of students who fail both semesters of Algebra I in ninth grade graduate in 4 years. Offering credit recovery options is one strategy to deal with high failure rates. The primary goal of credit recovery programs is to give students an opportunity to retake classes that they failed in an effort to get them back on track and keep them in school (Watson &amp;amp; Gemin, 2008). While it seems like a good idea, the pay-off may not actually be large for a number of reasons: few students who failed in the prior year may show up in the summer for credit recovery; few students may pass even if they do show up; and the gains of attending summer school for learning and for credit accumulation may be very small compared to students&apos; initial deficits in skills or the number of total credits they eventually need to recover. This study examines the benefits of offering expanded credit recovery options for ninth grade algebra, relative to business as usual (i.e., the summer programming schools would offer in the absence of efforts to expand credit recovery). The study incorporates all regular neighborhood high schools in Chicago (76) and all first-time ninth grade students who entered these schools (about 4,000 students in each cohort) between fall 2009 and fall 2011 who failed second semester algebra (Algebra IB). Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562706</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of Expanding Summer Credit Recovery in Algebra</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>25</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Supplementary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Louie, Josephine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rhoads, Christopher</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mark, June</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Recent federal legislation, such as the &amp;quot;No Child Left Behind Act&amp;quot; of 2001 and the &amp;quot;Education Sciences Reform Act (ESRA)&amp;quot; of 2002, has insisted that educational evaluations use rigorous research designs with quantitative outcome measures. In particular, the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) at the U.S. Department of Education has promoted the use of &amp;quot;randomized controlled trials&amp;quot; (RCTs) as the preferred method for educational evaluations that seek to determine the causal effect of interventions. This paper describes a regression discontinuity (RD) study conducted to evaluate the impact of Transition to Algebra (TTA)--a supplemental algebra-readiness curriculum. The TTA curriculum was developed over a period of two years and then evaluated through a formal field test in two Massachusetts high schools in 2011-2012. Outcome data was collected from 85 students who had been properly assigned to the TTA intervention (the &amp;quot;core&amp;quot; treatment group); 9 students who were eligible for the intervention but had been randomly excluded (the &amp;quot;core RCT&amp;quot; comparison group); and 27 students who were ineligible for the TTA intervention due to high Grade 8 Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS8) scores (the &amp;quot;core RD&amp;quot; comparison group). Outcomes were measured using a modified version of the MCAS test, labeled MCASmod. The research team&apos;s experience offers lessons about the implementation of RD studies and the need to work closely with practitioner partners to carry out evaluation designs that address both stakeholder concerns and broader goals of generating rigorous evidence to learn what works in education. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562707</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Challenges When Using the Regression Discontinuity Design in Educational Evaluations: Lessons from the Transition to Algebra Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence Based Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scaling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Biology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thomas, Ally S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bonner, Sarah M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Everson, Howard T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Recently, the authors have been exploring the use of propensity score methods for developing evidence of program impact. Specifically, they have been developing evidence (after one year of implementation) of the effects of the Math Science Partnership in New York City (&amp;quot;MSPinNYC2&amp;quot;) on high school students&apos; achievement--both in terms of course grades and scores on end-ofcourse tests in two key Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines: Integrated Algebra and Living Environment. Using an evidence-based approach which relies on propensity score matching, the authors asked if the program in its early stages is making a difference in students&apos; academic achievement and college readiness. The &amp;quot;MSPinNYC2&amp;quot; program restructures early high school STEM courses to include 6-8 Teaching Assistant Scholars (TAS) who, along with the teachers, facilitate in-classroom group work on a daily basis. Early pilot studies suggested the model of peer-enabled restructured classrooms (PERC) increases student achievement and narrows the achievement gap in high school STEM courses. In its inaugural year the &amp;quot;MSPinNYC2&amp;quot; project recruited over 700 students (n = 711) in four New York City public high schools to participate in PERC classes. The students served by the project are not the academically elite (e.g., only about 20-25% were proficient in math and/or English language arts at the end of 8th grade). In the first year (2011-12) the PERC courses were taught by eleven different high school teachers--all trained in the PERC pedagogical model by the Program&apos;s staff. Each course served between 25-30 students who were tutored in-class by 6 or 7 TAS. The &amp;quot;MSPinNYC2&amp;quot; program is a multi-year, multi-site STEM intervention, with new cohorts of students entering the program each year, it is essential to develop a sound, rigorous method for evaluating the effectiveness and the scalability of the intervention--one that can be replicated each year. The authors are keenly interested in models that allow them to replicate their results from year-to-year with each new cohort of students. Thus, the purpose of this proposed study is to explore the use of a propensity score model that uses a genetic matching algorithm to evaluate the replicability of limited first-year findings, using as participants a new cohort of students who participated in the second year of the program. Specifically, they examine: (1) the effectiveness of using propensity score methods to evaluate a math/science educational intervention; and (2) the replicability of the findings on a new cohort of students. The current study uses an observational design and is a replication of the initial, preliminary propensity score analysis conducted at the end of the first year of the program. The authors describe the variables used, and will continue to use, during the replication phase of the program evaluation efforts. The results from Phase I of the study are presented, while Phase II is still underway during the production of this paper.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562708</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluating Phase II of a New York City-Wide STEM Initiative Using Propensity Score Methods: A Replication Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bayesian Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonparametric Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Causal Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Schools of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Karabatsos, George</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Walker, Stephen G.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The regression discontinuity (RD) design (Thistlewaite &amp;amp; Campbell, 1960; Cook, 2008) provides a framework to identify and estimate causal effects from a non-randomized design. Each subject of a RD design is assigned to the treatment (versus assignment to a non-treatment) whenever her/his observed value of the assignment variable equals or exceeds a cutoff value. The RD design provides a &amp;quot;locally-randomized experiment&amp;quot; under remarkably mild conditions, so that the causal effect of treatment outcomes versus non-treatment outcomes can be identified and estimated at the cutoff (Lee, 2008). Such effect estimates are similar to those of a randomized study (Goldberger, 2008/1972). As a result, since 1997, at least 74 RD-based empirical studies have emerged in the ?fields of education, political science, psychology, economics, statistics, criminology, and health science (see van der Klaauw, 2008; Lee &amp;amp; Lemieux, 2010; Bloom, 2012; Wong et al. 2013; Li et al., 2013). Polynomial and local linear models are standard for RD designs (Bloom, 2012; Imbens &amp;amp; Lemieux, 2008). However, these models can produce biased causal effect estimates, due to the presence of outliers of treatment outcomes; and/or due to incorrect choices of the bandwidth parameter for the local linear model. Currently, the correct choice of bandwidth has only been justified by large-sample theory (Imbens &amp;amp; Kalyanaraman, 2012), and the local linear model for quantile regression (Frandsen et al., 2012) suffers from the &amp;quot;quantile crossing&amp;quot; problem. The authors introduce a novel formulation of their Bayesian nonparametric regression model (BLIND, 2012), which provides causal inference for RD designs. It is an infi?nite-mixture model, that allows the entire probability density of the outcome variable to change ?flexibly as a function of the assignment variable. Moreover, the Bayesian model can provide inferences of causal effects, in terms of how the treatment variable impacts the mean, variance, a quantile, distribution function, probability density, hazard function, and/or any other chosen functional of the outcome variable. Moreover, the accurate causal effect estimation relies on a predictively-accurate model for the data. The Bayesian nonparametric regression model attained best overall predictive performance, over many real data sets, compared to many other regression models (BLIND, 2012). Finally, the authors illustrate their Bayesian model through the causal analysis of two real educational data sets. Figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562709</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Bayesian Nonparametric Causal Model for Regression Discontinuity Designs</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>National Science Foundation (NSF)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>SES1156372</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resilience (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Violence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pilot Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Primary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Crime Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resistance to Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Modification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Infants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Treatment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hinerman, Krystal M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hull, Darrell M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hayes, DeMarquis</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Powell, Marvin G.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ferguson, Sarah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Naslund-Hadley, Emma I.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Belize</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Belize</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of the Childhood Resiliency Effects from Schoolwide Treatment (CREST) Pilot was to implement a comprehensive school wide social and character development program aimed at decreasing violence among students and assisting students exposed to violence in Belize City. This one-year pilot program implemented portions of the Positive Action curriculum with a randomized controlled design with 13 intervention and 12 control primary schools in Belize City. The Positive Action curriculum was developed and revised by Carol Allred from 1977 to the present using continuous process monitoring and evaluation. The current intervention, although not used with the current population, has been found to be effective in significantly improving school performance and behavior in multi-ethnic and diverse samples from various regions in the United States. Positive effects occur more slowly in older children due to the resistance to change commonly experienced by older children. Early introduction of cognitive-behavioral training is essential if children in Belize are to be able to adapt their behavior in response to what they understand as negative outcomes when they do not adapt positively. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562710</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Childhood Resiliency Effects from Schoolwide Treatment: A Cluster Randomized Trial</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>56</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcome Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Williams, R. T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Polanin, J. R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Publication bias is a term that typically refers to the well-known tendency for studies lacking statistically significant results to be less likely to be published in peer-reviewed journals. This happens because authors are less likely to submit, while editors and reviewers are less likely to accept for publication, papers that lack statistically significant results for their primary outcomes. Outcome reporting bias (ORB) is a phenomenon associated with publication bias. The purpose of this study is to investigate the consequences of ORB in education research and how to improve estimation in meta-analysis when ORB is present. One table and 2 figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562711</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Consequences of Outcome Reporting Bias in Education Research</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kaldon, Carolyn R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zoblotsky, Todd A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Previous research has linked inquiry-based science instruction (i.e., science instruction that engages students in doing science rather than just learning about science) with greater gains in student learning than text-book based methods (Vanosdall, Klentschy, Hedges &amp;amp; Weisbaum, 2007; Banilower, 2007; Ferguson 2009; Bredderman, 1983; Shymansky, Hedges, &amp;amp; Woodworth, 1990). The LASER model, being validated in the current study, has already been the subject of a number of case studies (RMC Research Corporation, 2010; Horizon Research, 2010; Vanosdall et al., 2007). However, experimental studies of the type that might establish a causal link between program implementation, student science learning, and other valued outcomes have yet to be conducted. Only a handful of studies have involved random assignment, and most of these have involved random assignment of students in a relatively small number of classrooms (see Furtak et al. 2009). With support from the U.S. Department of Education&apos;s Investing in Innovation Fund (i3), the current validation study of the LASER Model encompasses approximately 60,000 students, 1,900 teachers, and over 140 district administrators and principals. The efficacy of the LASER program has important implications for both research and practice when working with high-poverty schools and districts, who have limited resources and time available for science interventions. LASER&apos;s initial success with early learners also demonstrates its potential for reducing the development of chronic, long-term deficiencies and academic problems. One table and one figure are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562712</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Randomized Controlled Trial Validating the Impact of the LASER Model of Science Education on Student Achievement and Teacher Instruction</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Department of Education (ED), Office of Innovation and Improvement</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Conditions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching (Occupation)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Salaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Futures (of Society)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alternative Teacher Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Recruitment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ganimian, Alejandro</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Alfonso, Mariana</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Santiago, Ana</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Argentina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Argentina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many school systems today are trying to attract top college graduates into teaching, but little is known about what dissuades this target group from entering the profession. This study randomly assigned applicants for a highly-selective alternative pathway into teaching in Argentina either to a survey about their motivations for applying to the program or to surveys that revealed information about their future pay or working conditions. The study found that applicants who received information about pay or working conditions were much more likely to report that they intended to drop out of the selection process, but were no more likely to actually drop out. Applicants with higher undergraduate grade point averages and/or scores in the selection process, however, were both more likely to report that they will drop out and to actually do so. The overall picture that emerges is one in which applicants &amp;quot;bluff&amp;quot;--that is, those who receive this information are more likely to report that they will drop out of the selection process, but they are no more likely to actually drop out. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562713</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Calling Their Bluff: Expressed and Revealed Preferences of Top College Graduates Entering Teaching in Argentina</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>54</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Primary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrichment Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expressive Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Basic Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alphabets</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Receptive Language</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cann, Damon</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Karakaplan, Mustafa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lubke, Margaret</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rowland, Cyndi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New Mexico</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Mexico</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Students&apos; basic reading and math skills can decline significantly during the summer months. Most attribute this to the prolonged period during which young students are outside of a structured learning environment (Cooper et al 1996). While summer learning loss occurs among all income groups, the effects are more pronounced for those from lower-­-income households than those from higher-­-income households where families have sufficient resources to provide enriching summer activities including camps, lessons, tutoring, art programs, and such (Entwisle, Alexander, and Olson 1997). These losses begin even in the earliest years of K-12 schooling and accumulate from year to year as students move through the crucial years of learning to read and have lasting impacts on student achievement (Alexander et al 2007). Moderate levels of evidence suggest that summer programs provided as school can ameliorate regression in achievement over the summer holidays (e.g. Borman and Dowling 2006). These findings have led to renewed interest in summer programs designed to mitigate, or even reverse, the trend of summer learning loss. This paper shares additional findings on the effect of the program through the first grade year. The results show that across four outcome domains of interest--Expressive Vocabulary, Letter-Word ID, Applied Problems, and Basic Writing--students randomly assigned to spend the summer in K-3 Plus outperformed those who were randomly assigned to receive regular school year services only. Results, while preliminary, suggest that the K-3 Plus model is an effective way to improve student achievement in high-poverty schools by ameliorating summer learning loss. A table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562714</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessing the Effectiveness of New Mexico&apos;s K-3 plus Summer Learning Initiative</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Eligibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Required Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Salaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rickles, Jordan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Phillips, Meredith</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yamashiro, Kyo</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Between 1990 and 2012, the percentage of 13-year-olds (most of whom are 8th graders) taking algebra more than doubled, from 15% to 34% (National Center for Education Statistics, 2013). Yet recent education policy changes suggest that this movement to encourage algebra-taking in 8th grade has begun to reverse course. Existing research suggests that taking more advanced math courses has positive effects on academic achievement, college enrollment, and adult earnings. Preliminary analyses results suggest that exposure to 8th grade algebra may improve math course-taking and completion but that these effects do not translate into statistically significant improvements in high school graduation rates or satisfying college eligibility course requirements. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562715</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of 8th Grade Algebra on High School Course-Taking and Math Achievement: Evidence from Changing Practices in a Large Urban District</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trust (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Task Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Paxton, Carol L. C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Leis, Micela</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rimm-Kaufman, Sara E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Northeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper describes a mixed-methods pilot study that was conducted in collaboration with the developers of a new adult community-building intervention called &amp;quot;Leading Together&amp;quot; (LT), which focuses on strengthening relational trust among staff. The primary research focus of the collaboration was to gather and share descriptive information regarding implementation, and to examine program efficacy. From the context of this work, this study examines how principal and teacher collective efficacy beliefs (CEB) change over the two year arc of implementation of the &amp;quot;Leading Together&amp;quot; (LT) professional development program. Ten intervention schools in the northeastern United States were purposefully sampled by the program designers; two of the schools discontinued participation at the conclusion of the first year. The sample at each school included at least one administrator, one school leader teacher, and one school site teacher who did not participate in training or implementation planning. Teams participating in the direct training and facilitation portion of the intervention included principals and school leader teachers, with each of these LT teams ranging from 3-6 members. This study employs a sequential, exploratory mixed methods design. Quantitative analyses are used to identify changes in CE, as well as the subconstructs group competence and task analysis. Interview data are qualitatively analyzed to explore changes in quantitative levels of CE. Results confirm the CE theoretical model and suggest that implementation of LT may provide opportunities to increase CE levels for participants who carry out the program consistently and as intended. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562716</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Collective Efficacy and Adult Community: Teacher and Principal Perceptions after Two Years of Implementing &amp;quot;Leading Together&amp;quot; in Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=861'>R305B090002</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Weiss, Michael J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mayer, Alexander</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cullinan, Dan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ratledge, Alyssa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sommo, Colleen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Diamond, John</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Empirical evidence confirms that increased education is positively associated with higher earnings across a wide spectrum of fields and student demographics (Barrow &amp;amp; Rouse, 2005; Card, 2001; Carneiro, Heckman, &amp;amp; Vytlacil, 2011; Dadgar &amp;amp; Weiss, 2012; Dynarski, 2008; Jacobson &amp;amp; Mokher, 2009; Jepsen, Troske, &amp;amp; Coomes, 2009; Kane &amp;amp; Rouse, 1995; Marcotte, 2004). College degree holders earn higher salaries and experience unemployment less frequently than those who do not have college degrees (Dadgar &amp;amp; Weiss, 2012), and those who attended college, regardless of degree receipt, report higher rates of job satisfaction, promotion opportunities, increased work responsibilities, and improved work performance (Hoachlander, Sikora, &amp;amp; Horn, 2003). For many low-income students, the pathway to higher education and increased earnings begins in community colleges, which currently enroll about one-third of American degreeseekers (Digest of Education Statistics, 2012). However, community college students&apos; persistence and completion rates leave much room for improvement. Among students beginning at public two-year colleges, fewer than half earn a credential or transfer to a four-year institution within six years after their initial enrollment (Radford, Berkner, Wheeless, &amp;amp; Shepherd, 2010). Many community college students stop or drop out long before graduation day, losing out on the full complement of higher earnings and employment outcomes associated with higher education. One factor contributing to these low success rates is the fact that many students arrive on campus only to find that they are required to take non-credit-bearing courses, called &amp;quot;developmental&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;remedial&amp;quot; education courses, prior to enrolling in college-level courses (Duke &amp;amp; Strawn, 2008). One estimate of the prevalence of students required to complete developmental coursework suggests that among students whose first institution attended was a community college, around 60 percent took a remedial course at a postsecondary institution (Adelman, 2004; Bailey, Jeong, &amp;amp; Cho, 2009). Unsurprisingly, degree or certificate attainment rates among students who need developmental education are even lower than those of the general population (Attewell, Lavin, Domina, &amp;amp; Levey, 2006). Students in need of developmental education are not just failing to earn a credential -- the majority never complete the developmental course sequence to which they are referred (Bailey 2009). One popular strategy aimed at addressing the issues of students referred to developmental courses (as well as students in college-level courses) is called &amp;quot;learning communities,&amp;quot; or LCs. The LC evaluated in this study produced positive short-term impacts on academic outcomes including credits attempted and credits earned and students&apos; progression through the developmental reading sequence of courses. Given these positive results, similar learning communities for developmental reading and math students in community colleges were replicated and evaluated at five other schools. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562717</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Random Assignment Evaluation of Learning Communities Seven Years Later: Impacts on Education and Earnings Outcomes</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>21</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Treatment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equations (Mathematics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Price, Cristofer</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Unlu, Fatih</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New Jersey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Jersey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Comparative Short Interrupted Time Series (C-SITS) design is a frequently employed quasi-experimental method, in which the pre- and post-intervention changes observed in the outcome levels of a treatment group is compared with those of a comparison group where the difference between the former and the latter is attributed to the treatment. The increase in the availability and quality of extant data (e.g., state test scores, graduation rates, and college application rates in primary and secondary education and cognitive, language, and socio-emotional assessments in pre-school settings) has made the use of C-SITS designs a more viable option for assessing the impacts of interventions. Despite the recent growth in its use, the existing resources on how to estimate minimum detectable effects for this design are still very limited. This paper aims to address the limitations of existing research on this topic by: (1) deriving expressions for the variance of the various C-SITS estimators; and (2) providing plausible values for the critical variance parameters calculated using school-level test scores from state assessments. The study is ongoing at the time of this publication. Preliminary findings show that when appropriate plausible values are entered into the formulae provided in this paper, there is a close correspondence between the standard errors estimated from the formulae and those obtained from fitting models to actual data. The formulae and plausible values in this paper provide analysts with a flexible basis for estimating MDES for various C-SITS designs, and serves as a template for accumulation of relevant information that can be used to build databases of plausible values that inform the designs of future studies. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562718</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Unified Framework for Estimating Minimum Detectable Effects for Comparative Short Interrupted Time Series Designs</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Check Lists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Porche, Michelle</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Grossman, Jenny</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Biro, Nova</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>MacKay, Nancy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rivers, Sojourner</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Research on social and emotional learning (SEL) has largely focused on classroom interventions and student-­ and classroom­-level outcomes. Few studies have examined whole­-school and district-­level SEL implementations, or how to ensure that SEL programs are implemented effectively and sustained over time. This study examines both process outcomes and program impact as Open Circle is rolled out across a large, urban district over a three-year period beginning in June 2012. The study investigates the following research questions: (1) What are the critical factors to successful implementation of a whole­-school, comprehensive SEL program as it is scaled up across one third of elementary schools serving grades K­-5 in a large urban school district over a three-year period?; and (2) How will the implementation of the &amp;quot;Open Circle Curriculum&amp;quot; and corresponding professional development influence school climate, teacher practice, students&apos; social and emotional skill development, and behavior? The sample in this study includes over 7,000 students, 400 classrooms, and 23 schools. Primary data from the first two years gathered through classroom observation and student surveys in grades 3 and 5, Open Circle fidelity checklists completed by coaches and observers, semi­-annual online surveys completed by teachers, administrators and school support staff, focus group and individual interviews with staff, and training attendance and coaching logs provide data to measure program implementation, school climate, and social and emotional development at the student, classroom, school, and district levels. Preliminary results indicate that this whole-­school SEL program is highly scalable, reaching over 7,000 students with training for nearly 800 staff members at 23 district schools in a two­-year period. Key success factors have been robust whole­-school professional development, high quality implementation, initial and ongoing principal and district administrator support, and teacher buy-in. Forthcoming data will enable further conclusions about outcomes and impact. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562719</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Collaboration to Achieve Whole School SEL across a Large, Urban District</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Value Added Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Isenberg, Eric</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Max, Jeffrey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gleason, Philip</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Potamites, Liz</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Santillano, Robert</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hock, Heinrich</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hansen, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Recent federal policy initiatives are aimed at improving disadvantaged students&apos; access to effective teaching. These efforts, including Race to the Top and the Teacher Incentive Fund, arise from concerns that disadvantaged students are taught by less effective teachers. A growing body of research uses value-added analysis to measure teacher effectiveness and then examine whether disadvantaged students receive less effective teaching. Value added measures a teacher&apos;s contribution to student learning, accounting for the student&apos;s previous achievement level and background characteristics. Given the importance of teachers in improving student achievement and concerns about unequal access to effective teachers (Jerald et al. 2009; Brown and Haycock 2011), more evidence on access to effective teaching is needed. To address this need, the U.S. Department of Education&apos;s Institute of Education Sciences contracted with Mathematica Policy Research to examine access to effective teaching in a diverse set of school districts nationwide over a five-year period from the 2008-2009 to the 2012-2013 school years. This report addresses access to effective teaching in grades 4 through 8 for the first three years of the study (2008-2009 through 2011).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562721</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Access to Effective Teaching for Disadvantaged Students in 29 School Districts</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Care</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Environmental Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Feller, Avi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Grindal, Todd</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Miratrix, Luke</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Page, Lindsay C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Head Start programs currently provide early childhood education and family support services to more than 900,000 low-income children and their families across the United States with an annual budget of around $8 billion in state and federal funds. Researchers and policy makers have debated the program&apos;s effectiveness since its inception in 1964. Dozens of studies (see for example Currie &amp;amp; Thomas, 1993; Deming, 2009; Ludwig &amp;amp; Miller, 2007) over the last four decades have provided a mixed picture of results with some showing strong positive impacts and others indicating small or null effects. In an effort to resolve these long standing disputes over the impact of Head Start, the Administration for Children and Families commissioned a random assignment study of Head Start programs in 2000. To date, the results of the Head Start Impact Study (HSIS) have done little to settle debates about the effects of Head Start attendance on children&apos;s development. Some have suggested that the HSIS results may be attributable, in part, to the fact that more than one-third of children assigned to the study control group enrolled in some form of early childhood education that offered services similar to those provided by Head Start (National Forum on Early Childhood Policy and Programs, 2010). There is some empirical support for this hypothesis. However, unpacking treatment effect by variation in control group setting is difficult using traditional methods. The standard Two-Stage Least Squares (TSLS) framework can be used to estimate effects of Head Start relative to no Head Start among students who are &amp;quot;compliers&amp;quot; with the randomization scheme. Yet, there are many other instances of uncontrolled variation that are of policy interest in the context of HSIS. Given this variation, an important question to ask is whether enrollment in Head Start by virtue of the randomized offer to do so has differential effects according to the alternate care type setting in which a child would otherwise be. In this paper, the authors extend the main HSIS findings to examine whether the offer of Head Start was differentially beneficial for students grouped by the care setting they would have received absent the offer of Head Start. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562722</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Compared to What? Estimating Causal Effects for Latent Subgroups to Understand Variation in the Impacts of Head Start by Alternate Child Care Setting</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time on Task</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Required Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nomi, Takako</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Raudenbush, Stephen W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Algebra is often considered as a gateway for later achievement. A recent report by the Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008) underscores the importance of improving algebra learning in secondary school. Today, a growing number of states and districts require algebra for all students in ninth grade or earlier. Chicago is at the forefront of this movement. Many low-achieving students took remedial math before 1997 and the algebra-for-all policy immersed these students in academic coursework for the first time. Moreover, these low-achieving students experienced a rise in the ability levels of their classroom peers. However, this study suggests that simply requiring algebra is insufficient to improve their outcomes, even though students may benefit from having higher achieving peers in their classrooms. Overall, taking Algebra, instead of remedial math, would have no significant effect and this may be because students lack sufficient skills to handle algebra. Chicago subsequently implemented double-dose algebra to address this problem, and research showed that offering extended instructional time and instructional supports to teachers was successful in improving algebra learning of low achieving students (Nomi and Allensworth, 2009; 2010). Table and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562723</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Algebra for All: The Effect of Algebra Coursework and Classroom Peer Academic Composition on Low-Achieving Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>St. Clair, Travis</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hallberg, Kelly</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cook, Thomas D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Indiana Statewide Testing for Educ Progress Plus</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress Plus</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Researchers are increasingly using comparative interrupted time series (CITS) designs to estimate the effects of programs and policies when randomized controlled trials are not feasible. In a simple interrupted time series design, researchers compare the pre-treatment values of a treatment group time series to post-treatment values in order to assess the impact of a treatment, without any comparison group to account for confounding factors. The CITS design is a version of the ITS design in which both a treatment and a comparison group are evaluated both before and after the onset of a treatment. A growing body of literature is employing a within study comparison (WSC) methodology to examine the validity of the CITS model. WSC studies empirically estimate the extent to which a given observational study reproduces the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) when both share the same treatment group, and represent a rigorous method of evaluating non-experimental designs using real data. A number of recent within-study comparisons have demonstrated that CITS can produce estimates that are comparable to those from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in practice. In the St. Clair et al. (2014) application, the authors found that correspondence with the RCT was possible when the CITS model accounted for baseline trends, but that additional time points could actually increase bias when the pre-treatment trend was not modeled correctly. Examination of the pretreatment trends in this data set showed clearly that in at least one of the outcomes the treatment and comparison groups had different slopes in the pretreatment period, and as a result the &amp;quot;parallel trends&amp;quot; assumption often invoked in the difference-in-difference literature was clearly violated. This paper employs a within study comparison (WSC) methodology to examine the performance of two approaches: (1) a more flexible modeling approach, which employs year fixed-effects rather than trying to parametrically model the pretest trend; and (2) match treatment and comparison cases to reduce reliance on modeling the pretreatment trend. The paper then compares the approaches to the performance of the baseline mean and baseline slope models across three datasets. The purpose of this research is two-fold: (1) to examine what approach, if any, works in the unclear functional form case; and (2) to examine the relative superiority of the different approaches across the three datasets in terms of both bias reduction and precision. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562724</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Causal Inference and the Comparative Interrupted Time Series Design: Findings from Within-Study Comparisons</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Entrance Age</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jenkins, Jade Marcus</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Farkas, George</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Duncan, Greg J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burchinal, Margaret</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vandell, Deborah Lowe</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Oklahoma</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oklahoma</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study is a secondary data analysis of data collected on preschool and kindergarten-aged children in Tulsa, Oklahoma in the fall of 2006 to study the effects of school and community-based public early learning programs on children&apos;s cognitive and social-emotional outcomes. Children in the study participated in the state-funded pre-k program, in the county Head Start (HS) program, or a combination of both. The present study aims to compare the overall effects of a high-quality state pre-k program and Head Start; compare the effects of different pathways into pre-k and Head Start; and to test whether two years of participation in public early learning programs (age three and age four participation) are more effective than one year (age four participation only). The overall sample includes 1,985 pre-k entrants; 739 HS entrants; and 4,121 kindergarten entrants (1,597 pre-k graduates; 474 HS graduates; and 2,050 who did not attend a public preschool program). The data come from four sources: direct cognitive assessments of children at the beginning of the school year; parent surveys collected at their child&apos;s cognitive assessment; social-emotional assessments conducted by each child&apos;s teacher; and administrative data from Tulsa Public Schools and Head Start. Using propensity-score matched groups, a regression discontinuity (RD) design was implemented to estimate program effects on outcomes at kindergarten entry. Findings show that while both pre-k and HS are effective at improving children&apos;s pre-academic skills at school entry after one year of participation, the high-quality Oklahoma pre-k program produces stronger gains in skills at the start of kindergarten than the Oklahoma HS program. Study limitations are discussed. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562725</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Comparing the Effectiveness of Head Start and State Pre-K Using a Propensity-Score Matching Regression Discontinuity Design</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>21</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Schools of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multicultural Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Pluralism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reichman, Roxana G.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>European Union</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>European Union</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The globalized world we live in has forced institutions of higher education and of teacher education to deal with different aspects of diversity. More and more institution have become involved in creating programs geared at promoting multiculturalism on campus, as well as in changing the curriculum in order to make it more relevant to students who have to be prepared to live and work in a multicultural society. Previous research has shown the importance of using diverse assessment techniques in order to make sure that the programs meet the needs of the faculty and of the students who take part in developing and teaching courses on this subject both at the undergraduate and at the graduate level (Krishnamurthi, 2003, Levitan &amp;amp; Wolf, 1994, Brown, 2008). There are many definitions of multiculturalism but the common denominator stresses the importance of a conscious effort to assure that all people, regardless of race, religion, gender, etc get equal opportunities to live, study and work in any heterogeneous society. The objective of this paper is to present and examine a model used for the assessment process of the curriculum which has been developed for multicultural education and cultural diversity training by 60 consortium members over a year. The present study focuses specifically on the criteria for choosing this specific model, which borrowed from several models of assessing curriculum reform in the field of multicultural education in teacher education and in higher education. It is important to stress the fact that the curriculum developed by the consortium members does not only affect the institutions that will implement it, but it also has a domino effect because the teachers who are exposed to it will hopefully influence their schools at all levels and thus will have an impact on students of all ages.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562726</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Case Study of Assessing an International Initiative on Curriculum Reform</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kizil, Ruhan Circi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Briggs, Derek</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Seidel, Kent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Green, Kathy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Colorado</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Colorado</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The evidence that teacher preparation programs have an impact on teacher quality is often limited. Progress in research on this topic will remain rather limited in its influence on practice until more proximal measures of teacher education outcomes can be established. The dearth of variables to measure the impact of teacher preparation programs on teacher skills constitutes a measurement problem. As a part of a three year Institute of Education Sciences (IES)-funded project, the big picture motivating questions for the present study are as follows: (1) What is the best characterization of the dimensional structure of the core competencies (CC) survey?; and (2) How does the choice of dimensional structure change inferences about differences in quality among teacher preparation programs in Colorado? This study utilized data collected from all teacher preparation programs in Colorado. There are two groups of self-selected participants in this study: novice teachers in their first three years of teaching (graduates); and respondents just completing their preparation programs at the time of survey administration (candidates). A total of 648 graduates from 18 programs responded to at least some portion of the graduate survey, and a total of 355 candidates from 13 programs responded to at least some portion of the candidate survey. Both surveys were administered using the survey software Qualtrics via the internet. Three approaches are used for exploring dimensional structure: (1) exploratory factor analysis (EFA); (2) confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); and (3) bi-factor analysis. Findings show the following: (1) on the basis of a purely exploratory approach, an argument can be advanced for collapsing CCs into an overall composite; (2) on the basis of a confirmatory approach, an argument can be advanced for reporting 8 dimensions; (3) the bi-factor approach can be seen as a compromise between the first two approaches; and (4) the consequence of decisions made about how to represent the dimensional structure of the instrument such that each different outcome measure lead to different results. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562727</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Study Examining the Dimensionality of Core Competencies Measure in Teacher Preparation Programs: Challenges and Lessons</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Promotion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Leyva, Diana</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yoshikawa, Hirokazu</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Snow, Catherine E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Treviño, Ernesto</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rolla, Andrea</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Barata, M. Clara</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Weiland, Christina</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Chile</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Munoz Language Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Chile</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Munoz Language Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In recent years, governments across the world have increased their investments in early childhood education programs (Britto, Yoshikawa, &amp;amp; Boller, 2011; Engle et al., 2011; Myers, 2006; UNESCO, 2006). This investment in preprimary education reflects the proven value of providing early learning opportunities in promoting later educational attainment and earnings (Cunha &amp;amp; Heckman, 2006). While the initial focus for those interested in improving early childhood education in low and middle-income countries was access, the reform emphasis has progressively shifted to quality and equity, as overall access has improved in many nations. The intervention program &amp;quot;Un Buen Comienzo&amp;quot; (A Good Start) constitutes the first large-scale, randomized evaluation of an effort to improve the quality of preschool education in South America. &amp;quot;Un Buen Comienzo&amp;quot; (henceforth UBC) is an intensive two-year intervention that provides professional development program to prekindergarten and kindergarten teachers in Chile, with the goal of enhancing children&apos;s language, literacy, health and socio-emotional outcomes. This study provides useful data on classroom quality under usual conditions in government-funded pre-kindergarten and kindergarten classrooms in urban Chile. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562728</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Can We Improve Preschool Classroom Quality in Chile? A Cluster-Randomized Trial Evaluation of a Professional Development Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>29</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Research Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stricker, Lawrence J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rock, Donald A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pollack, Judith M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wenglinsky, Harold H.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explored individual differences in educational disadvantage-- deficits in formal and informal education in the school, home, and elsewhere--in the SAT test-taking population. Factor analysis identified six educational disadvantage factors--four concerning the students&apos; schools and two the students&apos; nativity and parenting--and one family socioeconomic status factor, race/ethnicity, high school grades, and SAT scores. The individual-differences perspective on disadvantage appears to be a viable one, and educational disadvantage seems to be a meaningful and useful construct. The following are appended: (1) Letters; and (2) Questionnaire.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562729</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Measuring Educational Disadvantage of SAT® Candidates. Research Report No. 2002-1. ETS RR-02-01</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>30</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>74</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>In State Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shobo, Yetty</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wong, Jen D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bell, Angie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>West Virginia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>West Virginia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Regression discontinuity (RD), an &amp;quot;as good as randomized,&amp;quot; research design is increasingly prominent in education research in recent years; the design gets eligible quasi-experimental designs as close as possible to experimental designs by using a stated threshold on a continuous baseline variable to assign individuals to a &amp;quot;treatment&amp;quot;. Fuzzy RD in which the threshold does not perfectly predict treatment receipt is a subset of this increasingly popular design. In higher education, RD design is increasingly prominent in estimating the impact of merit-based aids on enrollment, school completion, grade point average (GPA), and other key outcomes. Merit-based aids are increasingly allocated based on individuals meeting multiple academic proficiency criteria. A careful examination of merit-based scholarship is particularly critical in West Virginia, a state with the lowest percent of adults 25 and older who have a Bachelor&apos;s degree (US Census, 2006). Started in 2002, the West Virginia PROMISE grant aimed to &amp;quot;improve high school and post secondary academic achievement through scholarship incentives&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;promote access to higher education by reducing cost to students.&amp;quot; Originally, the grant provided full tuition for attending public colleges (equivalent amount was provided for students in in-state not-for-profit private colleges) but it now provides a maximum of $4750 towards tuition. Academic eligibility to receive and continue receiving the four-year maximum grant is increasingly stringent. The present study utilizes propensity scoring technique in a frontier RD design to estimate the effects of West Virginia&apos;s (WV) PROMISE on the quantity (4- and 5-year graduate rates, sum of credits earned) and quality (cumulative GPA) of long-term college indicators. The study examines the effects of receiving West Virginia&apos;s PROMISE scholarship for in-state students attending four-year public institutions. The present study uses fuzzy and frontier RD designs because PROMISE receipt is not perfect above the threshold and is based on multiple criteria. Administrative data was obtained from West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission (WVHEPC). This study demonstrates the significant potential that the frontier RD and the propensity score weighting techniques hold for education research. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562730</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Estimating the Impact of the PROMISE Scholarship Using Propensity Score Weighted Frontier Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Word Problems (Mathematics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Perceptual Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thai, Khanh-Phuong</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Son, Ji Y.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hoffman, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Devers, Christopher</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kellman, Philip J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Idaho</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Idaho</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Mathematics is the study of structure but students think of math as solving problems according to rules. Students can learn procedures, but they often have trouble knowing when to apply learned procedures, especially to problems unlike those they trained with. In this study, the authors rely on the psychological mechanism of perceptual learning (PL), the natural ability to extract invariant information across multiple learning experiences, to bring about this early appreciation of structure. In two studies, the authors examined the effectiveness of a PL approach to word problems, and to explore the relationship between understanding structure and solving. We designed and tested a PL based intervention called Math Problem Insight (MPI). In MPI, elementary school students practice solving and representing the structure of many word problems that varied along contextual and mathematical dimensions. The goal of MPI is to encourage the learner&apos;s own attentional system to highlight and extract invariant structure from varied contexts, by providing variations of verbal structures that map onto related abstract representations. The main research questions were: (1) Can PL interventions in which representation is the goal (rather than computing) help students make better generalization and use symbols to represent situations?; and (2) Are students who are proficient at solving are equally proficient in structure representation? In Study 1, the authors measured students&apos; improvements in solving and representing the structure of word problems from solving and mapping practice with a PL intervention. The study also examined whether students were equally adept at solving and representing equivalent problems. In Study 2, they randomly assigned students to have only either representing experience (the Mapping condition) or solving experience (the Solving condition) during the PL intervention, to examine whether these particular short exercises led to task specific or general improvements with word problems. In Study 1, third-grade homeschoolers enrolled in an online school in Idaho completed the study from home, as part of typical online math assignments. Each student was individually assigned login names and passwords so that they could complete the assignment at their own pace. In Study 2, third-graders from an elementary school in a Midwestern town logged in from their school computers to complete the study. This school expressed interest in the MPI intervention because they had a decrease in the percentage of students passing mathematics. Although Studies 1 and 2 are difficult to compare directly due to different participant groups, the results were consistent with the possibility that the strongest PLM intervention effects occurred when mapping problems, requiring interactions with problem structures across representational formats, were mixed with solving practice also specifically designed to enhance PL. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562731</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Perceptual Learning in Early Mathematics: Interacting with Problem Structure Improves Mapping, Solving and Fluency</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dong, Nianbo</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lipsey, Mark</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>When randomized control trials (RCT) are not feasible, researchers seek other methods to make causal inference, e.g., propensity score methods. One of the underlined assumptions for the propensity score methods to obtain unbiased treatment effect estimates is the ignorability assumption, that is, conditional on the propensity score, treatment assignment is independent of the outcome. The purpose of this study is to use within-study comparisons to assess how well propensity score methods can approximate experiments under various conditions. The authors test three ways of constructing comparison groups: (1) using the sample from the states that are different from the original experiments, with pretest and demographic information; (2) using the sample from the same state and districts (local matching) with the experiments, with demographic information only; and (3) same as (2) but with pretest as well. Propensity score methods (optimal matching, propensity score weighting, and stratification) are used to estimate the treatment effects for three ways of constructing comparison groups, which are compared with the benchmark from the experiment to assess estimate bias. This study will contribute to the literature by providing empirical evidence about how well propensity score methods can approximate experiments under various conditions. This study uses data from four IES funded projects, among which three are large scaled experiments: (1) &amp;quot;Scaling up TRIAD: Teaching Early Mathematics for Understanding with Trajectories and Technologies&amp;quot;; (2) &amp;quot;Evaluating the Effectiveness of Tennessee&apos;s Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten Program&amp;quot;; and (3) &amp;quot;Experimental Evaluation of the Tools of the Mind Pre-K Curriculum&amp;quot;, and one is a measurement study, &amp;quot;Learning-Related Cognitive Self-Regulation School Readiness Measures for Preschool Children Study&amp;quot;. The analysis is undergoing. The authors report partial results in this report. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562732</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Empirical Benchmarks of Hidden Bias in Educational Research: Implication for Assessing How well Propensity Score Methods Approximate Experiments and Conducting Sensitivity Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>32</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pustejovsky, James E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Single-case designs are a class of research designs for evaluating intervention effects on individual cases. The designs are widely applied in certain fields, including special education, school psychology, clinical psychology, social work, and applied behavior analysis. The multiple baseline design (MBD) is the most frequently used single-case design, and is often described as having desirable internal validity characteristics. This paper examines how the use of certain hierarchical linear models that have been proposed for the MBD affect internal validity, focusing specifically on the two key features described above. First, the author considers a deliberate but non-random method of treatment assignment. I demonstrate that the treatment effect estimate from a conventional multi-level model can be biased under this mechanism, then provide an expression for the magnitude of the bias. Second, he argues that the main analytic models proposed for the MBD fail to capture the benefits of staggered treatment introduction. The author proposes an alternative model that does account for this key feature and, based on the model, he defines an index measuring the strength of control offered by the MBD. A table and figure are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562733</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>On Internal Validity in Multiple Baseline Designs</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>21</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Public School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economically Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Urban Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lochmiller, Chad R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sugimoto, Thomas J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Muller, Patricia A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Kentucky</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Appalachia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Kentucky</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>CNA Corporation</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this descriptive study was to determine the rates of retention, mobility, and attrition for classroom teachers in Kentucky public schools, as well as how those rates might vary by various teacher and school characteristics. The study looks at retention, defined as teachers returning to their same classroom (&amp;quot;stayers&amp;quot;); mobility, when teachers change schools within the school system (&amp;quot;movers&amp;quot;); and attrition, when teachers leave the system (&amp;quot;leavers&amp;quot;) from one year to the next. The study used data on teachers collected by the Kentucky Center for Education &amp;amp; Workforce Statistics on every teacher employed in PK-12 public schools in academic years 2008/09, 2009/10, 2010/11, and 2011/12. Data on schools were obtained from the National Center for Education Statistics Common Core of Data. The study found that the Kentucky teacher workforce was largely stable across the study period (2008-2012). Most teachers (85.6 percent, on average) stayed in the same school from one year to the next, 6.0 percent moved to a different school, and 8.4 percent left the public school system. The study revealed some variation in rates based on select teacher and school characteristics. In particular, teachers with the fewest years of experience, teachers in urban schools, and teachers in schools where more students are eligible for free or reduced price lunch were retained at the lowest rates. Data sources and methods are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562734</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher Retention, Mobility, and Attrition in Kentucky Public Schools from 2008 to 2012. REL 2016-116</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>19</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia. Available from: Institute of Education Sciences. 555 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20208. Tel: 800-872-5327; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES12C0005</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?ProjectID=436</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Phelps, Geoffrey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jones, Nathan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Shuangshuang</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kisa, Zahid</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>District of Columbia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>District of Columbia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A variety of factors have converged in the last decade to focus attention on the need for more rigorous designs of professional development (PD). Teacher development is increasingly viewed as one of the primary levers for improving teaching quality and ultimately student achievement. The authors present data from the Teacher Knowledge Assessment System (TKAS), which is designed to administer the Learning Mathematics for Teaching (LMT) measures. TKAS is being widely adopted in the evaluation of PD programs with over 500 separate program administrations and 16,000 teachers representing every major region in the country. The study findings provided potential guidance for the design of studies using teacher knowledge as an outcome measure. Also, the results provide context relevant guidelines (e.g., test outcome, characteristics of teachers, school or program) that researchers may use individually or in combination to design studies and/or assess the practical impact of teacher PD interventions.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562735</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining Teacher, School, and Program Moderators in the Context of Teacher Professional Development Studies</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>26</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Context Effect</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College School Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Persuasive Discourse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gallagher, H. Alix</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Woodworth, Katrina</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCaffrey, Teresa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Park, Christina J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wang, Haiwen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (South)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (West)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Improving teacher effectiveness is a key strategy to ensure student readiness for college and careers and to address achievement gaps and persistent low performance. In response to the new Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts (CCSS-ELA) the National Writing Project (NWP) created a professional development (PD) program to support third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade teachers with their writing instruction. In partnership with the NWP, researchers sought to study the implementation of the program, estimate its effects, understand how context affected implementation, and provide formative feedback about the program. This study had four primary research questions: (1) Was the PD program implemented with fidelity?; (2) What impact did the PD program have on teacher practice?; (3) What impact did the PD program have on student writing?; and (4) How did contextual factors influence teachers&apos; uptake of new ideas in their classrooms? The NWP is a network of approximately 200, university-based Local Writing Project (LWP) sites that deliver PD throughout the country. LWP sites share a common model that includes university faculty working in collaboration with K-12 expert teachers. The NWP received a Supporting Effective Educator Development (SEED) grant in 2012. The NWP issued an RFP to LWP sites interested in participating in the SEED program and evaluation and actively recruited sites that had a track record of providing intensive in-service PD with elementary teachers and experience in high-need schools. NWP launched the program in partnership with 14 LWP sites, located in 13 states, including 7 in the South, 3 in the Midwest, 2 in the West. The evaluation was designed as a cluster randomized controlled trial in which schools were assigned to either the treatment or control condition. LWP sites identified at least one pair of high-poverty schools, defined as a school in which at least 50% of students are from low-income families. The 14 LWP sites recruited 22 pairs of elementary schools for the study. During the winter of 2013, one school attrited; researchers dropped its matched pair, resulting in a final sample of 13 LWP sites and 42 schools (21 pairs). The SEED program targeted all third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade teachers in program schools. To measure program impacts on students, researchers administered on-demand writing prompts to all students in mainstream third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade classes in both program and control schools in the fall of 2012 and spring of 2013. Despite the research-based attributes of the SEED PD (see Yoon et al., 2007) and its influences on program school teachers&apos; instructional practices, SEED PD did not impact student argument writing as measured by on-demand prompts scored on the National Writing Project&apos;s AWC. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562736</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Impact Evaluation of National Writing Project Professional Development Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developing Nations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Primary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Basic Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>After School Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Assistants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Duflo, Annie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kiessel, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Ghana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Ghana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Rigorous evidence from around the world has shown that significant improvements in learning can be obtained at comparatively low cost by spending more, focused time ensuring that the bottom half of the class in the early grades does not get left behind. The authors present results from the Teacher Community Assistant Initiative (TCAI) that tests the provision of remedial education as one possible solution to low learning levels in school. The theory of change of this program is simple: primary schools across the developing world fail to equip pupils with basic literacy and numeracy skills, often because schools are not able to target teaching to the actual learning levels of pupils. TCAI data collection included a baseline, 6 rolling midlines and 2 endline surveys. Preliminary results from the first endline indicated that the interventions which focus on targeting instruction at the level of the child--in-school and after-school remedial classes, as well as teacher training--had significant positive effects on basic skills in reading and math after only 10 weeks of instruction. Results reported both remedial during or after school remediation by TCAs are promising approaches and potential impacts can be quite high when implemented adequately.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562737</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Every Child Counts: Adapting and Evaluating Research Results on Remedial Education across Contexts</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culture Fair Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Opinion Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This is the College Board&apos;s response to a research article by Drs. Maria Veronica Santelices and Mark Wilson in the Harvard Educational Review, entitled &amp;quot;Unfair Treatment? The Case of Freedle, the SAT, and the Standardization Approach to Differential Item Functioning&amp;quot; (see EJ930622).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562738</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>College Board Response to &amp;quot;Harvard Educational Review&amp;quot; Article by Santelices and Wilson</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-06-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>2</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time to Degree</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bachelors Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Proprietary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sex</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ginder, Scott A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelly-Reid, Janice E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mann, Farrah B.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<dc:type>Information Analyses</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Center for Education Statistics (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>RTI International</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This &amp;quot;First Look&amp;quot; presents findings from the provisional data of the IPEDS winter 2014-15 data collection, which included four survey components: (1) Graduation Rates (GR); (2) 200 Percent Graduation Rates (GR200); (3) Student Financial Aid (SFA); and (4) Admissions (ADM). GR and GR200 present graduation rates for selected cohorts within 100, 150, and 200 percent of normal program completion time (e.g., &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; program completion time for a bachelor&apos;s degree would be 4 years). SFA collects the number of undergraduate students awarded aid as well as the amount of the aid awarded to those students. ADM collects information about the undergraduate selection process for entering first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students. Data for these components were collected through the IPEDS web-based data collection system. Though fielded during the same collection period, each survey component collected data on different groups of individuals (e.g., cohorts starting at a specific time). The purpose of this report is to introduce new data through tables containing descriptive information. The findings presented here demonstrate the range of information available through IPEDS. The following are appended: (1) Data Collection Procedures; and (2) Glossary of IPEDS Terms.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562739</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Graduation Rates for Selected Cohorts, 2006-11; Student Financial Aid, Academic Year 2013-14; and Admissions in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2014. First Look (Provisional Data). NCES 2015-181</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Center for Education Statistics</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Center for Education Statistics. Available from: ED Pubs. P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398. Tel: 877-433-7827; Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES13C0056</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link>http://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2015181</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culture Fair Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Class</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sathy, Viji</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Opinion Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This is the College Board&apos;s response to Roy O. Freedle&apos;s article in the Harvard Educational Review, entitled &amp;quot;Correcting the SAT&apos;s Ethnic and Social Class Bias: A Method for Reestimating SAT Scores.&amp;quot; It is the authors&apos; view that Freedle has presented no argument that would justify removing or de-emphasizing a critical college success skill, such as reading, from the SAT. Nor has he presented a credible case for constructing tests that are very difficult for the intended population of examinees. [To view the &amp;quot;Harvard Educational Review&amp;quot; article in ERIC, see EJ669197.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562740</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>College Board Response to &amp;quot;Harvard Educational Review&amp;quot; Article by Freedle</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2004-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>2</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Well Being</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stress Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relaxation Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Promotion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feasibility Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Burnout</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Burnout</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harris, Alexis R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jennings, Patricia A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Abenavoli, Rachel M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Katz, Deirdre A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Greenberg, Mark T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schussler, Deborah</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Maslach Burnout Inventory</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Maslach Burnout Inventory</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The current study involved the development, implementation, and evaluation of a universal school-based intervention designed to promote health and wellbeing among educators. This study aims to further investigate the efficacy of contemplative practices as a support for teacher wellbeing. The study contributes a new perspective to the current literature by including both classroom teachers and other school personnel and by testing an innovative intervention model. CALM is an intervention program based in gentle yoga and mindfulness practices designed specifically to promote health and wellbeing among teachers and school personnel by providing a daily stress reduction practice as well as empowering participants with skills and strategies to be used outside of the program. The current research tested the feasibility and efficacy of CALM, a 16-week brief daily yoga-based program integrated into the school setting. This study involved a quasi-experimental efficacy trial involving 64 educators from two schools. This study demonstrates that a brief daily program of mindfulness and yoga practice is a feasible strategy to impact educators&apos; social-emotional competence and wellbeing. One figure and one table are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562741</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Daily Dose of CALM: Supporting Middle School Educators&apos; Wellbeing and Classroom Functioning through a Brief Stress Reduction Intervention</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bibliographies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Coaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Wiseness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sathy, Viji</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - Bibliographies</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This is a bibliographic list of coaching studies on the SAT conducted by external researchers.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562742</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Coaching Studies on the SAT® Conducted by External Researchers</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-09-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>1</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcome Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graphs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Theobald, Roddy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Richardson, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A central goal of the education literature is to demonstrate that specific educational interventions--instructional interventions at the student or classroom level, structural interventions at the school level, or funding interventions at the school district level, for example--have a &amp;quot;treatment effect&amp;quot; on student achievement. This paper has three objectives. First, Theobald and Richardson explain both how Single World Intervention Templates (SWITs) unify two existing approaches to causality--potential outcomes and directed acyclic graphs (DAGs)--and their utility as a framework for discussing confounding and causality. Second, Theobald and Richardson introduce a specific SWIT that can be used to discuss confounding and causality in a &amp;quot;pre/post&amp;quot; study of an educational intervention. Finally, Theobald and Richardson use this SWIT to discuss the assumptions necessary for common estimation methods to produce an unbiased estimate of the treatment effect of a non-randomized educational intervention. The study concludes a central goal of this paper is to illustrate the utility of graphs, and single world intervention templates (SWITs) in particular, as a means of communicating these assumptions. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562743</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluating Non-Randomized Educational Interventions: A Graphical Discussion</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Structures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intellectual Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interest Inventories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spatial Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonverbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonverbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ackerman, Philip L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>College Level Examination Program</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>NEO Five Factor Inventory</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Interest Inventory</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Minnesota</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Minnesota</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Interest Inventory</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>College Level Examination Program</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>NEO Five Factor Inventory</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report reviews a theoretically inspired empirical investigation of individual differences in knowledge, abilities, and nonability traits as part of an ongoing effort to better understand adult intellectual development and to develop more accurate measures of adult intelligence. Twenty Knowledge Scales were constructed, drawing on College-Level Examination Program® (CLEP®) and Advanced Placement Program® (AP®) Examinations. These Knowledge Structures were administered, along with an extensive battery of traditional ability tests, and measures of personality, interests, and self-concept, to two samples of adults, a &amp;quot;younger&amp;quot; adult group, age 18-27, and an &amp;quot;older&amp;quot; adult group, age 30+. Results indicate that the older adults in this sample know a lot more than the younger adults across a broad range of domains that are represented both inside and outside of standard college curricula. In general, the older adult group showed a much higher degree of orientation toward things &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot; than the younger adult group, as indicated by scores on interest, personality, and self-concept scales. The following is appended: Six Selected Case Profiles. [This report was written in collaboration with Eric L. Rolfhus.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562744</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Knowledge Structures and Adult Intellectual Development. Report No. 98-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1998-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>29</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>37</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Profiles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Executive Function</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Abenavoli, Rachel M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Greenberg, Mark T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>School readiness is best conceptualized as a multidimensional construct that spans several skill domains. Academic and behavioral skills have been identified as important components of school readiness that uniquely predict learning and achievement. Few studies, however, have examined the effects of these skills simultaneously or explored how they interact within individuals. Person-oriented approaches show promise in furthering the understanding of variation in school readiness. The current study, which was conducted in a low-income, urban school district in Pennsylvania, had two primary aims. First, the authors examined whether teacher ratings of children&apos;s skills at the beginning of kindergarten could be used to identify school readiness profiles that differed in patterns of strengths and weaknesses across multiple domains (i.e., academic skills, learning engagement, social-emotional skills, aggression, and inattention/hyperactivity). Second, they explored the validity of profiles derived from teacher ratings by examining group differences on concurrent measures of language, executive functioning, peer relationships, and student-teacher relationships. Participants were 301 kindergarteners (64% male) from a low-income, urban setting who were also part of a broader study about the development and prevention of aggression. At the start of kindergarten, teachers in 10 elementary schools rated children on aggression. These ratings were used to recruit children either to a &amp;quot;high aggression&amp;quot; group, if they scored in the top quartile of their class on aggression, or a &amp;quot;low aggression&amp;quot; group, if they scored in the bottom quartile of their class on aggression. The current study used data from 180 &amp;quot;high aggression&amp;quot; children and 121 &amp;quot;low aggression&amp;quot; children with data on any of the 10 teacher-rated indicators of school readiness in the fall of kindergarten. On average, children were about 6 years old (M = 6.09, SD = 0.38) in the fall of kindergarten. Using teacher ratings from the fall of kindergarten, the current study identified four school readiness profiles that differed in their patterns of strengths and weakness across multiple domains of functioning. These profiles also differed on other measures of language, executive functioning, and relationships with peers and teachers, which suggests that profiles derived from teacher ratings are meaningful and valid. Future work should extend this work by exploring the predictive validity of school readiness profiles derived from teacher ratings into the early elementary school years. Results highlight the importance of considering intraindividual patterns of school readiness skills. Person-oriented approaches can aid in the identification of kindergarteners with risky school readiness profiles, as well as inform the development and delivery of individually tailored interventions to meet the specific needs of children starting school. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562745</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Patterns of School Readiness among Low-Income Kindergarteners</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Improvement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kurlaender, Michal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jackson, Jacob</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Howell, Jessica S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board Advocacy &amp; Policy Center</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This brief studies California&apos;s introduction of the Early Assessment Program to bridge the gap between K-12 educational standards and postsecondary education requirements, similar to the Common Core State Standards movement.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562746</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>K-12 Postsecondary Alignment and School Accountability: Investigating High School Responses to California&apos;s Early Assessment Program. Research Brief</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-09-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Dropout Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropout Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Maynard, Brandy R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kjellstrand, Elizabeth K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thompson, Aaron M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The present study evaluates the effectiveness of Check &amp;amp; Connect (C&amp;amp;C) in a randomly assigned sample of students who were all receiving Communities in Schools (CIS) services. The research questions for the study include: Are there differences in attendance, academics, and behavior for CIS students who also receive C&amp;amp;C compared to students who only receive CIS services? Nine middle schools, four high schools, and one middle/high school located in a large urban region of the southwestern US comprised the setting for the study. This study used a randomized block design to examine the effectiveness of C&amp;amp;C on academic performance, behavior, and attendance with at-risk middle and high school students. Results provide evidence of the effects of C&amp;amp;C implemented in a real-world setting by school-based practitioners, situating effect sizes within the context of C&amp;amp;C being implemented under conditions that practitioners would normally experience. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562747</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of Check &amp;amp; Connect on Attendance, Behavior, and Academics: A Randomized Effectiveness Trial</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Counselors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hurwitz, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Howell, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Schools and Staffing Survey (NCES)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Schools and Staffing Survey (NCES)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board Advocacy &amp; Policy Center</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This brief examines high school counselor staffing counts relative to four-year college enrollment rates. Recent evidence from a national survey of counselors provides support for claims by counselors and school administrators that current counselor staffing levels are suboptimal. An additional high school counselor is predicted to induce a 10 percentage point increase in four-year college enrollment. A technical appendix is included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562748</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Measuring the Impact of High School Counselors on College Enrollment. Research Brief</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prosocial Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Well Being</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resilience (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stress Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Contained Classrooms</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Depression (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Check Lists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Burnout</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Burnout</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jennings, Patricia A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brown, Joshua L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Frank, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tanler, Regin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Doyle, Sebrina</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rasheed, Damira</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>DeWeese, Anna</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Greenberg, Mark</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Northeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Maslach Burnout Inventory</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Maslach Burnout Inventory</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The present study, which takes place in a high-poverty section of a large urban area of the northeastern United States, is based upon the prosocial classroom theoretical model that emphasizes the significance of teachers&apos; social and emotional competence (SEC) and well-being in the development and maintenance of supportive teacher-student relationships, effective classroom management, and social and emotional learning (SEL) program effectiveness. These factors, as well as teachers&apos; classroom management and instructional skills contribute to creating a classroom climate that is conducive to learning and that promotes positive developmental behavioral and academic outcomes among students. Cultivating Awareness and Resilience in Education (CARE) is a mindfulness-based professional development program designed to reduce stress, promote SEC and improve teachers&apos; performance and classroom learning environments. From 8 elementary schools the authors recruited and consented 55 teachers (90.2% female, mean age = 39.41). They had relatively low attrition (7.2%) which was largely balanced across treatment and control conditions, resulting in a diverse sample of 51 teachers (53% white). All were regular lead teachers working in a self-contained classroom setting. The results reported here are from an IES-funded 4-year efficacy and replication study of CARE. The data are from the teacher self-report collected from the first year cohort of the cluster randomized controlled trial. After the teachers completed self-reports they were randomly assigned within schools to receive the CARE intervention or to a wait-list control group. After the treatment group received the CARE program, the same self-report battery was administered to both groups. A figure is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562749</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Promoting Teachers&apos; Social and Emotional Competence: A Replication Study of the Cultivating Awareness and Resilience in Education (CARE) Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>23</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Executive Function</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pilot Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Check Lists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jones, Stephanie M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kargman, Marie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kargman, Max</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bailey, Rebecca</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Arizona</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Arizona</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper presents initial results from a pilot evaluation of the pre-K component of a new school-based intervention strategy (Social, Emotional, and Cognitive Understanding and Regulation in education, SECURe) for pre-kindergarten through 3rd grade that is designed to build skills in social-emotional learning (focusing on executive function and self-regulation as core developmental processes) and literacy. The SECURe intervention was conceived and developed based on the need to target low-income children&apos;s needs in school settings, given research suggesting that disparities in poor vs. non-poor children&apos;s educational outcomes widen as they move through early elementary grades. Researchers present findings in the context of findings from the K-3 pilot of SECURe, and discuss the process of developing and evaluating a cross-grade intervention, as well as the implications of this work for intervention in preschool and elementary settings. The SECURe K-3 and SECURe Pre-K studies took place over two consecutive years (2011-2012, and 2012-2013) in six public elementary schools in Phoenix, Arizona. In the SECURe Pre-K study, preschool classrooms receiving the SECURe intervention were Head Start classrooms that were co-located in elementary schools. Participants in the SECURe Pre-K study included 189 children (51% boys) in twelve Head Start classrooms. Data were gathered from children, their teachers, and in their classrooms over three waves in the 2012-13 academic year: fall, winter, and spring. The participating school district provided the following data for all preschool children and classrooms in the district: monthly attendance and tardy statistics; IEP status; DECA scores (Devereaux Early Childhood Assessment of social-emotional skills conducted by classroom teacher at school entry); Dial3 scores (a general developmental assessment conducted by classroom teacher at school entry); TSG information (Teaching Strategies Gold); and CLASS scores (Classroom Assessment Scoring System). Researchers also conducted observations in SECURe classrooms at the winter and spring waves. These observations included completing the TSRS (Teaching Style Rating Scale) for each teacher, and a SECURe observation checklist for each classroom. Using simple hierarchical regression models with classrooms nested in schools (6), preliminary findings show: (1) differences favoring the SECURe Pre-K classrooms in spring of the preschool year for Emotional Support (p&amp;lt;0.07, ES = 0.88) and for Classroom Organization (p&amp;lt;0.07, ES = 0.89); and (2) differences favoring SECURe Pre-K children or the TSG social-emotional scale (p&amp;lt;0.01, ES = 0.72) in spring, controlling the fall score. This study was funded as a preliminary pilot designed to provide initial exploratory evidence of feasibility and effectiveness (as is consistent with the NIH R21 and IES Goal 2 mechanisms).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562750</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Preliminary Impacts of SECURe PreK on Child- and Classroom-Level Outcomes</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Coaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Letukas, Lynn</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this document is to identify and dispel rumors that are frequently cited about the SAT. The following is a compilation of nine popular rumors organized into three areas: &amp;quot;Student Demographics,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Test Preparation/Test Prediction,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Test Utilization.&amp;quot;</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562751</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Nine Facts about the SAT That Might Surprise You. Statistical Report</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Comparative Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adoption (Ideas)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Transfer</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Impact</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Competency Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Di Giacomo, F. Tony</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fishbein, Bethany G.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Buckley, Vanessa W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<dc:type>Information Analyses</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many articles and reports have reviewed, researched, and commented on international assessments from the perspective of exploring what is relevant for the United States&apos; education systems. Researchers make claims about whether the top-performing systems have transferable practices or policies that could be applied to the United States. However, looking only at top-performing education systems may omit important knowledge that could be applied from countries with similar demographic, geographic, linguistic, or economic characteristics--even if these countries do not perform highly on comparative assessments. Moreover, by exploring only the top performers, a presumption exists that these international assessments are in alignment with a country&apos;s curricular, pedagogic, political, and economic goals, which may falsely lead to the conclusion that by copying top performers, test scores would invariably increase and also meet the nation&apos;s needs. While international comparative assessments can be valuable when developing national or state policies, the way in which they are interpreted can be broadened cautiously to better inform their interpretability, relevance, and application to countries such as the United States--all while considering the purpose of each international assessment in the context of a nation&apos;s priorities. Ultimately, this report serves as a reference guide for various international assessments, as well as a review of literature that explores a possible relationship between national economies and international assessment performance. In addition, this review will discuss how policymakers might use international assessment results from various systems to adapt successful policies in the United States. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562752</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>International Comparative Assessments: Broadening the Interpretability, Application and Relevance to the United States. Research in Review 2012-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>76</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>70</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Factors (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dual Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ewing, Maureen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Howell, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Strong academic performance in college, as measured by first-year grades, is important for a host of reasons, but perhaps the most critical reason is that students who perform well in their first year of college are more likely to earn a bachelor&apos;s degree (Adelman, 2006). Research shows that Advanced Placement Program® (AP®) students, particularly those who earn higher AP Exam scores, are likely to earn higher first-year grade point averages (GPAs) and higher subject-area GPAs in college than students who do not take an AP Exam.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562753</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Is the Relationship between AP® Participation and Academic Performance Really Meaningful? Research Brief 2015-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligent Tutoring Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fractions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mendiburo, Maria</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Williams, Laura K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sulcer, Brian</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hasselbring, Ted</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this paper, the authors discuss a portion of the design research process of developing an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) for classroom use. The goal of this ITS is to simultaneously provide automated support for student learning and generate diagnostic information for teachers that can lead directly to actionable recommendations for pedagogy and classroom practice. They developed the HALF (Helping At-risk students Learn Fractions) intervention program in response to the need for a classroom-based instructional program that integrates the potential of technology-based instruction with support for teachers and the classroom environment. The results of this study suggest that the HALF intervention program has a similar positive impact on student learning as a fully developed commercial curriculum; student learning is at least as good as in an existing, widely used curriculum. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562754</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Designing Technology to Impact Classroom Practice: How Technology Design for Learning Can Support Both Students and Teachers</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>English Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Response Rates (Questionnaires)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, YoungKoung</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiley, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Packman, Sheryl</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In the fall of 2009, the College Board conducted a curriculum survey to gather information on the curricula and institutional practices of high schools and colleges in the United States. The primary objective of the survey was to collect data on the knowledge and skills, or topics, taught in high school classrooms and assess the importance of these topics for institutions of higher education. The College Board periodically reviews the state of K-12 and college curricula as a standard part of the SAT test development process (see example in Milewski, Johnsen, Glazer &amp;amp; Kutota, 2005). The results of the curriculum survey will allow the College Board to validate and ensure that the topics measured on the SAT and SAT Subject Tests™ reflect what is being taught in the nation&apos;s high schools and what college professors consider to be required for college success Curriculum surveys were completed by more than 5,000 high school and college teachers in English language arts (ELA) and mathematics. Surveys were also distributed in biology, chemistry, physics, and history, and the results of these surveys will be reported in later reports. Each survey covered the topics assessed on the SAT, SAT Subject Tests, and the College Board Standards for College Success™ and also inquired about various aspects of course curricula, including the use of assessments. This report presents the results of the English and mathematics surveys, with a focus on the alignment between the SAT and high school and college curricula. The report briefly introduces the SAT, discusses the method used to implement the survey, and concludes with a summary of the results of the ELA and mathematics surveys. Supplemental tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562755</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>National Curriculum Survey on English and Mathematics. Research Report 2011-13</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>36</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Timed Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Accommodations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cahalan-Laitusis, Cara</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>King, Teresa C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cline, Frederick</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bridgeman, Brent</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New Jersey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Jersey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study is to provide information on actual time used by students with disabilities on the new SAT®. This study observed students with learning disabilities (LD) and/or attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD) as they took SAT items under strict time limits and recorded the amount of time taken for each item. The study is a replication of study 2 in Bridgeman, Cahalan, and Cline (2003), which observed students without disabilities completing the same test items that are included in this study. Comparisons of the results from this study to the results of Bridgeman et al. are made and recommendations on appropriate extended-time limits for most students with disabilities are provided. An appendix contains supplemental tables.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562756</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Observational Timing Study on the SAT Reasoning Test™ for Test-Takers with Learning Disabilities and/or AD/HD. Research Report No. 2006-4. ETS RR-06-23</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2006-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Cluster Grouping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelcey, Ben</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A common design in education research for interventions operating at a group or cluster level is a cluster randomized trial (CRT) (Bloom, 2005). In CRTs, intact clusters (e.g., schools) are assigned to treatment conditions rather than individuals (e.g., students) and are frequently an effective way to study interventions because they permit researchers to accommodate existing school structures and the multilevel nature of many educational interventions. In this study, the author developed closed form analytic expressions for the test statistics of the mediation effect in three level CRT designs examining cross-level (e.g., 3-2-1) mediation. Using this test statistic, he estimated the power to detect cross-level mediation effects under different scenarios to assist researchers in the planning and design of multilevel mediation studies. To fix ideas, consider an example where the intervention is a professional development program to increase pedagogical knowledge and it is assigned at random to intact schools. In theory, exposure to the professional development program (treatment) should increase teachers&apos; pedagogical content knowledge (mediator) which in turns increases students&apos; achievement levels (outcome). The study could be described as a 3-2-1 cross-level mediation design because its hypothesized that a treatment assigned at the school level (level 3) impacts a classroom level (level 2) mediator which in turn impacts a student level (level 1) outcome. The focus of this study was to develop a framework to assess the power to detect cross-level mediation for this particular three level CRT design. A figure is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562757</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Power Analysis for Cross Level Mediation in CRTs</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equated Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Population Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Jinghua</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Feigenbaum, Miriam</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dorans, Neil J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Score equity assessment was used to evaluate linkings of new SAT® to the current SAT Reasoning Test™. Population invariance across gender groups was studied on the linkage of a new SAT critical reading prototype to a current SAT verbal section, and on the linkage of a new SAT math prototype to a current SAT math section. The results indicated that the conversion lines obtained through subgroup-only linkings were very similar to those obtained using the total group linking for both critical reading and math prototypes. Even though there were slight degrees of divergence from the total group conversion, the differences were smaller than the differences associated with rounding rules for the SAT. Hence, on the basis of the field trial data, it appears that population invariance was achieved with respect to gender groups.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562758</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Invariance of Linkings of the Revised 2005 SAT Reasoning Test™ to the SAT® I: Reasoning Test across Gender Groups. Research Report No. 2005-6. ETS RR-05-17</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pupil Personnel Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Support Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Personnel Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Roderick, Melissa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Holsapple, Matthew</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelley-Kemple, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Johnson, David W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Over the past 20 years, gaps in students&apos; educational aspirations have shrunk considerably (Roderick et al., 2008; Roderick, Nagaoka, &amp;amp; Coca, 2011; Kao &amp;amp; Tienda, 1998; Avery &amp;amp; Kane, 2004; Turner, 2007; Deil-Amen &amp;amp; Tevis, 2010). Similarly, racial and ethnic gaps in college enrollment have shrunk. The one area in which postsecondary racial gaps have not improved is in college completion (Turner, 2007). Given the complex and varied nature of the college application, enrollment, and graduation process, it is unsurprising that district and school policies have used a scattershot approach to evaluating college readiness, with rubrics containing items pertaining to non-cognitive skills, test scores, numbers of applications, FAFSA completion, college visits, and college knowledge. The problem with such an approach is not that these items are bad in and of themselves--indeed, all of these factors have valid research behind them--but rather there is no sense of the relative importance of these factors nor of the degree to which any of these factors ultimately affects degree completion. Here the authors have framed this analysis in terms of which factors as viewed from a high school standpoint, can have the largest influence on degree attainment. The authors propose four possible policy options: Raise Grades (GPA), Raise test scores (ACT), improve the rates at which students enroll in &amp;quot;match&amp;quot; colleges, improve college choice by looking at colleges&apos; institutional four-year graduation rate. Findings strongly suggest that the wide variation in college graduation rates, even among similarly qualified students, make it impossible to set a single set of college readiness benchmarks. It does appear possible, however, to create a demarcation of responsibility between high schools and colleges. On the one hand, high schools could be doing a great deal more to boost student achievement, especially related to grades, and providing structured supports around these students to ensure that they apply, and enroll in colleges that maximize students&apos; chances of success. Colleges, on the other hand, play their own role in supporting students through graduation. For high schools, the importance of making hard work pay off lies in helping students make college choices that translate their high school preparation into the highest chance of earning a college degree. For colleges, the challenge in making hard work pay off is to provide the supports necessary for the high-achieving students they admit to continue to succeed on their campuses. Two tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562759</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>From High School to the Future: Getting to College Readiness and College Graduation</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>19</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonparametric Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Steiner, Peter M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, Yongnam</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In contrast to randomized experiments, the estimation of unbiased treatment effects from observational data requires an analysis that conditions on all confounding covariates. Conditioning on covariates can be done via standard parametric regression techniques or nonparametric matching like propensity score (PS) matching. The regression or matching estimators are causally unbiased (or at least consistent) if the selection mechanism is strongly ignorable, i.e., if all confounding covariates are reliably measured (Rosenbaum &amp;amp; Rubin, 1983). However, for practitioners, the strong ignorability assumption is not very informative because it does not tell them which covariates should actually be included in a regression or PS analysis. In order to remove as much of the selection bias as possible, it is common advice to condition on all or at least a big set of covariates. However, recent studies have shown that conditioning on certain types of covariates such as &amp;quot;instrumental variables&amp;quot; (IVs) or &amp;quot;collider variables&amp;quot; can actually amplify or induce bias (e.g., Bhattacharya &amp;amp; Vogt, 2007; Wooldridge, 2009). Neither IVs nor colliders are confounders because, with respect to the data-generating model, they do not simultaneously determine the outcome (Y) and the treatment (Z). Interestingly, though IVs and colliders are unrelated to the outcome, including them in a regression or PS model may result in a dramatically increased bias--the bias might be much larger than the bias of the naïve estimate (i.e., the simple mean difference between the treatment and control group, without any covariate adjustments). Even if IVs might be rare in practice, one is much more likely confronted with covariates that are almost like IVs, that is, covariates that strongly determine treatment Z but are only weakly related to the outcome (other than via Z). Due to their resemblance to pure IVs they are called &amp;quot;near instrumental variables&amp;quot; (near-IVs, Myers et al, 2011). Given that conditioning on near-IVs might actually increase bias some authors suggest excluding near-IVs from causal analyses (e.g., Pearl, 2011). In this paper the authors focus on the bias-amplifying effect of near-IVs--but not only of a single near-IV in the context of a simple data-generating model (e.g., Myers et al., 2011; Pearl, 2010), but of multiple near-IVs in the context of more complex and realistic data-generating models. With the exemption of some formal derivations, they investigate the effect of conditioning on near-IVs on bias reduction using simulated data that involve many (interrelated) confounders. In their simulations they vary the confounders&apos; (1) degree of being a near instrument; (2) correlation structure; (3) heterogeneity with respect their relation to treatment Z and outcome Y (i.e., the strength and direction of the relation); and (4) measurement reliability. Simulation design and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562760</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>On the Bias-Amplifying Effect of Near Instruments in Observational Studies</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonparametric Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Probation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suspension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Incentives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chi, Olivia L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dow, Aaron W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Canada</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Canada</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study focuses on how matching, a method of preprocessing data prior to estimation and analysis, can be used to reduce imbalance between treatment and control group in regression discontinuity design. To examine the effects of academic probation on student outcomes, researchers replicate and expand upon research conducted by Lindo, Sanders, and Oreopolous in their 2010 study &amp;quot;Ability, Gender, and Performance Standards: Evidence from Academic Probation.&amp;quot; In replicating the results of Lindo et al. (2010), researchers find imbalance in observable pre-treatment characteristics between the treatment and control groups in the study. Such imbalance may indicate that randomization may not have been properly approximated through the regression discontinuity design. To improve balance and better approximate a randomized experiment, researchers preprocess Lindo et al.&apos;s data set by performing exact matching on pre-treatment covariates, such as high school grade percentile and native language, and then re-estimate the impact of academic probation on student outcomes. After preprocessing the data through exact matching, the sample consists of a subset of the original sample (12,530), with 6,506 first year students in a large Canadian university made up of one central campus and two smaller satellite campuses. Results indicate that the effect sizes of academic probation on the decision to leave the university, as well as the effect on subsequent grades, were previously underestimated by Lindo et al. (2010). By utilizing the matching method of preprocessing data prior to estimation and analysis, imbalance was reduced between treatment and control groups in a regression discontinuity design. By improving balance, bias was reduced in the estimates of the effects of being placed on academic probation on student outcomes, and larger discouragement and encouragement effects were uncovered. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562761</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Improving Balance in Regression Discontinuity Design by Matching: Estimating the Effect of Academic Probation after the First Year of College</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>19</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Language of Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immersion Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bilingual Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compliance (Legal)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Perez, Maria</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kennedy, Alec</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The number of students that live in families where a language other than English is spoken has risen relative to the English-only households in the United States over the last 25 years. These students face the dual challenge of mastering English while acquiring academic skills and knowledge. The education of these students has been shaped by several national- and state- level legal decisions of the past that have required schools to take action by providing services to help linguistic minority students overcome language barriers that impede their equal participation. Those services most often take the form of either an &amp;quot;English-immersion&amp;quot; approach, in which students receive all instruction in English, or employ a &amp;quot;bilingual model&amp;quot; where students are initially taught in some combination of English and their native language and eventually transfer to English-only classrooms. The question of which model of instruction is more &amp;quot;effective&amp;quot; has been notoriously difficult to answer and remains an open and controversial debate. The authors of this article take advantage of a policy passed in California that changed the default instructional program for ELs . Prior to 1998, most ELs were placed into bilingual education. This state-level legislation forced schools to move students to move to a different instructional setting--a change that would not had been chosen otherwise--providing a natural experiment opportunity to evaluate the effect of bilingual education versus English immersion on the academic achievement of ELs. Also analyzed is how changes in the composition of the classroom affect the academic achievement of students. Findings indicate that the achievement scores of ELs declined by the switch from bilingual education to English immersion programs, with the exception of grades 2-3 reading scores. The authors also found that there is a beneficial effect of placing ELs into classrooms with more native English speakers. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562762</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Do Changes in the Language of Instruction and Classroom Composition Affect English Learners?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cluster Grouping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sample Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rhoads, Christopher</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dye, Charles</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Recent years have seen an increased interest in quantitative educational research studies that use random assignment (RA) to evaluate the causal impacts of educational interventions (Angrist, 2004). The multi-level structure of the public education system in the United States often leads to experimental designs where naturally occurring clusters (eg. schools) are utilized to recruit participants (eg. students) into a study and/or as units that are randomized into one of two experimental conditions. When multiple clusters are recruited to participate in a research study but individuals within clusters are randomly assigned to experimental conditions the resulting experimental design is often referred to as a &amp;quot;multi-site&amp;quot; design. When clusters are utilized as the unit of randomization the resulting experimental design is generally called a &amp;quot;cluster randomized&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;hierarchical&amp;quot; design. While designs that use some form of random assignment are generally preferred for making causal inferences about treatment effects, RA designs are not always practical or feasible (Shadish, Cook and Campbell, 2002). The next best alternative to a random assignment design is often the regression discontinuity (RD) design. The same clustering issues that arise with random assignment studies also impact regression discontinuity studies. The score variable may be measured at any of many different levels in the educational hierarchy while outcome measurements are obtained at a lower level in the hierarchy. These sorts of situations lead to &amp;quot;hierarchical&amp;quot; regression discontinuity (RD) designs. An important component of planning experiments with clustering (whether they be multi-site or cluster randomized designs) is to determine the optimal within and between cluster sample sizes subject to a cost constraint. The current paper builds on previous work by Schochet (2008, 2009) in order to provide formulas for the optimal sample size at each level of a two-level regression discontinuity design. The paper also provides optimal sample size formulas for unbalanced random assignment designs (such formulas have not previously appeared in the literature). Optimal sample sizes for RD designs are compared to the optimal samples sizes for the corresponding RA designs. One table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562763</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Optimal Design for Regression Discontinuity Studies with Clustering</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economically Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lipsey, Mark W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Relatively few rigorous studies of the effectiveness of contemporary public prekindergarten programs have been conducted despite the growing number of programs and large monetary investments that accompany them. The study on which this presentation is based was launched in partnership with the Tennessee State Department of Education&apos;s Division of School Readiness and Early Learning to provide an assessment of the effects of the statewide Tennessee Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten (TN-VPK) program on the readiness for kindergarten of the economically disadvantaged population it serves. TN-VPK has become a controversial program in Tennessee, with some legislators expressing doubts about its value in the context of severe budget shortfalls and still others referring to it even more skeptically as expensive babysitting. This study interleaves a randomized control trial (RCT) design and an age-cutoff regression discontinuity (RD) design to evaluate the effectiveness of the TN-VPK program. Though the project is still underway, this presentation will summarize results from the RCT through first grade. One table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562764</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Immediate and Longitudinal Effects of the Tennessee Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten Program on Student Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Outcomes</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Promotion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vanlaar, Gudrun</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reardon, Sean F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kalogrides, Demetra</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Most research on the middle school transition focuses on developmental and psychological changes around the age of the transition, and investigates or discusses the impact of such changes on academic performance, motivation and behavior in schools. In addition to intrapersonal developmental changes that middle-school students experience, they also experience significant changes in school context and school experiences. What has been less studied however, is whether and how the transition from elementary to middle school may affect the racial achievement gaps. In other words, it is not known yet whether the change in school contexts affects students from different racial and socioeconomic backgrounds in different ways, possibly affecting the black-white or Hispanic-white achievement gaps. This paper addresses this question. On the whole, it is unclear whether the transition to middle school may exacerbate achievement gaps or narrow them. This paper attempts to provide initial evidence on this question. Preliminary findings suggest that the transition to middle school has, on average a significant effect on racial achievement gaps. Further analyses will need to be conducted to rule out alternative explanations for the findings, to explore potential mediators and mechanisms of the findings, and examine the extent to which these negative effects of the middle school transition persist over subsequent years. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562765</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Does Transition from Elementary to Middle School Affect the Racial Achievement Gap?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Care</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Antisocial Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Check Lists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Friedman-Krauss, Allison H.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Connors, Maia C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morris, Pamela A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Child Behavior Checklist</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Child Behavior Checklist</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The 1998 reauthorization of Head Start called for a national evaluation of the Head Start program. The goal of Head Start is to improve the school readiness skills of low-income children. Yet characteristics of Head Start programs, such as their quality and the amount of time children spend in them may influence their effectiveness at achieving this goal. Previous research has demonstrated that children who spend more weekly hours in Head Start demonstrate larger cognitive gains than children who attend fewer weekly hours (Li, Farkas, Duncan, Vandell, &amp;amp; Burchinal, 2013). But the quality of care children attend during such hours may also matter, as there is mounting evidence regarding the importance of classroom quality for children&apos;s developing school readiness skills (Burchinal, Vandergrift, Pianta, &amp;amp; Mashburn, 2009; Zaslow et al., 2010). Thus, the effect of weekly hours in Head Start may vary by the quality of the Head Start classroom. Indeed, previous research has found that child care quality moderates the association between hours in child care and child behavior problems, but not cognitive skills (McCartney et al., 2010; Votruba-Drzal, Coley, &amp;amp; Chase-Lansdale, 2004). The current study expands on previous research by using quasi-experimental methods that leverage the experimental context of the Head Start Impact Study (HSIS; Puma et al., 2010) to understand the extent to which Head Start classroom quality moderates the impact of weekly hours in Head Start on children&apos;s early language and math skills and externalizing behaviors. The authors hypothesize that weekly hours in Head Start will be more strongly associated with outcomes for children enrolled in high quality programs as compared with children enrolled in low quality programs. In contrast to previous research that used samples of children enrolled in child care, the current study relies on a sample of 3- and 4-year-old children enrolled in educationally focused Head Start programs in 22 states. Four tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562766</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Is More Time in Head Start Always Better for Children? The Moderating Role of Classroom Quality</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interrater Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gonzalez Canche, Manuel S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Portes, Pedro R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mellon, Paula J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stollberg, Robert A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Turk, Jonathan M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study is part of the core research agenda of the five-year, Goal 3 grant funded by the Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education &amp;quot;Improving the Teaching and Learning of English Language Learners: The Instructional Conversation Model.&amp;quot; In video review of teaching, bias in evaluation or rating is evident in many studies. Some of it is inevitable given the use of video review for professional development purposes and the reflexive nature of that rating process. This study utilizes an iterative process to refine an existing evaluation rubric for rating pedagogical intervention in recorded 3rd and 5th grade lessons across subject types. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562767</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Instrumental Iteration toward FOI Evaluation of Pedagogical Methods</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>16</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1031'>R305A100670</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Controversial Issues (Course Content)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizen Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizenship Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asian American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lin, Alex</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lawrence, Joshua</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Snow, Catherine</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (West Coast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Although past research suggests that civic education programs can be effective in helping students become more civically engaged, this study tests whether these treatment effects are generalizable across an urban school district with multiple middle school sites. This study also contributes understanding of how treatment effects may vary for students from ethnic minority populations, in particular to those identified as Asian and Latino. The theoretical framework that is tested in this study is the Structure-Stimulus-Orientation-Response (S-S-O-R) model that hypothesizes the relationship between classroom discussion of controversial issues and civic engagement. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a cross-content intervention called Word Generation (WG) has a significant impact on students&apos; self-reported civic engagement. Research is guided by the following questions: (1) Does the Word Generation program have a positive impact on students&apos; self-reported civic engagement?; and (2) To what extent does students&apos; ethnic identification (e.g. Latino and Asian) influence the direction and strength of the relationship between program participation and self-reported civic engagement? From fall 2011 to spring 2012, middle school students (N = 5,870) participated in a randomized study of the WG intervention that was conducted in an urban school district located in a West Coast metropolitan area of the United States. Multiple regression results show that participation in the WG program has a significant impact on students&apos; civic engagement, after accounting for other covariates. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562768</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Middle School Students Discussing Controversial Issues to Learn about Civic Engagement: A Randomized Evaluation of the Word Generation Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Census Figures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 10</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Structures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Claro, Susana</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Paunesku, David</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Chile</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Chile</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 10</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Students&apos; academic motivation and their achievement is affected by the mindset that students hold about their own intelligence. The current study presents a unique nationally-representative dataset to study the relationship of Mindset and Achievement among different populations. With census data of Chilean 10th graders and their schools, the authors try to answer the following questions: (1) Controlling by available predictors of achievement, does mindset predict achievement?; (2) Does Mindset predict achievement more in some groups than others?; and (3) What is the distribution of mindset among the different groups of 10th graders in Chile? Are there differences in mindset levels of 10th graders by SES, gender, type of school and rural areas? It was found that most Chilean students have a fixed mindset (51%). Only 23% have a growth mindset. Those who have a growth mindset perform significantly better on SIMCE language and math tests, which is a standardized assessment that is implemented every other year to all 10th graders in Chile. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562769</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Mindset Gap among SES Groups: The Case of Chile with Census Data</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Error Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fractions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Competency Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Malone, Amelia Schneider</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fuchs, Lynn S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wide Range Achievement Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Wide Range Achievement Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The 3 purposes of this study were to: (a) describe fraction ordering errors among at-risk 4th-grade students; (b) assess the effect of part-whole understanding and accuracy of fraction magnitude estimation on the probability of committing errors; and (c) examine the effect of students&apos; ability to explain comparing problems on the probability of committing errors. Students (n = 227) completed a 9-item ordering test. A high proportion (81%) of problems were completed incorrectly. Most (65% of) errors were due to students misapplying whole number logic to fractions. Fraction-magnitude estimation skill, but not part-whole understanding, significantly predicted the probability of committing this type of error. Implications for practice are discussed. [At time of submission to ERIC this article was in press with &amp;quot;Journal of Learning Disabilities.&amp;quot;]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562770</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Error Patterns in Ordering Fractions among At-Risk Fourth-Grade Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>Grantee Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-30</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (NIH)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>46</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>60</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1066'>R324C100004</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number>R24HD075443</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number>HD15052</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Length</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Wiseness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Limited English Speaking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wang, Xiang Bo</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research examines the effect of increased testing time by comparing the four performance indices of randomly equivalent examinee subpopulations on sections of similar content and difficulty administered at different times on three SAT administrations. A variety of analyses were used in this study and found no evidence that the current SAT test length has affected examinee performance at the population level or differentially across gender, racial/ethnic, and best language subgroups. Appended are: (1) Replication on the October 2005 Administration of the SAT Reasoning Test; and (2) Replications on the May 2002 SAT I: Reasoning Test.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562771</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Investigating the Effects of Increased SAT Reasoning Test™ Length and Time on Performance of Regular SAT® Examinees. Research Report No. 2006-9</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>56</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>37</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bitter, Catherine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>O&apos;Day, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The &amp;quot;Study of Deeper Learning: Opportunities and Outcomes,&amp;quot; funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, is a &amp;quot;proof-of-concept&amp;quot; study to determine whether students attending high schools with a mature and at least moderately well-implemented approach to promoting &amp;quot;deeper learning&amp;quot; experience greater deeper learning opportunities and outcomes than they would have had they not attended these schools. The study examined high schools associated with ten established networks from across the country that embrace the goals of deeper learning and promote instructional practices they believe are likely to lead to deeper learning competencies. To determine whether students who attend these schools experience different opportunities and outcomes relative to similar students who do not attend these network schools, the study included a sample of students from &amp;quot;non-network&amp;quot; comparison schools. This paper focuses on two central questions guiding the study: (1) Do students attending network schools have more opportunities to engage in deeper learning processes than they would have if they had not attended the network schools; and (2) Do individual students who experience more opportunities to engage in deeper learning achieve better deeper learning outcomes than students who experience fewer opportunities? This analysis relies on data from schools located in six districts across two states: California and New York. For the analysis and findings described in this paper, a quasi-experimental design was used to collect and analyze data from students within 12 network high schools, which represented 8 of the 10 networks, and were located in five districts across two states. Analyses also include students attending 10 non-network schools located in six districts across two states. One non-network school was matched to two network schools, for a total of 11 school pairs. The primary data sources used for the analysis in this paper include: (1) Student survey data; (2) OECD PISA-based Test for Schools; and (3) Qualitative data. Primary findings include: (1) Students in participating network high schools reported significantly greater opportunities for deeper learning than students in the paired non-network schools; (2) At the individual pair level, students in each of the 11 network schools reported significantly more opportunity for deeper learning on at least one opportunity measure than students in the paired non-network school. In addition, no negative effects of network attendance on opportunities within any individual pairs were observed; (3) Only gender and grade level revealed differences in the effects of attending a network school on opportunities for deeper learning; and (4) There is a statistically significant correlational relationship among all measures of opportunities for deeper learning and all measures of dispositional outcomes. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562772</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Providing Opportunities for Deeper Learning: Findings from the Study of Deeper Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lang, Laura B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schoen, Robert R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>LaVenia, Mark</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Oberlin, Maureen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (FCR-STEM) was awarded a grant by the Florida Department of Education to develop a Mathematics Formative Assessment System (MFAS) aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). Intended for both teachers and students, formative assessment is a process that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students&apos; achievement of instructional goals. The evidence collected enables teachers to differentiate instruction based on students&apos; mathematical thinking and reasoning rather than solely on incorrect answers. The MFAS-CCSS was designed to provide teachers with tasks and rubrics to employ the following five key strategies: (1) assess the student&apos;s level of understanding during instruction; (2) identify the student&apos;s specific misconceptions and errors; (3) examine samples of student work for further evidence of student understanding; (4) pose additional questions to elicit student thinking; and (5) obtain guidance on next steps for instruction. The current study--the MFAS-CCSS 2012-13 Study--is the third randomized field trial conducted on MFAS. The purpose was to evaluate the effect the MFAS-CCSS has on teachers&apos; knowledge of elementary mathematics and students&apos; mathematics learning in Grades K-1. The MFAS-CCSS 2012-13 Study made use of intervention protocols and measures developed, field tested, and validated in the prior two pilot studies. Two tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562773</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Mathematics Formative Assessment System--Common Core State Standards: A Randomized Field Trial in Kindergarten and First Grade</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>2</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Careers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Financial Aid Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Records (Forms)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Need Analysis (Student Financial Aid)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Paying for College</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Castleman, Benjamin L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Long, Bridget Terry</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mabel, Zachary A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The fastest growing supply of jobs in the United States today is in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. Yet despite the availability of work in STEM, there is not a sufficient supply of workers to fill open positions. Amidst the growing demand for STEM workers, educational achievement and attainment in STEM fields in the United States are moving in the opposite direction. The achievement of secondary school students in mathematics and science is declining, with less than one-third of U.S. eighth graders now proficient in these subjects; there is a concurrent decline in interest in STEM fields among many middle and high school students (PCAST, 2010). Equally troubling, 60 percent of all college students and more than 75 percent of Black and Latino college students who indicate initial interest in pursuing STEM fields do not persist to the point of earning a STEM degree (PCAST, 2010). An important policy question to consider is what role, if any, financial barriers play in dissuading students from pursuing or completing college study in STEM disciplines. In this paper, the authors offer new evidence of the impact of need-based financial aid on whether students pursue and complete courses and degrees in STEM fields. Their analysis focuses on Florida high school graduates in the 1999-2000 academic year who submitted a Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) application, whose Expected Family Contribution (EFC) falls between $590 and $2,590, and who demonstrate readiness for postsecondary study in STEM disciplines. Four tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562774</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Financial Barriers to STEM Study in College: Causal Effect Estimates of Need-Based Grants on the Pursuit and Completion of Courses and Degrees in STEM Fields</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Young Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Negative Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Modification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention Deficit Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Markov Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Monte Carlo Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>O&apos;Connor, Erin E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCormick, Meghan P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cappella, Elise</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McClowry, Sandee G.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Sutter Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Student Teacher Relationship Scale</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Student Teacher Relationship Scale</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Not all children begin kindergarten ready to learn. Young children who exhibit dysregulated or disruptive behavior in the classroom have fewer opportunities to learn and consequently achieve lower levels of academic skills (Arnold et al., 2006; Raver, Garner, &amp;amp; Smith-Donald, 2007). A growing body of literature has examined how children&apos;s temperament is related to their academic skills and classroom behaviors. Students with high maintenance or challenging temperaments are low in task persistence, and high in negative reactivity and motor activity, and have higher levels of behavior problems and lower levels of academic engagement (McClowry et al, 2010). These negative associations may be pronounced among low-income, urban children (Herman, Trotter, Reinke, &amp;amp; Ialongo, 2011). Teachers are often frustrated with students who have high maintenance temperaments. The combination of low task persistence, high negative reactivity and high motor activity results in the need for more teacher attention and can compromise teacher/student relationships (Rudasill &amp;amp; Rimm-Kaufman, 2009). Enhancing student-teacher relationship quality among children with high maintenance temperaments may a critical conduit for the effects of social-emotional learning (SEL) interventions for temperamentally difficult students. In this study the authors examined the efficacy of a temperament-based SEL intervention, &amp;quot;INSIGHTS into Children&apos;s Temperament&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;INSIGHTS&amp;quot;), in supporting the behaviors and academic engagement of children in urban, low-income schools during kindergarten and first grade with a focus on students with high maintenance temperament. Four tables and three figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562775</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Getting a Good Start in School: Differential Effects of &amp;quot;INSIGHTS&amp;quot; on the Behaviors and Engagement of Children with Challenging Temperaments</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Stereotypes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Calculus</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stricker, Lawrence J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Steele and Aronson (1995) found that the performance of African-American subjects on test items portrayed as a problem-solving task, in a laboratory experiment, was adversely affected when they were asked about their ethnicity. This outcome was attributed to &amp;quot;stereotype threat&amp;quot;. Performance was disrupted by the subjects&apos; concerns about fulfilling the negative stereotype concerning African Americans&apos; intellectual ability. Extending that research, this field experiment evaluated the effects of inquiring about ethnicity and sex on the performance of examinees taking the Advanced Placement Program Calculus AB Examination in an actual test administration. With a minor exception, this inquiry had no statistically and practically significant effects on the test performance of African-American, female, or other subgroups of examinees. Answer sheets are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562776</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Inquiring about Examinees&apos; Ethnicity and Sex: Effects on AP® Calculus AB Examination Performance. Report No. 98-1. ETS RR No. 98-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1998-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>23</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Stereotypes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Arithmetic</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sentences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stricker, Lawrence J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ward, William C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>College Board Computerized Placement Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Laboratory experiments by Steele and Aronson (1995) found that African-American subjects&apos; performance on difficult verbal items, described as a verbal problem-solving task, was adversely affected when they were asked about their ethnicity just before working on the items. These results were attributed to stereotype threat. Asking about ethnicity primes African-American subjects&apos; concerns about fulfilling the negative ethnic stereotype about their intellectual ability, thereby disrupting test performance. The present field experiment assessed the effects of asking community college students taking the Computerized Placement Tests (CPTs), in an actual operating setting, about their ethnicity and sex. This inquiry had no statistically and practically significant effects on how well the examinees did on the tests or how long they worked on the tests</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562777</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Inquiring about Examinees&apos; Ethnicity and Sex: Effects on Computerized Placement Tests™ Performance. Report No. 98-2. ETS RR No. 98-9</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1998-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Metacognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Objective Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bilingual Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Help Seeking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alternative Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aptitude</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prior Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cross Cultural Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tobias, Sigmund</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Everson, Howard T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Learning and Study Skills Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Armed Forces Qualification Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Degrees of Reading Power Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Degrees of Reading Power Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Armed Forces Qualification Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>To date the authors have completed 23 studies of knowledge monitoring and its relationship to learning from instruction. Their earlier work, 12 studies in all, is summarized and reported elsewhere (see Tobias and Everson, 1996; Tobias and Everson, 2000). In this paper they continue this line of research and summarize the results of 11 studies that have been conducted over the past three years. The work reported here attempts to address a number of general issues, e.g., the domain specificity of knowledge monitoring, measurement concerns, and the relationship of knowledge monitoring to academic ability.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562778</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Knowing What You Know and What You Don&apos;t: Further Research on Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring. Research Report No. 2002-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>31</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>60</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Handheld Devices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telecommunications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cost Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonological Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Fluency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Piper, Benjamin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Kenya</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Kenya</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is a dearth of literature that use research design for causal inference that estimate the effect of information and communications technology (ICT) programs on literacy outcomes in early primary, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. There are several programs that have used ICT at a large scale, including Los Angeles, Peru, Nicaragua, Rwanda and an ongoing program in Turkey. Seldom have the studies directly estimated the effect of the ICT program on learning, as the measures used have typically been a middle level of the causal chain (Strigel &amp;amp; Pouezevara, 2012). Mobile phones are increasingly available in the market, and several authors argue that mobile learning is an increasingly ideal way to increase outcomes at scale (UNESCO, 2012; GSMA, 2012; McKinsey &amp;amp; Co., 2012; Vosloo, 2012). There are concerns that using mobiles for learning would differentiate by gender (Murthy, 2011). Fewer studies have estimated the impact of e-readers on learning, though some recent studies in Kenya and Ghana are promising (Worldreader, 2012). Analyses of the impact of large scale tablet and laptop initiatives is somewhat discouraging. The World Bank blog of ICT Specialist Michael Trucano recently presented an analysis of several countries programs, including the USA, Uruguay, Thailand, Peru, Kenya, Rwanda, Turkey, India, Argentina and Portugal (Trucano, 2013). Few of these studies consider cost when estimating impact, and the impacts identified remain small or not yet determined. In all of the studies researched, in fact, there was no attempt to compare the cost and effectiveness of different ICT interventions within one study. The Kenya Primary Math and Reading Initiative (PRIMR) aims to improve literacy learning by aligning learning materials and teacher practices with current research, providing ongoing instructional support and observation, and supplying instructional materials and English and Kiswahili books for students. PRIMR is a partnership between USAID/Kenya and the Ministry of Education, with implementation by RTI International. Embedded in PRIMR is a study of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ICT in Kenya, located in Kisumu county. What little evidence exists suggests that ICT programs are not often ineffective. However, in a context where printed material is quite expensive, e-readers may dramatically expand access to print. Similarly, the lack of integration of ICT into the formal system is often decried by the Kenyan Ministry of Education. The ICT program is under careful examination in order to determine the lessons learned for Kenya&apos;s own ICT program, with an emphasis on rapidly expanding access to ICT for primary school. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562779</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>ICT, Literacy and Teacher Change: The Effectiveness of ICT Options in Kenya</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Equated Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language of Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Screening Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cascallar, Alicia S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dorans, Neil J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Prueba de Aptitud Academica</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>English as a Second Language Assessment Battery</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Puerto Rico</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Puerto Rico</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Score linkages between the Verbal and Math sections of the SAT® I: Reasoning Test and the corresponding sections of the new version of a Spanish-language admissions test, the Prueba de Aptitud Academica® (PAA™) were investigated. A bilingual group design was employed. A language proficiency measure (ESLAT) was used to define the bilingual group and as a predictor variable. Prediction and scaling for concordance results were compared. Results indicated that for both single (PAA Verbal or PAA Math to the corresponding SAT I scores) and composite (PAA-V+M to SAT I-V+M and PAA-V+M+ESLAT to SAT-I V+M) score linkage, prediction is preferable to concordance. Comparison of prediction and concordance results for composite scores versus single construct scores indicate that when PAA Verbal is combined with PAA Math to form a composite, predictions of this composite are better than for Verbal alone, but worse than for Math alone.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562780</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Linking Scores from Tests of Similar Content Given in Different Languages: Spanish Language PAA™ and English Language SAT® I. Research Report No. 2003-5. ETS RR-03-20</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2003-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>17</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>23</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prompting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 11</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asian American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Breland, Hunter</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kubota, Melvin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nickerson, Kristine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Trapani, Catherine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Walker, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 11</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study investigated the impact on ethnic, language, and gender groups of a new kind of essay prompt type intended for use with the new SAT®. The study also generated estimates of the reliability of scores obtained using the prompts examined. To examine the impact of a new prompt type, random samples of eleventh-grade students in 49 participating high schools were administered writing tests using four different prompts, two of an old type and two of a new type. To obtain estimates of the reliability of scores for the old and new types of prompts, schools were asked to participate in a second round of testing to occur four months after the initial testing. Results of the impact analyses revealed no significant prompt type effects for ethnic, gender, or language groups, although there were significant differences in mean scores for ethnic and gender groups for all prompts. The score reliability estimates obtained were similar to those obtained in previous studies.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562781</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>New SAT® Writing Prompt Study: Analyses of Group Impact and Reliability. Research Report No. 2004-1. ETS RR-04-03</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2004-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>26</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>26</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Summer Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Least Squares Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, James S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>White, Thomas G.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>READS (Reading Enhances Achievement During Summer) has been implemented in North Carolina schools for the past several years as part of an Investing in Innovation (i3) validation grant that began in fall 2010. This paper focuses on the Year 3 study and compares the Year 3 results to the Year 1 and Year 2 results, and the results of earlier studies. The purpose of the Year 3 study was to test the effectiveness of READS-PIF (Reads with Parent Involvement and Follow-up) in a larger sample of school districts and schools. Researchers addressed three main research questions: (1) What was the overall impact of READS-PIF on students&apos; reading comprehension?; (2) Was the impact of READS-PIF greater in high poverty schools than in moderate poverty schools?; and (3) Was the impact of READS-PIF greater for students receiving free or reduced price lunch (FRL)? This study took place in 59 elementary schools from 7 school districts in North Carolina. Of the 59 schools, 44 were high-poverty schools, and 15 were moderate-poverty schools. The final analytic sample included 5,284 students (2,798 2nd graders, and 2,486 3rd graders). Nearly 80% of the students in the study were eligible for FRL. On the spring pretest, students scored somewhat below national norms on the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) reading comprehension test. The sample mean normal-curve equivalent score was 46. Intervention methods included: (1) end-of-year lessons; (2) family nights; (3) tri-folds; (4) follow-up calls; and (5) book matching and summer book distribution. Within each grade and school, students were randomly assigned to the treatment or control condition and pre- and post-tested on a standardized reading comprehension test, the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS). OLS regression was used to estimate the main effect of the treatment condition, both overall and separately by grade. To address the question of whether school poverty moderated the treatment effect, researchers included a cross-level interaction involving the student-level treatment effect and school poverty. The results suggest that the scaffolded summer reading program may be effective for third grade girls but not third grade boys. Unlike the Year 1 and Year 2 studies, the results of this study do not indicate that treatment effects are moderated by poverty measured at the school level or individual student level. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562782</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Replicating the Effects of a Scaled-Up, Teacher-Scaffolded Voluntary Summer Reading Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcome Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cluster Grouping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Well Being</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonverbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Halpin, Peter F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Torrente, Catalina</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Congo</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Congo</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Using reliable and valid measures of students&apos; outcomes which are sensitive to change is critical for obtaining interpretable and therefore useful results from evaluations of school-based interventions. While measurement development for use in experimental evaluations receives a great deal of attention in the U.S., it lags behind in low-income countries. The Early Grade Math Assessment (EGMA, RTI, 2009) and Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA, RTI, 2009b) were developed by RTI international to provide snapshots of students&apos; emerging math and reading abilities in low-income countries. The assessments use a series of discrete sub-tests (e.g., number identification, quantity discrimination, phonemic awareness, familiar/unfamiliar word decoding) and are increasingly employed by governments and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) to diagnose the status of children&apos;s abilities and to fine tune interventions to meet the academic needs of children. As the popularity of evidence-based practices grows, EGMA and EGRA are also being used in experimental evaluations of school-based interventions. However, the use of multiple sub-test scores may inflate the risk of capitalizing on chance and undermine power to detect intervention impacts. The goals of the study are to describe and discuss the authors&apos; conceptual and analytical approaches to developing valid and internally consistent measures of social-emotional processes and academic outcomes for use in a cluster randomized trial of Opportunities for Equitable Access to Quality Basic Education (OPEQ) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). First, the authors present their approach to developing summary scores of children&apos;s early math and reading abilities. Second, they present psychometric analyses used to refine, reduce, and examine the underlying structure of scales intended to measure children&apos;s perceptions of school quality and socio-emotional well being. The analyses in this paper illustrate approaches to measuring children&apos;s academic outcomes, perceptions of school quality, and socio-emotional well being, as part of an impact evaluation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. As such, they contribute to advances in devising more reliable and valid instruments to inform the development of increasingly effective educational interventions in diverse parts of the world. These findings provide a model for future use of evaluative educational instruments in low-income countries, and confirm the importance of critically evaluating such instruments for use in new populations.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562783</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Measuring Critical Education Processes and Outcomes: Illustration from a Cluster Randomized Trial in the Democratic Republic of the Congo</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grouping (Instructional Purposes)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Adjustment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Adjustment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Context Effect</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structural Equation Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, Ha Yeon</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schwartz, Kate</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cappella, Elise</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Seidman, Edward</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Informed by the current literature, this study examines social contexts across middle grade schools with different grade span configurations. In doing so, the authors aim to build understanding of where and how to target interventions in the middle grades to enhance maintenance of social-emotional adjustment and experiences from middle childhood to early adolescence. Specifically, utilizing a large national dataset--the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-1999 (ECLS-K)--the authors: (1) describe the factor structure of the middle grade school social context as reported by administrators and teachers; (2) examine variation in social context among middle grade schools with different grade span configurations (k-8 schools; 6-8 middle schools; 7-9 junior high schools), controlling for school demographic and structural characteristics; and (3) test the role of middle grade school social context in the associations between school grade span configuration and student social adaptation and experiences (school attachment, perceived peer support, peer academic values). Results showed this study identified school social context as a potentially critical avenue of intervention toward supporting students&apos; social and academic development in the middle grades. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562784</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Navigating Middle Grades: Role of School Context in Students&apos; Social Adaptation and Experiences</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>26</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Selection (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Martinez, Marcela</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Given the growing economic returns to education (Psacharopoulos &amp;amp; Patrinos, 2004) and the overwhelmingly high educational expectations of American high school students (Domina et al., 2011; Goyette, 2008), one might expect nearly all U.S. high school students to take as many academic courses as they can. Consistent with this expectation, much research on inequalities in course completion focuses on structural inequalities in &amp;quot;opportunities to learn&amp;quot; (Catsambis, 1994; Oakes, 1990; Schneider et al., 1998; Stevenson et al., 1994). This research demonstrates that students&apos; current and future math opportunities are unequal and linked to inequalities formed in the past. However, less attention has been given to the fact that nearly 40 percent of U.S. high school students opt out of one or more years of high school mathematics (authors computations ELS: 2002). This estimate is even grimmer when we include high school dropouts and exclude retaken math courses. For this reason, this study focuses on students&apos; agency to choose (or not) to take four years of math while accounting for a web of influences such as social background, math track, prior performance, and state policies. Drawing upon youth academic motivation research, this paper investigates the factors that influence student decisions to complete four years of high school mathematics. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562785</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Motivational Predictors of Math Course Persistence</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>53</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature Reviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Polanin, Joshua R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wilson, Sandra Jo</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Information Analyses</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this project is to demonstrate the practical methods developed to utilize a dataset consisting of both multivariate and multilevel effect size data. The context for this project is a large-scale meta-analytic review of the predictors of academic achievement. This project is guided by three primary research questions: (1) How do we meta-analyze the heterogeneous and complex, multivariate, multilevel, and longitudinal correlational literature on parental involvement and academic achievement?; (2) What are the associations between parental involvement and academic achievement, controlling for socioeconomic status and age?; and (3) Are there differential impacts on academic achievement as a function of the type of parental involvement (i.e., school-based versus home-based)? The research design of this project is a multilevel, multivariate meta-analysis. Researchers have collected over 700 primary studies that measured and reported longitudinal correlations of behavior, attitude, and school readiness predicting academic achievement. More than 150,000 bivariate correlations have been extracted. The population of interest, given that this project is a meta-analysis, is primary studies. Researchers searched and screened traditional and grey literature databases, including PsycInfo, ERIC, Digital Dissertations, as well as several conference websites, and national study repositories. Experts in this field were also contacted. The results of this analysis provide a synthesized correlation matrix. To account for differences across the effect sizes and studies, researchers use a meta-regression to control differences in attrition, age, and race. The results of this project are ongoing. Based on 1,559 longitudinal correlation estimates, the simple weighted-mean effect size is positive and moderate across all correlations. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562786</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Meta-Analyzing a Complex Correlational Dataset: A Case Study Using Correlations That Measure the Relationship between Parental Involvement and Academic Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Cluster Grouping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sample Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spreadsheets</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dong, Nianbo</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>For intervention studies involving binary treatment variables, procedures for power analysis have been worked out and computerized estimation tools are generally available. The purpose of this study is to: (1) develop the statistical formulations for calculating statistical power, minimum detectable effect size (MDES) and its confidence interval, and minimum required sample size to detect the effects of a continuous moderator variable at level 1 or level 2 in two-level simple cluster random assignment designs; and (2) operatize these formulas in the enhanced version of PowerUp! to create spreadsheets for calculating MDES. This report only shows the preliminary results of the MDES for detecting a level-2 continuous moderator effect in two-level cluster randomized experiments. The formulas for statistical power and the minimum required sample sizes will be derived accordingly.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562787</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Power Analysis to Detect the Effects of a Continuous Moderator in 2-Level Simple Cluster Random Assignment Experiments</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>21</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recruitment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gallagher, H. Alix</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Roschelle, Jeremy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Feng, Mingyu</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The objective of this study was to look across strategies used in a wide range of studies to build a framework for researchers to use in conceptualizing the recruitment process. This paper harvests lessons learned across 19 randomized controlled trials in K-12 school settings conducted by a leading research organization to identify strategies that have fostered successful recruitment efforts. The authors report on their experiences in recruiting teachers for random assignment experiments in public primary and secondary schools. While this collection of studies is a naturally occurring sample, it is still a useful sample due to its diversity. This study revealed that based on the experience, a well-detailed recruitment plan should clearly fit the research design, explain how the intervention will be packaged to reduce the burden on participants, describe the overall timeline, staffing and project management structure for the campaign, give examples of how messages will be communicated to potential recruits, discuss strategies for handling contingencies that emerge during the campaign, and be thoughtful about how applicants will be welcomed into the study and retained as participants.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562788</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Recruiting Participants for Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Cluster Grouping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sample Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Spybrook, Jessaca</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelcey, Ben</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Cluster randomized trials (CRTs), or studies in which intact groups of individuals are randomly assigned to a condition, are becoming more common in the evaluation of educational programs, policies, and practices. The website for the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE) reveals they have launched over 30 evaluation studies in the past decade, the majority of them utilizing a randomized trial. Clearly there are a large number of randomized trials of educational programs, policies, and practices either complete or currently in the field. The overarching goal of these randomized trials is generate rigorous evidence of whether or not a program works. In order to do this, studies must also be designed to detect moderator effects. The power to detect moderator effects at the student, cluster, or site level in CRTs has received much less attention in the literature than the power for the main effect of treatment. The purpose of this paper is to extend the work on power calculations for moderator effects to include moderator effects at any level for the following 4 types of CRTs: 2-level CRT, 3-level CRT, 3-level multi-site cluster randomized trial (MSCRT), and 4-level MSCRT. In addition to providing the calculations and R code to do the calculations, we start to develop intuition around the minimum detectable effect size for moderator effects using sample sizes from CRTs in the field of education. This paper represents the next step towards building the capacity of researchers to design CRTs that move beyond the main effect of treatment. Designing studies to detect not only whether or not an intervention works, but for whom or under what circumstances is critical. The results from this study suggest that in many cases, if a study is powered to detect a reasonable main effect of treatment and it has a reasonable number of individuals per cluster, then it will also be powered to detect an individual level moderator (although not shown in this proposal).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562789</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Power Calculations for Binary Moderator in Cluster Randomized Trials</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Executive Function</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Short Term Memory</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Quinn, David</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A substantial body of evidence has shown large academic test score gaps between black and white students in early childhood. These gaps remain, and probably grow, as students progress through school. Many researchers have sought to explain these persistent test score gaps, and particularly, to understand the role of students&apos; socio-economic status (SES) in the formation of these gaps. Using data from the nationally representative Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-1999, Fryer and Levitt (2004), found large math and reading gaps at school entry, but a small number of SES-related variables explained all of the black-white reading gap and most of the math gap (with a standardized gap of 0.10 remaining). The recent release of data from the National Center for Education Statistics&apos; (NCES) ECLS-K: 2011 provides an opportunity to test whether Fryer and Levitt&apos;s results replicate in a new nationally representative sample over a decade after the first ECLS-K. Additionally, unlike the ECLS-K: 1999, the ECLS-K: 2011 administered executive functioning assessments. Data from the ECLS-K: 2011 was used to update the picture of black-white test score gaps and gap trends over kindergarten, and to determine whether patterns found in the earlier ECLS-K: 1999 replicate. Questions guiding this project include: (1) Do measures of socioeconomic status explain black-white math and reading test score gaps in the fall and spring of kindergarten?; and (2) Do measures of executive functioning show the same patterns of results as measures of math and reading skills? Three separate assessments provided data: two subject area assessments (math and reading), and one executive functioning assessment testing working memory. These assessments were administered one-on-one by trained child assessors in the fall of kindergarten, and in the spring. The results for working memory show a somewhat different pattern than for math and reading, however, the SES variables explain somewhat less of the black-white gap, and the gap does not change substantially over the school year. The differing pattern of results for math and reading compared to executive functioning is consistent with the hypothesis that gap estimates are sensitive to the measure used, and are affected by whether the material on the assessments is learned mostly inside or outside school. The math and reading gaps, which represent knowledge learned in school, grow from fall to spring, while the unadjusted executive functioning gap, which does not measure curricular objectives, does not grow from fall to spring. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562790</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Kindergarten Black-White Test Score Gaps: Replicating and Updating Previous Findings with New National Data</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Financial Aid Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Synchronous Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telecommunications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Castleman, Benjamin L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Page, Lindsay C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>While considerable effort has been invested to increase FAFSA completion among high school seniors, there has been much less investment to ensure that college freshmen re-apply for financial aid. Text messaging is a promising approach to inform students of important stages in the financial aid re-application process and to connect them to professional assistance when they need help. Building on a previous experiment, this paper examines and investigates the impact of financial aid-related prompts on whether college freshman re-apply for aid and persist into sophomore year. This study provides rigorous, experimental evidence on the impact of freshman-year financial aid text reminders on students&apos; college persistence. The experimental sample includes students who were assigned to the summer 2012 text messaging treatment group and who were enrolled in college in Fall 2012. 774 students met these conditions. Researchers randomly assigned 387 students to receive the freshman year financial aid text messaging intervention and 384 students to the control group. By virtue of using a randomized control trial design to select which students would receive the financial aid texts, researchers are able to employ straightforward regression analyses to isolate the causal effect of the messaging campaign on students&apos; college attainment. Preliminary data indicates a substantial response from students to the financial aid nudges. These findings are relevant both to ongoing policy efforts to increase college success and completion among low-income students and, more generally, to efforts to harness technology to improve students&apos; educational outcomes. Figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562791</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Freshman Year Financial Aid Nudges: An Experiment to Increase Financial Aid Renewal and Sophomore Year Persistence</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwc_reviewed>Meets Evidence Standards without Reservations</eric:wwc_reviewed>
<eric:wwcguide_link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/study/79016</eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Metacognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stress Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Well Being</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prosocial Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Burnout</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mental Health</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Abenavoli, Rachel M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harris, Alexis R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Katz, Deirdre A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jennings, Patricia A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Greenberg, Mark T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teachers are responsible for delivering academic instruction, facilitating student learning and engagement, and managing classroom behavior. Stress may interfere with performance in the classroom, however (Tsouloupas, Carson, Matthews, Grawitch, &amp;amp; Barber, 2010), and recent studies suggest that stress is quite common among today&apos;s educators. In light of these trends and their potential for negatively impacting students&apos; learning, it is critical to identify factors that support educators&apos; health, wellbeing, and effectiveness. The Prosocial Classroom Model (Jennings &amp;amp; Greenberg, 2009) suggests that mindfulness and other aspects of social-emotional competence may lead to more effective classroom management and protect educators from experiencing a &amp;quot;burnout cascade&amp;quot; of deteriorating classroom climate, student misbehavior, and emotional exhaustion. Mindfulness has been defined as &amp;quot;paying attention in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally&amp;quot; (Kabat- Zinn, 1994, p. 4), and mindfulness training for adults has been linked with reductions in stress and improvements in wellbeing (Ospina et al., 2007). Emerging evidence from intervention studies suggests that mindfulness training is associated with improvements in teachers&apos; classroom behavior (e.g., Flook, Goldberg, Pinger, Bonus, &amp;amp; Davidson, 2013; Jennings, Frank, Snowberg, Coccia, &amp;amp; Greenberg, 2013). In a central Pennsylvania middle school setting, the authors examined how educators&apos; mindfulness at the beginning of the school year predicted change in educators&apos; self-reported efficacy with respect to student engagement, classroom management, and instructional practices from fall to spring of the school year. Two tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562792</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Mindfulness Promotes Educators&apos; Efficacy in the Classroom</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>16</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mainstreaming</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Introductory Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Results</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Workshops</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Experiments</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Logue, Alexandra W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Watanabe-Rose, Mari</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study used a randomized controlled trial to determine whether students, assessed by their community colleges as needing an elementary algebra (remedial) mathematics course, could instead succeed at least as well in a college-level, credit-bearing introductory statistics course with extra support (a weekly workshop). Researchers randomly assigned one-third of the participants to one of three types of courses: traditional elementary algebra; traditional elementary algebra plus a weekly workshop; or college-level, credit-bearing, introductory statistics plus a weekly workshop. The experiment was conducted at three urban CUNY community colleges: Borough of Manhattan Community College; Hostos Community College; and LaGuardia Community College. There were 721 participants combined across the three colleges. Their mean age was 21.1 years (SD = 5.5), and 54% of them were female. Researchers collected the final grades for each participant in the experiment, as well as their high school records and assessment test scores. Adding a weekly workshop to a traditional remedial elementary algebra course seemed to improve students&apos; performance above the usual (low) pass rate. However, students in college-level introductory statistics with a weekly workshop passed at an even higher rate. Students with relatively high placement test scores and grades in high school, and students who registered for their classes relatively early, were particularly likely to pass the statistics course. A table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562793</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Mainstreaming Remedial Mathematics Students in Introductory Statistics: Results Using a Randomized Controlled Trial</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Numeracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developing Nations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Starkey, Leighann</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Aber, J. Lawrence</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Johnston, Brian M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Congo Republic</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Congo Republic</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Mastering basic numeracy and literacy skills is one of the most fundamental goals of education. However, it is estimated that 250 million primary-school-age children lack basic reading, writing and math skills (UN, 2013). Children living in war and poverty stricken countries are among the least likely to attain those basic goals. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has set out to improve basic literacy--and to a lesser extent, basic numeracy--skills for 100 million children in low-income countries by 2015. USAID hopes to accomplish this through the development of innovative teaching techniques and learning materials, maximizing time spent on instruction, and strengthening household, community, and school partnerships. The present study is part of an impact evaluation of one such effort in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The purpose of the study is to describe and discuss results from a cluster randomized trial of the &amp;quot;Opportunities for Equitable Access to Quality Basic Education&amp;quot; (OPEQ) program, using a sample of 8,879 second-, third-, and fourth-grade students in the province of Katanga. OPEQ was developed by the International Rescue Committee (IRC) with funding from USAID, to better the quality of teaching and learning processes and enhance children and youth&apos;s academic and socio-emotional outcomes in the DRC. Three tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562794</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Improving Congolese Children&apos;s Early Math and Reading Ability: Preliminary Results from a Cluster Randomized Trial in the Democratic Republic of the Congo</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines the relationship between scores on the SAT and retention to the second year of college using student level data from the freshman class of 2006 at 106 four-year institutions. Results indicate that the SAT predicts second-year retention, with 95.5 percent of high performers returning but only 63.8 percent of low performers. While retention rates do vary by subgroups (i.e., gender, ethnicity, parental income, and highest parental education) and institutional characteristics (i.e., control, selectivity, size), these differences are moderated when SAT performance and other indicators of academic preparation are considered. Three appendices are included: (1) Retention Rates Within Student and Institutional Characteristics by SAT Score Band; (2) Retention Rates by Two Institutional Characteristics; and (3) Retention Rates by Student Characteristics by Institutional Characteristics.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562795</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Is Performance on the SAT® Related to College Retention? Research Report No. 2009-7</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>30</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>26</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Part Time Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Full Time Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Attewell, Paul</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Douglas, Daniel</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper uses the credits-attempted perspective--in the context of how many credits a student attempts in their first year of college--and reports on several related projects all intended to evaluate potential interventions to raise academic momentum among first-year community college students. The presentation contrasts non-experimental findings from analyses of transcript data with three randomized control trials aimed at assessing the impact of increasing student momentum. The research questions addressed are: (1) Is there evidence that increased academic momentum--defined as increased engagement in course-taking in the first year--improves retention and degree completion among community college students in non-experimental settings?; and (2) Will experimental manipulations or interventions that increase students&apos; momentum result in better retention and degree completion? The research considers three potential interventions, programs, or practices: (1) enrolling in summer school immediately prior to starting at a community college; (2) increasing from a part-time course-load to a full-time course-load during the first year of college; and (3) attending summer school at the end of one&apos;s first year at community college. Researchers compare and contrast analyses of nation-wide transcripts, case study, and RCT data for community college students at the City University of New York (CUNY). The total number of participants was 1,570 with 719 in the control and 851 the experimental groups, respectively. Propensity score matched analyses of non-experimental data from national and CUNY transcript studies indicate that all three programs or interventions had significant positive effects on retention and/or degree completion among community college freshmen. Ongoing RCT experimental studies, however, have not shown significant results for all of the interventions. Preliminary results suggest that community colleges should offer bridge programs and summer programs, and encourage part-time students to increase to full time in their second semester. A table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562796</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Increasing the Academic Momentum of Community College Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developing Nations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cost Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clubs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bos, Johannes M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sherman, Dan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Orgut, Burhan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Liberia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Liberia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Under-enrollment of girls in primary and secondary is a longstanding and well-documented problem in developing countries. Limited parental and communal resources combine with cultural factors to create a disincentive for parents to send their girls to school and to keep them there throughout the school year and for the full primary and secondary school years. Girls in developing countries often enroll in school later than boys, attend less consistently, and drop out of school earlier. This phenomenon has serious negative consequences for the girls, their families, their future children, and the economic and social development of the communities in which they live. Because of this, girls&apos; education has been a major focus for international aid agencies like USAID and for NGOs engaged in international educational development. The evidence on the effectiveness of programs to promote girls&apos; enrollment and attendance is relatively limited. The project described herein is a demonstration project involving 60 primary schools in three counties in Liberia. The project, funded by USAID and the Millennium Challenge Corporation, provided 40 of these schools with three years of funding and logistical support to implement three different intervention models. The remaining 20 schools functioned as a comparison group. Outcomes for children exposed to three intervention models are compared to identify which model is the most effective one to carry forward in further scale up of the intervention. The purpose of the study is to (1) document the implementation of the three models in the participating schools; (2) measure the impacts of each of the three models on girls&apos; educational outcomes; and (3) analyze the relative cost-effectiveness of the three models under different assumptions.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562797</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Impacts of a Program to Improve Girls&apos; Enrollment and Persistence in Liberia Elementary Schools: The Challenge of Using Gender Differences in Aggregate Outcome Trends to Identify Program Effects</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>USAID</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Neighborhoods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Environmental Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Care</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Context Effect</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morris, Pamela A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Connors, Maia C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCoy, Dana Charles</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gomez, Celia J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yoshikawa, Hiro</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Aber, J. Lawrence</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper capitalizes on the addition of geocodes for Head Start centers in which children were randomly assigned to address questions about the role of neighborhood characteristics in moderating impacts of assignment to the Head Start program. Researchers explore the extent to which impacts of assignment to Head Start on outcomes for children vary by the availability of alternative child care options, as well as the presence of community crime and neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage. This research uses data from the Head Start Impact Study and includes 4,440 3- and 4-year-old children who were randomly assigned off a waitlist in 351 Head Start programs across 81 Head Start grantees to either receive an invitation to participate in Head Start services, or to the control group (no offer of Head Start). Randomization was conducted based on 202 center groups: a total of 2,644 children were randomized to receive Head Start services and 1,796 were randomized to the control group. Ultimately, children enrolled in 1,632 classrooms across 930 Head Start and non-Head Start centers. Researchers matched center geocodes to data from the US Department of Education (DOE), the American Community Survey, and Economic Census data to assess availability of alternative child care and preschool options. Initial results demonstrate: (1) a significant effect of child care availability on the treatment impact on children&apos;s PPVT scores; (2) no statistically significant effects of neighborhood characteristics on Head Start impacts were found for children&apos;s Woodcock Johnson Letter Word Identification; and (3) neighborhood crime analyses reveal evidence for treatment moderation of Head Start&apos;s impact on children&apos;s PPVT scores. Figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562798</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Do Head Start Impacts Vary by Neighborhood Context?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature Reviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Principles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Listening Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culturally Relevant Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metacognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Written Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holistic Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Li, Jun</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Information Analyses</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this literature review is to identify the most effective instructional principles for English language learners (ELLs) as documented by prominent researchers in the field and existing research reviews. This report is intended as a high-level synthesis of existing reviews of the literature rather than a comprehensive search and documentation of all primary research articles on ELL teaching and learning. To this end, this review lists the most effective principles for ELL instruction and documents the supporting research evidence for those principles. Principles 1 and 2 are about implementing challenging curriculum and designing the academic content. Principles 3, 4, and 5 are about effective instruction and the available strategies teachers may use in their teaching. Principles 6 and 7 deal with how to teach ELLs to acquire vocabulary and build reading ability. Principle 8 focuses on how to teach ELLs to use the English language. Last, Principle 9 is about the integration of four language skills: reading, writing, speaking, and listening.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562799</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Principles of Effective English Language Learner Pedagogy. Research in Review 2012-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>68</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Annotated Bibliographies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Barry, Carol</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cooney, Siobhan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Laitusis, Vytas</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Matos-Elefonte, Haifa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKillip, Mary</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Merriman, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Niu, Sunny</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smith, Kara</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - Bibliographies</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This annotated bibliography contains summaries of research studies examining a number of College Board assessments and programs. To be included in the bibliography, each study needed to meet a number of criteria. First, articles must have been published (as a College Board research report, in an external journal, or as an ETS research report). Conference presentations or proceedings were not included because these materials often do not undergo as much scientific scrutiny as fully published papers. Also, the articles must represent research as either a validity study or an impact/evaluation study. All SAT® studies must have used samples from 2005 or later to account for the new test design, and Advanced Placement Program® (AP®) studies should have been published in the last 20 years. All studies are grouped by assessment/program, and key findings that represent a synthesis across the studies are presented. Key findings refer to results of the most rigorous work to date regarding the College Board program in question. [For the 2012 edition, see ED561019.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562800</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Research on College Board Programs and Services: Annotated Bibliography 2013. Research in Review 2013-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>52</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Wiseness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guessing (Tests)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Powers, Donald E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Test of Standard Written English</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Test of Standard Written English</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Data were reanalyzed from a previously reported study of the passage dependence of reading comprehension questions being developed for the revised SAT. The objective was to uncover any gender differences in approaches to and performance on a task requiring examinees to answer reading comprehension questions without reading the passages on which the questions were based. Verbally able males and females were compared with respect to their reported use of a variety of test-taking strategies involving reasoning, personal knowledge, and guessing. A few relatively small (and often inconsistent) differences were detected between male and female test takers. However, far more similarities than differences were noted with respect to both test performance and test-taking behavior. If these results are generalizable to more typical tests of verbal ability, they would seem to suggest that males and females employ quite similar approaches to standardized test taking.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562801</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Performance by Gender on an Unconventional Verbal Reasoning Task: Answering Reading Comprehension Questions without the Passages. Report No. 95-2. ETS RR No. 95-14</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1995-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>23</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Test of English as a Foreign Language</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Test of English as a Foreign Language</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The College Board conducted a survey of students who took the ELPT test in 1996 and 1997. The survey yielded responses from 141 students with self-reported TOEFL scores. The results suggest a strong, near linear relationship between students&apos; performance levels on these two English language proficiency instruments.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562802</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Relationship between ELPT™ and TOEFL Performance: A Preliminary Analysis. Research Summary RS-03</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1998-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>2</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Affirmative Action</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socialization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diversity (Faculty)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Doctoral Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gándara, Patricia</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Commissioned by the College Board&apos;s National Task Force on Minority High Achievement, this report describes higher education programs and strategies that have the capacity to help many more minority students distinguish themselves academically on the undergraduate level. Chapters included in this report are: (1) Introduction; (2) The Challenge; (3) Academic Interventions for Minority Students in an Era of Waning Affirmative Action; (4) Programs That Strive to Increase Minority Achievement in Higher Education; (5) Confronting the Overprediction Problem and Stimulating High Achievement; and (6) Conclusions and Recommendations. A bibliography is included. The following are appended: (1) List of institutions, agencies, and organizations around the country from which nominees for possible programs concerned with promoting minority high achievement were sought; (2) List of considered, but eliminated, programs; and (3) List of programs serving as exemplars of the vast array of efforts being mounted nationwide. [This report was written with the assistance of Julie Maxwell-Jolly.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562803</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Priming the Pump: Strategies for Increasing the Achievement of Underrepresented Minority Undergraduates</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1999-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>129</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interrater Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelcey, Ben</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Valid and reliable measurement of teaching is essential to evaluating and improving teacher effectiveness and advancing large-scale policy-relevant research in education (Raudenbush &amp;amp; Sadoff, 2008). One increasingly common component of teaching evaluations is the direct observation of teachers in their classrooms. Classroom observations have been long viewed as a promising way to evaluate and develop teachers because they anchor assessments in specific and observable criteria (Gitomer, 2009). Despite the potential of classroom observations to identify strengths and address specific weaknesses in teachers&apos; practices, a significant problem with observed teaching scores is that they confound construct-irrelevant variation with persistent teaching quality (i.e., observed scores are not independent of the characteristics of a specific observation). In observational assessments of teaching, one key source of construct-irrelevant variation is the differences among raters. Research has shown that even after extensive training there are important differences in how raters interpret evidence and that these differences potentially introduce variability in the structure of the scale established by the guiding rubric/instrument (e.g., Eckes, 2009; Hill, Charlambous, &amp;amp; Kraft, 2012; Engelhard, 2002). The focus of this study was to develop and investigate a set of psychometric methods that accommodate, as best as possible, measurement noninvariance among raters. To estimate persistent teaching quality using rater-mediated classroom observations, a cross-classified multilevel random item effects graded response model was developed. Because instruments have different visions of teaching quality and use different systems and sets of competencies to operationalize these theories, instruments may vary in their sensitivity to rater effects. Instruments that are less sensitive to rater differences may reduce the value of the proposed method. Evidence from this study suggests the promise of random item effect models to address measurement non-invariance in rater-mediated assessments. However, there is a question of whether random item effects and the associated approximate measurement invariance can adequately compensate for differences in the scales raters use. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562804</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Noninvariant Measurement in Rater-Mediated Assessments of Teaching Quality</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zeiser, Kristina</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rickles, Jordan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Garet, Michael S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>To help researchers understand potential issues one can encounter when conducting propensity matching studies in complex settings, this paper describes methodological complications faced when studying schools using deeper learning practices to improve college and career readiness. The study uses data from high schools located in six districts across two states: California and New York. The study used a quasi-experimental matched design, in which each network school was matched to a non-network school within the same (or neighboring) school district. Results from the &amp;quot;Study of Deeper Learning&amp;quot; illustrated the tensions between the realities associated with conducting research based on matching methods and the simplicity of textbook study design and analysis. In this paper, different areas were examined in which the nature of the intervention being studied and the constraints and challenges of working with districts and schools affected design and analysis decisions and the potential threats to the validity of research findings. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562805</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Methodological Complications of Matching Designs under Real World Constraints: Lessons from a Study of Deeper Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Fluency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zuilkowski, Stephanie Simmons</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Piper, Benjamin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Kenya</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Kenya (Nairobi)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Kenya</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Kenya (Nairobi)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>If children do not learn how to read in the first few years of primary school, they will struggle to complete the cycle and are at greater risk of dropping out. It is therefore crucial to identify and test interventions that have the potential of making a large impact, can be implemented quickly, and are affordable to be taken to scale by the Kenyan government. This is the goal of the PRIMR Initiative--to test various options for improving learning outcomes and instruction in Kenyan schools, using a randomized controlled design. The design is essential to this contribution, as many pilot programs in the sector do not test the impacts of quality-improvement methods at a medium scale and with enough rigor to identify a causal impact. In this paper, the authors focus on early-grade literacy outcomes--reading fluency and comprehension--after one year of implementation for pupils in grades 1 and 2. Study findings indicated that the first year of PRIMR had a positive impact on the three outcomes of interest--oral reading fluency, the percentage of pupils who read at the MOE&apos;s benchmark, and reading comprehension--although not on all combinations of language, grade, and school type. Also, the meaningful first-year impacts of PRIMR on student achievement have implications for teacher professional development in Kenya. One table and one figure are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562806</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Improving Reading Outcomes in Kenya: First-Year Effects of the PRIMR Initiative</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mainstreaming</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Databases</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vanlaar, Gudrun</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vandecandelaere, Machteld</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>De Fraine, Bieke</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>De Witte, Kristof</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Van Damme, Jan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Belgium</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Belgium</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this paper, the authors looked at the effectiveness of special education schools for mathematics learning. Mathematics education is a key to increasing the later professional and citizenship opportunities of students and mathematical understanding influences decision making in all areas of life. Additionally, math failure correlates highly with referral to special education, grade retention, and school dropout and are cumulative and worsen with time, therefore, early identification and intervention is important. Empirical data from Flanders, the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium, was used, which makes an interesting case study as it has a strong tradition of separate special education. Study results indicated that students with special educational needs are better off in mainstream education than in a special education school, at least as far as mathematics goes. Also, practical implications suggest that transferring students to special schools is, on average, not beneficial. One figure and one table are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562807</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Is Transition to a Special Education School an Effective Answer to Mathematics Difficulties?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>34</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 11</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hansen, Ben B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fredrickson, Mark M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 11</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The goal of this research is to make sensitivity analysis accessible not only to empirical researchers but also to the various stakeholders for whom educational evaluations are conducted. To do this it derives anchors for the omitted variable (OV)-program participation association intrinsically, using the Love plot to present a wide range of possible values in a compact yet intuitive manner. At the same time it calibrates anchor points for the OV-outcome association extrinsically, drawing on published descriptions of nationally representative samples. The overall approach requires a quasi-experimental comparison using matching or weighting for covariate adjustment. Study results report that what is gained in return is a vast widening of the audience for sensitivity analysis. Broadening participation increases the pool of information brought to bear on the inherently subjective assessments required to assess omitted variable sensitivity. One figure is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562808</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Omitted Variable Sensitivity Analysis with the Annotated Love Plot</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>29</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Competency Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reardon, Sean F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shores, Kenneth A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kalogrides, Demetra</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Weathers, Ericka S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:keywords_test>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There are nearly 14,000 school districts in the United States. Of these districts, there is very little information about the size of academic achievement gaps between whites and blacks and white and Hispanic students. This study was interested in district-level achievement patterns across the almost 14,000 school districts in the country because districts differ dramatically in their socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, and because districts have considerable influence over instructional and organizational practices that may affect academic achievement gaps: including teacher hiring, evaluation, and placement decisions, professional development opportunities, student assignment and desegregation efforts, the allocation of resources among schools, and the type and availability of specialized instructional programs. The US Department of Education has provided a unique data set that contains the counts of students scoring in each of their state&apos;s proficiency categories. Study results found considerable variation in the level of white-Hispanic and white-black achievement gaps across districts in the United States. In the following months, additional explanation for this variation is expected by including a number of district-level control variables. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562809</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Patterns of Achievement Gaps among School Districts: New Data, New Measures, New Insights</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A study of the relationship of preadmission characteristics of students was conducted across nine colleges with over 25,000 applicants and 4,800 admitted students. Among the findings are: ratings by college staff were influential in admission decisions, but students so identified were not likely to achieve higher grades or persist into sophomore year at a rate higher than would be predicted by high school grades and test scores; at the most selective institutions, various personal qualities played an important role in selection, whereas colleges rejecting fewer applicants relied less on these qualities; and minority status, college affiliation (e.g., alumni), and ratings by admission staff were more highly related to admission decisions than other sources of data on personal qualities.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562810</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Personal Qualities and Academic Experiences: Predictors of Academic Success. Research Summary. RS-02</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1997-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>2</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Competency Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>National Assessment of Educational Progress</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>SpringBoard is a program in Mathematics and English Language Arts for students in grades 6 through 12. The College Board first began work on developing rigorous instructional content and assessments in the early 1990s through a program called Pacesetter. While the original focus of Pacesetter was 4th year high school courses, Pacesetter users encouraged the College Board to develop instructional frameworks for grades 6 through 12. This enhanced and expanded program is now known as SpringBoard. This report summarizes formal, in-depth evaluations from 1997 through 2001.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562811</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Pacesetter® Research and Evaluation Findings. Research Summary. RS-06</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2001-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>2</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Accommodations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cahalan, Cara</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mandinach, Ellen B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The predictive validity of the SAT I: Reasoning Test was examined for students who took the test with an extended time accommodation for a learning disability. The sample included college students with learning disabilities who took the SAT I between 1995 and 1998 with extended time accommodations. First year grade point average (FGPA) was used as a measure of student performance. Although positive, the adjusted correlation between FGPA and SAT scores was lower for test-takers with a learning disability than has been shown in prior research on test-takers without disabilities. Two appendixes are included: (1) Examples of SAT Accommodations; and (2) Guidelines for Documentation.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562812</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Predictive Validity of SAT® I: Reasoning Test for Test-Takers with Learning Disabilities and Extended Time Accommodations. Research Report No. 2002-5. ETS RR-02-11</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>26</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Use Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Incidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Factors (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Coaching</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Powers, Donald E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>To document the extent of special test preparation for the SAT I: Reasoning Test, a stratified random sample of some 6,700 students who registered to take the SAT in 1995-96 was surveyed. A smaller companion survey sought information about special preparation programs from a stratified random sample of secondary schools whose students take the SAT. The objectives were to: determine the availability, and incidence of use, of a variety of programs and resources designed to prepare students to take the SAT; describe some of the salient features of these resources; and estimate the amount of time (and money) that students spend on preparing for the test. Though the surveys differed slightly from similar surveys conducted in 1986-87, they were designed generally to enable comparison with the results of the earlier surveys. The student survey found that prospective SAT takers participate, to varying degrees, in a variety of preparation activities, and on average, students spend approximately 11 hours preparing for the SAT. The results of the school survey revealed that a slight majority (52 percent) of all secondary schools now offer programs to prepare students for the SAT, about the same proportion (49 percent) as in 1986-87. Two appendices are included: (1) Student Questionnaire; and (2) School Questionnaire.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562813</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Preparing for the SAT® I: Reasoning Test--An Update. College Board Report No. 98-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1998-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>27</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Milewski, Glenn B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sawtell, Ellen A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study investigated relationships between scores on the verbal, mathematics, and writing sections of the PSAT/NMSQT and the following indicators of academic achievement in high school: years of study, participation in specific math and English language arts courses, high school grade point average, academic intensity, and participation and performance in AP courses. The results showed that there are moderate to strong relationships between indicators of academic achievement and PSAT/NMSQT scores. Two appendices are included: (1) Mean Verbal, Mathematics, Writing, and Composite PSAT/NMSQT® Scores by Intended College Major; and (2) Number and Percent of Test-Takers by Years of Study Within an Academic Area.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562814</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Relationships between PSAT/NMSQT® Scores and Academic Achievement in High School. Research Report No. 2006-6</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2006-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mayer, Alexander</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Louisiana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Arizona</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New Mexico</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Ohio</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Arizona</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Louisiana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Mexico</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Ohio</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Performance-based scholarships were developed to help tackle some of the financial obstacles facing students in the postsecondary education system. In general, these scholarships aim to help reduce the financial burdens of low-income college students, and are structured to help incentivize good academic progress. Performance-based scholarships were evaluated in six states across the U.S. with eight educational institutions and one state-level intermediary. The postsecondary institutions involved were all community colleges or non-selective four-year colleges, all of whose populations contain predominantly low-income students. The studies each use a random assignment research design, the &amp;quot;gold standard&amp;quot; in program evaluation. The study results reported performance-based scholarships are a promising way to tie additional financial aid to academic benchmarks and improve outcomes for low-income students. These studies showed that performance-based scholarship programs can be replicated in diverse contexts across the United States and that they work for different types of students in these settings: the scholarships generally have positive impacts on students&apos; academic performance. Together these trials produce highly reliable estimates of the impacts of performance-based scholarships. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562816</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Performance-Based Scholarships: Replication at Six Sites Using Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>21</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technical Assistance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Slavin, Robert E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Madden, Nancy A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Quint, Janet</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;Success for All&amp;quot; (SFA) is one of the best known and thoroughly evaluated school reform models. Further evaluation of the initiative is especially important for two reasons. First, the program model has continued to evolve over time, with a greater emphasis placed on the use of engaging technology in the classroom and on the deployment of school district personnel trained by SFAF to provide professional development services and technical assistance to schools along with SFAF coaches. Second, many school reading programs have also modified their practices since earlier SFA evaluations were conducted. MDRC, a nonprofit, nonpartisan education and social policy research organization, is conducting the evaluation of the i3 scale-up. The data reported here come from the first of a series of three reports from that evaluation. That report examines the implementation and effects on student learning of SFA during the 2011-2012 school year, the first year that the program was put in place. The evaluation employs an experimental design, in which 37 schools in five school districts participating in the scale-up effort were assigned at random to a program group and a control group. The study results reported instructional logs and principal and teacher surveys point to key ways in which reading instruction in SFA schools and control schools differed. Reading lessons in SFA schools were more likely than those in control schools to emphasize comprehension. Teachers in SFA schools were also more likely to emphasize aspects of instruction that are hallmarks of the SFA program: grouping and regrouping of students for reading from first grade on by ability level and across grades, and, from kindergarten on, regular use of cooperative learning techniques and close adherence to a highly scripted curriculum. &amp;quot;Success for All&amp;quot; is maintaining its effectiveness. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562817</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Reading Outcomes of Success for All: Early Results from the MDRC Investing in Innovation Evaluation</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Department of Education (ED), Office of Innovation and Improvement</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>2</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Positive Behavior Supports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Incidents Method</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interrater Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Positive Reinforcement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teamwork</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expertise</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conflict</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Andreou, Theresa E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McIntosh, Kent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ross, Scott W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kahn, Joshua D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>British Columbia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Canada</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this exploratory study was to identify, categorize, and describe practitioners&apos; perspectives regarding factors that help and hinder sustainability of Tier I (universal) systems within School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS). Seventeen participants involved in sustaining Tier I SWPBIS over several years within a school district were interviewed and asked what events affected its long-term implementation through a qualitative approach called Critical Incident Technique. Two hundred and twenty-seven critical incidents were recorded and sorted into emergent unitary clusters based on content analysis. These categories then underwent rigorous reliability and validity checks, including expert analysis, inter-rater agreement, and participant feedback. This process yielded 13 categories that represent the participants&apos; experience of sustainability: Continuous Teaching, Positive Reinforcement, SWPBIS Team Effectiveness, Staff Ownership, School Administrator Involvement, Adaptation, Community of Practice, Use of Data, Involving New Personnel, Access to External Expertise, Maintaining Priority, Staff Turnover, and Conflict of Personal Beliefs/Mistaken Beliefs. [This paper was published in &amp;quot;Journal of Special Education&amp;quot; v49 n3 p157-167 2015.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562819</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Critical Incidents in Sustaining School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports</dc:title>
<dc:source>Grantee Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Journal of Special Education v49 n3 p157-167 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>33</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>40</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1360'>R324A120278</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Cognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Protocol Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bell, Courtney A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yi, Qi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jones, Nathan D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lewis, Jennifer M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McLeod, Monica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Shuangshuang</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Evidence from a handful of large-scale studies suggests that although observers can be trained to score reliably using observation protocols, there are concerns related to initial training and calibration activities designed to keep observers scoring accurately over time (e.g., Bell, et al, 2012; BMGF, 2012). Studies offer little insight into how educational practitioners understand and score observation protocols. This lack of clarity on the factors that facilitate and constrain educators&apos; learning and use of observation systems makes it difficult to implement training and quality control processes at scale. In order to effectively train administrators at scale, it is critical to understand how administrators learn to complete two major tasks--learning to create accurate scores and learning to have conversations around those scores that support instructional improvement. This study takes the perspective that scoring observations of classroom interactions is a complex socio-cognitive process that must be understood in order to improve observer training, and ultimately, score quality. This study suggests administrators have a great deal of knowledge they bring to bear on the observation process. They also bring a commitment to improving instruction to their observation work. In other words, they are not blank slates as they go through observer training. That said, certification data suggest observers have much to learn about how to accurately score lessons according to the protocol. It is unclear whether the knowledge and commitments observers bring is supportive of high quality scores or the improvement of instruction. Future studies should investigate whether the way in which principals use observation protocols results in better, more useful observation scores. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562820</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Observer Use of Standardized Observation Protocols in Consequential Observation Systems</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Parent School Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Turnaround</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participant Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schueler, Beth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A series of metaanalyses have documented a notable association between family engagement with children&apos;s learning and students&apos; academic outcomes (Fan &amp;amp; Chen, 2001; Hill &amp;amp; Tyson, 2009; Jeynes, 2003, 2005, 2007). Family-school engagement is also associated with effective school-level reform and improvement efforts. The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research examined the commonalities between schools that experienced academic improvement over a period of seven years in the Chicago Public School system and identified five essential characteristics that were in place at improved schools, one of which was strong relationships between parents and schools (Bryk, Sebring, Allensworth, Luppescu, &amp;amp; Easton, 2010). This body of research has helped spark a series of policy efforts to promote family-school engagement at federal, state, and district levels, often as a key strategy for turning around persistently low-performing schools (Gehlbach, Mapp, Capotosto, Bahena, Schueler &amp;amp; Garland, 2013). While some scholars argue that these policies could mitigate educational inequality, others caution that universal family involvement promotion efforts have the potential to reinforce patterns of educational inequality. Scholars have documented class-based differences in the skills, confidence, and orientation necessary for parents to effectively intervene in school affairs (Diamond &amp;amp; Gomez, 2004; Lareau, 1987, 1989, 2002; Lareau &amp;amp; Munoz, 2012; McGrath &amp;amp; Kuriloff, 1999). To the extent that family engagement does indeed improve students&apos; chances for academic success, class-based differences in family-school relations could contribute to class-based achievement gaps. Pro-engagement policy efforts could mitigate inequality if they successfully encourage involvement among the least engaged parent populations. However, universal family involvement promotion efforts have the potential to reinforce educational inequality if they simply provide more support for already engaged parents to either stay involved or increase their involvement (Lareau &amp;amp; Shumar, 1996; Fine, 1993). Therefore, additional research is needed to examine whether these programs decrease or reinforce inequality and to identify what policies and practices best encourage engagement among those parents whose children would benefit most. At the school level, to effectively target and promote engagement, educators need to understand how parents perceive the degree to which they engage, whether parents&apos; perceptions align with the school&apos;s view, as well as the barriers that parents believe prevent them from getting involved (Hoover-Dempsey et al., 2005; Hoover-Dempsey &amp;amp; Sandler, 1997). Unfortunately, there are a limited number of existing tools designed to measure family-school engagement, and particularly barriers to engagement. This presentation and paper describe the process one research team used to develop a set of survey tools that assess parents&apos; perceptions of their engagement with their children&apos;s schools and the barriers they perceive that prevent them from becoming more involved. Findings suggest that educational leaders and researchers alike can use the survey tools developed to measure parent perceptions of their engagement with the school and the barriers they face to becoming more involved. The author believes that the tools described here can aid educators in identifying groups of parents that are less engaged and in need of targeted outreach efforts, designing family-engagement strategies that are tailored to their communities, and tracking their progress at encouraging engagement over time. The author also supports the opinion that researchers can rely on these tools to better understand the ways in which family-school engagement can be harnessed to alleviate, rather than reinforce, educational inequality. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562821</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Measuring Family-School Relations for School Reform and Improvement</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>30</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Instructional Program Divisions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Response</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Workshops</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Murray, Desiree W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rabiner, David L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carrig, Madeline M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Conners Rating Scales</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Conners Rating Scales</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Professional development for teachers has historically been fairly didactic in nature (Garet et al., 2001; Rose &amp;amp; Church, 1998), which is believed to limit effectiveness and translation to teacher practice change (Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, &amp;amp; Wallace, 2005). One well-established program with a more active, collaborative training approach is the Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management Program (IYT). Although positive effects on young children&apos;s social-emotional competence have been demonstrated for this program when implemented in combination with other Incredible Years programs (Webster-Stratton, Reid, &amp;amp; Hammond, 2001; 2004; Webster-Stratton, Reid, &amp;amp; Stoolmiller, 2008), the program has not been evaluated as an independent intervention or with regard to academic outcomes for early elementary students. As with many teacher-directed universal interventions for behavior problems or social-emotional development, there may be differential effects for students with different risk levels (Bierman et al, 2010). In addition, it is possible that social-emotional learning (SEL) interventions may have varying impact based upon students&apos; developmental levels. Typically, it is believed that such interventions may be more effective for younger students, although there may be other contextual factors that affect outcomes. Thus, moderator analyses can be informative in understanding intervention effects. Overall, this study demonstrates modest effects of a relatively low-cost universal teacher training intervention on classroom climate, student social-emotional outcomes, and reading achievement. It contributes to the efficacy literature for the Incredible Years teacher program, which is supported for use with at-risk children in early childhood settings in combination with other interventions, by showing independent intervention effects in a large, normative sample of early elementary students attending rural schools. It is also the first study of this program to identify specific effects on an academic test, supporting the link between SEL programs and achievement. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562822</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Grade Level Effects of the Incredible Years Teacher Training Program on Emotion Regulation and Attention</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Robustness (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sample Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error Correction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tipton, Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Replication studies allow for making comparisons and generalizations regarding the effectiveness of an intervention across different populations, versions of a treatment, settings and contexts, and outcomes. One method for making these comparisons across many replication studies is through the use of meta-analysis. A recent innovation in meta-analysis is the introduction of a robust variance estimator (RVE) that allows for the inclusion of multiple, correlated effect sizes in a meta-analysis. While the RVE estimator is unbiased in large-samples, its small sample properties are often not ideal. This paper investigates possible approaches to adjusting the RVE estimator when the number of studies is small (less than 40), which is common in the both meta-analyses and replication studies in education. Results indicate that, even with m = 40 studies, the probability of a Type I error for the standard RVE estimator can be much larger than a = 0.05. For this reason the author argues that it is best if the corrections provided within the study are implemented in all RVE analyses, even those of moderate to large sizes. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562823</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Synthesizing Results from Replication Studies Using Robust Variance Estimation: Corrections When the Number of Studies Is Small</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>16</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Value Added Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Body Height</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Databases</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bitler, Marianne P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Corcoran, Sean P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Domina, Thurston</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Penner, Emily K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The growing availability of data linking students to classroom teachers has made it possible to estimate the contribution teachers make to student achievement. While there is a growing consensus that teacher quality is important and current evaluation systems are inadequate, many have expressed concerns over the use of value-added measures (VAMs) in high-stakes personnel decisions. We conduct a new test of the validity of teacher value-added models. We apply traditionally estimated VAM models to an outcome that teachers cannot plausibly have a causal effect on: student height. Any estimated &amp;quot;effect&amp;quot; of teachers on height should raise questions about the extent to which VAMs cleanly distinguish between effective and ineffective teachers. We also examine two potential interpretations for effects of teachers on height. The first is that these effects reflect bias, sorting to teachers on the basis of unobserved factors related to height (that may or may not be related to achievement). The second is that these effects reflect measurement error or other forms of random &amp;quot;noise.&amp;quot; Both have implications for the use of VAMs in practice. The findings raise important questions about the extent to which VAMs cleanly distinguish between effective and ineffective teachers. This is especially important when personnel and compensation decisions are tied to individual VAM estimates.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562824</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher Effects on Student Achievement and Height: A Cautionary Tale</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>21</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Check Lists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Watts, Tyler W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Duncan, Greg J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Siegler, Robert S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Davis-Kean, Pamela E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement Revised</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Continuous Performance Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Child Behavior Checklist</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (Revised)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Home Observation for Measurement of Environment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Continuous Performance Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Home Observation for Measurement of Environment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Child Behavior Checklist</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A number of studies, both small scale and of nationally-representative student samples, have reported substantial associations between school entry math ability and later elementary school achievement. However, questions remain regarding the persistence of the association between early growth in math ability and later math achievement due to the increasing complexity of math knowledge required to be successful in middle and high school. The current study relates both preschool level math skills and growth in math skills over kindergarten and 1st grade to math achievement measured into adolescence. Although it was expected that the association between early math growth and later achievement would decline over time, the study found that early math growth across kindergarten and 1st grade predicts age 15 math achievement as strongly as it predicts 3rd grade achievement. The study results imply the need for high quality math instruction and interventions during the period in which students first begin their primary schooling, as growth during in math ability during early elementary school appears to pay large dividends for achievement into adolescence. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562825</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Groove of Growth: How Early Gains in Math Ability Influence Adolescent Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Acceleration (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Associate Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cost Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Weiss, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Scrivener, Susan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fresques, Hannah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ratledge, Alyssa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rudd, Tim</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sommo, Colleen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The City University of New York&apos;s (CUNY&apos;s) Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) combines many of the ideas from a range of programs into a comprehensive model that requires students to attend school full-time, and provides supports and incentives for three years. ASAP&apos;s financial aid reforms, enhanced student services, and scheduling reforms are designed to increase the proportion of students who graduate with an associate&apos;s degree. Broadly speaking, the primary objective of the study is to determine: What is the effect of the ASAP program on students&apos; academic outcomes? This question examines whether ASAP is effective compared with the business-as-usual services offered at the participating colleges. This is the question at the heart of the evaluation. The three-year ASAP program bundles together a group of strategies--financial aid reforms, enhanced student services, and schedule reforms--many of which have a research base on their effectiveness therefore the study&apos;s results reported ASAP is one of the most ambitious efforts in the country to improve the success rates of low-income postsecondary students. Services at community colleges are often lacking--particularly when contrasted with services at four-year institutions--and initiatives such as ASAP may be what is needed to help the field see beyond the status quo and achieve the results desired by policymakers. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562826</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Platinum Bullet: An Experimental Evaluation of CUNY&apos;s Accelerated Study in Associate Program (ASAP)--New Three-Year Impacts, Cost Analyses, and Implementation Findings</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Policy Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Needs Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Akey, Terri</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hodara, Michelle</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morse, Les</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rosselli, Hilda</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Finkelstein, Neal</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Northwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Alaska</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Oregon</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Alaska</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oregon</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this panel is to discuss how researchers and policymakers work together in two Regional Education Laboratory (REL) research alliances to develop research agendas aimed at changing policy and practice and to provide practical lessons for researchers about the challenges and solutions to working in a research alliance context. The main content of the panel discussion will focus on three key issues that have emerged in their research alliance work--stakeholder engagement, capacity for research, and evidence use. The panel will describe how each key issue manifested in both featured alliances, explore variation in the approach to each issue, and discuss lessons that can be drawn from each alliance&apos;s experience to improve research alliance work. At the close of the panel, the moderator will provide a short response to the panelists&apos; presentation and will engage the audience in a facilitated question-and-answer session about the key issues presented.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562827</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Power of Partnerships: Lessons Learned from Research Alliances in the Northwest</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Acceleration (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dougherty, Shaun M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Goodman, Joshua</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hill, Darryl</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Litke, Erica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Page, Lindsay</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Wake County Public School System (WCPSS) in North Carolina recently addressed the issue of advancement in and equitable access to advanced mathematics. Under a recent policy, WCPSS uses a SAS-generated predicted probabilities of students&apos; success in obtaining a passing score on the NC Algebra I End-of-Course (EOC) exam, to determine recommended course placement in grades 6 through 8. The authors examine the question: do students who are just eligible for advancement in mathematics in middle school and who participate in advanced mathematics lead to improved academic outcomes compared to students who just miss being eligible for advancement and who do not enroll in advanced mathematics? By focusing on the students on the margin of eligibility under this policy the authors use a regression-discontinuity design to estimate the causal impact of this mathematics acceleration policy on subsequent test scores, grades, and course-taking behavior of middle-school students in Wake County who were exposed to this policy. The results indicate that students on the margin of eligibility and who participate in advanced mathematics in middle school may experience negative effects as a result of being in a peer group of more advanced ability, on average. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562828</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Updating Algebra for All?: Evidence of a Middle-Grades Math Acceleration Policy</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>41</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developmentally Appropriate Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Farran, Dale C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bilbrey, Carol</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Interest in scaling up prekindergarten programs for children from low income families is dramatically increasing, especially with the announcement by President Obama of support for &amp;quot;universal preschool.&amp;quot; Research in early education supports the idea of developmentally appropriate practice as reflected in instructional groupings and covered content; however, it is not yet clear if such appropriate practice and consistency in that practice can be upheld in a statewide program. This paper focuses on evidence from one portion of the Tennessee Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten Program (TN-VPK) evaluation from which classroom observations yield information on classroom quality state-wide. One table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562829</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Variation in Observed Program Characteristics across Classrooms in the Tennessee Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Attrition (Research Studies)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attrition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Deke, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chiang, Hanley</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Meeting the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) attrition standard (or one of the attrition standards based on the WWC standard) is now an important consideration for researchers conducting studies that could potentially be reviewed by the WWC (or other evidence reviews). Understanding the basis of this standard is valuable for anyone seeking to meet existing standards and for anyone interested in adopting this approach to developing a standard (that is, combining a theoretical model with empirical estimates of key parameters) in a new context. The purpose of this paper is to explain the WWC attrition model, the process for selecting key parameter values for that model, and how the model informed the development of the WWC attrition standard and can be used to develop attrition standards tailored to other substantive areas. The model of attrition bias presented here, and the standard based on it, is an effort to protect consumers of research from drawing mistaken conclusions because of bias (in this case, attrition bias) in impact estimates. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562830</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Theoretical and Empirical Underpinnings of the What Works Clearinghouse Attrition Standard for Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Group Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Doabler, Christian</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Clarke, Ben</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smolkowski, Keith</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fien, Hank</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baker, Scott</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Oregon</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oregon</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The adoption of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM, 2010) in 46 states has raised the mathematical proficiency bar for U.S. students. The advent of these new standards is at a time when the body of empirical evidence on the negative consequences of early and persistent difficulties in mathematics is clear, compelling, and growing. The purpose of this 4-year Goal-3 Efficacy Trial, funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (Clarke, Doabler, Smolkowski, &amp;amp; Fien, 2012), is to study the efficacy of ROOTS, a (Tier 2) kindergarten mathematics intervention designed to improve the mathematics achievement of students at risk for MD. This presentation focuses on data generated from the first year of the larger efficacy trial (2012-2013). The study used a randomized control trial (RCT) design (blocking on classrooms) to investigate the ROOTS intervention when implemented under rigorous experimental conditions. Year 1 of the ROOTS efficacy trial took place in 29 kindergarten classrooms from four school districts in Oregon with approximately 10 eligible students per classroom. The two primary aims of this presentation are: (1) present impact findings from the first year of the 4-year ROOTS efficacy trial; and (2) empirically examine the association between instructional intensity, manipulated via instructional group size, and student mathematics achievement. One table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562831</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Testing the Efficacy of a Tier 2 Kindergarten Mathematics Intervention: Findings of Year 1</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Positive Reinforcement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Positive Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Negative Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Money Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pinkelman, Sarah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McIntosh, Kent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Raspica, Caitlin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Berg, Tricia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to identify the most important perceived enablers and barriers regarding sustainability of School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS). School personnel representing 860 schools implementing or preparing to implement SWPBIS completed an open-ended survey of factors regarding its sustainability. Qualitative analyses were used to assess perceptions of the most important factors related to sustainability. Thematic analysis produced 13 themes regarding enablers and/or barriers. The most commonly cited enablers were Staff Buy-in, School Administrator Support, and Consistency. The most commonly cited barriers were Staff Buy-in, Resources: Time, and Resources: Money. Results are discussed in terms of enhancing durability of evidence-based practices in schools. [This article was published in &amp;quot;Behavioral Disorders,&amp;quot; v40 n3 p171-183 May 2015 (EJ1072245).]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562832</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Perceived Enablers and Barriers Related to Sustainability of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports</dc:title>
<dc:source>Grantee Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Behavioral Disorders v40 n3 p171-183 May 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>31</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://www.ccbd.net/publications/behavioraldisorders</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>44</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1360'>R324A120278</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Failure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Least Squares Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cohort Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Context Effect</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence Based Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conventional Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Benefits</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Eno, Jared</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Heppen, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Algebra is considered a key gatekeeper for higher-level mathematics course-taking in high school and for college enrollment (Adelman, 2006; Gamoran &amp;amp; Hannigan, 2000). Yet, algebra pass rates are consistently low in many places (Higgins, 2008; Ham &amp;amp; Walker, 1999; Helfand, 2006), including Chicago Public Schools (CPS). This is of particular concern because academic performance in core courses during the first year of high school is the strongest predictor of eventual graduation (Allensworth &amp;amp; Easton, 2005). Offering online credit recovery courses is one strategy to deal with high failure rates. However, no rigorous evidence currently exists about the efficacy of online credit recovery courses. Understanding patterns of treatment effects may provide clues to the relative strengths and weaknesses of online and standard face-to-face (f2f) learning. A related policy question is whether district and school administrators should target online learning to certain students. This paper investigates these questions by exploring heterogeneity in the treatment effects of online algebra credit recovery using Chicago Public School students who failed second semester Algebra I in the spring of freshman year, and attempted credit recovery as part of the study in summer 2011 or 2012. [For a related abstract, see ED562834.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562833</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Targeting Summer Credit Recovery</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Failure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence Based Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cohort Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Benefits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Heppen, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sorensen, Nicholas</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The consequences of failing core academic courses during the first year of high school are dire. More students fail courses in ninth grade than in any other grade, and a disproportionate number of these students subsequently drop out (Herlihy, 2007). As shown in Chicago and elsewhere, academic performance in core courses during the first year of high school is the strongest predictor of eventual graduation (Allensworth &amp;amp; Easton, 2005). Credit recovery online courses are a promising and popular strategy strategy to address high failure rates. This paper describes the design and initial implementation of a randomized control trial that was designed to strengthen the evidence base for online credit recovery. Using a sample of Chicago Public School first-time freshman who failed second semester Algebra (Algebra IB), the study tests: (1) the impact of online Algebra I for credit recovery against the standard face-to-face (f2f) version of the course; and (2) the effects of offering expanded credit recovery options with online algebra, relative to business as usual (i.e., summer programming that schools would offer in the absence expanded credit recovery efforts).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562834</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Study Design and Impact Results</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Dropout Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropout Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Relevance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recreational Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>After School Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Murray, Nancy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tietjen, Karen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Cambodia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>India</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Tajikistan</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Timor (Portuguese)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Cambodia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>India</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tajikistan</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>From 2000 to 2011, the number of children out of school worldwide has decreased from 102 million to 57 million--a reduction of almost 50 percent (Millennium Development Goals Report, 2013). However, many children in developing countries do not complete primary or secondary cycles once they enroll; out of the 137 million children who entered first grade in 2011, 34 million are likely to leave school before reaching the last grade in primary school (Millennium Development Goals Report, 2013). Unfortunately, the research base into interventions targeting student dropout in developing countries is still underdeveloped. The School Dropout Prevention Pilot (SDPP), a five-year, multi-country program, funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development, is designed to help fill this research gap by piloting and evaluating interventions aimed at decreasing student dropout rates in primary and secondary schools in Cambodia, India, Tajikistan, and Timor-Leste. Each intervention consists of an Early Warning System (EWS), which uses student data to identify and provide additional support students who are most likely to drop out of school, and additional country-specific school activities. The impact evaluations address the following questions: (1) Do the interventions improve the dropout rate? (2) Do the interventions improve student engagement in school? (3) Do the interventions improve student behavioral and attitudinal outcomes? (4) Do the interventions improve teacher behavior and attitudes? and (5) What are the programs&apos; impacts on all of the above dimensions for students identified as being at risk of dropping out of school? In this presentation, the authors present impacts from the first follow-up data collection, which represents less than a complete school year of exposure to the interventions. They will conduct two rounds of additional data collection in the remaining two years of the program. Two tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562835</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>School Dropout Prevention Pilot--First Follow-Up Impacts</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>USAID</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>25</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asian American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burton, Nancy W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ramist, Leonard</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Information Analyses</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Studies predicting success in college for students graduating since 1980 are reviewed. SAT scores and high school records are the most common predictors, but a few studies of other predictors are included. The review establishes that SAT scores and high school records predict academic performance, nonacademic accomplishments, leadership in college, and postcollege income. The combination of high school records and SAT scores is consistently the best predictor. Academic preadmission measures contribute substantially to predicting academic success (grades, honors, acceptance and graduation from graduate or professional school); contribute moderately to predicting outcomes with both academic and nonacademic components (persistence and graduation); and make a small but significant contribution to predicting college leadership, college accomplishments (artistic, athletic, business), and postcollege income. A small number of studies of nonacademic predictors (high school accomplishments, attitudes, interests) establish their importance, particularly for predicting nonacademic success.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562836</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Predicting Success in College: SAT® Studies of Classes Graduating since 1980. Research Report No. 2001-2</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2001-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>38</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>110</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Inflation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Selection (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Results</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The SAT I: Reasoning Test actually predicts how well females will do in college better than it predicts for males. Results from validity studies that have been conducted with hundreds of colleges and universities and examined by ETS and external researchers consistently confirm that the SAT correlation with both freshman GPA and individual course grades is actually higher for females than males.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562837</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>SAT® and Gender Differences. Research Summary RS-04</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1998-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Generalizability Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sporte, Susan E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jiang, Jennie Y.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Luppescu, Stuart</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Starting in 2012-13, researchers have worked in partnership with Chicago Public Schools (CPS) and the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) to study implementation of Chicago&apos;s new teacher evaluation system: Recognizing Educators Advancing Chicago&apos;s Students (REACH). This paper presents findings as well as experiences from the collaboration with CPS and the CTU as they seek to identify real-time strategies for improving implementation. The paper focuses on findings from two key components for implementing a new evaluation system: the reliability of evaluators, and teacher perceptions of their evaluators and the new process. Researchers share findings from the following research questions about Chicago&apos;s new teacher evaluation system: (1) To what extent do systematic differences between evaluators affect teacher ratings?; (2) What are teacher perceptions of their evaluators?; and (3) What are teacher perceptions of the new observation process? In addition to these questions, this paper describes how the district utilized findings to guide changes to the implementation of Chicago&apos;s new evaluation system. To understand systematic differences in evaluators and their effect on teacher observation ratings, researchers focus on three aspects of evaluator behavior: (1) evaluator severity; (2) evaluator internal consistency; and (3) reliability using a generalizability theory approach. Data for this study includes CPS personnel and administrative data from the 2012-13 school year, observation ratings from external observers, and survey data from the 2012-13 and 2013-14 school year. Findings from the end of the first year of REACH implementation include: (1) In general, administrators were able to apply the rating rubric in ways that were consistent with predictions given component difficulty. About 3 percent of administrators were identified as muted and about 5 percent of administrators were erratic; (2) There is considerable variation in evaluator severity, but few are so extreme as to have a very substantial effect on teacher ratings. About 10 percent of the sample of evaluators is extremely severe or lenient. In general, most administrators and external observers were rating within 0.5 points of the average; and (3) In the first year of REACH implementation, teachers were generally positive about the accuracy of the ratings they received from evaluators and the observation process. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562838</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher Evaluation in Practice: Understanding Evaluator Reliability and Teacher Engagement in Chicago Public Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>2</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>College Student Experiences Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>College Student Experiences Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There are many different ways to research the educational benefits of diversity. Most of the findings from the research in this field suggest that experiences with diversity in higher education result in significant benefits on learning and democracy outcomes. This paper offers several examples of previous studies, as well as recommendations and considerations for institutions interested in designing and carrying out their own research studies on the educational benefits of diversity. Appended are: (1) Explanation of Acronyms; (2) Sample Items from the Diversity Assessment Questionnaire (DAQ); (3) Diversity Experiences; (4) Openness to Diversity/Challenge Scale Items; (5) Independent Variables Investigated by Pascarella, Edison, Nora, Hagedorn, and Terenzini (1996); (6) Modern Racism Scale (MRS); (7) List and Description of Measures Used in Gurin, Nagda, and Lopez (2004); and (8) Interactional Diversity Items from the College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562839</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Researching the Educational Benefits of Diversity. Research Report No. 2005-4</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>34</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>40</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Values Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suburban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Flay, Brian R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Hawaii</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Hawaii</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Several social-emotional learning (SEL) or social-emotional and character development (SECD) programs have been shown to be effective at improving SEL/SECD skills, and some have also provided evidence of effectiveness in improving student behavior and academic achievement (Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki, Taylor, &amp;amp; Schellinger, 2011). Very few SEL or SECD programs have replicated effects for all three of these domains of outcomes with students of different cultural/ethnic backgrounds in schools of different socioeconomic status and urbinicity. In education research, replication with different populations in different settings is important for understanding the generalizability of findings. In this paper, the author reports results from two cluster-randomized trials of the SEL/SECD program, &amp;quot;Positive Action&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;PA&amp;quot;) across two very different groups of students and contexts: (1) 20 suburban and rural elementary schools (specifically grades 2/3 to grades 5/6) on three Hawai&apos;i islands in 2002-2006; and (2) 14 high-poverty, inner-city Chicago elementary schools (specifically grade 3 to grade 8) in 2004-2010. One table is appended. [The initial phase of the Chicago trial (R305L030072), a component of the Social and Character Development (SACD) Research Consortium, was a collaboration among Institute of Education Sciences (IES), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention&apos;s (CDC) Division of Violence Prevention, Mathematica Policy Research Inc. (MPR), and awardees of SACD cooperative agreements (Children&apos;s Institute, New York University, Oregon State University, University at Buffalo-SUNY, University of Maryland, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, and Vanderbilt University).]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562840</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Replication of Effects of the &amp;quot;Positive Action&amp;quot; Program in Randomized Trials in Hawai&apos;i and Chicago Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>National Institute on Drug Abuse (DHHS/PHS)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>23</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>DA13474</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number>DA018760</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=873'>R305L030072</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number>R305L030004</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=613'>R305A080253</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Board of Education Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Required Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 10</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 11</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 12</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Clotfelter, Charles T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ladd, Helen F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vigdor, Jacob L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 10</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 11</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 12</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 2008, the California State Board of Education voted to require all students to enroll in algebra by 8th grade. This policy initiative, yet to be actually implemented, represents the culmination of a decades-long movement toward offering algebra instruction before the traditional high school years. Nationally, the proportion of 8th grade students enrolled in algebra doubled between 1988 and 2007 (Perie, Moran and Lutkus, 2005; Walston and McCarroll 2010), reaching rates over 50% in three states and the District of Columbia. The movement to offer algebra instruction before high school has been inspired in large part by correlational research documenting significant differences in later-life outcomes between those students who enroll in algebra by 8th grade and those who do not. But correlation need not imply causation, and it is unclear whether accelerated algebra enrollment--particularly when not accompanied by complementary curriculum reform in earlier grades--yields positive or negative effects (Loveless, 2008). This paper provides a quasi-experimental estimate of the causal impact of accelerating the introduction of algebra coursework. The research is based on explicit policy initiatives in two large North Carolina school districts in 2002/03 and it is supplemented with observations from eight additional large North Carolina Districts. Two tables and two figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562841</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Aftermath of Accelerating Algebra: Evidence from District Policy Initiatives</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language of Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Deussen, Theresa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Autio, Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Roccograndi, Angela</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hanita, Makoto</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Idaho</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Idaho</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>With the increased population of English learners (ELs), educators need programs that help students access academic content while learning to understand, speak, read, and write English (Tharp, Estrada, Dalteen, &amp;amp; Yamaguchi 2000; Echevarria, Short &amp;amp; Powers, 2006). ELs come into U.S. schools needing to learn the same grade-level content as their nonEL peers, but with the additional challenge of learning English--usually the language of instruction--as well. Although some approaches separate the two tasks, many researchers and practitioners call for integrating them, so that students do not miss content area instruction while they are learning English. One way to combine the two is sheltered instruction, which provides intentional linguistic and other supports to ELs to facilitate their learning of grade-level content (Echevarria, Short &amp;amp; Powers, 2008). As a recent review of the research makes clear, however, there is limited evidence to show the effectiveness of sheltered instruction (Goldenberg, 2013). Since the early 1990s, Project GLAD (Guided Language Acquisition Design) has made claim to be a program that helps teachers meet diverse language and content needs within the mainstream classroom (Brechtel, 2001). Project GLAD is a multi-component K-12 instructional model designed to build academic English and grade-level content knowledge for students at varying levels of English language proficiency. The study discussed herein was a two-year cluster randomized trial in fifth-grade classrooms from 30 Idaho schools across 21 different districts. It focused on two research questions: (1) What is the impact of Project GLAD teacher training on fifth-grade students&apos; reading comprehension, vocabulary, writing and science achievement in the treatment classrooms during the first of implementation, compared to a &amp;quot;business as usual&amp;quot; control group? and (2) Is the program impact different for ELs? Twelve tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562842</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Project GLAD on Students&apos; Literacy and Science Learning: Year 1 Results from a Cluster-Randomized Trial of Sheltered Instruction</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>31</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dual Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>May, Henry</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rodriguez, Awilda</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sirinides, Philip M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Perna, Laura W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yee, April</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ransom, Tafaya</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>With the goal of increasing students&apos; academic readiness for college, high schools in the United States are increasingly offering &amp;quot;credit-based transition programs,&amp;quot; including International Baccalaureate (IB), Advanced Placement (AP), and dual enrollment. Existing research points to the promise of IB, AP, and other credit-based transition programs for improving students&apos; academic readiness for college; however, conclusions about program effects are often limited by potential issues of selection bias. Despite strong statistical controls and assumptions to address selection, observational research may not be able to determine whether differences in outcomes are caused by program participation or are simply an artifact of the unmeasured characteristics of schools, students, and families that correlate with the decision to participate in these optional programs. To address this knowledge gap and inform future studies of the impacts of IB and other credit-based transition programs, this paper makes three contributions: (1) A review of existing literature is used to produce an empirically-based conceptual model of selection into IB; (2) The conceptual model is used to identify the characteristics of students and schools that participate in the IB Diploma Programme using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Florida Education Data Warehouse. The conceptual model also allows researchers to identify key predictors for which there are no data available; and (3) A test of the ability of the available data to adjust for observed selection bias using propensity score methods, with the degree of bias reduction reported for each predictor is described. The data used in this study come from the Florida K-20 Education Data Warehouse (FL-EDW) and the U.S. Department of Education&apos;s Common Core of Data (CCD). The subset of data from FL-EDW has student-level records for 20,373 students who participated in an IB Diploma Programme and graduated between 2002 and 2007, and student-level records for 86,008 randomly sampled students who did not participate in an IB Diploma Programme and graduated over the same time period. This study reveals that, when looking at the statewide population in Florida, the selection bias associated with voluntary participation in IB is very large, and that mechanisms for dealing with selection bias using propensity scores may not be sufficient. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562843</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Futility of Propensity Score Methods in a Statewide Study of International Baccalaureate (IB)</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>30</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>40</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Check Lists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Boardman, Alison</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Buckley, Pamela</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Maul, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vaughn, Sharon</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Colorado</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Colorado</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) is a set of research-based strategies designed to improve reading comprehension, enhance students&apos; content area learning, facilitate access to higher-level texts, and to promote student engagement. The present study examines how fidelity of implementation of CSR is associated with reading outcomes for students with mild to moderate disabilities using data from two nonoverlapping studies conducted in middle school language arts and reading classrooms (study 1) and social studies and science classrooms (study 2). Researchers use a definition of fidelity that includes both the amount of CSR instruction delivered by teachers and the quality of implementation. The following questions guided this research: (1) Is higher CSR instructional quality associated with increased student outcomes for adolescents in treatment classrooms, and for a subgroup of students with disabilities?; and (2) Is the amount of CSR instruction related to student outcomes for adolescents in treatment classrooms, and for a subgroup of students with disabilities? Researchers replicated the analysis with two different samples (studies 1 and 2), and compared results to examine the stability of estimated relationships, as well as to answer the secondary research question: How do the characteristics of study participants and program contexts influence the replication of findings? The first study took place in nine low income middle schools in the metropolitan areas of Denver, Colorado, and Austin, Texas. The second study was conducted in three middle schools located in the same large, urban school district in Colorado. Teacher and student participants were part of a school-district-and-university collaboration designed to evaluate the effectiveness of CSR within the context of a district initiative and scale-up study. The samples for both studies included the treatment group from larger randomized control trials of CSR. Teacher quality for both studies was assessed using the CSR Global Quality Rating Score measured through the &amp;quot;Implementation Validity Checklist.&amp;quot; Teachers in both studies completed a log to monitor the dosage or amount of CSR intervention children received. The student outcome for both studies was reading comprehension ability, as measured by the reading comprehension subtest of the Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test (GMRT), Fourth Edition. Multilevel (random-intercept) models, as implemented in the software program Hierarchical Linear Modeling 7.0 were used to estimate the effects of CSR on outcomes controlling for pretest scores and student demographics. Both studies found that higher quality CSR instruction is associated with higher student outcomes for students in special education. The standardized coefficients in study 1, however, were nearly double those in study 2. Further research is needed to determine possible explanations for these findings. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562844</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between Implementation of Collaborative Strategic Reading and Student Outcomes for Adolescents with Disabilities</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>19</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Parent Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents as Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Home Visits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Aloud to Others</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parenting Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emergent Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Fluency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mathis, Erin T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bierman, Karen L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines changes in parent support and child emergent literacy skills over time as children moved from Head Start into kindergarten. It compares the transactional parent-child influences in families randomly assigned in Head Start to receive an enriched home visiting program that emphasized parents as teachers relative to a control group. In addition, it examined the impact of pre-intervention levels of parental support on change over time in child emergent literacy skill acquisition. It thus tested the logic model of the intervention--REDI-P (Research-based Developmentally-Informed-Parent)--and assessed moderation of intervention impact. Children and their parents were recruited from 26 Head Start Programs in three counties of Pennsylvania for a randomized-trial evaluation of a home visiting intervention designed to increase parental involvement in interactive reading and learning games. The Head Start programs served a range of small urban, suburban, and rural communities. Participants included two cohorts of children recruited in sequential years (total N = 210; mean age at time 1 = 4.8; 55% girls; 20% Hispanic; 25% African-American; and 55% European American). The caregivers who participated in this study (hereafter referred to as &amp;quot;parents&amp;quot;) were 88.57% mothers, 4.27% fathers, 5.24% grandmothers, and 1.92% other (e.g. other relative, stepparent, or foster parent). Data was collected from home visits, structured interviews, recorded parent-child interaction sessions, and pre- and post-test assessments conducted by research assistants. Findings suggest that the REDI-P program improved supportive parenting skills for the sub-group of parents with initially poorer skills in this area. These changes emerged primarily in the context of parent-child reading and teaching activities, which were the direct focus of the intervention and did not appear to generalize more broadly. Additionally, parents who entered the program with more supportive parenting skills were able to take the most advantage of the teaching games and activities provided by the program, and their children showed the greatest gains in literacy skills. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562845</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Transactional Influence of Parents and Children in a Parent-Administered School Readiness Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Value Added Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yuan, Kun</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (South)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Value-added modeling (VAM), one class of statistical models used to estimate individual teacher&apos;s or school&apos;s contribution to student achievement based on student test score growth between consecutive years, has become increasingly popular in the last decades. Despite the increasing popularity of VAM, many researchers are concerned about the quality of value-added (VA) scores as a measure of teaching and call for more research on VAM. One area of VAM that needs more research is about teacher spillover effects (TSEs). In this study, the author studied TSEs across four types of teachers, including math, ELA, science, and social studies, on student achievement in each of the four subjects. When estimating teachers&apos; value-added scores, the author used models similar to what is commonly used in the practice, which estimate teachers&apos; annual effects and control for teacher or classroom aggregates of student variables. By using models that are commonly used in the practice, the author expected to understand the magnitude of TSEs and the consequence of ignoring such effects for estimating own-subject teachers&apos; value-added scores in the common practice. Specifically, the author addressed the following two research questions: (1) Do TSEs exist across teachers of math, English Language Arts (ELA), science, and social studies on any of the four subjects at the middle school level?; (2) If so, how does controlling for TSEs affect the relative stance and variation of own-subject teachers&apos; effects? Data came from an urban school district in the Southern United States. Data used for analysis followed students at grades 6-8 and their math, ELA, science, and social studies teachers from 2006-07 to 2008-09. Results from both types of value-added models showed consistent evidences of teacher spillover effects at all three grade levels in middle schools, especially from ELA teachers to students&apos; achievement on the other three subjects. Consistent with most prior studies on teacher spillover effects, this study found evidence of TSEs. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562846</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher Spillover Effects across Four Subjects in Middle Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Crime</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Violence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stress Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Neighborhoods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Databases</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Records (Forms)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Crime Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Curran, F. Chris</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Students&apos; ability to succeed academically in the school setting depends heavily on factors that students face outside of the school walls. One such contributor is the presence of a safe environment for students to travel to and from school. Unfortunately, for many students in urban and economically depressed environments, the daily commute to and from school represents a risky undertaking riddled with potential violence and crime. The presence of such low-safety environments around schools has the potential to result in increased absenteeism as well as increased levels of stress among students, both of which contribute to decreased academic performance. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the Safe Passage program on crime around Chicago public schools. Specifically, the author seeks to answer the following research questions: (1) What is the effect of the Safe Passage program on the number of criminal incidents within the vicinity of CPS schools?; (2) Does the impact of the Safe Passage program on criminal incidents differ by crime type?; and (3) Does the Safe Passage program reduce criminal incidents around schools or redistribute criminal incidents within the vicinity surrounding schools? The Chicago Safe Passage program operates with the goal of increasing the safety of students as they travel to and from school. The data utilized for this study are drawn from both public data sources in addition to data generated uniquely for the purposes of this study. Data on crimes were acquired through the City of Chicago&apos;s Data Portal. Utilizing a difference-in-differences methodology, the author found that the Safe Passage Program reduces total crimes by approximately 0.15 standard deviations in the vicinity of a Safe Passage School. In the context of educational interventions, this effect size represents a reasonably large effect. Additionally, given the societal cost associated with crime, even small reductions in crime can produce reasonably large economic returns. Consistent with the location of the intervention, he found the largest reduction in crime to be among those occurring outside. A table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562847</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impacts of the Chicago Welcoming Schools&apos; Safe Passage Program on Student Safety and Crime</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Supply</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Demand</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Distribution</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kumar, Amal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hurwitz, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Higher education in the United States is a complex and multilayered system where open-access community colleges coexist with highly selective, 4-year institutions to which only a handful of students each year gain access. Each institution plays a unique role in this marketplace, and students across the spectrum engage with the system at different--and often, multiple--levels. Much of the national debate about postsecondary education in the United States in recent years has centered on the pervasive gaps in access to, and success in, higher education--across racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, or gender lines. This discourse typically takes a narrow view, focusing on one type of institution (e.g., for-profit colleges) or one type of student (e.g., low-income, first-generation students). Much of this popular narrative misses the forest for the trees, failing to situate individual students&apos; contexts in the larger narrative of supply and demand in the higher education marketplace. This research brief, along with its companion brief, aims for a wider lens by including the universe of postsecondary institutions in the United States and situating the racial/ethnic gaps in college enrollment in the context of the changing American demographic. This brief takes a data-based approach to describing trends in college admission, primarily focusing on how the changing face of the U.S. high school graduate has translated into the shifting demographic of the U.S. first-time college student. Data used in the following analyses come from the U.S. Department of Education&apos;s Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) and the Private School Survey, as well as from the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE). This brief unfolds in three parts: First, the authors briefly describe the high-level trends in high school graduation and college enrollment, paying special attention to the outcomes of different race/ethnic groups. They then disaggregate college enrollment by college institution level and examine how different racial/ethnic groups interact with the system at different levels, and finally, briefly identify a few key trends in the migration patterns in higher education market. A bibliography is included. [For the companion brief &amp;quot;Supply and Demand in the Higher Education Market: College Admission and College Choice,&amp;quot; see ED562849.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562848</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Supply and Demand in the Higher Education Market: College Enrollment. Research Brief</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Counselors</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Practitioners</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Demand</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Supply</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tuition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hurwitz, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kumar, Amal</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The nation&apos;s most selective colleges are often the centerpiece of the discussion surrounding college choice, and trends in college selectivity are relayed through stories of plunging admission rates at a few high-profile postsecondary institutions and anecdotes of model high school students unable to secure seats at these colleges. Such stories make for ideal attention-grabbing headlines and probably generate more panic than they should for students, parents, and others actively engaged in helping prospective college-goers to seek out and attend appropriately matched colleges. The information provided through these newspaper and magazine articles, books, and blogs fall short in that they present to consumers only pieces of the story, not a holistic national perspective of how the student demand for college has changed along with postsecondary responses to these changes. Experiences of individual students or institutions may or may not be representative of national trends. In this brief and the companion brief, the authors depart from the traditional manner of relaying trends in college applications, admission, and enrollment by taking a step back and considering patterns over time for the universe of U.S. 4-year postsecondary institutions with competitive admission processes, rather than small and possibly unrepresentative subsets of them. This wide-lens approach is possible through the aggregation and analysis of data from the U.S. Department of Education&apos;s Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE), as well as the College Board&apos;s own data. This brief begins by documenting trends in application volume, admission, and enrollment across all of the nation&apos;s selective 4-year postsecondary institutions. These trends are disaggregated by level of selectivity to call attention to the occasionally contrasting patterns that occur across selectivity categories. The authors offer corroboration that college admission rates are indeed declining and that the decline has continued in recent years even after the annual count of new U.S. high school graduates has peaked. Colleges have responded to the heightened demand by growing their first-year cohorts, although the rate of enrollment expansion has not kept pace with the sharper increases in application volume. A bibliography is included. [For the companion brief &amp;quot;Supply and Demand in the Higher Education Market: College Enrollment,&amp;quot; see ED562848.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562849</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Supply and Demand in the Higher Education Market: College Admission and College Choice. Research Brief</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Treatment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Information</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schochet, Peter Z.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the &amp;quot;gold standard&amp;quot; for evaluating an intervention&apos;s effectiveness. Recently, the federal government has placed increased emphasis on the use of opportunistic experiments. A key criterion for conducting opportunistic experiments, however, is that there is relatively easy access to data about key outcomes. This paper will address the following research question: What is the &amp;quot;minimum&amp;quot; amount of information that researchers can request from state longitudinal data systems (SLDS) staff to obtain unbiased estimates of average treatment effects (ATEs) and their standard errors for the full population and key population subgroups? The paper will consider non-clustered designs where (1) students are randomized to a treatment and control group, (2) clustered designs where units (such as schools or classrooms) are randomized, and (3) both stratified designs where random assignment is conducted within blocks (such as school districts or schools) and non-stratified designs. The paper will focus on the estimation of ATEs on a continuous student achievement test score that is available in the SLDS data. Also, the author will consider impact estimation models that adjust for baseline covariates and those that do not. The study results report that RCTs will be feasible only if administrative records data are readily available to conduct such analyses. Yet, obtaining these data can be difficult and time-consuming due to data access issues and staff availability.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562850</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>What Is the Minimum Information Needed to Estimate Average Treatment Effects in Education RCTs?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Length</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bilingual Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish Speaking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Support Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resource Allocation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hong, Guanglei</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gagne, Joshua</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>West, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study focuses on assessing the contribution of ELL services to Spanish-speaking students&apos; mathematics learning in elementary schools. ELL students tend to have lower average math achievement at school entry and throughout elementary school. The term &amp;quot;ELL services&amp;quot; encompasses English-as-a-second-language (ESL) programs, bilingual education programs, and other types of specialized programs for ELL students. Such students are entitled to support in the classroom until they achieve the level of English proficiency needed for full participation. Data were collected using outcome measures from math direct assessment scores. The assessment was administered in English if a student was proficient in English and was administered in Spanish if the student was proficient in Spanish but not in English. Study results indicate four or more years of ELL services on average are necessary to enable Spanish-speaking elementary students to become proficient in academic English essential for math learning. Yet a one-size-for-all recipe is practically naïve and often wasteful. Identifying the optimal length of ELL services for subpopulations of students therefore has immediate implications for ELL resource allocation. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562851</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>What Is the Optimal Length of an ELL Program?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>27</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Articulation (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Selection (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Associate Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baker, Rachel</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many community college students begin with the intention of transferring to a four-year school but relatively few actually do. One hypothesis for the low rates of successful two-to-four year transfers is that academic program choices in community colleges are too numerous and too complex. In this paper, the author will address a longer term outcome of a state articulation policy in California (number of associates degrees granted) as well as the more proximate outcome (changes in course taking patterns) implicit in these more distal goals. She will also examine whether the reform is having heterogeneous effects on different demographic groups and different degree programs. Using data from California Community Colleges, the author will answer the following research questions: (1) Do structured academic transfer programs for community college students affect student outcomes and course-taking behavior?; and (2) Does a more structured transfer program affect the demographics (race, age, SES, prior education) of degree programs in community colleges and does it have larger effects on particular groups of students? The author worked closely with a community college district in Northern California. She used exclusively administrative data for this project. This study provides preliminary evidence that the introduction of Associates degrees for transfer had an effect on the behavior of students. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562852</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effects of Structured Transfer Programs in Community Colleges</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ramist, Leonard</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lewis, Charles</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCamley-Jenkins, Laura</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>SAT I: Reasoning Test scores, combined with high school grades, result in more accurate predictions of college success than either measure alone or any other combination of two measures. Overall, there is a strong positive relationship between high school grades and SAT. In 1990, ETS conducted a study of the characteristics of different students with discrepant high school GPA and SAT scores. Students at three colleges were classified into three groups depending on the relationship between their SAT scores and high school GPA. Approximately two-thirds of all students have nondiscrepant scores, meaning that their predicted freshman GPA will be similar whether SAT scores or high school GPA are used, and one-third of students had discrepant scores. Characteristics of the students in both groups are discussed.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562853</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Students with Discrepant High School GPA and SAT® Scores. Research Summary RS-01</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1997-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>2</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Logical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standard Setting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cutting Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guides</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morgan, Deanna L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The introduction of the SAT Reasoning Test™ with a writing section in March 2005 and the concomitant elimination of the SAT® Subject Test in Writing after January 2005 have led many colleges and institutions to ask for guidance in using the new SAT Reasoning Test writing section scores for college placement and admissions. Standard-setting methodologies provide one possible set of processes that can be used to identify point(s) on a score scale to divide a group of examinees into categories. Many standard-setting methods have been developed, but only one, the Angoff Method (1971) with Mean Estimation for Essays (Loomis and Bourque 2001), is presented in this document. This document presents many of the decisions needed to conduct a standard-setting session and then provides step-by-step directions to enable colleges or institutions to conduct their own local Angoff-based standard setting for the SAT writing section. Many examples of the data collection documents and supplementary preparation and training materials useful during the standard-setting process, including test items for the March 2005 SAT writing section, are provided. Colleges and institutions are strongly encouraged to use the free Admitted Class Evaluation Service™ (ACES™) offered by the College Board for users of College Board tests to collect information regarding the validity of using specific cut scores on the SAT Reasoning Test writing section for placement or admissions for their institutions&apos; applicants and students. The following are appended: (1) Information on the SAT Reasoning Test™ Writing Section; (2) A Sample Schedule for a Standard Setting Using Angoff with Mean Estimation to Set One Cut Score; (3) A Sample Schedule for a Standard Setting Using Angoff with Mean Estimation to Set Two Cut Scores; (4) SAT Essay Prompt and Multiple-Choice Items for Writing--March 2005; (5) Scoring Guide for the SAT® Essay; (6) Answer Key for the SAT Reasoning Test Writing Section; (7) Training Essay Prompt and Multiple-Choice Items for Writing Section; (8) Angoff with Mean Estimation of Essay Ratings Training Record; (9) Training Evaluation Form; (10) Angoff with Mean Estimation of Essay Ratings Record; (11) SAT Writing Composite Score Conversion Table; (12) Final Evaluation Form for the SAT Reasoning Test Writing Section; and (13) Dictionary of Terms.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562854</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Setting Local Cut Scores on the Sat Reasoning Test™ Writing Section: For Use in College Placement and Admissions Decisions</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2006-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>79</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Individualized Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participant Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conference Papers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cost Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Definitions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Staff Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selection Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rigol, Gretchen W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This is the fourth monograph in the admissions models series. Based on discussions at a June 2004 conference and conversations with numerous admissions experts, this publication describes different approaches to individualized review and covers topics such as standardizing elements of the application, reader training and guidelines, consistency and reliability, and the economics of individualized review. The following are appended: (1) Roster of Participants in the June 8-9, 2004, Conference; and (2) Consistency and Reliability Background Paper.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562855</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Selection through Individualized Review: A Report on Phase IV of the Admissions Models Project</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2004-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>48</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 11</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 12</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nathan, Julie S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 11</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 12</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Each year over one million high school students complete the SAT[superscript R] I. Information on repeat testing and the probability that a student&apos;s SAT I score will change may help students and educators make better-informed decisions about retesting. This information would also be useful for high school counselors who advise students regarding testing, and for college admission officers and faculty who use SAT I scores for admission and placement decisions. The first part of this report concerns only score changes between consecutive testings of the SAT I. In the second half, average scores between PSAT/NMSQT and SAT I will be described.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562856</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Score Change When Retaking the SAT® I: Reasoning Test. Research Notes RN-05</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1998-09-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vignettes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Value Added Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yuan, Kun</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Engberg, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kaufman, Julia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hamilton, Laura</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hill, Heather</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Umland, Kristin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCaffrey, Daniel</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>High-quality measures of instructional practice are essential for research and evaluation of innovative instructional policies and programs, as well as for providing feedback to teachers and administrators. In this study, the authors examined whether using anchoring vignettes in web-based surveys improved the validity of teachers&apos; self-assessments of their mathematics instruction. To investigate validity, they compared correlations between teachers&apos; self-ratings and other measures of teaching including teachers&apos; value-added scores, student surveys, and observation ratings of instruction before and after calibration to examine whether calibration improves the correlation between teachers&apos; self-ratings and other teaching measures. Data came from 61 mathematics teachers in grades 4-9 participating in the Bill &amp;amp; Melinda Gates Foundation&apos;s Measures of Effective Teaching Extension project. The sample was roughly evenly distributed between elementary (grades 4-5) and middle school (grades 6-8) teachers, with only three percent teaching 9th grade. The authors used both non-parametric and parametric methods to calibrate teachers&apos; self-ratings. Preliminary findings suggest that anchoring vignettes represent a promising innovation for measuring teachers&apos; instruction through survey self-reports. Specifically, the authors found: (1) Teachers&apos; survey responses that are calibrated through the use of anchoring vignettes have increased variation compared to teachers&apos; raw survey responses, particularly for the cognitive challenge dimension; (2) Teachers&apos; calibrated survey responses regarding mathematical vocabulary and cognitively challenging tasks are more strongly correlated with the composite measure of teacher performance compared to raw survey responses; and (3) If teachers gave their self-rating after rating the vignettes, rather than before, the entire collection of calibrated self-ratings are significantly correlated with the composite performance measure (p&amp;lt;0.05).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562857</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using Anchoring Vignettes to Calibrate Teachers&apos; Self-Assessment of Teaching</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 10</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 11</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Proctor, Thomas P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wyatt, Jeffrey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiley, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 10</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 11</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report presents a methodology for the creation of a PSAT/NMSQT test score benchmark to identify students who are on track toward college readiness when completing high school. The proposed benchmark could create useful early indicators of whether students in grades 10 and 11 are on track to be college ready upon high school graduation. Two tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562858</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>PSAT/NMSQT® Indicators of College Readiness. Research Report No. 2010-4</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>19</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bridgeman, Brent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pollack, Judith</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burton, Nancy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The ability of high school grades (grade point average) and SAT® scores to predict cumulative grades in different types of college courses was evaluated in a sample of 26 colleges. Appended are: (1) Sample Sizes, Means, and Standard Deviations for Subgroups Defined by Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Course Type; and (2) Prediction of Cumulative GPA by Course Type, College-Selectivity Level, Gender, and Race/Ethnicity; Corrected for Range Restriction.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562859</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Predicting Grades in Different Types of College Courses. Research Report No. 2008-1. ETS RR-08-06</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>34</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sackett, Paul R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kuncel, Nathan R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Arneson, Justin J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cooper, Sara R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Waters, Shonna D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Critics of educational admissions tests assert that tests measure nothing other than socioeconomic status (SES), and that their apparent validity in predicting academic performance is an artifact of SES. We examine relationships among SAT, SES, and freshman grades in 41 colleges and universities and show that (a) SES is related to SAT scores (r = 0.42 among the population of SAT takers), (b) SAT scores are predictive of freshman grades (r = 0.47 corrected for school-specific range restriction), and (c) statistically controlling for SES reduces the estimated SAT-grade correlation from r = 0.47 to r = 0.44. Thus, the vast majority of the SAT-grade relationship is independent of SES: The SAT-grade relationship is not an artifact of common influences of SES on both test scores and grades. Correlations and Partial Correlations Among SAT, College GPA, HSGPA, and SES by School is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562860</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Socioeconomic Status and the Relationship between the SAT® and Freshman GPA: An Analysis of Data from 41 Colleges and Universities. Research Report No. 2009-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>19</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Care</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Receptive Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emergent Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Connors, Maia C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Friedman-Krauss, Allison H.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morris, Pamela A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Page, Lindsay C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Feller, Avi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (Revised)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Family Day Care Rating Scale</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study seeks to answer the following question: Are impacts on Head Start classroom quality associated with impacts of Head Start on children&apos;s learning and development? This study employs a variety of descriptive and quasi-experimental methods to explore the role of classroom quality as a mediator or mechanism of Head Start impacts. This research uses data from the Head Start Impact Study (HSIS) and includes 4,440 3- and 4-year-old children who were randomly assigned off a waitlist to either receive an invitation to participate in Head Start services or to the control group. Children initially applied to 351 Head Start programs across 81 Head Start grantees. A total of 2,644 children were randomized to receive Head Start services and 1,796 were randomized to the control group. Following randomization, children enrolled in a total of 1,632 classrooms across 930 Head Start and non-Head Start centers. Measures of children&apos;s cognitive skills include early receptive language, math skills, and early literacy. Classroom quality was assessed using three tools: The Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (ECERS-R), The Family Day Care Rating Scale (FDCRS), and the Arnett Caregiver Interaction Scale (CIS). Results of the multinomial logit models indicate that random assignment to Head Start is indeed associated with increases in all three classroom quality factors. Future analyses will address critical questions about the extent to which these impacts on quality are associated with impacts on child outcomes, using a variety of analytic approaches. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562861</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Role of Classroom Quality in Explaining Head Start Impacts</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hofer, Kerry G.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper presents evidence on the amount of classroom variation in gains across various domains of achievement within the Tennessee Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten (TN-VPK) program; the data are taken from the randomized control trial (RCT) design of the TN-VPK evaluation. This study explores areas where those differences are largest, and offers speculations about possible causes of these differences. The full randomized sample included children from 111 randomized school applicant lists in 28 districts across Tennessee. The consented subsample of that group came from 76 applicant lists in 58 schools from 21 districts. Ten of those 58 schools were in the West region of the state, 24 were in the Central West region, 12 were in the Central East region, and 12 were in the East. Children were individually assessed using the set of Woodcock Johnson III achievement tests (Letter-Word Identification, Spelling, Understanding Directions, Applied Problems, Quantitative Concepts, Passage Comprehension, and Oral Comprehension). Data presented were analyzed through first calculating each individual child&apos;s gain by differencing the beginning and end of pre-k scores on each subscale, and those differences were aggregated to the classroom level for the children who attended VPK. The focus of this paper is not just on mean gain, but on standard deviations and ranges of gain. The amount of gain made during the pre-k year in TN-VPK classrooms varied substantially from classroom to classroom. Correlations of gains across subscales revealed that though classrooms that tended to make more relative gain on one subtest also tended to make relatively more gain on other subtests, the strength of the correlations did not suggest that classrooms making the most gains always made the most gains regardless of subject matter. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562862</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Variation in Mean Academic Gains across Classrooms in the Tennessee Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>1</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Formulas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific and Technical Information</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kimmel, Ernest W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Based on statistics from the first few administrations of the SAT writing section, the test is performing as expected. The reliability of the writing section is very similar to that of other writing assessments. Based on preliminary validity research, the writing section is expected to add modestly to the prediction of college performance when critical reading and mathematics scores are considered.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562863</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Test Development and Technical Information on the Writing Section of the SAT Reasoning Test™. Research Notes RN-25</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2006-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Composition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selection Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bridgeman, Brent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burton, Nancy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cline, Frederick</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Using data from a sample of 10 colleges at which most students had taken both SAT I: Reasoning Test and SAT II: Subject Tests, the authors simulated the effects of making selection decisions using SAT II scores in place of SAT I scores. Specifically, they treated the students in each college as forming the applicant pool for a more select college, and then selected the top two-thirds (and top one-third) of the students using high school grade-point average combined with either SAT I scores or the average of SAT II scores. Success rates, in terms of freshman grade-point averages, were virtually identical for students selected by the different models. The percent of African American, Asian American, and White students selected varied only slightly across models. Appreciably more Mexican American and Other Latino students were selected with the model that used SAT II scores in place of SAT I scores because these students submitted Subject Test scores for the Spanish test on which they had high scores.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562864</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Substituting SAT® II: Subject Tests for SAT I: Reasoning Test: Impact on Admitted Class Composition and Quality. Research Report No. 2001-3. ETS RR-01-07</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2001-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Cutting Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Formulas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Validation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standard Setting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morgan, Deanna L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Michaelides, Michalis P.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Due to the high stakes that my be attached to placement decisions, it is imperative that the placement process be as solid and defensible as possible. An integral part of the placement process is the identification and use of cut scores, the point(s) on the score scale that classify students into adjacent categories for placement decisions. This paper is geared toward helping college administrators make valid decisions regarding setting cut scores, focusing particularly on selecting a method, but also discussing issues such as defining performance levels and validating the process.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562865</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Setting Cut Scores for College Placement. Research Report No. 2005-9</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>18</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>32</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Faria, Ann-Marie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Greenberg, Ariela</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Meakin, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bichay, Krystal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Heppen, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Educators have long used test scores to make educational decisions, but only within the last decade has the availability of data been systematic (Abelman, Elmore, Even, Kenyon, &amp;amp; Marshall, 1999). In recent years, interest has spiked in data-driven decision making in education (Marsh, Pane, &amp;amp; Hamilton, 2006). With technological advances and growing pressure for &amp;quot;data-driven&amp;quot; instruction under accountability reforms, many schools, districts, and states have invested significant resources in tools designed to provide educators with regular access to data (U.S. Department of Education, 2009a; 2009b; 2009c). The increased emphasis on data use is based on the belief that student data can be an important lever for improved teaching and learning. Although the relationship between data use and student achievement has face validity, little empirical evidence links educators&apos; use of data with improved student achievement. One recent study examined the relationship between key dimensions of interim assessment data use and student achievement. The study, known as the &amp;quot;Urban Data Study (UDS),&amp;quot; examined links between educators&apos; data use (measured by teacher self-reported surveys) and student achievement on end-of-year state assessments. This study contributed to the field by defining a conceptual framework for the effective use of data (see Figure 1, for the theory of action that links data use with student achievement), creating new measures of data use practices and providing some early evidence of a relationship between data use and achievement by empirically connecting data use practices to changes in teaching and actual improvements in student outcomes. With initial findings from the UDS suggesting an empirical link between data use and student achievement, the next step was to refine the measurement strategy and expand the type of data examined during educators&apos; data use. The next study in this line of research is the &amp;quot;Student Dashboard Usage Study.&amp;quot; The study examined educators&apos; use of Web-based data dashboard system and employed some of the same methods as the UDS as well as some innovative measurement techniques. The overarching goal of the current study is to compare and contrast findings between the UDS and the &amp;quot;Student Dashboard Usage Study.&amp;quot; This project attempts to replicate findings from the UDS (Faria et al., 2012) to further understand the links between teacher-level data-use practices and student achievement. Both the UDS and the Student Dashboard Usage Study answer the broad research question: &amp;quot;What are the relationships between teachers&apos; data-use practices and their students&apos; achievement?&amp;quot; By examining the findings from both studies together, researchers hope to better understand the relationship between data use and student achievement. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562866</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Replicating the Relationship between Teachers&apos; Data Use and Student Achievement: The Urban Data Study and the Data Dashboard Usage Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Context Effect</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Delphi Technique</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mayo-Wilson, Evan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Grant, Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Montgomery, Paul</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are increasingly used to evaluate programs and interventions in order to inform education policy and practice. High quality reports of these RCTs are needed for interested readers to understand the rigor of the study, the interventions tested, and the context in which the evaluation took place (Mayo-Wilson et al., 2013). The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement--and its extensions--are the preeminent guidelines for reporting RCTs; they are based on empirical evidence and expert consensus about biases related to validity (Schulz, Altman, Moher, for the CONSORT Group, 2010). While CONSORT guidelines are well-known in the social and behavioral sciences, there is less evidence of widespread uptake and implementation in education compared with biomedical disciplines, and deficiencies persist in the reporting of intervention trials in education (Torgerson, Torgerson, Birks, &amp;amp; Porthouse, 2005). Following recommended techniques for guideline development and dissemination (Moher et al., 2010), this presentation focuses on a structured research programme to develop a reporting guideline for intervention RCTs in education and related disciplines. Namely, this presentation will overview the reporting quality of RCTs in education, and discuss reporting guidance for reporting education intervention RCTs.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562867</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Distribution</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essay Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Coaching</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The focus of this report is to summarize the research that has been conducted thus far on the new SAT Writing section. The evidence provided reveals that the new writing section has satisfactory psychometric quality in that its reliability is acceptable; it is significantly related to first-year college GPA and college English grades; it has been perceived to impact high school curriculum; and it does not result in larger score disparities among racial/ethnic groups.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562868</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>SAT® Writing: An Overview of Research and Psychometrics to Date. Research Notes. RN-32</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Generalizability Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcome Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Positive Behavior Supports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Abry, Tashia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cash, Anne H.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bradshaw, Catherine P.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Maryland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Maryland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Generalizability theory (GT) offers a useful framework for estimating the reliability of a measure while accounting for multiple sources of error variance. The purpose of this study was to use GT to examine multiple sources of variance in and the reliability of school-level teacher and high school student behaviors as observed using the tool, Assessing School Settings: Interactions of Students and Teachers (ASSIST). The study took place in the context of a high school randomized controlled trial (Maryland Safe and Supportive Schools [MDS3]--58 high school randomized controlled trials funded by the U.S. Department of Education and the William T. Grant Foundation) of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) (Sugai &amp;amp; Horner 2006). PBIS is a school-based decision-making framework designed to enhance students&apos; social and academic functioning. Baseline data (collected prior to intervention) from six Maryland high schools provided the analytic sample for the study. Two raters worked in tandem to observe 25 classrooms/occasions in each of the six high schools using the ASSIST, resulting in a partially crossed design in which observations were nested within schools and crossed by rater. School interactions were assessed using the ASSIST, an observational measure of teachers&apos; behavior management strategies and student behavior. Generalizability studies (G-studies) and decision studies (D-studies) were conducted using GENOVA software. Variations in the number of raters used to conduct observations and the number of observations occurring within a school had direct implications for the reliability of ASSIST tally items. Results indicate that raters can be trained to observe selected behaviors with high levels of agreement, and that studies using the ASSIST may be well-positioned to capture school-level differences for the behaviors of teacher proactive behavior expectations, teacher reactive behavior management, student disruption, and student profanity. This study demonstrates GT as a useful tool when evaluating and planning for the use of observational measures in large-scale program evaluations. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562869</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using Generalizability Theory to Examine Sources of Variance in Observed Behaviors within High School Classrooms</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Department of Education (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>William T. Grant Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teamwork</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Principles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teachers and administrators were surveyed to determine the extent to which AP Vertical Teams for English were implemented in schools. Results indicate that even though the goals of the AP Vertical Teams were only partially realized, there was some positive impact on student exposure to Pre-AP instruction and AP courses and student performance on the AP Examinations. Although the results are only modest, they are promising. It appears that if the AP Vertical Team goals were more fully implemented, the impact is likely to be more extensive. Suggestions for improving the implementation of AP Vertical Teams are provided.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562870</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Summary of Evaluation Results of Advanced Placement Program® (AP®) Vertical Teams for English. Research Notes. RN-17</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-09-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcome Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Conn, Katharine</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Africa</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Africa</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In the last three decades, there has been a large increase in the number of rigorous experimental and quasi-experimental evaluations of education programs in developing countries. These impact evaluations have taken place all over the globe, including a large number in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The fact that the developing world is socially and economically diverse and that different interventions and programs are often culturally specific suggests that the broad results from previous syntheses may not be applicable to SSA, which is itself a quite diverse region. In this paper, the author conducts a large systematic review of the impact evaluation literature throughout the region, East, Central, Southern, and Western Africa, as well as the Indian Ocean Islands. This includes both experimental and quasi-experimental studies from all fields which evaluate the impact of education programs on student learning (fields include economics, health, psychology, and education). The author employed a random effects meta-analysis model. This meta-analysis found that interventions in pedagogical methods (particularly those that emphasize procedural or conceptual learning) to be very promising. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562871</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Which Interventions Have the Greatest Effect on Student Learning in Sub-Saharan Africa? &amp;quot;A Meta-Analysis of Rigorous Impact Evaluations&amp;quot;</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Maximum Likelihood Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Area Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Area Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wyatt, Jeffrey N.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Remigio, Mylene</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 2011, the College Board developed the SAT College and Career Readiness Benchmark to assist educators and policymakers in their efforts to better evaluate the college readiness of their students. This benchmark was designed to identify the point on the SAT score scale that is indicative of students&apos; having a high likelihood of success in college, with &amp;quot;success&amp;quot; being defined as a 65% probability of obtaining a first-year GPA (FYGPA) of 2.67 (B-) or higher. This criterion was informed by a panel of expert educators and policymakers convened by the College Board in 2007 (Kobrin, Patterson, Wiley, &amp;amp; Mattern, 2012).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562872</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>SAT® Subject Area Readiness Indicators: Reading, Writing, and STEM</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-08-31</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Native Speakers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As an admissions test, the SAT II: Subject Tests in foreign languages allow students to demonstrate academic competence in the selected language area. As a placement tool, the SAT II: Subject Tests in foreign languages serve the same function as the SAT II: Subject Tests do in other academic areas such as world history, chemistry, or math. SAT II: Subject Tests also provide college faculty with a superior placement tool without using faculty time to develop, administer, or score the tests. Issues regarding the tests include test difficulty, test content, selection of test titles, and assessing students who are native speakers of the language.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562873</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>SAT® II: Subject Tests in Foreign Languages--Using the Tests for Admission and Placement. Research Summary RS-07</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-06-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>3</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Logic</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gallagher, Ann M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mantel Haenszel Procedure</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Tukeys Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Performance of high-scoring males and females on the mathematics section of three forms of the College Board&apos;s Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT-M) was examined to determine how item content, solution strategy, and speededness differentially affect performance. The mathematical and verbal sections of the SAT were also compared for similarities in the performance patterns of high scorers. Items on three forms of the SAT-M were classified on the basis of content and potential solution strategies. Male and female performance in the top 5 percent was examined using the Mantel-Haenszel Differential Item Functioning (MH-DIF) procedure. A main effect was found for itemsolution strategy, but not for item content. Males tended to outperform females on items requiring logical estimation or insight even when subjects were matched on years of mathematics course taking and average mathematics grades. Conventional measures indicated that the test was not differentially speeded. However, omit rates indicated that females omitted a greater proportion of items requiring estimation. Different patterns by gender were found on the mathematical and verbal sections of the test. Item Classification of SAT-M Sex Differences Study is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562874</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Sex Differences in the Performance of High-Scoring Examinees on the SAT®-M. College Board Report No. 90-3. ETS RR No. 90-27</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1990-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>26</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essay Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holistic Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Formulas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The essay on the writing section of the SAT will be scored using a holistic approach. In holistic scoring, a piece of writing is considered as a total piece of work--the whole of which is greater than the sum of its parts.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562875</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Scoring the Essay on the SAT® Writing Section. Research Summary RS-10</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2003-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>3</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Selection (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ramist, Leonard</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lewis, Charles</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCamley-Jenkins, Laura</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Part 1 of this study investigated possible causes of the observed decline in correlations between SAT scores and freshman grade-point average (FGPA). Working with a database of 38 colleges, the study found that the comparability of course grades received by entering freshmen declined in the 1980s. Three new measures of grade comparability-variety of courses taken, variation in average student aptitude among courses, and appropriateness of average course grade in relation to student aptitude level-proved to be excellent indicators of both the level of and the change in SAT validity for predicting FGPA. Using course grade as a criterion instead of FGPA reduced the decline in both SAT and high school GPA (HSGPA) validity for predicting course grades by 40 percent. Contrary to the assumption that high school record (HSR) is a better predictor than the SAT, compared with HSR the SAT had higher or equal average validities for predicting course grades in almost all categories of courses. Part 2 examined course selection, grading patterns, grade comparability, SAT predictive effectiveness and mean over- and underprediction across different courses for groups based on gender, English as best or not best language, and ethnicity. All results were analyzed by college selectivity level and size. The following are appended: (1) Colleges Participating in the Study; and (2) Course Categories.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562876</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Student Group Differences in Predicting College Grades: Sex, Language, and Ethnic Groups. College Board Report No. 93-1. ETS RR No. 94-27</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1994-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>45</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>57</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burton, Nancy W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lewis, Charles</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Robertson, Nancy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>After adjusting for differences in background, women&apos;s average SAT-verbal scores were found to be higher than, or nearly equal to, men&apos;s. Although women&apos;s average SAT-mathematical scores after adjustment are still lower than men&apos;s, they are 25 points higher when adjusted for background. This report&apos;s analysis establishes that the background differences between men and women are significantly related to verbal and mathematical score differences. The research looked at samples of students in the high school classes of 1975, 1980, and 1985 who had taken the SAT.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562877</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Sex Differences in SAT® Scores. College Board Report No. 88-9. ETS RR No. 88-58</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1988-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>27</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>19</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Calculators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Milewski, Glenn B.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The SAT® and high school grades are the most accurate predictors of first-year college performance. Together, these two measures have a high multiple correlation (r = 0.7) with first-year college grades when the correlation coefficient is corrected for restriction in range, criterion unreliability, and different course grading standards (Bridgeman, McCamley-Jenkins, and Ervin, 2000; Ramist, Lewis, and McCamley-Jenkins, 1993). The current study examined predictions of first-year college performance for students whose SAT score and high school grades were discrepant and compared these results to predictions for students whose SAT score and high school grades were not discrepant. The current analyses replicated those performed in an earlier study conducted in 1990 by Baydar but utilized a larger sample of schools and recentered SAT scores. In addition, the current study used SAT scores that emphasized critical reading, grid-in math items, and calculator use, and de-emphasized antonym items (Bridgeman, McCamley- Jenkins, and Ervin, 2000). Results of the study suggest that students with a high HSGPA (high school grade point average) in the presence of low SAT scores will not do any better in college than students with lower HSGPA scores but higher SAT scores. Therefore, the SAT may be a more accurate predictor than the HSGPA for these students.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562878</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Students with Discrepant High School GPA and SAT® I Scores. Research Notes. RN-15</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Information</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fiscal Capacity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Labor Market</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Terenzini, Patrick T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cabrera, Alberto F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bernal, Elena M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Information Analyses</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Despite an enormous investment in equalizing educational opportunities for all Americans, substantial evidence indicates that significant inequities remain, particularly for low-socioeconomic-status (SES) students. The report draws on an extensive review of the current research literature and contributes new analyses of national databases to fill in some of the holes in the existing literature. Among the findings are: (1) by the ninth grade, most students have developed occupational and educational expectations that are strongly related to SES; (2) parents&apos; knowledge of financial aid, financial planning for college, and students&apos; access to college and financial aid information are clearly associated with SES; and (3) nearly one-half of the lowest-SES-quartile high school graduates do not enroll the following fall in any postsecondary institution, a nonenrollment rate nearly five times higher than that of high-SES students. Two appendices are included: (1) Definitions of Wealth: A Review of the Literature; and (2) Sources of Data and Methodology.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562879</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Swimming against the Tide: The Poor in American Higher Education. Research Report No. 2001-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2001-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Association for Institutional Research</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>62</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>133</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bayesian Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Distribution</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Proctor, Thomas P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, YoungKoung Rachel</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this paper is to provide information about how students&apos; scores change when they retake the PSAT/NMSQT as juniors or take the SAT in the spring after they take the PSAT/NMSQT as juniors. Two research questions guided this study and motivated the approach for analysis of the data: How do scores change for students who took the PSAT/NMSQT both as a sophomore and junior or the PSAT/NMSQT and SAT as juniors? How will future students taking the PSAT/NMSQT be expected to perform when they take the SAT or retake the PSAT/NMSQT? Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562880</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Score Change for 2007 PSAT/NMSQT® Test-Takers: An Analysis of Score Changes for PSAT/NMSQT Test-Takers Who Also Took the 2008 PSAT/NMSQT Test or a Spring 2008 SAT® Test. Research Notes RN-41</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-08-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Salaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Labor Market</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Certificates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credentials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carruthers, Celeste K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sanford, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many higher education institutions award credentials below the associate&apos;s degree level, yet little is known about the pecuniary returns to sub-baccalaureate awards like diplomas (for the culmination of a program of study lasting one to two years) and certificates (for the successful completion of portions of those programs, often within one or two semesters). Carruthers and Sanford add to this body of work in two ways, using administrative data on college and labor outcomes for Tennessee students and workers over the years 2000-2012. First, the authors highlight the potential role of state-run technology centers in producing diplomas and certificates. They next compare the returns to sub-baccalaureate awards across technology centers and community colleges, characterizing immediate post-credential gains in employment and earnings as well as post-credential trends in the same. Postsecondary data are drawn from administrative files maintained by the Tennessee Higher Education Commission. The study results support the conventional wisdom that narrow vocational programs and sub-baccalaureate credentials promote job placement and immediate earnings recovery, but with the important caveat that the labor market returns to certificates and diplomas depreciate after attainment. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562881</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Way Station or Launching Pad? Unpacking the Returns to Postsecondary Vocational Programs in Tennessee</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compliance (Legal)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Dissemination</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Favila, Marisela</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>For children to be successful, schools must provide a safe and secure environment in which teachers can teach and students can learn (Skiba &amp;amp; Sprague, 2008). In California, state regulations require that schools maintain an appropriate school climate on campus, in classrooms, and at school sponsored events (California Education Code 35294). The purpose of this study was to examine the experiences and perceptions of district leaders, school administrators, and teachers regarding the development and implementation of the Comprehensive School Safety Plan. This case study&apos;s participants included district and school leaders and teachers at three elementary schools within one rural Southern California elementary school district. The study was comprised of semi-structured and focus group interviews, on-site observations, and a document review, including each site&apos;s safe school plan. Findings indicated that while schools have complied with the mandated creation of their school safety plan there are various challenges in obtaining and incorporating staff input into the plan. In addition, school leaders struggled to communicate the various elements of the plan to their staff effectively. Finally, the limited implementation of the safe school plan suggests that further training and support is needed in this area. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562882</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Case Study of a Southern California Elementary School District&apos;s Comprehensive School Safety Plan: Experiences and Perceptions of School Leaders and Teachers</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, California Lutheran University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8841-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>129</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599505</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Utilization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shannon-Luster, Beverly</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Washington</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Washington</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Instructional leadership is the most important responsibility for principals and the most vulnerable students in need of productive instructional leadership are students of color with specific learning disabilities. Instructional leaders are challenged with creating supportive learning environments and school cultures that promotes the education for all students, more specifically students of color with specific learning disabilities. Concomitantly, productive instructional leaders are knowledgeable of evidence-based strategies and promote the use of such strategies by communicating with and supervising building staff members. The purpose of this multiple case study was to delve deeper into the descriptions of perceived instructional leadership practices for middle school students of color with specific learning disabilities in average selected schools in western Washington State. Middle schools were selected because of the percentage of students of color with specific learning disabilities in grades six through eight who achieved proficient scores on Washington State&apos;s math and reading assessment (Measurement of Student Progress) were amongst the lowest of all grades. Results from interviews with five administrators representing five middle schools in the selected school system indicated principals exhibited strong utilization of data; limited knowledge of special education policies and procedures, systemic disconnects, and moderate to strong understanding of best practice instructional strategies for middle school students of color with specific learning disabilities. Implications for future research are discussed. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562883</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Principals&apos; Perceptions of Instructional Leadership for Middle School Students of Color with Specific Learning Disabilities</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Hampton University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8813-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>209</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599498</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Veterans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Documentation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lopez, Eddie S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>With an active war ongoing for nearly thirteen years, the nation has been experiencing hundreds of thousands of returning solders as a result of the military drawdown of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan. The intent of this research study was to understand the effectiveness of university programs, services, and practices in retaining student veterans transitioning to higher education. This qualitative case study analysis approach was informed by persistence theories in order to analyze and understand the challenges, obstacles, and experiences of student veterans attending two universities and to hear the persistence stories or voices of student veterans as they transition to institutions of higher education. This study interviewed 20 presumptively selected participants who were student veterans enrolled at two universities in California. Data collection methods for this study included face-to-face individual interviews, focus group discussions, field notes, and text-based documents. The findings of this research study indicated that student veterans are a unique student population, requiring special attention from institutions of higher education. The study ends with a discussion of findings, implications for policy and practice, recommendations of future research, and highlights final conclusions. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562884</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effectiveness of University Programs, Services, and Practices in Retaining Student Veterans Transitioning to Higher Education: Voices of Student Veterans--A Case Study Analysis Approach at Two Universities</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, California State University, Los Angeles</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8810-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>245</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599497</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 11</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 12</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Habits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Winfree, Linda</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 11</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 12</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As college and workplace success becomes increasingly dependent on reading, parents and educators have become more interested in how to engage students in reading. Teachers at a rural Georgia high school have reported that students are reluctant to engage in academic reading. Guided by previous research on the factors that promote or discourage adolescent reading motivation, as well as Bandura&apos;s social learning theory and Guthrie&apos;s engagement theory, this collective case study assessed what factors affected reading motivation among students at a rural Georgia high school. Eight students from Grades 9, 11, and 12 comprised the sample. Data sources included the Adolescent Motivation to Read Profile (AMRP) Reading Survey, the AMRP Conversational Interview, and a focus group. Data analysis included line-by-line coding based on 5 major themes: relevance, parent attitudes, social aspect, identity/self-efficacy, and experiences. The analyses revealed that many of the students possessed rich, personal reading lives separate from their academic lives. Findings also indicated that students&apos; experiences with academic reading in the school often decreased their motivation to engage. The resulting project was a Professional Learning Community with a focus on improving teacher practices with academic reading through an action inquiry cycle, thus increasing student reading motivation. This study may help students to develop the critical reading skills for collegiate and noncollegiate careers through increased engagement in effective academic reading experiences. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562885</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Reading Motivation and Engagement at a Rural Georgia High School</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8780-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>230</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599489</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McGarrity, DeShawn N.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Society is faced with more complex problems than in the past because of rapid advancements in technology. These complex problems require multi-dimensional problem-solving abilities that are consistent with higher-order thinking skills. Bok (2006) posits that over 90% of U.S. faculty members consider critical thinking skills as essential for students to develop at the post-secondary educational level, which will prepare them to be employees in the 21st century. Implementing a systematic model of critical thinking is challenging because so many different models, definitions, and teaching approaches have been attempted, with little evaluation of their impact. Faculty resistance to learning about critical thinking teaching methodologies is another hurdle that colleges often face. In addition, according to Haas and Keeley (1998), most faculty report it is more important to teach content within the subject area than to implement critical thinking within the curricula; many also place more value on the steps to achieve tenure rather than on participation in training that relates to critical thinking. Twenty-first century educators must embrace the value of critical thinking in the curriculum over that of rote, memorization, and test-based teaching techniques (Paul, 2005). This dissertation examined the models for critical thinking across the curriculum in State University of New York (SUNY) community colleges. This model includes organizational change and faculty development regarding the inclusion of critical thinking skills across the curriculum to enhance and improve students&apos; critical thinking abilities. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562886</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Model for Developing Improvements to Critical Thinking Skills across the Community College Curriculum</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Mgt. Dissertation, University of Maryland University College</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8739-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>143</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599460</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>General Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dragoo, Kyrie Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics and predictive factors for children receiving special education services, and if they received special education services, factors associated with them discontinuing those services before eighth grade. In addition, a second purpose was to determine whether there are differences in the reading and mathematics growth trajectories of children who exit special education, children who remain in special education, and children who attend general education classes and how those growth trajectories vary by characteristics such as race and gender. I used data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K), a study of a nationally representative sample of children attending kindergarten during the 1998 school year and followed through eighth grade. I used a subsample of the data to compare the characteristics and predictive factors of children receiving special education services or exiting from special education using chi-squares, t-tests, and logistic regression analyses. Using hierarchical linear modeling, I analyzed data on the academic growth trajectories of children who exited special education, remained in special education or never received special education. The results of my study indicate that large number of children exit special education between kindergarten and eighth grade and the children who exit special education differ from their general and special education peers both in their characteristics and their academic growth rates in reading and mathematics. Finally, I discuss the implications of these findings for policy and future research. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562887</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Characteristics, Predictors, and Growth Trajectories of Children Who Exit Special Education Compared to Their General and Special Education Peers</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8726-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>198</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599450</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Child Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thurber, Yvonne Marie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This quantitative research study examined the relationship between student achievement in reading and mathematics on the STAR (Standardized Test for the Assessment of Reading and Mathematics) and parent involvement in specific character development activities. The research design was quantitative in nature and conducted in two similar elementary schools, within a four month time frame. School 1 (Experimental) served 719 students, while the School 2 (Control) served 807 students. Of the 839 participants included in the study, 410 attended School 1 (Experimental) and 429 attended School 2 (Control). The results of this study indicated students who engaged in specific parent involvement activities with their parents did not score significantly higher on the STAR Reading and Mathematics assessments. However, results indicted statistically significant differences in how third and fifth grade students at School 1 (Experimental) performed academically, when compared to second and fourth grade students at the same school. In addition, interesting data emerged regarding behavior and attendance when School 1 (Experimental) and School 2 (Control) were compared. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562888</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Parent Involvement and the Impact on Student Achievement in Grades 2-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Northwest Nazarene University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8714-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>149</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599440</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescent Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>O&apos;Keefe, Sherry Plath</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The topic of this research study was academic achievement of adolescents and the 40 Developmental Assets. Developmental Assets have been associated with positive growth in adolescents by protecting adolescents from negative influences, as well as promoting healthy and positive development. This study attempted to refine and identify the role the 40 Developmental Assets played in academic achievement among students at one junior high school in a moderately sized Midwestern city. While the results of this research did not demonstrate a positive correlation between any of the 8 Assets and academic achievement, disaggregated data did show some correlations which may be the starting point for future research. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562889</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Correlational Study of Academic Achievement and the 40 Developmental Assets with Middle School Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8478-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>125</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599309</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Power Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participative Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Williams, Arthur</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The primary purpose of this case study was to examine teacher leaders&apos; perception of distributed leadership practices in two exemplary middle schools. Eight teacher leaders were selected to participate in this study. Qualitative data were gathered via one-on-one interviews and a review of artifacts from four teacher leaders at each school. The data were coded, categorized and clustered to produce themes. The research questions were addressed and descriptions were developed for each case. Findings indicate that there are several dimensions of distributed leadership that shape teacher leaders&apos; practice. This study concluded with recommendations that center on the reconceptualization of teacher leadership practice, district and school based supports. Implication for practice and areas for future research was explored. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562890</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher Leaders&apos; Perceptions of Distributed Leadership Practices in Middle Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8758-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>152</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599475</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Pragmatics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immersion Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Native Speakers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role Playing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discourse Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Universals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psycholinguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech Acts</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rose, Marda C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines proposals made during planning talk--a speech act that has received little attention in previous literature--to determine the applicability of the stages of second language (L2) pragmatic development posited by Kasper and Rose (2002). Although Kasper and Rose suggest that formulas play a prominent role in L2 pragmatic development, few studies have considered the applicability of their stages to a non-formulaic speech act. The current study investigated proposal production in the planning talk of 69 participants: 46 learners of Spanish enrolled at five levels of instruction in a seven-week Spanish immersion program, 12 native Spanish speaking instructors in the same program, and 11 native English speaking undergraduate students at the same institution enrolled during the academic year. The L2 learners worked in groups of two or three as they planned three different role-plays during the seventh week of instruction. The native speakers met with the researcher in groups of two or three to complete the same role-plays in their first language (L1). A total of 1809 proposals and 351 supporting moves were produced in approximately four hours of planning talk. Analysis of transcriptions focused on the realization of the head-act strategies, deictic centering, internal and external modification, and the influence of the conversational context on the production of proposals. Results of this cross-sectional analysis suggest that learners do not pass through a formulaic stage when producing proposals in planning talk. The results also suggest that the learners&apos; production of proposals exhibits a u-shaped curve as they adhere to L1 English norms at intermediate levels of proficiency before reflecting L1 Spanish norms at more advanced levels of instruction. L1 English influence was observed in the level of directness of the head-act strategies, the use of deictic centering, internal and external modification, and the influence of the conversational context. Results point to a new framework involving three universal stages of L2 pragmatic development in which L1 influence and pragmatic expansion are more salient. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562891</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Pragmatic Development of L2 Spanish Proposals in Planning Talk</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8399-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>307</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599236</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiles, Greg</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Educators are committed to providing students the best possible education by using the practices and tools they know (Zmuda, Kuklis, &amp;amp; Kline, 2004). Unfortunately, the status quo for grading and assessment practices is faulty, outdated, and ineffective. Current practices have unwittingly hindered student progress and motivation (O&apos;Connor, 2007). Educational leaders, administrators, and teachers are faced with questions regarding the best ways to motivate students and accurately report their progress (Popham, 2011). Assessing and grading student achievement are primary functions of educators and if these practices are not approached and applied properly, a grade can misrepresent the true knowledge of the student regarding class standards (Brookhart, 2009). Even though there has been a shift to standards based teaching, grading and assessment practices have not followed suit and continue to lag behind (Zmuda, Kuklis, &amp;amp; Kline, 2004). Conventional grading and assessment practices abound, yet opportunities for the introduction of reform and the necessary professional development for the implementation and sustainability of such reform are lacking (Wormeli, 2006). Second order change is an apparent break from the past and is best presented and maintained through quality, ongoing professional development (Marzano, 2003). Change is inevitable and necessary at times, offering fresh perspective and new ideas, and it is the responsibility of those in the teaching profession to continue to learn and stay apprised of current research to give students the best possible education (Schimmer, 2012). When a district or school becomes aware of the need for change, there is an obligation to address the underlying issues and all relevant facts, logic, and research. Professional development provides the optimal venue for learning, discussing, applying, and evaluating any proposed changes (DuFour &amp;amp; Marzano, 2011). Reeves (2007) asked, &amp;quot;What is the risk if we engage in this change compared to the risk of continuing our present practice&amp;quot; (p. 7). The risk of embracing a proposed change may include limited buy-in, fear of failure, or the perception of more work. Regardless of potential effects, growth can only come through change, and trying new methods is the only way to know what changes work (Schimmer, 2012). The continuation of current grading practices poses a threat to the educational process and the future of student learning by undermining motivation and presenting inaccurate information due to grades&apos; convoluted nature (Brookhart, 2009). Grades should not represent tradition, opinion, behavior, effort, homework, attendance, or any other extra-curricular components (O&apos;Connor, 2007). They should purely and simply report the student&apos;s comprehension of predetermined class standards and goals (Brookhart, 2009). There are new research based methods for grading and assessment that honor the meaning of the grade and could be introduced and implemented in schools across the country through professional development opportunities (Reeves, 2007). The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions of grading and assessment practices in Fall River Middle School and to analyze the impact of increased opportunities for professional development in grading and assessment practices on the staff. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562892</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Quantitative Study Exploring Grading and Assessment Practices in the Middle School Environment</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Northwest Nazarene University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8715-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>186</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599441</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Administrator Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conflict</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hancks, Meredith L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines the perceptions of faculty members regarding conflict experiences with administrators. It is driven by the question, &amp;quot;To what extent are faculty perceptions of positive and negative outcomes of faculty-administrator conflict associated with domain, nature and disciplinary context of the conflict,&amp;quot; where domain refers to the administrative or academic area of the conflict situation and nature refers to whether the conflict is task-based or interpersonal. The analysis is based on quantitative study of survey results. The results indicate that task nature of conflicts has greater association than relationship nature with positive and negative outcomes of conflict. These findings suggest that working to remedy task-related conflicts in these domains might improve the outcomes of conflict experiences between faculty and administrators. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562893</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Faculty Perceptions of Conflict with Administrators: An Analysis of the Associations between the Nature of Conflict and Positive and Negative Outcomes</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8126-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>135</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599030</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Hermeneutics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Needs Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pack, Mamie L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this hermeneutic phenomenological study was to understand, interpret, and present the finding of how second year participants of the Teach for America (TFA) program perceived their professional needs from the mentor assigned to then within the school district and within the Teach for America program. The participants were Teach for America participants who had completed their first year teaching and were assigned a mentor through the school district and one mentor through the TFA program. Through the findings of this phenomenological research, additional information may help school districts, TFA, and other education stakeholders with identifying and meeting the needs of this group of novice educators. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562894</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Help Needed: A Hermeneutic Phenomenology Study of the Experience of Teach for America Participants</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8387-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>145</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599225</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suprasegmentals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Native Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Native Speakers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mandarin Chinese</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Korean</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lexicology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sentences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lin, Candise Yue</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation project examined the influence of language typology on the use of segmentation cues by second language (L2) learners of English. Previous research has shown that native English speakers rely more on sentence context and lexical knowledge than segmental (i.e. phonotactics or acoustic-phonetics) or prosodic cues (e.g., word stress) in native language (L1) segmentation. However, L2 learners may rely more on segmental and prosodic cues to identify word boundaries in L2 speech since it may require high lexical and syntactic proficiency in order to use lexical cues efficiently. The goal of this dissertation was to provide empirical evidence for the Revised Framework for L2 Segmentation (RFL2) which describes the relative importance of different levels of segmentation cues. Four experiments were carried out to test the hypotheses made by RFL2. Participants consisted of four language groups including native English speakers and L2 learners of English with Mandarin, Korean, or Spanish L1s. Experiment 1 compared the use of stress cues and lexical knowledge while Experiment 2 compared the use of phonotactic cues and lexical knowledge. Experiment 3 compared the use of phonotactic cues and semantic cues while Experiment 4 compared the use of stress cues and sentence context. Results showed that L2 learners rely more on segmental cues than lexical knowledge or semantic cues. L2 learners showed cue interaction in both lexical and sublexical levels whereas native speakers appeared to use the cues independently. In general, L2 learners appeared to have acquired sensitivity to the segmentation cues used in L2, although they still showed difficulty with specific aspects in each cue based on L1 characteristics. The results provided partial support for RFL2 in which L2 learners&apos; use of sublexical cues was influenced by L1 typology. The current dissertation has important pedagogical implication as findings may help identify cues that can facilitate L2 speech segmentation and comprehension. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562895</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Use of Segmentation Cues in Second Language Learners of English</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8737-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>193</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599458</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Archives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature Reviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Newspapers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pizmony-Levy, Oren</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North America</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Europe</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Israel</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Israel</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>North America</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation examines a vital catalyst in the globalization of education: international assessments--that involve testing and rankings--of student achievement in academic subjects. Nearly all high-income countries participate in international assessments such as Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), and Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), and participation is also growing among low-income countries. Empirical research on these assessments, however, is less extensive than what might be expected. Three broad questions guide this dissertation: (1) How did international assessments become a rationalized educational practice? (2) Why did countries choose to participate in international assessments? (3) How international assessments are engaged in public discourse at the local level? Using a multi-method approach to address these questions, I draw on a variety of data sources: an extensive array of primary-sources materials from archives from North America and Europe, interviews with 45 key actors from 15 countries in the field of international assessments, an original data set that includes 130 independent nation-states and their record of participation in international assessments from 1964 to 2012, and newspapers articles from Israel to examine the integration of international assessments in public discourse. The analysis shows three key patterns. First, the field of international assessments emerged from a loose network of scholars oriented toward education research and later transformed into a set of organizations that emphasized accountability of education systems. This transformation was driven by two mechanisms: resources and international discourse about education. Second, the transformation toward educational accountability is implicated in the diffusion of international assessments worldwide. In the early stages of international testing, a country&apos;s embeddedness in Western scholarship affected participation in international assessments. Subsequently, when the field emphasized accountability, a country&apos;s embeddedness in world society affected participation in international assessments. Third, local actors&apos; engagement with international assessments--via processes of interpretation and appropriation--further legitimized international assessments. Taken together, these patterns suggest that the institutionalization of policy scripts--such as international assessments--is driven by dynamic processes that take place at the global and local level. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562896</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Testing for All: The Emergence and Development of International Assessment of Student Achievement, 1958-2012</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8278-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>209</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599130</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Format</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Caregivers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McIntyre, Joe</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gehlbach, Hunter</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Of all the approaches to collecting data in the social sciences, the administration of questionnaires to respondents is among the most prevalent. Despite their popularity, there is broad consensus among survey design experts that using these items introduces excessive error into respondents&apos; ratings. The authors attempt to answer the following question: what are the specific impacts on survey data quality if one uses statements and A-D response anchors as opposed to questions and construct-specific (C-S) response anchors? Data were collected from a nationally representative SurveyMonkey panel of parents/primary caregivers for school-aged children. In return for their participation, participants received the chance to win money for a charity of their choosing. The authors found strong evidence that web-pages with only AD items elicited more straight-lining than corresponding pages with only C-S items. To their surprise, it was found that A-D scale scores were frequently less reliable than C-S scale scores even before removing straight-liners. While the authors consider these findings to be conclusive, they believe that more work remains to be done, both theoretical and practical. Tables and scales from the two forms of the survey are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562897</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Cost of Agree-Disagree: Satisficing and Sacrificing Reliability</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>19</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Discourse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Power Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intellectual Disciplines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Heuristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culturally Relevant Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educationally Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disproportionate Representation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Developed Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Panayotova, Dora Marinova</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation reports on a study investigating the identity of first-year university students as writers. The longitudinal project explored how students from educationally disadvantaged backgrounds construct their identities as undergraduates and as academic writers in their first year. The research was qualitative and interpretative, and used identity and identity in writing as theoretical lenses. The setting was a 4-year institution of higher education in California. The participants were 4 first-generation college attendees from educationally underserved communities participating in the Equal Opportunity Program Bridge program at the university. Data collection included interviews with the students and faculty, observations and field notes from classes, students&apos; written coursework and other student-produced documents, course materials and documents, and conversations with students about specific pieces of writing. By researching the participants in different academic settings (e.g., courses, lectures, tutoring, support services) and through examining their writing, this project illuminates how students&apos; understanding of self is affected in the process of negotiating academia. I examined how students construct their identities as undergraduates and as academic writers from the texts and discourses available to them. Student identities are inextricably linked to the writing process and their writing products--student papers. I found that the participants in this study experienced complex power relationships as they attempted to build their identities in institutionally acceptable ways. Both the immediate educational contexts (e.g., students&apos; disciplines, discourses, and majors) and the larger social structures that position students (e.g., race, gender, and sexuality) affected students&apos; academic writing. If the participants could not reconcile their personal worldviews with the ideologies they perceived to be associated with a particular discipline, they switched to another major. Larger social structures (outside the academic context) that shaped the participants&apos; understanding of themselves (such as race, ethnicity, and sexuality) interacted with nonacademic identities shaped through lived experiences and personal histories. Both the larger social structures and the influences from the more local, academic contexts were traceable in the participants&apos; writing. This study demonstrates the potential of an identity lens to reveal and understand the personal connection between a student&apos;s writing self and her written products. It provides a heuristic model of student writing identity that connects how students&apos; identities in contexts outside their texts (extratextual identities) relate to their textual construction of author and authority (intratextual identities). The findings suggest that students would benefit from writing assignments that are not only culturally appropriate and relatable, but are also socially relevant and explicit in discussing race, gender, and class. I conclude by arguing that faculty in writing and other disciplines and staff in learning-support programs and services, like researchers, view student identity as relational and situated, and as pertinent to the academic experiences of undergraduate writers. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562898</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining First-Year Non-Dominant Students&apos; Experiences as Academic Writers: An Identity Perspective</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8388-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>204</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599224</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developing Nations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Field Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Health</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immunization Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Patients</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Laptop Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Use Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Humpage, Sarah Davidson</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Guatemala</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Peru</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Costa Rica</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Costa Rica</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Guatemala</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Peru</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation presents the results of three field experiments implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to improve the health or education of children in developing countries. In Guatemala, community health workers at randomly selected clinics were given patient tracking lists to improve their ability to remind parents when their children were due for a vaccine; this is found to significantly increase children&apos;s likelihood of having all recommended vaccines. This strategy is particularly effective for older children. In Peru, a teacher training program is found to have no effect on how frequently children use their computers through the One Laptop Per Child program. In Costa Rica, learning English as a foreign language using one software program is found to be significantly more effective than studying with a teacher, or with a different software program, confirming the heterogeneity of effects of educational technology. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562899</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Essays on Child Development in Developing Countries</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8135-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>186</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599039</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Sector</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Sector</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thomas, David E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This executive position paper proposes recommendations for designing reform models between public and private sectors dedicated to improving school reform work in low performing urban high schools. It reviews scholarly research about for-profit educational management organizations, high reliability organizations, American high school reform, and school reform models in Philadelphia. Research was reviewed and data was collected about the for-profit educational management organization Victory&apos;s Philadelphia high school reform work and analyzed through the lens of development, implementation and sustainability of school reform and the concepts and characteristics of high reliability organizations. Research and review of data showed that the initial development of a school reform model significantly impacted upon Victory&apos;s ability to successfully and completely implement and sustain reform. Regarding the ability to act as a high reliability organization in school reform, research and qualitative data showed that Victory was able to, at some measure, act as a high reliability organization in the majority of the concept areas although the results were heavily impacted by design impediments which influenced implementation and sustainability as seen in slow increments of student academic improvement. Furthermore, when analyzing survey responses of a cross-sector of individuals involved in Victory&apos;s design and implementation of its reform work in its Philadelphia high schools, qualitative survey data supports this overarching finding. Recommendations include school reform design models for low-performing urban high schools fashioned after high reliability organization design and the mutual collaboration and cooperation of public and private sectors in the design, implementation, and sustainability of school reform models for low-performing urban high schools. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562900</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Educational Management Organizations as High Reliability Organizations: A Study of Victory&apos;s Philadelphia High School Reform Work</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Wilmington University (Delaware)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8255-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>143</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599110</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Remedial Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developmental Studies Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conventional Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constructivism (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Andragogy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Charters, Christi R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many students lack adequate mathematic skills and must enroll in developmental math programs to satisfy the math requirement to earn a college degree, but developmental programs are often problematic with high failure rates, preventing graduation. This study examined whether the emporium model, a computer-based developmental math tool, was more effective than the traditional model at getting students through developmental math at a rural, Hispanic-serving community college. Constructivism, andragogy, and technology provided the theoretical framework. A quantitative methodology and nonexperimental secondary data analysis design was used with a nonrandom convenience sample. Archival data collected included age and ethnicity of students, and number of courses completed in three semesters for each instructional format. A chi-square test for independence revealed that the number of courses completed was dependent on course format, and that the emporium model was more effective than the traditional model at helping students complete the developmental math sequence in a shorter period of time. Traditional (18-24 years of age) and nontraditional (25 years plus) students completed more emporium courses than traditional courses. Nontraditional students completed more emporium courses than did traditional students. Hispanics and Whites both completed more courses with the emporium model. Overall, the emporium model may be more effective than the traditional model at getting students of all ages and ethnicities through the developmental sequence in a reduced amount of time. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562901</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Comparison of Completion Times in Traditional versus Computer-Based Developmental Math Programs</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8307-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>128</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599154</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Athletics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Athletes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Paying for College</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Athletic Coaches</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>D&apos;Anna, Debora L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that contributed to the persistence of first-time full-time student athletes at a small private college affiliated with National Association Intercollegiate Athletics. The study used focus groups to determine the factors related to the persistence of student athletes. The participants in the focus groups included 42 first-time full-time student athletes who persisted to the fall of the second year, six faculty members, and 20 staff members from the selected institution. The student athletes represented 15 different sports teams sponsored by the institution. Faculty chosen for the study either taught first year courses or advised first-time full-time student athletes. Staff represented all areas of the college and had significant contact with first-time full-time student athletes. The study was a qualitative study with a case study format. The four themes that emerged from the student athlete focus groups were opportunity to play their sport, individual attention, social connectedness and financial/ability to pay. These themes are concurrent with Bean&apos;s factors of institutional fit, financial/ability to pay and social integration. The themes from the faculty staff focus groups were influence or relationship with coach, financial aid packages and support from faculty and staff. These themes correlate with Bean&apos;s factors of institutional fit, financial/ability to pay and academic integration. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562902</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Student Athletes at Small Private Colleges: Why Do They Persist to the Second Year?</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8320-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>126</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599165</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Workload</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Recruitment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Salaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wood, Jennifer J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Nursing faculty workloads have come to the forefront of discussion in nursing education. The National League of Nursing (NLN) has made nursing faculty workloads a high priority in nursing education. Included in the priorities are areas of creating reform through innovations in nursing education, evaluating reform through evaluation research, and evidence-based reform through the development of the science of nursing (NLN, 2011). Several elements contribute to nursing faculty recruitment and retention. McClusky&apos;s theory of margin and Bandura&apos;s social cognitive theory reveals balance is necessary in nursing education. Faculty and students alike must have balance in their required work and their time. In addition, Bandura&apos;s theory demonstrates behavior is driven by the interaction of people with their environment. How faculty and students behave is critical in the success of the students, the faculty, and the nursing program entirely. This dissertation explores the influence of nursing faculty workloads and mentoring on recruitment and retention of qualified nursing faculty. There were six participants in the study who were masters prepared or higher level educators and were teaching in a baccalaureate degree program in a southwestern state. Included in the study parameters were nursing faculty in a baccalaureate degree program who taught either didactic, clinical, or both. Participants were between the ages of 19 and 70. The research conducted was a qualitative case study, which included exploring nursing faculty workloads by having the participants complete a demographic survey and then meet with the researcher for a face to face interview. The interviews were audiotaped for later transcription of the audio tapes to text by the researcher. The data were coded using the Atlas ti qualitative coding software to determine common themes from the information received. The information concluded that faculty was satisfied with their faculty workloads, but expressed concerns regarding student attitudes and salary. The faculty also expressed salary was not very significant since they all had substantial autonomy in their campus time and execution of material in their classrooms. Further research is required to explore student attitudes in the nursing programs and how student issues affect the overall workload of nursing faculty. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562903</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Influence of Nursing Faculty Workloads on Faculty Retention: A Case Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8431-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>111</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599266</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Space Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Motion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mashiku, Alinda K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Kolmogorov Smirnov Two Sample Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The current Situational Space Awareness (SSA) is faced with a huge task of tracking the increasing number of space objects. The tracking of space objects requires frequent and accurate monitoring for orbit maintenance and collision avoidance using methods for statistical orbit determination. Statistical orbit determination enables us to obtain estimates of the state and the statistical information of its region of uncertainty given by the probability density function (PDF). As even collision events with very low probability are important, accurate prediction of collisions require the representation of the full PDF of the random orbit state. Through representing the full PDF of the orbit state for orbit maintenance and collision avoidance, we can take advantage of the statistical information present in the heavy tailed distributions, more accurately representing the orbit states with low probability. The classical methods of orbit determination (i.e. Kalman Filter and its derivatives) provide state estimates based on only the second moments of the state and measurement errors that are captured by assuming a Gaussian distribution. Although the measurement errors can be accurately assumed to have a Gaussian distribution, errors with a non-Gaussian distribution could arise during propagation between observations. In order to obtain an accurate representation of the PDF that incorporates higher order statistical information, we propose the use of nonlinear estimation methods such as the Particle Filter. A Particle Filter (PF) is proposed as a nonlinear filtering technique that is capable of propagating and estimating a more complete representation of the state distribution as an accurate approximation of a full PDF. The PF uses Monte Carlo runs to generate particles that approximate the full PDF representation. Moreover, during longer state propagations, we propose to represent the final state vector as a compressed probability mass function (PMF). Multivariate PDF compressions are computationally costly and could potentially be numerically intractable. We tackle this issue by decorrelating the nonlinear multivariate state PMFs using an improved nonlinear factor analysis (NFA) that uses a multilayer perceptron (MLP) network to model the state nonlinearities and obtain the sources that also incorporates the Fast Independent Component Analysis (FastICA [a faster computational method for ICA]) to obtain the independent and decorrelated states. Methods such as the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) are based on utilizing moments that only incorporate the second order statistics, hence will not suffice in maintaining maximum information content. On the other hand, the Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is a non-Gaussian decorrelator that is based on a linear mapping scheme, that does not incorporate the non-linear information. The PDF compressions are achieved by implementing the fast-Fourier Transform (FFT) and the wavelet transform (WT) to construct a smaller subset of data for data allocation and transmission cost reduction. The accuracy of tracking the space objects as well as reduced costs will help increase the capability of tracking the increased number of space objects. We use statistical information measures such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test and the Kullback-Leibler Divergence (KLD) metric to quantify the accuracy of the reconstructed state vector and the cost reduction is measured by the number of terms required to represent the states. A performance plot illuminates the performances of the transforms over a range of compression rates. Simulations are performed on real and simulated data to demonstrate the approach for this work. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562904</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Information Measures for Statistical Orbit Determination</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8275-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>194</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599128</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Turnaround</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Consortia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Branch, Cynthia Monroe</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 put a focus on each child in a school being proficient. Since 1957 when Sputnik was launched, the United States has been attempting to improve its schools. The existing literature has a gap as to how to turn around an underperforming school in a fairly short period of time. A qualitative case study methodology was chosen to provide an in-depth, longitudinal examination as to how the principal and his team of both classified and unclassified staff were able to institute changes that dramatically increased their rural secondary school&apos;s performance academically from 50.9% to 90.6% among its students. The 2008 Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium Educational Leadership Policy Standards framed and focused this study of a school that may serve as a template for other educators trying to turn their school around and head it towards success for its students. Members of the staff of a rural secondary school were surveyed who were employed at the school during the time of this accomplishment. The results of the survey along with documents from the Internet brought insight into how the leadership turned the school into a highly achieving school in three short years. The questions this study answered included (a) How did the leadership team of educational professionals identify the major problem area inherent to this school? (b) What actions did the leadership team take to improve teacher effectiveness? (c) What actions did the leadership team take to unify the staff and get them to work collaboratively? (e) How did the leadership team improve the climate of the school? The purpose of this study was to examine the leadership behaviors and actions of school leadership to determine how they were able to take an underperforming school and turn it into a high achieving school in a fairly short period of time. What was not known was how they accomplished this feat. What actions did they take and why did they take those actions? What changed within that school from when it was underperforming to its now excelling status? These questions have been addressed in this study. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562905</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Turning the School Around: The Transformation of a Secondary School from Underperforming to Highly Achieving</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8302-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>144</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599150</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Based Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>James, Shondra Denise</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Differentiated instruction has become a trend in education across the country as a way of addressing the needs of all students. In this study, data were analyzed from a research site that used differentiated instruction in math as a way of raising performance within a small sampling of second grade students. The success of the intervention determined if the methodology would be utilized through various grade levels. Data reflected in the study were from two second grade classrooms within the research site. Students&apos; pre-assessments were taken at the beginning of the intervention and post-assessments were taken at the end of the intervention using Curriculum Based Measurement. Assessment results were compared to measure improvement within the two classrooms. Student results were compared to each other to range the percentage of growth after the intervention phase took place. Students&apos; pre and post assessment results were compared to each other. This was done to establish a percentage range of growth after the intervention phase took place. The results of this study are reflected on a spreadsheet to determine success of the intervention. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562906</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Does Differentiated Instruction Raise Student Performance in Mathematics: An Action Research Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8358-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>65</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599200</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Agnant Rogers, Myriam</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As a result of poor student performance, professional development has emerged as a key strategy for improving instruction and achievement. In times of reduced resources and increased accountability, schools must evaluate their efforts in order to make sound decisions about policy and practice. This mixed method study was designed to investigate professional development evaluation practices and whether a relationship exists between professional development evaluation and math achievement in two groups of middle schools in one county school district. One group of middle schools met state standards in mathematics and the other group of schools did not meet state standards. The study sought to assess the perceptions of middle school principals, staff development teachers, and district level staff development instructional specialists/directors regarding the five levels of professional development evaluation: participant reactions, participant learning, organization support and change, participants&apos; use of new knowledge and skills, and impact on student learning outcomes. According to Guskey (2002), the levels of evaluation are sequential and hierarchical and in order to increase the chance for successful impact on student achievement, all levels must be carefully considered in planning professional development experiences for teachers. These data were gathered through the use of a survey and focus group interviews . A survey instrument was designed to solicit perceptions of the levels of professional development evaluation in schools. There was no statistically significant difference between principals and staff development teachers in the schools that met state standards in mathematics and those who did not. The researcher conducted a one way analysis of variance of differences between the perceptions of professional development evaluation practices of principals, staff development teachers, and instructional specialists/directors in both met and non-met schools. Focus groups were held with principals, staff development teachers, and staff development instructional specialists/directors to identify the types and levels of professional development evaluation across middle schools. This study has training, policy and practice implications for middle school principals and staff development teachers as they implement professional development evaluation efforts aimed at improving middle school mathematics. It is expected that this research will assist school systems in their school improvement efforts. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562907</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Study of the Relationship between Professional Development Evaluation and Middle School Mathematics Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8717-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>193</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599443</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alternative Teacher Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teacher Induction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transfer of Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ellis, Andrea Michelle</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Oklahoma</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oklahoma</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this research was to examine mentoring practices for new teachers. In an effort to analyze the characteristics of effective mentors and mentoring practices, the primary goal of this study was to determine Oklahoma non-traditionally certified CTE teachers&apos; perceptions of characteristics and elements of the mentoring process from the perspective of the new teacher. This research focused on progressivism as a philosophy through which mentoring theory, learning transfer theory, teacher induction programs, and teacher retention/attrition were studied. Eighty-four non-traditionally certified CTE teachers in Oklahoma participated in an online survey regarding mentor characteristics and mentoring program elements. The online survey used the Mentor Role Instrument (MRI) and the Survey of Mentors of Beginning Teachers (SMBT) in addition to a demographics section. A link to the online survey was distributed via the researcher&apos;s email. The results of the online survey were analyzed and statistically significant results were found in many areas. For the MRI, the psychosocial mentor roles appear to be more influential on a positive perception of the mentor than the career development mentor roles. The &amp;quot;acceptance&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;friend&amp;quot; mentor roles had the highest mean score for the participants. All four of the SMBT factor areas (&amp;quot;teacher involvement/support,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;staff development,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;administrative support,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;resource materials&amp;quot;) were considered relatively important for mentoring programs by the participants in this study. Of the four factor areas, &amp;quot;teacher involvement/support&amp;quot; held the highest mean score. The protege teachers mentioned having the most difficulties in the areas of &amp;quot;learning district policies/being new,&amp;quot; their &amp;quot;mentor not being helpful,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;instructional methods/classroom management.&amp;quot; Overall, the protege teachers wanted more &amp;quot;help with culture, procedures, and deadlines&amp;quot; within their positions. Finally, recommendations for further research and recommendations for practice were stated. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562908</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Analyzing Perceptions of Mentoring: Voices of Oklahoma Non-Traditionally Certified Career and Technology Education Teachers</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7857-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>158</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598898</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Cultural Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intercultural Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnocentrism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Pluralism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hornbuckle, Gavin Christopher</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Southeast Asia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Asia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study is a mixed methods investigation of teachers&apos; views regarding the ways in which the intercultural competence (ICC) of students is developed at an international school in Southeast Asia. To gather data for the study a survey was administered to approximately 90 teachers in the high school section of an international school in Asia to which forty-six teachers responded. The statistical software SPSS was used to analyze the survey data. In addition, nine teachers were interviewed and administered the Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI). Demographic data were also gathered. The results of the study indicate that, in the view of teachers, there are four primary ways that the intercultural competence of students is developed at an international school in Southeast Asia: 1) By spending time with students of other nationalities, 2) The way in which the curriculum is taught in the classroom, 3) By a school environment that is supportive of cultural diversity and 4) By being proficient in English. Results of the IDI show that the nine teachers to whom it was administered had a group Developmental Score that fell within the range of low Minimization, indicating a more ethnocentric world-view, which is consistent with other studies investigating the intercultural competence of teachers in K-12 settings. Teachers whose Developmental Scores fell within Polarization focused on student nationality, culture and difference to a greater extent than those whose Developmental Scores fell within Minimization. These finding indicate that teachers believe immersion in cultural difference is sufficient for the intercultural competence of students to develop, however a growing body of literature points out that this is not the case. The IDI results indicate that teachers may not be prepared to be cultural mentors. There is a need for increased focus on intercultural competence in leadership and professional development programs in K-12 settings, as well as further research into the outcomes of curricular and co-curricular programs in international schools. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562909</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teachers&apos; Views Regarding Ways in Which the Intercultural Competence of Students Is Developed at an International School in Southeast Asia: A Mixed Methods Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8132-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>196</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599036</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phrase Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mandarin Chinese</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nouns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structural Analysis (Linguistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Form Classes (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hsu, Yu-Yin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation concerns the interaction of syntax and information structure in Mandarin Chinese and puts the theoretical assumption of parallelism between clauses and noun phrases to the test. It examines and validates the information structural status of the object phrases preposed to clause-internal positions. I argue that Rizzi&apos;s (1997) &amp;quot;fine structure of the left periphery&amp;quot; proposed for Indo-European languages can be extended from the analysis of phrases that appear at the clause periphery to the analysis of phrases appearing in the sentence-internal domain in Chinese. This proposal is attested through the examination of the interaction between the preposed objects and other constructions, such as &amp;quot;wh&amp;quot;-questions, the &amp;quot;ba&amp;quot;-construction, modals, the &amp;quot;lian&amp;quot;-construction and the cleft-construction. Moreover, I argue that the so-called verb-copying structure and the fixed ordering of Topic and Focus elements in Chinese are better accounted for under the proposed analysis. The result of this study then explains the compatibility and the restriction of the co-occurrence of CP and TP Foci. The study also attempts to clarify the internal syntactic structure and its semantic effects of nominal expressions in Mandarin Chinese comparing them with those in other languages (Giusti 1996 and Aboh 2004). It is argued that the occurrence of measure words in Chinese represents the notion of &amp;quot;unit&amp;quot; that defines and quantifies over the noun phrase, independent of projections of demonstratives and nouns. Finally, I argue that nominals in Chinese are parallel to clauses in encoding the information structural properties to the elements appearing at the left periphery and the internal domain. This proposal accounts for the semantics and the specific discourse functions expressed by various types of nominal expressions. It also accounts for the non-canonical distribution of adjectives, ellipses of various sizes of nominal phrases, and the phenomenon of internal reordering of words within nominal expressions. The dissertation introduces a wide range of new data which makes it possible to reevaluate previous proposals, and to propose a new perspective to examine the parallelisms between clauses and noun phrases in regard to the interaction between syntax and information structure. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562910</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Interaction of Information Structure and Syntactic Representation in Chinese</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8354-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>295</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599196</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Special Education Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lemons, Theresa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Indiana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Indiana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Attrition of special education teachers is a national problem resulting in lost monetary resources, school climate discontinuity, and lower student achievement. Within a small, rural district in southern Indiana, special education teacher attrition has risen since 2008 and continues to rise. District administrators want to retain teachers to ensure a continuity of instructional services for students with special needs. To explore this problem, an intrinsic qualitative case study was employed, guided by a research question that investigated the factors that special education teachers and administrators perceived as influencing special educators&apos; career decisions. Herzberg&apos;s motivation-hygiene theory and Billingsley&apos;s schematic representation of special education attrition and retention comprised the conceptual framework. Data collection included one-on-one semistructured interviews with 7 teachers and 5 administrators and teacher retention documents. Data analysis involved in vivo coding and an inductive process to collapse data into the 3 following themes: (a) daily challenges, (b) retention factors, (c) transfer or leaving factors. A project arose from the study. Using salient interview data, a professional development plan was designed to address teachers&apos; needs of relevant professional development (PD) and collaboration. The PD plan will establish a professional learning community and utilizes free evidence-based online training modules to support reading comprehension of students with special needs. Positive social change may result from improvements in PD support provided by the district to retain its special education teachers, resulting in greater continuity of instruction for students with special needs who depend on high quality, experienced educators. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562911</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Factors That Influence Special Education Teachers&apos; Career Decisions in a Rural School District in Southern Indiana</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8772-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>162</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599485</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technical Institutes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Support Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Occupational Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Involvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattison, Tamara D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Minnesota</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Minnesota</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>African American females at the community level have low persistence rates and the literature regarding motivation and success strategies for those who persist to graduation is limited. This study was designed to identify the motivation and success strategies used by African American females to graduate from community colleges in Minnesota. Phenomenological research, the study of lived experience was the method chosen to study African American female graduates. The participants were graduates of community and technical colleges in Minnesota over the age of 18. This minority student phenomenon, which represents the human experience in all its complexity, includes the academic and social problems associated with retention. Addressing this problem will provide much needed information regarding the experiences of African American females attending community colleges. The information gained from this study may help stakeholders understand the strategies used by African American females to persist to graduation and the critical academic support from of the institution necessary to increase graduation rates for this demographic. An emerging theme expressed by the 1982 to 2012 graduates was the need for African American females to have help with balancing school, work, and family. The results showed the participant&apos;s motivations for attending community college were their desire for career advancement, expectations from their parents, family and friends, and children. The success strategies included preparing academically, researching information from parents, counselors, friends, and family. Future research recommendations include studying motivation and success strategies of African American females and males based on generational differences. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562912</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>African American Female Community College Graduates: A Phenomenological Study of Motivation and Success Strategies for Persistence in Minnesota</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8468-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>160</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599300</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Paraprofessional School Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grounded Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Qualifications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Supply and Demand</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lucey, Liana L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Paraprofessionals play a key role on the field of special education and are vital to the overall success of a classroom, school and district. However, the lack of clear expectations and qualifications is problematic. The purpose of this grounded theory study was to assess the paraprofessional preparation, support, and training offered at the six high schools representing three districts within one county. The participants of this qualitative study included directors of special education, special education teachers and paraprofessionals who were interviewed on their perceptions of preparation needs of paraprofessionals and the training and supports provided. The results demonstrated little evidence to support the presence of paraprofessional training and support at the district or site level within the mild/moderate high school setting. The literature and findings support the fact that paraprofessionals are overlooked and untrained in our schools. The increase in the number of paraprofessionals working in public schools along with the continued pressures placed upon special education from legislation, parents, and districts has created a serious need for well-trained paraprofessionals. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562913</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Investigation of the Preparation Needs for Paraprofessionals Working in the Mild/Moderate Special Education Classroom at the High School Level</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, California Lutheran University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8843-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>121</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599506</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theory Practice Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Superintendents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bingham, Donald P.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Idaho</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Idaho</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Principals play a critical role in how a school performs and what type of culture it will have. However, most principal evaluation relies heavily on practices and beliefs grounded in 20th century educational paradigms or adheres to outdated behavioral checklists. This mixed methods study explores the current realities of principal evaluation in southeastern Idaho and the perceptions of 127 principals and superintendents. Findings suggest that there is a variance between written evaluation policies and current practices. Further, there was a statistically significant difference in the perceptions of principals and superintendents in nearly every aspect of principal evaluation studied. The study supports the need to revise and examine current practices being employed to assess principal job performance. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562914</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Mixed Methods Study Exploring the Realities and Perceptions of Principal Evaluation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Northwest Nazarene University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8682-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>111</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599421</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Allied Health Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nurses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physical Therapy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Identity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Volunteers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conference Papers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Associations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bolding, Deborah J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This basic qualitative study explored factors that influenced the development of professional role behaviors of nurses, occupational and physical therapists who were characterized as exemplars in the acute hospital setting. The participants, four occupational therapists, four nurses, and four physical therapists were interviewed using a semi-structured format, and the interviews were analyzed to determine themes. Participant selection was based on manager and colleague recommendations, knowledge, skills, experience, certifications, teaching abilities, leadership, participation in research or advocacy programs, and membership in professional organizations. Ten participants had presented posters or sessions at conferences. Most of the exemplars had volunteered on a short-term basis for community programs, and one was a volunteer for a community health clinic. Six of the 12 participants had earned post-professional degrees, and nine participants had earned one or more certificates related to advanced knowledge and skills in their practice areas. Professional behaviors appeared to be influenced by personal values and opportunities in the practice setting, and to a lesser extent by views of professionalism learned in academic setting or through professional organizations. The group exhibited values and traits for learning, advocacy, taking risks to reach goals, care, and commitment. Support for development came from family, mentors, colleagues, managers and colleagues. Tangible support in terms of money for education or paid time off was important for supporting activities, but not essential. Exemplars appeared to have the same pressures as their colleagues--managing work, families, relationships, and finding balance, but professional activities were also a priority. Barriers to participation in professional role behaviors included family obligations and sometimes lack of support from managers and colleagues. The exemplars had little memory of learning about professionalism in entry-level academic programs. Professional organizations were viewed as important for providing education; with only a limited recognition of the obligations professionals have toward professional governance. Several models, including self-directed learning, possible selves, theory of planned behavior, communities of practice, and management/leadership styles were used to help understand and explain the development of professional role behaviors. The most influential model appeared to be self-directed learning, although the others were influential for understanding how professional behaviors might be developed and strengthened. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562915</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Factors Influencing Role Behaviors by Professional Exemplars in Hospitals</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8300-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>209</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599148</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Hospitals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nurses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physicians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sleep</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physiology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Retrieval</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diagnostic Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Auditory Discrimination</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Auditory Stimuli</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Medical Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equipment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Records (Forms)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nguyen, Andrew V.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Physicians, nurses, and other clinical staff rely on alarms from various bedside monitors and sensors to alert when there is a change in the patient&apos;s clinical status, typically when urgent intervention is necessary. These alarms are usually embedded directly within the sensor or monitor and lacks the context of the patient&apos;s medical history and data from other sensors. A missed alarm may result in severe morbidity or mortality so alarm algorithms tend to err on the side of sensitivity. As a result, 40-90% of alarms within the clinical setting are false. These false alarms have a negative impact on patient care as clinicians become desensitized to the alarms. False alarms also directly impact patient recovery due to sleep interruption and increased anxiety. There is an increasing amount of research dedicated to improving clinical alarms but the field lacks a standardized approach to capturing, storing, processing, and analyzing physiological sensor data. This work focuses on the informatics issues and demonstrates a standardized platform for conducting research involving the combination of various clinical data sources (e.g. EHR/EMR) with physiological sensor data (including high resolution waveforms). This platform can also be easily extended into the clinical environment to eventually provide clinical decision support. The standardized approach presented has the additional benefit that researchers do not have to concern themselves with how to connect, retrieve, or format the data. They can focus solely on the higher level problems of designing the experiments, implementing algorithms, and interpreting results. A 3-stage computational pipeline was implemented on top of a Hadoop-based parallel computing platform to reduce the number of false alarms of ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. Two waveforms (ECG and arterial blood pressure) were fed through several feature extraction and change (point) detection algorithms, then through supervised learning algorithms to generate a model that was able to better detect true alarm situations. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562916</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Computational Pipeline to Improve Clinical Alarms Using a Parallel Computing Infrastructure</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, San Francisco</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8642-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>90</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599400</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Church Related Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Christianity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Mission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Church Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kirk, Kristi K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study provides a history and case study of Concordia University Texas (CTX). There has been a gap in the scholarly research literature regarding how and to what extent Concordia Texas mirrors the path of other denominational colleges and universities in terms of relationship to their founding church bodies. Therefore, the purpose of this study is understand how this institution has, both historically and currently, defined its purpose, ethos and mission as a Lutheran institution. The research questions focused on the development of the institutions mission and purpose; the changing relationship between the institution and its founding church body, the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod (LCMS); the institution&apos;s understanding of its own Lutheran ethos; and possibilities for the future relationship of Concordia and the LCMS. A qualitative history and case study was used that allowed the researcher to utilize both the historical documents from both CTX and the LCMS and 17 interviews with current and former faculty and administrators at both institutions. Findings from the study reveal that Concordia mirrors the path of other institutions as they sought to continually redefine their relationship to their founding church body and that the relationship between the 2 entities is at a critical juncture as they seek to redefine the relationship in a way that is practical and relevant for the modern educational context. Results from this study could prove useful to Concordia University Texas and the other institutions of the Concordia University System as well as other institutions who seek to better understand the nature of church-college relations. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562917</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Changing Nature of Church College Relations: A History and Case Study of Concordia University Texas</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8365-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>125</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599205</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Midlife Transitions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Independent Living</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Death</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metropolitan Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Records (Forms)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McDaniel, Brenda J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this collective embedded qualitative case study was to examine the perspectives of three middle-aged independent-living African Americans who had participated in the process of advance care planning (ACP) and completed at least two advance directives (ADs), a Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care (DPAHC) and a Living Will (LW). The contention was supported-that generating a description of factors coresearchers considered when making end-of-life health care decisions, determining the potential influence of such factors on future learning, and revealing the meaning ascribed to the completion of advance directives, may assist in understanding the gap between adults who think advance care planning is a good idea and those who go on to complete advance directives. Acquiring multiple forms of qualitative data illuminated how secondary data may be generated to answer research questions while primary data emerges from examining constitutional aspects of the educational research process itself. Seven categories emerged from data analysis, which included: Impetus and Intentional Consequences (IIC), Frame of Mind (FOM), Great Expectations (GE), Heart&apos;s Desire (HD), Angels for Proxies (AFP), Sustainability (S), In Lieu of Knowing (ILK), and, I&apos;ll Keep Mine, Thank You Very Much (Thanks). The qualitative educational research experience in advance care planning, as an entity, rose up to intersect with, and to compliment analysis of the quality and applicability of a pluralistic theoretical framework for organizing existing knowledge and generating new knowledge in the area of advance care planning at the processual- and community-levels. A most significant finding was the revelation that participants&apos; current health status was preceded, accompanied, or followed by, proactivity, or an acceptance of responsibility for managing personal health care. The educational research goal was then changed from striving to increase proactivity among other community-residing adults to targeting people who are already proactive health managers. Ultimately, the means was envisioned for potentially refining the research position and approach with a highly complex reiterative inquiry in the ACP domain. Limitations include only middle-aged African Americans, who are not health care workers, and who completed two specific ADs, in a large metropolitan city in the southwestern United States. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562918</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Middle-Aged Independent-Living African Americans&apos; Selections for Advance Directives: A Case Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8377-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>282</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599214</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>French, N. Shalene</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Idaho</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Idaho</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) provide the basis for meeting the challenges and expectations in today&apos;s educational environment. Effective PLCs provide the framework for school improvement and ultimately impact student academic success. School leadership is fundamental in this process (Bennis, 2009; Buffum, Mattos, &amp;amp; Weber, 2009; Carter, 2007; Day, Leithwood, &amp;amp; Sammons, 2008: DuFour &amp;amp; Eaker, 1998; Fullan, 2001; Leithwood, Harris, &amp;amp; Hopkins, 2008; Leithwood, Mascall, Strauss, Sacks, Memon, &amp;amp; Yashkina, 2007; Marzano &amp;amp; Waters, 2009; Spears, 2005; Steiner, Hassel, &amp;amp; Hassel, 2008) and the building principal is the central figure. This project explored district-wide implementation of school level PLCs and the role school administration played in implementing a PLC culture. This mixed-methods study examined how district level administrative support helped establish a PLC culture of continuous improvement through quality professional development, role modeling, and observed expectations. Faculty members and administrators from a geographically diverse Eastern Idaho district participated in this PLC research study in an effort to answer the following questions: To what extent are the foundational principles of PLCs established throughout the district? What differences between elementary and secondary schools exist in the implementation of PLCs? What differences in teacher and principal perception exist regarding the implementation of PLC in a building? [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562919</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Whatever It Takes: A Mixed Methods Study Evaluating the Implementation of Professional Learning Communities across a District</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Northwest Nazarene University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8693-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>153</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599428</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alternative Teacher Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lesson Plans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journal Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experienced Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Duncan, Benjamin R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Elements essential to effective teaching are closely aligned with the domains of a teacher&apos;s pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) (Park &amp;amp; Oliver, 2008). Often, alternatively trained teachers enter the teaching profession lacking exposure to pedagogical events that allow these educators opportunities to reflect on their practice and construction of their PCK (Friedrichsen et al., 2007); yet little is known about the knowledge of experienced alternatively trained educators and the complexities associated with their PCK development. The purpose of this study was to describe the nature and sources of alternatively trained secondary school science teachers&apos; PCK after gaining classroom experience. The Park and Oliver (2008) hexagon PCK model was used as the theoretical framework. A case study of two experienced secondary science teachers at a school in the southeastern region of the United States was conducted. Data were collected from multiple sources, such as interviews, classroom observations, participant field journals, lesson plans, classroom assignments, classroom assessments, and researcher&apos;s field notes. Data analysis was conducted using the constant comparative method, qualitative deductive analysis, and a content representation. The results showed that experienced alternatively trained science teachers&apos; PCK development was heavily influenced by each teacher&apos;s orientation to science teaching. Alternatively trained science teachers compensated for their lack of pedagogical training by relying heavily upon their content knowledge, their knowledge of students, and past experiences. Even after gaining years of experience in a school setting, alternatively trained teachers still lacked familiarity with traditional educational terminology and practices, rather relying upon instructional approaches and techniques independently acquired while each teacher was in &amp;quot;survival&amp;quot; mode. This study provides several implications for teacher preparation, research, and policy. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562920</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Case Study of Alternatively Trained Science Teachers: Attainment of Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Tennessee State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8691-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>292</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599426</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Electronic Libraries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Archives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Library Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Christianity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Primary Sources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Library Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Church Related Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hall, Taffey</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to explore the construction of a collaborative Baptist digital library and archive on the Internet. The study investigated how a central electronic location of digitized Baptist primary source materials could look and work on the Internet and how such a project could benefit Baptist history professors, the primary user group of libraries and archives at Baptist institutions. The study explored two sub-research questions: (1) What are suggestions for the design and function of a collaborative Baptist digital library and archive?; and (2) what are suggestions for material selection and use of such a project? The study was timely and important to the field of higher education leadership and administration because it spoke to the impact emerging digital technologies are making on academic research and scholarship, and the avenues through which professors teach and students learn in the 21st century. The study used the case study research method to investigate the central phenomenon through several lenses. Validity and reliability were established through triangulation, member checks, peer review, and reflexivity. Information was gathered and analyzed from archival documents, online sources, materials from participating Baptist history professors, and nine interviews with the professors. Cross data analysis revealed four emergent themes: (1) overall interest in developing a collaborative Baptist digital library and archive on the Internet; (2) that digitized Baptist primary source materials can enhance the teaching, learning, and research of Baptist history; (3) differences in material type and content preferences for inclusion in a Baptist digital library and archive; and (4) differences in the project management protocol methodologies for constructing such a project. The emergent themes provided insight into suggestions for moving forward with a collaborative Baptist digital library and archive, suggestions for scholarly use of the project, implications and considerations for other collaborative digital library and archive projects, and implications for higher education. Future research studies on this topic could include quantitative and mixed methods studies that use larger samples of Baptist history professors or samples of professors from other academic disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. A more in-depth qualitative study could also be conducted. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562921</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Creating Collaboration: Exploring the Development of a Baptist Digital Library and Archive. A Case Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Tennessee State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8696-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>178</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599430</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Licensing Examinations (Professions)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Exit Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prior Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clinical Teaching (Health Professions)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sequential Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Simpson, Janis Lee</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this quantitative research study was to determine the degree to which Licensed Practical Nursing programmatic variables positively correlate with select Tennessee Technology Center institution pass rates on the licensure examination--NCLEX-PNRTM. This study investigated the relationship between the dependent variable of NCLEX-PNRTM success and licensed practical nursing students&apos; scores on comprehensive exit examinations, race or ethnicity, gender, prior educational level, sequence of courses taught, number of theory hours, and number of clinical hours assigned for 1,010 graduates from practical nursing programs in six Technology Centers in Tennessee from 2007 to 2010. The results showed a positive correlation (+0.18) between the Caucasian ethnicity group in one of six institutions, and a significant negative correlation in this same institution (-0.20) in the African-American ethnicity group in relation to success on the NCLEX-PNRTM. A weak negative correlation (-0.13) was also found in one institution in the African-American ethnicity in relation to success on the NCLEX-PNRTM. The hypotheses tested using Chi-square analysis revealed a statistical significance between scoring levels two and three in both Institutions A and B on standardized comprehensive tests in relation to success on the licensure examination--NCLEX-PNRTM. As students scored in level three, they were more likely to pass the licensure examination. This lends support to administration of comprehensive exit examinations. A negative correlation was found in three institutions in the scoring level &amp;quot;Below Level 1&amp;quot; on the comprehensive exit examination and success on the licensure examination. There were no statistically significant correlations found for the variables: gender, prior educational level, course sequences, and theory or clinical hours assigned for each practical nursing program with success on the NCLEX-PNRTM. These findings will contribute to development of further research guiding nursing education programs. Recommendations from the research to further investigate academic variables specific to facility programs will lead to the enhancement of admission policies, remediation policies and curriculum development throughout nursing programs. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562922</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Analysis of Programmatic Variables Relating to the Pass Rates on the Licensure Examination by Practical Nurses in Tennessee Technology Centers</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Tennessee State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8710-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>141</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599438</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Childrens Rights</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Rights</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Readability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Documentation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Empowerment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Informed Consent</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advocacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dinnesen, Megan Schneider</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Procedural safeguards have been in place for years with the intention of protecting the rights of parents and their children with disabilities. Despite the promises of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, parents have not been given the tools they need to be active participants in their child&apos;s special education. Parents of children with disabilities must be informed of their rights and responsibilities in documents that are cogent and concise and clearly communicate the expectation that parents will advocate for their children. Review of the documents currently used to inform parents of their rights, as well as relevant literature on the topic, indicated that parents are not truly being empowered to give informed consent. This study examined parent satisfaction with a procedural safeguards document intentionally designed for parents of children with disabilities with attention to usability and readability (&amp;quot;Making it My IDEA&amp;quot;). Survey and interview data collected in this study demonstrated that parents of children with disabilities see a need for re-designed documents and need information from the schools that is functional and pertinent. Parents involved in this study unanimously preferred the re-designed document. The implementation of rights notices that authentically inform parents could bring about a shift in the culture of special education and include all parents as active participants in their child&apos;s special education. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562923</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Making It My IDEA: Notice of Procedural Safeguards Designed for Increased Readability</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8450-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>88</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599284</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Personality Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Antisocial Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burns, Cardra E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Computer deviance by employees, defined as malicious and nonmalicious computer use behaviors, has contributed to billions of dollars of monetary and productivity losses for public and private sector organizations. The purpose of this correlational study was to examine the relationship between personality characteristics and employees&apos; computer deviance. Trait theory formed the theoretical framework for this study. The research questions addressed whether a relationship existed between personality characteristics (honesty-humility and conscientiousness) and computer deviance. Data were collected using the HEXACO-100 personality inventory and the Personal Use of Work Computers (PUWC) survey, which was transferred into a web-based survey and administered via random clustering and snowball sampling to 85 public sector employees in the southeastern United States. A Pearson product-moment correlation analysis indicated a statistically significant negative relationship (p &amp;lt; 0.02) between certain personality characteristics and computer deviance. Specifically, employees with stronger honesty-humility and conscientiousness personality characteristics were less inclined to commit computer deviance. The results of this correlational analysis furthered the understanding of the area of computer deviance committed by employees. Organizational leaders could use these findings to foster an organization with employees who perform daily operations ethically and ensure the security of electronic information. Implications for positive social change include providing organizational leaders with an understanding of why employees commit computer deviance. This information could aid in decreasing loss of revenue as well as productivity associated with such actions. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562924</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between Personality and Computer Deviance</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.B.A. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8764-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>124</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599478</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Science Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stinson, John Kevin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Ohio</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Ohio</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>It has become standard practice for teachers to step into the role of &amp;quot;teacher leaders&amp;quot; and perform a variety of curriculum, instruction and assessment tasks for schools and school districts. The literature regarding these Ohio K-12 teacher leaders, who may perform these tasks in addition to or in lieu of regular teaching assignments, rarely includes a disciplinary focus. In this exploratory, descriptive study the results of a web-based survey containing both closed and open-ended items were used in an inquiry into teacher leaders working with the discipline of science. Data from Ohio teachers responding to the survey were used first to create a standard profile for science teacher leaders. Descriptive statistics and correlations were then performed on quantitative survey data to explore science teacher leader tasks and factors that influence task performance. Analysis of data included descriptions of sense of purpose for their role held by these science teacher leaders. Results indicate that science teacher leaders appear to embrace their role as advocates for science and have great potential for implementing science education reform as well as other science-related school initiatives. Aligning performance, administrative oversight, impact on student achievement and teacher training concerning tasks science teacher leaders are expected to perform would enhance this potential. However, science teacher leaders face challenges to realizing that potential due to ambiguity of their leadership role, the breadth of tasks they tend to perform and lack of alignment between task and outcomes. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562925</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Science Teacher Leaders: Exploring Practices and Potential</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8491-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>170</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599321</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Based Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Full Time Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Program Divisions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sex</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prior Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Curtis, Heidi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>While questions exist about the effectiveness of online education, it is a growing part of the pantheon of educational choices available to students in America today. Though online education first gained popularity for advanced learners, increasingly at-risk populations are enrolling in online learning environments. Research in K-12 full-time, online learning environments is nearly non-existent. This mixed-methods study investigates student achievement in the full-time, online learning environment and the effect parents have on student success. Descriptive statistics and Pearson&apos;s Correlation&apos;s found statistically significant relationships between the variables of grade point average and socioeconomic status, family configuration, education of the parent, student grade level, gender and previous online experience. Themes from semi-structured interviews found parents of current or former students in a full-time, online school perceive multiple facets of student success in the online environment. The school can provide support to families by communicating, being transparent with tools, and individualizing instruction. Students must be self-motivated, engaged and participating, and accountable for their own learning. Parents should be available to monitor, mentor, and motivate students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562926</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Mixed Methods Study Investigating Parental Involvement and Student Success in High School Online Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Northwest Nazarene University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8690-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>160</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599425</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Turnaround</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflective Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transcripts (Written Records)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jimerson, Linda D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Secondary school students in the 21st-century are faced with political, economic, and social trends that often pose crises such as performing below levels of proficiency on state mandated assessments. Restructuring school cultures within various schools and districts were noted through the establishment of professional learning communities (PLCs). The purpose of this phenomenological, qualitative study was to give a descriptive account of a newly formed professional learning community by examining three areas that transformed a culture within a struggling secondary school. Specifically, the research questions focused on the perspectives of professional educators in terms of purposeful reflections within PLCs, leadership within PLCs, and collaboration within PLCs were explored. Three teachers working in secondary schools in the Midwest region of the United States participated were interviewed in depth. Transcriptions of the interviews were read in their entirety, and meaningful units were noted and interpreted. The perceptive findings cited professional learning communities as systematic and structured methods of reform. The success of the method, however, was perceived to be predicated on collaborative effort, valued perspectives, effective leadership, and reflective insight among all stakeholders. A consideration of this study focuses on further research in the areas of secondary professional learning communities undergoing reform. In addition, similar research in the areas of student learning communities (SLCs) and literacy learning communities (LLCs) may be an additional consideration. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562927</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Professional Learning Communities in Secondary Schools: Purposeful Reflection, Leadership and Collaborative Practice</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8360-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>153</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599202</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>American Indian Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Womens Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tribes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Women Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tribally Controlled Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sitting Crow, Karen Paetz</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The dynamics of Native American female leadership is becoming a more prevalent topic in the scholarly literature as more educated Native American women become visible in tribal higher education. This qualitative case study explored Native American female leadership, as a growing number of Native American women enter higher education and earn doctorates. The research explored the opportunities and challenges that have influenced Native American women who are leaders in Tribal Colleges and Universities, the significance they place on their culture and heritage as leaders, their roles in policy and institutional change, and their perspectives regarding their leadership roles. The study revealed many aspects of Native American female leadership in higher education and how it interfaces with Native American culture. Participants&apos; stories revealed that the development of leadership skills for Native American women is rooted in the oral traditions of Native American culture. The cultural makeup of the participants was varied and extraordinary; this group of Native American women shared their individual stories and journeys to leadership in tribal higher education so that Native American women and others who aspire to become leaders can benefit from their experiences. All participants agreed that tribal politics, curriculum development, providing authentic cultural learning experiences, and tribal sovereignty are challenges for the continuing development of Tribal Colleges and Universities. The leadership styles and approaches were as diverse as the group of unique and individual participants. However, one resounding aspect of their leadership is the importance of maintaining cultural identity, oral traditions, and heritage, which participants agreed are the foundation for developing professional and personal leadership skills. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562928</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Tribal Colleges and Universities in the 21st Century: Native American Female Leadership in Tribal Higher Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8403-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>126</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599239</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Social Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Affective Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web 2.0 Technologies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Collaborative Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Based Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carrigan, Robert L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 2006, the U.S. Department of Education commissioned a report called, &amp;quot;Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education&amp;quot;, asking educators to, &amp;quot;...test new teaching methods, content deliveries, and innovative pedagogies using technology-based collaborative applications&amp;quot; (p. 6). Fittingly, technology-based collaborative applications such as those associated with Web 2.0 technologies have increased rapidly in educational environments in recent years. Yet limited research is available on the design strategies instructional designers employ with technology-based collaborative applications commonly referred to as social networking tools. The purpose of this study was to identify instructional design strategies seen as effective in online learning environments that use a social networking tool, such as a wiki, to enhance the affective domain. Using a descriptive method research approach, this study investigated the design strategies employed with a social networking application to enhance the affective learning domain. Data gathered from this study documented the opinions of 32 experienced instructional designers integrating a wiki into soft-skills training to enhance the affective domain. This study was accomplished using a new survey created for this research by the investigator. The survey employed a Likert-type rating scale to assess agreement and solicit instructional designer input on design strategies seen as effective to enhancing the affective domain. Based upon the opinions of experienced instructional designers the following themes emerged from the analysis of data. First, the majority of instructional designers surveyed agreed or strongly agreed that the 20 identified design strategies are effective for enhancing learning in the affective domain when using a social networking tool, such as a wiki. Second, most of the courses identified involved the development of intrapersonal and interpersonal skills (i.e. Soft Skills). Third, the instructional design processes used by participants of this study closely related to the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) process of instructional design, which is common to the Department of Defense. Overall, the results show that instructional designers can employ specific design strategies to impact a student&apos;s motivation, belief, feeling, tone, emotion, or a degree of acceptance or rejection concerning the educational material. Using design strategies identified in this study will help instructional designers create online instruction where students communicate, collaborate, and learn using Web 2.0 technologies. Data gathered during this study may provide educators interested in using social networking applications in course designs the knowledge and inspiration needed to prepare today&apos;s student for learning in the digital age. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562929</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Social Networking and the Affective Domain of Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8306-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>250</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599153</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Todd, Preston</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>External stakeholders hold higher education institutions accountable for the rate students persist and graduate. When identifying at-risk student populations, one group involves students whose parents did not graduate. These students are known as first-generation students. There are many challenging factors facing first-generation college students in their quest to graduate. Institutions have a responsibility to provide support services targeted to promote student success and retention. This study provides a comprehensive examination of retention strategies recognized as influencing first-generation student retention in the first year of college at one institution. The selected institution was identified as having first-year retention rates in the top quartile of members for a Midwestern private and independent college association. Administrators, faculty members, and staff members provided keen insight regarding their efforts to effectively support first-year first-generation college students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562930</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Institutional Factors Influencing First-Generation College Students in the First Year: A Case Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8414-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>132</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599248</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Stereotypes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Psychology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Negative Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Walker, Michael E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bridgeman, Brent</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A recent study by Beilock, Reidell, and McConnell (2007) suggested that stereotype threat experienced in one domain (e.g., math) triggered by knowledge of a negative stereotype about a social group in that particular domain can spill over into subsequent tasks in totally unrelated domains (e.g., reading). The authors suggested that these findings might have implications for how the ordering of sections on standardized tests such as the SAT or GRE could affect examinee performance. To test the authors&apos; assertions, this study used data from a recent SAT administration in which either a reading, a math, or a writing task preceded a reading task. Performance on the subsequent reading task of members of a stereotype threatened group (i.e., women) who took the math task first was compared to performance of those who took the reading or writing task first. Results were inconsistent with the stereotype threat spillover hypothesis, and serve to justify the exhortation of Cullen, Hardison, and Sackett (2004) for caution in generalizing lab findings on stereotype threat to operational testing situations.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562931</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Stereotype Threat Spillover and SAT® Scores. Research Report No. 2008-2. ETS RR-08-28</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dual Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sex</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Memorization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Study Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Haley, Katrina A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study provides an in-depth analysis of whether students who take dual enrollment and/or AP classes have higher ACT test scores compared to a group of their peers that did not take dual enrollment or AP courses. The study also identified the demographic characteristics (ethnicity, gender, and socio-economic status) of students with a 3.0 or higher who were enrolled in dual enrollment and/or AP courses compared to students with comparable GPAs who did not enroll. Using a mixed methods model, this research incorporated academic student data and interview responses from teachers to explore their perceptions of advanced placement and dual enrollment classes and ACT test scores. The quantitative section focused on a group of high school seniors from a rural high school in the middle Tennessee area with GPAs of 3.0 or higher. The data collected was ACT composite and sub-scores, class enrollment, ethnicity, gender, grade point average, and socio-economic status. The qualitative section focused on four selected teachers in the Middle Tennessee area who taught AP and/or dual enrollment classes within various high schools. An analysis of the archival student data and one-on-one interviews demonstrated that the overall impact of dual enrollment and AP classes suggests that these classes aid in improving ACT composite and sub-scores. The quantitative data analysis findings reported that gender and ethnicity effects academic achievement of students who are enrolled or not enrolled in these kinds of classes. However, the quantitative data analysis did not determine that socioeconomic status effected students included in this study, but the qualitative one-on-one interviews did conclude that low socio-economic status does negatively affect students&apos; academic performance within these classes. Based on the analysis of the one-on-one teacher interviews, it was concluded that more professional development should be provided to all teachers to promote reading for content and less memorization in the classroom. Teachers highlighted the need for students to learn effective study skills and time management skills. The participants also expressed the need for all classes to hold students to high expectations and offer a challenging and rigorous curriculum to help improve ACT test scores and increase enrollment in AP and dual enrollment courses. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562933</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Comparative Study of High School Advanced Placement and Dual Enrollment Programs Using a Mixed Methods Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Tennessee State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8695-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>121</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599429</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Licensing Examinations (Professions)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smiley, Garrett</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>E-learning has grown to such an extent that paper-based testing is being replaced by computer-based testing otherwise known as e-exams. Because these e-exams can be delivered outside of the traditional proctored environment, additional authentication measures must be employed in order to offer similar authentication assurance as found in proctored, paper-based testing. This dissertation addressed the need for valid authentication in e-learning systems, in e-examinations in particular, and especially in professional certification e-examinations. Furthermore, this dissertation proposed a more robust method for learner authentication during e-examination taking. Finally, this dissertation extended e-learning research by comparing e-examination scores and durations of three separate groups of exam takers using different authentication methods: Online Using Username/Password (OLUP), In-Testing Center (ITC), and Online with Multibiometrics (OLMB) to better understand the role as well as the possible effect of continuous and dynamic multibiometric authentication on professional certification e-examination scores and durations. The sample used in this study was based on participants who were all professional members of a technology professional certification organization. The methodology used to collect data was a posttest only, multiple, non-equivalent groups quasi-experiment, where age, gender, and Information Technology Proficiency (ITP) were also recorded. The analyses performed in this study included pre-analysis data screening, reliability analyses for each instrument used, and the main analysis to address each hypothesis. Group affiliation, i.e. type of authentication methods, was found to have no significant effect on differences among exam scores and durations. While there was a clear path of increased mean e-examination score as authentication method was relaxed, it was evident from the analysis that these were not significant differences. Age was found to have a significant effect on exam scores where younger participants were found to have higher exam scores and lower exam durations than older participants. Gender was not found to have a significant effect on exam scores nor durations. ITP was found to have a significant effect on exam scores and durations where greater scores with the ITP instrument indicated greater exam scores and lower exam durations. This study&apos;s results can help organizations better understand the role, possible effect, and potential application of continuous and dynamic multibiometric authentication as a justifiable approach when compared with the more common authentication approach of User Identifier (UID) and password, both in professional certification e-examinations as well as in an online environment. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562934</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Investigating the Role of Multibiometric Authentication on Professional Certification E-Examination</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8599-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>325</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599364</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Engineering Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Textbooks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Maximum Likelihood Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Concept Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ene, Emanuela</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Following the trend in science and engineering education generated by the visible impact created by the Force Concept Inventory (FCI), the investigator developed a Physics of Semiconductors Concept Inventory (PSCI). PSCI fills the need of standardized concept tests for undergraduate education in photonics and electrical engineering. The structure of the PSCI test followed a concept map reflecting the input from a panel of experts from different universities and from a survey of textbooks currently used in engineering schools in the United States. Based on the statistical analysis of the scores and response patterns, the test was calibrated as an instrument to measure participants&apos; cognitive ability independent of items&apos; difficulty. The models employed were the Rasch Model and the Rasch Partial Credit Model. The estimation procedure employed was Conditional Maximum Likelihood. The analysis was carried on using algorithms written in the open-source language R. The current PSCI BETA test contains eighteen calibrated items covering six concepts of the physics of semiconductors. PSCI BETA may be used for three purposes: individual student diagnostic if applied at the beginning of a physics of semiconductors course; predictor for students&apos; academic performance in the field of semiconductors if applied at the end of instruction; assessment instrument for instructional strategies if applied both for pre- and post-instruction. The PSCI BETA instrument can be applied in any English speaking college setting. The main results of the PSCI research are: ranking persons&apos; ability related to the physics of semiconductors on an objective linear scale, building a diagnose matrix that may be utilized by instructors for choosing an optimal teaching approach and by students for remediation, and demonstrating a calibration method for small sample size. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562935</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessing Conceptual Knowledge for the Physics of Semiconductors</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7855-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>258</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598896</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Charter Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Coaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Human Capital</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compensation (Remuneration)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Angrist, Joshua D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cohodes, Sarah R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dynarski, Susan M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pathak, Parag A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Walters, Christopher R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>One of the most important questions in education research is whether the gains from interventions for which perceived short-term success can be sustained. The possibility of short-lived impacts is especially relevant for research on charter schools, where charter operators who face high-stakes assessments have an incentive to &amp;quot;teach to the test.&amp;quot; The fact that charters are subject to intense scrutiny and evaluation may even create incentives for cheating (Jacob and Levitt, 2003), strategic instruction (Jacob, 2007), and a focus on small groups of students that are pivotal for official accountability measures (Neal and Schanzenbach, 2010). The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of attendance at Boston&apos;s charter high schools on outcomes where the link with human capital and future earnings seems likely to be sustained and strong. Specifically, the authors focus on outcomes that are either essential to or facilitate post-secondary schooling: high school graduation, the attainment of state competency thresholds, scholarship qualification, Advanced Placement (AP) and SAT scores, college enrollment, and college persistence. Importantly, most of these outcomes are less subject to strategic manipulation than are the state&apos;s test-based assessments. As in earlier work, the research design implemented here exploits randomized enrollment lotteries at oversubscribed charter schools. The resulting estimates are likely to provide reliable measures of average causal effects for charter applicants. Six tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562936</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Stand and Deliver: Effects of Boston&apos;s Charter High Schools on College Preparation, Entry, and Choice</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwc_reviewed>Meets Evidence Standards without Reservations</eric:wwc_reviewed>
<eric:wwcguide_link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/study/77769</eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transitional Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiential Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropout Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hatfield, Tammy H.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_law>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Students with disabilities are faced with many challenges as they transition from high school to postsecondary education, enter the workforce, and begin independent living. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990 (IDEA) initially addressed these challenges by mandating that transition planning be included as a part of the Individualized Education Plan (IEP) for a student with disabilities by the age of 16 or younger, if approved by a state education department. The state of Tennessee requires transition planning to begin by the age of 14. The federal IDEA mandate for transition planning does not mandate the type of transition program(s) to be provided in school districts, nor does IDEA mandate that a specific amount of federal money be spent on transition programs in school districts. This lack of federal guidance has become problematic and the result is that transition programs are not consistent as one compares among school districts and across states. Despite the efforts of the federal IDEA regarding transition programs, students with disabilities, as compared to their non-disabled peers, typically have experienced lower graduation rates, higher drop-out rates, and have graduated from high school and are unprepared for the world ahead of them. This mixed-methods research study analyzed the perceptions of special education administrators and the provision of transition programs in 120 Tennessee K-12 school districts. The participants responded to survey questions regarding the current transition programs and the future plans for transition programs in their local school district. Two special education administrators were interviewed to obtain an in-depth perception of transition programs in their respective school districts. Additionally, this study analyzed the effects of work-based learning opportunities and the hiring of transition coordinators on graduation rates of students with disabilities, drop-out rate, and ACT scores of K-12 school districts in Tennessee. The major findings of this study included the students who attend schools in the more populated districts, typically have access to more types of transition programs than those who attend in smaller districts. Additionally, the offering of work-based learning programs and the employment of transition coordinators do not have an effect on ACT scores, the drop-out rate, or attendance rates. Special education administrators understand the value and importance of transition services, however, budget and time constraints do not allow the administrators to address transition services as they would desire. The above findings from this study may provide information for the Tennessee State Department of Education, Division of Special Populations, the Tennessee State Department of Education Transition Planning Team, and local school district administrators as the state continues to promote transition program improvements. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562937</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Mixed Methods Study of Special Education Administrators in Tennessee on Transition Services for High School Students with Disabilities</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Tennessee State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8698-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>160</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599432</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Environmental Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Water</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Facilitators (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Edwards, Warren Patrick</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Scope and Method of Study: The researcher&apos;s evaluation of the West Atlanta Watershed Alliance&apos;s (WAWA) programs highlighted that few if any of the offered educational programs included a program evaluation, especially the most promising, the Enviroscape® Watershed learning module. The education programs that were customized and developed by the education staff did not offer evaluations either. Additionally, these programs did not offer a pre or posttest. Students would visit the center, experience the &amp;quot;learning&amp;quot; and then leave. The problem was that no system was in place to assess the transfer of content or whether learning occurred. The purpose of this education study was to determine if the Enviroscape® Watershed learning module increases content knowledge, by collecting data from urban-suburban schools from third, fourth and fifth grade students. The sample population consisted of 62 elementary students in grades three, four and five from urban and suburban school districts. These participants were involved in the Watershed Alliance Outdoor Activity at the Bush Mountain Outdoor Activity Center from the years of 2011 to 2012. Findings and Conclusions: The researcher, in partnership with the designer of the Enviroscape® Module, and the OAC Education director, was able to collect data from trained education facilitators at school sites from suburban and the Urban Atlanta Areas. Educators were recruited to participate in the study based on their prior experience with environmental activities at the center, and were teaching third, fourth and fifth graders. A slight increase was found between the pretest and posttest of participants&apos; scores on the science content knowledge. After conducting a T-Test analysis of the data however, it was concluded that no significant difference existed between the scores. The results also showed no significant increase in the mean scores between urban and suburban participants&apos; content knowledge science scores. Furthermore, the results of an ANOVA analysis of the data showed that there was not a significant difference between the groups in the science content knowledge for participants in the third, fourth and fifth grades. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562938</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessing the Value of the Enviroscape Watershed Learning Module</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7856-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>85</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598897</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Family Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Occupational Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Qualities</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hankinson, Marie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Middle managers in higher education hold diverse titles and perform a variety of roles. Women represent a large portion of this midlevel management, but there is limited research exploring their experiences. As a result, little is known about women middle managers&apos; career trajectories and what effect their experiences have on their future career plans. It is not clear if these women want to advance to senior roles or if something is preventing them from doing so. No current qualitative studies address the experiences, aspirations and barriers to advancement for female midlevel managers at private institutions. As a result of thirty interviews conducted with ten participants via Seidman (2006) methodology, ten themes and 43 sub-themes materialized. Five themes and corresponding sub-themes emerged in the areas of (a) career planning, (b) career trajectories, (c) roles of middle manager, (d) expectations, and (e) challenges. Five other themes developed that contribute to the existing literature in the areas (a) support, (b) potential changes, (c) self (personal) barriers, (d) organization structural and cultural barriers, and (e) important leadership qualities. The study confirmed there is a variety of barriers and supports that can affect the career trajectories of women in higher education. More research is needed particularly regarding the themes that emerged. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562939</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Understanding the Work-Life Experiences and Goals of Women Middle Managers in Higher Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Chicago School of Professional Psychology</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8344-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>234</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599186</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Inference</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Laboratories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Task Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Calculus</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Introductory Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Conant, Darcy Lynn</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Stochastic understanding of probability distribution undergirds development of conceptual connections between probability and statistics and supports development of a principled understanding of statistical inference. This study investigated the impact of an instructional course intervention designed to support development of stochastic understanding of probability distribution. Instructional supports consisted of supplemental lab assignments comprised of anticipatory tasks designed to engage students in coordinating thinking about complementary probabilistic and statistical notions. These tasks utilized dynamic software simulations to elicit stochastic conceptions and to support development of conceptual connections between empirical distributions and theoretical probability distribution models along a hypothetical learning trajectory undergirding stochastic understanding of probability distribution. The study employed a treatment-control design, using a mix of quantitative and qualitative research methods to examine students&apos; understanding after a one-semester course. Participants were 184 undergraduate students enrolled in a lecture/recitation, calculus-based, introductory probability and statistics course who completed lab assignments addressing either calculus review (control) or stochastic conceptions of probability distribution (treatment). Data sources consisted of a student background survey, a conceptual assessment, ARTIST assessment items, and final course examinations. Student interviews provided insight into the nature of students&apos; reasoning and facilitated examination of validity of the stochastic conceptual assessment. Logistic regression analysis revealed completion of supplemental assignments designed to undergird development of stochastic conceptions had a statistically significant impact on students&apos; understanding of probability distribution. Students who held stochastic conceptions indicated integrated reasoning related to probability, variability, and distribution and presented images which support a principled understanding of statistical inference. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562940</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of an Instructional Intervention Designed to Support Development of Stochastic Understanding of Probability Distribution</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8724-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>418</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599449</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Story Telling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peace</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Justice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Figurative Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Science Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multimedia Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Caring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hermeneutics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gibbins, Thor</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Maryland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Maryland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explores the experiences of undergraduate students enrolled in an education I-Series (University of Maryland undergraduate courses designed to inspire innovation, imagination, and intellect) course, Good Stories: Teaching Stories for Peace and Justice. In this course students are asked to produce digital stories that project themes of peace and justice. The locus of this study focuses on the essential question: In what ways do participants &amp;quot;world&amp;quot; their experiences producing digital stories for peace and justice? The methodology of hermeneutic phenomenology is employed in order to elucidate interpretive understandings about digital storytelling for peace and justice in the experiences of nine undergraduates over the course of one semester. The metaphor of alchemy is used since the practice of alchemy entailed amalgamating base metals in the hopes of transmuting them into gold. Jung (1968) likens this process to our experience of becoming individuated, whole, and healthy human beings. Digital media amalgamates image sound and written text in order to enhance narrative, making it an apt metaphor since it captures the synergism inherent in both the metaphor of alchemy and the multimodality inherent in digital stories. The methodological practices for this inquiry employ van Manen&apos;s (1997) human science research. This inquiry elucidates the participants&apos; experiences on being students of digital media in addition becoming agentive knowers capable of projecting digital stories for the purposes of peace and justice. The conspicuousness of developing the technological know-how of producing digital media also takes particular precedent in this study. Themes of the ways in which students are concerned by being students, producing digital stories the &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; way, and developing particular stances on their understandings of peace and justice are disclosed. Additionally, the pedagogical implications for designing teaching and learning of digital media are discussed. These implications focus on ways educators may develop pedagogical tact in engaging and apprenticing students in digital media. These pedagogical understandings may open possible opportunities for classrooms to be transformed into digital media studios where students develop critical stances through the practice of digitally designing narratives for the purposes of extending care, caring, and caring for others to possible global audiences. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562941</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Digital Alchemy: A Hermeneutic Phenomenological Investigation of Digital Storytelling for Peace and Justice</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8730-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>285</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599453</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Charter Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participative Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Moral Issues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Contingency Management</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bloomfield, Brian D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study was a qualitative exploration of educational leadership within charter schools in an attempt to identify traits demonstrated by executive directors of successful charter schools. Because much research has been conducted to identify trends in educational leadership, but comparable little within the unique context of charter schools, and because the charter school movement is growing, it is imperative that Boards, CMOs, and advocates of charter schooling understand more clearly what constitutes successful leadership within this sphere. Two research questions were created for this study, and qualitative methods were used to collect and analyze data. Data were collected through personal interviews with four charter school executive directors, document review, field observations, and follow-up interviews. The conceptual framework used to interpret the collected data was based on Leithwood and Duke&apos;s six dimensions of educational leadership: instructional, transformational, moral, participative, managerial, and contingent leadership. Data were gathered and analyzed against these six leadership dimensions. A thick description of the experiences and perspectives of the four participants was created. The data provided insight into successful charter school leadership. Some of the findings supported extant research about leadership in other educational contexts, while some indicated some unique characteristics of leadership within a charter school. Participants indicated that the largest demands in their jobs were the quantity of needs as well as the necessary practice of affecting change through systems rather than directly with students. Participants further identified a sense of personal accountability, a change management process, as well as working within all six dimensions of leadership as essential to their successes. These findings and conclusions are reported in Chapters 4 and 5. This study was an exploration of traits and behaviors exhibited by executive directors of successful charter schools. The findings indicate a gap between current understandings of educational leadership in general and that within a charter school. It is expected that this research will help to create a clearer understanding of charter school leadership and provide insight for stakeholders to move forward in locating and training future charter school leaders. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562942</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Investigating Leadership in Charter Schools: An Examination of the Leadership Traits of Executive Directors in Successful Charter Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8720-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>160</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599446</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Check Lists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emergent Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Numeracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bloom, Howard S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Weiland, Christina</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Child Behavior Checklist</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Child Behavior Checklist</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Head Start is the largest publicly funded preschool program in the U.S., and one of its primary goals is to improve the school readiness of low-income children. As has been widely reported, the first randomized trial of Head Start in the program&apos;s history found some evidence that it is achieving this goal. Receiving one year of Head Start had small impacts on children&apos;s cognitive outcomes, with impacts on cognitive impacts concentrated in the language and literacy domain. However, effects largely faded out by the end of first grade (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2010). In explaining these results, some have pointed to the variation in quality across Head Start centers. This study uses data for the first follow-up year of the Head Start Impact Study to examine variation in Head Start&apos;s impacts on children. Researchers examine whether there is statistically significant variation in Head Start&apos;s impacts on children&apos;s cognitive and socio-emotional outcomes across individual children, subgroups of children, and Head Start centers. To do so, researchers use a new and innovative methodology for estimating sources of variation in program impacts. In total, 4,440 children in 202 center groups were randomized to treatment or control in the original Head Start Impact Study. The sample is comprised of the subset of children within these 202 center groups for whom there was outcome data available during the study&apos;s first follow-up year (N=3,785 children, or 85% of the children originally randomized). Children randomized to treatment were offered a seat in a classroom in a Head Start program in fall 2002 for the 2002-2003 school year. Children randomized to control conditions were free to take up any available early childhood program except for the program provided by the Head Start to which they had applied and had not won a seat. In fall 2002 and in spring 2003, study children were tested by a trained child assessor on an extensive battery of cognitive and socio-emotional assessments. Parents were also surveyed in fall 2002 and spring 2003 on basic demographic information and on dimensions of their children&apos;s behavior. Children were followed through third grade, and other data were gathered from various sources (e.g. additional child testing, teacher and center director interviews, direct observations of classroom quality). The analysis is based on data from the fall 2002 and spring 2003 child testing and parent survey only. One important feature of the analysis was comparison of residual outcome variances for treatment and control group members. The analysis of the statistical significance of across-center variance in impacts on children distinguishes between: (1) variation in program effect &amp;quot;estimates&amp;quot;; and (2) variation in program &amp;quot;effects.&amp;quot; Findings suggest that Head Start had impacts on individual residual variance that have not yet been recognized in analyses of these data. Specifically, Head Start reduced the individual residual variance for treatment group members versus control group members on two important early skills--receptive vocabulary and early math. These findings suggest that Head Start was successful in improving the vocabulary and early numeracy skills of children with lower levels of such skills at entry, with such effects concentrated among dual-language learners and Hispanic children. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562943</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>To What Extent Do Head Start&apos;s Effects on Children&apos;s Language, Literacy, Mathematics, and Socio-Emotional Skills Vary across Individuals, Subgroups, and Centers?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Affirmative Action</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competitive Selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reputation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Information</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Court Litigation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Composition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Income</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reardon, Sean</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baker, Rachel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kasman, Matt</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Townsend, Joe</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Klasik, Daniel</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The creation of racially diverse colleges at all levels of selectivity has proven to be no small task, even with the legal use of race-conscious affirmative action. As evidenced in the postsecondary destinations of the high school class of 2004, very selective schools (those with Barron&apos;s Selectivity rankings of 1, 2 or 3) have many more White, and many fewer Black and Hispanic, students than the population of 18-year-olds overall. However, the trend of decreasing diversity with increasing selectivity is not strictly monotonic: the most selective schools (Barron&apos;s 1s) are slightly more diverse than the schools just below them in the selectivity rankings. In these Barron&apos;s 1 schools there is suggestive evidence of successful (race-based) affirmative action policies. Given the apparently modest results of explicitly race-based affirmative action, the construction of race-neutral policies that replicate, or even improve upon, these levels of diversity presents a daunting challenge. The goal of this study is to inform the current affirmative action debate with evidence from sophisticated simulation models in which the authors vary how colleges weigh race and class in the admission decision process. This model is able to take into account many of the complexities and interrelated dynamics of the college admissions process, such as uncertainty over college or student quality, learning over time, and strategic application submission. Results from the simulations suggest at least three important patterns: (1) unless SES-based affirmative action policies use a very large bump, these policies are unlikely to result in the same racial composition in colleges as under current race-based affirmative action policies; (2) socioeconomic affirmative action results in a moderate-to-substantial reduction in the average resources of students enrolled at elite colleges, and are thus effective at increasing socioeconomic diversity; and (3) information plays a large, and perhaps previously unrecognized, role in the sorting of minority students into colleges; the application behavior of students responded much more effectively to affirmative action policies when those policies were made explicit to students. Three figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562944</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Simulation Models of the Effects of Race- and Socioeconomic-Based Affirmative Action Policies on Elite College Enrollment Patterns</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Tuition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undocumented Immigrants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stopouts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Full Time Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Part Time Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Conger, Dylan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper examines the effect of a short-lived increase in tuition rates on undocumented college students&apos; schooling decisions. In the spring of 2002, the City University of New York (CUNY) reversed its policy of charging in-state tuition rates to undocumented college students who could demonstrate that they migrated to New York at a relatively young age. The policy was in place for exactly one semester; by fall 2002, the New York legislature restored the in-state tuition policy for eligible undocumented youth. I use this unique policy context to examine the impact of tuition increases on undocumented students&apos; schooling choices, including whether to remain enrolled or to disenroll for a semester (&amp;quot;stopout&amp;quot;) and whether to enroll part-time instead of full-time. The data are provided by CUNY and the empirical models estimate the difference between documented and undocumented students in fall 2002 relative to earlier and later semesters. The results suggest that the removal of in-state tuition caused undocumented students in the bachelor&apos;s degree programs to stopout of school and shift from full-time to part-time enrollment. The findings provide strong evidence that college costs can have a large impact on the collegiate outcomes of undocumented students who have already chosen to attend college and, perhaps more generally, the outcomes of price sensitive college students, including those from low-income backgrounds. Figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562945</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Tuition Increases on Undocumented College Students&apos; Schooling Decisions</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>16</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adjustment (to Environment)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stress Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hirai, Reiko</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Despite the increasing number of international students in U.S. universities, the course of adjustment of international students has not been adequately tested and only one study to date has examined multiple trajectories of international students&apos; adjustment. Therefore, the first goal of the current study was to explore multiple trajectories of international student adjustment, using four types of adjustment outcomes (i.e., psychological distress, positive psychological adjustment, acculturative stress, and functional adjustment). The second goal was to identify important predictors of trajectories. A wide range of predictor variables were examined including individual, interpersonal, and contextual factors. Undergraduate and graduate international students who started their first semester at a large Midwestern university participated in this five-wave longitudinal study (N = 211) that spanned a period of six months. Multiple trajectories emerged and the trajectories varied across four adjustment outcomes. Contrary to the popular notion, the U-shape adjustment trajectory only emerged for one of four outcomes (psychological distress). Significant predictors of adjustment trajectories included perceived present control over reactions to academic stress, neuroticism, openness, social connectedness with Americans, and self-rated English proficiency. Limitations, implications for practice, and future directions are discussed. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562946</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Longitudinal Adjustment Trajectories of International Students and Their Predictors</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8130-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>96</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599034</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Engineering Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Interests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrated Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kersten, Jennifer Anna</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In recent years there has been increasing interest in engineering education at the K-12 level, which has resulted in states adopting engineering standards as a part of their academic science standards. From a national perspective, the basis for research into engineering education at the K-12 level is the belief that it is of benefit to student learning, including to &amp;quot;improve student learning and achievement in science and mathematics; increase awareness of engineering and the work of engineers; boost youth interest in pursuing engineering as a career; and increase the technological literacy of all students&amp;quot; (National Research Council, 2009a, p. 1). The above has led to a need to understand how teachers are currently implementing engineering education in their classrooms. High school physics teachers have a history of implementing engineering design projects in their classrooms, thus providing an appropriate setting to look for evidence of quality engineering education at the high school level. Understanding the characteristics of quality engineering integration can inform curricular and professional development efforts for teachers asked to implement engineering in their classrooms. Thus, the question that guided this study is: How, and to what extent, do physics teachers represent quality engineering in a physics unit focused on engineering? A case study research design was implemented for this project. Three high school physics teachers were participants in this study focused on the integration of engineering education into the physics classroom. The data collected included observations, interviews, and classroom documents that were analyzed using the &amp;quot;Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education&amp;quot; (Moore, Glancy et al., 2013). The results provided information about the areas of the K-12 engineering framework addressed during these engineering design projects, and detailed the quality of these lesson components. The results indicate that all of the design projects contained components of the indicators central to engineering education, although with varied degrees of success. In addition, each design project contained aspects important to the development of students&apos; understanding of engineering and that promote important professional skills used by engineers. The implications of this work are discussed at the teacher, school, professional development, and policy levels. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562947</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Integration of Engineering Education by High School Teachers to Meet Standards in the Physics Classroom</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8139-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>359</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599043</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Awards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Extracurricular Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Koch, Amanda Joy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A national shortage of workers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) occupations has led to efforts to identify why people leave these fields. Lower persistence rates in STEM for females than for males have also led to examinations of features that cause females to leave STEM fields. The current study examines individual- and school-level features that influence undergraduate students&apos; decisions to leave STEM majors, focusing on potential explanations for why females are more likely than males to leave. Persistence in STEM was examined in three samples: (a) persistence through the second year of college in a sample of high school seniors interested in STEM majors; (b) persistence through the fourth year of college in a sample of second year undergraduate STEM majors; and (c) persistence through the second, third, and fourth years of college in a sample of high school seniors interested in STEM majors. Differences between persistence in male-dominated and non-male-dominated STEM majors were also examined. In all samples, gender differences were found for most individual-level predictors, with males tending to score higher than females on measures such as SAT-Math, self-rated STEM ability, and high school extracurricular activities and awards in STEM. On the other hand, females earned better high school grades and had stronger relative non-STEM ability and achievement than males. Bivariate analyses indicated that those who persisted in STEM majors typically had higher scores than those who did not persist for SAT-Math, high school achievement, STEM course taking, undergraduate STEM grades, self-rated STEM ability, interest in STEM, extracurricular activities and awards in STEM, degree goals, and socioeconomic status. Multivariate analyses identified SAT-Math as one of the best predictors of persistence in high school samples, and undergraduate STEM GPA was one of the best predictors in the samples of second year undergraduates. In several samples, a significant cross-level interaction was found between gender and undergraduate females&apos; college-level proportional representation in STEM; however, the effects were inconsistent across samples. Even when controlling for various individual- and school-level predictors, gender effects tended to remain significant, with females in most samples leaving STEM majors at higher rates than males. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562948</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Predicting Undergraduates&apos; Persistence in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Fields</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8144-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>342</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599048</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Summer Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Retrieval</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature Reviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Quinn, David M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lynch, Kathleen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, James S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Information Analyses</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The finding that academic summer programs are effective for low income students has been replicated across meta-analytic reviews. However, these reviews have yielded contradictory evidence about whether summer programs are more effective for lower- or higher-income students. This discrepancy may be due to income-based differences in the summer counterfactual that exist for reading but not for math. Additionally, the related question of whether the effects of summer school differ for math and for reading in general has not yielded robust findings to date and bears replication with updated studies. In the present study, the authors therefore extend their previous research on summer learning programs in two ways: (1) They conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature on math summer school programs (from 1998 to 2011), and test whether the moderating role of income that they observed in reading over this period replicates for math; and (2) They ask whether the effect of summer programs on student outcomes differs for math compared to reading. Their search resulted in 35 studies of summer reading programs, which reported the effects of 41 different interventions, and 12 studies of summer math programs. In conclusion, the authors found evidence that the result does replicate for math, with stronger effects for low-income students than for higher-income students. They also found that the effects of summer programs did not differ for math and reading outcomes; on the contrary, programs with both math and reading components demonstrated effect sizes that were highly correlated between content areas. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562949</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Replicating the Moderating Role of Income Status on Summer School Effects across Subject Areas: A Meta-Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>29</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clinical Diagnosis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advocacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Underachievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Medical Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Rights</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gifted</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physiology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Brain</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Maturity (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sensory Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dietetics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Exercise</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Environmental Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Peterson-Malen, Melissa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Advocates of students with ADHD in the school system are usually parents who must become advocates in response to the child&apos;s need for support and a call for parental involvement from the school. Parent advocates are confronted with many challenges, the primary being the daunting, often solitary task of advocating for a child who is often viewed by teachers and peers as unruly, disrespectful and underachieving. Resources available to parent advocates include legal and medical resources regarding ADHD which are regularly resourced to advocates by advocacy organizations and clinicians. Topics include medical diagnosis, treatment and educational rights and planning for ADHD students. In addition, a set of more diverse ADHD resources exists in the literature that discusses various influences on student behavior and achievement that parent advocates can consider in combination or in place of medical and educational ADHD resources. Diverse ADHD resources present a breadth of information ranging from misdiagnosis of ADHD to conditions that contribute to inattentive student behavior such as giftedness, physiology (including the impact of brain maturation, dietary omega-3, ferratin levels, pediatric sensory issues, and eye conditions), environment and exercise. This study uses a phenomenological research method to further understand the experience of parent advocates, specifically by interviewing parent advocates of students with ADHD in school. Findings include several themes organized in the following four categories: 1) Identifying and Treating ADHD in the School Context, 2) ADHD Advocates Need more Support from Schools, 3) Advocate Experience with the School is a Swinging Pendulum and 4) Advocates Struggle to Pave a Path for Success. Recommendations for further research include qualitative research to further understand parent advocate experience in identifying and treating ADHD in the school context, specifically to understand the impact on advocate interpretation of ADHD-type behaviors after being presented with a list of non-ADHD conditions the precipitate ADHD-type behaviors. In addition, quantitative research is recommended to gather data regarding what advocates need in support from schools as they work to pave a path for success for their children. The work presented in this thesis explores the experience of parent advocates of students with ADHD in school in an effort to understand and improve parent advocate experience. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562950</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Phenomenological Study of the Experience of Parent Advocates of Students Diagnosed with ADHD</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8166-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>193</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599070</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Aids</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Positive Reinforcement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drills (Practice)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rumberger, Jessica L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Mathematics skill acquisition is a crucial component of education and ongoing research is needed to determine quality instructional techniques. A ubiquitous instructional question is how to manage time. This study investigated several flashcard presentation methods to determine the one that would provide the most learning in a set amount of time. A multi-element design was planned for a study comparing the effects of the interspersal (IS) and traditional drill (TD) flashcard methods with and without additional contingent reinforcement on learning rate and accuracy of unknown math facts. Participants included 5 third-grade students selected based on teacher concern with their math fact knowledge. While the areas of IS and positive reinforcement are well researched, less research exists for combining and comparing the two variables for math skill acquisition. The reinforcement conditions (TD+R and IS+R) consisted of access to a prize box based on improvement of learning rate. The TD and TD+R conditions were comprised of the presentation of seven unknown facts per trial, while the IS and IS+R conditions were comprised of the addition of known facts folded in after the presentation of two unknown facts for a total of seven facts per trial (i.e., K, U, U, K, U, U, K). A consistent amount of total facts was used to control for instructional time to determine the technique that would yield the best results in that time frame. Accuracy and learning rate data were visually analyzed by looking at trend and level of data across the four conditions. The traditional drill + reinforcement (TD+R) condition led to the highest accuracy and learning rate levels for 4 out of 5 students. Practical implications, limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562951</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effects of Interspersal and Reinforcement on Math Fact Accuracy and Learning Rate</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8485-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>81</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599315</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student School Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Phillips, Gareth Carlington</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>National Survey of Student Engagement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Survey of Student Engagement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The study examined international students&apos; engagement and success using NSSE 2007 data. The sample consisted of 1996 first years and 2,158 seniors. These students were compared by race/ethnicity, gender, and institutional type. The study found that students&apos; engagement differed by race/ethnicity as well as type of institution. The null hypotheses were rejected at p &amp;lt; 0.001. Blacks and Hispanics, more so than other racial/ethnic groups, exhibited different levels of success especially when using engagement and satisfaction as predictors. Males, more than females, were engaged in enriching educational experiences. Overall, institutions that are serious about improving international student success are encouraged to engage these students in meaningful on campus activities and cater to them as separate groups rather than a homogeneous group. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562952</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Comparative Study of International Student Engagement and Success Based on Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Institutional Type</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8167-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>414</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599071</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>State Departments of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Voting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Financial Support</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Funding Formulas</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Packer, Chad Douglas</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Ohio</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Ohio</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The complexities surrounding public school funding are not unique to Ohio. There have been numerous legal challenges in the State Supreme Courts and seminal cases from the U.S. Supreme Court which have assigned the practices and formulas by which schools are funded to the individual states. Although previous research has investigated voter approval related to school referenda from the 614 public school districts in Ohio, a significant question remains as to which factors are affecting the school districts and their attempts to pass school operating levies. This study focuses on seven typologies developed by the Ohio Department of Education for comparing districts based on nine demographic variables and the factors which predict the outcomes of first attempt school operating levies within each of those typologies. The following research question was developed to provide researchers and practitioners information on factors affecting school levy referenda in Ohio public school typologies: What factors (proposed levy size in mills, length of the levy, election month, type of levy, effective millage rate, and value per pupil) are significant predictors for the passage for first attempt operating levies proposed between the years 2002 and 2010 in each of the seven Ohio Department of Education Typologies? According to the Ohio Secretary of State&apos;s certified election results, 2,199 school operating levies were on the ballot during this time frame with 327 being first attempts. These 327 first attempt school operating levies comprised the data set for this study. Using binary logistic regression, the results of this study indicate four of the six variables tested were significant predictors of first attempt school operating levy passage. The proposed levy size in mills (Typologies 3 and 6), election month (Typology 2), type of levy (Typologies, 1, 2, 3, and 6), and effective millage rate (Typology 2 and 6) were found to be factors significant at the p &amp;lt; 0.05 level. From this, practitioners and researchers can begin to investigate how these factors are being addressed in current and future operating levies. The results of this study have presented practitioners in all 614 school districts in Ohio with evidence of the factors which affect first attempt operating levies within the different typologies. Without a radical change to Ohio&apos;s school funding formula, the practice of relying on voters in each school district to pass tax levies will remain; therefore, a &amp;quot;one size fits all&amp;quot; approach to passing proposed referenda is not recommended. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562953</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>School Referenda and Ohio Department of Education Typologies: An Investigation of the Outcomes of First Attempt School Operating Levies from 2002-2010</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8249-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>170</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599104</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Extension Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Extension Agents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Extension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>County Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Marketing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Workshops</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Barnes, Thelma C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Researchers have acknowledged that cooperative extension organizations should rethink dominant agricultural foci and be more inclusive of nontraditional audiences. An extension organization in the southeastern United States has experienced declining workshop participation, requests for technical assistance, and local office visits. These declines were due to organizational roles that were irrelevant to the needs of clients in local communities. Limited research is available on roles extension agents should assume in a changing society. The purpose of this study was to gather perceptions of county level cooperative extension employees regarding suitable roles for today&apos;s clientele. Transformational learning was the theoretical framework that guided this project study. The research questions addressed organizational roles, program accessibility, and geographical and agricultural foci. A qualitative, descriptive research design was used to collect data using an open-ended, electronic survey and semi structured follow-up interviews. Twenty-four employees, representing all types of county-level positions, participated in the study. Data were coded according to the conceptual framework and six roles emerged. Results indicated that agents who assume these roles and apply learned skills in marketing organizational programs could improve program relevancy for their clientele. A series of professional development workshops was designed as a project to prepare agents to market programs via traditional methods and using social media. Providing relevant programs and marketing them might create positive social change through enhancement of cooperative extension client learning. This enhancement could result in increased support for extension organizations, both locally and nationally. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562954</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Changing Roles of a University Cooperative Extension Service in Response to Social Change</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8258-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>276</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599112</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>General Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inclusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regular and Special Education Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Negative Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Horton, Melinda</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The 2004 amendment of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) required major changes for schools in educating students with disabilities. For teachers, this act brought new challenges to the general education classroom. Guided by the conceptual frameworks of Moustakas and Cresswell, this phenomenological study examined the attitudes of general education teachers towards the instruction of students with disabilities and how they perceive that their knowledge and training affect their instruction with these students in the general education classroom. To address these questions, 12 general education teachers from Grades 1-3 were chosen through purposeful criterion sampling to participate in individual interviews and a focus group session. The data from the interviews and focus group were transcribed, coded, reduced, and analyzed. Textural and structural descriptions were used to identify common themes. The key findings in this study indicated that teachers&apos; concerns, frustrations, and negative attitudes and beliefs towards inclusion developed from insufficient training, lack of support, and inadequate resources. The findings demonstrate an obligation for school leaders to create a stable environment that promotes implications for positive social change. A secure environment should incorporate goals that will improve teacher instructional success with students with learning disabilities, increase school morale, improve academic success for students with disabilities, and foster greater motivation to work and learn as teams. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562955</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>General Education Teacher Attitudes toward Instruction of Students with Disabilities</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8269-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>165</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599123</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Entrepreneurship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Veterans Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Redmon, Stephen Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This multiple-case study explored the nature of the experiences of family members of service-disabled veterans who participated in the Entrepreneurship Bootcamp for Veterans Family Program (EBV-F), an entrepreneurial learning and coaching program designed to assist family members of service-disabled veterans to support the discontinuous life transition of these veterans and their families. A blended-method, multiple-case study was used to explore the learning experiences and challenging life transitions of the EBV-F program participants. The study employed a new theoretical framework combining aspects of Mezirow&apos;s (1978a; 1978b) transformative learning theory and Schlossberg, Waters, &amp;amp; Goodman (1995) life transition theory. Semistructured interviews with 10 EBV-F family members, pre- and postresidency surveys were conducted, and a focus group was held. The primary, overriding finding of this study is that the participant&apos;s learning experience during the EBV-F program was transformative and improved participants&apos; perceptions of self and their situations. Another important finding of this study indicated that the EBV-F program facilitation of the participants trying new roles and relationships was an essential part of their transformative learning experience. Possible implications of the study&apos;s findings include discovery of synergy between transformative learning and life transition outcomes. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562956</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Entrepreneurship Bootcamp for Veterans&apos; Families Program: Transformative Learning for Discontinuous Life Transition</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8279-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>168</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599131</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Whites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Empowerment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Boucher, Michael Lee, Jr.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Despite a decade of concentration on closing the pervasive achievement gap in America, White students and Black students still attend schools with unequal results. Many strategies aimed at closing the gap exist, including increasing the number of African American teachers, but the majority of urban teachers are White, which will remain the case for the foreseeable future. Because high school students report that White teachers who build relationships of solidarity with their African American students are uncommon, this qualitative case study focused on the counternarrative of these successful teachers. This ethnographic case study was designed to reveal how five successful White social studies teachers negotiate their teaching relationships with their African American students. The participants, from a midwestern de facto segregated urban district, were identified as successful teachers and chosen using a nomination process. They were observed in the classroom and interviewed using a photo elicitation technique that allowed them to theorize about their pedagogy, practice, student interactions, and whiteness. The interviews were then qualitatively analyzed for emerging themes. Two major themes emerged. First, these successful teachers were in the process of interrogating their whiteness through self-study of books, faculty development, and mentorship from African American adults. Second, they worked to create relationships of solidarity with students despite articulated narratives that expressed varying degrees of deficit modeling. These participants have shown that building solidarity in the classroom takes many small steps with a durable commitment to meeting students&apos; needs. However, they also demonstrated a complex push and pull between empowerment and deficit models that can inhibit the goal of attaining solidarity. This study complicates existing essentialist beliefs that White teachers must entirely drop their deficit models or they will be unable to join in solidarity with their racially different students. This study also prioritizes building relationships of solidarity as an unambiguous goal for White teachers who seek to be successful in racially diverse classrooms. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562957</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>&amp;quot;This Is How We Roll!&amp;quot;: How &amp;quot;Successful&amp;quot; White Social Studies Teachers Build Solidarity with African American Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8301-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>235</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599149</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Base for Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resource Allocation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technological Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Efficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Guidice, Michael J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The school district involved with this study has been successful in reaching Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) as required by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Since the target scores on the state&apos;s school assessment program are increasing to 100% proficiency in reading and mathematics by 2014, the school leadership must implement strategies to ensure the students&apos; progress fulfills this requirement. They must make certain the faculty is offered professional development opportunities that improve their teaching strategies. The district leadership has committed significant amounts of time, space, and funding for technological resources, and they need to know whether or not the acquisition of these resources is justified. The leadership also needs to determine if the teachers are effectively using the technological resources available to them. An action research study was conducted to measure the impact of technology training on the faculty&apos;s attitude, knowledge, and behaviors in the classroom. This study not only attempted to address these questions, it also provided valuable feedback regarding professional growth opportunities and technology training. The participants were provided with the opportunity to attend trainings designed to enhance learning opportunities for their students, promote the use of technology in the classroom, and increase the level of efficiency in which faculty members complete daily tasks. The participants provided insight into their attitude, knowledge, and behaviors regarding technology by completing surveys before and after the training. The results of this study are useful for determining the effectiveness of technological resources, understanding how the faculty utilizes these resources, and providing suggestions for future professional development opportunities. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562958</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Technology Training and Faculty Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior: An Action Research Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8338-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>108</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599182</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Qualifications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Shortage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Retirement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accreditation (Institutions)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nurses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Qualifications</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hamlin, Amy S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (South)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The United States is in the midst of an increasingly worsening shortage of registered nurses, due, in part, to the nursing educator shortage. Further, nursing programs nationwide are turning away qualified applicants because of a lack of nursing educators. Unfortunately, the nursing educator shortage is not a problem that will be easily fixed. As large numbers of nursing educators leave positions in academia because of retirement or other causes, an inadequate number of qualified educators exist to replace them. The purpose of this cross-sectional quantitative study was to determine factors that influence nursing educators&apos; intentions to stay. Specifically, this study explored the relationship between job embeddedness and intent to stay using Mitchell&apos;s job embeddedness theory as the theoretical foundation. Five research questions guided this study. Research Question 1 explored the relationship between total job embeddedness and intent to stay. Research Questions 2 and 3 determined the relationships between intent to stay and the two sub-dimensions of job embeddedness (organizational and community job embeddedness). Research Question 4 explored the moderating effects of selected demographics on the relationship between job embeddedness and intent to stay. Finally, Research Question 5 determined whether the number of years as a nursing educator mediated the relationship between intent to stay and job embeddedness. A sample of nursing educators who taught full-time in National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (NLNAC) baccalaureate of nursing (BSN) programs in 17 Southern states were asked to complete a researcher-developed online survey tool that evaluated job embeddedness and intent to stay. The survey was administered online via surveymonkey.com. Findings indicated that a relationship between job embeddedness and intent to stay existed for the nursing educators who completed the survey. Findings from this study suggest that consideration and implementation of retention programs focus on enhancing job embeddedness. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562959</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Nursing Educator Retention: The Relationship between Job Embeddedness and Intent to Stay among Nursing Educators</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8341-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>142</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599184</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Scheduling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Schedules</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Response to Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hayes, Matthew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Scheduling in any school or organization plays a vital role in the effectiveness that stakeholders&apos; needs are met. The administration at a large comprehensive high school in the Charlotte Mecklenburg School District realized that in order for their school to meet the changing needs of its student body, it had to build a culture and climate that created opportunities for all stakeholders in the organizations to be successful. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to determine the level of impact an effective schedule has on the climate and culture of a large comprehensive high school. The comprehensive high school that was used in this study underwent a drastic demographic shift within the period of six months. During this time the economically disadvantaged percentage of students attending the school more than doubled, and the once neighborhood school reached into a more urban community of a neighboring city. The administration utilized a creative master schedule to implement various strategies and programs, such as professional learning communities, a response to intervention program, an enrichment and acceleration block and mastery learning to better meet the needs of all stakeholders. The results indicated that there was a significant difference between evaluations that were conducted before, during and two years after the demographic shift at the school. Through a three-tier evaluation system of teachers&apos; responses, evidence was shown that would suggest that the master schedule has a significant impact on the climate and culture of the school. Future schools and organizations that have gone or are going through a drastic change in the demographics they serve will be able to utilize these findings and recommendations to better meet the needs of the stakeholders in their organization. This is a study about effective scheduling and program implementation that could just as easily be about implementing transformational change through the restructuring of an individual&apos;s mental models. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562960</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Effective Scheduling on the Climate and Culture in a Large Comprehensive High School</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Wingate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8348-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>154</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599190</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Women Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Whites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resilience (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Systems Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Identity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jackson, Alicia D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>African American women represented a growing proportion within the field of education in attaining leadership roles as school principals. As the numbers continued to rise slowly, African American women principals found themselves leading in diverse or even predominately White school settings. Leading in such settings encouraged African American women to find ways to deal with resilient behaviors that were encountered in such settings. Using critical race theory, phenomenological variant ecological systems theory (PVEST), and Black feminist theory, this qualitative, phenomenological study explored the experiences, challenges, and perceptions of three African American women principals who lead in predominately White school settings in the southeastern United States. This replicated study investigated their experiences in such settings and how they dealt with the challenges faced while leading in predominately White school settings. The research methodology was grounded in phenomenological inquiry that included in-depth, face- to- face interviews, and the use of the Cross Racial Identity Scale (CRIS) by Dr. William Cross, 2004. The research showed that African American women principals faced many challenges related to race, context, and identity and were subjected to many susceptibilities while leading in predominately White school settings. The principals were able to overcome these challenges they faced by using resilient coping mechanisms that helped them become strong leaders in their specific school communities. This research helped to document the experiences of each individual African American woman principal and described how they coped with adversity, and informed the field of educational leadership of the successes of African American women who lead in predominately White school settings. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562961</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Fighting through Resistance: Challenges Faced by African American Women Principals in Predominately White School Settings</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8357-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>122</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599199</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Biology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Biodiversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrated Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Marine Biology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ecology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Animals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Information Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Molecular Biology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Centered Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conservation (Environment)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCully, Kristin M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Hawaii</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Hawaii</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>To protect and conserve the Earth&apos;s biodiversity and ecosystem services, it is important not only to understand and conserve species and ecosystems, but also to instill an understanding and appreciation for biodiversity and ecosystem services in the next generations of both scientists and citizens. Thus, this dissertation combines research into the ecology and identity of large bivalves at Midway Atoll in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI) with research on pedagogical strategies for integrating mathematics into undergraduate biology education. The NWHI is one of the few remaining large, mainly intact, predator-dominated coral reef ecosystems and one of the world&apos;s largest marine protected areas. Previous bivalve studies focused on the black-lipped pearl oyster, &amp;quot;Pinctada margaritifera,&amp;quot; which was heavily harvested in the late 1920s, has not recovered, and is now a candidate species for restoration. First, I combined remote sensing, geographic information systems, SCUBA, and mathematical modeling to quantify the abundance, spatial distributions, and filtration capacity of large epifaunal bivalves at Midway Atoll. These bivalves are most abundant on the forereef outside the atoll, but densities are much lower than reported on other reefs, and Midway&apos;s bivalves are unlikely to affect plankton abundance and productivity inside the lagoon. Second, I used molecular techniques and phylogenetic reconstructions to identify pearl oysters (&amp;quot;Pinctada&amp;quot;) from Midway Atoll as &amp;quot;P. maculata,&amp;quot; a species not previously reported in Hawaii. As a small morphologically cryptic species, &amp;quot;P. maculata&amp;quot; may be a native species that has not been collected previously, a native species that has been identified incorrectly as the morphologically similar &amp;quot;P. radiata,&amp;quot; or it may be a recent introduction or natural range extension from the western Pacific. Finally, I review science education literature integrating mathematics into undergraduate biology curricula, and then present and evaluate a computer inquiry module using learner-centered teaching strategies to introduce structured population (matrix) models in an upper-division ecology course. Using pre- and post-test surveys and student interviews, I concluded that students accomplished the module&apos;s learning goals: to use matrix models to assess and protect populations and to better appreciate the importance and uses of mathematics in ecology and conservation. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562962</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Uncharted Waters: Bivalves of Midway Atoll and Integrating Mathematics into Biology Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8376-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>170</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599213</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Males</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disproportionate Representation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Friendship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grounded Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McGowan, Brian Lamont</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>African American men enter postsecondary institutions having been socialized to adopt stereotypical notions of masculinity. These traditional expectations of masculinity play a role in how African American men negotiate relationships with their male counterparts on the campus. African American men cultivate close relationships with other men to feel like men, but also learn from society to avoid behaviors and attitudes that could be perceived as feminine. Unfortunately, when considering male interpersonal relationships in the collegiate setting, many erroneous assumptions are made about how they are developed. Thus, the manner in which African American men develop interpersonal relationships with their male counterparts requires further investigation. The focus of this qualitative study was to understand the development of 17 African American male college students&apos; interpersonal relationships with other men at a predominantly White institution. The use of both semi-structured and photo-elicitation interview formats provided study participants an opportunity to reflect on their precollege experiences, identity, and the processes involved in developing interpersonal relationships with other men. As a result of using grounded theory methodology, a conceptual model emerged during analysis that explains the process of developing male interpersonal relationships and illustrates that this phenomenon can best be understood as an interactive relationship between intentionally seeking relationships with men, developing the capacity for intimacy with men, and resolving identity conflicts. This model also considers precollege influences and environmental factors that play a role in participants&apos; interpersonal relationships with other men. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562963</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Images of Male Friendships: An Investigation of How African American Undergraduate Men Develop Interpersonal Relationships with Other Men at a Predominantly White Institution</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8378-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>223</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599215</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Animals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journal Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Treat, Wendy Abigail</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Gray Oral Reading Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Basic Reading Inventory (Johns)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Gray Oral Reading Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Basic Reading Inventory</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Literacy acquisition is imperative to successful academic progress and to successful participation in our society. Students with identified learning disabilities are often among those who struggle to acquire literacy skills. The following dissertation shares the results of a reading intervention study in which nine students with identified learning disabilities practiced guided oral reading with the researcher-teacher in the presence of a certified therapy dog. There were 10 reading sessions, each lasting 10-15 minutes. A matched group of eight students with identified learning disabilities practiced guided oral reading with the researcher-teacher but did not have the therapy dog present during the reading sessions. Achievement data were collected through pre- and post-testing on the Gray Oral Reading Test (GORT-4) and the Basic Reading Inventory (BRI), which is a locally used assessment of reading skills. Measures to assess changes in student&apos;s feelings of self-efficacy and anxiety about reading included the Reader Self-Perception Scale (RSPS) and an anxiety scale. Pre- and post-intervention interviews, parent questionnaires and reading journals provided additional data. The results indicate that students who participated in the intervention demonstrated statistically significant increases in reading skills. In addition, the results suggest that reading in the presence of a therapy dog increases feelings of self-efficacy, decreases anxiety and increases students&apos; motivation to read. The final section of this dissertation explores a range of explanations for the effectiveness of incorporating a therapy dog into guided oral reading sessions and includes a discussion of the contexts in which animals, including certified therapy dogs, may be utilized in special education instruction to support academic progress for students with identified learning disabilities. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562964</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Animal-Assisted Literacy Instruction for Students with Identified Learning Disabilities: Examining the Effects of Incorporating a Therapy Dog into Guided Oral Reading Sessions</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8415-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>220</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599249</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influence of Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science and Society</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiltse, Heather</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Digital technologies have become thoroughly enmeshed in everyday life, forming a backdrop of experience. We live not only with these technologies but also through them as they mediate our engagement with the world. This mediation calls for closer attention with respect to practical design concerns as well as more theoretical and philosophical questions regarding the role of technologies in experience and society. This dissertation is an inquiry into this mediating role of technology. Its purpose is to analyze and theorize the relation between mediating technologies and the activities they make visible; to theorize the structure and dynamics of digitally-mediated engagement; and to provide a flexible conceptual framework that can be used for analyzing these aspects during design and critique. It develops a conceptualization of digital technologies as responsive digital materials that function as substrates that can make activities visible as traces. It then applies and extends existing postphenomenological theories of technological mediation in order to account for these specific components of digital material and to examine the structure and dynamics of digital material mediation. These theoretical developments are empirically grounded in a set of structured close analyses of specific digital material cases. This analytic, artifact-centered method was developed in order to analyze specific mechanisms by which digital technologies make activities visible, and in a way that can be useful in both practical design work and more theoretical analyses. The primary contributions of this dissertation are a theoretical framing of the mediating role and capabilities of technologies as a unit of analysis; development and extension of existing conceptualizations of digital material and technological mediation; a conceptual framework that can be used in framing and analysis; a method of framing and analyzing digital material cases; and an archive of cases that illustrate this method and approach. The high-level goal of this dissertation is to enable and contribute to a philosophically-grounded understanding of the role of digital technologies in society and human experience, and its contributions are intended to enable further, more precise, and more practical inquiries into the ways in which digital materials mediate engagement with the world. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562965</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Mediating Role of Responsive Digital Materials: A Conceptual Investigation and Analytic Framework</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8429-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>177</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599263</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journal Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Williams-Payne, Taisha C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This action research study examined the implementation and impact of a job-embedded professional development intervention that included professional learning community (PLC) sessions and individualized feedback and coaching. Participants in the study were eight high school teachers who had historically demonstrated poor classroom performance and were selected by the school&apos;s leadership team to participate in the professional development intervention. The study examined the implementation process, changes in teacher efficacy before and after the intervention, use of formative feedback and coaching to change teaching behaviors, and the perceptions of teachers about the intensive professional development and coaching activities. Quantitative measures were the Teachers&apos; Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) and Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) rubrics. Minutes from the PLC focus sessions, Individual Growth Plan journals, individual interviews, and the researcher&apos;s journal were the qualitative data sources. Triangulation of the data suggested that for seven of the eight participants, teacher efficacy increased, and for six of the eight participants, teaching practices improved by the end of the intervention. Quantitatively, the average scores of the eight participants collectively increased by 0.53 points on the TSES and 0.29 points on the TAP rubrics. Analysis of the quantitative data also indicated that the greatest improvement was in the area of classroom management. Analysis of qualitative data rendered results and findings that explained teachers&apos; perceptions and beliefs regarding how a job-embedded professional develop intervention impacts teacher efficacy and teaching practices. Participants&apos; perceptions and beliefs indicated that increases in their efficacy scores and improved classroom performance are likely to happen when teachers feel more confident and competent, are provided with quality mentors and effective coaching, are reflective practitioners, and are provided with professional development that is relevant to their needs and the needs of their students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562966</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Influencing Teacher Efficacy through Action Research: The Implementation of an Embedded, Standards-Based Professional Development Approach</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8430-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>202</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599264</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Units of Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yin, Xinying</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this collaborative action research was to understand how science educators can negotiate the tension between integrating formative assessment (FA) for students&apos; learning and meeting the need for standardized summative assessment (testing) from a critical perspective. Using formative assessment in the era of accountability testing was a process in which the science educators identified the ways that the standardized testing system constrained the teacher&apos;s use of FA to improve students&apos; learning, sought solutions to overcome the obstacles and came to understand how FA can be utilized to neutralize the power relationship between the institutional requirement and classroom teaching and learning. The challenge of doing FA under the pressure of standardized testing mainly lie in two dimensions: one was the demand of teaching all the desired standard-based content to all students in a limited amount of time and the sufficient time and flexibility required by doing FA to improve students&apos; understanding, the other was the different levels of knowledge and forms of knowledge representation on FA and tests. The negotiation of doing FA for teaching standards and preparing students for tests entailed six aspects for the collaborative team, including clarifying teaching objectives, reconstructing instructional activities, negotiating with time constraints, designing effective FA activities, attending to students&apos; needs in doing FA, and modifying end-of-unit tests to better assess the learning goals. As the teacher&apos;s instructional goals evolved to be more focused on conceptual understanding of standards and more thorough understanding for less activities, she perceived doing FA for learning and preparing students for standardized tests as more congruent. By integrating both divergent and convergent FA into instruction as well as modifying tests to be more aligned with standards, students&apos; learning were enhanced and they were also being prepared for tests. This study added to our understandings about the relationship between formative assessment and summative accountability tests in science education and classroom teachers&apos; conceptions and practices in making the relationship more coherent for learning. It also provided implications for science teacher professional development of formative assessment and for educational accountability policies. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562967</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Negotiating the Use of Formative Assessment for Learning in an Era of Accountability Testing</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8433-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>321</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599268</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Qualities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nkadi, Francisca M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Ethical leadership plays a major role in school administration while transactional and transformational leadership styles have been known to be effective in an organizational setting. However, the latter styles have also been linked to unethical behavior. The research problem for this study tested the possibility that transactional and transformation leadership behavior would lead to unethical leadership behavior among school administrators. The study, which was quantitative, nonexperimental, and ex post facto in nature, was aimed at evaluating the major facets of ethical, transactional, and transformational leadership styles. The literature reviewed did not support a possible link between the three leadership styles being studied. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire and the Ethical Leadership Scale were used to determine the relationship. The omnibus hypothesis was tested using a statistical model based on multiple regressions utilizing a probability sample attained through random sampling. Data were collected through a survey of 729 participants consisting of principals, assistant principals and school administrators from an independent school district in the southwestern United States. The statistical analysis of the data collected was conducted using SPSS 20.0 software. The ANOVA regression model revealed that at least one of the transactional or transformational variables was linked to ethical leadership behavior. The findings backed literature review results that no marked relationship existed between the attributes of transformational leadership and the ethical leadership behavior of school administrators. However, a significant and positive correlation was noted between the idealized behaviors of transformational leadership and ethical leadership behaviors of school administrators. When the intensity of transformational leadership behavior increased, there was a substantial rise in ethical leadership behavior. However, there was no sizable link between the inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, contingent reward, and management-by-exception behaviors of transformational leadership and the ethical leadership behavior of the sample base. To summarize, while transformational leadership attributes were not linked to ethical leadership behavior of school administrators, transformational leadership behaviors showed a significant relationship in the same context. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562968</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between Leadership Styles and the Ethical Leadership Behaviors of Public School Administrators</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8476-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>142</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599307</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grounded Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personal Narratives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trauma</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trust (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family (Sociological Unit)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holistic Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disclosure</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Powers, Trudy Lee</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study of &amp;quot;Telling and Not-Telling&amp;quot; was conducted using the classic grounded theory methodology (Glaser 1978, 1992, 1998; Glaser &amp;amp; Strauss, 1967). This unique methodology systematically and inductively generates conceptual theories from data. The goal is to discover theory that explains, predicts, and provides practical applications for what is truly going on with the people (or problem) in the field of study. The theory of telling and not-telling involves a universal social process that is valid across fields of inquiry. In this study, it applies to people who share their stories of personal life-experiences, as well as to those who choose not to share, and those who are undecided or are contemplating sharing. It also applies to those who are seeking (trying to find) pieces of their stories--whether personal, family, or historical. Ultimately, sharing life-stories is about connecting with others. However, people may place limits on how, what, and with whom they share; especially in cases of trauma, they may create boundaries. There are a number of underlying elements to this theory: the spectrum of life experiences, levels of awareness, roles and positional relationships, trust, boundaries, time, and the positive outcomes and negative consequences of sharing. Beyond these, the heart of the theory includes a number of intertwining and layered elements: people seeking their own stories as well as the stories of others; keeping secrets and silences, and not-telling; deciding whether or not to tell; generational passing down of family and bounded community stories, cultures, and traditions; and finally breaking the silence--often of traumatic experiences. Each of these main areas further encompasses a number of significant elements. This theory may be useful for anyone seeking, sharing, or contemplating sharing life experiences with others. It may also be useful for those in various fields who help people work through their life experiences, as it presents several aspects of sharing story in a holistic manner. Furthermore, the concepts may be useful to anyone deciding whether or not to &amp;quot;tell.&amp;quot; [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562969</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Telling and Not-Telling: A Classic Grounded Theory of Sharing Life-Stories</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8480-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>227</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599311</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mild Intellectual Disability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutionalized Persons</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Residential Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bui, Levita Yen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The ability to integrate, adapt and strive in the community has become a focal point in research with individuals who have an intellectual disability. However, research regarding teaching social skills to adults who are preparing to transition into the community is limited. The purpose of this study is to utilize peer tutoring with adults who have a mild intellectual disability. Furthermore, a video feedback component will be added in an attempt to enhance the effects of peer tutoring. This overall aim is to increase social skills in adults who are currently living in an institutionalized setting and who may be able to transition into a community residential setting in the future. The results of this study provide preliminary support for a peer tutoring intervention and video feedback in order to enhance social skills with adults who have a mild intellectual disability. Peer tutoring is an intervention that is generally used with children and youth in school settings when increasing social skills. The data suggest that peer tutoring is an effective strategy for increasing social skills in adults with mild disabilities. The data also demonstrated that video feedback does enhance the effects of peer tutoring despite the high levels of appropriate behavior that peer tutoring facilitated. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562970</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Utilizing Video Feedback to Increase Appropriate Social Behaviors When Used in Conjunction with Peer Tutoring</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7822-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>82</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598881</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Land Grant Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Agricultural Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student School Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Sources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reputation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cunningham, Shannon Kaye</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Oklahoma</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oklahoma</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to identify factors that influenced college choice of students who recently enrolled (current freshmen and sophomores) in agriculture programs at Oklahoma&apos;s land-grant university, as compared to recently enrolled students (current freshmen and sophomores) in selected agriculture programs at public community colleges in the state of Oklahoma. This study focused on student characteristics, the influence of significant persons, efforts of the institution to communicate with students, and fixed college characteristics, in terms of their influence on student choice of institution. The convenience sample consisted of 210 recently enrolled students in a land-grant university agriculture program, and 162 recently enrolled students in community college agriculture programs. Students in both groups were found to be very similar in terms of their gender, ethnicity, state of residence, and time when they began the college choice process, finalized their college choice, and finalized their major. A significant difference was found in ACT composite scores for each group. Both groups of students were found to use similar sources of information related to their college choice, reporting campus visit, Internet, and university/college website information, as the most useful sources of information used during the college choice process. Academic reputation, academic programs, and scholarships were reported as influential in the college choice process for both groups. Land-grant university students more frequently ranked prestige, quality of facilities, and location as more influential in college decision, while cost was more influential for community college students in the college choice process. Both groups most frequently ranked &amp;quot;parent or guardian&amp;quot; as the most influential individual in their college choice. Relative to other individuals represented, land-grant university students more frequently reported &amp;quot;relative who attended this university/college&amp;quot; as more influential in the college choice process. Conversely, community college students more frequently reported &amp;quot;friend from high school&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;high school agriculture teacher&amp;quot; as more influential in their college decision. Both groups most frequently ranked &amp;quot;student organizations&amp;quot; as the most influential opportunity for social interaction in their college decision. Community college students more frequently ranked &amp;quot;agricultural competitive teams&amp;quot; as a more influential factor than did land-grant university students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562971</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Factors Influencing College Choice for Students in Agriculture Programs: A Comparative Study of Community College and Land-Grant University Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7841-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>147</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598892</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resistance to Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dodd, Bucky J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Online course design is an emerging practice in higher education, yet few theoretical models currently exist to explain or predict how the diffusion of innovations occurs in this space. This study used a descriptive, quantitative survey research design to examine theoretical relationships between decision-making style and resistance to change among higher education online course designers and the potential influence on the diffusion of innovations in online course design. The original theoretical model proposed in this study was partially supported. This study found that online course designers in higher education were diverse with regards to training and experience for designing online courses and that an online course designer&apos;s decision-making style does not likely contribute to their level of resistance to change. In addition, the majority of online course designers in this study were rational decision-makers, reported a generally low resistance to change, and responded to change situations with cognitive rigidity. Four &amp;quot;types&amp;quot; of online course designers were identified based on decision-making style, resistance to change, and response to change situations. These types were classified as: reactors, visionaries, traditionalists, and planners. The study concluded that the lengthier and more detailed decision-making processes of rational decision-makers and the rigidity of online course designers&apos; willingness to change perspectives likely moderates the diffusion of innovations in higher education online course design. In addition, the types of online course designers identified in this study informed the development of a revised theoretical framework for explaining how the combination of these characteristics may influence how online course designers contribute to the diffusion of online course design innovations. The types of online course designers may also be used to develop customized tools and strategies for promoting innovative online course design practices. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562972</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Toward a Theoretical Model of Decision-Making and Resistance to Change among Higher Education Online Course Designers</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7853-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>246</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598895</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graphs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Concept Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Foster, Luke Burton</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This concurrent embedded mixed methods study investigates the influence of the computer program Tinkerplots™ on 34 preservice elementary teachers&apos; understanding of measures of center and graphical representations of data. Participants&apos; opinions and beliefs about the effectiveness of the program were also explored. At the beginning of the experimental period, participants had marginal understanding of measures of center and graphical representations. Both the control and experimental groups showed an improved understanding at the end of the experimental period. It is still unclear what influence Tinkerplots™ had on the understanding of participants in the experimental group, since quantitative analysis revealed that the experimental group did not perform significantly better than the control group. However, this does not diminish the fact that pre-service elementary teachers need to be statistically literate, and if certain educational tools can enhance their statistical understanding, then utilizing those tools is beneficial. This research study did provide some evidence, through participant responses on multiple instruments, that one such tool, Tinkerplots™, can be effective in enhancing the statistical learning experience for pre-service elementary teachers. The fact that pre- service teachers believe that the program is effectual, regardless of quantitative analysis to reinforce the belief, can do nothing but encourage educators as to the potential learning experience offered by this type of program. It should be noted that although the analysis of the quantitative data doesn&apos;t support a claim of significant influence regarding Tinkerplots™, it also does nothing to discourage further research and investigation into this area of statistics education. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562973</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Impact of Tinkerplots™ on Preservice Elementary Teachers&apos; Understanding of Measures of Center and Graphical Representations</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7860-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>157</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598900</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>American Indians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Biculturalism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Acculturation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Whites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Foutch, Victoria Marie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Behavior Assessment System for Children</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Behavior Assessment System for Children</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study compared the responses of Native American youths ages 12-18 on the Behavior Assessment System for Children-2nd Edition (BASC-2) Self-Report-Adolescent (SRP-A) to a random sample of 200 from the BASC-2 normative sample. Two analyses were conducted: the first analysis was a 2x2 MANOVA (n = 162) comparing the two samples among composite scales. The second analysis (n = 157) examined if composite scale differences were related to ethnic identity as measured by the Bicultural Ethnic Identity scale (BEIS). For the first analysis, a two group MANOVA was performed on the 5 BASC-2 SRP-A composite scales and Inattention/Hyperactivity was found to be significantly different across the two samples with a small to medium effect size (Cohen&apos;s d = 0.29). For the second analysis, participants were split into one of four acculturation groups using a median split. After the groups were identified a 2X2 ANOVA was conducted. Interaction between White and Indian scale scores were found to be statistically significant. A simple main effects post hoc analysis was conducted and revealed significant differences in inattention/hyperactivity composite scale scores were found across high and low levels of identification with the White culture. Students who identified as high with the White scale were similar to the normative sample, while students who identified as low with the White scale were significantly different from the normative sample. Participants&apos; level of identification (low versus high) with their Native culture did not impact their scores on the inattention/hyperactivity composite scale. Ethnic identification with both the mainstream culture and the students&apos; Native culture should be examined when conducting evaluations using the BASC-2 SRP-A. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562974</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examination of the BASC-2 SRP-A Scales with Native American Youth</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7861-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>86</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598901</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jiang, Jennie Y.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sartain, Lauren</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sporte, Susan E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Steinberg, Matthew P.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>One of the most persistent and urgent problems facing education policymakers is the provision of highly effective teachers in all of the nation&apos;s classrooms. Of all school-level factors related to student learning and achievement, the student&apos;s teacher is consistently the most important (Goldhaber 2002; Rockoff 2004; Rivkin, Hanushek, and Kain 2005). Even with substantial within-school variation in teacher effectiveness (Rivkin, Hanushek, and Kain 2005; Aaronson, Barrow, and Sander 2007), historically teacher evaluation systems have inadequately differentiated teachers who effectively improve student learning from lower-performing teachers. In Chicago from 2003 to 2006, for example, nearly all teachers (93 percent) received performance evaluation ratings of &amp;quot;Superior&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Excellent&amp;quot; (based on a four-tiered rating system) while at the same time 66 percent of CPS schools failed to meet state proficiency standards under Illinois&apos; accountability system (The New Teacher Project 2007). This study seeks to answer the following research questions about two waves of teacher evaluation reform in Chicago, a pilot (Excellence in Teaching Pilot or EITP) focused on rigorous classroom observations (2008-10) and a fully implemented evaluation system (REACH) that incorporates information from classroom observations and student assessment (2012-13 to present): (1) What does experimental evidence say about the effect teacher evaluation can have on school-level performance in mathematics and reading in elementary schools? and What does experimental evidence say about how teacher evaluation can differentially impact schools with different characteristics (for example, are there greater impacts in lower- or higher-achieving schools)? Findings from the first wave showed: (1) at the end of the first year of implementing EITP, schools improved student achievement in reading; and (2) more advantaged schools (i.e., schools that were high achieving prior to implementation, schools with lower rates of student poverty) tended to benefit the most from EITP. This finding suggests that an intervention such as teacher evaluation requires high levels of capacity in the school building in order to affect student learning. Analysis of the REACH data is still ongoing. Five tables and one figure are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562975</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Teacher Evaluation Reform on Student Learning: Success and Challenges in Replicating Experimental Findings with Non-Experimental Data</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trigonometry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transfer of Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lecture Method</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Textbooks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geometric Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>James, Wendy Michelle</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Science and engineering instructors often observe that students have difficulty using or applying prerequisite mathematics knowledge in their courses. This qualitative project uses a case-study method to investigate the instruction in a trigonometry course and a physics course based on a different methodology and set of assumptions about student learning and the nature of mathematics than traditionally used when investigating students&apos; difficulty using or applying prerequisite mathematics knowledge. Transfer theory examined within a positivist or post-positivist paradigm is often used to investigate students&apos; issue applying their knowledge; in contrast, this qualitative case-study is positioned using constructionism as an epistemology to understand and describe mathematical practices concerning vectors in a trigonometry and a physics course. Instructor interviews, observations of course lectures, and textbooks served as the qualitative data for in-depth study and comparison, and Saussure&apos;s (1959) concept of signifier and signified provided a lens for examining the data during analysis. Multiple recursions of within-case comparisons and across-case comparison were analyzed for differences in what the instructors and textbooks explicitly stated and later performed as their practices. While the trigonometry and physics instruction differed slightly, the two main differences occurred in the nature and use of vectors in the physics course. First, the &amp;quot;what&amp;quot; that is signified in notation and diagrams differs between contextualized and context-free situations, and second, physics instruction taught vectors very similar to trigonometry instruction when teaching the mathematics for doing physics, but once instruction focused on physics, the manner in which vector notation and diagrams are used differed from what is explicitly stated during mathematics instruction. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562976</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Qualitative Study Comparing the Instruction on Vectors between a Physics Course and a Trigonometry Course</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7889-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>198</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598917</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Johnson, Adam W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As a growing entity within higher education organizational structures, enrollment managers (EMs) are primarily tasked with projecting, recruiting, and retaining the student population of their campuses. Enrollment managers are expected by institutional presidents as well as through industry standards to make data-driven planning decisions to reach their goals. However, despite the availability of data, some enrollment managers revealed a different reality from traditional, rational decision-making models. This study explored the factors that contributed to or influenced the decision-making process of six enrollment managers working in either two or four-year public colleges and universities located in the Midwestern United States. Interviews, including a word association exercise, documents and artifacts of tools utilized to make enrollment management decisions, and observational field notes were gathered and analyzed in this qualitative study grounded in constructionism. Using the theories of Bounded Rationality and the Garbage Can model as lenses, EMs in this study seemed to reflect a highly stressful, competitive, and complex environment where rational decision-making gave way to satisficing, or &amp;quot;good-enough&amp;quot; decisions as expectations to meet enrollment goals governed their motives. Decisions also appeared to be closely associated to the Garbage Can Model due to the ambiguity of goal setting and the mixture of participants, problems, and solutions where temporal proximity appeared to be more of a factor in terms of what received attention first. With multiple interruptions into an EM&apos;s daily schedule, the ability for the enrollment manager to maintain consistent efforts on desired projects and plans was severely hindered. Enrollment managers in this study shared through multiple examples that they did not feel they had enough time to accomplish their tasks as thoroughly as they preferred and often addressed their problems without full consideration of all possible options, much less the optimal one. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562977</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Balancing Data, Time, and Expectations: The Complex Decision-Making Environment of Enrollment Management</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7893-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>183</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598919</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Licensing Examinations (Professions)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Associate Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Winter, Alexandra Selman</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Council Licensure Exam Registered Nurses</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This project study sought to evaluate the effects of implementing quarterly predictive testing and remediation on National Certification and Licensure Examination-Registered Nurse (NCLEX-RN) pass rates of an associate&apos;s degree nursing program at a small Midwestern community college. The college&apos;s pass rate on the NCLEX-RN has been below both the national and state averages for the last 5 years. Several options have been considered in order to address this problem, such as adopting more stringent admission requirements and preventing at-risk students from progressing through the program. Using Mezirow&apos;s transformative learning theory as a framework, a causal-comparative study was conducted to determine if completion of an NCLEX-RN predictor assessment and its associated remediation on a quarterly basis positively impacted students&apos; pass rate on the NCLEX-RN. A 1-tailed t test was applied to the data to examine the difference between NCLEX-RN pass rates of graduates who have received quarterly testing and remediation and those who have not. Data analysis concluded that the mean scores of the 2 groups of graduates in the study sample were significantly different from each other (t(104) = -1.376, p = 0.086), which is a meaningful difference to nursing education in terms of treatment efficacy. The results of this study can have a major impact on the community by increasing the NCLEX-RN pass rate and adequately preparing nursing program graduates for entry into their profession. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562978</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Efficacy of ATI Predictive Testing and Remediation on National Certification and Licensure Examination-Registered Nurse Pass Rates</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7927-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>132</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598940</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Study Abroad</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Interests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Komura, Kiriko</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explores the current status of borderless education in STEM through surveys of two populations of STEM students: American students who studied abroad and foreign students who were studying in the U.S. It was undertaken in response to the U.S. government&apos;s desires to strengthen STEM education and to develop American students&apos; global competencies. The purpose was to understand how international experiences can be enhanced in order to increase American STEM students&apos; interest in study abroad programs and in earning advanced STEM degrees and to understand how to attract more foreign STEM students to study in the United States. Issues of particular focus were: the impacts of gender, race/ethnicity, and nationality on STEM students&apos; motivation to participate in, and responses to study abroad programs, and the value of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in borderless STEM education. Several different forms of multivariate analyses were performed on data from surveys at seven public and private colleges and universities in the Southern California area. The results indicated that among American students, greater value was placed on social and cultural experiences gained through studying abroad. In contrast, among foreign students greater value was placed on enhancement of their academic and professional development opportunities. American students whose study abroad included research experiences had a greater interest in international research and teaching in the future. Foreign graduate students majoring in computer science, engineering and biology are the most likely to seek opportunities to study and work in the US. Finally, ICTs were valued by American students as platforms for social interactions and by foreign students for facilitating professional networks. The analyses lead to several recommendations, including: STEM faculty should be made aware of the critical importance of their advising and mentoring in motivating students to choose to study abroad and, minority students gain more confidence about working in STEM fields and seeking advanced STEM degrees as a result of studying abroad. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562979</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Borderless STEM Education: A Study of Both American Students and Foreign Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7952-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>199</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598942</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hinerman, Krystal M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hull, Darrell M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chen, Qi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Booker, Dana D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Naslund-Hadley, Emma I.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Belize</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Belize</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In Belize, the percentage of untrained teachers (i.e. teachers with the equivalent of a high school education or less) is one of the highest in the region of Latin America and the Caribbean. In response to growing student cohorts, the increased demand for more classroom teachers has led to significant decrease in the proportion of trained teachers at both the primary and secondary levels. Fewer than 45% of teachers at primary and secondary levels are trained, whereas some countries in the region report more than 80% are trained. Perhaps as a result of the lack of training, a content test that was applied to a representative sample of teachers nationwide as part of this study design revealed important gaps in teachers&apos; math content knowledge. The authors hypothesized that increased math content and pedagogical skill enhancement of teachers would lead to improved student outcomes on content knowledge in mathematics. The Teacher-Led Math Inquiry (TLMI) project posed three research questions: 1.When controlling for pretest differences, do students exposed to the TLMI treatment exhibit higher post-treatment math achievement than students in the control group at the end of one school year? (Intent to treat model); 2. To what extent does implementation fidelity as an added variable in the ITT model moderate post-treatment math achievement? (Test of treatment model); and 3. How did teachers view implementation of the TLMI approach? (Qualitative results). The present study indicates TLMI has a substantive significant positive effect on student math performance in comparison to traditional instructional practices in Belize, specifically in the Belize District. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562980</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher-Led Math Inquiry in Belize: A Cluster Randomized Trial</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>28</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Attendance Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Robotics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mac Iver, Martha Abele</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mac Iver, Douglas J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Attendance is probably the most fundamental behavioral indicator of student engagement with school. Though many students fall off-track to success for the first time in ninth grade, poor attendance patterns often begin increasing in middle school and become worse in high school. Missing school during the secondary grades can often be traced to low levels of motivation. As Eccles (2008) has so aptly summarized the crux of the motivation issue, it often boils down to two main questions in students&apos; minds about what happens in school: &amp;quot;Can I do the task?&amp;quot; And &amp;quot;Do I want to do the task?&amp;quot; (Eccles &amp;amp; Midgely, 1989; Meece, 2003). Recent discussions of noncognitive factors affecting academic performance have emphasized the importance of developing an academic mindset to influence academic behaviors such as attendance and exerting effort in class and homework assignments (Farrington et al., 2013). The process of helping students to internalize these beliefs can occur not only in the core academic classroom, but also in elective activities like robotics that build a sense of competence and value in academic pursuits. Given the salience of attendance as a predictor of student achievement outcomes, additional research on effective means of increasing attendance for at-risk students is particularly important. This paper focuses on the following research question: Did the five week STEM robotics summer learning program have a positive impact on the following year&apos;s attendance rate of middle school students (compared to a matched sample of students who did not receive any of the district&apos;s summer programs)? The focus of this study is a STEM Robotics Summer Learning Program funded by the U.S. Department of Education&apos;s Investing in Innovation (i3) program in a development award. The primary goal of this five-week summer program implemented by the school district was to provide additional out of school time focused on mathematics instruction and robotics so that enrolled students could increase their mathematics grade-level aptitude by the end of the program and develop interest in technology and STEM college majors and careers. The robotics component was expected to increase student engagement (including attendance) and perception of the relevance of mathematics, leading to increased student effort and math achievement. Despite limitations, the findings of this study emphasize the importance of investigating the potential impact of out-of-school programs on school-focused engagement. As Lawson and Lawson (2013) argue, research on school engagement needs to move beyond the traditional classroom and school to include out-of-school and community-focused activities. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562981</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>&amp;quot;STEMming&amp;quot; the Swell of Absenteeism in Urban Middle Grade Schools: Impacts of a Summer Robotics Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Department of Education (ED), Office of Innovation and Improvement</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>65</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Hazardous Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Facilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Location</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Justice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Distribution</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Environmental Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moore, Andrea Lisa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Oklahoma</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oklahoma</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Toxic Release Inventory facilities are among the many environmental hazards shown to create environmental inequities in the United States. This project examined four factors associated with Toxic Release Inventory, specifically, manufacturing facility location at multiple spatial scales using spatial analysis techniques (i.e., O-ring statistic and geographically weighted regression (GWR)). The first project in this study examined the influence of Executive Order 12898 on the spatial distribution of Toxic Release Inventory facilities and whether the influence or ideologies of environmental agency administrators, the Presidential, and Congress (political climate) played a role in the placement of facilities post-enactment in EPA Region 6. The results suggest that neither EO 12898 nor political climate influence facility location uniformly and that county and local level factors may be of importance. The second study examined three competing environmental inequity hypotheses. Discrimination, economic, and sociopolitical factors from environmental inequity literature were used to assess statewide effects at the local (census block) level in Oklahoma. Discrimination factors explained a greater proportion of the variability; however, the model including factors from all three models was superior. The third portion of this work combined the results and concepts from the first study with a real life situation to create a case-based teaching unit. The case study used environmental justice policy and environmental law in the context of protecting a small, Native American group in northern Oklahoma from persistent exposure to carbon black, a known carcinogen. The case study was designed to fill a gap in environmental justice curriculum materials and provide a resource for instructors to teach students about environmental justice concepts, Executive Order 12898 and existing environmental laws in environmental studies, sociology, and political science courses. This work contributes to environmental justice literature by evaluating efforts to achieve environmental justice, recognizing the role of the state in producing environmental justice outcomes, advancing our understanding of the spatial scale(s) of environmental justice, incorporating new methodology (from ecology) to address environmental justice research methodological concerns, examining trends in the socio-ecological landscape, and adding to curriculum materials on environmental justice. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562982</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Executive Order 12898 and Social, Economic, and Sociopolitical Factors Influencing Toxic Release Inventory Facility Location in EPA Region 6: A Multi-Scale Spatial Assessment of Environmental Justice</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7972-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>152</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598947</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>American Indian Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mother Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Boarding Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Child Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Orona, Cynthia C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Oklahoma</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Fennema Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oklahoma</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Fennema Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>American Indians have the largest high school dropout rates of all ethnic groups in the United States. Though drop outs technically occur in high school, they actually begin with lowered academic achievement during elementary school years. Looking to mothers as the primary caretakers, this study sought to explore the correlations between American Indian mothers&apos; and their 5th grade children&apos;s mathematics efficacy beliefs and utility values--to see if these beliefs and values could predict children&apos;s mathematics achievement. Particularly when it comes to mathematics, American Indian mothers are dually challenged to encourage their children&apos;s success in school because of (1) generalized school disconnect due to negative boarding school experiences and (2) limited understanding about how to assist children&apos;s success in mathematics as it is currently being taught. School mathematics lessons are different from those lessons mothers experienced when they were in school. New Common Core State Standards for Mathematics may contribute to mothers&apos; disconnect. The purpose of this explanatory correlational research study was to determine the extent to which the relationship between American Indian students&apos; and mothers&apos; mathematical efficacy beliefs and utility values for mathematics influence student&apos;s mathematical achievement. This study, component to a larger National Science Foundation (NSF) project study (Award No. HRD-0936672), utilized data from 148 mother-child dyads. Participant children attended one of 23 rural, public schools in northeastern Oklahoma that included high American Indian student populations. The data included participants&apos; responses to the Fennema-Sherman Mathematical Attitudes Survey (FSMAS) and children&apos;s mathematics achievement results from the Oklahoma Core Curriculum Test. Study results indicated that, although mothers mathematical efficacy belief and utility value for mathematics influenced their children&apos;s mathematical efficacy belief and utility value for mathematics, only a mother&apos;s utility value for mathematics significantly predicted children&apos;s mathematical achievement. In addition, children&apos;s own mathematical efficacy belief and utility value for mathematics was not predictive of their mathematical achievement. This research improves our understanding of the influence of parents, particularly mothers of American Indian children and can help guide supportive parent involvement in mathematics education efforts. Implications of this research relate to both theory and practice. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562983</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Efficacy and Utility Beliefs of Mothers and Children as Predictors of Mathematics Achievement for American Indian Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-7983-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>106</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598951</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disability Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Roring, Catherine Mary</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many risk factors have been identified for children entering Kindergarten. Many at-risk children eventually get classified as having a Specific Learning disability. Some of these risk factors include having a primary home language other than English (Hosp &amp;amp; Reschly, 2004), having non-intact families (Pong, 1997), being of minority status (Losen &amp;amp; Orfield, 2002; Morgan, Farkas and Hibel, 2008) and not attending a quality pre-school (Lee, 2010). This study analyzed ECLS-K data to examine the extent to which race, family composition, primary home language, and pre-kindergarten attendance predict the likelihood of children being classified with a specific learning disability (SLD) by spring of third grade. Four logistic regressions were completed: one which analyzed for the entire sample and three others which separately analyzed these predictive variables for students attending low, medium, and high poverty schools. When analyzing the entire model, these predictors were not found to have much power, however when each SES group were analyzed, interesting results were found. In low SES schools, students who were minorities had odds twice as high as those who were White of being classified SLD, and those who did not speak English as their primary language had odds that were three times as high. Having attended Pre-K lowered these students&apos; odds of being labeled. In middle SES schools, once again non-English as the primary language led to higher odds of being classified SLD, but race had an opposite trend, with White children having higher odds of being given this label. In the wealthiest schools, coming from a non-intact family actually led to lower rates of classification as SLD, as did not speaking English at home. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562984</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Contribution of Race, Primary Language, Family Structure and Pre-Kindergarten Attendance to the Odds of Being Classified as Having a Specific Learning Disability by the Third Grade</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8010-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>70</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598963</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clinical Diagnosis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diagnostic Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Symptoms (Individual Disorders)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rowland, Julie Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) make up approximately 5% of the school-aged population and they often experience significant difficulties in school, particularly in the areas of academics, disruptive behavior, and social relationships. A diagnosis of ADHD does not provide guidance for creating interventions to address the impairments. Effective diagnostic assessments should go beyond traditional symptom-based categorization and allow for more accurate and precise problem identification. The current study compared the cognitive abilities of children with ADHD to typically developing children using the CHC factors from the WJ III COG. Results confirmed that the children with ADHD in this study had significant weaknesses in long-term storage and retrieval (Glr) and processing speed (Gs) as compared to children with no disabilities. Research-driven, empirically-validated academic interventions should be implemented in the educational setting to address these cognitive weaknesses in students with ADHD. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562985</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Discriminative Ability of CHC Factor Scores from the WJ III Tests of Cognitive Abilities in Children with ADHD</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8012-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>122</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598964</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Information Security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Confidentiality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compliance (Legal)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grounded Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employee Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sikolia, David Wafula</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>User non-compliance with information security policies in organizations due to negligence or ignorance is reported as a key data security problem for organizations. The violation of the confidentiality, integrity and availability of organizational data has led to losses in millions of dollars for organizations in terms of money and time spent correcting the problem. Research on employee violation of information security policies has focused on non-compliance due to poor training, low employee motivation, weak effective commitment, or individual oversight. Theoretical foundations applied to this phenomenon include deterrence, reasoned action, planned behavior, protection motivation, self-efficacy, individual adoption factors, organizational commitment and other individual cognitive factors. However, the findings from some of the studies are contradictory. Furthermore, no parsimonious theory explains nor predicts employee compliance with information security policies. This study addresses this problem by building a theoretical model grounded in data using grounded theory methodology. Seed concepts from High Performance Work Systems (HPWS) were used to develop the initial questions for the structured interviews. Four rounds of interviews over a period of one year were carried out as well as iterative data analysis. Data analysis consisted of open coding, selective coding and theoretical coding. The findings indicate organizations need to create a supportive organizational culture, conduct appropriate training, clearly communicate deterrence measures and design job tasks aligned with the information security policies. These measures will impact individual employee&apos;s engagement, knowledge, perception of the ramifications and self-efficacy. Information technology plays a moderating role between organization practices and the individual cognitive factors. These cognitive factors will in turn have an effect on the individual employees&apos; compliance with the information security policies. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562986</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Toward a Theory of Employee Compliance with Information Security Policies: A Grounded Theory Methodology</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8025-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>115</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598969</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Trigonometry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Concept Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Logic</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Stimuli</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wescoatt, Benjamin Mark</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Topics in trigonometry have not been well-studied, especially with college-level students. Thus, despite providing a venue for important concepts such as notions of proof and algebraic skill, the process of verifying trigonometric identities, or VTI, has not been thoroughly explored. This study attempts to remedy this gap in the literature by exploring college students&apos; concept images of VTI, providing a description of certain aspects of students&apos; VTI concept images while focusing on students&apos; problem solving and proof making behaviors during VTI. Students viewed VTI in terms of proof construction and problem solving actions. Overall, students perceived the flow of VTI as a process of simplification involving simplifying acts. Viewing the flow in this way helped students monitor their actions; they tended to choose the complicated expression in order to simplify it or choose manipulative actions that would result in a perceived simpler expression. As for simplifying actions, students used a particular technique, dodging, to marginalize complicated function arguments, allowing them to choose appropriate actions once the cognitive complexity was removed. As proof constructions, students generally believed VTI provided a verification of the truth or an explanation for the truth of the identity. The role VTI served depended on how students approached the identity prior to VTI, believing the identity to already be true or believing it could potentially be false. In turn, the knowledge students built as a result of the VTI process varied. Many students signaled the conclusion of VTI with a particular construction, the reflexive step. This construction acted as a sign, conveying information about the identity to the prover and readers of the VTI construction. Students also indicated a preference for the visual nature of the VTI construction; they preferred formats that highlighted the manipulative steps of the construction. Overall, students believed a format that arranged the manipulated expressions in a vertical manner, forming columns, to clearly display the steps. When given the choice, students rated constructions of this format higher than constructions in which the steps were arranged in a horizontal format. Additionally, most students wrote their constructions in the columned format. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562987</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Exploration of College Students&apos; Problem Solving Behaviors While Verifying Trigonometric Identities: A Mixed Methods Case Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8079-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>273</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598988</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Publications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Marketing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Consumer Economics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trust (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yang, Jing</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Customer reviews play an important role in today&apos;s online shopping environment. Research into customer reviews has largely focused on the predictive effect of review characteristics on variables such as product sales. However, relatively little attention has been directed towards understanding how reviews impact a customer&apos;s decision to purchase a product. In particular, the mechanism by which reviews influence customers is not well understood. Some studies have suggested that reviews influence a customer&apos;s trust in the product and or vendor. However, we propose that reviews impact a customer&apos;s perceived risk, in turn reducing their perceived uncertainty. This reduced uncertainty should result in an improved customer attitude towards the product or service, leading to higher purchase intention. As such, we performed three related studies, aiming to improve our understanding of the role of online reviews on customers&apos; risk perception. Particularly, the first two studies (Essay 1: &amp;quot;The Impact of Product Reviews on Purchase Intention: A Study based on the Theory of Reasoned Action&amp;quot; and Essay 2: &amp;quot;How Product Reviews Help Mitigate the Uncertainty in Online Transactions: An Exploration into the Antecedents of Risk Perceptions&amp;quot;) explore in greater detail the impact of product reviews first on intention to purchase the product, and then on perceived uncertainty in transactions. In contrast, Essay 3: &amp;quot;Reading the Voice in Seller Reviews: An Analysis on the Trust Felling Revealed by Reviews&amp;quot; examines the impacts of seller reviews on both perceived risk and perceived uncertainty. In general, most of the findings are consistent with our hypotheses. For example, both product reviews and seller reviews have significant impacts on lessening the risks and uncertainty. However, there are also some interesting findings which are slightly different from our initial hypotheses and suggest the path for future studies. For instance, both Essay 1 and 2 reveal that review valence outweighs review quantity in the context of risk reduction, and Essay 3 reveals that, compared to hidden information, customers are more worried about sellers&apos; hidden actions, and additionally the reviews on sellers&apos; integrity and competence are more important than their benevolence. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562988</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Understanding the Role of Online Reviews on Customers&apos; Risk Perception</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8084-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>173</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3598991</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Independent Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Supervisors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Workplace Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Staff Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stimulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structural Equation Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Aparicio, Ricardo Antonio</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The rapid pace of change for knowledge workers competing globally necessitates ongoing continuous learning. Increasingly, knowledge workers will need to be ready--willing and able--to engage in self-directed learning. This makes it important to understand what factors in the work environment might be related to the self-directed learning readiness. The variables examined in this study were drawn from three strands of literature. Self-directed learning readiness, the dependent variable, was drawn form the education research. Transformational leadership the independent variable was drawn from the leadership research. Based on findings from the employee development research supervisor support for development was also included as an independent variable. The present study addresses the lack of knowledge regarding whether a relationship exists between supervisor transformational leadership behaviors, supervisor support for development, and knowledge worker self-directed learning readiness. This study used a correlational, cross-sectional, research design. A survey using well validated instruments was sent to 1,200 knowledge workers at a Fortune 500 company. A total of 385 responses (a 32% response rate) were received. Pearson moment correlation, multiple regression, and structural equation modeling were used to analyze the data. Aggregate transformational leadership was found to be positively related to self-directed learning readiness in this sample (r = 0.12, p = 0.02). The results found support for a weak relationship between self-directed learning readiness and transformational leadership. Similarly weak relationships were found between self-directed learning readiness and the four separate transformational leadership behavior sub-scales. Supervisor support for development was weakly related to self-directed learning readiness. A strong relationship (r = 0.80, p = 0.00) was found between supervisor support for development and transformational leadership. Due to multicollinearity, multiple regression analysis (F[subscript 2,382] = 2.846, p = 0.059) did not find unique effects on subordinate self-directed learning readiness for aggregate transformational leadership (ß = 0.085, p = 0.32) or supervisor support for development (ß = 0.042, p = 0.62) when controlling for each other. Due to multicollinearity, a second multiple regression analysis (F[subscript 4,380] = 1.555, p = 0.19) with idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, or individualized consideration in the model did not find unique effects on self-directed learning readiness when controlling for the other behaviors. Self-directed learning readiness was significantly related (r = 0.19, p = 0.00) to self-reported job performance. Implications for both research and practice were discussed based on these results. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562989</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Knowledge Workers&apos; Self-Directed Learning Readiness</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8096-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>203</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599001</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Numbers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Numeracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bengtson, Barbara J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Understanding the linear relationship of numbers is essential for doing practical and abstract mathematics throughout education and everyday life. There is evidence that number line activities increase learners&apos; number sense, improving the linearity of mental number line representations (Siegler &amp;amp; Ramani, 2009). Mental representations of numbers of children in kindergarten through 2nd grade were examined. Methods of improving mental representation using number line activities were also examined. This experimental study included a pretest, interventions, control, and posttest. Analyses were completed to determine accuracy and linearity of estimation patterns as a reflection of mental representations before and after interventions. Age and achievement test data analyses contributed developmental and mathematics performance information to the study. The findings of this study support existing research indicating children&apos;s understanding of number improves with age, with accurate and linear mental representations on a 1 to 100 number line fitting few students in kindergarten, about half in 1st grade and the majority of students in 2 nd grade. This study also contributes to our understanding of the educational power of number line activities and interventions. After three short experiences with board games and broken number line puzzles growth is evident, although not significant, for performance on the number line estimation task. Further study must be done to add to our understanding of number line estimation as well as the activities which improve mental representations. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562990</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Changing Mental Representations Using Related Physical Models: The Effects of Analyzing Number Lines on Learner Internal Scale of Numerical Magnitude</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8101-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>73</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599006</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shadish, William R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hedges, Larry V.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Horner, Robert H.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Odom, Samuel L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Center for Education Research (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Westat, Inc.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Center for Special Education Research (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The field of education is increasingly committed to adopting evidence-based practices. Although randomized experimental designs provide strong evidence of the causal effects of interventions, they are not always feasible. For example, depending upon the research question, it may be difficult for researchers to find the number of children necessary for such research designs (e.g., to answer questions about impacts for children with low-incidence disabilities). A type of experimental design that is well suited for such low-incidence populations is the single-case design (SCD). These designs involve observations of a single case (e.g., a child or a classroom) over time in the absence and presence of an experimenter-controlled treatment manipulation to determine whether the outcome is systematically related to the treatment. Research using SCD is often omitted from reviews of whether evidence-based practices work because there has not been a common metric to gauge effects as there is in group design research. To address this issue, the National Center for Education Research (NCER) and National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) commissioned a paper by leading experts in methodology and SCD. Authors William Shadish, Larry Hedges, Robert Horner, and Samuel Odom contend that the best way to ensure that SCD research is accessible and informs policy decisions is to use good standardized effect size measures--indices that put results on a scale with the same meaning across studies--for statistical analyses. Included in this paper are the authors&apos; recommendations for how SCD researchers can calculate and report on standardized between-case effect sizes, the way in these effect sizes can be used for various audiences (including policymakers) to interpret findings, and how they can be used across studies to summarize the evidence base for education practices. Chapters 1 and 2 provide an overview of the paper and a detailed definition SCDs, their basic forms, and how they can be used to make causal inferences. Chapters 3 and 4 explain SCD research and the benefit of the use of effect sizes in general, the different types of standardized effect sizes (i.e., between-case and within-case), how they can be used in SCD research, and a suggested approach for reporting between-case effect sizes. Chapters 5 and 6 describe how to use between-case effect sizes for individual SCD studies, benefits that are likely to result from increased reporting of between-case effect sizes, and how these effect sizes can be used to identify evidence-based practices across studies. Chapter 7 provides recommendations for future directions and development of between-group effect sizes in SCD. A glossary is included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562991</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Role of Between-Case Effect Size in Conducting, Interpreting, and Summarizing Single-Case Research. NCER 2015-002</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Center for Education Research</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Policymakers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Researchers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>109</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Center for Education Research. Available from: ED Pubs. P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794. Tel: 877-433-7826; Fax: 301-470-1244; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncer/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>142</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES12D0015</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link>https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/2015002/</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bernard, Benjamin Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Minnesota</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Minnesota</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Computer Aided Instruction (CAI) has been used for many years in an attempt to increase student achievement. Districts have spent millions of dollars implementing different forms of CAI that may or may not be working. This study was an attempt to describe one such district and its CAI implementation. The study sought to complete three tasks. The first task was to create a description of the student use of a specific CAI, &amp;quot;Study Island.&amp;quot; Second, it examined grade level and graduation year data to see if there were correlations between using &amp;quot;Study Island&amp;quot; and achievement levels on the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment (MCA). Lastly, the study examined correlations between the proficiency levels that students achieved on Study Island and their proficiency levels on the MCA. The results of the study found several areas of significant results. First, students&apos; scores on the MCA were significantly higher after the year that &amp;quot;Study Island&amp;quot; was included as a supplement to their curriculum. It is important to remember that this is not proving causation. This study was observational and not scientific in nature. Because of this, confounding variables do exist that could be causing the observed differences. Second, significant correlations between the use of &amp;quot;Study Island&amp;quot; and increased achievement levels on the MCA were found. The students&apos; proficiency levels on &amp;quot;Study Island&amp;quot; were highly correlated with their proficiency levels on the MCA. Using regression analysis, the researcher determined the percent of questions that a student should answer correctly on &amp;quot;Study Island&amp;quot; to predict that she/he will achieve proficiency on the MCA. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562992</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Student Achievement and the Use of the Program &amp;quot;Study Island&amp;quot;</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8103-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>114</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599008</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Human Capital</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developing Nations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropout Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Least Squares Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Loyalka, Prashant</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huang, Xiaoting</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zhang, Linxiu</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wei, Jianguo</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yi, Hongmei</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Song, Yingquan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ren, Baoping</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shi, Yaojiang</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chu, James</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Maani, May</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rozelle, Scott</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>China (Shaanxi Province)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>China (Zhejiang Province)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>China</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A number of developing countries currently identify vocational education and training (VET) as a key approach to building human capital. For example, the promotion of VET at the high school level (&amp;quot;vocational high school&amp;quot;, which is used here interchangeably with VET throughout the paper) has become a policy priority among emerging economies such as Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico and China (Newhouse and Suryadarma, 2011; National Congress of Brazil, 2011; Ministry of National Education of Indonesia, 2006; China State Council, 2010). The rationale underlying these policies is that increases in the proportion of vocational--as opposed to academic--high school enrollments can more effectively build human capital. For VET to successfully build human capital in these countries, however, it must meet two prerequisites. The first prerequisite is that VET must help students learn specific (vocational) skills. Vocational high school, in particular, must help youth acquire specific, medium-level skills that can either directly be used in the labor market after graduation or serve as a foundation for vocational college (Kuczera et al., 2008). Second, in addition to specific skills, for VET to be considered successful, it must help students acquire general skills (Kuczera et al., 2008; Chiswick, Lee and Miller, 2002). Despite the increasing interest in VET among policymakers, there is surprisingly little evidence from developing countries as to whether vocational high school, especially in comparison to academic high school, actually helps students acquire specific and general skills. The authors aim to begin to fill what appears to be a gap in the literature on VET in developing countries by examining whether vocational high school students are, in fact, learning specific and/or general skills. Toward this overall aim, they seek to accomplish three goals: (1) to assess the impact of attending vocational versus academic high school on the dropout rates, specific skills and general skills of the &amp;quot;average&amp;quot; student that is attending academic and vocational high schools; (2) to estimate the &amp;quot;heterogeneous impacts&amp;quot; of attending vocational versus academic high school on the dropout rates and skill levels of disadvantaged (low-income or low-ability) students; and (3) to establish whether vocational high school leads to any absolute gains in specific and general skills. Results indicate that attending vocational (relative to academic high school) substantially reduces general skills without improving specific skills. Attending vocational high school also increases dropout, especially among disadvantaged (low-income and low-ability) students.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562993</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Vocational Schooling on Human Capital Development in Developing Countries: Evidence from China</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Humpage, Sarah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Álvarez-Marinelli, Horacio</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Costa Rica</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Munoz Language Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wide Range Achievement Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Costa Rica</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Wide Range Achievement Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Munoz Language Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Computers have taken an increasingly prominent role in education around the world in recent years in developed and developing countries alike. As developing country governments have turned their focus from increasing enrollment to improving the quality of education in their schools, many have made access to computers a key component to their strategies (Trucano, 2005). There is an emerging body of research now that shows that these strategies, which often come with a hefty price tag, have varied effects (Glewwe et al., forthcoming). This paper contributes to this literature by comparing the use of computer-assisted language learning software to traditional methods of English instruction in Costa Rica. The authors also compare two different software programs to one another. Because schools were randomly assigned to one of these two treatment groups or a control group, this research permits a rigorous comparison of the differential effects of two software programs, holding contextual factors constant. The following research questions are addressed: (1) What is the impact of each of the two English language learning software programs on test scores, as compared to a teacher alone; (2) what is the magnitude of the effect of each program compared to the other; and (3) do these effects vary by school-level baseline performance, students&apos; baseline test scores or gender? The main finding of this research is that academic software can be an effective learning tool, but that this depends on the software. Previous research has already shown that technology can be effective in some cases and ineffective in others. One of this paper&apos;s contributions is to show that these heterogeneous effects are not simply the product of using technology in different contexts (although that is likely to be important as well). By randomly assigning two different software packages to students in similar schools, this research has shown that the type of technology used matters, holding other factors constant. Furthermore, technology&apos;s effectiveness also depends on student characteristics like baseline abilities and gender. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562994</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teachers&apos; Helpers: Experimental Evidence from Costa Rica on Computers for English Language Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>25</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>52</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metacognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goal Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Memory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Listening Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teamwork</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Response</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Webb, Linda</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carey, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Villares, Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wells, Craig</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sayer, Aline</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Numerous authors have reviewed research to determine which skills are considered fundamental to successful academic and social outcomes for students (Hattie, Briggs, &amp;amp; Purdie, 1996; Masten &amp;amp; Coatworth, 1998; Wang, Haertel, &amp;amp; Walberg, 1994; Zins, Weissberg, Wang, &amp;amp; Walberg, 2004). These skills include: (1) cognitive and meta-cognitive skills such as goal setting, progress monitoring, organization and memory skills; (2) social skills such as interpersonal, social problem-solving, listening, and team-work skills; and (3) self-management skills such as managing attention, motivation, and anger. If students are taught these fundamental cognitive, social, and self-management skills in a caring, supportive, and encouraging environment where they feel safe to take risks as they try new strategies, their confidence in their abilities increases, as does their effort in the classroom, eventually leading to improved academic outcomes. The Student Success Skills (SSS) classroom-based intervention was developed to systematically teach students fundamental social, emotional, and learning skills. The purpose of the project described here was to allow for rigorous research to evaluate both the proximal and distal outcomes resulting from classroom level student participation in SSS when facilitated by school counselors and reinforced by classroom teachers. Participants were 4,321 fifth grade students in 235 classrooms in 60 schools across two school districts (15 treatment and 15 control in each district). The study employed a hierarchical design, often referred to as a cluster-randomized design, where schools (i.e., clusters) were randomly assigned to either treatment or control conditions. Therefore, the unit of randomization was the school. Hierarchical Liner Modeling (HLM) results suggest that Student Success Skills (SSS) has a beneficial effect on student academic-related behavior. Specifically, these results suggest that participation in the SSS program resulted in lower levels of test anxiety, higher levels of engagement in classroom work, higher levels of appropriate assertion in classroom interactions, and higher levels of cooperation. In addition, participation in Student Success Skills prevented a rise in disruptive behavior over the school year that was observed in Control students. These results indicate that SSS enhanced students&apos; ability to perform under pressure, increased students&apos; motivated engagement in school-work, enhanced classroom social skills, and decreased students&apos; disruptive behavior. Data analysis tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562995</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Student Success Skills</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Picture Books</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poetry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intermediate Grades</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescent Literature</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fiction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drama</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Story Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classics (Literature)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novels</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multilingual Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Games</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Delanoy, Werner, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Eisenmann, Maria, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Matz, Frauke, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;Learning with Literature in the EFL Classroom&amp;quot; provides a comprehensive, in-depth and state-of-the-art introduction to literature learning in EFL contexts. Paying attention to both theoretical and practical concerns, the study focuses on a wide range of literary genres, different age and ability groups and new topics for literature learning. The 18 contributions discuss present-day challenges for literature teaching in the light of current theoretical debates and offer a balance between theory and practice by combining theoretical input with practical work in the classroom. The volume offers many suggestions for the future of the field and has a varied readership in mind, comprising language teachers, university students and academics. Contents include: (1) Learning with Literature in the EFL Classroom (Werner Delanoy, Maria Eisenmann, and Frauke Matz); (2) Literature Teaching and Learning: Theory and Practice (Werner Delanoy); (3) Literary Literacy and Intercultural Competence: Furthering Students&apos; Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes (Laurenz Volkmann); (4) A Picture (Book) is Worth a Thousand Words: Picture Books in the EFL Primary Classroom (Margit Hempel); (5) Performing Poems in the Primary School (Janice Bland); (6) Poetry in the Intermediate EFL Classroom (Carsten Albers); (7) Teaching Young Adult Fiction (Frauke Matz and Anne Stieger); (8) Playful Learning with Short Plays (Carola Surkamp); (9) Teaching Narrative Competence: American Short Stories in the EFL Classroom (Peter Freese); (10) Why Read a Shakespeare Play in Class? (Rüdiger Ahrens); (11) The American Dream: New Approaches to an Old Topic (Peter Freese); (12) Crossovers--Postcolonial Literature and Transcultural Learning (Maria Eisenmann); (13) Opportunities and Challenges for Transcultural Learning and Global Education via Literature (Laurenz Volkmann); (14) Alternative Worlds--Alternative Texts: Teaching (Young Adult) Dystopian Novels (Frauke Matz); (15) Teaching Multimodal Novels (Wolfgang Hallet); (16) Narrating the &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;: Using Autographics in the EFL Classroom (Christian Ludwig); (17) Performative Approaches and Innovative Methods (Nancy Grimm and Julia Hammer); (18) Approaches to Plurilingual Literature Teaching in the EFL Classroom (Gabriele Blell); and (19) Teaching Games--Video Games in Educational Contexts (René Schallegger).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562996</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Learning with Literature in the EFL Classroom. Anglo-American Studies. Volume 49</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-3-6316-4710-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>394</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04297-9</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Bullying</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stereotypes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Victims</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sexual Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aesthetics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Empowerment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Justice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Homosexuality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Body Weight</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Body Composition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Miller, sj, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burns, Leslie David, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Johnson, Tara Star, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Bullying is a contemporary wildfire of a social problem that continues to burn, scar, and even kill U.S. schoolchildren on a daily basis. Not only do the targets of bullying suffer in their abilities to grow, learn and succeed; so do bystanders, and even the bullies themselves. &amp;quot;Generation BULLIED 2.0&amp;quot; details the nature of bullying as a tremendously negative force in schools today and offers practical, research-based strategies for constructing and cultivating cultures that support learning, safety, and dignity for everyone. Analyzing the nature and inadequacy of current anti-bullying policies, &amp;quot;Generation BULLIED 2.0&amp;quot; explores how stereotyping and other negative behaviors are reinforced and sustained in both large and small ways at school. Its critical narratives of commonly bullied individuals and groups are representative of events that transpire every day across the country&apos;s education system. Focusing on the most common targets of bullying: race, gender, sexual orientation, physical appearance, physical and mental disability, and cyber-abuse, this book does not offer simplistic solutions. Instead, it offers empowerment to readers while providing tools for elevating social justice and preventing bullying from taking root as a supposedly «normal» part of life in our society. Contents include: (1) Where Are We Now? The Current State of Bullying in the United States (sj Miller); (2) The Distressing Realities About Queer-Related (LGBTQGV) Bullying (sj Miller and James R. Gilligan); (3) Bullies and Bodies: Addressing Weight Discrimination (Tara Star Johnson and Elana Cutter); (4) Bullying and Students with Disabilities: The Bully, the Bullied, and the Misunderstood (Joseph John Morgan and Deanna Adams); (5) Black Ritual Insults: Causing Harm or Passing Time? (Tyrone Rivers and Dorothy Espelage); (6) Bullying and Harassment Prevention in the Lives of Latina and Latino Students (Rodrigo Joseph Rodríguez); (7) Cyber-Digital Bullying (sj Miller and Stephanie Beyer); (8) The Consequences of Bullying and Anti-Bullying Interventions for Individual and School Success (Leslie David Burns); (9) The Broader Contexts of Bullying: Disrupting Bullying Through Preventive and Interventionist Policy (sj Miller); and (10) Shifting the Tide of Bullying Through Teacher Education: Tools for the Classroom (sj Miller).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562997</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Generation BULLIED 2.0: Prevention and Intervention Strategies for Our Most Vulnerable Students. Gender and Sexualities in Education. Volume 1</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-2072-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>206</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/30088?format=HC</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Postmodernism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Qualifications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Neoliberalism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Democracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Voting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advocacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gorlewski, Julie A., Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gorlewski, David A., Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hopkins, Jed, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Porfilio, Brad J., Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In our work as educators, we all aspire to be effective. We also aspire to be wise. If teachers are to represent and advocate for education, we must become the stewards of a discourse that nurtures education&apos;s possibilities. This book explores how teacher dispositions are defined, developed, cultivated, and assessed. The authors in the volume consider the various and interconnected ways in which educators&apos; values, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors are performed and how these performances affect experiences and practices of learning. This text investigates complex questions, such as: &amp;quot;How should teachers be?&amp;quot;; and &amp;quot;Who should decide how teachers should be?&amp;quot; In different ways, all the chapters in this book invite us into the work of reinvigorating educational discourse. The contributors contradict the idea that wisdom is the province of the lone genius who possesses knowledge that is obscure to the majority. Instead, they ask us all to participate in the necessarily collaborative endeavor of discourse stewardship in--as grand as it may sound--the pursuit of wisdom. Contents include: (1) Practicing in the Panopticon: Teaching and Learning in the Surveillance Media Culture (Julie Gorlewski, David Gorlewski, and Catherine Lalond); (2) The Myth of the &amp;quot;Fully Qualified&amp;quot; Bright Young Teacher: Using Haberman Star Teacher Pre-Screener to Teach and Assess Professional Dispositions (Nicholas D. Hartlep, Sara Mccubbins, and Grant B. Morgan); (3) When the Obvious Isn&apos;t True: What&apos;s Really Wrong with Teacher Quality and Teacher Education? (P. L. Thomas); (4) Teach for America, the Neoliberal Alternative to Teacher Professionalism (T. Jameson Brewer, and Anthony Cody); (5) The Joy of Educating (Jed Hopkins); (6) Seeking the Authentic: Inquiry and Dispositions, Teacher Candidates, and Ourselves (Pamela J. Hickey, and Mary H. Sawyer); (7) The Big &amp;quot;O&amp;quot;: Occupying against Reductionism in Education Using Small and Sustained Actions (Barbara Rose); (8) Ways of Being as an Alternative to the Limits of Teacher Dispositions (Matthew J. Kruger-Ross); (9) Seeking Balance: Rethinking Who Decides the Role of Dispositions in Teacher Evaluation (Tim Mahoney, and John Ward); (10) Professional Dispositions for Teacher Candidates: From Standardization to Wisely Effective Classrooms (Susan M. Dunkle, and Kelly H. Ahuna); (11) Teachers as Advocates for Democracy: Standardization of Public Education and Voter Participation (Shelley J. Pineo-Jensen); (12) CSFE Principles: Wise and Effective Mechanisms to Translate Social Foundations Content to K-12 Classroom Practice (Jacquelyn Benchik-Osborne); and (13) Urban Teachers and Technology: Critical Reflections in the Age of Accountability (Kate E. O&apos;Hara).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562998</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effective or Wise? Teaching and the Meaning of Professional Dispositions in Education. Counterpoints: Studies in the Postmodern Theory of Education. Volume 447</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-2131-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>277</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1342-0</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Listening</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advocacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Praxis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Activism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Politics of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smyth, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Down, Barry</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McInerney, Peter</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hattam, Robert</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>John Smyth&apos;s remarkable body of writing, research and scholarship has spanned four decades, and the urgency of our times makes it imperative to look in some depth at the breadth of his research and its trajectory, in order to see how we can connect, extend, build and enrich our understandings from it. Possibly the single most unique aspect to Smyth&apos;s version of critical research is his passion for living and &amp;quot;doing&amp;quot; what it means to be a critical pedagogue. For him, &amp;quot;doing&amp;quot; is a verb that gives expression to what he believes it means to be a critical scholar. This necessitates actively listening to lives; taking on an advocacy position with informant groups; displaying a commitment to praxis; and being activist in celebrating &amp;quot;local responses&amp;quot; to global issues. Smyth&apos;s research is pursued with vigour through the lives he researches, as he interrupts and punctures &amp;quot;bad&amp;quot; theory, supplanting it with more democratic alternatives, which, by his own admission, makes his research (and all research), political. Contents include: (1) Opening up his &amp;quot;Intellectual Craftsmanship&amp;quot;; (2) Teachers&apos; Work; (3) Students&apos; Lives; (4) Community Engagement; (5) Educational Policy and Leadership; and (6) Synthesis of Future Directions for Action.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED562999</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Doing Critical Educational Research: A Conversation with the Research of John Smyth. Teaching Contemporary Scholars. Volume 7</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-2318-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>193</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1324-6</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Liberal Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>General Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Moral Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Civics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Service Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Core Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Advisers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Engineering Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Justice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Crime</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theory Practice Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peace</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>DeVitis, Joseph L., Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Colorado</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Virginia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Washington</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Arizona</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Ohio</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Vermont</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Arizona</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Colorado</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Ohio</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Vermont</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Virginia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Washington</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Mark Van Doren, the noted literary scholar, once remarked, &amp;quot;The college is meaningless without a curriculum, but it is more so when it has one that is meaningless.&amp;quot; Many current critics of undergraduate curricula in America assent to the crucial need for programmatic renewal in our colleges and universities. They bemoan the cookie-cutter sameness in far too many of them. The oddity is that U.S. colleges have long touted their &amp;quot;diversity&amp;quot; while largely holding fast to rather traditional pathways. This illuminating volume goes beyond formulaic nuts-and-bolts recipes for constructing curriculum: it seeks to interpret and analyze the contemporary landscape of college curriculum. Yet it also hopes to heighten pedagogic horizons in more imaginative, innovative ways by presenting actual curricula from more distinctive academic offerings. This book will stimulate vitally needed &amp;quot;out-of-the-box&amp;quot; thinking about curricula among faculty, administrators, and students, and ultimately invite the emergence of more radically diverse visions and realities for today&apos;s college curriculum. Contents include: (1) What Is a Liberal Education? (Roger William Gilman); (2) Liberal Education: The Challenge of Consumerism, Careerism, and Commodification (Christopher J. Lucas); (3) Liberal Education and Moral Education (Daniel R. DeNicola); (4) A Core Curriculum for Civic Literacy? (Donald Lazere); (5) Understanding Student Motivation: A Key to Effective Curriculum Design (Jonathan D. Stolk); (6) Community Service Learning and Higher Education: The Need for a Prerequisite to Thoughtful Service (Eric C. Sheffield); (7) Schubert: Multiple Curricula in Higher Education (William H. Schubert:); (8) The Habit of Reflection: An Essay on St. John&apos;s College (Peter Kalkavage); (9) An Essay in American Liberal Education: University of Dallas&apos;s &amp;quot;Core Curriculum&amp;quot; (William A. Frank); (10) Fairhaven College and the Progressive Curriculum (Roger William Gilman); (11) The Plan for Bennington: An (Ever) Emergent Curriculum (Duncan Dobbelmann and Isabel Roche); (12) Multiple Routes, Alternative Learning Experiences: Developing Analytic Abilities, Practical Skills, Creativity, and Self-Reflection at Hampshire College (Laura Wenk and Kristen Luschen); (13) Individualized Undergraduate Curricula at SUNY Empire State College (Susan Oaks); (14) Prescott College: Lessons Learned &amp;quot;For the Liberal Arts, Environment, and Social Justice&amp;quot; (Kristin Woolever and Paul Burkhardt); (15) The Colorado College Block Plan (Susan A. Ashley); (16) A Community of Advisors: The Johnston Center for Integrative Studies at the University of Redlands (Tim Seiber and Kelly Hankin); (17) Building an Integrated Science and Technology Program at James Madison University (Jeffrey Tang); (18) Olin College: Re-Visioning Undergraduate Engineering Education (Lynn Andrea Stein, Mark H. Somerville, Jessica Townsend, and Vincent P. Manno); (19) Teaching and Learning Outside the Box at John Jay College of Criminal Justice (Amy S. Green); (20) &amp;quot;Connecting the Classroom to the World&amp;quot;: An Integrative, Interdisciplinary, and Experiential Approach to Learning at George Mason University (Lisa Gring-Pemble); (21) The Liberal Arts Approach to Leadership: The Curriculum of the Jepson School of Leadership Studies at the University of Richmond (Terry L. Price); (22) Revising the Salem Signature: Crafting an Interdisciplinary General Education Program (Daniel O. Prosterman); (23) Developing a New Individualized and Interdisciplinary Curriculum for the 21st Century: Miami University&apos;s Western Program Reimagined (Nicholas P. Money); (24) Staying Alive With The Wagner Plan: How to Keep a New First-Year Program Thriving Fifteen Years Out (John P. Esser, Lily D. McNair, and Richard Guarasci); (25) The Intellectual Inquiry Curriculum at Roanoke College (Adrienne Bloss and Gail Steehler); (26) Starting With the Students: Integrating Theory and Practice in Teaching, Learning, and Curriculum Development at Alverno College (Stephen Sharkey and Kathleen O&apos;Brien); (27) Seeking &amp;quot;Productive, Caring, and Fulfilling Lives&amp;quot; Through the Environmental Liberal Arts at Green Mountain College (Thomas J. Mauhs-Pugh and Meriel Brooks); (28) Starting Its Second Century: Cooperative Education at the University of Cincinnati (Michelle Clare, Anita Todd, and Kettil Cedercreutz); (29) Building Students&apos; Capacity to Lead: The West Point Leader Development System (Bruce Keith and Thomas Judd); (30) From the Local to the Global, to the &amp;quot;Beyond&amp;quot; and the In-Between: Earlham College&apos;s Peace and Global Studies Program (Joanna Swanger); and (31) Union College&apos;s Ethics Across the Curriculum Program (Robert Baker).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563000</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The College Curriculum: A Reader. Adolescent Cultures, School, and Society. Volume 62</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-1788-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>444</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/29699?rskey=8wlS3d&amp;result=1</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Peace</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Violence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Neighborhoods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Quinn, Molly</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>What makes for peace as lived? What images of peace issue from examination of daily experience? What can be gleaned from reflection upon the topic for the meanings and makings of peace in our world? Considering that to work for peace, we must begin with ourselves and with our children, Molly Quinn addresses these questions through her own life and work. She does so with those who would, and do, teach children, and with the children they teach. The text is rooted in inquiry with aspiring elementary teachers through a university social studies course in New York City, where East Harlem first-graders engage peace curriculum, and in the South Bronx, where fourth-graders attempt to understand and respond to neighborhood violence. The author seeks to elucidate educational possibilities for dreaming peace anew, and passionately living and laboring, singularly and together, for its realization among us. Contents include: (1) Picturing Peace: A Beginning; (2) Why &amp;quot;Picturing Peace&amp;quot;?; (3) On Re-Imaging Peace, in Portraiture; (4) A Word Worth a Thousand Pictures; (5) On the Way of/to Peace; (6) Seeking Peace through Children&apos;s Eyes; and (7) On Re-Imagining Peace and Pedagogies for Peace.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Peace and Pedagogy. Peter Lang Primers</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-1844-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>164</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1323-9</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Multilingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immersion Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language of Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Empowerment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technological Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kupetz, Rita, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Becker, Carmen, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Europe</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is an established approach to support multilingualism in Europe by teaching various school subjects in an additional language. The practices used, however, vary considerably. Our book considers this diversity by looking at CLIL scenarios, defined as learning environments supporting content learning, language learning and skill development in task-based learning settings, with a strong focus on interaction in different curricular contexts (primary and secondary school and CLIL teacher education at university) and at various levels of proficiency (primary, secondary, tertiary). CLIL by Interaction is understood here both as negotiation of meaning and form as well as discourse to empower CLIL learners to participate in social interaction. Contents include: (1) Language Education Policy and CLIL Principles (Rita Kupetz, and Alexander Woltin); (2) Peer-to-Peer Scaffolding in a Primary Science Class (Carmen Becker); (3) Empowering the Prospective CLIL Teacher through the Analysis of Classroom Interaction (Maxi Kupetz, and Rita Kupetz); (4) Interactive and Collaborative Supports for CLIL: Towards a Formal Model Based on Digital Literacy (Ivana Marenzi); and (5) Approaching Content through Communicative Interaction (Jana Roos).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Content and Language Integrated Learning by Interaction. Fremdsprachendidaktik inhalts-und lernerorientiert. Volume 26</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-3-631-64899-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>119</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04725-7</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Place Based Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ownership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizen Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiential Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Coulter, Bob</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Place-based education offers a compelling opportunity to engage students in the life of their community. More than just taking a field trip, participants in a place-based project make sustained efforts to make a difference and learn basic skills along the way. Academic concepts come to life as real-world problems are investigated from a local angle. Even global issues can be connected to the community, such as the high school in Missouri that linked local land-use choices to the &amp;quot;dead zone&amp;quot; in the Gulf of Mexico. For teachers, place-based projects offer a chance for professional revitalization as they orchestrate complex and meaningful learning environments that go well beyond scripted curriculum mandates. Both teachers and students benefit from a new level of agency as they take ownership of their work. Drawing on his own experience as a teacher and more than a decade of work supporting teachers in crafting their own projects, the author outlines the many benefits of place-based education and describes the challenges that must be overcome if we are to realize its potential.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>No More Robots: Building Kids&apos; Character, Competence, and Sense of Place. [Re]Thinking Environmental Education. Volume 2</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-2472-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>136</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1305-5</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Inference</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equations (Mathematics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Van den Noortgate, Wim</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moeyaert, Mariola</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ugille, Maaike</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Beretvas, Tasha</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ferron, John</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Due to an increasing interest in the use of single-subject experimental designs (SSEDs), appropriate techniques are needed to analyze this type of data. The purpose of this paper proposal is to present four studies (Beretvas, Hembry, Van den Noortgate, &amp;amp; Ferron, 2013; Bunuan, Hembry &amp;amp; Beretvas, 2013; Moeyaert, Ugille, Ferron, Beretvas, &amp;amp; Van den Noortgate, 2013c; Petit-Bois, Baek &amp;amp; Ferron, 2013) each studying empirically one particular extension of the basic two-level or basic three-level model that can be used to synthesize SSED data across cases (i.e., two-level model) and across cases and studies (three-level model). Each extension is discussed and examined through intensive simulation studies by looking at the bias and precision of the parameter estimates, and the validity of statistical inferences. The results indicate whether the extended two- and three-level models are recommended to summarize SSEDs and in which conditions. This is a timely issue, since the number of published SSEDs is increasing rapidly together with the need for adequate techniques to analyze and meta-analyze SSEDs answering the same underlying research question. The authors conclude that the multilevel model is flexible enough to be extended and is found to be appropriate for combining SSEDs. However, there are still a lot of other extensions that are not discussed here that are being investigated and that still remain to be investigated such as other estimation procedures (i.e., bootstrapping and Bayesian estimation), count outcomes, and multiple dependent outcome variables.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Synthesis of Single-Subject Experimental Data: Extensions of the Basic Multilevel Model</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>24</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1121'>R305D110024</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multimedia Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Films</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Animation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novels</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Picture Books</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Empowerment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Authors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Late Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Literacies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Unsworth, Len, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thomas, Angela, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Australia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Australia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;English Teaching and New Literacies Pedagogy: Interpreting and Authoring Digital Multimedia Narratives&amp;quot; is about the fusion of media and narrative, and explores theoretical and practical dimensions of young people&apos;s engagement with contemporary forms of text. It showcases a range of critical interpretative approaches for integrating multimedia narratives into English teaching contexts, including animated films such as Shaun Tan&apos;s &amp;quot;The Lost Thing&amp;quot;, digital novels such as &amp;quot;Inanimate Alice&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;5 Haitis&amp;quot;, and a virtual treatment of Shakespeare&apos;s &amp;quot;Macbeth&amp;quot;. English teachers across grade levels will recognize the valuing of literature and will appreciate the practical pedagogy and fostering of creativity as students are encouraged to explore new forms of narrative. In the context of developing expertise in knowing how multimodal texts work, students can apply that knowledge in their own authoring of digital multimedia narratives. Contents include: (1) Toward a Metalanguage for Multimedia Narrative Interpretation and Authoring Pedagogy: A National Curriculum Perspective from Australia (Len Unsworth); (2) Using Contemporary Picture Books to Explore the Concept of Intermodal Complementarity (Angela Thomas); (3) Digital Fiction (Angela Thomas); (4) A Model for Critical Games Literacy (Thomas Apperley &amp;amp; Catherine Beavis); (5) Enabling Students to Be Effective Multimodal Authors (Paul D. Chandler); (6) The Image/Language Interface in Picture Books as Animated Films: A Focus for New Narrative Interpretation and Composition Pedagogies (Len Unsworth); (7) Using Focalisation Choices to Manipulate Audience Viewpoint in 3-D Animation Narratives: What Do Student Authors Need to Know? (Annemaree O&apos;Brien); (8) Social Media, Education, and Contentious Literacies (Martin Waller); (9) Teaching Inanimate Alice (Angela Thomas, Jenny White, and Ros Lippis); (10) Empowering Older Adolescents as Authors: Multiliteracies, Metalanguage, and Multimodal Versions of Literary Narratives (Julie Bain and Len Unsworth); (11) Augmented Reality in the English Classroom (Winyu Chinthammit and Angela Thomas); and (12) Virtual Macbeth: Using Virtual Worlds to Explore Literary Texts (Angela Thomas, Kerreen Ely-Harper, and Kate Richards).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>English Teaching and New Literacies Pedagogy: Interpreting and Authoring Digital Multimedia Narratives. New Literacies and Digital Epistemologies. Volume 61</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-1907-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>272</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1311-6</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Underachievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Environmental Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Class</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smyth, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wrigley, Terry</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This book confronts one of the most enduring and controversial issues in education--the nexus between poverty and underachievement. The topic has become a key contemporary battleground in the struggle to raise standards. &amp;quot;Living on the Edge&amp;quot; maps and compares a number of competing explanations, critiques inadequate and deficit accounts, and offers a more convincing and useful theory. The authors challenge the view that problems can be fixed by discrete initiatives, which in many instances are deeply rooted in deficit views of youth, families and communities. The book systematically interrogates a range of explanations based outside as well as inside schools. It draws upon positive examples of schools which are succeeding in engaging marginalized young people, providing worthwhile forms of learning, and improving young lives. It is a &amp;quot;must read&amp;quot; for anyone concerned about or implicated in the struggle for more socially just forms of education. Contents include: (1) Foreword: Putting Those &amp;quot;Living on the Edge&amp;quot; at the Centre of Educational Policy and Practice Bob Lingard; (2) Understanding Class and Poverty; (3) Blaming Individuals, Families, and Communities; and (4) The Role of the School.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Living on the Edge: Rethinking Poverty, Class and Schooling. Adolescent Cultures, School and Society. Volume 61</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-1653-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>239</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1137-2</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clearinghouses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Munter, Charles</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cobb, Paul</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shekell, Calli</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>One purpose of education research is to develop and rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of programs for supporting students&apos; learning and achievement. The Institute of Education Sciences has amplified that purpose (Shadish &amp;amp; Cook, 2009) and attempted to improve the methodological standards for conducting such work--primarily through the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), which, since 2002, has supported an ongoing effort to synthesize research on the effectiveness of educational interventions, programs, and policies. According to its stringent, methodological standards, only &amp;quot;well-designed and well-implemented&amp;quot; randomized controlled trials and studies employing quasi-experimental designs with equating or matching are included in the WWC&apos;s 15 topical syntheses, one of which is mathematics. Despite repeated calls for increased attention to theory in program evaluation for more than 25 years, recent reviews of the literature suggest that the field has seen little change (Confrey &amp;amp; Stohl, 2004; Coryn, Noakes, Westine, &amp;amp; Schröter, 2010; Weiss, 1997). The requirement that evaluators link research designs to the theories underlying the programs they evaluate is not included in the WWC&apos;s standards for rigorous evaluations. Given the considerable differences in mathematical goals and theories of learning from which mathematics programs are designed, and the high stakes for students&apos; mathematics learning and academic futures (as well as for the fortunes of program developers), it is important to ask whether the WWC&apos;s methodological specifications are sufficient, or whether program evaluation has once again lost (or perhaps never gained) sight of the role of theory in evaluation design and implementation (Bickman, 1987), resulting in overly-constrained and uninterpretable syntheses of otherwise methodologically strong evaluation research (Schoenfeld, 2006). The purpose of this paper is to determine whether calls for theory-based evaluation research have had an impact on the extent to which evaluators of mathematics programs attend to program theory in their design, implementation, and reporting of studies. For each report that met stringent methodological standards (i.e., WWC evidence standards), the authors asked: (1) What type of program theory was articulated (none, sub-theoretical, or theoretical; Lipsey et al., 1985); (2) What was the quality of evaluators&apos; articulation of program theory (entirely implicit, drawn from a limited number of resources such as developer or publisher descriptions, or drawn from multiple resources and situated in the research literature); (3) How was the articulated program theory used in the evaluation; and (4) To what extent does attention to program theory vary by characteristics of the program and evaluator(s), such as the nature of the program&apos;s mathematics learning goals and instruction (i.e., back-to-basics, typical, inquiry-based, or blended); type of publication (e.g., peer-reviewed journal or technical report); funding source (e.g., Federal/state agency or publisher/developer); and timing of analysis (i.e., primary or secondary analysis)? Modeled after the WWC&apos;s process, every report was examined and coded independently by two individuals employing the same coding scheme, and research questions listed here. The findings of evaluation studies guide the decisions of policy makers at every level, including the adoption of both curriculum materials and intervention programs. These decisions are consequential for students&apos; mathematics learning and academic futures. It is therefore crucial that evaluators &amp;quot;get it right&amp;quot; when assessing the effectiveness of such programs. This analysis indicates that WWC&apos;s methodological specifications are inadequate because they overlook understanding and using theory in evaluation design and implementation. In general, evaluation research of mathematics programs needs to improve in its attention to and use of program theory. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Use of Program Theory in Mathematics Education Evaluation Research</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>History Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Segregation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Esteem</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nationalism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Textbooks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Official Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>French</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>War</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Crime</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Jews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>European History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Political Issues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immigration</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carrier, Peter, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>France</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Quebec</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Spain</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Bulgaria</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Germany</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Algeria</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Algeria</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Bulgaria</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Canada</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>France</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Germany</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Spain</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>At a time when the power of schools and both state and federal education authorities to guide young people&apos;s sense of belonging is being challenged by multilingualism, by the claims of supra- and subnational regions and minorities, by memories of national catastrophes and crimes, and by out-of-school educational media, this collection of essays provides an apposite exploration of the ways in which shared narratives continue to be transmitted and learnt. Its authors, whose work emerged from a series of conferences organised by the French National Institute for Pedagogical Research in Lyon, Barcelona and Paris in 2010, demonstrate not only ways in which multiple disciplines (including history, literature, social and language studies) address young people&apos;s sense of attachment, but also how challenges to educational policy are reflected in school textbooks and curricula in Algeria, Bulgaria, Catalonia, France, Galicia, Germany, Quebec, Senegal and the USA. These studies about the role of education in relation to largely tenacious but shifting national identities should appeal to specialists of education, nationalism studies, history and political science. Contents include: (1) Introduction (Peter Carrier); (2) The Empire in French History Teaching. From a Promise to a Burden (Françoise Lantheaume); (3) School and Nation in Senegal from 1960 to the Present Day. A History of Misunderstanding (Amadou Fall); (4) Teaching History and the Future of the Nation. The Case of Quebec (Jocelyn Létourneau); (5) The Social Sciences Curriculum of Catalonia and the Construction of a Regional Identity (Montserrat Oller i Freixa); (6) The Integration and Segregation of African American History. Self-esteem and Recognition in History Education (Elizabeth Hanauer); (7) History Teaching in Galicia (Ramón López Facal); (8) The Use of Literature in the Formation of French National Identity in School Teaching during the Twentieth Century (Anne-Marie Chartier); (9) Caught between Two Empires. History School Textbooks in Bulgaria in the Twentieth Century (Liliana Deyanova); (10) National Languages, Regional Variations and Immigration. The Challenge of Teaching French in Quebec (Diane Vincent); (11) Naming and Misnaming the Nation. Ambivalence and National Belonging in German Textbook Representations of the Holocaust (Peter Carrier); and (12) The National History of Algeria as Reflected in Textbooks at a Time of Political and Educational Reform (Lydia Aït Saadi Bouras).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>School and Nation: Identity Politics and Educational Media in an Age of Diversity</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-3-6316-2692-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>134</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-02462-3</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Politics of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature Reviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Textbooks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Media Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journalism Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Capital</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Laptop Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resistance to Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Animation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Activism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Shared Resources and Services</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stocchetti, Matteo, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Europe</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Portugal</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Spain</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>China</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>China</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Portugal</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Spain</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This book is an invitation to informed and critical participation in the current debate on the role of digital technology in education and a comprehensive introduction to the most relevant issues in this debate. After an early wave of enthusiasm about the emancipative opportunities of the digital &amp;quot;revolution&amp;quot; in education, recent contributions invite caution, if not scepticism. This collection rejects extreme interpretations and establishes a conceptual framework for the critical questioning of this role in terms of concepts, assessments and subversions. This book offers conceptual tools, ideas and insights for further research. It also provides motivation and information to foster active participation in debates and politics and encourages teachers, parents and learners to take part in the making of the future of our societies. Contents include: (1) The Politics of Educational Reform in the Digital Age: Concepts, Assessment and Subversions (Matteo Stocchetti); (2) Digital Inequality in Primary and Secondary Education: Findings From a Systematic Literature Review (Ulli Samuelsson and Tobias Olsson); (3) The Future of Mathematics Textbooks: Ramifications of Technological Change (Daniel Chazan and Michal Yerushalmy); (4) Media and Information Literacy in the Digital Age. An Example on Exploring Pluralism (Marlène Loicq); (5) Scaffolding Curation: Developing Digital Competencies in Media Literacy Education (Paul Mihailidis and Megan E. Fromm); (6) Journalist Education and Truth in the Digital Age: Why We Need Critical Digital Literacy (Filip Lab and Alice N. Tejkalova); (7) Bowling Online: A Critical View of Social Capital and Virtual Communities (Melissa Harness and Sultana A. Shabazz); (8) Informal Media Education in Europe: an Analysis of the Best Practices (Alberto Bitonti and Andrey Školkay); (9) Critical Review of an e-Learning Tool (Barbara Szafrajzen and Karen Ferreira-Meyers); (10) Social Health Education Programs at School: Investigating the Integration of Serious Games in the Curriculum (Katarina Panic, Verolien Cauberghe, and Patrick De Pelsmacker); (11) Children and Video Games: Oral and Written Narratives (Rut Martínez-Borda and Pilar Lacasa); (12) Teaching with Laptops: A Critical Assessment of One-to-one Technologies (Magda Pischetola); (13) Teachers and the Challenges of Digital Technologies in Education: The Portuguese &amp;quot;e.escolinha&amp;quot; Programme (Sara Pereira); (14) Enthusiastic, Hesitant and Resistant Teachers Toward the One-To-One Laptop Programme: A Multi-Sited Ethnographic Study in Catalonia (Cristina Aliagas Marín and Josep M. Castellà Lidon); (15) Animation: A New Method of Educational Communication in China (Vincenzo De Masi and Yan Han); (16) Teaching the Unteachable: Networked Media, Simulation and Community Research/Activism (Judith Faifman and Brian Goldfarb); (17) Beyond &amp;quot;Beyond Schools&amp;quot;: Young People&apos;s Unsanctioned Digital Media Use In and Around Schools and Classrooms (David Elliott and Scott Bulfin); (18) Digital Introductions as Critical Practice (Julie Faulkner); (19) Redefining Students&apos; Reflections: Opportunities and Challenges of Video-Enhanced Blogging (Dennis N. York and Ronald D. Owston); and (20) Emancipative Technology in Formal Education: The Case for &amp;quot;Free and Open Source Software (FOSS)&amp;quot; (Gloria Gómez-Diago).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Media and Education in the Digital Age: Concepts, Assessments, Subversions</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-3-631-65154-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>366</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04437-9</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Impact</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compulsory Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Migrant Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Moral Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Study Abroad</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>DeVillar, Robert A., Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jiang, Binbin, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cummins, Jim, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Africa</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Asia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Europe</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>North America</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>South America</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Australia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Chile</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>India</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>China</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Sierra Leone</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>South Korea</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United Arab Emirates</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Singapore</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Finland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Africa</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Asia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Australia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Chile</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>China</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Finland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>India</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>North America</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Sierra Leone</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Singapore</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>South America</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Korea</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United Arab Emirates</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research-based volume presents a substantive, panoramic view of ways in which Australia and countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, and North and South America engage in educational programs and practices to transform the learning processes and outcomes of their students. It reveals and analyzes national and global trajectories in key areas of educational development, and enhances readers&apos; understanding of the nature and complexity of educational transformation in a global context. The book&apos;s comprehensive analysis of factors associated with transforming education within globally representative geographical, cultural, and political contexts contributes to critical scholarship; its discussion of individual country findings and cross-country patterns has significant implications for educational practitioners and leaders. The volume has direct practical relevance for educational practitioners and leaders, policymakers, and researchers, as nations remain in dire need of effective ways and means to transform their respective educational systems to (1) more ably realize educational equity, (2) make learning relevant to an increasingly diverse overall student populace, (3) ensure individual and general prosperity, and (4) promote substantive global collaboration in developing the new economy. Contents include: (1) The Role of Research on Literacy, Poverty, and Diversity in Transforming Schools: A Critical Analysis of PISA Cross-National Findings (Jim Cummins); (2) Multiple Paths to the 21st Century: National Responses to Enhancing Education with ICTs in Chile, India, and Turkey (Daniel Light); (3) Transforming Education by Contextualizing Professional Learning for Teachers: A Case in Science and Mathematics in Australia (Debra L. Panizzon, Mark Ward, and Martin Westwell); (4) What Can We Do Even Better? Research for Promoting Quality in Teacher Education in Finland (Hannele Niemi); (5) Transforming Teacher Education for Social Equity in China (Heng Jiang); (6) The Perceptions of Teachers in Sierra Leone&apos;s Secondary Education Reform (Yee Han Joong, and Kathryn Noel); (7) Compulsory Education for Migrant Children in China: Issues in Educational Quality (Henan Cheng); (8) The Effects of Student Teaching Abroad on Professional Development, Character Formation, and Cultural Responsiveness (Binbin Jiang, and Robert A. DeVillar); (9) Transforming Education in South Korea: Currents in Critical Perspective (Sohyun An); (10) Accessing Inclusive Education: Family Stories from India (Srikala Naraian, and Poonam Natarajan); (11) Networking and Transformation: School Leadership Programs and Practices in Singapore (Lee Hean Lim, and Zhi Quan Lim); and (12) Leading for Educational Revolution in the United Arab Emirates: Remapping Culture, Educational Outcomes, and Paradigm Shift (Robin R. Dada).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Transforming Education: Global Perspectives, Experiences and Implications. Educational Psychology: Critical Pedagogical Perspectives. Volume 24</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-2038-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>280</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1127-3</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Parent Teacher Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Repetition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Required Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kraft, Matthew A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rogers, Todd</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (Northeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A wide body of literature documents the important role that parents play in supporting children&apos;s academic success in school (Houtenville &amp;amp; Conway, 2008; Barnard, 2004; Fan &amp;amp; Chen, 2001). Drawing on this literature, national taskforces and federal legislation consistently identify increased parental involvement as a central goal of educational reform initiatives (e.g. No Child Left Behind, Title I, Part A, Section 1118). Schools attempt to promote greater parental engagement though a variety of efforts centered on teacher-parent communication (Epstein, 2008). Cheung and Pomerantz (2012) found that children whose parents were more likely to be involved with their learning were more likely to be motivated to meet their parents&apos; academic expectations, and received higher grades. Recent experimental research has documented how two-way teacher-parent communication can lead to greater parental involvement, improved student engagement and academic achievement (Authors, 2013; Bergman, 2012). This study examines the effect of delivering to parents weekly messages written by teachers about each child&apos;s performance in school, and the authors explore how these effects differ across different message types. This is accomplished by conducting a field experiment during a summer credit recovery program in a large urban school district. Researchers randomly assigned participating students and their parents to one of three experimental conditions. Some parents received information throughout the summer program about what their students were doing well and should continue doing; others received information about what their students needed to improve upon, while a third group received no information. The research sought to answer two questions: (1) What is the effect of teacher-to-parent communication on the probability a student earns course credit in a credit recovery program; and 2) Are positive or needs-improvement messages more effective at increasing a student&apos;s likelihood of earning course credit? This research contributes to a growing body of evidence on the beneficial impact that teachers providing parents with individualized messages and information about their children&apos;s schoolwork can have on student achievement and advancement in school. This study also points to the importance of further examining how teachers and schools can improve the content and quality of their communication with parents. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher-to-Parent Communication: Experimental Evidence from a Low-Cost Communication Policy</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Care</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shen, Jianping</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ma, Xin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Quality Rating Improvement System (QRIS) has gained national momentum. The authors first present a national scene of QRIS and then use Children&apos;s Services Council of Palm Beach County as a case study to illustrate a number of things. First, they look at the logic model behind the QRIS. Next, they review the design and implementation of the QRIS in the context of partnership and systems thinking. Finally, they provide an evaluation design and findings. The book is useful for policy makers, administrators of early and education at various levels, researchers, and others who seek to improve early care and education.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Quality Rating Improvement System &amp;quot;for&amp;quot; Early Care &amp;quot;and&amp;quot; Education: Development, Implementation, Evaluation and Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-2086-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Policymakers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Administrators</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Researchers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>218</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/30106?rskey=jsxyO3&amp;result=1</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mental Health</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reinke, Wendy M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Herman, Keith C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dong, Nianbo</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A significant number of children in schools have mental health problems (World Health Organization, 2004). If children receive any type of mental health services, the vast majority receive these supports at school (Rones &amp;amp; Hoagwood, 2000). Mental health needs in children often manifest as emotional dysregulation, social incompetence, and disruptive behaviors. In turn, emotional, social, and behavior problems of students are a significant concern to teachers. For instance, research has documented that 48% of teachers reported classroom behavior problems to be their largest concern in school (Walter, Gouze, &amp;amp; Lim, 2006). In a recent survey of almost 300 teachers of early childhood and elementary aged children, 97% of teachers reported concerns with student behaviors in the past year and many requested additional training and supports in effective classroom management (Reinke, Stormont, Herman, Puri, &amp;amp; Goel, 2011). Importantly, research has demonstrated that teacher classroom practices are linked to disruptive behavior and emotional regulation (Leflot van Lier, Onghena, Colpin, 2010). Furthermore, students in classrooms where behavior is poorly managed receive less academic instruction (Weinstein, 2007) and are more likely to have long-term negative academic, behavioral, and social outcomes than students in well-managed classrooms (Ialongo, Poduska, Werthamer, &amp;amp; Kellam, 2001; Kellam, Ling, Merisca, Brown, &amp;amp; Ialongo, 1998; National Research Council, 2002). Therefore, interventions that provide training to teachers in implementation of effective classroom management have the potential to improve teacher skills and outcomes for students. The &amp;quot;Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management&amp;quot; program (IY TCM) is a universal intervention delivered to teachers to increase their use of effective classroom management strategies. The program includes research based classroom management strategies that have been associated with increases in children&apos;s social emotional development, positive teacher-student interactions, as well as decreases in student problem behavior (Snyder et al., 2011; Webster-Stratton, Reid, &amp;amp; Hammond, 2004). This study examined the efficacy of the IY TCM program in supporting teacher use of effective practices toward improving the behaviors and competence of elementary students in urban, low-income schools. Nine elementary schools from one large urban school district were partners in conducting this study. The participants included 105 K to 3rd grade teachers and their students N = 1818. The authors report that their findings suggest that the IY TCM is an effective universal preventative intervention for fostering effective classroom management practices and for promoting student competence. Teachers assigned to the IY TCM condition were more likely to implement higher ratios of proactive teaching strategies over the course of an academic year compared to teachers in a wait-list control condition. Likewise, students in intervention classrooms had higher levels of social and emotional competence by the end of the year than students in control classrooms.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Incredible Year Teacher Classroom Management Program: Initial Findings from a Group Randomized Control Trial</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>23</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Civics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizen Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Democracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Political Issues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>VeLure Roholt, Ross</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baizerman, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Apparent political apathy among youth in the United States has led to a moral panic about the future of democracy. Many researchers question the facts, while others seek to engage and mobilize young people around public issues they care about in order to master the citizen role and to bring social change. Civic youth work has its modern roots in this work. Its guiding ethos is authentic, meaningful, just, inclusive, and consequential youth involvement in everyday civic life through a small-group process, with the goal of supporting citizenship for young people as a life-long practice. Using their U.S. and international experience, the authors discuss civic youth work touchstones, promising practices, and activities. The text expands earlier notions of youth engagement by grounding them to a conception of the lived-citizen. A substantive bibliography lists the sources on the subject of civic youth work and provides links to scholarly work for researchers and practitioners to effectively support youth involvement in community, social, and political development.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Civic Youth Work Primer. Peter Lang Primers</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-1881-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>145</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/29824?rskey=5VdgSe&amp;result=1</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Justice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mexican Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brown, Ruth Nicole, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carducci, Rozana, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kuby, Candace R., Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;Disrupting Qualitative Inquiry&amp;quot; is an edited volume that examines the possibilities and tensions encountered by scholars who adopt disruptive qualitative approaches to the study of educational contexts, issues, and phenomena. It presents a collection of innovative and intellectually stimulating chapters which illustrate the potential for disruptive qualitative research perspectives to advance social justice aims omnipresent in educational policy and practice dialogues. The book defines &amp;quot;disruptive&amp;quot; qualitative methodologies and methods in educational research as processes of inquiry which seek to: (1) Disrupt traditional notions of research roles and relationships; (2) Disrupt dominant approaches to the collection and analysis of data; (3) Disrupt traditional notions of representing and disseminating research findings; (4) Disrupt rigid epistemological and methodological boundaries; and (5) Disrupt disciplinarily boundaries and assumptive frameworks of how to do educational research. Scholars and graduate students interested in disrupting traditional approaches to the study of education will find this book of tremendous value. Given the inclusion of both research examples and reflective narratives, this book is an ideal text for adoption in introductory research design seminars as well as advanced courses devoted to theoretical and practical applications of qualitative and interpretive methodologies. The book contains the following chapters and authors: (1) &amp;quot;She Came at Me Wreckless!&amp;quot; Wreckless Theatrics as Disruptive Methodology (Ruth Nicole Brown); (2) Reports of Illegal Activities by Research Participants: Meaning-Making through Reflexivity, Dis-Order, and Mexican-American Studies (Rosario Carrillo); (3) Promiscuous Methodology: Breaching the Limits of Theory and Practice for a Social Science We Can Live With (Sara M. Childers); (4) CRiT Walking for Disruption of Educational Master Narratives (Mark S. Giles and Robin L. Hughes); (5) Always Already Inquiry: A/r/tography as a Disruptive Methodology (Nicole M. Pourchier and Teri Holbrook); (6) Crystallization as a Methodology: Disrupting Traditional Ways of Analyzing and (Re)presenting through Multiple Genres Candace R. Kuby); (7) Beyond Scientific &amp;quot;Facts&amp;quot;: Choosing to Honor and Make Visible a Variety of Knowledge Systems (Cassie F. Quigley and Nicole Beeman-Cadwallader); (8) &amp;quot;Bringing a Little Bit of Heaven to Humanity&amp;quot;: Raising Hell While Interrupting Traditional Methods for the Purpose of Justice (David Stovall); (9) Picture This: Using Photography to Tell a Black Girl&apos;s Truth (Claudine Candy Taaffe); (10) Identity as Inquiry: Living and Researching From the Borderlands (Z. Nicolazzo); (11) Advancing Disruptive Methodological Perspectives in Educational Qualitative Research Through Teaching and Learning (Penny A. Pasque); (12) Disrupting the Dissertation, Phenomenologically Speaking: A Reflexive Dialogue Between Advisor-Advisee (Hilary E. Hughes and Mark D. Vagle); and (13) Methodological Freedom: A Journey (Nana Osei-Kofi).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Disrupting Qualitative Inquiry: Possibilities and Tensions in Educational Research. Critical Qualitative Research. Volume 10</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-2312-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>308</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1268-3</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conventional Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Freedom</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Human Dignity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Altruism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Church Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holistic Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chimaka, Anthony Ikechukwu</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Nigeria</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Nigeria</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The smallest and most remote villages in the developing countries are affected by the rapid and seemingly irresistible trend towards globalization. The limitless availability of information however necessitates education to stand out as the key factor for human and national development. But which conditions must be met by societies for education systems to perform this function effectively? Which benefits in turn must education systems provide to ensure social cohesion? These general considerations are exemplified by an analysis of the social situation of Nigeria, where one third of the whole population did not receive an education and thus cannot participate in the opportunities of modern social structures. As an advocate of the social values of freedom, dignity and charity the church stated clearly that education belongs to the inalienable human rights. The study argues that only a holistic development of each and every citizen of Nigeria will lead to the development of Nigeria as a nation. It portrays the areas where lack of formal education has slowed down the implementation and acceptance of modern techniques and as a result has hampered development. It critically analyses the Nigerian educational system and concludes by suggesting strategies towards national development. The book contains the following chapters: (1) The description of Education and Nation building; (2) The Teachings of the Church on Education and Human development; (3) A Brief Historical Survey of the Development of Education in Nigeria; (4) Aims of Educational Acquisition; (5) Formal Education and some Factors of Nation Building in Nigeria; (6) Targets (Strategies) towards National Development; and (7) Some Issues of Concern in Nigerian Educational System.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Formal Education: A Catalyst to Nation Building. A Case Study of Nigeria. African Theological Studies. Volume 6</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-3-631-64599-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>244</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03861-3</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Literature</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Criticism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holistic Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Choo, Suzanne S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this book is restore the centrality of pedagogy in governing the ways literary texts are received, experienced, and interpreted by students in the classroom. Utilizing a method of pedagogical criticism, it provides an account of core approaches to teaching literature that have emerged across history and the conceptual values informing these approaches. More importantly, &amp;quot;Reading the World&amp;quot; discusses how these values have been shaped by broader global forces and key movements in the discipline of English Literature. To varying degrees, these approaches are aimed at cultivating a hospitable imagination so that students may more fully engage with multiple others in the world. Given the reality of an increasingly interconnected twenty-first century, literature pedagogy plays a vital role in schools by demonstrating how world, global, and cosmopolitan approaches to teaching literature can facilitate the prioritization of the other, challenge us to think about how we can be accountable to multiple others in the world, and push us to continually problematize the boundaries of our openness towards the other.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563017</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Reading the World, the Globe, and the Cosmos: Approaches to Teaching Literature for the Twenty-First Century. Global Studies in Education. Volume 28</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-2178-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>189</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1153-2</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Accommodations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Timed Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schneider, Dianne</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The number of students requesting accommodations has increased in recent years, and the effects of extended time have become increasingly important as this is the only accommodation for 7 of 10 of these students completing the SAT I. Allowing learning disabled students to retest with extended time clearly enables them to improve their SAT I scores, but gains associated with extended time are generally modest, with mean gains of 32 and 26 points on the verbal and math scales, respectively. Additional time should serve as a compensating factor for students with learning disabilities, but time and a half or double time may overcompensate for some students, permitting them to respond more leisurely and result in overprediction of college performance.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Testing with Extended Time on the SAT® I: Effects for Students with Learning Disabilities. Research Notes. RN-08</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2000-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Economy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reputation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Rating</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Marketing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Governance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prior Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zgaga, Pavel, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Teichler, Ulrich, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brennan, John, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Europe</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Austria</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>England</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Netherlands</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Balkans</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Poland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Bosnia and Herzegovina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Croatia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Yugoslavia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Austria</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Bosnia and Herzegovina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Croatia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Netherlands</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Poland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United Kingdom (England)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Yugoslavia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The last decade has marked the European higher education with a particular dynamics. Today, after a decade of a «concerted» policy, national systems look much more convergent but new questions and dilemmas are emerging: about its nature and quality, about real impact of recent reforms in different countries as well as about its future. The book examines the impact of Europe-wide and global developments on national higher education systems. The authors try in particular to upfront issues of convergence and diversity, of equity and of the relationship of centres and peripheries in higher education. The book is an outcome of research collaboration between six institutes which developed a EuroHESC research proposal on the consequences of expanded and differentiated higher education systems. The following chapters are included: (1) Challenges for European Higher Education: &amp;quot;Global&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;National&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Europe&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;sub-Europes&amp;quot; (Pavel Zgaga, Ulrich Teichler, and John Brennan); (2) Imagining Higher Education in the European Knowledge Economy: Discourse and Ideas in Communications of the EU (Janja Komljenovic and Klemen Miklavic); (3) The Event of International Mobility in the Course of Study--The European Policy Objective (Ulrich Teichler); (4) The Impact of University Rankings on Higher Education Policy in Europe: A Challenge to Perceived Wisdom and a Stimulus for Change (Ellen Hazelkorn and Martin Ryan); (5) Diversification in Austrian Higher Education: A Result of European or National Policies? (Elsa Hackl); (6) The Effects of Europeanisation on Institutional Diversification in the Western Balkans (Manja Klemencic); (7) The Monolithic Un-intentionality of Higher Education Policies: On the Continuing Importance of Karl Marx, Joseph Stalin and the Minor Classics Less Known (Voldemar Tomusk); (8) &amp;quot;Hullabaloo in the Groves of Academe&amp;quot;: The Politics of &amp;quot;Instituting&amp;quot; a Market in English Higher Education (Susan L. Robertson); (9) Higher Education Differentiation and the Myth of Meritocracy: The Case of the UK (John Brennan); (10) The Recognition of Prior Learning and Dutch Higher Education--At Cross-Purposes? (Leon Cremonini); (11) From System Expansion to System Contraction. Access to Higher Education in Poland (Marek Kwiek); (12) Higher Education Policy Dynamics in a Multi-level Governance Context: A Comparative Study of Four Post-Communist Countries (Martina Vukasovic and Mari Elken); (13) What Kind of University for What Kind of Society? Nation-States, Post-National Constellations, and Higher Education in the Post-Yugoslav Space (Jana Bacevic); (14) The Bosnian Puzzle of Higher Education in the Perspective of the Bologna Process (Tatjana Sekulic); (15) Reclaiming the Role of Higher Education in Croatia: Dominant and Oppositional Framings (Danijela Dolenec and Karin Doolan); and (16) Reconsidering Higher Education Reforms in the Western Balkans: &amp;quot;Policy Colonies&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Policy Autarchies&amp;quot;? (Pavel Zgaga).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Globalisation Challenge for European Higher Education: Convergence and Diversity, Centres and Peripheries. Higher Education Research and Policy. Volume 4</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-3-631-63908-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>389</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-02598-9</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Play</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulated Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Friendship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burke, Anne, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Marsh, Jackie, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As children&apos;s digital lives become more relevant to schools and educators, the question of play and learning is being revisited in new and interesting ways. &amp;quot;Children&apos;s Virtual Play Worlds: Culture, Learning, and Participation&amp;quot; provides a more reasoned account of children&apos;s play engagements in virtual worlds through a number of scholarly perspectives, exploring key concerns and issues which have come to the forefront. The global nature of the research in this edited volume embraces many different areas of study from school based research, sociology, cultural studies, psychology, to contract law showing how children&apos;s play and learning in virtual spaces has great potential and possibilities. Contents include; (1) The changing landscapes of children&apos;s play worlds (Susan Edwards); (2) Post-Industrial Play: Understanding the Relationship between Traditional and Converged Forms of Play in the Early Years (Kaveri Subrahmanyam); (3) Developmental Implications for Children&apos;s Virtual Worlds (Anne Burke); (4) Stardolls and the Virtual Playground: How Identity Construction Works in the New Digital Frontier (Jackie Marsh); (5) Breaking the Ice: Play, Friendships and Online Identities in Young Children&apos;s Use of Virtual Worlds (Karen E. Wohlwend/Tolga Kargin); (6) &amp;quot;Cause I Know How to Get Friends--Plus They Like My Dancing&amp;quot;: (L)earning the Nexus of Practice in Club Penguin (Jan Connelly); (7) Virtual Clay or Virtual Play: Identity Shaping, Consumer Building and Corporate Affiliation versus Literacies Affordance inside barbiegirls.com ( Isabel Pederson/Jennifer Rowsell); (8) May the Force Be with You: Harnessing the Power of Brain-Computer Games ( Stephanie M. Reich/Ksenia A. Korobkova/Rebecca W. Black/Mariya Sumaroka); (9) &amp;quot;Hey! Can You Show Me How to Do This?&amp;quot; Digital Games as a Mediator of Family Time (Sara M. Grimes); (10) Digital Play Structures: Examining the Terms of Use (and Play) Found in Children&apos;s Commercial Virtual Worlds (Eric Meyers/Robert Bittner); (11) Green Pixels to Green Behaviours: Sustainability Literacy in Virtual Worlds for Children (Victoria Carrington); and (12) An Argument for Assemblage Theory: Integrated Spaces, Mobility, and Polycentricity.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Children&apos;s Virtual Play Worlds Culture, Learning, and Participation. New Literacies and Digital Epistemologies. Volume 58</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-1827-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>236</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1069-6</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admissions Officers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Counselor Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Accommodations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Support Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Consultants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Disclosure (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Counselors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mandinach, Ellen B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cahalan, Cara</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The study represents a first step in trying to gain a better appreciation for the complexity of the issues surrounding flagging test scores taken with nonstandard conditions and how the admission process can better serve students with disabilities. Surveys were sent to admission officers, guidance counselors, and disability service providers at colleges and universities to examine their institutional policies and practices. In addition, interviews and focus groups also were conducted. It is clear from the results of this study that perceptions about the use of the flag for nonstandard test administrations differ based on the role the respondent plays in the admission process. Although differences exist with regard to the use of the flag, all three groups perceived an equity problem concerning how students with disabilities are identified, what documentation is required, and what services are provided to these students. Respondents felt that some subgroups of students are not being served adequately by the current system. In addition, the three groups shared a concern that some nondisabled students are manipulating the system to receive diagnoses and accommodations, such as extended time, so as to gain a perceived advantage on the standardized tests. Five appendices are included: (1) Survey Instrument for Admission Officers; (2) Survey Instrument for Guidance Counselors; (3) Survey Instrument for Disability Service Providers; (4) Interview Protocol for Admission Officers; and (5) Interview Protocol for Guidance Counselors.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563021</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Flagging on the Admission Process: Policies, Practices, and Implications. Research Report No. 2002-2. ETS RR-02-03</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>63</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>42</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essay Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Breland, Hunter M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kubota, Melvin Y.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bonner, Marilyn W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined the SAT® II: Writing Subject Test as a predictor of writing performance in college English courses. Writing performance was based on eight writing samples submitted as part of regular course work by students in eight colleges. The samples consisted of drafts and final papers submitted in response to four take-home writing assignments. The samples submitted were evaluated by 20 experienced readers of student writing using a common scoring scale. Each sample was read and scored independently by two different readers. In addition to this writing performance criterion, two supplemental criteria were used: English course grades and students&apos; self-assessments of their own writing ability and experience. In evaluating the SAT II: Writing Test as a predictor of these three criteria, special attention was given to comparisons of the predictive effectiveness of the essay and multiple-choice components of the test. It was concluded that both components were good predictors of the three criteria; however, the 40-minute multiple-choice component tended to produce higher predictive correlations than the 20-minute essay component. The best predictions were obtained when the two components were combined. Appendices include: (1) Student Consent Statement; (2) Writing Experience Questionnaire; and (3) Performance Assessment Study in Writing.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Performance Assessment Study in Writing: Analysis of the SAT® II--Writing Subject Test. Report No. 99-4. ETS RR No. 99-24</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1999-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scaling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asian American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dorans, Neil J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The history of SAT® score scales is summarized, and the need for realigning SAT score scales is demonstrated. The process employed to produce the conversions that take scores from the original SAT scales to recentered scales in which reference group scores are centered near the midpoint of the score-reporting range is laid out. For the purposes of this paper, SAT verbal and SAT mathematical scores were placed on recentered scales, which have reporting ranges of 920 to 980, means of 950, and standard deviations of 11. (The 920-to-980 scale is used in this article to highlight the distinction between it and the old 200-to-800 scale. In actuality, recentered scores were reported on a 200-to-800 scale.) Recentering was accomplished via a linear transformation of normally distributed scores that were obtained from a continuized, smoothed frequency distribution of original SAT scores that were originally on augmented two-digit scales, i.e., discrete scores rounded to either 0 or 5 in the third decimal place. These discrete scores were obtained for all students in the &amp;quot;1990 Reference Group&amp;quot; using 35 different editions of the SAT taken between October 1988 and June 1990. The performance of this &amp;quot;1990 Reference Group&amp;quot; on the original and recentered scales is described. The effects of recentering on scores of individuals and the &amp;quot;1990 Reference Group&amp;quot; are also examined. Finally, recentering did not occur solely on the basis of its technical merit. Issues associated with converting recentering from a possibility into a reality are discussed.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Recentering of SAT® Scales and Its Effects on Score Distributions and Score Interpretations. Research Report No. 2002-11. ETS RR-02-04</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>27</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multilingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bilingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bilingual Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Limited English Speaking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrated Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theory Practice Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Identity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Breidbach, Stephan, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Viebrock, Britta, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Europe</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Belgium</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>France</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Germany</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Luxembourg</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Belgium</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>France</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Germany</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Luxembourg</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dc:language>German</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Content and Language Integrated Learning has received a strong tailwind in European educational and language policies. It is on the verge of becoming a mainstream phenomenon. However, an overly speedy implementation of &amp;quot;CLIL for all&amp;quot; might bear a number of risks for all groups of stakeholders. The purpose of this book is to link the growing empirical knowledge about the full complexity of CLIL to the current European educational and language policies. The articles collected in this volume contribute to a more systematic evidence base of CLIL that has frequently been called for at a European level. This bi-lingual volume (English/German) brings together authors from several European countries to present significant findings from recent CLIL research in the light of the developments in education policy. The four parts of the book focus on the reconstruction of learning processes, learner achievement, theory-driven investigations of the concept of CLIL itself, and critical reflections on the current &amp;quot;CLIL boom&amp;quot;. Articles include: (1) CLIL: Complementing or Compromising Foreign Language Teaching? Effects and Perspectives of Education Policy Plans (Stephan Breidbach and Britta Viebrock); (2) Integrating CLIL with Other Mainstream Discourses (Peeter Mehisto); (3) &amp;quot;Mehrsprachigkeit&amp;quot; und &amp;quot;CLIL&amp;quot;--zwei unverbundene Konzepte in der europäischen Sprachen-und Bildungspolitik? (Bettina Deutsch); (4) Bilingual, offen, konzeptlos - Was Schulen mit reformpädagogischen Bildungskonzepten zum fremdsprachlichen Lernen versprechen und nicht halten (Henriette Dausend, Daniela Elsner, and Jörg-U. Keßler); (5) Transnationalism in Education: CLIL Experience in Turkey (Özlem Etus); (6) The Construction of the CLIL Subject Teacher Identity (Lauretta D&apos;Angelo); (7) &amp;quot;Dealing with the Language Aspect? Personally, No.&amp;quot; Content Lecturers&apos; Views in an ICLHE Context (Francesca Costa); (8) Der Einfluss subjektiver Sprachlerntheorien auf den Erfolg der Implementierung von CLIL-Programmen (Julia Hüttner and Christiane Dalton-Puffer); (9) CLIL-Teacher Training at the University Level: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice (Petra Burmeister, Michael Ewig, Evelyn Frey, and Marisa Rimmele); (10) The CLIL Learning Experience: Strategies and Underlying Knowledge Employed by Limited English Primary School Students during Conceptual and Linguistic Comprehension (Irina Adriana Hawker); (11) Students&apos; General English Proficiency Prior to CLIL: Empirical Evidence for Substantial Differences between Prospective CLIL and Non-CLIL Students in Germany (Dominik Rumlich); (12) Sprachlernprozesse im bilingualen Geschichtsunterricht (Ulrich Wannagat); (13) CLIL as a New Momentum for Learning? Reconsidering the Differences between Languages as Subjects and Vehicular Languages in Luxembourg Schools? (Marie-Anne Hansen-Pauly); (14) Deutsch als Fremdsprache fördern-ein Fall für CLIL? Sichtung empirischer Befunde in Belgien und Frankreich zu Einstellungen und Sprachlernmotivation im Zusammenhang mit &amp;quot;Content and Language Integrated Learning&amp;quot; (Katja Lochtmann and Vinciane Devaux); (15) CLIL Modules in the Mathematics Classroom--Reasons for Their Implementation and First Empirical Results--Andreas Bonnet/Christiane Dalton-Puffer: Great Expectations? Competence and Standard Related Questions Concerning CLIL Moving into the Mainstream (Katharina Prüfer); (16) It&apos;s Not CLIL That Is a Success--CLIL Students Are! Some Critical Remarks on the Current CLIL Boom (Almut Küppers and Matthias Trautmann); (17) Bili für alle? Ergebnisse und Perspektiven aus einem Forschungsprojekt zur Einführung bilingualer Module in einer Hauptschule (Götz Schwab); and (18) Generalisierbare sprachlich-diskursive Kompetenzen im bilingualen Unterricht (und darüber hinaus) (Wolfgang Zydatiß).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in Europe: Research Perspectives on Policy and Practice. Mehrsprachigkeit in Schule und Unterricht. Volume 14</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-3-631-64400-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>355</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-02955-0</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dorans, Neil</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This summary explains how a student&apos;s relative standing in a particular group, as measured by a percentile score, is the same regardless of whether that student&apos;s score is on the SAT scale established in 1941 or on the recentered SAT scale, established with a 1990 reference group, and introduced in 1995.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563025</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effects of SAT® Scale Recentering on Percentiles. Research Summary RS-05</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1999-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Introductory Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Screening Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jackson, Rex</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morgan, Jeanette</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Osborne, Gerald</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Test of Standard Written English</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Test of Standard Written English</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The effectiveness of the Test of Standard Written English (TSWE) as an aid in placing students into introductory English courses was studied by relating test scores to course outcomes for students entering the University of Houston between the fall of 1977 and the spring of 1981. For students placed into the regular introductory English composition course, TSWE scores were effective in predicting end-of-course grades, end-of-course essay scores, and endof- course test scores. Students with scores below 40 on the TSWE were estimated to have less than 58 chances in 100 of obtaining grades of C or higher in the regular course. For students who were placed into and completed the remedial course, large gains were found from precourse TSWE scores to postcourse TSWE scores. These findings support the placement uses made of the TSWE by the University of Houston. The evidence strongly suggests that students with low TSWE scores are unlikely to succeed in the regular introductory composition course and are likely to profit from the instruction provided in the remedial course. The following are appended: (1) Regression of Observed Retest on Observed Initial TSWE Scores Under Conditions of No True Change; and (2) Tables.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effectiveness of the College Board&apos;s Test of Standard Written English for Placing Students in Entry-Level English Courses. Report No. 86-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1986-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Timed Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Accommodations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mandinach, Ellen B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bridgeman, Brent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cahalan-Laitusis, Cara</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Trapani, Catherine</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The effects of extended time on SAT Reasoning Test™ performance are examined. The study explored the impact of providing standard time, time and a half (1.5 time) with and without specified section breaks, and double time without specified section breaks on the verbal and mathematics sections of the SAT®. Differences among ability, disability, and gender groups were examined. Results indicated that time and a half with separately timed sections benefits students with and without disabilities. Some extra time improves performance, but too much may be detrimental. Extra time benefits medium- and high-ability students but provides little or no advantage to low-ability students. The effects of extended time are more pronounced for the mathematics sections of the SAT. The implications for potential changes to the SAT and the need for future research are discussed. The following is appended: (1) Proportions Correct and Omit/Not Reached by Item for V1, V2, M1, and M2 by Disability Status.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Extended Time on SAT® Test Performance. Research Report No. 2005-8. ETS RR-05-20</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>41</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>35</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sathy, Viji</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Barbuti, Sandra</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report provides information on the SAT and trends in test performance for the years 2004, 2005, and 2006.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The New SAT and Trends in Test Performance. Statistical Report No. 2006-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>19</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Textiles Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clothing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Furniture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Architecture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vignettes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Workshops</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Athletics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theater Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Music</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fine Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fairy Tales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Engineering Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Puppetry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Creativity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Human Body</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feminism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Buechley, Leah, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Peppler, Kylie, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Eisenberg, Michael, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yasmin, Kafai, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;Textile Messages&amp;quot; focuses on the emerging field of electronic textiles, or e-textiles--computers that can be soft, colorful, approachable, and beautiful. E-textiles are articles of clothing, home furnishings, or architectures that include embedded computational and electronic elements. This book introduces a collection of tools that enable novices--including educators, hobbyists, and youth designers--to create and learn with e-textiles. It then examines how these tools are reshaping technology education--and DIY practices--across the K-16 spectrum, presenting examples of the ways educators, researchers, designers, and young people are employing them to build new technology, new curricula, and new creative communities. Contents include: (1) Vignette: LilyPad Arduino Embroidery (Becky Stern); (2 ) Vignette: The Climate Dress (Michel Guglielmi,Hanne-Louise Johannesen); (3) Vignette: Know It All Knotting Bag (Kalani Craig). (4) LilyPad Arduino: E-Textiles for Everyone (Leah Buechley,Despina Papadopoulos, and Zach Eveland ); (5) i*CATch: A Plug-n-Play Kit for Wearable Computing (Grace Ngai/Stephen C.F. Chan/Vincent T.Y. Ng); (6) Traveling Light: Making Textiles Programmable &amp;quot;Through the Air&amp;quot; (Nwanua Elumeze Lynne Bruning: Vignette: Mrs. Mary Atkins-Holl; and (7) Handcrafting Textile Sensors (Hannah Perner-Wilson/Leah Buechley). Section 2, Learning and Designing with E-Textiles contains: (8) Learning about Circuitry with E-textiles in After-School Settings (Kylie Peppler, Diane Glosson); (9) Making Connections Across Disciplines in High School E-Textile Workshops (Yasmin Kafai, Deborah Fields, Kristin Searle); (10) EduWear: E-Textiles in Youth Sports and Theater (Heidi Schelhowe, Eva-Sophie Katterfeldt, Nadine Dittert, Milena Reichel) Vignette: The Space Between Us: Electronic Music + Modern Dance + E-Textiles (Eric Lindsay); (11) ETextiles and the New Fundamentals of Fine Arts (Kylie Peppler/ Leslie Sharpe/Diane Glosson), Vignette: FairyTale Fashion (Diana Eng); (12) Bringing E-Textiles into Engineering Education (Mike Eisenberg, Ann Eisenberg, Yingdan Huang); Vignette: Amirobo: Crocheted Robot (Osamu Iwasaki); and (13) ETextiles for Educators: Participatory Simulations with e-Puppetry (Kylie Peppler, Joshua Danish). (14) LilyPad in the Wild: Technology DIY, E-Textiles, and Gender (Leah Buechley, Jennifer Jacobs, Benjamin Mako Hill) Vignette: Tendrils: Sensing &amp;amp; Sharing Touch (Thecla Schiphorst/Jinsil Seo); (15) Mediated Craft: Digital Practices around Creative Handwork (Daniela K. Rosner); (16) E-Textile Technologies in Design, Research and Pedagogy (Joanna Berzowska) Vignette: Muttering Hat (Kate Hartman); (17) E-Textiles and the Body: Feminist Technologies and Design Research ( Shaowen Bardzell); and (18) Adventures in Electronic Textiles (Maggie Orth).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Textile Messages: Dispatches from the World of E-Textiles and Education. New Literacies and Digital Epistemologies. Volume 62</dc:title>
<dc:source>Peter Lang Publishing Group</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-4331-1920-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>264</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Peter Lang Publishing Group. 29 Broadway 18th Floor, New York, NY 10006. Tel: 212-647-7706; Fax: 212-647-7707; e-mail: customerservice@plang.com; Web site: http://www.peterlang.com</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-0941-6</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>National Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Charter Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Magnet Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Noncollege Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Maucieri, Lawrence</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gernand, Renee</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patelis, Thanos</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Guidance Services and Research and Development Departments of the College Board coordinated an investigation of the results of a national high school survey. This survey, administered in 2000, follows a similar, large-scale survey of high schools in 1993 by the College Board. The current research report is designed to provide the reader with detailed and updated information about high schools in the United States. It provides basic facts, figures, and trends about common features among the participating institutions. The report also presents evidence in support of observable trends among the educational and demographic factors of concern as of 2000 and 1993. Two appendices are included: (1) 2000 Advanced Placement Examination® (AP®) Participation by Total School Enrollment and by Institution Type; and (2) Methodology and Survey Instrument.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The College Board National High School Survey Report. Research Report No. 2002-4</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>64</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reputation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smith, Jonathan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pender, Matea</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Howell, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hurwitz, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board Advocacy &amp; Policy Center</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research quantifies the extent of student-college academic undermatch among the 1992 and 2004 cohorts of graduating high school seniors and documents changes in the extent of academic undermatch over time. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The CollegeKeys Compact™. Getting into College: Postsecondary Academic Undermatch</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conflict Resolution</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prompting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Downer, Jason</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brown, Josh</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Herrera, Manuela Jimenez</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stuhlman, Megan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bourassa, Kyle</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gologor, Ben</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wong, Pamela</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teacher-educators and policy-makers recognize that ongoing training and support for high quality implementation of curricula can be a vital component of systems that ensure the value of education experiences, particularly for students at-risk of school failure (Meisels, 2007; Pew Charitable Trusts, 2007; Pianta, 2005). In particular, there is growing consensus that one-on-one consultation approaches (also referred to as coaching, mentoring, staff development) that provide ongoing support and feedback may be the most direct, effective path to producing high quality implementation of curricula (Ingersoll &amp;amp; Kralik, 2004; Landry et al., 2006; Pianta &amp;amp; Allen, 2009). However, there is as much potential for variability in the quality of coaching as there is in a teacher&apos;s fidelity to a curriculum, which raises several questions about how these different levels of intervention fidelity are related to one another. The current study is embedded within the evaluation of an integrated SEL and literacy program in third through fifth grade classrooms called the 4Rs (Reading, Writing, Respect, and Resolution; Morningside Center for Teaching Social Responsibility, 2001). A recent randomized controlled evaluation of 4Rs indicated moderate to large, positive impacts on teacher practices and small, positive impacts on student outcomes (Brown, Jones, LaRusso &amp;amp; Aber, 2010; Jones, Brown &amp;amp; Aber, 2011). Despite the promise of these findings, there was considerable variability during implementation of the 4Rs Program in curriculum delivery, which may have attenuated intervention effects. Therefore, in the current study teachers using the 4Rs curriculum are supported with a standardized, video-based coaching program called MyTeachingPartner (MTP; Pianta et al., 2008). In past trials with a variety of curricula across prek and secondary classrooms, MTP yielded improvements on teacher implementation and teaching practices that were moderate to large (Pianta et al., 2008). As part of this evaluation of 4Rs+MTP, authors monitored the quality with which coaches implement the 2 main components of MTP: (1) on-line written prompts that ask teachers to analyze key interactions from their own videotaped 4Rs lessons, and (2) in-person conferences that deepen teachers analysis of their 4Rs practice and result in actionable improvement plans. In addition, videotaped footage of teachers&apos; implementation of 4Rs are coded by independent observers for fidelity to the curriculum protocol. These data allow researchers to explore the following questions about patterns of variability in these 2 levels of implementation and how they relate to one another: (1) To what extent are the two measures of coaches&apos; quality of implementation (prompt-writing, conferences) related to one another? (2) To what extent is there variability on these two measures within coaches, across their caseload of teachers? (3) To what extent does quality of coaching predict variation in teachers&apos; implementation of the 4Rs curriculum, above and beyond a global measure of teaching quality (CLASS)? Researchers expect to learn how different measures of coaching implementation are associated with one another and to identify elements of coaching that may be particularly challenging to standardize. Implications will be drawn about how best to provide support to coaches in the field to maintain their fidelity to the coaching model and ensure a high quality coaching experience for teachers.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Coaching Quality and Teachers&apos; Implementation of the 4Rs Social-Emotional and Literacy Curriculum: Testing the Link between Two Levels of Intervention Fidelity</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Policymakers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Practitioners</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>26</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Norris, Dwayne</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Oppler, Scott</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kuang, Daniel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Day, Rachel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Adams, Kimberly</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study assessed the predictive and incremental validity of a prototype version of the forthcoming SAT® writing section that was administered to a sample of incoming students at 13 colleges and universities. For these participants, SAT scores, high school GPA, and first-year grades also were obtained. Using these data, analyses were conducted to assess the validity of SAT writing scores for predicting first-year college GPA and GPA in English composition courses. Also assessed was the incremental validity of SAT writing. Consistent with the results of prior research, the weighted-average correlation between SAT writing scores and first-year college GPA was 0.46 when corrected for range restriction. Furthermore, the SAT writing scores resulted in a weighted-average increment of 0.01 to the predictive validity already provided by SAT verbal and math scores and high school GPA in predicting first-year college GPA. Also consistent with previous research, the weighted-average correlation between SAT writing scores and GPA in English composition was 0.32 when corrected for range restriction. In light of the study constraints, these results are encouraging and suggest that the new SAT writing section should be a useful addition to the SAT in terms of predicting academic performance during the first year in college. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The College Board SAT® Writing Validation Study: An Assessment of Predictive and Incremental Validity. Research Report No. 2006-2</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2006-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>38</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quality Control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Affordances</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economically Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Eligibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lunch Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Breakfast Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCaffrey, Daniel F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Casabianca, Jodi M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Mid Atlantic States)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As the education reform movement increasingly focuses on teachers and teaching, educators, policy-makers, and researchers need valid and reliable measures that can be used to evaluate individual teachers, provide guidance for improving teaching performance, and support research in ways that advance instruction and classroom dialog and practice. A new generation of classroom evaluation tools has recently been developed to support evaluation of teaching. Live observations tend to be the standard for studies of teaching and teacher evaluations in practice. They have the benefit of the observer being in the teacher&apos;s physical classroom. This is valuable for teacher evaluations because it gives observation scores credibility among teachers. Using video provides particular affordances because they create a permanent record and teachers can review them to evaluate their own instruction as professional development (Miller, 2007; Sherin &amp;amp; Han, 2004; van Es &amp;amp; Sherin, 2010). Videos can be scored by multiple raters, which can reduce error by averaging scores. The use of video also allows for scores to be audited as a part of quality control and videos can be evaluated using multiple scoring protocols to assess the robustness of inferences to a protocol. For most of these reasons, many recent studies of classrooms have made use of videos (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 2012). Given these affordances, an important issue is to understand the comparability of the nature and quality of information created through these two observation modes. Nearly 20 years ago Jaeger (1993) identified mode of observation as potentially contributing to the psychometric properties of measuring teaching, but little research on mode effects has occurred since. This study is a first step toward rectifying the dearth in knowledge on the effects of observation mode on the psychometric properties of classroom teaching evaluations. It tests for observation mode effects on inferences about teaching, classrooms, and teachers. Research questions include the following: (1) Do raters systematically give higher scores using one observation mode or the other? (2) Does the observation mode affect the rank ordering of scores? (3) Does the observation mode affect the size of the standard errors of measurement or the reliability of scores? (4) What are the implications of errors for inferences about the teaching in a lesson or for a classroom for a year? The authors use data collected for the study Toward an Understanding of Classroom Context (TUCC) to test for mode effects in the scores and inferences about the teaching in lessons and in classrooms. TUCC took place in middle and high schools in an urban fringe mid-Atlantic school district that serves roughly 90 percent students of color and 55 percent students who are eligible for free or reduced price meals. The study concluded that there are small mode effects on score means but they are relatively small and most likely inconsequential. Modes do not rank order teachers differently; it is the measurement error that results in differences between live observations and video scoring in the ordering of classrooms or lessons. Differences in the decomposition of variance across modes are a result of the differences in scoring dates. Scoring trends and the differences in timing across the modes are the only significant difference between modes. They have important implications for studies using classroom observations. Live scoring will confound rater learning with lessons and video scoring can avoid this confound. Figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effect of Observation Mode on Measures of Teaching</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Practitioners</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Researchers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Teachers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Policymakers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prompting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Location</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Oh, Hyeon-Joo</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Walker, Michael E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study evaluated (1) whether essay placement (either at the beginning or at the end of the test battery) impacts test-takers&apos; performance on the critical reading, mathematics, and writing multiple choice measures; and (2) whether essay prompt type (either a simple one-line prompt or a prompt including a short passage) affects test-takers&apos; essay performance. The following are appended: (1) PSAT/NMSQT® Essay Placement Analyses; (2) PSAT/NMSQT Prompt Type Analyses; and (3) Sample Essay Prompts.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effects of Essay Placement and Prompt Type on Performance on the New SAT®. Research Report No. 2006-7. ETS RR-06-34</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metacognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Care Centers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Task Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expressive Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Unlu, Fatih</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Layzer, Carolyn</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Clements, Douglas</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sarama, Julie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cook, David</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many educational Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) collect baseline versions of outcome measures (pretests) to be used in the estimation of impacts at posttest. Although pretest measures are not necessary for unbiased impact estimates in well executed experimental studies, using them increases the precision of impact estimates and reduces sample size requirements to detect desired effect sizes. This paper provides a theoretical overview of the late pretest issue and empirically assesses the bias-precision tradeoff in the experimental evaluation of the efficacy of adding a curriculum designed to support the development of children&apos;s self-regulation skills (Scaffolded Self-Regulation, SSR) to an established early mathematics curriculum (Building Blocks, BB) to form a synthesized curriculum, BBSSR. The RCT described in this paper is conducted in three large districts in Southern California. The analytic sample includes 807 students who participated in both baseline and posttest data collection. These students were in 84 4-year-old classrooms across the three districts. The authors analyzed a three-armed cluster RCT in which classrooms in early childhood centers or schools were randomized to the two intervention conditions and a business-as-usual control condition. Randomization was conducted separately for schools with one or two participating classrooms (groups A and B). Schools/centers in group A were placed into five randomization blocks such that each block consisted of all half-day or full-day PreK classrooms in one of the three study districts. Within each block, schools/centers were sorted with respect to prior math achievement, % reduced price lunch eligible, and %ELL and randomly assigned to the three conditions three at a time, starting with a randomly chosen point in the sorted list. This process was used to ensure balanced experimental groups. In each group B center/school, the two study classrooms were randomly assigned to two conditions that were randomly determined. Analyses conducted thus far show that controlling for contaminated pretest measures in impact regressions can lead to substantially biased impact estimates while their effect on the precision of impact estimates is less profound, causing one to question the overall merit of using them. Figures and exhibits are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Approaches to Incorporating Late Pretests in Experiments: Evaluation of Two Early Mathematics and Self-Regulation Interventions</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcome Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bayesian Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pattanayak, Cassandra W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rubin, Donald B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zell, Elizabeth R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Mantel Haenszel Procedure</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In educational research, outcome measures are often estimated across separate studies or across schools, districts, or other subgroups to assess the overall causal effect of an active treatment versus a control treatment. Students may be partitioned into such strata or blocks by experimental design, or separated into studies within a meta-analysis. In non-randomized studies, students may be partitioned into subclasses based on key covariates or estimated propensity scores to improve observed covariate balance across treatment groups (e.g., Rosenbaum &amp;amp; Rubin, 1983). Procedures designed to estimate any estimand in the presence of strata, including a simple t-test for the difference in mean outcomes (Neyman, Iwaszkiewicz, &amp;amp; Kolodziejczyk, 1935), rely on implicit assumptions about the unknowable correlation between potential outcomes under active treatment and control treatment. For binary outcomes, the standard procedures used to estimate overall odds ratios in the presence of strata were introduced by Cochran (1954), who first proposed a hypothesis test for the difference in proportions across strata. Mantel and Haenszel (1959) proposed a very similar test and introduced an estimator for a common odds ratio. Consider the following hypothetical studies designed to estimate the causal effect of an existing program on high school graduation: (1) Within each of several school districts, half of the schools are randomized to participate in the program, and half are randomized not to participate in the program. (2) Within each of several cities, schools participating in the program are compared to schools not participating in the program, though participation was not randomized. (3) Several separate evaluations of the program are collected, to be combined in a meta-analysis. In each hypothetical study, a binary outcome (graduation) must be measured over strata (1. school districts, 2. cities, 3. evaluations). The effect of the program on graduation rates may be measured by a difference in proportions, odds ratio, or some other quantity. A hypothesis test will be conducted and a confidence interval constructed for the chosen estimand. The authors propose tests and intervals that can be more powerful for any finite population estimand than traditional tests and intervals, including t-tests for the difference in means or Cochran-Mantel- Haenszel procedures for the odds ratio.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Powerful, Potential Outcomes Method for Estimating Any Estimand across Multiple Groups</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sampling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sample Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error Correction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Citkowicz, Martyna</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hedges, Larry V.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In some instances, intentionally or not, study designs are such that there is clustering in one group but not in the other. This paper describes methods for computing effect size estimates and their variances when there is clustering in only one group and the analysis has not taken that clustering into account. The authors provide the effect size and sampling variance computations, along with the adjustments for the test of significance. In addition, they provide examples of how much the statistical results can be affected (or adjusted) once one-group clustering is taken into account depending on various data characteristics. In examining sample data, that authors found that not accounting for one-group clustering affects the variance and degrees of freedom more than the effect size. With those same degrees of freedom used in the t-test, it is easy to change the conclusion of the test from significant to non-significant once one adjusts for this clustering. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Accounting for One-Group Clustering in Effect-Size Estimation</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Short Term Memory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Word Problems (Mathematics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Swanson, H. Lee</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Orosco, Michael J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lussier, Cathy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Raven Progressive Matrices</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wide Range Achievement Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Raven Progressive Matrices</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Wide Range Achievement Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Recent intervention studies directed to improve problem solving accuracy in children with math difficulties (MD) have found support for teaching cognitive strategies. This study addresses the question: What role does working memory capacity (WMC) play in strategy outcomes for children with MD? Four prediction models can be applied to strategy training outcomes for children with MD: (a) WMC as a limiting factor, (b) basic skills, (c) general resource, and (d) compensatory. The limiting WMC factor model suggests that children with lower WMC are less likely to benefit from strategy conditions than children with relatively higher WMC. Thus, children with MD vary in their responsiveness to strategy instruction and this is predicated on their WMC. In contrast, the basic skills model suggests that if declarative knowledge is intact (e.g., reading comprehension, and computational knowledge are in the average range), strategy instruction provides a helpful procedure to solve word problems without making demands on WMC. Participants were comprised of 146 third grade children from public school classrooms in the southwest United States. Children were drawn from 22 3rd grade classrooms. Children in the treatment conditions were provided instruction in small groups during math time and were instructed in a class or library in the same school setting. All children in the study participated with their peers in their home rooms on tasks and activities related to the district wide math school curriculum. Each experimental treatment condition included 20 scripted lessons administered over 8 weeks. Each lesson was 30 minutes in duration and was administered three times a week in small groups of 3 to 5 children. The criterion measures used to assess treatment effects were word problems from the Comprehensive Math Abilities Test (CMAT), arithmetic problems from the WRAT-3, and recall from an Operation Span measure. The results showed a significant WMC x treatment interaction across all criterion measures. In general, the results indicated that WMC played an important role in post-test performance outcomes, especially for the strategy conditions that included diagramming (visual-only condition). Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Does Cognitive Strategy Training on Word Problems Compensate for Working Memory Capacity in Children with Math Difficulties?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>37</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prior Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Retention (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discovery Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fyfe, Emily R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>DeCaro, Marci S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rittle-Johnson, Bethany</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>An emerging consensus suggests that guided discovery, which combines discovery and instruction, is a more effective educational approach than either one in isolation. The goal of this study was to examine two specific forms of guided discovery, testing whether conceptual instruction should precede or follow exploratory problem solving. In both cases, the problem solving is considered exploratory because children have not been told how to solve the problems; rather, children are expected to generate or apply their own problem solving procedures. The difference is in the timing of conceptual instruction. The authors worked with children from 12 second- and third-grade classrooms in two urban, public schools in Tennessee. Participants were 183 second- and third-grade children. The intervention had a conceptual instruction phase and an exploratory problem solving phase. The two phases were identical for all children; the only difference between conditions was the timing of the two phases (instruct-solve vs. solve-instruct). The authors used a pretest- intervention-posttest design followed by a two-week retention test. Children were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: instruct-solve or solve-instruct. Evidence suggests that guided discovery promotes deeper learning than discovery or instruction alone. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Alternative Time for Telling: When Conceptual Instruction Prior to Exploration Improves Mathematical Knowledge</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>19</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Care</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Acquisition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Schedules</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Modification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Li, Weilin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Farkas, George</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Duncan, Greg J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vandell, Deborah Lowe</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burchinal, Margaret</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Children from low-income families benefit remarkably from exposure to compensatory education that began with Head Start in 1965 and aimed to improve school readiness skills by design. While empirical evidence has supported more instructional time in elementary and secondary schools for low-income students, little is known that whether increasing quantity of Head Start could also benefit low-income children. The authors&apos; goal was to estimate the effect of Head Start hours on child development by examining: (1) Does the amount of daily exposure to Head Start impact cognitive, pre-academic, and social outcomes?; and (2) Does the impact vary by age? 4,442 applicants to 383 Head Start centers participated in the National Head Start Impact Study (HSIS). The results from the study showed significant positive effects of hours in center care experienced on the children&apos;s cognitive, language, and academic outcomes. Additionally, the results show that an additional hour per day spent in Head Start centers decreases problem behaviors of children in age-3 cohort, but results do not show significant effects for behavioral problems of age-4 cohort. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of Head Start Hours on Children&apos;s Cognitive, Pre-Academic, and Behavioral Outcomes: An Instrumental Variable Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>53</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pattern Recognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kidd, Julie K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gadzichowski, K. Marinka</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gallington, Deb A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lopez, Claudia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pasnak, Robert</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Virginia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Gray Oral Reading Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Virginia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Gray Oral Reading Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In early elementary school in most English-speaking countries children are taught &amp;quot;patterning,&amp;quot; which involves learning repetitive patterns of colors or shapes (e.g., red, blue, green, red, blue, green). The present study was designed to test the effectiveness of patterning instruction when compared to equal amounts of instruction in reading or mathematics, or social studies. Further, The effectiveness of using more complex patterns was also tested. The authors used: (1) symmetrical patterns--gray, blue, pink, pink, blue, gray; (2) patterns that had increasing numbers of one element--red, tan, red, tan, tan, red, tan, tan, tan; (3) arbitrary repeating patterns--white, green, black, brown, yellow, white; and (4) patterns that showed an object rotating through 6 or 8 positions. Results of the study indicate that this patterning instruction involved patterns that were more complex than those used in conventional patterning instruction; the instruction continued all year; and required individual mastery of each pattern before moving on to the next. A gain of even two months in grade equivalents has great practical significance to educators, and the patterning children often made gains much larger than that. In addition, long-term instruction on and mastery of increasingly complex patterns can lead to substantially improved performance on some standardized tests of reading and mathematics, but not all. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563042</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Teacher-Friendly Method of Improving Reading and Mathematics</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Selection (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 11</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Deng, Hui</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 11</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report describes the results of two studies designed to evaluate the impact of self-reported mathematics course-taking on performance on SAT mathematics questions measuring new content (Algebra II). A supplemental table and figure are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Course-Taking on Performance on SAT® Items with Higher-Level Mathematics Content. Research Report No. 2006-8</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>18</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Testing Accommodations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Board of Education Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Exit Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Young, John W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>King, Teresa C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Information Analyses</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report is a review and summary of current information regarding test accommodations currently used in different states and districts for English language learners (ELL). Similarities and differences among states regarding ELL accommodation are documented. Five appendixes are included: (1) Accommodations Designated for ELLs in States&apos; Policies, Classified by Traditional Accommodation Categories (Rivera et al., 2006); (2) Presentation Accommodations and Modifications for ELLs for States with High School Exit Exams; (3) Response, Timing, and Scheduling Accommodations and Modifications for ELLs for States with High School Exit Exams; (4) Setting and Other Accommodations and Modifications for ELLs for States with High School Exit Exams.; and (5) Sources for States&apos; Accommodations Policies.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Testing Accommodations for English Language Learners: A Review of State and District Policies. Research Report No. 2008-6. ETS RR-08-48</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>21</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hands on Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Concept Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Process Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Museums</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brown, Judy A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Greenfield, Daryl B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bell, Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Juárez, Cheryl Lani</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Myers, Ted</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nayfeld, Irena</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;ECHOS: Early Childhood Hands-On Science&amp;quot; was developed at the Miami Science Museum as a comprehensive set of science lessons sequenced to lead children toward a deeper understanding of science content and the use of science process skills. The purpose of the research is to determine whether use of the &amp;quot;ECHOS&amp;quot; model will increase the amount and quality of science teaching and learning in preschool programs serving low-income children. &amp;quot;ECHOS&amp;quot; is based on the conviction that teachers of children at risk of school failure need to be both content sources and facilitators of learning who deliberately structure the environment and provide explicit instruction on basic science concepts. Analyses at the end of the first year show preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of &amp;quot;ECHOS&amp;quot; on the quality of teacher&apos;s science instruction and on children&apos;s science skills. These positive preliminary results from a first year of the randomized controlled trial, and relatively high rates of teacher fidelity, indicate that &amp;quot;ECHOS&amp;quot; has demonstrated its potential to impact teacher practice and student outcomes. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>ECHOS: Early Childhood Hands-On Science Efficacy Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>1</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goal Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Task Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Simzar, Rahila</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Domina, Thurston</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Conley, AnneMarie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tran, Cathy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A national initiative encourages STEM careers to prepare students to succeed in an increasingly competitive economy (National Research Council, 2011). The STEM pipeline is dependent on students&apos; mathematics course-taking trajectories, which are determined once a student enrolls in his/her first Algebra course. Despite efforts to increase access to advanced math courses, there is a national decline in participation in these courses over the last two decades (Watt, Shapka, Morris, Durik, Keating, &amp;amp; Eccles, 2012). During the later high school years many students opt out of math-related disciplines (Meece, 2006). Student motivation predicts choice to &amp;quot;pursue&amp;quot; mathematics (Martin, Anderson, Bobis, Way, &amp;amp; Vellar, 2012), thus attending to student motivation is a necessary precursor to increasing the numbers of students choosing to pursue advanced mathematics learning. This case study uses the increasing eighth grade Algebra enrollment trends in an urban Californian school district to investigate motivational changes found between students selected into eighth grade Algebra with peers enrolled in other math courses referenced as General Mathematics. Using two waves of motivation survey data, we estimate motivational changes for eighth grade students beginning in the fall and ending in the spring. This research focuses on two questions: (1) How do achievement goals, expectancy, and task value change for eighth grade Algebra students compared with peers enrolled in General Mathematics courses? and (2) Do these motivational changes vary by mathematics achievement prior to Algebra course placement? Findings indicated that all students placed in Algebra, on average, experienced increases in maladaptive performance-avoid goals as compared with peers placed in General Mathematics. Average and low performing students placed in Algebra experienced decreases in performance-approach goals as compared with peers placed in General Mathematics. Furthermore, all students placed in Algebra experienced declines in both academic self-efficacy and task value as compared with peers placed in General Mathematics. Average and low achieving students experienced greater declines in self-efficacy and task value than high achieving peers in Algebra. Appended are: (1) Tables and figures; (2) Achievement Goal Scale Items; and (3) Expectancy Value Scale Items.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563046</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Course Placement Influences on Student Motivation</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Base for Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Phelps, Geoffrey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jones, Nathan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelcey, Ben</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Shuangshuang</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kisa, Zahid</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Growing interest in teaching quality and accountability has focused attention on the need for rigorous studies and evaluations of professional development (PD) programs. However, the study of PD has been hampered by a lack of suitable instruments. The authors present data from the Teacher Knowledge Assessment System (TKAS), which was designed to administer Learning Mathematics for Teaching (LMT) measures. TKAS is being widely adopted in the evaluation of PD programs with over 500 separate program administrations and 16,000 teachers representing every major region in the country. The purpose of the current study was to leverage the TKAS dataset to develop a set of empirical benchmarks of effect sizes for designing rigorous studies of teacher professional development programs. The research design consisted of two goals: (1) to investigate the average effect sizes of over 259 PD programs in math, paying specific attention to variation across programs and variation across outcome measures and (2) to leverage the extensive professional development questionnaire describing the enacted professional development interventions and teachers using data collected from surveys of teachers and program providers. In conclusion, the authors report that, though their findings were preliminary, they provide potentially important guidance for the design of group randomized trials using teacher knowledge as an outcome measure. Most notable about the findings is the variation of effects between and across outcomes, suggesting that researchers should consider the specific math outcome that is most relevant for their intervention. Two tables and one figure are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Developing Empirical Benchmarks of Teacher Knowledge Effect Sizes in Studies of Professional Development Effectiveness</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fractions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pilot Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Content</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mendiburo, Maria</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Williams, Laura</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Henson, Robert</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hasselbring, Ted</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The fact that research has shown that fractions are among the most difficult mathematical concepts for elementary school students to master (Behr, Harel, Post, &amp;amp; Lesh, 1992; Bezuk &amp;amp; Cramer, 1989; Moss &amp;amp; Case, 1999) provides a compelling motivation for research and innovation focused on improving the available assessment and instructional tools related to fractions concepts. To address students&apos; deficiencies in learning fractions prior to beginning algebra, the researchers began an IES-funded development project called Helping At-risk students Learn Fractions (HALF). The project aims to develop and pilot test a complete, technology-based fractions intervention program. To date, the authors have created 243 multiple-choice assessment items that measure multiple aspects of the content domain of fractions and have completed four rounds of pilot testing these items. In this paper, they report findings from their pilot testing that contradicted the content framework they developed at the beginning of the HALF project. Using a sample of 880 fifth- and sixth-grade students drawn from 9 public and private school sites in Tennessee, they focused on determining whether the theoretical framework developed in the learning objectives is a good fit for the item data they have collected. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563048</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Designing and Redesigning a Framework for Assessing Students&apos; Understanding of Foundational Fractions Concepts</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Charter Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Farrington, Camille</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Levenstein, Rachel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nagaoka, Jenny</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Colorado</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>District of Columbia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Connecticut</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Colorado</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Connecticut</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>District of Columbia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The educational outcomes of low-income and racial/ethnic minority students suggest that there is a fundamental disconnect between contemporary schooling and the needs of students in urban schools. Most attempts to address these problems in K-12 schools have focused on increasing students&apos; mastery of content knowledge and skills. While the evidence from interventions and other experimental research strongly supports the importance of academic mindsets and learning strategies to students&apos; overall school performance, there is very little research on whether noncognitive factors are situated within students or are products of particular environments, the extent to which they transfer across contexts, or how teachers might intentionally build noncognitive factors as a regular part of their classroom practice. To that end, in collaboration with national and international substantive experts and expert practitioners, the authors are conducting the &amp;quot;Becoming Effective Learners&amp;quot; survey development project. The centerpiece of work in this project is the creation of a reliable and validated survey instrument for students in grades 6-12 to be made available for free noncommercial use by researchers and practitioners for purposes of basic research and formative/ diagnostic assessment. Eleven neighborhood schools and 11 charter schools in Chicago Public Schools (CPS) participated in Round 1 of the pilot study. Current analysis is ongoing and will conclude by coming mid-summer to allow researchers and practitioners to better focus their efforts on the practices and interventions that promote noncognitive factors and move this interest in noncognitive factors into something truly useful for improving educational achievement and attainment. One table and one figure are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>&amp;quot;Becoming Effective Learners&amp;quot; Survey Development Project</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Location</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiley, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wyatt, Jeffrey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report presents a methodology for the measurement and tracking of the college readiness level of high school students who are engaged in the college admission process. The proposed index uses the three distinct hurdles of SAT scores, high school GPA and a newly developed measure of academic rigor. Appendix A contains tables and numerical statistics. Appendix B presents the following (1) Percentage of Students Who Are College Ready by Individual Components; (2) Percentage of the Population and the Sample Who Are College Ready, by SAT Scores; (3) Percentage of the Population and the Sample Who Are College Ready, by HSGPA; and (4) Percentage of the Population and the Sample Who Are College Ready, by Academic Rigor (ARI).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563050</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Development of a Multidimensional College Readiness Index. Research Report 2010-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>48</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>60</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_cited>ED556748</eric:ies_cited>
<eric:ies_cited>ED555627</eric:ies_cited>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Treatment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Maximum Likelihood Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Youth Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equations (Mathematics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schochet, Peter Z.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In randomized control trials (RCTs) of educational interventions, there is a growing literature on impact estimation methods to adjust for missing student outcome data using such methods as multiple imputation, the construction of nonresponse weights, casewise deletion, and maximum likelihood methods (see, for example, Allison, 2002; Graham, 2009; Peugh &amp;amp; Enders, 2004; Puma, Olsen, Bell &amp;amp; Price, 2009; Schafer &amp;amp; Graham, 2002). Much less attention, however, has been devoted in education RCTs to developing statistical methods to adjust for the systematic misreporting of student outcome data for those with nonmissing data. Without appropriate adjustments, misreporting could lead to biased impact estimates, which could be exacerbated if the intervention leads to treatment-control differences in misreporting rates and the composition of students with misreported data. Misreporting could also affect the variance of the estimated impacts, and hence, significance levels from statistical hypothesis tests of intervention effects. This article develops a parametric statistical framework to test and adjust for the misreporting of binary outcomes in the estimation of average treatment effects (ATEs) for school-based RCTs. The author considers a realistic scenario where it is assumed that binary outcomes on sensitive topics can be misreported for students with truly undesirable outcomes, but not for those with truly desirable outcomes. A latent index framework is employed where misreporting and binary outcome decision processes are modeled using available baseline data and normality assumptions about model error terms. This approach yields a &amp;quot;double hurdle&amp;quot; random effects probit model that can be estimated separately for treatments and controls. The article discusses quasi-Newton ML methods for obtaining consistent estimates of the unobserved misreporting rates, the ATEs on the considered binary outcomes, and standard errors of the estimates that are not contaminated by misreporting. The article also discusses how the approach can be applied to continuous outcomes and to nonclustered, student-level RCT designs</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Statistical Model for Misreported Binary Outcomes in Clustered RCTs of Education Interventions</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>42</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Matched Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hallberg, Kelly</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cook, Thomas D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Figlio, David</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Indiana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Indiana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The goal of this paper is to provide guidance for applied education researchers in using multi-level data to study the effects of interventions implemented at the school level. Two primary approaches are currently employed in observational studies of the effect of school-level interventions. One approach employs intact school matching: matching schools that are implementing the treatment to schools not implementing the treatment that are similar in observable characteristics. An alternative approach disregards the clustered data structure and matches students in the treatment schools to students in any non-treated school. This approach essentially creates a synthetic comparison school for each treatment school composed of non-treated students that look like students in the treatment school regardless of what school these students attend. A primary purpose of this paper is to examine which approach performs better in practice. A related goal is to explore which of several variations of each strategy works best. With intact school matching, one can address any residual imbalance through regression adjustment or individual student matches that occur within a given school match. When matching at the student level to create synthetic groups, one can either match on student-level characteristics alone or also include school-level characteristics attributed to the individual. A secondary goal of this paper is to examine the relative performance of each of these approaches within the broader strategy of matching intact schools or individual students. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563052</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Empirically Examining the Performance of Approaches to Multi-Level Matching to Study the Effect of School-Level Interventions</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Researchers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>19</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligent Tutoring Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Concept Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error Correction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Booth, Julie L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Koedinger, Kenneth R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Newton, Kristie J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lange, Karin E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A plethora of laboratory studies have shown that including the study of worked examples during problem-solving practice improves learning (Sweller, 1999; Sweller &amp;amp; Cooper, 1985). While most worked-example research focuses on the use of correct examples, recent work suggests that asking children to explain a combination of correct and incorrect examples can be even more effective (e.g., Siegler &amp;amp; Chen, 2008). The combination of correct and incorrect examples has been shown to lead to improvements in both conceptual understanding and procedural skill in Algebra compared with procedural practice alone (Booth et al., in revision). It seems clear that both types of support are necessary, but what if extra support for knowledge construction is achieved through other types of innovative classroom practice? In that case, would it still be optimal to provide a combination of correct and incorrect examples, or would providing incorrect examples alone suffice for improving student learning? In the present study, the researchers test the contribution of correct vs. incorrect examples in the context of such support for knowledge construction--guided problem-solving practice with the Cognitive Tutor, a self-paced intelligent tutor system which provides students with feedback and hints as they practice (Koedinger, Anderson, Hadley, &amp;amp; Mark, 1997). Sixty-four eighth-grade Algebra I students (29 females, 35 males) at a mid-western middle school participated. This study was the first to test whether a combination of correct and incorrect examples is more beneficial than incorrect examples alone. The study&apos;s findings suggest that receiving incorrect examples can be beneficial regardless of whether it is paired with correct examples. This finding is especially important to note because when examples are used in classrooms and in textbooks, they are most frequently correctly solved examples. One figure is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Differentiating Instruction: Providing the Right Kinds of Worked Examples for Individual Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structural Equation Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Park, So Jung</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 2002, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) called for &amp;quot;highly qualified&amp;quot; teachers in every classroom in order to increase student outcome and provide equitable learning opportunities to all students including poor and minority students. content and pedagogical knowledge before they come into the classrooms. However, research evidence suggests that the relationship between teachers&apos; background characteristics and student achievement is still tenuous and mixed (Darling-Hammond and Youngs, 2002). Moreover, it is hard to interpret these mixed results because the mechanism by which teacher qualifications influence student achievement remains unknown. In spite of much research on the relationship between instructional practices and student outcome, not many of them consider instructional practices as a mediator between teacher background characteristics and student achievement. Using structural equation modeling (SEM) and the National Center for Educational Statistics&apos;s Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort of 1998-1999 (ECLS-K), the author examined direct and indirect effects of teacher background characteristics on student achievement. Indirect effect is used to describe the teacher&apos;s effects on student achievement mediated by various instructional practices. Assuming that teachers acquire the content and pedagogical knowledge from prior educational or teaching experiences, the indirect effect can show how the &amp;quot;knowledge&amp;quot; of what to teach and how to teach is connected to the &amp;quot;practices&amp;quot; of what to teach and how to teach. With this approach, the total effects of teacher quality on student achievement would be substantially less obscure. Three tables and one figure are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Do Highly Qualified Teachers Use More Effective Instructional Practices than Other Teachers: The Mediating Effect of Instructional Practices</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economically Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Counseling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropouts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Junior High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Information</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Loyalka, Prashant</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Chengfang</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Song, Yingquan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yi, Hongmei</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huang, Xiaoting</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wei, Jianguo</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zhang, Linxiu</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shi, Yaojiang</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chu, James</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rozelle, Scott</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>China</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>China</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>To sustain its economic growth in the coming years, China will have to increase the country&apos;s supply of skilled labor by enabling its workforce to attain to higher levels of formal education. Unfortunately, when children in poor, rural areas today grow up, they may not be able to enjoy China&apos;s future economic prosperity because of their low levels of education. Credit constraints combined with the high cost of attending school can induce students from economically disadvantaged households to prematurely leave school (Banerjee et al., 2000). Even when schooling is free, there may be high opportunity costs of going to school (Angrist and Lavy, 2009). The highly competitive nature of education systems in many developing countries can also discourage students in poor, rural areas from continuing their education (Glewwe and Kremer, 2006; Clarke et al., 2000). Misinformation about the returns to schooling is another important, but less researched, factor that may undermine the likelihood that students continue school. However, this may only be part of the problem. There may be a number of other constraints. First, even if students understand that there are high returns to high school, they may not know how to prepare for high school, i.e., entrance requirements and which types of high schools are available. Second, beyond economic returns, students may not see the links among their own interests and aptitudes, going to high school and the careers options available to them. The term &amp;quot;career planning skills&amp;quot; is used here to refer to the knowledge about how to attend high school (requirements, options, planning, etc.) and the awareness of the links among one&apos;s own interests and aptitudes, high school and future career options. The main purpose of this study is to measure the impact of offering information or teaching career planning skills on dropout, academic achievement, and plans to go to high school among grade 7 students in poor, rural areas in China. Results from the study suggest that information and counseling have negligible to quite small impacts on the outcomes of the average junior high school student in poor, rural areas.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563055</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Can Information and Counseling Help Students from Poor Rural Areas Go to High School? Evidence from China</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>42</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Dialects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diagnostic Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economically Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lunch Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Eligibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Black Dialects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>North American English</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thomas-Tate, Shurita</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Connor, Carol McDonald</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Johnson, Lakeisha</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Reading comprehension, defined as the active extraction and construction of meaning from all kinds of text, requires children to fluently decode and understand what they are reading. Basic processes underlying reading comprehension are complex and call on the oral language system and a conscious understanding of this system, i.e., metalinguistic awareness, at all levels from semantic and morpho-syntactic to pragmatic awareness. Higher order meta-cognitive skills also appear to contribute to comprehension. Thus there is emerging research for what is being called the usual suspects. These include semantic knowledge and vocabulary, comprehension strategy use, awareness of text structure, background knowledge, and self-regulation, including attention among others. Even with the usual suspects, however, there is much to be learned. For example, the association between use of non-mainstream American English (NMAE), such as African American English, and literacy has been documented in correlational research but it is not clear that there is a causal association. Indeed, recent research suggests that it is not NMAE use per se that is related to reading but rather the use of MAE rather than NMAE in contexts where it is expected, such as school. New findings suggest that those students who continue to use NMAE in situations that expect the use of School English (i.e., MAE), such as writing tasks, past second grade are at serious risk for reading underachievement. This design study was designed to test whether second through fourth graders could be taught to use School English (i.e., MAE) rather than Home English (NMAE) when writing (a context where School English is expected), and whether there was an advantage to providing an explicit focus on the contrasts between Home English and School English. The design experiment was conducted at schools in North Florida where at least 50% of the students qualified for the US Free and Reduced Lunch program, a frequently used marker of family poverty. The schools were also racially and ethnically diverse. Second through fourth grade students (n = 116) who used at least one feature of NMAE on the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation Screener (DELV-S) part one, an oral language assessment, or in a written narrative participated in the study. For this design experiment, the authors developed a short 4-week intervention. Two important findings emerged from this study: First dialect shifting is malleable. Overall, students in both treatment conditions demonstrated greater knowledge and use of three MAE/NMAE contrastive features in written tasks than students in the control group. Second, explicitly contrasting home and school language enhanced dialect-shifting instruction. Students in the Dialect Awareness treatment group had significantly better outcomes on all post-intervention measures than either the editing-only treatment group or the control. Figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Design Experiments: Developing and Testing an Intervention for Elementary School-Age Students Who Use Non-Mainstream American English Dialects</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Arithmetic</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Short Term Memory</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cirino, Paul T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tolar, Tammy D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fuchs, Lynn S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Algebra is a prerequisite for access to STEM careers and occupational success (NMAP, 2008a), yet algebra is difficult for students through high school (US DOE, 2008). Growth in children&apos;s conceptual and procedural arithmetical knowledge is reciprocal, although conceptual knowledge has more impact on procedural knowledge than the reverse (Rittle-Johnson &amp;amp; Alibali, 1999; Rittle-Johnson et al., 2001). However, research produce a complete picture of whether and how algebra procedural skill and conceptual knowledge are distinct versus related. Arithmetic skills are likely strongly related to algebra, and cognitive processes influence algebra directly or indirectly through arithmetic. Relations between cognition and arithmetic are more established relative to what is known about how either influence algebra. The broad purpose is to identify skills important for algebra with the ultimate goal of improving algebra preparedness. This presentation focuses on 3 inter-related components: (a) predictors of procedural and conceptual algebra performance (School Algebra); (b) predictors of algebraic precursor skills such as arithmetic concepts, fractions, and proportional reasoning (Skills); and (c) experimental manipulation of procedural and conceptual algebraic skill (Experimental). The studies took place in diverse intermediate/middle schools in Texas and Tennessee. This group of studies sought to identify cognitive concomitants of arithmetic, as well as cognitive and arithmetic predictors of algebra, and to examine the manipulation of procedural and conceptual instruction. Cognitive predictors of arithmetic in Grade 6 include language (vocabulary), line estimation, magnitude estimation (symbolic and nonsymbolic), and working memory. The dominant predictors were clearly line estimation and symbolic magnitude estimation. Both involve identification and mapping of symbolic information, quickly, which is consistent with the nature of written arithmetic, as well as the timed nature of many of these measures. For the Algebra study, vocabulary was a significant cognitive contributor to algebra skills, but remained so even when arithmetic predictors were included. Arithmetic concepts and fractions were dominant arithmetic predictors. Even when pretest performance was included, the same pattern of predictive variables remained relevant. For the Experimental study, results suggest that procedural and conceptual knowledge are partially separable. Students may acquire procedural knowledge without conceptual knowledge, but may not necessarily acquire conceptual knowledge without also acquiring some procedural knowledge. However, the evidence also suggests that the order in which students receive procedural and conceptual instruction (i.e., all procedural followed by all conceptual, all conceptual followed by all procedural, or procedural and conceptual together) does not affect the overall procedural or conceptual learning. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Arithmetic and Cognitive Contributions to Algebra</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Outcome Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ambiguity (Context)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>After School Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intermediate Grades</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Interpretation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hartry, Ardice</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (East)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper considers one challenge from recent emphasis on rigorous research for decision-making in education: the interpretation of non-replicated findings. Under Clinton and Bush, the federal government called for and funded highly rigorous research. The &amp;quot;gold-standard&amp;quot; for research was randomized-control trials (RCTs), which supposedly offered clear answers about program efficacy. Such clear answers were meant to be used by stakeholders in making decisions about adopting programs. During 2005-2008, the authors conducted an RCT meant to measure the impact of a reading program in the afterschool setting, with the goal of comparing the effectiveness of that program with regular school offerings. The study covered three school years, with slight variations in both the delivery of the intervention and the design of the research, resulting in three essentially discrete studies conducted within a single school district. The authors hoped by replicating the study in one context, they would be able to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the reading program. This paper, therefore, addresses the following questions: (1) How may contradictory findings be used in program design and implementation? (2) How may the conversation among practitioners, policymakers and researchers be expanded to acknowledge both consistency and contradictions in robust research studies? and (3) How may we better communicate what contradictory findings suggest about practice and program development to practitioners?</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Communicating to Policymakers: What to Do with Ambiguous Results from Three Impact Studies of the Same Education Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Group Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grouping (Instructional Purposes)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chojnacki, Gregory</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Eno, Jared</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Feng</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Meyers, Coby</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Konstantopoulos, Spyros</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Miller, Shazia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>van der Ploeg, Arie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Indiana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Indiana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Recent work that has examined the impact of what are variously called periodic, interim, benchmark, or diagnostic assessments, typically administered three or four times during a school year, has produced mixed findings. For instance, one study reported small significant effects in mathematics in grades 3-8, but not in reading (Carlson et al., 2011). Other research however, has reported significant effects on both mathematics and reading (Slavin et al., 2011). Finally, a very recent study found no effects on reading achievement in grades 4-5 (Cordray et al., 2012). This study compares instructional practices of teachers in schools that were randomly assigned to receive an interim assessment tool with those of teachers in schools that did not receive the tool. Using rich data collected at 16 time points during the school year, the authors study teachers&apos; self-reported instructional practices to determine whether teachers with access to an interim assessment tool alter each of three facets of instructional practice--scope and sequence of content coverage, instructional level, and instructional grouping--more than those without the tool. The research questions are: (1) Do teachers with access to the interim assessment change the scope and sequence of content, and/or vary instructional difficulty level and grouping methods more than those without? (2) Do variations in these teacher practices respond to variations in student Acuity performance? Researchers employ treatment vs. control comparisons to explore whether teachers with the interim assessment intervention engage in expected instructional practices more than those without it. Results are reported from rich data on teacher instructional practices generated at sixteen intervals by teachers with and without access to a specific interim assessment tool. Estimates provide no strong evidence that teachers change the instructional practices measured here in response to Acuity performance data. One possible reason for these findings is that Acuity is not a unique intervention, and a significant number of control teachers reported using other interim assessment tools. Another possible explanation for these results is that the relatively small sample of teachers completing checklists harms the study&apos;s power. Finally, these results pertain to the first year of the intervention, when teachers are likely still learning how to use the assessment tool and integrate it into their instructional practice. Future research should explore the hypothesis that impacts on teacher practice grow over time as teachers learn to use the assessment tool. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Do Interim Assessments Influence Instructional Practice in Year One? Evidence from Indiana Elementary School Teachers</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=821'>R305E090005</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rohrer, Doug</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dedrick, Robert F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burgess, Kaleena</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In a typical mathematics course, the material is divided into many lessons, and each lesson is followed by an assignment consisting of practice problems. Most commonly, each assignment consists solely of problems on the preceding lesson. For example, a lesson on ratios might be followed by an assignment with 12 problems on ratios. In other words, problems of the same kind are arranged in blocks. In this study, &amp;quot;blocked assignments&amp;quot; served as the control. In an alternative approach that is the intervention of interest, problems within the course are rearranged so that most of the problems within each assignment are based on previous lessons and arranged in an &amp;quot;interleaved&amp;quot; order. For example, after a lesson on ratios, an interleaved assignment might include a small block of four ratio problems and one problem from each of eight previous lessons. The remaining eight ratio problems are distributed across future assignments. Researchers conducted the study at a large public middle school in Tampa, Florida. Three middle school mathematics teachers and 140 of their seventh grade students participated. Students received 10 assignments over an 8-week period. All students received the same practice problems, but the problems were rearranged to produce two versions of each assignment. Across all assignments, students received 12 problems on each of four different kinds of problems. The study used a counterbalanced crossover design. For each assignment, researchers provided teachers with a slide presentation with solved examples and solutions to each problem. Teachers presented the examples before distributing the assignment. On the following school day, teachers presented the solutions while encouraging students to make any necessary corrections to their own solutions, and then collected the assignments. Within two days of each assignment&apos;s due date, at least one of the authors visited the school and scored the assignments. The Final Test was given to students during their regular classroom period and proctored by both the teacher and one author. Final test scores revealed that interleaved assignments were nearly twice as effective as blocked assignments. This finding suggests that interleaved mathematics assignments might be feasible and effective. This intervention could be implemented at all levels of mathematics instruction, and creators of mathematics texts and other instructional media can provide interleaved practice by simply rearranging practice problems.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Efficacy Study of Interleaved Mathematics Practice. Revised</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Markov Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Monte Carlo Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bayesian Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>One of the vexing problems in the analysis of SSD is in the assessment of the effect of intervention. Serial dependence notwithstanding, the linear model approach that has been advanced involves, in general, the fitting of regression lines (or curves) to the set of observations within each phase of the design and comparing the parameters of these lines (or curves). In the simplest case of an AB design, this involves fitting a regression lines to the observations in phases A and B and comparing the slopes and intercepts. In the event the slope is zero in the two phases, the comparison reduces to the comparison of the means or levels. If there is a trend but the slope is the same in the two phases, then the adjusted means (levels) are compared. A problem arises if the levels and the trends in the two phases are different. In this case the intercepts and slopes are compared across the phases. While statistically such comparisons are not problematic, the interpretations of treatment effects that arise from these comparisons are not intuitive. A &amp;quot;combination&amp;quot; of the slope and intercept parameters that yields a single measure of treatment effect could be more meaningful. Such a measure of treatment effect yields, in turn, an effect size that can be readily computed and interpreted. To this end, the study deals with: (1) Development of a measure of the effect of intervention which leads to an effect size measure; and (2) Development of statistical procedures for assessing intervention effects that take into account the serial dependence in single-subject designs. The statistical procedure described here that includes a definition of treatment effect and consequently an effect size provides a viable method for the analysis of single-subject designs. The advantage of the procedure outlined here is that a single measure of treatment effect and consequently a single effect size measure is available when there is both a level change and trend change in the phases.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effect Size Measure and Analysis of Single Subject Designs</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>49</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experienced Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vaughn, Sharon</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Roberts, Greg</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reutebuch, Colleen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Colorado</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Colorado</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) is a multicomponent reading intervention aimed at improving students&apos; text comprehension. Two 1-year randomized controlled trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of CSR with seventh and eighth grade students. The Year 2 replication study was identical to the original Year 1 study except that the student sample was different and the teachers were more experienced in the Year 2 study since the same teachers taught during both years of the study. The primary research question for the replication study was to determine the efficacy of CSR on middle school students&apos; reading comprehension when taught by relatively experienced teachers (year 2), and to contrast the impacts to those obtained when similar middle school students were taught by inexperienced CSR teachers (year 1). This study incorporated fidelity into multilevel analyses in order to more fully explore and document the relationship between implementation of CSR strategies by experienced teachers and middle school students&apos; reading comprehension. This study was conducted in 6 middle schools in 3 school districts (two near urban and one urban) in Texas and Colorado that reflected a diverse student population who were provided daily English/language arts/reading instruction. Twelve teachers and 48 classes (treatment = 26, control = 22) participated during Year 2. Students in this study were two separate cohorts of seventh and eighth graders enrolled in English/language arts/reading classes. Researchers conducted a randomized control trial at two sites for both studies. The same set of pretest and posttest measures were administered prior to treatment and immediately following treatment for both. The reading achievement battery included the TOWRE, the Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension (TOSREC), Test of Sentence Reading Efficiency (TOSRE), AIMSweb Maze passages for 7th and 8th Grades, and the Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test. Researchers also collected data on student characteristics (e.g., language and special education status, age, gender, ethnicity, reading proficiency) to examine comparability of groups. For quantitative analyses, multilevel modeling in Mplus 5.1 was used to estimate the effects of treatment and the moderating influence of important covariates. For fidelity analysis in Year 2, confirmatory factor analysis with categorical indicators was used to estimate factors related to fidelity and spillover, and the mediating effect of implementation was evaluated. The Year 2 trial results suggest that implementation was high in the treatment conditions and relatively low in the comparisons. Findings also indicate that implementation was consistent across program elements; treatment conditions had high implementation of all program elements, on average. These findings represent a model for replicating effective intervention in the context of evaluating the relative contribution of its respective components.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Collaborative Strategic Reading: Replications with Consideration of the Role of Fidelity</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>19</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vitale, Michael R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Romance, Nancy R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A variety of research has pointed to the interdependent linkage among vocabulary knowledge, reading comprehension, and level of literacy. With this point in mind, the present study addressed the question of whether student vocabulary acquisition could be accelerated by using a multi-part, semantic word-family-oriented learning strategy to inductively expand vocabulary taught directly. The study was implemented in a large, highly diverse school system in southeastern Florida. The instructional intervention was implemented on a school-wide basis in grades 3-4-5 during an 18 week period in the school year. Observation of classroom implementation averaging 3.4 visits per teacher found the intervention easy to implement by teachers and the project-developed, story-specific vocabulary guides to be effective. Demonstrating the effect of the intervention on reading as well as on vocabulary was an important finding of the present study because engaging students in the inductive vocabulary intervention implicitly required them to focus attention on comprehension of each story. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Accelerating Vocabulary Development and Reading Comprehension in Grades 3-4-5 through an Inductive Vocabulary Model</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>33</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Marine Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personal Narratives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Seraphin, Kanesa Duncan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Philippoff, Joanna</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harrison, George</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brandon, Paul</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Hawaii</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Hawaii</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>These authors are in the process of completing the development and evaluation of a series of professional development (PD) modules consisting of in-person trainings coupled with online learning support. The PD is grounded in the Teaching Science as Inquiry (TSI) pedagogical framework, which is centered on learning through authentic application of knowledge and skills. The purpose of the TSI Aquatic PD module series is to increase teachers&apos; content knowledge in aquatic science disciplines and to improve teachers&apos; (1) understanding of scientific inquiry; (2) pedagogical content knowledge needed to create classrooms that function as a community of scientists; and (e) self-efficacy in using TSI pedagogy. In July 2013 the authors will have conducted five PD cohorts, with 62 teachers and four teacher-leaders completing the program. The course begins with an introductory meeting, followed by the four modules. The four modules total more than 88 contact hours spread throughout the academic year. The authors administered teacher and student questionnaires and assessments at the beginning of the academic year, before the first PD workshop, and at the end of the academic year, after the final PD workshop. Preliminary findings suggest that the TSI Aquatic PD has positive, significant effects on teachers&apos; and students&apos; scientific process knowledge. Qualitative analyses of teacher reflections and narratives also suggest that explicit instruction in metacognitive strategies to teachers and their students has increased the ability of both groups to become more aware of their observations, decisions, and thought processes needed to do and understand science. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of the Teaching Science as Inquiry (TSI) Aquatic Professional Development Course for Middle- and High-School Teachers</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>16</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mediation Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lazarev, Valeriy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Newman, Denis</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Grossman, Pam</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Efficacy studies of educational programs often involve mediator analyses aimed at testing empirically appropriate theories of action. In particular, in the studies of professional teacher development programs, the intervention targets presumably teacher performance while the ultimate outcome is the student achievement measured by a standardized test. The main objective of this study is to develop a methodology for creating an optimal aggregate teacher performance metric from domain scores for use as mediators in the analyses of student outcomes. The authors use one particular observation rubric, PLATO, to answer the question of how an aggregate teacher performance metric can be constructed from domain scores that would be best aligned with a selected measure of student achievement. The preliminary analysis determined that only three out of six domains of PLATO used in the study were significantly associated with the value-added measure of student achievement. Of the three significant domains, two had linear relationship with the value added. For the only domain with non-linear relationship, log transformation appeared to be sufficient to linearize the relationship. A figure is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Developing an Aggregate Metric of Teaching Practice for Use in Mediator Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Bayesian Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Monte Carlo Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Markov Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kaplan, David</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chen, Jianshen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study is to explore Bayesian model averaging in the propensity score context. Previous research on Bayesian propensity score analysis does not take into account model uncertainty. In this regard, an internally consistent Bayesian framework for model building and estimation must also account for model uncertainty. The significance of the current study is that it directly addresses the problem of uncertainty in propensity score models via the method of Bayesian model averaging (BMA). The usefulness of the proposed method is that it provides the investigator a way to incorporate prior knowledge regarding the relationship between the covariates and treatment selection (via the Kaplan and Chen, 2012 approach) while at the same time acknowledging model uncertainty via Bayesian model averaging. This paper provides a fully Bayesian MCMC methodology to obtain propensity score and treatment effect estimates, as well as R code to conduct such an analysis. Research design utilizes a combination of simulation studies and real data analysis. The simulation study examines the choice of parameter and model priors. The real data example examines a model relating full vs. part-day kindergarten attendance on achievement outcomes for first grade student using the ECLS-K. Preliminary findings suggest that the fully MCMC algorithm for Bayesian model averaging within the PSA framework provides accurate expected a posteriori estimates of the treatment effect. An appendix provides additional information on the two-step Bayesian PSA model, Bayesian model averaging, and computational considerations.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Bayesian Model Averaging for Propensity Score Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cohort Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cortes, Kalena</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Goodman, Joshua</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nomi, Takako</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this research is to study the long-run impacts (i.e. on educational attainment) of a freshman math intervention called &amp;quot;double-dose algebra&amp;quot;. The intervention was conducted in 2003 and 2004 within the Chicago Public Schools (CPS), a large, poor urban school district. In response to low passing rates in 9th grade algebra, CPS launched the double-dose algebra policy for students entering high school in the fall of 2003. Instead of reinstating the traditional remedial courses from previous years, CPS required enrollment in two periods of algebra coursework for all first-time 9th graders testing below the national median on the math portion of the 8th grade Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS). Such students enrolled for two math credits, a full-year regular algebra class plus a full-year algebra support class. The authors follow two cohorts of students from the Chicago Public Schools from their freshman high school fall (in 2003 and 2004) through the end of high school and the beginning of college. The main analytic sample contains upwards of 11,000 students, 95% of whom are poor and black or Hispanic. Double-dosing increased the proportion of students earning at least a B in freshman algebra by 9.4 percentage points, a more than 65% increase from a base of 13.8 percentage points. Though passing rates for freshman algebra increased by 4.7 percentage points, the increase is statistically insignificant. Double-dosed students were also no more likely to pass geometry. Results show that math instruction was most successful for students with average math skills but relatively low reading skills, and not successful for the average treated student. This highlights the importance of carefully targeting such interventions to students most likely to benefit from them. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Doubling Up: Intensive Math Instruction and Educational Attainment</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>40</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_cited>ED559928</eric:ies_cited>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Starkey, Prentice</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Klein, Alice</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>DeFlorio, Lydia</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is a national need for effective interventions to improve school readiness and subsequent achievement in mathematics for students from low-income families. The purpose of this study was to implement and evaluate a 2-year preschool math intervention that began at preschool entry when children were 3 years of age and continued through the end of the pre-kindergarten (pre-K) year. Three principal objectives will be addressed in this presentation: (1) to evaluate the efficacy of a math curriculum for 3-year-olds implemented in the pre-pre-kindergarten (pre-pre-K) year of preschool; (2) to compare the impact of a 2-year math intervention (implemented during pre-pre-K and pre-K years) with a 1-year math intervention (PK) or a business-as-usual control condition on children&apos;s mathematical knowledge at the end of preschool; and (3) to examine the longitudinal effects of the 2-year and 1-year math interventions on young children&apos;s mathematical development in kindergarten. The study was conducted in 63 classrooms in three Head Start programs in Northern California. Children remained in the same classrooms with the same teachers throughout their two years of preschool. The study concluded that the Pre-Pre-K Mathematics intervention had a large impact on 3-year-olds&apos; mathematical knowledge. Likewise, the Pre-K Mathematics intervention had a significant impact on 4-year-olds&apos; mathematical knowledge. The cumulative impact of receiving 1 vs. 2 years of math intervention appeared to be surprisingly similar at the end of pre-K. Gains children made during the 1-year intervention began to fade in K, but gains children made during the 2-year intervention were sustained in K. Possible explanations are better retention after 2 years of intervention or greater consolidation of previously learned informal math knowledge. Figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Changing the Developmental Trajectory in Early Math through a Two-Year Preschool Math Intervention</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Utilization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Distribution</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Milewski, Glenn B.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines the relative utility and predictive validity of the SAT I and SAT II for various subgroups in both California and the nation. The effect of eliminating the SAT I on the test impact and on the over- and under-prediction of various gender and racial/ethnic subgroups is examined. Two statistical adjustments and tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Utility of the SAT® I and SAT II for Admissions Decisions in California and the Nation. Research Report No. 2002-6</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2002-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>34</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Paxton, Carol L. C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wanless, Shannon B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rimm-Kaufman, Sara E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Mid Atlantic States)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Research in social and emotional learning interventions confirms the importance of fidelity of implementation in predicting intervention effectiveness (Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki, Taylor, &amp;amp; Schellinger, 2011). The present mixed-methods study was conducted in the context of the Responsive Classroom Efficacy Study (RCES). This was a randomized controlled trial of the Responsive Classroom® (RC) approach, a social and emotional learning intervention designed to improve teachers&apos; capacity to create caring and well-organized classroom environments to facilitate learning. The main finding emanating from RCES is that the efficacy of the RC approach hinges upon schools&apos; high fidelity of implementation of the intervention (Rimm-Kaufman et al., 2012). This finding turns attention to examining factors and processes that lead to high versus low levels of fidelity of implementation among schools randomized into the intervention condition. The present study draws from the Domitrovich et al.(2008) conceptual framework for program implementation. The model illustrates how macro-, school-, and individual-level factors interact with each other, as well as with the quality of the intervention, to support or hinder fidelity of intervention (FOI) (Figure 1). The Domitrovich, et al. model describes a number of avenues through which FOI can be supported, including coaching with teachers (Domitrovich et al., 2008). Within the conceptual framework, program coaches assisting teachers with intervention implementation represents one potential aspect of the support system, as shown in Figure 1. Fidelity of implementation requires confidence in one&apos;s ability to effectively execute a program and the belief in a program&apos;s effectiveness (Domitrovich &amp;amp; Greenberg, 2000). Coaching appears to be a logical approach to fostering this sense of self-efficacy and technical competence in teachers. However, although coaches are popularly used in schools to instructionally support teachers, surprisingly little has been written about the nature and effectiveness of the coaching process for supporting teacher fidelity in the implementation of school-wide socioemotional learning programs. The present study uses coaches&apos; summary descriptions in order to better understand the support system underlying implementation quality. Coach summaries are used to assess how coaching support and dosage differ between high- and low- fidelity schools. School psychological context surrounding decisions about coaching support offered to teachers is described. The following research questions are posed: (1) What types of relational and strategic support do coaches use to assist teachers implementing the Responsive Classroom® Approach? (2) How do types of coaching support and dosage differ between the high- and low- fidelity of implementation schools? Participants in this study were four certified, veteran RC coaches training fifth grade teachers who were beginning their first year of RC. This research provides insight about coaching and contextual considerations to guide implementation theory and subsequent implementation. The school-level context embracing program implementation may require strong leadership and principal buy-in in order for coaching effects to be seen clearly. The RCT upon which this work was based showed large variability in schools&apos; use of RC practices. Next steps involve examining the coaching characteristics and school conditions that contribute to fidelity in a broader sample. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563070</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Coaching Support, Context, and Fidelity of Implementation in &amp;quot;Responsive Classroom&amp;quot;® Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=861'>R305B090002</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=523'>R305A070063</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Positive Behavior Supports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Turnaround</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emergent Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Fluency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gage, Nicholas A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sugai, George</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lewis, Timothy J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Connecticut</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Connecticut Mastery Testing Program</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Connecticut Academic Performance Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Stanford Achievement Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Metropolitan Achievement Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Reading Mastery Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Connecticut</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Connecticut Mastery Testing Program</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Metropolitan Achievement Tests</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Stanford Achievement Tests</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Reading Mastery Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Turning around chronically low-performing schools requires a multifaceted school-wide, systematic effort that includes strong leadership and data-based decision making. School-wide efforts to turn-around low-performing schools should address the academic, social, and behavioral needs of all students. One evidence-based, systematic school-wide approach for addressing social and behavioral concerns in schools and, distally, increasing students&apos; access to academic instruction, is school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports (SWPBIS). SWPBIS is associated with increased positive school climate, increased teacher self-efficacy, decreased problem behaviors for the whole school, and potentially, increased academic achievement. The underlying assumption is that by improving social behavior, schools have more time and ability to deliver effective curriculum and instruction. However, to-date, this assumption has not been fully investigated. The goal of this paper is to explicitly examine the impact of SWPBIS on school-wide academic achievement. A review of the SWPBIS literature was conducted to determine the impact of SWPBIS on academic achievement. Then, a longitudinal state-level analysis of schools implementing SWPBIS and propensity score matched control schools was conducted to identify differential effects. The following questions guided this research: (1) Are there significant differences between schools implementing SWPBIS with fidelity and schools not implementing with fidelity in mean school-level achievement?; and (2) Are there significant differences in mean school-level academic achievement SWPBIS schools and matched controlled schools? This study included all schools in the state of Connecticut, and used a quasi-experimental design with schools as the unit of analysis. Control schools were identified from the Connecticut population of public schools using propensity score matching. Data was collected from the Connecticut State Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Education&apos;s Common Core of Data. Based on the literature review, no school-level differences between schools implementing SWPBIS with or without fidelity and control schools were found for academic achievement, including reading and math. The results of the state-level longitudinal study confirm these findings. The results of this study suggest that SWPBIS alone does not affect school-level academic achievement as measured by summative state high stakes tests. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Academic Achievement and School-Wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>25</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>36</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Manipulative Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conventional Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature Reviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Holmes, Amy B.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Information Analyses</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Four figures and three tables are appended.There is growing consensus among researchers, educators, and policy makers about the need for greater emphasis on ambitious student-centered mathematics instruction in light of mounting concern about student mathematics performance in the intermediate grades and beyond. To facilitate educators&apos; adoption of ambitious mathematics instructional practices, recent reform initiatives, such as the Common Core Standards for Mathematics (CCSM), have specified the content elementary students should learn and the practices in which students should engage, while organizations such as the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) have assumed responsibility for making recommendations for improving instructional practices in mathematics. In particular, since 1989, the NCTM has continually called for the increased use of manipulative materials at all levels of mathematics education in order to support students&apos; conceptual and procedural understanding. However, the evidence for the effects of using manipulatives to support student mathematics achievement across the primary and secondary grades is generally mixed. Investigating reasons for such contradictory findings through rigorous inquiry is important for advancing both theory and practice in mathematics education. This systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to address this issue in order to strengthen communication and research partnerships with educators, administrators, and policy makers interested in effective practices in mathematics education. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify qualifying studies reported between 1989 and 2012, including a search of electronic bibliographic databases, gray literature databases, and reference lists of research reports and prior reviews. The search culminated in a total of 856 reports, of which 17 reports describing 21 primary studies met the eligibility criteria after screening of titles, abstracts, and/or full-text reports, for a total sample of 1519 students. Two separate meta-analyses were conducted for the comparison of manipulatives use to a business as usual nonuse condition (14 studies, 14 effect sizes, 1126 students) and for the comparison of virtual manipulatives use to a business as usual physical manipulatives use condition (7 studies, 7 effect sizes, 393 students). Although clearly not a mathematics achievement panacea, results from this review provide evidence that student achievement in grades PK-12 can be improved through the use of mathematics manipulatives. Among other implications, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers may want to consider purchasing more inexpensive manipulative materials in order to reserve funds for other interventions that research has shown to have a more substantial impact on student mathematics achievement. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563072</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of Manipulative Use on PK-12 Mathematics Achievement: A Meta-Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>18</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>50</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Michel, Rochelle S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study employed logistic regression to predict the probability that a student would be successful in achieving a FGPA at various levels, based on that student&apos;s SAT scores and high school grade point average. Tables of accuracy rates are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563073</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The SAT® as a Predictor of Different Levels of College Performance. Research Report No. 2006-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2006-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>18</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Factor Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bayesian Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yuan, Kun</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCaffrey, Daniel F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Savitsky, Terrance D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (Mid Atlantic States)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Standardized teaching observation protocols have become increasingly popular in evaluating teaching in recent years. One of such protocols that has gained substantial interest from researchers and practitioners is the Classroom Assessment Scoring System-Secondary (CLASSS). According to the developer, CLASS-S has three domains of teacher-student interactions: Classroom Organization, Emotional Support, and Instructional Support. The goal of this study is to examine the structure of CLASS-S while accounting for the hierarchical multivariate ordinal nature of data collected through this protocol. Data used in this study came from two sources. The first source is the Understanding Teacher Quality (UTQ) study that took place middle schools in three large school systems from the same metropolitan region in the southeastern United States. The second source is the Toward an Understanding of Classroom Context (TUCC) study conducted in middle and high schools in an urban fringe mid-Atlantic school district. The UTQ study includes 458 teachers teaching mathematics (n = 231) or English language arts (n = 227) to sixth, seventh, or eight graders. The TUCC study included 82 teachers in 20 middle and 20 high schools. The authors examined the structure of CLASS-S using a Bayesian hierarchical multivariate ordinal model. Results from this study showed that accounting for the hierarchical multivariate ordinal nature of data does matter for understanding the structure of CLASS-S scores. Figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563074</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Analyzing the Factorial Structure of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System-Secondary Using a Bayesian Hierarchical Multivariate Ordinal Model</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ability Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Selection (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is a strong and consistent relationship between PSAT/NMSQT scores and AP Examination grades for nearly all courses--higher scores on the PSAT/NMSQT indicate a higher probability of success on AP Examinations. PSAT/NMSQT verbal or mathematics scores are often more highly related to AP Examination grades than overall high school GPA, number of courses in the subject area, and even previous high school grades in the subject for some examinations.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563075</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship of PSAT/NMSQT Scores and AP® Examination Grades. Research Notes. RN-02</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1997-11-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schmidt, Amy Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report provides a brief summary of the research projects that have been conducted to support the development of the new SAT.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563076</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Research behind the New SAT®. Research Summary RS-11</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stereotypes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Exercises</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Borman, Geoffrey D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Grigg, Jeffrey</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study addresses closing the academic performance gaps between African American and Latino students and their White counterparts, and between girls and boys in mathematics. Of the various models and theories of these social inequalities that have been advanced in literature, one particularly compelling line of research concerns the idea of &amp;quot;stereotype threat&amp;quot;--the apprehension individuals experience when confronted with a personally relevant stereotype that threatens their social identity or self-esteem. A number of research programs suggest that interventions aimed at reducing stereotype threat can attenuate its effects in school-based contexts, yielding significant gains in test scores. Specifically, individuals can manage threatening situations by shoring up their self-concept--a strategy known as &amp;quot;compensatory self-inflation&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;self-affirmation.&amp;quot; This study assessed the achievement impacts of this stereotype threat-reduction intervention relative to a control group condition on the test scores of nearly 1,000 middle-school students in the Madison (Wisconsin) Metropolitan School District. Findings show no evidence that the self-affirmations closed the Black-White achievement gap. However, gender and ethnic group moderated the impact of self-affirmation; the variation in achievement by gender and ethnicity appears to be slighter in the self-affirmation condition. The proposed work may have important implications for education policy and practice in the state. Moreover, the cost-effective intervention strategies described in this study--each involving simple 15-minute writing exercises--could easily be replicated and implemented across the United States, with the potential to help close the persistent achievement gaps within other school systems across the country. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Effort to Close Achievement Gaps at Scale through Self-Affirmation</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines student performance on the SAT and SAT Subject Tests in order to identify groups of students who score differently on these two tests, and to determine whether certain demographic groups score higher on one test compared to the other. Discrepancy scores were created to capture individuals&apos; performance differences on the critical reading, mathematics, and writing sections of the SAT and selected Subject Tests that were deemed the most comparable (such as the SAT critical reading section and the Subject Test in Literature; the SAT mathematics section and the Mathematics Level 1 and Mathematics Level 2 Subject Tests). The percentage of students with discrepant scores was compared for each SAT-Subject Test pair, overall and by gender, racial/ethnic, and best spoken language subgroups. Next, the predictive validity of SAT and Subject Test scores for predicting first-year college/university grade point average (FYGPA) was compared for students with and without discrepant scores. The results demonstrate that the percentage of students with discrepant SAT and Subject Test scores is small, especially for the tests that are most similar in terms of content. The validity of the SAT and SAT Subject Tests for predicting FYGPA varies according to the assessment on which a student scored higher relative to the other, and the pattern of results varies for the different SAT-Subject Test pairs. In all cases, however, SAT and Subject Test scores each have incremental predictive power over the other. This study provides evidence that each test provides distinct information that may be useful in the college admission process. As such, joint consideration of these two test scores in college admission is warranted. Estimates of Standard Error of Difference (SED) and Effective Significance Levels is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563078</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The SAT® and SAT Subject Tests™: Discrepant Scores and Incremental Validity. Research Report 2012-2</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>38</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sample Size</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The College Board formed a research consortium with four-year colleges and universities to build a national higher education database with the primary goal of validating the SAT® for use in college admission. The first sample included first-time, first-year students entering college in fall 2006, with 110 institutions providing students&apos; first-year course work, grades, and retention to the second year. In addition to examining the predictive validity of the SAT in terms of college grades (Kobrin, Patterson, Shaw, Mattern, &amp;amp; Barbuti, 2008; Mattern, Patterson, Shaw, Kobrin, &amp;amp; Barbuti, 2008), the relationship between SAT performance and retention to the second year was examined (Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2009). The results found that higher SAT scores were associated with higher retention rates In the following years, participating colleges and universities were invited to provide subsequent performance data for these students in order to track them longitudinally throughout their college career. For the second year, 66 of the original 110 institutions provided data. Mattern and Patterson (2011) examined the relationship between SAT performance and retention to the third year of college. Similar to the results for second-year retention rates, higher SAT scores were associated with higher third-year retention rates. This study builds on this body of research by examining the relationship between SAT performance and retention to the fourth year of college. The sample consisted of 59 of the original 110 institutions. Complete data (i.e., SAT scores, self-reported high school grade point average (HSGPA), retention to second-, third-, and fourth-year data) were available for 78,640 students. Results show that SAT performance was positively related to fourth-year retention rates. Detailed results are provided in this report. A list of institutions providing retention to the fourth year data for the 2006 SAT validity sample is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between SAT® Scores and Retention to the Fourth Year: 2006 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report 2011-6</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cohort Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sample Size</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Results show that SAT performance is related to third year retention rates. Even after controlling for student and institutional characteristics, returners had higher SAT total scores than non-returners, and the performance gap is not due to differences in the demographic makeup of the two groups. Furthermore, while differences in retention can be observed between various student and institutional subgroups, these differences are minimized and in some instances eliminated when controlling for SAT performance, especially for higher SAT score bands. A list of &amp;quot;Institutions Providing Third Year Retention Data on the 2006 Freshman Cohort&amp;quot; is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563080</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between SAT Scores and Retention to the Third Year: 2006 Cohort. Statistical Report</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-11-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role Perception</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Etiology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Economy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Distribution</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bausmith, Jennifer Merriman</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The need is urgent for reducing literacy achievement gaps--both morally to ensure that all students receive a high-quality education as well as economically to build our nation&apos;s workforce with the requisite skills needed for the 21st century. Taken together, changes to the economy, divergent literacy skill distributions, and changes to the demographic composition of the U.S. population create a perfect storm of factors that will increase social and economic inequalities as well as affect the United States&apos; ability to be a competitive global leader (Kirsch, Braun, Yamamoto, &amp;amp; Sum, 2007). This report explores how and when literacy achievement gaps develop and argues that effective summer literacy programs for low-achieving students in the middle grades offer promise as a way to reduce those gaps to ensure later academic and economic success.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563081</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Role of Literacy in Building the Economy: Summer Literacy Interventions for Grades 3-5. Research in Review 2012-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>42</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Screening Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harrell-Williams, L. M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dowdy, E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Twyford, J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The BESS is a relatively new screening system for identifying behavior and emotional risk (BER) in children and adolescents. Psychometric evidence regarding this instrument is important for researchers and practitioners considering the use of the BESS for identifying BER in students. This study seeks to provide and evaluate evidence for the use of the Student form of the BESS. The following objectives guided this study: (1) assess the internal structure of the BESS Student Form using factor analysis; (2) determine if the items perform differently across two locations with different ethnic characteristics via Rasch-based DIF analysis; and (3) assess the odds of elevated risk levels based on student demographics. Data were collected in two locations: the Los Angeles United School District (LAUSD), and Bibb County (Georgia). The first sample was collected from the Los Angeles United School District (LAUSD) as part of a larger IES funded research project investigating the longitudinal validity for screening (Advancing Children&apos;s and Teacher&apos;s Success through Early Screening and Intervention; U.S. Department of Education), and consisted of 273 elementary and middle school students. The second sample contained the responses of 4,074 students from 3 LAUSD high schools in the Northern region of the school district. The third sample was collected as part of a pilot for district-wide screening initiative in Bibb County. There were 1,874 students across the four schools in grades 9 through 12. To evaluate the constructs being measured by the BESS as well as evaluate the predictive validity for future educational outcomes, a longitudinal, trend survey approach was used. To evaluate the appropriateness of the BESS in high school-aged students, a cross-sectional survey approach was used. Data was collected at one time point for all high schools. Results show that the theorized four factor structure of the BESS holds for all school levels (elementary/middle and high school), no evidence of differential item functioning was found across the 30 items when comparing the LAUSD high school group to the Bibb high school group, and logistic regression analysis revealed that gender and location did not affect risk. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563082</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessing the Psychometric Characteristics of a Child/Adolescent Behavioral and Emotional Risk Self-Report Screener across Grade Levels and School Districts</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=689'>R324B080006</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=399'>R324B060005</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Distribution</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sample Size</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report presents the findings from a replication of the analyses from the report, &amp;quot;Is Performance on the SAT Related to College Retention?&amp;quot; (Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2009). The tables presented herein are based on the 2007 sample and the findings are largely the same as those presented in the original report, and show SAT scores are related to second-year retention. Even after controlling for student and institutional characteristics, returners had higher SAT total scores than non-returners, by an average of 116 points. This held true even within each subgroup analyzed, meaning the SAT performance gap is not due to differences in the demographic characteristics of the two groups. Also, this report finds that differences in retention rates by student subgroups are minimized and in some instances eliminated when controlling for SAT performance. This is particularly noticeable with respect to differences in retention rates by ethnicity.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563083</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between SAT Scores and Retention to the Second Year: 2007 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report No. 2011-4</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-02-11</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sample Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The College Board formed a research consortium with four-year colleges and universities to build a national higher education database with the primary goal of validating the revised SAT®, which consists of three sections: critical reading (SAT-CR), mathematics (SAT-M), and writing (SAT-W), for use in college admission. A study by Mattern and Patterson (2009) examined the relationship between SAT scores and retention to the second year of college. The sample included first-time first-year students entering college in fall 2006, with 106 of the original 110 participating institutions providing data on retention to the second year. Results showed that SAT performance was related to retention, even after controlling for HSGPA. The following year, previously participating as well as new colleges and universities were invited to provide first-year performance data on the first-time first-year students who entered college in the fall of 2007. For the 2007 sample, a total of 72 of the original 110 institutions and 38 new institutions provided data. The 110 institutions in the 2007 sample contained 216,081 students. A replication of the Mattern and Patterson study (2009) was conducted with the new cohort and similar results were found (Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2011). Similarly, previously participating as well as new colleges and universities were invited to provide first-year performance data on the first-time first-year students who began in the fall of 2008. For the 2008 cohort of students, a total of 129 institutions provided data on a total of 246,652 students. Students without SAT scores, self-reported high school grade point average (HSGPA), or retention data were removed from analyses, resulting in a final sample size of 173,963 students. Replicating the analyses of the previous two reports (Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2009; 2011), the tables below are based on the 2008 sample, and the findings are largely the same as those found in the earlier reports Results show that SAT performance is positively related to second-year retention rates, even after controlling for student and institutional characteristics. This was also true within HSGPA bands, showing that SAT scores provide incremental value over high school grades in predicting retention. Furthermore, controlling for SAT performance is seen to reduce and in some cases eliminate the differences in retention rates between student and institutional subgroups that are otherwise observed. [For &amp;quot;The Relationship between SAT Scores and Retention to the Second Year: 2007 SAT Validity Sample,&amp;quot; see ED563083.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563084</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between SAT® Scores and Retention to the Second Year: 2008 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report 2012-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-01-10</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>2</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Charter Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence Based Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Eligibility</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dougherty, Shaun M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper provides causal evidence to answer the question, &amp;quot;Does the application of a double dose of literacy instruction in middle school improve student performance on subsequent academic outcomes?&amp;quot; The focus of this paper is on an intervention where the second dose of literacy instruction uses research-based instructional strategies, and shows that this instruction leads to systematic improvement in adolescent reading comprehension. How differences in the fidelity of implementation of this policy may impact the effects of the intervention both at the school-level and in aggregate are examined. This district-designed literacy intervention used 5th-grade scores on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) to determine student eligibility for a double dose of literacy instruction in middle school. Students who scored at the 60th percentile or lower on the ITBS reading test were assigned, by rule, to be eligible for this literacy program. Using a regression-discontinuity design, preliminary findings show that there was a positive aggregate effect of the policy for students who were just eligible for the intervention compared to those who were not. Figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563085</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Adolescent Literacy on the Margin: Regression-Discontinuity Evidence from a &amp;quot;Double Dose&amp;quot; Middle Grades Literacy Intervention</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>23</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Play</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recess Breaks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conflict Resolution</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bullying</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Positive Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>James-Burdumy, Susanne</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bleeker, Martha</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Beyler, Nicholas</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>London, Rebecca A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Westrich, Lisa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stokes-Guinan, Katie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Castrechini, Sebastian</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Most school principals believe recess has a positive impact on the development of students&apos; social skills and academic achievement. Research also suggests that physical activity and play during recess may be linked to improvements in both academic and prosocial behaviors (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2010). Recess, however, has been reduced or eliminated in up to 40 percent of school districts across the country, and these declines have disproportionately affected low-income minority students in urban areas. In schools where recess is still offered, recess periods often lack the structure needed to support physical activity and positive social development, often leading to increased discipline-related problems. The Playworks program--which aims to address these issues--places full-time coaches in low-income schools to provide opportunities for organized play during recess and throughout the school day. Activities are designed to engage students in physical activity, improve quality of play, foster social skills related to cooperation and conflict resolution, improve students&apos; ability to focus on class work, decrease behavioral problems, and improve school climate. This study both rigorously assesses the impacts of the Playworks program on student and school outcomes, and documents the program&apos;s implementation. The study included 25 low-income urban schools from 5 cities. All of the schools were interested in implementing the Playworks program. Data were collected from 1,982 students, 247 teachers, 25 principals, and 14 Playworks coaches in spring 2011 to document the implementation of Playworks and to assess the impact of the program. Data collection activities included administration of student and teacher surveys, recess observations, interviews with principals, collection of student physical activity data, and collection of administrative records from schools. Data collection activities focused on six outcome domains: (1) school climate; (2) conflict resolution and aggression; (3) learning and academic performance; (4) recess experience; (5) youth development; and (6) student behavior. The study team used regression models to estimate the impact of Playworks on outcomes. The following significant, positive impacts of Playworks were found: (1) There was a positive impact of Playworks on teachers&apos; perceptions of students&apos; safety and the extent to which teachers reported students felt included during recess; (2) Teachers in treatment schools reported less bullying and exclusionary behavior during recess than teachers in control schools; (3) Teachers in treatment schools were less likely to report difficulties in transitioning to classroom learning activities after recess and reported significantly less time to transition from recess to learning activities than teachers in control schools. Treatment students were also more likely than control students to report better behavior and attention in class after sports, games, and play; and (4) Treatment teachers reported significantly better student behavior at recess and readiness for class than control teachers, and were also more likely to report that their students enjoyed adult-organized recess activities. The following key implementation findings were observed: (1) Strong implementation occurred in seven of 14 treatment schools, and moderate implementation occurred in another five schools. Two schools had weak implementation; (2) Playworks implementation was stronger in schools that had recess in the past and when coaches were experienced with the program; and (3) Most teachers, students, and principals had positive perceptions of the Playworks program.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563086</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Does Playworks Work? Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The College Board formed a research consortium with four-year colleges and universities to build a national higher education database with the primary goal of validating the revised SAT for use in college admission. A study by Mattern and Patterson (2009) examined the relationship between SAT scores and retention to the second year. The sample included first-time, first-year students entering college in fall 2006, with 106 of the original 110 participating institutions providing data on retention to the second-year. Results showed that SAT performance was related to retention, even after controlling for relevant student and institutional characteristics. Replication studies have been conducted for subsequent entering cohorts of students and similar results were found (Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2011, 2012a, 2012b). Replicating the analyses of the previous four reports (Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2009; 2011, 2012a, 2012b), the current study examined the relationship between SAT performance and retention to the second year for first-time, first-year students that began in the fall of 2010. A total of 160 institutions provided data which translated to 287,881 students. Students without SAT scores, self-reported high school grade point average (HSGPA), or retention data were removed from analyses, resulting in a final sample size of 215,704 students. The results from the current study based on the 2010 sample show the same pattern of results as the previous reports. Namely, higher SAT scores are associated with higher retention rates. This was true, even after controlling for student characteristics (gender, race/ethnicity, household income, parental education, and HSGPA) and institutional characteristics (control, size, and undergraduate admittance rate). [For &amp;quot;The Relationship between SAT Scores and Retention to the Second Year: Replication with 2009 SAT Validity Sample,&amp;quot; see ED563088.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between SAT® Scores and Retention to the Second Year: Replication with the 2010 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report 2013-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The College Board formed a research consortium with four-year colleges and universities to build a national higher education database with the primary goal of validating the revised SAT for use in college admission. A study by Mattern and Patterson (2009) examined the relationship between SAT scores and retention to the second year of college. The sample included first-time, first-year students entering college in fall 2006, with 106 of the original 110 participating institutions providing data on retention to the second year. The results showed that SAT performance was related to retention, even after controlling for relevant student and institutional characteristics. Replication studies have been conducted for subsequent entering cohorts of students, and similar results were found (Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2011a, 2011b). Replicating the analyses of the previous three reports (Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2009; 2011a, 2011b), the current study examined the relationship between SAT performance and retention to the second year for first-time, first-year students that began in the fall of 2009. A total of 131 institutions provided data which translated to 262,949 students. Students without SAT scores, self-reported high school grade point average (HSGPA), or retention data were removed from analyses, resulting in a final sample size of 199,366 students. The results from the current study based on the 2009 sample show the same pattern of results as the previous reports. Namely, higher SAT scores are associated with higher retention rates. This was true, even after controlling for student characteristics (gender, race/ethnicity, household income, parental education, and HSGPA) and institutional characteristics (control, size, and selectivity). [For &amp;quot;The Relationship between SAT® Scores and Retention to the Second Year: 2008 SAT Validity Sample,&amp;quot; see ED563084.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563088</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between SAT Scores and Retention to the Second Year: Replication with 2009 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report 2011-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines the relationship between students&apos; SAT essay scores and college outcomes, including first-year grade point average (FYGPA) and first-year English course grade average (FY EngGPA), overall and by various demographic and academic performance subgroups. Results showed that the SAT essay score has a positive relationship with both FYGPA and FY EngGPA. Additionally, the SAT essay score offers useful and unique information in understanding how students perform in college generally, and in their English course work, after controlling for relevant academic variables (e.g., high school grades and SAT scores). As we continually seek to improve students&apos; writing performance in the United States, the findings warrant further exploration of the value and role of the SAT essay in college admission and placement, particularly because students who take the SAT and apply to college are already providing this information to admission offices.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563089</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The SAT® Essay and College Performance: Understanding What Essay Scores Add to HSGPA and SAT. Research Report 2012-9 (REV: 4-2013)</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>27</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bridgeman, Brent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pollack, Judy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burton, Nancy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Although a number of large-scale studies have demonstrated an increase in predictive validity when SAT® scores are added to high school grades, this increment is often described in terms of a seemingly very small increase in explained variance. This may have led to the erroneous belief among test critics and others that students with low SAT scores would perform, on average, almost as well in college as students with high SAT scores. Using a sample of 41 colleges, the current study shows substantial differences in the percent of students who succeed (defined by a 2.5 or 3.5 college grade point average [CGPA] at the end of one year or four years in college) by SAT score level, even when intensity of the high school curriculum and high school grades are taken into account. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563090</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Understanding What SAT Reasoning Test™ Scores Add to High School Grades: A Straightforward Approach. Research Report No. 2004-4</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2004-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>26</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Millsap, Roger</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study reports that student performance on the PSAT/NMSQT can be useful in identifying additional students who may be successful in Advanced Placement Program (AP) courses. PSAT/NMSQT scores can identify students who may not have been initially considered for an AP course through teacher nomination, self-nomination, or other local procedures. Performance on the PSAT/NMSQT is not strongly related to AP grades on four examinations: (1) studio art: design, (2) studio art: drawing, (3) German language, and (4) Spanish language. The relationship of PSAT/NMSQT scores with other AP Examination grades is moderately strong and invariant across ethnic groups and time of testing. That is, the relationship is substantially the same for all ethnic and racial groups and is only slightly weaker when time between testing spreads across two academic years. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using the PSAT/NMSQT and Course Grades in Predicting Success in the Advanced Placement Program®. Report No. 98-4</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1998-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Taxonomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Eligibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aptitude</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Perfetto, Greg</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Escandón, Mérida</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Graff, Steve</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rigol, Gretchen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schmidt, Amy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In August of 1998, a group of about 50 admissions deans, directors, and researchers from the United States gathered in Toronto at the invitation of the College Board. The participants represented a broad cross section of private and public colleges and universities. The goal of the symposium was to begin a dialogue on the future of admissions, and to consider how the profession needs to change to meet social, political, and economic challenges of the twenty-first century. A subsequent meeting was held in Vancouver in January of 1999, during which the core ideas presented at the first meeting were refined and elaborated. One result of this effort is the present paper, which attempts to organize the various approaches to admissions decision making in two ways: to preserve the underlying complexity of admissions as a profession, and to present a framework clear enough to promote future discussion. The following is appended: Admission Decision-Making Models Classification Scheme. A roster of participants is also included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563092</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Toward a Taxonomy of the Admissions Decision-Making Process: A Public Document Based on the First and Second College Board Conferences on Admissions Models</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1999-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>37</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavioral Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Noeth, Richard J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Analysis</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to learn whether there have been any changes in writing instruction across K-12 education in the past three years. A three-year time frame was chosen to structure the study as it included the time period subsequent to the College Board&apos;s first announcement of the SAT writing section (the 2002-03 academic year). The English/language arts teachers and district administrators surveyed reported major changes in writing priorities, attitudes, and expectations; how writing is taught; learning related to writing; writing resources; and the importance placed upon writing in the curriculum in their schools and districts.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Writing Changes in the Nation&apos;s K-12 Education System. Research Notes RN-34</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equated Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zhang, Yanling</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dorans, Neil J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Matthews-López, Joy L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mantel Haenszel Procedure</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Statistical procedures for detecting differential item functioning (DIF) are often used as an initial step to screen items for construct irrelevant variance. This research applies a DIF dissection method and a two-way classification scheme to SAT Reasoning Test™ verbal section data and explores the effects of deleting sizable DIF items on reported scores after re-equating. The DIF dissection approach and the two-way classification scheme may yield new and detailed insight into item functioning at the subgroup level. Two hypotheses are studied: (1) whether or not the deletion of a sizeable DIF item that is the most disadvantageous to a particular subgroup will affect the scores for that subgroup the most; and (2) whether or not the effects of item deletion on scores can be predicted by the standardization method. Both hypotheses are supported by the results of this research. The following are appended: (1) Summary of Two-Way &amp;quot;STD FS-DIF&amp;quot; Effects and Unrounded Observed Scaled Score Differences for the Subgroups after DIF Item Deletion; and (2) The Local Approximation Algorithm.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563094</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using DIF Dissection Method to Assess Effects of Item Deletion. Research Report No. 2005-10. ETS RR-05-23</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>18</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>16</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>History Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ramist, Leonard</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lewis, Charles</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCamley-Jenkins, Laura</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There has been increased interest in emphasizing Achievement Tests, as SAT II: Subject Tests, for use in admission and placement. In this report, data was obtained from a comprehensive database of categorized course grades for a large number and great variety of colleges, with student groups identified. For each student group, the percentage of SAT takers who took any Achievement test and the percentage of Achievement Test takers who took each specific test are determined. The performance of those who took each Achievement Test is compared with the performance of the same students on the verbal section of the SAT (for English, history, and foreign language tests), the mathematical section of the SAT (for mathematics tests), or the sum of the verbal and mathematical scores on the SAT (for science tests and the average of all of a student&apos;s Achievement Test scores). The predictive effectiveness of each Achievement Test is determined for predicting freshman grade-point average, alone and in combination with high school grade-point average and SAT scores, and for predicting grades in each kind of course. Finally, one aspect of fairness of each Achievement Test for each student group is evaluated in terms of average over- and under-predictions. The following are appended: (1) Colleges Participating in the Study; and (2) Course Categories.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563095</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using Achievement Tests/SAT® II: Subject Tests to Demonstrate Achievement and Predict College Grades: Sex, Language, Ethnic, and Parental Education Groups. Research Report No. 2001-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2001-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>94</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>35</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report presents the validity of the SAT for predicting two third-year college outcomes: (1) third-year cumulative GPA (3rd Yr Cum GPA), and (2) third-year grade point average (3rd Yr GPA). Similar to the results for first- and second-year outcomes (1st Yr GPA, 2nd Yr GPA, 2nd Yr Cum GPA), the SAT is strongly correlated with third year outcomes overall and by institutional (control, selectivity, size) and student (gender, race/ethnicity, best language) characteristics. Detailed results are provided below. Results are based on data on over 60,000 students across 60 institutions (see Appendix A for a list of participating institutions). The following tables are appended: (1) Institutions Providing Third-Year Outcomes Data for the 2006 Cohort; (2) Raw Correlations of SAT and HSGPA with 3rd Yr Cum GPA by Institutional Characteristics; (3) Raw Correlation of SAT Scores and HSGPA with 3rd Yr Cum GPA by Student Characteristics; (4) Raw Correlations of SAT and HSGPA with 3rd Yr GPA by Institutional Characteristics; and (5) Raw Correlation of SAT Scores and HSGPA with 3rd Yr GPA by Student Characteristics.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563096</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validity of the SAT for Predicting Third-Year Grades: 2006 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report No. 2011-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2006-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>27</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Timed Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bridgeman, Brent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Laitusis, Cara Cahalan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cline, Frederick</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The current study used three data sources to estimate time requirements for different item types on the now current SAT Reasoning Test™. First, we estimated times from a computer-adaptive version of the SAT® (SAT CAT) that automatically recorded item times. Second, we observed students as they answered SAT questions under strict time limits and recorded the amount of time taken for each question. Finally, we asked high school students to record the amount of time taken for test subsections that were composed of items of a single type. The rules of thumb used by test developers were quite accurate in rank ordering the item types from least to most time-consuming, but the time actually spent was generally higher than assumed in the rules of thumb. The following is appended: Examples of Different Item Types.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563097</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Time Requirements for the Different Item Types Proposed for Use in the Revised SAT®. Research Report No. 2007-3. ETS RR-07-35</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>30</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>2</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The College Board formed a research consortium with four-year colleges and universities to build a national higher education database with the primary goal of validating the SAT®, which is used in college admission and consists of three sections: critical reading (SAT-CR), mathematics (SAT-M) and writing (SAT-W). This report builds on a body of evidence that confirms that SAT scores are predictive of multiple indicators of college performance (e.g., first-year grade point average [Kobrin, Patterson, Shaw, Mattern, &amp;amp; Barbuti, 2008; Mattern, Patterson, Shaw, Kobrin, &amp;amp; Barbuti, 2008; Patterson, Mattern, &amp;amp; Kobrin, 2009; Patterson &amp;amp; Mattern, 2011]; retention to the second year [Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2009]; second-year grades (Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2011b), retention to the third year [Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2011a]; and third-year grades[Mattern &amp;amp; Patterson, 2011c]) by demonstrating a strong link between SAT scores and grades earned through the fourth year of college This report presents the validity of the SAT for predicting two fourth-year college outcomes: (1) fourth-year cumulative GPA (4th Yr Cum GPA), and (2) fourth-year grade point average (4th Yr GPA). Grade point average (GPA) for a given year is defined as the average of course grades earned just in that year. Cumulative grade point average (Cum GPA) for a given year is defined as the average of course grades earned at any time from the first year through the year in question. Thus 4th Yr GPA is the average of course grades in just the fourth year, while 4th Yr Cum GPA is the average of course grades in the first through fourth years. Similar to the results for first-, second-, and third-year outcomes, the study found that the SAT is strongly correlated with 4th Yr Cum GPA and 4th Yr GPA for the total sample. The correlations remain strong even when controlling for institutional characteristics (control, selectivity, size) and student characteristics (gender, race/ethnicity, best language, household income, highest parental education). Results are based on nearly 60,000 students across 55 institutions. The following tables are appended: (1) Institutions Providing Fourth-Year Outcomes Data for the 2006 Cohort; (2) Raw Correlations of SAT and HSGPA with 4th Yr Cum GPA by Institutional Characteristics; (3) Raw Correlation of SAT Scores and HSGPA with 4th Yr Cum GPA by Student Characteristics; (4) Raw Correlations of SAT and HSGPA with 4th Yr GPA by Institutional Characteristics; and (5) Raw Correlation of SAT Scores and HSGPA with 4th Yr GPA by Student Characteristics.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563098</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validity of the SAT® for Predicting Fourth-Year Grades: 2006 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report 2011-7</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2006-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligent Tutoring Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lee, Hee Seung</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Anderson, John R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Berman, Susan R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ferris-Glick, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Joshi, Ambarish</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nixon, Tristan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ritter, Steve</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>West Virginia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>West Virginia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In designing learning environments that support student learning, there are many instructional design decisions. These include when and how to provide examples, verbal explanations, feedback, and other scaffolding features. In this paper, the authors investigate instructional guidance as it relates to Cognitive Tutor, an intelligent tutoring system that provides students with an interactive learning environment. Cognitive tutors for high school mathematics have been successful in raising students&apos; test scores and the Cognitive Tutor Algebra curriculum is being used in over 3,000 schools nationwide. This paper reports early results from a large scale experiment evaluating different instructional conditions implemented in the Cognitive Tutor Algebra. This study explores the degree to which students can be taught without verbal explanations and tests whether the results obtained in the laboratory will generalize to real classrooms. High school students from a large rural and urban school district in West Virginia participated in this study. This study contrasted two modified tutors with the standard tutor as a control condition. To summarize the results, the authors did not find any benefits of adding verbal explanations. The explanatory and non-explanatory students did not differ in terms of number of hints or errors in any of the experimental and non-experimental units. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563099</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Exploring Optimal Conditions of Instructional Guidance in an Algebra Tutor</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Charter Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competitive Selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission (School)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Core Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Concept Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>White, Thomas G.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Grissmer, David W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Altenhofen, Shannon</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Larson, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Colorado</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Colorado</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The authors are presently in the fourth year of a six-year, lottery-based randomized control trial (RCT) studying the effectiveness of nine Colorado charter schools that have implemented Core Knowledge®. Core Knowledge (CK) is a comprehensive K-8 curriculum for language arts, math, science, social studies, visual arts, and music that is intended to build knowledge, concepts, and vocabulary systematically from one grade to the next, leading to substantial progress in reading. The purpose of this paper is to describe (1) a particular set of problems that arose in conducting the lottery-based RCT and (2) the solutions that we developed and implemented. The nine participating CK charters are located in six school districts that range from the suburbs south of Denver to the city of Fort Collins in the north. The participants include two cohorts of students and their parents who participated in kindergarten entrance lotteries in 2010 and 2011. Students are being tracked as they progress from kindergarten to third or fourth grade when they will take Colorado achievement tests in reading, mathematics, and writing in 2014 and 2015. In the third year of the project the authors conducted a small parent survey to assess the feasibility of individually testing Cohort 1 students in a non-school setting. The parent survey not only gave the authors access to Cohort 1 students for testing but also proved to be a valuable source of data in its own right. In fact, although it was not included in the original proposal, they have come to view it as an integral part of the lottery-based RCT, indeed the key to plans for Years 4-6. They will repeat the survey and testing process with Cohort 2.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563100</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Lessons Learned in Conducting a Lottery-Based Study of Core Knowledge Charter Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Protocol Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Structures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equations (Mathematics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gierl, Mark J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Leighton, Jacqueline P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wang, Changjiang</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zhou, Jiawen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gokiert, Rebecca</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tan, Adele</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of the study is to present research focused on validating the four algebra cognitive models in Gierl, Wang, et al., using student response data collected with protocol analysis methods to evaluate the knowledge structures and processing skills used by a sample of SAT test takers.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563101</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validating Cognitive Models of Task Performance in Algebra on the SAT®. Research Report No. 2009-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>39</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>31</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Publications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Causal Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sample Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journal Articles</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Taylor, Joseph</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kowalski, Susan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stuhlsatz, Molly</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wilson, Christopher</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Spybrook, Jessaca</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Europe</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Asia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Asia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this paper is to use both conceptual and statistical approaches to explore publication bias in recent causal effects studies in science education, and to draw from this exploration implications for researchers, journal reviewers, and journal editors. This paper fills a void in the &amp;quot;science education&amp;quot; literature as no previous exploration of its kind can be located. The studies in this publication bias analysis are taken from a larger meta-analysis that includes studies from the Unites States, Europe, and East Asia. The general research design is random effects meta-analysis. Specific tests of publication bias were performed within the meta-analysis context. These include funnel plots, Galbraith plots, and Egger&apos;s test of Asymmetry. Publication bias was investigated using both intuitive and statistical techniques. The results of this analysis suggest that meta-analyses may not require significant work in the grey literature to produce unbiased results. The data from this 2010-11 study suggest that small effect-small sample studies are being &amp;quot;submitted&amp;quot; for publication and are being &amp;quot;accepted&amp;quot; for publication. One table and four figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563102</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Investigating the File Drawer Problem in Causal Effects Studies in Science Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In an effort to continuously monitor the validity of the SAT for predicting first-year college grades, the College Board has continued its multi-year effort to recruit four-year colleges and universities (henceforth, &amp;quot;institutions&amp;quot;) to provide data on the cohorts of first-time, first-year students entering in the fall semester beginning with 2006 through 2009. Its goal in doing so is to provide clear evidence for the use of the SAT in college admission. Prior research based on the same data collection effort has demonstrated a strong, linear relationship of the SAT section scores with first-year grade point average (FYGPA) in college across a variety of institutional and student characteristics (Kobrin, Patterson, Shaw, Mattern, &amp;amp; Barbuti, 2008; Mattern, Patterson, Shaw, Kobrin, &amp;amp; Barbuti, 2008; Patterson, Mattern, &amp;amp; Kobrin, 2009; Patterson &amp;amp; Mattern, 2011). This study serves as a replication of prior analyses for the most recent cohort of students: those who graduated from high school in the spring of 2009 and subsequently enrolled in a four-year college in the fall of 2009 The present study examined the extent to which four predictors commonly used in college admission were linearly related to FYGPA; in particular, SAT critical reading (SAT-CR), mathematics (SAT-M), and writing (SAT-W), as well as high school grade point average (HSGPA), were considered. Overall FYGPA correlations were approximately equal for the combination of all three SAT sections and HSGPA (r = 0.54, for both correlations). Combining these four predictors led to the strongest linear relationship with FYGPA (r = 0.62), indicating that the SAT added substantially to predictions that relied solely on HSPGA. Among the three SAT sections, SAT-W tended to exhibit the strongest linear relationship with FYGPA (r = 0.52). In addition, many of these patterns held true across institutional characteristics, such as control (i.e., public or private), size, and selectivity, and across student characteristics, such as gender, racial/ethnic identity, best spoken language, household income, and highest parental education level. Finally, analyses of differential prediction for the student characteristics showed that using the three SAT sections to predict FYGPA tended to result in smaller differential prediction in absolute magnitude than when using HSGPA alone. With the exception of a few student subgroups, the differential prediction of FYGPA was reduced the most when using the combination of SAT sections and HSGPA. The following tables are appended: (1) Institutions Providing First-Year Outcomes Data for the 2009 Cohort; (2) Raw Correlations of SAT and HSGPA with FYGPA by Institutional Characteristics; and (3) Raw Correlation of SAT Scores and HSGPA with FYGPA by Subgroups.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validity of the SAT® for Predicting First-Year Grades: 2009 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report No. 2012-2</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Screening Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, Jihye</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kamphaus, Randy W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BESS) Student Form is one of the behavioral and emotional risk screening tests that is in more widespread use in U.S. schools systems from preschool through high school. From 2007 to the present, the BESS Student Form has been used for screening in the Los Angeles United School District (LA), which was part of a research grant from the Institute of Education Sciences (Grant # R324B060005). All middle and high schools of the Bibb County Public Schools, an urban schools system surrounding Macon, Georgia, have also participated in BESS screening from 2009 to the present. This study sought to reveal the heterogeneity or uniqueness of the adolescents screened with the BESS Student Form, and then classified them into number of classes holding similar latent features and demographic backgrounds. The primary analytic method of latent class analysis using Mplus 6.11 (Muthen and Muthen 1998) was employed in order to classify the heterogeneity of the BESS participants. Follow-up multivariate analysis was conducted with latent class probabilities as dependent variables for three types of demographic information (gender, grade level, and risk-level classification) as independent variables for finding out the significant effect of demographic information within each class. In the latent class analysis with 4-class solution, class 2 produced statistically significant findings with regard to students&apos; demographic information. There was a significant interaction between student grade and risk level, indicating that younger students were more salient in exhibiting an elevated level of risk than older students. This finding, however, was only present for the LA sample. The gender proportions were also different between LA and Bibb in that girls predominated the high risk class 2 in Bibb, even though the item response patterns within classes were similar. Future research plans include collecting more comprehensive student demographic information and exploring the undiscovered uniqueness within each class. One table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563104</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Latent Class Analysis of Youth Behavioral and Emotional Risk: Associations with Demographic Characteristics</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined the validity of the SAT for predicting performance in first-year English and mathematics courses. Results reveal a significant positive relationship between SAT scores and course grades, with slightly higher correlations for mathematics courses compared to English courses. Correlations were estimated by student characteristics (gender, ethnicity, and best language), institutional characteristics (size, selectivity, and control, i.e., private or public), and course content (e.g., calculus, algebra). The findings suggest that performance on the SAT is predictive of performance in specific college courses. Furthermore, stronger relationships were found between test scores and grades when the content of the two were aligned (such as the SAT mathematics section and mathematics course grades, or the SAT writing section and English course grades). Supplemental tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563105</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Validity of SAT® Scores in Predicting First-Year Mathematics and English Grades. Research Report 2012-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>36</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bayesian Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Least Squares Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rindskopf, David</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Single case designs (SCDs) generally consist of a small number of short time series in two or more phases. The analysis of SCDs statistically fits in the framework of a multilevel model, or hierarchical model. The usual analysis does not take into account the uncertainty in the estimation of the random effects. This not only has an effect on the estimates of the fixed effects, but also on their standard error. This research investigates this phenomenon on a selected SCD, and compares the results with the analyses of other people on the panel. The authors presume the results, which are not presented, will show the advantages of fully Bayesian estimates.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563106</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Fully Bayesian Estimation of Data from Single Case Designs</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Extended School Day</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Homework</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fatigue (Biology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Schedules</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Checkoway, Amy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gamse, Beth</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Velez, Melissa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Linkow, Tamara</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Abt Associates, Inc.</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Massachusetts Expanded Learning Time (ELT) initiative provides grants to selected schools to redesign their schedules by adding 300-plus instructional hours to the school year to improve outcomes, broaden enrichment opportunities, and provide teachers with more planning and professional development time. The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (ESE) and Abt Associates, with grant funding from the U.S. Department of Education&apos;s Institute for Education Sciences (IES), completed a five year study of the ELT initiative to examine three primary research questions: (1) How has expanded learning time been implemented in schools that receive ELT grants?; (2) What are the outcomes of expanded learning time for schools, students, and teachers?; and (3) What is the relationship between implementation and outcomes? This study included 24 elementary, middle, and K-8 ELT schools that were funded by the state and 25 matched comparison schools. As random assignment of schools or students to ELT was not feasible, this study&apos;s impact analysis relies upon a strong longitudinal quasi-experimental design: a comparative interrupted time-series approach that leverages pre-program data and data from matched comparison schools to produce estimated effects representing differences between ELT and comparison schools beyond what one might expect given pre-program measures and other secular initiatives affecting all schools. Analyses of non-academic outcomes rely on cross-sectional survey data and use multi-level models that produce estimates of differences between ELT and comparison schools to approximate what would have happened in the absence of ELT. Each year, longitudinal student-level MCAS and other extant data for both ELT and matched comparison schools are analyzed. One of the study&apos;s key contributions was to integrate implementation and outcomes data using an index based on principles of effective ELT operation; this implementation index provides a measure of fidelity that can be used both to understand school-level implementation and to explore relationships between implementation and outcomes. Findings from the study reveal the following: (1) More ELT teachers were satisfied with time available for instruction and planning, and reported that they spend sufficient instructional time with students. Fewer ELT teachers reported that student academic performance and homework completion rates were problem areas; (2) More teachers in ELT schools reported that teacher and staff fatigue, as well as student fatigue, were problems in their respective schools; (3) Generally, there were no statistically significant effects of ELT on student achievement; (4) Descriptive analysis linking the level of implementation in ELT schools and student achievement outcomes indicate no clear patterns or meaningful relationships; (5) Exploratory analysis of differential effects of ELT in higher- versus lower-implementing schools indicates minimal heterogeneity in the effect by the level of ELT implementation; and (6) The school reform landscape is dynamic; each year, more schools (outside of this ELT initiative) appear to be expanding the amount of time in their school year as well as implementing reforms consistent with the core ELT components. Exhibits are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563107</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluation of the Massachusetts Expanded Learning Time (ELT) Initiative: Final Study Findings</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>2</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Value Added Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Program Divisions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Departments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lazarev, Valeriy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Newman, Denis</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teacher evaluation is currently a major policy issue at all levels of the K-12 system driven in large part by current US Department of Education requirements. The main objective of this study is to explore the patterns of relationship between observational scores and value-added measures of teacher performance in math classrooms and the variation in these relationships across grade levels. While the MET analyses used a single composite score consisting of a simple average of the eight component scores of the protocol, in our work we treated each component separately since each measures a separately definable aspect of classroom practice. Specifically, across all the components, the authors pose the following questions: (1) Do the relationships between observation scores of math teachers and their value-added scores tend to be non-linear?; (2) Is there a difference in the relationships associated with developmental changes as indicated by grade levels (four through eight)?; and (3) To what extent the observed changes are associated with increasing departmentalization (in upper elementary and middle school)? The relationship between classroom observation instruments and teacher effectiveness is often presumed to be a simple linear mapping. The authors find that the relationship is complex: it is typically non-linear and the shape of this relationship appears to evolve with the grade level progression. Careful analysis of such relationships will improve understanding of teacher effectiveness and result in more accurate teacher evaluation systems. Better evaluation systems will in turn generate more useful administrative data for use in effectiveness research. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563108</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Non-Linearity and Grade-Level Differences Complicate the Validation of Observation Protocols</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Tuition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baum, Sandy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ma, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board Advocacy &amp; Policy Center</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Recent data from the College Board&apos;s Annual Survey of Colleges reveal significant variation in institutional aid patterns among colleges and universities. The undergraduate tuition discount rate--the ratio of institutional grant aid to published tuition and fee charges--is higher at private institutions than at public institutions, but there are also notable differences within sectors. It is not just the magnitude of the discounts offered that is important but also the purposes of the discounts and the distribution of the grants to students in different circumstances. Since 2000-01, the total discount rate has been relatively stable in the public sector but continues to rise in the private sector. Breaking the discount rate down into aid that meets financial need, aid that goes beyond financial need (or goes to students with no documented need), and the more specialized categories of tuition waivers and athletic awards. This report presents a summary of the report analysis and findings.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563109</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Tuition Discounting: Institutional Aid Patterns at Public and Private Colleges and Universities. Trends in Higher Education Series</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Westine, Carl</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Spybrook, Jessaca</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The capacity of the field to conduct power analyses for group randomized trials (GRTs) of educational interventions has improved over the past decade (Authors, 2009). However, a power analysis depends on estimates of design parameters. Hence it is critical to build the empirical base of design parameters for GRTs across a variety of outcomes and contexts. This study provides a first step towards building this base of design parameters specifically for science outcomes. Unlike reading and math, science is not typically tested each year. Preliminary findings from this study suggest that although not direct comparisons, unconditional intraclass correlations (ICCs) for science outcomes are smaller than grade 3 math and reading as reported by Bloom, Richburg-Hayes, and Black (2005; 2007) for five urban districts. Similarly, Hedges and Hedberg (2007) found larger ICCs for both reading and math using a nationally representative sample of students nested in schools. R-square values for school level covariates have not been computed yet, but a one year lagged student pretest appears to be highly effective in reducing variance between and within schools, more so than in reading (R-squares less than 0.86) and math (less than 0.63) as reported by Bloom et al. (2005; 2007). The empirical estimates from this study will help improve the accuracy of the power analyses for GRTs of science interventions. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Improving the Design of Science Intervention Studies: An Empirical Investigation of Design Parameters for Planning Group Randomized Trials</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Writing Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Law Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Medical Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Breland, Hunter M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bridgeman, Brent</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fowles, Mary E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Graduate Management Admission Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Graduate Record Examinations</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Law School Admission Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Medical College Admission Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Test of English as a Foreign Language</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Graduate Management Admission Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Graduate Record Examinations</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Law School Admission Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Medical College Admission Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Test of English as a Foreign Language</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Educational Testing Service, Graduate Record Examination Board Program</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A comprehensive review was conducted of writing research literature and writing test program activities in a number of testing programs. The review was limited to writing assessments used for admission in higher education. Programs reviewed included ACT, Inc.&apos;s ACT™ program, the California State Universities and Colleges (CSUC) testing program, the College Board&apos;s SAT® program, the Graduate Management Admissions Test® (GMAT®) program, the Graduate Record Examinations ® (GRE®) test program, the Law School Admission Test® (LSAT®) program, the Medical College Admission Test® (MCAT®) program, and the Test of English as a Foreign Language™ (TOEFL®) testing program. Particular attention was given in the review to writing constructs, fairness and group differences, test reliability, and predictive validity. A number of recommendations are made for research on writing assessment. Tables Summarizing Previous Studies of Mean Differences, Reliability, and Validity are provided in the appendix.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563111</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Writing Assessment in Admission to Higher Education: Review and Framework. College Board Report No. 99-3. GRE Board Research Report No. 96-12R</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>1999-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>44</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>89</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Calculus</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discussion (Teaching Technique)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dickson, Lisa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mandell, Marv</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Maton, Kenneth</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Marcotte, Dave</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rous, Philip</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McDermott, Patrice</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rutledge, Janet</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>LaCourse, William R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sutphin, Kathy Lee</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Maryland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Maryland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many researchers, policymakers, and university administrators have called for more students to major in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields to address the critical need for a diverse and technically skilled workforce that is prepared to address national problems and educate its future STEM leaders. One of the questions facing the nation is how best to increase the number of students obtaining degrees in STEM fields. The University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) received support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to comprehensively investigate cost effective and scalable strategies to increase the number of students graduating with STEM degrees. UMBC&apos;s Meyerhoff Scholarship Program has been recognized as a national model for increasing diversity among future leaders in science and engineering. The programs, as currently administered, can impact a limited number of students due to the cost. Also, it is unclear as to what individual facets of these programs matter most for student retention and graduation. The project&apos;s primary purpose is to identify techniques that significantly impact retention and graduation rates among students who intend to major in STEM disciplines, to verify the estimates of these impacts through careful analysis, and to assess all costs relative to the effectiveness of these interventions. Eligible students who signed the consent forms to participate were randomly assigned into five separate groups: (1) high-status faculty mentoring with ongoing risk assessment; (2) professional staff mentoring with ongoing risk assessment; (3) placement in an active learning discussion section in pre-calculus or calculus classes in the CNMS Active Science Teaching and Learning Environment (CASTLE); (4) assistance in forming and maintaining study groups; and (5) the control group that offers a $50 UMBC Bookstore gift card. Participation took place over the fall and spring semesters with Cohort 1 held during the 2011-2012 AY, Cohort 2 held during the 2012-2013 AY, and Cohort 3 held during the 2013-2104 AY. The project is in its third and final Cohort at the time of the writing of this paper. The remaining time of the five-year study is devoted to data analysis and dissemination.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563112</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluation, Integration and Institutionalization of Initiatives to Enhance STEM Student Success</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>National Science Foundation (NSF)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>1038170</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report presents the validity of the SAT for predicting two second-year outcomes: (1) second-year cumulative GPA (2nd Yr Cum GPA), and (2) second-year grade point average (2nd Yr GPA). Similar to the results for first-year grade point average (1st Yr GPA), the SAT is strongly correlated with second year outcomes. For many significant subgroups, such as ethnic minority students and female students, the SAT was in fact a better predictor of 2nd Yr Cum GPA and 2nd Yr GPA than were high school grades alone. However, for all students, SAT score in combination with high school grades was the best predictor of these second year outcomes since both measures provide incrementally validity over each other. For example, even within HSGPA levels, there is still a strong positive relationship between SAT and 2nd Yr Cum GPA and 2nd Yr. An appendix lists the institutions providing second-year data on the 2006 freshman cohort.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563113</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validity of the SAT for Predicting Second-Year Grades: 2006 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report No. 2011-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>30</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wang, Ye</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gushta, Matthew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The No Child Left Behind Act resulted in increased school-level implementation of assessment-based school interventions that aim to improve student performance. Diagnostic assessments are included among these interventions, designed to help teachers use evidence about student performance to modify and differentiate instruction and improve student outcomes. The mCLASS: Math software (Ginsburg, Cannon, Eisenband, &amp;amp; Pappas, 2006) is comprised of screening/progress monitoring curriculum-based measures (CBMs) and Diagnostic Interviews to help teachers identify students&apos; skill levels. mCLASS: Math enables teachers to target instruction to each student&apos;s needs and monitor each student&apos;s progress toward mastery. Educators are expected to use the constantly updated diagnostic information to improve ongoing instruction and increase student achievement. Schools have found that the use of mCLASS: Math helps support curriculum, instruction, and assessment (Ginsburg et al, 2006). This study provides evidence about the effectiveness of mCLASS: Math in improving student outcomes on a statewide math achievement test, examining whether or not using the mCLASS: Math CBM impacts students&apos; achievement test scores. Among the students who were administered the CBM, we investigate whether or not being administered the mCLASS: Math Diagnostic Interviews further influences subsequent test scores. This study was conducted in a large mid-western state which provided data from 175 districts, 606 schools, and 1856 teachers for this study. All the schools and teachers had elected to implement mCLASS: Math; however, there are instances in which individuals students may be exempted from the assessment. CBM measures quickly identify students who are at risk for poor mathematical performance while Diagnostic Interviews identify students&apos; mathematical strengths and weaknesses which can be used to inform instruction. Overall, the administration of CBM measures provides broad, useful information about students&apos; skill levels and identifies those students in need of further assessments and development. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563114</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Improving Student Outcomes with mCLASS: Math, a Technology-Enhanced CBM and Diagnostic Interview Assessment</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Core Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Context Effect</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gersten, Russell</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dimino, Joseph</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jayanthi, Madhavi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Newman-Gonchar, Rebecca</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Taylor, Mary Jo</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Ohio</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Elementary Secondary Education Act Title I</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Diagnostic Reading Battery</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Ohio</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_law>Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Diagnostic Reading Battery</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The ESEA Blueprint for Reform states that teachers need &amp;quot;effective, ongoing, job-embedded, professional development that is targeted to student and school needs… [and] aligned with evidence of improvements in student learning.&amp;quot; Unfortunately, the professional development approaches advocated, though sensible and compelling in theory, have rarely been widely field-tested and evaluated using rigorous research techniques. The situation is slowly changing, but often the results have been mixed. One promising professional development effort in recent years has been the Teacher Study Group (TSG). This approach to professional development is an attempt to orchestrate several of the &amp;quot;best practices&amp;quot; in professional development--linkage to core curriculum, concreteness, establishment of collegial networks, and ongoing related activities--into a feasible model for use in elementary schools. The goal of the TSG professional development program is to enhance instruction by helping teachers integrate research-based instructional strategies into their existing curriculum. The purpose of the study is to examine the impact of the Teacher Study Group, focused on effective vocabulary instruction, on teacher knowledge, observed teaching practice, and student vocabulary achievement when implemented with first grade teachers in Title I schools. The major research questions were: (1) What is the impact of the TSG on teacher knowledge and teaching practice when compared to the professional development efforts being provided by the states and districts?; (2) What is the impact of the TSG on students&apos; vocabulary knowledge when compared with students in classes receiving existing professional development efforts?; (3) What role does fidelity of implementation of the TSG protocols by the facilitators play in moderating the impacts of TSG on teacher and student outcomes?; and (4) What contextual factors facilitate or hinder effective implementation of the TSG? the randomized controlled study was conducted in 61 Title 1 schools (31 treatment and 30 control) from 16 school districts in four states: California, Ohio, Illinois, and Texas. The sample consisted of 182 first grade teachers (94 treatment and 88 control) and a randomly selected sample of 1811 students (940 in treatment and 871 in control). In each district, data were collected from both the TSG and control schools at the same time, by observers and testers blind to condition, to guard against bias entering the data collection process. Preliminary findings demonstrate the potential of the TSG intervention to bring about significant positive impacts at the teacher level (a proximal outcome for a professional development intervention). Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563115</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Impact of the Teacher Study Group Professional Development Program on Student Vocabulary and Observed Teaching Practice: A Replication in First Grade Classrooms</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, James S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cooc, North</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Quinn, David M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>District of Columbia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>District of Columbia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The problem of summer reading loss among low-income children has been amply documented by researchers. Over time, income-based disparities in reading achievement appear to grow more rapidly during the summer months than the academic school year. This paper describes two experiments in which teachers scaffold summer book reading with two different approaches to improving comprehension through end of school year lessons. Because teachers implemented different comprehension lessons in the two studies, the instructional activities varied across the two studies. Both studies used the same norm-referenced reading comprehension test (Iowa Test of Basic Skills), enabling a comparison of impacts on a similar measure across two studies. The purpose of this study is to capitalize on the lessons from the two experiments. Results from the 2006 experiment, which focused on comprehension strategy instruction, improved children&apos;s performance on comprehension tasks that required inference and interpretation (d = 0.15). Results from the 2011 experiment suggest that content-oriented comprehension instruction improved children&apos;s performance on tasks that required analysis and generalization (d = 0.11) compared to strategy-oriented instruction. In study 1, strategy lessons appeared to benefit Grade 4 children&apos;s ability to make inferences and interpretation. In study 2, content lessons appeared to benefit Grade 3 children&apos;s ability to make analyses and generalizations. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563116</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Teacher-Scaffolded Summer Reading Improves Different Components of Reading Comprehension: Lessons Learned from Two Experimental Studies</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The findings for the 2008 sample are largely consistent with the previous reports. SAT scores were found to be correlated with FYGPA (r = 0.54), with a magnitude similar to HSGPA (r = 0.56). The best set of predictors of FYGPA remains SAT scores and HSGPA (r = 0.63), as the addition of the SAT sections to the correlation of HSGPA alone with FYGPA leads to a substantial improvement in prediction (?r = 0.07). This finding was consistent across all subgroups of the sample, by both institutional characteristics and demographics (?r = 0.06). All correlations presented here have been corrected for restriction of range, but the same basic patterns hold for the raw correlations. The following are appended: (1) Institutions Providing First-Year Outcomes Data for the 2008 Cohort; (2) Raw Correlations of SAT and HSGPA with FYGPA by Institutional Characteristics ; and (3) Raw Correlation of SAT Scores and HSGPA with FYGPA by Subgroups.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563117</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validity of the SAT for Predicting First-Year Grades: 2008 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report No. 2011-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rose, Bess A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Mid Atlantic States)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Research on the effectiveness of educational interventions usually is based on samples of students who remain in the same school over time. In contrast, most students transfer schools at least once during their K-12 school career, not including normative transfers such as those from elementary to middle school (Rumberger, 2002). Even when looking at just the two years prior to the 1998 NAEP, one-third of fourth graders, 19 percent of eighth graders, and 10 percent of twelfth graders had changed schools at least once (Rumberger, 2002). Mobility is higher among low-income and minority populations (Rumberger, 2002). While many studies have investigated the relationship of student mobility with achievement (Alexander, Entwisle, &amp;amp; Dauber, 1996; Reynolds, Chen, &amp;amp; Herbers, 2009; Rumberger &amp;amp; Larson, 1998; Tucker, Marx, &amp;amp; Long, 1998), the degree to which this relationship might vary among schools has not been fully investigated; in other words, are some schools more effective with mobile students than others? Data for the current study were obtained from a prior study of student mobility in a mid-Atlantic state that took place in 2001-2003. (A full description is available in Rogers, 2004.) This study examined complete school history data from a statewide sample of students in order to investigate the relationship between mobility and reading achievement in the sixth year of schooling. Cross-classified, multiple membership models were used to accurately account for students&apos; membership in multiple schools during Year 6 as well as prior years. The relationship between mobility and reading scores was found to be non-significant on average, but examination of the variance components revealed that the impact of student mobility on reading achievement varied significantly among schools. Furthermore, the covariance estimate suggests that mobility gaps are especially large in schools with higher overall levels of achievement. This suggests that further research is necessary that more closely examines the contextual effects of mobility. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563118</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining Variation in Effects of Student Mobility Using Cross-Classified, Multiple Membership Modeling</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Annie E. Casey Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=673'>R305B080020</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wyatt, Jeffrey N.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A recurrent trend in higher education research has been to identify additional predictors of college success beyond the traditional measures of high school grade point average (HSGPA) and standardized test scores, given that a large percentage of unaccounted variance in college performance remains. A recent study by Wyatt, Wiley, Camara, and Proestler (2012) expanded the definition of college readiness beyond test scores and HSGPA to include a measure of the academic rigor or challenge associated with a student&apos;s course work in high school, referred to as the academic rigor index (ARI). This study represents the first examination of the validity of ARI in predicting first-year grade point average (FYGPA). The correlation between ARI and FYGPA indicated a moderate effect overall and by gender, ethnicity, and household income subgroups; however, ARI did not add incremental validity above SAT scores and HSGPA. Additionally, when added to SAT scores and HSGPA, ARI had no impact on differential prediction by relevant subgroups. Given the current movement toward a more holistic assessment of college applicants, a standardized measure of the academic rigor of a student&apos;s course load in high school suggests a promising additional measure to the assessment of a student&apos;s level of college readiness. Table A-1 is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563119</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Validity of the Academic Rigor Index (ARI) for Predicting FYGPA. Research Report 2012-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>23</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Summer Science Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Walters, Kirk</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sorensen, Nicholas</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper describes the implementation of the online and f2f summer algebra courses that were delivered in summers 2011 and 2012. These data will be used to frame the impact results presented in an earlier paper. In particular, the paper will provide a detailed picture of how the online course was structured and the types of supports provided to students; compare the algebra content and course rigor between the online and f2f classes; and examine students&apos; perceptions of the online course between summers 2011 and 2012, which were starkly different in terms of the software glitches that interfered with the delivery of the course in 2012. The paper will be guided by the following research questions: (1) How were the key components of the online algebra credit recovery course implemented during the summers of 2011 and 2012, including specific technology challenges?; (2) How did the online and f2f Algebra IB courses compare in terms of content rigor and grading expectations?; and (3) How did the instructional experience compare for students taking online and f2f summer credit recovery courses, and between students who took the online course in 2011 and 2012? The authors will draw from several different sources of implementation data that were collected in both conditions in both summer 2011 and 2012 to answer the paper&apos;s research questions. These include in-person observations of the online and f2f classrooms, archival data generated from the online course, student and teacher surveys, online mentor logs, and course materials (syllabi, annotated tables of contents). The preliminary findings from year 1 (summer 2011) indicated that students were engaged, cooperative and attentive in both the online and f2f algebra classes, with no statistically significant differences between conditions. The online mentors reported spending the majority of their time (62%) on administrative tasks, 28% of their time teaching mathematics; and 9% of their time communicating with the online teacher or Aventa technical support.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563120</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Implementation Challenges and Results</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>3</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emergent Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Fluency</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Doabler, Christian T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nelson-Walker, Nancy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kosty, Derek</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baker, Scott K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smolkowski, Keith</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fien, Hank</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Oregon</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oregon</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this study, the authors conceptualize teaching episodes such as an integrated set of observable student-teacher interactions. Instructional interactions that take place between teachers and students around critical academic content are a defining characteristic of classroom instruction and a component carefully defined in many education interventions (Cohen, Raudenbush, &amp;amp; Ball, 2003; Pianta &amp;amp; Hamre, 2009). This presentation focuses on observational data collected during two separate IES-funded randomized controlled trials. The first study, Project Enhancing Core Reading Instruction (ECRI), is a four-year project designed to study the efficacy of a multi-tiered, first-grade intervention system. The second study, the Early Learning in Mathematics (ELM) project, investigated the efficacy of a core (Tier 1) kindergarten mathematics curriculum. There are two primary purposes of this presentation. The first is to establish classroom stability of instructional interactions during early literacy and beginning mathematics instruction. The second purpose is to examine the association between these instructional interactions and academic achievement. Three research questions were posed to guide the research on instructional interactions: (1) How stable are instructional interactions across the academic year? (2) How reliable are classroom means of instructional interactions (averaged across observations)? (3) Is the rate of instructional interactions associated with student achievement? Standardized observation protocols have demonstrated the capacity to measure core elements of intervention trials, including implementation fidelity and intervention impact (Snyder et al., 2006). This study used a direct observation tool to systematically investigate the explicit instructional interactions that occur during early literacy and beginning mathematics instruction. Preliminary analysis of the Early Learning in Mathematics (ELM) and Project Enhancing Core Reading Instruction (ECRI) data reveals that many of the studied instructional variables were unrelated to student achievement. One explanation for these results is that the low stability of the instructional variables attenuated the relationships. The present study highlights the importance of obtaining stability of observed teaching practices (Shavelson &amp;amp; Dempsey, 1976). The implications of the present study warrant further investigation of methods to improve stability of these instructional variables, such as controlling for the type of academic content observed and observing consecutive days of instruction. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Explicit Instructional Interactions: Observed Stability and Predictive Validity during Early Literacy and Beginning Mathematics Instruction</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Screening Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rolfhus, Eric</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Clarke, Ben</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Decker, Lauren E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Williams, Chuck</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dimino, Joseph</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (South Central)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Large scale longitudinal research (Morgan, Farkas, &amp;amp; Wu, 2009) and a meta-analysis (Duncan et al., 2007) have found that early mathematics achievement is a strong predictor of later mathematics achievement. In fact, end of Kindergarten and end of grade 1 mathematics achievement on ECLS-K and similar mathematics proficiency measures tends to be a stronger predictor than early measures of reading or reading-related skills such as phonemic awareness. Yet, despite increasing interest, there is little research on the effectiveness of recommended best practices in Response to Intervention Models (RtI) in mathematics (Gersten et al. 2009). This study (Rolfhus, et al. 2012) replicates the Fuchs et al. (2005) study as the first large-scale effectiveness trial (one intended to approximate real-world implementation) of &amp;quot;Number Rockets&amp;quot;. While the Fuchs et al. study used interventionists experienced with at-risk students, the current study employed interventionists with a range of experience who were selected from the local community. While the Fuchs et al. study provided interventionists with substantial monitoring and support, the current study provided professional development and a support program similar to those provided by publishers of curriculum products (Agodini et al. 2009). Different measures were used to identify at-risk students, and measure outcomes. Finally, the district in the Fuchs et al. study used just one curriculum; each of the four urban districts in the current study used a different one, which may have provided a more heterogeneous instructional context. This study is the first effectiveness evaluation (and first replication) of &amp;quot;Number Rockets&amp;quot; and builds on the positive findings of the Fuchs et al. (2005) efficacy study. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563122</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>From Efficacy Trial to Large Scale Effectiveness Trial: A Tier 2 Mathematics Intervention for First Graders with Difficulties in Mathematics</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Class Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wong, Vivian C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hallberg, Kelly</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cook, Thomas D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Indiana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Indiana Statewide Testing for Educ Progress Plus</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Indiana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress Plus</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The nested data structure inherent in education (i.e. students nested in schools nested in districts) makes intact school matching an appealing approach in observational studies of educational interventions and policies for both theoretical and practical purposes. This paper provides guidance to applied education researchers who are employing intact school matching. First, using a within study comparison (WSC) methodology the authors examine whether intact school matching is able to replicate experimental results. In addition, they examine what approaches to intact school matching lead to the greatest level of bias reduction. Specifically, the authors estimate the ability to reproduce Randomized Control Trial (RCT) results when comparison units are matched. The study draws on data from two RCTs conducted in education and data on other schools and students in the states in which the RCTs were conducted. The RCTs were conducted in Tennessee and Indiana and include schools and students from across the state in both cases. Data from schools (and students attending those schools) that participated in the two RCTs were used to calculate the experimental benchmark. In the case of the Indiana RCT, the quasi-experimental comparison group was drawn from all other schools in the state that did not participate in the RCT. In the case of the Tennessee RCT, the comparison group was constructed from within the RCT using a synthetic WSC design. This paper provides preliminary evidence that intact school matching can replicate experimental estimates and provides some guidance for which approaches are more likely to effectively reduce bias. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563123</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Intact School Matching in Education: Exploring the Relative Importance of Focal and Local Matching</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>2</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The current study examined the differential validity of the SAT for predicting cumulative GPA (cGPA) through the second year of college by college major, as well as the differential prediction of cGPA by college major across student subgroups. The relationship between the SAT and cGPA varied somewhat by major, as well as by major and subgroup (e.g. gender, ethnicity,and parental education level). This variability was likely due to differences in the nature of the college course work,grading practices, student self-selection, and academic cultures (e.g., male dominated or highly competitive) across majors. The findings from this study may be particularly relevant to colleges and universities in examining different admission criteria for acceptance to specialized colleges and major programs within an institution, and thus it could serve as a comprehensive resource for higher education researchers examining college major and performance. Supplemental tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563124</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Validity of the SAT® for Predicting Cumulative Grade Point Average by College Major. Research Report 2012-6</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>76</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>46</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Friedman-Krauss, Allison H.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Connors, Maia C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morris, Pamela A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As a result of the 1998 reauthorization of Head Start, the Department of Health and Human Services conducted a national evaluation of the Head Start program. The goal of Head Start is to improve the school readiness skills of low-income children in the United States. There is a substantial body of experimental and correlational research that has found associations between the quality of children&apos;s early childhood classrooms and their subsequent academic success (Pianta, Barnett, Burchinal, &amp;amp; Thornburg, 2009; Raver et al., 2008; 2009; 2011; Zaslow et al., 2010). A particularly important part of evaluating the effectiveness of Head Start is understanding whether the program improves the quality of participants&apos; early learning environments. Results from the original analysis of the classroom quality data from the Head Start Impact Study (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010) show that randomization to Head Start lead to improvement in the quality of care children received. However, these results are obfuscated by the way in which missing data were handled. The apparent improvements in classroom quality may be due to greater access to formal care settings. To address this problem, the primary objectives of this research are to address the challenges faced when estimating impacts of treatment random assignment on classroom quality within the Head Start Impact Study, to explore how different solutions influence the impact estimates, and to offer methodological solutions. What are the impacts of random assignment to Head Start on measures of classroom quality? Do children who are randomly assigned to Head Start receive higher/better quality care than children who are randomly assigned to the control group? Results confirm that the three types of missing data described here are indeed endogenous to treatment random assignment. Thus, methodological approaches must be used to handle missing data in order to obtain unbiased estimates of impacts of random assignment to Head Start on classroom quality. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563125</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Estimating Impacts of Treatment Random Assignment on Classroom Quality in the Head Start Impact Study: The Problem of Missing Data</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geometry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graphs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCoach, D. Betsy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gubbins, E. Jean</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Foreman, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rambo, Karen E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rubenstein, Lisa DaVia</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>TerraNova Multiple Assessments</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Tests of Academic Progress</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Stanford Achievement Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Stanford Achievement Tests</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>TerraNova Multiple Assessments</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Although research on the effectiveness of differentiated and enriched instruction in improving the achievement of diverse students is still emerging, some studies suggest that students in academically diverse classrooms benefited academically from differentiated learning experiences. The primary research question explored in this study was &amp;quot;What is the impact of implementing the pre-differentiated mathematics curricula in algebra, geometry and measurement, and graphing and data analysis on the achievement of grade 3 students, after controlling for pretest achievement scores?&amp;quot; Specifically, the authors were interested in examining whether math achievement outcomes of treatment and control group students differed. This study compared researcher-designed, pre-differentiated and enriched mathematics curricula in algebra, geometry, and measurement, graphing, and data analysis to the districts&apos; mathematics curricula. The study concluded that, in general, the post-Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) scores of students in the treatment group were equal to those in the control group. However, high-achieving students did appear to derive some benefit from the differentiated curricula. This was especially true for high-achieving students in lower-achieving schools. Future research should explore the differentiated units using different post-assessments, including the researcher-developed curriculum-based measures for both the treatment and control groups. Utilizing out of grade level assessments would have provided a clearer picture of the effects of the intervention. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563126</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluating the Efficacy of Using Pre-Differentiated and Enriched Mathematics Curricula for Grade 3 Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>42</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Study Abroad</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adjustment (to Environment)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rui, Ning</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Northeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>An institution that offers high-quality study abroad programs is perceived as likely to provide a stimulating learning environment for the students (Stroud, 2010). However, there are very few well-designed evaluation studies that provide evidence about the types of impacts of study abroad programs on students&apos; academic and non-academic outcomes. To fill this void in the literature, the present study aims to estimate, from an institutional perspective, the effect of study abroad experience on students&apos; social, behavioral, and attitudinal outcomes with an emphasis on students&apos; intercultural competence and adaptability using survey data of 1,330 college students who entered a northeastern mid-size comprehensive private university in the fall of 2006. This study not only advances the understanding of the nature of impacts of study abroad programs, but also addresses the need for innovative methods to address the selection bias, i.e., individual and institutional factors that influence students&apos; intent to participate in the programs. Results from this study have important implications and show that the study abroad experience does have a positive impact on habits of mind, social self-concept, civic-awareness, and social agency involvement, but no impacts on academic outcomes. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563127</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Impacts of Study Abroad on American Students&apos; Intercultural Competence--A Propensity Score Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resistance to Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Documentation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participative Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kincaid, Eric R</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The implementation of professional learning communities (PLCs) in schools has been shown to increase the academic performance of students and develop a beneficial and productive culture of true teacher collaboration. Despite these demonstrated benefits, resistance to PLC implementation has been documented in various forms throughout the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify the barriers to PLC implementation and determine means of removing them. A social-constructivist theoretical framework was employed to explore the research questions, which examined the reasons for the resistance to full PLC implementation and the possibilities for overcoming resistance. A phenomenological research design was used to develop a thorough description of the implementation process through interviews and document analysis of PLC meeting notes. A combination of critical-case and network sampling was used to identify 9 teachers as participants to be interviewed for the study using predetermined criteria. Transcripts of participant interviews and notes taken during past PLC meetings were hand-coded using a 3-column procedure to identify codes, which were grouped into themes related to PLC implementation resistance. The main barriers to implementation identified in this project study were lack of time, lack of shared leadership, and lack of communication. The findings led to a project consisting of a series of professional development sessions for PLC leaders and teachers. The intent of the project is to eliminate PLC barriers and establish effective PLCs. The motivation behind this study and project is to bring about positive social change by assisting educators working to implement PLCs at their schools in the development of sustained PLCs that nurture the education of teachers and students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563128</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Barriers to Implementation of Effective Professional Learning Communities</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0357-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>171</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600285</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Listening Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vowels</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syllables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suprasegmentals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Meador, Diane L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Previous investigations have sought to determine how listeners might locate word boundaries in the speech signal for the purpose of lexical access. Cutler (1990) proposes the Metrical Segmentation Strategy (MSS), such that only full vowels in stressed syllables and their preceding syllabic onsets are segmented from the speech stream. I report the results of several experiments which indicate that the listener segments the minimal word, a phonologically motivated prosodic constituent, during processing of the speech signal. These experiments were designed to contrast the MSS with two prosodic alternative hypotheses. The Syllable Hypothesis posits that listeners segment a linguistic syllable in its entirety as it is produced by the speaker. The Minimal Word Hypothesis proposes that a minimal word is segmented according to implicit knowledge the listener has concerning statistically probable characteristics of the lexicon. These competing hypotheses were tested by using a word spotting method similar to that in Cutler and Norris (1988). The subjects&apos; task was to detect real monosyllabic words embedded initially in bisyllabic nonce strings. Both open (CV) and closed (CVC) words were embedded in strings containing a single intervocalic consonant. The prosodic constituency of this consonant was varied by manipulating factors affecting prosodic structure: stress, the sonority of the consonant, and the quality of the vowel in the first syllable. The assumption behind the method is that word detection will be facilitated when embedded word and segmentation boundaries are coincident. Results show that these factors are influential during segmentation. The degree of difficulty in word detection is a function of how well the speech signal corresponds to the minimal word. Findings are consistently counter to both the MSS and Syllable hypotheses. The Minimal Word Hypothesis takes advantage of statistical properties of the lexicon, ensuring a strategy which is successful more often than not. The minimal word specifies the smallest possible content word in a language in terms of prosodic structure while simultaneously affiliating the greatest amount of featural information within the structural limits. It therefore guarantees an efficient strategy with as few parses as possible. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563129</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Minimal Word Hypothesis: A Speech Segmentation Strategy</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Arizona</eric:citation>
<dc:date>1996-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0359-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>280</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600287</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Labor Market</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Industry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sublette, Heidi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In the last 5 years, industries have begun to recognize a growing gap in the production of college graduates in areas of STEM. Researchers in various industries believe this gap will create a significant loss of competitive edge in the STEM fields, which will leave the United States pursuing STEM graduates from foreign countries and may ultimately leave the US behind in the industry of science, technology and innovation. This qualitative study analyzes the value and impact of STEM teacher leaders in secondary education. A phenomenological study was conducted with 10 secondary school science and math teacher leaders in order to gain a better understanding of teacher leaders&apos; perceptions, classroom practices and the role of a STEM teacher leader. This study addresses the following research questions: 1) What attributes define effective STEM teacher leaders, according to teacher leaders who have completed the Center for Math and Science Teaching system? 2) What success strategies, among teacher leaders of the Center for Math and Science Teaching program, have enabled further development of teacher leadership? 3) What is the best model in developing teacher leaders, according to literature from 2005 to present? 4) What is an optimal model of developing STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) teacher leaders within secondary education? This research aims to explore teacher leaders&apos; perceptions of their role as a teacher leader based on strategies learned from CMAST and past experiences. Findings from this study provide critical data for making informed decisions on including important elements when implementing an effective STEM teacher leader system or program, and the impact it can create on science and math teaching and learning in secondary education. The investigator concludes this study with the development of a STEM teacher leader model that merges these findings with existing research. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563130</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Effective Model of Developing Teacher Leaders in STEM Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Pepperdine University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0366-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>177</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600294</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wucherer, Robin M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In an extension of research linking teachers&apos; beliefs about mathematics and their instructional practices at the Prek-12 level, the present study examined and documented both the beliefs and instructional practices of four community college instructors who teach remedial mathematics. Data was collected through survey, observations, interviews, and classroom artifacts. The results of the survey, the &amp;quot;Modified Standards Based Belief Instrument&amp;quot; (MSBI), showed one-third of 39 community college mathematics instructors had beliefs about mathematics and the teaching and learning of mathematics that aligned with the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) &amp;quot;Standards&amp;quot; (1989,2000), with the remaining two-thirds having a mix of traditional and &amp;quot;Standards&amp;quot;-based beliefs. Case study findings indicated a variation in teachers&apos; beliefs about mathematics and the teaching and learning of mathematics, in particular, two instructors had &amp;quot;Standards&amp;quot;-based beliefs while two instructors had traditional based beliefs. Each instructor&apos;s mathematical tasks, discourse, and learning environment were evaluated using Smith and Stein&apos;s (1998) level of cognitive demand, Brendefur and Frykholm&apos;s (2000) four constructs of discourse, and Horizon Research&apos;s (2000) classroom observation protocol. The findings showed that four instructors employed traditional practices. They consistently employed tasks labeled as procedures without connections. There was a difference in the discourse observed in the four classes. Two instructors were at the uni-directional level of communication with one instructor at each of the contributive and reflective levels of communication. Study findings indicate a need for further research of the effectiveness of student learning based on an instructor&apos;s beliefs and instructional strategies along with effectiveness of professional development that focuses on cognitive demand level of tasks, discourse, and group activities. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563131</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Beliefs and Instructional Practices of Four Community College Remedial Mathematics Instructors</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Illinois State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0369-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>300</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600296</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Concept Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Number Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cary, Mari Strand</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Doabler, Christian</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Clarke, Benjamin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fien, Hank</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baker, Scott K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jungjohann, Kathy J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Northwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The low level of mathematics performance of U.S. students in relation to national standards and in international comparisons has concerned educators and policy makers for many years. The authors&apos; primary goals were to design a feasible and usable intervention and gather data on the promise of the intervention to foster students&apos; conceptual understanding of whole number concepts and skills and procedural fluency. The FUSION curriculum was developed using an iterative design process aligned with design experiment methodology. The pilot study took place in nine schools in two suburban school districts in the northwest. The FUSION program is a Grade 1 (Tier 2) mathematics intervention that focuses specifically on building students&apos; early knowledge of whole number concepts. Results indicate that understanding student outcomes, program implementation fidelity, and interventionists&apos; perceptions of--and reactions to--the intervention has been a crucial piece of the iterative design process. The Pilot Study results revealed differential effects for proximal and distal outcomes and the degree to which measured outcomes align with teachers&apos; perceptions of the program&apos;s utility. The authors state that their results and the resulting conversations will be useful to the team as they move forward with other curricula design and implementation efforts and as they finalize plans to propose--and conduct--a subsequent FUSION efficacy study.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563132</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluating the Promise of the &amp;quot;FUSION&amp;quot; Tier 2 Math Intervention</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>24</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drug Therapy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vignettes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nurses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dover, Cheryl D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Nursing educational programs are struggling with how to educate students to safely and efficiently administer medications. There is no doubt education programs need to find a way to assist students to acquire the skill of medication administration and to also transfer the skill into practice. Knowledge, skills, and abilities are requirements for nursing practice and are part of Quality and Safety Education for Nurses competencies, but research has shown that nursing education programs have not done an adequate job to prepare students to administer medications in the practice arena. With the increase use of various medication deliver systems; nursing students are unable to learn and deliver safe administration of medications in clinical facilities. Yet, facilities expect the new graduate to have knowledge and confidence in their ability to safely administer medications to patients. Students and full-time nursing faculty performed the same medication administration simulated scenario. Both groups must achieve 100% accuracy and had three attempts for success. Faculty members perform medication administration skills with students in the nursing skills laboratory and in the clinical settings; therefore, faculty must accurately perform the scenario. During performance of the simulated scenario, common distractors experienced in clinical practice were incorporated. The faculty members must be able to assist students in correctly administer medications. There were 59 students and 9 faculty members that participated in the medication administration capstone project. The data findings indicated 50 out of 59 or 85% of students were successful on the first attempt. Only 4 out of 9 or 44% of the faculty participates were successful on the first attempt of the simulated scenario. Both groups responded to distractors without being diverted from administrating medications. Medication administration skills must be deliberate and accurate with patient safety first. The data findings support the need for change while students are learning the medication administration process and periodical practice for faculty is warranted. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563133</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluation of Safe Medication Administration through the Use of Simulation in an Academic Setting</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.N.P. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9660-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>84</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599867</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socialization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sense of Community</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Isolation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asynchronous Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Adams, Jacob Lyle</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Purpose: This study sought to (1) identify and describe the experiences of international students participating in U.S. cohort- and text-based asynchronous online courses and to 2) analyze perceptions of belonging/isolation within online environments through group and organizational socialization theory. Research Methods: Data from interviews with international undergraduate students were collected at a U.S. institution of higher education offering asynchronous online courses. Targeted sampling methods were used to seek a broad sample within a greater university international student population base by time of participation in an online course, gender, and major. Discussion board asynchronous communication text was reviewed after the interviews were conducted to better understand the context of the interview data and to inform the ongoing analysis process. The data were analyzed by determining open and axial codes that emerged as categories, themes, and findings. Implications for Research and Practice: This study helps curriculum designers, teachers, administrators, and policy decision makers better understand and appreciate the implications of an expanding enrollment of international undergraduate students within U.S. based online courses. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563134</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Study of International Undergraduate Students Taking Online Courses: Group and Organizational Socialization Theory and Sense of Belonging</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Utah</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0370-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>132</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600297</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Jews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Cultural Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Rearing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parenting Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Day Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Uhrman, Abigail L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>To date, there is limited research examining the parenting experiences of parents with a child with special needs, and there is virtually no research on the experience of these parents in the Jewish community. In addressing this gap in the scholarship, this study describes the experiences of parents with a child with special needs and explores the interplay between parents&apos; experiences and their identities as Jewish adults, parents, and parents of a child with special needs. The study involved interviews with 20 parents in the greater New York area who have or had a child in a Jewish day school within the last three years. The study focused on three areas: parents&apos; day-to-day experiences raising a child with special needs, experiences with their child&apos;s Jewish day school, and interactions with and perceptions of the larger Jewish community. The day school context provided a unique opportunity to explore the ways in which schooling choices reflect and shape parents&apos; experiences. The findings suggest that parents with a child with special needs struggle to find community and connection. While their parenting experiences were similar to parents with typically developing children in many ways, their unique experiences with their child and his/her disability contributed to feelings of difference and otherness. The findings also suggest marked differences in the experiences of parents whose child was able to remain in the day school and those who left as a result of their child&apos;s special needs. In the latter group, the themes of loneliness and marginalization were common. Although parents hoped to feel included in the Jewish community--with Jewish day school an important expression of this desire and commitment--many experienced a dearth of appropriate programs and services and a lack of awareness of and sensitivity to special needs issues in the Jewish community. The study concludes by sharing recommendations that day schools and other Jewish institutions should consider in order to better serve the needs of individuals with special needs and their families. Although recommendations are grounded in a Jewish context, they also have implications for other settings. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563135</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Alike and Different: Parenting a Child with Special Needs in the Jewish Community</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9705-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>175</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599904</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Class</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sampling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Use Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lee, Tanja Lynne</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mann Whitney U Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>It is hoped that implementing educational technology (ET) into academic curriculums will close the achievement gap among ethnically and socioeconomically (SES) diverse students. California public schools have arranged for instructional classrooms to be stored with information communication technology (ICT) resources. Even so, there is inequity in the provision of ET. The purpose of this causal-comparative research study was to compare how select secondary schools in Northern California with different SES provide access to and use of computers as a regular part of students&apos; learning. A digital divide theoretical background, which focuses on social stratification in control, privilege, and power among specific groups of people, was used. Participants were chosen through stratified sampling. Information was collected from 52 teachers who completed an online survey regarding their students&apos; use of technology. Mann-Whitney-U and Chi-Square of Independence tests indicated a statistically significant difference in how African American and Hispanic students from low-SES backgrounds use ICT and students from more affluent SES. More specifically, students are not using ICT frequently to engage in student-centered critical thinking learning activities. It is recommended that school districts set specifications that describe what the implementation of technology should entail. A clear report of computer use, types of ICT learning activities, and ICT objectives should be established. These findings have social change implications in that they provide select high schools in Northern California with a valid and reliable assessment of which areas of ET implementation need to be addressed. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563136</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Educational Technology and Equity: Students Access to and Use of Computers in Low-Socioeconomic and Middle-Class Socioeconomic Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9306-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>164</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599654</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Surgery</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Medical Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physicians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychomotor Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Usability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Efficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Islam, Gazi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Surgery as a profession requires significant training to improve both clinical decision making and psychomotor proficiency. In the medical knowledge domain, tools have been developed, validated, and accepted for evaluation of surgeons&apos; competencies. However, assessment of the psychomotor skills still relies on the Halstedian model of apprenticeship, wherein surgeons are observed during residency for judgment of their skills. Although the value of this method of skills assessment cannot be ignored, novel methodologies of objective skills assessment need to be designed, developed, and evaluated that augment the traditional approach. Several sensor-based systems have been developed to measure a user&apos;s skill quantitatively, but use of sensors could interfere with skill execution and thus limit the potential for evaluating real-life surgery. However, having a method to judge skills automatically in real-life conditions should be the ultimate goal, since only with such features that a system would be widely adopted. This research proposes a novel video-based approach for observing surgeons&apos; hand and surgical tool movements in minimally invasive surgical training exercises as well as during laparoscopic surgery. Because our system does not require surgeons to wear special sensors, it has the distinct advantage over alternatives of offering skills assessment in both learning and real-life environments. The system automatically detects major skill-measuring features from surgical task videos using a computing system composed of a series of computer vision algorithms and provides on-screen real-time performance feedback for more efficient skill learning. Finally, the machine-learning approach is used to develop an observer-independent composite scoring model through objective and quantitative measurement of surgical skills. To increase effectiveness and usability of the developed system, it is integrated with a cloud-based tool, which automatically assesses surgical videos upload to the cloud. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563137</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Informatics Approach to Improving Surgical Skills Training</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0377-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>139</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600300</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Pragmatics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Context Effect</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discourse Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Form Classes (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lewis, Shevaun N.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The goal of language comprehension for humans is not just to decode the semantic content of sentences, but rather to grasp what speakers intend to communicate. To infer speaker meaning, listeners must at minimum assess whether and how the literal meaning of an utterance addresses a question under discussion in the conversation. In cases of implicature, where the speaker intends to communicate more than just the literal meaning, listeners must access additional relevant information in order to understand the intended contribution of the utterance. I argue that the primary challenge for inferring speaker meaning is in identifying and accessing this relevant contextual information. In this dissertation, I integrate evidence from several different types of implicature to argue that both adults and children are able to execute complex pragmatic inferences relatively efficiently, but encounter some difficulty finding what is relevant in context. I argue that the variability observed in processing costs associated with adults&apos; computation of scalar implicatures can be better understood by examining how the critical contextual information is presented in the discourse context. I show that children&apos;s oft-cited hyper-literal interpretation style is limited to scalar quantifiers. Even 3-year-olds are adept at understanding indirect requests and &amp;quot;parenthetical&amp;quot; readings of belief reports. Their ability to infer speaker meanings is limited only by their relative inexperience in conversation and lack of world knowledge. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563138</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Pragmatic Enrichment in Language Processing and Development</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9787-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>239</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599959</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trust (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Privacy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Birge, Colin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Designers who create user interfaces are frequently required to ask users for personal information. For the user, this is a &amp;quot;trust question&amp;quot;: Do I, the user, trust the system or entity that is asking me for this information? The creation and management of these trust questions is an important aspect of the research field called usable privacy and security. However, most working designers do not focus exclusively on usable privacy and security problems. Decomposition and modularity of trust and usable privacy and security issues are problematic for working designers. Studies in the usable privacy and security field have traditionally focused on the usability of specific interface elements, or on a specific usable privacy and security problem. This dissertation explores how designers approach and handle these trust questions in their design process. A multi-modal study investigates how designers conceive of usable privacy and security in their daily work. The object of study is a working designer for whom privacy and security is not a primary task in their daily job. The study uses a survey based on a snowball sample of professional design online forums and semi-structured interviews to explore the attitudes and conceptual models of designers who produce designs involving &amp;quot;trust questions.&amp;quot; The results showed that working designers are interested in usable privacy and security issues but often have problems decomposing and modularizing the problem space of usable privacy and security. Usable privacy and security problems are seen as important in the abstract but are hard to identify and engage as part of day-to-day work. To reach the shared goal of making it easy for working designers to achieve positive usable privacy and security outcomes including an increased sense of user satisfaction and safety, it will be important for the research community to find ways to assist working designers with that decomposition and modularization process. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563139</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Conceptions of Trust: How Designers Approach Usable Privacy and Security</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9343-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>250</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599669</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Whites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Composition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aggression</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resistance (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hotchkins, Bryan K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study addresses African American students&apos; leadership experiences at predominantly White institutions. Findings indicated participants utilized servant leadership in historically Black organizations and transformational leadership in predominantly White organizations. The differences displayed showed that participants&apos; leadership perceptions and behaviors were influenced by the racial micro-organizational climates experienced. Emergent themes were: 1) Resistant apathy; 2) Blackness as benefit; 3) Positional responsibility; and 4) Leader efficacy enhancement. Ultimately, participants adjusted the ways in which they enacted leadership, mentored followers and defined leading based on the organizational context. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563140</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Soul of Leadership: African American Students&apos; Experiences in Historically Black and Predominantly White Organizations</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Utah</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0392-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>263</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600312</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theory Practice Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Doctoral Dissertations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Identity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jain, Rashi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Traditional notions around &amp;quot;research&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;teaching&amp;quot; tend to project the two as separate, often conflicting, activities. My dissertation challenges this perceived dichotomy and explores points of connections, or continuities, between teaching and research through my own practice as an adjunct community-college English as a Second Language (ESL) instructor as well as a doctoral candidate at a research-intensive university. I use Wenger&apos;s (1998) framework of communities of practice to locate my practitioner research at the intersections of the academic community and the teaching community. I also employ Cochran-Smith and Lytle&apos;s (2009) ideas around the dialectic of practice and research to conceptualize the integration of research and practice in my dissertation project. I employ a pluralistic approach to the dissertation design and procedures by drawing upon and adapting elements from different research traditions and approaches in ways that best fitted my integrated practitioner research. Keeping doability and ethicality as my guiding principles, I provide authenticity to the thesis report by writing with deep reflexivity. With inquiry as my ongoing stance, I identify ways in which I integrated teaching and research: by primarily harnessing teaching tools to do research, and research tools to teach. I then propose that practitioner inquiry is an ongoing process, wherein the practitioner researcher analyzes in-depth a specific aspect of her pedagogy post-instruction to make research non-parasitic on teaching. I provide an example of such an ongoing inquiry by analyzing deeply a specific aspect of my own instruction--global Englishes and translinguistic identities in my ESL classroom. I thus make a case for engaging in practitioner inquiry that integrates teaching and research, and discuss the implications of my dissertation work for teacher preparation and professional development, doctoral education, TESOL and community college practice, as well as practitioner research at large. I finally conclude my doctoral thesis by reimagining myself as a &amp;quot;pracademic&amp;quot;: a coherent unified and hybrid identity that allows me to be both a practitioner and an academic at the same time without privileging either role; and invite my readers to push the boundaries of their own thinking about the roles of teachers and researchers in the academy. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563141</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Practitioner-Reseach as Dissertation: Exploring the Continuities between Practice and Research in a Community College ESL Classroom</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9099-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>302</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599610</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Group Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>World Views</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conferences (Gatherings)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Holmes, Kimberly Monique</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this dissertation study was to explore African-American women&apos;s perceptions of undergraduate STEM classroom experiences, and the ways in which those experiences have supported or hindered their persistence in physics majors. The major research question guiding this study was: How do African-American women perceive the climate and interactions with peers and faculty in undergraduate STEM classrooms? Using qualitative methods and a multiple case study design, a sample of 11 women were interviewed. This study was also informed by data from 31 African-American women who participated in focus group interviews at annual meetings of the National Society of Black and Hispanic Physicists. Findings indicated that the women excelled in small courses with faculty who took a personal interest in their success. They also perceived that there was a pervasive culture in physics and other STEM departments that often conflicted with their own worldviews. Findings also indicated that the women&apos;s perceptions of classroom experiences varied widely depending on professors&apos; behaviors, institution types, and the level of courses. It is anticipated that through a better understanding of their perceptions of STEM learning environments and factors in their persistence, STEM faculty and departments can better retain and support this population of students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563142</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Perceived Undergraduate Classroom Experiences of African American Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9095-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>275</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599607</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Organizational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constructivism (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participant Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resistance to Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stress Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Identity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resilience (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sutherland, Claire Euline</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Jamaica (Kingston)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Jamaica</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many universities have expanded from teaching only to include research goals, requiring shifts in organization behavior. An exploratory case study method was used to examine these dynamics among positive deviant researchers at the University of Technology, Jamaica (UTech), the single case examined, from a social construction perspective. As a participant observer in the organization, the researcher engaged in marginality and its associated risks in studying UTech&apos;s transition from low to higher research outputs to answer the research questions--significant norms influencing positive deviancy patterns of the researchers and, their perceptions and experiences during transition. A qualitative case report and mini-organization ethnography of UTech was produced to enhance contextual understanding of positive deviance among university researchers, an area not previously described in the literature. Several important organizational findings emerged from the analysis of interviews of 6 participants who received the President&apos;s Research Initiative Award (PRIA), artifacts of the organization, and participant observation. The results detail early development of a descriptive typology of positive deviance during organization change, including motivation, feelings of being marginalized and coping strategies. Three patterns--(1) teaching versus research (2) disorder, and (3) personal resilience--and 9 interrelated themes enhance understanding of role adaptations and the meanings and beliefs that these faculty associate with their research environment. The results also indicate organizational factors and personal dimensions in a research subculture that is emerging amidst strong pivotal teaching norms and culture; social costs involved in such a transition, and; some challenges and opportunities for building a research culture and a high performance research environment at UTech. A construct of organizational and individual adaptation to stress was hypothesized, subject to future research. The main conclusions included that research is a peripheral norm; doing teaching and research involved tensions, challenges, incongruence, disequilibria as new identities and the implied research subculture are emerging at UTech; there are anti-research risks to the transition, and; organizational tradeoffs might be required. The findings, although not a template, are of potential usefulness in any organizational setting where organization growth and change are contemplated. Recommendations are made for UTech and future research. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563143</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Positive Deviance during Organization Change: Researchers&apos; Social Construction of Expanded University Goals</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Pepperdine University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0395-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>169</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600315</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Extended School Day</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Capital</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immigrants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wagner, Kathryn Mary-LaCroix</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Despite No Child Left Behind mandates, the math achievement gap is still prevalent in schools in the United States, and efforts to address this problem have demonstrated little documented progress. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an intervention strategy used to address the math achievement gap. In this study, social capital theory, which Miller related to the benefits gained from extended-day learning activities, was used as a theoretical framework. The research question determined whether a group of African American and Middle Eastern students who participated in an extended-day program demonstrated higher achievement gains in math compared to the math scores of students who did not participate. An outcome-based program evaluation was used in order to compare the differences in math scores between 2 groups of students. The treatment group included 15 elementary-aged students, and the control group included 13 elementary-aged students. Pretest and posttest data were used to establish gain scores made during the 20-week program. A 1-way ANOVA demonstrated that the group participating in the extended-day program made significantly more progress than the group that did not participate. In an evaluation report, recommendations that included schedule changes and group learning were provided to support the enhancement of math potential among students who struggle the most in math. The study promotes positive social change by assisting elementary educators and local stakeholders in addressing the achievement gap and providing strategies for improving the effectiveness of extended-day learning. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563144</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effects of an Extended-Day Online Math Program on Math Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9742-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>102</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599931</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teamwork</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Team Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Group Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journal Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Use Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Workshops</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Group Dynamics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blended Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McAliney, Peter J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Technology continues to evolve and become accessible to students in higher education. Concurrently, teamwork has become an important skill in academia and the workplace and students have adopted established technologies to support their learning in both individual and team project work. Given the emergence of social media technologies, I examined how these new technologies supported or interfered with group development processes underlying the development of team skills as students completed a group project. Using case studies, I examined 11 undergraduate students in an upper level blended class at a public university in the southeastern United States. Data were collected through a variety of sources including focus groups, individual interviews, reflection logs, and other group support tools provide by the instructor to see how students were using social media technologies to support their group project work. Data analysis resulted in six themes: 1) social media technology choices used to support group project work depended on individual team members&apos; prior use and attitudes about technology; 2) social media technology is most useful for the &amp;quot;people&amp;quot; aspects of team projects; 3) certain technologies are more useful at different stages of the project; 4) lack of an explicit social media technology &amp;quot;contract&amp;quot; within a group leads to some unintended, negative consequences; 5) the immediacy associated with social media technology can blur the lines among specific team roles, ownership of tasks, and overall integrated project planning perspective; 6) social media technologies are used to produce a cooperative, not collaborative, deliverable. For students to continue to make the best use of evolving technology, institutions may want to provide resources such as workshops and self-paced tutorials to students and instructors on how to use social media technologies to support learning outside the classroom. Instructors can enhance students&apos; connections with their coursework by using social media technologies themselves and for class assignments. Researchers can extend this study by studying other student populations, such as adult learners and international students, as well as studying how social media is used in a variety of course delivery modalities, such as traditional classroom-based environments and distance learning. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563145</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Undergraduate Students Use Social Media Technologies to Support Group Project Work</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9679-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>236</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599884</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 11</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teamwork</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Loudermilk, Teresa J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 11</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Schools&apos; functioning as learning organizations provide educators the opportunity to focus on working together in innovative ways. However, it is unknown to what extent learning organizations exist in small high schools or whether small high schools&apos; functioning as learning organizations improve academic achievement. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between teachers&apos; instructional practices as defined by Bowen&apos;s six action dimensions of a learning organization and student achievement in small high schools. The study investigated whether implementation of the six action dimensions--team orientation, innovation, involvement, information flow, tolerance for error, and results orientation--were associated with student academic achievement in mathematics and English language arts (ELA). Data to determine teachers&apos; use of the six action dimensions were collected using the School Success Profile-Learning Organization survey. Surveys (N = 303) were collected from mathematics and ELA teachers from 60 Texas high schools with enrollments between 300 and 800. Student achievement was measured by the mean scale score of the 11th-grade student exit-level Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) in mathematics and ELA. Statistically significant relationships were detected for two action dimensions (innovation and involvement) with academic achievement in ELA. Results indicated a statistically significant relationship between each of the six action dimensions and student achievement on the mathematics TAKS assessment. This study contributes empirical findings to the research literature that has tended to be limited to the best practices of learning organizations without providing evidence-based results. Learning organizations characterized by action dimensions associated with faculty cooperation, uninhibited experimental and novel approaches to educational practices, and an orientation toward goal-based achievement tend to yield higher academic achievement in small high school settings. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563146</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Improving Instructional Practices at the Secondary Level through Actions of a Learning Organization</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Tarleton State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9676-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>101</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599883</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Prior Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Natural Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Retrieval</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Input Output Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Taxonomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Representation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Man Machine Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Do, Quang Xuan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this thesis, we study the importance of background knowledge in relation extraction systems. We not only demonstrate the benefits of leveraging background knowledge to improve the systems&apos; performance but also propose a principled framework that allows one to effectively incorporate knowledge into statistical machine learning models for relation extraction. Our work is motivated by the fact that relation extraction systems in the literature usually use evidence that is written explicitly in the input text to detect and characterize the semantic relations between target concepts. Although this approach achieves reasonable performance, it does not necessarily guarantee accurate extraction due to problems of poor information representation of the systems&apos; inputs and lack of knowledge to support logical reasoning. We argue that relation extraction systems would benefit from using one or more background knowledge sources, both in enriching the systems&apos; inputs and biasing the final outputs. We illustrate our framework in the context of several learning-based relation extraction tasks. The first task is &amp;quot;Taxonomic Relation Identification&amp;quot; where we employ an external knowledge source to construct meaning representation of the task inputs and support global inference to identify taxonomic relations between input terms. In the second task, &amp;quot;Event Relation Discovery&amp;quot;, we focus on identify causality relation between events in text. Our approach leverages background knowledge to perform joint inference among several classifiers that make local decisions on event causality relation. After that, we study the problem of constructing a timeline of events extracted from text, &amp;quot;Event Timeline Construction&amp;quot;. To address this task, we propose a new timeline representation with events mapped to absolute time intervals. In this work, we present a time interval-based global inference model that jointly assigns events into time intervals on a timeline and orders events temporally. Besides using relational constraints in the inference model, we also show that using event coreference as another source of background knowledge is beneficial to the system. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563147</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Background Knowledge in Learning-Based Relation Extraction</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0433-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>120</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600339</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resilience (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Law Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Law Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Siblings</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Athletics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiential Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Environmental Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Alfaro, Daisy Denise</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study focuses on the academic resilience exhibited by urban, low-income, first college generation Latino students, as they navigated numerous risk factors and persisted from early education to law school. In order to uncover the protective factors that allowed resilient Latino students to overcome adversity within the K-20 educational pipeline, this study used academic resilience as a theoretical framework. Methodologically, a two-phase, qualitative longitudinal study (Creswell, 2007, 2009; Merriam, 2009) was used to capture the intricate experiences of nine academically resilient Latino students. Phase I examined the experiences of Latino students through the educational pipeline into law school and identified several protective factors that allowed the participants to persist. Phase II examined the process in which the factors identified in Phase I fostered resilience to and through law school. A phenomenological approach and elements of portraiture were utilized in Phase I and II in order to focus on the shared lived experience of a phenomenon and &amp;quot;unearth goodness&amp;quot; within this experience. Findings from the first phase identified familial, environmental, and institutional protective factors, which contributed to the persistence of the participants in the K-20 pipeline. Familial protective factors encompass two distinct components, parents and siblings. Each contains different characteristics that allow for resilience within the K-20 pipeline. The examples of perseverance, involvement, and high expectations exhibited by parents were found to be particularly effective in mitigating risk factors. The sibling components of the familial protective factor were found to consist of their older siblings showing them how to navigate their education, a sense of responsibility by the participant to do well in school so that they can set an example, and siblings telling them what not to do. Environmental protective factors emerged from the study in the context of community. These protective factors were discovered to occur in two precise ways. The first was in the form of the community acting in a protective fashion, which shielded the participants from several community risk factors. The second was seen within the participants&apos; eventual transformation to the role of community protectors. Institutional protective factors were found to influence academic resilience. Specifically, teachers, college outreach programs, and sports proved to be the most relevant institutional protective factors in the P-12 trajectory. Service, experiential learning opportunities, early academic law outreach programs, and law school retention programs were found to be the most pertinent institutional factors in the postsecondary and law school experiences of the participants. The second phase of this study examined how these factors worked, evolved, and nurtured the participants&apos; academic resilience. Findings also revealed that the participants&apos; academic resilience was based on interactions between all of the protective factors identified in Phase I. The conceptual model proposed in this study suggested that the result of these interactions was a protective process that materialized into four individual protective factors: a positive disposition towards education, optimism, hard work, and giving back. These four individual protective factors were thus critical to the academic resilience of the nine Latino participants. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563148</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Concrete Roses: Examining the Resilience of Academically Successful Latino Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9327-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>254</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599662</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Modalities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Musical Composition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Creative Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Pluralism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sociocultural Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hall, Matthew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This qualitative study analyzed the meaning-making practices of urban adolescents participating in a college preparatory program featuring philosophical inquiry into cosmopolitanism and the creation of multimodal texts. In contrast to studies of composing that focus on individual outcomes, this dissertation traced group meaning making. The study was grounded in sociocultural perspectives that theorize literacy as diverse, socially constructed, meaning-making practices that emerge in particular cultural and social contexts, and include multiple modes of communication. Data included interviews, observations, and artifacts. To analyze the data, a music-inspired analytic system was devised to examine the collaborative nature of composing. The study demonstrated, first, that composing in this setting was a collaborative process exceeding customary understandings of collaborative composing. Uncovered after examining complex patterns of interactions over varied timescales, collaboration at the group level occurred while community members created individual products. Second, the study revealed that improvisation was an important strategy for shaping the content of this collaborative process. During informal jam sessions, participants creatively explored options for representing content. They actively built upon ideas offered by other participants in the moment, in order to read, interpret, select, and design the content of their multimodal texts. Last, facilitated by the complex patterns of interaction and shaped by the improvised frames for representing content, this study revealed the ways in which participants constructed a shared meaning of the concept of cosmopolitanism at the group level. Utilizing an image-afforded exploration of juxtaposition, this shared understanding evolved from early conceptions of cosmopolitanism as represented in juxtaposed images to an understanding of cosmopolitanism as the act of creating and interpreting juxtaposition between varying perspectives. This study contributes to growing empirical research on meaning making through multimodal text design. It extends socio-cultural explanations of what counts as &amp;quot;social&amp;quot; in educational contexts, illustrating that composing is not just influenced by social interaction but rather &amp;quot;is&amp;quot; social. Finally, in an age of standards, testing, and accountability that can narrow what constitutes valued literacy practices, this study provides an example of the varied interactional paths and diverse compositional strategies and products that can engage learners and expand opportunities for meaning making. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563149</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Designing Is Learning: An Investigation of Designing Multimodal Texts</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9665-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>267</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599872</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Pragmatics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Context Effect</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Efficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Degen, Judith</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In the face of underspecified utterances, listeners routinely and without much apparent effort make the right kinds of pragmatic inferences about a speaker&apos;s intended meaning. This dissertation investigates the processing of scalar implicatures as a way of addressing how listeners perform this remarkable feat. In particular, the role of context in the processing of scalar implicatures from &amp;quot;some&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;not all&amp;quot; is explored. Contrary to the widely held assumption that scalar implicatures are highly regularized, frequent, and relatively context-independent, this dissertation suggests that they are in fact relatively infrequent and highly context-dependent; both the robustness and the speed with which scalar implicatures from &amp;quot;some&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;not all&amp;quot; are computed are modulated by the probabilistic support that the implicature receives from multiple contextual cues. Scalar implicatures are found to be especially sensitive to the naturalness or expectedness of both scalar and non-scalar alternative utterances the speaker could have produced, but didn&apos;t. A novel contextualist account of scalar implicature processing that has roots in both constraint-based and information-theoretic accounts of language processing is proposed that provides a unifying explanation for a) the varying robustness of scalar implicatures across different contexts, b) the varying speed of scalar implicatures across different contexts, and c) the speed and efficiency of communication. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563150</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Alternatives in Pragmatic Reasoning</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rochester</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0461-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>257</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600366</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Memory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Associative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sentences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computational Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Indo European Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Form Classes (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phrase Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Morphology (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psycholinguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kush, Dave W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation uses the processing of anaphoric relations to probe how linguistic information is encoded in and retrieved from memory during real-time sentence comprehension. More specifically, the dissertation attempts to resolve a tension between the demands of a linguistic processor implemented in a general-purpose cognitive architecture and the demands of abstract grammatical constraints that govern language use. The source of the tension is the role that abstract configurational relations (such as &amp;quot;c-command,&amp;quot; Reinhart 1983) play in constraining computations. Anaphoric dependencies are governed by formal grammatical constraints stated in terms of relations. For example, Binding Principle A (Chomsky 1981) requires that antecedents for local anaphors (like the English reciprocal &amp;quot;each other&amp;quot;) bear the c-command relation to those anaphors. In incremental sentence processing, antecedents of anaphors must be retrieved from memory. Recent research has motivated a model of processing that exploits a cue-based, associative retrieval process in content-addressable memory (e.g. Lewis, Vasishth &amp;amp; Van Dyke 2006) in which relations such as c-command are difficult to use as cues for retrieval. As such, the c-command constraints of formal grammars are predicted to be poorly implemented by the retrieval mechanism. I examine retrieval&apos;s sensitivity to three constraints on anaphoric dependencies: Principle A (via Hindi local reciprocal licensing), the Scope Constraint on bound-variable pronoun licensing (often stated as a c-command constraint, though see Barker 2012), and Crossover constraints on pronominal binding (Postal 1971, Wasow 1972). The data suggest that retrieval exhibits fidelity to the constraints: structurally inaccessible NPs that match an anaphoric element in morphological features do not interfere with the retrieval of an antecedent in most cases considered. In spite of this alignment, I argue that retrieval&apos;s apparent sensitivity to c-command constraints need not motivate a memory access procedure that makes direct reference to c-command relations. Instead, proxy features and general parsing operations conspire to mimic the extension of a system that respects c-command constraints. These strategies provide a robust approximation of grammatical performance while remaining within the confines of a independently- motivated general-purpose cognitive architecture. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563151</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Respecting Relations: Memory Access and Antecedent Retrieval in Incremental Sentence Processing</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9783-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>362</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599956</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Variation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computational Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sentences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Schemata (Cognition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psycholinguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Retention (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Priming</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Auditory Perception</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fine, Alex Brabham</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A fundamental challenge for human cognition is perceiving and acting in a world in which the statistics that characterize available sensory data are non-stationary. This thesis focuses on this problem specifically in the domain of sentence comprehension, where linguistic variability poses computational challenges to the processes underlying sentence comprehension. We begin by framing the problem of linguistic variation, especially in syntax, and then propose that humans respond to this variability by continuously adapting to and learning the statistical regularities of novel linguistic environments. Experiments 1-6 provide evidence that, in the face of a novel environment whose statistics violate subjects&apos; expectations, subjects adjust their linguistic expectations in order to allow their expectations to converge towards the statistics of the current environment. These experiments tacitly assume that adaptation is error-sensitive: subjects adapt when their expectations are violated. Experiment 7 explicitly addresses and tests this tacit assumption. In that experiment, we provide a quantitative operationalization of the syntactic &amp;quot;error signal&amp;quot; in language comprehension, and ask how the magnitude of this error signal correlates with immediate changes in linguistic expectations. This experiment also provides the context for a more in-depth discussion of what type of cognitive mechanism might give rise to the experimental results reported in this thesis. Experiment 8 attempts to more directly address the presumed environment-specificity of adaptation by asking whether distributional information indexed to a particular environment and to particular verbs can be retained over multiple days. The work reported here takes a step toward synthesizing three lines of research in psycholinguistics that have previously proceeded largely in parallel: (1) experience- or expectation-based processing, (2) syntactic priming, and (3) statistical learning in language. The work here also suggests an intriguing if somewhat tentative link between adaptation in syntactic comprehension on the one hand and adaptation in lower-level speech perception and non-linguistic perception, where adaptation phenomena have previously been more thoroughly examined. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563152</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Prediction, Error, and Adaptation during Online Sentence Comprehension</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rochester</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0468-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>273</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600373</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Equipment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Automation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Energy Management</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yu, Chao</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this thesis, we consider estimation, coding, and sensor scheduling for energy efficient operation of wireless visual sensor networks (VSN), which consist of battery-powered wireless sensors with sensing (imaging), computation, and communication capabilities. The competing requirements for applications of these wireless sensor networks (WSN) (e.g., smart environmental surveillance) include long duration of unattended operation and limited energy supply, which motivate our investigation into energy-efficient estimation, coding, and sensor scheduling to prolong the lifetime of these wireless networked systems. Motivated by a telepresence setting in visual sensor networks, we first consider an abstract setting for investigating efficient distributed estimation and coding in wireless sensor networks where the captured data is jointly Gaussian. The sensors are geographically dispersed, and acquire indirect, noisy observations pertaining to a desired signal. A central processor (CP) communicates with these sensors via a rate-constrained channel and estimates the desired signal. In a simplified scenario where information from one sensor is to be sent to the CP that already has information regarding the desired signal, we establish a decomposed structure for the optimal encoding of the local observation: a first pre-processing step to extract elevant information from the indirect observation with consideration of the side information, followed by a second step of side-informed encoding of the pre-processed output. In the general scenario consisting of multiple sensors, we present a sequential framework to recursively utilize the separation. Simulation results demonstrate that constructions obtained using the proposed decomposition offer very good performance, closely matching nonconstructive information theoretic bounds for the problem. We next propose a novel code construction and design method for low-density parity-check accumulate (LDPCA) codes used for rate-adaptive distributed source coding. We propose a code construction using non-uniform splitting, in contrast to the uniform splitting used in prior literature. We also develop methods to analyze the proposed LDPCA codes using density evolution, based on which code search strategies are developed to find good LDPCA codes. Simulation results show the proposed code design outperforms the conventional LDPCA code design, and provides state-of-the-art performance. The final part of the thesis addresses the networking aspect of VSNs, considering sensor scheduling and energy allocation in a telepresence wireless VSN application, where visual coverage over a monitored region is obtained by deploying image sensors (cameras). Each camera provides coverage over a part of the monitored region, and a CP coordinates these cameras in order to gather required visual data. We model the network lifetime as a stochastic random variable that depends upon the coverage geometry for the cameras and the distribution of data requests over the monitored region, two key characteristics that distinguish our problem from other WSN applications. By suitably abstracting this model of network lifetime and utilizing asymptotic analysis, we propose lifetime-maximizing camera scheduling and energy allocation strategies. The effectiveness of the proposed strategies is validated through simulations. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563153</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Distributed Estimation, Coding, and Scheduling in Wireless Visual Sensor Networks</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rochester</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0584-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>160</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600478</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prognostic Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yu, Bing</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Difference-in-differences (DID) strategies are particularly useful for evaluating policy effects in natural experiments in which, for example, a policy affects some schools and students but not others. However, the standard DID method may produce biased estimation of the policy effect if the confounding effect of concurrent events varies by individual characteristics and if the experimental group and the comparison group differ in such characteristics. This paper reviews the existing alternative DID methods and compares their identification assumptions with those of the new prognostic score-based DID strategy. The author hypothesize that, in comparison with other existing DID methods, the new prognostic score-based DID strategy invokes assumptions that are relatively more plausible and is more likely to produce unbiased and efficient estimates of policy effects. Empirical findings obtained from simulation studies will inform the understanding of the relative performance of the new prognostic score-based DID method in comparison with the existing DID methods under a wide array of scenarios often plausible in educational policy evaluations with accountability data. The results will contribute to the statistics and econometrics literature and will provide practical guidance for applied researchers.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563154</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluation of Alternative Difference-in-Differences Methods</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Graduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Doctoral Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mothers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Justice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education as a Field of Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ideology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Child Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lifelong Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fathers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pement, Nancy-Jean M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of doctoral student mothers pursuing doctorates in higher education as well as the meanings ascribed to the doctorate. This study was guided by Rich&apos;s (1976) notion of motherhood as experience and as institution held in tension with postmodernism&apos;s interest in discourse and difference. As such, it attempted to fulfill Cixous&apos; (1976) call to action that &amp;quot;(w)oman must put herself into the text--as into the world and into history--by her own movement&amp;quot; (p. 875). Increasingly, women are overrepresented among doctoral recipients in higher education. As more women with dependent children enroll in doctoral programs (Anderson &amp;amp; Mietzitis, 1999) it behooves institutions to recognize mothers&apos; needs and interests. Utilizing data from 16 semi-structured interviews with participants at five universities in the Pacific Rim region, this study considered women&apos;s experiences in the context of ideological and structural imperatives. Participants also explored the significance of the doctorate. The data confirm that the lives of doctoral student mothers are deeply enmeshed with those of their children. They identify as lifelong learners, and consistent with Lynch (2008), most women did not acknowledge the structural constraints that have implications for their lived realities. Surprising findings include narratives regarding the role of their fathers as sources of inspiration, and representations of the doctorate as an extension of student mothers&apos; commitment to advance social justice on behalf of other people&apos;s children. Finally, two WEpoems are offered as a means to (re)present the data and to further infuse the study with the voices of participants. Recommendations for policy, programs and further research are also offered. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563155</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>&amp;quot;This Has Been My Life&apos;s Work&amp;quot;: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Doctoral Student Mothers in Higher Education and Their Quest for Social Justice</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, California Lutheran University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8847-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>250</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599510</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goal Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Support Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sense of Community</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Personnel Services</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McLean, Laura Colson</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Against all odds, first-generation college students continue to enroll in postsecondary schools with aspirations of obtaining a bachelor&apos;s degree. Unfortunately, many have not successfully reached their goal, which in turn has affected retention rates of colleges and universities. There are programs that provide academic support and advising to increase retention for first-generation college students. However, there are academic and nonacademic needs of the students that colleges, universities, and public policymakers have neglected to address. The purpose of this research study was to determine from 168 first-generation college students at 5 participating institutions, what factors impacted their enrollment after their first year in college. Tinto&apos;s Interactionalist Theory (1982) served as the study&apos;s theoretical foundation. Findings warranted the following conclusions: the academic factors that motivated first-generation students to enroll the subsequent year were having a positive rapport with faculty and staff, personal goal of degree completion, and support services provided by the institution. Data analysis revealed that the non-academic factors that motivated first-generation students to enroll the subsequent year were: family, peers, and a sense of community on campus. This research provides data for Student Support Services (SSS) programs in reference to services their eligible freshman participants deem necessary in order to enroll in college the subsequent year. This information can be used by the programs to evaluate the services currently provided to participants and to focus and build upon those areas most addressed by the students in this study. Public and private postsecondary institutions alike may also use the findings to further enhance current support programs as well as develop new initiatives to work towards increasing their student retention rates, while parents, high schools, and pre-college programs can use the information gathered to assist with preparing students for college, thus providing measures working toward increasing college enrollment, attrition, and graduation rates. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563156</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>First-Generation Freshman College Students: Factors Impacting Retention for the Subsequent Year</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Gardner-Webb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0636-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>136</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600510</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meetings</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Network Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Capacity Building</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Redmond, Kimberley B.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Italy</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Italy</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Although all of the schools in the target school system adhere to a school improvement process, achievement scores remain mediocre or stagnant within the overseas school in Italy that serves children of United States armed service members. To address this problem, this study explored the target school&apos;s improvement process to discover how different stakeholder groups viewed that process. The aim of these investigations was to determine if different stakeholder groups&apos; competing values hindered the school&apos;s improvement efforts. The conceptual framework of this study was Schein&apos;s organizational culture theory along with recent findings by Creemers and Kyriakides that show that school culture must be addressed in order for a school to improve. The research design was a single case study. Four different stakeholder groups were interviewed, two school improvement committee meetings were observed, and seven school-improvement related documents were examined. &amp;quot;ATLASti&amp;quot; qualitative analysis software was used following Hatch&apos;s typological analysis method. Two major themes, &amp;quot;Teachers versus Technocrats&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Pre-Fourth Way,&amp;quot; revealed the importance of school culture. The recommended project, a Networked Learning Community (NLC), was designed to build a positive culture by promoting collective responsibility, empowering innovation, and building capacity. This study will promote positive social change by demonstrating how school improvement occurs and by providing a research-based plan for a NLC that can help shift the trajectory of the static moderate achievement levels in the case study school and the target school system. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563157</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Action Plan for Improving Mediocre or Stagnant Student Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8853-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>277</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599512</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>History Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Historians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Philosophy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reddy, Kimberly</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;School history&amp;quot; has long since been characterized by teacher-centered lectures and student passivity, which deviates substantially from the inquiry-based and rigorous methodology historians use to actively reconstruct the past. While recent efforts have been made to move toward a more investigative approach in classrooms, little if any progress has been made beyond the superficial reading of primary source documents. When trying to understand why the disconnect between disciplinary approaches to history and school history continues, researchers have speculated that the knowledge bases, from which prospective teachers develop beliefs about the meaning and processes of history, are foundationally weak. This study examines the influence of a college course designed to specifically address the teacher knowledge problem in history. Participant beliefs were targeted and intentionally challenged to elicit shifts toward more criterialist ways of knowing. It contributes to the literature on the teaching and learning of historical thinking as well as epistemic beliefs in history. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from participants over the course of one college semester through questionnaires, interviews, and coursework artifacts. Analysis was completed on two subscales: beliefs about history and beliefs about history teaching and learning. Consistent with some previous studies, this research found that once surfaced, participant beliefs did begin to shift toward a more expert way of knowing following explicit instruction and practice with authentic disciplinary tasks. While beliefs about the knower, what can be known, and the procedural strategies necessary to create knowledge shifted at varying levels of consistency and stability, the shifts appeared to have an associative relationship often moving in concert rather than independently. Additionally, results indicate that participants whose initial beliefs were more stable made greater shifts toward criterialism suggesting that those who were able to spend less time understanding new ideas were able to spend more time thinking about how to take those ideas and put them into practice. Implications of this research raise questions about what teacher educators need to know in order to expertly prepare preservice history educators along with considerations for the content and instruction of teacher education programs. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563158</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Challenging Preservice Teacher Beliefs about the Past: The Influence of a Course Designed to Shift Ways of Knowing about History Teaching and Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9138-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>396</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599631</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telecommunications</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bright, Lisa M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Elementary Secondary Education Act Title I</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Studies have examined methods of communication between home and school and the resulting impact on parents&apos; satisfaction and students&apos; academic achievement. However, there is insufficient information concerning the use of technology to support parental involvement, especially in the area of social media. Drawing from overlapping spheres of influence theory, the purpose of this quantitative action research project study was to evaluate the parental involvement needs of a small, urban, Title 1 elementary school and develop a stronger communication network through the use of technology. The research question determined the need for an alternate method of communication pertinent to curriculum and academic affairs in order to improve parental engagement. Data were collected using a quantitative, cross-sectional, 1-shot survey consisting of 10, 5-point Likert scale response questions given to all teachers and parents of 4th grade students. Questions were coded into 4 constructs and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the level of agreement for each response. Findings indicated that both teachers and parents did indeed feel the need for alternative methods of communication. As a result, a technology-based plan was developed which focused on the use of the educational networking site Edmodo as the chosen method of communication. Implications for social change include providing a framework for this method of communication with parents for other schools, thereby increasing parents&apos; satisfaction and students&apos; academic achievement. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563159</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Alternative Methods of Communication to Improve Parents&apos; Involvement in and Knowledge of the Curriculum</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8886-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>242</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599517</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constructivism (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kauffman, Theresa Rose</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Researchers have found that positive relationships in schools can impact student achievement, and researchers in brain imaging have connected emotion centers in the brain to the learning process. However, current practice in schools reflects a lack of understanding of the impact of relationships in the classroom on learning from a student perspective. The conceptual framework for this study was drawn from a constructivist view of relationships in schools; research on the mind, brain, and education connection; and student perceptions of schools. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to understand middle school students&apos; lived experiences of their relationships with teachers, and what educators might learn about creating an environment more conducive to learning. From a population of 60 7th and 8th grade participants at a small private school, a sample of 9 students was randomly selected for interviews. An interpretive analysis of the interviews followed Moustakas&apos;s modification of the Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen method by recognizing each perception and developing meaning units leading to clustered themes, which were used to develop a full description from the student perspective. The findings provide details describing the positive impact of a student&apos;s experience with teachers who notice them, listen to them, and enjoy learning with them. A student is more willing to take risks and put in the effort that learning requires when these elements are present. This study contributes to social change by providing teachers, administrators, and parents with knowledge to promote the dignity and development of individual students through the expansion of respectful, positive relationships that engage students in the learning process and create conditions for higher achievement. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563160</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Middle School Students&apos; Lived Experiences of Teacher Relationship Impact</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8908-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>134</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599535</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Aids</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Equipment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interactive Video</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mangano, Nicolas Francisco</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>When developers are faced with a design challenge, they often turn to the whiteboard. This is typical during the conceptual stages of software design, when no code is in existence yet. It may also happen when a significant code base has already been developed, for instance, to plan new functionality or discuss optimizing a key component. While software design at the whiteboard has long received an interest from the research community in terms of providing automated support through electronic sketching tools, the tools to date fall short in that each supports only a small subset of the design behaviors that software designers exhibit while working at the whiteboard. Indeed, the key insight motivating the research presented in this dissertation is that designers do not &amp;quot;operate in&amp;quot; or apply just a small handful of such design behaviors, but flexibly switch among many of them, all the time. As such, tools that only support a few design behaviors at the expense of others are inadequate to fully support the rich activity of software design at the whiteboard. In this dissertation, I present Calico, a distributed, collaborative sketch-based environment that supports a broad range of design behaviors. Calico offers four features: (1) scraps and connectors to manipulate content and build higher-order representations, (2) intentional interfaces to partition and organize the drawing space, (3) a palette to reuse content, and (4) a fading highlighter to make temporary marks on sketches. These features were designed based on an extensive study of the literature on software designers at work, and yield a minimally-invasive, yet rich environment for supporting design at the whiteboard that maintains the fluid and sketchy feel of sketch-based design. Calico was evaluated with designers in a controlled laboratory experiment, as well as in a longer-term in-the-field deployment, which included two software teams in industry and one research group. Findings show that, while there was a great amount of diversity in the design approaches by the different groups, the features do support and indeed are used for the design behaviors in actual work. Further, the designers reported that they sketched more than they would have on the whiteboard, built and refined their own types of representations, managed a growing number of sketches by organizing them into multi-page narratives, were more likely to return to old sketches, and switched between synchronous and asynchronous work during meetings. The contributions of this dissertation are four-fold: (1) The establishment of design behaviors as a necessary quality to support in informal design at the whiteboard. (2) A set of features to support informal software design at the interactive whiteboard. (3) An extensive evaluation of these features in a controlled laboratory setting and in the field with professional designers using Calico to perform their everyday work. (4) The construction of an extensible, sketch-based environment for early-phase software design. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563161</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Calico: An Early-Phase Software Design Tool</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0635-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>280</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600509</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Davis, Matthew H.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to determine if an online learning readiness survey (OLRS) is predictive of successful course completion in an online adult secondary learning program. Specifically, this study sought to determine whether a 5-factor online learning readiness survey accurately predicted course completion and non-completion. The data were compiled from participants&apos; responses on the 25-item OLRS. The results of the logistic regression analysis indicate the OLRS is an accurate predictor of non-completion (90.6%) but not an accurate predictor of completion (17.9%). The results suggest that the OLRS is well-suited to identify learners who are &amp;quot;at-risk&amp;quot; in the online learning environment but not as a method to identify who is most likely to be successful in online learning. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563162</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Factors Predicting Student Success in an Adult Online Learning Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Wilmington University (Delaware)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9659-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>103</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599866</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Translation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Written Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computational Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Retrieval</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multilingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Searching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bilingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ture, Ferhan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>With the adoption of web services in daily life, people have access to tremendous amounts of information, beyond any human&apos;s reading and comprehension capabilities. As a result, search technologies have become a fundamental tool for accessing information. Furthermore, the web contains information in multiple languages, introducing another barrier between people and information. Therefore, search technologies need to handle content written in multiple languages, which requires techniques to account for the linguistic differences. Information Retrieval (IR) is the study of search techniques, in which the task is to find material relevant to a given information need. Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) is a special case of IR when the search takes place in a multi-lingual collection. Of course, it is not helpful to retrieve content in languages the user cannot understand. Machine Translation (MT) studies the translation of text from one language into another efficiently (within a reasonable amount of time) and effectively (fluent and retaining the original meaning), which helps people understand what is being written, regardless of the source language. Putting these together, we observe that search and translation technologies are part of an important user application, calling for a better integration of search (IR) and translation (MT), since these two technologies need to work together to produce high-quality output. In this dissertation, the main goal is to build better connections between IR and MT, for which we present solutions to two problems: Searching to translate explores approximate search techniques for extracting bilingual data from multilingual Wikipedia collections to train better translation models. Translating to search explores the integration of a modern statistical MT system into the cross-language search processes. In both cases, our best-performing approach yielded improvements over strong baselines for a variety of language pairs. Finally, we propose a general architecture, in which various components of IR and MT systems can be connected together into a feedback loop, with potential improvements to both search and translation tasks. We hope that the ideas presented in this dissertation will spur more interest in the integration of search and translation technologies. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563163</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Searching to Translate and Translating to Search: When Information Retrieval Meets Machine Translation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8929-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>240</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599555</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Guidance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Paying for College</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harris, Kristen L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Kentucky</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Appalachia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Kentucky</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined the extent to which the college choice process of four students from one high school in rural Appalachian Kentucky aligned with Perna&apos;s (2006; 2010) nested process model of college choice. I used qualitative case study methodology and inductive analysis to describe how four high-academic achieving students of varying family income backgrounds in the particular context of one community in rural Appalachian Kentucky decided to enroll in an institution of higher education. In brief, three of the four students enrolled in the closest, most familiar institution after relying on an adult other than their parents for guidance in selecting a college. The remaining student, despite her low socioeconomic status and family income, enrolled in a selective private university in Kentucky after an expanded college search. School practices that supported students&apos; access to higher education are highlighted. This research adds to the theoretical knowledge in the field of college access and choice, which indicates that different student populations experience the college choice process differently, but has yet to fully include research on rural students. My analysis revealed a number of influential factors for these four students&apos; college choice decisions that were in Perna&apos;s (2006; 2010) model, such as guidance counseling, college costs, and financial aid. The analysis also showed the meaning of identified factors for students given the context of their community in rural Appalachian Kentucky. Additional influential factors that were found for these students, such as the role of athletics in increasing demand for higher education, and factors that were not present, such as parental support during the college choice process, added nuance to the model. By learning how and why some students from rural Appalachian Kentucky are able to go to college, we can begin to understand how to increase the low level of educational attainment of individuals in the region. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563164</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The College Choice Process of Four Students from Rural Appalachian Kentucky</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9093-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>214</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599605</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Collaborative Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Chemistry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Process Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>O&apos;Sullivan, Edwin Duncan, Jr.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate if wiki collaboration among Latino high school chemistry students can help reduce the science achievement gap between Latino and White students. The study was a quasi-experimental pre/post control group mixed-methods design. It used three intact sections of a high school chemistry course. The first research question asked if there is a difference in academic achievement between a treatment and control group on selected concepts from the topics of bonding, physical changes, and chemical changes, when Latino high school chemistry students collaborate on a quasi-natural wiki project. Overall results for all three activities (Bonding, Physical Changes, and Chemical Changes) indicated no significant difference between the wiki and control group. However, students performing the chemical changes activity did significantly better than their respective control group. Furthermore, there was a significant association, with large effect size, between group membership and ability to overcome the misconception that aqueous ionic reactants in precipitation reactions exist as molecular pairs of ions. Qualitative analysis of classroom and computer lab dialogue, discussion board communication, student focus groups, teacher interviews, and wiki content attributes the better performance of the chemical changes wiki group to favorable differences in intersubjectivity and calibrated assistance, as well as learning about submicroscopic representations of precipitation reactions in multiple contexts. Furthermore, the nonsignificant result overall points to an aversion to peer editing as a possible cause. Drawing considerably on Vygotsky and Piaget, the results are discussed within the context of how distributed scaffolding facilitated medium levels of cognitive conflict. The second research question asked what the characteristics of distributed metacognitive scaffolding are when Latino high school chemistry students collaborate on a quasi-natural wiki project. Results suggested a higher frequency of metacognitive scaffolding by the teacher, over peers, for content knowledge and making connections knowledge. Teacher metacognitive scaffolding often took the form of posting discussion board questions designed to stimulate student reflection on their content or creativity. On the other hand, both teacher and peer metacognitive scaffolding for general goals knowledge and strategy knowledge was relatively infrequent. Recommendations are offered for improving teacher and peer metacognitive scaffolding. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563165</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Distributed Scaffolding: Wiki Collaboration among Latino High School Chemistry Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Marquette University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8961-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>415</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599570</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Superintendents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tenure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personal Narratives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Femininity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rohlfing, Tracy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to investigate, through narrative inquiry (Clandinin &amp;amp; Connelly, 2000), the leadership evolution of five female superintendents in California with longevity of 5 or more years in their current school district positions. The research question addressed was, &amp;quot;How do California female superintendents evolve to longevity?&amp;quot; Demographic data regarding the superintendents and their districts were gathered through website perusal and electronic surveys. Narrative profiles were created after structured interviews, and 11 themes emerged to form a descriptive framework of the superintendents&apos; leadership. In addition, the leadership styles of the superintendents were identified and found to be consistent with those defined in feminine leadership theory. The participants defined their leadership as: (a) caring, (b) ethical, (c) interactive, (d) relational, and (e) power-shared. Participants&apos; leadership was found to be transformative (Bennis, 2002) and consistent with findings regarding feminine leadership theory by Shakeshaft, Brown, Irby, Grogan, and Ballenger (2007). Recommendations for future research include exploring, through quantitative analysis, the themes of the study for all California female superintendents with tenure of five or more years, and pursuing a similar qualitative study with male superintendents with longevity to compare findings. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563166</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Female Superintendent Longevity in California</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, California Lutheran University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8977-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>172</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599579</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vaughan, Mary Elaine</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Researchers have endorsed teacher collaboration within a professional learning community (PLC) that is focused on student learning. Despite these research-based endorsements, several Algebra 1 teachers in a southeastern high school implemented components of a PLC with little or no results in student achievement. The purpose of this study was to explore the implementation and structure of an Algebra 1 collaborative community with a focus on enhancing student achievement and learning. Components of a PLC were used as a conceptual framework in this study. Guiding questions were directed toward examining the structure and outcomes of teacher collaboration on student learning. A case study design was used in which data were collected from interviews of 9 Algebra 1 teachers and 2 observations of the collaborative PLC group. Data were organized through coding in order to interpret patterns and themes based on the components of the conceptual framework. According to the study findings, teachers in the Algebra 1 PLC shared ideas, teaching strategies, and their commitment to student learning. However, the teachers did not focus on collaboration as it relates to common formative assessment, analysis of student data, and research-based intervention strategies. Due to these mixed priorities, a professional development project was created, consisting of PLC activities on the development of formative assessment, data analysis, and intervention. The project may provide positive social change for schools focused on increasing student academic achievement in mathematics by establishing effective PLCs that help teachers to facilitate improving student learning in the local setting. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563167</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher Collaboration and Student Learning in a Professional Learning Community</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9066-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>180</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599593</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Males</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Support Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Systems Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Black Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Work Ethic</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moyo, Tawonga Timothy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The academic achievement gap persists in spite of much concern and talk in both the educational and political arenas. Moreover, literature on the education of African American male students at the college level is scarce; the existing literature is on the achievement gap issue in general. In this phenomenological study, the academic achievement gap was explored and understood in relation to the education of African American male students in college. The perceived impact of academic support services, activities, and programs designed to facilitate student academic success was also examined. The conceptual framework informing this study was based on Ogbu and Freire&apos;s critical, Bronfenbrenner&apos;s systems, and Bandura&apos;s social learning theories. The selection of participants followed a purposive criterion sampling. The participants included 19 MAN Center Program members and 6 selected administrators, instructors, and program directors at a historically Black college in the southeast region of the United States. Data were collected through structured individual interviews these data were then analyzed using the process of horizontalization to extract relevant themes and essences as proposed by Moustakas. Results indicated that participation in structured academic support programs, services, and activities for students improved students&apos; academic achievement, work ethic, self concept, behaviors, understanding, and acceptance of these students. The study contributes to positive social change by raising stakeholders&apos; awareness of the achievement gap problems, improving cultural sensitivity, informing educational reform in instructional methodology, and leading to academic success for African American male students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563168</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Educating the African American Male College Student: The Achievement Gap Factor</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9064-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>247</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599591</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Educational Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goal Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Support Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Berbery, Maria Luz</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined predictors of college-going self-efficacy and educational goals in a sample of Latina/o high school students (N = 119). Specifically, the study investigated the variance accounted for by school performance, ethnic identity, barriers, and family support in college-going self-efficacy and educational goals. Important findings included that school performance was a key predictor of college-going self-efficacy, and this relationship was moderated by family&apos;s college-going support. For students with a high GPA, having support was linked to higher college-going self-efficacy, while students that had a high GPA but low support had lower self-efficacy. Students with lower GPA had lower college-going self-efficacy regardless of the level of support they reported. Another important finding was that school performance was the main predictor of educational goals. In addition, socioeconomic status was related to perceptions of barriers, GPA, and educational goals, such that students with a lower socioeconomic status were more likely to perceive more barriers, have a lower GPA, and lower educational goals. This study advanced knowledge regarding salient variables for Latina/o students, and may contribute to the development of an empirically tested intervention to improve Latina/o students&apos; academic performance, college-going self-efficacy, and educational goals. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563169</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Investigating Predictors of College-Going Self-Efficacy and Educational Goals for Latina/o High School Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9081-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>125</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599594</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Support Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Issues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Johnson, Jennifer Michelle</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of the academic and social experiences of African American, first generation college students attending a selective university. Following interpretive case study methodology, the major research questions guiding this study were: How do African American, first generation college students describe their academic and social experiences attending a selective institution of higher education? And How do African American, first generation college students mitigate barriers to college persistence? Through demographic questionnaire responses and individual semi-structured interviews with five African American women attending the University of Pennsylvania, participants identified the ways that their collegiate experiences were shaped by their social identities, precollege academic and social experiences, and interactions with members of their campus and home communities. Findings indicated that African American, first generation college women graduate from high school with a strong academic sense of self, developed after years of parental encouragement for academic achievement and positive precollege experiences with teachers and counselors. This academic sense of self contributed to students&apos; ability to adapt to the academic competitiveness and classroom expectations of their given major upon matriculation. With time and self-reflection, students began to engage in academic behaviors linked with success. Socially, early experiences of isolation or alienation primarily occurred during students&apos; first semester, but were mitigated through interactions with peers or engagement in campus organizations and activities. Students identified availability of financial resources, their strong support networks, and their intrinsic motivation and academic self-efficacy as factors that contributed to their college persistence within the setting of a selective university. Finally, students specifically described how five salient aspects of their identity--their race, class, academic sense of self, gender, and spirituality, influenced not only the ways they individually engaged with the college environment, but also their perceptions of various members of the campus community. The findings of this study contributes to the complexity of understanding how African American, first generation college women experience a selective campus environment. Implications for campus policies and practices, as well as recommendations for future research are presented. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563170</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Different World: African American, First Generation College Women at a Selective University</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9118-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>342</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599611</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Form Classes (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Schematic Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Morphemes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Indo European Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Chinese</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Japanese</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dravidian Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKeown, Rebecca Katherine</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This thesis examines reflexive pronouns, such as Icelandic &amp;quot;sig&amp;quot; (Cf. Thrainsson 2007), which may be bound from outside of an infinitive clause (which I call MD &amp;quot;medium distance&amp;quot; binding) in addition to being bound locally. I propose that such reflexives are linked to their antecedents via sisterhood followed by movement: the reflexive and antecedent are first merged together as sisters, and the antecedent subsequently moves to receive its first theta-role, as schematized below: 1. &amp;quot;He ordered Harold to shave&amp;quot; he+sig. This links the properties of bound simplex reflexives to the properties of movement. I argue that reflexives such as &amp;quot;sig&amp;quot; must be bound within the first finite clause because finite CP is a spell-out domain and its escape hatch is inaccessible to A-movement. Furthermore, I derive the subject-orientation of &amp;quot;sig&amp;quot; and other simplex reflexives from merge-over-move, combined with a numeration divided into phases including vP. Since the antecedent is moving into its first theta-role, and merge is preferable to move, the antecedent will end up in the highest position in the phase: that is, the subject. I then examine long-distance (LD) uses of sig as well as Chinese &amp;quot;ziji&amp;quot;, Japanese &amp;quot;zibun&amp;quot;, and Kannada &amp;quot;tannu&amp;quot;. I propose that in such cases the reflexive still has a double, which is not the antecedent but a null element, possibly an operator. It undergoes A&apos; movement to a position in the left periphery of a finite clause, associated with point-of-view (with a divided left periphery as in Speas 2004)--and this operator is in turn associated with an antecedent either outside the finite clause, or outside the sentence entirely. This accounts for the observation that LD reflexives often must refer to POV holders (Sells 1987). Evidence for LD reflexives being mediated by an A&apos; position comes from the interaction of binding with wh-movement in Kannada (Lidz 2008), and is one way of describing where blocking effects do and do not occur in Chinese (Anand 2006). Furthermore, in Japanese there are sometimes overt morphemes, potentially left-periphery heads, that indicate POV and can co-occur with the use of LD reflexives (Nishigauchi 2005, 2010). [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563171</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Movement Account of Long-Distance Reflexives</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9131-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>307</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599624</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Phonology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonetics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computational Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dunbar, Ewan Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation deals with the theory of the phonetic component of grammar in a formal probabilistic inference framework: (1) it has been recognized since the beginning of generative phonology that some language-specific phonetic implementation is actually context-dependent, and thus it can be said that there are gradient &amp;quot;phonetic processes&amp;quot; in grammar in addition to categorical &amp;quot;phonological processes.&amp;quot; However, no explicit theory has been developed to characterize these processes. Meanwhile, (2) it is understood that language acquisition and perception are both really informed guesswork: the result of both types of inference can be reasonably thought to be a less-than-perfect commitment, with multiple candidate grammars or parses considered and each associated with some degree of credence. Previous research has used probability theory to formalize these inferences in implemented computational models, especially in phonetics and phonology. In this role, computational models serve to demonstrate the existence of working learning/perception/parsing systems assuming a faithful implementation of one particular theory of human language, and are not intended to adjudicate whether that theory is correct. The current dissertation (1) develops a theory of the phonetic component of grammar and how it relates to the greater phonological system and (2) uses a formal Bayesian treatment of learning to evaluate this theory of the phonological architecture and for making predictions about how the resulting grammars will be organized. The coarse description of the consequence for linguistic theory is that the processes we think of as &amp;quot;allophonic&amp;quot; are actually language-specific, gradient phonetic processes, assigned to the phonetic component of grammar; strict allophones have no representation in the output of the categorical phonological grammar. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563172</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Statistical Knowledge and Learning in Phonology</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8891-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>356</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599521</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Laptop Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Benefits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zheng, Binbin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Over the last decade, the number of one-to-one laptop programs in U.S. schools has steadily increased. Though technology advocates believe that such programs can assist student writing, there has been little systematic evidence for this claim, and even less focused on the benefits of specific technology use by diverse learners. This dissertation investigates the overall effect of a one-to-one laptop program--combined with a curriculum reform focused on authentic writing--on upper elementary students&apos; writing outcomes and processes; and the use of two specific social media tools--microblogging and Google Docs--on students&apos; participation, interaction, and achievement within the one-to-one laptop program. This dissertation finds that at-risk learners used their netbooks in school for writing-related activities more frequently than their counterparts, and Hispanics and students from low-income families also benefited from the laptop program the most, in terms of their standardized writing achievement gains. Further investigation of students&apos; use of microblogging and Google Docs in two specific schools suggests that well-designed technology-facilitated writing activities among diverse upper elementary and middle school students can result in increased participation, interaction, and collaboration, leading to improved students&apos; language and literacy development. This dissertation provides policymakers and educators with evidence of the educational benefits of investing in technology programs in schools to improve students&apos; literacy development. It also provides school administrators and teachers with practical examples of the integration of social media into classroom activities to facilitate students&apos; participation, interaction, and writing development. Finally, this dissertation enriches current literacy research by investigating how to bridge students&apos; out-of-school and in-school literacy activities and, ultimately, how to enhance educational equity by providing diverse learners equal access to digital resources that are indispensible to literacy development. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563173</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Social Media and Classroom Writing: Participation, Interaction, and Collaboration</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0638-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>174</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600512</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Charter Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metropolitan Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Occupational Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goal Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jones, Russell Alan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>District of Columbia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>District of Columbia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate the College-Going Self Efficacy Scale for High School Students (CSHS). The CSHS is a measure of self-efficacy in completing college-going tasks (i.e. acquiring knowledge of oneself, acquiring knowledge about colleges, exploring colleges, completing college application tasks, acquiring information about financial aid/scholarship monies, receiving support from adults, and understanding potential college barriers) experienced by African American urban high school students. Participants (N = 272) included a local sample of high school students from a Washington, D.C. charter school. All participants resided in the DC metropolitan area within the continental United States at the time of data collection. Data were collected through the use of a paper-based survey containing the CSHS and measures used to assess convergent and discriminant validity. Internal consistency estimates of subscales ranged from 0.81 to 0.87. Convergent validity was supported through positive relations of the CSHS subscales with vocational identity and achievement goals. Discriminant validity was not supported, as there was a positive relation between the CSHS subscales and life satisfaction. Directions for future research and the limitations of this study are discussed. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563174</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The College-Going Self Efficacy Scale for High School Students: The Development and Validation of a Measure</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9119-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>139</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599612</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Short Term Memory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Purpura, David J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ganley, Colleen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The successful acquisition and development of mathematics skills and concepts is a critical aspect of children&apos;s early academic growth. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the unique relations of working memory and language to a range of specific early mathematics skills in a sample of preschool and kindergarten age children. Data were collected in 45 public and private preschools and elementary schools. Children were assessed on all tasks in the spring of the academic year. Individuals who had either completed or were working toward completion of a Bachelor&apos;s degree in psychology or education conducted the assessments. Assessments took place in the local preschools or kindergarten classrooms during non-instructional time in a quiet room designated by the individual school directors or teachers. Children were assessed on 10 measures of early mathematics skills/concepts. To evaluate the relations of language and working memory with specific early mathematics skills, a series of separate mixed-effects regression analyses were conducted. The results of this study suggest that both language skills and working memory are related to a range of early mathematics skills. Although both domains are correlated with all early mathematics skills that were assessed, the nature of these relations differs when accounting for the other domain and controlling for background variables. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563175</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Integrating Non-Mathematical Domains into Mathematical Development: Key Factors to Consider in Constructing Effective Interventions</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligent Tutoring Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Associate Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>LaRose, Patrick S., Sr.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The role of the registered nurse has evolved over the years as technology has changed and the practice of nursing has advanced. There are many factors that influence how a new nurse enters practice; however, confidence appears to play a large role in the way nursing students see themselves and how this self perception regulates transition to practice. Consequently the ability of the new graduate to evolve into a strong core member of the health care team is often tempered by time for transition and the need for mentoring from an experienced registered nurse. Confidence development is driven by knowledge, skill, and experience. This capstone project describes an intervention to improve confidence by allowing senior nursing students with the opportunity to explore thoughts and feelings about readiness for practice through an electronic learning management system platform. The intervention associated with this project explored e-Mentoring as an adjunctive approach to professional development for a confidence intervention. The intervention sampled a total of sixteen (n = 16) senior nursing students from an associate&apos;s degree in nursing program (ADN program). Participants were surveyed before and after the intervention to assess change through a simple comparison. Initial results from the project demonstrated an increase of 31% in self-reported confidence, 28% increase in self-reported confidence in critical thinking, and a 25% increase in satisfaction with the use of an e-Mentoring platform. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563176</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>E-Mentoring: Confidence Intervention for Senior Nursing Students Preparing for Readiness to Practice</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.N.P. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9124-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>65</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599617</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Information Seeking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Searching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Users (Information)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Peripherals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Retrieval</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Search Engines</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huang, Jeff</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In Web search, query and click log data are easy to collect but they fail to capture user behaviors that do not lead to clicks. As search engines reach the limits inherent in click data and are hungry for more data in a competitive environment, mining cursor movements, hovering, and scrolling becomes important. This dissertation investigates how remotely collecting rich user interaction data in the form of mouse cursor activity can help researchers understand fundamental human behavior and improve the design of search engines. Specifically, mining cursor activity can improve upon state-of-the-art methods for scoring and ranking search results, and estimating where users are looking without eye-tracking. Descriptive analyses of cursor movements show how users move their cursor when they search to provide signals of relevance and explain reasons for abandoning a search. User models can be used to infer visual attention on the page to identify what content users are looking at, as well as compute the relevance and attractiveness of search results to the user. This implicit feedback given to the search engine can then inform the layout and content presented on the pages, or improve the ranking of search results. This dissertation will demonstrate the following thesis: &amp;quot;users&apos; mouse cursor interactions can be collected efficiently on the Web, used to understand users&apos; search behaviors, and can be useful in the design of Web search engines.&amp;quot; [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563177</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Modeling User Behavior and Attention in Search</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9430-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>124</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599728</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Severity (of Disability)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCollow, Meaghan M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Professional development serves as means of transferring skills and knowledge to in-service educators (Reid, 2010) and of aiding practitioners in maintaining a current knowledge base (Grimes, Kurns, &amp;amp; Tilly, 2006; Jacobson, 1990). Much remains unanswered regarding how to enhance professional development and increase implementation of evidence-based practices in order to improve student outcomes (Guskey &amp;amp; Yoon, 2009; Odom, 2008). This study utilized a non-concurrent multi-element within a multiple-baseline across participants design to investigate the effects of a least-to-most system of supports for professional development to increase implementation of discrete trial training (DTT). Three special educators of young children with moderate to severe disabilities participated in the study. Results were varied across each participant but indicated a relationship between number of DTT components implemented, closed learn units, and behavior-specific praise and the professional development activities (i.e., online module, self-monitoring, coaching). In addition, teachers reported the activities were informative and valuable. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563178</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Increasing Implementation of Effective Teaching: A Professional Development Model of Least-to-Most Supports for Special Educators</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9484-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>161</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599761</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Robotics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Programming</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Concept Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semiotics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonverbal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Imagery</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participant Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Field Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mediation Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kwah, Helen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This thesis explores the questions of how a teacher guides students to see concepts, and the role of gesture and gesture viewpoints in mediating the process of guidance. To examine these questions, two sociocultural theoretical frameworks--Radford&apos;s cultural-semiotic theory of knowledge objectification (e.g., 2003), and Goldman&apos;s Points of Viewing theory (e.g., 2007)--were applied to conduct a microanalytic, explanatory case study of the instructional activity of an exemplary teacher and his students in a middle school robotics programming class. According to Radford, students acquire concepts as they draw upon semiotic resources such as language and gesture to generalize and objectify initially concrete perceptions and actions. I applied Radford&apos;s framework to explain the mediations that a teacher might enact in guiding students to objectify and see concepts. Furthermore, I focused on gesture as semiotic means because of emergent research on gesture&apos;s role in communicating the visuospatial imagery that underlies math/ scientific concepts. I extended the view of gestures to the viewpoints constructed in gesture, and applied Goldman&apos;s theory to explain how perspectives might be actively constructed and shared in the process of guiding student conceptualization. Data was collected over a semester through participant observation, field notes, teacher and student interviews, and reviews of artifacts. Multimodal microanalyses were conducted on video data from eight class sessions. The findings provide confirmations and some disconfirmations about the applicability of Radford&apos;s and Goldman&apos;s theories for explaining a teacher&apos;s process of guiding student conceptualization. Notably, some of Radford&apos;s notions about de-contextualization and symbolic generalizations were not confirmed. Overall, the findings are summarized through three themes including, grounding, and perceptual organizers as two ways that gesture and other means served to both index and identify action-perception schemes for bridging to the symbolic level of programming concepts and conceptual structures. A third theme of iteration, shifting, and layering described the quality of the teacher&apos;s process, and the importance of constructing shifting and multiple viewpoints in gesture and speech, as Goldman&apos;s theory proposed. Finally, implications for designing educational applications that draw upon gesture as mediational means are discussed. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563179</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Coming to See Objects of Knowledge: Guiding Student Conceptualization through Teacher Embodied Instruction in a Robotics Programming Class</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9674-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>250</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599881</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Diseases</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Chronic Illness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carey, Stephen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined teacher asthma knowledge based on three areas including (a) the level of teacher asthma knowledge in the Maury County Public School System, (b) the level of teacher asthma knowledge based on five demographic factors, and (c) the level of teacher asthma knowledge in the Maury County Public School System compared with teacher asthma knowledge in the Georgia Public School System. There were a total of 218 surveys submitted online. The overall mean score of correctness for asthma knowledge in the Maury County Public School System is 78% (Likert 3.90). This was above the asthma knowledge threshold for efficacy of 70% (Likert 3.50). The asthma knowledge in each of five demographic groups was assessed based on (a) gender, (b) asthma status, (c) chronic illness status, (d) educational attainment, and (d) school level. In this analysis, only asthma status demonstrated statistical significance where teachers with asthma scored higher (M = 4.09) in their understanding of asthma than teachers without asthma (M = 3.87). When comparing the level of teacher asthma knowledge in the Maury County Public School System with teachers in the Georgia Public School System, participants scored statistically different on two items. On the item, &amp;quot;asthma episodes usually occur without warning&amp;quot;, teachers with a chronic illness in the Maury County Public School System scored statistically lower (z score = -2.03732) than similar teachers in the Georgia Public School System (z score = -0.28890). On the item, &amp;quot;people can outgrow their asthma&amp;quot;, based on school level, teachers in the Maury County Public School System scored statistically lower (z score = -2.02651) than teachers in the Georgia Public School System (z score = -0.257274). It is recommended public school systems regularly evaluate teacher asthma knowledge based on mean scores of correctness to ensure teachers are prepared to assist students with asthma and are knowledgeable regarding the presence of asthma triggers in the school environment. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563180</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>What Is the Current Level of Asthma Knowledge in Elementary, Middle, and High School Teachers?</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Tennessee State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9868-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>176</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599995</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developmental Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blended Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Failure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lenzen, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many students enter college inadequately prepared to take college-level math courses like College Algebra, and as a consequence must take one or more developmental math courses. It is becoming increasingly common for colleges to offer math courses online, including various developmental math courses including Intermediate Algebra. Many computer-assistive technologies exist, some coupled with mathematics textbooks, to purportedly help students learn mathematics better. These technologies are often used in online developmental math courses, and in developmental math course taught in the traditional face-to-face classroom. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the use of technology in Intermediate Algebra courses taught through regular and blended instruction, online, in the traditional classroom supplemented with technology, and in the traditional classroom. The independent variable was the type of instruction received but students were not randomly assigned to the three types of instruction, as they were free to take whichever instruction they chose. The dependent variables were the final course grades of those who completed the course, and a comparison of the rate of course completion, versus withdrawing or failing for all students enrolled in the course past the first week drop/add period. Dummy variables of 1 and 0 were assigned to completing and not completing the course, respectively. An analysis of variance was used to analyze the data. There was no statistically significant difference in the course grades of those who took the courses in the three types of instruction; nor was there any statistically significant difference in the rate of course completion in the three types of instruction. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563181</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effectiveness of Online and Classroom-Based Instructional Methods in Developmental Mathematics Courses at a Small Public Community College</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of South Dakota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9675-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>90</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599882</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journal Articles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Energy Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assistive Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Government</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Government Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Free Enterprise System</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Power Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Security</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Noah, Philip D., Jr.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this research project was to explore what the core factors are that play a role in the development of the smart-grid. This research study examined The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 as it pertains to the smart-grid, the economic and security effects of the smart grid, and key factors for its success. The methodology used for this research study is based on a qualitative meta-analysis, multiple case analysis, and text analysis. Secondary data in the form of journal articles were used as the data for this study. Five to six articles on the smart grid, nuclear power, and cellular communication were synthesized to produce a smart gird case, a nuclear case, and a cellular communication case. An interruptive analysis and text analysis was used to create the synthesis. The three cases were analyzed using a multiple case study approach combined with a text analysis to produce a list of possible key factors for the smart grid. This research project found that the core issues (factors) for the smart grid can be categorized into the following five categories; economic, public policy, technology, regulatory, and safety/security. Key terms in each of the core issues were identified and used to answer the research question. The conclusions reached are that consumers will need to use assistive technologies to manage electrical use and to take advantage of dynamic pricing. Furthermore, the Federal Government will have to ensure that open standards are used for the smart grid, and that devices and protocols at all levels of the grid are secured against cyber-attack. Finally, the Federal Government needs to take a more free market approach to smart grid, especially concerning renewable resources. The market should dictate what mix of power generation is used to create an economically viable electric system. Natural gas, nuclear, solar, wind, and geothermal all should compete on a level playing field. With an estimated cost of over $2 trillion and 20 years to implement, there will be only one change to get it right. Limitations of the study include the use of only two comparative domains with the one domain under investigation, the use of a third domain would help to refine and better validate the findings of the study. The exploratory and interpretive nature of the research along with the use of a developing methodology required the researcher to use judgment about how to best analyze the data in a systematic way. The results of this research study not only contributes to the body of academic knowledge but is also a guide for policy makers and consumers who must wrestle with the effects the smart grid will have on the economy, national security, and daily life. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563182</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Qualitative Meta-Analysis of the Diffusion of Mandated and Subsidized Technology: United States Energy Security and Independence</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Sc. Dissertation, Robert Morris University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9683-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>209</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599889</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drama</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discussion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intergroup Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multicultural Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socialization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Power Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Art Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Simons, Sara M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This qualitative case study examined the use of process drama in an undergraduate Intergroup Dialogue and how the use of this drama-based pedagogy shaped participants&apos; attitudes and understandings about race and privilege. The research focused on the creation of and subsequent reflection on improvised, episodic scenes and images structured around larger themes of socialization and oppression. The process drama utilized in this study involved both students and facilitators in role. This study found that participation in process drama affected participants&apos; attitudes about race and privilege in a number of different ways and to different extents. Participants also experienced and problematized process drama in different ways. Overall, process drama was found to create empathy, to enable reflection on lived experiences, to lead to examination of stereotypes, privilege, and internalized racism, and to create awareness about gaps in students&apos; education. This study found that mechanisms of process drama such as taking on roles of power, simulating the experience of oppression, and using abstract physicalizations to embody emotion all aided a shift in attitudes and understandings about race and privilege. This study examined best practices in race dialogue and multicultural education and posited the use of drama-based pedagogy as an innovative way to engage undergraduates. This study showed process drama to be highly compatible with the needs and goals of multicultural education, and the findings from this study strongly supported the use of this method as a way to engage students both cognitively and affectively with material regarding race, privilege, and systems of oppression. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563183</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>&amp;quot;It Gets under Your Skin&amp;quot;: Using Process Drama to Explore Race and Privilege with Undergraduate Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9697-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>285</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599898</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resilience (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Catholic Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Athletics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Housework</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Employment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Toohey, Susan M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to discover what variables from the home and the high school may be related to a student having a high resilience score. The participants for the current research were all young women who attended the same all-girls, Catholic high school in the Midwest and were alumnae of the school. Resilience is defined as the ability to bounce back from adversity, change or stress, and the learning from that challenge so as to lead a productive and positive life. Using the Resilience Scale(TM) (Wagnild, 2011) as a tool to determine a resilience score, participants completed a survey. Analyses were conducted to determine which variables were significant contributors to higher resilience scores. The current research indicated that there were high school and home variables that influenced resilience scores. Significant school variables included class participation, taking leadership positions, being involved in activities and athletics. Home variables that affected resilience included completing chores, working, experiencing the unemployment of a parent and having consequences for failing grades. There are specific ways to increase resilience, and it is important for school administrators and parents to work collaboratively to assist young women, to develop higher resilience. The current research provides the data, the analysis and suggestions for school administrators and parents to teach resilience. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563184</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>What Makes Young Women More Resilient? Leadership, Work, Independence and Participation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Creighton University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9704-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>134</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599903</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conventional Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Licensing Examinations (Professions)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hamar, Sandra K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mann Whitney U Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Praxis Series</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Praxis Series</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>New initiatives in preservice teacher formal student teaching experiences seek to prepare high-quality educators commensurate with current demands of the profession. Professional development schools (PDS) provide more hours of clinical preparation for student teaching, with a qualified mentor teacher. This research study investigated the effectiveness of teacher candidates, measured by the differences in participants&apos; scores on initial licensure examinations to determine if there was a difference in teacher candidates who were prepared through two separate methods: a PDS yearlong internship and a traditional 14-week student-teaching format. The study determined the extent to which students who were prepared through the PDS approach differed from those prepared through the traditional approach to teaching preparation at a Midwestern university. Praxis II standardized licensure examination score were compared with the Mann Whitney U, test and ANCOVA using data from four cohorts of PDS and non-PDS students. The median Praxis II score for the PDS group (Md = 167.0) was not significantly different (p = 0.178) to that of the non-PDS group (Md = 173.5). After controlling for gender, race, and GPA score using ANCOVA, the mean Praxis II score for the PDS group (M = 173.50) was only marginally significantly different (p = 0.040) to the non-PDS group (M = 166.65) with a small effect size (Eta Squared = 0.1). The conclusion was that PDS only has a limited effect on success in standardized licensure examinations. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563185</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effective Teacher Candidate Preparation: Professional Development Schools versus Traditional Training Format</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Grand Canyon University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9823-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>127</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599984</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Well Being</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Play</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rojas, Natalia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lloyd, Chrishana M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattera, Shira</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Northeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (West)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (South)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Head Start, the largest federally funded early childhood education program in the United States, provides comprehensive services to low-income children and their families. These services historically have a whole child approach, fostering social-emotional well-being, physical and mental health, and cognitive and language development, as well as parent involvement and family social services. In recent years, a number of non-experimental studies have outlined the risk to social-emotional development in young children growing up in poverty. Because children in poverty are exposed to a wide range of psychological and social stressors, they have been found to be at a greater risk for developing emotional and behavioral difficulties compared with their more affluent peers. Low-income children are particularly vulnerable to behavior and emotional difficulties in preschool (Gilliam, 2007), and teachers have reported that they do not know how to address behavioral challenges (Lloyd &amp;amp; Bangser, 2009; La Paro &amp;amp; Pianta, 2000). Head Start has responded to the pressing need for effective tools to strengthen children&apos;s social-emotional skills and recent research has shown that well-designed professional development which includes training and coaching can enhance teachers&apos; skills, and strengthen children&apos;s social and emotional outcomes (Hemmeter &amp;amp; Fox, 2009; Lloyd &amp;amp; Bangser, 2009; Morris et al, 2010; Raver et al., 2009). Head Start CARES examined enhanced curriculum improvements and professional development in the context of a large-scale random assignment study. The demonstration tested the effects of three theoretically distinct social-emotional program enhancements in Head Start settings across the country in order to determine whether it was possible to effectively implement these programs in a large number of Head Start centers and if so, how. The three structured program enhancements focused on different strategies including training teachers on delivery of classroom management procedures, enhancing children&apos;s skills to understand and respond to emotions, and a set of play-based activities designed to support self-regulation. In addition to testing classroom-based strategies, Head Start CARES served as a test of an overall system that was meant to support large-scale implementation of program enhancements in the classroom. This paper focuses on preliminary lessons learned from implementing social-emotional programs supported by a professional development model across the country in varied contexts; in particular the focus is on the training and coaching of teachers in the Head Start CARES demonstration. The seventeen Head Start delegate agencies that were selected to participate in the Head Start CARES demonstration were located in ten states across the nation. In total 307 classrooms and over 3,600 children participated in the study, with one-half receiving the CARES intervention. Training and coaching as a form of professional development offers the opportunity to greatly influence the quality of experiences that both teachers and children in early childhood education settings receive. Implementation of strong coaching and training, however, can be a complicated endeavor, due to the large number of people involved and the varied organizational contexts across grantees. In summary, implementation and scale-up of training, coaching, and the social-emotional enhancements required substantial effort among all of the stakeholders involved. One table and one figure are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563186</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Fidelity and Scaling-Up in the Context of a Social-Emotional Intervention for Early Childhood Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Scientific Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Clark-Chiarelli, Nancy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gropen, Jess</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fuccillo, Janna</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hoisington, Cindy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The need for a scientifically-literate American population has gained great prominence on the educational landscape of priorities over the past decade; young children will be increasingly exposed to the STEM fields and encouraged to excel in these areas. Professional development is key to assuring that early childhood teachers provide children with cognitively-challenging early learning experiences. Focusing on the Head Start community, &amp;quot;Foundations of Science Literacy&amp;quot; (FSL) is a credit-bearing professional development course that directly addresses the achievement gap in early science education. The program not only addresses an urgent need, it also integrates the resources, structure, and support that preschool teachers need to improve early science learning and teaching. First, based on data from an efficacy study nearing completion, the authors assess whether &amp;quot;FSL without&amp;quot; embedded formative assessments leads to gains in preschool children. Second, drawing on insights from a new development project, the authors describe how instruction-embedded formative assessment can be used to &amp;quot;strengthen&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;clarify&amp;quot; the relation between gains in teacher pedagogical content knowledge and gains in children&apos;s scientific thinking. For the efficacy study, FSL was implemented in the greater New York City area and the population included preschool teachers and a sample of children in their classrooms using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. The authors highlight a promising approach to learning from mixed (summative) results using formative assessment to provide more nuanced information about children&apos;s learning over time and to allow teachers to tailor instruction so that it is more effective. One figure is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563187</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Foundations of Science Literacy: Using Instruction-Embedded Formative Assessment to Strengthen the Relation between Gains in Teacher Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Children&apos;s Scientific Thinking</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Dual Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Acceleration (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disproportionate Representation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tuition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kearse, Douglas</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Savannah Early College Program (SECP) opened its doors in August 2007 to make a difference in the lives of all students who enrolled. Its primary mission was to combine academic rigor and support to help students enter college early and graduate from high school with up to 2 years of college credit. Since SECP joined the Early College High School Initiative (ECHSI) that was launched in 2002, with the financial support of the Bill &amp;amp; Melinda Gates Foundation, SECP has received local recognition for educating students who are traditionally underrepresented in postsecondary education settings. Using an action-oriented research approach, this research focused on the SECP and its ability to meet the needs of stakeholders including parents, students, and teachers of the SECP. The study aspired to determine the benefits of the SECP and what can be done to improve the service SECP provides parents and students. The data collected from 40 focus group participants revealed SECP&apos;s strengths, which include a curriculum that helps students to enter college early and save tuition cost; a supportive staff that expects students to achieve at their highest levels; and a diverse and safe school environment that offers a family-like atmosphere and supports teacher and student bonding. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563188</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Evaluation of the Savannah Early College Program: An Action Oriented Research Approach</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0639-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>146</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600513</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inclusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mainstreaming</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regular and Special Education Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cordoves, Jose L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Puerto Rico</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Puerto Rico</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Research indicates that many general education teachers have negative attitudes about the inclusion of students with disabilities. Ways to promote positive attitudes in preservice teachers are needed, particularly in Puerto Rico, where the autism identification rate is the highest in the world. The purposes of this concurrent mixed method study were to explore the attitudes of preservice teachers toward inclusion of students with autism and to gather the perceptions of education faculty members regarding their students&apos; attitudes. Research questions were designed to examine the attitudes of the student teachers and the reflections of faculty, to identify possible differences across preservice majors, and to gather recommendations about preparation offerings. Ajzen&apos;s attitudinal theory and Salvia and Munson&apos;s model of attitudes towards inclusion guided the study. One hundred twelve preservice teachers from a university in Puerto Rico completed the inclusion survey, and 11 preservice teachers and 8 education faculty members were interviewed. Spearman&apos;s rho and independent t-test analyses revealed significant differences in attitudes between elementary majors and both special education and preschool majors. A priori and open coding were used to identify themes related to knowledge, preparation, climate, and feelings of effectiveness. Preservice teachers&apos; perceptions were that they were unprepared to serve students with autism; faculty members supported the need for more courses related to all special needs and especially autism. Positive social change implications include modifying preparation curricula to enhance preservice teachers&apos; knowledge of inclusion and to support positive teacher attitudes toward the inclusion of students with autism in general education classrooms in Puerto Rico. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563189</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Concurrent Mixed Method Study of Preservice Teachers&apos; Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Autism in General Education Classrooms</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-8852-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>182</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599511</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Taylor, Ann Marie H.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>South Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Retaining effective teachers is a challenge in every classroom, but nowhere more than in special education classrooms. The purpose of the study was to conduct a program evaluation using archival data that were collected as a part of the Special Education Advanced Mentor Training (SEAMT) in South Carolina. Drawing on Erikson&apos;s Intimacy vs. Isolation stage of human life, educators have realized that beginning teachers benefit from the sense of intimacy provided by a mentor. To combat the issue of special education teacher attrition, a 1-day SEAMT was developed and presented but never evaluated. The research questions were developed to determine if the SEAMT affected the work of mentors; which aspects of the training were most helpful; and which additional information, tools, and/or strategies would be helpful in working with special education teachers. The program evaluation utilized a sequential mixed methods approach while triangulating the data from 3 sources: 2 surveys and 1 interview. The qualitative data were coded using an inductive process, while the quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The evaluation results for the SEAMT showed that for all participants, the training either met or exceeded their expectations. Once mentors worked with new special education teachers in the field, they found several tools to be helpful. The interviews revealed that more training for administrators is needed to enhance their knowledge of special education. This program evaluation concludes with recommendations to support and retain special educators in the classroom, which will effect positive social change through increased student achievement. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563190</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Program Evaluation of the Special Education Mentor Training in South Carolina</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9834-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>151</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599990</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regional Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Degruy, Elizabeth J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions of students with Individualized Education Programs who attend regional safe schools of their educational experiences. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act mandates that students with disabilities be provided a free, appropriate, public education in the least restrictive environment; however, the students who participated in this study had been removed from their home public schools. This study employed a qualitative research methodology to investigate the students&apos; perspectives on their experiences at public schools and a regional safe school. Participants in this study were 8 high school students with disabilities who attended a regional safe school. The school was located in a small urban community in the Midwest. Data were collected through document review, observations, and one-on-one, semi-structured interviews. All but one student participated in three interviews. Interview questions focused on students&apos; experiences, views of their success in public and alternative school, and elements that they identified as being essential for their success. Open coding was used to analyze student responses to interview questions. Findings indicated that students identified both teacher and school factors as essential to their school success. Students expressed positive changes in themselves in the areas of motivation, determination to succeed, and self-awareness. All students perceived that they were more successful at their regional safe school. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563191</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Examination of Student Perceptions of Regional Safe School and Public School Services</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Illinois State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9719-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>239</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599913</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Public Agencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Least Squares Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Government Employees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metropolitan Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Crime</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sex</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Occupational Information</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tenure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Veterans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Crime Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Choi, Min Suk</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Northeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities are causing substantial financial losses for governments and organizations all over the world. Cybersecurity criminals are stealing more than one billion dollars from banks every year by exploiting vulnerabilities caused by bank users&apos; computer misuse. Cybersecurity breaches are threatening the common welfare of citizens since more and more terrorists are using cyberterrorism to target critical infrastructures (e.g., transportation, telecommunications, power, nuclear plants, water supply, banking) to coerce the targeted government and its people to accomplish their political objectives. Cyberwar is another major concern that nations around the world are struggling to get ready to fight. It has been found that intentional and unintentional users&apos; misuse of information systems (IS) resources represents about 50% to 75% of cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities to organizations. Computer Crime and Security Survey revealed that nearly 60% of security breaches occurred from inside the organization by users. Computer users are one of the weakest links in the information systems security chain, because users seem to have very limited or no knowledge of user computer self-efficacy (CSE), cybersecurity countermeasures awareness (CCA), and cybersecurity skills (CS). Users&apos; CSE, CCA, and CS play an important role in users&apos; computer misuse intention (CMI). CMI can be categorized as unauthorized access, use, disruption, modification, disclosure, inspection, recording, or destruction of information system data. This dissertation used a survey to empirically assess users&apos; CSE, CCA, CS, and computer misuse intention (CMI) at government agencies. This study used Partial Least Square (PLS) technique to measure the fit of a theoretical model that includes seven independent latent variables (CSE, UAS-P, UAS-T, UAC-M, CCS, CIS, &amp;amp; CAS) and their influences on the dependent variable CMI. Also, PLS was used to examine if the six control variables (age, gender, job function, education level, length of working in the organization, &amp;amp; military status such as veteran) had any significant impact on CMI. This study included data collected from 185 employees of a local and state transportation agency from a large metropolitan in the northeastern United States. Participants received an email invitation to take the Web-based survey. PLS was used to test the four research hypotheses. The results of the PLS model showed that UAC-M and CIS were significant contributors (p &amp;lt;.05) to CMI. UAC-M was a significant contributor (p &amp;lt;.05) to CCS. UAS-P was a significant contributor (p &amp;lt;.05) to CAS. CSE was the most significant contributor (p &amp;lt; .001) to CCS, while it did not show a significance contribution towards CMI. It can be concluded that UAC-M and CIS play a significant role on CMI. This investigation contributes to the IS and cybersecurity practice by providing valuable information that can be used by government agencies in an effort to significantly reduce computer users&apos; abuse, while increasing productivity and effectiveness. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563192</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessing the Role of User Computer Self-Efficacy, Cybersecurity Countermeasures Awareness, and Cybersecurity Skills toward Computer Misuse Intention at Government Agencies</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9626-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>105</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599848</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Chinese Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immigrants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Involvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Capital</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Working Class</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Businesses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Capital</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telecommunications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Handheld Devices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents as Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tutors</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liang, Senfeng</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines ways in which Chinese immigrant families are involved in their children&apos;s mathematics education, particularly focusing on how different types of families utilize different forms of capital to support their children&apos;s mathematics education. The theoretical framework defines four types of Chinese immigrant families--working families, small business families, transitional professional families, and settled professional families--and addresses three forms of capital--cultural, social and economic capital. In the analysis, the first two groups are often clustered as less educated families and the other two groups as highly educated families. Nine families with different backgrounds participated in the study. Data include observations, interviews, essays and Twitter messages from students, and a video discussion activity. Data analysis utilized cross-case analysis (Yin, 2002). First, this study shows significant differences in how Chinese immigrant parents conceptualize U.S. mathematics education. Highly educated parents believed U.S. mathematics education failed to meet their children&apos;s mathematical needs while less educated parents were less critical of U.S. mathematics education. Second, this study examines how different types of families use cultural, social and economic capital to influence their children&apos;s mathematics education. Parent tutoring and aspirations are indicators of cultural capital. Less educated parents tended to tutor their children when they were in lower grades. Students with highly educated parents received more direct tutoring from their parents, even when they went on to more advanced grades. All parents had high aspirations for their children&apos;s education, but to varying degrees depending on the type of family. One common approach was to send their children to supplementary education programs which suggest an indicator of social capital. Family location and hiring tutors are indicators of economic capital. All families but one managed to live in what they believed were good school districts. Higher income families also spent money to hire tutors to teach their children academic subjects (including mathematics) and sports. This study contributes to the exploration of the role of families in the mathematics education of Chinese American students. It also extends current literature in general Chinese American studies that primarily focus on highly educated, high income, professional families and less educated, low income, working families while omitting populations that fall between them, particularly small business families and transitional professional families. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563193</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Family Involvement in Children&apos;s Mathematics Education Experiences: Voices of Immigrant Chinese American Students and Their Parents</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9788-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>262</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599960</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Human Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Politics of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conflict</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>DeArmond, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation is about how organizational politics--or what some scholars call micro-politics--shapes the implementation of comprehensive human resource (HR) reform in school district central offices. Over the last decade, education reformers and advocates have promoted comprehensive HR reform as a way to improve teaching and learning in K-12 schools, especially in urban districts. These reforms call on school districts to orient and coordinate all of their HR activities around a common vision of effective teaching and use the way they hire, develop, and retain teachers to systematically build and leverage talent across all schools. For most school districts, this ambitious vision of HR is a profound departure from present practice. Emerging accounts of comprehensive HR reform suggest that implementation is often marked by organizational conflict, but they do not elaborate why this is the case or what it implies for implementation. In investigating the micro-political dynamics of implementing comprehensive HR reform, this study reveals both the sources of conflict that emerge during these ambitious reforms, how actors within central offices negotiate and resolve them, and how micro-political dynamics can--for better or worse--shape the implementation of ambitious bureaucratic reform. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563194</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Good Ideas and Engagement Aren&apos;t Enough: School District Central Offices and the Micro-Politics of Implementing Comprehensive Human Resource Reform</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9376-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>231</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599694</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Food</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Modification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Eating Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Responses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compliance (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Congdon, Marissa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Behavioral feeding difficulties occur at a high rate in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and can have a serious impact on their overall health and development. Although there are a number of studies demonstrating effective strategies for addressing behavioral feeding difficulties in children with ASD, the majority of them have been conducted in clinical settings. High probability (high-p) request sequences have been used as an antecedent intervention to increase compliance, appropriate behavior, social interactions, decrease stereotypy, self injurious behavior, increase compliance to academic tasks, increase communication skills, and in interventions to increase food acceptance and consumption. This evidence-based intervention has been demonstrated to be effective in both clinical and applied (e.g., school) settings. The current study investigated the efficacy of high probability request sequences, an easy to implement, school-based behavioral feeding treatment. In the study food related and non-food related high probability requests sequences were compared for efficacy. The participants in the study were three children with ASD that had parent and teacher reported feeding difficulties. Results suggested that school-based high probability response sequences were extremely effective for 2 of the 3 participants. Consumers were very positive about the intervention. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563195</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Increasing Food Acceptance in the School Setting for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Using High Probability Requests Sequences</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9370-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>87</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599690</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assistant Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suburban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Politics of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Women Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Garrard, John Christian Timothy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>To identify how high school assistant principals in large suburban schools serve as instructional leaders and how they develop these skills, this research utilized a multiple-case study design, followed by a cross-case analysis of the data. This research explores the instructional leadership of three female comprehensive high school assistant principals who are employed in the same Northern California school district. Each case was developed with the use of interviews, observation and document analysis. Included in each case is a description of the assistant principal&apos;s instructional job responsibilities, how they develop their instructional leadership and obtain opportunities to function in instructional leadership roles. This research found several main themes. They include that the theoretical model for Hallinger&apos;s Principals Instructional Management Rating Scale did not work in regards to assistant principals, they were found to serve not in the role of leader, but more in the role of facilitator and relationship builders, the role of the assistant principal has not evolved over the past century, they are constrained by the political dynamics of their school structure which leaves them as marginalized leaders, they lack opportunities to grow as instructional leaders due to opportunities for professional development and the ambiguity of their role, and female assistant principals may not take the opportunity to serve as a leader since this may not be perceived natural due to their gender association. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563196</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Instructional Leadership of High School Assistant Principals in Northern California</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, University of the Pacific</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9772-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>171</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599949</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constructivism (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baum, Lisa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is gap in passing rates on the standardized science assessment between European American and Hispanic American students. The purpose of this study was to examine student performance in science and the closing of the achievement gap between European American and Hispanic American students based upon receipt of an inquiry or noninquiry instruction method. Guided by the theoretical framework of constructive learning, this quantitative ex post facto research design gathered data from 8 teachers who had already implemented 1 of the 2 methods of instruction. The teachers were chosen through purposive sampling based on previous observations of instructional method and were placed into 2 groups depending upon the type of instruction: inquiry or noninquiry. Descriptive statistics were used to determine mean differences and a 2-way analysis of variance was used to determine mean differences in science test scores between European American and Hispanic American students and between the instructional methods to which they had been exposed. Results found that the inquiry instructional method was related to a significant increase in mean scores for both ethnic groups, but the achievement gap between the two groups was not closed by the inquiry instruction method. This study can promote positive social change for students by informing the efforts of educational leaders and teachers to create professional development using inquiry instruction. Students may perform higher on standardized tests when they are allowed to explore science by asking questions and answering their own questions through the collection and analysis of data. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Instructional Methods within the Elementary-School Science Classroom Related to Improved Academic Performance</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9063-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>102</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599590</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Advertising</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Schemata (Cognition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Russian</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discourse Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Television</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Consumer Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pragmatics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Stimuli</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Persuasive Discourse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Egorova, Veronika</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research examines advertising discourse in Russian and English as acts of communicative exchange and interpersonal relationship between advertising discourse participants. The purpose was to identify and describe the way that viewers process information contained in television commercials and how they become consumers moving from getting information to acting upon it. The present research was conducted within the framework of Yokoyama&apos;s (1986) Transactional Discourse Model (TDM), as further developed in Yokoyama (1998-manipulation), Moon (1995) and Chapman (2001). The framework was applied to the analysis of empirical data from 150 Russian and 150 American TV commercials representing a set of data hitherto unnoticed. As such, it describes a specific set of questions dubbed &amp;quot;non-informational&amp;quot;. This is the first study that has systematically investigated the pragmatic/informational interaction between non-verbal/visual components of an ad and the linguistic shape of the ad. It also contributes to further development of the discourse model applicable beyond advertising genre. The analysis demonstrates a cognitive basis for the pragmatic/informational interaction both at a linguistic and a non-linguistic level and emphasizes the direct connection between cognitive processes and the syntactic and pragmatic components of language, thereby contributing to our understanding of the phenomenon of manipulation, particularly as it occurs in the contexts of advertising: through camera work on the non-verbal/visual level and, at the linguistic level, through the use of ellipsis and non-informational questions. The study sheds light not only on the manipulative strategies used in advertising to sell the product, but also on representations of Russian and American cultural communicative norms and values. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Language, Cognition, and Manipulation in Advertising Discourse</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9383-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>244</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599698</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Equations (Mathematics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Concept Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Logical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intuition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Symbolic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kuo, Eric</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Although a large part the Physics Education Research (PER) literature investigates students&apos; conceptual understanding in physics, these investigations focus on qualitative, conceptual reasoning. Even in modeling expert problem solving, attention to conceptual understanding means a focus on initial qualitative analysis of the problem; the equations are typically conceived of as tools for &amp;quot;plug-and-chug&amp;quot; calculations. In this dissertation, I explore the ways that undergraduate physics students make conceptual sense &amp;quot;of physics equations&amp;quot; and the factors that support this type of reasoning through three separate studies. In the first study, I investigate how students&apos; can understand physics equations intuitively through use of a particular class of cognitive elements, &amp;quot;symbolic forms&amp;quot; (Sherin, 2001). Additionally, I show how students leverage this intuitive, conceptual meaning of equations in problem solving. By doing so, these students avoid algorithmic manipulations, instead using a heuristic approach that leverages the equation in a conceptual argument. The second study asks the question why some students use symbolic forms and others don&apos;t. Although it is possible that students simply lack the knowledge required, I argue that this is not the only explanation. Rather, symbolic forms use is connected to particular &amp;quot;epistemological stances,&amp;quot; in-the-moment views on what kinds of knowledge and reasoning are appropriate in physics. Specifically, stances that value &amp;quot;coherence&amp;quot; between formal, mathematical knowledge and intuitive, conceptual knowledge are likely to support symbolic forms use. Through the case study of one student, I argue that both reasoning with equations and epistemological stances are dynamic, and that shifts in epistemological stance can produce shifts in whether symbolic forms are used to reason with equations. The third study expands the focus to what influences how students reason with equations across disciplinary problem contexts. In seeking to understand differences in how the same student reasons on two similar problems in calculus and physics, I show two factors, beyond the content or structure of the problems, that can help explain why reasoning on these two problems would be so different. This contributes to an understanding of what can support or impede transfer of content knowledge across disciplinary boundaries. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563199</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>More than Just &amp;quot;Plug-and-Chug&amp;quot;: Exploring How Physics Students Make Sense with Equations</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9123-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>280</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599616</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ability Grouping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Helming, Luralyn</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The author studied how math anxiety, motivation, and ability group interact to affect performance in college math courses. This clarified the effects of math anxiety and ability grouping on performance. It clarified the interrelationships between math anxiety, motivation, and ability grouping by considering them in a single analysis. It introduces to the literature the study of college students as ability grouped students. A partial correlation addresses the interrelationships between math anxiety, motivation, and ability grouping. A hierarchical multiple logistic regression addresses the effect of math anxiety, motivation, and ability grouping on performance. Results indicated that motivation and the interaction of motivation and ability group are significant predictors of performance; math anxiety was not a significant predictor. College students in the highest ability group are most likely to receive a satisfactory grade (70% and above) regardless of their level of motivation. For students in the average and low groups their likelihood of receiving a satisfactory grade was a function of their motivation. College students experience ability groups in a manner similar to secondary students. Motivation is an important factor in predicting performance, especially for students in the average and low groups. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563200</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Motivation and Math Anxiety for Ability Grouped College Math Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of South Dakota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9666-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>98</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599873</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The continued accumulation of validity evidence for the intended uses of educational assessments is critical to ensure that proper inferences will be made for those purposes. To that end, the College Board has continued to collect college outcome data to evaluate the relationship between SAT® scores and college success. This report provides updated validity evidence for using the SAT to predict first-year college grade point average (FYGPA) for the 2011 cohort. Appended are: (1) Institutions Providing First-Year Outcomes for the 2011 Cohort; (2) Raw Correlations of SAT and SHGPA with FYGPA by Institutional Characteristics; and (3) Raw Correlation of SAT and HSGPA with FYGPA by Subgroups.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563201</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validity of the SAT® for Predicting First-Year Grades: 2011 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report 2013-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Barbuti, Sandra M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report presents the results of a large-scale national validity study of the SAT®. In March 2005, the College Board introduced a revised SAT, with an additional section in writing and minor changes in content to the verbal and mathematics sections. The first full cohort of students taking this test completed their first year of college in May/June 2007. This report documents the methods undertaken to recruit institutions to participate in the study; the procedures for gathering, cleaning, and aggregating data; and the statistical corrections and analyses applied to the data and the results of those analyses. The report concludes with a discussion of the results in light of prior SAT validity studies and a description of future SAT validity research studies. The results show that the changes made to the SAT did not substantially change how well the test predicts first-year college performance. Across all institutions, the recently added writing section is the most highly predictive of the three individual SAT sections. As expected, the best combination of predictors of first-year college grade point average (FYGPA) is high school grade point average (HSGPA) and SAT scores. The College Board continues to encourage institutions to use both measures when making admissions decisions. Two appendices are included: (1) Participating Institutions; and (2) Characteristics of Participating Institutions.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563202</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validity of the SAT® for Predicting First-Year College Grade Point Average. Research Report No. 2008-5</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_cited>ED555627</eric:ies_cited>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Inflation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kimmel, Ernest</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Scheuneman, Janice</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sawtell, Ellen A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Student Descriptive Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Student Descriptive Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is clear evidence that the average grades earned in high school have been going up for some period of time. This study examines the question of whether students of varying backgrounds have experienced similar increases in grade point average (GPA) over a 25-plus-year period. Changes in SAT verbal and mathematical scores for the same gender and racial/ethnic groups are also examined. Trends in the grading practices of major subjects in the high school curriculum are presented, as are changes in the GPA and test scores for students clustered by the type of community in which their school is located and whether it is public or nonpublic. Three appendices are included: (1) Mean GPA by Year, Gender, Ethnicity, and Parental Education, 1976-2002; (2) Mean SAT-V and SAT-M by Year, Gender, Ethnicity, and Parental Education, 1976-2002; and (3) Ethnicity, Gender, and Parental Education.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563203</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Whose Grades Are Inflated? Research Report No. 2003-4</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Entrance Examination Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2004-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>70</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Entrance Examination Board. Available from: College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>48</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Simmons, Deborah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fogarty, Melissa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Simmons, Leslie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Davis, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Anderson, Leah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Oslund, Eric</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Adolescents in the United States and their educators face an enormous challenge with respect to reading comprehension. College and career readiness standards outlined in the Common Core State Standards Initiative (2012) place increased emphasis on preparing students to read complex text across a range of content areas. At issue is how to develop the necessary skills to be able to read the texts required of college classes and literacy-demanding occupations when fewer than 35% of students in the secondary grades read proficiently (U.S. Department of Education, 2011). An emerging body of research has identified promising practices to promote reading comprehension among adolescents (Biancarosa &amp;amp; Snow, 2006; Boardman et al., 2008; Edmonds et al., 2009). Dole, Nokes, and Drits (2009) categorized comprehension practices into two categories: teaching practices and self-regulated learning strategies (i.e., strategies students use to gain understanding or knowledge). Findings from meta-analyses (Davis, 2010; Edmonds, 2009) suggest that multicomponent comprehension intervention holds promise. This study expands this evidence base by comparing a theoretically developed set of practices designed to develop knowledge and student-regulated text processing. Extending findings from recent meta-analyses of comprehension strategy instruction (Davis, 2010; Edmonds et al., 2009), the authors investigated effects of integrating teacher-directed knowledge-building and student-regulated comprehension practices on 7-10th grade students&apos; reading comprehension. Three research questions were targeted: (1) What are the statistical and practical effects of knowledge-building and student-regulated practices on 7th to 10th-grade students&apos; reading comprehension? (2) What is the relationship between dimensions of fidelity of implementation (i.e., adherence, quality of instruction, and program differentiation) and reading comprehension? and (3) Do knowledge-building and student-regulated practices differentially benefit subgroups of students with lower entry-level comprehension performance? Two tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563204</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining Positive but Nondifferential Gains in Secondary Students&apos; Reading Comprehension: A Focus on Instructional Practices and Differential Benefit</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>18</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Interfaces</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Patients</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Field Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hospitals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Use Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physicians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Records (Forms)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer System Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surgery</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drug Therapy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nurses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pharmacy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wilcox-Patterson, Lauren</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The recent trend toward patients participating in their own healthcare has opened up numerous opportunities for computing research. This dissertation focuses on how technology can foster this participation, through user interfaces to effectively communicate personal health status and care progress to hospital patients. I first characterize the design space for electronic information communication to patients through field studies conducted in multiple hospital settings. These studies utilize a combination of survey instruments, and low- and high-fidelity prototypes, including a document-editing prototype through which users can view and manage clinical data to automatically associate it with progress notes. The prototype, activeNotes, includes the first known techniques supporting clinical information requests directly within a document editor. A usage study with ICU physicians at New York-Presbyterian Hospital (NYP) substantiated our design and revealed how electronic information related to patient status and care progress is derived from a typical Electronic Health Record system. Insights gained from this study informed following studies to understand how to design abstracted, plain-language views suitable for patients. We gauged both patient and physician responses to information display prototypes deployed in patient rooms for a formative study exploring their design. Following my reports on this study, I discuss the design, development and pilot evaluations of a prototype Personal Health Record application providing live, abstracted clinical information for patients at NYP. The portal, evaluated by cardiothoracic surgery patients, is the first of its kind to allow patients to capture and monitor live data related to their care. Patient use of the portal influenced the subsequent design of tools to support users in making sense of online medication information. These tools, designed with nurses and pharmacists and evaluated by cardiothoracic surgery patients at NYP, were developed using topic modeling approaches and text analysis techniques. Embodied in a prototype called Remedy, they enable rapid filtering and comparison of medication-related search results, based on a number of website features and content topics. I conclude by discussing how findings from this series of studies can help shape the ongoing design and development of patient-centered technology. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563205</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>User Interfaces for Patient-Centered Communication of Health Status and Care Progress</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0665-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>356</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600538</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Stress Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Well Being</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physiology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metabolism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Biochemistry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Burnout</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Perspective</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Katz, Deirdre A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harris, Alexis R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Abenavoli, Rachel M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Greenberg, Mark T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Educators are exposed to a variety of stressors, which can lead to poorer teaching performance, burnout, and increased student misbehavior (Jennings &amp;amp; Greenberg, 2009). Although self-report measures of stress are most commonly used in education research, physiological measures of stress may also contribute to the understanding of educators&apos; stress, as well as their responsiveness to interventions designed to reduce stress and promote well-being. Some studies show a relationship between self-reported burnout and cortisol levels. Salivary alpha amylase (sAA) research indicates that it is a highly sensitive indicator of changes caused by psychological stressors (Granger, Kivlighan, El-Sheikh, Gordis &amp;amp; Stroud, 2007). This study employs an innovative measurement design to facilitate the examination of associations between physiological indicators and self-reported measures related to stress and health. The authors examine associations between salivary biomarkers of teachers at the beginning of the school year and their self-reported levels of stress and burnout both concurrently and in the spring of that school year. This short-term longitudinal study was conducted in two middle schools in Central Pennsylvania over the course of one school year. Self-report and physiological data were collected at two time points: fall 2012 and spring 2013. Results show that salivary markers of stress show a modest relationship to self-reported measures in this sample but that measures of cortisol and sAA are not predictive of spring self-reported burnout or stress. Results did reveal that fall reports of high time urgency were associated with less steep awakening responses in both sAA and cortisol. Two tables and two figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563206</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining the Relationship between Physiological Measurements and Self-Reports of Stress and Well-Being in Middle School Teachers over One School Year</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>21</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bloom, Howard S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Porter, Kristin E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Weiss, Michael J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Raudenbush, Stephen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>To date, evaluation research and policy analysis have focused mainly on average program impacts and paid little systematic attention to their variation. Recently, the growing number of multi-site randomized trials that are being planned and conducted make it increasingly feasible to study &amp;quot;cross-site&amp;quot; variation in impacts. Important technical questions arise when one uses data from a multi-site randomized trial to estimate the magnitude of cross-site impact variation and assess the statistical significance of these estimates. Some of these questions arise from the likelihood that variation in &amp;quot;individual&amp;quot; outcomes (which in the context of multi-level models is often referred to as a &amp;quot;level-one residual variance&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;residual variance&amp;quot; for short) might be different for the treatment group and control group members and/or might be different for different sites. In addition, to the extent that different populations and local conditions are represented by different sites, the variance of individual &amp;quot;counterfactual&amp;quot; outcomes (i.e. potential outcomes under no treatment) and therefore the variance of control group members&apos; outcomes will differ across sites. This situation can be exacerbated if &amp;quot;the extent of&amp;quot; individual variation in program impacts also varies across sites because of their differences client populations and local conditions. These &amp;quot;differences in individual outcome variation&amp;quot; represent forms of heteroscedasticity which the authors refer to as: (1) T/C heteroscedasticity; and (2) cross-site heteroscedasticity. In this study, the following methodological questions are addressed through a series of simulations: To what extent are estimators of cross-site impact variation biased and tests of statistical significance incorrect when one does not take into account how the variance of individual outcomes differs between treatment and control group members and/or across sites? In other words, in practice, what are the risks of &amp;quot;estimating too few&amp;quot; residual variances and how does this risk vary under a wide range of conditions? (2) Among different estimators that take heteroscedasticity into account--estimators based on either a random-effects model, on a mixed-effects model or on no model (a method of moments estimator)--how do they compare? and (3) What recommendations can be made for practice?</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563208</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Estimating Cross-Site Impact Variation in the Presence of Heteroscedasticity</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grounded Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cervera, Constance M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The number of English language learners (ELLs) in the nation&apos;s classrooms is over five million, an increase of 57% in the last decade. California alone has 1.4 million ELLs in grades K-12 for the 2011-2012 school year, and one-third are secondary students who need to learn English and content in a very short time. These students usually come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, have varied academic proficiencies, and generally attend schools with teachers unprepared to support their academic achievement. Moreover, teachers at the secondary level do not have the skills, knowledge, ability, or disposition to effectively instruct adolescent ELLs. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the perceptions of teachers who instruct ELLs in the secondary mainstream classroom and obtain insight into the preparation needed to effectively instruct ELLs in the secondary mainstream classroom. This qualitative study employed a grounded theory method to systematically collect and analyze the data. The data revealed teachers&apos; feelings of inadequacy in the instruction of ELLs due to the inadequate training in their teacher preparation program, and these perceptions affected their attitudes towards ELLs. The findings in this study support the need for teacher preparation programs to redesign teacher education in order to support the academic achievement of the growing numbers of ELLs in the mainstream classroom. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563209</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher Perceptions of the Preparation Needed to Work Effectively with English Language Learners in the Secondary Mainstream Classroom</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, California Lutheran University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0681-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>171</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600552</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outreach Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Paying for College</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Counselors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pupil Personnel Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Owen, Laura</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bettinger, Eric</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Long, Bridget Terry</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Oreopoulos, Phil</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New Mexico</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Colorado</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Colorado</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Mexico</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Despite increases in postsecondary enrollment at American universities and colleges, there are still significant gaps in who matriculates to college and persists through graduation. Low-income students and students of color continue to be underrepresented in institutions of higher education; for many of these students, a lack of awareness of available financial funding options remains a substantial barrier to college entry and completion. This study investigates whether, among students who begin the summer without firm college plans in place and who have yet to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), the proactive offer and provision of individualized school counselor support leads to improved rates of FAFSA completion and timely college enrollment. The research was conducted across three large urban school districts, Albuquerque Public Schools (APS), Dallas Independent School District (DISD), and Denver Public Schools (DPS). All three districts serve predominantly low-income Hispanic students. Data come from the U.S. Department of Education&apos;s FAFSA completion database and the National Student Clearinghouse database to quantify the impact of summer outreach on FAFSA completion and college enrollment for students who graduated from high school uncommitted to attend college. At the time of this report, the research team is currently working with participating districts to gather de-identified data so they can begin the intervention analysis, looking specifically at any differences between treatment and control group for FAFSA completion and FAFSA initiations. Research and evaluations will be presented at a later date.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563210</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Late Is Too Late? The Influence of Summer Outreach on FAFSA Completion and College Enrollment for the Uncommitted High School Graduate</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>2</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Heuristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Process Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Workshops</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conventional Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hand, Brian</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Therrien, William</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shelley, Mack</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Iowa</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Iowa</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Iowa Tests of Basic Skills</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The U.S. began a new national standards movement in the area of K-12 science education curriculum reform in the 1980s known as &amp;quot;Science for All&amp;quot; to develop a population that is literate in economic and democratic agendas for a global market focused on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) (Duschl, 2008). The National Research Council (NRC) report, Rising above the Gathering Storm (RAGS, NRC, 2007), describes four areas of needed proficiency for science students: generate and evaluate scientific evidence and explanations; know, use, and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world; understand the nature and development of scientific knowledge; and participate productively in scientific practices and discourse. The Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach shifts teaching from memorizing facts about science to focusing on argumentation as a means of learning the big ideas and theories of topics studied. This method, developed by Hand and Keys (1999), focuses on the student&apos;s ability to construct and critique ideas by actively participating in negotiating questioning, claims and evidence. This study was conducted with students in grades 3-5 at 48 elementary schools in Iowa. A cluster randomized experimental design was employed, with random assignment of participating elementary school buildings to SWH treatment (24 schools) or control condition (24 schools). The treatment schools were involved in a 2-year workshop and implementation program to use the SWH approach as the primary teaching and learning approach for the teaching of science. Standardized test scores were obtained for all students from the years immediately prior to the start of the SWH study. Findings showed that the inquiry-based SWH approach to teaching science is associated with a demonstrable reduction in Mathematics and Reading test score disadvantages for students in many traditionally disadvantaged groups. Further, over the two years of learning about science with the SWH approach, the Mathematics and Reading scores for students in disadvantaged schools recovered to the level of their peers who were learning from a traditional approach in more advantaged schools. It is important to note that the disappearance of SWH-exposed students&apos; initial disadvantage in Mathematics and Reading scores following the intervention was not replicated with Science scores. One table is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563211</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining the Impact of Using the Science Writing Heuristic Approach in Learning Science: A Cluster Randomized Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resilience (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 10</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCormick, Meghan P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>O&apos;Connor, Erin E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cappella, Elise</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McClowry, Sandee G.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 10</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A robust body of research has identified associations between positive teacher-child relationships--characterized by high levels of closeness and low levels of conflict--and children&apos;s academic achievement in elementary school (e.g. Roorda, 2012). Additional studies find that high-quality teacher-child relationships may promote academic resilience among lower-income, racial/ethnic minority children at-risk for poor achievement (Crosnoe et al., 2010; Murray &amp;amp; Zvoch, 2011). This work suggests that interventions designed to boost academic achievement in lower-income urban schools should consider targeting teacher-child relationship quality. Research, however, has yet to use multi-level models to infer causal impacts of high-quality teacher-child relationships on academic achievement within this high-risk population of students and schools. The current study uses a multi-level propensity score matching approach to estimate causal effects of a high-quality teacher-child relationship in kindergarten on student math and reading achievement at the transition to first grade. In this study, the researchers compare effects from these models to multi-level regressions, and conduct sensitivity analyses of continuous effects using generalized propensity score matching procedures. The results revealed sizeable, positive impacts of high-quality teacher-child relationships in kindergarten on a standardized measure of math achievement in first grade for a low-income, racial/ethnic minority population of students attending urban schools. However, no effects of high-quality teacher-child relations were detected for reading outcomes in first grade. Two tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563212</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Estimating Causal Effects of Teacher-Child Relationships on Reading and Math Achievement in a High-Risk Sample: A Multi-Level Propensity Score Matching Approach</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>24</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Number Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fairy Tales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feasibility Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nelson-Walker, Nancy J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Doabler, Christian T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fien, Hank</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gause, Marshall</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baker, Scott K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Clarke, Ben</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Oregon</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oregon</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Widespread concern has been expressed about the persistent low mathematics achievement of students in the US, particularly for students from low-income and minority backgrounds and students with disabilities. Instructional gaming technology, when designed and fictionalized well, has the potential to improve the motivation and mathematics achievement of students with or at-risk for mathematics difficulties (MD). Despite these potential advantages, the research base is scant for efficacious technology tools in early mathematics. This paper describes development and testing of the NumberShire intervention, and discusses results from feasibility studies in kindergarten, first, and second grade classrooms. Project NumberShire supports the development of in-depth knowledge of whole number concepts for students with or at risk for MD in grades K-2, a focus recommended by mathematics education experts. NumberShire is a browser-based, educational video game in which players build an idyllic fairytale village by learning and applying whole number knowledge in three domains of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. To test the initial feasibility and usability of NumberShire, researchers aimed to answer four research questions: (1) Is NumberShire reliably efficient and easy for students and teachers to use?; (2) Are students able to focus on and benefit from mathematics content in the game, rather than being distracted by other features?; (3) Are students operating the game as intended?; and (4) Are students engaged in NumberShire mini-games and activities? In fall 2012, 125 students participated in feasibility testing, 50 of which teachers identified as being at risk for difficulties in mathematics on the basis of student performance on screening measures (e.g., EasyCBM) and other classroom assessments. Classrooms were located in three elementary schools in Oregon and Massachusetts. This study used design experiment methodology and iterative end-user testing trials to examine initial feasibility and usability of the NumberShire intervention. Mixed methods research design was also employed to study initial student learning during the feasibility test and guide program revisions in preparation for a formal, rigorous, small scale RCT pilot study to assess intervention promise. Feasibility data were collected in fall 2012 and spring 2013, from a variety of assessment, game, and interview activities. In winter 2013, research staff summarized data from all observations and interviews conducted in second grade classrooms. Results from the first half of the feasibility study suggest second grade students were engaged in and able to use NumberShire with general ease. Second grade teachers perceived the NumberShire intervention as being aligned with important skill objectives and found the features of the intervention useful. Preliminary results suggest NumberShire may support student achievement for second grade students working to demonstrate proficiency with whole number concepts aligned with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSO 2010). Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563213</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Instructional Gaming: Using Technology to Support Early Mathematical Proficiency</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Associations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lobbying</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outreach Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonprofit Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Politics of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Action</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bennett, Stacy M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study sought to gain a better understanding of lobbying by the major DC-based higher education associations. To understand this phenomenon, this study looked at the lobbying tactics used by the associations and how they decide on what lobbying tactics to use. A qualitative, multiple case study approach was used with a sample comprised of association representatives and Congressional staffers. Overall, associations used a variety of tactics, but the for-profit association used more tactics and used all tactics more intensely compared to the non-profit associations. Particular focus was given to the tactic of membership mobilization using a signaling theory framework. Signaling theory explained why membership mobilization is an effective tactic because it signals to legislators that constituents care about an issue and could cause re-election consequences. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563214</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Higher Education Association Lobbying: Grassroots Outreach as a Signal of Constituent Opinion</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0860-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>263</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600645</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Morphemes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Form Classes (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phrase Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pragmatics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structural Analysis (Linguistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Beamer, Brandon Robert</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation presents a novel theory of tense and tense-like constructions. It is named after a key theoretical component of the theory, the event restriction interval. In Event Restriction Interval (ERI) Theory, sentences are semantically evaluated relative to an index which contains two key intervals, the evaluation interval and the event restriction interval. The evaluation interval marks the present relative to context, and the event restriction interval defines temporal boundaries on events. Various constituents, called R-modifiers, operate on these two intervals compositionally, such that each verb is evaluated relative to values which yield correct temporal restrictions. This dissertation develops ERI Theory to present an analysis of independent clauses as well as embedded clauses of various types. One of the positive aspects of ERI Theory is that it offers a purely semantic analysis of the sequence of tense phenomena which occur in the latter. Also, a pragmatic component is presented which accounts for a number of intuitions regarding the usage of tense, while simultaneously providing a solution to some problems related to tense and quantification over times. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563215</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Event Restriction Interval Theory of Tense</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0858-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>160</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600643</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>State History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Historical Interpretation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Historic Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Land Settlement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clergy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Catholics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Church Role</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lorimer, Michelle Marie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Spanish missions that dot the landscape in California today exist as centers of historical interpretation. Visitors to California, residents of the state, and school children often turn to these sites to learn about the early history of the region. Unbeknownst to many visitors, the history presented at many contemporary California mission sites reflects an incomplete, skewed, and biased perspective of the past created in the early-twentieth century by local promoters such as Charles Fletcher Lummis and John Steven McGroarty. This &amp;quot;revisionist&amp;quot; history focused on a romantic and idyllic representation of the mission era--centered on the benevolent work of Spanish priests and celebration of mission ruins. Revisionists pushed Native Californians into the periphery of this manufactured narrative, despite the central role of indigenous people in building, populating, sustaining, and expanding the missions. Following in this tradition, contemporary mission museums continue to present an unhistorical version of the past. Interpreters at these sites frequently ignore such themes as Native labor, Indian resistance, contagious diseases, malnutrition, infant mortality, violence, death, and Spanish-inflicted punishments. They glorify the Spanish priests, deemphasize the role of Native people, and minimize the negative impact of Spanish colonization on California Indian populations. Scholars writing in the late twentieth century provide more accurate and detailed analyses of early California history and the Spanish mission system. However, popular representations of mission history do not reflect scholarly knowledge offered during the past fifty years about the role of Native Californians within the mission system. Interpreters at mission sites today continue to situate colonial California within idyllic depictions consistent with the mission myth. While some contemporary sites attempt to present more balanced and honest representations of the past, sanitized and romanticized narratives remain the most prominent presentation of Spanish missions in California found in popular culture today. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563216</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Reconstructing the Past: Historical Interpretations and Native Experiences at Contemporary California Missions</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Riverside</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0720-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>322</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600585</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Natural Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computational Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bayesian Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sentence Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Robustness (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Generalization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Heuristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yamangil, Elif</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The past two decades have shown an unexpected effectiveness of &amp;quot;Web-scale&amp;quot; data in natural language processing. Even the simplest models, when paired with unprecedented amounts of unstructured and unlabeled Web data, have been shown to outperform sophisticated ones. It has been argued that the effectiveness of Web-scale data has undermined the necessity of sophisticated modeling or laborious data set curation. In this thesis, we argue for and illustrate an alternative view, that Web-scale data not only serves to improve the performance of simple models, but also can allow the use of qualitatively more sophisticated models that would not be deployable otherwise, leading to even further performance gains. We investigate this hypothesis through the use of both &amp;quot;parametric&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Bayesian non-parametric&amp;quot; modeling techniques. First, by comparing rich parametric models against simpler models, we show that richer modeling of Web data brings about qualitative and quantitative performance gains. Experimental results in the application domain of &amp;quot;sentence compression&amp;quot; show that richer models lead to systems with improved robustness and generalization power. In the domain of &amp;quot;lexical correction&amp;quot; we augment a coarse &amp;quot;generative model&amp;quot; with a &amp;quot;discriminative reranking&amp;quot; component that incorporates richer contextual information and achieve improvements in performance. Second, by using the Bayesian nonparametric modeling framework, we show how to induce rich models in fully automatic, data-driven ways as opposed to heuristically. We propose principled and unified solutions to not only the estimation but also the &amp;quot;model selection&amp;quot; problem of the linguistically sophisticated grammar formalisms of &amp;quot;tree-insertion grammars&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;tree-adjoining grammars.&amp;quot; When evaluated in the domain of &amp;quot;syntactic parsing,&amp;quot; our induced grammars do not only lead to improved performance but are also &amp;quot;compact,&amp;quot; allowing for efficient computational processing and linguistic analysis. Further we show that these compact grammars can achieve the same performance gains as the parametric rich models in Web-scale sentence compression experiments. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563217</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Rich Linguistic Structure from Large-Scale Web Data</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0337-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>170</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600271</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Males</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropouts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stereotypes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Support Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Financial Support</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wilborn, Willie J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>During the past decade, Black male students have been enrolling in college in growing numbers. They have also been dropping out of college, prior to graduation, in high numbers. These trends have generated concern among educators and policymakers about the economic future of the Black community. Despite these concerns, most of the research on this topic has addressed topics tangential to the issues that have an impact on Black male college persistence. The purpose of this study was to talk to Black male college graduates and Black male college dropouts to ascertain their feelings and values about certain college expectations, criteria, and possible obstacles that may exist. A qualitative case study design was employed within a purposeful sample of 16 interview respondents. Six topical areas were examined, based on themes derived from the literature including: academic behavior, self-belief, support networks, and financial resources. Emergent themes regarding grade point average, college preparedness, classroom engagement, financial aid, stereotyping, and support were extracted from the interview data and validated via continuous member checking. A key finding was the ability to differentiate between what helped some Black male students persist and graduate and what caused some Black male students to drop out of college. Results can be used by educational policymakers, academicians, and parents to encourage college completion of Black males. Results also may be used to influence the development of programs that will facilitate education progress. More Black males graduating from college will have a profound positive impact on society and the economy of the Black community. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563218</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Factors and Characteristics Influencing the College Enrollment, Retention, and Graduation of Black Males</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0331-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>204</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600265</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Food</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Justice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Agricultural Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Capacity Building</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Activism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainable Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advocacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Sector</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonprofit Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Agricultural Occupations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizen Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Local Issues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nongovernmental Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hutchinson, Carole L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation is an ethnographic study of a New York City-based third-sector organization focused on what it calls &amp;quot;food justice.&amp;quot; This study concentrates on how this organization, that I call Food Rights, has built a broad multi-sector network made up of a varied set of constituents and collaborators aiming to develop and promote an alternative food system for New York City (NYC). This network model has allowed Food Rights to leverage capacity in order to reach thousands of New Yorkers who participate in many different aspects of the local food system (LFS) that correspond to its programming. These include Community Supported Agriculture (CSA), urban agriculture, emergency food, policy and advocacy efforts, and community food education. This dissertation explores the ways that Food Rights navigates the contested space of civil society and the third-sector realm through its LFS efforts--a geography where Food Rights constituents feel they have a say in how local food is grown, distributed, purchased, and prepared. It also considers the complex challenges presented by the burgeoning LFS movement in NYC. This study reveals weak contact points in Food Rights network design as well as organizational strengths that could assist it and other LFS-focused NGOs in addressing the many challenges associated with the social changes that have lead to the spatial, ideological, and material shifts that are transforming the NYC landscape into &amp;quot;a new ontology of food.&amp;quot; [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563219</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Growing toward the Sun: How the Good-Food Movement Catapulted a Small New York City Third-Sector Organization into Rapid Growth, Success, and Many Challenges</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0238-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>198</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600184</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transfer Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Efficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Crosta, Peter Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In the United States, community colleges serve nearly half of the 18 million students enrolled in postsecondary education. However, it has only been the last decade or so where these public, two-year institutions have claimed substantial attention from the research community. This dissertation consists of three essays that focus on aspects of the community college student pathway and feature analyses relevant to research, college, and state stakeholders. The first essay evaluates the effectiveness of structured transfer pathways for Associate in Arts and Associate in Science degrees in North Carolina (called pre-major programs). It asks how these programs impact student behavior and the postsecondary outcomes of earning a community college credential, transferring to a four-year institution, and earning a baccalaureate degree compared to students enrolled in conventional, less structured associate degree programs. The paper employs an instrumental variables technique that exploits exogenous variation in student exposure to the pre-major program opportunity. Among first-time in college students, reduced-form estimates suggest that pre-major programs have a negative intent-to-treat effect on earning the intended community college credential among students enrolled in institutions that offer pre-majors. However, the program offer does not appear to have an effect on four-year credential outcomes. A plausible explanation for the findings is not that structured programs are ineffective, but rather, there likely is a failure in the policies between two-year and four-year colleges that govern the transfer of credits. Alternatively, the programs may simply be too &amp;quot;light touch&amp;quot; to result in detectable impacts. The second essay examines the relationship between community college enrollment patterns and two successful student outcomes--credential completion and transfer to a four-year institution. It also introduces a new way to visualize the various attendance patterns of community college students. Patterns of enrollment intensity (full- or part-time status) and continuity (enrolling in consecutive terms or skipping one or more terms) are graphed and then clustered according to their salient features. Using data on cohorts of first-time community college students at five colleges in a single state, the study finds that over an 18-semester period, ten patterns of attendance account for nearly half the students, with the two most common patterns characterized by enrolling in one semester full time or one semester part time. Among the remaining students who persisted, there is astounding variation in their patterns of enrollment. Clustering reveals two relationships: the first is a positive association between enrollment continuity and earning a community college credential and the second is a positive association between enrollment intensity and the likelihood of transfer. The third essay discusses an economic model for community college pathways. In a departure from cost models that use cross-sectional data to relate college expenditures to student outcomes, this paper takes a longitudinal cohort approach to estimate pathway costs. It suggests a model for estimating costs, revenues, and efficiency metrics for cohorts of students progressing through a community college. The framework is then used to simulate how economic metrics change as intermediate student and institutional goals are accomplished, with a special emphasis on informing colleges engaging in reform processes. It is argued that goals with the greatest efficiency (such as increasing completion rates for students who have earned 30 credits but have not earned a credential) should be preferred when budget consciousness is prioritized. Efficiency is a central theme running through the essays. In the first essay, structured transfer pathways are not found to be more efficient (in terms of student progression) than unstructured pathways, likely due to policy weaknesses. The second essay highlights the scattered enrollment patterns generated by community college students, many of which are not efficient pathways for completing college. The third essay explicitly measures the expenditures and outputs to understand efficiency quantitatively and to see how college reforms may improve efficiency. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563220</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Essays on the Economics of Education: Structured Transfer Programs, Enrollment Patterns, and Efficiency at Community Colleges</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0177-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>168</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600151</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scheduling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Perez, Jerry F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The goal of the dissertation study was to evaluate the existing DG scheduling algorithm. The evaluation was developed through previously explored simulated analyses of DGs performed by researchers in the field of DG scheduling optimization and to improve the current RT framework of the DG at TTU. The author analyzed the RT of an actual DG, thereby enabling other investigators to compare theoretical results with the results of this dissertation case study. Two statistical methods were used to formulate and validate predictive models: multiple linear regression and graphical exploratory data analysis techniques. Using both statistical methods, the author was able to determine that the theoretical model was able to predict the significance of four independent variables of resource fragmentation, computational volatility, resource management, and grid job scheduling on the dependent variables quality of service and job performance affecting RT. After an experimental case study analysis of the DG variables, the author identified the best DG resources to perform optimization of run-time performance of DG at TTU. The projected outcome of this investigation is the improved job scheduling techniques of the DG at TTU. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563221</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Investigation of Run-Time Operations in a Heterogeneous Desktop Grid Environment: The Texas Tech University Desktop Grid Case Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0078-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>246</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600127</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Security</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tyagi, Himanshu</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation concerns the secure processing of distributed data by multiple terminals, using interactive public communication among themselves, in order to accomplish a given computational task. In the setting of a probabilistic multiterminal source model in which several terminals observe correlated random signals, we analyze secure distributed data processing protocols that harness the correlation in the data. The specific tasks considered are: computing functions of the data under secrecy requirements; generating secretly shared bits with minimal rate of public communication; and securely sharing bits in presence of a querying eavesdropper. In studying these various secure distributed processing tasks, we adopt a unified approach that entails examining the form of underlying common randomness (CR) that is generated at the terminals during distributed processing. We make the case that the exact form of established CR is linked inherently to the data processing task at hand, and its characterization can lead to a structural understanding of the associated algorithms. An identification of the underlying CR and its decomposition into independent components, each with a different operational significance, is a recurring fundamental theme at the heart of all the proofs in this dissertation. In addition to leading to new theoretical insights, it brings out equivalences between seemingly unrelated problems. Another distinguishing feature of this work is that it considers interactive communication protocols. In fact, understanding the structure of such interactive communication is a key step in proving our results. We make the following contributions. First, we propose a new information theoretic formulation to study secure distributed computing using public communication. The parties observing distributed data are trusted but an eavesdropper has access to the public communication network. We examine distributed communication protocols that allow the trusted parties to accomplish their required computation tasks while giving away negligible information about a specified portion of the data to an eavesdropper with access to the communication. Our theoretical results provide necessary and sufficient conditions that characterize the feasibility of various secure computing tasks; in many cases of practical importance, these conditions take a simple form and can be verified easily. When secure computing is feasible, we propose new algorithms in special cases. Next, we revisit the problem of generating shared secret keys (SKs). We investigate minimum communication requirements for generating information theoretically secure SKs of maximum rates from correlated observations using interactive public communication. In particular, our approach allows us to examine the role of interaction in such communication. On the one hand, we find that interaction is not needed when the observed correlated bits are symmetrically correlated and therefore, in this case, simple noninteractive protocols are the most efficient means of generating optimum rate SKs. On the other hand, we illustrate that interactive protocols can require a strictly lower rate of overall communication than noninteractive protocols. Finally, we consider the task of ensuring security against an eavesdropper who makes queries about a portion of the distributed data that the terminals share by communicating over a public network. We introduce an alternative notion of secrecy which requires rendering the task of a querying eavesdropper as onerous as possible. Our main contribution in this part is the development of a new technique for proving converse results for secrecy problems involving CR with interactive communication, which is employed then to obtain an upper bound for the maximum number of queries that can be inflicted on the eavesdropper for any CR and corresponding communication. Surprisingly, there is an equivalence between this notion of secrecy and that of information theoretic security, which leads to new theoretical results for SK generation; for instance, we prove a strong converse for the SK capacity. We conclude by hypothesizing the basic principles of secrecy generation that emerge from the results developed in this dissertation. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563222</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Common Randomness Principles of Secrecy</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0064-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>212</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600116</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Magnet Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Work Experience Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Maturity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Identity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reyes, Urlette</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of an experiential program on the occupational identity, access, and career maturity of Black and Latino students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Data shows these students to be underrepresented in STEM fields. Student interest and access are noted in the literature to be amongst the reasons minorities do not pursue a career in STEM related fields. Jobs within the STEM industry pay considerably more than non-STEM related jobs, access to these jobs can help individuals transform their socioeconomic status. Lack of access and exposure to these fields for low socioeconomic minorities then becomes a social justice issue. A mixed methods approach was applied which included surveys and interviews of junior students currently in an experiential careers program with a STEM emphasis. Composites and subscales were created and checked for internal reliability and consistency. Interview responses were recorded and coded based on theories of occupational identity and emergent themes. Findings suggest that most students within the experiential careers program exhibited high levels of occupational identity. The experiential learning model works well to support continuous learning and the identity development of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563223</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Close Look at a STEM-Themed Magnet and Its Experiential Program on the Occupational Identities, Career Maturity, and Access Provided to Low Socioeconomic Minority Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Loyola Marymount University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0053-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>156</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600110</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resilience (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ravitch, Nancy Kathryn</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Oregon</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oregon</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Assessment of social and emotional learning (SEL) in young children is critical to understanding developmental progress and informing care and instruction. The current study investigated the development of a behavior rating scale designed to measure SEL skills in preschool-age children. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the development of a new strength-based assessment prototype, the Social-Emotional Assets and Resiliency Scale for Preschool (SEARS-Pre). Items for the SEARS-Pre were developed based on a review of literature and existing measures and evaluated by a content validation panel of ten experts in the field. Following the content validation and revision process, local preschools were recruited to pilot the final SEARS-Pre measure. Eighteen instructors from three preschool programs in Oregon participated and completed a total of 94 SEARS-Pre rating forms for students in their classrooms. Results from an exploratory factor analysis suggested three factors: Self-regulation/Social competence; 2) Emotion knowledge/Expression; and 3) Empathy/Responsibility. The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency, with alpha values of 0.95 for Factor 1 (Self-Regulation/Social Competence), 0.92 for Factor 2 (Emotion Knowledge/Expression), 0.90 for Factor 3 (Empathy/Responsibility), and 0.97 for the total score (all three factors). [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563224</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Development and Preliminary Validation of the Social-Emotional Assets and Resiliency Scale for Preschool</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oregon</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0051-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>116</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600108</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teamwork</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Business</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Path Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Location</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holistic Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Strategic Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Dissemination</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ngoma, Ngoma Sylvestre</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Virtual teams are increasingly viewed as a powerful determinant of competitive advantage in geographically distributed organizations. This study was designed to provide insights into the interdependencies between virtual collaboration, collaboration technologies, knowledge transfer, and virtual team performance in an effort to understand whether this interplay strengthens the effectiveness of virtual teams. The results of path analysis and multiple regression of data gathered from a sample of 219 key informants revealed that the four constructs were interlaced. The study provided evidence to support the thesis that virtual collaboration and collaboration technologies support lead to successful knowledge transfer, which in turn leads to effective team performance in geographically distributed organizations. The study findings substantiated the interrelationships and confirmed the predicted alternative hypotheses. Based on social impact theory, the study shed light on the importance of a holistic approach encompassing the four constructs to maximize the beneficial effects of virtual teams. The researcher concluded that the significance of the relationships between the variables implies a strategic planning framework for aligning virtual collaborative systems with organizational goals. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563225</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Virtual Collaboration and Collaboration Technologies on Knowledge Transfer and Team Performance in Distributed Organizations</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0041-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>136</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600101</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Utilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Energy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Weather</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Operations Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adoption (Ideas)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk Management</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Houston, Clemith J., Jr.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study investigated the relationship between organizational processes that have been identified as promoting resiliency and their impact on service reliability within the scope of critical infrastructure providers. The importance of critical infrastructure to the nation is evident from the body of research and is supported by instances where critical infrastructure has been negatively impacted and this has created significant implications for those that rely upon it. The CERT-RMM framework is one of a number of models that has been created to assist organizations with improving their ability to respond to threats to critical infrastructure. This study utilized a subset of the CERT-RMM framework processes and representatives from the electric utility industry to determine the level of adoption of these processes in their organizations and obtain metrics regarding their level of process capability and looked at their relationship to historical levels of service reliability. The results of a process capability questionnaire were used to establish the relationship between process capability and service reliability, including moderating factors and their impact to service reliability. The questionnaire evaluated eleven process areas, including risk management to determine levels of process capability. The findings of the study established support for the overall model, in addition to relationships between service reliability and two levels of process capability as defined by the CERT-RMM model. The moderating impact of weather events upon service reliability was also established. The study supported the usefulness of process capability and other emerging maturity models in measuring how well organizations are establishing and preparing their operations to withstand impacts to service reliability and that trends of improved service reliability in the United States can be attributed to these models. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563226</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Process Capability on Service Reliability for Critical Infrastructure Providers</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0022-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>233</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600087</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Public School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Burnout</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stress Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mental Health</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Depression (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Symptoms (Individual Disorders)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Well Being</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hinds, Erika D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Oregon</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oregon</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Job dissatisfaction in American public school teachers is at its lowest in 20 years. Workplace stress is a primary factor associated with job dissatisfaction, and teachers are exposed to a range of potential stressors including student problem behavior, difficult interpersonal interactions, and job insecurity. Research has shown significant and strong correlations between low job satisfaction and burnout, depression, anxiety, and decreased efficacy. Although negative outcomes associated with stress impact many teachers, others successfully cope. Experiential avoidance, a relatively new psychological construct, may play a role in why some teachers experience negative outcomes related to stressful work conditions while others do not. To further our understanding of the role of experiential avoidance in teacher functioning, the present study investigated the psychometric properties of a new measure of teacher experiential avoidance and examined the relationships between aspects of teacher stress (i.e., student problem behavior, job dissatisfaction, and low social support), experiential avoidance, and mental health symptoms. Oregon teachers (n = 523) completed measures assessing social support, job satisfaction, the impact of student problem behavior on their teaching, experiential avoidance, depression, burnout, and teaching efficacy. Results showed 1) good reliability and validity for a teacher experiential avoidance measure; 2) that experiential avoidance was significantly associated with all mental health measures in the expected directions; 3) that there were no statistically significant differences between men and women in the relationships between experiential avoidance and teacher mental health measures; 4) a significant interaction effect between job satisfaction, experiential avoidance, and depression; and 5) full mediation of the association between student problem behavior and depression when controlling for experiential avoidance and partial mediation of the relationship between student problem behavior and emotional exhaustion. Findings suggest that experiential avoidance may be an important factor in teachers&apos; psychological well-being. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563227</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Role of Experiential Avoidance in Teacher Stress and Mental Health</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oregon</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0021-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>107</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600086</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Head Injuries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Neurological Impairments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Athletics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>War</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nontraditional Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rehabilitation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metacognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Textbooks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recall (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Griffiths, Gina G.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Adults with mild to moderate acquired brain injury (ABI) often pursue post-secondary or professional education after their injuries in order to enter or re-enter the job market. An increasing number of these adults report problems with reading-to-learn. The problem is particularly concerning given the growing population of adult survivors of ABI. Combat-related brain trauma and sports concussions are two factors contributing to increases in traumatic brain injuries, while higher incidences of stroke in young adults and better rates of survival after brain tumors are contributing to increases in non-traumatic brain injuries. Despite the rising need, empirical evaluation of reading comprehension interventions for adults with ABI is scarce. This study used a within-subject design to evaluate whether adult college students with ABI with no more than moderate cognitive impairments benefited from using a multi-component reading comprehension strategy package to improve comprehension of expository text. The strategy package was based on empirical support from the cognitive rehabilitation literature that shows individuals with ABI benefit from metacognitive strategy training to improve function in other academic activities. Further empirical support was drawn from the special education literature that demonstrates other populations of struggling readers benefit from reading comprehension strategy use. In this study, participants read chapters from an introductory-level college Anthropology textbook in two different conditions: strategy and no-strategy. The results indicated that providing these readers with reading comprehension strategies was associated with better recall of correct information units in two free recall tasks: one elicited immediately after reading the chapter, and one elicited the following day. The strategy condition was also associated with better efficiency of recall in the delayed task and a more accurate ability to recognize statements from a sentence verification task designed to reflect the local and global coherence of the text. The findings support further research into using reading comprehension strategies as an intervention approach for the adult ABI population. Future research needs include identifying how to match particular reading comprehension strategies to individuals, examining whether reading comprehension performance improves further through the incorporation of systematic training, and evaluating texts from a range of disciplines and genres. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563228</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluation of a Reading Comprehension Strategy Package to Improve Reading Comprehension of Adult College Students with Acquired Brain Injuries</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oregon</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0018-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>135</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600083</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Television</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Programming (Broadcast)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Archives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Documentation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Museums</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bratslavsky, Lauren Michelle</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The dissertation offers a historical inquiry about how television&apos;s material traces entered archival spaces. Material traces refer to both the moving image products and the assortment of documentation about the processes of television as industrial and creative endeavors. By identifying the development of television-specific archives and collecting areas in the 1950s to the 1970s, the dissertation contributes to television studies, specifically pointing out how television materials were conceived as cultural and historical materials &amp;quot;worthy&amp;quot; of preservation and academic study. Institutions, particularly academic and cultural institutions with archival spaces, conferred television with a status of legitimacy alongside the ascent of television studies in the 1960s and 1970s. Institutions were sites of legitimation, however, television&apos;s entrance into these archival spaces depended on the work of various individuals within academic, archival, and industrial structures who grappled with defining television&apos;s intangible archival values and dealt with material obstacles. In examining several major institutions and the factors at play in archiving television, we can trace how television was valued as worthy of academic study and conceptualized as historical evidence. The following research questions structured this historical inquiry: How did different institutions approach television as archivable in the 1950s to the 1970s? Who were the determinators within these institutions, who could conceptualize television as archivable? What were the factors that enabled television&apos;s material traces to enter archival spaces? How did television directly or indirectly enter these archival spaces? Drawing on historical methods, the research primarily examined the &amp;quot;archives of the archives,&amp;quot; meaning institutional documents that illuminated the archival process and perceptions about television and media. The dissertation focused on five case studies: the Museum of Modern Art, the Mass Communications History Center at the State Historical Society of Wisconsin, the Wisconsin Center for Film and Theater Research, the UCLA Film and Television Archives, and the Museum of Broadcasting. These case studies represent the various institutional contexts that applied an archival logic to television. Cultural institutions, academic archives, and industry-initiated archives worked as sites to legitimate television, transforming ephemeral broadcast moments into lasting historical and cultural material. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563229</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>From Ephemeral to Legitimate: An Inquiry into Television&apos;s Material Traces in Archival Spaces, 1950s-1970s</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oregon</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9996-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>471</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600068</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foster Care</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alumni</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Antisocial Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Taglianetti, Victor J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Devastating life experiences continually plague many foster care youth throughout their entire lives on social, emotional, educational, psychological, and physical levels. Oftentimes, the cumulative effect of these events results in large numbers of individuals dropping out of school and becoming increasingly disconnected from people and many social situations (Wagner, Newman, Cameto, Garza, &amp;amp; Levine, 2005). In their work, Wagner et al. (2005) define or view social disconnection as foster youth who have dropped out of school, run away from their homes, foster care placements, rehabilitations, detention centers, or who do not seek employment, join clubs, or spend time with friends. Although thousands of foster youth endure such incredible obstacles from infancy and later become entangled in a morass of events, which inexorably lead to their social disconnection and ultimately to their life-failures, many others manage to defy the odds and achieve a measure of success in adulthood. This proposed study investigated why some individuals do not succumb to social disconnection and its disastrous consequences while trying to determine what events make a difference or provide the turning points in the lives of individuals who were formerly in foster care. The intended research utilized a case study, interview approach to identify what Espinoza (2011) refers to as the critical, pivotal moments in the lives of these individuals. Two case studies were developed: one focused on a person who had been identified with a disability and the other focused on a person without disabilities. The overall goal of this research is that if individuals in foster care can define the turning points or pivotal moments in their lives and clearly articulate what makes the difference for them, then this study might influence institutional policies in education and other aspects of their lives to implement specific practices and programs that could increase educational and career outcomes for youths in foster care. The hope is that such knowledge sets individuals on a course that results in more positive adult outcomes and avoids paths that typically lead to a continuing downward spiral and an unsuccessful transition into adulthood. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563230</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Overcoming Social Disconnection and Its Consequences for Transition into Adulthood: Case Studies of Adults Who Exited Foster Care</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9977-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>202</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600059</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Entrepreneurship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participant Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Governance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Qiu, Yixin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This two-essay dissertation aims to study institutional logics in the context of Apple&apos;s independent third-party software developers. In essay 1, I investigate the embedded agency aspect of the institutional logics theory. It builds on the premise that logics constrain preferences, interests and behaviors of individuals and organizations, thereby determining the appropriate and legitimate decisions and actions of actors. In the meantime, most social actors operate in fields characterized by multiple institutional logics where contradictions exist, allowing individuals and organizations with opportunities for negotiation and change through exploitation or management of these contradictions. I specifically study two competing institutional logics: professional and market logics when they are experienced simultaneously by independent iOS app entrepreneurs. Using participant observation and semi-structured interviews, I delineate the ways in which logic tension is reconciled through mechanisms of &amp;quot;logic synthesis&amp;quot; in three entrepreneurial areas--app ideation, app execution and app marketing, and conditions which facilitate or inhibit logic synthesis. In essay 2, I study the emergence and evolution of field-level logics in the context of Apple&apos;s desktop developers--Mac indies. Following the cultural emergence model of field-level logics in Thornton et al. (2012), and the argument that &amp;quot;field-level logics are both embedded in societal-level logics and subject to field-level processes that generate distinct forms of instantiation, variation, and combination of societal logics&amp;quot; (p148), I particularly examine the relationship between resource environment and the emergence and evolution of field-level logics. Taking advantage of a critical change in developers&apos; resource environment--Apple&apos;s opening of the iOS App Store and subsequently the Mac App Store, and hence its governance model shifting from mainly a technological platform to a platform that includes a market exchange place, I identify developers&apos; logics before and after the change, namely, the software ecosystem logic and platform ecosystem logic. Two ideal types are constructed for the logics along elemental categories, and a content analysis demonstrates the logic shift pattern as resource environments change. A further analysis of the two logics suggests that the software ecosystem logic and platform ecosystem logic are in contestation at this early stage of institutional change. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563231</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Institutional Logics, Indie Software Developers and Platform Governance</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9955-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>153</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600045</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Disturbances</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Day Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journal Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Conditions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pressley, Denise Marie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In an attempt to provide educational services to students eligible to receive special education, school systems are using beginning out-of-field teachers. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to determine which skills, knowledge, training methods, and support beginning out-of-field special education teachers identified as necessary to teach students with emotional/behavioral disorders (EBD) in a private separate day school. Journal responses, questionnaires, and one-on-one interviews were used to understand the lived experiences of 9 beginning out-of-field special education teachers. Guided by Bandura&apos;s social learning/cognitive theory, which indicates that a great deal of learning happens within the social environment, and theory of self-efficacy, which holds that a teacher&apos;s self-efficacy is about what he or she brings to a student learning, the research questions focused on the type of teaching and coping methods beginning out-of-field special education teachers need to feel supportive and effective. Coded data were analyzed for themes. The findings indicated that beginning out-of-field special education teachers believe that in order to be effective teachers of students with EBD, they need time, experience, and continual professional development. The results also showed that being a teacher of students with EBD is a very detailed and complex task. This is a socially significant issue to educators and administrators who are concerned about the quality and training of teachers for students with EBD. The study will help teachers of students with EBD and other special education teachers to understand and develop the knowledge and skills necessary for students growth and achievement and educators overall professional development. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563232</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Beginning Special Education Teachers of Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9954-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>147</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600044</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Auditory Perception</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Native Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vowels</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bilingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Monolingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Listening</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonemes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interlanguage</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Barrios, Shannon L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Adult second language (L2) learners often experience difficulty producing and perceiving non-native phonological contrasts. Even highly proficient bilinguals, who have been exposed to an L2 for long periods of time, struggle with difficult contrasts, such as /r/-/l/ for Japanese learners of English. To account for the relative ease or difficulty with which L2 learners perceive and acquire non-native contrasts, theories of (L2) speech perception often appeal to notions of similarity. But how is similarity best determined? In this dissertation I explored the predictions of two theoretical approaches to similarity comparison in the second language, and asked: (1) How should L2 sound similarity be measured? (2) What is the nature of the representations that guide sound similarity? (3) To what extent can the influence of the native language be overcome? In Chapter 2, I tested a &amp;quot;legos&amp;quot; (featural) approach to sound similarity. Given a distinctive feature analysis of Spanish and English vowels, I investigated the hypothesis that feature availability in the L1 grammar constrains which target language segments will be accurately perceived and acquired by L2 learners (Brown [1998], Brown [2000]). Our results suggest that second language acquisition of phonology is not limited by the phonological features used by the native language grammar, nor is the presence/use of a particular phonological feature in the native language grammar sufficient to trigger redeployment. I take these findings to imply that feature availability is neither a necessary, nor a sufficient condition to predict learning outcomes. In Chapter 3, I extended a computational model proposed by Feldman et al. (2009) to nonnative speech perception, in order to investigate whether a sophisticated &amp;quot;rulers&amp;quot; (spatial) approach to sound similarity can better explain existing interlingual identification and discrimination data from Spanish monolinguals and advanced L1 Spanish late-learners of English, respectively. The model assumes that acoustic distributions of sounds control listeners&apos; ability to discriminate a given contrast. I found that, while the model succeeded in emulating certain aspects of human behavior, the model at present is incomplete and would have to be extended in various ways to capture several aspects of nonnative and L2 speech perception. In Chapter 4 I explored whether the phonological relatedness among sounds in the listeners native language impacts the perceived similarity of those sounds in the target language. Listeners were expected to be more sensitive to the contrast between sound pairs which are allophones of different phonemes than to sound pairs which are allophones of the same phoneme in their native language. Moreover, I hypothesized that L2 learners would experience difficulty perceiving and acquiring target language contrasts between sound pairs which are allophones of the same phoneme in their native language. Our results suggest that phonological relatedness may influence perceived similarity on some tasks, but does not seem to cause long-lasting perceptual difficulty in advanced L2 learners. On the basis of those findings, I argue that existing models have not been adequately explicit about the nature of the representations and processes involved in similarity-based comparisons of L1 and L2 sounds. More generally, I describe what I see as a desirable target for an explanatorily adequate theory of cross-language influence in L2 phonology. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563233</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Similarity in L2 Phonology</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9909-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>165</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600018</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board, Office of Research and Development</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report presents the findings from a replication of the Kobrin et al. (2008) and Mattern et al. (2008) reports. Students who were missing at least one of the following were excluded from the analyses: SAT scores, a self-reported high school grade point average (HSGPA), and a valid first-year GPA (FYGPA); this resulted in a final sample size of 159,286. Based on Powers (2004), the analytical procedure for computing multiple correlations was modified slightly from what was done in the two original reports. This document presents the updated tables for the 2007 sample, and the findings are largely the same. A list of participating institutions is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563234</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validity of the SAT for Predicting FYGPA: 2007 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report No. 2009-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-12-30</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tables (Data)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The continued accumulation of validity evidence for the core uses of educational assessments is critical to ensure that proper inferences will be made for those core purposes. To that end, the College Board has continued to follow previous cohorts of college students and this report provides updated validity evidence for using the SAT to predict first-year college grade point average (FYGPA) for the 2010 cohort. Colleges and universities (henceforth, &amp;quot;institutions&amp;quot;) provided data on the cohort of first-time, first-year students enrolling in the fall of 2010. The College Board combined those college outcomes data with official SAT scores and SAT Questionnaire response data. In particular, 160 institutions provided data on 287,881 students with 211,403 having complete data on high school grade point average (HSGPA), SAT critical reading (SAT-CR), mathematics (SAT-M), and writing (SAT-W), and FYGPA. As has been shown in previous work (Kobrin, Patterson, Shaw, Mattern, &amp;amp; Barbuti, 2008; Patterson, Mattern, &amp;amp; Kobrin, 2009; Patterson &amp;amp; Mattern, 2011; Patterson &amp;amp; Mattern, 2012), the correlation of SAT section scores and HSGPA with FYGPA was strong (r = 0.63). When compared with the correlation of HSGPA alone with FYGPA (r = 0.54), the addition of the SAT section scores to HSGPA represented a substantial increase (?r = 0.09) in the correlation with FYGPA. The patterns of differential validity by institutional and student characteristics and differential prediction by student characteristics also follow the same general patterns, as has been shown in previous work (Mattern, Patterson, Shaw, Kobrin, &amp;amp; Barbuti, 2008; Patterson, et al., 2009; Patterson &amp;amp; Mattern, 2011; Patterson &amp;amp; Mattern, 2012). The following are appended: (1) Institutions Providing First-Year Outcomes Data for the 2010 Cohort; (2) Raw Correlations of SAT and HSGPA with FYGPA by Institutional Characteristics; and (3) Raw Correlation of SAT Scores and HSGPA with FYGPA by Subgroups.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563235</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validity of the SAT® for Predicting First-Year Grades: 2010 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report 2013-2</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computational Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Task Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Turkish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Morphology (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dictionaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Acoustics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Science</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hutchinson, Brian</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Language modeling is one of many problems in language processing that have to grapple with naturally high ambient dimensions. Even in large datasets, the number of unseen sequences is overwhelmingly larger than the number of observed ones, posing clear challenges for estimation. Although existing methods for building smooth language models tend to work well in general, they make assumptions that are not well suited to training with limited data. This thesis introduces a new approach to language modeling that makes different assumptions about how best to smooth the distributions, aimed at better handling the limited data scenario. Among these, it assumes that some words and word sequences behave similarly to others and that similarities can be learned by parameterizing a model with matrices or tensors and controlling the matrix or tensor rank. This thesis also demonstrates that sparsity acts as a complement to the low rank parameters: a low rank component learns the regularities that exist in language, while a sparse one captures the exceptional sequence phenomena. The sparse component not only improves the quality of the model, but the exceptions identified prove to be meaningful for other language processing tasks, making the models useful not only for computing probabilities but as tools for the analysis of language. Three new language models are introduced in this thesis. The first uses a factored low rank tensor to encode joint probabilities. It can be interpreted as a &amp;quot;mixture of unigrams&amp;quot; model and is evaluated on an English genre-adaptation task. The second is an exponential model parameterized by two matrices: one sparse and one low rank. This &amp;quot;Sparse Plus Low Rank Language Model&amp;quot; (SLR-LM) is evaluated with data from six languages, finding consistent gains over the standard baseline. Its ability to exploit features of words is used to incorporate morphological information in a Turkish language modeling experiment, with some improvements over a word-only model. Lastly, its use to discover words in an unsupervised fashion from sub-word segmented data is presented, showing good performance in finding dictionary words. The third model extends the SLR-LM in order to capture diverse and overlapping influences on text (e.g. topic, genre, speaker) using additive sparse matrices. The &amp;quot;Multi-Factor SLR-LM&amp;quot; is evaluated on three corpora with different factoring structures, showing improvements in perplexity and the ability to find high quality factor-dependent keywords. Finally, models and training algorithms are presented that extend the low rank ideas of the thesis to sequence tagging and acoustic modeling. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563236</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Rank and Sparsity in Language Processing</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9435-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>135</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599731</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Emotional Disturbances</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Persuasive Discourse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liberty, Lisa M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Students with emotional behavioral disorders (EBD) are well known for their challenging, demanding, unpredictable, and difficult behaviors. Many students with EBD exhibit significant academic deficits, especially in writing. Writing instruction is challenging for teachers because they lack knowledge of the writing process, strategies, and resources to teach writing. Professional development (PD) and coaching provides teachers with opportunities for sustained learning of content and pedagogy, which can result in improved student outcomes. In this study, a multiple baseline across participant design was used to examine the effects of PD and coaching on special education teachers&apos; dispositions, instructional practice, and students&apos; writing performance. Special education teachers were able to learn an effective strategy to teach students with EBD how to write persuasive essays. Results indicate that PD and coaching was effective in increasing the percentage of writing instructional behaviors teachers used to teach writing. Students showed improved outcomes in the number of persuasive elements they included in their essays. The results of this study suggest PD and coaching is a promising way to provide teachers with opportunities to learn how to teach an evidence-based writing instructional method. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563237</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Influence of Professional Development for Special Education Teachers: Self-Regulated Strategy Development in Writing for Students with Emotional Behavioral Disorders</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9468-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>203</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599752</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trust (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gyenfie, Karen D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research project was organized in three phases. Phase I began with the selection of the high performing urban school site to be studied. Phase II of the study centered on the researcher&apos;s study of the school&apos;s policies, curriculum, instructional practices, personnel, and related artifacts. The researcher processed, analyzed, and coded all data in accordance to qualitaive standards in order to identify those indigenous practices that impact the success of the school. The findings of the study including the following: 1) School improvement is a multifaceted endeavor that requires the commitment of the entire school community; 2) Schools seeking to improve must strengthen multiple areas such as those identified in the NECA Best Practice Framework (curriculum and academic goals; staff selection, leadership and capacity building; instructional programs, practices, and arrangements; monitoring, compilation, analysis and use of data; recognition, intervention and adjustment); 3) Schools must develop relational trust, maintain instructional program coherence, and establish a professional learning community; and 4) Finally, none of these laudable precepts identified by best practices, relational trust, and instructional program coherence would have any chance without a highly competent principal who embodies respect for the school&apos;s students, teachers, and parents. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563238</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Ethos of Excellence in an Effective School: A Study of an Exemplary Urban School</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Illinois State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9623-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>157</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599846</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Video Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Profiles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Industry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Psychology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Frye, Jonathan M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>For decades, game designers and game studies experts have largely sought to understand video game players through a lens of experience and observation. Meanwhile, social science research has focused on the empirical understanding of video game players using a variety of psychological constructs. This study focuses on the creation and evaluation of Player Profiles, a theoretical framework which builds upon both the experience and knowledge of game designers and game studies academics with the empirical research of social scientists. This bridge establishes seven different Player Profiles: Competitor, Explorer, Socializer, Challenger/Achiever, Escaper, and Stimulation Seeker. Two studies are presented, investigating the validity of the Player Profile Framework and examining its potential use in game design to increase learning and engagement in educational games for adolescents. A large scale survey of adults and small scale survey of adolescents were conducted. Participants completed validated measures of goal orientation, personality aspects, and video game uses and gratification. Additional questionnaires included the Player Profile Questionnaire (PPQ) and a measure of preferred video game features. A model-based cluster analysis of the adult sample revealed implications for cultural differences in player profiles as well as indications that players exhibit multiple player profiles. Analysis of the PPQ establishes the first significant empirical link between game design experience and the psychological constructs examined, also revealing a consistency between adolescents and adults. A second study asked adolescents from study 1 to play two learning games, each featuring prominent game design features intended for a specific profile, Competitor or Fantasizer. Although results were mixed, players who met the criteria for the Fantasizer profile scored significantly higher on the posttest of the Force Fantasy game than those who did not. Results establish the potential of the Player Profile Framework and create a foundation for future research. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563239</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Video Game Player Profiles: Bridging Industry, Game Studies and Social Science Perspectives</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9664-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>190</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599871</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Youth Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescent Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Media Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizen Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Expression</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Males</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>After School Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>James, Coran</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this interpretive study was to understand how students made sense of their experiences in a technology-based youth development program. This study was framed by James P. Connell and Michelle A. Gambone&apos;s, Community Action Framework for Youth Development, conceptual model for understanding youth development that identifies the processes that promote a successful transition from adolescence to adulthood and what it will take to transform communities into places where all young people, particularly those young people currently least likely to succeed, can achieve their fullest potential. The study was guided by three primary research questions: How does this program seek to expand participants&apos; access to and growth in media literacy, civic engagement and self-expression? How do students make sense of their experiences in this technology-based youth development program and How does the program influence their understanding of and involvement in media literacy, civic engagement and self-expression? Norman Denzin&apos;s (2001), methodology, interpretive interactionism, guided this in-depth case study of the program at the JFK Center and the lives of four boys who participated in it. Through interviews and observations of four boys, we see the challenges that the boys faced in school, at home and in their communities and how the JFK Center provided a physically and socio-emotional safe place for them to engage with technology during non school hours and summers. This study captures the processes at the JFK Center that created greater supports and opportunities for the boys, specially around their experiences with technology. The findings of this study offers educators, community organizations and policymakers greater insight into the obstacles facing youth who struggle to gain access to and use of technology. The findings of this study suggest that current educational policies, accountability and high-stakes testing, focusing only on the cognitive academic needs of youth are problematic, as are afterschool experiences that merely extend the school day. Through the findings of this case study, we see that students benefit greatly by technology-based educational/recreational programs that address the broader spectrum of human needs-social, emotional, academic and for today&apos;s youth-technological. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563240</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Net Generation of Youth: A Case Study of Students in a Technology-Based Youth Development Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, New York University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9671-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>162</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599878</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>American Indian Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Reservations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Isolation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Salary Wage Differentials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Location</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Krogman, Calvin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>For many Native American students, particularly those from reservations, the pursuit of higher education is a formidable concept to grasp. Poverty, rural isolation, and a myriad of social ills all take a role as demotivational factors that act as barriers between Native American students and a college education. On the other hand, family, community, and hope for a better future motivate many students to overcome these barriers and to pursue a college degree. This quantitative study explored Native American high school seniors&apos; perceptions of both motivating and demotivating factors for the pursuit of higher education. This study utilized a researcher-developed survey based on literature. It reviewed factors that might be perceived as motivational or demotivational by Native American high school senior students. There were 370 survey responses that were utilized in the survey. Participant responses came from ten different high schools, five located on Native American reservations, five located off of, but in close proximity to, reservations. The survey used a five-point Likert scale to assess students&apos; perceptions of motivational and demotivational factors toward higher education. The survey also collected responses on demographic data for selected criteria for further statistical analysis to observe any differences based on demographics. The data were analyzed using means, standard deviations, and t tests. The findings from this study indicate that better job opportunities and earning potential were the highest perceived motivating factors, wheras cost, distance, and difficulty of college coursework were the highest perceived demotivational factors for Native American students. Furthermore, this survey found that statistically significant differences existed in perceptions of motivating factors for students based on the demographic characteristics observed; gender, high school location, first generation status, college preparation program participation, likelihood of attending college. Finally, this study found that Native American high school seniors&apos; perceptions of motivational and demotivational factors toward higher education were mostly similar to their non-Native American peers. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563241</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Native American High School Seniors&apos; Perceptions of Higher Education: Motivating and Demotivating Factors</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of South Dakota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9673-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>106</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599880</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advocacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Activism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Capital</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mediratta, Kavitha</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation examines the effects of participation in grassroots organizing on the capacity and commitment of public school parents and community members to engage in future activism. The study used a mixed-methods research design, drawing on qualitative and quantitative data collected from individuals involved in seven exemplar organizations. A growing literature has examined the impacts of grassroots community organizing on public schools, but to date, there has not been a systematic examination of how participation in such efforts influences the personal trajectory of members involved to determine if they develop greater propensity to engage in activism, in school reform or other social issues, over the long term. Drawing on social capital, resource and learning theories, I develop a conceptual model explaining how and why involvement in grassroots organizing increases the propensity for future activism among participants. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to test this model. Results indicate that participation in organizing is significantly and positively related to: (1) beliefs in collective action; (2) sense of self-efficacy; and (3) feelings of community attachment and engagement. The relationship between participation and the propensity for activism was influenced by organizational learning practices, specifically, the extent to which members were helped to develop democratic leadership skills, understanding of systems and advocacy knowledge, and awareness of their capacity to generate change. Organizational strategies that supported this development include: (a) apprenticeship and mentoring; (b) a focus on engaging members through participatory deliberation and action; and (c) the cultivation of members&apos; understanding of power dynamics and their critical consciousness. Learning strategies appeared most influential on newer members, suggesting a need to develop higher-order learning opportunities for more experienced members. This study is relevant to policymakers, researchers and practitioners who aim to improve urban public schooling. Successful reform requires creating a normative and political context that will be supportive of change both inside schools and within the surrounding community. Therefore, forms of parental engagement that enhance community members&apos; awareness of the structural contributors to schooling inequalities, and build their leadership and base of power to address them, are critically important to generating long-term improvements in public schools. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563242</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Parent Power and Public Education Reform: The Experience of Participation in Grassroots Organizing</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9680-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>240</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599885</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Eye Movements</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Brain</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mandarin Chinese</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Input</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sentences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chow, Wing Yee</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This thesis explores how predictions about upcoming language inputs are computed during real-time language comprehension. Previous research has demonstrated humans&apos; ability to use rich contextual information to compute linguistic prediction during real-time language comprehension, and it has been widely assumed that contextual information can impact linguistic prediction as soon as it arises in the input. This thesis questions this key assumption and explores how linguistic predictions develop in real-time. I provide event-related potential (ERP) and reading eye-movement (EM) evidence from studies in Mandarin Chinese and English that even prominent and unambiguous information about preverbal arguments&apos; structural roles cannot immediately impact comprehenders&apos; verb prediction. I demonstrate that the N400, an ERP response that is modulated by a word&apos;s predictability, becomes sensitive to argument role-reversals only when the time interval for prediction is widened. Further, I provide initial evidence that different sources of contextual information, namely, information about preverbal arguments&apos; lexical identity vs. their structural roles, may impact linguistic prediction on different time scales. I put forth a research framework that aims to characterize the mental computations underlying linguistic prediction along a temporal dimension. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563243</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Temporal Dimension of Linguistic Prediction</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3034-9766-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>269</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3599944</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time to Degree</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attrition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ifill, Nicole</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Radford, Alexandria Walton</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wu, Joanna</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cataldi, Emily Forrest</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wilson, David</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hill, Jason</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Beginning Postsecondary Students Long Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Center for Education Statistics (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>RTI International</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report provides a &amp;quot;first look&amp;quot; at selected findings from the 2012/14 Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (BPS:12/14). It is based on final data describing a nationally representative sample of undergraduates who entered postsecondary education for the first time during the 2011-12 academic year. BPS:12/14 covers the experiences of these first-time beginning students over 3 academic years, 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14, and provides information about the rates at which students completed degrees or certificates as well as the rates at which they persisted at the same institution, transferred to other institutions, or left postsecondary education without completing degrees or certificates. The findings presented in this report have been chosen to demonstrate the range of information available when using BPS data rather than to discuss all of the observed differences, and they are not meant to emphasize any particular issue. The first-time postsecondary students in the BPS:12/14 study were identified in the 2011-12 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:12). NPSAS:12 is a nationally representative sample of about 95,000 undergraduate and 16,000 graduate students attending about 1,500 Title IV eligible postsecondary institutions in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. First-time beginners in the BPS:12/14 study participated in two interviews: in 2012, at the end of their first year in postsecondary education, and 3 years after they had started postsecondary education in 2014. The following are appended: (1) Glossary; and (2) Technical Notes and Methodology.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563244</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Persistence and Attainment of 2011-12 First-Time Postsecondary Students after 3 Years. First Look. NCES 2016-401</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Center for Education Statistics</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>78</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Center for Education Statistics. Available from: ED Pubs. P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398. Tel: 877-433-7827; Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES09C0039</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link>http://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2016401</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Astronomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Misconceptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bostan Sarioglan, Ayberk</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Küçüközer, Hüseyin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Tukeys Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research was a cross-age study that sought to determine and compare students&apos; ideas about the causes of the seasons. Toward this aim, the research was carried out with 974 students at different educational levels and across the various age groups. First, the data obtained from the responses to the open-ended question was categorized according to a rubric formulated in line with the goal of the study.The methodology used in analyzing the data derived from the interviews was a grouped categorization of those responses that were construed as having similar intended meanings. Statistically, a significant difference was found between the groups of university students aged 20-22 and the other groups of students who were between the ages of 10-19. In addition, whereas the frequency of encountering some misconceptions decreased with age, on the other hand, the frequency of other misconceptions showed an increase in older students. At the same time, there were some misconceptions which did not vary significantly in frequency across the age groups and still others that did show changes.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563245</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>From Elementary to University Students&apos; Ideas about Causes of the Seasons</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Journal of Turkish Science Education v12 n2 p3-20 Jun 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-06-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>18</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>39</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McLeod, Linda P.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Ontario</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mann Whitney U Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Canada</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The fact that some learners learn language more successfully than others who are at the same level of aptitude and capabilities is inevitable. To understand why, the researcher has focused her attention on individual differences among learners. The ones that have been taken into account in this study are namely called self-efficacy and identity processing styles and the relationship between them in EFL learners. In addition, the difference between the identity processing styles among male and female participants is investigated. A group of 20 MA students from the Ontario College of Teachers, Canada participated in the study. Quantitative data were collected through two questionnaires namely the Revised Identity Style Inventory (ISI-4) which was developed by Berzonsky et al. (2011) and a general self-efficacy scale. Getting benefit of SPSS, the researcher first coded and then analyzed the data were coded. In order to determine the relationship between Canadian EFL learners&apos; identity style and self-efficacy, the Spearman&apos;s rank order correlation formula was used. Secondly, to show the existence of a significant difference between the identity processing styles of male and female participants of the study, the Mann-Whitney U test was run. Statistical analyses indicated that there was a meaningful relationship between self-efficacy and identity processing styles among Canadian EFL learners and no difference was seen between the identity processing styles of both groups of male and female participants of the study.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563246</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Self-Efficacy and IPS: An Empirical Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>63</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scheduling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Pluralism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Creative Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Core Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time on Task</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cost Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sklarz, David P.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Connecticut</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Connecticut</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of the study was to conduct a comprehensive review of the research and best practices of exemplary elementary school World Language and Culture Programs. Specifically, (1) to assess the degree to which various program designs had most closely met the measurable goals of the American Council of Teachers of a Foreign Language, commonly referred to as the 5C&apos;s guide to program development, and the Brown University study of the eight characteristics of highly successful elementary World Language and Culture Programs which compares a program that meets two days a week for 20 minutes in grades 4-6 with models that are cited in the research as exemplars of research-based best practices and (2) to compare and contrast the measurable outcomes of different program designs, associated costs and community support for different programs. The results of the study clearly reflected that an elementary world language program that meets daily allows for greater continuity of practice in a second language and enriches opportunities to reinforce the understanding of our multicultural world in which students will live. Cognitive research of language acquisition demonstrated that beginning a second language as early as kindergarten showed the greatest gain in the study of a new language over time. Other research showed demonstrable benefits in other academic subjects, increased higher order and creative thinking skills, a greater multicultural awareness and an increased sense of achievement. The results of this study of research and best practices and findings leads to several conclusions and recommendations for the implementation of a world class World Language and Culture Program for elementary school age children. In summary, the program should begin as early as kindergarten and be built upon throughout the elementary school years. A world language program should be part of the core curriculum and an integral part of a student&apos;s daily instruction for a minimum of 15-20 minutes. The study of the language should have a strong multicultural component and be taught by highly qualified teachers skilled in research-based instructional practices strategies and methodologies. Included in the study is a comprehensive bibliography of best practices and research, a cost-benefit analysis, alternative program designs and a community survey. A bibliography, supplemental tables, and the Marlborough Community Survey: World Languages &amp;amp; Cultures and Full-Day Kindergarten are included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563247</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>World Languages and Cultures Feasibility Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-10-24</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>21</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developmental Delays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Screening Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feasibility Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Neurological Impairments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Eratay, Emine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bayoglu, Birgül</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Anlar, Banu</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Denver Developmental Screening Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Revised)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Denver Developmental Screening Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2380-0534</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Purpose: To assess the feasibility and reliability of screening semi-urban preschool children with Denver II, developmental and neurological status was examined in relation with one-year outcome. Methodology: Denver II developmental screening test was applied to 583 children who visited family physicians or other health centers in a province of Turkey. Children with abnormal and suspect results were evaluated by neurological examination, Development Profile-3 (DP-3), repeat Denver II or Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children-Revised (WISC-R) depending on the age of the child, and teacher&apos;s perception of school performance and behavior within one year of the first screening. Relationships were investigated between the initial Denver II screening test results and neurological examination findings, neurological risk factors, DP-3, repeat Denver II test results for children &amp;lt; 6 years old, WISC-R results for children &amp;gt; 6 years old; domains of failure in the first and second Denver II tests; and data obtained from families and teachers regarding school performance, behavior and attention. No intervention but routine schooling was given. Results: DP-3 results were average or above (4/6) or low average (2/6) in the abnormal Denver II group and average (9/12) or below average (3/12) in the suspect Denver II group (p: n.s.), both different from the &amp;quot;normal Denver II&amp;quot; sample who rated average or above. Children with abnormal and suspect Denver II results had similar rates of abnormality or neurological risk factor in their histories. They were more likely to score &amp;quot;under average classroom level&amp;quot; compared to a children attending the same schools who had normal initial Denver II. WISC-R results were average or below average in children with abnormal initial screening with Denver II, and average or above in those with suspect Denver II. Conclusions: In this population with high mobility, more than half (56%) of the target population could be reached for follow-up. Suspect or abnormal initial screening results persisted after 1 year but a small group (2/12 and 2/6 respectively) improved to normal, possibly due to &amp;quot;catching-up&amp;quot;, adverse factors being corrected in the interim period, or just a false-positive initial result. Recommendations: Early screening followed by further evaluation within one year is feasible even in a region with high population mobility. Preschool screening with Denver II and re-evaluation of children with abnormal and suspect test results for global development and school performance appears useful. The administration of the test is practical for workers in health care and education, and various degrees of school problems can be detected early.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563248</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Preschool Developmental Screening with Denver II Test in Semi-Urban Areas</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Journal of Pediatrics &amp; Child Care v1 n2 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>35</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mothers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Class</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Caring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discipline</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ramazan, M. Oya</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey (Istanbul)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>South Korea (Seoul)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Korea (Seoul)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey (Istanbul)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The preschool period which comprises the years from birth to age of six, is one of the most critic periods of life because of its future effect on the formation and shaping of the personality, moulding the social and emotional life, and the acquisition of basic knowledge, skills, and habits. Most of the behaviors which are acquired in the childhood shape one&apos;s personality, attitudes, habits, beliefs, and values in the adulthood. Although Turkey and South Korea are geographically distant countries, there is a close relationship between them in terms of their late history. The paths of historical development of preschool education in these countries are similar, but their current schooling rates are different. Their development levels, cultures, and systems of education are also different. This study aims to compare the views of mothers&apos; with children in preschools about preschool education and expectations from preschools in both of these countries. This study includes mothers in the neighborhoods where families with middle socio-economic levels live in Istanbul (Turkey) and Seul (South Korea), whose children are between three and six years old and go to the preschools registered under the Ministry of Education. A survey with closed-ended questions was administered to 279 mothers (139 Turkish mothers and 140 South Korean mothers) who were included in the study according to the principle of voluntariness. The research results indicated that Turkish and South Korean mothers have some similar views as well as some different views. Their answers to six questions which seek their views about preschool education show that mothers from both countries consider preschool education as an important issue; they do not consider preschools as a caring institution; they think rather than themselves, preschools affect their children, and they try to learn about preschool education and children in this period. According to the mothers&apos; answers to seven questions about their expectations from preschools, both Turkish mothers and South Korean mothers sent their children to preschools and were against strict discipline. While most South Korean mothers supported that their children go out and play in summer and winter, and learn how to read and write in preschools, few Turkish mothers agreed with this view. Both Turkish mothers and South Korean mothers supported teaching simple add-subtract operations, foreign languages, and computer, but this rate was higher in the latter.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563249</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Comparison of Turkish and South Korean Mothers&apos; Views about Preschool Education and Their Expectations from Preschools</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>US-China Education Review B v5 n9 p565-578 Sep 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-09-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>32</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constructivism (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behaviorism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gürbüz, Fatih</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Töman, Ufuk</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Aksoy, Gökhan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Çimer, Sabiha Odabasi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-1309-6249</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study is to explore the secondary school pre-service science teachers&apos; views about teaching theories and methods. Qualitative research method and purposeful sampling were used in the study. The participants of the study were the five students in the final year of their studies in Science Teaching Department of Bayburt Education Faculty at Bayburt University. The interviews were carried out face to face with the participants by one of the researchers and they were recorded with a recorder after they gave their consent. After the interviews, the data recorded was transcribed. Then the texts were given to the participants so that they could verify the accuracy and completeness of the data. Therefore, the reliability of the data was obtained. Content analysis was used for data analysis. When the data obtained as a result of data analysis was examined, it was found that pre-service science teachers attributed conceptually similar meanings to teaching theories and methods. Moreover, it was discovered that pre-service teachers expressed opinions mainly about behaviourism and constructivism as teaching theories and recitation and discussion as teaching methods.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563250</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Pre-Service Science Teachers&apos; Views about Teaching Theories and Methods</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications v4 n4 Article 18 p197-207 Oct 2013</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Informal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Corporate Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Financial Support</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kaufmann, Katrin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Europe</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Norway</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Sweden</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Germany</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Lithuania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Latvia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Spain</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>France</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United Kingdom</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>France</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Germany</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Latvia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Lithuania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Norway</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Spain</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Sweden</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United Kingdom</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This investigation focuses on participation and related investment patterns in job related non-formal education (NFE) in selected European countries. Broadening previous research formats of NFE are distinguished by investment including financial and time investments by employers, employees and public authorities. By this, company-sponsored and individual-financed NFE are distinguished sharply and cases with shared investment between employers and employees (co-financed NFE) and between employers, employees and public funding (co-financed pooled NFE) are accounted for, additionally. For explaining participation in NFE supply and demand models are referred to. Hypotheses on cross-country differences for investment in NFE refer to the Varieties-of-Capitalism approach and countries are selected representing different varieties of capitalism (Norway, Sweden, Germany, Lithuania, Latvia, Spain, France, UK). Analyses are based on data of the Adult Education Survey (AES) 2011/12.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563251</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Non-Formal Education in International Comparison: Patterns of Participation and Investment in Selected European Countries</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET) v2 n4 p239-267 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>29</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>58</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Science Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Turgut, Umit</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gurbuz, Fatih</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Salar, Riza</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Toman, Ufuk</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this study, the viewpoints of physics teacher candidates at undergraduate level towards the concepts in special theory of relativity and the interpretations they made about these concepts were investigated. The viewpoints of the teacher candidates towards the concepts in the subject of special theory of relativity were revealed with six open ended questions prepared by the writers who are physics teachers as well. The research is a qualitative study and the study was conducted with eighteen teacher candidates. In this study, case study, one of the methods of qualitative research, was used. The study group of the research was chosen by convenience sampling. The data collected via open ended questions was analysed by descriptive analysis method. According to the results of the study, it was revealed that most of the students have not been introduced to the special theory of relativity and the concepts related to them. It could be stated that the candidates had difficulty with the relativity of time and its reference frame. Most of the teacher candidates could not make the interpretation that the speed of light was the limit speed and no other object could reach that speed.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563252</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Viewpoints of Physics Teacher Candidates towards the Concepts in Special Theory of Relativity and Their Evaluation Designs</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>International Journal of Academic Research v5 n4 p481-489 Jul 2013</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ownership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Akturk, Ahmet Oguz</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Izci, Kemal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Caliskan, Gurbuz</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sahin, Ismail</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Rapid developments in technology in the present age have made it necessary for communities to follow technological developments and adapt themselves to these developments. One of the fields that are most rapidly affected by these developments is undoubtedly education. Determination of the attitudes of preservice teachers, who live in an age of technology and get ready to raise future individuals, is of paramount importance both educationally and professionally. The purpose of this study was to analyze attitudes of preservice teachers towards technology and some variables that predict these attitudes (gender, daily duration of internet use, and the number of technical devices owned). 329 preservice teachers attending the education faculty of a large university in central Turkey participated, on a volunteer basis, in this study, where relational survey model was used as the research method. Research findings reveal that preservice teachers&apos; attitudes towards technology are positive and at the same time, the attitudes of male preservice teachers towards technology are more positive than their female counterparts. As a result of the stepwise multiple regression analysis where factors predicting preservice teachers&apos; attitudes towards technology, it was found that duration of daily internet use was the strongest predictor of attitudes towards technology.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563253</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Analyzing Preservice Teachers&apos; Attitudes towards Technology</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering v9 n12 p3960-3966 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>56</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bekmezci, Mehmet</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Celik, Ismail</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sahin, Ismail</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kiray, Ahmet</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Akturk, Ahmet Oguz</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Computer Anxiety Scale</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Scientific Attitude Inventory</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Computer Anxiety Scale</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this research, students&apos; scientific attitude, computer anxiety, educational use of the Internet, academic achievement, and problematic use of the Internet are analyzed based on different variables (gender, parents&apos; educational level and daily access to the Internet). The research group involves 361 students from two middle schools which are located in the center of Konya. The &amp;quot;general survey method&amp;quot; is adopted in the research. In accordance with the purpose of the study, percentage, mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test, ANOVA (variance) are employed in the study. A total of four scales are implemented. These four scales include a total of 13 sub-dimensions. The scores from these scales and their subscales are studied in terms of various variables. In the research, students&apos; scientific attitude, computer anxiety, educational use of the Internet, the problematic Internet use and academic achievement (gender, parent educational level, and daily access to the Internet) are investigated based on various variables and some significant relations are found.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563254</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Analysis of Scientific Attitude, Computer Anxiety, Educational Internet Use, Problematic Internet Use, and Academic Achievement of Middle School Students According to Demographic Variables</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering v9 n12 p4006-4014 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>41</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Primary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Retention (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Aksoy, Gokhan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gurbuz, Fatih</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The aim of this study is to determine the effect of the group research technique and cooperative reading-writing application technique in the science and technology course in the unit of &amp;quot;what is the Earth&apos;s crust made of&amp;quot; on the academic achievement of the students and whether the change observed in the student achievement is permanent or not. The study group is formed of total 62 students in two classes studying in the 6th grade of a primary school in 2010-2011 education year. One of the classes is determined to be Group Research Group (GRG) where group research technique is used and the other one is Reading-Writing-Application Group (RWAG) where cooperative reading-writing-application technique is used. The main instruments for obtaining data were the Academic Achievement Test (AAT). The data obtained on instruments were evaluated by using descriptive statistic, independent sample t test, paired sample t test and effect sizes. As a result, it was determined that the academic achievements of the students who were taught with cooperative reading-writing-application technique were at a higher level than the academic achievements of the students who were taught with group research. In addition teaching with group technique did not have a permanent effect on the student achievement.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563255</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effect of Group Research and Cooperative Reading-Writing-Application Techniques in the Unit of &amp;quot;What Is the Earth&apos;s Crust Made Of?&amp;quot; on The Academic Achievements of the Students and the Permanent</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Balkan Physics Letters v21 p133-139 May 2013</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>30</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Across the Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Demirbag, Mehmet</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kingir, Sevgi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Çepni, Salih</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between prospective teachers&apos; belief systems and writing-to-learn. The participants comprised eight freshmen from the Department of Elementary Science Education at a public university in Turkey. The data were collected using semi-structured interviews.The results indicated that epistemological and pedagogical beliefs, attitudes and pre-experience were the main factors that affected the participants&apos; writing processes. These prospective teachers also used a set of cognitive, meta-cognitive and affective strategies in their writing such as self-assessment, awareness, revising and empathising. Overall, writing provided the participants with benefits that helped them perform research, construct knowledge, understand conceptual change and acquire permanent learning. Therefore, this study concludes that the development of prospective teachers&apos; belief systems can increase the quality of writing-to-learn and the strategies used for such activities.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563256</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between Prospective Teachers&apos; Belief Systems and Writing-to-Learn</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty v16 n2 p423-442 Aug 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-08-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>62</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Incidental Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish Speaking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Fluency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Word Recognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decoding (Reading)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Crosby, Robert Glenn, III.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Elementary Reading Attitude Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Elementary Reading Attitude Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Although literacy skills have been associated with critical academic, social, and economic outcomes, most adolescents in the United States lack basic proficiency in reading comprehension. Experts in the field of adolescent literacy have identified affective components of reading (e.g., reading attitudes) as a critical topic in need of further research. Prior research has found a significant correlation between affective components of reading and reading comprehension, even after controlling for cognitive covariates (e.g., vocabulary). However, the bulk of this research has been limited to first language learners and children in the early grades. Therefore, this study extends the reading attitudes literature by examining these relationships among Latino adolescents, including those who speak English as a second language. Furthermore, reading attitudes has predicted reading comprehension growth among certain populations, although the mechanisms behind this relationship are unclear. This study theorizes that reading attitudes promotes reading development by facilitating incidental vocabulary acquisition through increased reader engagement and implicit strategy use. Therefore, this study also extends the literature by determining whether reading attitudes predicts vocabulary growth from September to June of ninth grade. Participants were 128 ninth grade students in a low-income, predominantly Latino high school. 24% spoke English only (EO), 26% were from Spanish-speaking homes but had been determined to be initially fluent-English-proficient (I-FEP) at enrollment, 21% were classified as &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; English learners (ELs) who had not yet attained proficiency in English, and 29% were former English learners who had been redesignated fluent-English-proficient (R-FEP). Reading attitudes were assessed using an adapted form of the Elementary Reading Attitudes Survey (ERAS), which contains both recreational (ERAS-R) and academic (ERAS-A) reading subscales. In a hierarchical regression analysis (HRA), the ERAS-R independently predicted reading comprehension after controlling for language group, vocabulary, and word reading ability (i.e., decoding, word recognition, and fluency). No language group interactions were detected. In a second HRA, the ERAS-R predicted students&apos; vocabulary at the end of ninth grade after controlling for language group, prior vocabulary achievement, and word reading ability. However, reading attitudes only predicted vocabulary development for EO and R-FEP students, while no effect was present for I-FEP children and &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; ELs. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563257</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Reading Attitudes as a Predictor of Latino Adolescents&apos; Reading Comprehension</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Riverside</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0684-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>167</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600555</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Transfer</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kamal, Ahmed Tashrif</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Due to their high fault-tolerance, ease of installation and scalability to large networks, distributed algorithms have recently gained immense popularity in the sensor networks community, especially in computer vision. Multi-target tracking in a camera network is one of the fundamental problems in this domain. Distributed estimation algorithms work by exchanging information between sensors that are communication neighbors. Since most cameras are directional sensors, it is often the case that neighboring sensors may not be sensing the same target. Such sensors that do not have information about a target are termed as &apos;&apos;naive&apos;&apos; with respect to that target. State-of-the-art distributed state estimation algorithms (e.g., the Kalman Consensus Filter (KCF)) in the sensor networks community are not directly applicable to tracking applications in camera networks mainly due to this naivety issue. In our work, we propose generalized distributed algorithms for state estimation in a sensor network taking the naivety issue into account. For multi-target tracking, along with the tracking framework, a data association step is necessary where the measurements in each camera&apos;s view are associated with the appropriate targets&apos; tracks. At first, under the assumption that the data association is given, we develop distributed state estimation algorithms addressing the naivety issue. In this process, first, we propose the Generalized Kalman Consensus Filter (GKCF) where an information-weighting scheme is utilized to account for the naivety issue. Next, we propose the Information-weighted Consensus Filter (ICF) which can achieve optimal centralized performance while also accounting for naivety. This is the core contribution of this thesis. Next, we introduce the aspect of multi-target tracking where a probabilistic data association scheme is incorporated in the distributed tracking scheme resulting the Multi-Target Information Consensus (MTIC) algorithm. The incorporation of the probabilistic data association mechanism makes the MTIC algorithm very robust to false measurements/clutter. The aforementioned algorithms are derived under the assumption that the measurements are related to the state variables using a linear relationship. However, in general, this is not true for many sensors including camera sensors. Thus, to account for the non-linearity in the observation model, we propose non-linear extensions of the previous algorithms which we denote as the Extended ICF (EICF) and the Extended MTIC (EMTIC) algorithms. In-depth theoretical and experimental analysis are provided to compare these algorithms with existing ones. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563258</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Information Weighted Consensus for Distributed Estimation in Vision Networks</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Riverside</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0709-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>131</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600575</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Power Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Masters Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alumni</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personal Narratives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bailie, John W., III</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined power and authority in the student-instructor relationship in a restorative practices-based graduate program. This qualitative investigation utilized a narrative approach. Ten alumni of the International Institute for Restorative Practices master&apos;s degree programs were engaged in a one-time face-to-face interview and document review of their final master&apos;s degree capstone papers. A listening guide voice-centered method was used as the primary data analysis method. This study found that participants used highly consistent language when describing the teachers and professors who were most meaningful to them, regardless of life stage. The second finding was that participants had meaningful personal experiences in this program, which they described using therapeutic language. The participants&apos; narratives often centered on reconciling past conflict, hardship, or trauma. The third finding was that relationships with the classroom group as a whole were more important to participants than relationships with professors alone. Finally, this study discovered that many of these participants were drawn to this program out of a desire to make change in the world and that this desire was driven by conflicts and other elements of their personal life stories. This study has implications for adult learning institutions implementing participatory and collaborative models of instruction. Five appendices are included: (1) Informed Consent; (2) Semistructured Interview Guide; (3) Confidentiality Agreement; (4) E-mail Invitation to Participate; and (5) Cumulative Analysis Examples.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563259</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Power and Authority in the Student-Instructor Relationship in a Restorative Practices-Based Graduate Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Lesley University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>145</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>99</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Psychology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychoeducational Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communication Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Police Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Shyness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Daily Living Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Group Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pilot Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Opinions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Genetic Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Child Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socialization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Support Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drug Addiction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mental Health</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inclusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Group Counseling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Counseling Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Counselor Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Qualities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Style</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Antisocial Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Depression (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gifted</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Well Being</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Administrator Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Neuropsychology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Piagetian Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pracana, Clara, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Silva, Liliana, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Collected Works - Proceedings</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Peru</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Portugal</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Algeria</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Brazil</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Slovakia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Turkey (Ankara)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Australia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Romania (Bucharest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>France</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Russia (Saint Petersburg)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Algeria</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Australia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Brazil</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>France</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Peru</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Portugal</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Romania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Russia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Slovakia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey (Ankara)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>World Institute for Advanced Research and Science (WIARS) (Portugal)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>We are delighted to welcome you to the International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends 2013, taking place in Madrid, Spain, from 26 to 28 of April. Our efforts and active engagement can now be rewarded with these three days of exciting new developments about what we are passionate about: Psychology and its connections. We take pride in having been able to connect and bring together academics, scholars, practitioners and others interested in a field that is fertile in new perspectives, ideas and knowledge. We counted on an extensive variety of contributors and presenters, which can supplement our view of the human essence and behavior, showing the impact of their different personal, academic and cultural experiences. This is, certainly, one of the reasons we have many nationalities and cultures represented, inspiring multi-disciplinary collaborative links, fomenting intellectual encounter and development. InPACT 2013 received over more 338 submissions, from 37 different countries, reviewed by a double-blind process. Submissions were prepared to take form of Oral Presentations, Posters, Virtual Presentations and Workshops. The conference also includes a keynote presentation from an internationally distinguished researcher Prof. Howard S. Schwartz, from Oakland University, U.S.A.. There will be also two Special Talks, one by Michael Wang, Professor of Clinical Psychology in the School of Psychology, College of Medicine, University of Leicester and also Director of the Doctoral Clinical Psychology Training Course at Leicester, UK, and the other by Clara Pracana, founding member of Portuguese Association of Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, Portugal, to whom we express our most gratitude. This volume is composed by the proceedings of the International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends (InPACT 2013), organized by the World Institute for Advanced Research and Science (W.I.A.R.S.) and co-sponsored by the respected partners we reference in the dedicated page. This conference addressed important topics in four main fields taken from Applied Psychology: Clinical, Educational, Social, Legal and Cognitive and Experimental Psychology. The areas can, of course, be object of discussion, but extended abstracts were presented in 56 topics within these fields of research: (1) Clinical Psychology: Emotions and related psychological processes; Assessment; Psychotherapy and counseling; Addictive behaviors; Eating disorders; Personality disorders; Quality of life and mental health; Communication within relationships; Services of mental health; and Psychopathology. (2) Educational Psychology: Language and cognitive processes; School environment and childhood disorders; Parenting and parenting related processes; Learning and technology; Psychology in schools; Intelligence and creativity; Motivation in classroom; Perspectives on teaching; Assessment and evaluation; and Individual differences in learning. (3) Social Psychology: Cross-cultural dimensions of mental disorders; Employment issues and training; Organizational psychology; Psychology in politics and international issues; Social factors in adolescence and its development; Social anxiety and self-esteem; Immigration and social policy; Self-efficacy and identity development; Parenting and social support; and Addiction and stigmatization. (4) Legal Psychology: Violence and trauma; Mass-media and aggression; Intra-familial violence; Juvenile delinquency; Aggressive behavior in childhood; Internet offending; vi Working with crime perpetrators; Forensic psychology; Violent risk assessment; and Law enforcement and stress. (5) Cognitive and Experimental Psychology: Perception, memory and attention; Decision making and problem-solving; Concept formation, reasoning and judgment; Language processing; Learning skills and education; Cognitive Neuroscience; Computer analogies and information processing (Artificial Intelligence and computer simulations); Social and cultural factors in the cognitive approach; Experimental methods, research and statistics; and Biopsychology. The proceedings contain the results of the research and developments conducted by authors who focused on what they are passionate about: Psychology and its multi-disciplinary connections. It includes an extensive variety of contributors and presenters, who will extend our view of the human psyche and behavior, by sharing with us their different personal, academic and cultural experiences. This is certainly one of the reasons we have so many nationalities and cultures represented, inspiring collaborative links and fostering intellectual encounters. Educational Psychology oral presentations include: (1) Investigation of Primary School Students&apos; Optimism Level and their School Perception (Esra Çalik Var and Selahiddin Ögülmüs); (2) The Effect of Communication Skills-Psychoeducation Program on the Communication Skills of the Police Academy Students (Sevgi Sezer); (3) Working with Shy Adolescents: Effectiveness of Life Skills Group Training (Lancy D&apos;Souza); (4) Transition In Transition Out (TITO): Using Peer Mentoring to Assist Graduating Students Transition Beyond University (Sophia Xenos, Andrea Chester and Lorelle Burton); (5) Personality and Academic Dishonesty: Evidentes from an Exploratory Pilot Study (Dan Florin Stanescu and Elena Madalina Iorga); (6) How to Improve the Writing of Opinion Essays? - The Role of Self-Regulated Strategies Development (Catarina Araújo, Ana Paula Martins and António Osório); (7) Early Intervention and Fragile X Syndrome (Ana Apolónio and Vítor Franco); (8) Chronopsychology Assessment of the Type of Time Organization Applied in Algerian Schools (Louisa Marouf, Rachid Khelfane and François Testu); (9) Perfectionism and School Performance in Children (Lauriane Drolet, Philippe Valois and Jacques Forget); (10) A General Overview on Parental Emotional Socialization Behaviors (Sukran Kilic); (11) Family Unpredictability and Social Support Reported by Families in Early Intervention Programs versus Community Families (Teresa Sousa Machado and Iolanda Correia); (12) Toxic Environment: Outcomes of Parental Methamphetamine Addiction on Child Psychological Health (Comfort B. Asanbe, Charlene Hall and Charles Bolden); (13) Parental Involvement and Inclusive Contexts (Sara Alexandre Felizardo and Esperança Jales Ribeiro); (14) The Effect of Group Counseling Experiences to Counselor Trainees&apos; Group Leadership Characteristics (Bahar Mete Otlu); (15) The Role of Big Ideas in Technology-Mediated Curricula (Theodore R. Prawat and Richard S. Prawat); (16) Cognitive Features of Students with Different Level of Research Potential and Success in Learning (Nina Bordovskaia); (17) Associations of Unhealthy Behaviors and Depressive Symptoms with School Difficulties and Role of Socioeconomic Factors in Early Adolescence (Kénora Chau, Michèle Baumann, Jean-Charles Vauthier, Bernard Kabuth and Nearkasen Chau); and (18) Expanding Borders: Teachers Motivation (Claus Dieter Stobäus, Juan Mosquera and Bettina Steren dos Santos). Educational Psychology poster presentations include: (1) Peruvian Teachers&apos; Perceptions about Autism and Implications for Educational Practice (Joyce Echegaray-Bengoa and Manuel Soriano-Ferrer); (2) Giftedness: Peruvian Teachers&apos; Perception (Joyce Echegaray-Bengoa and Manuel Soriano-Ferrer); (3) Work Satisfaction and Social Well-Being of Teachers according to Headmasters&apos; Support and Teachers&apos; Personality Traits (Anna Janovská, Olga Orosová and Beata Gajdošová); (4) Early Intervention in Childhood: Study on the Evaluation of the Satisfaction of Families (Esperança Jales Ribeiro, Sandra Gonçalves and Sara Alexandre Felizardo); (5) Socio-Emotional Competences in Portuguese Youngsters: Developing of Assessment Tools for Parents (Heldemerina Pires, Adelinda Candeias, Nicole Rebelo, Diana Varelas and António M. Diniz); (6) The SET GAME® and its Cognitive Aspects (Sandreilane Cano da Silva and Lino de Macedo); (7) Teachers&apos; Notions about Types of Communicative Behavior and Levels of Communicative Culture (Galina Glotova and Angelika Wilhelm); and (8) Reading Comprehension Difficulties - Comparison of Poor and Good Comprehenders using Neuropsychological Tasks (Helena Vellinho Corso, Tânia Mara Sperb and Jerusa Fumagalli de Salles). Author index is included. (Individual papers contain references.) [Abstract modified to meet ERIC guidelines.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563260</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends (InPACT) Book of Proceedings (Madrid, Spain, April 26-28, 2013)</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-989-97866-0-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>479</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>1000</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Creativity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Turkish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Translation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Length</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dikici, Ayhan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Soh, Kaycheng</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Singapore</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Singapore</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-1927-0232</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many measurement tools on creativity are available in the literature. One of these scales is Creativity Fostering Teacher Behaviour Index (CFTIndex) developed for Singaporean teacher originally. It was then translated into Turkish and trialled on teachers in Nigde province with acceptable reliability and factorial validity. The main purpose of this study is to compare the original English and the translated Turkish versions and to explore more flexible use of CFTIndex to facilitate data collection for future research. Factor loadings of English and Turkish versions are found to be highly similar. The original version that consists of 45-item was shortened to 27-item and also grouped into five sets. Correlations with the full-length version show acceptable validity and reliability. All new versions were verified by confirmatory factor analysis. It is concluded that CFTIndex has flexible features and its shorter forms can be used with confidence. It is especially useful when a study entails collecting data for many variables.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563261</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Indexing Creativity Fostering Teacher Behaviour: Replication and Modification</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Higher Education of Social Science v9 n3 p1-10 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>39</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Turkish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Native Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influence of Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Variation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bulut, Mesut</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The way of communication has developed on social media, an environment where informal education occurs, and the social media language or social media Turkish which has emerged as a result of this communication is an important subject which needs to be discussed in terms of Turkish teaching. The reflections of the use of social media on Turkish in today&apos;s information age and in light of scientific and technological developments are an undeniable fact. Therefore, it has been revealed that social media tools such as Facebook, Twitter, Myspace, Skype, YouTube, blogs, search engines, electronic dictionaries and encyclopaedias, forums, dating sites and social communication and sharing platforms have an effect on the syntax and punctuation of Turkish and these effects damage the development of Turkish in terms of language and writing unity. Therefore, what should be done by both individuals and society in order to minimise the negative effects of social media has been determined and also use of language on social media and current problems of Turkish have been pointed out by making use of these remarks and some suggestions have been made. Finally, the aim of this study is to make contributions to Turkish and Turkish teaching.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563262</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Study on the Use of Social Media and Its Reflections on Turkish Regarding</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Journal of Foreign Languages, Cultures &amp; Civilizations v1 n2 p18-27 Dec 2013</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mental Health</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Well Being</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Symptoms (Individual Disorders)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Depression (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moradi Sheykhjan, Tohid</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>We all have mental health. Mental health relates to how we think, feel, behave and interact with other people. At its simplest, good mental health is the absence of a mental disorder or mental health problem. Adults, children and young people with good mental health are likely to have high levels of mental wellbeing. The World Health Organisation has defined mental wellbeing as &amp;quot;a state of mind in which an individual is able to realise his or her own abilities, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively, and is able to make a contribution to his or her community&amp;quot; (World Health Organisation, 2010).It can be helpful to understand wellbeing as being made up of two key elements: (1) Feeling good; and (2) Functioning well. Feeling good means experiencing positive emotions like happiness, contentment and enjoyment. It also includes feelings like curiosity, engagement and safety. Functioning well is about how a person is able to function in the world. This includes having positive relationships and social connections, as well as feeling in control of your life and having a sense of purpose. Mental well-being does not mean being happy all the time and it does not mean you won&apos;t experience negative or painful emotions such as grief, loss, or failure, which are a normal part of life. People with high levels of well-being will still experience these feelings, but are likely to be better able to cope with them without it having a significant impact on their mental health. [This paper was published in: &amp;quot;Proceedings of the National Seminar on &apos;Humanising Education of Children with Special Needs&apos; [Kerala, India, February 5-6, 2015],&amp;quot; edited by Sankaranarayanan Paleeri. 152-155. Ottapalam: NSS Training College, 2015 (ISBN: 978-81-924412-1-4).]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563263</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Mental Health Problems in Children and Young People with Learning Disabilities</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the National Seminar on &quot;Humanising Education of Children with Special Needs&quot; (Ottappalam, Kerala, India, Feb 5-6, 2015)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-02-05</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Alternative Teacher Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Penner, Emily K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Maryland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Louisiana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mississippi</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Louisiana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Maryland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Mississippi</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper revisits existing experimental work on Teach For America (TFA) and extends it by examining treatment effects across the distribution of student achievement. TFA is a rapidly expanding teacher preparation program that currently serves over half a million students in low-income districts across the country. Previous research results did not have notable variation by subgroup. Estimates were inaccurate due to the treatment of a non-response code as a valid response value. Revised estimates confirm positive effects for math and not reading, but show that TFA teachers were especially effective for African American students, but not Hispanics, and for females, but not males. In addition to examining differences across subgroup, others have argued that a distributional approach is important for thoroughly investigating policy interventions because examinations focused solely on mean impacts might obscure large countervailing differences in program impacts that offset one another. To deepen the understanding of the effect of TFA on student achievement, this study investigates distributional as well as mean impacts. New distributional results reveal TFA teachers are especially beneficial for the upper-middle of the distribution of math achievement, but not the upper and lower tails. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563264</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Missing Data and Mixed Results: The Effects of Teach For America on Student Achievement Revisited</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hearing Impairments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Music Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Musical Instruments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accessibility (for Disabled)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inclusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Accommodations (Disabilities)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Documentation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intonation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burdett, John Paul</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of two students with hearing loss participating in instrumental music. Four orienting questions guided the inquiry: (a) What factors contribute to these students&apos; motivation to continue participating in instrumental music?; (b) How is hearing loss affecting each student&apos;s music participation and what strategies are accommodating for their hearing loss?; (c) How are students with hearing loss experiencing inclusion in the secondary instrumental classroom?; and (d) What can school music teachers learn from the experiences of these students? Two participants were identified through email solicitation of a large instrumental music teacher organization and snowball sampling with audiologists in the medical community. Data was gleaned in the two cases through analysis of documents, interviews with the two principal informants, their parents and music teachers, and observations of the two students with hearing loss in large ensemble settings, as well as, private lessons or sectionals. Analysis and interpretation of the data revealed (a) multiple factors affected motivation for continued participation, many similar to typically hearing students; (b) intonation is the most challenging aspect of music performance and that is being accommodated for in a number of ways, primarily through peer modeling and attention to visual and vibrotactile input; and (c) the two students have gone beyond simple inclusion to being authentic members of their school instrumental ensemble. The study concludes with implications for music teachers, parents, and researchers of students with hearing loss. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563265</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Authentic Membership: The Experiences of Two Students with Hearing Loss in Instrumental Music</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0867-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>262</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600652</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Minorities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bilingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sociocultural Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multilingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>German</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dialects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Cultural Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Byfield, Lavern Georgia McLeary</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Few studies on English language learners (ELLs) focus on teachers&apos; perceptions of bilingualism and bidialectalism and describe the impact of those perceptions on language arts pedagogy. While numerous studies have explored the teaching of diverse students and the negative effects of standardized tests on the quality instruction these students receive (Bielenberg &amp;amp; Wong Fillmore, 2005; Evans &amp;amp; Hornberger, 2005; Garcia &amp;amp; Bauer, 2009; Jimenez &amp;amp; Teague, 2009; McCarthey, 2008; Valenzuela, 2005), none of these studies have examined teachers&apos; perceptions of bilinguals and bidialectals and the effects of teaching them English. This research was designed to understand how teachers&apos; perceptions are influenced by sociocultural contexts and shape their language teaching. I draw on sociocultural theories that support the use of students&apos; lived experiences in the teaching/learning process (Lee, 2006; Moll, Amanti, Neff, &amp;amp; Gonzalez, 2005). The funds of knowledge phenomenon (Moll, Amanti, Neff, &amp;amp; Gonzalez) and cultural modeling framework (Lee) both subscribe to the notion that language minority students have knowledge that should be validated in classrooms. A three-phased approach was used to understand how perceptions influenced teachers&apos; language pedagogy. For the first phase, I completed a survey with nine teachers and the principal in a multilingual school. In the second and third phases, I interviewed and observed four teachers over three months to analyze as case studies. The data showed that the teachers focused on the Hispanic students as needing language intervention and mostly overlooked the Amish students who spoke a German dialect. The study suggests that although ELLs include several language minority groups, teachers associated language minority students with being Hispanic. Essentially, teachers conflated race/ethnicity with language in the discourse about language minority students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563266</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teachers&apos; Perceptions of Bilingualism and Bidialectalism: The Effect on Language Arts Pedagogy</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0869-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>177</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600654</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Libraries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Junior High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Seeking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discourse Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Librarians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Informal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Comstock, Sharon L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation is a dual-site ethnographic case study of the lived information literacy experiences of students in their junior year of high school relative to their school library and librarians. What began as an investigation of an apparent gap in understanding between the views of teens and school librarians regarding &amp;quot;information literacy&amp;quot; ended up being a discovery of young adult information cultures--or &amp;quot;small worlds,&amp;quot; as described by Elfreda Chatman (1999). Information literacy, as it is defined within the school environment, often neglects the information experience of teens outside of the school. Therefore, emphasis in schools is placed on everyday life information seeking (&amp;quot;ELIS&amp;quot;; Savolainen, 1995) of teens operating within the dominant discourse of information literacy as defined by the school librarians and within the epistemology of schooling, where there are explicit limits on legitimate uses, definitions, technologies, and even inquiries of and about &amp;quot;information&amp;quot;. The irony, however, is that while the core objectives of teaching information literacy include critical thinking and evaluation, the discourse of information literacy relates little to the empowered decision-making of teens in their everyday information behaviors at home, work, and in schoolwork tasks outside of the school library. This thesis delineates the small worlds of teens relative to their librarians, with an emphasis on the teen experience. However, the evidence suggests that both student and librarian are limited within the context of the school library by dominant information literacy discourses, and that both communities may benefit from including their own lived information behaviors within the schooling environment and its attendant tasks. Essentially, the study takes critical-theory (Foucault, 1980) and Pragmatic, inquiry-based (Dewey, 1938) approaches to information literacy as defined within formal learning environments and calls for a practical, ELIS-based approach in our school libraries. The alternative embraced by a continued defense of information literacy as currently defined is professional irrelevance. Using discourse analysis (Gee, 1999) as a methodological lens makes explicit the knowledge domains of high school students and school librarians. Findings include: (1) information behaviors of high school students and school librarians appear to be concordant in informal information seeking, mirroring one another&apos;s knowledge domains and consistent with ELIS theories; (2) however, in formal information tasks such as those for a school assignment, school librarians&apos; understandings--or at least their practices--regarding what makes students information &amp;quot;literate&amp;quot; are restrictive, focusing on issues of legitimacy rather than effectiveness; (3) &amp;quot;small world&amp;quot; knowledge domains of high school students are neglected in school information tasks, and this has implications for student access, agency, and identity; and (4) there appears to be an opportunity to draw on the lived information behaviors of both communities to make the term &amp;quot;information literate&amp;quot; more inclusive, flexible, and adaptable; ultimately having pedagogical implications. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563267</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Case Study of Legitimate Literacies: Teens&apos; &amp;quot;Small World&amp;quot; and the School Library</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0875-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>233</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600661</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competency Based Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conceptual Tempo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Study Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Melton, Rebecca Mindigo</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Research indicates that students underachieve in college settings, in spite of intellect and other abilities. This research tested the likelihood of self-efficacy for learning, conscientiousness, impulsivity, procrastination and temporal discounting to predict academic achievement in an online competency-based university. Undergraduate students (N = 100) who had successfully completed at least one term in school self-selected to participate in a multiple-assessment online survey. Valid and reliable measures of self-efficacy, personality, temporal discounting and procrastination were analyzed against the students&apos; achievement status at a point in time. Neither procrastination nor temporal discounting predicted academic achievement, but the two constructs were positively related to each other. Further, procrastination was negatively related to conscientiousness, low impulsivity, and self-efficacy. Conscientiousness was positively related to self-efficacy and negatively related to impulsivity. Significant difference was found between the two student groups (performers, non-performers) as predicted by conscientiousness. Limitations of the present research are discussed and suggestions for future research provided. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563268</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Academic Underachievement: The Relationship between Motivation and Study Skills</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Psy.D. Dissertation, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2187-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>100</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601314</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Outcomes Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intellectual Disciplines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compliance (Legal)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adoption (Ideas)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fontenot, Janet Smith</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to identify the attitudes and concerns community college faculty have about student learning outcomes assessment and to further explore the relationship between these factors and faculty levels of involvement in assessment activities. Combining the conceptual frameworks of the concerns-based adoption Model (CBAM) and the framework developed by the National Center for Postsecondary Improvement project, an online survey was developed to measure the attitudes, concerns, and levels of involvement in student learning outcomes assessment of full-time Illinois community college faculty. The sample for the study was full-time faculty employed at four Illinois community colleges participating in the Higher Learning Commission&apos;s Academy for Assessment of Student Learning. A Principal Component Extraction with Varimax Rotation was conducted on the constructs of faculty attitudes and levels of involvement. These PCs were used as variables for the multivariate analysis. Principal components associated with the faculty attitudes construct were Benefits and Reluctance. The principal components identified for the involvement construct were Classroom or Instruction, Institutional, and External Involvement. Demographic variables of tenure status, academic discipline, and number of years employed at the institution were examined to identify any differences that may occur between faculty in these groups. Results indicated faculty were moderately involved in student learning outcomes assessment at the classroom or instructional level but their involvement declined at the institutional level and with external assessment activities. Moderate to weak relationships were identified in faculty attitudes toward the benefits of assessment based on the academic discipline in which faculty members perform their primary teaching responsibilities. This result suggests there are differences between the hard-pure (e.g., biology, chemistry, math) and both the soft-pure (e.g., communications, English, psychology, social sciences) and soft-applied disciplines (e.g., accounting, business, allied health, education) on the subscales of Classroom or Instructional and Institutional involvement. Faculty teaching in the hard-pure discipline reported lower levels of involvement in student learning outcomes assessment at the classroom or instructional and institutional levels than faculty teaching in the soft-pure or soft-applied disciplines. The hard-pure discipline also reported lower levels of involvement for the Institutional subscale. Faculty concerns about assessment were categorized using the CBAM protocol suggested by Hall et al. (1973) and the responses were categorized primarily as Stage 2, personal concerns; Stage 3, management concerns; and Stage 4, consequence concerns. Findings showed faculty are concerned about the amount of time it takes to conduct assessment, the perception that assessment is being conducted primarily to meet compliance mandates, and a distrust of how assessment results are used within the institution. These concerns were not related to demographics of tenure status, academic discipline, and number of years employed at the institution. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563269</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Community College Faculty Attitudes and Concerns about Student Learning Outcomes Assessment</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0882-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>200</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600668</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Assistive Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Impairments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blindness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Handheld Devices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telecommunications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Scott, Shari</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This qualitative study sought to explore the shared essence of the lived experiences of early adopters of iOS devices as assistive technology by persons with visual impairments. The capstone question addressed the idea of whether any one device could fully meet the assistive technology needs of this population. Purposeful sampling methods were used to find nine participants with legal blindness that had been using iPhones, iPads, and/or iPods soon after Apple added VoiceOver to its mobile operating systems. These participants were surveyed and interviewed about all of their experiences of assistive technology, both vision-specific and adapted mass marketed devices. This document contains extensive verbatim statements regarding assistive technology as presented to the researcher. After horizontalization of the data, thematic groupings of structural and textual descriptions, and creative integration, the distilled essence of the group&apos;s experiences appeared to be the very ubiquitous and personal nature of assistive technology. Assistive technology becomes so personal that its presence is often forgotten. Participants agreed that for assistive technology to be effective, the choice of system and implementation must be made by the individual; it cannot be mandated by an outside agency, provider, or evaluator. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563270</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>iOS--Worthy of the Hype as Assistive Technology for Visual Impairments? A Phenomenological Study of iOS Device Use by Individuals with Visual Impairments</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Tennessee State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2321-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>219</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601339</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Music</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>German</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computational Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Borrowing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sociolinguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Musicians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discourse Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Form Classes (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Morphology (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Word Frequency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spelling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diachronic Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metalinguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ideology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standard Spoken Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Subcultures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Skill Attrition</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Garley, Matthew E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Germany</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Germany</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The influence of English on German has been an ongoing subject of intense popular and academic interest in the German sphere. In order to better understand this language contact situation, this research project investigates anglicisms--instances of English language material in a German language context--in the German hip hop community, where the use of novel anglicisms is especially frequent. This investigation takes a methodologically diverse approach, including complementary corpus, sociolinguistic, and ethnographic analyses. In this dissertation, I focus primarily on an original 12.5-million-word German-language corpus of hip hop discussions from the Internet forums at MZEE.com which includes 11 years of computer-mediated discourse. I supplement these data with an English-language hip hop discussion corpus and a set of ethnographic interviews conducted with hip hop fans and artists in Hamburg in the summer of 2010. I first detail the development of a computational classifier which identifies novel anglicisms in the MZEE.com corpus with high accuracy, yielding a list of 850 frequent anglicisms which is in turn used to identify unexpected wordforms--those which have a non-canonical morphological or orthographic nativization. Through an exploration of the linguistic properties, frequency, and distribution of these forms, I demonstrate the close link between orthographic, morphological, and phonological expressions of these anglicisms and argue that these forms are the result of extraordinary interaction of German and English linguistic-orthographic rules. The next analysis investigates the diachronic fate of anglicisms in the MZEE corpus, finding that frequency in an initial time window is significantly, and negatively, correlated with change in frequency for the set of 850 anglicisms--and this correlation is much stronger for anglicisms than for native German words, indicating the limited shelf life of anglicisms&apos; stylistic utility, a situation corroborated by the subsequent analysis of ethnographic interviews with linguistic actors in the German hip hop community. That analysis reveals systematic and enduring constellations of attitudes toward German, English, and the use of anglicisms which interact with what I term the standard language ideology complex for German (including the related ideologies of the standard language, language purism, and Herderian ideology)--finding a surprising basis of linguistic conservatism which, even when opposed by individual actors, seems to reliably frame metalinguistic discourses. In combination, these findings, 1) that the nativization of anglicism wordforms is rule-governed, even when it appears haphazard or disruptive; 2) that many novel anglicisms seem to have a limited timeframe of popularity; and 3) that the standard language ideology complex and other related ideological stances toward anglicisms are dominant, even in a subcultural community where English material is ubiquitous and linguistic &amp;quot;resistance&amp;quot; is hypothesized; suggest that concerns about the imminent decline or loss of the German language are (to borrow from Mark Twain, an infamous student of the language) &amp;quot;an exaggeration&amp;quot;. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563271</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Crossing the Lexicon: Anglicisms in the German Hip Hop Community</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0887-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>216</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600673</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Experiments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discourse Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recall (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Memory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suprasegmentals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Layout (Publications)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recognition (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Factors (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Contrastive Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Indonesian Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Portuguese</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fraundorf, Scott</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In five experiments, I investigated how readers and listeners generate relevant contrasts in comprehending and remembering discourse. Past work has suggested that prominent words promote encoding of salient alternatives and that this benefits later memory, but it is unclear exactly which alternatives are considered or how consistent these benefits are across modalities and across individuals. Participants read or listened to discourses containing salient alternatives (e.g., Malaysia when the discourse also mentioned &amp;quot;Indonesia&amp;quot;). In Experiments 1 and 2, font emphasis in the initial presentation facilitated participants&apos; ability to later reject the salient alternatives but not unmentioned items (e.g., &amp;quot;Portuguese scientists&amp;quot;), generalizing past effects of contrastive pitch accents. In Experiment 3, font emphasis facilitated rejections of salient alternatives but not less plausible alternatives that were nevertheless mentioned in the discourse. Online reading time measures in Experiment 2 indicated that emphasized words did not improve performance on all trials and only benefited memory to the extent that participants devoted extra time to them, although no such relation was observed in Experiment 3. The relationship of online reading time to later memory is consistent with views of language processing in which some aspects of linguistic representations may be left underspecified because they are time- or resource-consuming to generate. Further, the effortful processing of an alternative impaired memory for the rest of the discourse in populations with more restricted online processing abilities: older adults (Experiment 4) and younger adults who have lower scores on complex span scores (Experiment 5). [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563272</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>What Happened (and What Didn&apos;t): Prominence Promotes Representation of Salient Alternatives in Discourse</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0883-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>140</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600669</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Lunch Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Obesity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suburban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nutrition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expenditures</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Geddis, Alicia M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>According to a 2007 U.S. Census report, 43% of children in America younger than six are classified as low income (U.S. Census Bureau, 2007). The USDA (2008a, 2009a) indicated 17.1% of school-aged children are classified as overweight; an additional 15% are at risk of becoming overweight; and approximately 17.2 million children are living in food-insecure households. Nationwide, poverty, obesity, and food insecurity are harsh realities for school-aged children. The state of Illinois is not exempt from these problems. With poverty, obesity, and food insecurity challenging the daily lives of children, schools should be empowered to meet some of these challenges. The purpose of this qualitative inquiry was to investigate how elementary school district administrators in south suburban Chicago school districts implement the National School Lunch Program and examine how they maximize the nutrition provided to children who live with poverty. This research sought to describe the lived experiences of the administrators who are given charge over the National School Lunch Program and develop meaning from these experiences. Consistent with research, this study found that school administrators who work in high poverty schools tend to prefer such settings, and conveyed a sense of purpose in their work. This study found that while they minimized their efforts, these school administrators were shining examples of transformative leaders who were taking steps to address the issues of food insecurity and obesity for children. Researchers estimate that it costs about one to three times as much to educate students from disadvantaged communities compared to more advantaged communities (Wall, 2006). It appears that the same is true for feeding children in disadvantaged communities. This study revealed that the overall food service expenses for these high poverty districts greatly exceeded the expenditures made in districts serving Illinois&apos; most affluent neighborhoods. The School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study III (USDA, 2007) indicated that over two-thirds of the public school lunches did not meet the USDA requirements for total fat or saturated fats. As the meals analyzed in this study consistently failed to meet the calorie and other nutrient benchmarks, it is evident that we must educate and provide solutions for those most responsible for the school menu. As the administrators in this study expressed their hopes and desires to serve their students more nutritious meals, I believe these transformative leaders have stumbled upon a solution that can address issues of obesity, food insecurity, and some of the economic conditions for the communities in which they serve. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563273</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>School Administrators&apos; Use of the National School Lunch Program to Address the Needs of Students Living in Poverty</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0888-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>130</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600674</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Identity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Justice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Sociology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gregson, Susan A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This case study investigates the equity practice of secondary mathematics teachers in an urban secondary school specifically structured to support students becoming critical citizens; able to analyze the world; and empowered to act, individually and collectively, for the good of their communities and the larger society. The study is framed by two central research questions: (a) What are the tensions and dilemmas mathematics teachers face as they work toward equitable mathematics practice within a community that views the goals of public education as transformative? and (b) How do mathematics teachers negotiate these tensions and dilemmas? In addressing these questions, both the history within which this school community came into existence, and its current nature are discussed. Information is provided about mathematics curriculum, instruction, assessment, social relations, and the ways students&apos; lived experiences are taken up in teachers&apos; practice. The study identifies four categories of tensions that cut across its cases and the literature. These include: (1) Tensions of identity. (2) Tensions between teaching dominant and social justice mathematics. (3) Tensions between the individual and the social. (4) Tensions related to mathematics as a tool for social justice. Description of how teachers negotiated these tensions is provided. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563274</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Equity Practice of Secondary Mathematics Teachers in a School Committed to College Preparation, Community Connection, and Social Justice</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0890-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>287</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600676</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Construct Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Departments</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Knorek, John Kenneth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The concept &amp;quot;academic culture&amp;quot; has been used as a framework to understand faculty work in higher education. Academic culture research builds on organizational psychology concepts of culture and climate to better understand employee practices and work phenomenon. Ample research has investigated faculty teaching at the disciplinary and institutional level; however, a relatively small body of literature exists on &amp;quot;departmental culture.&amp;quot; Cultural analysis has consistently identified a number of teaching culture categories in higher education. However, culture is commonly cited as a difficult construct to study, challenging scholars to clarify how it is defined, assessed, and relates to faculty teaching practice. Scholars have suggested that academic culture be analyzed at the department level, which is the immediate environment in which faculty operate on a daily basis. However, researchers have yet to develop a measure that assesses teaching culture at the department level. The present study constructed a measure to assess &amp;quot;teaching climate&amp;quot; at the department level. Items were generated from categories derived from an extensive literature review and consultations with experts in the field; faculty familiar with scale construction revised initial items. A pilot study provided initial data to help revise the Department Teaching Climate (DTC) scale, provided preliminary psychometrics, and determined scale structure. A main study provided further psychometric evidence for the scale across an array of disciplines and institutions in higher education. Internal reliability estimates were determined by correlation analyses. Construct validity was established by correlating the DTC scale to conceptually meaningful constructs: student teaching evaluations, faculty teaching behaviors, and administrative interviews. There is little theoretical support available to posit a hypothesis about the structure of the scale. However, based on this study&apos;s inductive and deductive item generation process, the DTC scale was expected to be multidimensional. Due to methodological changes in the main study and to more accurately reflect the nature of the measure, the name of the scale was changed to Faculty Teaching Climate (FTC). Results indicated that the FTC scale has three distinct subscales and has moderate psychometric support. The FTC scale can inform administration and faculty development expert&apos;s efforts to improve teaching climate and faculty teaching related work. The FTC scale can also be used in other areas of research, such as institutional assessment, student learning and success, and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). Ultimately, the FTC scale is a valuable tool that addresses the need to clarify academic cultures and the role they play in faculty work. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563275</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Faculty Teaching Climate: Scale Construction and Initial Validation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0906-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>219</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600693</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expressive Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lexicology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Repetition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psycholinguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lam, Tuan Q.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In conversation, speakers produce some words with greater intensity, longer duration, and higher fundamental frequency (F0) than other words. By making different words in a sentence more prominent than other words, a speaker can change the meaning implied by a sentence. This thesis explores the relationship between processing in the language production system and the prominence of referring expressions. In particular, this thesis focuses on the effect of processing at the message and lexical levels of language production. Across seven experiments, I examine three factors that affect prominence: predictability, repetition, and partner identity. Based upon these the results, I argue that these factors can be separated into factors that operate at the level of the message and factors that operate at the level of lexical access. Furthermore, the results suggest that message level factors and lexical level factors affect prominence in different ways: lexical level factors lead to differences in spoken duration cross-linguistically whereas message level factors manifest differently across different languages. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563276</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Prominence of Referring Expressions: Message and Lexical Level Effects</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0907-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>117</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600694</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Task Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lichtman, Karen Melissa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Mainstream linguistics has long held that there is a fundamental difference between adult and child language learning (Bley-Vroman, 1990; Johnson &amp;amp; Newport, 1989; DeKeyser, 2000; Paradis, 2004). This difference is often framed as a change from implicit language learning in childhood to explicit language learning in adulthood, which is presumably caused by maturation. However, the position that children learn implicitly and adults learn explicitly relies on studies done only with adults (e.g. R. Ellis, 2005; Norris &amp;amp; Ortega, 2001; Spada &amp;amp; Tomita, 2010). No research to date has compared child second language (L2) learners on tasks tapping implicit vs. explicit knowledge separately. Moreover, the position that this change is caused by cognitive maturation ignores the fact that adult language learners typically receive more explicit instruction than child language learners (Nikolov, 2009). Based on literature to date, we do not know whether child L2 learners do, in fact, learn implicitly, and if so, whether they do so because they are children, or because they typically receive no explicit instruction. This dissertation comprises two empirical studies that tease apart the effects of age from the effects of instruction on implicit vs. explicit second language learning. The first study compares the performance of elementary and high school classroom learners of Spanish, who receive different types of instruction, on a story listening-and-rewriting task, which taps implicit knowledge, and a verb conjugation task, which taps explicit knowledge. The second study manipulates instruction, teaching child and adult participants an artificial mini-language under controlled implicit or explicit training conditions. Major findings of Study 1 are that (1) child learners who also receive implicit instruction do favor implicit knowledge, (2) adolescent learners favor implicit knowledge if they receive implicit instruction, but explicit knowledge if they receive explicit instruction, and (3) a small amount of explicit instruction quickly changes patterns of performance. Study 2 finds that (1) both children and adults develop greater awareness of grammatical rules under explicit training conditions than implicit training conditions, (2) both children and adults produce an artificial mini-language more accurately when their attention is directed to form, and (3) adults, but not children, may &amp;quot;spontaneously&amp;quot; develop explicit knowledge even under implicit training conditions, but this may be related to their prior foreign language instruction. Based on these findings, I argue that the change from implicit language learning in childhood to explicit language learning in adulthood is not caused by age alone. Instead, instruction has a significant influence on implicit vs. explicit learning, at any age. This contradicts the strong version of the critical period hypothesis for implicit learning (DeKeyser &amp;amp; Larson-Hall, 2005). Theoretically, these results support views of child and adult second language learning as qualitatively similar. Pedagogically, results suggest that child and adult L2 learners can take advantage of both implicit and explicit learning capacities. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563277</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Child-Adult Differences in Implicit and Explicit Second Language Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0910-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>222</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600697</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Study Abroad</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Campuses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alienation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personal Narratives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Isolation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Power Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Place of Residence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Adjustment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Maintenance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intergroup Relations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Life</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Acculturation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Choi, Hee Young</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Korea</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Korea</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines the unique experiences of international Korean college students in the Midwest who have gone through the early study abroad (ESA) period in the US during their formative secondary school education and the influence of the experiences into their college lives in the mega campus. Two overarching research questions are: 1) how do international Korean college students retrospect their ESA experiences? And 2) how do their ESA experiences place them in unique and critical ways in their transition period into the US higher education, particularly at Midwestern University (MU)? According to the narratives of the participants, there was a potentially hostile climate for international students who experienced discrimination and segregation for the first time. A &amp;quot;Chilly Climate&amp;quot; of campus environment is not new in the US. As Smith (1989) points out, many studies suggest &amp;quot;some campus environments are chillier than welcoming, more alienating than involving, more hostile than encouraging&amp;quot; (p. 20). Without the understanding of this newly emerging group of students, the slogan of internationalization will be &amp;quot;out of sync with the reality&amp;quot; as Ewell (1998) states, and the Korean ESA students would be easily lost within the system of US higher education. &amp;quot;Case Narrative&amp;quot; method was applied to acquire a thorough knowledge of the daily lives of the participants, their motivation and experiences of ESA, and the way they constructed, and continue to construct, their socio-cultural lives in a US university. Five Korean college students participated in this study. The results revealed that the Korean ESA students experienced not only a severe sense of isolation and loneliness, but a power structure from the host family they lived with and the mainstream students of US high schools or colleges. When the participants encountered the power of race and the English speaking people during their secondary school days in the US they kept silent to avoid problems, disregarding their right to speak and seeking a resolution. Later, on the US campus, the only adaptive strategy the students selected was proactive response to the outer context that was aloof toward international students. It was creating a strong bond with only other Korean international students to make secure their own culture, emotion, and the feeling of solidarity. In this sense, the solidarity of Korean ESA students was involuntary, but at the same time, self-segregation. The significant contribution of this study was that it enhanced the understanding of Korean ESA college students, documenting their detailed life experiences during their ESA period and college years in this global era. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563278</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Korean Diaspora in the Age of Globalization: Early Study Abroad (ESA) College Students in the Midwest</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0931-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>192</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600708</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Service Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiential Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pepin, Gina M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Michigan</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Michigan</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Although the implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001 created new instructional intervention practices, reading and writing scores across K-12 and postsecondary levels continue to reflect stagnant achievement outcomes. The research questions in this study concerned the effect of a northern Michigan middle school language arts intervention, in the form of a service-learning project, on student academic achievement as indicated by Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) reading scores. The service-learning intervention provided an educational opportunity for students to learn through personal experiences based on David Kolb&apos;s experiential learning theory. An experimental research design was used for the study where 70 randomly selected 6th-grade language arts students participated in a 9-week service-learning project. After data collection, the students were grouped by their performance assessment scores into 4 categories. Descriptive statistics and a 1-way ANOVA were conducted to examine possible differences between group means. Nonsignificant results showed that the service-learning project had no effect on MEAP reading scores from 2011 [F(3,66) = 0.392, p = 1.00] and 2012 [F(3,66) = 0.426, p = 0.735] as measured by a performance assessment. An outcome-based program evaluation studied the effectiveness of the service-learning project on student academic achievement. Findings were presented to the targeted audience; a continuation of a program evaluation for 2013-2014 was recommended. The findings led to social change through community partnerships and the development of teacher professional development opportunities, which included training for classroom service-learning program implementation and classroom alternative performance-based tasks. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563279</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of a Language Arts Service-Learning Project on Sixth-Grade Academic Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2240-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>178</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601330</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computational Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Natural Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sentence Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tu, Yuancheng</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The fundamental problem faced by automatic text understanding in Natural Language Processing (NLP) is to identify semantically related pieces of text and integrate them together to compute the meaning of the whole text. However, the principle of compositionality runs into trouble very quickly when real language is examined with its frequent appearance of Multiword Expressions (MWEs) whose meaning is not based on the meaning of their parts. MWEs occur in all text genres and are far more frequent and productive than are generally recognized, and pose serious difficulties for every kind of NLP applications. Given these diverse kinds of MWEs, this dissertation focuses on English verb related MWEs, constructs stochastic models to identify these complex verb predicates within the given context and discusses empirically the significance of this MWE recognition component in the context of Textual Entailment (TE), an intricate semantic inference task that involves various levels of linguistic knowledge and logic reasoning. This dissertation develops high quality computational models for three of the most frequent kinds of English complex verb constructions: Light Verb Construction (LVC), Phrasal Verb Construction (PVC) and Embedded Verb Construction (EVC), and demonstrates empirically their usage in textual entailment. The discriminative model for LVC identification achieves an 86.3% accuracy when trained with groups of either contextual and statistical features. For PVC identification, the learning model reaches 79.4% accuracy, a 41.1% error reduction compared to the baseline. In addition, adding the LVC classifier helps the simple but robust lexical TE system achieve a 39.5% error reduction in accuracy and a 21.6% absolute F1 value improvement. Similar improvements are achieved by adding the PVC and EVC classifiers into this entailment system with a 30.6% and 39.4% absolute accuracy improvement respectively. In this dissertation, two types of automation are achieved with respect to English complex verb predicates: learning to recognize these MWEs within a given context and discovering the significance of this identification within an empirical semantic NLP application, i.e., textual entailment. The lack of benchmark datasets with respect to these special linguistic phenomena is the main bottleneck to advance the computational research in them. The study presented in this dissertation provides two benchmark datasets related to the identification of LVCs and PVCs respectively and three linguistic phenomenon specified TE datasets to automate the investigation of the significance of these linguistic phenomena within a TE system. These datasets enable us to make a direct evaluation and comparison of lexically based models, reveal insightful differences between them, and create a simple but robust improved model combination. In the long run, we believe that the availability of these datasets will facilitate improved models that consider the various special multiword related phenomena within the complex semantic systems, as well as applying supervised machine learning models to optimize model combination and performance. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563280</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>English Complex Verb Constructions: Identification and Inference</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0962-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>132</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600741</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software Selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Laboratories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Andragogy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reputation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selection Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technical Support</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Design</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Samuels, Jeffrey D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) is an established field of academic inquiry with distinct applications for second language teaching and learning. Many CALL professionals direct language labs or language resource centers (LRCs) in which CALL software applications and generic software applications support language learning programs and individual study. The central research question of this study is: What aspects define the lived experience of CALL professionals as they select CALL solutions for language resource centers or language labs? A subset of related research questions focuses on how CALL professionals consider pedagogical aspects of CALL solutions in making selections, the other aspects that CALL professionals consider in adoption or non-adoption decisions, and how CALL professionals experience satisfaction with the solutions available to them, taking into account these pedagogical and other aspects. This study explores the selection of applications from a phenomenological approach based upon Moustakas&apos;s modification of Van Kaam&apos;s method. Twenty-five language lab and language resource center directors, members of the International Association for Language Learning Technology (IALLT), were interviewed to ascertain aspects of their lived experience in the selection and use of CALL applications in their educational institutions. Areas of inquiry included the alignment of instructional technologies used for language learning to pedagogical and andragogical approaches; the importance of other factors such as cost, technical support, and provider reputation; and the extent of user satisfaction with each of these elements. The majority of the interviewees indicated that pedagogical alignment between CALL solutions and the pedagogical orientation of the programs they support is a critical factor in their decision-making process. Cost is a factor in the majority of cases, while provider reputation and technical support vary as criteria for adoption. Interviewees also identified varying levels of satisfaction with the CALL solutions available with regard to these factors. They proposed a number of additional user requirements and adoption criteria to be integrated into the development lifecycle of CALL software solutions. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563281</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Pedagogy and Related Criteria: The Selection of Software for Computer Assisted Language Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0996-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>183</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600773</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Load</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lepisto-Wood, Kimberly</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In an urban Texas Independent School District (TXISD), novice teachers leave the field of education for different careers within the first 3 years of employment at a rate that is nearly twice the Texas average and near the top of the national novice teacher attrition rate range. This study examined the lived experiences of 23 TXISD novice teachers to better understand why some chose to leave and others chose to stay in their first 3 years of teaching. The research question addressed the experiences and perceptions of novice teachers during the first 3 years of teaching. The conceptual framework of this study was guided by the frameworks outlined by Guarino, Santibanez, and Daley that addressed several aspects of the problem, including understanding the characteristics of novice teachers who chose to leave or stay in the teaching profession, and the characteristics of schools that impacted novice teacher retention decisions. In this phenomenological study, semi structured interviews were conducted with 9 novice teachers who left the teaching profession and a focus group was conducted with 14 novice teachers who chose to remain in the district. In addition, a qualitative survey of 14 district leaders with extensive experience working with novice teachers provided a 3rd perspective. Inductive analysis of the collected data identified categories and themes from transcripts of the interviews and the focus group to identify key problem areas. These problems included excessive novice teacher workloads, ineffective mentoring, and lack of administration support. Recommendations included reducing novice teacher workloads; extracurricular responsibilities; building a more effective mentoring program; and providing teachers with positive, helpful critiquing rather than relying solely on negative comments that focus on problems and not solutions. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563282</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Understanding the Lived Experiences of Novice Teachers in an Urban Texas School District</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2413-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>276</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601353</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Distance Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Benefits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asynchronous Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blended Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dunnick, Roger Dale</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this phenomenological study was to identify the predominant format, benefits and challenges of distance education at the target school as perceived by multiple groups of stakeholders. Important in identifying the above categories were gaining an understanding of the reasons behind participant perceptions as well as the reasons for the current format of distance education at the target school. Additionally, the stakeholders were queried as to their beliefs as to what would improve distance education at the school. Results from this study included the participant&apos;s perception that college preparedness offered the greatest benefit, technology issues posed the greatest challenge and, courses offered were predominantly asynchronous in format and offered for college credit. Stakeholders believed that distance education at the target school should be expanded. Expansion of the program should include more high school level courses according to participants. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563283</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effectiveness of Distance Education in a Small Rural High School: A Phenomenological Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Liberty University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2426-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>265</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601354</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Resources Centers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Alexander, Roy E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this quantitative study was to improve the academic success of students through the utilization of differentiated teaching within a specialized Learning Resource Center. The research study site is a private coeducational K-11 school located in Northern Georgia. The school provides motivated and disciplined students with a rigorous and balanced liberal arts college preparatory education while emphasizing every student&apos;s social, physical, and spiritual well-being. The school administration was concerned that students who struggled with the rigorous curriculum and academic demands of the school needed some type of intervention to improve their academic success. The results of this study will provide K-12 educational administrators with an understanding of the impact this teaching methodology has on student academic success when administered within a specialized learning center. Recommendations for further research on differentiated teaching methodologies within a specialized Learning Resource Center are provided. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563284</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Improving Student Academic Success through Differentiated Teaching within a Specialized Learning Resource Center</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2476-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>109</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601358</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Parent Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Story Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents as Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emergent Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Role</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carroll, Crystal</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Acquisition of literacy is best conceptualized as a developmental continuum, with its origins early in the life of a child, rather than an all-or-none phenomenon that begins when children start school. How parents expose their children to literacy even before they enter school is important for the later development of reading. The home environment is an important setting for the acquisition of literacy knowledge because children have unique literacy opportunities at home such as observing literacy activities of others, engaging in joint reading and writing activities with other people, and benefiting from teaching strategies used by family members. Researchers suggest that storybook exposure and parental teaching about literacy are distinct types of activities that differently promote language skills and the acquisition of early literacy skills. This study used hierarchical regression analyses to examine the role of storybook exposure and direct parental teaching of emergent literacy in addition to child interest of reading and literacy activities to predict emergent literacy outcomes using an ethnically diverse sample of preschool aged children from low socio-economic status (SES) backgrounds. The study found that young children&apos;s book exposure predicts oral language development. This has important implications for parental involvement in children&apos;s education. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563285</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effects of Parental Literacy Involvement and Child Reading Interest on the Development of Emergent Literacy Skills</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2484-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>214</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601364</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Intellectual Disability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telecommunications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Handheld Devices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Modeling (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Adjustment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Males</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Down Syndrome</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Christman, Jennifer T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The aim of this study was to examine the application of video modeling on mobile technology to increase efficiency in the classroom for students identified with intellectual disabilities. Specially, this study sought to identify if video modeling on mobile technology could decrease adult prompting for students with intellectual disabilities during an in school transitions. The use of video modeling on mobile technology to increase speed and to increase task completion for students with intellectual disabilities during an in school transition is examined. Using a single subject, ABAB design, a video model with a peer as the model, was recorded and viewed on an iPod touch to assess the effectiveness of the intervention in an urban high school. Participants included four high school, male, African American students. The intervention was intended for three students and the fourth student served as model in the video. One student had a primary diagnosis of autism and the other two had a primary diagnosis of Down syndrome. Data were analyzed using visual inspection with mean, range, split middle average, variability, immediacy of effect and percent of overlapping data. Outcomes varied but there was an overall positive conclusion from the intervention. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563286</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using Mobile Technology in an Urban High School to Decrease Adult Prompting during in School Transitions for Students Identified with Intellectual Disabilities</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2486-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>102</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601365</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>State Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarships</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Policy Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Retailing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Delivery Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journal Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Copeland, Kristopher</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Arkansas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Arkansas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Lottery policies have been created by many states to generate additional funds to support public initiatives, such as higher education scholarships. In 2009, Arkansas adopted a lottery to generate higher education scholarships. The purpose of this qualitative case study was to examine the Arkansas state lottery policy design process to better understand how the social construction of higher education students and other citizens became embedded within the policy. The social construction of target populations theory (Ingram &amp;amp; Schneider, 1993), guided three research questions regarding how policy actors in Arkansas socially constructed citizens while designing lottery legislation, how these social constructions became embedded within the policy, and how the social constructions became communicated to the public. Through 18 participant interviews, document analysis, and journaling, this study examined how policy actors socially constructed target populations while forming lottery policy. The findings were presented as a descriptive analysis, which outlined the development of the lottery policy, and an interpretive analysis, which was guided by the three research questions. In the current study, I found that policy actors socially constructed three targeted populations when designing the lottery scholarship act: (a) students as beneficiaries, (b) lottery players supplying the extra revenue, identified as mostly composed of low-income citizens, and (c) retailers and vendors as beneficiaries. Policy actors embedded these constructions into the policy design through several ways: (a) the initiated act developed constructions of students, (b) the modification of the Academic Challenge scholarship, (c) competing goals for this policy were created since access did not necessarily guarantee degree completion, and (d) the retail and vendor community received favorable benefits in the form of commission and state contracts. These constructions were communicated to the public by the messages created in the Hope for Arkansas lottery campaign and the development of the policy, which was conveyed through the media and the Arkansas Department of Higher Education. The study concludes with recommendations for future research and implications for policy and practice, which focus on sustainability of scholarship award amounts, programs for the poor, and strategies to accomplish degree completion and access goals within the policy. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563287</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>&amp;quot;There Were High Hopes and High Projections:&amp;quot; Examining the Social Construction of Target Populations in the Policy Design of the Arkansas Lottery Legislation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arkansas</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1983-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>174</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601264</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attrition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Associate Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission (School)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cumberbatch-Sullivan, Karen J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This quantitative, causal-comparative research study investigated the effectiveness of a strategy to address concerns in nursing education about the high attrition rates and poor retention rates of pre-licensure nursing students, particularly in the first semester of nursing school. Two research questions guided this study and focused on the influence of the remediation-review course on posttest Test of Essential Academic Skills (TEAS-V) scores. An independent sample t-test (at a = 0.05) was conducted to determine if statistically significant differences existed on posttest scores by group (treatment vs. control). The results of the independent sample t-test on posttest scores by group (treatment vs. control) were statistically significant, p &amp;lt; 0.001, indicating that posttest scores were significantly different by group: the treatment group had significantly higher posttest scores than the control group. A dependent sample t-test (at a = 0.05) was conducted to determine if statistically significant differences existed between the treatment group&apos;s pretest and posttest scores. The results of the dependent sample t-test were significant, p &amp;lt; 0.001, indicating that pretest and posttest scores were significantly different: posttest scores were significantly higher. Two groups were examined in the study: 106 associate degree nursing program applicants who scored below the recommended cut score and completed a required remediation-review course (treatment group) and 106 associate degree nursing program applicants who scored below the recommended cut score but did not participate in the remediation-review course (control group). The TEAS-V scores were examined at pretest and posttest for the treatment group, and at posttest for the control group. The purpose of this research study was to determine if the completion of a required remediation-review course would lead to significant differences in the posttest scores on a standardized nursing admission assessment, the TEAS-V. Implications for practice and recommendations for further research are included. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563288</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Begin with the End in Mind: Measuring the Effectiveness of Remediation on Student Performance on the Test of Essential Academic Skills (TEAS-V)</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2489-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>170</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601366</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asperger Syndrome</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transitional Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interprofessional Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lifelong Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Empowerment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Actualization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moore-Gumora, Courteny</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The dissertation explores as ethnography the transformative process of ten student in a program for students with Asperger Syndrome transitioning from high school to college located in an urban high school to include the extracurricular extension referred to as Ethos. The dissertation considers the experience in the context of specialized education, and the broader even contexts of curricular development and instruction concerning school reform and design. Fundamentally, the study intends to examine and explain the extent to which these students experience transformation during their transition to higher education in this progressive program. Embedded in the AsIP design are in-depth inquiry driven discussions and experiences to enhance interpersonal relationships, effective communication and higher level cognition. The exploration examines if the in-depth inquiry driven design does contribute to academic and lifelong learning, fundamentally improving students over-all self-perception, empowerment and actualization of life goals, which is the underpinning purpose of an exceptional education. The dissertation brings together the theoretical and empirical practices of traditional informative education, radical transformative theory and sustainable education reform. An analysis of learning disability and constructivist learning are used to elucidate the socio-complexity of historic academic constructs concerning educational leadership and social justice. This study is the beginning of a larger future exploration of alternative academic practices as transformative learning in radical school reform. This ontological perspective considers where in the realm of education does the student with ASD (specifically with Asperger Syndrome) exist. The study provides access to student experiences that drives discussion to ponder equity and power in education and society by removing historic constraints. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563289</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Study of Students on the Autism Spectrum Transformation in a High School Transition Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, California State University, East Bay</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2000-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>198</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601277</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holistic Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Support Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mayer, Alexander K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Weiss, Michael J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Visher, Mary G.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sommo, Colleen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rudd, Timothy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cullinan, Dan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Weissman, Evan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wathington, Heather D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Maryland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Maryland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper presents research that explores similarities and differences across six randomized controlled trials of learning communities in community colleges that were conducted by MDRC and the National Center for Postsecondary Research. Five of these studies track students&apos; progress in the program semester and two follow-up semesters, and one study follows students for six years. These studies provide the most extensive evidence available on the promise and limitations of learning communities for improving the academic outcomes of students in community colleges. The present research examines several competing explanations for mixed findings and draws lessons to inform further research in the field. The following six community colleges were involved in the studies: (1) Community College of Baltimore County (CCBC) in suburban Maryland; (2) Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Florida; (3) Houston Community College in Houston, Texas; (4) Kingsborough Community College in Brooklyn, New York; (5) Merced College in Merced, California; and (6) Queensborough Community College in Queens, New York. The learning communities each lasted for one semester, and consisted of four key components, although there was variation in their emphasis and implementation: (1) linked courses and student cohorts; (2) faculty collaboration; (3) instructional practices; and (4) student supports. More than 7,000 students were randomly assigned to either the program group or the control group. The researchers used several data sources: (1) the baseline information form; (2) operational site visits, field research, and instructor survey; and (3) student records. Results from the studies suggest the following: (1) One-semester learning communities can have a long-term impact and even boost graduation, as shown in the study of the Kingsborough program; and (2) The combined results of all six trials suggest that, on average, learning communities for developmental education students produce only a modest impact on credits earned in the targeted subject of English or mathematics. The research provides good tests of learning communities as they appear to be typically enacted, but not a test of the &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;advanced&amp;quot; learning communities described in the literature. Tables and figures are appended. [This report was written with Kelley Fong, Hannah Fresques, and Jedediah Teres.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563290</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Mixed Results from Six Large Randomized Controlled Trials of Learning Communities in Community Colleges</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Protocol Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metacognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Screening Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Revision (Written Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Basaraba, Deni</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zannou, Yetunde</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Woods, Dawn</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Within the current test-centered educational reform movement, considerable emphasis is placed on using assessment results to make instructional decisions for individual students. Test scores are used to estimate a student&apos;s current level of skill, monitor his or her progress during instruction, and identify whether the student has gained the expected skills and knowledge at the end of an instructional period. Informed and appropriate instructional decision-making, however, is predicated on several assumptions: (1) assessments can provide information about students&apos; understanding, strategic competence, and reasoning skills within a domain; and (2) that this information can be obtained accurately and efficiently to help educators determine whether students will benefit from additional instructional supports to be successful (Ikeda, Neessen, &amp;amp; Witt, 2008). Meeting these assumptions, however, requires taking steps during the assessment development process to ensure valid inferences can be made about students&apos; knowledge, skills, and abilities based on their performance on the assessment. The purpose of this study is to describe the development of a universal screening assessment of algebra readiness for Grades 2-4 with a particular focus on the collection of student think-aloud data to: (1) provide insights into students&apos; cognitive and problem-solving processes; (2) investigate the relationships between students&apos; predictive, planning, and procedural metacognition and their performance on multiple-choice mathematics items that were similar in structure and content to those that would be used in the universal screening assessment; and (3) inform the item writing and revision process. Specifically, this study focuses on the following research questions: (1) To what extent can multiple-choice mathematics items be written that require students&apos; to demonstrate varying levels of cognitive engagement; and (2) What is the relation between students&apos; predictive, planning, and procedural metacognition and their performance on multiple-choice mathematics items. Three tables and one figure (Directions for Concurrent and Retrospective Think-Alouds) are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563291</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Exploring the Utility of Student-Think Alouds for Providing Insights into Students&apos; Metacognitive and Problem-Solving Processes during Assessment Development</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economically Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Papay, John P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Murnane, Richard J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Willett, John B.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In the past thirty years educational attainments in the United States have stagnated, particularly for low-income Americans. As a result, income-related gaps in educational attainments have grown. These gaps are important because education has historically been the key mechanism for intergenerational socio-economic mobility in the U.S. While the research and policy community has spent a great deal of energy documenting and exploring the important issue of racial gaps in education, less attention has been paid to income-related gaps. Recent evidence suggests that while racial achievement gaps have narrowed over the past few decades, income-related achievement gaps have grown substantially (Reardon, 2011). In this analysis, the researchers use dataset from Massachusetts to document income-based gaps in educational attainments and marshal evidence to examine the role of schooling and school-related policies in accounting for them. In most of the analyses the focus is on students who were first-time 8th graders in 2002-03 and 2003-04 school years. The results suggest several important lessons for educators and policymakers: (1) income-related gaps are large and important. They reflect differences in skills and behaviors that emerge early in students&apos; educational careers, often even before they enter the public school system. Early intervention to remediate these gaps is critical; (2) income-related gaps in both academic achievement and educational attainments are smaller for students who have been in school in the state longer suggesting that the system is having some success in closing these gaps; and (3) while early gaps exist, they do not tell the whole story and even high school does not appear to be too late for intervention. Something appears to be happening to low-income students in high school that makes them fall out of the educational pipeline. Even among demographically similar students who persist to 10th grade, have similar test scores, and say that they plan to attend college, low-income students drop out of the pipeline at much greater rates than their higher-income peers. Five figures and three tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563292</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Inequality and Educational Attainment: Evidence from Massachusetts</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Brain</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pakulak, Eric</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stevens, Courtney</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bell, Theodore A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fanning, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Klein, Scott</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Isbell, Elif</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Neville, Helen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Oregon</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oregon</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Over the course of several years of research, the authors have employed psychophysics, electrophysiological (ERP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to study the development and neuroplasticity of the human brain. During this time, they observed that different brain systems and related functions display markedly different degrees or &amp;quot;profiles&amp;quot; of neuroplasticity. Most relevant for the application of research in cognitive neuroscience to the design of education interventions are results showing that some systems are highly modifiable by experience and are dependent on experience but only during particular time periods (&amp;quot;sensitive periods&amp;quot;). In such systems they also observed Systems that are most modifiable (i.e., display more neuroplasticity) display both enhancements in the deaf and blind, and greater vulnerability in those with or at risk for developmental disorders. One system that displays this profile is sustained selective attention. Considerable evidence documents the central role of selective attention in all aspects of learning and memory, and school readiness in particular (for review, see Stevens &amp;amp; Bavelier, 2012). Selective attention is a highly malleable system that is both enhanced in remaining modalities following sensory deprivation, shows deficits in developmental disorders and in typically developing children from lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds and that can be increased in both typically and non-typically developing children following computerized training (Stevens &amp;amp; Neville, 2009; Stevens, Lauinger, &amp;amp; Neville, 2009; Stevens, et al., 2008). Guided in part by these findings, the authors developed and assessed an eight-week, family-based training program designed to improve lower SES preschool children&apos;s academic readiness and, centrally, selective attention. 141 3-5 year-old children enrolled in Head Start (HS) and their parents participated in the current study which took place at the Brain Development Laboratory at the University of Oregon and Head Start sites in Lane County, Oregon. The training program, Parents and Children Making Connections: Highlighting Attention (PCMC-A), included both a child-directed component, as well as a family-based, parent directed component. Parents attended eight weekly, two-hour small-group classes that occurred in the evenings or on weekends at HS sites, and their children participated in concurrent small group training activities. Results show that a program that targets child attention using a family-based model involving children and their parents is highly effective in changing children&apos;s neurocognitive function as well as their parents&apos; caregiving behaviors in the relatively short timeframe of eight weeks. The evidence presented here suggests that programs that target multiple pathways, including parents and the home environment, have the potential to narrow the large and growing gap in school readiness and academic achievement between higher and lower SES children. Two figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563293</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Family-Based Training Program Improves Brain Function, Cognition, and Behavior in Lower Socioeconomic Status Preschoolers</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>7</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwc_reviewed>Meets Evidence Standards without Reservations</eric:wwc_reviewed>
<eric:wwcguide_link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/study/80698</eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Support Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inclusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disability Discrimination</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Discrimination</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>General Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Adjustment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culturally Relevant Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personal Narratives</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Villalobos, Anna Marie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this dissertation was to examine students with disabilities self-perceptions of their academic and social supports in the general and special education classroom and the impact of the students&apos; counterstories to inform the design of classroom supports. This study was anchored in organizational theory, critical race theory, and the special education inclusion literature that supports the positive achievement and positive social effects for students with disabilities in the general education program. I make a case for the use of Critical Race Theory as a means to address ableism and argue for the use of more qualitative and transformative research to address the research to practice gap in the special education literature. The dissertation was a case study of eight high school students and six of their teachers. The experimental design was an explanatory mixed methods approach collecting five cycles of quantitative and qualitative data. The cycles collected data related to the students&apos; preferred classroom supports, their academic identity, teachers classroom supports, and the impact of the students counterstories on their teachers instructional design. Findings suggest students prefer individual supports, feel more successful in their general education classes that are challenging than in special education classes, and possess many of the positive non-cognitive factors associated with student success. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563294</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Students&apos; Self-Perceptions of Support</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, California State University, East Bay</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2007-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>218</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601283</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Health</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Rearing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mashburn, Andrew J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Downer, Jason T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The goals of the Head Start Impact Study (HSIS) are to: (1) determine the impacts of Head Start on children&apos;s school readiness and parental practices that support children&apos;s development; and (2) to determine under what circumstances Head Start achieves its greatest impacts and for which children (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2010). The HSIS includes a nationally-representative sample of newly entering 3- and 4-year old children from 84 grantee/delegate agencies who were randomly assigned to either have access to Head Start or to a control group who did not have access to Head Start but could enroll in other early childhood programs. Results of prior analyses that address the first goal of the HSIS found benefits for children at the end of Head Start that were concentrated on language and literacy skills for the 4-year-old group and benefits at the end of Head Start on cognitive, social-emotional, health, and parenting outcomes for the 3-year old group. However, the early advantages found at the end of Head Start on most of these outcomes were non-significant by the end of kindergarten and first grade. The second goal of the HSIS is to identify the circumstances under which Head Start achieves its greatest impacts, and one possible explanation for the largely non-significant effects at the end of kindergarten and first grade has to do with the quality of children&apos;s experiences in elementary school. The purpose of this presentation is to describe the methods used to examine the extent to which the impacts of Head Start on children&apos;s cognitive and social-emotional outcomes at kindergarten, first grade, and third grade may be moderated by the quality of children&apos;s experiences during elementary school.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563295</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Methods That Examine the Extent to Which the Quality of Children&apos;s Experiences in Elementary School Moderate the Long-Term Impacts of Head Start</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>6</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>1</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Christianity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alumni</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Group Unity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Empathy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Church Related Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yonkers-Talz, Kevin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Casa de la Solidaridad has been recognized as an innovative and effective educational model within Jesuit higher education yet, until now, there have only been verbal presentations of the unique attributes of the Casa de la Solidaridad model. In addition, there has been a lack of information regarding the influence of the Casa experience on the lives of alumni. The purpose of this study was twofold: 1) to thoroughly describe and document the unique attributes of the Casa de la Solidaridad model, and 2) to provide some insight into how the Casa program has influenced the lives of Casa alumni. This mixed method study gathered both qualitative and quantitative data in order to answer the research questions. A qualitative case study was conducted in order to document and describe the unique attributes of the Casa de la Solidaridad educational model. Survey research investigated qualitatively and quantitatively how the Casa experience has influenced the lives of Casa alumni. This research demonstrated that the Casa de la Solidaridad educational model fosters well-educated solidarity. This was evidenced not only by the students&apos; written responses but also by how they are living their lives. In addition, the findings demonstrated that the Casa model successfully supported students&apos; exploration of their spirituality, something that is vital to Jesuit higher education, and influenced their vocational decisions in ways that kept students connected to people suffering from the effects of poverty. It is recommended, therefore, that leaders in Jesuit higher education explore ways they can leverage the large and robust international network of Jesuit colleges and universities and create a sustainable network of Casa programs. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563296</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Casa De La Solidaridad: A Pedagogy of Solidarity</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of San Francisco</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2009-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>133</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601284</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Causal Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelcey, Ben</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Phelps, Geoffrey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jones, Nathan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teacher professional development (PD) is seen as critical to improving the quality of US schools (National Commission on Teaching and America&apos;s Future, 1997). PD is increasingly viewed as one of the primary levers for improving teaching quality and ultimately student achievement (Correnti, 2007). One factor that is driving interest in PD is rapidly mounting evidence that teachers vary greatly in their effectiveness (Nye et al., 2004). Another is a growing recognition that there is much for teachers to learn if they are to realize ambitious new content standards for students (Ball &amp;amp; Cohen, 1999; Borko, 2004). To this end, policymakers and funding agencies have directed considerable resources toward PD studies focused on improving teacher effectiveness (Birman et al. 2007). Despite recent shifts in research emphasizing the value of carefully designed experiments, the number of studies of teacher PD with rigorous designs and outcomes has lagged behind its student outcome counterparts. The purpose of the work reported in this proposal is to provide guidance to the research and policy community on the design of rigorous studies that have the power to draw strong causal inferences to establish the effectiveness of PD programs on valued outcomes. The authors&apos; work considered a new generation of mathematics and reading knowledge outcomes designed to assess the types of content problems that teachers encounter in practice. Using these outcomes, they developed empirical estimates of design parameters such as the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for teacher PD studies. Within this framework they first investigated the extent to which teachers&apos; knowledge levels were clustered in schools and the extent to which this clustering varies by outcome domain and school context. Second, they investigated the extent to which uses of general design parameter estimates (e.g., ICCs irrespective of outcome) leads to indeterminacies in design. Third, they examined the extent to which the appropriateness of design parameters in mounting a well powered study were sensitive to the knowledge domain and the contextual features of studies. They then provide empirical estimates of domain- and context-specific design parameters to help researchers navigate methodological choices that lead to more effective PD study design. Four tables and one figure are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563297</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Parameters for the Design of Group Randomized Studies for Teacher Professional Development</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Calculators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Handheld Devices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Audience Response Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Phyllis</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Program for International Assessment tested students in mathematics from 41 countries and found that students in the United States ranked in the lowest percentile. This struggle with math among youth in the United States prompted this quasi-experimental quantitative study about using interactive technology to engage and motivate 9th grade students in an Algebra classroom. The theoretical basis of this study was a constructivist perspective, using the Piagetian concept of action as an intellect builder. A convenience sample of 76 students was divided into 4 groups: Group 1, the control group, used no technology and consisted of 21 students; Group 2 used the TI Nspires calculators and consisted of 17 students; Group 3 used the TI Nspire calculators with the TI Navigator and consisted of 20 students; and Group 4 used the TI Nspire calculators, the TI Navigator, and the clickers. The participants were given 45 instructional classes that covered a 9-week period. All groups took the Motivated Strategy for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) and the State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness test (STAAR) before and after the treatment of interactive technologies. A paired t test and a factorial repeated ANOVA were conducted, revealing no significant effect for the MSLQ based on the use of technology. However, the use of technology with the STAAR did show a significant difference in test scores for 2 treatment groups: Group 3, which used the calculator and the TI navigator; and Group 4, which used the calculator, the TI navigator, and the clickers. These results support the use of additional technology that is needed in the mathematics classroom to support the use of the calculators. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563298</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Interactive Technology and Engaging Learners in the Mathematics Classroom</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2042-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>266</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601289</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Handheld Devices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web 2.0 Technologies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>An, Jin S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Student retention is a major concern of many higher education administrators and educators in the United States. The American College Testing Program (ACT) studies conducted between 1983 and 2010 indicated that one out of three students who started college did not return as sophomores and one out of two college students were unable to graduate. Student integration theory, theory of connectivism, and high popularity and wide availability of technologies among many college students suggests technologies could be the solutions for this retention problem by helping to improve connection, communication, integration, and support among students and faculty. However, there are not enough studies available to confirm the effectiveness of the use of technologies on student retention and to have a full understanding of the correlation between technologies and student retention. Many researchers also suggested that focusing on high-risk groups of college students (low-income, first-year, first-generation and ethnic minority college students) is one of the best strategies to solve the retention problem. This case study served to explore the perceptions of high-risk groups of college students on the use of new and emerging technologies on student retention in order to have a better understanding of the correlation between technologies and student retention from college students&apos; perspectives. This study suggests that high-risk groups of college students perceived mobile technologies and social networking services as technologies with high potential to help improve student retention; while they perceived texting and Web 2.0 as technologies with low potential. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563299</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Study of College Students&apos; Perceptions on the Use of New and Emerging Technologies on Student Retention in a Higher Education Setting</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Keiser University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2073-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>201</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601293</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Child Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Modification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aggression</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kurki, Anja</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wang, Wei</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Li, Yibing</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Poduska, Jeanne</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Good Behavior Game (GBG) is a classroom-based behavior management strategy aimed at reducing aggressive/disruptive behavior and socializing children into the role of student. GBG, delivered in first and second grades, has been shown to reduce rates of substance abuse and other deleterious outcomes into young adulthood (Brown, C.H. et al 2007, Ialongo, et al. 2001, Kellam, S.G. et al, 2008 and Poduska, J.M. et al. 2008, Kellam, S.G. et al 1998, Ialongo, N.S. et al. 1999), especially for students that were rated as aggressive, disruptive at entry into first grade/baseline by their teachers. Despite GBG being recognized as an evidence-based prevention program (National Registry of Evidence-based programs and Practices, NREPP, http://nrepp.samhsa.gov/), published data to date is mostly limited to African American and Anglo populations that are native English speakers. This study is a four-year IES Goal 3 project (R305A090446, PI Poduska) that was designed to understand the level of professional development (PD) required for teachers to implement and sustain the Good Behavior Game (GBG), a universal preventive intervention. Two models of PD are being compared with each other and with a control condition, in a randomized field trial. &amp;quot;GBG Basic,&amp;quot; which provides group-based pre-implementation training to teachers supplemented by a group-based booster session, and &amp;quot;GBG w Coach,&amp;quot; which has the same activities under &amp;quot;GBG Basic&amp;quot; plus a coach who works directly in the classroom with the teacher. This trial takes place in multilingual context of Houston Independent School district. Five tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563300</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Measurement of Child Behavior via Classroom Observations in the Good Behavior Game Professional Development Models Randomized Control Trial</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>National Institute on Drug Abuse (DHHS/PHS)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=851'>R305A090446</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number>R01DA030452</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Methods Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reaction Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prior Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Efficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cutting Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Length</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Licensing Examinations (Professions)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adaptive Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Qian, Hong</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation includes three essays: one essay focuses on the effect of teacher preparation programs on teacher knowledge while the other two focus on test-takers&apos; response times on test items. Essay One addresses the problem of how opportunities to learn in teacher preparation programs influence future elementary mathematics teachers&apos; knowledge. This essay used data collected for the Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). TEDS-M measured the mathematics content knowledge (MCK) and the mathematics pedagogical content knowledge (MPCK) of future teachers in their final year in teacher preparation programs. The purpose of this essay is to explore whether elementary teaching candidates&apos; MCK and MPCK are associated with their opportunities to learn in mathematics courses, mathematics methods courses, general pedagogy courses, and student teaching in five countries. The results showed that opportunities to learn in some teacher preparation components are more important than in other components and that there are more associations in high-performance countries than in low-performance countries. Essay Two addresses the problem of how to detect item pre-knowledge using item responses and response time data. Item-knowledge is indicated by an unexpected short response time and unexpected correct response. This essay used a hierarchical framework proposed by other researchers for predicting expected response and response times. Large residuals between the expected responses and the observed responses indicate aberrance. Two samples are used for detecting item pre-knowledge. The first sample is from the early stage of the operational test and is used for item calibration. The second sample is from the late stage of the operational test, which may feature item pre-knowledge. The purpose of this essay is to explore whether there are item pre-knowledge and compromised items in the second sample using the parameters estimated from the first sample. The results showed two items (out of 111) potentially exposed, and two candidates (out of 1,172) showing some indication of pre-knowledge on multiple items. Essay Three addresses the problem of how to improve ability estimation or shorten a test using response times as collateral information. Response times can provide useful information about ability based on the correlation between person ability and person speed. The purpose of this essay is to explore whether incorporating a response time model into a CAT procedure will improve the correlation between true ability and estimated ability and classification accuracy by simulation studies. At the same time, the test length for the examinees whose ability is near the cut score is usually very long in variable length adaptive tests that have stopping rules related to decision making. Another purpose of this essay is to investigate whether using response times as collateral information can shorten the test length for these examinees while maintaining the same level of accuracy. The results from this study showed that using response times as collateral information does not improve ability estimation for this large-scale licensure examination using the specified estimation procedure which was designed to support a CAT procedure. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563301</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Three Essays on Teacher Education Programs and Test-Takers&apos; Response Times on Test Items</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2196-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>122</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601321</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Labor Market</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Papay, John P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kraft, Matthew A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bloom, Julia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Buckley, Kate</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liebowitz, David</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>While there are many reasons why late hiring may affect student achievement, no empirical studies have documented this effect in practice. This paper presents the first estimates of the direct impact of late hiring on students&apos; academic achievement, sheds light on two competing explanations for the struggles of late-hire teachers advanced in the literature (labor market effects and disruption effects), and examines broader consequences of late hiring on student achievement, including spillover effects that occur from increased teacher turnover. Researchers address the following questions: (1) Do the observable characteristics of teachers who are hired late and the schools that hire them differ from on-time hires?; (2) Does late hiring reduce student achievement? If so, are labor market effects or disruption effects to blame?; and (3) Are teachers who are hired late more likely to switch schools or leave the school district? The study reveals the following findings: (1) Late-hired teachers differ from their peers in the district in several ways--gender, ethnicity, age, professional route to teaching, and a tendency to work in different types of schools; (2) A classroom with a teacher hired after school starts in the fall reduces student achievement; and (3) Late-hired teachers are much less likely to stay in the district than standard-hired teachers, and those who remain are more likely to transfer schools. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563302</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Missed Opportunities in the Labor Market or Temporary Disruptions? How Late Teacher Hiring Affects Student Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>6</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Moral Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Moral Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Work</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Justice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Counselor Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Associations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Groessl, Joan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Defining Issues Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Defining Issues Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined both the moral development levels using the Defining Issues Test-2 (DIT--2) and ethical decision-making using the Professional Opinion Scale (POS) of social workers who provide field supervision to students within accredited social work programs in Wisconsin. Using the moral development theory of Kohlberg (1981) which defined moral development in terms of stages that increased an individual&apos;s ability to incorporate justice reasoning, Rest (1979) developed a four component model consisting of moral identity, judgment, sensitivity and motivation; the Defining Issues Test-2 (DIT-2) is a means of measuring moral judgment. Abbott (1988) developed the Professional Opinion Scale (POS) as a means of measuring social workers&apos; identification with the established values of the profession. Applying Rest&apos;s model, moral identity in social workers was connected to identity as a social worker. The POS was postulated as a measure of social work identity and motivation since higher POS scores are reflective of adherence to the social work values identified in the &amp;quot;National Association of Social Work Code of Ethics&amp;quot; (r2008). A web-based survey was distributed to 1356 social workers through the e-mail lists of field coordinators in accredited social work programs in Wisconsin resulting in 163 usable surveys for analysis. Results of this study demonstrate that participants who score higher on the DIT-2 also score higher on the POS supporting the postulation that higher levels of moral development relate positively to ethical decision-making. Study participants with Masters of Social Work degrees scored higher on the DIT-2 but not higher on the POS than those holding Bachelor of Social Work degrees. There were no relationships found between either DIT-2 scores or POS scores with years in service, and employer type or practice area. This study implies that the capacity to make ethical decisions can be demonstrated by higher levels of moral development and congruence with the social work values. The outcomes of this study can serve as a foundation for further research examining the fourth component of Rest&apos;s model, moral action, applied to social worker&apos;s ethical choices. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563303</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Moral Development and Social Worker Ethical Decision-Making</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Marian University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2198-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>166</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601323</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Team Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>General Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constructivism (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Johnson, Beverly N.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Coteaching is an instructional strategy that improves the achievement of students with disabilities, but few researchers examined the impact of coteaching on general-education students. Vygotsky&apos;s social-constructivist perspective of learning, the zone of proximal development, was the theoretical framework used in this research study. The influence of coteaching on general education students&apos; mathematics End-of-Course Test (EOCT) scores is not known. The purpose of this retrospective and predictive, non-experimental, quantitative study was to determine if participation in coteaching classrooms makes a difference in the academic achievement of general-education students&apos; 9th-grade mathematics EOCT scores. The study examined achievements of 9th-grade general-education students from a Georgia high school. The achievements of general-education students in traditional and in coteaching classes, moderated by gender, were analyzed using individual scaled scores from the 9th-grade mathematics EOCT. The study was designed to determine if coteaching and gender have an effect on the academic performance of general-education mathematics students. Data for this study were analyzed using an independent t-test and ANOVA. Results revealed that general-education students performed at higher levels in traditional mathematics classes than in coteaching mathematics classes. In addition, in traditional mathematics classes, girls performed slightly better than boys while in coteaching mathematics classes, boys performed better than girls. On average, cotaught girls failed to meet the average passing proficiency level. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563304</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Coteaching on End-of-Course Test Scores</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Grand Canyon University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2237-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>131</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601328</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Repetition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Required Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Failure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Allensworth, Elaine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nomi, Takako</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Heppen, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The consequences of failing core academic courses during the first year are dire. In Chicago, over a quarter of students fail at least one semester of algebra in their ninth grade year, and only 13% of students who fail both semesters of Algebra I in ninth grade graduate in 4 years. Offering credit recovery options is one strategy to deal with high failure rates. The primary goal of credit recovery programs is to give students an opportunity to retake classes that they failed in an effort to get them back on track and keep them in school (Watson &amp;amp; Gemin, 2008). It makes theoretical sense to try to get students to recover their algebra credits early, in the summer after ninth grade--before they take geometry or Algebra II and chemistry, and to put them back on track towards graduation. But there is little evidence about the extent to which expanding credit recovery leads to substantive improvements in student progression and outcomes. Using a population of all first-time ninth grade students who entered regular neighborhood high schools in Chicago between 2008-2012, this study examines the benefits of offering expanded credit recovery options for ninth grade algebra, relative to business as usual (i.e., the summer programming schools would offer in the absence of efforts to expand credit recovery). Some CPS high schools in the study received funding to implement at least two Algebra I credit recovery courses during the summer sessions of 2011 and 2012--at least one online and one face-to-face section. Fifteen schools participated in 2011; in total they offered 18 pairs of sections (36 total). Thirteen schools participated in 2012; in total they offered 20 pairs of sections (40 total). Preliminary findings suggest that participation in this study did significantly expand access to credit recovery options. It sets the stage for the analyses of the effects of expanding credit recovery on school- and student-level outcomes that will be reported in full in this paper along with additional forthcoming results of the study. All analyses will be completed by January 2013. Three figures and two tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563305</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Pay-Offs from Expanding Summer Credit Recovery in Algebra</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>20</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Limited English Speaking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 10</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Denson, Bettina Coley</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 10</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study sought to determine whether a relationship existed between teacher-assigned classroom grades and high-stakes test scores. The study examined teacher-assigned math grades in correlation to the student scores on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment test (FCAT) in a selected Florida high school. It also sought to determine the relationship between teacher-assigned classroom grades and high-stakes testing scores independent of the variables of gender, ethnicity, disability status, and Limited English Proficiency Status. Hence, there were two main research questions that drove this study: (a) Do tenth-grade classroom math grades relate to the student&apos;s performance on the math portion of the FCAT, and (b) After controlling for student characteristics (gender, ethnicity, disability status, and Limited English proficiency), is there a significant relationship between tenth-grade classroom math grades and students&apos; performance on the math portion of the FCAT? The raw scores were taken from the available sample of tenth grade students whose test scores and classroom grade scores were reported from their tenth-grade year during the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 school years. A quantitative, non-experimental correlational approach was used to determine if there is a correlation between the students&apos; classroom grades and their FCAT scores. Correlational coefficients were produced to reflect the strength of the relationship between the independent variable, teacher-assigned grades, and the dependent variable, the FCAT. A Pearson correlation was used as the statistical technique to determine the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable. A multiple regression was used to determine the strength or existence of a relationship of the independent variable and the dependent variable independent of gender, ethnicity, disability status, and Limited English Proficiency status. This information will assist in developing high school grading models that can be used to produce grades that are strongly indicative of student achievement towards classroom preparation of mastering standards for state assessments. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563307</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining Teacher-Assigned Math Grades as Predictors for High-Stakes Testing</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1583-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>109</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601062</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attribution Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Departments of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suburban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McDonald, Wendy E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>South Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This quantitative, causal-comparative study examined the reading achievement of third grade students to ascertain the reading health of elementary students as measured through South Carolina&apos;s standardized assessment, the Palmetto Assessment of State Standards (PASS). The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a significant difference in reading achievement in 2012 when compared to 2009 with subgroups portrayed based on economic status, gender, ethnicity, and disability status. The study used ex-post facto, archival standardized reading assessment scores retrieved from the South Carolina Department of Education&apos;s website. The sample included third grade reading scores from students in 2009 and 2012 within a suburban school district. The results from the study revealed descriptive differences among various subgroups yet inferential statistics displayed statistically significant differences only within the demographic subgroups of students with disabilities and within one subgroup for ethnicity. The findings from the study may assist district leaders in making appropriate reading curricular decisions for students who have experienced minimal or negative standardized test scores and the implementation of the commercial reading program, both descriptively and inferentially. Researchers and educational leaders should continue to explore reading curriculum policy and practice based on campus and student needs as opposed to the use of generic commercial programs for all students without consideration of authenticity or circumstance to assist with reading achievement for the individual. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563308</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Causal-Comparative Study of Third Grade Reading Achievement and the Use of Commercial Reading Programs to Promote Literacy</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1590-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>158</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601068</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nurses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Continuing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Murray, Rhoda R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As the American population ages, the need for more long-term care services will increase. The elderly who are afflicted with a number of chronic illnesses predominantly use long-term care services. By 2020, 12 million older Americans will need long-term care services, and those 65 and older have a 40% chance of entering some type of long-term care facility as cited by Medicare, What is Long-Term Care. Challenged to care for this complex group of patients, nurses in long-term care need continuing education to provide appropriate evidence based care. In order to provide competent care, long-term care nurses need to participate in continuing education activities. Due to the growing need for long-term care services, it is important to understand the attitudes and deterrents that may prevent long-term care nurses from participating in continuing educational activities. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between attitudes of long-term care nurses toward continuing education and deterrents to participate in these activities. A quantitative correlation design using a survey methodology was employed in this study. Bivariate and multivariate analysis tested for the existence of primary relationships between attitudes toward continuing education and deterrents to participate in continuing education. Analysis also tested for the effects of the moderating variables on the primary relationships. A demographic survey and two quantitative set of surveys, the Adults Attitudes Toward Continuing Education Scale (AATCES) and the Deterrents to Participation Scale (DPS), were administered to gerontological nurses who are members of a national nursing organization. The online surveys were completed by (n = 81) nurses. Overall, there were high positive attitudes toward continuing education. In addition, there was a negative statistically significant correlation between attitudes toward continuing education and deterrents to participate, (r = -0.283; p = 0.010). There were also several statically significant correlations between specific attitudes toward continuing education and specific deterring factors. This study provides a detailed view of the relationship between attitudes toward continuing education and deterring factors that influence participation. Educators can use these findings to better address barriers that prevent participation in continuing education activities among long-term care nurses. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563309</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Quantitative Analysis of Factors That Influence Participation in Continuing Education among Nurses Employed in Long-Term Care Facilities</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1591-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>176</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601069</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Males</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Associate Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rios, Deidre M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>President Obama&apos;s 2009 graduation initiative has emphasized the shift in the national academic focus from access to higher education to graduation, making degree attainment one of the most important factors of measurement and accountability for institutions of higher education. Students of color, in particular, Hispanic males, have not fared well in higher education, and their graduation rates fare among the lowest. Because community colleges have received federal financial support for workforce programs, such as nursing, a community college with a successful associate degree nursing program (ADN) was selected for this qualitative case study. The research question that guided this study was, what institutional factors contributed to ADN degree completion by Hispanic male students at one community college in Texas? The researcher interviewed six participants, and the data gathered was triangulated through review of field notes, internal documents shared, and various online reports. Three themes emerged from the data collected: (a) The community college invested in the development of faculty and staff and shared best practices; (b) The faculty and staff were united in their mission, personally desired to help students succeed, and believed in the value of shared governance and collaboration; and (c) The campus environment was student-centered, inclusive, diverse, and espoused a &amp;quot;graduation and beyond&amp;quot; outlook. Findings suggest that the institutional factors that contributed to the increase in graduation rate of Hispanic males from the associate degree nursing program include recruitment and admissions, curriculum and instruction, and to a lesser degree academic services and student services. Financial aid was the only institutional factor that could not be confirmed as having contributed to the graduation rates of the Hispanic male nursing students who attended one community college in Texas during the first decade of this century. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563310</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Institutional Factors Contributing to Hispanic Male Nursing Degree Attainment</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1595-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>126</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601071</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Distance Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participative Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recruitment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Design</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tantchou, Pierre Orly M., Jr.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This phenomenological qualitative study identified the leadership competencies that distance education (DE) leaders regard as essential to the successful administration of DE programs and courses in contemporary education. The following competencies were discussed in the study: flexibility, collaboration, active listening, communication, empathy, trust, shared vision, persuasion, and delegation of authority. Further, all participants recognized change management as the most significant competency for DE leaders to possess in contemporary education. The results also displayed participative leadership style as the emerging leadership theory in contemporary distance education. Indeed, a participative leadership style would ensure collaboration among team members and the pursuit of common goals for the betterment of the DE program. The emerging and multitasking role of DE leaders requires a leadership style that is inclusive of all the stakeholders&apos; interests as well as participation in the decision-making process. Recommendations include further studies pertaining to participative leadership style in relation to DE leadership in times of constant change in higher education, for conclusive evidence. The results of the study benefit the field of DE leadership on multiple levels, including current DE leaders in need of skills upgrade and best practices, administrators and human resources personnel looking for recruitment guidelines, and leadership training programs seeking new data for curriculum design pertaining to effective DE leadership practices. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563311</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Contemporary Distance Education Leadership: Distance Education Leaders&apos; Perceptions of Leadership Competencies</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1598-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>172</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601074</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wilson, Cecilia E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Insufficient information exists regarding the process influencing faculty decisions, specifically in the area of maintaining academic integrity in an online environment. The purpose of the study was to explore the experiences and decision-making process of nursing faculty related to maintaining academic integrity in an online environment. The decisions involving the acceptance and use of dishonesty prevention strategies and technological tools were of specific interest. A basic qualitative design was selected to explore and describe a process from nursing faculty teaching in an online educational environment. The concepts from Everett M. Rogers&apos;s Diffusion of Innovations Theory (1995) were utilized in the conceptual framework for the study. Twelve open-ended survey questionnaires and seven focus group interviews were utilized to collect data. The use of two types of data collection methods, along with the process of member checking, ensured reliability of the interpretation of data. The commonalities in participants&apos; responses revealed in the study provided a description of the decision-making process of nursing faculty related to maintaining academic integrity and presented a clearer understanding of how nursing faculty members maintain academic integrity in an online environment. Findings revealed the types of strategies and technological tools being used, issues associated with their use, and channels of communication influencing the decision-making process of nursing faculty members. Limitations of the study were identified. Implications for practice included a deficit in knowledge and training regarding technological tools. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563312</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Nursing Faculty and Academic Integrity</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1599-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>172</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601075</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Hermeneutics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Documentation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Style</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Study Habits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Support Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiential Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Determination</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Johnston, Vickie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This hermeneutic phenomenological study inquired about the challenges and successes of eight university students diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder at a university in the southeastern United States. The data collection methods involved documentation, questionnaires, focus groups, and individual interviews. The analysis of data involved open coding and in vivo coding; conversational interview methods through member checks were employed at the end of each interview. Several themes emerged from the data regarding the factors in academic success and challenges, the environments and learning styles most conducive to learning, individual factors that contributed to academic success, and the reading and study strategies that were most beneficial to participants. Participants found social supports, such as family, friends, study groups, or organizations, and university resources to be key factors in their academic success. The university schedule was seen as support, as participants shared their ability to adapt their schedule to their needs. Participants mentioned their social struggles, and struggles with focus and attention and shared strategies for controlling the distractions. Participants preferred a hands-on learning environment; and although they were confident in their reading and study strategies, almost all of the participants expressed their frustration with math. Participants cited time management and organizational strategies, reading and study strategies, as well as their individual self-determination factors that contributed to their academic success. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563313</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>University Students Diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Hermeneutical Phenomenological Study of Challenges and Successes</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Liberty University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1633-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>152</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601099</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teacher Induction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Workshops</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Seminars</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hong, Yihua</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hong, Guanglei</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teachers new to the profession may face various challenges and struggle with pedagogy and classroom management. They tend to be less effective in boosting student learning than their more experienced colleagues (Murnane &amp;amp; Phillips, 1981; Raymond, Fletcher, &amp;amp; Luque, 2001; Rivkin, Hanusheck, &amp;amp; Kain, 2001). Since the early 1980s, there has been an increasing recognition of the importance of providing induction support in forms of mentoring programs, workshops, orientation seminars, collaboration opportunities, and other support systems to new teachers in their initial years of teaching (Furtwengler, 1995). At the present time, 27 states require some forms of induction or mentoring support for new teachers, 22 states mandate completion of or participation in an induction program for advanced teaching certification, and 17 states provide dedicated funding for teacher induction. While the general goal of teacher induction is to transform a student of teaching into a competent teacher of students, many evaluations in the past have focused on program impacts on novice teacher retention and professional well-being. Only a few studies have attended to instructional improvement as outcomes (see reviews by Ingersoll &amp;amp; Strong, 2011; Strong, 2009; Wang, Odell, &amp;amp; Schwille, 2008). Most studies (Davis &amp;amp; Higdon, 2008; Evertson &amp;amp; Smithey, 2000; Stanulis &amp;amp; Floden, 2009; Thompson, Paek, Goe, &amp;amp; Ponte, 2004) have suggested that more intensive mentoring and support from university-trained mentors might be associated with a higher rate of using effective instructional practices among new teachers. Yet one study (Roehrig, Bohn, Turner, &amp;amp; Pressley, 2008) reported that new teachers regardless of induction intensity declined in their use of effective teaching practices over the first year. These evaluations have been mostly non-experimental or quasi-experimental with a relatively small sample size. In contrast, a large-scale randomized study funded by the U.S. Department of Education and conducted by a research team from Mathematica Policy Research (Glazerman et. al, 2010) compared two prominent Comprehensive Teacher Induction (CTI) programs with standard district or school support for more than one thousand new teachers. Although teachers in the treatment group experienced more intensive, structured, and sequenced mentoring activities from trained external mentors, they exhibited surprisingly similar teaching practices as those in the control group in the spring of the first year such that a zero effect of the CTI programs was concluded. Reanalyzing data from the comprehensive teacher induction study, the authors aimed to unpack the zero effect of the CTI programs on teaching practices by closely examining the content and activities of mentoring as potential mediators of the induction program effects on teaching practices. The content of mentoring includes teaching planning and preparation, management of classroom environment, instructional content and pedagogy, and professional responsibilities. Key activities for mentees include keeping record and analysis of teaching and student learning, working with a study group of teachers, observing other teachers&apos; teaching, and meeting with local instructional leaders. The following questions were asked: (1) Did treatment teachers and control teachers have different experiences with mentoring content and activities? (2) Did the differences in mentoring experiences mediate the program effect on teaching practices? (3) Was receiving mentoring from external mentors in the CTI programs as effective as receiving mentoring from home-based mentors under the control condition? Preliminary analysis indicated that treatment teachers and control teachers had different experiences with mentoring content and activities. Clearly, beginning teachers assigned to the CTI programs tend to receive a higher dosage of induction content and a higher intensity of mentoring activities. Therefore, we can rule out the second explanation for the zero effect of the CTI programs given that the treatment teachers displayed an equal or higher rate of participation than did the control teachers. The authors did note that a higher level of participation rate in the treatment group apparently did not lead to superiority in teaching practices in comparison with the control group. One would wonder, had the treatment teachers participated in the CTI programs at a lower rate that becomes equal to the control teachers&apos; participation rate in their local induction programs, whether the teaching practices of the treatment group would become inferior to that of the control group. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563315</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Making Sense of the &amp;quot;Zero Effect&amp;quot; of Comprehensive Teacher Induction Programs: A Mediational Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Libraries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Librarians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Page, Kayla</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Despite the efforts of local school library media specialists to promote their programming, many administrators do not understand the roles and responsibilities of the school library media specialist. Using a constructivist theoretical framework, this study was designed to examine the local school administrators&apos; perceptions of the role of the school library media specialist. The research design was a cross-sectional survey. A convenience sample of 82 local school administrators was asked to complete a Likert scale survey that addressed the services offered through the media center, the of those services, and the awareness of services offered that are relative to learning standards. Data were analyzed through a chi-square test to understand the administrative base knowledge for their perceptions or attitudes on the roles, responsibilities, and impact of the school library media center program. A significant difference was found between a knowledge base obtained from administrative training compared to a knowledge base that was gained through personal experiences. These findings suggest that school library media specialists need to provide administrators with more collegial reinforcement such as an instructional support plan that can inform administrators on the intervention resources that school library media specialists can implement. Implications for social change include enhanced educational relationships, improved communication and collaboration amongst educators, and an increased leadership presence within the school library media specialist community. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563316</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Administrative Perceptions on the Role of the School Library Media Specialist</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1717-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>160</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601152</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Needs Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nontraditional Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Daily Living Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moison, Lisa M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in determining the personal and educational needs of adult learners in higher education. This may be due to the rise in the number of students age 25 and over who have been returning to college (NCES, 2012). The purpose of this study was to survey adult learners on their personal and educational needs so university and college services could be improved to serve them. Another goal was to determine if self-reported needs of adult learners validated or refuted theories of adult learning. Data were collected from the Adult Learner Needs Assessment Survey (ALNAS) by American College Testing and the findings indicate that adult learners need help in five distinct categories: having associations with others, educational planning, life skills, career development, and managing family issues. The research suggested that some demographic factors were associated with particular needs. There was a statistically significant difference in the needs of several groups: widowers, students who had children, students who were continuing their education, students with an income level below $14,999, and women who expressed a need for help with associations with others. The findings did not show a difference in the needs of adult learners based on their ethnicity nor was there a difference in the needs of the learners between the ages of 23 and 61. The three main conclusions are that (a) adult learners have definable educational and personal needs as they return to college; (b) marital, job, income, and gender variables can be factors in identifying those needs, but ethnicity and age were not; and (c) the findings support theories of adult learning by Knowles, Cross, and Mezirow. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563317</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Educational and Personal Needs of Adult Learners in Higher Education: A Quantitative Exploratory Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1793-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>123</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601166</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Crisis Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goal Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compensation (Remuneration)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communication (Thought Transfer)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employees</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burt, Ernest, III</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined components that have an effect on crisis response team members&apos; personal motivation to perform campus safety protocols. The research method for this study was a quantitative design. The variables measured were compensation, experience, training, and communication. The motivation sources for this study included instrumental motivation, external self-concept based motivation, internal self-concept based motivation, and goal internalization motivation. Study participants were crisis response team members from a private non-for profit institution in the Southeast region of the United States. The participants responded to a Likert scale survey. Data analysis was conducted using a &amp;quot;t&amp;quot; test to compare the variable means against the selected test value to determine if a difference existed among the means. The results indicated that compensation does not have an effect on crisis response team members personal motivation to perform campus safety protocols. However, the results were inclusive on whether crisis response team members are motivated to choose positions that offer the most compensation. Crisis response team members favored experience, training, and communication as the three variables that motivated them the most to implement campus safety protocols. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563318</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Components That Affect the Personal Motivation to Implement Campus Safety Protocols</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Keiser University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1803-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>120</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601176</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Goal Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conferences (Gatherings)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sense of Community</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suburban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Worksheets</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Godwin, Paul Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Programs and reforms have come and gone in the educational arena with little impact on student performance. The problem at the school of study was the students&apos; perception of their sense of belonging and the sense of the school as a community and the students&apos; academic performance did not show adequate growth. The study took place in a mid-western suburban elementary school serving 440 students kindergarten through fifth grade. The significance of the study was to examine the impact of a Goal-Setting Worksheet, along with regular teacher-student conferences, as a strategy to improve the overall school climate and academic achievement as measured by climate survey results, standardized test scores, attendance rates, and office referrals. The process allowed teachers and students in 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade the opportunity to work together to complete the Goal-Setting Worksheet by setting goals, establishing a plan of action, and providing feedback through conferences throughout the goal-setting period. Students assessed their progress and worked with the teachers to determine if the student needed to revisit their goal or establish a new goal. The purpose of this process was to increase the students&apos; perception of their sense of belonging and academic achievement. To determine if there was a change in the students&apos; perception of school climate, students took the Caring School Community climate spring survey and the pre and post School Climate survey. Academic performance was measured by comparing scores on the Missouri Assessment Program Communication Arts and Math test and the Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test. Survey results and academic scores were compared over a four year period. The results were that the implementation of the goal-setting worksheet and teacher-student conferences to school climate did not yield the desired change at the school of study in the areas of overall school climate or academic achievement. However, the understanding of the value of the two has influenced the staff to continue the desire, process, and pursuit to improve the students&apos; perception of the school climate and increase academic performance. Because of the limited timeframe of the study, further investigation of this process is recommended. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563319</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Goal-Setting, Self-Monitoring, and Teacher-Student Conferences and the Relationship with Overall School Climate and Student Academic Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lindenwood University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1813-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>153</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601186</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 10</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Group Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hamilton, Tina</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 10</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Literacy is a national concern in the United States. Many students are graduating from high school across the U.S. lacking the skills needed to be a proficient reader. The lack of college readiness skills in reading causes these students to be placed in remedial classes on the collegiate level. School systems that recognize the high percentage of students entering high school who cannot read at their grade level can implement early interventions and provide professional development opportunities for teachers in order to increase reading achievement. Due to the culture created at the secondary level that held teachers responsible for teaching content, covering the mandated curriculum, and making adequate yearly progress, instructing students while utilizing best practices in reading instruction often was not a practical consideration. The traditional approach to literacy is not enough. It is time for teachers to acknowledge that literacy in middle and high school must be taught across all contents to lay the groundwork for literacy skills that students need to thrive in college. This study explored the effect of implementing Literature Circles in a secondary Communication Arts classroom on reading comprehension. While extensive research on Literature Circles exists, most of it focuses on their use at the elementary and middle school levels, with few studies investigating their implementation at the secondary level. However, the research establishes Literature Circles as a proven practice to assist students in making gains in reading skills. The sample population consisted of five 10th grade classes participating in Literature Circles and one 10th grade class as a control group. By implementing Literature Circles at the secondary level, the results of the data did not support the hypothesis that secondary students reading comprehension increased through participation in Literature Circles. While this study did not prove statistically any significant gains from participation in Literature Circles, observable gains occurred through the higher level of student questioning and students responding with evidence cited from the text. By implementing a classroom infrastructure that supported Literature Circles, students collaborated effectively about a text and used textual support to justify their responses to questions and to derive meaning from the text. The research from this study will add to the current body of knowledge regarding the use of Literature Circles at the secondary level. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563320</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Exploration of the Influences of Literature Circles on Secondary Student Reading Level</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lindenwood University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1816-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>136</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601189</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Suicide</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gifted</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Males</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Homosexuality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sampling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resilience (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vignettes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grounded Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sexual Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sedillo, Paul James</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This qualitative, retrospective study investigated suicidal ideation among 32 young adult men. Participants were asked to report their experiences as adolescents. The primary focus of the study was to discover how gay gifted adolescents dealt with issues of suicide and suicidal ideation. Participants were selected using a purposive sampling technique. Four groups of participants were chosen with eight males in each group. The groups were: gay (i.e., homosexual) gifted, gay nongifted, straight (i.e., heterosexual) gifted and straight nongifted. Forty-one percent of participants were Hispanic/Latino, 31% were Caucasian, 22% were biracial, and 6% were African American. Data were collected using an initial questionnaire followed by in-depth individual interviews with all participants. Grounded Theory methodology was employed during the analysis phase of the study. The voices of participants were conveyed within a series of narrative vignettes. Specific categories of risk and resiliency were revealed using coding and constant comparative analysis. Results indicated that resiliency played a predominant role in how the participants dealt with suicidal issues. All of the eight gay gifted males had considered attempting suicide at least once. This group did not the lowest rate of overall suicidal ideation across the groups. Also, the gay gifted group had one of the highest number of resiliency factors. Additionally, the gifted adolescents appeared to rely on their giftedness as a safeguard that protected them from suicide. Based on the study&apos;s outcome, a theory of suicidal ideation was proposed, and an assessment was designed for future studies. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563321</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Retrospective Study of Gay Gifted, Young Adult Males&apos; Perceptions of Giftedness and Suicide</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of New Mexico</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1846-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>459</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601219</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Child Abuse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Violence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hospitals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Slaton, Scott Larue</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The History and Examination of the Shaken Baby Project looks at the use of a Child Abuse prevention program at a Southwestern Community Hospital. The origination of the program is researched that uncovers the inception of the curriculum used in the medical facility. The Administrative and Hospital Staff are surveyed to determine their viewpoint to the program&apos;s effectiveness to participating parents. The data from the surveys was extracted to determine the Administrative and Hospital staff currant relationship to the implementation of curriculum. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563322</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The History and Examination of the Shaken Baby Project</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of New Mexico</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1851-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>125</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601223</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Libraries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Librarians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Library Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technological Advancement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Libraries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Virgil, Candance L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Ohio</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Ohio</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This document analysis examined the academic library and the changing role of the academic librarian in higher education. A comparison of the trends and issues reported by prominent librarians in the 20th century was made to those reported in the 21st century. Emphasis was placed on the following decades: 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s in the 20th century and 2000s (through 2013) in the 21st century. Initial topics from the 20th century were selected from the cornerstone article, &amp;quot;College Libraries and the Teaching/Learning Process: A 25-Year Reflection&amp;quot; by Farber (1999). Farber, who was well known for research regarding bibliographic instruction at Earlham College, observed, reported, and predicted for the future many changes in the field of librarianship. His cornerstone article presented an historical view of bibliographic instruction, the development and oversight of the Ohio College Library Century, the rise of the use of microfilm and microfiche, the drastic change in processes for establishing and maintaining the card catalog, and an overview of technological changes as they relate to the academic library located in institutions of higher learning. The issues Farber discussed were compared to discussion by prominent librarians from the 21st century. An overview of the similarities, differences, and topics which have almost disappeared, as discussed by Farber, were reviewed. Also examined were current academic library topics Farber discussed which have changed immensely in the early years of the 21st century. The changing role of the academic librarian, motivated by changing media and technology availability was reviewed by decade. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563323</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Analysis of the Academic Library and the Changing Role of the Academic Librarian in Higher Education: 1975-2012</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lindenwood University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1863-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>192</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601227</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Virtual Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Progress Monitoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Least Squares Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Flores, Alberto M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In an increasingly competitive world, many universities have tried to improve academic performance, retention and graduation rates by introducing online education or mentoring. Although researchers have explored university mentoring using qualitative methods, few have addressed the quantitative connection between student mentoring and academic performance. The analyses of this study consisted of the census population of graduate and undergraduate students and the relationship between the predictor variables (a) satisfaction with mentoring and (b) satisfaction with the university, and the outcome variables (a) satisfactory academic performance (SAP) and (b) on-time progress (OTP). Four separate regression analyses using ordinary least squares (OLS) methodology for the continuous outcome variable SAP and binary logistic methodology for the binary outcome variable OTP, were performed on 19,869 responses to a survey designed and administered by the university over a three-year period. Each regression included demographic and school variables as controls. Positive linear relationships were found between both predictor variables and SAP. A positive relationship was found between the satisfaction with the university and OTP; however, satisfaction with mentoring was not a predictor of OTP. The strengths of the significant relationships were low, which indicated that other variables, some among the controls and others unaccounted for here, had stronger influences on academic performance than either of the predictor variables. The results of this study provided information based on quantitative analysis about the relationship between student satisfaction and student academic performance outcomes. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563324</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Student Satisfaction with an Online University and Its Mentoring Program as Predictors of Student Academic Performance</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Grand Canyon University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1885-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>260</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601235</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lesson Plans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Controlled Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resistance to Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cubillos, Jo Ann</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The integration of technology into classroom instruction in K-12 schools remains problematic. The problems associated with this integration are troubling, as technology integration may change a teacher&apos;s pedagogy toward more innovative approaches that increase student achievement. The purpose of this study was to document teachers&apos; experiences as technology was adopted on a private school campus. Mezirow&apos;s transformative learning theory provided a framework that focused on the role of dialogue, reflection, and modeling in the resistance to change. The impact of technology integration on teachers&apos; beliefs, attitudes, and pedagogy was documented using a sequential mixed method design. The beliefs and attitudes about technology of 18 teachers were explored through a campus blog, debriefing logs, and interviews and were analyzed using thematic coding. The number of technology-infused lessons found in lesson plans, scores on the Levels of Teaching Innovation survey, and ITBS scores provided pedagogy data and were analyzed with descriptive statistics. According to study results, peer support relieved gaps in knowledge concerning technology integration. The community increased its personal computer use and moved to more student-centered pedagogy, although only modest increases were found in survey data and ITBS scores. Study findings were used to create a professional development program for teachers on lesson planning, real-world connections, and campus vision for technology integration. The developed training will increase the overall integration of technology at the local site, improving the quality of education for students. Technology integration through this transformative method may be a catalyst for social change by moving the campus to a community of practice and teachers to more student-centered pedagogy. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563325</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Technology Integration through a Transformative Approach</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2076-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>173</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601296</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>American Indians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Business</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Reservations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Environmental Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schmitt, Barbara Elise</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Dakota</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Dakota</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Successful economic development is essential in building and sustaining a healthy community. The purpose of this study was to identify indicators of successful economic development as it pertained to Native American owned businesses located on/or adjacent to North Dakota reservations. More specifically this study sought to explore specific relationships between the perceived level of importance of knowledge, skills, and attitudes and sustainable Native American owned business ventures. Using a quantitative correlation research design, 194 Native American owned businesses located on/or adjacent to the four reservations in North Dakota: Spirit Lake, Standing Rock, Fort Berthold, and Turtle Mountain responded to a self-administered 69 item survey instrument. The instrument was designed to gain an understanding of how important each factor was to the business owner and to what extent the business owner used each factor. The compiled research data was analyzed in addressing the following questions: (a) How important are knowledge, skills, and attitudes to the sustainability of Native American owned businesses? and (b) To what extent are Native American environmental factors, knowledge, skills, and attitudes significant for emerging verses mature Native American owned businesses? Native American owned businesses play a significant role in their communities. This research indicated Native American owned businesses need planning and organization skills to be successful. Strategic planning, operational planning, communication, managing change, innovation, and human resources are all essential planning and organization skills that both emerging and mature businesses need. Emerging Native American business owners also need to be technically proficient in their field. Therefore, they should be encouraged to participate in training which focuses on technical skills. They also need to solicit critical suggestions from a business network to be successful. Receiving constant feedback on the performance of the business will assist emerging business owners in identifying and correcting issues which would otherwise hold a business back or cause it to go out of business. Tribal administrations and tribal economic development offices may benefit from this study by providing foundational knowledge to advance their economic development efforts. The results from this study may also benefit higher education business departments who offer economic development courses. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563326</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Defining Economic Success as It Pertains to Native American Owned Businesses Located on/or Adjacent to North Dakota Reservations</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, North Dakota State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2084-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>188</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601302</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nurses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance Based Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drug Therapy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competency Based Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wise, Vanessa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As newly graduated associate degree nurses (ADN) and baccalaureate degree nurses (BSN) enter into the workforce, they must be equipped to care for a complex patient population; therefore, the purpose of this study was to address the practice expectations and clinical competency of new nurses as perceived by nurse preceptors and nurse managers. Theoretical frameworks guiding this study were the competency outcomes performance assessment theory and the constructivist learning theory. The research questions sought to identify the skill levels and practice expectations of new graduate nurses that nurse preceptors and nurse managers perceive as the most important, and to determine how the identified competency-based assessments can be incorporated in academia to improve new graduate nurses&apos; cognitive and technical skill sets. Purposeful sampling for this mixed methods design was used with 30 nurse managers and 8 nurse preceptors completing the Hospital Nurse Educator Questionnaire (HNEQ). Cronbach&apos;s alpha determined the HNEQ&apos;s internal consistency. Descriptive analysis and the Wilcoxon alpha test were used on the quantitative data; results revealed that safe nursing practices with knowledge and safe administration of medications were the highest nursing care expectations. Four areas ranked below the p = 0.05 level of significance, revealing a higher expectation of nursing abilities among BSN graduates vs. ADN graduates. Qualitative data were analyzed categorically to identify common themes and patterns, revealing that safe nursing practice ranked highest among the participants. The challenge is for academia and industry to use these research findings to develop competency-based curriculum and orientation programs that address safe nursing practice issues regarding the care given by new graduate nurses. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563327</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Competency of Graduate Nurses as Perceived by Nurse Preceptors and Nurse Managers</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2089-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>200</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601306</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Homosexuality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sexual Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sexual Identity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Relevance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rivera-Ramos, Zully A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Research on the campus climate for lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals evidences that heterosexism at institutions of higher education is still prevalent. Although campus climate research is increasing, studies have been primarily conducted with European American samples. Sexual orientation issues within ethnic minority campus communities have remained largely unexplored. The current study is the first to examine the readiness of a Latina/o community at a major Midwestern State University to address LGB concerns. Using the Community Readiness Model (CRM), data were collected through individual interviews with 16 key informants from programs and organizations serving the Latina/o campus community. The Community Readiness Assessment scoring procedure was used to analyze the interview data. Findings suggest that the community is at a vague awareness readiness stage to address LGB issues. Culturally sensitive recommendations for stage-appropriate strategies to improve the Latina/o campus community&apos;s readiness are presented. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563328</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessing the Community Readiness of a Latina/o Campus Community to Address Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Concerns</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1058-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>89</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600805</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Frost, Bernard Emmanuel</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many school districts have provided support to middle school mathematics teachers who face challenges involving delivery of instruction by hiring instructional mathematics coaches. The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore the experiences between classroom mathematics middle school teachers and their instructional coach, and to understand how those interactions assisted in improving teachers&apos; instructional practices. Vygotsky&apos;s adult learning theory formed the theoretical foundation of this study. The research question sought to understand the ways a mathematics coach helps teachers improve instruction. The convenience sample consisted of 6 middle school mathematics teachers and their instructional coach. Qualitative data were collected using semi-structured interviews to capture teachers&apos; experiences with improving mathematics learning and classroom practice. Traditional qualitative analysis techniques were used to identify themes and understandings about the phenomenon of instructional coaching and the relationship between coach and teacher. Teachers reported improvement in their instructional practice as a result of (a) collaborative relationships, (b) embedded professional development, and (c) support within coaching. These data resulted in a staff development project intended to support teachers, administrators, and coaches as they develop local instructional coaching programs. This project study may create positive social change by improving interaction between classroom teachers and their instructional coaches. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563329</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teachers&apos; Experiences with Middle-Level Mathematics Coaches</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1234-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>169</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600895</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonological Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Fluency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonemes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Persons</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Short Term Memory</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Robinson, Stephanie J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>South Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Although phonological awareness (PA) is an essential preliteracy skill with well-established predictive validity for elementary school reading success, previous research indicates that PA intervention does not demonstrate long term effects on reading. The theory of automaticity was the underlying foundation used to understand the importance of mastering beginning reading skills to ensure efficient use of working memory. This mastery allows the excess capacity of working memory to be available for higher level reading skills. The purpose of this non-experimental, correlational study was to examine the literature gap regarding the predictive validity of 2 kindergarten predictor variables for 3rd grade reading success: PA acquisition rates and kindergarten phoneme segmentation accuracy. Archival data were collected from a 2009 kindergarten class in a rural, high poverty elementary school in South Carolina. Linear regression was used to determine the predictive validity of PA acquisition rates and accuracy of responses on the criterion variable of 3rd grade oral reading fluency. The results of this study indicated that only PA acquisition rates significantly predicted 3rd grade oral reading fluency. Kindergarten phoneme segmentation accuracy rate was not a significant predictor of 3rd grade oral reading fluency. The results from this study contribute to positive social change by identifying a significant predictor variable for educators to consider when implementing a more refined, meaningful early intervention strategy for enhancing future reading success of children known to be at high risk for reading difficulties. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563330</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Predicting Third Grade Reading Success from Kindergarten Phonological Awareness</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1237-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>123</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600898</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>French</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Translation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computational Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spelling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>O&apos;Neill, Errol Marinus</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Online translation (OT) sites such as Free Translation and Babel Fish are freely available to the general public and purport to convert inputted text, from single words to entire paragraphs, instantly from one language to another. Discussion in the literature about OT for second-language (L2) acquisition has generally focused either on the pedagogical and ethical issues surrounding online translators or on anecdotal discussions of errors researchers have encountered on such tools. This dissertation takes a different approach by investigating the quantative and qualitative effects of OT use on L2 composition writing. A study conducted among 32 third- and fourth-semester L2 French students compared the results of three conditions: participants who were allowed to use an online translator for writing tasks after attending a training session on OT (+translator, +training); participants who were permitted to use OT for their writing, but who had received no prior training (+translator, -training); and a control group whose participants had no training and were not allowed to use OT (-translator, -training). Each of the 128 compositions collected was scored by raters and evaluated on six features: overall comprehensibility, content, spelling, syntax, remaining grammar, and vocabulary. Additionally, raters were asked to judge whether or not, in their estimation, each composition&apos;s writer had used an online translator. The results showed that not only did OT use not have a negative effect on the mean scores of those who used a translator during the study, but the online translator groups performed as well as, if not better than, the control group on the experimental writing tasks both overall and on specific linguistic features. Specifically, the global scores of the translation group that had received training (+translator +training) were in fact statistically significantly higher (p &amp;lt; 0.05) on the second of two experimental writing tasks as compared to the control group (-translator -training). Additionally, on Tasks One and Two, one or both translator groups significantly outperformed the control group on four of the six components evaluated (overall comprehensibility, content, spelling, and remaining grammar). Raters were able to identify correctly, to a statistically-significant level, whether or not online translation was used for compositions; there were however cases where one or both raters scoring a given composition mistakenly suspected OT use, as well as some OT-aided compositions that escaped detection by raters. This dissertation analyzes global and component scores of compositions written with the use of an online translator and those written without such aid; presents and discusses samples of student writing in light of rater comments and participant self-reports; and explores the implications of the study&apos;s results for L2 learning and instruction. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563331</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effect of Online Translators on L2 Writing in French</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1240-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>267</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600901</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Language Variation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sociolinguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Official Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Native Speakers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Applied Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Litzenberg, Jason</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>English has become the default language of global communication, and users around the world are adapting the traditional standards of grammar and interaction. It is imperative that teachers of English keep pace with these changing conceptualizations of the language as well as the changing expectations of its users so that they can best prepare language learners for the sociolinguistic realities they will encounter. Teacher training programs have a critical role to play in that they must keep pace with both the changing global linguistic landscape and how these changes influence pre-service teachers. It is therefore imperative to understand the attitudes of pre-service teachers towards the varieties of English that their students will encounter. This study considers the attitudes of pre-service TESOL teachers towards varieties of native and non-native English as used in naturalistic communicative situations. It considers personal factors that may play a role in how participants evaluate the interactive speech samples and whether TESOL training programs influence the development of attitudes towards language-in-use. To this end, a mixed methods design involving three primary components was used: an online survey of 70 respondents from 26 institutions, four focus group interviews, and a curriculum analysis of five teacher training programs. This study is unique in that participants evaluate speech-in-action that is representative of the types of language found in many English as a lingua franca (ELF) settings. Among other things, primary results suggest that (a) standard language ideology influences many participant assessments of both native and non-native speech, (b) teacher training programs exert at least some influence on the attitudes of pre-service teachers towards varieties of spoken English in discourse, and (c) engagement with non-native speech in teacher preparation courses and language learning as a component of a curriculum can benefit pre-service teachers. Implications for applied linguistics, teacher training, and ELF are considered. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563332</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Investigation of Pre-Service English Language Teacher Attitudes towards Varieties of English in Interaction</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1276-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>257</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600909</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bullying</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Role</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bryant, Veneschia R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The 21st century has allowed for endless possibilities in the areas of technology and technological innovations. Access is unlimited and society as a whole is benefiting from the abundance and availability, from private sectors to public. This access is truly tremendous as it continues to make many advances in areas such as medicine and education, but to whom much is given, much is required. This technological access has also been provided to 21st century youth and they are often seen using some type of digital device: cell phone, tablets, computers and eReaders. As the beneficiaries of 21st century devices, youth should be required to be reliable, responsible, and to use critical thinking when it comes to their digital devices, activities, and decisions. Access to technology often times means access to the Internet. Youth are using devices for more than the initial purposes; for example, cell phones are not just for having audio conversations, but also for texting, accessing the Internet, posting on social media sites and even inappropriate acts like sexting. This research looked at the type of access 21st century youth are exposed to, analyzed the types of digital devices they have access to, and then explored the types of activities in which they engage. It looked at which devices they use to access the Internet, what they are doing when they are engaged on the Internet, and finally what types of digital decisions youth make with their digital devices. Having access is not always considered atrocious, but what youth do with this access is important to consider. In addition to analyzing the digital devices, activities, and decisions of youth, this research looked at parental perspectives to determine if parents, who are probably the key people who provide the access to the youth, have some awareness about their children&apos;s digital decisions. Youth and parents were given the same instruments and each participant was required to complete three surveys and one questionnaire. The results were first used to gain an understanding of and analyze the digital devices, activities, and decisions of youth who participated in the research and then to compare their responses with those of the parents to determine parental perspectives of the digital devices, activities, and decisions of their children to determine if parents know what is going on online. Sometimes the online or digital world can be the private playground of youth and they may engage in events that are inappropriate or illegal. Although this research is analyzing the digital decisions of youth who may not be using critical thinking skills online, it is important to note that there are several youth who are innocently using their digital devices for the right purposes, but it is important for parents to check in or understand what is available, what dangers are lurking, and what their children are possibly doing in online or digital environments. The results of this research will be used as baseline data to determine what efforts need to be done to educate youth and parents on this issue. A series of webinars, articles, and books will be generated from this research that will focus on digital and online issues that youth face, such as cyberbullying, sexting, social media, and communicating with strangers online. These resources will be used to educate parents on what to look for and how to talk to their children, as well as to teach youth how to be cyber safe and use critical thinking skills in a digital era. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563333</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>21st Century Youth Using Critical Thinking Skills and Practicing Cyber Safety When Making Digital Decisions: An Analysis of the Digital Devices and Decisions of Youth and Parental Perspectives of the Same</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1295-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>138</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600915</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Campuses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Mission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student School Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carmody Roster, Ellen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study uses data from the 2011 Community College Survey of Student Engagement [CCSSE] to compare students&apos; engagement in academic pursuits and their relationships to fellow students, faculty, and administrators at community colleges that host highly-involved Phi Theta Kappa chapters, with students&apos; perceptions of these attributes at community colleges that do not host Phi Theta Kappa chapters or have less involved chapters. The questions explored are: (a) Does having a highly-involved Phi Theta Kappa chapter on campus affect the level of engagement of all students on campus and (b) Does having a highly-involved Phi Theta Kappa chapter on campus influence students&apos; views of their relationships with fellow students, faculty and administrative personnel? The findings indicate that students&apos; enrollment status, age, gender, first-generation status, and race impact students&apos; level of engagement and their relationships with others on campus. The presence and involvement level of Phi Theta Kappa chapters were not statistically significant in explaining students&apos; engagement levels or perceptions of campus relationships. Community college officials should consider an evaluation of student groups on their campuses to determine how closely the groups&apos; missions match and enhance the college&apos;s mission and goals, when budgets are allocated. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563334</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Student Organizations on Community College Campuses: An Examination of Engagement Levels of Community College Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1307-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>160</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600926</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Brain</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Head Injuries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rehabilitation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Taxonomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Grove, Michael J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) rehabilitation interventions are very heterogeneous due to injury characteristics and pathology, patient demographics, healthcare settings, caregiver variability, and individualized, multi-discipline treatment plans. Consequently, comparing and generalizing the effectiveness of interventions is limited largely due to non-interoperable domain data. Addressing domain data interoperability through standardization can help unpack the &amp;quot;black-box&amp;quot; of rehabilitation treatment research. This paper describes the development of a foundational non-surgical, non-pharmaceutical ontology for TBI rehabilitation to facilitate domain interoperability. A conceptualization of the clinical domain was developed through a triangulation of data sources in order to create context and to serve as the underlying source for an ontology. A set of classes with primitive ontological relations based on the conceptualization was assembled in the Protege Ontology Editor. The ontology is designed to facilitate further granularity of classes, properties, and instances as a collaborative hub for domain engagement. It is proposed that the ontology will aid in identification of effective rehabilitation components through the facilitation of comparative effectiveness research (CER). [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563335</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Development of an Ontology for Rehabilitation: Traumatic Brain Injury</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1316-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>216</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600936</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Patients</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hospitals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Patient Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Allied Health Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lewis, Carol Ann</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Purpose: To evaluate the adult patient&apos;s understanding of the emergency department (ED) discharge instructions and motivation to use an online health education website. A survey of the ED staff was incorporated into the study to evaluate the ED staff members&apos; motivation to include patient education on an online health education website prior to discharge. Background &amp;amp; Significance: There are six major knowledge gaps in the ED discharge process: (a) education, (b) care management, (c) follow-up and discharge, (d) communication, (e) health care provider accountability and (f) health literacy (Shepard, Donovan, &amp;amp; Lyons, 2010). Patient-centered transition and discharge management that focuses on these knowledge gaps will promote satisfactory health outcomes. The Health Belief Model theorizes that a sustained change in behavior is influenced by internal motivation and perception of the illness. Cognitive knowledge and ED staff motivation to educate the patients on the use of an online health education website will improve health literacy. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional quantitative study, conducted from March-June, 2012, in a 52-bed ED facility in an urban setting. A simple unbiased random sample of adult patients (n = 100) was surveyed in the ED prior to discharge. Inclusion criteria included alert adult patients and confused patients with a family member at the bedside. Exclusion criteria included pediatric patients and confused patients without a family member at the bedside. Family members assisted the primary investigator with interpretation of the survey questions for non-English speaking patients. ED staff (n = 45) was surveyed in October, 2012. This was a single-center study, not all potentially eligible patients or staff could be surveyed, and the outcome assessment relied on the participants&apos; answers to the surveys. Results: The majority of participants did not understand the discharge instructions. The Pearson chi-square was statistically significant and indicated a &amp;quot;reasonable difference&amp;quot; between the preferred method of learning and understanding of the discharge instructions. Cramer&apos;s V indicated a &amp;quot;reasonable association&amp;quot; between the preferred method of learning and understanding the discharge instructions. Motivation to use an online health education website indicated a central tendency mean of 3.02, (0 is not motivated and 5 is very motivated). There was a relationship between motivation and the use of the online website. A survey completed by 45 ED staff members indicated that 76.1% of the ED staff were motivated to provide information about the online health education website to the patient prior to discharge. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: The data suggest that the majority of patients are being discharged without a thorough understanding of the treatment plan. There is a statistically &amp;quot;reasonable difference&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;association&amp;quot; between the preferred method of learning and understanding. The data suggest more time and effort are needed for effective communication. Information available through a health education website, such as kp.org, &amp;quot;My Health Manager&amp;quot;, that provides a visual or audio learning method may provide a better understanding of the medical condition, encourage critical decision making, and improve adherence to the treatment plan. The Health Belief Model theorized by Nola Pender (Pender, Murdaugh &amp;amp; Parsons, 2010) asserts that a sustained change in behavior is achieved more effectively when the motivation to do so is elicited internally by the patient rather than imposed by others. A patient-centered technique, such as collaborative goal setting, which aims to promote internal motivation, has been associated with improved health outcomes (Picker Institute, 2012). Ultimately, these efforts would address the major knowledge gaps in the ED process and may reduce ED revisits, [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563336</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluating Patient Motivation and the Use of Online Health Information: Keeping Patients and Families in the Loop</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.N.P. Dissertation, Brandman University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1350-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>99</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600969</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>State Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compliance (Legal)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tribal Sovereignty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moody, Heather Ann</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Wisconsin Act 31 was established for the purpose of addressing American Indian history, culture, and sovereignty within K-12 schools as a response to treaty rights issues in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Yet, in the 21 st century there remain issues with compliance throughout not only K-12 schools but also institutions of higher education. The research addresses how public institutions of higher education factor into compliance with regard to teacher preparation programs. Through a mixed methods approach, instructors from nine University of Wisconsin System institutions were surveyed regarding their professional and personal background in relation to American Indian Studies as well as their understanding of Wisconsin Act 31. In addition, a document analysis was performed on the syllabi from teacher-licensing certified courses. The results provided an overall understanding of the issues within teacher preparation programs that affect future educators. A distinction became apparent between courses that are education-related and those that are discipline specific. Majority of the courses are education-related and provide an emphasis on the general human diversity elements of Wisconsin Act 31. Alternatively, discipline specific courses address the foundational topics of Wisconsin Act 31 including culture, history, sovereignty, and contemporary issues. The differences between the types of courses that fulfill the Wisconsin Act 31 teacher-licensing requirement signify a need for further investigation into bringing together University of Wisconsin institutions, the Department of Public Instruction, and American Indians to fully address Wisconsin Act 31 requirements. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563337</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>&amp;quot;Before We Teach It, We Have to Learn It&amp;quot;: Wisconsin Act 31 Compliance within Public Teacher Preparation Programs</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1329-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>117</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600949</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Paying for College</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shultz, Judith J. Andrews</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines first-generation research-university students in relation to their financial considerations. It is driven by the question, What is the relationship between first-generation college-student status and financial considerations among research-university students? It explores the impact of such variables as first-generation student status, parents&apos; educational levels, student demographics, student&apos;s financial status, and academic considerations on students&apos; financial concerns including the level of student financial concerns associated with paying for college, the behaviors students might choose, the manageability of college costs, and the worry associated with those costs. The results indicate that first-generation research-university students have unique financial concerns and responses to these concerns which are tied to their educational and family related backgrounds that influence their financial decision-making. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563338</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Am I Going to Pay for That?!: First-Generation University Students and Their Financial Concerns</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1337-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>135</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600957</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Child Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Caregivers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credentials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professionalism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McBride, Vickie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this case study was to investigate what impact the child development associate (CDA) credential has on the performance of childcare providers in the 6 CDA competency areas. Each participant was interviewed using 9 open-ended questions regarding their experience. Over the past few years, a number of studies have examined the effects of varying levels of quality on children&apos;s behavior and development. These outcomes also coincide with the 6 competency areas of the CDA, which are to (a) establish and maintain a safe, healthy, learning environment; (b) advance physical and intellectual competence; (c) support social and emotional development, and provide positive guidance; (d) establish positive and productive relationships with families; (e) ensure a well-run, purposeful program responsive to participants&apos; needs; and (f) maintain a commitment to professionalism. The specific objective of the study was to contribute new knowledge to the field of early childhood by examining the impact of the CDA credential and how it impacts provider job performance. The findings of this study indicate infinite options for future research involving child care providers&apos; need for professional development. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563339</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Case Study: Investigating the Impact of the Child Development Associate Credentialing Process on Child Care Provider Performance</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1589-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>148</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601067</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Information Sources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Systems Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Grenn, Michael W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation introduces a theory of information quality to explain macroscopic behavior observed in the systems engineering process. The theory extends principles of Shannon&apos;s mathematical theory of communication [1948] and statistical mechanics to information development processes concerned with the flow, transformation, and meaning of information. The meaning of requirements information in the systems engineering context is estimated or measured in terms of the cumulative requirements quality Q which corresponds to the distribution of the requirements among the available quality levels. The requirements entropy framework (REF) implements the theory to address the requirements engineering problem. The REF defines the relationship between requirements changes, requirements volatility, requirements quality, requirements entropy and uncertainty, and engineering effort. The REF is evaluated via simulation experiments to assess its practical utility as a new method for measuring, monitoring and predicting requirements trends and engineering effort at any given time in the process. The REF treats the requirements engineering process as an open system in which the requirements are discrete information entities that transition from initial states of high entropy, disorder and uncertainty toward the desired state of minimum entropy as engineering effort is input and requirements increase in quality. The distribution of the total number of requirements R among the N discrete quality levels is determined by the number of defined quality attributes accumulated by R at any given time. Quantum statistics are used to estimate the number of possibilities P for arranging R among the available quality levels. The requirements entropy H[subscript R] is estimated using R, N and P by extending principles of information theory and statistical mechanics to the requirements engineering process. The information I increases as HR and uncertainty decrease, and the change in information ÄI needed to reach the desired state of quality is estimated from the perspective of the receiver. The HR may increase, decrease or remain steady depending on the degree to which additions, deletions and revisions impact the distribution of R among the quality levels. Current requirements trend metrics generally treat additions, deletions and revisions the same and simply measure the quantity of these changes over time. The REF evaluates the quantity of requirements changes over time, distinguishes between their positive and negative effects by calculating their impact on H[subscript R], Q, and ÄI, and forecasts when the desired state will be reached, enabling more accurate assessment of the status and progress of the requirements engineering effort. Results from random variable simulations suggest the REF is an improved leading indicator of requirements trends that can be readily combined with current methods. The increase in I, or decrease in H[subscript R] and uncertainty, is proportional to the engineering effort E input into the requirements engineering process. The REF estimates the ÄE needed to transition R from their current state of quality to the desired end state or some other interim state of interest. Simulation results are compared with measured engineering effort data for Department of Defense programs published in the SE literature, and the results suggest the REF is a promising new method for estimation of ÄE. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563340</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Theory of Information Quality and a Framework for Its Implementation in the Requirements Engineering Process</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Sc. Dissertation, The George Washington University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1419-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>159</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600973</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nontraditional Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nontraditional Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evening Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attrition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>James, Christina M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Adult students are enrolling in postsecondary educational programs in record numbers, but many are not completing their programs. The purpose of this quantitative study was to explore the perceptions of adult students enrolled in a nontraditional undergraduate evening program at a selected liberal arts college to gain insights into the factors that students felt were most influential in supporting their degree completion. Using Bean and Metzner&apos;s conceptual model of nontraditional student attrition as a framework, research questions concerned students&apos; perceptions of the roles that institutional, situational, and dispositional factors play in adult student retention, and whether students&apos; perceptions were related to their age and gender. A convenience sample of 38 participants completed a Likert survey online, and descriptive and correlational designs were used to answer the research questions. Data were analyzed using frequencies, means and standard deviations, and correlations. According to study findings, institutional factors were perceived as having a greater effect on retention when compared to both situational and dispositional factors. There was a direct, moderate relationship between perceptions regarding institutional factors and age, and an inverse relationship existed between perceptions regarding situational factors and age; no other significant relationships were found. Based upon the findings, an orientation program was developed for the college to increase student involvement. Implications for positive social change include providing a program to the local site that may increase retention rates of adults students enrolled in the evening program by aiding student involvement within the institution, thus resulting in increased graduation rates for the institution. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563341</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Perceived Contributing Factors for Nontraditional Undergraduate Student Retention</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1421-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>165</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600975</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Corporations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Security</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Systems Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Business</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teamwork</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKee, Shari Turner</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Between 2002 and 2012, information technology (IT) procedural decisions related to technology, fraud, bias, greed, and misleading information increased cost by more than $44 billion. The purpose of this phenomenological study was to explore IT professionals&apos; experiences of IT procedural decisions. The research questions were intended to learn from the professional experiences of a Midwestern Fortune 500 company about the informational, situational, or behavioral characteristics that influence IT procedural decisions. Systems theory served as the conceptual framework. A purposive sample of 20 IT professionals completed semistructured interviews and described their personal experiences. All data were analyzed using coded keywords, phrases, and concepts. The procedural decision themes identified were as follows: (a) decision entropy, (b) information quality, (c) exponential growth of data, and (d) team experience. The findings indicated that procedural decisions improve when situational, informational, and behavioral considerations are applied equally. These findings suggest that a monitoring mechanism should be established that would include inspection, continuing education, communication, corrective action, and audit independence. The recommendations of this study may benefit both researchers and organizational leaders as evidence indicated the importance of mitigating situations that can lead to poor decisions. The implications for positive social change include decision improvements for business practices, financial sustainability, and consumer satisfaction. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563342</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Procedural Decision-Making Experiences among Informational Technology Professionals at a Midwestern Fortune 500 Company</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.B.A. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1427-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>132</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600980</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Systems Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Government</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bayesian Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Industry</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Doskey, Steven Craig</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research presents an innovative means of gauging Systems Engineering effectiveness through a Systems Engineering Relative Effectiveness Index (SE REI) model. The SE REI model uses a Bayesian Belief Network to map causal relationships in government acquisitions of Complex Information Systems (CIS), enabling practitioners to identify and analyze Systems Engineering (SE) patterns and predict areas of potential SE performance risk. Although developed in the context of federal government acquisition of CIS, the SE REI model can be adapted to a broad spectrum of systems engineering domains through future research. Progress in Systems Engineering, in particular Systems-of-Systems Engineering, are driving the advance of Complex Information Systems with increasingly complicated constituent systems, components and integration points. As one of the world&apos;s largest purchasers of CIS, the federal government is at the forefront of addressing the challenges of acquiring and managing these CIS. Government, along with industry and academia, have invested enormous resources into evolving Systems Engineering (SE) practices to address these challenges and, over time, have integrated new and refined approaches and heuristics (Doskey, Mazzuchi, &amp;amp; Sarkani, 2013a). Although the measurement of SE effectiveness has its own rich history of research in terms of methods, process, and tools, it has not kept pace with the velocity of SE change. Current SE effectiveness measures provide guidance throughout the acquisition lifecycle, but tend to be descriptive instead of inferential in nature and therefore useful for retrospective reviews of programs, or as stage gates through SE processes. In response to the need for more prescriptive options, this research proposes a Systems Engineering Relative Effectiveness Index (SE REI) model. The SE REI model offers acquisition organizations--both government and industry--insights to address the challenges of integrating and evaluating complex programs. It provides predictive analysis of a project&apos;s SE challenges early in the acquisition lifecycle, enabling practitioners to assess and mitigate risks before investing significant resources and time in a program. To model a program or project&apos;s SE performance, the SE REI applies conditional probability through the use of a Bayesian Belief Network. While the SE REI model focuses on CIS projects with the high level of system integration commonly found in Systems-of-Systems Engineering projects, it is sufficiently extensible to adapt it to other project domains through recalculation of prior probabilities. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563343</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Measure of Systems Engineering Effectiveness in Government Acquisition of Complex Information Systems: A Bayesian Belief Network-Based Approach</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, George Washington University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1192-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>199</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600858</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metalinguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pragmatics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dempsey, Michael S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Currently influential models of writing processes, such as Flower and Hayes (1980) and Hayes (1996) do not attend explicitly to metalinguistics--writers&apos; ability to monitor and control linguistic skills. Dimensions of metalinguistic ability--metaphonology, metasyntax, metasemantics, metapragmatics, and metatext--arguably are central to the writing process and to writers&apos; success as they compose. The purpose of this study was to discover if a relationship existed between metalinguistic self-efficacy and (1) ratings on essays written by participants and (2) participants&apos; self-reported average grade on college papers. Essays were rated using two rubrics, one analytic and the other holistic, which were developed from metalinguistic constructs. The data were analyzed to answer three questions related to metalinguistic self-efficacy and writing quality: (1) exploratory factor analysis was used to determine if five metalinguistic factors would be observed; (2) correlational analysis was used to identify relationships between the metalinguistic self-efficacy measure and the quality of participants&apos; essays as well as their self-reported college paper grades; and (3) regression analysis was used to determine if the metalinguistic dimensions revealed were equally related to writers&apos; essay quality and to self-reported college paper grades. The study yielded multiple factors through factor analysis. The correlational analysis revealed an overall relationship between metalinguistic self-efficacy and participant writing quality as well as with self-reported paper grades. Finally, the regression analysis showed that some metalinguistic factors revealed stronger relationships to writing quality than others. Metalinguistic ability, then, was observed to influence writing quality, though not as strongly as anticipated at the start of the study. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563344</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Self-Efficacy for Metalinguistic Control and Its Relationship to Writing Quality</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1448-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>115</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601000</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Administrator Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gardner, Theresa Burr</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to identify teachers&apos; perceptions of how leadership styles and practices of administration can improve the process of broad-based change in an educational organization. The study focused on the lived experiences of 12 teachers and school administrators (coresearchers) during a major change in their school district. Guided interviews were utilized in order to understand the essence of their experiences. Results indicated the importance of communication during the process of change as it relates to perceptions of involvement, buy-in, self-worth, job satisfaction, and support and impact on instruction. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563345</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Qualitative Inquiry into Teachers&apos; Perceptions of Change</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Liberty University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2427-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>233</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601355</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stivers-Blaebaum, Janet E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Research has shown that there is a strong link between reading comprehension and vocabulary, yet many children lack the required vocabulary needed to perform adequately on reading comprehension assessments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the teaching of Larry Bell&apos;s 12 Powerful Words vocabulary program in order to raise third, fourth and fifth grade test scores on the North Carolina Reading Comprehension End-of-Grade Assessments. This study surveyed third, fourth and fifth grade teachers concerning their beliefs of the efficacy of this vocabulary program, surveyed third, fourth and fifth grade students to determine their knowledge of these 12 words, and tallied the occurrence of these 12 words on formative and summative assessments administered within the district. A regression analysis was performed to determine if there was a relationship between teachers&apos; perceptions and student performance on the North Carolina Reading Comprehension End-of-Grade Assessments. Results of the regression analysis showed no significant relationship between teachers&apos; beliefs of the value of teaching these 12 words and students&apos; mean scores across 12 years of third, fourth and fifth grade North Carolina Reading Comprehension End-of-Grade Assessments in the district of study. Results of the word searches indicate that only five of these 12 words occurred frequently enough to impact reading assessments. An implication of this study is that teaching and learning a short list of vocabulary words may not result in higher scores on reading comprehension assessments. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563346</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Study of a District-Wide Vocabulary Program Implemented to Improve Reading Comprehension on the North Carolina End-of-Grade Assessment</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1597-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>143</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601073</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clinical Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clinical Teaching (Health Professions)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nurses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Berndt, Jodi L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Clinical experiences are an integral component of nursing education. Because the amount of time that a student spends in clinical experiences can be as many as twelve to sixteen hours per week, the clinical instructor plays a significant role in the nursing student&apos;s development of nursing knowledge. Many nurse educators attempt to balance dual roles of clinician and teacher even though there is no literature that describes the influence of engagement in clinical practice on clinical teaching. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how clinical nursing instructors perceive the influence of their engagement in bedside nursing practice on the clinical teaching of undergraduate nursing students. An exploratory design was used for the study, in which qualitative data was collected through open-ended questions used in interviews. Eleven nursing faculty who maintain engagement in clinical practice and have clinical teaching responsibilities were interviewed. Findings indicated that engagement in clinical practice had a positive influence on clinical teaching in regards to the identified areas of: instructor credibility, instructor competence, student relationships, and staff relationships. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563347</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Clinical Nursing Instructor Perception of the Influence of Engagement in Bedside Nursing Practice on Clinical Teaching</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2481-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>143</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601361</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theological Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blended Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrated Learning Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Management Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Use Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Word Frequency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Form Classes (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Audience Response Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Modules</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kokensparger, Brian Jay</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explored relationships between writing sample features and LMS usage patterns for 366 college students who enrolled in Theology courses, junior-level courses cross-listed with theology courses, or Senior Perspective Program courses in the fall semester of 2012. These hybrid courses were managed inside the Canvas(TM) learning management system. LMS usage log data, containing the URLs visited as well as date/time stamps, were processed to generate session metrics and URL token categories, which were further reduced to eight prominent features (Assignments, Conversations, Files, Grades, Modules, Topics, View, and Wiki). Writing samples were processed using the LIWC software, producing word counts and linguistic particle analysis data. These data were further reduced to writing sample metrics and rollup categories labeled as Pronouns, Articles, Verbs, Social, Cognitive, and Relativity. After students were ranked into quartiles in each category by course frequencies, with outliers receiving boundary rankings, they were pre-classified by their rankings in specific categories as students with Fast Clicker and High Times Out LMS usage patterns. Correlation mining was then performed among and across all writing sample and page views categories. Additional correlation mining was performed among courses classified as Files/Assignments, Assignments/Files, Modules/Assignments, and Files/Modules, and among writing samples classified into four groups based upon average word counts. These correlation tests revealed a clear relationship between writing sample features and LMS usage patterns, suggesting a possibility for building predictive models. This possibility is tempered, however, by the course design and writing sample requirements. The study further explored generating decision trees and applying them to new data from a similar course in the following semester. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563348</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using Compositional Writing Samples to Explore Student Usage Patterns in a Learning Management System</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1459-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>229</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601009</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adjunct Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sampling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Occupational Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cross, Emily L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This qualitative phenomenological study was designed to give an in-depth understanding of the lived experiences of women adjunct faculty working at a mid-sized community college in California. A review of literature surrounding adjunct faculty, community colleges, and women in higher education found a gap in the exploration and discussion of several subpopulations of faculty--that of adjunct faculty and that of the experiences of women adjunct faculty. This study was designed a preliminary investigation toward creating greater understanding of women in the adjunct faculty position at community colleges. Convenience sampling methodology was applied to target women adjunct faculty at a California community college. Potential subjects were invited to participate based on their willingness to participate, gender, and tenure working as an adjunct faculty instructor. The use of a phenomenological tradition allowed participants to share their experiences in narrative form, leading to a better understanding of their lived experiences as women adjunct faculty within the community college context. The central research question was: How do women describe their lived experiences as adjunct faculty within a California community college? Participant interviews demonstrated that women describe their lived experiences as adjunct faculty within the community college as an opportunity to engage in higher education, while also balancing personal responsibilities and obligations. Interviews also suggested that women came into adjunct teaching unintentionally, yet remain because it offers additional income, is flexible, allows them independence and is enjoyable. Interviews also noted that women did not think that adjunct teaching was their ideal career, or sustainable as an independent career path. These findings have several implications for potential faculty members, administrators and institutional decision-makers. First, participants appreciate the opportunity to engage with students while balancing life responsibilities. Second, lack of institutional integration was a commonly reported detriment of the position and women did not view their adjunct positions as a career path, yet remained in the position as a response to achieve work-life balance. Administrative implications include development of recruiting and faculty retention policy. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563349</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Exploring the Experiences of Women Adjunct Faculty: A Phenomenology</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1447-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>228</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600999</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Church Related Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moore, Angelica</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>First generation college students are accessing colleges and universities at an increased rate. However, first generation college students, which include a disproportionate number of minorities and low income populations, continue to lag behind their counterparts in graduating from college. More prevalent in the research are factors that cause first generation college students to drop-out. On the contrary, the researcher utilized a qualitative descriptive methodology to explore factors that enable first generation college students to persist and complete college, rather than drop out. Engaging in a series of in-depth semi-structured interviews, the researcher examined the lived experiences of twelve first generation college students who have persisted at Saint Lucia University (SLU), a faith-based, four year liberal arts college located in California. Four central themes emerged: Support (especially from parents), Challenges Endured, Impetus to Stick it Out, and Institutional Factors. Aside from challenges that included unclear expectations about college life and a lack of confidence in their academic readiness, (though SLU has a population of students who are 55% ethnic minority) many participants encountered a dose of culture shock, as they &amp;quot;perceived&amp;quot; SLU to be &amp;quot;mostly White and mostly rich.&amp;quot; Others professed having encountered racial discrimination. Indeed, it was daunting experiences like these that were most taxing on the participants and their ability to persist to degree. Nevertheless, for many of these students, their dire impetus to succeed was for the prospect of making a better life for themselves and their families. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563350</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>First Generation College Students: Indicators of College Persistence and Graduation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Saint Mary&apos;s College of California</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2318-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>137</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601336</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Portfolio Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Monte Carlo Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Management Information Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burke, John C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The objective of my dissertation is to create a general approach to evaluating IS/IT projects using Real Option Analysis (ROA). This is an important problem because an IT Project Portfolio (ITPP) can represent hundreds of projects, millions of dollars of investment and hundreds of thousands of employee hours. Therefore, any advance in the techniques used to manage an ITPP will save a significant amount of limited resources. A primary obstacle in using traditional methods to evaluate IS/IT projects is that they are notoriously risky. Cost overruns of 100%, or even outright failure are commonplace (Standish Group, 2009). When project volatility is high metrics such as NPV and ROI are of limited value. The weakness of these measures is that they are point estimates of static business environments and do not account for managerial flexibility. ROA has been a primary stream of MIS research for the last decade and is a suggested approach for evaluating projects in IS management frameworks such as COBIT and Val IT. There are several known issues that need to be addressed before project portfolios can be evaluated using ROA. Unlike investments in financial portfolios, projects in MIS are clearly not independent of each other. That is, companies invest in particular technologies that actively interact and often depend on each other, e.g. Java, Oracle, SAP etc. A second issue is that IS/IT projects and their driving variables can be non-normally distributed, non-linearly related, and asymmetrically correlated. These characteristics, especially inter and intra-project interactions between non-normally distributed variables, violate the assumptions of the basic Black-Scholes, Binomial, and Margrabe ROA models used in the current MIS research. This work suggests using a Monte Carlo approach to calculating option value using mathematical copulas. Copulas allow each variable that make up a multivariate distribution to be considered separately from the dependence structure between the variables. This work can be seen as a logical next step in the MIS literature, which has thus far focused on evaluating individual projects without interactions, and will enable practitioners to manage their ITPP as a whole, instead of as individual projects. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563351</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Incorporating Asymmetric Dependency Patterns in the Evaluation of IS/IT projects Using Real Option Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0868-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>120</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600653</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Fluency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emergent Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Figurative Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ellison, Marclette</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In &amp;quot;Reading First&amp;quot; schools throughout the United States, literacy coaches administer the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) as the sole measure of fluency and then offer instructional recommendations for students with reading difficulties based on those results. However, critics of DIBELS question its accuracy for determinations about students&apos; reading abilities and its applicability to groups, such as diverse urban students, who are not well represented in the research. Drawing on reasoned action theory, the purpose of this phenomenological study was to gauge the perceived effectiveness of DIBELS through an examination of individual and shared experiences of DIBELS literacy coaches serving diverse students in urban elementary schools. The research questions focused on understanding the experiences and perceptions most influential to the behaviors and attitudes of literacy coaches using DIBELS. Six active literacy coaches were identified via purposeful sampling. Data were collected using interviews and analyzed using highlighting and coding to identify emergent themes. Themes were interpreted using metaphors to capture the essence of participants&apos; lived experiences in their work. Findings indicated that participants viewed DIBELS as a source of rational and systematic data and an effective tool for identifying and addressing reading problems in diverse urban students. The overarching metaphor likened literacy coaches to kindlers of a flame. Results support the view that DIBELS can benefit a diverse urban school population and yield recommendations for leaders to promote understanding and support for the efforts of literacy coaches. Implications for social change include improved assessment of fluency and reading interventions, especially for students served by literacy coaches in &amp;quot;Reading First&amp;quot; urban schools. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563352</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Literacy Coaches&apos; Perceptions of a Formative Fluency Assessment in Urban Elementary Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1015-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>139</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600782</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goal Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>General Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mahlberg, Jamie Lynn</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined the hypothesis that mastery orientation would increase for college students enrolled in courses that incorporated self-assessment. Early in the spring 2013 semester, 216 community college students enrolled in 16 different general education and developmental courses volunteered to participate and completed a demographic/goal orientation questionnaire. During the semester, 10 of the courses implemented self-assessment and 6 did not. At the conclusion of the semester, 143 of the original sample completed the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) which provided post-test goal orientation scores along with measures of additional motivational and self-regulatory variables. Results indicated a trend in the direction hypothesized only for students enrolled in general education, not developmental courses. Further, retention was significantly higher for students enrolled in self-assessment courses. Additional motivational and self-regulatory variables were correlated with achievement outcomes such as final grades. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563353</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Examination of the Influence of Formative Self-Assessment on College Student Mastery Orientation in College Courses</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Minnesota State University, Mankato</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1466-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>96</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601016</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Delphi Technique</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Virtual Classrooms</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cartagena, Michelle M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Creation of high quality online courses, required for successful learning outcomes, can be a challenge to non-traditional online course designers, such as secondary school teachers. Increasing interest in online classes prompted secondary school teachers to design their course. A poorly designed online course can cause students to lose interest and affect whether or not they graduate from secondary school. This Delphi study investigated a number of best practices that help secondary school teachers to become proficient in designing online courses. In this Delphi study, Round 1 consisted of 19 statements which were divided over three sections, namely critical issues, barriers/challenges, and components. This was sent to 32 panelists. Twenty-five of them completed this round. Twenty-four panelists completed Round 2 and 20 completed the final and third round. The final instrument had 34 statements. The expert panel focused on issues specifically to deal with the challenges of moving a course from the face-to-face course room to the online environment. Consensus from the panel provided best practices for secondary school teachers as they designed their online course. These were divided into required and recommended best practices. They will help to keep the learner engaged in the lesson content. Engagement will lead to a pleasant and successful online experience. Having expertise in the process of designing an online course can also help secondary school teachers to fill the demand for online courses. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563354</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Delphi Study of Online Course Development by Secondary School Teachers</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1576-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>145</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601055</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Science Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lesson Plans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Astronomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Benefits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Aids</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mayeur, Paul Anthony</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation looks at the effects of an educator-scientist partnership on the creation of an inquiry based science lesson for the middle school classroom. The lesson was initially created by a scientist following their science research, but changed as the scientist began working with teachers. The changes in the lesson show that scientists and educators may not agree on what is considered appropriate for a science lesson because of time commitment and grade level. However, by working together the partnership is able to reach a compromise of the lesson that allows for the students to get the best possible outcome. This dissertation also shows that science research is a method of inquiry, which can be brought to the classroom through inquiry education. The science research the lesson followed looks at the interstellar dust cloud DC 314.8-5.1, which is unique because of the cloud&apos;s proximity to a B-type star with no known association. This thesis did a survey of the area looking for background sources that can be used for future spectroscopical studies. Further, the survey led to the discovery of two possible young stellar objects. In order to fuel educator-scientist interaction and to bring inquiry education into the middle school classroom a scientist created a web-based science lesson that incorporated real NASA data into the middle-school classroom. This lesson was based on the scientist&apos;s research in infrared astronomy within the broader context of astrobiology. The lesson includes students plotting real data; in the process the students learn about infrared radiation, star color, and the wavelength/temperature relationship. These are all topics that were studied in the scientist&apos;s research, which led the scientist to the idea of creating a lesson for the middle-school classroom. This lesson is based on the principles of inquiry-based learning. Inquiry lessons can bring together these ideas into one place and hopefully inspire new generations to explore the world and universe through science. The scientist then worked with five teachers to edit the lesson for each teacher&apos;s classroom. For four of five teachers the lesson changed from an online based lesson that used Excel to a PowerPoint presentation and paper graphing. It is shown here that partnerships between scientists and educators are beneficial for both parties as it allows scientists to understand how to communicate their scientific findings to the general public, while allowing teachers to stay updated with the most advanced science research. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563355</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Infrared Astronomy in Science and Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1468-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>282</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601018</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Benefits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Esteem</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Team Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Berger, Marcia G.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>School districts are required to provide special education students with the same education benefits available to other students at their grade level, but meeting the needs of special education students continues to be challenging as most programs provide only one teacher rather than seeking the expertise of content area specialists. Co-teaching classrooms are designed to assist special education students to effectively transition between high school and adult life. The theoretical foundation for the study included social learning theory and constructivist learning theory. Research questions focused on the stakeholders&apos; perceptions of the effectiveness of the co-teaching environment relating to benefits in curriculum and learning, social and emotional behavior, communication, and independent functioning. Using a mixed-method research design with a sequential explanatory strategy, data were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of the co-teaching classroom experience through the eyes of the stakeholders. Key findings from both the quantitative survey and qualitative interviews indicated that stakeholders&apos; views were positive regarding the benefits of the co-teaching classroom overall, reflecting gains in self-confidence, self-esteem, and school satisfaction. Florida Alternate Assessment test score results support these findings, with students in co-teaching classrooms performing better academically. One recommendation for practice is that parents, as stakeholders, need to be better informed as partners in their child&apos;s education. A significant implication from this study is that the co-teaching classroom may be a more-than-acceptable alternative to the self-contained classroom for students with special needs. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563356</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Study of the Perceptions of Stakeholders on the Effectiveness of Co-Teaching in a Special Education Classroom</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1565-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>165</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601050</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Parent Teacher Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communication Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communication Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Whichard-Bond, LaTisha Tawanda</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The commitment to improve the education of all students has become a national priority. Preparing students for the challenges of the future, however, is not the responsibility of schools alone (N. Carey, L. Lewis, &amp;amp; E. Farris, &amp;quot;Parent Involvement in Children&apos;s Education: Efforts by Public Elementary School,&amp;quot; 1998). Schools communicate with parents by means of newsletters, notes, and report cards as a way of informing parents about their child&apos;s behavior, classroom placement, and progress. This form of communication is 1-way communication. Because communication is the core of education, communication should be 2-way. In 2-way communication, parents and teachers share responsibility for the success of the student. Creating 2-way communication is not easy because many individuals operate in Model I defensive behaviors. Operating in Model II behaviors allows for collaboration and sharing. Because communication is the foundation of effective teacher-to-parent relationships, stakeholders must begin to talk, listen, and acknowledge each other&apos;s voice. The purpose of this action research project was to provide a 1-hour training with a 5-week follow-up for teachers to determine if there was a change in teachers&apos; comfort level and their communication techniques. Success for the project was based upon teachers&apos; improving their comfort level of communication with parents, and teachers&apos; improving their communication techniques with parents. A quantitative and qualitative analysis focused on improving teachers&apos; ability to relate and communicate with parents at a comfortable level. The study resulted in increased communication between home and school, improved relationships with teachers and parents, and a culture based on mutual trust and respect. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563357</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher-to-Parent Communication Techniques after a One-Hour Training Session: An Action Science Project</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1569-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>98</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601051</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Concept Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diagnostic Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Williams, Laura K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mendiburo, Maria</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hasselbring, Ted</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A strong understanding of fractions is vital to later success in mathematics. However, research has consistently shown that fractions are one of the most difficult mathematical concepts for elementary school students to master. To attempt to remedy this deficit, the authors began a project called Helping At-risk students Learn Fractions (HALF) in June of 2010. The purpose of the HALF project was to develop a technology-based learning environment that uses interactive visual representation to help students&apos; gain conceptual understanding of fractions. The school sites whose students participated in the diagnostic assessment item pilot testing include nine different schools that represent a broad range of possible school settings in order to allow for more generalizable results. As in the selection of school sites, the authors attempted to collect data from as broad of a range of fifth- and sixth-grade students as possible; no students were systematically excluded. Of the six t tests performed, four showed a significant difference between the groups. The most striking result was the comparison between items that presented a fraction that was greater than one as an improper fraction and those presented as mixed numbers (t(27) = 7.902, p &amp;lt; 0.001). These findings are useful in multiple ways, for example: (1) in working to improve fractions pedagogy, they allow for making general recommendations to teachers regarding the order in which to present material; and (2) knowing that items using triangles are more challenging for students, a teacher could introduce a new topic using circle and square models and move on to triangles when the students are ready to challenge their understanding. Since instruction does not take place in a vacuum; regardless of how and in what order the theory states students should learn fractions, it is valuable to both good pedagogy and good research to understand how they actually do learn fractions. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563358</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Half of One, 6/12 of Another: Understanding Relative Item Difficulties in a Fractions Assessment under Development</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>16</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Experiments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Generalization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sampling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Indexes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tipton, Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Recent research on the design of social experiments has highlighted the effects of different design choices on research findings. Since experiments rarely collect their samples using random selection, in order to address these external validity problems and design choices, recent research has focused on two areas. The first area is on methods for adjusting experimental treatment effect estimates for known population characteristics. A second research area has been on how to select a sample (non-randomly) to improve generalizations to a well-defined inference population. The goal of this paper is to develop a measure that summarizes differences in the propensity score distributions in the experimental sample and population. The author includes an example, a middle school mathematics program SimCalc. SimCalc is a computer based program that teaches linearity, proportionality, and rates of change. The cluster randomized trial of this program was conducted on 73 schools in Texas. The primary purpose of this paper was to develop an index that can be used to evaluate how generalizable an experimental sample is for a particular inference population. This index is based entirely on pre-treatment variables, enabling the index both to be calculated and recalculated throughout recruitment but before an experiment has commenced (as a sampling tool) and to be calculated after an experiment has been completed for many different inference populations and outcomes. Figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563359</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Generalizable Is Your Experiment? An Index for Comparing Samples and Populations</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sampling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Youth</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Robustness (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bell, Stephen H.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Puma, Michael J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cook, Ronna J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Heid, Camilla A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Access to Head Start has been shown to improve children&apos;s preschool experiences and school readiness on selected factors through the end of 1st grade. Two more years of follow-up, through the end of 3rd grade, can now be examined to determine whether these effects continue into the middle elementary grades. The statistical design and impact analysis methodology for the Head Start Impact Study (HSIS) has been lauded as exemplary for a large scale social experiment, and analytic strategies continue to evolve through three rounds of analysis covering six years of sample follow-up. Based on a randomized admission lottery in hundreds of local sites, the HSIS provides a platform for measuring Head Start&apos;s impacts--both short term and long term--on a nationally representative sample of participants without selection bias, providing internally and externally valid impact estimates for the overall Head Start participant population and for subsets of participants of particular policy interest. The HSIS includes a nationally representative sample of 4,667 three- and four-year-old children in 383 centers nationwide. The evaluation has followed sample children through the end of 3rd grade, with rich data available across many outcomes over multiple years. The foundation of random assignment both empowers and challenges methodological development when seeking to measure program effectiveness without bias and with balanced interpretation as to the strength of the statistical data and measurement tools used. Throughout its 12-year course, the HSIS has sought to capitalize on its experimental design, larger representative sample, and vast rich data elements.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563360</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Methods for Analyzing Data from a Randomized Control Trial with a Nationally Representative Sample</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>5</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Mail</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kraft, Matthew A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Blazar, David L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Louisiana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Louisiana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>For over a century, school systems in the U.S. have attempted to improve instructional quality by investing in the education and training of their teachers. Today, over 90% of teachers report participating in some form of professional development (PD). Practitioners have responded to critiques of PD by re-envisioning it in the form of individualized and sustained teacher coaching programs that provide tailored feedback to teachers about their classroom practices. In this paper, the authors evaluate the effect of a time-intensive, individualized coaching program MATCH Teacher Coaching (MTC) that focuses on improving teachers&apos; classroom management and instructional practices, both of which are cited as important mechanisms behind improvements in student outcomes. In May of 2011, the authors recruited 59 teachers, working in Recovery School District charter schools across New Orleans, to participate in a randomized trial of the year-long coaching program. Study findings reported that that MTC was implemented with a high degree of fidelity and had a profound effect on teachers&apos; instructional practices compared to control teachers who had access to standard professional development opportunities. Teachers&apos; emails and coaches&apos; logs were analyzed to assess the content and methods used during coaching sessions. Results indicate that teachers who received coaching are more effective than those who participated in the standard PD activities provided by their schools. Building the necessary evidentiary base and shifting longstanding norms about PD practices will take time, but the evidence-to-date suggests doing so will be a valuable investment. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563361</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Improving Teacher Practice: Experimental Evidence on Individualized Teacher Coaching</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>11</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Generalizability Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelcey, Ben</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McGinn, Daniel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hill, Heather</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Recent policy has charged schools and districts with maintaining highly qualified teachers and differentiating among teachers in terms of their effectiveness (U.S. Department of Education, 2009). This emphasis has driven the development and implementation of teacher quality measures which are increasingly being used to evaluate teachers with important consequences. One increasingly common component of these evaluations is the direct observation of teachers in their classrooms. Classroom observations have been long viewed as a promising way to evaluate and develop teachers because they anchor assessments in specific and observable criteria. In this proposal, the authors investigated the robustness of classroom observation scores to three measurement approaches: classical test theory (CTT), generalizability theory (GT), and item response theory (IRT). They investigated the extent to which choices among these approaches lead to indeterminacies in conclusions regarding teaching quality, the precision with which the authors can index this quality, and the relation of this quality to student achievement. They then provide insights delineating the reasons for the discrepancies among methods and explore the extent to which the observed differences are indicative of true differences among teachers in their teaching quality. This study takes place within the larger Developing Measures of Effective Mathematics Teaching study which focused on developing identifying practices and characteristics that distinguish between more and less effective teachers. The sample includes 250 teachers from 40 schools and 4 districts. Overall the results suggest that construct-irrelevant variance is sizeable in classroom observations and that treatment of this variance had significant implications for the resulting scores. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563362</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Measurement of Classroom Teaching Quality with Item Response Theory</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Misconceptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diagnostic Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Clements, Peggy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Buffington, Pamela</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tobey, Cheryl</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New England</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Rational number concepts underpin many topics in advanced mathematics and understanding these concepts is a prerequisite for students&apos; success in high-school level courses. Students with rational number misconceptions that are not diagnosed and remediated in the middle grades are likely to encounter difficulty in high-school mathematics courses. The goal of the Eliciting Mathematical Concepts (EM[superscript 2]) project is to develop diagnostic assessments that target rational number misconceptions that research indicates are common among middle-grades students. EM[superscript 2] is working with multiple school districts in New England to administer the assessments in classroom settings. There are two representing &amp;quot;fractions assessments.&amp;quot; This abstract provides a brief overview of the (EM[superscript 2]) project. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563363</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Middle-Grade Students&apos; Misconceptions about the Graphical Representation of Simple Fractions: An Assessment from the Eliciting Mathematical Misconceptions Project (EM[superscript 2])</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Meta Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Psychology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Incidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Work</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Treatment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pustejovsky, James E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Single-case designs (SCDs) are a class of research methods for evaluating intervention effects by taking repeated measurements of an outcome over time on a single case, both before and after the deliberate introduction of a treatment. SCDs are used heavily in fields such as special education, school psychology, social work, and applied behavior analysis. Several different operational procedures are commonly used to record direct observations of human behavior, ranging from continuous duration recording to interval recording methods. This methodological research will describe a model for behavioral observation data that allows definition of an intuitively interpretable, operationally comparable effect size, the prevalence odds ratio (POR). After defining the POR, the author describes basic estimators based on data from several different recording methods. The model described in this abstract provides a basis for defining an operationally comparable effect size, the prevalence odds ratio, that allows comparisons and meta-analytic summaries of treatment effects measured using different behavioral observation recording procedures. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563364</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Operationally Comparable Effect Sizes for Quantifying Changes in Behavior, with Application to Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Studies</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>40</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drama</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Letters (Correspondence)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dikici, Ayhan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yavuzer, Yasemin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gundogdu, Rezzan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Drama at primary teaching course is given as a compulsory course to students enrolling department of the primary teaching in college of education in Turkey. In drama, assessment is problematic as the content of the lesson often deviates from the plan because of spontaneous input from the students and on-the-spot changes in direction by the instructors. This paper presents an assessment model for the creative drama at education. The research was carried out with 213 teacher candidates enrolling drama at primary teaching course. One group pre-test and post-test models were formed in the research. The candidates were required to write letters to one of their friends on the creative drama in the first week of the program. The program lasted 14 weeks and at the end of it candidates were required to write letters as the post-tests. By analyzing the letters with content analysis method, main themes and sub-themes were formed. The increase between pre-test and post-test frequencies in the way of using themes in the letters were found. The correlation among main themes was investigated. It was seen that the students using concepts correctly in written letters as the post-tests.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563365</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Creative Drama Course in College of Education: A Study of Content Analysis</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Essays in Education v23 p36-48 Spr 2008</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>26</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonprofit Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Moral Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Human Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Philosophy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Labor Force Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Business</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Craft, Jana L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Using an exploratory case study approach, this research examined the consistency between espoused and enacted values within a large nonprofit organization known as an ethical leader in the human services industry. This research explored ethical business culture, ethical decision making, deontological and utilitarian moral paradigms and learning organization theory. The process of values-based decision making was dissected and analyzed in order to understand why and how it was used. Findings revealed a gap between hierarchical levels and corporate and satellite locations in several areas. Yet, strong ethical culture and ethical decision making practices were evident. Further, differing philosophical viewpoints were found to exist between higher and lower organizational levels. The study concluded with recommendations for Human Resource Development-related practices that help address the gap between espoused and enacted values and more fully operate as a learning organization to strengthen the ethical business culture and better understand the benefits of ethical decision making. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563366</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Mind the Gap: A Case Study of Values-Based Decision Making in a Nonprofit Organization</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1310-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>270</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600929</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Bullying</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aggression</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resilience (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Change</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thompson, Kent W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This multiple case study focused on whether and how cyberbullying had an impact on students&apos; use of technology. Analysis of the lived experiences of the participants in this study added depth to the quantitative research previously conducted by others in this area. The conceptual framework was based on social learning theory, which suggested that unless safety needs were met, adoption of technology would be hindered. How cyberbullying impacted participants&apos; use of digital communication and learning during their adolescent years was explored, including their use of texting, Internet use, e-mail, cell phones, blogging, wikis, and social networking sites. Participants consisted of 5 college-age students from a university in a Southwestern state who were recruited based on their involvement with educational and communication technologies and their experiences with cyberbullying in primary and secondary school. Data were collected through interviews and observations of the participants&apos; current technology use; these data were analyzed for themes, patterns, and discrepant cases. Results indicated diminished occurrences of cyberbullying toward the middle of high school, strong support from female family members that helped build resilience among cyberbullying recipients, and continued use of technology and social media without any denial of use or change in contact information. Educators and parents can use this information to support positive social change by increasing awareness, promoting greater understanding in the community of the need to support targets/victims, and helping the public at large to change its values regarding cyberbullying. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563367</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Multiple Case Study on Cyberbullying&apos;s Impacts on Adolescent Technology Use</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2045-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>161</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601292</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nurses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Documentation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Records (Forms)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jensen, Tracey A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Electronic health records (EHRs) will soon become the standard for documenting nursing care. The EHR holds the promise of rapid access to complete records of a patient&apos;s encounter with the healthcare system. It is the expectation that healthcare providers input essential data that communicates important patient information to support quality decision making that is customized and precise for each person. Nurses comprise the largest portion of the healthcare team in U.S. hospitals and deliver more hours of patient care and perform more coordination of care than other healthcare disciplines during a typical hospital stay. This primary provider role makes nursing a primary contributor to the documentation of the total care of hospitalized patients and an important user of the EHR. This study uses the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model as a framework for the quantitative evaluation of how RNs view documentation in the EHR as relevant to their work. In addition, this study examines RNs satisfaction with the EHR as a representation of their work. Finally, the study explores influences of demographic factors on the RNs&apos; belief in the relevancy of and satisfaction with the EHR. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563368</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Nurses&apos; Perceptions of Nursing Care Documentation in the Electronic Health Record</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0986-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>128</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600764</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Deafness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partial Hearing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hearing Impairments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ealy, Barbara Smith</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This qualitative study explores the level of satisfaction of parents regarding early identification/intervention services for children who are deaf or hard of hearing (D/HH). The purpose of this study is to compare the progress of children who are D/HH with their hearing peers on elements used to measure the readiness of students to enter the first grade as measured by teacher and parental perception/satisfaction. This study will include a qualitative exploration of assistive strategies and parental choices regarding early-intervention services, amplification, and modes of communication. Furthermore, it will provide and analyze data concerning teacher and parent perception of the relative success of the various pre-school interventions for children with hearing losses. The study employs a qualitative case-study methodology using an in-depth guided-interview format to collect data. Participants include four families of children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Triangulation of data sources is achieved through guided in-depth interviews with parents, document review, verbatim transcripts of all interviews, and personal observations. The findings reveal levels of functioning for children who are D/HH upon entry into the school system through the end of their kindergarten year and levels of parental satisfaction concerning their choices made about early-intervention services prior to their children&apos;s entry into the school system. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563369</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Parental Level of Satisfaction Regarding Early Intervention Services for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Piedmont College</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1433-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>131</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600986</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Superintendents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Futures (of Society)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kaufman, Douglas R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The 1983 publication of &amp;quot;A Nation at Risk&amp;quot; was the start of the latest chapter in the long history and development of the public school superintendent. &amp;quot;A Nation at Risk&amp;quot; brought new pressure and awareness on university programs that train school administrators coupled with suggestions on how to improve their effectiveness. This study describes many of these suggested reforms and investigates their effectiveness and rate of implementation. This qualitative study describes the experiences and perceptions of pre-service learning from the perspective of individuals who have completed pre-service training, worked as public school superintendents and currently teach in a pre-service program for future superintendents. The opinions of these individuals on pre-service training are unique as they have seen the impact these programs can have from three unique perspectives. Through an interview format, these individuals describe how their pre-service training helped them succeed as a superintendent as well as their frustrations with the process. They also elaborate on how they attempt to prepare future educational leaders with the skills they feel their students need. This study adds to the knowledge base of pre-service training for the superintendent endorsement by describing the impact these programs have had from the perspective of individuals who have gone through pre-service training, served as superintendents and the program to the student and the professor. Prior research has focused on one or two of these aspects but has never brought all three together. The findings from this study may lead to future research on how to make pre-service experiences more applicable to the real world or help students see the connections between what is being learned and how it will help them in future administrative positions. Other findings suggest a need for better transitions to the superintendent through organized and continued support provided by the university, the school district and other administrators in the field. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563370</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Perceptions of Educational Administration Pre-Service Training by Former Illinois Superintendents Currently Serving as University Professors</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Illinois State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1206-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>191</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600870</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Poets</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poetry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Workshops</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Imagery</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Enteshari, Fariba</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research examined how Rumi&apos;s poetry impacts the lives of individuals who study his teachings, written 800 years ago in his masterpiece, &amp;quot;Mathnawi.&amp;quot; After teaching Rumi for the last 15 years, I was aware of positive changes in my students&apos; lives but wanted a more in-depth understanding of what drew the students to Rumi&apos;s poetry and the impact of studying the poetry on the students&apos; lives. Fourteen experienced students, and 14 students who were new to the study of Rumi participated. I used a grounded analytical approach to analyze the new students&apos; reflections written during a study workshop as well as in-depth interviews with all students. The findings show that students drawn to study Rumi&apos;s poetry were searching for more meaning and understanding of themselves and their lives. As they engaged with the core concepts of Rumi&apos;s poetry, they felt validated and comforted by the affirmation they received. Students were able to reconcile their religious beliefs as they incorporated Rumi&apos;s teachings into their lives. They also felt moved and enriched by the beauty of the language and imagery of the poetry. Students were able to understand themselves and others better and find a deeper meaning in their lives. Students need continuity in practicing what they learned to stay in touch with the wisdom that they gained during the lectures. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563371</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Rumi&apos;s Poetry: The Journey toward Meaning and Transformation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1434-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>140</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600987</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bieneman, Paula Dorothy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined the collective teacher efficacy in selected elementary schools, specifically exploring the extent to which those schools demonstrate collective efficacy, the nature of collective efficacy in those schools, and the underlying belief systems and tacit assumptions that may inform that efficacy. The first phase of a mixed methods design was used to determine the level of collective efficacy present in eight diverse elementary schools. Through a series of interviews in the second and third phases of the study, I investigated the nature of collective efficacy in those schools and the possibility that underlying belief systems such as deficit thinking may inform beliefs at the school level. My respondents came from eight elementary schools in three northern Illinois school districts serving increasingly diverse student populations. Results from phase 1 of the study provided a range of collective teacher efficacy (CTE) scores for the participating sites and revealed no significant variance in the CTE scores of the eight schools. In phase 2 of the study, interviews were conducted with six building administrators in four selected schools to explore the nature of collective efficacy in their schools and to examine the underlying belief systems from the vantage point of school leaders. In phase 3 of the study, teachers from two schools facing different school-based challenges but with similar collective efficacy scores and similar demographic data were interviewed to provide a more comprehensive understanding of collective efficacy and underlying belief systems in those two schools. As supported in previous research, collective teacher efficacy did correlate with student achievement despite varying levels of socioeconomic status. The eight school sites participating in phase 1 of the study demonstrated levels of collective teacher efficacy that correlated with socioeconomic status. Despite slight differences in the CTE scores, with all schools scoring in the average range, no significant variance between the scores were found. Given the complexity of increasingly diverse school populations and the limitations of academic achievement data as an independent variable, quantitative analysis alone was not adequate to examine the construct of collective efficacy in these schools, given their common selection criteria. The qualitative findings of this study revealed that belief systems grounded in deficit thinking coexisted with average levels of collective teacher efficacy. That collective teacher efficacy can coexist with deficit thinking is problematic for school improvement efforts based on collective efficacy theory. The utility of collective efficacy as a framework for school improvement is questionable for school leaders working to realize a socially just education and to understand the issues confronting schools serving diverse populations. A deeper interrogation and a measurement of deficit thinking needs to be conducted to better articulate the relationship between collective efficacy and deficit thinking in elementary schools serving increasing diverse student populations. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563372</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Study of Collective Efficacy in Award Winning Schools in Illinois Serving Racially Diverse Elementary Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0862-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>184</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600647</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Chinese</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Morphemes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Chinese Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Task Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Audio Equipment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Form Classes (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Morphology (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discourse Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Li, Ming-Ching</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This longitudinal study examines the acquisition of tense and agreement morphology by child L2 learners in an early stage of language acquisition. The objectives of this study are twofold. The first is to observe the development of verb inflections and syntactic competence over time from an early stage by Chinese child L2 learners of English. The second is to determine the similarities and differences in the acquisition of verb inflections by comparing child L2 learners of this study with child L1 and adult L2 learners from the literature in this field. Participants included six Chinese-L1 English-L2 children between the ages of 7 and 9, with a length of residence in the United States between four and six months. Data were collected regularly over a period of seven months. Tasks include a conversation with the investigator on general topics, and an elicitation task via picture description. Speech production samples were audio-recorded and later transcribed to analyze the use of verb inflections: the third-person singular - &amp;quot;s&amp;quot;, regular past form - &amp;quot;ed&amp;quot;, copula &amp;quot;be&amp;quot;, and auxiliary &amp;quot;be&amp;quot;, and the use of related syntactic properties: the use of overt subjects, and the case of subject pronouns. Based on previous research, the study adopts the Separation Hypothesis, claiming that abstract properties can be present in the syntactic representation in the absence of overt morphology, and the acquisition of syntax triggers the acquisition of morphology. Results demonstrated the early acquisition of syntactic properties, the use of overt subjects and the nominative case for the subject pronouns, while conversely, verb inflections were largely omitted. This suggests that the functional category [Infl] is already in place in the L2 initial state and that syntax acts as a trigger for the acquisition of overt morphology. The Separation Hypothesis is consequently supported. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563373</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Acquisition of Tense and Agreement by Early Child Second Language Learners</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0909-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>160</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600696</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sullivan, Kristynn J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shadish, William R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Single case designs (SCDs) are short time series that assess intervention effects by measuring units repeatedly over time both in the presence and absence of treatment. For a variety of reasons, interest in the statistical analysis and meta-analysis of these designs has been growing in recent years. This paper proposes modeling SCD data with Generalized Additive Models (GAMs), a semi-parametric method from which it is possible to estimate the functional form of trend directly from the data, arguably capturing the true functional form better than ordinary least squares regression methods in which the researcher must decide which functional form to impose on the data. Generalized Additive Models provide a flexible way to model SCD data, allowing the data to inform the researcher both as to whether significant trend or trend treatment interaction exists, as well as which of those terms need nonlinear representations and which can remain linear. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563374</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Modeling Longitudinal Data with Generalized Additive Models: Applications to Single-Case Designs</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Location</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Least Squares Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropout Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Potential Dropouts</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sampaio, Gustavo Ramos</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Brazil</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Brazil</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation encompasses three chapters that study the Brazilian higher educational system and determines the barriers to acquiring higher education in the country. Below are the individual abstracts for each chapter. Chapter 1: &amp;quot;Rural and urban schools&apos; performance in Brazil and its impact on access to higher education&amp;quot;. Recent research on academic achievement in Brazil shows that public school students face strong barriers in gaining access to higher education compared to private school students. However, little is known about differences between public schools located in urban and rural areas, another source of opportunity inequality. I estimate the effectiveness of rural and urban schools in Brazil using data from a major university entrance exam. To account for bias in Ordinary Least Square (OLS), I use a technique recently developed by Altonji, Elder, and Taber (2005b) that estimates the ratio of the influence of omitted variables relative to observed variables that would be required to completely explain the estimates one obtains via OLS. The results indicate that students from urban areas outperform their rural counterparts and provide suggestive evidence that the poor quality of rural public schools is the source of such score differences. Chapter 2: &amp;quot;Climbing the Educational Ladder: The Relative Performance of Rural and Urban Students in Brazilian Universities&amp;quot;. Recent research on academic achievement in Brazil shows that rural school students face strong barriers in gaining access to higher education compared to urban school students. However, little is known about differences between rural and urban students when they are granted access to the university. We estimate the relative performance of rural and urban students in Brazil using data from a major university. Furthermore, to observe how performance varies along the different GPA quantiles, we use Koenker and Bassett (1978) quantile regression approach. The results indicate that students from rural areas outperform their urban counterparts providing suggestive evidence that using policed implementations that increase rural acceptance rates would decrease regional educational inequalities and help fight the high income inequality rates observed in the Brazilian society. Chapter 3: &amp;quot;College Dropouts and Entrance Test Scores: A Censored Quantile Regression Approach&amp;quot;. The problem of university dropouts has generated increased interest among researchers, policymakers, and educators in recent years. This paper examines the many issues involved in trying to understand and solve this complex social and educational problem. Using a dataset from students enrolled in a Brazilian major university, we estimate the effect of student entrance exam performance on dropout rates using a censored quantile regression approach proposed by Portnoy (2003). We find that students with higher entrance exam scores are more likely to dropout of college in the beginning of their college journey while being less likely to dropout after some time. Such results are likely due to the perception that a high ability student has over his probabilities of entering a more difficult or better major the following year. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563375</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Three Essays on the Economics of Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-0951-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>132</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600730</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Activism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Philosophy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stafford, Casey</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Senegal (Dakar)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Senegal (Dakar)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explores and interrogates dominant representations of African university students by examining how students conceptualize and act upon their own agency. Using a qualitative case-study approach, the author examines how students actively confront the ideological and material conditions presented by schooling. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563376</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>University Student Agency, Representation, and Activism: A Case Study of Students Studying English at Universite Cheikh Anta Diop (Dakar, Senegal)</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1341-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>258</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600961</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Psychology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Counseling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aging (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Older Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gerontology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Units of Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constructivism (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Realism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mothers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rejection (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attachment Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developmental Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family (Sociological Unit)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asperger Syndrome</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role Playing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Driver Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Interests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Marital Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conflict</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Psychologists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Child Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Burnout</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pracana, Clara, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Collected Works - Proceedings</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Serbia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Chile</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Brazil</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Albania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Spain</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Portugal</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Oman</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Greece (Crete)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Guatemala</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Slovenia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Fey Acceptance of Others Scale</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Greece</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Czech Republic</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>France</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Italy</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Albania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Brazil</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Chile</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Czech Republic</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>France</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Greece</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Guatemala</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Italy</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Oman</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Portugal</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Serbia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Slovenia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Spain</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>World Institute for Advanced Research and Science (WIARS) (Portugal)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>We are delighted to welcome you to the International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends 2014, taking place in Porto, Portugal, from 4 to 6 of April. Psychology, in our time, offers a large range of scientific fields where it can be applied. The goal of understanding individuals and groups (mental functions and behavioral standpoints), from this academic and practical scientific discipline, is aimed ultimately to benefit society. Our International Conference seeks to provide some answers and explore the several areas within the Psychology field, new developments in studies and proposals for future scientific projects. Our goal is to offer a worldwide connection between psychologists, researchers and lecturers, from a wide range of academic fields, interested in exploring and giving their contribution in psychological issues. We take pride in having been able to connect and bring together academics, scholars, practitioners and others interested in a field that is fertile in new perspectives, ideas and knowledge. We counted on an extensive variety of contributors and presenters, which can supplement our view of the human essence and behavior, showing the impact of their different personal, academic and cultural experiences. This is, certainly, one of the reasons we have many nationalities and cultures represented, inspiring multi-disciplinary collaborative links, fomenting intellectual encounter and development. InPACT 2014 received 326 submissions, from 31 different countries, reviewed by a double-blind process. Submissions were prepared to take form of Oral Presentations, Posters, Virtual Presentations and Workshops. It were accepted for presentation in the conference, 92 submissions (28% acceptance rate). The conference also includes a keynote presentation from an internationally distinguished Emeritus Professor Carlos Amaral Dias, BSc(Hons), MD, PhD, C. Psychol., FBPsS, Full Professor in the University of Coimbra, Director of Institute Superior Miguel Torga and Vice-President of the Portuguese Association of Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, to whom we express our most gratitude. This volume is composed by the proceedings of the International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends (InPACT 2014), organized by the World Institute for Advanced Research and Science (W.I.A.R.S.) and co-sponsored by the respected partners we reference in the dedicated page. This conference addressed different categories inside Applied Psychology area and papers are expected to fit broadly into one of the named themes and sub-themes. To develop the conference program we have chosen six main broad-ranging categories, which also cover different interest areas: (1) In Clinical Psychology: Emotions and related psychological processes; Assessment; Psychotherapy and counseling; Addictive behaviors; Eating disorders; Personality disorders; Quality of life and mental health; Communication within relationships; Services of mental health; and Psychopathology. (2) In Educational Psychology: Language and cognitive processes; School environment and childhood disorders; Parenting and parenting related processes; Learning and technology; Psychology in schools; Intelligence and creativity; Motivation in classroom; Perspectives on teaching; Assessment and evaluation; and Individual differences in learning. (3) In Social Psychology: Cross-cultural dimensions of mental disorders; Employment issues and training; Organizational psychology; Psychology in politics and international issues; Social factors in adolescence and its development; Social anxiety and self-esteem; Immigration and social policy; Self-efficacy and identity development; Parenting and social support; and Addiction and stigmatization. (4) In Legal Psychology: Violence and trauma; Mass-media and aggression; Intra-familial violence; Juvenile delinquency; Aggressive behavior in childhood; Internet offending; Working with crime perpetrators; Forensic psychology; Violent risk assessment; and Law enforcement and stress. (5) In Cognitive and Experimental Psychology: Perception, memory and attention; Decision making and problem-solving; Concept formation, reasoning and judgment; Language processing; Learning skills and education; Cognitive Neuroscience; Computer analogies and information processing (Artificial Intelligence and computer simulations); Social and cultural factors in the cognitive approach; Experimental methods, research and statistics; and Biopsychology. (6) In Psychoanalysis AND Psychoanalytical Psychotherapy: Psychoanalysis and psychology; The unconscious; The Oedipus complex; Psychoanalysis of children; Pathological mourning; Addictive personalities; Borderline organizations; Narcissistic personalities; Anxiety and phobias; Psychosis. The proceedings contain the results of the research and developments conducted by authors who focused on what they are passionate about: to promote growth in research methods intimately related to Psychology and its applications. It includes an extensive variety of contributors and presenters, who will extend our view in exploring and giving their contribution in educational issues, by sharing with us their different personal, academic and cultural experiences. Educational psychology oral papers include: (1) Effects of a multisensory/phonic intervention program on prevention of reading learning difficulties in kindergartners (Mariana dos Santos Moretto-Moresch and Sylvia Domingos Barrera); (2) Parents&apos; and teachers&apos; agreement on behavior problems in children with reading problems (Aikaterini Venianaki); (3) Differentiating cultural, social, and psychological attitudes towards school counselling in Saudi Arabia (Turki Aziz M. Alotaibi); (4) Construction and validity evidence of successful University-to-Work transition scale (Marina Cardoso de Oliveira, Lucy Leal Melo-Silva and Maria do Céu Taveira); (5) Body-esteem as perceived by Omani school students&apos; grade 7 through 12 (Abdulqawi Alzubaidi, Ali Mahdi Kazem, Said Aldhafri, Muna Albahrani and Hussain Alkharusi); (6) Elderly answer about concepts of aging and computer use: Educational Psychology and gerontological perspective (Claus Dieter Stobäus, Anderson Jackle Ferreira, Caroline Prato Marques, Cláudia de Oliveira Tacques Wehemeyer, Denise Goulart and Juan José Mouriño Mosquera); (7) A realist constructivist approach to unit development in science (Theodore R. Prawat and Richard S. Prawat); (8) Designing, building and preliminary results of &amp;quot;Cerebrex&amp;quot;, a serious educational videogame (Ali Lemus, Byron Ajin and Rigoberto Pinto); (9) Maternal acceptance-rejection and emotion regulation (assessed by Erica) in Portuguese adolescents (Teresa Sousa Machado and Isabel S. Reverendo); and (10) Attachment to parents (assessed by IPPA-R) and emotion regulation (REQ-2) in Portuguese adolescents (Teresa Sousa Machado and Mariana Duarte). Educational psychology posters include: (1) Self-regulation of learning in secondary school students with special educational needs (Karin Bakracevic Vukman and Majda Schmidt); (2) Personality traits and quality of relations to people in adult Psychology students (Galina Kozhukhar); (3) Psychometric analysis of the Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS) in the Arab culture (Ali Mahdi Kazem and Abdulqawi Alzubaidi); (4) Short form of WISC-IV for Spanish primary school children: A pilot study (Carmen Dasí, María J. Soler, Vicente Bellver and Juan C. Ruiz); (5) Coping behaviors in families of children with developmental disabilities in Albania (Erjona Dervishaliaj); (6) Imagined contact: A method to improve young adolescents&apos; behavioural intentions towards a peer presented as having Asperger Syndrome (Eleni Fleva); (7) Burnout Syndrome among Brazilian lecturers in undergraduate and postgraduate courses in Psychology and Education (Cristina Py de Pinto Gomes Mairesse and Ana Paula Melchiors Stahlschmidt); (8) School refusal and perceived academic self-efficacy in a sample of Chilean adolescents (José Manuel García-Fernández, Antonio Pérez-Sánchez, Maria Vicent Juan, Carolina Gonzalvez Macià, María Isabel González Núñes and Nelly Lagos San Martín); (9) New perspectives in traffic education life action role playing as a new method of teaching (Zuzana Strnadová, Leona Winklerová and Kamila Paráková); (10) Academic self-efficacy influence the attitude and interest in the school in a sample of Chilean adolescents (Antonio Pérez-Sánchez, José Manuel García-Fernández, Maria Vicent Juan, Carolina Gonzalvez Macià, Cándido J. Inglés and Nelly Lagos San Martín); (11) Applying the serious educational videogame: &amp;quot;Cerebrex&amp;quot; to 6th graders for an educational and motivational boost (Ali Lemus, Yetilu de Baessa and Jorge Mario Garcia); (12) Scientific literature review about school refusal through the SSCI (José M. García-Fernández, Antonio Miguel Pérez-Sánchez, Carolina Gonzálvez, Maria Vicent, María Soledad Torregrosa-Díez and Nieves Gomis); (13) Relationship between academic self-efficacy and selecting main ideas: Study with a sample of Chilean adolescents (Antonio Pérez-Sánchez, José M. García-Fernández, Maria Vicent Juan, Carolina Gonzalvez Macià, Patricia Poveda Serra, Cándido J. Inglés and Nelly Lagos San Martín); and (14) Individual differences in learning difficulty (Kénora Chau, Senad Karavdic, Michèle Baumann and Nearkasen Chau). Educational psychology virtual presentations include: (1) Marital quality: Work-family conflict as a vulnerability factor (Rosalba Raffagnino, Martina Fabrizi and Luisa Puddu); (2) A preliminary investigation of students&apos; work engagement and anxiety (Hanan Asghar); and (3) Intercultural sensitivity of school psychologists in Serbia (Danijela S. Petrovic and Bojana M. Dimitrijevic). (Individual papers contain references.) [Abstract modified to meet ERIC guidelines.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563377</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends (InPACT) Proceedings (Porto, Portugal, April 4-6, 2014)</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-9-8997-8666-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>398</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>1000</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mastery Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Unlu, Fatih</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bozzi, Laurie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Layzer, Carolyn</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smith, Arthur</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Price, Cristofer</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hurtig, Richard</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Woodcock Reading Mastery Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Woodcock Reading Mastery Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In experimental studies, researchers are often interested in secondary research questions that explore important aspects of main findings, such as whether or not program effects vary according to the level of fidelity in which the program has been implemented; or according to the dosage received by individuals participated in the program. In this evaluation, stakeholders questioned whether higher fidelity of implementation was related to greater impact of the intervention on student outcomes. This paper addresses this question and compares the methodology and results of three approaches for linking implementation fidelity to impacts. Exhibits are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563378</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Linking Implementation Fidelity to Impacts in an RCT</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>R305G04145</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Group Discussion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Boulay, Beth</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Martin, Carlos</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Zief, Susan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Granger, Robert</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Contradictory findings from &amp;quot;well-implemented&amp;quot; rigorous evaluations invite researchers to identify the differences that might explain the contradictions, helping to generate testable hypotheses for new research. This panel will examine efforts to ensure that the large number of local evaluations being conducted as part of four federally-funded grant programs generate rigorous findings that can inform understanding of contradictory findings. The panel will focus on the&amp;quot; Investing in Innovation Program&amp;quot; (i3) and &amp;quot;Striving Readers Program&amp;quot; (both funded by the Department of Education), the &amp;quot;Workforce Innovation Fund &amp;quot;(Department of Labor), and the &amp;quot;Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program&amp;quot; (Department of Health and Human Services). These programs have clearly made it a priority to protect the federal investment in rigorous, local evaluations; they have each put contracts in place with nationally recognized research firms to provide technical assistance to support the local evaluators as they conduct rigorous research. The populations, participants, and subjects also come from a range of contexts, given the breadth of the evaluations. The findings from the panel report include: (1) variety across the evaluations, giving rise to interesting contradictions that provide opportunities for learning; and (2) discussions that will generate conclusions about how the panel should think about grouping evaluations together to identify contradictions, the possible types of hypotheses generated to explain these contradictions, and what data the panel might want to be able to test those hypotheses down the road.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563379</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Leveraging Rigorous Local Evaluations to Understand Contradictory Findings</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>4</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Light</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Aksoy, Gokhan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gurbuz, Fatih</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined the effectiveness of group investigation teaching technique in teaching &amp;quot;Light&amp;quot; unit 7th grade primary science education level. This study was carried out in two different classes in the Primary school during the 2011-2012 academic year in Erzurum, Turkey. One of the classes was the Experimental Group (group investigation teaching technique applied) and the other was the Control Group (traditional teaching methods applied). Students in the Experimental Group were divided into 6 groups and each group concluded 4 members since &amp;quot;Light&amp;quot; unit formed 4 subtopics. The subtopics names are a) absorption of light, b) refraction of light, c) lenses and d) prism of light. The main instrument for obtaining data was the Light Achievement Test (LAT), which was applied to groups both pre-test and post-test. The data obtained indicated that the students in the Experimental Group were more successful than students in the Control Group.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563380</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Group Investigation Teaching Technique in Turkish Primary Science Courses</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Balkan Physics Letters v21 n1 p99-106 May 2013</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>25</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Psychology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Based Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bullying</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Child Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drug Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Volunteers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Play</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Creativity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inspection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>One Parent Family</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pracana, Clara, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Collected Works - Proceedings</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Russia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Slovakia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Japan</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Philippines</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Hong Kong</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Brazil</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Poland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Germany</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Brazil</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Germany</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Hong Kong</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Japan</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Philippines</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Poland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Russia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Slovakia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>World Institute for Advanced Research and Science (WIARS) (Portugal)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>We are delighted to welcome you to the International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends (InPACT) 2015, taking place in Ljubljana, Slovenia, from 2 to 4 of May. Psychology, nowadays, offers a large range of scientific fields where it can be applied. The goal of understanding individuals and groups (mental functions and behavioral standpoints), from this academic and practical scientific discipline, is aimed ultimately to benefit society. This International Conference seeks to provide some answers and explore the several areas within the Psychology field, new developments in studies and proposals for future scientific projects. The goal is to offer a worldwide connection between psychologists, researchers and lecturers, from a wide range of academic fields, interested in exploring and giving their contribution in psychological issues. The conference is a forum that connects and brings together academics, scholars, practitioners and others interested in a field that is fertile in new perspectives, ideas and knowledge. There is an extensive variety of contributors and presenters, which can supplement the view of the human essence and behavior, showing the impact of their different personal, academic and cultural experiences. This is, certainly, one of the reasons there are nationalities and cultures represented, inspiring multi-disciplinary collaborative links, fomenting intellectual encounter and development. InPACT 2015 received 368 submissions, from 31 different countries, reviewed by a double-blind process. Submissions were prepared to take form of Oral Presentations, Posters, Virtual Presentations and Workshops. 112 submissions were accepted for presentation in the conference (30% acceptance rate). The conference also includes a keynote presentation from Miguel Angel Gonzalez Torres, MD, PhD, working at the Department of Neuroscience in The University of the Basque Country (Spain), the Psychiatry Department in Basurto University Hospital (Bilbao, Spain), and Centro Psicoanalítico de Madrid, Spain, to whom we express our most gratitude. This volume is composed by the proceedings of the International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends (InPACT 2015), organized by the World Institute for Advanced Research and Science (W.I.A.R.S.) and co-sponsored by the respected partners we reference in the dedicated page. This conference addresses different categories inside Applied Psychology area and papers fit broadly into one of the named themes and sub-themes. To develop the conference program six main broad-ranging categories had been chosen, which also cover different interest areas: (1) Clinical Psychology: Emotions and related psychological processes; Assessment; Psychotherapy and counseling; Addictive behaviors; Eating disorders; Personality disorders; Quality of life and mental health; Communication within relationships; Services of mental health; and Psychopathology. (2) Educational Psychology: Language and cognitive processes; School environment and childhood disorders; Parenting and parenting related processes; Learning and technology; Psychology in schools; Intelligence and creativity; Motivation in classroom; Perspectives on teaching; Assessment and evaluation; and Individual differences in learning. (3) Social Psychology: Cross-cultural dimensions of mental disorders; Employment issues and training; Organizational psychology; Psychology in politics and international issues; Social factors in adolescence and its development; Social anxiety and self-esteem; Immigration and social policy; Self-efficacy and identity development; Parenting and social support; and Addiction and stigmatization. (4) Legal Psychology: Violence and trauma; Mass-media and aggression; Intra-familial violence; Juvenile delinquency; Aggressive behavior in childhood; Internet offending; Working with crime perpetrators; Forensic psychology; Violent risk assessment; and Law enforcement and stress. (5) Cognitive and Experimental Psychology: Perception, memory and attention; Decision making and problem-solving; Concept formation, reasoning and judgment; Language processing; Learning skills and education; Cognitive Neuroscience; Computer analogies and information processing (Artificial Intelligence and computer simulations); Social and cultural factors in the cognitive approach; Experimental methods, research and statistics; and Biopsychology. (6) Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytical Psychotherapy: Psychoanalysis and psychology; The unconscious; The Oedipus complex; Psychoanalysis of children; Pathological mourning; Addictive personalities; Borderline organizations; Narcissistic personalities; Anxiety and phobias; Psychosis. The proceedings contain the results of the research and developments conducted by authors who focused on what they are passionate about: to promote growth in research methods intimately related to Psychology and its applications. It includes an extensive variety of contributors and presenters by sharing their different personal, academic and cultural experiences. Educational Psychology oral presentations include: (1) The academic performance of third and fourth year college students of World Citi Colleges with absentee parents (Elenita M. Tiamzon, Mª Cristina J. Estioco, Jaime R. Buniao, Mª Isidora B. Dayanghirang, Karren L. Fortes, and Mª Doris P. Puzon); (2) Developing creative and meaning potential in EFL writing through problem-based instruction (Tat Heung Choi); (3) School bullying from the Russian teachers&apos; point of view (Alexandra Bochaver, Kirill Khlomov, and Alisa Zhilinskaya); and (4) CSCL in non-technological environments: Evaluation of a Wiki system with integrated self- and peer assessment (Gudrun Wesiak, Margit Höfler, Mohammad AL-Smadi, and Christian Gütl). Educational Psychology poster presentations include: (1) Can parental monitoring and the unplugged drug use prevention program contribute to a change in alcohol consumption among Slovak adolescents? (Olga Orosová, Marianna Berinsterová, Beáta Gajdošová, and Anna Janovská); (2) Transitioning to high school: The perception of students with ASD as opposed to their peers (Ariane Leroux-Boudreault, and Nathalie Poirier); (3) The change of volunteer students and the users: Evaluations of volunteering program in elementary school in Japan (Kie Sugimoto, Sachiko Kurosawa, Eriko Suwa, Kosuke Aoyagi, Kaoru Hirakue, and Junko Hidaka); (4) In defense of Homo Ludens and playful as a space for teaching-learning in higher education: The playful and creative possibility in teaching (Maria Vitoria Campos Mamede Maia, and Maria Isabel Luna Simões Hallak); and (5) The ludic as strategy for propitiate the learning in EJA: Infantilization or space for creation? (Maria Vitoria Campos Mamede Maia, and Priscilla Frazão). Educational Psychology virtual presentations include: (1) Constructive and apparent non-conformists in school (Ryszarda Ewa Bernacka); (2) How do future teachers handle feedback regarding their teaching skills? (Kristin Behnke); and (3) Before and after inspection: Attitudes of headmasters towards external evaluations (Kristin Behnke). An author index is included. (Individual papers contain references.) [Psiterra co-sponsored the 2015 InPACT conference. Abstract modified to meet ERIC guidelines.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563381</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends (InPACT) Proceedings (Ljubljana, Slovenia, May 2-4, 2015)</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-989-99389-0-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>452</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>1000</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Global Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Audits (Verification)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Regions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hunt, Frances</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cara, Olga</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>England</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United Kingdom (England)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>University of London, Development Education Research Centre (DERC)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Global Learning Programme in England is an initiative aimed at supporting the teaching and learning of global learning in schools in England at Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 3. It is a five-year national programme of support to schools to enhance their provision of global learning. Specifically, the GLP-E works with teachers to enhance their confidence and ability to provide whole school support to global learning across their institutions. The GLP-E has a strong emphasis on research and evaluation, in particular using research evidence to support the development of better practice in the programme. The Whole School Audit (WSA) is an online data-gathering tool that respondents in participating schools complete after registering onto the GLP-E. This paper presents findings from the baseline analysis of WSA submissions for schools joining the GLP-E between June 2013 and February 2014. Specifically, the paper responds to four key questions: (1) Which schools are signing up for the GLP-E?; (2) Why are schools signing up for the GLP-E?; (3) What global learning activities are schools signing up to the GLP-E already involved in?; and (4) What are levels of global learning in schools signing up to the GLP-E? The following are appended: (1) GLP Whole School Framework; and (2) GLP-E Whole School Audit Questions.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563382</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Global Learning in England: Baseline Analysis of the Global Learning Programme Whole School Audit 2013-14. Research Paper No. 15 for the Global Learning Programme</dc:title>
<dc:source>Development Education Research Centre</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-0-9574-5468-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>64</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Development Education Research Centre. Available from: Institute of Education - London. 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK. Tel: +44-20-7612-6000; Fax: +44-20-7612-6126; e-mail: ioepublications@ioe.ac.uk; Web site: http://www.ioe.ac.uk/research/150.html</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://clients.squareeye.net/uploads/glp/GLP_pdfs/Research/DERCrp15huntcara_web.pdf</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>22</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Modeling (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time on Task</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carlson, Sarah E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nelson-Walker, Nancy J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kennedy, Patrick C.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Biancarosa, Gina</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Turtura, Jessica</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Crone, Deanne A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Baker, Scott K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fien, Hank</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cohen, Jason</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pacific Northwest</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As education policy in the U.S. focuses increasingly on the quality of classroom instruction, there is a growing need to identify valid constructs and develop reliable tools that measure student opportunities to learn academic knowledge and skills. The purpose of this study is to examine the relative contributions of two different classroom observation instruments in an evaluation of classroom instruction in a comprehensive reading intervention program designed to support struggling readers. This study was conducted in 25 middle schools in six school districts in the Pacific Northwest. The intervention includes three components: (a) Reading Intervention, (b) School Engagement Intervention, and (c) Data Based Decision Making. Initial findings from this study indicate that high quality instruction matters above and beyond the quantity of instruction students receive. Overall, these findings provide initial evidence for the types of observational tools that can be used to distinguish among the diversity of classroom inputs and how such inputs impact student learning. However, these measures may be limited in their ability to identify quality of instruction within a particular content area (e.g., reading comprehension). Future research is discussed in terms of developing new observational tools to identify specific instruction within the content area of reading comprehension and its impact on student learning. Tables are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563383</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Measuring the Quantity and Quality of Instructional Interactions for Middle School Literacy Improvement</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>26</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Minimum Wage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Wages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Associate Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bachelors Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Williams, Betsy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>How do changes in minimum wages affect community college enrollment and employment? In particular, among adults without associate&apos;s or bachelor&apos;s degrees who may earn near the minimum wage, do endowment effects of a higher minimum wage encourage school attendance? Among adults without associate&apos;s or bachelor&apos;s degrees who may earn near the minimum wage, does the higher opportunity cost for attending school created by the minimum wage reduce community college enrollment? As Neumark and Wascher (2008) ask, does a higher minimum wage reduce employment and through that channel encourage school enrollment? This analysis compares individual-level and aggregated data to examine why findings about the effects of minimum wages on school enrollment produce mixed results. The author highlights the role of heterogeneous results by group as a reason results in the aggregate may be mixed. Which groups are most likely to attend has implications for policy and practice. However, the sample may not adequately capture trends that have developed during the Great Recession, including both the expansion of and increased governmental scrutiny of online, for-profit higher educational offerings. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563384</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Minimum Wage and Community College Attendance: How Economic Circumstances Affect Educational Choices</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Clements, Douglas H.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sarama, Julie</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Layzer, Carolyn</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Unlu, Fatih</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wolfe, Christopher B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Spitler, Mary Elaine</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Education needs generalizable models to scale up evidence-based practices and programs and longitudinal research evaluating the persistence of the effect of their implementation. This is particularly important given the &amp;quot;deep, systemic incapacity of U.S. schools, and the practitioners who work in them, to develop, incorporate, and extend new ideas about teaching and learning in anything but a small fraction of schools and classrooms.&amp;quot; The authors synthesized research to create a model called TRIAD (Technology-enhanced, Research-based, Instruction, Assessment, and professional Development) for the scale of successful interventions. The specific goal of the implementation of the TRIAD model was to increase math achievement in young children, especially those at risk, by means of centering aspects of the curriculum--mathematical content, pedagogy, technology, and assessments--on a common core of learning trajectories. Results indicate that TRIAD was effective during the treatment period. The TRIAD implementation included a complete intervention in pre-K, and the impact was strong at pre-K. The TRIAD follow-through component was important for persistence of effects. The fact that at least some effects last for African-American children 3 years after the end of all interventions support the need for continued follow through interventions in mathematics for at-risk children. Tables and figures are appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563385</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Longitudinal Evaluation of a Scale-up Model for Teaching Mathematics with Trajectories and Technologies: Persistence of Effects Three Years after the Treatment</dc:title>
<dc:source>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>8</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Tel: 202-495-0920; Fax: 202-640-4401; e-mail: inquiries@sree.org; Web site: http://www.sree.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>14</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developmental Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Site Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Visitation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personal Narratives</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harrington, Anna M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Developmental writers have long been viewed as marginalized, and one course delivery method which might disrupt this marginalization is computer-assisted personalized system of instruction (CAPSI), which has proven successful in many disciplines. However, research on CAPSI writing courses is minimal, and there have been no published articles about the success of CAPSI in developmental writing courses. Despite this gap, administrations across the U.S. have mandated the redesign of their developmental writing programs based upon the tenets of CAPSI course delivery. Situated within a critical theoretical framework, this dissertation seeks to determine the extent to which CAPSI developmental writing courses are successful by presenting case studies of CAPSI developmental writing programs at two Tennessee community colleges. Multiple data sources included interviews with program directors and instructors, artifacts documenting the programs&apos; creation and outcomes, site visits, and personal narratives. Data was analyzed twice. A first analysis determined what four criteria are used to measure program success; a second analysis compared each program&apos;s results against these four criteria. The study concludes that CAPSI developmental writing courses are not successful and work to increase marginalization rather than lessening it. Calls for future research include studies on the effect of quality of teaching on program success, student access to and knowledge of computer technology, the effect of procrastination among developmental writers, the effect of reading and writing abilities, and others. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563387</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Redesign and (Re)Marginalization in a Terrain of Struggle: Measuring the Success of Computer-Assisted Personalized System of Instruction (CAPSI) in Developmental Writing Courses</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1020-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>217</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600784</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ideology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ricklefs, Mariana Alvayero</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation was a qualitative case study of an educational program for English Language Learners (ELL) at an elementary school in a small city in the Midwest. This case study investigated how language ideologies influence the constraints and opportunities for the planning and execution of this educational program. The findings evidenced that multiple and contested language ideologies mediated the design and implementation of the program, which in turn ignited power struggles among school district leaders and the local school teachers. The findings also demonstrated that multiple and conflicting language ideologies affected the expectations of teachers, parents, and students themselves, regarding the school performance of ELL students. The findings of the study also manifested that multiple and contradictory language ideologies influenced the social interactions of ELL students with their native English speaking peers and teachers. Future research could focus on program evaluation, principalship and leadership role, and professional development. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563388</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Educational Policy and Literacy Learning in an ESL Classroom: Constraints and Opportunities</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1056-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>285</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600803</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Educators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Educator Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Land Settlement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Identity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Centered Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theory Practice Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Microteaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mayne, Hope Antoinette</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Jamaica</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Jamaica</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The study explored teaching and teacher education in the postcolonial context, Jamaica, based on arguments that Jamaica&apos;s education system and teacher training is constructed on its colonial past and the heavy reliance on knowledge from the West. It provided a rich description of the shared teaching experiences of teacher educators in Jamaica, answering the central research questions: (a) How do teacher educators see themselves in their practice? (b) What do teacher educators understand to be the impact of colonization on education and their teaching (teacher education), and how do they evaluate this? (c) How do teacher educators describe their education, and how does this impact their teacher education practice? (d) How do they describe their practice? (e) What does this practice look like? The study was framed on a qualitative research design and used theories of phenomenology to uncover lived experiences of teacher educators. Data collection methods were in-depth interviews, observations, and focus groups. Fourteen participants were included in the study from three teacher education sites in Jamaica. A postcolonial theoretical perspective was used to interpret the findings, but also drew on critical pedagogy and critical thinking to explain the emerging phenomenon. Data were coded and analyzed using the cross-case analysis thematic design. Based on the theoretical perspectives, I reported these findings: Teacher educators see the impact of colonialism as having an inherent value in the construction of knowledge; it is historically and socially embedded, reproduced, and a fostered dependency. Their educational background has impacted who they are as teacher educators in that it gave them the foundation needed to frame their own perceptions about teaching and learning. They find benefit in adopting new approaches, in particular, student-centered classrooms, but this is not without challenges. Teacher educators&apos; teaching philosophy is reflective of these characteristics: developing teacher characteristics in a loving and structured way, fostering constructive classrooms, sharing experiences, and preparing students for life. Their classroom practice is innovative, facilitative, structured, and consultative. Some challenges they encounter in their practice are a disconnect with theory and practice, limited exposure of the real experience in microteaching sessions, challenges with using learner-centered approaches, and poor language skills in the classroom. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563389</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>From Roots to Blossoms: A Description of the Shared Teaching Experiences of Jamaican Teacher Educators</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1057-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>206</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600804</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence Quotient</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sex</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Luna, Alberto D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Academic Motivation Scale</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Academic Motivation Scale</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Given the paucity of research on factors associated with motivation in learning disabled college students, the present study investigated the motivation levels in college students with learning disabilities. The Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) has been validated cross-nationally and across all educational age groups of students having various academic majors; however, it has not been used with students who have a learning disability (LD). The purpose of this study, therefore, was to validate the AMS with students with LD and determine which of the 3-, 5-, or 7-factor model best fit the sample. In addition, this study sought to verify the predictors and related factors of motivation in these students. The variables that were examined were IQ, GPA, gender, type of disability, and academic skills as they relate to motivation. Lastly, the simplex structure, which endorsed motivation to be a continuum, was also statistically verified. Findings of this study concluded that the 7-factor model as proposed by Vallerand (i.e., Vallerand, Pelletier, Blais, Briere, Senecal, &amp;amp; Vallieres, 1992) was best suited for this sample. IQ significantly negatively predicted and was significantly inversely related to extrinsic motivation (EM), especially perceptual reasoning skills. Basic academic skills were significantly inversely related to EM, as well as a significant positive predictor of amotivation. Math skills were inversely correlated with several EM factors. There was no significant effect for gender, but students with a disability in math were significantly higher on measures of intrinsic motivation than other disability types. Finally, the simplex structure was only partially supported, since the opposite ends of the motivation continuum did not display the highest negative correlation as expected (Vallerand et al., 1992). These findings were discussed in relation to the current literature on motivation in students followed by a discussion of the limitations of the study and future directions for research in this area. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563390</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Predicting the Motivation in College-Aged Learning Disabled Students Based on the Academic Motivation Scale</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Arizona</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1198-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>126</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600862</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Addictive Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Administrator Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Galster, Donald C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As expectations for improvements in public K-12 education continue, principals and teachers need to collaborate for continuous school improvement. Innovative change is needed to meet the needs of students. Michael Fullan&apos;s change theory (1993) identified many inhibitors to change, such as the human tendency to avoid change due to vulnerability and fear, high stakes accountability, parent pressure and, in contrast, maintenance of the status quo. In Wisconsin, the passage of Act 10 posed new threats to innovation. Both Robert Marzano (2004) and Kathleen Cotton (2003) explored principal practices and behaviors associated with student learning, but it is important to extend that research to understand the impact of principal behavior in high performing schools. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of middle school principal practices and behaviors on innovative instructional practices of middle school teachers working in high performing, high pressure school environments where risk-taking and innovation can sometimes be challenged and inhibited by the pressures associated with failure and vulnerability. Seven high performing middle schools were identified using data where students scored 90% proficient or above on state standardized tests in reading and math. The staffs of all seven schools took a reliable survey measuring school culture and three were selected for study. Each staff identified faculty for interviews in addition to the principal. Finally, a confirmatory focus group was held in order to reinforce and deepen understanding of the findings. Six key principal leadership behaviors and practices were identified. Five main themes including relational practices, shared leadership, support of risk-taking, role modeling and observation, feedback and evaluation emerged from the interviews. During the confirmatory focus group, two additional themes emerged as &amp;quot;assumed high expectations,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;balancing focus on student learning and staff emotional support.&amp;quot; One of the seven themes, teacher observation, feedback and evaluation, was not deemed as supportive or effective in supporting innovation given the perspective of teachers. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563391</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Dissertation Story: Effective Behaviors and Practices of Principals That Encourage and Support Teacher Instructional Risk-Taking and Innovation in High Achieving Middle Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Cardinal Stritch University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-1205-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>366</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3600869</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>First Year Seminars</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technical Institutes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>What Works Clearinghouse (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Development Services Group, Inc.</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;First year experience courses for students in developmental education&amp;quot; are designed to ease the transition to college by providing academic and social development supports. Although course content and focus may vary, most are designed to introduce students to campus resources, provide training in time management and study skills, and address student development issues. First year experience courses, also called success courses, study skills, student development, or new student orientation courses, are often linked with or taken concurrently with developmental courses. The WWC recently reviewed the research on the impacts of &amp;quot;first year experience courses for students in developmental education.&amp;quot; One study met WWC group design standards and included 911 freshman college students in developmental education at one technical community college in the United States. Based on this study, the WWC found the practice to have no discernible effects on academic achievement, progress through developmental education, and credit accumulation and persistence for postsecondary students. The following are appended: (1) Research details for Rutschow et al. (2012); (2) Outcome measures for each domain; (3) Findings included in the rating for the academic achievement domain; (4) Findings included in the rating for the progress through developmental education domain; and (5) Findings included in the rating for the credit accumulation and persistence domain. [The Study that meets WWC group design standards without reservations was: Rutschow. E. Z., Cullinan, D., &amp;amp; Welbeck, R. (2012). &amp;quot;Keeping students on course: An impact study of a student success course at Guilford Technical Community College.&amp;quot; New York: MDRC. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED531183.pdf. See ED531183 to view the study.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563392</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>First Year Experience Courses for Students in Developmental Education. What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report</dc:title>
<dc:source>What Works Clearinghouse</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-02-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>21</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>What Works Clearinghouse. P.O. Box 2393, Princeton, NJ 08543-2393. Tel: 866-503-6114; e-mail: info@whatworks.ed.gov; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>49</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES12C0084</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/interventionreport.aspx?sid=651</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Selection (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Balemian, Kara</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Feng, Jing</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the AP Annual Conference (APAC) in Las Vegas, NV in July 2013. This analysis takes a close look at first-generation Advanced Placement® (AP®) test takers to better understand the needs and challenges they face on their path to college. The analysis focuses on college-bound AP test takers who also took the SAT and examines a variety of data elements including: student socio-economic background, high-school characteristics, course-taking patterns, college major preferences, and college institution type selections. The analysis includes five years of matched AP-SAT cohort data, provides insight into the particular needs of first-generation students, and offers suggestions on how to guide first-generation students through their high school career. A bibliography is included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563393</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>First Generation Students: College Aspirations, Preparedness and Challenges</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Advanced Placement Annual Conference (APAC) (Las Vegas, NV, Jul 19, 2013)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-07-19</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Administrators</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Teachers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Researchers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Counselors</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>60</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Summer Institute on College Admissions at Harvard in June 2008. The presentation explores whether the SAT validity has changed with the test changes and if those changes affect specific subgroups.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563394</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Score Trends, SAT Validity and Subgroup Differences</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Summer Institute on College Admissions (Cambridge, MA, Jun 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-06-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>33</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Edwards, Kelcey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sawtell, Ellen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Advanced Placement Annual Conference (APAC) in Las Vegas, NV in July 2013. This presentation reviews new research examining the AP® experience of Hispanic graduates over the past decade. Topics include an in-depth look at the AP Spanish Language and Culture gateway hypothesis and trends in family characteristics such as parent education, income, and language background. In addition, this presentation reviews recent changes to race and ethnicity data collection and reporting and the implications for analyzing and interpreting AP data trends as schools, districts, and states work to close equity gaps in AP participation and performance.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563395</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Advanced Placement Annual Conference (APAC) (Las Vegas, NV, Jul 19, 2013)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-07-19</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>62</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the conference for USC Center for Enrollment Research, Policy and Practice (CERRP). This provides an overview of the various studies currently underway to establish the validity of noncognitive measures of success as a supplement to current cognitive measures which are used. Comparisons between what is defined as college readiness and college success and how to bring the two closer.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563396</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>College Readiness vs College Admissions: Will We Resolve the Chasm between K-12 and Higher Education?</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Conference on Defining Enrollment in the 21st Century (Los Angeles, CA, Aug 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-08-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>35</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Utilization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lee, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sawtell, Ellen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual Dream Deferred Conference in Los Angeles, CA in April 2008. This presentation explores the participation and performance of African American students in the SAT and AP programs and use data to inform ways to better support and encourage achievement and college success.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563397</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Realizing the Dream: Using Data to Increase Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Dream Deferred Conference (Los Angeles, CA, Apr 24, 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-04-24</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>48</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Format</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Weighted Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Construct Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Macroeconomics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Environmental Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish Literature</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hendrickson, Amy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Melican, Gerald</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in New York in March 2008. This presentation explores how different item weighting can affect the effective weights, validity coefficents and test reliability of composite scores among test takers.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563398</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effect of Using Different Weights for Multiple-Choice and Free-Response Item Sections</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (New York City, NY, Mar 27, 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-03-27</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Human Capital</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Edwards, Kelcey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sawtell, Ellen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Perfetto, Greg</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shapiro, Douglas T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelly, Patrick J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this session presented at the Middle States Regional Forum (February 2013), experts working with national data presented trends in higher education from a forward-looking perspective. Senior researchers from the College Board provided trends using SAT, AP, and Net Price Calculator data. The research director of the National Student Clearinghouse offered new insight into the trends in enrollment and persistence of transfer students. Finally, the director of the Center for Higher Education Management Systems Information Center provided information from national data systems to help higher education policymakers and analysts understand the return on investment in higher education and potential for gainful employment. [The following slide presentations are presented within this slide deck: (1) Landscape of Higher Education: Net Price (Greg Perfetto); (2) The Changing Landscape Postsecondary Pathways (Douglas T. Shapiro); and (3) The College Completion Agenda: From &amp;quot;Education for Education&apos;s Sake&amp;quot; to Return on Investment and Gainful Employment (Patrick J. Kelly).]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563399</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Landscape of Higher Education: Human Capital</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Middle States Regional Forum (Brooklyn, NY, Feb 15, 2013)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-02-15</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>81</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance Based Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Responses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Looking beyond the right or wrong answer is imperative to the development of effective educational environments conducive to Pre-AP work in math. This presentation explores a system of evaluation in math that provides a personalized, student-reflective model correlated to consortia-based assessment. Using examples of students&apos; work that includes performance based tasks, the presentation will explore, evaluate and identify key factors relevant to successful student outcomes in assessments that include extended constructed response items, scored with rubrics.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563400</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Looking at Students&apos; Work: Assessment Strategies That Inform Instruction</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Advanced Placement Annual Conference (APAC) (Lake Buena Vista, FL, Jul, 18-22, 2012)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-07-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>39</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Occupational Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preferences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lee, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiley, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the College Board New England Regional Office (NERO) Forum in Boston in February 2008. This presentation explores first generation SAT test takers in various areas. Focusing on academic preparation, educational plans, work plans and college preferences differ between this group of students and the non-first generation students.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563401</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>First Generation Students in the 2007 SAT® Cohort</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the College Board New England Regional Forum (Boston, MA, Feb 2, 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-02-02</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>31</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conferences (Gatherings)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Databases</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Growth Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patelis, Thanos</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This is a keynote presentation given at AERA on developing a validity agenda for growth models in a large scale (e.g., state) setting. The emphasis of this presentation was to indicate that growth models and the validity agenda designed to provide evidence in supporting the claims to be made need to be personalized to meet the local or state-specific goals, purposes and context. The takeaways from the presentation were (a) large scale assessments, national databases, validity work and technology are components that cannot be separated and must exist to implement growth models well; (b) there are a number of components that must be in place when introducing growth models in large scale settings (e.g., states); (c) it is our professional responsibility to make sure that there is evidence to support the claims being made; (d) a short- and long-term validity agenda are needed to permit the collection of evidence across all component of the growth model that represent fundamentally stating the claims to be made and evaluating whether the claims can be supported; (e) because there exist a variety of goals and diverse contexts, there is no one growth model and the design of the validity agenda will be personalized and end up being similarly varied; (f) start with the score report as the concrete expression of the claims being made and make sure that each component is validated; and (g) there a lot of work that needs to be done and it&apos;s hard work, so the targets of these results (children, teachers, and administrators) need your thinking and efforts.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563402</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Validity Agenda for Growth Models: One Size Doesn&apos;t Fit All!</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Joint Business Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Special Interest Groups on Test Validity Research and Evaluation, Large Scale Assessment, Advanced Study of National Databases, and Computer and Internet Applications in Education (Vancouver, BC, Apr 14, 2012)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-04-14</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>29</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Competency Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Results</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Reports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Officials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Usability</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patelis, Thanos</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Matos-Elefonte, Haifa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in San Diego in April 2009. This presentation explores how the College Board strives to ensure the relevance and utility of score reporting practices and methods for the PSAT/NMSQT and SAT scores. The new reporting methods allow for greater interaction and intervention at various levels of achievement in order to improve future performance.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563403</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Efforts to Produce Relevant Score Reports to School, District, and State Officials on National Tests</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (San Diego, CA, Apr 14, 2009)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-04-19</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>23</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Board of Education Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Delgado, Jane</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the National Conference on Student Assessment in Orlando, hosted by the CCSSO (Council of Chief State School Officers), June 2008. This presentation explores use of the assessments within the classroom and how those choices can affect performance and learning.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563404</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Classroom Assessment Environment: Teachers&apos; Choice of Assessments and Use of Data</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the National Conference on Student Assessment (Orlando, FL, Jun 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-06-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The current study will explore the validity and potential of using the SAT, in conjunction with HSGPA, to arrive at a predicted FYGPA to improve student retention at four-year postsecondary institutions. Specifically, this study examined whether college students who did not perform as expected (observed FYGPA minus predicted FYGPA) were more likely to leave their institution. Results showed that both under- and over-performing students were more likely to leave college as compared to their academically similar peers who performed as expected. Recommendations for institutions to incorporate this information as part of a cost-effective and efficient detection tool to identify students that may be at risk for not completing their degrees and to help improve institutional retention rates are provided.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563405</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Identifying Students at Risk for Leaving an Institution: SAT and HSGPA as Tools to Improve Retention</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (Vancouver, BC, Apr 15, 2012)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-04-15</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Generalizability Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Use</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Proctor, Thomas P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, YoungKoung Rachel</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the national conference for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in April 2009. This study examined the utility of scores on the SAT writing test, specifically examining the reliability of scores using generalizability and item response theories. The study also provides an overview of current predictive validity studies.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563406</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Select Psychometric Properties and Predictive Validity of Scores on the SAT Writing Section</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (San Diego, CA, Apr 14, 2009)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-04-14</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>19</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lee, John</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Native American Student Advocacy Institute (NASAI) in Tsaile, AZ in May 2008. This presentation explores the participation and performance of Native American students in the SAT program and attempt to find a way to find how to better support and encourage students to ensure postsecondary access and excellence.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563407</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Participation and Performance for Native American Students in the 2007 SAT® Cohort</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Native American Student Advocacy Institute (NASAI) (Tsaile, AZ, May 20-21, 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>26</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Growth Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Deng, Hui</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiley, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in New York in March 2008. This presentation explores the growth trajectory of the SAT Reading scores and examine what demographics and variation may cause changes and affect growth.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563408</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Modeling Growth of SAT Reading Performance Using Repeated Measures Data</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (New York, NY, Mar 27, 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-03-27</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Selection (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Calculus</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Macroeconomics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Proximity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Location</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sawtell, Ellen A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Handwerk, Philip</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gillie, Jacqueline M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Advanced Placement Annual Conference (APAC) in Las Vegas, July 2007. This presentation explores the demographic and course-taking patterns that have been identified behind what students take AP exams and how to best reach the population of students that are not currently taking AP exams.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563409</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>What We Know about AP® Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Advanced Placement Annual Conference (APAC) (Las
Vegas, NV, Jul 13, 2007)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-07-13</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>55</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Woo, Sang Eun</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wyatt, Jeff N.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Conference in New York in March 2008. This presentation explores if what a student believes is a good fit for them at an institution is supported by the evidence once they choose to attend an specific institution.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563410</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using Student-College Fit for Admissions: Do Applicants Really Know What Is Good for Them?</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (New York, NY, Mar 27, 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-03-27</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>17</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence Based Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huff, Kristen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Steinberg, Linda</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Matts, Tom</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in San Diego, CA in April 2009. This presentation provides an overview of ECD. In addition, the presentation describes the benefits of, as well as the challenges that were faced, in implementing ECD in the Advanced Placement Program.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563411</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Promises and Challenges of Implementing Evidence-Centered Design in Large Scale Assessment</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (San Diego, CA, Apr 2009)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>19</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the quarterly meeting of the New York Area SAS Users-Group in December 2008. In virtually any research context, there is likely to be opportunity to apply mixed-models--of which repeated-measures, multilevel, hierarchical and random- and fixed-effect models are specific types-- that improve upon their traditional linear or generalized linear model counterparts. This presentation focused primarily on multi-level modeling and on drawing parallels between the statistical specification of these models and their implementation in SAS. Some time was devoted to the discussion of problems of convergence, some diagnostics and other impediments to the modeling process.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563412</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>&amp;quot;Almost&amp;quot; 31 Flavors of Multi-Level Modeling in SAS</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the New York Area SAS Users&apos; Group Meeting (Dec 9, 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-12-09</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>44</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Selection (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vasavada, Natasha</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiley, Drew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the College Board National Forum, October 2011. In this session on academic preparedness and the Common Core, presenters summarized research on academic rigor and current course taking patterns for students and discussed how the new common core state standards will impact curriculum and expectations for student coursework.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563413</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Cost of Unprepared Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the College Board National Forum (Oct 25, 2011)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-10-25</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standard Setting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kaliski, Pamela</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wind, Stefanie A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Engelhard, George, Jr.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morgan, Deanna</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Plake, Barbara</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reshetar, Rosemary</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Many-Facet Rasch (MFR) Model is traditionally used to evaluate the quality of ratings on constructed response assessments; however, it can also be used to evaluate the quality of judgments from panel-based standard setting procedures. The current study illustrates the use of the MFR Model by examining the quality of ratings obtained from a standard setting employing the Multiple Yes-No (MYN) modified Angoff standard setting procedure to set the cuts on the Advanced Placement® (AP®) Environmental Science exam. The locations of the panelists, judged item difficulties, rounds, and performance standards using the MFR Model were examined. Results revealed evidence of acceptable quality of the ratings obtained from the panelists. Thus, the current study provides an important contribution of validity evidence for the AP Environmental Science standard setting, as well as an illustration of the utility of the MFR Model to evaluate standard setting judgments.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563414</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using the Many-Facet Rasch Model to Evaluate Standard-Setting Judgments: Setting Performance Standards for Advanced Placement® Examinations</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (Vancouver, BC, Apr 15, 2012)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-04-15</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Biology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence Based Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Educational Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Review (Reexamination)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Process Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reshetar, Rosemary</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>On 9/13/12, the Workshop on Developing Assessments to Meet the Goals of the 2012 Framework for K-12 Science Education was held at the National Academies of Science. The workshop was organized and led by the NRC Committee on Developing Assessments of Science Proficiency in K-12 (co-chaired by James Pellegrino and Mark Wilson) and targeted to state assessment leaders. Rosemary represented the College Board as one of three panelists in a large-scale assessment session focused on assessments that assess science practices in conjunction with core ideas and cross cutting concepts, similar to those depicted in the Framework. Focus was on how these strategies can be used to measure learning as envisioned in the Framework. The revised AP Biology Course and Exam which went into effect this fall were presented as an example of how College Board utilized the Evidence Centered Design process for the course and exam review. Of particular interest was the integration of content knowledge with science practices into the learning objectives of the course, and ultimately into the exam to be offered in May.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563415</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>AP® Biology Exam</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Large Scale Assessments Session of the Workshop on Developing Assessments to Meet the Goals of the 2012 Framework for K-12 Science Education (Washington, D.C., Sep 13, 2012)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-09-13</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>26</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The main goal of this study was to illustrate and provide some direction for dealing with the complexities of propensity score matching within different multilevel contexts. Special attention is given to how procedures typically applied in a non-hierarchical setting may be modified to properly reduce the expected bias in the estimated treatment effect of a high school-level intervention on college-level outcomes. In particular, students self-selected into a high school level intervention and the outcome of interest was observed within the context of the college or university in which students subsequently enrolled. A simulation was prepared to delineate the relevant issues and to demonstrate the effects of ignoring a hierarchical nesting of subjects. An empirical example of an evaluation of a large-scale, national educational program is given.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563416</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Multilevel Issues in the Application of Propensity Score Matching: Simulations and Results for Evaluation of the Advanced Placement Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (Vancouver, BC, Apr 17, 2012)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-04-17</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>28</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Conference Papers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Response Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goodness of Fit</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Class Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, YoungKoung Rachel</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>ACT Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the national conference for AERA (American Educational Research Association) in April 2009. The large variability of SAT taker population across states makes state-by-state comparisons of the SAT scores challenging. Using a mixture modeling approach, therefore, the current study presents a method of identifying subpopulations in terms of SAT scores while taking into account the percentage of SAT takers so that state SAT scores within a subpopulation can be properly compared.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563417</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Comparing State SAT Scores Using a Mixture Modeling Approach</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (San Diego, CA, Apr 15, 2009)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-04-15</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>18</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Utilization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lee, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sawtell, Ellen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Knowledge Is Power Program (KIPP) School Summit in San Antonio, TX in July 2008. This presentation explores the participation and performance of African American students in the SAT and AP programs and use data to inform ways to better support and encourage achievment and college success.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563418</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Realizing the Dream: Using Data to Increase Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Knowledge Is Power Program (KIPP) National Conference (San Antonio, TX, Jul, 30, 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-07-30</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>39</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the national conference for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in 2010. This presentation describes an alternative way of presenting the unique information provided by the SAT over HSGPA, namely examining students with discrepant SAT-HSGPA performance.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563419</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Case for Not Going SAT-Optional: Students with Discrepant SAT and HSGPA Performance</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (Denver, CO, May 3, 2010)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-05-03</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>17</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Bilingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prior Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Native Language</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Dominance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prompting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Persuasive Discourse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>It is well-documented that students&apos; prior knowledge, cultural background, and language proficiency play a role in how they read, interpret, and respond to writing tasks (Barkaoui, 2007; Connor &amp;amp; Kramer, 1995; Hinkel, 2002). Essays written by students from different language backgrounds often differ in their linguistic, stylistic, and rhetorical characteristics and these features may affect the scores that students receive. This study explored the features of essays written on the SAT by students for whom English was not their best language (L2 students) and bilingual students who reported both English and another language as their best language, compared to students for whom English was solely their best language (L1 students). A sample of essay responses on 14 different prompts administered between October 2005 and January 2006 were coded on a variety of features including number of words, use of first-person voice, use of a five-paragraph structure, and types of examples offered (e.g., scholarly or personal experience). Multilevel logistic regression analyses indicated that L2 students had greater odds of using first-person and using personal experience in their essay responses; and had lesser odds of taking a mixed argument approach in responding to the essay prompt. There was substantial variability in the frequency of essay features by language group across prompt, suggesting that different prompts elicit responses with different features. The implications for test development and student instruction are discussed.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563420</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Exploration of L1, L2, and Bilingual Students&apos; Writing Features on the SAT Essay</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) n (Vancouver, BC, Apr 14, 2012)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-04-14</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>17</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the College Board Western Regional Office (WRO) Forum in San Diego in February 2009. This presentation explores SAT test validity and how it can be used to inform both advisement and placement at the national or institution level. Institutional validity can be measured using the Admitted Class Evaluation Service (ACES) which schools can request.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563421</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Use of the SAT in Advisement and Placement: What the Research Tells Us</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the College Board Western Regional Office (WRO) Forum (San Diego, CA, Feb 23, 2009)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-02-23</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>23</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Human Capital</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Edwards, Kelcey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Perfetto, Greg</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hossler, Don</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelly, Patrick J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There are many changes occurring in higher education, and often it is difficult to see trends nationally. In this presentation, experts working with national data present trends in higher education from a forward-looking perspective. Senior researchers from the College Board provide trends using College Board SAT and AP data, as well as new research around Net Price Calculators. The director of the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems Information Center provides information from national data systems that can help higher education policymakers and analysts. The research director of the National Student Clearinghouse offers trends in enrollment and persistence, with a special focus on transfer students. [The following slide presentations are presented within this slide deck: (1) Landscape of Higher Education: Net Price (Greg Perfetto); (2) The Changing Landscape of How We Understand Postsecondary Pathways--With a Focus on Transfer Students and Persistence Anywhere (Don Hossler); and (3) The College Completion Agenda: From &amp;quot;Education for Education&apos;s Sake&amp;quot; to Return on Investment and Gainful Employment (Patrick J. Kelly).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563422</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Landscape of Higher Education: Human Capital</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the College Board National Forum (Miami, FL, Oct 26, 2012)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-10-26</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>71</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Definitions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonprofit Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research and Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patelis, Thanos</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiley, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the 11th International Conference on Education (ICE) in 2009. This presentation provides an overview of the College Board and its efforts to develop college readiness indicators. The information provided includes a conceptual overview of the indicators and the research and development components in the development and validation of the indicators.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563423</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Efforts to Define College Readiness in the United States</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the International Conference on Education (ICE) (11th, Athens, Greece, May 25-28, 2009)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>23</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>8</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Evidence Based Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Content</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ewing, Maureen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Packman, Sheryl</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hamen, Cynthia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Clark, Allison</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in San Diego, CA in April 2009. This presentation describes the methodology that was used with subject-matter experts (SMEs) to articulate the content and skills important in the domain, and then the iterative processes that were used to articulate the claims and evidence to represent the targets of instruction for AP courses, and by extension, the targets of measurement for the AP exams.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563424</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Representing Targets of Measurement within ECD</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (San Diego, CA, Apr 2009)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pilot Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expertise</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reshetar, Rosemary</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kaliski, Pamela</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chajewski, Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lionberger, Karen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This presentation summarizes a pilot study conducted after the May 2011 administration of the AP Environmental Science Exam. The study used analytical methods based on scaled anchoring as input to a Performance Level Descriptor validation process that solicited systematic input from subject matter experts.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563425</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validating Performance Level Descriptors (PLDs) for the AP® Environmental Science Exam</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the International Test Commission (ICT) Conference (8th, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Jul 5, 2012)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-07-05</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>26</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Geller, Martha</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lee, John</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Matos, Haifa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiley, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual Prepárate Conference in Chicago, IL in May 2008. This presentation explores the participation and performance of Latino students in the SAT program and attempt to find a way to find how to better support and encourage students in striving for success.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563426</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Pathways to Success: Participation and Performance for Latino Students in the 2007 SAT® Cohort</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Prepárate Conference (Chicago, IL, May 22-23, 2008)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>35</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Interpretation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Edwards, Kelcey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Duggan, Odette</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Advanced Placement Annual Conference (APAC) in Lake Buena Vista, FL in July 2012. This presentation reviews concepts central to achieving equitable AP access and success for all willing and academically prepared students. We analyze trends in participation and performance by race/ethnicity from the AP Report to the Nation and consider the ethics of data in order to understand challenges to interpretation as well as behavioral consequences of various metrics. The intended audience is AP Coordinators, school administrators, and those who recognize the importance of building equity from the ground up.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563427</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Data-Based Decision Making: The Road to AP Equity</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Advanced Placement Annual Conference (APAC) (Lake Buena Vista, FL, Jul 20, 2012)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-07-20</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>64</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>American Indian Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alaska Natives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish Speaking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Asian American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiracial Persons</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sawtell, Ellen A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gillie, Jacqueline M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smith, Patricia Z.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In February 2012, the College Board published The 8th Annual AP Report to the Nation. This session provides a deeper dive into key information for the United States with an emphasis on Florida, and participants hear how one school in Florida utilizes AP Potential™ to help build their AP Program. Participants also learn about AP participation and performance in the STEM field. Analyses by race/ethnicity is provided. Participants also gain a clear understanding of common questions centered around the growing Hispanic/Latino population in AP. The goal of this session is to provide participants with the knowledge of how the AP population has changed over the last 10 years. At the end of this session, administrators, counselors and other school personnel are better able to help identify students not currently being served by AP and understand how the available data can assist in building their AP program.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563428</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>AP Report to the Nation: A Closer Look at the Nation and Florida</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Advanced Placement Annual Conference (APAC) (Lake Buena Vista, FL, Jul 20, 2012)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-07-20</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>80</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equated Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Antal, Judit</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Melican, Gerald</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Proctor, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiley, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in 2010. The focus of the research is to investigate the effect of applying the Sinharay &amp;amp; Holland (2007) midi-test idea for building anchor tests to an on-going testing program with a series of versions of the test and comparing these results to the more commonly applied miniature anchor test assembly method. Overall, the results of our study support the proposal by Sinharay and Holland under very strict item and simulee generation method as the amount and degree of equating error observed did not appear to be significantly impacted by the change in the anchor test characteristics.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563429</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effect of Anchor Test Construction on Scale Drift</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (Denver, CO, Apr 3, 2010)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-04-03</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Replication (Evaluation)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the national conference for AERA (American Educational Research Association) . This study examined whether there are distinct differences in the demographic characteristics, HSGPA, first-year college performance, and second-year college retention rates among students who have discrepant CR-W performance.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563430</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Understanding Students with Discrepant Critical Reading and Writing Scores</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (San Diego, CA, Apr 14, 2009)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-04-14</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>21</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Format</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Essay Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wiley, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the national conference for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in 2009. This discussed the development and implementation of the new SAT writing section.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563431</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Politics, Psychometrics and Promise of the New SAT Writing Section</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (San Diego, CA, Apr 14, 2009)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>12</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Advising</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Databases</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intention</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Byers, Jenny</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Springall, Robert</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the College Board National Forum, October 26, 2011. Choosing a college major is challenging enough, without stopping to consider the impact it has on a student&apos;s college experience and career choice. To provide support during this major decision, participants in this session will develop strategies to facilitate students in making an appropriate major choice. Based on research and recommendations from high school and college educators, participants will discuss interventions and best practices. Participants will focus on factors related to major choice and retention (with an emphasis on STEM majors), and will investigate some noteworthy findings related to students with undeclared majors.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563432</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>It&apos;s Major! College Major Selection &amp;amp; Success</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the College Board National Forum (Oct 26, 2011)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-10-26</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>53</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in New Orleans, LA in April 2011. The current study examined the differential validity of the SAT for predicting cumulative GPA through the second-year of college by college major, as well as the differential prediction of cumulative GPA by college major among student subgroups. The relationship between the SAT and cumulative GPA varied somewhat by major, as well as by major and subgroup, likely due to differences in the nature of the college coursework, grading practices, student self-selection, and differing academic cultures (e.g., male dominated or highly competitive) across majors.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563433</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Validity of the SAT for Predicting Cumulative Grade Point Average by College Major</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (New Orleans, LA, Apr 10, 2011)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-04-10</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>9</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Finkelstein, Doreen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in April 2009. Compares results of different approaches to propensity-score matching with hierarchical data.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563434</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Exploring Approaches to Constructing Comparable Groups within Hierarchies</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (San Diego, CA, Apr 15, 2009)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-04-15</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>21</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Format</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culture Fair Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Weighted Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equated Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hendrickson, Amy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ewing, Maureen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The psychometric considerations and challenges associated with including constructed response items on tests are discussed along with how these issues affect the form assembly specifications for mixed-format exams. Reliability and validity, security and fairness, pretesting, content and skills coverage, test length and timing, weights, statistical specifications, and equating concerns are all discussed. Practical suggestions for dealing with these concerns in the form assembly specifications are presented. Advanced Placement Program® (AP®) Exams are used as examples throughout, as most all of these large-scale standardized exams contain both multiple-choice and constructed response items.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563435</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Developing Form Assembly Specifications for Exams with Multiple Choice and Constructed Response Items: Balancing Reliability and Validity Concerns</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Council for Measurement in Education (NCME) (Denver, CO, May 1, 2010)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-05-01</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>25</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Core Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Selection (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Required Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bachelors Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Finkelstein, Doreen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in April 2009. Using a comprehensive longitudinal data set as an example, poses questions and raises issues around defining a high school curriculum that is related to indicators of college success.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563436</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Defining the College-Bound Core Curriculum in High Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Diego, CA, Apr 16, 2009)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-04-16</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Governing Boards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonprofit Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Consortia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patelis, Thanos</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In an effort to ensure fair preparation and selection of high school applicants to college, a committee of university and secondary school leaders after significant discussion and dialogue organized in 1900 the College Entrance Examination Board, known today as simply the College Board. The presentation will highlight the topics of this discussion and dialogue that led to the formation of this organization highlighting the issues and context that facilitated its formation. The presentation will also attempt to show how education is faced with very similar issues with the Common Core Standards and the formation of the consortia to develop assessments. The intention of the presentation is not to offer a full history and evolution of the College Board, but to offer a perspective on how the context seen in history seems to repeat itself. The presenter will comment on what can be learned from the formation for the College Board in the context of today&apos;s issues.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563437</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Formation of the College Board and the Context of Today</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (New Orleans, LA, Apr 10, 2011)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-04-10</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>26</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Occupational Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Interests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bachelors Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Course Selection (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Edwards, Kelcey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sawtell, Ellen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in New Orleans, LA in April 2011. The first study evaluated the level of interest in engineering as students approached the end of high school and explored the degree to which the academic preparation of these students shaped the engineering pipeline over a tenyear period. The second analyzed a recent graduating class in order to understand various pathways that students took toward or away from engineering as they progressed through high school. Several paths emerged, including students who demonstrated stable interest across time, students who became interested in engineering, and students who turned toward other majors by the end of high school. Groups differed with regard to demographic characteristics, test scores, academic background, and math and science self-efficacy.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563438</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>College-Bound Students&apos; Interest in Engineering: Pathways and Characteristics of the Pre-College Pipeline</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (New Orleans, LA, Apr 2011)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>25</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the national conference for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in 2010. This presentation examines the relationship between academic self-beliefs and outcomes.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563439</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Look beyond Cognitive Predictors of Academic Success: Understanding the Relationship between Academic Self-Beliefs and Outcomes</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (Denver, CO, May 2, 2010)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-05-02</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>19</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cohort Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Least Squares Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study presents a case for applying a transformation (Box and Cox, 1964) of the criterion used in predictive validity studies. The goals of the transformation were to better meet the assumptions of the linear regression model and to reduce the residual variance of fitted (i.e., predicted) values. Using data for the 2008 cohort of first-time, first-year students attending 129 different colleges and universities, this study demonstrated how the transformation may be incorporated into the process of validating an admission test for predicting students&apos; first-year grade point average (FYGPA). In this setting, we regularly found substantial negative skewness in both the criterion and its residuals and the use of a Box-Cox transformation of the criterion yielded residuals that much better approximated the assumption of normally distributed residuals. The result is that with relatively little additional effort, researchers may perform predictive validity studies for college admission measures with one of the most meaningful criteria (i.e., FYGPA) and they can better meet the assumptions of the linear regression model.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563440</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Case for Transforming the Criterion of a Predictive Validity Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (New Orleans, LA, Apr 10th, 2011)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-04-10</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>26</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Response Rates (Questionnaires)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiracial Persons</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sawtell, Ellen A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sathy, Viji</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Skrobela, David A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the Association for Institutional Research (AIR) in Kansas City in June 2007. This presentation explores what has been learned in the effort to maintain the ability to collect demographic information on SAT test takers when registration moved to the web. The information which is collected for research purposes include student&apos;s ethnicity information which is more varied than in the past due to an increase in multi-ethnic families and test takers.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563441</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Overcoming Non-Response: Lessons Learned Migrating to a Web-Based Platform and Offering a Multi-Ethnic Response Option</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Association for Institutional Research Conference (Kansas City, MO, Jun 6, 2007)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2007-06-06</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>31</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Response Rates (Questionnaires)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sawtell, Ellen A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Conference in San Diego in May 2005. This presentation explores the issues and problems with declining response rates to the questionnaire once test registration moved from paper format to a web platform. A decline would affect research over time so interventions were put in place to increase future response rates.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563442</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Overcoming Non-Response: Lessons Learned Migrating to a Web-Based Platform</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Association for Institutional Research Conference (San Diego, CA, May 9, 2005)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2005-05-09</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graphs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admission Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Futures (of Society)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the 23rd Annual Historically Black Colleges &amp;amp; Universities (HBCU) Conference in Atlanta, GA, in September 2011. Admitted Class Evaluation Service (ACES) is the College Board&apos;s free online service that predicts how admitted students will perform at a college or university generally, and how successful students will be in specific courses. ACES studies provide the information needed to confirm or improve current admission and placement policies and can identify the optimum combination of measures to predict a student&apos;s future performance at your institution. Each study presents an analysis of findings and gives you general background information to help you examine the study in greater detail. This session provided an overview of ACES, including how to design useful admission and placement validity studies for your institution, advice on submitting the corresponding data file(s), and how to interpret the text, graphs, and key findings from ACES admission and placement validity reports. The following are appended: (1) Prediction equations; (2) Statistical summaries of study variables; and (3) List of IDs for students possibly at risk for not completing their degrees at Sample One University</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563443</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using the Admitted Class Evaluation Service (ACES) to Conduct Institution-Specific Admission or Placement Validity Studies</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the Historically Black Colleges &amp; Universities Annual Conference (23rd, Atlanta, GA, Sep 25, 2011)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-09-25</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>65</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>New Jersey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Jersey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Presented at the College Board National Forum in Washington, D.C., October 2010. This presentation examines the recent national validity evidence that supports the use of SAT Writing in college admissions and English placement. Additionally it includes information on the College Board&apos;s free online Admitted Class Evaluation Service (ACES) system, for institutions interested in conducting their own admission and placement validity research on SAT Writing.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563444</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Incorporating SAT® Writing into Admission and Placement Decisions</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the College Board Forum (Wash, D.C., Oct 28, 2010)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-10-28</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>32</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Growth Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Criterion Referenced Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lash, Andrea</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Makkonen, Reino</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tran, Loan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huang, Min</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Nevada</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Nevada</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory West (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>WestEd</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study, undertaken at the request of the Nevada Department of Education, examined the stability over years of teacher-level growth scores from the Student Growth Percentile (SGP) model, which many states and districts have selected as a measure of effectiveness in their teacher evaluation systems. The authors conducted a generalizability study using three years of data in mathematics and reading for nearly 370 elementary and middle school teachers from Washoe County School District in Reno, Nevada&apos;s second-largest district. The study found that in mathematics, half of the variation among teachers&apos; annual growth score (median SGPs) was attributable to differences among teachers, while half was random or unstable. In reading, 0.41 of the variance in annual scores was attributable to differences among teachers, while 0.59 was due to random or unstable sources. More stable measures of effectiveness can be constructed by averaging multiple years of growth scores for a teacher, and the report provides stability estimates for averages of two, three, and four years of annual scores. The results from this study can also be used to examine the accuracy of judgments of teachers&apos; effectiveness that are based on these scores. Study results suggest that as states examine properties of their estimates of teacher effectiveness and consider their use in teacher accountability, they may want to be cautious in using such scores for teacher evaluation. The following are appended: (1) Related literature; (2) Creating student achievement variables; (3) Design and methods; and (4) Calculating misclassifications of effectiveness.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563445</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Analysis of the Stability of Teacher-Level Growth Scores from the Student Growth Percentile Model. REL 2016-104</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory West</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>30</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory West. Available from: Institute of Education Sciences. 555 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20208. Tel: 800-872-5327; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>39</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES12C0002</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link>https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=332</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Leadership Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assistant Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Value Added Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCullough, Moira</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lipscomb, Stephen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chiang, Hanley</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gill, Brian</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cheban, Irina</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>ICF International</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines the accuracy of performance ratings from the Framework for Leadership (FFL), Pennsylvania&apos;s tool for evaluating the leadership practices of principals and assistant principals. The study analyzed four key properties of the FFL: score variation, internal consistency, year-to-year stability, and concurrent validity. Score variation was characterized by the percentages of school leaders earning scores in different portions of the rating scale. To measure the internal consistency of the FFL, Cronbach&apos;s alpha was calculated for the full FFL and for each of its four categories of leadership practices. Analyses of score stability used data on FFL scores of school years across two years to calculate Pearson&apos;s correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity was assessed through a regression model for the relationship between school leaders&apos; estimated contributions to student achievement growth and their FFL scores. This report is based primarily on the 2013/14 pilot in which 517 principals and 123 assistant principals were rated by their supervisors; an interim report examined data from the 2012/13 pilot year. The study finds that the FFL is a reliable measure, with good internal consistency and a moderate level of year-to-year stability in scores. The study also finds evidence of the FFL&apos;s concurrent validity: principals with higher scores on the FFL, on average, make larger estimated contributions to student achievement growth. Higher total FFL scores and scores in two of the four FFL domains are significantly or marginally significantly associated with both value-added in all subjects combined and value-added in math specifically. This evidence of the validity of the FFL sets it apart from other principal evaluation tools: No other measures of principals&apos; professional practice have been shown to be related to principals&apos; effects on student achievement. However, in both pilot years, variation in scores was limited, with most school leaders scoring in the upper third of the rating scale. As the FFL is implemented statewide, continued examination of evidence on its statistical properties, especially the variation in scores, is important. The following are appended: (1) Prior research on measuring principal effectiveness; (2) Structure of the Framework for Leadership; (3) Data used in the study; (4) Technical details and supplementary findings on variation in Framework for Leadership scores; (5) Technical details and supplementary findings on the internal consistency of the Framework for Leadership; (6) Technical details and supplementary findings on year-to-year stability; (7) Technical details of school and principal value-added models; and (8) Technical details and supplementary findings on the relationships between Framework for Leadership scores and principals&apos; value-added.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563446</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Measuring School Leaders&apos; Effectiveness: Final Report from a Multiyear Pilot of Pennsylvania&apos;s Framework for Leadership. REL 2016-106</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>85</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Available from: Institute of Education Sciences. 555 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20208. Tel: 800-872-5327; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>26</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES12C0006</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_cited>ED563447</eric:ies_cited>
<eric:ies_publication_link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=343</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Leadership Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assistant Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Value Added Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McCullough, Moira</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lipscomb, Stephen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chiang, Hanley</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gill, Brian</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cheban, Irina</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic (ED)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>ICF International</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This &amp;quot;Stated Briefly&amp;quot; report is a companion piece that summarizes the results of another report of the same name. This study examines the accuracy of performance ratings from the Framework for Leadership (FFL), Pennsylvania&apos;s tool for evaluating the leadership practices of principals and assistant principals. The study analyzed four key properties of the FFL: score variation, internal consistency, year-to-year stability, and concurrent validity. Score variation was characterized by the percentages of school leaders earning scores in different portions of the rating scale. To measure the internal consistency of the FFL, Cronbach&apos;s alpha was calculated for the full FFL and for each of its four categories of leadership practices. Analyses of score stability used data on FFL scores of school years across two years to calculate Pearson&apos;s correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity was assessed through a regression model for the relationship between school leaders&apos; estimated contributions to student achievement growth and their FFL scores. This report is based primarily on the 2013/14 pilot in which 517 principals and 123 assistant principals were rated by their supervisors; an interim report examined data from the 2012/13 pilot year. The study finds that the FFL is a reliable measure, with good internal consistency and a moderate level of year-to-year stability in scores. The study also finds evidence of the FFL&apos;s concurrent validity: principals with higher scores on the FFL, on average, make larger estimated contributions to student achievement growth. Higher total FFL scores and scores in two of the four FFL domains are significantly or marginally significantly associated with both value-added in all subjects combined and value-added in math specifically. This evidence of the validity of the FFL sets it apart from other principal evaluation tools: No other measures of principals&apos; professional practice have been shown to be related to principals&apos; effects on student achievement. However, in both pilot years, variation in scores was limited, with most school leaders scoring in the upper third of the rating scale. As the FFL is implemented statewide, continued examination of evidence on its statistical properties, especially the variation in scores, is important. The following are appended: (1) Structure of the Framework for Leadership; and (2) Study data and methods.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563447</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Measuring School Leaders&apos; Effectiveness: Findings from a Multiyear Pilot of Pennsylvania&apos;s Framework for Leadership. Stated Briefly. REL 2016-111</dc:title>
<dc:source>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>12</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Available from: Institute of Education Sciences. 555 New Jersey Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20208. Tel: 800-872-5327; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>EDIES­12C0006</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link>http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=343</eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Team Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regular and Special Education Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Group Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Grant, Marquis</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Co-teaching involves a highly collaborative, mutually accountable relationship between a regular education and special education teacher in an inclusive environment. Effective co-teaching involves both teachers working together in the regular classroom setting in an effort to make learning accessible for all students regardless of ability or disabilities. Most of the analysis of co-teaching has determined that both special education students and regular education students benefit from the provision of differentiated instruction and the presence of two teachers in the classroom. This study seeks to gain an accurate analysis of co-teaching from the perspectives of regular education and special education teachers.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563448</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Tale of Two Teachers: An Analytical Look at the Co-Teaching Theory Using a Case Study Model</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>24</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>25</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Regions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fidelity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shannon, Lisa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Grant, Billie-Jo</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (Northeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (Pacific States)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Achieve3000 publishes a number of online literacy programs that differentiate lessons and activities based on student performance. Magnolia Consulting--an independent, third party evaluation firm--assessed Achieve3000 Solutions&apos; impact on student learning during the 2014-15 school year. The researchers used a randomized control trial, where approximately half of the 46 participating teachers were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control groups. The study included 1,012 students in 3rd, 6th, and 9th grade from four school districts across the country that provided a representative demographic sample of ethnicities, students with disabilities and English language learners. All participants were measured at the beginning and end of the school year using the Gates MacGinite Reading Test, fourth edition (GMRT-4), a group-administered, norm-referenced assessment that yields scores for Vocabulary, Reading Comprehension, and Total Reading. Magnolia additionally measured program implementation using a mix of weekly logs, classroom observation, and usage data and found an average implementation of 71% (where 100% would indicate at least 90 minutes of program use per week). The researchers concluded that Achieve3000 users made significant gains during the school year and performed better than students using their traditional ELA curriculum. Students who used Achieve3000 during the 2014-15 school year demonstrated statistically significant and substantively important gains on the GMRT-4&apos;s Vocabulary, Reading Comprehension, and Total Reading measures (effect sizes of 0.43, 0.47, 0.48, respectively). In comparison to the control group, Achieve3000 users also made statistically significant gains that approached substantively important reading gains on the GMRT-4 Reading Comprehension and Total Reading test scores. The study also found variation on the impact of the Achieve3000 solutions at grade level and further studies would benefit from increased sample sizes. The following are appended: (1) Data Preparation; (2) Achieve300 Implementation Guidelines; (3) Procedures for Calculating Implementation Fidelity; (4) Observation Scores; (5) Missing Data Rates; (6) Supporting Tables for Student Performance Results; (7) Consort; and (8) School-Level Characteristics. [The Magnolia Consulting Team provided support for this study.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563449</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Final Report for the Evaluation of the Achieve3000 Programs</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-10-13</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>94</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>28</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychotherapy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Primary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonparametric Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Düsmez, Ihsan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Barut, Yasar</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Turkey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Signed Ranks Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mann Whitney U Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Turkey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2148-6123</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The research is an experimental study which has experimental and control groups, and based on pre-test, post-test, monitoring test model. Research group consists of second and third grade students of Primary School Education and Psychological Counseling undergraduate programmes in Giresun University Faculty of Educational Sciences. The research group was formed among the students whose academic procrastination tendency is middle or high, by using academic procrastination scale. 60 students, whose academic procrastination tendencies are medium and high level, were identified. 24 students, who volunteered to participate to the study, were appointed randomly to the experimental and control groups. Academic procrastination scale was used to collect data. Scales were given to experiment and control groups as pre-test. A prevention of academic procrastination program which developed by the researcher based on Rational Emotive Behavioral Approach was applied to the experimental group. Control group was not given any training. After the training the of experiment group, post-test measurements were taken. And also 30 days after the experimental training, follow-up measurements were taken. Data were analyzed using Analyzis of Nonparametric. In the result of the applied program, a significant difference was found in favor of experiment group in academic procrastination. The results were interpreted in the light of the literature considering effects of Rational Emotive Behavioral Approach on academic procrastination.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563450</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Rational Emotive Behavior Based on Academic Procrastination Prevention: Training Programme of Effectiveness</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Participatory Educational Research (PER) v3 n1 p1-13 Apr 2016</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>28</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Leis, Micela</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schmidt, Karen M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rimm-Kaufman, Sara E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Journal Articles</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Mid Atlantic States)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Student Engagement in Mathematics Scale (SEMS) is a self-report measure that was created to assess three dimensions of student engagement (social, emotional, and cognitive) in mathematics based on a single day of class. In the current study, the SEMS was administered to a sample of 360 fifth graders from a large Mid-Atlantic district. The Rasch partial credit model (PCM) was used to analyze the psychometric properties of each sub-dimension of the SEMS. Misfitting items were removed from the final analysis. In general, items represented a range of engagement levels. Results show that the SEMS is an effective measure for researchers and practitioners to assess upper elementary school students&apos; perception of their engagement in math. The paper concludes with several recommendations for researchers considering using the SEMS. An appendix presents the Student Engagement in Mathematics Scale (SEMS).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563451</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using the Partial Credit Model to Evaluate the Student Engagement in Mathematics Scale</dc:title>
<dc:source>Grantee Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Journal of Applied Measurement v16 n3 p251-267 2015</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>National Science Foundation (NSF)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://jampress.org/abst2015.htm</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>44</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=861'>R305B090002</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number>DRL0814872</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discourse Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kachchaf, Rachel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Noble, Tracy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rosebery, Ann</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wang, Yang</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Warren, Beth</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>O&apos;Connor, Mary Catherine</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Most research on linguistic features of test items negatively impacting English language learners&apos; (ELLs&apos;) performance has focused on lexical and syntactic features, rather than discourse features that operate at the level of the whole item. This mixed-methods study identified two discourse features in 162 multiple-choice items on a standardized science assessment. After analyzing the frequency of features, we correlated the presence of these features with values of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) favoring non-ELLs over ELLs. Next, we analyzed 52 interviews with ELLs to examine the interactions between students and items with and without these features. Our results indicate that these two discourse features negatively impacted ELLs&apos; item performance and item comprehension, indicating they should be avoided when developing test items.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563452</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Discourse Features of Science Test Items on ELL Performance</dc:title>
<dc:source>Grantee Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) (Philadelphia, PA, Apr 2014)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>30</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1117'>R305A110122</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Biological Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Earth Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Space Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physical Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Noble, Tracy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kachchaf, Rachel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rosebery, Ann</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Warren, Beth</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>O&apos;Connor, Mary Catherine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wang, Yang</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Little research has examined individual linguistic features that influence English language learners (ELLs) test performance. Furthermore, research has yet to explore the relationship between the science strand of test items and the types of linguistic features the items include. Utilizing Differential Item Functioning, this study examines ELL performance on 162 Grade 5 large-scale science multiple-choice test items and its relationship to two discourse features, as well as the distribution of these features across three science strands. We also interviewed 52 ELLs to examine their interaction with these two features. Results indicate that these two features were most frequent on items under the Life Science strand. Additionally, both of these features were significantly correlated with DIF disfavoring ELLs indicating that the presence of these features potentially hinder ELLs&apos; abilities to understand test items containing these features. Interviews confirmed that these two features in combination interfered with ELLs&apos; abilities to make sense of the items, which often resulted in students answering incorrectly, even when they demonstrated knowledge of the content. Because the features are most frequent on Life Science items, ELLs&apos; content knowledge on these topics may be severely underestimated for this strand.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563453</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Do Linguistic Features of Science Test Items Prevent English Language Learners from Demonstrating Their Knowledge?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Grantee Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research on Science Teaching (Pittsburgh, PA, Apr 2014)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>T</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>24</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1117'>R305A110122</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Work Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sex</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Regions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tenure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time on Task</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compensation (Remuneration)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Consultants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Data</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Packman, Sheryl</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huff, Kristen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at the Annual National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in New York in March 2008. This presentation explores the demographic information as well as how and where educational measurement professionals are in the field.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563454</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Educational Measurement Profession in 2007: What Is the State of Our Union?</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>53</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Interpretation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Plake, Barbara S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huff, Kristen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reshetar, Rosemary</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at the Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in San Diego, CA in April 2009. This presentation discusses a methodology for directly connecting evidence-centered assessment design (ECD) to score interpretation and use through the development of Achievement level descriptors.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563455</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evidence-Centered Design as a Foundation for ALD Development</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interrater Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Results</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>DeCarlo, Lawrence T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, YoungKoung</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Conference in New York in March 2008. This presentation explores what cues are used as a deciding factor in essay scoring by the essay grader.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563456</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Score Resolution in Essay Grading: A View from a Signal Detection Model of Rater Behavior</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-03-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Rating</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hendrickson, Amy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huff, Kristen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Luecht, Ric</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at the Annual Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in San Diego, CA in April 2009. This presentation describes how the vehicles for gathering student evidence--task models and test specifications--are developed.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563457</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Claims, Evidence and Achievement Level Descriptors as a Foundation for Item Design and Test Specifications</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Discourse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Modeling (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Core Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>DeBoer, George</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carman, Elaine</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lazzaro, Christopher</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at the College Board National Forum in Washington, D.C., October 2010. This presentation examines the implementation of Common Core Standards for English Language Arts in STEM classrooms and the implications for effective teaching of STEM subjects.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563458</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Role of Language Arts in a Successful STEM Education Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-10-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>42</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grade Inflation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Biology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Calculus</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Literature</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Godfrey, Kelly E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in 2009. This study investigated the presence of a general rise in high school grades without a corresponding rise in SAT scores, as well as different grading criteria between schools, as shown by differential relationships between AP course grades and exam scores. These findings were put into context of conducting large-scale longitudinal educational research and its implications.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563459</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Investigating Grade Inflation and Non-Equivalence</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Cutting Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adaptive Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morgan, Deanna L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Buckendahl, Chad W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at the annual conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education, 2011, New Orleans.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563460</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluating a Strategy for Setting Cut Scores on a Computer Adaptive Test</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Construct Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Camara, Wayne</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This presentation was presented at the 2011 National Conference on Student Assessment (CCSSO). The focus of this presentation is how to validate the common core state standards (CCSS) in math and ELA and the subsequent assessments that will be developed by state consortia. The CCSS specify the skills students need to be ready for post-secondary career training or college credit courses, yet much of the evidence has been based on professional judgments and reviews of standards and assessment frameworks specified by states and international assessments. A comprehensive validation strategy requires multiple sources of convergent evidence. This presentations reviews the sources of such evidence, the weight that should be attributed to such evidence and some preliminary thinking about how to proceed in developing a validation framework. The College Board&apos;s college readiness benchmarks, and how they have been empirically developed, are also discussed.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563461</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>College and Career Readiness: An Initial Validation Argument</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Slides presented at the National Conference on Student Assessment (Orlando, FL, Jun 19-22, 2011)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-06-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>23</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>World History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Protocol Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence Based Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kaliski, Pamela</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>France, Megan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huff, Kristen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thurber, Allison</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Developing a cognitive model of task performance is an important and often overlooked phase in assessment design; failing to establish such a model can threaten the validity of the inferences made from the scores produced by an assessment (e.g., Leighton, 2004). Conducting think aloud interviews (TAIs), where students think aloud while completing and interacting with a task, is an ideal approach for developing a cognitive model of task performance. The objective of this research was to pilot the use of think aloud interviews (TAIs) to inform item development and strengthen the validity argument for a new AP World History exam that is currently being developed. The results indicate that we are seeing evidence in students&apos; verbal reports of intended historical thinking skills. Also, there are several different features (e.g., degree of familiarity) that contribute to the perceived difficulty of these items. [Slides] presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) and National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in New Orleans, LA in April 2011.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563462</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using Think Aloud Interviews in Evidence-Centered Assessment Design for the AP World History Exam</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Definitions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Godfrey, Kelly E.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Matos-Elefonte, Haifa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at AERA in Denver, CO in April 2010. In today&apos;s education climate, an enormous amount of pressure has been placed on states, school districts, and programs to produce graduates who are prepared to successfully enter, persist through, and graduate from the nation&apos;s universities and colleges. However, much of this research has been limited to one school or has focused on publicly available variables, thus limiting the analyses&apos; generalizability and relevance. This study investigates the power of various student-level background and academic variables as well as school-level social and academic characteristics in the prediction of college enrollment, persistence, and graduation, demonstrating that characteristics at both levels play a role in the likelihood of reaching these goals. By creating this prediction model, researchers hope to further the field&apos;s understanding of the impact that a student&apos;s high school experience has on his or her likelihood of successfully navigating through college immediately following high school graduation.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563463</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Key Indicators of College Success: Predicting College Enrollment, Persistence, and Graduation</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>21</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expertise</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluative Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pilot Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Taxonomy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kaliski, Pamela</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huff, Kristen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Barry, Carol</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>For educational achievement tests that employ multiple-choice (MC) items and aim to reliably classify students into performance categories, it is critical to design MC items that are capable of discriminating student performance according to the stated achievement levels. This is accomplished, in part, by clearly understanding how item design features align with each of the achievement level descriptions. Difficulty drivers are defined as specific item features that are related to the difficulty of an item. The purpose of this research study was to pilot a methodology for working with subject matter experts to identify what item features drive item difficulty, and to determine specific features that drive item difficulty on a summative large scale assessment used in high school social science and history classrooms. Results of the study indicated that although this methodology was useful for gathering such information, modifications could be made in the future to better elicit the desired information about difficulty drivers. [Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) and National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in New Orleans, LA in April 2011.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563464</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Aligning Items and Achievement Levels: A Study Comparing Expert Judgments</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>13</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Responses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reshetar, Rosemary</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Melican, Gerald J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Mantel Haenszel Procedure</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Advanced Placement Examinations (CEEB)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This paper discusses issues related to the design and psychometric work for mixed-format tests --tests containing both multiple-choice (MC) and constructed-response (CR) items. The issues of validity, fairness, reliability and score consistency can be addressed but for mixed-format tests there are many decisions to be made and no examination or examination program faces exactly the same choices. This paper raised some issues and used the AP experience to illustrate the types of questions that need to be addressed and outlined the strong test development processes that need to be in place to address the issues.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563465</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Design and Evaluation of Mixed-Format Large Scale Assessments for the Advanced Placement Program® (AP®)</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA) (Denver, CO, April 2010)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>30</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>29</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Acceleration (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goal Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Task Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Core Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Expectations of Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Davis, Donna</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carman, Elaine</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>McGraw-Hill Education</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at the annual conference of the National Council of Supervisors of Math.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563466</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Accelerate Learning with SMART Goals for Students and Staff</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-04-20</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>46</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>3</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Patterson, Brian F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is substantial variability in the degree to which the SAT and high school grade point average (HSGPA) predict first-year college performance at different institutions. This paper demonstrates the usefulness of multilevel modeling as a tool to uncover institutional characteristics that are associated with this variability. In a model that includes both HSGPA and SAT scores as predictors of FYGPA, the results suggest that higher mean SAT score at an institution is associated with slightly smaller validity coefficients for both HSGPA and SAT scores. The validity coefficients for HSGPA were larger at institutions with a larger percentage of white freshmen; and the predictive validity of the SAT was found to be higher at institutions with a larger percentage of students submitting SAT scores, and at smaller institutions. [Slides presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in 2010.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563467</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Exploring the Variability in the Validity of SAT Scores and High School GPA for Predicting First-Year College Grades at Different Colleges and Universities</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>15</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Noeth, Richard J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at the national conference for AERA (American Educational Research Association). This study examined whether the addition of the Writing section caused the implementation of changes in writing instruction across the nation. It used survey data from teachers and administrators across the country to measure the impact on the teaching and learning of writing.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563468</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Consequences of the Addition of the SAT Writing Section: A Survey of Writing Changes in the Nation&apos;s K-12 Educational System</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2009-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Databases</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disclosure</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mattern, Krista D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at AERA in Denver, CO in April 2010. This study examined the relationship between students&apos; self-reported high school grade point average (HSGPA) from the SAT Questionnaire and their HSGPA provided by the colleges and universities they attend. The purpose of this research was to offer updated information on the relatedness of self-reported (by the student) and school-reported (by the college/university from the high school transcript) HSGPA, compare these results to prior studies and provide recommendations on the use of self-reported HSGPA. Results from this study indicated that even though the correlation between the self-reported and school-reported HSGPA is slightly lower than in prior studies (r = 0.74), there is still a very strong relationship between the two measures.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563469</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining the Accuracy of Self-Reported High School Grade Point Average</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>11</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Format</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcome Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kobrin, Jennifer L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kim, Rachel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sackett, Paul</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is much debate on the merits and pitfalls of standardized tests for college admission, with questions regarding the format (multiple-choice versus constructed response), cognitive complexity, and content of these assessments (achievement versus aptitude) at the forefront of the discussion. This study addressed these questions by investigating the relationship between SAT Mathematics (SAT-M) item characteristics and the item&apos;s ability to predict college outcomes. Using multiple regression, SAT-M item characteristics (content area, format, cognitive complexity, and abstract/concrete classification) were used to predict three outcome measures: the correlation of item score with first-year college grade point average (FYGPA), the correlation of item score with mathematics course grades, and the percentage of students who answered the item correctly and chose to major in a mathematics or science (STEM) field. Separate models were run including and excluding item difficulty and discrimination as covariates. The results revealed that many of the item characteristics were related to the outcome measures, and that item difficulty and discrimination had a mediating effect on several of the predictor variables, particularly on the effects of non-routine/insightful items, and multiple-choice items. [Slides presented at AERA 2011.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563470</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Modeling the Predictive Validity of SAT Mathematics Items Using Item Characteristics</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>28</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKenzie, Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Non-Print Media</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reference Materials - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>[Slides] presented at the annual conference of the Southern Association for College Admission Counseling, April 2010. This presentation summarizes recent research from the national SAT Validity Study and includes information on the Admitted Class Evaluation Service (ACES) system and how ACES can help institutions conduct their own validity research.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563471</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The National SAT Validity Study: Sharing Results from Recent College Success Research</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2010-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>60</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Construction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Usage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shaw, Emily J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Marini, Jessica P.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Beard, Jonathan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shmueli, Doron</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Young, Linda</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ng, Helen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>SAT (College Admission Test)</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>College Board</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In February of 2013, the College Board announced it would undertake a redesign of the SAT® in order to develop an assessment that better reflects the work that students will do in college, focusing on the core knowledge and skills that evidence has shown to be critical in preparation for college and career. The redesigned test will be introduced in March 2016 and will include a number of important changes. As with the redesign of all assessments, it is important to examine and understand how the changes to the content and format of the test impact the inferences made from the test&apos;s scores for their intended uses. One primary use of the SAT is for admission and placement decisions and, therefore, it was important to examine the relationship between the scores from the redesigned test with college outcomes such as first-year grade point average (FYGPA) and college course grades. In order to conduct such an analysis a pilot study was initiated because the test is not yet operational. Fifteen four-year institutions were recruited to administer a pilot form of the redesigned SAT to between 75 and 250 first-year, first-time students very early in the fall semester of 2014. Measures were taken to ensure that the redesigned SAT was administered to students under standardized conditions and that students were motivated to perform well on the test. In June 2015, participating institutions provided the College Board with first-year performance data for those students participating in the fall 2014 administration of the redesigned SAT so that relationships between SAT scores and college performance could be analyzed. Results of study analyses show that the redesigned SAT is as predictive of college success as the current SAT, that redesigned SAT scores improve the ability to predict college performance above high school GPA alone, and that there is a strong, positive relationship between redesigned SAT scores and grades in matching college course domains, suggesting that the redesigned SAT is sensitive to instruction in English language arts, math, science, and history/social studies.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563472</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Redesigned SAT® Pilot Predictive Validity Study: A First Look. Research Report 2016-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>College Board</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>25</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>College Board. 250 Vesey Street, New York, NY 10281. Tel: 212-713-8000; e-mail: research@collegeboard.org; Web site: http://research.collegeboard.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Department Heads</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Definitions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Administrator Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Parascandalo, Marthese</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Malta</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Malta</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this dissertation was to compare and contrast the Leadership Styles of two Heads of Department who work at Carnelian Secondary School (anonymized). It augments a previous paper (Parascandalo 2011) which examined the role of the middle leader in secondary schools in educational literature. The investigation by means of two case-studies aimed to establish similarities and differences in leadership styles and its intention was to discover how different leadership qualities and approaches promote specific aspects of management which can make a department more effective. The research was based on the following questions: 1. What does the literature of educational research and theory tell us about defining leadership styles? 2. What are the similarities and the differences between the leadership styles of the two studied Heads of Department? 3. What are the teachers&apos; and the SMT members&apos; perceptions of the leadership styles of the two studied Heads of Department and how do they react to them? 4. What kind of learning cultures are encouraged by each of the two studied Heads of Department to promote departmental team building? 5. What kind of programme of training for Heads of Department might be put in place to promote successful practices and effective management strategies? Participants included the two HoDs and all willing members of both teams, all the members of the SMT and two student teachers undertaking their practicum with one of the departments. Respondent triangulation was obtained through the perceptions of all the above, while methodological triangulation by means of interviews and observation sessions proved very valuable as ethnographic research to really understand how both teams functioned. Qualitative data was from the sampling of results. All institutions, locations and individuals were anonymized. Results suggest that Monica rarely moves out of the transformational style, has a high level of emotional intelligence and has a family bond with her members. In contrast, Catherine continually moves in and out of the transformational, transactional and the laissez-faire styles and has only a professional relationship with members. The similarities emerge when both leaders operate within the transformational leadership style while the differences emerge when Catherine frequently moves in and out of the three main styles identified for this study. It was concluded that, even though higher marks were obtained in Catherine&apos;s subject, the same students fared much better in Monica&apos;s subject as her papers demanded intellectual, logical and mental visualization abilities, while Catherine&apos;s paper, one size fits all, was mostly based on fill-in, multiple choice and picture interpretation exercises. Recommendations cover training in leadership, the organisation of resource sharing and a Human Resource position to identify and organise training for leaders. It is hoped that this investigation into leadership styles and their effectiveness will be followed by others as research in this area is limited in Maltese schools. The following are appended: (1) The findings and analysis of the perceptions of Thomas and Gary, student teachers in Catherine&apos;s department, regarding her leadership style; (2) The observation; (3) The sampling of students&apos; results and outcomes; (4) Schedule of interview questions for HoDs; (5) Schedule of interview questions for teacher in department; (6) Schedule of interview questions for student teacher in department; and (7) Schedule of interview questions for the SMT. [The research work disclosed in this publication is partially-funded by the ESF project 4.100--Developing Core Skills in the Public Service. The sponsorship is partially-financed by the European Union, from the European Social Fund (ESF) under Operational Programme II--Cohesion Policy 2007-2013, &amp;quot;Empowering People for More Jobs and a Better Quality of Life&amp;quot;.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563473</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Comparing the Leadership Styles of Two Heads of Department at Carnelian School: Comparative Case Studies</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>MSc Dissertation, University of Malta</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>138</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>162</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Immigrants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Adjustment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Well Being</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immigration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Europe</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2077-6802</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (France)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>How school systems respond to immigration has an enormous impact on the economic and social well-being of all members of the communities they serve, whether they have an immigrant background or not. &amp;quot;Immigrant Students at School: Easing the Journey towards Integration&amp;quot; reveals some of the difficulties immigrant students encounter--and some of the contributions they offer--as they settle into their new communities and new schools. Results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) indicate that students with an immigrant background tend to perform worse in school than students without an immigrant background. Several factors are associated with this disparity, including the concentration of disadvantage in the schools immigrant students attend, language barriers and certain school policies, like grade repetition and tracking, that can hinder immigrant students&apos; progress through school. But successful integration is measured in more than academic achievement; immigrant students&apos; well-being and hopes for the future are just as telling. This report examines not only immigrant students&apos; aspirations and sense of belonging at school, but also recent trends in Europeans&apos; receptiveness to welcoming immigrants into their own countries--the context that could make all the difference in how well immigrant students integrate into their new communities. The report includes a special section on refugees and education, and an extensive discussion on education policy responses to immigration. Selected tables on immigrant students are provided in an annex.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563474</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Immigrant Students at School: Easing the Journey towards Integration. OECD Reviews of Migrant Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>OECD Publishing</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-17</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-9-2642-4949-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>124</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. Tel: +33-145-24-8200; Fax: +33-145-24-8500; Web site: http://www.oecd.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264249509-en</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>61</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developing Nations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expenditures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Financial Support</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Political Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Capacity Building</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Publications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>International Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Policy Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Opinion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lockheed, Marlaine E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn>ISSN-1990-8539</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (France)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>World Bank</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This report provides a systematic review and empirical evidence related to the experiences of middle-income countries and economies participating in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2000 to 2015. PISA is a triennial survey that aims to evaluate education systems worldwide by testing the skills and knowledge of 15-year-old students. To date, students representing more than 70 countries and economies have participated in the assessment, including 44 middle-income countries, many of which are developing countries receiving foreign aid. This report provides answers to six important questions about these middle-income countries and their experiences of participating in PISA: What is the extent of developing country participation in PISA and other international learning assessments? Why do these countries join PISA? What are the financial, technical, and cultural challenges for their participation in PISA? What impact has participation had on their national assessment capacity? How have PISA results influenced their national policy discussions? And what does PISA data tell us about education in these countries and the policies and practices that influence student performance? The findings of this report are being used by the OECD to support its efforts to make PISA more relevant to a wider range of countries, and by the World Bank as part of its on-going dialogue with its client countries regarding participation in international large-scale assessments. The following are appended: (1) Selected tables from PISA 2012 results, Volumes I-IV; (2) Results of multi-level analyses of PISA 2012 mathematics in 18 middle-income countries; (3) PISA 2012 mathematics performance and books in the home; and (4) Summary descriptions for the six levels of proficiency in mathematics. (Individual chapters contain references.) [This publication was written with Tijana Prokic-Breuer and Anna Shadrova.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563475</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Experience of Middle-Income Countries Participating in PISA 2000. PISA</dc:title>
<dc:source>OECD Publishing</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-92-64-24618-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>130</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. Tel: +33-145-24-8200; Fax: +33-145-24-8500; Web site: http://www.oecd.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264246195-en</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Purchasing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Entrepreneurship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrative Organization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hodas, Steven</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<dc:type>Guides - Non-Classroom</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As schools and classrooms explore technology-based, student-centered, personalized approaches to teaching and learning, their efforts to innovate can be hamstrung by archaic district operating systems that do not allow them to take advantage of new technologies, to work with smaller startup companies, or to quickly make and implement decisions. When he was at the helm of the New York City Department of Education (NYCDOE), Chancellor Joel Klein attempted to remedy this problem by creating the iZone, an office explicitly charged with fostering innovation from within the school district. From 2012 to 2014, the author designed and served as executive director of Innovate NYC Schools, the iZone project that focused on new structures for district procurement and decision making. As the first urban school system to make design thinking a routine part of its practice with educators, alternatives were created to established procurement processes and build collaborations between the school district and early-stage education technology companies. Regular support was also provided to entrepreneurs, investors, and innovators who sought to do business with NYCDOE. Using the philosophy and examples from NYCDOE, this paper lays out steps school systems can take to foster innovative practices throughout the organization and develop new instructional tools and practices through nimble procurement procedures.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563476</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Changing Methods and Mindsets: Lessons from Innovate NYC</dc:title>
<dc:source>Center on Reinventing Public Education</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Carnegie Corporation of New York</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>14</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Center on Reinventing Public Education. University of Washington Bothell Box 358200, Seattle, WA 98195. Tel: 206-685-2214; Fax: 206-221-7402; e-mail: crpe@u.washington.edu; Web site: http://www.crpe.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Physics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Masters Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizenship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Doctoral Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Salaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Sector</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pold, Jack</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mulvey, Patrick</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>American Institute of Physics, Statistical Research Center</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Exiting physics master&apos;s recipients from the classes of 2012, 2013, and 2014 combined pursued a variety of different post-degree outcomes. Initial outcomes differed greatly depending on citizenship. The majority of US citizens were in the workforce following the receipt of their master&apos;s degrees. In contrast, the majority of non-US citizens continued their education by enrolling in another graduate program. Regardless of citizenship, most masters continuing with graduate study did so in physics. In this report, an exiting master is defined as an individual who received his or her degree from a US physics department and left that department with no degree higher than a master&apos;s degree. Exiting masters can be earned at departments where the master&apos;s is the highest degree offered as well as at departments that offer a PhD. Each year there are many students who earn a masters en route and continue working toward a physics PhD at the same institution. They are not included in this analysis.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563477</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Physics Masters One Year after Degree: Results from the Follow-Up Survey of Master&apos;s Recipients, Classes of 2012, 2013, &amp;amp; 2014 Combined. Focus On</dc:title>
<dc:source>AIP Statistical Research Center</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-12-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>10</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>AIP Statistical Research Center .One Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740. Tel: 301-209-3100; e-mail: stats@aip.org; Web site: http://www.aip.org/statistics</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Severe Intellectual Disability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alternative Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Content</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Items</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Portfolio Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rogers, Christopher M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thurlow, Martha L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lazarus, Sheryl S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Center on Educational Outcomes</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Federal law requires that all students, including students with disabilities, participate in state assessments used for accountability purposes. It also requires states to assess students in several content areas, including science. Most students with disabilities take the general science assessment with or without accommodations, but a few students with the most significant cognitive disabilities participate in alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS). The purpose of this analysis was to learn more about the characteristics of states&apos; science AA-AAS in 2014-2015. Data for this report were gathered by examining information that was publicly available on state websites. Key findings include: (1) Most states&apos; science AA-AAS covered the life science/biology, earth science/earth and space science, and physical sciences/physics content domains at all grade levels; (2) In many states some content domains assessed differed between the general assessment and the AA-AAS; (3) In some states more content domains were covered on the AA-AAS than on the general assessment and in others fewer content domains were covered; and (4) More than half of the states had item-based AA-AAS, while about a third of the states used portfolios; fewer than 10 used rating scales, either alone or in combination with another approach. Although federal regulations do allow states to define the complexity, depth, and breadth of the AAAAS, the apparent lack of consistency in the domains assessed suggests that some students with significant cognitive disabilities may not be getting access to the same rigorous grade-appropriate content. States&apos; evolving assessment systems provide an excellent opportunity for states and consortia to consider the content assessed by the science AA-AAS. The following are appended: (1) AA-AAS Science Content Domains by State; (2) General Assessment and AA-AAS Science Comparisons; and (3) Assessment Approach Types and Response Formats.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563478</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Science Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards (AA-AAS) during School Year 2014-2015. Synthesis Report 99</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Center on Educational Outcomes</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-11-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Office of Special Education Programs (ED/OSERS)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>41</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Center on Educational Outcomes. University of Minnesota, 207 Pattee Hall, 150 Pillsburg Drive Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Tel: 612-626-1530; Fax: 612-624-0879; e-mail: nceo@umn.edu; Web site: http://www.cehd.umn.edu/nceo</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>4</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>H326G110002</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Delivery Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Systems Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lake, Robin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hill, Paul T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Maas, Tricia</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Every sector of the U.S. economy is working on ways to deliver services in a more customized manner. If all goes well, education is headed in the same direction. Personalized learning and globally benchmarked academic standards (a.k.a. Common Core) are the focus of most major school districts and charter school networks. Educators and parents know students must be better prepared to think deeply about complex problems and to have skills that are relevant for jobs that haven&apos;t yet been created. Promising school models are showing what&apos;s possible, but innovation in the classroom only takes you so far. Twenty-first century learning practices demand twenty-first century systems. This paper goes deep into the question of which system policies are most likely to get in the way of implementing personalized learning at scale. We work outward from the school to define the new capacities and functions districts need to develop. We make the case that districts are currently unwittingly hostile to school-level innovation. For that to change, they must aggressively work to change the incentives, policies, and structures so that they encourage and free up schools to innovate. This is the first of three white papers looking at system redesign from a variety of perspectives. Our next paper, &amp;quot;The Case for Coherent High Schools&amp;quot; [see: ED556237], examines the challenges of high school redesign. Our third and final paper, &amp;quot;Redesigning the District Operating System [see: ED563481], explains why there must be updated central office systems to allow school-level initiative and problem solving.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563479</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Next Generation School Districts: What Capacities Do Districts Need to Create and Sustain Schools That Are Ready to Deliver on Common Core?</dc:title>
<dc:source>Center on Reinventing Public Education</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-04-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Carnegie Corporation of New York</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Center on Reinventing Public Education. University of Washington Bothell Box 358200, Seattle, WA 98195. Tel: 206-685-2214; Fax: 206-221-7402; e-mail: crpe@u.washington.edu; Web site: http://www.crpe.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Delivery Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Government Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Funding Formulas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Distribution</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intellectual Disciplines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Profiles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Australia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Australia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2205-4391</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Centre for Vocational Education Research</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This publication provides a summary of data relating to students, programs, training providers and funding in Australia&apos;s government-funded vocational education and training (VET) system (broadly defined as all activity delivered by government providers and government-funded activity delivered by community education and private training providers). It is the third quarterly report of government-funded training activity and does not provide comparisons with previously published collected data. The data in this publication cover the period 1 January 2015 to 30 September 2015. The Australian VET system provides training across a wide range of subject areas and is delivered through a variety of training institutions and enterprises (including to apprentices and trainees). The system provides training for students of all ages and backgrounds. Students have many options for training and may study individual subjects or full programs that lead to formal qualifications. Training takes place in classrooms, in the workplace, online and through other flexible delivery methods. Providers of vocational education and training in Australia include technical and further education (TAFE) institutes, universities, secondary schools, industry organisations, private enterprises, agricultural colleges, community education providers and other government providers.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563480</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Government-Funded Students and Courses: January to September 2015. Australian Vocational Education and Training Statistics</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER)</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Australian Government Department of Education and Training</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>16</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Centre for Vocational Education Research Ltd. P.O. Box 8288, Stational Arcade, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Tel: +61-8-230-8400; Fax: +61-8-212-3436; e-mail: ncver@ncver.edu.au; Web site: http://www.ncver.edu.au</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrative Organization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Systems Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Systems Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theory Practice Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Delivery Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hodas, Steven</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this paper, we look at the inner workings of a school district through the lens of the &amp;quot;district operating system (DOS),&amp;quot; a set of interlocking mutually-reinforcing modules that includes functions like procurement, contracting, data and IT policy, the general counsel&apos;s office, human resources, and the systems for employee and family engagement. We examine the ways in which ingrained district operating systems practices can interfere with policy goals and school-level initiative and argues for a retooling of the DOS to enable dynamic problem-solving. This is the last in a series of white papers on system redesign. Our first paper, &amp;quot;Next Generation School Districts&amp;quot; [see: ED563479], goes deep into the question of which system policies are most likely to get in the way of implementing personalized learning at scale and defines the new capacities and functions districts need to develop. Our second paper, &amp;quot;The Case for Coherent High Schools&amp;quot; [see: ED556237], explains why personalized high schools are hard to get and keep in a traditional district, and argues that stable leadership, school-level autonomy, and choice for both staff and families are necessary to support high school redesign at scale.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563481</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Redesigning the District Operating System</dc:title>
<dc:source>Center on Reinventing Public Education</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Carnegie Corporation of New York</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>22</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Center on Reinventing Public Education. University of Washington Bothell Box 358200, Seattle, WA 98195. Tel: 206-685-2214; Fax: 206-221-7402; e-mail: crpe@u.washington.edu; Web site: http://www.crpe.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Labor Force Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Industry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Government Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Financial Support</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bowman, Kaye</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKenna, Suzy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Australia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Australia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Centre for Vocational Education Research</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This occasional paper provides an overview of the development of Australia&apos;s national training system and is a key knowledge document of a wider research project &amp;quot;Consistency with flexibility in the Australian national training system.&amp;quot; This research project investigates the various approaches undertaken by each of the jurisdictions to establish a student entitlement funding model and also examines one of the often overlooked fundamentals of the national training system--the dynamic tension that exists between consistency and flexibility. This paper reflects on the history of vocational education and training (VET) in Australia. A key focus is the development of the national training system, which has emerged over the last two decades. The authors also explore the dynamic tension, built into the system, to achieve both national consistency and sufficient flexibility to ensure that training meets specific local, industry and learner needs. Australia&apos;s national training system: goals, objectives and key elements 1992 to 2015 is appended.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563482</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Development of Australia&apos;s National Training System: A Dynamic Tension between Consistency and Flexibility. Occasional Paper</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER)</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Australian Government Department of Education and Training</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-9251-7343-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>56</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Centre for Vocational Education Research Ltd. P.O. Box 8288, Stational Arcade, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Tel: +61-8-230-8400; Fax: +61-8-212-3436; e-mail: ncver@ncver.edu.au; Web site: http://www.ncver.edu.au</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>73</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Government Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Qualifications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bowman, Kaye</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKenna, Suzy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Australia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Australia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Centre for Vocational Education Research</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This occasional paper provides the views of 17 &amp;quot;thought leaders&amp;quot; in the Australian vocational education and training (VET) sector. Their insight and opinions were sought to inform a larger research project focused on the student entitlement reforms that were introduced into the national VET system from 2012. These individuals offered a variety of senior-level vantage points on the topics of: (1) Australia&apos;s national training system: why it has been developed, what its key elements are, and the aspects where consistency has been sought and the aspects where flexibility has been sought; (2) VET student training entitlements: why this initiative has been introduced and the implications of the agreed flexibility in approach to its implementation by jurisdictions, in terms of maintaining a functional national training system; and (3) the implications of the VET student entitlement initiative for future national VET reform. A particular emphasis has been on the implications of the reforms and the challenges faced in its implementation in the context of achieving a balance between national consistency and jurisdictional flexibility. The interviewees considered key elements of the national training system, namely: standards for VET products (training packages and materials); standards for VET providers; and a flexible training market. The interviewees commented on the consistency and flexibility sought in each of these key elements, highlighting where tensions exist, particularly in student training entitlements. The following are appended: (1) Project statement provided to interviewees about the project and Project protocols; and (2) Interview guide questions. Information about the NVETR Program funding is provided at the end of this paper.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563483</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Student Entitlement Models in Australia&apos;s National Training System: Expert Views. Occasional Paper</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER)</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Australian Government Department of Education and Training</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-9251-7342-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>36</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Centre for Vocational Education Research Ltd. P.O. Box 8288, Stational Arcade, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Tel: +61-8-230-8400; Fax: +61-8-212-3436; e-mail: ncver@ncver.edu.au; Web site: http://www.ncver.edu.au</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>17</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Municipalities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Islam</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Muslims</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holistic Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Democracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Working Class</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizenship Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>West, Linden</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>England</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United Kingdom (England)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>University of London, Institute of Education</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Every day brings news about so-called Islamic State and its seduction of young people in the West. The radicalization of young Muslims causes alarm; even the desirability of multiculturalism is questioned in troubled cities where racism and Islamophobia are on the rise. This book is a case study of one distressed post-industrial city struggling with various discontents, drawn from those who live there. Their stories illuminate how racism, Islamophobia and Islamism take hold, rendering the city emblematic of wider problems across the world today. Through Linden West&apos;s holistic, psychosocial analysis, racism, Islamophobia and fundamentalism are understood by reference to growing inequality, mental illness and hopelessness, all within a context of fractured economies, malfunctioning democracies and the narrowing of education&apos;s purpose. But the author also describes the resources of hope in the city--the experiments in democratic education and the working class struggle against Nazi fundamentalism, the concern for the other--that inspire civic education in schools and communities today. An index is included.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563484</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Distress in the City: Racism, Fundamentalism and a Democratic Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>Trentham Books</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-15</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-85856-688-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>210</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Trentham Books. Available from: IOE Press, Institute of Education, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK. Tel: +44-20-7612-6000; e-mail: ioepress@ioe.ac.uk; Web site: http://www.ioepress.co.uk</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>https://ioepress.co.uk/books/social-justice-equality-and-human-rights/distress-in-the-city/</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Oral Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Fluency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Length</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Based Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kahn, Josh</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nese, Joseph T.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Alonzo, Julie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>University of Oregon, Behavioral Research and Teaching (BRT)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is strong theoretical support for oral reading fluency (ORF) as an essential building block of reading proficiency. The current and standard ORF assessment procedure requires that students read aloud a grade-level passage (˜ 250 words) in a one-to-one administration, with the number of words read correctly in 60 seconds constituting their ORF performance. The current study was part of a larger project to develop and validate a computerized ORF assessment system--Computerized Oral Reading Evaluation (CORE)--to reduce limitations in current ORF measures and procedures. The purposes of this technical report are to: (a) document whether the CORE system was accessible and useful for teachers, (b) explore potential differences between CORE and traditional ORF (i.e., easyCBM) passages, and (c) identify potential deficits in the three CORE lengths (˜ 25, 50, or 85 words). This information contributes to the response-process evidence for the CORE system&apos;s validity. Our results suggest that delivering, scoring, and storing ORF assessments online may be feasible, and desirable, for classroom teachers across Grades 2 through 4. In addition, although there were no distinct differences between CORE and traditional ORF passages, teacher reports suggest that the CORE short passages are most appropriate for Grade 2 students while CORE long and medium passages are preferred by teachers for students in Grades 3 and 4. Appendix A contains the teacher questionnaire.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563485</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher Survey of the Accessibility and Text Features of the Computerized Oral Reading Evaluation (CORE). Technical Report #1601</dc:title>
<dc:source>Behavioral Research and Teaching</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Institute of Education Sciences (ED)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>31</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Behavioral Research and Teaching. 175 Lokey Education 5262 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403. Tel: 541-346-3535; Fax: 541-346-5689; Web site: http://www.brtprojects.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>23</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded>Yes</eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number link='http://ies.ed.gov/funding/grantsearch/details.asp?ID=1492'>R305A140203</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Location</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Qualifications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Eligibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bowman, Kaye</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKenna, Suzy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Australia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Australia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Centre for Vocational Education Research</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The past two decades have seen some evolution towards a more nationally consistent vocational education and training (VET) system. One of the challenges is to find the right balance between national consistency and appropriate flexibility, to accommodate the regional and local industry requirements and learner preferences that best serve the needs of states and territories. This report maps the implementation by jurisdictions of the most recent training market reforms, agreed to in the 2012-16 National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform--a student training entitlement. The authors also undertake an analysis of the commonalities and differences in each jurisdiction&apos;s approach. This report will be useful as a composite description and the analysis valuable to the review of the student training entitlement and other aspects of the 2012-16 National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform, planned for 2015-16. Information was gathered from publicly available sources on each jurisdiction&apos;s approach to the student training entitlement as at 30 March 2015 and arranged by the categories in which flexibilities are allowed under the National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform: (1) eligibility for the entitlement; (2) the level of entitlement available; (3) the courses (qualifications) the entitlement applies to; (4) processes for setting subsidies, fees and prices and maintaining budget control; (5) the providers delivering the entitlement; and (6) the way by which access to high-quality information on the training entitlement is provided to clients. Jurisdictions&apos; training entitlement models as at 30 March 2015 are appended. Information on NVETR Program funding is provided at the end of this report.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563486</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Jurisdictional Approaches to Student Training Entitlements: Commonalities and Differences. Research Report</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER)</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Australian Government Department of Education and Training</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-9251-73413</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>104</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Centre for Vocational Education Research Ltd. P.O. Box 8288, Stational Arcade, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Tel: +61-8-230-8400; Fax: +61-8-212-3436; e-mail: ncver@ncver.edu.au; Web site: http://www.ncver.edu.au</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>10</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>International Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Neoliberalism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smith, William C., Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Collected Works - General</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>El Salvador</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Chile</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Finland</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Denmark</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>South Korea</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>South Africa</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Sweden</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Chile</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Denmark</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>El Salvador</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Finland</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Africa</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Korea</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Sweden</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Program for International Student Assessment</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Progress in International Reading Literacy Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:keywords_test>Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The past thirty years have seen a rapid expansion of testing, exposing students worldwide to tests that are now, more than ever, standardized and linked to high-stakes outcomes. The use of testing as a policy tool has been legitimized within international educational development to measure education quality in the vast majority of countries worldwide. The embedded nature and normative power of high-stakes standardized testing across national contexts can be understood as a global testing culture. The global testing culture permeates all aspects of education, from financing, to parental involvement, to teacher and student beliefs and practices. The reinforcing nature of the global testing culture leads to an environment where testing becomes synonymous with accountability, which becomes synonymous with education quality. Underlying the global testing culture is a set of values identified from the increasing literature on world culture. These include: education as a human right, academic intelligence, faith in science, decentralization, and neoliberalism. Each of these values highlights different aspects of the dialogue in support of high-stakes standardized testing. The wide approval of these values and their ability to legitimate various aspects of high-stakes testing reinforces the taken-for-granted notion that such tests are effective and appropriate education practices. However, a large body of literature emphasizes the negative unintended consequences -- teaching to the test, reshaping the testing pool, the inequitable distribution of school resources and teachers&apos; attention, and reconstructing the role of the student, teacher, and parent -- commonly found when standardized, census-based tests are combined with high-stakes outcomes for educators or students. This book problematizes this culture by providing critical perspectives that challenge the assumptions of the culture and describe how the culture manifests in national contexts. The volume makes it clear that testing, per se, is not the problem. Instead it is how tests are administered, used or misused, and linked to accountability that provide the global testing culture with its powerful ability to shape schools and society and lead to its unintended, undesirable consequences. Contents include: (1) An Introduction to the Global Testing Culture (William C. Smith); (2) A Perfect Storm: The political economy of community-based management, teacher accountability and impact evaluations in El Salvador and the global reform agenda (D. Brent Edwards, Jr.); (3) Legitimacy, State-Building and Contestation in Education Policy Development: Chile&apos;s involvement in cross-national assessments (Rie Kijima and Jane Leer); (4) Teaching the World that Less is More: Global education testing and the Finnish national brand (Hilla Aurén and Devin Joshi); (5) Student Achievement and PISA Rankings: Policy effects or cultural explanations? (Ji Liu); (6) Measuring Learning Outcomes and Education for Sustainable Development: The new education development goal (Angeline M. Barrett); (7) The International Space of the Danish Testing Community in the Post-War Years (Karen E. Andreasen and Christian Ydesen); (8) Facilitating Student Learning: A comparison of classroom and accountability assessment (Sumera Ahsan and William C. Smith); (9) Beyond the Large-Scale Testing of Basic Skills: Using formative assessment to facilitate student learning (Renáta Tichá and Brian Abery); (10) Questioning across the Spectrum: Pedagogy, selection examinations and assessment systems in low-income countries (Anthony Somerset); (11) An Evaluation of How the &amp;quot;Policies of K-12 Testing&amp;quot; Impact the Effectiveness of Global Testing Programs (Sean W. Mulvenon and Sandra G. Bowman); (12) How Much Stakes for Tests? Public Schooling, Private Tutoring and Equilibrium (Mariam Orkodashvili); (13) Testing and School Reform in Danish Education: An analysis informed by the use of &amp;quot;the dispositive&amp;quot; (Kristine Kousholt and Bjørn Hamre); (14) South Korea&apos;s Accountability Policy System and National Achievement Test (Pearl J. Chung and Hyeonwoo Chea); (15) The Discursive Hold of the Matric: Is there space for a new vision for secondary education in South Africa? (David Balwanz); and (16) Accountability, Municipal Capacity and the Use of Data: A case study of Sweden (Tracey Burns, Patrick Blanchenay and Florian Köster).</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563487</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Global Testing Culture: Shaping Education Policy, Perceptions, and Practice. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>Symposium Books</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-873927-72-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>302</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Symposium Books. P.O. Box 204, Didcot, Oxford, OX11 9ZQ, UK. Tel: +44-1235-818-062; Fax: +44-1235-817-275; e-mail: orders@symposium-books.co.uk; Web site: http://www.symposium-books.co.uk</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://www.symposium-books.co.uk/books/bookdetails.asp?bid=94</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Majors (Students)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time to Degree</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nontraditional Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sex Stereotypes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Bias</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Stereotypes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Paying for College</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Malcom, Shirley, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Feder, Michael, Ed.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Academies, National Academy of Sciences</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Academies, National Academy of Engineering</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Academies, National Academy of Medicine</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Nearly 40 percent of the students entering 2- and 4-year postsecondary institutions indicated their intention to major in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in 2012. But the barriers to students realizing their ambitions are reflected in the fact that about half of those with the intention to earn a STEM bachelor&apos;s degree and more than two-thirds intending to earn a STEM associate&apos;s degree fail to earn these degrees 4 to 6 years after their initial enrollment. Many of those who do obtain a degree take longer than the advertised length of the programs, thus raising the cost of their education. Are the STEM educational pathways any less efficient than for other fields of study? How might the losses be &amp;quot;stemmed&amp;quot; and greater efficiencies realized? These questions and others are at the heart of this study. &amp;quot;Barriers and Opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees&amp;quot; reviews research on the roles that people, processes, and institutions play in 2-and 4-year STEM degree production. This study pays special attention to the factors that influence students&apos; decisions to enter, stay in, or leave STEM majors--quality of instruction, grading policies, course sequences, undergraduate learning environments, student supports, co-curricular activities, students&apos; general academic preparedness and competence in science, family background, and governmental and institutional policies that affect STEM educational pathways. Because many students do not take the traditional 4-year path to a STEM undergraduate degree, &amp;quot;Barriers and Opportunities&amp;quot; describes several other common pathways and also reviews what happens to those who do not complete the journey to a degree. This book describes the major changes in student demographics; how students, view, value, and utilize programs of higher education; and how institutions can adapt to support successful student outcomes. In doing so, &amp;quot;Barriers and Opportunities&amp;quot; questions whether definitions and characteristics of what constitutes success in STEM should change. As this book explores these issues, it identifies where further research is needed to build a system that works for all students who aspire to STEM degrees. The conclusions of this report lay out the steps that faculty, STEM departments, colleges and universities, professional societies, and others can take to improve STEM education for all students interested in a STEM degree. Two appendices are included: (1) Instructional Resources, Online Curriculum Repositories, and Situational Barriers to Change; and (2) Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff. (Individual chapters contain references.) [This document was prepared by the Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees; Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Board on Higher Education and the Workforce, Division of Policy and Global Affairs; National Academy of Engineering; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Additional support was provided by the National Academy of Sciences Kellogg Fund.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563488</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Barriers and Opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to Support Students&apos; Diverse Pathways</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Academies Press</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>National Science Foundation (NSF)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Alfred P. Sloan Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>S.D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-0-309-37357-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>202</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Academies Press. 500 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001. Tel: 888-624-8373; Tel: 202-334-2000; Fax: 202-334-2793; e-mail: Customer_Service@nap.edu; Web site: http://www.nap.edu</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.17226/21739</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>HRD1244829</eric:contract_number>
<eric:contract_number>B201230</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Continuing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Workplace Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Billett, Stephen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Choy, Sarojni</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dymock, Darryl</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smith, Ray</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Henderson, Amanda</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Tyler, Mark</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kelly, Ann</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Australia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Australia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Centre for Vocational Education Research</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This is the final report of a three-year research project that aimed to identify and evaluate the potential models and practices of learning support that might constitute a national approach to workers&apos; continuing education and training. The identification of a national approach to continuing education and training is emerging as a priority for the nation&apos;s vocational education and training (VET) system because of changing work requirements, an ageing workforce, and lengthening working lives. This research was motivated by a concern that entry-level training models may not best address workers&apos; continuing education and training needs. Previous reports on the project describe how a range of models and practices of continuing education and training were appraised and refined through interviews and surveys undertaken with 137 workers and 60 managers in five industries across four Australian states. This process led to the identification of four models of continuing education as being the most effective, and which were preferred by workers and supervisors involved in learning within workplaces. These four models are: (1) wholly work-based; (2) work-based with direct guidance; (3) work-based with educational interventions; and (4) wholly education institution-based. The final phase of the project involved a series of roundtable discussions, in which a total of 62 VET professionals (practitioners and managers) were asked to appraise the suitability and sustainability of the four proposed models of education and training from their perspectives. Consultations were also held with a number of senior representatives of three key national agencies concerned with training and workforce development: a central agency in the Australian Government department providing advice on the vocational education system and its contributions to workforce skills and productivity, and two peak national agencies for both the public and private provision of vocational education. The purpose of this report is twofold: (1) to report on the outcomes of the final consultations; and (2) to present conclusions about continuing education and training models and practices that support workers&apos; ongoing employability and workforce development. The report&apos;s conclusions also draw on the earlier phases of the project. The authors argue that the overall findings of the project suggest that a broader concept of a national continuing education and training system is required, one that shifts the focus away from education organised by and through education institutions toward one that better encompasses workers&apos; needs and workplace requirements. Acknowledgment, support, and recognition of the value of work-based learning are fundamental to achieving this more holistic continuing education and training system.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563489</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Towards More Effective Continuing Education and Training for Australian Workers</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER)</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Australian Government Department of Education and Training</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-925173-40-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>46</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Centre for Vocational Education Research Ltd. P.O. Box 8288, Stational Arcade, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Tel: +61-8-230-8400; Fax: +61-8-212-3436; e-mail: ncver@ncver.edu.au; Web site: http://www.ncver.edu.au</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>15</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Qualifications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Eligibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Government Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Location</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bowman, Kaye</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McKenna, Suzy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Griffin, Tabatha</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Australia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Australia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Centre for Vocational Education Research</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research overview summarizes the work undertaken by Kaye Bowman and Suzy McKenna in exploring jurisdictional approaches to the implementation of student entitlements to vocational skills training, a key reform initiative in the National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform (NPASR) of 2012-16. The overview is a condensed summary of three related papers, the first being a description of the recent evolution of a national training system, the second a detailed description and analysis on the manner in which student entitlements have been implemented by the states and territories, and, thirdly, the reflective opinions of informed experts on these issues. It highlights similarities and differences in the implementation of student entitlements and, pieced together, it examines the balance between the consistency of the national policy approach and practised jurisdictional flexibility, and the consequences for the longer-term objectives of the national training system. [For the reports summarized in this research overview, see ED563482, ED563486, and ED563483.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563490</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Balancing Consistency and Flexibility in Student Training Entitlements: Research Overview</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER)</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Australian Government Department of Education and Training</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-925173-44-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>20</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Centre for Vocational Education Research Ltd. P.O. Box 8288, Stational Arcade, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Tel: +61-8-230-8400; Fax: +61-8-212-3436; e-mail: ncver@ncver.edu.au; Web site: http://www.ncver.edu.au</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>5</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Generational Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Marital Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Rearing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Income</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Menard, Lauren A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>General Social Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>General Social Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Age and Time disparities in young adult research populations are common because young adults are defined by varying age spans; members of Generation X and Millennial generations may both be considered young adults; study years vary, affecting populations; and qualitative methods with limited age/year samples are frequently utilized. The current theoretical analysis brings population differences to the forefront by a) identifying Age and Time differences among Young Adults, Gen Xers, and Millennials, b) demonstrating associations vary by Age and Time, and c) directly comparing findings for several commonly researched measures (i.e., Race, Education, Marriage, Parenthood, Employment, Income, Computer Use, Social Trust, and Prayer). Information presented advances the perspicacious assessment of young adult studies.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563491</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Age and Time Population Differences: Young Adults, Gen Xers, and Millennials</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-05-27</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>29</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>34</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Futures (of Society)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Global Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expenditures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Labor Market</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Entrepreneurship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Obesity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urbanization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influence of Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn>ISSN-2218-7030</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (France), Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Did you ever wonder if education has a role to play in stemming the obesity epidemic sweeping across all OECD countries? Or what the impact of increasing urbanisation might be on our schools, families, and communities? Or whether new technologies really are fundamentally changing the way our children think and learn? &amp;quot;Trends Shaping Education&amp;quot; examines major trends affecting the future of education and sets the background on upcoming challenges for policy makers and education providers alike. This work does not give conclusive answers: it is not an analytical report nor is it a statistical compendium, and it is certainly not a statement of OECD policy on these different developments. It is instead a stimulus for thinking about major tendencies that have the potential to influence education, and conversely, the potential of education to influence these trends. The following contents are included: (1) Foreword; (2) Executive summary; (3) Overview: The impact of trends on the future of education; (4) Globalisation; (5) The future of the nation state; (6) Are cities the new countries?; (7) Family matters; and (8) A brave new world. [For the previous edition, published in 2013, &amp;quot;Trends Shaping Education 2013. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation,&amp;quot; see ED539023.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563492</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Trends Shaping Education 2016. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation</dc:title>
<dc:source>OECD Publishing</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-18</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-9-2642-5016-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Parents</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Teachers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Administrators</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Researchers</dcterms:audience>
<dcterms:audience>Policymakers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>116</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. Tel: +33-145-24-8200; Fax: +33-145-24-8500; Web site: http://www.oecd.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/trends_edu-2016-en</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trend Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocational Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Background</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Generational Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Wages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Salaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Labor Market</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Unemployment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Incentives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cost Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expenditure per Student</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expenditures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Financial Support</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Support</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tuition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Loan Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Loan Repayment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resource Allocation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Salaries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Study Abroad</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Ratio</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:type>Books</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Evaluative</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:issn>ISSN-1563-051X</eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (France)</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>&amp;quot;Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators&amp;quot; is the authoritative source for accurate information on the state of education around the world. It provides data on the output of educational institutions; the impact of learning across countries; the financial and human resources invested in education; access, participation and progression in education; and the learning environment and organisation of schools. The 2015 edition introduces more detailed analysis of participation in early childhood and tertiary levels of education. The report also examines first generation tertiary-educated adults&apos; educational and social mobility, labour market outcomes for recent graduates, and participation in employer-sponsored formal and/or non-formal education. Readiness to use information and communication technology for problem solving in teaching and learning is also examined. The publication provides indicators on the impact of skills on employment and earnings, gender differences in education and employment, and teacher and school leader appraisal systems. The report covers all 34 OECD countries and a number of partner countries (Argentina, Brazil, China, Colombia, India, Indonesia, Latvia, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia and South Africa, and for the first time, Costa Rica and Lithuania). This book is organized into the following chapters: (1) The output of educational institutions and the impact of learning; (2) Financial and human resources invested in education; (3) Access to education, participation and progression; and (4) The learning environment and organisation of schools. The following Annexes are included: (1) Characteristics of Education Systems; (2) Reference Statistics; (3) Sources, Methods and Technical Notes; (4) Contributors to this Publication; and (5) Education Indicators in Focus. Individual chapters contain references.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563493</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Education at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators</dc:title>
<dc:source>OECD Publishing</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-11-24</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-9-2642-4208-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>568</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. Tel: +33-145-24-8200; Fax: +33-145-24-8500; Web site: http://www.oecd.org</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2015-en</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Based Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Menard, Lauren</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>McAlister, Kimberly Walker</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Louisiana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Louisiana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Reading comprehension was investigated between undergraduates at a university in Louisiana, United States (n = 17) and an English-based university in Saudi Arabia (n = 41) for the purpose of comparing variance and proficiency. Comprehension was measured with an 8th grade curriculum-based measure administered in English. The research hypothesis of a larger proportion proficient (60% or higher) from the university within the United States (99%) than the proportion proficient from an English-based university in Saudi Arabia (49%) was revealed in data (?[superscript 2] = 10.49, p = 0.0012). Greater variance in reading comprehension was expected at the English-based university in the non-English speaking country because of non-standardization of English instruction in k-12 programming. Analysis of sample variance in student data from Prince Mohammad bin fahd University (s[superscript 2] = 11.575) and Northwestern State University (s[superscript 2] = 4.639) confirmed this expectation.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563494</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Comprehension of English Text among Saudi Arabian and American Undergraduates</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association (Knoxville, TN, Nov 5-7, 2014)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-11-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>9</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>7</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Impact</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Menard, Lauren Ann</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Speeches/Meeting Papers</dc:type>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>General Social Survey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>General Social Survey</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Dwindling American financial satisfaction and growing college degree attainment were revealed in national social survey data spanning more than four decades (N = 57,061). Against these backdrops, associations between being financially satisfied and having a college degree grew stronger in each decade, with the strongest association between graduate degree and financially satisfied in 2010-2012 data. Associate degree was inversely correlated with financial satisfaction when statistically significant, but associations grew more weakly inverse over time. Older Americans with a bachelor or graduate degree in 2010-2012 were 152% more likely to be financially satisfied, compared to 68% more likely for young counterparts. The strength of associations between college degree and financial satisfaction more than doubled between the 1970s and 2012 for men and women. College degree was a stronger predictor of financial satisfaction for Other individuals than for White individuals in 2010-2012 data.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563495</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Educational Attainment and Financial Satisfaction: The Changing Economic Value of a College Degree</dc:title>
<dc:source>Online Submission</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association (Knoxville, TN, Nov 5-7, 2014)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-11-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>17</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>30</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Accessibility (for Disabled)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>General Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conferences (Gatherings)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Accommodations (Disabilities)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Support Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Warren, S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Christensen, L.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Chartrand, A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shyyan, V.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lazarus, S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thurlow, M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Descriptive</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Center on Educational Outcomes</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Sixty individuals representing staff from state departments of education, school districts, other countries, testing and testing-related companies, and other educational organizations participated in a forum on June 22, 2015 in San Diego, California, to discuss implementing accessibility frameworks for all students, including students in general education, students who are English language learners (ELLs), and students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) or 504 plans. The forum was a pre-session to the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) National Conference on Student Assessment (NCSA), and was a collaboration of the Assessing Special Education Students (ASES) State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards (SCASS) and the National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO). This report summarizes the introductory information provided to forum participants, its main purpose is to describe the panel presentations and the facilitated forum discussions. Summaries of the panel presentations were developed from notes taken during the presentations, and from the presenters&apos; slides. Summaries of the facilitated discussions were developed from notes taken by notetakers. Participants were encouraged to comment and discuss freely, with assurances that no individual&apos;s name, nor any state, company, or organization would be attached to comments that were made.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563496</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Forum on Implementing Accessibility Frameworks for ALL Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>National Center on Educational Outcomes</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Office of Special Education Programs (ED/OSERS)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>19</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>National Center on Educational Outcomes. University of Minnesota, 207 Pattee Hall, 150 Pillsburg Drive Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Tel: 612-626-1530; Fax: 612-624-0879; e-mail: nceo@umn.edu; Web site: http://www.cehd.umn.edu/nceo</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number>H326G110002</eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telephone Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Change Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Articulation (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intercollegiate Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidance Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Systems Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transitional Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advanced Placement Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Relevance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Proposals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lichtenberger, Eric J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Klostermann, Brenda K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Duffy, Daniel Q.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Race to the Top</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_law>Race to the Top</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Southern Illinois University, Illinois Education Research Council</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The main goals of this implementation study were to: (1) examine how the grant recipients were implementing the changes set forth in their grant proposals; (2) identify initial barriers to implementation of grant activities; (3) identify catalysts that aided in goal attainment and/or partnership development; and (4) consider the sustainability of the impact of the grant-related activities. Through structured telephone interviews, a brief description of major activities associated with the grant; catalysts and/or levers enhancing grant activities; barriers inhibiting implementation of grant activities; and successful strategies utilized to overcome barriers were solicited. There was also a specific emphasis on articulation activities within the partnerships, as articulation was considered a foundational component of the Educator Preparation Program Innovation (EPPI) grants. This implementation study reveals the barriers to project-specific goal attainment and the catalysts that allowed the partnerships to meet their objectives. This research is informative for policy development specific to articulation agreements, current and future early childhood innovation grantees, as well as others attempting to build stronger and more authentic partnerships between community colleges and four-year institutions. Appended are: (1) Basic Interview Protocol; (2) Table B1: Representative Summaries or Quotes within the Institutional Barriers Theme; (3) Table B2: Representative Summaries or Quotes within the Systemic Barriers Theme; (4) Table B3: Representative Summaries or Quotes within the Catalysts Theme; (5) Table B4: Representative Summaries or Quotes within the Potential Long-Term Impacts Theme; (6) Table B5: Representative Summaries or Quotes within the Mediating Impacts Theme; and (7) Table B6: Representative Summaries or Quotes within the Frameworks Theme.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563497</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Early Childhood Educator Preparation Innovation Grant: Lessons from Initial Implementation. Policy Research: IERC 2015-2</dc:title>
<dc:source>Illinois Education Research Council</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-05-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Illinois Board of Higher Education (IBHE)</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>64</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Illinois Education Research Council. Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Campus Box 1064, Edwardsville, IL 62026. Tel: 866-799-4372; Tel: 618-650-2840; Fax: 618-650-2425; e-mail: ierc@siue.edu; Web site: http://www.siue.edu/ierc</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>13</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Strategic Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Klostermann, Brenda K.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pareja, Amber Stitziel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hart, Holly</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>White, Bradford R.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huynh, Michelle Hanh</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Southern Illinois University, Illinois Education Research Council</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In June 2010, the Illinois General Assembly passed Public Act 96-0903, a sweeping restructuring of the preparation of school principals and assistant principals that represented 10 years of effort from a broad coalition of stakeholders. The restructuring in Illinois was part of a movement nationwide to provide stronger training for principals in order to better equip them to direct instructional change and lead schools that produce high levels of student achievement. This study, examining the initial implementation of the new policy lays the groundwork for the subsequent evaluation studies which will examine the impact of the new policy. Results of phase one of a implementation review study of Illinois&apos; new policy for principal preparation indicate that a majority of those interviewed support the policy goals and have a positive outlook on its future impact. Concerns about a constricted pipeline and strained resources were also expressed. Future policy implications are suggested. Appended are: (1) I-PREP Advisory Board; (2) Study Methodology; and (3) Statewide Scan Interview Protocol.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563498</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Restructuring Principal Preparation in Illinois: Perspectives on Implementation Successes, Challenges, and Future Outlook. Policy Research: IERC 2015-3</dc:title>
<dc:source>Illinois Education Research Council</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-09-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Robert R. McCormick Tribune Foundation, Chicago, IL.</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Wallace Foundation</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>52</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Illinois Education Research Council. Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Campus Box 1064, Edwardsville, IL 62026. Tel: 866-799-4372; Tel: 618-650-2840; Fax: 618-650-2425; e-mail: ierc@siue.edu; Web site: http://www.siue.edu/ierc</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>33</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bachelors Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geographic Location</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jenkins, Davis</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fink, John</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>United States</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Columbia University, Community College Research Center</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Aspen Institute</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>National Student Clearinghouse Research Center</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Increasing the effectiveness of two- to four-year college transfer is critical for meeting national goals for college attainment and promoting upward social mobility. Efforts to improve institutional effectiveness in serving transfer students and state transfer policy have been hampered by a lack of comparable metrics for measuring transfer student outcomes. In this report, the authors propose a common set of metrics for measuring the effectiveness of two- and four-year institutions in enabling degree-seeking students who start college at a community college to transfer to four-year institutions and earn bachelor&apos;s degrees. These include three community college measures--transfer-out rate, transfer-with-award rate, and transfer-out bachelor&apos;s completion rate--and one measure for four-year institutions--transfer-in bachelor&apos;s completion rate. The authors also examine a fifth measure: the overall rate at which the cohort of students who start at a community college in a given state go on to earn a bachelor&apos;s degree from a four-year institution. They calculated outcomes for these measures using unit record data from the National Student Clearinghouse on the cohort of more than 700,000 degree-seeking students who entered higher education for the first time through a community college in the fall of 2007. They compared the average outcomes on these measures six years after these students first started college for two-and four-year institutions by institutional characteristics such as urbanicity, student body socioeconomic status, and selectivity (for four-year institutions) and by state. The authors also examined how well different types of institutions serve lower income transfer students compared with their higher income peers. The following are the main takeaways from this research: (1) Institutional practices--not just institutional characteristics--matter; (2) Among four-year institutions, transfer students had better outcomes at public institutions, very selective institutions, and institutions with higher socioeconomic status (SES) students; (3) Outcomes at both two- and four-year institutions varied remarkably by state; (4) Strong baccalaureate completion for community college students requires both high transfer-out rates and high bachelor&apos;s completion rates; (5) The connection between earning a community college credential before transferring and the probability of earning a bachelor&apos;s degree is not clear in most states; (6) Lower income transfer students had worse outcomes than higher income students on almost all measures; and (7) In a handful of states, the success gap between lower income and higher income transfer students was small or nonexistent. In the conclusion of the report, the authors discuss implications for institutional leaders and policymakers and identify areas for further research.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563499</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Tracking Transfer: New Measures of Institutional and State Effectiveness in Helping Community College Students Attain Bachelor&apos;s Degrees</dc:title>
<dc:source>Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2016-01-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor>Carnegie Corporation of New York</eric:sponsor>
<eric:sponsor>Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust</eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>56</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Community College Research Center. Available from: CCRC Publications. Teachers College, Columbia University, 525 West 120th Street Box 174, New York, NY 10027. Tel: 212-678-3091; Fax: 212-678-3699; e-mail: ccrc@columbia.edu; Web site: http://www.tc.columbia.edu/ccrc</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>35</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>Yes</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rowbotham, Melodie A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Reports - Research</dc:type>
<dc:type>Numerical/Quantitative Data</dc:type>
<dc:type>Tests/Questionnaires</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'>Southern Illinois University, Illinois Education Research Council</dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Continued employment and advancement for faculty members depends upon growth in teaching practices; thus, there is a need for faculty across all disciplines to understand best instructional practices and the strategies that develop effective teaching behaviors and skills. While faculty members at the university level are considered experts in their field of study, many may not have been trained in practices of effective teaching, how to share their expertise, or how to improve their teaching. The induction and mentoring of faculty members is often overlooked in higher education, but many faculty members report they struggle with the teaching aspects of their responsibilities (Sorcinelli, 2000). Creation and evaluation of a faculty development program can aid in the formation of best instructional practices and increase the competency of faculty in meeting the challenges of educating students. The changing demands on faculty members, under-developed teaching skills, increased attention to student learning and teaching, and decreased satisfaction with teaching spurred the development of the current project. This study examined the relationship of faculty development on teaching to faculty self-assessment of teaching skills and their teacher self-efficacy. Appended are: (1) Summer Immersion Schedule; and (2) Welcome &amp;amp; Overview of Faculty Development.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563500</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Faculty Development on Teacher Self-Efficacy, Skills and Perspectives. Policy Research: IERC FFR 2015-1</dc:title>
<dc:source>Illinois Education Research Council</dc:source>
<eric:citation></eric:citation>
<dc:date>2015-11-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn></eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience>Teachers</dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>28</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>Illinois Education Research Council. Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Campus Box 1064, Edwardsville, IL 62026. Tel: 866-799-4372; Tel: 618-650-2840; Fax: 618-650-2425; e-mail: ierc@siue.edu; Web site: http://www.siue.edu/ierc</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'></dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount>35</eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>ERIC</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preschool Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Majors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dulski-Bucholz, Andrea L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Professional identity development encompasses concepts of personal identity and self-efficacy while continued education supports a teacher&apos;s change in perspective and practices leading to professional growth. A combination of motivation and personal goals guide teachers&apos; behaviors as they interact within their social and cultural environments. The purpose of this multiple case study was to understand how kindergarten teachers perceive interactions in social, organizational, and academic environments to gain personal perspectives of barriers and supports that influence a decision to pursue or not pursue an advanced degree in education as well as their ideologies about continued formal education. With limited research specific to kindergarten teachers and professional development or their interest in graduate degree obtainment, the need to identify perceived barriers or supports kindergarten teachers have about pursuing an advanced degree was identified. The need to raise awareness of practices that tend to marginalize this population of educators was an additional focus of the study. Six kindergarten teachers participated in semi-structured interviews and written communications that reflectively provided insights about their choice of obtaining or not obtaining an advanced degree. All participants found time and money most concerning to continue their professional growth and development in an advanced degree program, but it was intrinsic motivation from participants who had advanced degrees that helped them overcome perceived barriers in their quest to obtain an advanced degree. Results suggest that dialogue with others in and outside of the workplace and in the academic environment provided interest and engagement in learning when topics were relevant and applicable to the kindergarten teachers&apos; professional positions. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563501</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>No Teachers Left Behind: A Qualitative Study of the Perceived Needs and Barriers That Kindergarten Teachers Face While Pursuing Advanced Degrees</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2490-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>178</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601367</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Users (Information)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computational Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reputation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Item Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Guo, Lifan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As we witness the prosperity of the social media in the past few years, and feel the explosion of &amp;quot;user-generated content&amp;quot; on the Internet, there is little question that we have entered an era of Big Data. Those social media sites, such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Quora and Twitter have been important sources for a wide spectrum of users. Mushrooming numbers of tasks, such as community detection, personalized message recommendation and sentiment analysis, have become more important under such scenario. While many researches wish to use standard text mining tools to understand social media data, the heterogeneity and restricted length of data, prevents them from directly applying those tools. Among those tools, topic modeling (Blei D. , 2003) (Hofmann, 2009) (Steyvers, 2007), a type of probabilistic and statistical model for discovering the abstract &amp;quot;topics&amp;quot; that occur in a collection of documents, draw a lot of interests in recent ten years. Topic model can uncover the hidden structure in document collections and help us develop new ways to search, browse and summarize large archives of texts. Directly applying topic model to social media data, however, is not straightforward for the following reasons: (1) social-media data are essentially unstructured and include heterogeneous data types, such as text, clicks, votes and so on, while traditional topic model are used to analyze structured data, like archives of books, journals, and newspapers; (2) compared to focus on discovering topics, the purpose of using social media data is more complex, such as reliable information detection, sentiment detection, and recommendation. In other words, discovered topics are just intermediate results for further use; (3) traditional topic modeling technology assumes that words in documents are drawn independently from a set of topics and documents are identically distrusted in the corpus. Such an independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.) assumption, however, often does not hold in reality. Further, the i.i.d. assumption ignores semantic information existed on web. Therefore, it is reasonable to incorporate the existing knowledge into current unsupervised topic modeling in the purpose of semantically enhancing topic modeling technology. To address the facing challenges, this dissertation first proposes a semantically enhanced topic modeling framework that does not rely on independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.) assumption through utilizing existing knowledge. Experiments show that this framework enhanced current topic models since they are able to employ the relations of words to achieve better results compared to other traditional topic modeling methods. Second, we extend the framework into social media data targeting two research questions: 1) How to detect reliable authority and content information in community question answering? 2) How to enhance recommender system with items&apos; reviews in communities. To answer the first question, we effectively extend LDA model to model the question and answers from different topic distribution in community question answering through semantic correlations between terms. Our model outperforms the model that directly apply LDA model to the same question and the model without enhanced semantic correlations. Also our model can utilize the topical information from questions, answers, questioner and answerer, in the purpose of detecting domain authority and reliable contents. Last but not least, we apply our model to recommender system. We propose an innovative concept, namely Item Social Reputation (ISR), to enhance current recommender system. Our model is to add another social dimension to items, in the purpose of effectively improving conversion rate of items recommendations. Furthermore, we can automatically determine the number of ISR of a certain item. Our experiments outperform the-state-of-the-art algorithms in the domain of sentiment analysis. Besides, our model shows potentials to be used to design a new interface of recommender systems. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563502</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Semantically Enhanced Topic Modeling and Its Applications in Social Media</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Drexel University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2493-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>101</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601370</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Formative Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hinze, Laurie E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>As the online education environment continues to grow and evolve, a greater understanding of faculty perception of the influence of course design features on providing feedback will inform course design decisions and suggest future improvements in the design and facilitation of online courses. This dissertation explored faculty feedback practices and the impact of course design features on the tools and instructional strategies faculty choose to provide effective and efficient feedback. A qualitative case study was conducted with faculty participants who teach online and also have experience related to curriculum or course design gained through online course development, training, or professional development. Participants were selected who had taught online within the past 12 months at a full or part-time status. This study utilized interviews with open-ended questions, and a review of feedback examples to collect and analyze data on faculty perception of feedback delivery practices. Overall findings point to preferences for a formative assessment design approach, use of elaborative feedback, and feedback to individuals and groups of students. Course design features faculty perceived as influential in a formative assessment approach included scaffolding of assignments to support a framework that provides multiple reinforcement opportunities. This study&apos;s findings also provided insight on faculty use of strategies and tools in a course designed with a formative assessment approach to provide effective and efficient feedback. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563503</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Feedback Practices: Faculty Perception on the Influence of Course Design on Feedback Delivery in Higher Education Online Classrooms</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-303-524-981</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>97</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601372</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Definitions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Severe Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expertise</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Response</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hollingshead, Aleksandra K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>While a great deal has been written about the complexities of engagement for learners without severe disabilities, there is less for students with severe disabilities. Engagement as a complex construct, consisting of behavioral, cognitive, and emotional components (Finn &amp;amp; Zimmer, 2012; Fredricks, Blumenfeld, &amp;amp; Paris, 2004; Skinner &amp;amp; Pitzer, 2012) must be addressed as conversations continue to grow around instructional practices for these learners. Traditionally, in the literature on students with severe disabilities engagement has been defined in behavioral terms. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of the experts in the field of severe disabilities on the phenomenon of engagement. Research question guiding this study was the following: How do the experts in the field of severe disabilities conceptualize cognitive and emotional engagement of students with severe disabilities? The qualitative data for the study included verbatim transcripts from 23 semi-structured interviews with the experts in the field of severe disabilities. This study was approached from a theoretical perspective of the transcendental phenomenology of Husserl. Textural, structural, and composite descriptions were constructed first on the individual participant level, and then across all participants. The phenomenological analysis resulted in the essence of the phenomenon of engagement. The findings were broken into four major sections: the essence of engaging instructional environment, the essence of cognitive engagement, the essence of emotional engagement, and the essence of broadly conceptualized engagement. The essence of engaging instructional environment was organized into themes of inclusive education, contextual engagement prerequisites, and meaningfulness of instruction. The essence of cognitive engagement was complex and revealed differences in experts&apos; theoretical frameworks. The major themes of cognitive engagement referred to the academic responding, learning outcomes, engagement being more than participation, meaningfulness, and measurement. The essence of emotional engagement was described by the factors that influence emotional engagement, the concepts of expressing emotions beyond language skills, and concerns about defining and measuring emotional engagement. Finally, the essence of broadly conceptualized engagement was described by the examples of experts&apos; experiences and by the concept that measurement of engagement of students with severe disabilities needs to be individualized. The discussion contained a synthesis of the findings and the connections with the extant literature. Implications for future research and practice are discussed. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563504</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Broadening the Definition of Engagement for Students with Severe Disabilities: A Phenomenological Study of the Experts in the Field</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2499-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>163</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601373</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Objectives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Benefits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Washington-Brown, Bianca</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Journey to College and Career (JTCC) is a PreK-12 program implemented at the research site to help students graduate from high school and plan for their future. JTCC had not been evaluated for its effectiveness at the research site regarding high school retention by determining (a) whether the goals and objectives of JTCC were being met and (b) trends in high school completion rates from its implementation to the present. The purpose of this project study was to provide educational stakeholders such as teachers, counselors, administrators, and test coordinators with recommendations for the program and strategies for improving high school retention. The conceptual framework for this project was based on the program logic model of program evaluation theory. The guided questions asked whether there were measurable impacts of JTCC&apos;s strengths and/or limitations on student retention. Stratified purposeful sampling was used to select 6 stakeholders based on their role in JTCC program implementation. A program evaluation was performed and data were collected through (a) stakeholder observations during JTCC stakeholder leadership meetings, (b) individual stakeholder interviews, (c) a review of the JTCC program document, and (d) public records to identify trends in high school completion rates. Data analysis for the evaluation of JTCC was recursive in nature employing repetitious coding methods to organize information. The findings of this study showed positive trends in high school completion rates from initial JTCC implementation to present and goals and objectives of JTCC have been met. Positive social change will stem from recognition among all stakeholders of the importance of high school retention rates and improvements to JTCC. Potential JTCC benefits to the participating school district are higher high school student graduation and retention rates. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563505</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Program Evaluation of a College and Career Program Created to Improve High School Retention</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3649-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>271</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601913</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Turkish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nouns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structural Analysis (Linguistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phrase Structure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Form Classes (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intonation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suprasegmentals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nagai, Miho</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation examines the syntactic positions of nominal arguments in Turkish, looking at Turkish clausal structure based on Aktionsart (aspectual) properties (e.g. Vendler 1967) of (dynamic) predicates from the perspective of Antisymmetry (Kayne 1994). It has been argued that indefinite/non-specific arguments appear syntactically in lower positions than definite/specific arguments in some languages. While definite/specific arguments can be scrambled away from their base positions, indefinite/non-specific ones stay in situ (e.g. de Hoop 1992; Diesing 1992; Kornfilt 1984). Even though previous studies have shown that in Turkish specific arguments appear syntactically higher than non-specific arguments (e.g. Kennelly 1994; Zidani-Erothlu 1997; Kelepir 2001), the question of where exactly they appear within a particular syntactic domain has not been clearly addressed. Based on the syntactic position and the behavior of Turkish nominals and (low) adverbs, I argue that a bare internal argument does not occur in the complement position of a verb; rather, it occurs in the specifier position of VP (cf. Larson 1988). The current proposal has important implications for Turkish clausal architecture: (i) Aktionsart (aspectual) properties of predicates play a crucial role in determining their syntactic structures, (ii) there is an aspectual projection (AspP) in accomplishments/activities, but not in achievements; this study thus provides evidence that the Vendlerian/Dowtian distinction between accomplishments and achievements is syntactically real, and (iii) clause structure obeys (a weak version of) Antisymmetry. This study also provides implications for the relation between syntax and information structure. I show that the syntax-prosody boundary is associated with the semantic boundary between the presuppositional and the non-presuppositional interpretations, which is (at) the edge of vP. Crucially, the edge of vP serves as the boundary for both prosody and presuppositionality (at least in Turkish). This syntactic boundary/domain interacts with the information structure where topic/focus elements in discourse contexts are placed in particular syntactic position/domains. Languages use different linguistic cues/strategies in the realization of topic/focus. Such linguistic signals are typically the same as the signals for marking grammatical functions (e.g. case morphology, agreement, word order, and so on). In the case of Turkish, definite/specific DPs (and topics) occur above TP (SpecTP/SpecTopP) and indefinite/non-specifics (foci) occur within vP (SpecvP and SpecVP) (or a immediately pre-verbal position). Those particular syntactic specifier positions are clearly associated with the role of topic-comment/information structure, not just grammatical functions. It has been shown from Turkish data that syntactic positions of nominals (scrambling/word order) and prosodic prominence interplay in order to signal and maintain the topic-comment/information structure, which can also be observed across languages (such as German and Russian). Both word order and prosody are necessary to realize the information structure in Turkish; thus, neither syntax nor prosody should be reduced. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563506</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Antisymmetry Account of the Syntactic Positions of Nominal Arguments in Turkish: Implications for Clausal Architecture</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3690-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>203</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601935</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African American Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Retirement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culturally Relevant Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moncree-Moffett, Kareem</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this empirical study was to explore the lived experiences of African American retired female teachers who have prior experience with educating urban African American students in public schools. Also explored are the experiences of active African American female teachers of urban African American students and comparisons are analyzed. The research questions explore how retired African American educators perceived and describe their experiences with urban students and how their experiences can be used to improve teacher training programs designed to help teachers adapt to school reform. Conceptually, this study was framed within the context that stories are an effective way to communicate experiences, as supported by Dewey and Erickson. Data was collected through a series of interviews. Initially, a line by line analysis was conducted on the responses of 6 respondents, 3 retired and 3 active African American women, who were chosen from a large metropolitan area based upon their designation as retirees and their willingness to participate. Each interview question was coded for specific information. Each code was derived as a result of repetitive analysis with a goal of identifying patterns and drawing out as much information as possible about the respondents&apos; lived experiences with urban educational. The results of the study suggest that listening to retirees is an effective way to evaluate previous pedagogues and practices, from the perspectives of those who lived through them, information about how they were implemented. The retirees were eager to use their experiences to convey messages of hope and give advice to pre-service and active teachers about strategies to use when adapting to educating urban African American students. This study contributes to positive social change by providing suggestions to improve professional development programs, which could lead to better teaching experiences for pre-service and active teachers and higher recruitment and retention rates for minority educators. Suggestions from this study also introduce methods that can positively impact interaction with this generation of urban students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563507</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Successfully Educating Our African-American Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2511-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>158</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601381</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Program Divisions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Alrehaili, Bakheet Wasel</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Saudi Arabia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The main objective of this study was to investigate the attitudes of undergraduate mathematics students in Saudi Arabia towards online mathematics education. Comparisons were made among male, female, underclassmen, and upperclassmen undergraduate mathematics students at the University of Tabuk (UT). Of 161 students enrolled in the mathematics program, 118 mathematics students responded to the survey. The sample consisted of 57 male and 61 female students. A 2 x 2 ANOVA test was used to reveal any statistically significant differences between the various groups based on gender and educational level. The findings showed that underclassmen did not differ significantly from upperclassmen in their attitudes toward online mathematics, male students did not differ significantly from female students in their attitudes toward online mathematics, and there was no significant interaction between educational level and gender in terms of the students&apos; attitudes toward online mathematics education. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563508</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Undergraduate Mathematics Students&apos; Attitudes toward Using E-Learning in Saudi Arabia</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3712-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>100</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601948</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Consolidated Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School District Size</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expenditures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dunlap, James A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined whether or not enrollment, poverty rate, and district type could be used to predict cost and achievement, as measured on the Illinois Standards Achievement Test and Prairie State Achievement Exam, at the building and district levels within the state of Illinois. This study provides quantitative data that will aid educational leaders and policy makers in making decisions related to the appropriateness of consolidation as related to the factors of enrollment, poverty rate, and district type. This study revealed that these factors have varying relationships with the outcomes. All were significant predictors at some level. The most influential predictor, however, was always poverty rate in outcomes where it was a significant predictor, which included all outcomes related to student achievement. Enrollment, in cases where it was a significant predictor, was typically the predictor that had the least impact on the outcome. District type was often a significant predictor, with an indicated increase of scores in elementary districts as opposed to unit districts and an increased cost for elementary and high school districts as opposed to unit districts. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563509</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Appropriateness of Consolidation in Illinois: A Study of the Impact of Poverty, District Type, and Size on Expenditures and Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3720-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>148</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601956</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bachelors Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nwabuebo, Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This quantitative correlational study investigated the relationship between trait emotional intelligence (EI) and academic achievement as evident by Grade Point Average (GPA) among senior Black students enrolled in Baccalaureate Science nursing (BSN) programs within the United States. Participants were invited via the Internet to volunteer for the study. A sample of 60 participants dispersed over 17 states volunteered for the study. Inclusion criteria were students who self-identified as being Black, students who were seniors in BSN programs within the United States, and students who were at least 18 years of age. Participants were asked to self-report GPA, complete a demographic questionnaire, and complete the TEIQue- SF (quantitative measurement of trait EI). Participation in the study was voluntary and the identities of participants remained anonymous. Information that could be used to identify participants was not collected. The methodology used was quantitative survey, and statistical software (SPSS) was used for data analysis. The study investigated the relationship between trait EI and GPA, trait EI and gender, and trait EI and age. The statistical findings of the study revealed that there was no relationship between trait EI and GPA, there was no relationship between trait EI and gender; there was no difference in trait EI between gender; and there was no relationship between trait EI and age. It is important to review current literature for other tools that can measure EI among Black students enrolled in BSN nursing programs. The recommendations are for the study to be replicated among students entering nursing programs and students in specific geographic locations, as well as collection of data face-to-face instead of via the Internet using more than one quantitative measure of EI. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563510</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Emotional Intelligence and Academic Achievement among Senior Black Students Enrolled in Baccalaureate Nursing Programs: Implications for Nursing Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2515-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>167</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601383</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Databases</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hannan, Daniel D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of the study was to address a gap in the scholarly literature about one of the factors related to the Global Digital Divide by expanding the body of generalizable knowledge about the relationship between national culture attitudes about information and communications technology (ICT) acceptance and use (A&amp;amp;U) and national ICT use behavior across time. A quantitative quasi-experimental non-equivalent groups design was used as the basis for this research. Bivariate correlation analysis was conducted for 64 combinations of use behaviors and attitudes that were drawn from two secondary data sources; the first source was the World Values Survey database, and the second source the International Telecommunications Union ICT database. The study findings consistently suggest that there is a significant relationship between national culture attitudes about ICT A&amp;amp;U and national ICT use behavior across time and within specific periods. Furthermore, the findings suggest that at any point in time, where national culture attitudes about ICT A&amp;amp;U are the strongest, national ICT use behaviors will be the lowest, and where national culture attitudes about ICT A&amp;amp;U are the most neutral, national ICT use behaviors will be the highest. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563511</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Reaching Information Society Targets: Do National Culture Attitudes about ICT Acceptance and Use Matter?</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3724-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>378</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601960</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Information Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Governance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adoption (Ideas)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Structural Equation Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Least Squares Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Path Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Usability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Norms</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Climate</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Parker, Sharon L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research explored IT governance framework adoption, leveraging established IS theories. It applied both the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the technology, organization, environment (TOE) models. The study consisted of developing a model utilizing TOE and TAM, deriving relevant hypotheses. Interviews with a group of practitioners piloted a four-page Web-based survey, which was then deployed to large groups via social media and email. Statistical analysis approaches included SPSS, Excel, and the primary tool SmartPLS, which leverages the second generation statistical approaches of structural equation modeling - partial least squares (SEM-PLS). This path modeling technique measured the relationships between the independent and dependent latent variables of the research model. The results illustrated the strength of the model. The relevance of the core TAM model was validated. Hypotheses pertaining to the impact of perceived usefulness on intent were strongly supported. The aspect of ease of use was also supported. Hence, TAM was confirmed as an appropriate theory to provide insight into the adoption of IT governance frameworks. The study also found that organizational norms and support had a significant relationship with intent to adopt. The hypotheses that TOE factors influenced adoption were not strongly supported in this study. These aspects may nevertheless prove more material in a broader and less homogenous population. The other finding was that organizations had implemented tailored frameworks, not a single standard framework. The majority had established governance in some areas, although not throughout, while very few indicated that there was none in place. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563512</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Exploration of the Factors Influencing the Adoption of an IS Governance Framework</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2517-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>165</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601384</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teamwork</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Interests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lauridsen, Barbara L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (West Coast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this research was to determine if the effectiveness of technology education can be significantly increased through use of team-based activities including both real-time team encounters and results-driven team assignments. The research addresses this purpose by examining perceptions regarding effectiveness of team-based learning in several degree programs in Information Technology education. Survey data was gathered from adult students about their experience with recent team assignments. All participants were enrolled at a large private non-profile university on the west coast within the School of Engineering, Technology and Media. The Team Work Survey was administered and hosted on the Survey Monkey website and released to about 200 courses in programs for a Bachelor of Science or a Master of Science degree. Over four periods, survey responses were returned for 96 learners enrolled in undergraduate courses and 126 learners enrolled in graduate courses. The researcher was granted permission by DiFonzo (2010) to use a survey instrument adapted and piloted that was based on an earlier Team Performance Survey originated by Peters (1997) who developed, validated and determined its reliability. Several comparisons were made using statistical analysis to determine the interesting patterns relevant to this research. The interpretation of findings included evidence that team effectiveness was indeed positively aligned with team members&apos; perceptions about ability to learn, with their interest in the topic and the motivation of individual members to commit time and energy to the team assignments. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563513</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Is Information Technology Education Betters Learned in Teams? An Exploratory Study of Teamwork Effectiveness at a Higher Education Institution</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3728-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>206</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601964</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Biographies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Presidents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scholarship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moser, Drew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined Ernest L. Boyer&apos;s life (1928-1995), career, and influence on higher education. Scholar, administrator, education reformer, devoted Christian, husband and parent, Boyer was acknowledged by some as one of the most influential leaders in higher education of the twentieth century (Bradley &amp;amp; Smith, 1995; Carnegie Foundation, 1996; Coye, 1997, Reid-Wallace, n.d.). Ernest Boyer held prominent positions of educational leadership spanning three decades. As former chancellor of the State University of New York System (1971-1977), United States Commissioner of Education during the Carter administration (1977-1979), and President of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1979-1995), Boyer&apos;s career was devoted to public education in America, yet little scholarship has focused on the historical impact of his influence, especially in the context of higher education. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563514</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>To Lift the Leaden-Eyed: Ernest Boyer&apos;s Life and Career in Higher Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3733-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>231</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601969</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Human Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Input Output Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Programming</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>O&apos;Horo, Neal O.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this quantitative survey study was to test the Leontief input/output theory relating the input of IT certification to the output of the English-speaking U.S. human resource professional perceived IT professional job performance. Participants (N = 104) rated their perceptions of IT certified vs. non-IT certified professionals&apos; job performance. Presented identical, ordinal Likert-type scale questions twice, participants rated 21 previously validated IT professional Behavioral Rating Scale technical, managerial, and people factor skills: once for the IT certified professionals and once for the non-IT certified professionals. Cross-tabulations were calculated for each skill, comparing the IT-certified rating to the non-IT certified rating. Symmetric lambdas, chi-square statistics, Pearson&apos;s Rs, and Spearman&apos;s correlations were calculated, each with an observed significance of 0.000, thereby rejecting the null hypothesis that the HR professional perceived skill levels for the IT certified and non-IT certified professionals were the same. Two of the technical factor skill levels for the IT certified professionals, functional application knowledge and programming, were least likely to predict the skill levels for the non-IT certified professionals. The technical-functional application knowledge skill had a symmetric lambda of 0.30. Thirty percent of the time, the IT certified professional ratings predicted the non-IT certified professional ratings with a Pearson&apos;s R of 0.46 and a Spearman&apos;s correlation of 0.49. The technical programming skill had a symmetric lambda of 0.28. Twenty-eight percent of the time, the IT certified professional ratings predicted the non-IT certified professional ratings with a Pearson&apos;s R of 0.57 and a Spearman&apos;s correlation of 0.56. Thus, these two technical factor skills were the most likely perceived by the HR professionals as related to the IT certification. The result requires further study. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563515</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examination of Information Technology (IT) Certification and the Human Resources (HR) Professional Perception of Job Performance: A Quantitative Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3734-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>156</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601970</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Exercise</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physical Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Motion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Charter Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Males</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Style</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Perception</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Auditory Perception</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kinesthetic Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pritchard, Jan Teena</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tukeys Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The most basic and fundamental skill for academic success is the ability to read. The purpose of this 1-group pretest and posttest pre-experimental quantitative study was to investigate how a unique instructional approach, called &amp;quot;curriculum in motion&amp;quot; with an emphasis on therapeutic martial arts and Brain Gym exercises influenced reading scores for students diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The population for the study was from a small, inner-city charter school designed for ADHD students. The Northwest Education Association (NWEA) standardized test was the instrument used to gather reading achievement scores prior to participation in curriculum in motion (nontraditional physical education) and post curriculum in motion. The sample population of approximately 50 male students (age = 13 to = 22 years) diagnosed with ADHD and a reading disorder. The students were from low-income families and lived in an inner-city environment. All participants had a standardized test administrated prior to any school-related physical activity. Approximately 4 weeks after participating in curriculum in motion, the NWEA test was re-administered to the same sample group. A quantitative inquiry utilizing an analysis of variance test was used to yield a comparison of the scores from the NWEA test pre and post curriculum in motion. The Multiple Intelligences Inventory (McKenzie, 2013) and Visual Auditory Kinesthetic Learning Styles (Clark, 2004) surveys were given to participants to determine not only their personal learning styles, but also whether curriculum in motion had a greater impact on learning styles. A one-way analysis of variance with a Tukey&apos;s honestly significant difference post hoc test was used to compare kinesthetic students&apos; and visual/auditory students&apos; reading scores upon completion of curriculum in motion. The data were compiled to determine how and to what degree reading scores changed as a result of participating in curriculum in motion. The results showed there is no statistical difference between the pretest and posttest NWEA scores for students with ADHD but reading scores did increase for ADHD students participating in curriculum in motion. However, when comparing reading scores between visual-auditory and kinesthetic learners the results showed scores for ADHD non-kinesthetic learners increased as a result of curriculum in motion but ADHD kinesthetic learners did not have the same positive affect. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563516</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effects of Curriculum in Motion on Reading Scores for Male Students with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2520-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>134</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601386</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Handheld Devices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telecommunications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Older Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adoption (Ideas)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Usability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Difficulty Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reneau, James M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>South Africa</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Africa</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research looked at the process of the diffusion of an innovation in the context of smartphones with American senior citizens. The subject of diffusion, or spread of a technology, is a rich and varied topic with more than 60 years of research. Much of this diffusion research does not go beyond the study of the original acceptance of a new idea. An on-line and face-to-face questionnaire was used to collect data from 155 seniors on the entire process of diffusion. The questionnaire was adaptive in nature, focusing questions directly at participants based on where they were in the diffusion process. The scope of the study was limited to two areas: 1) to verify or refute the findings of the Senior Technology Acceptance &amp;amp; Adoption Model (STAM) in the setting of a more diverse population of seniors and the different technology of modern smartphones than the original small population of South African seniors using mobile-phones and 2) to look at the phenomenon of discontinuance of use after adoption. The results show that seniors exhibit a much broader range of influences, behaviors, and motivations than the STAM model showed. Confirmed usefulness, ease of use, and other facilitating conditions play a significant role in how a technology moved from mere use to either being fully accepted or finally rejected. This research adds to the body of knowledge regarding the diffusion of technology, specifically adoption in seniors. Many existing models did not include the complete process by shortening the initial exploration and ignoring the discontinuance. These issues have been specifically addressed in a newly proposed model, the Senior Innovation Domestication and Life-cycle Model (SIDLM). [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563517</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Examination of the Acceptance, Adoption, and Diffusion of Smartphone Devices with Senior Citizens</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2521-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>135</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601387</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Critical Incidents Method</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regular and Special Education Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Virtual Classrooms</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Based Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interaction Process Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Snyder, Kathleen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Coaching is a powerful tool for improving special education teachers&apos; use of evidence-based practices. Recent technological advances have great potential to influence the manner in which coaching is implemented. Virtual coaching is an innovative cycle of coaching that utilizes video-conferencing and bug-in-ear technology in internet-mediated environments to support teachers in their classrooms and with immediate feedback about their instructional practices. This type of coaching differs from traditional coaching practice, which typically relies on an observation and post-observation conference model of interaction between coaches and teachers. In the last decade, studies have investigated the potential of virtual coaching with bug-in-ear technology to impact specific teaching practices, with positive results. Little is known, however, about the nature of coaching and feedback in this virtual medium when the interactions between coaches and teachers are not predetermined or prescribed. Further, the studies investigating feedback via virtual bug-in-ear technology have not examined that practice in a larger cycle of coaching that includes post-lesson reflection. This study uses critical incident analysis to investigate the nature of interactions between teachers and coaches in a virtual context of coaching, which includes real-time responses to classroom events and instructional decision-making and collaborative reflection sessions. In addition, this study seeks to identify additional critical events that occur during the coaching sessions that may not be identified as critical incidents by the coaches or teachers. Data sources for this study include video of classroom coaching sessions, audio of collaborative reflections between teachers and coaches, written artifacts (i.e., emails, written reflections), and semi-structured interviews with participants. Analysis of the data revealed that the incidents identified during coaching sessions differed somewhat from those identified during collaborative reflection sessions. Coaching incidents involved instructional supports, communication, and praise. Incidents in collaborative reflections included instructional supports, communication, literacy, instructional content, and classroom logistics. Differences also existed in the manner in which different coach and teacher dyads addressed classroom incidents. These differences included identification during coaching sessions versus collaborative reflection and the depth of guidance provided to teachers about how to alter their instruction to address the critical incidents. Certain categories of critical incidents better suited to discussion in reflection sessions due to the depth of discussion needed to address any related instructional changes (e.g., technology). Other events could have been addressed during immediate feedback, but were either overlooked completely or addressed reflectively when an immediate impact on the classroom was no longer a possibility. The analysis indicated that both the immediate feedback through virtual bug-in-ear technology and the collaborative reflection after the lesson had an important role in the coaching process. Other important factors included the coaches&apos; experience and expertise related to the classroom setting and needs and the coaches&apos; comfort with and willingness to use the virtual bug-in-ear technology during coaching sessions. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563518</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining the Nature of Critical Incidents during Interactions between Special Education Teachers and Virtual Coaches</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2526-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>140</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601391</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Phonemes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Slavic Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Morphology (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intonation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suprasegmentals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Auditory Perception</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Acoustics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Task Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Listening</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Form Classes (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nouns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Silent Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ambiguity (Semantics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Priming</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stoyneshka-Raleva, Iglika</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation introduces and evaluates a new methodology for studying aspects of human language processing and the factors to which it is sensitive. It makes use of the phoneme restoration illusion (Warren, 1970). A small portion of a spoken sentence is replaced by a burst of noise. Listeners typically mentally restore the missing phoneme(s), reporting that they heard a complete utterance with the noise burst overlaid on it. Phoneme restoration is used in the present study to explore the role of prosodic phrasing, specifically the impact of a major prosodic break on the interpretation of a sentence where no other type of disambiguation remains. Materials are constructed so that the phoneme(s) that listeners indicate they had heard reveal which syntactic/semantic interpretation of the sentence they had computed. Two target constructions in Bulgarian are investigated in a series of experiments, using the same materials throughout: NP/S coordination as in (1) and RC attachment as in (2). The target items are originally disambiguated by morphological agreement: number agreement between subject and verb in (1), and gender agreement between the head noun and the relative pronoun in (2). The sentences in each pair differ with respect to one or more phonemes in the word on which the morphological disambiguation is encoded; these are the phonemes that are noise-replaced in the experimental materials. (Prosodic boundaries are indicated by ||.). (1) a. Nakraia sreshtnahme Ani || i Ivan i Mimi biaha vav vaztorg. In the end meet-past-1p.pl Ani and Ivan and Mimi were in ecstasy &amp;quot;In the end, we met Ani and Ivan and Mimi were in ecstasy.&amp;quot;. b. Nakraia sreshtnahme Ani i Ivan || i Mimi bese vav vaztorg. In the end meet-past-1p.pl Ani and Ivan and Mimi was in ecstasy &amp;quot;In the end, we met Ani and Ivan and Mimi was in ecstasy.&amp;quot;. (2) a. Podtseniha advokata || na pevitsata koiato kupi imenieto. underestimate-past lawyer-m of singer-f who-f buy-past estate-det &amp;quot;(They) underestimated the lawyer of the singer who=N2 bought the estate.&amp;quot;. b. Podtseniha advokata na pevitsata || kojto kupi imenieto. underestimate-past lawyer-m of singer-f who-m buy-past estate-det &amp;quot;(They) underestimated the lawyer of the singer who=N1 bought the estate.&amp;quot;. The alternative structures for both (1) and (2) are also disambiguated by the location of a major prosodic boundary, as shown. For the NP/S coordination a boundary after the first noun (1a) signals that only that noun (Ani) is the object of the first clause; a boundary after the second noun (1b) signals that the first two nouns (Ani and Ivan) form a coordinate object in the first clause. For the RC construction, a boundary after the first noun (2a) favors the interpretation that the RC modifies the second noun (the singer), whereas a boundary after the second noun (2b) favors RC modification of the entire complex NP (the lawyer of the singer). After noise-replacement of the disambiguating phonemes, only these prosodic boundaries differentiate the competing interpretations. Three different response tasks are employed to tap which phonemes listeners mentally restored. In a visual word choice task, participants indicate which of two words (e.g. biaha / bee in the case of (1)) they had &amp;quot;heard&amp;quot; in the stimulus sentence (Experiments 1a-c). In a sentence repetition task, participants repeat back the sentence after hearing it (Experiments 2a-b). In a sentence shadowing task, participants repeat back the sentence as they are listening to it (Experiments 3a-b). In all three tasks, responses confirmed that prosodic boundary location provided viable disambiguation of syntactic structure. However, the effect of prosody differed for the two constructions. Both prosodic contours disambiguated NP/S coordination equally well, but a break after the first noun was a stronger structural cue for RC attachment than a break after the second noun. These findings for Bulgarian comport well with data from more traditional methodologies on prosodic influences on coordination and RC attachment interpretation in other languages, thereby validating the sensitivity of the new methodology. A broader range of other ambiguities in Bulgarian were explored in a subsequent pilot experiment. Also, the original target constructions were tested in written form, with a simulated &amp;quot;ink blot&amp;quot; obscuring the morphological agreement. Two tasks were employed: silent reading with visual word choice (Experiments 4a-b) and silent reading with sentence repetition (Experiments 5a-b). Visual grouping of phrases disambiguated NP/S coordination quite effectively, but had little impact on RC attachment interpretation. The advantage of the phoneme restoration approach is that it is unobtrusive, resembling everyday listening in a partly noisy environment. It draws no attention to the presence of ambiguity or to the relevance of prosody, it does not interrupt the stimulus sentence, and no comprehension question intrudes between stimulus and response. It is equally well-suited to studies of parsing sensitivity to non-acoustic factors such as syntactic priming, discourse context or lexical frequencies. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563519</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Phoneme Restoration Methods Reveal Prosodic Influences on Syntactic Parsing: Data from Bulgarian</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3743-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>353</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601978</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Service Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Value Judgment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizenship Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Starr, Ruth E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this research study was to understand how college graduates used their service-learning experiences while in college to enhance their work lives after graduation. Service learning in higher education is a community-based, reciprocal approach using experiential education theories. Through service-learning activities associated with the course curriculum, learners develop good work habits that enhance their ability to become responsible, engaged participants in the workforce and in their community after graduation. This study examined the learners&apos; cultural perceptions, personal attitudes, and perceived value of their service-learning experiences after graduation. The Lowery conceptual learning model (Lowery, D., et al., 2006) was used to assess how service experiences influence developing character traits related to the individual&apos;s civic responsibility and the cultural awareness of the needs of others. This study used a cross-sectional descriptive mixed methods strategy to increase the scientific merit of the findings. The study results present a composite view of college graduates from service-learning classes taught in 2007 through 2012 in four Eastern Region Campus Compact schools. A short 20-question online survey and follow-up scripted interviews were used to gain insight about the graduates&apos; perceptions and attitudes regarding their academic course-related service-learning experiences. Issues raised by responders included the number of hours of service required, the amount of work needed to be accomplished in a short period of time, and the impact they had on the lives of others as a result of their service. While most responders agreed that their service-learning experiences helped them gain work experience and professional confidence, some suggested that their relationships with the service organization could have been improved with better training and orientation about the people they were serving. The graduates&apos; desire to continue volunteering after graduation is supported by their interests in pursuing careers in service occupations. The summary addresses some improvements to future practices and offers some recommendations for future research about service-learning programs. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563520</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Role Service-Learning Plays in the Transition from College to Work</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2529-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>144</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601393</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Personnel Workers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Philosophy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fraternities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Willis, Salatha T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to examine, understand, and describe the life, leadership, and influence of Dr. James Edward Scott on higher education and more specifically student affairs; as one of the most well-known and respected African American male chief student affairs officers in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Using a qualitative research approach as the method of research, this study utilized elements of inquiry to illuminate the experiences of Dr. James Edward Scott. For its biographical components, this study employed a narrative approach to qualitative research methodology to determine the realities that existed within Scott&apos;s leadership journey. A narrative approach was also utilized to frame chronologically the experiences and stories presented through the data collection process. In an effort to reveal Scott&apos;s leadership journey, this study examined leadership theories, philosophies, and development. Theories and philosophies--such as transformational leadership, authentic leadership, and learning leadership--were reviewed and analyzed as the main theoretical framework for leadership within this study. Leadership and management experiences of African Americans as well as the barriers, challenges, and organizational dynamics that influence their professional journey or career matriculation were also explored. The executive position of chief student affairs officer was also examined for its characteristics, role, and function, along with an overview of collegiate student affairs. Because Scott was a member of an historical African American Greek organization, literature emphasizing the leadership influence of African American Greek letter organizations was reviewed. Critical race theory (CRT) was also reviewed for its role in analyzing this study to understand Scott&apos;s experiences and stories. For Scott, his leadership was not a formality of his profession; it was a way of life demonstrated in his day-to-day interactions with people--not just with students and staff members, but individuals--within the communities in which he lived. When considering Northouse&apos;s (2010) trait versus process leadership, Scott&apos;s skill for goal-setting and planning for the future was not a biological imperative; it was mindset expressed in his words and translated through his actions (pp. 4-5). Scott&apos;s true leadership journey was not one of managerial idiosyncrasies that are often defined by paper pushing, budget calculation, and performance evaluation; it was one of the heart, with relationship ties and commitments that bind individuals and celebrate the accomplishments and innermost attributes of others, which in many cases were students, staff members, and colleagues. As an inspirational leader, Scott&apos;s legacy lives through many of the organizations for which he bestowed his talents: the University of Florida, Omega Psi Phi fraternity, and NASPA. In spite of Scott&apos;s awards and honors, his achievements in student affairs as a professional are only masked by his character and willingness to be in service to others. Ultimately, though Scott rose to a position of leadership and authority, his legacy lives beyond it and continues through the passion of others. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563521</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>James Edward Scott: The Leadership Journey of a Senior-Level African American Student Affairs Officer</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3748-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>269</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601983</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Error of Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bayesian Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Benchmarking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sarkar, Saurabh</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In the modern world information has become the new power. An increasing amount of efforts are being made to gather data, resources being allocated, time being invested and tools being developed. Data collection is no longer a myth; however, it remains a great challenge to create value out of the enormous data that is being collected. Data modeling is one of the ways in which data is being utilized. When we try to model a process or a system, it is crucial to have the right features, and thus, feature selection has become an essential part of data modeling. Yet often we have missing data, and in a worse scenario, the important features themselves may have considerable data missing. The challenge is to pick out the best features and yet accommodate the missing data. To address this problem, this dissertation introduces a cluster based feature selection process which is quite robust in handling missing data. The research extends the Minimum Expected Cost of Misclassification (MECM) based feature selection method to a very high dimensional dataset by using cluster based sampling methods. However, even though the cluster based sampling methods allow the MECM to scale to larger datasets, determining the optimal cluster size is still a challenge. This is the first issue that the dissertation aims to solve. The second area that the dissertation tries to address is the issue of handling missing data while doing feature selection by MECM based method. This area has not been studied extensively as feature selection itself, though missing data is witnessed quite often. The dissertation discusses an algorithm which enables the MECM to handle missing data. This approach is a probabilistic approach based on the distribution of most similar instances. The algorithm determines the probability of having the instance in the sampling cluster and then does a fractional count while evaluating the MECM. One of the challenges of this approach is to correctly estimate the probability of a missing point lying within the sampling cluster. The key lies in picking up the correct number of similar instances to calculate the probability. The dissertation also seeks to address this problem. The last part of the research contains a benchmark study to determine the effectiveness of the algorithm. A wrapper based feature selection method using Naive Bayesian and another method using the MECM without missing data algorithm are used simultaneously as benchmarks. The MECM missing data algorithm showed a significant improvement over the other two. Solving these problems is of great practical significance to data modeling. Instances with missing data might carry critical information; ignoring missing data during feature selection can have a cascading effect downstream when the final model is built. This research will enable us to choose better features which would in return improve the accuracy of the existing models. It will impact a broad range of applications from gene based medicine, fraud detection models, engineering, business and any field which uses feature selection as one of the components in model building process. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563522</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Feature Selection with Missing Data</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2574-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>109</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601418</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Job Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metropolitan Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Supervision</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compensation (Remuneration)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role Conflict</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Walker, Althea Rochelle</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Florida</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Florida</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study focused on assessing the levels of job satisfaction among peer evaluators in a large, metropolitan public K-12 school district in Florida. Peer evaluators were defined as former classroom teachers with five or more years of teaching experience who observe and evaluate teachers with two or more years of teaching experience. Seventy-eight peer evaluators participated in a quantitative study by completing a six-item demographical questionnaire and the Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS). The study measured peer evaluators&apos; levels of satisfaction based on demographical characteristics, including age, educational levels, and gender. The findings suggested that no significant differences were evident for satisfaction levels and age, education, or gender. Next, the study assessed the factors (ie: pay, supervision, or operating conditions) that influence job satisfaction. The results indicated that peer evaluators report higher levels of satisfaction for supervision than for compensation. Finally, the study measured the levels of job satisfaction between peer evaluators with different years of peer evaluating experience. The findings indicated that peer evaluators with more evaluating experience reported lower levels of satisfaction for the supervision subscale. Future research should explore potential role conflicts peer evaluators experience. Districts might consider reviewing their practices for recruiting and hiring peer evaluators. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563523</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining the Levels of Job Satisfaction among Peer Evaluators</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Keiser University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2581-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>83</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601422</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>After School Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Awards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recognition (Achievement)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yokley-Busby, Suzi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Nebraska</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California Achievement Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Nebraska</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>California Achievement Tests</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of attendance longevity participation in an after school program, attending one and two times or three times weekly for two years, designed to build intentional relationships and support academic success, on urban elementary school students&apos; achievement, attendance, and positive school awards. Independent variable attendance fidelity condition one was those students who attended the Hope Center for Kids after school program regularly scheduled after school activities one and two times weekly for two years (n = 9) and independent variable attendance fidelity condition two was those students who attended the Hope Center for Kids regularly scheduled after school activities three times weekly for two years (n = 10). Same urban school district control students (n = 11) did not participate in the after school program served as the study control group. The null hypothesis for between group California Achievement Test Normal Curve Equivalent posttest-only average and below average reading scores where F(2, 27) = 2.07, p = 0.145 was not rejected. Null hypotheses were also not rejected for between group California Achievement Test Normal Curve Equivalent posttest-only average range language scores where F(2, 27) = 1.09, p = 0.350 and between group California Achievement Test Normal Curve Equivalent posttest-only average range math scores where F(2, 27) = 0.38, p = 0.687. School attendance as measured by total end of the fifth-grade year overall absence totals were not statistically different where F(2, 27) = 0.65, p = 0.530 and school-wide awards and recognition as measured by end of the fifth-grade year overall awards presented totals were also congruent where ?[superscript 2](2, N = 48) = 0.591, p = 0.744. Findings suggest that even limited student participation in Hope Center for Kids after school program resulted in achievement, attendance, and earned awards consistent with the study&apos;s control group students who were not in need of these after school services. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563524</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Attendance Longevity in an after School Program, Designed to Build Intentional Relationships and Support Academic Success, on Urban Elementary Students&apos; Achievement, Attendance, and School Awards</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Nebraska at Omaha</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2585-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>90</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601426</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Deception</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Artificial Intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Interpretation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Merritts, Richard A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research has two facets within separate research areas. The research area of Belief, Desire and Intention (BDI) agent capability development was extended. Deception detection research has been advanced with the development of automation using BDI agents. BDI agents performed tasks automatically and autonomously. This study used these characteristics to automate deception detection with limited intervention of human users. This was a useful research area resulting in a capability general enough to have practical application by private individuals, investigators, organizations and others. The need for this research is grounded in the fact that humans are not very effective at detecting deception whether in written or spoken form. This research extends the deception detection capability research in that typical deception detection tools are labor intensive and require extraction of the text in question following ingestion into a deception detection tool. A neural network capability module was incorporated to lend the resulting prototype Machine Learning attributes. The prototype developed as a result of this research was able to classify online data as either &amp;quot;deceptive&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;not deceptive&amp;quot; with 85% accuracy. The false discovery rate for &amp;quot;deceptive&amp;quot; online data entries was 20% while the false discovery rate for &amp;quot;not deceptive&amp;quot; was 10%. The system showed stability during test runs. No computer crashes or other anomalous system behavior were observed during the testing phase. The prototype successfully interacted with an online data communications server database and processed data using Neural Network input vector generation algorithms within seconds. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563525</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Online Deception Detection Using BDI Agents</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2588-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>131</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601429</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Business</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participant Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Perigo, Levi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this dissertation, the author examined the capabilities of Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) in regard to replacing Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) as the internetworking technology for Medium-sized Businesses (MBs) in the Information Systems (IS) field. Transition to IPv6 is inevitable, and, thus, organizations are adopting this protocol to be prepared in it becoming the dominant internetworking protocol. The goal of the research was to develop a model for IS specialists to use with MBs in the transition from IPv4 to IPv6. To achieve this goal, the author performed a case study of ADTRAN Inc.&apos;s IPv6 implementation, using the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) framework. The SDLC methodology consists of five phases and was used to support the design, development, and implementation of the ADTRAN Inc. IPv6 solution. For Phase 1, the Research Phase, the author examined business requirements, administered a questionnaire, and recorded participant observation. In Phase 2, the Analysis Phase, the author analyzed the data from Phase 1 and created a functional and nonfunctional requirements list. For Phase 3, the Logical Design Phase, the author developed documentation and diagrams for the IPv6 implementation. In Phase 4, the Physical Design Phase, the author determined what internetworking hardware would be needed and where it should be deployed. For Phase 5, the Implementation Phase, the author completed the IPv6 network implementation. Finally, the author analyzed the data collected from this investigation. The use of the findings, in conjunction with the SDLC methodology, resulted in the ADTRAN Inc. Implementation model, which can be used by MBs of a similar size to ADTRAN Inc., when IPv6 transition initiatives are being considered. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563526</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Examination of the Design, Development, and Implementation of an Internet Protocol Version 6 Network: The ADTRAN Inc. Case Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2589-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>144</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601430</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shoemaker, Susan F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this qualitative, phenomenological study was to investigate, through interviews, secondary teachers&apos; perceptions of the level of the value, applicability, and implementation of skills learned within professional development offerings in the targeted school district. Non-probability, stratified, purposeful sampling was utilized to enlist secondary teachers as participants within the ABC school district. The principal research question in this study was: What are secondary teachers&apos; perceptions of the value, relevance, and implementation of the strategies learned in professional development opportunities offered in this district? There were many common characteristics of professional development reported as effective as well as those perceived as ineffective. In most of the situations discussed, administrators did not check to see if the teachers were implementing the information or strategies. Recommendations comprise planning professional development to include qualified facilitators with recent classroom experience; presentations with opportunities to observe modeled implementation and practice strategies; options for teachers to choose which trainings to attend; current information that is supported by research and evaluated by student achievement data; and accountability implementation of new skills and strategies to ensure use and fidelity of implementation. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563527</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teachers&apos; Perceptions of the Relevance and Usefulness of Professional Development</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Keiser University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2590-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>101</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601431</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Veterans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Veterans Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transitional Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pamphile, Murielle F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Military veterans preparing for new careers in the civilian world are pursuing higher educational degrees to fulfill career goals. The real-life experiences of veterans in the military are beneficial tools that can effectively enhance student veterans&apos; academic performance and success. As veterans&apos; enrollment continues to rise, veteran&apos;s academic success has become a priority for all collegiate institutions; as a result, there is an increased need to examine the services that higher educational institutions provide student veterans. In response to this need, Congress passed H.R. 4057, &amp;quot;Improving Transparency of Education Opportunities for Veterans Act of 2012,&amp;quot; which became effective on January 10, 2013. This study was an examination of student veterans&apos; perception of the transitional services and support systems in their higher educational setting in response to the transparency of services. The Act requires a centralized mechanism for tracking and publishing feedback from student veterans and State Approving Agencies (SAA) regarding the quality of educational practices. Findings from this phenomenological study provide transparency of the multifaceted services student veterans have available to influence academic persistence. Findings of this study support the perception of student veterans as an essential component for the transparency of transitional services and support services. The results provided insight on student veterans&apos; knowledge and use of services, which brings transparency to institutional services. Transparency will ensure institutional and governmental monitoring for ongoing improvement, including the increase of outreach to student veterans. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563528</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Military-Veteran Students&apos; Perceptions of College Transition and Support Systems</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Keiser University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2592-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>199</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601433</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Care Centers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Persons</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Infants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Toddlers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Eisenbrey, Taryn Caye</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This program evaluation focused on one year of Bridges to Tomorrow, a multi-year initiative designed by Metro United Way to better prepare at-risk children for academic success upon entering kindergarten. Bridges to Tomorrow provided three child care centers operating in at-risk neighborhoods with interventions that included a structured curriculum, professional mentors, annual evaluations of quality in every classroom, and a structured process with incentives for teachers to improve their skills. All six preschool classrooms in this study improved their overall scores from &amp;quot;minimal&amp;quot; range at pretest to &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; range at posttest, a substantial improvement for all classrooms. As a group, these preschool classrooms significantly improved their Total score and five of the six subscales. At pretest, six of the 11 infant and toddler classrooms were in the &amp;quot;minimal&amp;quot; range while five were in the &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; range. At posttest, only one classroom remained in the &amp;quot;minimal&amp;quot; range; 10 had achieved &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; range, a substantial improvement for four classrooms. As a group, these classrooms significantly improved their Total score and three of the seven subscales. Additionally, 11 teachers took part in focus groups. Teachers discussed a number of positive changes, provided input on the most helpful interventions, shared some ideas for improving the program, and two teachers from one center examined barriers to utilizing the program. These results were closely examined for explanations regarding why some quality scores did not improve. Recommendations were also provided both specific to the Bridges to Tomorrow program and future research regarding quality of child care. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563529</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Creating a Center of Choice: A Program Evaluation of Higher Quality Child Care</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Psy.D. Dissertation, Spalding University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2666-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>131</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601437</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Art Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Art Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Workload</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measures (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Polczynski, Casey Marie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pupil Control Ideology Form</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Pupil Control Ideology Form</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 2012, nearly 50% of elementary visual art teachers were itinerant. Itinerant visual art teachers face unique challenges such as traveling between multiple schools that may influence their teaching effectiveness. Despite these prominent challenges, little research has addressed the relationship between the loss of teacher efficacy from working in multiple schools and pupil control beliefs. To address this gap, this quantitative descriptive examined the relationship among 3 independent variables of itinerancy, number of students taught per week, and number of classes taught per week on 2 dependent variables of teacher efficacy and pupil control beliefs. Guided by theories of teacher efficacy and pupil control ideology, data were collected online via SurveyMonkey from 88 participants including a confidential demographic survey, the Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale, and the Pupil Control Ideology. Multiple regression and correlational analyses were the primary statistical strategies applied in this study. Results revealed 2 significant findings indicating that (a) non itinerant elementary visual art teachers exhibited higher overall teacher efficacy beliefs than did itinerant art teachers ( p = 0.03), and (b) a negative correlation existed between pupil control beliefs and teacher efficacy (r = -0.35). Investigating itinerancy and teacher efficacy are important to art supervisors, school administrators, and art teachers who desire quality and continuity in art instruction. This study contributes to social change and the existing literature by identifying itinerancy as a significant factor influencing teacher efficacy beliefs of elementary visual art teachers. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563530</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Virginia&apos;s Elementary Art Educators&apos; Beliefs of Teacher Efficacy and Pupil Control</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2847-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>164</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601539</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hart, Kimberly S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teacher collaboration is essential for the improvement of student achievement and teacher performance. Classrooms comprise a variety of learners with individual learning needs that must be met for effective learning to take place. In the past, teachers have taught in isolation without the assistance of collaboration. A professional learning community (PLC) is a model that promotes staff professional development as a critical improvement to student learning. This type of professional development is most effective when it is collaborative, collegial, and involves inquiry and problem solving. The theoretical framework that guided this study was collective inquiry, which postulates that when educators work collaboratively in recurring cycles of collective inquiry and action research, they achieve better results for the students they serve. An explanatory case study design was used to investigate how teachers use collaboration in PLCs to enhance instruction and student achievement. Three teams of teachers from 4 academic disciplines were interviewed and observed. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and data were analyzed using an inductive process to identify themes. Findings indicated that teacher performance and student achievement are positively affected by the opportunities of collaboration. One recommendation would be for school personnel to conduct a book study about professional learning communities such as texts that describe how PLCs changed schools from low performance to high performance schools. The resulting project and recommendations may promote a deeper understanding about how structured PLCs promote teacher discussion and reflection that may lead to improved future instructional strategies, teaching methods, and planning of authentic assessments. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563531</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teacher Collaborative Planning in Professional Learning Communities</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2736-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>123</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601483</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Military Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Demography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ferby, Clifford Jerome</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many soldiers are interested in pursuing their college education but discover there are barriers and roadblocks that hamper their ability to take college courses. The notion of taking the classroom to the soldiers within their military unit should be studied further. The reason for this research was to improve soldiers&apos; success in pursuing their college education during their off-duty time. Research has shown a number of universities have initiated soldier-only introductory classes or classes with their peers for credit. This study was an action research study utilizing an intervention that offered classes within the soldiers&apos; unit with the intent to increase the likelihood soldiers will make significant strides towards attending college classes. The setting for the intervention was within soldiers&apos; military unit. A mixed methodology was utilized during this research. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze the quantitative information collected and thematic analysis was utilized for the qualitative information collected. A total of 20 soldiers participated in the study. Some of the soldiers had taken college courses while serving on active duty and others had never taken a college-level course. The demographics of the soldiers participating in the study were very diverse. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563532</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Action Research Intervention for Improving Soldiers&apos; Success in Their Off-Duty Education Pursuits</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3590-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>73</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601869</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Wellness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Black Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Heart Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Related Fitness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Exercise</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nutrition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Smoking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stress Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypertension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Body Composition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Promotion</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Romano, Victor Owen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Wellness is something that needs to be taught, encouraged, and valued within a community for it to be obtainable. Preventable health disparities attributed to lack of physical activity continue to be a burden in predominantly African-American communities. Preventative wellness programming has been shown to be successful for students, as well as employees, as long as it is culturally relevant, especially when working within a predominantly African-American population. The purpose of this study was to establish a baseline multidimensional analysis of wellness in correspondence with the opening of a new wellness center. Data were gathered from employees and students from a small private university by use of MicroFit software in three categories: health history, wellness profile, and fitness profile. Health History showed that students were at an elevated risk for developing cardiovascular disease, while high percentages (18.6%) of employees were already receiving treatment for cardiovascular disease. Wellness profile indicated that employee wellness was better than student wellness in all five categories that were analyzed (exercise, nutrition, safety, stress, and tobacco). Combination of staff and student campus wellness analysis showed that exercise and nutrition were the two aspects of wellness that tied for the worst scores (41 of 100). Overall campus fitness data indicated that blood pressure was pre-hypertensive (133/81), aerobic fitness was in the 30th percentile (VO2max 29.3 ml/kg/min), and BMI was 28.0. Other fitness tests were within normal standards. Data indicated that exercise and nutrition habits are areas that need to be improved. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563533</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Creating a Culture of Wellness: A Baseline Multidimensional Analysis of Wellness at a Small Private Historically Black College and University</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Gardner-Webb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6010-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>117</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602768</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bachelors Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Costs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Marketing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Admissions Officers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Recruitment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Meece, Jeffrey Scott</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explored variables that impacted college choices of traditionally aged new freshmen who chose to attend two-year colleges in central Wisconsin with the intention of completing bachelor&apos;s degrees. Participants in this study were traditionally aged 18 and 19 years-old first-time freshmen who attended one of five two-year schools in Wisconsin. A quantitative survey instrument was used to evaluate variables that respondents indicated as important in the decision to attend either a University of Wisconsin College (UWC) or a Wisconsin Technical College (WTC). Results indicated that cost and location were the most important college choice variables for the students from the UWC schools. Program and degree availability, cost and location were the most important variables for the WTC respondents. The sensitivity of both groups to cost and location suggests that any state initiative to combine the two systems into one community college system must consider the effect of merger on access to higher education. Results from this study offer admissions and higher education marketing professionals guidance on the variables to emphasize when recruiting prospective students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563534</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Determinants of College Choice for Students Attending Two-Year Colleges in Wisconsin</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Edgewood College</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4196-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>207</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602302</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Funding Formulas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Registration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developmental Studies Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Frogge, George</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 2010, the Tennessee Higher Education Commission changed its allotment of funding to an outcomes-based system (Tennessee Higher Education Commission, 2012, p.1). This meant that universities and colleges received money based on factors including associate degrees, certifications, and job placement rather than on enrollment, as institutions of higher education had formerly done. This new funding formula prompted change in higher education as institutions began to examine strategies to increase student retention and academic success. Many community colleges have been operating with an open access practice, which allowed students to register up to the day before the start of the semester. An urban community college in middle Tennessee wanted to know whether the date of student application and registration impacted student success as defined by the number of credits earned in a given semester. This community college wanted to continue its open access practice and to compare the successful completion rates of those students who applied and registered for classes during the week immediately prior to the start of classes with those who applied prior to that week; changes based on this comparison may maximize the probability of successful completion of its courses. In addition to examining application and registration dates, this study also examined student characteristics including financial assistance status, gender, age of students, developmental math, developmental reading, and developmental writing. For the quantitative questions, researchers performed correlational tests of linear, multiple, and stepwise regression with scatter plots, t-tests, and ANOVA. The study examined characteristics of students who applied and registered at different times. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563535</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Application Date and Other Factors Influencing Higher Education Success for Students at Community Colleges</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6115-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>146</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602786</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Registration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Funding Formulas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Financial Aid</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developmental Studies Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Reid, E. Carol</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 2010, the Tennessee Higher Education Commission changed its allotment of funding to an outcomes-based system (Tennessee Higher Education Commission, 2012, p.1). This meant that universities and colleges received money based on factors including associate degrees, certifications, and job placement rather than on enrollment, as institutions of higher education had formerly done. This new funding formula prompted change in higher education as institutions began to examine strategies to increase student retention and academic success. Many community colleges have been operating with an open access practice, which allowed students to register up to the day before the start of the semester. An urban community college in middle Tennessee wanted to know whether the date of student application and registration impacted student success as defined by the number of credits earned in a given semester. This community college wanted to continue its open access practice and to compare the successful completion rates of those students who applied and registered for classes during the week immediately prior to the start of classes with those who applied prior to that week; changes based on this comparison may maximize the probability of successful completion of its courses. In addition to examining application and registration dates, this study also examined student characteristics including financial assistance status, gender, age of students, developmental math, developmental reading, and developmental writing. For the quantitative questions, researchers performed correlational tests of linear, multiple, and stepwise regression with scatter plots, t-tests, and ANOVA. The study examined characteristics of students who applied and registered at different times. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563536</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Application Date and Other Factors Influencing Higher Education Success for Students at Community Colleges</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6125-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>146</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602793</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recruitment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Degrees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Proprietary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personnel Selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credentials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kinneer, James W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Despite the rapid growth of online learning and student enrollment at for-profit colleges, previous research has found that employers are wary of job applicants with credentials earned from these sources. This study compared the attitudes of health care recruiters toward four different RN-to-BSN degree options based on the method of instruction (classroom, online) and the type of college (traditional, for-profit). A sample of 116 health care recruiters from across the United States completed an online survey. The study revealed that there were significant differences in the perceived advantage in the hiring process, credibility, concerns about credentials and likelihood to recommend hiring. Applicants with RN-to-BSN degrees from traditional colleges and via classroom instruction were clearly most favored and those with degrees earned through online instruction at for-profit colleges were perceived the least favorably. An online degree from a traditional college was determined to be more acceptable than an online degree from a for-profit college but still less acceptable than a degree earned through classroom instruction at a traditional college. The implication of these findings is that the return on education for students earning college degrees online or from for-profit colleges may be inhibited by employer perceptions regarding the quality of credentials earned in these environments. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563537</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Comparison of Health Care Recruiters&apos; Attitudes toward RN-to-BSN Degrees Based on Instructional Delivery Method and College For-Profit/Nonprofit Status</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6119-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>145</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602789</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Acculturation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parochial Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Losey, Lauren</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Transitioning into a new school can be a daunting task for students as they deal with the academic and social pressures during the acclimation process to a new school. Students transferring into Ezell-Harding Christian School in Nashville, Tennessee, are no different. This mixed methods study was conducted to determine the struggles and difficulties of transferring into Ezell-Harding Christian School by gathering data from transfer students, as well as to provide recommendations for the school to consider in order to improve the retention rate of transfer students in the middle and high schools. This research looked at both academic and social conditions, which are determining factors in helping increase the retention of transfer students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563538</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Ezell-Harding: Transitioning Students and Acclimation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6121-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>210</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602790</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Acculturation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parochial Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Latham, Kelly</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Transitioning into a new school can be a daunting task for students as they deal with the academic and social pressures during the acclimation process to a new school. Students transferring into Ezell-Harding Christian School in Nashville, Tennessee, are no different. This mixed methods study was conducted to determine the struggles and difficulties of transferring into Ezell-Harding Christian School by gathering data from transfer students, as well as to provide recommendations for the school to consider in order to improve the retention rate of transfer students in the middle and high schools. This research looked at both academic and social conditions, which are determining factors in helping increase the retention of transfer students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563539</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Ezell-Harding: Transitioning Students and Acclimation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6181-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>210</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602804</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Acculturation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parochial Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Childers, William</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Transitioning into a new school can be a daunting task for students as they deal with the academic and social pressures during the acclimation process to a new school. Students transferring into Ezell-Harding Christian School in Nashville, Tennessee, are no different. This mixed methods study was conducted to determine the struggles and difficulties of transferring into Ezell-Harding Christian School by gathering data from transfer students, as well as to provide recommendations for the school to consider in order to improve the retention rate of transfer students in the middle and high schools. This research looked at both academic and social conditions, which are determining factors in helping increase the retention of transfer students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563540</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Ezell-Harding: Transitioning Students and Acclimation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6110-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>210</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602781</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blended Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrated Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Calderon, Blanca I. Rodriguez</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This qualitative phenomenological study investigated how professors perceive the effectiveness of hybrid courses at the university level. The study gathered data related to professor&apos;s experiences that could give insight about the factors encouraging the development of hybrid instruction in higher education. The targeted population consisted of ten professors at a higher education institution where they taught hybrid courses. To assess the effectiveness of the faculty experiences ten professors responded through interviews that were recorded. Although the study was limited in duration and scope the results clearly support earlier research on positive outcomes of faculty experiences with this modality. The study revealed that the majority of the participants in the study showed significant advances in the integration of hybrid modality of teaching in the curricula of their programs. Even with the limitations encountered the faculty showed enthusiasm, and a great motivation to get more involved in this type of teaching modality. The study findings show that if the institution provides the right environment, procuring equipment, improving technological infrastructure, consistently training faculty in this type of technology, continually updating the knowledge in this modality, the hybrid course offerings will be the rule rather than the exception. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563541</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Faculty Experiences in Higher Education Institutions Teaching Hybrid Courses</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6127-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>142</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602794</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>After School Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Benefits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Homework</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Esteem</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Goal Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Wiseness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sumter, Pamela Robinson</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>South Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This qualitative case study examined causes of low graduation rates for young adults. The purpose of this study was to evaluate students participating in an after-school program and reflect on their perceptions of that program a year after they graduated. The theoretical framework for this study reflected upon an open social system. The research questions sought to explore how students perceived after-school programs and how attending the programs benefitted students. The participants for this study were 15 students and one teacher chosen from one high school located in South Carolina. The study was based on data collected from interviews. Twelve themes emerged in this study. The themes were (a) attentiveness in class, (b) preparation for class, (c) improved grades, (d) help with homework, (e) confidence in class, (f) motivation, (g) academic improvement, (h) grade accountability, (i) accomplishing success, (j) life goals, (k) future potential, and (l) strategies for passing standardized tests. Participants reported they received benefits from attending the after-school program. The participants made improvements on standardized test scores, grades, and attendance. The participants reported they performed better on tests, felt more confident, were more motivated, felt more prepared for class, and were more attentive. The results of the study indicated that after-school programs were helpful and a significant influence for at-risk students. As a result, community involvement, tutoring and future research are recommended. The conclusions drawn from this research can be used to assist educational leaders in developing and implementing programs that will benefit at-risk students, improve the graduation rate, decrease the dropout rate, and decrease achievement gaps. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563542</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Causes of Low Graduation Rates in a Rural High School Located in South Carolina: A Case Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6129-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>105</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602796</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family School Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Involvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literature Reviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Trends</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Modules</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Participatory Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflection</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hackett-Villalobos, Karen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This qualitative study focuses on how beginning teachers attain skills to engage families in the educational process. Historical rationale, theoretical frameworks, and key research findings for family engagement training during the last three decades were reviewed, studied, and analyzed for themes. A review of scholarly literature is incorporated into this inquiry to provide a lens into the scope of existing family engagement research regarding the ways in which teachers are trained how to partner with families. This study also includes discussion and analysis of state and federal policies and mandated reporting to support new teachers in engaging families, the identification of theoretical frameworks that provide insight and rationale for teacher-family partnerships, and the inclusion of pre-service beginning teacher training focusing on partnering with families in the elementary school. Data for this case study includes beginning teacher training, interviews, document analysis, and anecdotal accounts, including teacher reflective journals. Utilizing case study and participant action research (PAR) methodology, the author identifies how providing professional development opportunities for beginning teachers supports increasing teacher-family engagement. The study focuses on beginning teacher training, as well as identifying attitudes and interactions with families, emerging patterns, and further research themes. Utilizing research in this case study, I set out to identify trends in the literature, research, and participant training modules to enhance training for beginning teachers in engaging families in the educational process. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563543</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Training Beginning Teachers How to Engage Families: A Case Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, University of the Pacific</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6177-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>179</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602801</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Handwriting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonparametric Statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Program Divisions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Myers, Dorothy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Kruskal Wallis Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Mann Whitney U Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study surveyed current third-, fourth- and fifth-grade teachers in two small school districts in the southeast. One school district has initiated a technology initiative in its elementary schools. The other school district involved in the study incorporates technology but does not have a specified technology initiative. This dissertation was designed to provide information about the attitudes and beliefs of current third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade teachers about the necessity of teaching cursive handwriting. Many schools today either no longer teach cursive handwriting or do not spend the amount of time teaching cursive handwriting as in years past. With the age of new common standards and technology, many teachers feel they do not have the time to spend teaching cursive handwriting. Knowing that teachers&apos; attitudes and beliefs affect what is taught in the classroom, the researcher developed a survey to determine the attitudes and beliefs of third-, fourth- and fifth-grade teachers and how those attitudes and beliefs affect their current instruction in the area of cursive handwriting. The survey was evaluated by parametric statistics using an independent t test and an ANOVA as well as nonparametric statistics using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U. The t test and Mann Whitney U were used to determine the difference in attitudes and beliefs among the two school districts. The analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis were used to determine the differences between the grade levels and years of experience among the teachers. The independent t test and Mann Whitney U showed a statistical difference in the attitudes and beliefs between the two different school districts about cursive handwriting. A statistical difference was also found among the number of years of teaching experience using an Analysis of Variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test. However, a statistical significance was not found between the grade levels using an Analysis of Variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test. Qualitative data were also gathered using embedded open-ended questions in the survey. The results from the qualitative data supported the quantitative data found in the statistic results. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563544</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Attitudes and Beliefs of Upper Elementary Teachers Regarding the Teaching of Cursive Handwriting</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Gardner-Webb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6183-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>95</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602805</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Seniors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Bound Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualifications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Applicants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Selective Admission</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disproportionate Representation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Park, Eunkyoung</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The undermatch between low-income students&apos; academic achievement and college destinations has become increasingly important in discussions of higher education access and equity. This study investigates whether low-income students are undermatched in their college choice, and if so, what factors are related to the undermatching. Specifically, this study examines the timing and reasons for low-income students to leave from the process of selective college access (i.e., qualification, application, admission, and enrollment). The study used data from the Education Longitudinal Study 2002 (ELS: 2002) and the sample of this study includes 12,270 students who were seniors in 2004. Discrete time event history analysis was applied. Regardless of family income, the stage of qualification was the most hazardous followed by the stage of application and the stage of admission was the least hazardous. Low-income students had lower odds of being qualified for, applying to, being admitted in, and enrolling at a selective institution(s) than high-income students, and the largest gap among income groups was found in the stage of qualification. Gender, race/ethnicity, parental education, academic ability, the quality of high school attended, the proximity to a selective institution, and the number of peers aspiring to four-year college education were associated with selective college access. Disadvantages in these factors further limited low-income students&apos; access to selective higher education. Overall, the current research revealed the tendency of undermatching for low-income students and structural barriers directly or indirectly resulting in undermatching. As a way to resolve the structural barriers, the study recommends to create a comprehensive and uniform secondary school system with equal funding for public schools, to provide sufficient college guidance and counseling to the disadvantaged students, and to increase the opportunities of participating extracurricular activities. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563545</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Low-Income Students&apos; Access to Selective Higher Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6184-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>202</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602806</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telecommunications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dogan, Gulustan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Trust can be an important component of wireless sensor networks for believability of the produced data and historical value is a crucial asset in deciding trust of the data. A node&apos;s trust can change over time after its initial deployment due to various reasons such as energy loss, environmental conditions or exhausting sources. Provenance can play a significant role for supporting the calculation of information trust by recording the data flow and snapshots of the network. Furthermore provenance can be used for registering previous trust records and other information such as node type, data type, node location, average of the historical data. We will introduce a node-level trust-enhancing architecture for sensor networks using provenance. Our network will be cognitive in the sense that our system will react automatically upon detecting anomalies. Through simulations we will verify our model and will show that our approach can provide substantial enhancements in information trust as compared to the traditional network approaches. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563546</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Protru: Leveraging Provenance to Enhance Network Trust in a Wireless Sensor Network</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3297-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>137</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601701</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Art Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Art Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>National Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Aids</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lung, Heidi K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study investigated the practice of elementary art teachers who utilize carts for the delivery of art lessons; to understand how the art on a cart practice influences art educators&apos; approaches to curriculum development and instruction; and to identify challenges, benefits, and best practices. The practice of art on a cart is defined as the practice of art teachers moving art materials on a cart from room-to-room, class-to-class, even school-to-school to deliver elementary art lessons in lieu of having students come to them in a dedicated art based classroom. A systematic literature review completed by the researcher returned no results of in-depth research on this topic, although the practice of art on a cart has existed for decades. The sequential explanatory research design was completed in two phases. The first phase consisted of a national online survey focusing on the art on a cart practice and collected responses from 174 art educators who currently or in the past practiced art on a cart. The second phase focused qualitative data including interviews, observations, and photos with a subset of six teachers who initially participated in the online survey. Findings from these two phases produced detailed descriptions of how art teachers who travel on carts to deliver lessons navigate the traditional educational environment in nontraditional ways; the challenges they face in daily practice; how the art on a cart practice influences the way teachers approach curriculum, classroom management, and instruction; and the ways in which art on a cart practice alters and limits creative learning experiences for students. Discussion of results highlights the importance of awareness of the practice within the field and the need for support systems for teachers at both the local and national level. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563547</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Art on a Cart: A National Mixed Methods Investigation of Elementary Art Teacher Experiences and Perceptions</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri - Saint Louis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5660-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>236</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602582</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Staff Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Based Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Semrow, Lisa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explored and analyzed a purposeful sample size of five teachers from four districts on the perceptions of teachers in first and second grade regarding their participation in whether or not professional development provided through Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) grant activities influenced their implementation of technology-enhance Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in the elementary classroom. The study outcome confirmed that staff development activities resulted in a change of instruction from a teacher-centered method of instruction to a teacher-facilitated method of instruction. The researcher discovered that the rate of change or amount of change per participant depended among their disposition. The researcher concluded that the elementary teachers changed their methods of instruction due to staff development, and their disposition affected the extent of their change. This study provided school districts with insight to teacher perceptions of what they need to effectively implement technology-enhanced PBL into their instruction. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563548</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Influence of Staff Development on Implementing Technology-Enhanced Problem-Based Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Edgewood College</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4211-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>110</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602315</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Males</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Underachievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constructivism (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lesson Plans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drills (Practice)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novels</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Small Group Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Direct Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Silent Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Basal Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Miller, Erin Elizabeth</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Male underachievement in language arts is a continuing problem. At the participating school for this study, girls in Grades 3-6 have continued to outscore boys by 8% to 24% in language arts. As a result, school administrators identified male students as a population that need to demonstrate growth in this subject to meet state expectations. This study explored the problem of these underachieving male students by evaluating reading instruction in those grades. The conceptual framework for this case study was constructivist-based learning theories. The two primary research questions explored (a) the skills and strategies upper elementary teachers used when teaching reading comprehension and (b) how upper elementary teachers modified reading instruction for boys. Interviews, classroom inventories, and teacher lesson plans were gathered from 18 participants and analyzed via typological analysis and inductive analysis. Results showed reading instructional strengths included drilling for skills, using novels, small group instruction, explicit instruction, transactional learning, self-selected silent reading, and basal instruction. The weakest area was comprehension strategies due to a heavy reliance on a basal reading program. Participants recommended increasing the amount of embedded professional development and purchasing more books for each classroom, including both short novels and nonfiction. Social change can be achieved by increasing teacher knowledge through professional training which would translate into making the classroom a more positive learning environment. These changes can lead to better readers who are prepared for high school, college, and the workforce, thus resulting in lower unemployment and less poverty. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563549</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effective Reading Comprehension Instruction for Struggling Male Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5112-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>189</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602489</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Service Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outdoor Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Freshmen</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student College Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nolan, Christy David</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Keystone Learning Community was implemented by the Department of Campus Recreation to address retention at the institution. This learning community for incoming freshmen consists of two phases. Phase I is as an outdoor orientation program that includes a three day, two night canoeing and camping experience lead by upperclassmen leaders. Faculty and staff from the institution complete every aspect of Phase I with the freshmen. Phase II is class time that concentrates on development of critical thinking and writing skills. Through surveys and interviews, participants in the Keystone Learning Community reported strong peer, faculty, and upperclassmen engagement initiated by the completion of Phase I. Participants in the Keystone LC considered Phase I to a be a significant event in their transition to college. The engagement facilitated in Phase I created and strengthened the ability to persist in the participants. The strategies to persist the students gained through their engagement leads to retention of the participants. Both persistence and retention as facilitated through the Keystone Learning Community feed back into deeper engagement at the institution. A conceptual framework is introduced that purposes a non-linear alternative to the Tinto model of student departure. This new framework highlights the dynamic complexity and interactions between engagement, persistence, and retention. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563550</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Broadening the Learning Community Experience: An Outdoor Orientation Program&apos;s Impact on Engagement, Persistence, and Retention</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Wayne State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5665-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>109</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602586</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Young Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Child Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Stimuli</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adjustment (to Environment)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time on Task</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Modification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scheduling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Handheld Devices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Males</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nelson, Leslie Lynn</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) frequently display an inability to self-regulate (use materials appropriately and refrain from self-stimulatory behavior) and self-monitor (complete each step in a task before continuing to the next step) their behavior and therefore experience a great deal of failure within their respective school and home environments and frequently end up receiving instruction in restrictive, self-contained classrooms. Visual schedules have been used to help students with ASD self-regulate their behaviors in academic and community settings (NPDC, 2010; NSR, 2009). The purpose of this study was to determine whether high-tech visual schedules increase the self-regulation and transition behaviors of young children with ASD. Specifically, on-task and on-schedule behaviors were addressed along with the satisfaction of the stakeholders with the high-tech visual schedule intervention. A multiple-baseline across academic tasks (reading, writing, and math) was used to determine the effectiveness of a visual schedule delivered via an iPod touch on on-task and on-schedule behaviors. The participants included three elementary students who were receiving special education services under the category of autism. There were three males (one African American third grader, and two Hispanic fourth graders). The participants were provided with visual schedules for three academic tasks (reading, writing, and math) delivered via an iPod touch. Given the variability in the data it cannot be said that the visual schedule had an impact on on-task and on-schedule behaviors. The visual schedules did however, generalize to the general education setting and were effective in maintaining on-task and on-schedule behaviors across participants. Additionally, the teaching staff indicated a high level of satisfaction with the implementation of the visual schedule indicated by ongoing use after completion of the study. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563551</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using a Mobile Device to Deliver Visual Schedules to Young Children with Autism</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3067-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>159</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601598</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Essays</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economic Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technological Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Shared Resources and Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cost Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Risk Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dutt, Abhijit</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Improvements in Information Technology (IT) infrastructure and standardization of interoperability standards among heterogeneous Information System (IS) applications have brought a paradigm shift in the way an IS application could be used and delivered. Not only an IS application can be built using standardized component but also parts of it can be hosted by different organizations in different locations provided it can be accessed using the Internet. This dissertation is an attempt to uncover unique aspects of this phenomenon known as Software as a Service (SaaS). The first essay examines design decision making by SaaS providers by analyzing effects of two non-functional attributes of an IS Application--modularity and architectural performance. We model the relationship of the two attributes with factors such as demand, price, and user&apos;s preference. The model includes marginal cost and maintenance cost to recognize the service aspect of SaaS. Our results show the optimal values of various decision variables while taking into account user&apos;s sensitivity to modularity, architectural performance and price. The service component in cloud computing necessitates that the service providers plan for requisite delivery capacity. The second essay addresses optimal infrastructure capacity planning while taking into account the opportunity cost of having low capacity and cost of unused capacity in the case of high capacity. We develop a model which provides insight to a SaaS provider on optimal capacity planning of IT infrastructure when faced with a variable demand and performance expectations. The third essay focuses on financial risks faced by SaaS providers in the context of provider&apos;s risk tolerance. We analyze the financial risk of provider&apos;s decision making on pricing, capacity and other factors that may lead to financial risk as they are based on incomplete information. We built a model using Mean Variance Analysis theory for investigating the effect of provider&apos;s risk tolerance on infrastructure capacity planning while taking into account modularity in software architecture and operational performance. This dissertation extends our understanding of significant issues facing a SaaS provider. The models presented here can form the basis for an extensive exploration of the phenomenon of SaaS specifically and Cloud Computing in general. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563552</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Economic Perspective on Cloud Computing: Three Essays</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2828-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>194</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601521</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Developmental Studies Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technical Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culturally Relevant Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Raney, Kristen A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This mixed methods study examined the perspectives of developmental math faculty at a two-year technical college regarding culturally responsive beliefs and instructional practices. Thirteen faculty who taught the developmental class Elementary Algebra with Applications were surveyed. Nine of the 13 faculty responded. One section of Wisconsin&apos;s Response to Intervention model, High Quality Instruction, framed the study that addressed two research questions: What are common beliefs developmental math faculty hold with regard to teaching in culturally diverse classrooms? To what extent do developmental math faculty perceive their instructional practices to be culturally responsive to students? The findings of the study identified common beliefs of the faculty. The common beliefs varied in their level of cultural responsiveness. The study also found that the faculty participants perceive themselves as using instructional methods that are culturally responsive, though the degree to which they are using culturally responsive strategies varies. The faculty responses revealed some contradictions between their beliefs and instructional practices. The study affords the opportunity to determine the faculty needs for professional development and, ultimately, improve student outcomes. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563553</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Faculty Perspectives on Culturally Responsive Teaching Practices in Developmental Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Edgewood College</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4208-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>119</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602312</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Team Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regular and Special Education Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suburban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>O&apos;Neal, Angeline N.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In response to numerous mandates in the field of education, schools have found it imperative to ensure that teachers are incorporating effective instructional methods which meet the diverse needs of student populations within a single classroom. The co-teaching model of instruction is just one way educators have chosen to lead classroom instruction in order to reach all learners. In the co-teaching setting two or more teachers work together to deliver instruction to a heterogeneous group of students in a class. This research study was completed to determine if the co-teaching method featuring two content area teachers had a positive effect on student achievement as measured by a valid and reliable standardized achievement assessment. This study presented the history and overview of the co-teaching strategy and highlighted the implementation of this model in schools. First, the study used teacher evaluation data and administrator confirmation that the method was being used with fidelity. Then, the researcher analyzed archival data on 784 student scores on a yearly standardized assessment and broke down the data into subgroups. Finally, the researcher performed a limited mixed effects model (LMM) test to measure if student scores were higher in a co-taught with two content area teachers classroom setting when compared to students&apos; scores in a traditional setting. Although the students in the co-taught classroom setting achieved higher scores on the yearly assessments, the differences were not at a statistically significant level. Further study on implementing the co-teaching model with two content area teachers is needed. This instructional strategy should be studied in alternative settings, additional grade levels, and other content areas to determine if this method is beneficial for all students. Also, additional longitudinal observation of this cohort might be useful to see if the co-taught classrooms resulted in longer term effects on learning. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563554</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effects of Co-Teaching on Regular Education and Special Education Students&apos; Standardized Communication Arts Test Scores in a Suburban Midwest Middle School</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri - Saint Louis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5666-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>128</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602587</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Introductory Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ragin, Tracey B.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Fundamental computer skills are vital in the current technology-driven society. The purpose of this study was to investigate the development needs of students at a rural community college in the Southeast who lacked the computer literacy skills required in a basic computer course. Guided by Greenwood&apos;s pragmatic approach as a reformative force in higher education, this action research study focused on understanding stakeholders&apos; perceptions of students&apos; computer skills, determining interventions to address deficiencies, and understanding the relationship between students&apos; placement test scores and final course outcomes. Inquiry in this mixed method study included interview responses and a correlational analysis of placement test scores, pretest scores, and final course outcomes in 4 beginning computer courses. Interviews with administrators and faculty provided perceptions concerning students&apos; computer literacy skills, and data were coded to determine themes. Test data were analyzed using correlation and multiple regression to determine the relationship between placement test, pretest and final outcomes in the course. Findings revealed that participants believed students need basic computer skills before attempting a beginning computer class, and no significant correlation was found among the test scores. It was concluded that while the computer placement test assessed theoretical understanding, it did not assess skills. The resulting recommendations promoted coaching and tutoring to assist students with low computer skills. With a focus on developing educational alternatives to better serve students, implementation of the recommendations may promote positive social change that benefits not only students needing support in developing computer skills but also the community as well. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563555</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Administrators&apos; Perceptions of Community College Students&apos; Computer Literacy Skills in Beginner Courses</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3381-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>179</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601747</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Brain</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Psychology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Listening Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time on Task</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hodges, Jane Allen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Research has shown student inattention, off-task behaviors, and lack of listening skills in the classroom can impact progress in reading, math, and language development. Lack of verbal interaction in home environments, variations in learning and teaching modalities, and larger class sizes contribute to the difficulties students have in developing listening skills and focused attention behaviors. To address this problem, Quantum Learning, a professional staff development program that teaches strategies to stimulate the brain and increase learning, was implemented in the subject school district. Cognitive psychology, which uses the understanding of the internal processes of the mind to understand the actions of people, was the theoretical framework for this study. When implemented in the classroom, the brain-based strategies of Quantum Learning should increase student achievement through better listening skills and reduced off-task behaviors. Twenty-three teachers and administrators at an elementary school responded to survey questions regarding which brain-based strategies from the Quantum Learning program were implemented and what impact the strategies had on the students&apos; achievement as indicated by the benchmark testing. These data were analyzed using ANOVA and Cronbach&apos;s alpha. Although the ANOVA revealed no statistically significant differences in achievement when comparing levels of implementation and years of teaching experience, the findings nevertheless provide recommendations for school leaders to determine future professional staff development opportunities. Because 100% of participants indicated the strategies impact student learning, continued staff development was recommended. By increasing teachers&apos; knowledge of brain-based strategies, student listening and on-task behaviors may be increased. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563556</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Brain-Based Strategies: One School&apos;s Perspective</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3335-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>101</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601734</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Software</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sequential Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pedersen, Mitra</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study investigated the rate of success for IT projects using agile and standard project management methodologies. Any successful project requires use of project methodology. Specifically, large projects require formal project management methodologies or models, which establish a blueprint of processes and project planning activities. This study asked what methodologies should be utilized to improve the chances of project success, as project managers are engaged in decision making. A deficiency in reliability and consistency correlate to a lower success rate of projects. The objective of this quantitative study was to relate the use of the agile or waterfall methodologies and specific critical success factors (CSFs) to IT project success for a sample of IT project managers who have used these methodologies. The results of the analysis of variance showed that there were significant differences between the extent of use of effective communications, user involvement, and use of a quality plan between the models. The results of the Pearson&apos;s correlation test showed that project success is significantly and positively associated with effective communication, user involvement, and use of a quality plan in the agile methodology. In addition, the results of the Pearson&apos;s correlation test showed that project success is significantly and positively associated with only effective communication and use of a quality plan in the waterfall methodology. Lastly, the results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that none of the CSFs of effective communication, use of quality plan, and user involvement significantly influences the success of the project in both the agile and waterfall project management models. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563557</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Quantitative Examination of Critical Success Factors Comparing Agile and Waterfall Project Management Methodologies</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5667-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>189</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602588</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nontraditional Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Searching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Computers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Henson, Amy Renee</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this research was to determine the extent that computer-related factors affect the success of nontraditional college students. Since nontraditional students typically have fewer skills than traditionally-aged students, they may be less efficacious regarding their ability to use technology. Unfortunately, such reduced confidence may adversely affect the entire college experience for students, and ultimately, successful employment. The simple process of obtaining information on campus websites may be daunting enough; however, when students enter the classroom, they often find that course requirements include considerable amounts of computer use. Therefore, in addition to learning specific course content, nontraditional students must also learn how to operate computers and conduct Internet research. Such expectations may reduce the potential for college success. To conduct the research, surveys were administered to students attending two Midwestern community colleges. Using the resultant data, various analyses were conducted to examine interactions between computer-related variables and course grades and completion rates. Results indicated that high school access was the most significant factor in determining computer efficacy in college students. The second most successful method of obtaining confidence was found among students who used computers for work. Students employed with computers also enrolled in more online courses than students who were unemployed or who worked in non-technical positions. Additional factors that correlated to efficacy were high-bandwidth Internet access and the availability of computer-related devices. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563558</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Computer Efficacy on the Success of the Nontraditional Community College Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri - Saint Louis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5652-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>156</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602574</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Females</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Womens Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>After School Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Youth Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journal Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>STEM Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Robinson-Hill, Rona M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Missouri</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Missouri</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>What affect does female participation in the Training Future Scientist (TFS) program based on Vygotsky&apos;s sociocultural theory and Maslow&apos;s Hierarchies of Needs have on female adolescents&apos; achievement levels in science and their attitude toward science and interest in science-based careers? The theoretical framework for this study was developed through a constructivist perspective, using dialogic engagement, coinciding with Lev Vygotsky&apos;s sociocultural learning theory. This action research project used mixed methods research design, targeted urban adolescent females who were members of Boys &amp;amp; Girls Club of Greater St. Louis (BGCGSTL) after-school program. The data collection measures were three qualitative instruments (semi-structured interviews, reflective journal entries and attitudinal survey open-ended responses) and two quantitative instruments (pre-test and posttests over the content from the Buckle-down Curriculum and attitudinal survey scaled responses). The goal was to describe the impact the Training Future Scientist (TFS) after-school program has on the girls&apos; scientific content knowledge, attitude toward choosing a science career, and self-perception in science. Through the TFS after-school program participants had access to a secondary science teacher-researcher, peer leaders that were in the 9th-12th grade, and Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) role models from Washington University Medical School Young Scientist Program (YSP) graduate and medical students and fellows as volunteers. The program utilized the Buckle-down Curriculum as guided, peer-led cooperative learning groups, hands-on labs and demonstrations facilitated by the researcher, trained peer leaders and/or role models that used constructivist science pedagogy to improve test-taking strategies. The outcomes for the TFS study were an increase in science content knowledge, a positive trend in attitude change, and a negative trend in choosing a science career. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563559</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Journey of a Science Teacher: Preparing Female Students in the Training Future Scientists after School Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri - Saint Louis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5672-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>203</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602592</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Job Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Records (Forms)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Clinics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Records</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feasibility Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Armed Forces</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Facilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Facilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stuart, Sandra L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined participants&apos; perceptions of the effectiveness of a new job-training program designed to enhance the authentic learning in adult learners using an electronic medical records system at a naval health clinic. This job-training program lacked data about participants&apos; perceptions of this learning process by which to gauge its overall effectiveness for the clinic and its personnel. The rationale for selecting the problem is the need to provide knowledge of this system and training for employees to fulfill their duties. The theoretical framework for the study was based on Dennis and O&apos;Hair&apos;s model for authentic learning. Two guiding research questions focused on the participants&apos; perceptions of the usefulness of the program and whether or not age and/or gender played any role in these perceptions. The research design was a qualitative evaluation using a 2-part survey delivered to 30 of the course participants. The data were analyzed by identifying themes and/or patterns within the data. A key finding was that the training program was effective based upon the participant&apos;s perceptions. age and gender did not play a role in these findings. Recommendations include evaluating future courses to ensure continued program effectiveness. Implications include initiating a Navy-wide change in the manner of educating personnel to use this training program to help other naval medical facilities wishing to adopt this type of training. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563560</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Evaluation of Authentic Learning in an Electronic Medical Records System</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5679-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>114</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602599</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inclusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Disturbances</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mainstreaming</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Anoh, Jean-Dominique Herve</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research investigated the perceptions and attitudes of principals and headmasters about the inclusion of students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD), the factors supporting or inhibiting school leaders in their effort to implement inclusive practices, and the approaches they use to initiate, facilitate, support and sustain the inclusion of students with EBD. Grounded in a mixed-method research, this investigator surveyed 71 school leaders and interviewed five of them. Descriptive and correlational findings supported by qualitative results reveal that principals and headmasters exhibit positive attitudes toward the inclusion of students with EBD. Overwhelmingly, attitudinal predictive variables such as school characteristics (size, academic level, percentage of students with EBD, and adequately yearly progress status) and demographic variables of school leaders (gender, and experience) were insignificant in determining principals&apos; and headmasters&apos; attitudes. In spite of a noted positive attitude, school leaders in this study remained uncertain or unwilling to implement inclusive settings for students with EBD. Firstly, this suggests a leadership schism between central administration and school leaders. A top-down mandate is found to be ineffective in initiating and sustaining inclusionary practices. Secondly, some school leaders lack the knowledge and skills necessary to undertake such endeavor. The study also revels that to make inclusion work for students with EBD, school leaders must engage in a real shift in paradigm by investing in the reculturing process rather than focus on restructuring issues. They must lead rather than merely manage their school. Finally, school leaders must exude moral courage by impacting change with their actions rather than anticipating directives from central office. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563561</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Perceptions of Urban School Principals Regarding the Education of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Lesley University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5688-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>279</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602608</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Influence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trust (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Superintendents</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Farag-Davis, S. Ayesha</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Maine</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Maine</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Because their role is highly complex, school principals require ongoing professional learning to lead effectively and respond to the challenges inherent to school leadership. Networking among principals is frequently identified as a valuable source of professional learning for school leaders. Nevertheless, existing literature applies the term to a wide variety of principal relationships and affiliations, and there is little research that examines networking among principals and its effects upon their skills, knowledge, and convictions. This qualitative study, based on phenomenological research methods, investigates how networking promotes experienced principals&apos; professional growth through an exploration of what principals report about the nature, characteristics, and benefits of peer dialogue. Participants identified through purposeful selection included twenty-one practicing elementary or middle school principals from Maine and Massachusetts with at least five years experience who indicated that dialogue with role-alike peers is useful to them in their practice. Data were collected through focus group sessions, individual interviews, participant responses to a writing prompt, and work artifacts. Participants in this study report that their practice is most influenced through interactions with peers characterized by high levels of trust. Findings indicate that peer learning networks provide instructive and affective support through dialogue that promotes principals&apos; development within three domains: leadership inventory, leadership judgment, and leadership integrity. Moreover, while peer learning networks can be a resource for principals&apos; learning, the manner in which they engage in dialogue may have consequences for whether they experience transformative learning that makes them more able to address adaptive challenges in their schools. Principals&apos; accounts suggest that superintendents are well situated to create conditions principals need to develop their skills, knowledge, and attitudes to effectively lead. Additional research is recommended to further explore peer dialogue processes as well as the factors that enhance or impede the development of school leaders&apos; adaptive capacity through participation in peer learning networks. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563562</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>School Leaders and Networks: Understanding Principal Peer Dialogue as a Resource for Professional Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Lesley University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5689-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>200</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602609</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Comorbidity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Support Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hubbard, Laura E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The focus of this study is to understand, from their own perspective, the learning needs of adult college students with comorbid attention deficits and psychiatric disabilities, and to identify services and practices that support their success in the college environment. Adult students with comorbid attention deficits and psychiatric disorders present unique needs and challenges to colleges (Megivern, Pellerito, &amp;amp; Mowbray, 2003). Many have the motivation and the educational background to begin a college education or return to campus after a hiatus; however, those who do attend college report difficulties in all aspects of academic functioning (Barkley, Murphy, &amp;amp; Fischer 2008). Unfortunately, there is limited research that explores their complex learning needs, informs teaching practice, and offers direction for the development of support services for these students (Blake, 2000; Brown, 2005; Nadeau &amp;amp; Quinn, 2002). As a result, there is a dearth of effective models for establishing appropriate campus support services for them. This study attempts to articulate the learning needs of adults with coexisting disabilities and based on their experiences, offers a model to inform support practices. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563563</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>ADHD and Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders: Adult Student Perspectives on Learning Needs and Academic Support</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Lesley University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5690-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>171</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602610</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Urdu</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Augmentative and Alternative Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Native Speakers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Word Frequency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reliability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transcripts (Written Records)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Word Lists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Word Recognition</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mukati, Abdul Samad</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pakistan (Karachi)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pakistan (Karachi)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this research is to identify a core set of vocabulary used by native Urdu language (UL) speakers during dyadic conversation for social interaction and relationship building. This study was conducted in Karachi, Pakistan at an institution of higher education. This research seeks to distinguish between general (nonspecific communication) and social interactive communication used by UL speakers. The identification and establishment of high frequency word usage lists was utilized to construct and select core vocabulary for possible use in Augmentative Alternative Communication (AAC) tools and strategies. This descriptive study used observational methods to explore the reliability of transcribing Urdu language (UL) for utterance and word identification. The goal is to establish a core vocabulary list to support the development of AAC applications in UL. This cannot be accomplished until a systematic and reliable approach to analyzing conversational language samples in UL is demonstrated. Furthermore, the study replicated methods from similar previous studies in English by collecting and analyzing language samples from native UL speaking college students. The degree of similarity between the UL core and the English language core was also identified. A total of ten thousand three hundred and one (10,301) words were collected, during dyadic conversation of which nine hundred and seventy-six (976) were identified for a word frequency list. This list was compiled in hierarchical order based upon frequency of occurrences and percentage within the corpus. The results and analysis of the total corpus revealed the presence of nine (9) different grammatical categories including: 379 nouns, (38.8%); 246 verbs, (25.2%); 174 adjectives, (17.8%); 76 adverbs, (7.8%); 53 pronouns, (5.4%); 22 prepositions, (2.3%); 9 conjunctions, (0.9%); 8 interjections, (0.8%); 2 articles, (0.2%); and 7 other, (0.7%). A possible core of 100, 150 and 250 words were identified. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563564</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Identifying Core Vocabulary for Urdu Language Speakers Using Augmentative Alternative Communication</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Howard University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2669-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>149</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601439</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Postsecondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiential Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychological Patterns</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Springer, V. Isabell</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Previous research has suggested that relationship education (RE) courses, whose curricula are intended to develop learners&apos; emotional faculties, could raise participants&apos; skills related to recognizing, managing, and empathizing with emotions, known as emotional competence (EC), but this relationship has not been ascertained to exist for postsecondary students. However, higher levels of EC have been linked to positive academic and life outcomes, suggesting that effective RE courses could be a potential way for colleges to promote life-long growth and value for their students. The present study sought to determine whether a brief RE intervention, delivered using experiential and transformational learning methods, raised overall EC levels and levels of five individual EC domains, hypothesizing that overall and domain-related scores would increase in the intervention condition. Using a convenience sample of 100 postsecondary-level students, ages 18 to 28, from a single university randomly assigned to one of four conditions, the study explored this relationship using the Widener Emotional Learning Scale to measure changes in EC and provide between-group comparisons. Analysis of the results determined that the hypotheses were only partially supported. While participation in an RE course did raise overall EC scores significantly, only one EC domain, awareness of emotions in oneself and others, showed a significant increase in the experimental condition. The results suggest that brief RE interventions could be an effective way of providing at least some benefits to student participants in the form of increased EC. However, additional research on RE delivery methods and with wider postsecondary populations must also be performed in the future to expand on these findings. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563565</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Learning about Me: The Impact of Relationship Education on the Emotional Competence of College Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3617-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>91</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601895</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graphs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experimental Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sauriol, Jennifer</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This longitudinal study evaluates the impact of a new Algebra 1 course at a High School for language-based learning-disabled (LD) students. The new course prioritized the teaching of relationship graphs and functions as an introduction to algebra. Across three studies, the dissertation documents and evaluates the progress made by LD high school students in Algebra 1 on the interpretation and production of relationship graphs. The first two studies examine intervention and control students&apos; answers to a written assessment on time-distance graphs, immediately after and two years after the intervention. The third study, examines other intervention and control students&apos; written assessment answers on graphs relating variables other than time and distance, two years after the Algebra 1 course. Data from the first study show significantly better results for the intervention group in the post-assessment results and significantly better results for the intervention group&apos;s post-assessment results in comparison to the control group. Results for the control students taking Algebra 2 were similar to those of the intervention group&apos;s pre-assessment results. The second study, again, shows significantly better results for the intervention group two years later. In the third study, even though the intervention group performed slightly better than the control group, the difference between groups was not significant, with both groups showing high levels of performance. Because discussions in the entire department aimed at including a multi-representational view of algebra at all levels, this may have led to changes among the Algebra 2 teachers&apos; views and ways of teaching algebra. This set of results supports the view that beginning Algebra 1 with instruction on the graphical representation of functions, instead of focusing on the alpha-numeric representation of algebra, allows for learning among LD students that remains over the years. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563566</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Introducing Algebra through the Graphical Representation of Functions: A Study among LD Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Tufts University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4305-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>186</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602394</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Workplace Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonformal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Mail</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Industry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Age Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Manning, Christin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Workers in the 21st century workplace are faced with rapid and constant developments that place a heavy demand on them to continually learn beyond what the Human Resources and Training groups can meet. As a consequence, professionals must rely on non-formal learning approaches through the development of a personal learning network to keep up-to-date. This phenomenological study used an explanatory mixed methods approach to examine the lived experiences of how training professionals construct their personal learning networks to support their continuous learning in the workplace. Results from this study indicate that participants have integrated non-formal learning into their work stream with a majority spending between one to three hours per week. The study found that there were two primary reasons for continuous learning: keeping up with industry trends and project-focused. For ongoing learning, participants used a push of learning using automated emails as their primary aggregator. These emails provide an overview of industry trends as well as a starting point for more focused additional learning. For project-oriented learning, participants use a pull of learning using Google as their starting point. Connecting to their people network for learning support was secondary. The ability to validate expert contributions is critical to 21st century learning and the study participants described using a trust but verify approach relying initially on name recognition and their connections. Some significant differences in personal learning network construction were found based on gender, age, experience, and education. Examining how training professionals use various approaches for their own non-formal learning serves to provide guidance to both individual and organizational learning strategies that will leverage limited resources and organizational expertise while meeting the rapid and constant changes of the 21st century worker. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563567</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Understanding the Construction of Personal Learning Networks to Support Non-Formal Workplace Learning of Training Professionals</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Lesley University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5691-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>196</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602611</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Business Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Virtual Classrooms</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teamwork</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Database Management Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Group Dynamics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Graham, C. Matt</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Maine</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Maine</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The majority of database system development projects end in failure. Reasons that include, the system not being developed on time, the system was developed over budget, and the system developed did not meet the planned project&apos;s criteria. These failures are compounded by the use of virtual teams which includes problems with team formation, the organizational environment in which the team operates, and the technology used for collaboration and communication. As more organizations use virtual teams, these problems have continued to impede the successful completion of database system development. The goal of the study was to determine what leadership type, transformational, transactional, or management-by-exception (passive-avoidant leadership) is most effective in leading a virtual team in developing a database management system. The target population for this study was Generation Y students at the Maine Business School who were assigned to virtual teams tasked with developing a database management system. Specifically this study answered these three research questions: 1) What is the effect of leadership type, as self-reported through the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire on the quality of completed team projects? 2) What is the impact of type of leadership on virtual team effectiveness as measured by the Virtual Teams Survey? 3) What is the joint effect of type of leadership, and virtual team effectiveness on the quality and uniqueness of the completed team project? Virtual team effectiveness was defined as the level of involvement in team formation, job characteristics, technical proficiency of team members, relationship between team members, teams process and attributes about the team leader, organizational environment in which the team operates, and technology the team used for collaboration and communication. The quality of the completed team project was defined as one that meets the team project criteria which included tables, relationships, forms, queries, and reports. Other attributes included the uniqueness of product defined by the addition of extra functions and controls added to the database system that go above and beyond the project criteria. The study found that for research question 1, only transformational and transactional leadership types had a significant and negative impact on the quality of completed team projects. Research question 2 found no significant correlation between leadership type and virtual team effectiveness. Research question 3 showed that none of the variables were significantly associated with the quality of the completed team project. These findings suggest that traditional concepts of leadership types do not work well in virtual environments. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563568</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Examination of Leadership Types among Generation Y and Its Impact on Virtual Team Effectiveness</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4144-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>116</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602278</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflective Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Murphy, Debra G.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teacher research has been included in university and graduate teacher education programs for the past 2 decades. Recently, associate degree programs have also begun to engage their students in teacher research. What happens when community college early childhood students conduct teacher research as a course assignment? This study involved 8 former community college early childhood education students who had recently completed teacher research projects as part of their coursework in 1 of 3 different courses. Data sources included students&apos; written reports of teacher research, classroom field notes, photographs of student data, and interviews with each participant. The study was informed by theories of reflective thinking (Dewey, 1933), reflective practice (Schon, 1983, 1987), transformative learning (Cranton, 2006b; Mezirow, 2000), the voice-centered method (Brown &amp;amp; Gilligan, 1992), and narrative knowing and inquiry (Bruner, 1986; Clandinin &amp;amp; Connelly, 2000a). The study found that the teacher research projects enabled students to question their assumptions about children and teaching and benefitted both the college students and the children in their classrooms. Participants spoke in the voices of both learners and teachers, and their teacher voices were confident and committed to teaching children and caring for their well-being. Teacher research created a context in which these students demonstrated both voice and power, which they used on behalf of the young children in their classrooms. The findings of this study can contribute to the conversation about teacher research in community college early education programs, as well as inform teacher education and early childhood education research and practice. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563569</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Making Voices Visible: Teacher Research in a Community College Early Childhood Teacher Education Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Lesley University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5692-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>143</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602612</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Involvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Community Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Donlon, Betsy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to examine the effect that community partnerships could have on school climate and, ultimately, student achievement. Specifically, community partnerships that were formed through the PENCIL (Public Education Needs Community Involvement and Leadership) Foundation in Nashville, Tennessee were researched to determine their influence on the schools they serve. This mixed methods research study used a purposeful sample of 33 elementary schools and conducted interviews with three case study schools from that sample. The quantitative portion of the study consisted of an examination of the relationship between school climate as measured by the TELL (Teaching, Empowering, Learning, and Leading) survey and student achievement as measured by the TCAP (Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program) data. It was found that the level of involvement of the community partner and the quality of the relationship between the community partner and the school were significant indicators of effective partnerships. The quantitative data revealed that the most significant predictor of student achievement from the TELL survey was the level that teachers felt supported by the parents of the students. The findings resulted in the development of a PENCIL Partnership Assessment Tool so that the PENCIL Foundation could use data to maintain quality partnerships and measure the effectiveness of the programs that partners implemented in schools. Further research is needed to determine other factors that affect school climate, student achievement, and community partnerships in schools in order to provide more precise data for the assessment of the partnerships. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563570</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effect of Community Involvement through PENCIL Partners on School Climate and Student Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4296-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>198</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602388</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Autonomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teacher Induction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rak, Rosemary C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New England</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The turnover of high school science teachers is an especially troubling problem in urban schools with economically disadvantaged students. Because high teacher turnover rates impede effective instruction, the persistence of teacher attrition is a serious concern. Using an online survey and interviews in a sequential mixed-methods approach, this study investigates the perceptions of high school science teachers regarding factors that contribute to their employment decisions. The study also compares first-career and second-career science teachers&apos; perceptions of retention and attrition factors and identifies conditions that urban school leaders can establish to support the retention of their science teachers. A purposeful sample of 138 science teachers from urban area New England public high schools with 50% or more Free and Reduced Price Lunch-eligible students participated in the survey. Twelve survey respondents were subsequently interviewed. In accord with extant research, this study&apos;s results suggest that school leadership is essential to fostering teacher retention. The findings also reveal the importance of autonomy, professional community, and adequate resources to support science instruction. Although mentoring and induction programs receive low importance ratings in this study, career-changers view these programs as more important to their retention than do first-career science teachers. Second-career interviewees, in particular, voice the importance of being treated as professionals by school leaders. Future research may examine the characteristics of mentoring and induction programs that make them most responsive to the needs of first-career and second-career science teachers. Future studies may also investigate the aspects of school leadership and professional autonomy that are most effective in promoting science teacher retention. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563571</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Factors Affecting the Retention of First-Career and Second-Career Science Teachers in Urban High Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Lesley University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5693-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>303</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602613</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Athletics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Educators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Trainers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiential Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socialization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rooney, Kevin F.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Athletic trainers work in clinical settings such as secondary schools, colleges and universities, sports medicine clinics, professional sports, hospitals, and other healthcare environments. However, with the rapid expansion of athletic training education programs (ATEP) over the years, another role for the athletic trainer has developed, the athletic trainer educator. Consequently, it is currently becoming increasingly apparent that athletic trainers must also be equipped with the knowledge and expertise to teach, mentor, and train the future generations of certified athletic trainers within the classroom. Recently, researchers (Hertel et al., 2001; Craig, 2006; Rich, 2009) have argued that athletic training instructors lack the necessary pedagogical knowledge to be more effective instructors. However, athletic training education is a unique environment that provides both a wealth of content knowledge and many opportunities for students and professionals to engage in inquiry, action, interaction, mentoring, and reflection. Does the athletic training environment provide informal opportunities for students and instructors to gain pedagogical expertise? To learn more about instructors&apos; preparation for teaching, this dissertation explored athletic training instructors perceived preparedness for teaching in an ATEP. This study used a mixed methods research approach through a self-developed and pre-piloted electronic questionnaire. The approach consisted of collecting and analyzing scalable quantitative and qualitative data as well as written narrative qualitative responses from 364 participants currently teaching within an ATEP. In addition, quantitative data was collected from ATEP program directors regarding their perceptions of pedagogy on instructor preparation and its place within athletic training (AT) education. Through the study&apos;s findings, it became evident that instructors&apos; perceived preparedness for teaching is explained by several theories of learning, such as the mentor/protege model of learning, experiential learning theory, and social learning theory. Demonstrated by their actions, attitudes, and beliefs, participants placed high value on pedagogy, its importance on effective teaching, and its place within AT education. Furthermore, from within athletic training&apos;s unique clinical field and classroom settings, participants demonstrated how each environment provided them with their perceived foundations for teaching within an ATEP. Despite these findings, formal pedagogical preparation and its place within athletic training curricula needs further exploration. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563572</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Athletic Training: Instructors Perceived Preparedness for Teaching in an Athletic Training Education Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Lesley University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5694-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>140</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602614</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>State Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Remedial Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Entrance Examinations</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Solomon, Jibril</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Massachusetts</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Massachusetts</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 1998, the Massachusetts Board of Higher Education, with assistance from the Developmental Assessment and Placement Advisory Committee, adopted an assessment policy that set standards for college placement testing at Massachusetts public colleges and universities. The purposes of the policy were to place students more adequately suited for college remedial coursework at the state colleges and to ensure compatibility and comparability of implementation across all the public campuses. Limited research exists on the accuracy of the implementation of college placement assessments. Prior research focused on the ethical dilemmas associated with mandatory placement. This research investigated how the Massachusetts public four-year institutions implement the college placement testing policies. This study addresses the &amp;quot;knowledge-building&amp;quot; about implementation by asking the following questions: What is being implemented, why, for whom and how do campus histories, cultures, demographics and practitioner buy-in shape what gets implemented? The role of college readiness assessment and placement is high-stakes because placement in remedial courses serves as gatekeepers to students&apos; abilities to access college credit-bearing coursework. Remedial courses do not count towards graduation, are not transferrable, and charge same tuition rates as credit-bearing ones. Students placed in remedial education programs experience higher college dropout rates than their counterparts. A mixed methods design this study surveyed college assessment administrators, and found that while seventy-three percent of the colleges implement the state&apos;s policy, there is a plethora of incongruities in the ways implementation occurs (i.e., in mathematics, fifty-four percent used different elementary algebra cut-off scores; in English, sixty-nine percent test writing differently). Results from the survey showed that current assessment experiences and outcomes of first-time first-year students are inconsistent. Students entering different Massachusetts public four-year campuses are receiving varying and sometimes conflicting signals about their college readiness competencies and remedial placement outcomes. The findings call attention to disconnections that exist between policy and practice in the state assessment system and recommend the state (a) rethink how to use new assessments to develop a system capable of supporting students through the K-12 through higher education pipeline; and (b) gather more information about how to evaluate its remedial programs&apos; benefits and costs. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563573</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>College Readiness Policy Implementation in the Massachusetts Public Higher Education System from Policy to Practice: An Analysis of the Implementation of the State College Placement Testing (CPT) Policies at the Four Year Public Institutions</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Lesley University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5695-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>131</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602615</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Virtual Classrooms</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrated Learning Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kilgore, Leah dee Carter</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This mixed-method research examines student achievement, student interaction and social elements to determine which elements support online course completion for students in a state virtual school. The quantitative goals seek to find a possible degree of convergence with the course completion average grade. Qualitative data from 10 high school students, their teachers, and quantitative data from their courses were gathered. Quantitative data from the learning management system (LMS) was reproduced, scrubbed of unwanted data, such as dropped students. Mixed method constant comparison was performed to determine a descriptive analysis of three variables: student achievement, student interaction, and social elements. Using the data gathered from the qualitative interviews, a yes or no was assigned to the students for behavioral, cognitive, and social skills. Using descriptive statistics, the skills were compared to the students&apos; course grades. The results revealed a strong pattern match of data for Research Question 1. This data was indicative of the need for behavioral, cognitive, and social skills to complete an online course. Quantitative and teacher data were grouped by themes: asynchronous, administrative, and assessments; synchronous added for teacher data. A constant comparison of data correspondence was performed between the student course average grade, the access data, LMS theme data, and the course average final grade. The investigation of Research Question 2 indicated that the LMS&apos;s reporting module can determine interactions to support online course completion by providing average grade analysis along with access analysis and tool usage analysis. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563574</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Analysis of Student Achievement, Student Interaction, and Social Elements That Support Online Course Completion for High School Students as Compared Qualitatively with Quantitative Data Retrieved via a Learning Management System</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Piedmont College</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5706-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>298</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602620</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Jews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>North Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Philosophy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Seminars</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theological Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semitic Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Concept Mapping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Collectivism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Judaism</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bell-Kligler, Roberta</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Israel</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Israel</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The role of Israel in the identity of North American Jews is of concern and interest to community leaders, philosophers of Jewish education, and most important, practitioners in the field. Although there is an awareness of the need to help emerging Jewish educators grapple with the complex questions surrounding Israel engagement, little research exists about how connections to Israel are formed and how novice educators translate them into practice. This dissertation explores the evolving attitudes of young Jewish educators regarding Israel and Israel education. It looks closely at four graduate students of education, all of whom took part in a three-week seminar in Israel, a mandatory aspect of their graduate studies in Jewish Education at the Davidson School of the Jewish Theological Seminary. Using a mixed methodology, a case study of each participant is presented. Over the five years of the study, participants filled out written questionnaires, participated in semi-structured interviews, and drew concept maps. Findings from these four participants were compared with findings from their entire cohort (37 students) as well as five subsequent cohorts (approximately 100 students). The study produced a number of key conclusions: Israel orientation is influenced by many factors and is extremely dynamic; a pronounced yearning for community and collective is part of the evolving approach of young educators; Hebrew language plays a positive and central role in connection to Israel; and while the pre-service seminar in Israel did not fulfill the participants&apos; expectations about Israel education, which were different from those of the program designers, it did contribute significantly to the participants&apos; personal growth and attitudes. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563575</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Case Studies of North American Jewish Educators: Attitudes Regarding Israel and Israel Engagement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, The Jewish Theological Seminary of America</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5855-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>391</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602627</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Involvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Community Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wyatt, Aimee</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to examine the effect that community partnerships could have on school climate and, ultimately, student achievement. Specifically, community partnerships that were formed through the PENCIL (Public Education Needs Community Involvement and Leadership) Foundation in Nashville, Tennessee were researched to determine their influence on the schools they serve. This mixed methods research study used a purposeful sample of 33 elementary schools and conducted interviews with three case study schools from that sample. The quantitative portion of the study consisted of an examination of the relationship between school climate as measured by the TELL (Teaching, Empowering, Learning, and Leading) survey and student achievement as measured by the TCAP (Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program) data. It was found that the level of involvement of the community partner and the quality of the relationship between the community partner and the school were significant indicators of effective partnerships. The quantitative data revealed that the most significant predictor of student achievement from the TELL survey was the level that teachers felt supported by the parents of the students. The findings resulted in the development of a PENCIL Partnership Assessment Tool so that the PENCIL Foundation could use data to maintain quality partnerships and measure the effectiveness of the programs that partners implemented in schools. Further research is needed to determine other factors that affect school climate, student achievement, and community partnerships in schools in order to provide more precise data for the assessment of the partnerships. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563576</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effect of Community Involvement through PENCIL Partners on School Climate and Student Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4306-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>198</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602395</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Safety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Violence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Counties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Terrorism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Qualifications</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Henderson, Joyce Herod</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Our schools are considered a place of safety for learning, however, the unfortunate reality is that schools may face crises and violence. Leadership styles vary among school leaders and provide the framework for handling daily challenges. This mixed-methods research design was used to investigate the individual leadership styles of public school principals from twelve counties in southwestern Pennsylvania and their experiences with and preparedness for incidents of school violence. Quantitative data were collected using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, the Evaluation Survey for School Terrorism, and a brief demographic questionnaire. Using SPSS, descriptive statistics summarized the survey data and further data analysis used an independent-samples t-test to compare preparedness for school violence and leadership style. A statistical significance was not found between the two groups. Qualitative data were collected through personal interviews and provided descriptions of personal leadership styles, school violence experiences, preparedness for and effective leadership during crises. Although some interviewees stated no personal experience with an act of school violence, each understood the threat potential, the expectation to respond, and the unfortunate reality that may await them. From the data analysis, findings from the study revealed that building relationships is important for the general welfare of students and staff, that violent school incidents regardless of location have an effect on the general sense of preparedness for a similar event, and that school leader&apos;s leadership style affects the climate and culture of the school. When a school crisis occurs, the responsible, skilled, professional leadership in our schools is, and always will be, the first level of defense against any threat that has the potential to harm children. The conclusions confirm that schools are safe places. Leadership is the key. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563577</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Mixed Methods Study: Principals&apos; Perceived Leadership Styles and Ability to Lead during a School Violence Crisis</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5438-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>232</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602511</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Moral Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Judaism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Biographies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Base for Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Citizen Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Portraiture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personal Narratives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Jews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Arabs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>North Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sela Kol, Aviva Helena</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Israel</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Israel</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>My study concerns the teacher knowledge of &amp;quot;mehankhim,&amp;quot; teachers in Israeli high schools entrusted to promote students&apos; moral, civic, and social growth. It examines two &amp;quot;mehankhim&amp;quot; from a secular Israeli high school who participated in a long-term professional development program in secular Jewish education, centered by traditional and modern Jewish texts. This study is situated within the body of research on teachers&apos; professional development, focusing on the vocation of &amp;quot;mehanekh&amp;quot; in secular Jewish education, teachers&apos; professional knowledge, and &amp;quot;mehankhim&apos;s&amp;quot; life stories. I suggest that &amp;quot;mehankhim&amp;quot; are professionals, with a professional practical knowledge unique to them, despite their current lack of specific training for their vocation. One major source of knowledge that informs the practice of today&apos;s &amp;quot;mehankhim&amp;quot; is the historical legacy of the role. A second is the evolution of Israeli public discourse, which demands a corresponding evolution in the undefined &amp;quot;mission statement&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;mehankhim,&amp;quot; and in their preparation and in-service training. Using the qualitative method of portraiture and relying on narrative analysis, I have drawn portraits of two &amp;quot;mehankhim.&amp;quot; I completed a full ethnographic survey of the participants in their professional setting, engendering the creation of a multi-layered, comprehensive and esthetic whole. This study examines ways to professionalize the vocation of &amp;quot;mehankhim.&amp;quot; It offers hope for change in the Israeli public discourse by well-trained Jewish and Arab &amp;quot;mehankhim,&amp;quot; invigorated with a new popular mandate; it suggests an opportunity for Jewish Israeli &amp;quot;mehankhim&amp;quot; to collaborate with their American counterparts in Jewish education, giving Jewish texts a central role. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563578</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>&amp;quot;Text-Books and Textpeople&amp;quot; (A. J. Heschel): What Is the Role of the Mehanekh in the Jewish Secular High School in Israel, and What Is the Place of Jewish Texts within That Role?</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, The Jewish Theological Seminary of America</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2011-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5866-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>301</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602633</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accuracy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mizell, Paul J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study was a case study of the experiences and perceptions of collaborative, subject-alike planning among middle school teachers. Many investigators have identified gaps between teacher planning and classroom instruction and have asserted that teacher planning often occurs independently and in isolation of other teachers. Researchers in other studies have concluded that collaboration among teachers allows teachers to share experiences and enhances classroom learning. From a constructivist theoretical framework, learning is the result of interactions and deliberate processes by teachers that require students to assimilate knowledge. Key research questions in this study focused on how middle school teachers perceived subject-alike planning to impact classroom instruction and student achievement. Data were gathered from 5 teacher interviews, 2 panel discussions, and 3 observations of teacher planning sessions. Data were coded and common themes were identified based on the theoretical framework. Triangulation of data and member checking ensured the accuracy and credibility of study findings. Findings in this study indicated that participating teachers perceived collaborative planning with subject-alike teachers to improve classroom instruction and increase student mastery of content in their classrooms. Recommendations for administrators include providing quality common planning time for subject-alike teachers that contributes to their professional growth and improves classroom instruction. Results from this study contribute to positive social change by clarifying teacher beliefs and perceptions regarding the effectiveness of collaborative subject specific planning on classroom instruction and student and teacher learning. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563579</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Case Study of Collaborative, Subject-Alike Planning among Middle School Teachers</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5113-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>145</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602490</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>General Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inclusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Primary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multivariate Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Biasotti, Nancy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Regular education teachers&apos; self-efficacy may be negatively impacted due to a lack of professional development and experience teaching students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Research links teacher self-efficacy with increased student academic achievement. The purpose of this study was to examine to what degree training on ASD during and following teacher certification and experience had on overall teacher self-efficacy. This one-shot case study was based upon Bandura&apos;s theoretical construct of self-efficacy and secondarily on Tschannen-Moran, Woolfolk Hoy, and Hoy&apos;s theory of self-efficacy. The Teachers&apos; Sense of Efficacy Scales (TSES) was used to collect data from regular education teachers with experience teaching students with ASD in 1st through 3rd grades in a Southern California school district. After the data were assessed for accuracy, missing data, and outliers, the analysis was conducted on 36 cases. MANOVAs were conducted to assess differences on overall self-efficacy. Separate ANOVAs were used since the overall self-efficacy and the subscores were highly correlated. Though the sample in this study was small (n = 36) for data analysis, the effect size showed that training experience and grade levels had a moderate to large effect on teacher self-efficacy (0.16, 0.13, 0.13 respectively). Therefore teacher self-efficacy has a positive impact on student achievement. Implications for positive social change are self-efficacious teachers increase the academic achievement of students with ASD. In this way, such students can become self-sustaining, dynamic members of the work force and community. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563580</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Professional Development Training in Autism and Experience on Teachers&apos; Self-Efficacy</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4290-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>132</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602382</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Religious Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Christianity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>General Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Based Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Response Style (Tests)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>St. John, Kelvin Wesley</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Kansas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Kansas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Today&apos;s Millennials, the first generation to reach their majority in this millennium, often compartmentalize their faith lives from their social and work lives. MidAmerica Nazarene University (MNU) offers a course in Spiritual Formation once each spring. The enrollment for this elective course ranges from twelve to eighteen students per class. Each undergraduate must take three general education courses that inform their faith: Old Testament Literature, New Testament Literature, and Christian Beliefs. However, simple math shows that approximately just over one thousand of MNU&apos;s 1,037 undergraduates are unable to take Spiritual Formation--the course that forms their faith. This study offered online delivery of spiritual disciplines, a small yet vital part of the Spiritual Formation course. The twelve disciplines featured in the study are disciplines that were evident in the life of Christ. The local context for this study was MNU. Because of their affinity for technology and social networking, the target population consisted of all millennial undergraduate students. The purpose of this six-week study of Millennials was to evaluate the effectiveness of how MNU undergraduates leveraged social networking and new media to establish and develop the daily practice of a spiritual discipline that Christ modeled. The findings suggest that (1) the practice of spiritual disciplines can be propagated through the use of technology, (2) Millennials are not as dependent on technology as culture portrays them, (3) Millennials prefer immediacy and convenience in the technology they use, (4) they value face-to-face relationships, (5) social networking caused a halo effect on accountability, (6) the use of technology varied over the course of the study, and (7) technology doubly drove accountability. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563581</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Creating Space for God in the Lives of Millennials by Leveraging Technology to Practice a Spiritual Discipline Modeled by Christ</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Min. Dissertation, Asbury Theological Seminary</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5970-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>336</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602732</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brown, Jennifer V.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of the study was to determine if the eight steps of the Continuous Improvement Model (CIM) provided a framework to raise achievement and to focus educators in identifying high-yield literacy strategies. This study sought to determine if an examination of the assessment data in reading revealed differences among schools that fully, partially, or did not implement the CIM. The research focused what happened during the school year 2011-12 in nine schools. The qualitative research attempted to discover the relationship among the eight steps of the CIM and the educators who implemented the model. The design of the qualitative research focused on the schools that implemented the CIM including the perceptions of participants regarding the impact upon reading/literacy proficiency. Interviews with leadership teams in six schools that implemented partially and fully were conducted. A survey was conducted among teachers from six schools that implemented the CIM. Quantitative data were collected from student results on the Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program Reading/Language Arts assessments for school years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012. The results showed practical and significant differences in achievement scores among those schools that partially and fully implemented the model compared to those schools that did not implement. The study also highlighted positive and negative perceptions of the model and identified high-yield strategies. The findings suggest a carefully orchestrated plan to address literacy should be implemented during the early stages in a child&apos;s education. The CIM provides a framework for educators to design a literacy plan that comprehensively addresses the needs of teachers and students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563582</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Continuous Improvement Model: A K-12 Literacy Focus</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4235-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>251</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602327</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Literacy Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smith, Vicky B.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of the study was to determine if the eight steps of the Continuous Improvement Model (CIM) provided a framework to raise achievement and to focus educators in identifying high-yield literacy strategies. This study sought to determine if an examination of the assessment data in reading revealed differences among schools that fully, partially, or did not implement the CIM. The research focused what happened during the school year 2011-12 in nine schools. The qualitative research attempted to discover the relationship among the eight steps of the CIM and the educators who implemented the model. The design of the qualitative research focused on the schools that implemented the CIM including the perceptions of participants regarding the impact upon reading/literacy proficiency. Interviews with leadership teams in six schools that implemented partially and fully were conducted. A survey was conducted among teachers from six schools that implemented the CIM. Quantitative data were collected from student results on the Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program Reading/Language Arts assessments for school years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012. The results showed practical and significant differences in achievement scores among those schools that partially and fully implemented the model compared to those schools that did not implement. The study also highlighted positive and negative perceptions of the model and identified high-yield strategies. The findings suggest a carefully orchestrated plan to address literacy should be implemented during the early stages in a child&apos;s education. The CIM provides a framework for educators to design a literacy plan that comprehensively addresses the needs of teachers and students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563583</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Continuous Improvement Model: A K-12 Literacy Focus</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4285-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>251</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602377</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Merit Pay</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Compensation (Remuneration)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Balls, John Daniel</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation determined the perceived association of merit pay and teacher qualities in the sample schools. The research focused on the association of merit pay and levels of teacher qualities and if a relationship exists between teacher performance-based compensation and teacher qualities/performance. The indications and suggestions of this research were based on the data collected from surveys and interviews of teachers in the two sample schools on performance pay plans. This component of the study identified any perceived association of merit pay and teacher qualities. This information was corroborated with research collected on studies done on school systems that have adopted merit pay plans. Information was obtained from multi-question surveys from middle school teachers, open-ended questions, and interviews. The results of this research indicated that there was a perceived association of merit pay and teacher qualities in these two sample middle schools. This association may lead to increased teacher efficacy and, ultimately, increased student achievement. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563584</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Perceived Association of Merit Pay and Teacher Qualities in Two Middle Schools in a Southeastern State</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Gardner-Webb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5999-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>120</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602761</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Word Order</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intonation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bilingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sociolinguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computational Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pragmatics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discourse Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Barrera-Tobon, Carolina</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation is a variationist sociolinguistic analysis of the variable word order and prosody of copular constructions (&amp;quot;Nicolas es feliz&amp;quot; versus &amp;quot;&apos;Feliz&apos; es Nicolas,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Es Nicolas &apos;feliz,&apos;&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Es &apos;feliz&apos; Nicolas,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Nicolas is &apos;happy&apos;&amp;quot;) in the Spanish of first- and second-generation Spanish-English bilinguals in New York City (henceforth NYC). The data used for the study come from a spoken corpus of Spanish in NYC based on 140 sociolinguistic interviews (details of the corpus will be presented in Chapter Three). This dissertation addresses the question of whether second-generation bilinguals have a less flexible word order in Spanish as a result of their increased use of, and contact with, English, where a more fixed order prevails. We will show that the informants in the present study, like their peers in Los Angeles and other parts of the US, exhibit a more rigid word order compared to their first-generation peers. We have established that this increase in rigidity of word order among the second-generation can be attributed in large part to their increased use of and contact with English. The studies mentioned above have interpreted their results to mean that these speakers are losing or have lost the discourse pragmatic constraints that govern word order. However, the data here show that the first- and second-generation speakers in the present study share many of the same conditioning variables and constraints for word order, although these variables appear to account for a smaller amount of variance among the second-generation. In this way, we have established that the second-generation is not losing the discourse pragmatic constraints that govern word order, but that they are differently sensitive to these constraints. In fact, we show that second-generation speakers are very capable of communicating the pragmatic functions that the first-generation speakers do using word order because they maintain the prosodic details of their first-generation counterparts. In other words, the second-generation communicates these functions in ways that are slightly different from the first-generation, relying more on prosodic resources than syntactic ones. Furthermore, the data indicate that their prosodic patterns are not modeled after the prosody of English. In general terms we show that the second-generation does not have a different grammar from their first-generation counterparts, as is claimed by other researchers. Instead we show that these speakers favor certain first-generation strategies over others. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563585</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Contact-Induced Changes in Word Order and Intonation in the Spanish of New York City Bilinguals</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3576-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>201</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601855</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technological Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influence of Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Aptitude Treatment Interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Class Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mooney, Melody Anne</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study is to examine the impacts of integrating new literacies practices into high school curriculum content classrooms. This study examined data collected through observations and semi-structured interviews conducted with four high school content curriculum teachers. Analysis of the data resulted in essential findings emerging across all four classrooms, suggesting that new literacies practices in the classroom have an impact on both students&apos; and teachers&apos; classroom practices. Implications of the study suggested that students appear to have greater leverage in making deeper learning connections when they are engaged with new literacies practices in the classroom. Furthermore, teachers appeared to migrate between pedagogical models of teaching and learning with transitional ease. A key implication of this study is the need for further research focused on what leads teachers to adopt effective technology and new literacies practices in the content classroom. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563586</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>New Literacies and Pedagogical Migration: Exploring Impacts of New Literacies on Instruction and Learning in High School Content Classrooms</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.S. Dissertation, Arkansas State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4255-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>96</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602348</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Integrated Learning Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transcripts (Written Records)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Controlled Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sampling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Design Requirements</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Design</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dutta, Pratima</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) design theory is a design recommendation regarding the function and features of Learning Managements Systems (LMS) that can support the information-age learner-centered paradigm of education. The purpose of this study was to improve the proposed functions and features of the PIES design theory such that it is compatible with the technological needs of the information-age, learner-centered paradigm of education. Four schools or educational systems that embodied all or some of the characteristics of the learner-centered, information-age paradigm were selected through a purposeful, theoretical sampling process. They were selected based on how useful they would be in extending and improving the design recommendations for PIES and the extent to which the naturalistic cases had transitioned into the learner-centered, information-age paradigm of education. Research participants within these schools were chosen through a non-probability sampling method. Twenty teachers agreed to participate and were interviewed and observed. Data collected in the form of interview transcripts and observation notes were analyzed to reveal functions and features that could be added and removed from the PIES design theory. Data were analyzed to also reveal factors that encouraged/discouraged technology use, implementation, and policy. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563587</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) for the Learner-Centered Information-Age Paradigm of Education: A Study to Improve the Design of the Functions and Features of PIES</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3510-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>248</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601795</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Early Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Garmon, Terri P.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Georgia Criterion Referenced Tests</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_test>Georgia Criterion Referenced Tests</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Requirements of No Child Left Behind have caused tremendous interest in the effectiveness of preschool education programs. Intervention programs such as Head Start have existed for children with academic, social, or emotional delays. These programs provided services to help remediate deficits that are often observed in children from less privileged backgrounds. Recently states have established free, universal prekindergarten programs to enrich early language development and pre-literacy skills. Since literacy development is linked to the acquisition of language and vocabulary skills, preschool programs that emphasize early language development are thought to better prepare children for success in primary school. However, little research has been conducted to examine the causal relationship between prekindergarten participation and academic achievement in later primary grades. It is important to understand the relationship between participation in prekindergarten and academic performance in primary school in order to plan for effectiveness of prekindergarten programs. This study used casual-comparative design to examine secondary data for causal relationships regarding children who have participated in prekindergarten and children who have not participated in prekindergarten, and their performance on the Reading portion of the 3rd grade Georgia Criterion Referenced Competency Tests. Consideration was given to the type of prekindergarten program in which children participated, since public and private programs are currently approved and provided by the Georgia Department of Education. The samples used in this study were obtained from 3rd grade students in public school in rural South Georgia. Test results indicate that children who participated in prekindergarten administered through the public school system scored higher on 3rd evaluations than children who attended prekindergarten in a private setting or children who did not attend prekindergarten. Children who did not attend prekindergarten actually scored higher than those who attended prekindergarten in privately administered programs. Results indicate that resources may be most effectively in publicly administered programs. Students attending these programs experienced more effective long-term gains than children in private programs or children who did not attend prekindergarten. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563588</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Prekindergarten Participation as Related to Performance in Primary Grades</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5647-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>138</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602569</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Social Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Sites</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Privacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constitutional Law</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Civil Rights</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Judges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Science Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Pure, Rebekah Abigail</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Fourth Amendment</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_law>Fourth Amendment</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Advances in digital networked communication technology over the last two decades have brought the issue of personal privacy into sharper focus within contemporary public discourse. In this dissertation, I explain the Fourth Amendment and the role that privacy expectations play in the constitutional protection of personal privacy generally, and then narrow the focus on this issue to the context of social networking sites. For the legal protection of personal privacy under the Fourth Amendment, a person must have what courts term &amp;quot;a reasonable expectation of privacy.&amp;quot; For an expectation of privacy in a given context to be deemed reasonable, society must consider that expectation as reasonable, yet no empirical research has explored what society would consider to be a reasonable expectation of privacy in online contexts. I argue that in order to make decisions about societal privacy expectations, judges should rely on social science data to determine what society considers as being reasonable expectations of privacy within any given context, including online. I further argue that by using social science theories of privacy and protection, it is possible to predict people&apos;s privacy expectations in online contexts. More specifically, I suggest that based on research on privacy in various social science disciplines, people&apos;s normative expectations of privacy depend on what information they think is observable in specific situations. Findings from this study support the notion that people have lower expectations of privacy when they believe their information to be more readily observable, and the results highlight the complicated nature of privacy expectations in the social networking context in particular. A model was proposed in this dissertation to explore how people&apos;s privacy expectations differ depending on the audience for their personal information, and it was found that within the context of social networking sites, the factors that contribute to different types of privacy expectations (i.e., the privacy expectations surrounding different potential audiences for one&apos;s information) vary widely. That is, some privacy protection behaviors (implementing privacy settings) influence privacy expectations about the degree to which other social networking site (SNS) users should have access to one&apos;s personal information, whereas other privacy protection behaviors (reading a site&apos;s privacy policies) affect privacy expectations regarding what information people expect law enforcement officers to have access to in SNSs. Similarly, the factors that were hypothesized in the model to influence privacy protection behaviors, including for example, past experience using SNS, personality, and demographic variables, functioned differently depending on the type of privacy expectation. Implications of these results for law and policy are discussed, as are avenues for future research to investigate the role of privacy expectations in the broader privacy literature, both offline and online. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563589</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Privacy Expectations in Online Contexts</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4024-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>151</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602192</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expertise</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Jackson, Barcus C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>School districts across the country are charged with preparing the next generation for competing in a global economy and have spent billions of dollars on technology acquisition and Internet use. However, teachers do not feel prepared to integrate technology in the classroom. To prepare teachers for technology integration, the most common approach to professional development is the one-stop-shop. Teachers typically spend one hour to one day in professional development given the content area. &amp;quot;One-stop-shop&amp;quot; professional development focuses on training teachers to operate computers and software packages instead of how to integrate technology in the classroom (Knapp, 1996; McCannon &amp;amp; Crews, 2000). This type of training is not found appropriate for meeting teachers&apos; pedagogical needs and is too far removed from their day-to-day classroom practice. This type of training has yielded uninterested teachers and lack of teachers integrating technology in the classroom. To address this issue, data were collected from 209 teachers about their expertise for integrating in the classroom using the TPACK survey instrument. Demographic data were also collected to further identify teacher&apos;s unique preparation needs and to avoid a one-size-fits-all approach. Multiple Regression was used to identify teacher preparation needs for classroom technology integration. With the results, yielded as a group, teachers&apos; preparation needs are TK, SC, PK, PCK, TPK, and TCK. When data were filtered by demographic categories, teacher preparation needs for classroom technology integration were different. Conducting a Training Needs Analysis (TNA) should be the first step for preparing teachers in this regard. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563590</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Teachers&apos; Preparation Needs for Integrating Technology in the Classroom</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Missouri Baptist University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3008-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>121</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601562</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technological Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Objective Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Maderick, Joseph Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Technology is now integrated into the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) required to be a highly qualified 21st century teacher. Accurate measurement of digital competence has become critical. Self-assessment has been used widely to measure the digital competence of preservice teachers who are expected to integrate technology into their teaching. There is little in the literature indicating that there has been validation of self-assessment as a measure of that competence. While recent research studies have tested the validity of self-assessment verses objective testing among business and accounting students, there have been no studies of self-assessment validity conducted on digital competence among preservice teachers. This study matched surveys of subjective self-assessment and objective assessment on seven domains of digital competence for preservice teachers. The results indicate that all participant groups inaccurately self-assessed their digital competence. The study concluded that subjective self-assessment lacks appropriate validity and is not an accurate predictor of digital competence among preservice teachers. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563591</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Validity of Subjective Self-Assessment of Digital Competence among Undergraduate Preservice Teachers</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3062-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>184</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601594</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Test Results</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Biology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Superintendents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bostic, Cristi M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation evaluated the implementation of professional learning communities in a large suburban school district in North Carolina. The presence of shared and supportive leadership, shared values and vision, collective learning and application, shared personal practice, supportive conditions for relationships, and supportive conditions for structures are all attributes that were assessed to determine the degree of implementation. A quantitative and qualitative program evaluation was conducted using the CIPP evaluation model to determine the degree of implementation of professional learning communities and whether or not the implementation has had an impact on student achievement based on state end of course test results. The CIPP model of program evaluation is a systematic process to evaluate the context, input, process and product of a particular program to determine the effectiveness of the program. Teacher members of the Algebra I, English 9, and Biology professional learning communities at each of the six high schools were asked to complete the &amp;quot;Professional Learning Communities Assessment-Revised&amp;quot; survey. The researcher also requested to observe a sample of professional learning community meetings with these teachers to determine whether or not there is evidence that certain characteristics of the professional learning community concept exist. Interviews were conducted with each of the 6 principals, the assistant superintendent of secondary education and the facilitator of professional development. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563592</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluation of the Implementation of Professional Learning Communities and the Impact on Student Achievement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Gardner-Webb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6000-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>108</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602762</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 9</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physical Sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blended Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Honors Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Homework</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conventional Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Howell, Donna</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 9</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This mixed-methods action research study was designed to assess the achievement of ninth-grade Physical Science Honors students by analysis of pre and posttest data. In addition, perceptual data from students, parents, and the researcher were collected to form a complete picture of the flipped lecture format versus the traditional lecture format. The researcher utilized a 4MAT learning cycle in two Physical Science Honors classes. One of these classes was traditionally delivered with lecture-type activities taking place inside the classroom and homework-type activities taking place at home; the other inverted, or flipped, delivered with lecture-type activities taking place outside the classroom and homework-type activities taking place inside the classroom. Existing unit pre and posttests for both classes were analyzed for differences in academic achievement. At the completion of the units, the flipped class students and parents were surveyed, and student focus groups were convened to ascertain their perceptions of the flipped classroom delivery model. Statistical analysis of posttest data revealed that there is no significant difference between the traditional lecture delivery format and the flipped delivery format. Analysis of perceptual data revealed six themes that must be considered when deciding to flip the classroom: how to hold students accountable for viewing the at-home videos, accessibility of students to the required technology, technical considerations relating to the video production, comprehension of the material both during and after viewing the videos, pedagogy of the overall flipped method, and preference for the flipped method overall. Findings revealed that students, parents, and the researcher all had a preference for the flipped class format, provided the above issues are addressed. The flipped class format encourages students to become more responsible for their learning, and, in addition, students reported that the hands-on inquiry activities done in class aided them in learning the subject matter. It is recommended, however, that before instructors decide to flip the classroom, they ensure that all students have access to needed technology, that there is a plan in place for ensuring that the students actually view the assigned videos, that they have a way to create the videos and ensure adequate quality, and that some discussion is held in class after each assigned video to ensure comprehension of the material. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563593</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of an Inverted Instructional Delivery Model on Achievement of Ninth-Grade Physical Science Honors Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Gardner-Webb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6003-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>176</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602764</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alignment (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kick, Laura C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pacific Northwest</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 2007, Lisa Carter created the Total Instructional Alignment system--a process that aligns standards, curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Employed in several hundred school systems, the TIA process is a successful professional development program. The researcher developed an instrument to measure the success of the TIA process with the assistance of educational experts throughout the United States, administered the instrument utilizing teachers and administrators from the Pacific Northwest and readministered the instrument to a rural school district in the southeastern region of the United States. A comparative analysis methodology was conducted to discover if the results could measure, and to what extent, the perceived differences and effect as instructional practices are altered due to the Total Instructional Alignment process. The researcher was able to confirm that the Total Instructional Alignment professional development process created by Carter does increase the educators&apos; perceived awareness of the alignment of the standards, curriculum, instruction, and assessment, increase knowledge, and change behavior and performance. The research includes nine minor thematic units that were reported by respondents answering an open-ended question in relationship to TIA professional development. These results were confirmed using a mixed-methodology research design that included a comparative analysis and cumulative frequency distribution. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563594</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Comparative Analysis of the Measurement of Total Instructional Alignment</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Gardner-Webb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6005-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>151</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602766</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Magnet Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Place of Residence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Snapp, David Wayne</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>North Carolina</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>North Carolina</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This research was designed to examine the difference in student performance between minority magnet school students who live in the residential area for those magnet schools and minority students assigned to a non-magnet residential school. This difference in performance was measured by scale score differences from the North Carolina End-of-Grade tests in reading and math after the sample scores were converted to z scores using the state mean and standard deviation for the given years in the study. Performance growth was measured for students who were in the third grade in 2009-2010 and remained at their school through the fifth grade in 2011-2012. Participants used in the study were selected based on their race, the size of the school they attended, the percent of minority students attending that school, and whether they lived in the residential boundary for their school. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to import and evaluate data received from the district&apos;s accountability department. A mixed, two-factor repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine the data through multiple independent variables and the dependent variables of math and reading tests. A mixed, two-factor repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that there was a p value of 0.007 for groups over time, where the magnet and zone schools performed differently. A univariate, repeated-measures ANOVA of math scores determined that there was no statistically significant interaction between the groups over time in math. However, the same univariate analysis, when performed for reading scores, showed a p value of 0.005, meaning the type of school may have impacted the achievement of the students in the study. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563595</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Examination of Academic Growth of Minority Elementary Magnet School Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Gardner-Webb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6012-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>130</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602769</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Play</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Empathy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preadolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Natural Resources</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Environmental Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Anzek, Kimberly E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teaching children to be empathetic is important because empathy is linked with positive social behaviors, future academic success, and the development of work-related skills. Children&apos;s relationships with nature can help to establish their values and relationships with other people. The purpose of the study, based on empathy theory, was to determine if there is an association between empathy and environmental education and play. This quantitative, quasi-experimental design included 9- to 11-year-old children who attended an environmental play and education camp or a camp that was not environmental in nature. It was hypothesized that data would show a relationship between empathy and environmental knowledge/attitude and attending an environmental camp. Data included children&apos;s demographic characteristics, empathy scores from the Feeling and Thinking Scale, and environmental knowledge/attitude scores from The Environment Questionnaire and the Children&apos;s Environmental Attitudes and Knowledge Scale, measured before and after camp. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and linear regression were conducted to assess prepost differences in empathy scores. Both total environmental attitude and total environmental knowledge were found to be statistically significant positive predictors of empathy. Father&apos;s education and cognitive and affective empathy significantly predicted the type of camp attended. These findings suggest that empathy can predict how people treat nature and other people and can help develop respect for human and nonhuman life. Social change may be impacted in that people may have better relationships with each other and with the environment. Psychologists may benefit from this research as no previous research has been done regarding the relationship between empathy and environmentalism. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563596</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Potential Impact of Environmental Play and Education on Empathy in Children</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6105-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>147</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602776</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Shortage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hermeneutics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cooley, Shirley S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>To relieve the nursing faculty shortage, notable numbers of master&apos;s prepared clinical nurse experts are entering the ranks of nursing faculty to teach the prelicensure nursing student. The transition from clinical practice to the academia raises concern about the adequacy of preparation for the complex specialization role of nurse educator. In response to this concern, this hermeneutic phenomenological study was implemented to gain insight about the experience of the novice nursing faculty in academia. It examined the perceptions of facilitators and barriers to the development of nurse educator practice competence and also sought to identify transformative learning experiences related to novice faculty development. The data consisted of audio recordings and verbatim transcripts of opened-ended face-to-face interviews along with journal data describing the day-to-day experiences as novice nurse educators. The findings revealed key facilitators and barriers to the development of nurse educator competence and transformative learning experiences which also influenced the development of teaching practice competence. The implications of this study underscored the need for two primary components in the novice nurse educator experience to support the development of teaching practice competence, a competent compassionate mentor and an internship program for novice nursing faculty. Major elements that contribute to transformative learning experiences for new nursing faculty were also identified. The recommendations are to create academic environments that incorporate key facilitators to the development of teaching practice competence and to structure academic communities to enable transformative learning for new faculty, both being important to the development of quality excellence in the role of nursing faculty teaching the prelicensure nursing student. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563597</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Lived Experience of Novice Nursing Faculty in Academia</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6111-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>122</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602782</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Criterion Referenced Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constructivism (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time on Task</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Principles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Frias, Ramon</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)&apos;s emphasis of reading, language arts, and mathematics (RLA&amp;amp;M) and its de-emphasis of science has been a source of great concern among educators. Through an objectivist and constructionist framework, this study explored the unforeseen effects of the NCLB on public science education among Title I (TI) and non-Title I (NTI) students. The research questions focused on the effects of NCLB on Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) scores in the high-stakes subjects of reading, language arts, mathematics and the low stakes subject of science among TI and NTI 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students in a north Georgia County during the 2010/2011 school year. This study also compared instructional time TI and NTI teachers dedicated to science. A causal-comparative quantitative methodology was used to analyze Georgia&apos;s public domain CRCT scores. Three independent-samples t tests showed that TI schools exhibited significantly lower Science CRCT scores than did NTI students at all grade levels (p &amp;lt; 0.0001). The data also showed CRCT scores in high-stakes subjects between TI and NTI students converging but science CRCT scores between TI and NTI students diverging. The self-report survey indicated no significant differences between TI and NTI teachers&apos; instructional science time (t (107) = 1.49, p = 0.137). A teacher development project was designed to focus on improving teacher science content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge through a formal introduction to the nature of science. With increasing global science competition, science is more relevant than ever, and communities need students with strong science foundations. Further study is recommended to analyze the factors associated with this science gap between TI and NTI students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563598</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Science Scores in Title I Elementary Schools in North Georgia: A Project Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6114-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>178</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602785</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbal Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Class Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nonverbal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intellectual Disability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mainstreaming</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Krueger, Kathryne Kelley</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Minimally verbal school aged children with autism (MVSACwA) receive the bulk of their behavioral and academic support in schools yet we know little about the environments to which they are exposed. This population of children has often been excluded from studies and thus, underrepresented in current data on autism. As increasing numbers of minimally verbal school aged children with autism enter into public school special and regular education classrooms, it is crucial that research literature explores the classroom dynamics of this population. The present study set out to better understand how MVSACwA were academically, socially and communicatively engaged in the contexts in which they spend the most time during the day by characterizing classroom quality and adult-child interactions in schools. Thirty-five MVSACwA were observed in their classrooms for two hours during their typical morning routine. This descriptive, exploratory study had four main findings. Minimally verbal school aged children with autism were 1) mostly unengaged in classroom activities, 2) they communicated frequently but rarely with gesture use, 3) adults missed many of their communicative attempts, and 4) when adults and children engaged it was more often with aides than with teachers. When grouped by cognitive impairment or classroom quality, results were driven more by child cognitive impairment than classroom quality. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563599</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Minimally Verbal School-Aged Children with Autism: Communication, Academic Engagement and Classroom Quality</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6220-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>64</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602826</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hoppe, Christina R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Little attention has been given to boundary issues surrounding student-faculty relationships in higher education. Researchers have indicated that students and faculty are both uncertain about the boundaries of their social relationships. Faculty teaching in psychology has also raised questions about how social relationships with students are managed. Principle-based ethics was the theory that guided this research because it explains how one&apos;s moral foundation influences one&apos;s ethical decision making and beliefs. An important gap in the current literature remains regarding the limited research that has explored differences in student and faculty beliefs in the same study. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in beliefs based on respondent characteristics and to identify variables that predicted faculty beliefs. A random sample of 222 students and faculty from a large university in the Midwest completed the &amp;quot;Student-Faculty Interaction Questionnaire.&amp;quot; An ANOVA indicated significant main effects for respondent type and gender, and a significant interaction where male faculty rated the interaction items more conservatively than did female faculty and students. A generalized linear equation was also used to predict faculty beliefs. The analysis indicated that academic discipline was a significant variable here. This research can promote social change through increasing the possibility of awareness, discussion, education, and guidance for students, faculty, and universities about social relationships in higher education. Ongoing dialogue and education by universities and faculty will be beneficial for reducing the risks for boundary crossing, blurring, or violations. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563600</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Student and Faculty Beliefs about Nonsexual Social Relationship Boundaries in Higher Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6251-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>192</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602831</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Use</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Business</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adoption (Ideas)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telecommunications</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kamara, Mohamed K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Sierra Leone</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Sierra Leone</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study utilized the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to determine Internet users&apos; perceptions and behavioral intentions to accept Wi-Fi technology deployment in Sierra Leone. The study sought to investigate (a) the Internet usage rates before and after Wi-Fi adaption in Freetown; (b) differences in Internet usage patterns among Internet users in Sierra Leone; and (c) the relationship between Internet use and perceived business outcomes, which indicated a gap in the literature reviewed for the current study. The study used a quantitative descriptive research design using an online survey as a principal approach for data collection. The sample consisted of 150 Internet users who responded to an online survey. Analysis of variance and Pearson&apos;s product moment correlation coefficients were used for data analyses. Research results indicated that regardless of age, gender, or job position, the people of the Sierra Leone have positive perceptions and behavioral intentions for Wi-Fi technology. The results of this study demonstrated no statistical significant differences in age, gender, and job position amongst Internet users. The results indicated statistical significance in (a) Internet usage rates before and after Wi-Fi adaption in Freetown, (b) Internet usage patterns among Internet users in Sierra Leone, and (c) the relationship between Internet use and perceived business outcomes, as measured by the performance expectancy subscale of UTAUT. The results of this investigation provide insight on Wi-Fi technology capable of impacting future Internet usage in Sierra Leone. Knowledge gained may sociologically or psychologically encourage sustainable initiatives for more advanced wireless fidelity, or facilitate the use of other innovations and modernisms in technologies. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563601</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining Internet Usage Demographic Differences and the Relationship between Internet Usage and Business Outcomes in Sierra Leone</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6253-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>191</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602832</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Teacher Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communication Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Leong, Karen C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The topic of parental involvement has been widely studied but within the topic, the area of training teachers to work with parents has not. The training and preparation for teachers to work with parents are scarce and at times, non-existent. The primary purpose of this study is to examine effective middle school teachers about the steps on their path of learning to work effectively with parents. The study also included middle student teachers that shared their needs in learning how to work with parents. The study focused on interviewing highly successful middle school teachers in the area of working with parents. The first part of the study involved 18 semi-structured interviews with teachers who were recommended by their building administrators because the administrators have first hand information about the expert teachers in the area of working with parents. The second part of the study involved focus group interviews with middle school student teachers that shared their experiences, training and materials to learn to work with parents effectively in a university setting. Several homogeneous focus groups were established based on the SES (socio-economic status) level of schools where the student teachers were assigned. Data were analyzed and the results included eight categories that impacted the steps of learning for middle school teachers to work with parents: amount of training, methods of learning, personal experiences, communication tools, approaches to communication, teachers&apos; beliefs, support for teachers and suggestions for future training. The steps on the path of learning for teachers to work with parents were clearly established. Almost all teachers start with little to no training in the university as an undergraduate student. Often, teachers begin their first teaching position unprepared to work with parents. Therefore, they are left with a few methods of learning by being mentored, being observant and, unfortunately, trial and error as well. Moreover, teachers drew from their personal experiences ranging from being parents to doing other types of jobs. On the other hand, teachers learn to utilize the variety of communication tools that are widely available at most schools but the effectiveness of teachers comes from the wisdom in the usage of the communication tools for specific purposes. These steps of learning are supported by teacher&apos;s own beliefs and approaches to communication. Furthermore, regardless of a teacher&apos;s specific path of learning, he/she requires support and resources including administrators, counselors, teachers, other support staff and time. Finally, the participants gave suggestions for the purpose of improving training for future teachers. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563602</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Building an Effective One-on-One Working Relationship between Middle School Teachers and Parents: What Are the Steps of Learning for Teachers?</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri - Saint Louis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5658-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>297</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602580</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drug Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drug Abuse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pilot Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prevention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Smoking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Drinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Partnerships in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Agencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Police Community Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Finance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Butler, Miriam</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Missouri</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Missouri</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Drug use and abuse presents a significant problem to individuals, families, and law enforcement in communities across the United States. Methamphetamine is a particular concern in one rural eastern Missouri county. Much work being done in this county by multiple agencies to decrease methamphetamine production and use. Little attention, however, has been focused on prevention in the elementary schools. Substance use and experimentation may begin as early as 12 years old or even earlier. By initiating a proven drug prevention education curriculum before children begin to experiment with tobacco, alcohol and illicit drugs, drug use may be delayed or prevented. Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) grant funds have supported a collaborative initiative between the University of Missouri St Louis College of Nursing, Partners Responsible 4 Increasing Drug Education (PRIDE), the county Sheriff&apos;s Department, and the County Health Department. This community-based participatory action research process has focused on the implementation of the &amp;quot;Brain Power&amp;quot;! Junior Scientist Program developed by the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The purpose of this specific project was to create a pilot tool to evaluate the effectiveness of the &amp;quot;Brain Power&amp;quot;! program by determining gain in drug-related scientific knowledge after the presentation of six learning modules for third graders in a rural eastern Missouri county elementary school. Data from pre and post tests demonstrated a gain in knowledge of information covered in the modules for the third graders in this project. Project benefits, limitations, barriers, challenges and implications for future research and application to practice are discussed. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563603</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Pilot Project to Develop a Tool to Assess Gain in Knowledge in Third Graders Participating in a Science Based Drug Prevention Education Curriculum</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.N.P. Dissertation, University of Missouri - Saint Louis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5638-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>56</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602563</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Portfolio Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Faculty College Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ambrose, G. Alex</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Indiana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Indiana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study considers how advising ePortfolios are uniquely situated to address a current challenge in the application of educational technologies: using the right tool for the right job for the right reason at the right time. The particular problem identified for investigation lies at the intersection of two central issues: first, in the age of accountability in higher education, academic advisors lack both a tool and a metric for assessing advising; second, the current ePortfolio field struggles to prove methodological validity with regard to design, development, delivery, and evaluation. These ePortfolios were systematically studied using an approach that provided a workable method for conceptualizing the advising ePortfolio, its design, and its development to improve faculty-student engagement with first-generation students. The sample was composed of 10 first-generation first-year students at the University of Notre Dame. The overall methodology followed design and development research for product/tool use and evaluation. Data were gathered using surveys, interviews, and observations. This study answered the following questions: What procedures were undertaken to facilitate the design and development of a validated advising ePortfolio tool? In what ways is the advising ePortfolio prototype practical in meeting the requirements specified for the target group--first-year first-generation students? To what extent is the advising ePortfolio effective in impacting student engagement, particularly with first-year first-generation students? Key findings indicate that the advising ePortfolio was easy to learn, easy to use, and highly enjoyable. In addition, participants reported that the advising ePortfolio improved the effectiveness of the advising process and, as a result, had a clear impact on increasing student engagement. Beyond the overall positive impact on student engagement, two significant outcomes and contributions emerged: first, the development of the blended advising model, which uses the ePortfolio to deepen the engagement cycle; second, enhanced assessment, learning analytics, and data triangulation models which qualitatively and quantitatively data mines the ePortfolio to create next generation learning analytics that could measure student engagement. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563604</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Advising ePortfolios to Improve First-Generation Student Engagement in Higher Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5630-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>130</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602555</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Futures (of Society)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beliefs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Locus of Control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Traditionalism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Time Perspective</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religion</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Abouzahr, Mohammed S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This essay is a contribution to the new trend and old tradition of analyzing theological fatalism in light of its relationship to logical fatalism. All results pertain to branching temporal systems that use the A-theory and assume presentism. The project focuses on two kinds of views about branching time. One position is true futurism, which designates what will occur regardless of contingency. The opposing view is open futurism, by which no possible course of events is privileged over others; that is, there are no soft facts. A contextualist theory of temporal standpoints, standpoint inheritance, is designed to enhance Priorian temporal logics. The proposal helps all branching time systems, not only those with an open future. Even though an account of temporal standpoints goes a long way towards aiding various analyses from a linguistic standpoint, theories that designate a true future ultimately succumb to philosophical difficulties. Under open futurism, standpoint inheritance commandeers the best semantic evidence for true futurism. Standpoint inheritance accounts for the evidence, but the evidence does not support true futurism&apos;s stronger claims. Furthermore, attempts to explain why one timeline is privileged as the actual future lead to fatalism. Open futurism and a related kind of open theism are the only viable alternatives under dynamic, branching time. If true futurism is feasible at all, it is so only with a static or eternalist basis. Standpoint inheritance is very general. It is applied to every system discussed in this analysis to handle damning linguistic shortcomings of traditional logics. Standpoint inheritance yields several other fruitful results, too. The theory helps clarify what it is for characterizations of God&apos;s beliefs to be soft and how his beliefs must differ from normal beliefs to retain softness. For open futurism, all strings of consecutive &amp;quot;will&apos;s&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;was&apos;s&amp;quot; can be reduced to at most two such operators under standpoint inheritance, but not under traditional theories. The open futurist distinction between &amp;quot;will&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;will-inevitably&amp;quot; is clarified, too. Standpoint inheritance allows for a supervaluationist semantics using open futurism as its basis instead of the usual true futurism. The theory of standpoint inheritance enhances dynamic, branching accounts of time to better compete with their static correlates. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563605</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Future Contingents, Freedom, and Foreknowledge</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Wayne State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5626-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>273</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602551</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Positive Behavior Supports</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rewards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discipline</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Referral</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Modification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Witwer, Dianne</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this multiple case study described and compared practices utilized to implement the School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) approach at 3 purposely selected Central California elementary school sites. More specifically, this study described and compared: (a) school practices for defining and teaching school rules/expectations; (b) the reward systems being used; (c) systems for documenting and reporting office-managed student behavior violations; (d) systems for collecting and summarizing discipline referrals; (e) the priority given to improving behavior-support systems in school site plans; (f) school budget allocations for SWPBS; and (g) district support, financial and otherwise, for SWPBS at these schools. This study did not attempt to prove a causal relationship between SWPBS and improved student achievement; rather, it focused on describing and comparing specific practices that these 3 schools were utilizing in relation to the SWPBS approach. The intention was thus to learn more about specific practices that might be replicated in other schools. This research was qualitative in nature and utilized a multiple case-study methodology. Interviews, observations, and artifact reviews were conducted at 3 Central California elementary schools, all purposely selected because they had each implemented the SWPBS Framework for more than 1 year, had subsequently decreased negative student behavior, and had increased student achievement. 3 types of data were collected in order to understand each school&apos;s SWPBS practices and the level of support for the program. School principals, campus supervisors, and classroom teachers were interviewed; classroom and playground observations were conducted; and reports were reviewed by the researcher and the principal. The 3 types of data were triangulated for each school and compared. The findings led to the conclusions that SWPBS is a systems approach that uses interventions to help students succeed in school. Furthermore, it has to have consistent, committed leadership in order to be successful. It has to be built on the foundation of implementing clear and precise rules that are embedded in all areas of the school. Lastly, SWPBS can be implemented without the district&apos;s assistance; however it is difficult to sustain unless the district fully supports the approach. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563606</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Case Studies of the School-Wide Positive Behavior Support Approach</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Pepperdine University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5623-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>212</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602549</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Acquisition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cartoons</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Freehand Drawing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economically Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Native Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Thomas, Susan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (South)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Vocabulary knowledge is a crucial component for success in and out of school. For most children, word acquisition hits a plateau in the middle of elementary school, which has a negative impact on their academic achievement. This study evaluated whether the instructional strategy of drawing cartoons improved the vocabulary achievement among 5th grade students. It also examined whether the strategy had an impact on the vocabulary development of economically disadvantaged students. The theoretical foundation of this research came from Vygotsky&apos;s zone of proximal development, Dewey&apos;s learner-centered environment, and Piaget&apos;s constructivism. This quantitative study used a quasi-experimental design of the pretest-posttest control group model with 5th grade children of diverse backgrounds in a school district in the southern United States. Students in the control group learned vocabulary through a traditional method of instruction for 6 weeks, while the treatment group received instruction through an experimental method of drawing cartoons for 6 weeks. A t test was used to measure the differences in the pretest and posttest scores between control and treatment groups. The results showed no significant difference in scores between the treatment and control groups; however, this study&apos;s contribution is its careful examination of a strategy aligned with the Common Core State Standards. Teaching vocabulary through different strategies and methods of instruction may promote social change by increasing students&apos; vocabulary and reading skills, thus helping them to be productive in the world regardless of their ethnic and socioeconomic status. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563607</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Improving Vocabulary Acquisition and Reading Comprehension through Cartoon Drawing Instruction Method</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5613-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>95</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602542</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reader Text Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Aloud to Others</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Class Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Materials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Material Selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Childrens Literature</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Schreier, Virginia A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Although scholars have long advocated the use of informational texts in the primary grades, gaps and inconsistencies in research have produced conflicting reports on how teachers used these texts in the primary curriculum, and how primary students dealt with them during instruction and on their own (e.g., Saul &amp;amp; Dieckman, 2005). Thus, to add to research on informational texts in the primary grades, the purpose of this study was to examine: (a) a first-grade teacher&apos;s use of science informational trade books (SITBs) in her classroom, (b) the ways students responded to her instruction, and (c) how students interacted with these texts. My study was guided by a sociocultural perspective (e.g., Bakhtin, 1981; Vygotsky, 1978), providing me a lens to examine participants during naturally occurring social practices in the classroom, mediated by language and other symbolic tools. Data were collected by means of 28 observations, 6 semi-structured interviews, 21 unstructured interviews, and 26 documents over the course of 10 weeks. Three themes generated from the data to provide insight into the teacher&apos;s and students&apos; practices and interactions with SITBs. First, the first-grade teacher used SITBs as teaching tools during guided conversations around the text to scaffold students&apos; understanding of specialized vocabulary, science concepts, and text features. Her instruction with SITBs included shared reading lessons, interactive read-alouds and learning activities during two literacy/science units. However, there was limited use of SITBs during the rest of her reading program, in which she demonstrated a preference for narrative. Second, students responded to instruction by participating in guided conversations around the text, in which they used prior knowledge, shared ideas, and visual representations (e.g., illustrations, diagrams, labels, and captions) to actively make meaning of the text. Third, students interacted with SITBs on their own to make sense of science, in which they demonstrated their interest in reading the texts, formed connections to science, used reading strategies, and adjusted to the text type and variations of text complexity. The findings indicate the teacher&apos;s practices with SITBs were supportive of literacy and science learning for students at various levels of reading development. However, her inexperience with informational books and her preference for narrative demonstrates a need for training to assist her in providing guided and individualized reading instruction with SITBs, as well as provide students with full access to these texts in the classroom. Further, the teacher&apos;s overgeneralizations for science during instruction with SITBs indicates the need for training to strengthen her knowledge of science that would better prepare her to convey information and critically read information presented in these texts. Finally, the students&apos; engagement with SITBs and their use of strategies to make sense of these texts on their own, indicates the first graders were motivated and capable readers of informational books. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563608</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Science Informational Trade Books: An Exploration of Text-Based Practices and Interactions in a First-Grade Classroom</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of South Florida</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5612-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>239</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602541</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Leadership Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theological Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Christianity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Styles</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Youn, Houng Jin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Korea</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>South Korea</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this dissertation was to launch a leadership training program for shared leadership based on &amp;quot;super leadership.&amp;quot; The constructs of the study were designed to study Bible leaders in shared leadership, leadership paradigm and types, transformational leadership, and, super leadership and shared leadership theory that are all discussed in the review of literature and measured in the research project. The review of literature discusses how shared leadership based on the super leadership model is effective to guide leadership development and transform current leadership. New leadership models are a very effective way to discipline church leaders who learn and apply new leadership for the next generation. The effective use of training programs also enable the leaders to build up their leadership teams from shared leadership based on the super leadership theory. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563609</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Leadership Training Program for Shared Leadership Based on Super Leadership at Cheo-Eum Korean Presbyterian Church: A Study of Christian Leadership</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Min. Dissertation, Asbury Theological Seminary</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5544-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>153</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602534</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Hispanic Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Catholics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Catholic Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Recruitment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Culturally Relevant Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outreach Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Moral Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Benefits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Strategic Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Choice</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vazquez Matos, Alberto</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In this study, the administrators of a Roman Catholic Diocese needed to find innovative ways to make connections with, educate, and recruit Hispanic families, or they would begin to see their schools close. It is important to understand the needs and culture of Hispanics in the United States in order to create strong academic programs, culturally proficient schools, and strong outreach programs that may help Hispanics to become successful citizens. The conceptual framework for the study consisted of Piaget&apos;s theories of cognitive development and moral education, as well as Bandura&apos;s self-efficacy theory. Three areas were focused on in this study: the reasons Hispanic families chose to enroll or not enroll their children in Catholic schools, the barriers that prevented Hispanic parents from enrolling their child(ren) in Catholic schools, and the educational benefits Hispanic parents felt their children gained from attending a Catholic School. Using the case study method, the perceptions, obstacles, interactions, and/or needs that might cause Hispanic parents to choose or not to choose a Catholic education for their child(ren) were investigated. After 8 Hispanic parents were interviewed, the data were coded for emerging themes based on the theoretical frameworks. Findings indicated a strong need for Catholic schools to review their academic programs and create other programs that include opportunities not only for students but also for the Hispanic family. In order to address these findings, a 5-year strategic plan was created for the diocese, which may contribute to social change by promoting parental choice for Hispanic families in providing their child(ren) with the best possible educational services and programs. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563610</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>La Nueva Esperanza-Hispanics and Catholic Education</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5121-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>200</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602496</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate School Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lanchoney, Maryann C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This executive position paper proposes recommendations for changes to the teacher candidate readiness evaluation policy and practice in the Education Department at Cabrini College. These recommendations are based upon best practices and evolving research on the importance of disposition characteristics for professional educators. A summarization of current practice is provided along with proposed procedures for identification and support for dispositions development. Admissions files for the graduate program provide relevant data regarding potential teacher candidates&apos; dispositions criteria in order to successfully and effectively progress toward teacher certification. Faculty members who teach the first graduate course within the curriculum model for teacher candidacy rate each student for readiness in the profession. Qualitative assessment may also provide a valuable lens into candidate dispositions. All of the recommendations have the end goal of identifying and supporting teacher candidate disposition development. Each recommended component addresses a current need or an area with some deficiency within Cabrini&apos;s current program. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563611</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Exploratory Study: Creating a System to Effectively Identify Post Baccalaureate Teacher Candidates Who Require Dispositions Development</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Wilmington University (Delaware)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5107-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>100</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602486</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Status</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blended Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conventional Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grades (Scholastic)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Interests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Likert Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hein, Juliane Olbers</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Delaware</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Delaware</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this quantitative study was to determine if achievement and interest of students taught in a blended classroom differ from students taught in a traditional classroom. The research questions that guided the study included determining differences between gender, race, and socioeconomic status between the blended and traditional classrooms. Mathematics grades and mathematics Delaware Comprehensive Assessment (DCAS) scores were collected from sixth grade students in a southern Delaware middle school. The same sixth graders also completed a Perceived Interest Survey (Shroff &amp;amp; Vogel, 2010) in which they rated items on a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the participants and analyze results. Independent t tests were used to compare means of the two classes, and two-way analysis of variance was used to compare multiple means of differing gender, race, and socioeconomic between the two classes. No significant differences in achievement or interest were found between the blended class and the traditional class (when special education, English language learner, and honors students were removed from analysis), regardless of gender, race, and socioeconomic status. However, on the survey item concerning &amp;quot;attention,&amp;quot; the traditional class scored significantly higher. White students in the blended class rated the survey item concerning &amp;quot;fun&amp;quot; significantly higher than the traditional class. The results from this study have significant implications for educational stakeholders, and they should be used in conjunction with various other literatures when determining if blended learning is beneficial for education and student learning. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563612</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Comparison of a Blended Learning Environment and a Traditional Learning Environment. Are Student Achievement and Student Interest Affected?</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Wilmington University (Delaware)</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2014-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5103-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>168</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602484</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Fear</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Police</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Crime</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Probability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sampling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>General Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Liberal Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Housing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Race</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Victims</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Police Community Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Crowl, Justin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examines the relationship between student perceptions of university police and fear of crime through the utilization of a rational choice perspective. Over the last three decades, a plethora of research has explored fear of crime and factors related to its occurrence. However, a thorough review of the literature revealed a limited amount of studies that have examined the impact that fear of crime has on college students. Moreover, no studies were uncovered that utilize rational choice theory to examine whether student perceptions of university police influence their fear. This study attempts to address this shortcoming and therefore add to the fear of crime literature. For purposes of data collection, a survey methodology and two probability sampling techniques were utilized. Sections of various general education and elective liberal studies courses were randomly selected and students within these courses were given a survey to complete. Survey questions examined several factors that can impact fear, and these factors were guided by past fear of crime research. Responses were coded and entered into a statistical software program for analysis. The results revealed empirical support for several fear of crime correlates, including gender, living arrangement, race, perceived risk of victimization and police visibility. Policy implications and suggestions for future research are discussed to conclude the study. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563613</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>University Police Legitimacy and Fear of Crime: An Exploration of Student Perceptions</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-5098-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>179</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602482</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Charter Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Williams, Andrew</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Webb, Leigh</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The topic of educational spending and its connection to student achievement was long-debated before charter schools entered the conversation. With the rise in government spending on education, particularly charter school funding, the financial debate has strengthened and evoked much controversy. Though the Tennessee Department of Education (TNDOE) had some of the most demanding charter school laws in the country in 2011, it wasn&apos;t immune to the firestorm of debate as the number of open charters grew to forty-nine during the 2012-13 school year. Along with the charter school movement in Tennessee came the issuing of charter school grants. To assist in the opening of charter schools in the state, the TNDOE began distributing $600,000--700,000 allotments of a $22 billion United States Department of Education Charter Schools Program (CSP) grant. Charters could apply for a CSP grant to offset start-up costs associated with opening a charter to supplement the basic education funding (BEP) given to each school based on student enrollment. This research evaluates the CSP grant spending in six Tennessee charter schools serving grades 5--8 during each year of the three-year life of the grant while evaluating spending patterns into the categories of instruction, supplies, facilities, and technology. While evaluating only CSP grant spending in the school&apos;s total budget, findings from this research suggest that year one targeted spending in the area of instruction from CSP grants in Tennessee has a positive correlation with student achievement and school sustainability. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563614</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effective Uses of CSP Grant Funds in Tennessee Charter Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4903-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>150</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602479</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Inclusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Administrator Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Alternative Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diagnostic Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech Impairments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hayes, Brandalyn</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ashley, Mandi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Salter, Derrick</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The overall purpose of this study was to provide school districts within Tennessee with more research about how weekly hours of inclusion impact student achievement. Specifically, researchers examined which models of inclusion were in use in two school districts in Tennessee, administrators&apos; and teachers&apos; perceptions of inclusion, and whether or not a relationship existed between the number of weekly hours third and fourth grade exceptional education students spent in an inclusive Reading/Language Arts class and their TCAP/TCAP MAAS scores. The researchers looked specifically at students with a diagnosis of a Specific Learning Disability, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and Speech or Language Impairments. The research was quantitative in nature and data were collected on 308 third and fourth grade students with disabilities and 192 teachers and administrators. Researchers found a positive relationship between weekly hours of inclusion in Reading/Language Arts and TCAP/TCAP MAAS scaled scores. When researchers looked at specific disabilities, data revealed a positive relationship between weekly hours of inclusion and TCAP scaled scores for students with Autism and students with a Speech or Language Impairment. An examination of weekly hours of inclusion and TCAP MAAS scaled scores showed a negative relationship for students with Autism and students with a Speech or Language Impairment. Data for students with a Specific Learning Disability showed no relationship between weekly hours of inclusion and TCAP scaled scores and a negative relationship for TCAP MAAS scaled scores. Based on the findings of this study, researchers recommended more instructional training, state monitoring of the practice of inclusion, and additional research to determine appropriate alternative assessments for students with disabilities. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563615</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Inclusion in Middle Tennessee</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4901-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>203</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602477</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational History</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>United States History</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Massella, Regina A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Effective teacher training and preparation is widely recognized as key in raising student achievement. This historical study examined the influence of the normal school movement, one of the first concrete approaches to the preparation and training of public school teachers in the nineteenth century in the United States. Specifically, this study investigated the influence of the vision of teaching and learning of Nicholas Tillinghast, the first principal of Bridgewater State Normal School between 1840 and 1853, and of the &amp;quot;sons of Bridgewater,&amp;quot; the students of Tillinghast who became normal school principals across the United States. Primary source and archived documents such as personal correspondence, diaries, conference records, and newsletters, and photographs were used to conduct this study. As a result of this study, normal schools, which were regionally impacted as they were established across the United States, emerged as an unrecognized, yet significant factor in the evolution of teacher training programs. The work of Nicholas Tillinghast and the sons of Bridgewater during the nineteenth century made a significant impact on the spread and evolution of the normal school movement and played an important role in the professionalization of teaching. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563616</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Sons of Bridgewater</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Notre Dame of Maryland University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4900-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>326</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602476</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Libraries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Librarians</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professionalism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Recognition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Librarian Teacher Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Library Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Advocacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Library Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Librarian Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Libraries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership Qualities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Berggren, Kira Chauvin</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Louisiana</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Louisiana</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Positive relationships between administrators and school librarians were essential for increasing awareness of, and promoting advocacy for, school librarians who successfully fulfilled their six professional roles in contributing to school improvement and serving as additional educational leaders. The six professional roles of 21st century school librarians were that of instructional partner, technology leader, school improvement facilitator, collection manager, literacy leader, and advocate. To examine the perceptions of administrators and school librarians with regard to the professional roles, the researcher conducted a sequential mixed methods study of one public school district in Louisiana. The study consisted of two phases; the first phase included a pair of surveys sent to participating administrators and school librarians, prompting them to rate the importance and frequency of various tasks associated with the professional roles. The second phase included an interview protocol designed as a follow-up to build upon and complement the participants&apos; feedback to the surveys. The data were analyzed for triangulation purposes and to answer the overarching research question: &amp;quot;To what extent are there differences between administrators&apos; and school librarians&apos; perceptions of school librarians&apos; professional roles in school improvement in the TLK Public School System?&amp;quot; As a result of data collection and analyses, it was found that not only did administrators and school librarians share similarities in their perceptions with regard to the professional roles, but they also agreed on various reasons for identifying school librarians as additional educational leaders. The administrators and school librarians indicated that the various tasks and professional roles of school librarians were either important or highly important, and they were completed on a regular basis. The results of the study were generalized to the population, which was all administrators and school librarians employed in the public school system of study. The results were also used for educating other administrators, school librarians, and legislators about the professional roles of successful 21st century school librarians in contributing to school improvement and serving as additional educational leaders. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563617</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Professional Roles of 21st Century School Librarians: A Mixed-Methods Study of the Perceptions of Administrators and School Librarians in a Louisiana Public School District</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Southeastern Louisiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4899-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>605</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602475</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discovery Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizations (Groups)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrative Organization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Efficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Resource Allocation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wanjagi, James K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Increasingly, organizations are conducting more Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) projects in order to promote organizational efficiencies. Meanwhile, minimal research has been conducted on the leadership challenges faced by project managers during the ERP project implementations and how these challenges are managed. The existing project management framework is all about monitoring, controlling, and problem-solving. Leadership on the other hand is about establishing a direction, planning and preparing for the bigger picture, aligning resources, strategies, tasks and activities. This research study focused on examining and investigating the leadership experiences and challenges encountered by Project Managers, as well as capturing their perspectives on how these leadership challenges can be managed in order to contribute and improve project ERP implementation success. Findings from the research study revealed leadership challenges that project managers encountered during ERP project implementations and the elements they utilized to manage these challenges. The participants were from various regions of the country providing a diverse unbiased sample. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563618</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Managing the Challenges of Leadership in ERP Implementations: An Exploratory Study of the Leadership Challenges Encountered by Project Managers Involved in ERP Implementation Projects</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4894-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>124</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602471</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Counselors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Burnout</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metropolitan Areas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Role Perception</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ambiguity (Context)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tenure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rating Scales</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ford, Beatrice R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between school counselor participants&apos; perceived levels of job burnout, as measured by Lee&apos;s 2007 Counselor Burnout Inventory (CBI) with the assignment of non-counseling duties, as measured by Scarborough&apos;s 2005 School Counselors Activity Rating Scale (SCARS) and the alignment of their school counseling programs with an American School Counseling Association (ASCA) model comprehensive school counseling program (CSCP) as measured by Clemens&apos; 2010 School Counseling Program Implementation Survey (SCPIS). Demographic variables such as the age and race of the professional school counselors as well as their length of service in this capacity were also considered as factors in relation to the perceived levels of job burnout. The researcher was expecting to find a direct relationship between counselors&apos; perceived amounts of role ambiguity, level of comprehensive school counseling program implementation and job burnout. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563619</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Analysis of Causal Factors of Burnout among School Counselors in a Large Urban School System in the Greater Atlanta, Georgia Metropolitan Area</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4885-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>148</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602467</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ability Grouping</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suburban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Position Papers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Publications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Needs Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Economically Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Slonaker, Richard V.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>School leaders face increased pressure to identify instructional and administrative practices that increase student achievement. However, achievement gaps persist between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged student groups. This study highlighted relationships between ability grouping and academic achievement in a suburban school district. Thorndike&apos;s social intelligence framework proffered learning as a social process and provided a theoretical framework. Research questions addressed whether ability grouping impacted academic achievement of students with special needs, English language learners, and the economically disadvantaged based upon Grade 5 Pennsylvania System of School Assessment mathematics data, Grade 5 mathematics 4Sight data, and Grade 5 enVisionMATH benchmark data. Four independent-samples t tests, 3 chi-square analyses, and 2 point-biserial correlation analyses determined statistically significant differences between student achievement and class placement and rejected 4 of 9 null hypotheses. The current study resulted in a project in the form of a white paper. The white paper included an overview of ability grouping and district assessment data, and recommended a district discussion around ability grouping and alternate grouping structures targeted at increasing student achievement. Implications for local and broader social change included potential elimination of ability grouping for mathematics instruction; reduced inequity of educational opportunities; and decreased achievement gaps between students with special needs, English language learners, and students who are economically disadvantaged compared to students not in these groups. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563620</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessment Results and Student Achievement; a Correlation Study Regarding Ability Grouping</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4824-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>161</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602463</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sharing Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Utilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technical Support</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Harrison, Priscilla</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The problem addressed in this study is the willingness or reluctance of information technology (IT) knowledge workers and managers to share knowledge. The purpose of the study was to examine the willingness or unwillingness of technical personnel in IT to share technical knowledge and the issues surrounding their reluctance, if any. The study investigated the conditions and circumstances in which IT managers and workers share knowledge. The research design was a case study that involved selected individuals of a Public Works Department, specifically the IT department, using purposeful sampling. Data from the interviews evolved through the process of identifying commonalities within the transcripts. To distinguish the data, concepts were color coded and labeled. Field notes, transcripts from the interviews, and member checking were used to triangulate the data. Results of the study produced three specific categories: the Essence of Knowledge Sharing (EKS), the Power of Not Sharing Knowledge (PNSK), and Competitive Advantage (CA). The data indicated that the EKS acknowledged IT workers and managers&apos; willingness to share. The PNSK affirmed the participants&apos; unwillingness and fear of sharing knowledge, while CA verified the participants&apos; unwillingness to share knowledge. An implication of the study would be to allow IT knowledge workers who are unwilling to share knowledge to work on projects with more visibility and personal recognition. Based on the results of the research, recommendations include that IT workers and managers have more control of their own projects and have in-depth professional involvement so that they will be more willing to share their knowledge with each other. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563621</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Knowledge Sharing and Dialogue among Information Technology Workers: A Case Study Using a Public Works Department</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4313-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>108</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602401</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Doochin, Julie L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Complete College Tennessee Act of 2010 (CCTA) changed the funding formula from enrollment-based to outcomes-based in order to increase the number of college graduates in Tennessee and as a result altered the landscape of public higher education in the state. The purpose of this qualitative study was to ascertain the impact of the CCTA on higher education in Tennessee by assessing perceptions of change among administrators and students at two Tennessee Board of Regents&apos; (TBR) institutions. Through administrator interviews, student focus groups and student questionnaires, the researchers explored the tangible and perceptual impact of this legislation at an early juncture in its implementation. Evidence collected from a community college and a four-year university suggested that there has been intentional mobilization of programs and services to meet the goal of the CCTA, which was student completion. Results also reflected that institutional responses have led to greater communication among TBR institutions and administrators and faculty at these institutions. This system-wide mobilization has generated uniformity across the system, but impelled each institution to maintain their individuality within the larger system. Finally, results indicated that faculty responsibilities had increased because of their roles as executors of the CCTA on a daily basis. As such, they have played the most significant student support roles in communicating completion messaging and providing academic direction and emotional support. Further, though students had no direct knowledge of the CCTA, they recognized that faculty were increasingly engaged in their academic goals and had a significant influence upon their persistence and completion. Ultimately, the evidence, or lack thereof, suggested that more time is needed to effectively gauge the impact of the CCTA. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563622</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluating the Efficacy of the Complete College Tennessee Act of 2010: A Qualitative Analysis of Leadership and Student Persistence among Colleges and Universities in Tennessee</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4310-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>220</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602398</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holistic Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theory Practice Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transcripts (Written Records)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burke, Mary Ann</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore possibilities for transformational coaching in education through the collaboration and cooperative argumentation of two researchers, one using appreciative inquiry to look at its transformative potential and the other using critical inquiry to investigate possible hegemonic and non-hegemonic barriers to this potential. Each researcher conducted separate research studies. The first researcher performed phenomenological interviews of 7 prominent coaches representing 5 different philosophical approaches to coaching that could enhance the potential for transformation in K-12 educational settings. Data analysis focused primarily on how the individual responses related to each other in terms of commonalities and distinguishing features regarding the phenomenon of the potential for transformation. The second researcher conducted phenomenological interviews of 10 coaches, 9 administrators, and 2 teachers in a single school district that has had an educational coaching program for 7 years. Interview transcripts underwent 3 levels of analysis, from topical organization of the raw data, to a more interpretive categorization of the data, to a final level where the categories of data generated theory about barriers to this district&apos;s coaching program. Results of the first research study indicate that holistic coaching approaches can enhance the transformative potential of educational coaching. These approaches require coaches who have achieved advanced levels of emotional maturity, mastery of their craft, and the ability to access different ways of knowing to help guide the coaching process. Results of the second study show that two aspects of school and district culture influence the viability of educational coaching: administrators&apos; ability and willingness to understand and facilitate coaches&apos; work, and varying degrees of openness to equitable practice among educators. Some of the barriers are hegemonic and others are not. We conclude that holistic approaches to coaching can offer transformative possibilities for educators. Educational coaches can develop themselves and achieve mastery and effectiveness by drawing from a more holistic and eclectic base of coaching theory and practice. Coaches can and must learn the art of detecting hegemony in others and in themselves to help assure optimal applications of this knowledge toward positive transformation in their schools. Recommendations for further research include research on transformative coaching practices in education, research on the developmental and maturation levels of coaches and their impact on school coaching, and research on hegemony that includes other school districts that represent a wide variety of demographic configurations. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563623</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Transformational Coaching in Education: A Collaborative Look at the Bridges and Barriers to Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4294-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>342</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602386</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Universities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Governing Boards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Researchers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brown, Celeste M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Tennessee</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Tennessee</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Complete College Tennessee Act of 2010 (CCTA) changed the funding formula from enrollment-based to outcomes-based in order to increase the number of college graduates in Tennessee and as a result altered the landscape of public higher education in the state. The purpose of this qualitative study was to ascertain the impact of the CCTA on higher education in Tennessee by assessing perceptions of change among administrators and students at two Tennessee Board of Regents&apos; (TBR) institutions. Through administrator interviews, student focus groups and student questionnaires, the researchers explored the tangible and perceptual impact of this legislation at an early juncture in its implementation. Evidence collected from a community college and a four-year university suggested that there has been intentional mobilization of programs and services to meet the goal of the CCTA, which was student completion. Results also reflected that institutional responses have led to greater communication among TBR institutions and administrators and faculty at these institutions. This system-wide mobilization has generated uniformity across the system, but impelled each institution to maintain their individuality within the larger system. Finally, results indicated that faculty responsibilities had increased because of their roles as executors of the CCTA on a daily basis. As such, they have played the most significant student support roles in communicating completion messaging and providing academic direction and emotional support. Further, though students had no direct knowledge of the CCTA, they recognized that faculty were increasingly engaged in their academic goals and had a significant influence upon their persistence and completion. Ultimately, the evidence, or lack thereof, suggested that more time is needed to effectively gauge the impact of the CCTA. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563624</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Evaluating the Efficacy of the Complete College Tennessee Act of 2010: A Qualitative Analysis of Leadership and Student Persistence among Colleges and Universities in Tennessee</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lipscomb University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4293-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>220</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602385</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Victims</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bullying</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Media</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telecommunications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suicide</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lyons, Suzanne Shaw</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Cyberbullying among students has become a serious issue for school communities, partly due to ubiquitous Internet access, instant messaging, and a myriad of social media websites that provide infinite ways to abuse, threaten, and insult others. In some cases, students have been cyberbullied so brutally that adolescent victims even contemplate or commit suicide. The central focus of this research study was to describe how school leaders are effectively managing and reducing the number of cyberbullying incidents. The researcher implemented a qualitative multiple case study design and interviewed teachers, parents, and administrators at three independent middle schools in southern California. Findings revealed that school leaders take immediate action to resolve incidents, but that their ability to consistently monitor student online communication is exceedingly difficult. Since victims can experience continued repercussions even after an incident has been addressed, more follow-through with victims and perpetrators is needed as well as uncovering the root cause of incidents to more effectively resolve situations. Furthermore, school intervention that is well intentioned can sometimes perpetuate or act as a catalyst for repercussions on the victims, and parent responses and involvement can sometimes impede successful management by school leaders. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563625</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Perceptions of Cyberbullying Management within Southern California Independent Middle Schools: A Multiple Case Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, California Lutheran University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4251-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>192</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602344</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technological Advancement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blended Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Community Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Group Dynamics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Group Unity</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Cleugh, Christina</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The need to belong and connect with others is universal among human beings. Technological advances make connecting and belonging possible via technologies, without face to face interaction. This new ubiquitous way of belonging and connecting is seen in all areas of communication, including work, schools and social environments. Online learning programs pose new challenges and questions. The purpose of this study was to learn more about the importance of sense of community within blended online programs and to determine whether there are specific learning activities that either enhance or detract from a sense of community. This information will inform course developers as to how to build community enhancing learning activities into blended online courses. Forty-three graduate students enrolled in three different blended online programs from one University participated in an online survey process. The Classroom Community Scale (CCS) was used to assess an overall sense of community as well as 2 subscales; connectedness and learning. Overall, 86% of the subjects reported a sense of community within their educational program. Specific learning activities were assessed for use as well as student perceptions regarding whether the activity enhanced or detracted from the sense of community. Learning activities that were both collaborative in nature and synchronous were those rated by students as enhancing the sense of community. The most utilized learning activities were reading, synchronous discussions, collaborative assignments, writing and asynchronous discussions. Enhancing activities included face to face orientation pre-program start, collaborative projects, synchronous virtual sessions and group presentations. To enhance community in online programs, it is recommended that an initial pre-program face to face session can best serve to build the initial community and support more effective learning. Additionally, course developers should incorporate synchronous and collaborative learning activities as much as possible within the structure of the course. Finally, faculty could use the CCS to measure connectedness and learning as a way to understand the learning and community preferences of the students in order to determine options and alternatives for learning and assignment completion. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563626</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Sense of Community in Post-Secondary Online Blended Courses: Importance Of, Opportunities and Implications for Course Development</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Pepperdine University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2696-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>166</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601445</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Autobiographies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Research Methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Quality</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Equal Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Organizations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Base for Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lincoln, Carleton</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Recent research suggests a major crisis exists affecting urban children&apos;s educational opportunities. This study focuses on the use of research-based strategies to determine whether, and to what extent, transformative leadership influences the development of quality education that overcomes educational inequity in the lives of students who attend Children of Promise Schools and other similar poor urban schools. A central focus of the study highlights the importance of developing organizational and community-wide initiatives to reduce (a) the achievement gap, before kindergarten, through early childhood development programs and (b) the impact and responsibility that faith-based communities have in developing key approaches to empower and provide educational opportunities for underserved families, schools and communities. Additionally, autoethnography and action research methods are used to reveal personal and professional experiences that influenced the author&apos;s pedagogical knowledge and practice employed to improve the quality of education for students of Children of Promise Schools in Inglewood, California. Implications and recommendations for further research are also included in the study. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563627</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Autoethnographical Analysis of a School Leader: Informing Strategies to Improve Educational Outcomes for Children of Promise Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2711-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>260</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601460</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gains</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mendez, Larry</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The research study was an evaluation of a professional learning community (PLC) and its effect on teachers and student achievement in a high school serving predominately Latino students. The study was a mixed research study that consisted of both quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data included school-wide and Latino student Academic Performance Index (API) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) scores. The qualitative data sources were derived from faculty interviews and open-ended questions on the survey. The data were collected from 34 out of 50 (68%) faculty surveys and 29 out of 50 faculty rubrics (58%). Developing, implementing, and evaluating PLCs in a high school that served predominately Latino students led to increased API scores and increased AYP scores in math. AYP scores did not increase for English/Language Arts. Over half of the faculty (76%) reported PLCs as effective in developing standards based assessments, and 67.7% reported collaboration among teacher teams as effective for sharing best practices. Implications, recommendations for practice, and recommendations for future research are included. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563628</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effects of a Professional Learning Community on Teachers and Student Achievement in a High School Serving Predominately Latino Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2712-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>86</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601461</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropouts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Negative Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reentry Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Waters Zelbovitz, Karyn T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This mixed methods study was designed to explore why students leave college before graduation and draws upon their phenomenological insights, educational experiences, and readmission reflections. This study used a convergent parallel design that matched the qualitative content from interviews and quantitative responses to questionnaires to converge to identify what statements, attitudes, and behaviors exist in the footprint of the college student that has dropped out. Triangulation of the converged parallel data, through three standardized tests established the unmet needs, academic ability, and optimistic confidence of each of the 15-25 purposively selected participants. Exiting students make statements, reflect negativistic attitudes, and exhibit behaviors that characterize their self-defeating decision process. Some educators argue the problem has been limited preparedness for the rigors of higher education, while others personify the existential meaninglessness of higher education that overwhelmed the motivation and persistence of the college student. This study explored the identified attrition characteristics through the experiences of the readmitted college student. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563629</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Phenomenological Characteristics of College Dropouts</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Keiser University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2734-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>450</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601482</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Parent Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Kindergarten</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent School Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bradley, Lynn Renee&apos;</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Michigan</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Michigan</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Kindergarten</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Parental involvement is a factor in student achievement. Low parental engagement at home and school has created a problem in an urban elementary school. Guided by Epstein&apos;s 6 types of parental involvement, the purpose of this case study was to examine and describe the perspectives of 17 parents of K-2 students in an urban school in Michigan. Few studies have concentrated on the problem of low parental engagement between home and school in Grades K-2. In addition, there have been few discussions on using resources to increase parental engagement within these foundational grades. The methods and tools that the school used to implement parental engagement, as well as communication that may have existed, were examined. Data were collected from parents through structured focus groups and interviews; these data were then collected, transcribed, and analyzed using an open-coding analysis process and member checking. Key findings revealed that while the parents had positive things to say about the school and staff, they also believed that communication between home and school needed to be more timely and clear. Results also indicated that low parental engagement was related to conflicts with parents&apos; work schedules or apathy from the parents in becoming more engaged. The social significance of this study is that new strategies and resources could be brought to the forefront. These strategies and resources could lead to initiatives to evoke timely, effective, reciprocal communication between home and school and increase parental engagement, which could affect a student&apos;s academic achievement. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563630</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Parental Engagement Using Effective Communication for K-2 Students in an Urban School</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2772-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>165</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601486</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Traits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personality Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Buchner, Jenna K.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Teacher education programs are charged with identifying, developing, and assessing the knowledge, skills, and dispositions that teacher candidates should exhibit. However, the identification and assessment of the dispositions is challenging due to the nature of dispositions and the scarcity of specific guidelines within national teacher standards. This study sought to identify the dispositions candidates from a Concordia University Wisconsin (CUW) should exhibit and develop a tool to assess those dispositions. This study followed a two-phase sequential explanatory mixed methods design. Phase one utilized a triangulation convergence model in which both quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed concurrently. The researcher developed, validated, and administered a survey to completers of the undergraduate teacher education program (N = 148) and administrators of the schools where those graduates were employed for their first teaching assignment (N = 71) to determine the dispositions they believed an effective teacher who graduated from CUW should exhibit. The researcher concurrently performed a document analysis of the conceptual framework of the CUW education program to identify dispositions a candidate should exhibit. In phase two, the researcher created an assessment tool and conducted a focus group of eight undergraduate teacher education faculty to validate the findings of phase one and to establish validity of the tool. Results of the study indicate that all CUW undergraduate teacher education candidates should exhibit 31 dispositions representing eight distinct constructs. Lutheran and Christian public education candidates should exhibit an additional disposition. Results also suggested that the dispositions a CUW undergraduate teacher education candidate should exhibit can be accurately assessed using an instrument that identifies specific dispositions and explicit performance criteria. The assessment tool can be used to provide developmental feedback to teacher candidates from early in the program to culminating field experiences and to communicate and teach the desired dispositions to program candidates. The findings of the study suggested that teacher education programs can identify program-specific dispositions teacher candidates should exhibit by utilizing stakeholders of the program and the conceptual framework of the program. They also suggested that dispositions can be accurately assessed using an assessment tool developed through the study. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563631</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Identifying and Assessing Program-Specific Dispositions of Concordia University Wisconsin Undergraduate Teacher Candidates: A Mixed-Methods Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Cardinal Stritch University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2806-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>281</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601503</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Program Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Organizational Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teamwork</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constructivism (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lynch, Margaret M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explores the meaning project managers (PMs) make of their project environment, how they lead their teams and have incorporate complexity into their project management approach. The exploration of the PM&apos;s developmental level and meaning making offers a different angle on the project management and leadership literature. The study expands from the traditional project management leadership literature and provides an alternative lens to the conversation. This expansion incorporates the subjective, interpretive, construct oriented side of leadership and explores &amp;quot;how&amp;quot; the PM knows instead of &amp;quot;what&amp;quot; the PM knows (Eigel, 1998). This study pulls together two streams of neo-Piaget developmental theory. The first stream is focused on cognitive development and hierarchical complexity and the individual&apos;s ability to construct and coordinate increasingly complex concepts by theorists such as Michael Commons, Theo Dawson, and Kurt Fischer. The second stream of constructive developmental theory concentrates on individual meaning-making and the process of differentiation and integration of the subjective and objective experiences as discussed by theorists such as Susanne Cook-Greuter, Robert Kegan, and Bill Torbert. Participants were assessed for their developmental level using the Lectical(TM) Assessment System&apos;s (LAS) Lectical(TM) Decision Making Assessment (LDMA). This study has significant implications for the fields of leadership, project management, and constructive developmentalism. The overall finding of this study is way the PM leads the project team. Each of the three Achiever level groupings had distinct approaches to how the PM structured and approached the project team. This influence affected how the PM approached complexity to how the PM integrated the larger organization into the project. A constructive developmental lens has provided important insight for project management leadership practice as well as theory. It is recommended that project management theorists and practitioners consider the meaning making of the PMs to better understand approaches to project management and project success and failure. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563632</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>How Does a Project Manager&apos;s Level of Development Influence Conceptualizations of Project Management and the Project Development Environment?</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2812-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>239</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601507</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Virtual Classrooms</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Performance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Maps</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spatial Ability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Geometric Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Depth Perception</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Choi, Gil Ok</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>For the past few years, virtual environments (VEs) have gained broad attention from both scholarly and practitioner communities. However, in spite of intense and widespread efforts, most VE-related research has focused on the technical aspects of applications, and the necessary theoretical framework to assess the quality of interfaces and designs has not yet been fully developed. This research, as a response to such challenges, concerns the usability of three-dimensional VEs. More specifically, this study aims to investigate the effects of wayfinding affordance design on users&apos; task performance and perceptual experience in 3D desktop VEs. For this purpose, four different wayfinding affordance conditions were set up: Fixed Detached Affordance Cues (FDAC) condition, Switchable Detached Affordance Cues (SDAC) condition, Portable Embedded Affordance Cues (PEAC) condition and Fixed Embedded Affordance Cues (FEAC) condition. Maps and directional cues were employed to implement wayfinding affordance. The results show that the design of wayfinding affordance has significant effects on users&apos; perceptual experience as well as their task performance. Task performance was significantly better where the maps and directional cues were provided independently from the VE interfaces (FDAC, SDAC). With regard to perceptual experience, the effect was significant only in simple environments. In these environments, the fixed and, therefore, stable interfaces (FEAC, FDAC) were found to provide a better sense of presence for users whereas the manipulative interfaces (PEAC, SDAC) offered a greater state of playfulness. The research findings also indicated that the design of 3D interfaces had a greater impact on non-expert users than on expert users. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563633</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Design of Wayfinding Affordance and Its Influence on Task Performance and Perceptual Experience in Desktop Virtual Environments</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2008-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2824-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>186</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601518</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Handheld Devices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Centered Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Charter Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Focus Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Durbin, Annette L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Mobile technology is increasing its presence in the educational environment. The public school district in this study has made great strides improving technology usage in schools with updated hardware, extensive district-wide infrastructure, a technology plan, and professional development. While the district has been successful in some areas, like others across the nation, the challenges educators face in the classroom continue to have a negative impact on the end results this district seeks: 100% technology implementation. The current study focused on a local charter school whose practices were grounded in the conceptual framework of experiential learning, social interdependence, and multiple intelligences using mobile technology. The purpose of this study was to understand the pedagogies, practices, and attitudes among K-8 charter school educators on the mobile technology used as a student-centered instructional tool. A qualitative, multiple case study design was used to gather and analyze data from interviews, a focus learning group, and instructional observations of 6 K-8 charter school teachers. Data were analyzed using a constant comparative method to identify common trends and themes. Results showed how these teachers transitioned from traditional pedagogy to 21st century pedagogy. Trends included learning opportunities; technology implementation strategies; motivation; and challenges encountered that impacted pedagogy, practice and attitude. A tech lab project study was designed to support educator transitioning to 21st century pedagogy. These findings show that professional development and professional learning communities can be used to overcome challenges and support teachers using mobile technology as a student-centered instructional tool, one that aids a successful transition. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563634</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>K-8 Teachers Using Mobile Technology as a Student Centered Instructional Tool</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2897-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>186</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601548</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blended Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conventional Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Specialists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Constructivism (Learning)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Mobility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Job Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Employment Potential</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Johnson, Christopher P.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Chile</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Chile</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Learning English as a foreign language (EFL), a highly valued skill in the Chilean marketplace, is an arduous and complex personal endeavor requiring high student motivation. Reflecting this challenge is the heightened anxiety among EFL students, whose work has been associated with historically meager results. Blended learning, the fusion of face-to-face and online content delivery and assessment, offers a promising solution to EFL learner reticence. Evidence suggests that an active online teacher presence in a blended EFL course can enhance student engagement. The purpose of this study was to discover the perceptions of EFL instructional specialists concerning (a) student involvement and engagement in online portions of blended courses, (b) marginal teacher presence in the online portions of blended courses, and (c) ways to improve student involvement in the online portions of the blended courses. Results of a systematic qualitative analysis, employing constant comparative data analysis of individual interviews with a sample of 10 voluntary EFL instructional specialists, indicated teachers need to take part in design of blended EFL courses to address these issues. The findings, coupled with theoretical frameworks of social-constructivism, transactional distance, diffusion of innovation, and universal design for instruction, served as the background for a proposed teacher training project resulting from this study. The study can contribute to positive social change by inviting EFL teachers to become more involved in blended course design, increasing their sense of ownership, sharing best practices for blended EFL teaching and learning, and creating conditions for more successful upward social mobility opportunities for Chilean university students who have acquired certifiable English language skills. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563635</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Increasing Students&apos; Academic Involvement: Chilean Teacher Engagement with Learners in Blended English as a Foreign Language Courses</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2898-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>262</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601549</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Team Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inclusion</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regular and Special Education Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individual Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academically Gifted</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Needs Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Principals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Delphi Technique</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Betancourt, Angela Mobley</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Arkansas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>Illinois</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Arkansas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_geo>Illinois</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Inclusion programs have expanded in schools across the country as educational leaders strive to meet the needs of a more diverse group of students. In response to Special Education legislation, schools and districts implemented programs and strategies for students with disabilities in the general education setting as increasing numbers of students with diverse needs were included. Inclusion reinforced the recognition that one person cannot effectively respond to the various psychological and educational needs of students in current classrooms. Many schools are now implementing the co-teaching model in response to the new demands on classroom teachers. By definition, the general education teacher and special education teacher work collaboratively to meet the individual needs of all students in an inclusive setting. Students with special needs, gifted students, English Language Learners, and all regular education students are held to the same standards on state developed assessments demonstrating accountability for teachers. It is critical that research-based instructional models are implemented in the classroom. School principals are responsible for monitoring and evaluating the instruction that takes place in the classroom to ensure research-based instructional practices are being implemented effectively. Since many schools or school districts chose to use the co-teaching model as a means of meeting the needs of all students and to ensure best practice, principals must have adequate knowledge of the model and be able to recognize effective implementation in the classroom. This study was designed to examine current practice in monitoring and evaluation of co-teachers and expert consensus regarding indicators of effective co-teachers in the inclusion classroom. This Delphi study utilized a mixed-methods research design. Three hundred five experts, selected from the 2012 Chicago Co-teacher training and current Arkansas co-teacher lists, were invited to participate in a two-round process. One hundred thirty-one responded in the first round to generate a list of indicators. Fifty-nine experts participated in the second round to rate the relevance of panel generated indicators and indicators from an existing instrument. Analysis of descriptive statistics revealed consensus for a majority of items from both sets of indicators. Though agreement was reached on all but one item as relevant, inter-rater correlation was low for all items. The study provided evidence for experts implementing the co-teaching model agreed upon specific indicators to help principals identify effective classroom practice. There was a lack of consistency and fidelity in using the specific indicators during program monitoring and teacher evaluation. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563636</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Monitoring and Evaluating Co-Teachers in the Inclusion Classroom</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Arkansas at Little Rock</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-2996-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>133</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601557</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reader Response</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Journal Writing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suburban Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Common Core State Standards</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pretests Posttests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Across the Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hume, Julie M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many of today&apos;s students are reading below grade level and schools are investigating methods for increasing student achievement in the area of reading. This mixed method research study investigated the achievement of students who were reading below grade level. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between reading response journals as an intervention and student achievement of fourth and fifth grade students in a suburban school district. The research questions this study addressed were: (1) Does implementation of reading response journals improve student achievement in reading? (2) Does implementation of reading response journals aid a student in preparing for the Common Core State Standards? (3) What impact do reading response journals have on a student&apos;s instructional reading level? The researcher used a teacher questionnaire to obtain qualitative data. The researcher used paired t-tests to compare DRA (Developmental Reading Assessment) scores from September 2012 and December 2012 and reading pre and posttest scores. These results were then triangulated to provide conclusions. The researcher concluded that the use of reading response journals can have a positive effect on students&apos; reading level, responding to their reading using higher order thinking skills, and growing as a reader in general. Many of the qualitative findings centered on the high need for students to be active writers during the reading process. Although an overwhelmingly large number of students improved during this research study, it is difficult to conclude that these results were yielded solely from using reading response journals as an intervention to benefit student achievement. The results of this study can open the door for expansion in the area of reading response journals. Suggestions for school districts are to increase the amount of time that students are spending on authentic experiences with reading and writing and to teach reading and writing across the curriculum. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563637</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between Reading Response Journals as an Intervention and Reading Achievement of Fourth and Fifth Graders in a Suburban School District</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Missouri Baptist University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3030-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>119</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601577</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Process Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Aids</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Persuasive Discourse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prompting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Retention (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Multiple Choice Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kern, Cynthia Lee</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Scientific inscriptions--graphs, diagrams, and data--and argumentation are integral to generating and communicating scientific understanding. Scientific inscriptions and argumentation are also important to learning science. However, previous research has indicated that learners struggle to understand and learn science content represented in inscriptions. Furthermore, when learners engage in argumentation, learning science content becomes secondary to the learning of argumentation skills. This design-based research study is nested within the larger effort to inform the design and development of the 5-Featured Dynamic Inquiry Enterprise design framework (5-DIE) for cyberlearning environments and to advance theory associated with the difficulties learners have with scientific inscriptions and the consequences related to using argumentation to learn science content. In an attempt to engage participants in the process of learning science content with scientific inscriptions and argumentation, two learning strategies were embedded in a 5-DIE lessons. The two learning strategies evaluated in this study were (1) &amp;quot;self-explanation prompts&amp;quot; paired with a scientific inscription and (2) &amp;quot;faded worked examples&amp;quot; for the evaluation and development of scientific knowledge claims. The participants consisted of ninth and tenth grade students (age: 13-16 years; N = 245) enrolled in one of three state-mandated biology courses taught by four different teachers. A three factor mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) with two between factors (self-explanation prompts and faded worked examples) and one within factor (pre, post, delayed post-test) was used to evaluate the effects of the learning strategies on the acquisition and retention of domain-specific content knowledge. Both between factors had two levels (with &amp;amp; without) and are described by the following experimental conditions: (1) control condition (general prompts), (2) self-explanation condition, (3) faded worked examples condition, and (4) combined condition with both self-explanation and faded worked examples. Acquisition and retention of content knowledge was assessed with a 17-item multiple-choice, researcher-developed content knowledge test. Results indicated that self-explanation prompts and faded worked examples learning strategies did not influence acquisition and retention of science content in a positive (i.e., learning) way. Based on the finding of this study, it may be concluded that the use of general prompts is as effective as self-explanation prompts and faded worked examples for scaffolding learner engagement with scientific inscriptions and argumentation. Furthermore, the finding indicated additional research is warranted evaluating the generalizability of scaffolds from college to pre-college populations. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563638</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effect of Scaffolded Strategies on Content Learning in a Designed Science Cyberlearning Environment</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3058-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>158</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601592</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visualization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hermeneutics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moorman, Margaret M.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Nurse educators are called upon to provide creative, innovative experiences for students in order to prepare nurses to work in complex healthcare settings. As part of this preparation, teaching observational and communication skills is critical for nurses and can directly affect patient outcomes. Visual thinking strategies (VTS) are a teaching method that has been studied in primary education to develop communication and observational skills. VTS holds the possibility to improve these same skills in nursing students, but it has only been studied once with nursing students in a quantitative study. Therefore, this qualitative research study sought to explore how nursing students utilize VTS by answering the following research questions: What meaning does VTS have for nursing students? How do nursing students who have experienced VTS use it in their care of patients? Students at a large Midwest university in a Bachelor of Science program were recruited for participation. Only students who voluntarily participated in a previous VTS experience were invited to participate in a second VTS experience, followed by an interview. Martin Heidegger developed a phenomenological philosophy about the meaning people attach to experiences, which was the philosophical framework for this study. Heideggerian hermeneutics was used to analyze participant transcripts and interpretive summaries were analyzed. Themes of feeling safe in learning and thinking and seeing differently were identified and a literature review was performed to further expand these themes. Also revealed in the findings were themes from the perspective of the researcher; validation, mutual respect, and reformulation of the VTS process into clinical practice. Results are presented in Chapter 5. Analysis of the findings and implications for future research are presented in the final, 6th chapter. Also included in the final chapter is a section on how nurse educators can enact the role of facilitative teaching, a term that came out of the research findings. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563639</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Meaning of Visual Thinking Strategies for Nursing Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3066-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>180</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601597</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing (Composition)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sentences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Management</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Junior High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 8</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Maintenance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Effect Size</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rago, David J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 8</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Writing is a tool students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can use to communicate and interact with other people socially and professionally. Strong writing skills may lead to social and economic success, as well as a sense of self-empowerment. Unfortunately, there is very little research related to the use of sentence-writing strategies and self-monitoring procedures to improve the writing performance of adolescent students with ASD. Thus, this study was designed to examine the effects of a sentence-writing strategy and a self-monitoring procedure on the writing performance of adolescents with ASD. The study included five participants. These participants attended the same junior high school in a large southwestern city and were in the sixth, seventh, or eighth grade. Each participant had a spectrum disorder. A multiple baseline across participants design with one replication was used in this research. There were three conditions in this design: baseline, Intervention 1: sentence writing strategy, Intervention 2: self-monitoring procedure, and Maintenance. A comparison of curriculum-based probes between phases was conducted in order to assess the functional relationship between the independent and dependent variables. The independent variables were The Proficiency in Sentence Writing Strategy (Schumaker &amp;amp; Sheldon, 1999) and the self-monitoring procedure. The dependent variables were writing quality and writing quantity. Writing quality was measured using specific predictive indicators for writing quality and criterion described in the Proficiency in Sentence Writing Strategy Instructor&apos;s Manual (Schumaker &amp;amp; Sheldon, 2006). Writing quantity was measured by counting the total number of words written during each session. A visual analysis of the data revealed five things. First, each participant responded differently to the sentence writing strategy and the self-monitoring procedure. Second, when the interventions were combined, a moderate effect size resulted. Third, participants&apos; feelings about writing may have influenced performance levels. Fourth, all the participants ended the study feeling better about their own writing ability, and fifth, the sentence writing strategy and the self-monitoring procedure are socially valid interventions that may improve the overall writing performance levels of middle school students with ASD. These findings support the use of The Proficiency in Sentence Writing strategy and the self-monitoring procedure in middle schools and classrooms where middle school age students with ASD are receiving writing instruction. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563640</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Investigating the Effects of a Sentence-Writing Strategy and a Self-Monitoring Procedure on the Writing Performance of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3069-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>182</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601600</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Restructuring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sampson, Elizabeth E.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Georgia</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Georgia</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Many school systems across the United States have begun redesign efforts by investing in smaller high school settings (Cawelti, 1999). Transforming schools into structured academic or career-themed academies has been associated with increased student achievement and more personalized learning environments. Ongoing collaboration of district level leaders, school administrators, teachers, parents, and community members is needed to successfully convert traditional, comprehensive schools into small learning communities. The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of school leaders regarding the efficacy of small learning communities in one central Georgia high school. A purposeful sample of 12 school leaders involved in the development of small learning communities participated in qualitative interviews. Three themes emerged labeled as reculturing, sustainability, and accountability. Barriers hindering the implementation of effective small learning communities surfaced through the analysis of qualitative data. Findings provided evidence most school leaders supported small learning communities as a credible approach to reforming high schools despite ongoing challenges. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563641</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Perceptions of School Leaders Regarding the Efficacy of Small Learning Communities</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Lincoln Memorial University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3070-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>131</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601601</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Turnaround</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Aptitude</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>White Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disabilities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Limited English Speaking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Segler Zender, Rene&apos;</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Since the middle of the last century, student education in the U.S. public school systems has been deemed inadequate. Critics developed measures in the form of standardized testing to measure student progress in an attempt to help facilitate reforms. In the last thirty years, the federal government has played an increasing role in school reform efforts in the form of laws and unfunded mandates. School districts have attempted to respond to federal pressure by attempting radical changes from replacing all school administration and staff to a complete curriculum overhaul. While school reform efforts have been widely documented by various groups, no actual quantitative studies have been conducted on the dynamics that occur in successful school turnarounds. There is little research concerning specific programs within the context of turnaround schools that contribute to increased student achievement and the small body of research that does exist in more anecdotal accounts. The literature on the turnaround school improvement process has reported anecdotal evidence and highlighted a few successful schools, but has not provided data on student achievement following implementation of a turnaround program. Given the lack of specific programs available for high school administrators to utilize, it has been necessary for leadership to use strategies reported to be effective, but not necessarily supported by research that demonstrates effectiveness with student populations involved in the turnaround program. In addition, little information exists about demographic factors that may be related to students&apos; successes or failures in the high school turnaround process. In a high school, the SIG program requires that student academic proficiency be tracked by student scores in reading and math on a state high school proficiency exam. The academic proficiency of students must be reported as the percentage of all students who passed, as well as percentages of students in specific subgroups (i.e., ethnicity, students with disabilities, and students with limited proficiency in English). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects on students&apos; high school proficiency exam scores in math and reading in the initial two years of implementation of a Turnaround Intervention Package (TIP). The TIP incorporated common formative student assessments and teachers&apos; use of student assessment data in Professional Learning Communities (PLC) to inform and differentiate instructional practices. The underlying question was whether the use of this package of interventions would contribute to improved student achievement in the critical areas of math and reading as measured by state high school proficiency scores. It was hypothesized that the use of the TIP would result in significant increases in students&apos; math and reading high school proficiency exam scores. The proficiency scores of the pre-turnaround grade 10 cohort students were analyzed to determine growth in the two subsequent years of turnaround. In previous years, any instructional remediation and differentiated instruction that teachers adopted to improve student achievement was not based on the use of a PLC Assessment Cycle by teachers. The Site Improvement Grant under which the Turnaround school worked required growth in the following specified demographic groups: Black, Hispanic, White, IEP (students with disabilities), and LEP (Limited English Proficient). This study examined the effectiveness of the use of the TIP components for required instructional changes in the classroom and its impact upon student proficiency scores. The TIP was found effective in raising scores on the state proficiency exams in math and reading. While the entire student group raised scores significantly, there were little significant raises in specific groups. A further question of social significance also was addressed with a measure of teacher satisfaction of the PLC Assessment Cycle component of the TIP. Teachers reported satisfaction with the PLC Assessment Cycle as it related to student achievement, but reported little satisfaction with continued use of the cycle. This could be due to the time it takes to master the new skills of data analysis as required by the PLC Assessment Cycle. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563642</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A High School Turnaround School Initiative: Effects on Students&apos; Math and Reading Proficiency</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3071-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>138</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601602</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Intellectual Disability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Classes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pictorial Stimuli</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vignettes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sparks, Shannon Lynn</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A number of studies have suggested that when children with disabilities are presented with choice-making opportunities, they can make choices (Bambara, 2004; Carlson, Luiselli, Slyman, &amp;amp; Markowski, 2008; Dibley &amp;amp; Lim, 1999; Manhertz, 2006). Teaching choice-making to students with intellectual disability is an important skill. Students with intellectual disability, when exposed to choice-making, tend to display these skills in future settings as they grow older (Lee, Palmer, Turnbull, &amp;amp; Wehmeyer, 2006). Choice-making research has been limited for high school students with mild to moderate intellectual disability (Dibley &amp;amp; Lim, 1999; Manhertz, 2006; Shevin &amp;amp; Klein, 2004). The purpose of this study was to determine if high school students with intellectual disability, when given choice training, would improve their choice selections. This study involved an investigation of choice-making instruction intervention with individuals with intellectual disability. The researcher used a multiple probe design with one replication for six students with intellectual disability. The study took place in one 9-12 public high school classroom. One specialized classroom with a special education teacher who served students with mild to moderate intellectual disability was used in this study. Students received daily instruction with choice-making scenarios using still picture photographs. Choice-making training scenarios embedded real life situations that teenagers face daily. Real life choice situations were (a) making a choice on how to tell a friend that you are going to attend his or her birthday party, (b) making a choice on what and how you will spend your money, and (c) making a choice on what to wear to a job interview. This study involved an investigation of daily life choices and choice-making options that high school age students are given everyday. Lastly, the maintenance of choice-making skills in high school age students with intellectual disability was explored. The results of this study will add to the choice-making body of literature. Additionally, this study provided strategies for teachers to implement choice-making with a variety of students with disabilities. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563643</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Increasing Choice-Making and Choice Awareness for Students with Intellectual Disability</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3074-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>197</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601603</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Ideology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Decision Making</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Counseling</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Psychologists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pilot Projects</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Political Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vignettes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Brenner, Michelle Klein</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The present study built on the design and results from the pilot study in an attempt to explore the relationship between psychologists&apos; personal ideologies and the decisions they make in school-based counseling. Of particular interest was whether higher levels of self-reported ideology were related to support of relevant school policies. Participants included 166 psychologists who responded to an online survey that included questions related to personal and professional ideologies, attitudes toward school policies, training and preparedness in four areas of interest, and hypothetical scenarios. Consistency among responses in areas including theoretical orientation, political party, and training and preparedness in ethics and multicultural issues limited the analyses that could be performed to compare different populations. Correlation data indicated that there was no relationship between those who reported to be religious and those who reported that they were not religious, though slight differences were noted qualitatively. There was also no difference between responses of individuals who had not taken a class but felt prepared as compared with responses of the rest of the population. Correlation data also indicated some associations between the school policies related to liberal/conservative political views and the vignette designed toward that ideology. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563644</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Ideology and Decision Making in School-Based Counseling</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3290-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>118</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601695</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>African American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Gap</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Control Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mentors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Empowerment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Anxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Johnson, Willie F., Jr.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Texas</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Texas</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In the United States, an academic achievement gap has prevented many African American students from advancement and educational empowerment. Guided by Bandura&apos;s theoretical belief, which posits a relationship between social factors and an individual&apos;s perception, this non-experimental, causal comparative, control treatment group design study explored the effect of a 12-week instructional and mentoring intervention program on African American students&apos; mathematics achievement. Data from the high-stakes accountability exam, the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS), and the Assessment of Course Performance (ACP) were gathered from 42 African American students who were identified as underachieving; these students were designated as the intervention group. TAKS and ACP data were also gathered from 281 nonintervention students. An independent t test analyzed mean differences in scores between the samples, before and after the intervention. According to study results, although not statistically significant, comparable growth in scale scores occurred for intervention students as compared to nonintervention on the state&apos;s accountability exam. More growth, although not statistically significant, was also noted on the Assessment of Course Performance. The outcomes led to the design of an intervention manual to address students not performing to target standard. These findings suggest that African American students&apos; math performance can be interconnected with low self-efficacy, resulting in poor academic math performance. The use of this manual can provide a system of intervention services to successfully respond to these students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563645</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of a Math Intervention Program on Math Academic Performance among African American Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3308-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>113</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601709</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Restructuring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Identification (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Doctoral Dissertations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Public Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lucas, Roland</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New Jersey</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New Jersey</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There are three hypotheses for this research: 1. High school mathematics students in urban public schools, who are provided interactive technology resources during normal course work, will experience a multiplier effect of enhanced learning in mathematics. They will have an increase in positive dispositions indicative of their identity development as competent doers of math. 2. Through focusing on solving problems that relate to the life-world of students, students will experience an increase in the levels of solidarity with participants of the course. This will have a positive impact of the learning experiences and achievement of students. 3. Students will develop increased value of using their developing competencies in math to model and analyze issues relevant to their communities. The purpose of this research is to study effective utilization of interactive technologies and math computer programs in public high school mathematics classes. The interactive technologies used in classes are to support graphical, tabluar, verbal and analytical representations of the mathematics in hopes of increasing the learning potential and math fluency of students. The research will serve as a basis for ongoing development of teaching practices that improve student achievement in mathematics. The research design is an interpretive / phenomenological study of evolving attitudes and practices of students as they are engaged with math problem solving. Students will not be asked to produce any data solely for the purposes of the research. All activities that students do, and all data that will inform the research, will emerge from best teaching practices, which are supported by the school principal and have been formally approved by the school board. All methods and strategies employed in this study are ones I have used, over the past six years, in my role as a highly qualified math teacher in Newark public schools. No changes in what happens will occur because of this dissertation study. The research design is an interpretive / phenomenological study of evolving attitudes and practices of students as they are engaged with math problem solving. Students will not be asked to produce any data solely for the purposes of the research. All activities that students do, and all data that will inform the research, will emerge from best teaching practices, which are supported by the school principal and have been formally approved by the school board. All methods and strategies employed in this study are ones I have used, over the past six years, in my role as a highly qualified math teacher in Newark public schools. No changes in what happens will occur because of this dissertation study. Not all teachers are implementing the best practices that this study focuses on. I want to shed light on these practices and show how they can become more common and done in a more collaborative way. Students can opt not to use technologies at all, but it is not likely they would want to since doing so would slow down their progress. Teachers, however, are required to teach math with using various technologies, such as in an advanced graphing calculator or an interactive smart board. This is a case of, students are using technology in classes, gaining advantages with this technology use, and I would just like to analyze it write about my findings in my dissertation. Please see the school issued student calculator contract included with this application. It shows that math teachers are required to teach with school approved technologies, in this case a newer handheld graphing calculator), but that students may opt not to use it. Furthermore, many teachers don&apos;t yet know how to use these newer school approved technologies and must be shown the methods and benefits. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563646</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Restructuring High School Math Learning Spaces with Interactive Technology and Transformative Pedagogy</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3312-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>145</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601712</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Middle School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 6</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 7</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Murray, Vicki</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Junior High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 6</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 7</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>English language learner (ELL) mathematics students at a California middle school did not meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) toward state standards in 2010. The purpose of this project study was to examine 6th and 7th grade mathematics teachers&apos; perceptions regarding differentiated instruction for ELL students&apos; specific academic needs and to reveal how these perceptions affected ELL students learning in mainstream classrooms. Hord&apos;s professional learning community (PLC) model grounded the conceptual framework for this study with a culture of continuous, shared inquiry based on collegial trust. The research question investigated teachers&apos; perceptions regarding how PLC teachers are able to differentiate instruction for ELL students in mathematics classrooms. A case study design included transcripts from semistructured interviews, member checking, and PLC minutes. A purposeful, unique convenience sampling technique was used to recruit 4 mathematics teachers from both the 6th and 7th grade PLCs for a total of 8 interviews. The interview data were analyzed using descriptive coding and organized into categories. Themes emerged around teacher capacity, academic vocabulary, instructional challenges, PLC support, and outcomes. The findings revealed a need for a systematic method of providing professional development of differentiated instructional strategies. Implications for positive social change through this study may provide educators, administrators, and other researchers with instructional strategies that will improve ELL students&apos; academic achievement, which is a positive outcome that also benefits the community. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563647</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Middle School Mathematics Teachers&apos; Perceptions of Differentiated Instruction for English Language Learners</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3318-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>244</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601717</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 10</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Quasiexperimental Design</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Smith, Christiana Helen Croson</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 10</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Drastic reform measures have taken place at Howard High School of Technology to incorporate a 10th grade small learning community. Due to the costs and resources associated with implementing small learning communities, it is important to examine if the 10th graders&apos; achievement on the state tests in reading and math were significantly different after the implementation of this structure. This study can assist school administrators and district officials in making decisions regarding the implementation of small learning communities in their schools. Small learning communities stem from the distributed leadership theory, which provides teachers with opportunities to lead and make decisions in the school. The purpose of this quantitative quasi-experimental study was to examine the possible impact of a small learning community on 10th graders&apos; state test scores in reading and math. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the students&apos; 9th grade spring DCAS scores from the 2010-2011 school year to their 10th grade spring scores in the 2011-2012 school year. There was a positive significant difference from 9th grade to 10 th grade for students in both reading and math. The Collective Efficacy Scale is a 1-shot cross sectional survey given to teachers who were a part of the 2011-2012 10th grade small learning community. The results showed there was an average range of collective efficacy within the 10th grade small learning community teachers. The results of the study indicate that the school should continue to implement this model and the district should consider expanding the model into other parts of the school and district. This study will impact social change by informing educators of the possible positive impact of small learning communities on students&apos; achievement. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563648</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Small Learning Community&apos;s Impact on Students&apos; Success Assessed by State Test Scores in Reading and Math</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3328-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>111</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601727</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Psychotherapy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech Acts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physician Patient Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Allied Health Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Patients</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Counseling Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Repetition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Vegas, Monica</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study looked at the interplay of the analyst verbal speech acts and the process of change in a psychoanalytic treatment. Using a single case design on the session transcripts of the well studied case of Mrs. C., following Halfon and Weinstein&apos;s (2013) methodology the study tracked linguistic patterns as represented by the interaction of fixed/exact repetitions and representational language, assessed through the patient&apos;s use of Referential Activity (Bucci, 1997). These linguistic structures organize the psychodynamic content and meaning of the exchange that is taking place between the analyst and his patient. The representation of the different speech patterns in conjunction with the analyst&apos;s interventions allowed the creation of a map of the process inside the sessions at different points of the treatment. Results indicate that these speech patterns do not happen in a random way, 38% of the units evidenced a baseline speech pattern, 23% a symbolizing mode, 11% an overexcited mode, 8% a disengaged pattern and 3% of the units the patient was in a conflict mode. One important finding was the addition of the baseline pattern as a distinct mode of psychic functioning. By analyzing the baseline segments a picture emerged that was characterized by the patient&apos;s usual defensive style. In these instances the patient is adhering to the fundamental rule, the alliance is in place, and the potential for symbolization and discovery is within reach. 52% of the time the analyst intervened this is the type of speech pattern that preceded his interventions, 48% of the time after the analyst spoke the patient would go towards a baseline mode of functioning; both of these frequencies are significantly higher than those observed for any of the other reported patterns. It was hypothesized that interventions with exploratory functions would evidence a greater disorganizing potential, which would be reflected by increased repetitions. Additionally interventions with linking qualities were predicted to have greater organizing potential to be evidenced in speech with greater symbolizing qualities and more integration. Quantitative analysis showed no significant findings for either of these hypotheses. Qualitative analysis, however, indicated that the way the analyst intervenes has an effect on the response that can be observed in the patient&apos;s speech, it was therefore suggested that the measures employed failed to capture this effect. In terms of the evolution of the treatment it was predicted that the analyst would increase his level of activity as the treatment progressed and that he would use more interpretive comments in the later phases of treatment, additionally faster fluctuations in terms of the speech patterns would be observed as the treatment progressed. The data trended in this direction but statistical evidence was not found to corroborate these hypotheses. Qualitative observations note that interpretations become more detailed and transference based and that explorations are geared towards unconscious fantasies in the later stages of treatment. Finally integrating qualitative and quantitative results the questions of analytic technique and process will be revisited using the concepts of Vigotsky&apos;s zone of proximal development (ZPD), thirdness and symbolization following Norbert Freedman&apos;s contributions. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563649</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Therapeutic Communications and the Process of Change in a Psychoanalytic Treatment</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3334-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>201</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601733</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Programming</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Satisfaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematical Logic</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Artificial Intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Yun, Xi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Constraint satisfaction problems are a powerful way to abstract and represent academic and real-world problems from both artificial intelligence and operations research. A constraint satisfaction problem is typically addressed by a sequential constraint solver running on a single processor. Rather than construct a new, parallel solver, this work develops convenient parallelization methods for pre-existing solvers, and thereby benefits from both state-of-the-art research and increasingly available computational resources. This work proposes and evaluates several approaches that exploit scheduling and partitioning. It formulates parallel algorithm portfolio construction as an integer- programming problem, and solves the problem with algorithms that combine case-based reasoning with either a greedy algorithm or a complete integer-programming solver. This work also develops a hybrid adaptive paradigm that learns critical information to support search and workload splitting while it solves the problem. Extensive experiments show that these approaches improve the performance of the underlying sequential solvers. The hybrid paradigm solves many difficult problems left open after recent solver competitions. Although the empirical results are mainly on constraint satisfaction problems, this work also generalizes the reasoning component of the parallel scheduler to a new, case-based paradigm, and successfully applies it to protein-ligand docking. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563650</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Learning and Parallelization Boost Constraint Search</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3338-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>135</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601737</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Distributions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Psychometrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Collection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Felder, Valerie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Micceri (1989) examined the distributional characteristics of 440 large-sample achievement and psychometric measures. All the distributions were found to be nonnormal at alpha = 0.01. Micceri indicated three factors that might contribute to a non-Gaussian error distribution in the population. The first factor is subpopulations within a target population. The second factor is ceiling effects and the third factor is treatment effects that may change the location parameter, variability, or shape of the distribution. This present study examined the distributional characteristics of special education assessments and determined whether these distributions were differently distributed than Micceri&apos;s distributions. Three hundred ninety five datasets were collected, examined and classified according to distribution shape. The classification findings were compared with Micceri&apos;s (1989) classification of achievement and psychometric distributions. The findings indicate that there were more classifications of special education datasets and these distributions were differently distributed. There were 258, or 65.31%, of special education distributions that were different than Micceri&apos;s (1989) distributions. One hundred thirty seven, or 34.67%, of special education distributions were similar to Micceri&apos;s distributions. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563651</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Descriptive Statistical Attributes of Special Education Data Sets</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Wayne State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3377-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>150</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601743</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Placement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internship Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Capacity Building</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rose, Jodie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The training and preparation of prospective teachers includes an important phase where the future teachers begin to make a transition from learner to teacher. During this time, prospective teachers begin to utilize the knowledge they have gained through coursework and life experience to begin teaching students of their own. During this time, assignments and activities that prospective teachers undergo become less about conveying personal knowledge to professors, being learners, and more about being able to effectively convey knowledge to others, being teachers. These initial experiences are valuable in the development of effective teachers. For many future teachers, these initial experiences occur during a phase in the university training called pre-student teaching. Pre-student teaching is a transitional phase between coursework and student teaching. At the school where this study was conducted, pre-student teaching takes place in two differing internship programs. In the more traditional program, pre-student teachers are placed in a K-12 classroom where they mostly observe the classroom teacher, but also participate in some teacher responsibilities, including a few experiences where they teach lessons to students. In the alternative program, pre-student teachers work with a partner pre-student teacher to instruct their own group of 12-year old students during a full-day Saturday extra-curricular program. To better understand the influence of these internship experiences on the prospective teacher&apos;s development, pre-student teachers from both programs were studied. The conceptual framework of Engagement, Capacity and Continuity, developed by Campbell, Jolly &amp;amp; Perlman (2004), anchored this study. Interviews, observations, and written artifacts were utilized during this study to illuminate the pre-student teachers&apos; transitional process. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563652</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Engagement, Capacity, and Continuity: A Study of the Impact of Participation in Alternative Pre-Student Teaching Placements</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Wayne State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3382-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>184</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601748</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Blended Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Conventional Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Distance Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Theories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Telecommunications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Religious Factors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Crime</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Violence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Information</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Access to Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sandiford, Gladwyn A.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Haiti</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Haiti</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is a lack of access to technology blended with face-to-face instruction and learning in Haiti. Despite this lack of access, some Haitian college students have nevertheless leveraged technology to overcome the obstacles of poverty and obtain a higher education. This phenomenological study explored the lived experiences of 20 adult participants, consisting of 8 Haitian adult college students, 4 teachers, 5 information systems technicians, and 3 administrators from the Carrefour community of Haiti, to help reveal the reasons behind these successes. The theoretical framework included transactional distance education theory, social learning theory, and use of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Data were collected through interviews that were conducted over the telephone and face-to-face; these data were then sorted, coded, and analyzed for categorical parts and central themes. Emergent themes included but not limited to (a) encouragement, sacrifice, and support from family in addition to personal determination and gratitude for survival (b) faith in God and desire to help others, (c) saw education as the only way to avoid involvement in crime and violence, and (d) motivated by the ability to use technology for research, collaboration, and problem solving, were factors in education achievement. The findings of the study suggested various forms of social media, such as Facebook or networking applications including ooVoo or Skype, should be integrated in the classroom to narrow the education achievement gap in Haiti. The results of the study might be helpful to Haitian college students and educational leaders in their efforts to create initiatives to support, promote, and encourage the implementation and usage of technology in blended learning classes and provide adequate training for teachers to increase technology adoption. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563653</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Rebuilding Haiti&apos;s Educational Access: A Phenomenological Study of Technology Use in Education Delivery</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3383-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>298</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601749</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>First Generation College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Summer Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Personal Narratives</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Discourse</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Huerta, Andrew L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Arizona</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Arizona</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>With increasing numbers of first-generation college students enrolling in colleges and universities across the US, so too is the need to begin preparing such underrepresented students for graduate school and a career in academia. As a phenomenological case study of student transformation, this dissertation examines the experience of nine first-generation college students in the summer research portion of the Ronald E. McNair Achievement Program (McNair) at University of Arizona. The qualitative data collected includes in-depth interviewing, observing the students&apos; in-class presentations on the progress of their summer research, and reviewing the students&apos; written work. Drawing on Adult Transformational Learning Theory (Mezirow, 1991) and Gee&apos;s writings on student identity (2000) and Discourse (2005), this study primarily addresses the following questions: 1) How do UA McNair students take on and use the Discourse of research during the 10 week summer program? And 2) as they engage in the Discourse of research (in classes, with mentors, with peers, in written work), what academic identity transformations are observed (in the classroom, in interviews, and in written work)? Narrative inquiry (Clandinin &amp;amp; Connelly, 2000) was utilized to organize and examine the data, and research texts consist of academic biographies written for each student. Findings reveal that student transformation is the noticeable difference in the students&apos; utilization and integration of a language system used to describe their summer research and to define their research interests. Defined as the Discourse of research, this becomes the basis for students enacting the identity of undergraduate researcher. As a cohort of nine McNair Scholars, students share the experience of undergraduate research and engage in conversations which address the insecurities they have as first-generation college students. Through this formation of an affinity group (Gee, 2005) and their utilization of the Discourse of research, students engage in critical reflection, reevaluate their academic identities, and begin preparing themselves for their transition from undergraduate students to first-year doctoral students. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563654</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>First-Generation College Students and Undergraduate Research: Narrative Inquiry into the University of Arizona&apos;s Ronald E. McNair Achievement Program and the Phenomenon of Student Transformation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Arizona</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3429-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>252</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601767</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Videoconferencing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Business</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Agnor, Robert Joseph</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Telepresence uses the latest video conferencing technology, with high definition video, surround sound audio, and specially constructed studios, to create a near face-to-face meeting experience. A Fortune 500 company which markets information technology has organizations distributed around the globe, and has extensive collaboration needs among those organizations. Having invested heavily in telepresence technology to assist in the collaboration, the company has experienced a broad range of use among departments, but some departments do not use it at all. The purpose of this research was to study the reasons for widely disparate levels of telepresence use. The research is based upon factors contained in the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and assessed the impact of each upon the use of telepresence technology. The results of the research showed some factors affected telepresence acceptance and use while other factors had little or no effect. Underlying practices and conditions, such as the need to multi-task and to telecommute, impacted the factors. The research provided recommendations for assessing the likelihood of technology adoption before making investments, and for positively influencing adoption. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563655</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Factors Affecting Use of Telepresence Technology in a Global Technology Company</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Sc. Dissertation, Robert Morris University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3485-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>144</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601772</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Social Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Indexing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Searching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Audience Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Experiments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Users (Information)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Alsarhan, Hesham</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Online social bookmarking systems allow users to assign tags (i.e., keywords) to represent the content of resources. Research on the effects of target audience on social tagging suggests that taggers select different tags for themselves, their community (e.g., family, friends, colleagues), and the general public (Panke &amp;amp; Gaiser, 2009; Pu &amp;amp; Chang, 2009). This experiment investigated whether the common ground theory proposed by (Clark, Schreuder, &amp;amp; Buttrick, 1983) could explain tag selection and assignment: whether knowledge presumably shared by the tagger and the target audience influences tag selection and assignment. Ninety subjects studying finance and journalism were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Each group then tagged the same set of 21 resources for a different target audience (i.e., self, colleague, or stranger). To explore the influence of shared knowledge on subjects&apos; tagging behavior, the experiment addressed four questions: Does the number of tags assigned to resources vary across target audiences? Does the number of assigned tags appearing in tagged resources vary across target audiences? Does the number of concepts represented by assigned tags vary across target audiences? and Does the specificity of tags assigned to resources vary across target audiences? Analysis of tagging data showed that only the number of tags assigned to resources differed significantly between groups tagging for different target audiences. However, tag specificity and the number of tags appearing in the text of tagged resources showed patterns of tagging behavior suggesting the influence of common ground theory on tag production despite the lack of statistically significant differences. While findings for the number of tags assigned support the influence of knowledge presumably shared by the tagger and the target audience, research using larger samples is necessary to investigate the explanatory power of common ground theory for other aspects of tagging behavior. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563656</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effects of Target Audience on Social Tagging</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3486-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>258</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601773</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Hearing Impairments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Deafness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assistive Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Perception</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Acoustics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonetics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Suprasegmentals</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Listening</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Auditory Discrimination</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Casserly, Elizabeth D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Real-time use of spoken language is a fundamentally interactive process involving speech perception, speech production, linguistic competence, motor control, neurocognitive abilities such as working memory, attention, and executive function, environmental noise, conversational context, and--critically--the communicative interaction between speakers and listeners. In this thesis, use of a novel portable, real-time vocoder (PRTV) allowed for exploration of these foundational interactions in a variety of new ways. Experiment 1 linked perception and production, describing the impact of real-time perceptual transformation of acoustic feedback on segmental acoustic-phonetics in speech production. Chapter 2 obtained evidence for links between cognitive/attentional resources and real-time spoken language processing; in a series of three experiments, supra-segmental changes in speech production consistent with effects of limited attention were found as a result of real-time feedback perturbation. The playback experiment reported in Chapter 3 examined the impact of feedback-related changes in speech production from the point of view of a listener, finding that naive listeners could accurately discriminate differences in speech produced under unprocessed versus real-time perturbation conditions. While Chapters 1-3 focused on interactive effects in speech processing over short time periods, Chapter 4 investigated the coupling between speech perception and production in two subjects over 16 hours of PRTV use, exploring the impact of dynamic change on the perception/production relationship. Finally, the two experiments reported in Chapter 5 link the communicative context of real-world spoken language use to the domains and effectiveness of short-term perceptual learning. These findings enhance our understanding of several foundational linguistic and psychological issues, from basic links between perception and production to the experience of deaf users of cochlear implants. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563657</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Effects of Real-Time Cochlear Implant Simulation on Speech Perception and Production</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3496-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>312</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601782</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Morphology (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>African Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intonation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Concept</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Morphemes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Contrastive Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Verbs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diachronic Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hantgan, Abbie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Mali</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Mali</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation provides a description of aspects of the phonology, morphology, and morphosyntax of Bangime. Bangime is a language isolate spoken in the Dogon language speaking area of Central Eastern Mali. Although the Bangande, the speakers of Bangime, self-identify with the Dogon, their language bears practically no resemblance to the surrounding Dogon languages. Bangime has limited productive morphological processes whereas Dogon languages are agglutinating, with productive morphemes to indicate inflectional and derivational verbal and nominal processes. Bangime has a complex tonal system. General tendencies of the tonal patterns are described, with the many exceptions which frequently occur also outlined. Nominal tonal melodies are apparent in plural forms. Objects in verb phrases receive tonal agreement with tones on the verb in accordance with the subject of the sentence. The tense, aspect, and mood system of the language is also complicated. Inflectional marking on the verb, auxiliaries, and the word order all contribute to the indication of the tense, aspect or mood of the sentence. An overview of these multifaceted phonological and morphological processes is provided in this dissertation with hypotheses as to how the language might have evolved. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563658</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Aspects of Bangime Phonology, Morphology, and Morphosyntax</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3518-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>551</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601801</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Role Playing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preadolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Adolescents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Programming</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Games</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Relevance (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Logical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ingram-Goble, Adam</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This is an exploratory design study of a novel system for learning programming and 3D role-playing game design as tools for social change. This study was conducted at two sites. Participants in the study were ages 9-14 and worked for up to 15 hours with the platform to learn how to program and design video games with personally or socially relevant narratives. This first study was successful in that students learned to program a narrative game, and they viewed the social problem framing for the practices as an interesting aspect of the experience. The second study provided illustrative examples of how providing less general structure up-front, afforded players the opportunity to produce the necessary structures as needed for their particular design, and therefore had a richer understanding of what those structures represented. This study demonstrates that not only were participants able to use computational thinking skills such as Boolean and conditional logic, planning, modeling, abstraction, and encapsulation, they were able to bridge these skills to social domains they cared about. In particular, participants created stories about socially relevant topics without to explicit pushes by the instructors. The findings also suggest that the rapid uptake, and successful creation of personally and socially relevant narratives may have been facilitated by close alignment between the conceptual tools represented in the platform, and the domain of 3D role-playing games. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563659</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Playable Stories: Making Programming and 3D Role-Playing Game Design Personally and Socially Relevant</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3523-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>228</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601806</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Coaching (Performance)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transformational Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary Secondary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transcripts (Written Records)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Holistic Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Theory Practice Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Culture</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Norwood, Kathryn J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore possibilities for transformational coaching in education through the collaboration and cooperative argumentation of two researchers, one using appreciative inquiry to look at its transformative potential and the other using critical inquiry to investigate possible hegemonic and non-hegemonic barriers to this potential. Each researcher conducted separate research studies. The first researcher performed phenomenological interviews of 7 prominent coaches representing 5 different philosophical approaches to coaching that could enhance the potential for transformation in K-12 educational settings. Data analysis focused primarily on how the individual responses related to each other in terms of commonalities and distinguishing features regarding the phenomenon of the potential for transformation. The second researcher conducted phenomenological interviews of 10 coaches, 9 administrators, and 2 teachers in a single school district that has had an educational coaching program for 7 years. Interview transcripts underwent 3 levels of analysis, from topical organization of the raw data, to a more interpretive categorization of the data, to a final level where the categories of data generated theory about barriers to this district&apos;s coaching program. Results of the first research study indicate that holistic coaching approaches can enhance the transformative potential of educational coaching. These approaches require coaches who have achieved advanced levels of emotional maturity, mastery of their craft, and the ability to access &amp;quot;different ways of knowing&amp;quot; to help guide the coaching process. Results of the second study show that two aspects of school and district culture influence the viability of educational coaching: administrators&apos; ability and willingness to understand and facilitate coaches&apos; work, and varying degrees of openness to equitable practice among educators. Some of the barriers are hegemonic and others are not. We conclude that holistic approaches to coaching can offer transformative possibilities for educators. Educational coaches can develop themselves and achieve mastery and effectiveness by drawing from a more holistic and eclectic base of coaching theory and practice. Coaches can and must learn the art of detecting hegemony in others and in themselves to help assure optimal applications of this knowledge toward positive transformation in their schools. Recommendations for further research include research on transformative coaching practices in education, research on the developmental and maturation levels of coaches and their impact on school coaching, and research on hegemony that includes other school districts that represent a wide variety of demographic configurations. (Contains 3 Tables, 3 Figures, 12 Appendices). [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563660</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Transformational Coaching in Education: A Collaborative Look at the Bridges and Barriers to Learning</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3543-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>342</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601821</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Allied Health Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dentistry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dental Health</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Service Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Allied Health Occupations Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Internet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attitude Measures</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Burch, Sharlee Shirley</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Mann Whitney U Test</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this non-experimental causal-comparative study was to determine if service-learning teaching experience affects dental hygiene faculty perceptions of service-learning benefits and barriers in the United States. Dental hygiene educators from entry-level dental hygiene education programs in the United States completed the Web-based Faculty Service-Learning Beliefs Inventory (wFSLBI) and a short demographic survey to determine the perceived differences in benefits at the classroom and community levels, and barriers at the classroom and institutional levels. Independent samples t tests and Mann-Whitney tests were employed in data analysis. Results from 317 surveys revealed there was a statistically significant difference between dental hygiene educators&apos; perceptions in three of the four areas (benefits at the classroom and community levels and barriers at the classroom level) based on their service-learning teaching experience. In regards to institutional barriers, there was no significant difference between the two groups. These findings suggest that service-learning teaching experience impacts United States entry-level program dental hygiene faculty beliefs about the educational pedagogy known as service-learning. This tentative evidence contributes valuable knowledge to the field of service-learning in dental hygiene education and the broader field of service-learning in health professions education. It is recommended that other investigations into the service-learning beliefs of higher education faculty include additional health professional educators for contrast and comparison. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563661</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Effect of Teaching Experience on Service-Learning Beliefs of Dental Hygiene Educators</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Liberty University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4173-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>146</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602287</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Technical Institutes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Courses</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Support Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Delphi Technique</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Web Based Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Success</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technical Support</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Mediated Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Dowd, Nathan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study is to determine how Wisconsin Technical College (WTCS) administrators and online instructors perceive the impact of online learner readiness and student support services to be on student success in online courses. The study used a modified three-round Delphi technique to determine to collect data. The results indicated that WTCS online instructors perceive that student access to IT help desk all hours of the day and days of the week is essential to promoting student success in online courses. The results also indicated that students would benefit from the development of a dedicated department of online learning, that student success in online courses depends on their readiness for online learning, and that self-direction was the most important student characteristic that promoted student success in an online course. The study makes four recommendations. First, in order to ensure optimal course success, students in online courses should be provided with IT help desk support 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Second, students should be required to take an online readiness course prior to signing up for an online course or be given an online learning readiness assessment prior to registering for an online course. Third, support departments dedicated to online learning should prepare faculty to teach in online environments as well as prepare online readiness assessments and courses for students. Fourth, regular communication between the online student and instructor through technology, such as phones, emails, and voice over IP services, is essential for course success. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563662</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Technical College Instructors&apos; Perceptions of the Impact of Online Readiness and of Student Support Services on Student Success in Online Courses</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Edgewood College</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2012-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4179-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>132</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602292</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lorge-Grover, Christina</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This qualitative study examined first-year Interest Groups (FIGs) that resulted in higher graduation rates at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. Participants in this study included eight former FIG participants from the academic years 2008-2011. This researcher created a questionnaire guided by Astin&apos;s theory of involvement, that analyzed the first-year interest group program, along the areas of peer interaction, staff interaction, faculty interaction, academic activities, and out-of-class activities. The findings of the study supported Astin&apos;s theory, along with the literature on college student persistence and retention. The key finding of the study was the importance of peer interaction in college student success. This study also found that out-of-classroom activities were also a condition in college student success. These out-of-class activities were typically based in peer interaction, but changed the environment for these interactions to occur. Surprisingly, staff and faculty interactions were not considered notable conditions of the FIG program. Recommendations included working with college leaders to incorporate more opportunities for peer interaction to occur on campus and to intentionally work to create opportunities for additional faculty and staff interaction outside the classroom. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563663</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of First-Year Interest Groups on Retention and Graduation Rates</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Edgewood College</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4193-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>102</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602301</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Veterans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Readiness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transitional Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Veterans Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Morris, Brett Eugene</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Kentucky</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Kentucky</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined whether a bridge program designed to remediate academic deficiencies for a cohort of student veterans has any bearing on their post-secondary success and persistence. Specifically, this study examined the Veterans Bridge to College Success (VBCS) pilot program at Eastern Kentucky University, which provides an admission pathway for student veterans with low ACT or SAT test scores, no test scores, or marginal high school or college GPAs. The study utilized both quantitative and qualitative analyses to determine whether student veterans with known academic deficiencies prior to enrollment would persist and perform at similar rates as their academically proficient peers and examine whether their academic and social cohort experience in the VBCS program had any lasting effect upon their persistence. The study examined both groups during their third and fourth academic terms when all participants were considered fully academic ready and enrolled full-time in credit bearing coursework. The quantitative results of the study show evidence that the academic performance and retention rate of students who continued to pursue their degree after completing VBCS program did not differ significantly from their college-ready student veteran peers who did not participate in the cohort-based program. Furthermore, the qualitative portion of the study confirmed that members of the VBCS group reported lasting effects of the VBCS program on their desire to persist. Chapter 5 of the study reflects upon the value of the research in regards to policy, practice and for future research. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563664</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Bridge Program&apos;s Effect on Non-College Ready Student Veterans</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Eastern Kentucky University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4199-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>166</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602304</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Urban Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Emotional Intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnocentrism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Positive Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Onipede, Vanessa Yvonne Stuart</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In the last ten years, education reform in this country has led to keen emphasis on student achievement at every level. Since then, many research studies have been dedicated to closing the student achievement gap through the examination of teacher training &amp;amp; development. Research has also incited awareness in the value of &amp;quot;emotional intelligence&amp;quot; (EI) inclusion into teacher preparation programs. This qualitative study explored the post training perceptions and learning outcomes of 12 secondary school teachers within a city school district, specifically concerning the incorporation of EI in their training program and their utilization of it in the classroom. The data findings of this single case-instrumental case study indicated an overall positive perception of EI infused training. The following four overarching themes emerged from the analysis of the qualitative interviews: EI: education of educators, cultural norms collide with EI, the EI effect, and system of support. Additionally, the underlying issues embedded within these aforementioned themes such as disparities in teacher education content regarding EI, relationship between EI and teacher motivation, professional learning communities: culture of collaboration and overcoming ethnocentrism are also deliberated. Finally, this research exploration provided recommendations for future research and explicated ways to enhance the content and delivery of future teacher training; thus adding a unique dimension to the body of knowledge on this topic. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563665</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Emotional Education: A Case on the Perceptions of Secondary School Teachers&apos; Emotional Intelligence Leadership Training</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4203-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>169</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602307</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Beginning Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technical Institutes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Check Lists</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Raehpour, Julia</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Wisconsin</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Wisconsin</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This mixed-methods study used an online survey and interviews to explore perceptions of 21 first-year faculty in the Wisconsin Technical College System to determine which professional development activities were important to their teaching needs and concerns and whether there were differences between occupational and general education faculty. Danielson&apos;s &amp;quot;Framework for Teaching&amp;quot; was used to ground the exploration of professional development activities germane to technical college teaching. The combined findings from the survey and interviews revealed that instructional as well as organizational development were primary needs of new faculty during the first year with informal support and getting frequent, meaningful feedback as most beneficial in preparing them to teach. Differences between occupational and general education faculty indicated a need to provide separate professional development topics to reflect a distinction in daily work and responsibilities. The researcher made 11 recommendations and a checklist for designing and evaluating professional development programming. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563666</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Perceptions of New Full-Time Faculty on Professional Development in Wisconsin Technical Colleges</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Edgewood College</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4207-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>215</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602311</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Liberal Arts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Private Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Factor Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socialization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Significance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Adjustment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Expectation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Indicators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sunleaf, Arthur W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Midwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this study was to identify variables that influenced first-year retention at a small, private, and Midwestern liberal arts college. A survey was administered to first-year students; factor analysis of the data produced variables representing academic and social integration as well as perceptions of institutional support. Regression analysis estimated effects of factor variables on departure decisions and some regression equations explained more than 50 percent of the variance. Variables representing quality of students&apos; personal relationships and social community fit had large and statistically significant coefficients in most or all regressions. The most important academic integration factor was academic performance, which included anticipated GPA, academic performance compared to expectations, and other academic performance indicators. The policy implications were to provide an interactive academic setting and maximize student achievement, and develop more ways for students to interact with each other so that they build strong peer relationships. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563667</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>First-to-Second-Year Undergraduate Student Retention at a Small Midwest Four-Year Liberal Arts College</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Edgewood College</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4212-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>168</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602316</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Computer Networks</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Failure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Database Management Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Efficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Programming</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Simulation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Avci, Serhat Nazim</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Link failures in wide area networks are common and cause significant data losses. Mesh-based protection schemes offer high capacity efficiency but they are slow, require complex signaling, and instable. Diversity coding is a proactive coding-based recovery technique which offers near-hitless (sub-ms) restoration with a competitive spare capacity requirement with respect to other techniques. In this thesis, an optimal algorithm is developed for pre-provisioning of the static traffic using both systematic and non-systematic diversity coding. A Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) formulation is developed for systematic diversity coding which requires many fewer integer variables and constraints than similar optimal coding-based formulations. In all scenarios, diversity coding results in smaller restoration time, higher transmission integrity, and much reduced signaling complexity than the existing techniques in the literature at the expense of slightly lower capacity efficiency than Shared Path Protection (SPP) and p-cycle protection. The drawbacks of the earlier implementations of diversity coding are the low scalability and restricted coding structure. To overcome these, a simple column generation-based design algorithm and a novel advanced diversity coding technique to achieve near-hitless recovery over large networks are proposed. The design framework consists of two parts: a main problem and sub problem. Simulation results over large networks with arbitrary topologies suggest that both the novel coding structure and the novel design algorithm lead to higher capacity efficiency for near-hitless recovery. Moreover, this thesis presents a bidirectional coding-based scheme, named Coded Path Protection (CPP). In addition to a systematic approach of building valid coding structures, this paper presents an optimal and simple capacity placement and coding group formation algorithm. The algorithm converts the sharing structure of any solution of an SPP technique into a coding structure with minimum extra capacity. Simulation results confirm that the CPP is significantly faster than both SPP and Shared Link Protection (SLP) and more capacity efficient than SLP. This thesis also investigates the dynamic provisioning of the traffic on-demand. In dynamic provisioning, an Integer Linear Programming (ILP)-based optimal algorithm covers both of the systematic and non-systematic diversity coding. The performance of proposed dynamic provisioning technique is similar to that of pre-provisioning. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563668</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Optimal Near-Hitless Network Failure Recovery Using Diversity Coding</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4233-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>146</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602325</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Adults</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dyslexia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Etiology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypothesis Testing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonological Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Difficulties</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pictorial Stimuli</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Repetition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonemes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Recall (Psychology)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Conner, Peggy S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A high percentage of individuals with dyslexia struggle to learn unfamiliar spoken words, creating a significant obstacle to foreign language learning after early childhood. The origin of spoken-word learning difficulties in this population, generally thought to be related to the underlying literacy deficit, is not well defined (e.g., Di Betta &amp;amp; Romani, 2006; Jakoby, 2010, 2011). Although it is widely accepted that dyslexia is characterized by a core deficit in phonological processing, considerable debate remains regarding the etiology of this deficit and how it hinders reading and writing development. This study investigates two prominent hypotheses about why people with dyslexia struggle with learning to read and write and examines how these may explain spoken-word learning difficulties. These hypotheses are the phonological representations hypothesis that proposes poorly specified phonological representations can largely account for the literacy difficulties experienced by people with dyslexia, and the perceptual anchoring deficit hypothesis that suggests these challenges stem from a reduced ability to implicitly benefit from repetitions of phonological information. Thirty-nine individuals, 16 with and 23 without dyslexia were given novel spoken words paired with pictures of novel objects in a story format. The relative contribution of the participants&apos; phonological knowledge (sublexical and lexical representations) and perceptual anchoring (the ability to benefit from stimulus-specific repetitions) to this novel word-learning task was measured by two aspects of a production task. The independent variables of the phonological properties of the word forms and the effects of repetitions over test time informed us about phonological knowledge and perceptual anchoring respectively. The participants&apos; novel word productions in a picture-naming task served as the dependent variable. By measuring the participants&apos; progress in learning words, we quantified the potential benefit provided both by the speech-sound characteristics and by repetitions of the novel words over test time. The results suggested that deficits in phonological knowledge and perceptual anchoring make independent contributions to novel spoken-word learning and that a combination of deficits in the two areas contribute to word-learning difficulties in learners with dyslexia. The single best predictor for both groups was a task of phonological awareness, phoneme reversal. Apart from this task, a measure of verbal recall of real words appeared to be a better predictor for typical learners whereas a measure of spelling had greater predictor value for the learners with dyslexia. Spoken-word learning as a dynamic interaction of implicit and explicit memory processes is presented and discussed. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563669</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Novel Spoken Word Learning in Adults with Developmental Dyslexia</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3586-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>120</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601865</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Communities of Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrators</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Values</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Feedback (Response)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Egbune, Francisca</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Nigeria</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Nigeria</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine whether educators perceive the existence of the five dimensions of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) in Delta State Schools in Nigeria. This study used an online survey to assess 105 teachers&apos; and administrator&apos;s perceptions from six randomly sampled Delta State Central Senatorial District schools. The analyzed results of the data from the online survey with the t-test statistical techniques revealed that four out of the five dimensions of PLCs were perceived by the educators to exist in the Nigeria schools. The dimensions are: Shared and supportive leadership, shared values and vision, collective learning and application of learning, and supportive conditions and capacities. But the educators did not perceive that shared personal practice--peer performance review and feedback--exists in their schools. Since all five dimensions provided by Hord (1997a) were identified as key characteristics that exist in schools that encouraged the development of PLCs, the study suggests that educators did not perceive that PLCs exist or is practiced in Nigeria schools. Also, the study revealed that there exists no statistically significant difference between the teachers and administrators perceptions in all the five dimensions of PLCs. However, it suggested for a further study to be replicated in other States schools&apos; districts in Nigeria in order to ascertain whether there is concurrence perception nationally. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563670</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Examining the Five Dimensions of Professional Learning Communities in Nigerian Schools: A Study of the Perceptions of Educators in Delta State Schools</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3588-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>157</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601867</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Generative Grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Form Classes (Languages)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Finno Ugric Languages</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Diachronic Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Syntax</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Code Switching (Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Contrastive Linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Ferrazzano, Lisa Reisig</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is significant variation in the literature on how demonstratives are characterized semantically, leading to divergent syntactic analyses of demonstratives. A major source of this disagreement regards how distance specifications relate to the demonstrative: whether [+/- speaker] is an integral property of the demonstrative or not. I argue that distance-marking divides the class of demonstratives into strong and weak, along the lines of what Cardinaletti and Starke (1999) propose for pronouns. Strong demonstratives possess a [+/- speaker] feature, while weak demonstratives have a neutral [speaker] feature, corresponding to a distance-neutral interpretation, and the pragmatic notion of immediate accessibility of the referent (Lyons 1999). The diachronic component of this work serves as a lens through which to view the demonstrative&apos;s synchronic behavior. I argue that the process of grammaticalization (Meillet 1912) allows us to &amp;quot;see&amp;quot; certain aspects of a demonstrative&apos;s meaning (and, I argue, corresponding internal syntactic structure) getting peeled away as the demonstrative evolves. Latin &amp;quot;ille&amp;quot; and spoken Finnish se provide evidence that demonstratives pass through a distance-neutral phase before being analyzed as definite articles, suggesting that strong and weak demonstratives should receive distinct analyses in the synchronic domain. I argue that strong and weak demonstratives can be viewed as synchronic imprints of a diachronic process. In addition to teasing apart different semantic types of demonstratives, this dissertation seeks to identify differences between demonstratives and definite articles. I propose that the demonstrative is specified for (i) [(+/-) speaker], (ii) [+contrastive] (encoding contrast), and (iii) [+identifiability], and that these features are encoded on functional heads in the extended projection of the demonstrative. The complex demonstrative is merged in a dedicated functional projection ([Spec, TrackerAdjP) within the DP. The definite article, in contrast, expresses only [+identifiability], and is merged directly in the DP projection. I argue that the common core of [+identifiability] helps explain the synchronic and diachronic dependency between the demonstrative and the DP projection, and sheds light on our discussion on the phenomenon of apparent &amp;quot;double definiteness.&amp;quot; [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563671</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Demonstratives in Motion: The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives as a Window into Synchronic Phenomena</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3589-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>276</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601868</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Habits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Study Habits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correspondence Study</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Books</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Military Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hypermedia</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Isreal, Kenith R.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_test>Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire</eric:keywords_test>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Electronic books have rapidly moved through the entertainment community and are rapidly making their way into the academic environment. Public and private schools, libraries and training organizations use eBooks for research and instruction. This study sought to enhance the learning habits of students taking self-paced correspondence courses delivered in the eBook format. Course distributors produce courses formatted for personal computers, tablets, and a host of electronic devices. This study limited its focus to eBook courses taken on personal computers in military work center environments. Research techniques use the mix method (quantitative/qualitative) approach to data collection and analysis. The sample audience for this study was 44 persons filling supervisor (S = 22) and trainee (T = 22) duty positions at four military installations. The trainee participants used the eBook courses configured with text markup features to complete skill advancement training; supervisors directed volume completion and managed the training programs. The intervention taught participants how to study eBooks by introducing an active reading process and text markup techniques to enhance their existing learning habits. Learning habits were assessed using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire prior to and after the application of techniques presented in the researcher designed active reading and eBook text markup guide. The study revealed differences in learning habits of participants in supervisory roles as compared to participants in trainee positions. The study also revealed how learning techniques used to study printed material could be transferred to material delivered in eBook formats as long as the eBooks had a text markup configuration. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563672</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Active Reading Intervention for the Electronic Career Development Course (eCDC) Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3597-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>109</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601876</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Allied Health Personnel</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Integration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Health Services</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technological Literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Skill Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Palkie, Brooke N.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The Health Information Management (HIM) profession is evolving to meet the technology demands of the current healthcare landscape. The 2009 enactment of the HITECH Act has placed unprecedented emphasis on utilizing technology to improve the quality of care and to decrease healthcare costs. Expectations of deep analytical skills have set the stage for HIM professionals to exert leadership in terms of infrastructure, governance, data analytics and health informatics. The adoption of health information technology is expected to increase with the arrival of big data and due to the Title XIII (HITECH Act) of the ARRA. In order to meet these goals, healthcare will need an increase in professionals with the appropriate health informatics training and data analysis skills. This study helps to identify the perceived knowledge of the emerging health informatics competencies by HIM professionals as the needs of the healthcare industry shifts to a health informatics driven era. Several categories emerged from the study that can be used to help strengthen HIM curriculum and HIM professional initiatives in the workforce. Of the identified categories, the strongest predictor of HIM competency tended to be education. Greater years of experience was also associated with greater knowledge in various HIM categories, and greater knowledge of health informatics competencies was associated with health information technology (HIT) use. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563673</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Improving the Understanding of Progressing and Emerging Health Informatics Roles and Skill Sets among Health Information Management Professionals: An Action Research Study</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3608-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>173</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601887</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Two Year Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Outcomes Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Participation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Departments</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bruley, Marie N.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study utilizes a mixed methods exploratory design to examine the nature of math faculty engagement in the student learning outcomes assessment cycle. The focus of the study is on the types of changes that math faculty are implementing as a result of assessment outcomes and the institutional environmental factors that impact faculty engagement in the assessment cycle. The study fills a gap in the research on student learning outcomes assessment by focusing on how assessment is impacting math faculty teaching practice. This study is of particular importance because of the importance in helping students meet math requirements so they can achieve their educational goals and because of poor success rates in math courses that show room for improvement in math instruction. This study uses a pragmatic framework to explore faculty engagement. The study participants are math faculty from community colleges in the state of California. The mixed methods design utilized math faculty interviews and a survey instrument designed to describe math faculty engagement in student learning outcomes assessment cycles throughout the California community college system. The findings indicate that math faculty are actively participating in assessment and implementing improvement plans that are developed either by individual faculty or by departments. The typical changes that are being implemented are more time or emphasis for particular elements of the content of courses and revisions to SLO statements. Factors impacting math faculty engagement in assessment are faculty workload, obtaining meaningful assessment data, and departmental environment. The math faculty indicate that the types of support they would like their institutions to provide are release-time and support for adjunct faculty involvement in assessment. The math faculty report that there are differences in the changes applied to courses at different levels of the mathematics curriculum due to a number of factors that are either systemic or due to department environment. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563674</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Outcomes of Math Faculty Engagement in Student Learning Outcomes Assessment in the Two-Year Colleges</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, California State University, Stanislaus</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4236-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>338</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602328</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>School Orientation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Rural Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Holding Power</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Data Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade Point Average</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Credentials</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Policy Formation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Best Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Davis, James Michael</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Appalachia</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Economic and fiscal challenges, increased public scrutiny, and calls for accountability from stakeholders necessitate that community colleges work diligently to improve student success outcomes. Programs, services, and initiatives need to be developed and implemented that will increase student retention. Orientation is an important intervention service that can help new students to acclimate and make a more successful transition to college. There is a need to study programs that increase student success, and new student orientation programs have demonstrated their promise in reducing student attrition. This quantitative study examined a first year new student orientation program at a rural community college in Appalachia and its impact on term-to-term retention for credential seeking students. Academic and other non-academic information for all first-time, full-time status incoming students in the Fall 2010 were collected and compared between those students who participated in the Academic Orientation Program (AOP) and those who did not. Data utilized to measure student success outcomes were cumulative grade point average, total credit hours earned, the number of credentials earned, as well as term-to-term persistence and retention rates for both groups over a two full academic year period. Independent samples T-tests were performed as well as linear regressions, both of which resulted in positive findings that showed the overall positive impact of the AOP on student success. Implications for policy development, best practice, and further study are discussed, and an example of the AOP curriculum plan is provided in the appendix. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563675</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Impact of Orientation Programming on Student Success Outcomes at a Rural Community College</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Eastern Kentucky University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4238-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>128</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602330</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Reading Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Testing Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence Based Practice</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Implementation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inferences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonemic Awareness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phonics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fedor, Linda C.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Pennsylvania</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>In 2000, the National Reading Panel (NRP) identified scientifically based reading instructional practices in the five key areas of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency vocabulary, and comprehension. The purpose of this study was to determine the strength of the relationship between the degree of implementation of scientifically based reading instruction in K-3 and Grade 3 Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA) Reading achievement in school districts in Northeastern Pennsylvania (NEPA). Research indicates that throughout the past decade, these same instructional practices were found to be effective. As educators in K-3 worked to prepare students for high-stakes testing in reading, the degree of implementation of these instructional practices were being examined. In this quantitative study, 132 K-3 classroom teachers in 20 schools completed the Revised Teacher&apos;s Implementation of Scientifically Based Reading Instruction (TISBRI) survey to determine the school-wide level of implementation of scientifically based reading instruction. Teacher experience within each school was also studied. The results of the survey were compared to the 2012 Grade 3 PSSA Reading mean scale score for each school. Inferential statistics determined that no correlation existed between the level of implementation of scientifically based reading strategies and Grade 3 PSSA Reading achievement. There was a correlation between years of teaching experience and level of implementation of scientifically based reading strategies. The study also concluded that scientifically based fluency instruction correlated to scientifically based reading instruction in phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, and comprehension. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563676</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between the Level of Implementation of Scientifically Based Reading Instructional Practices in K-3 and Grade 3 Pennsylvania System of School Assessment Reading Achievement in Northeastern Pennsylvania</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Wilkes University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4240-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>116</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602332</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Educational Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Legislation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tutoring</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Improvement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tutors</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>School Districts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tutorial Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outcomes of Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Disadvantaged Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educationally Disadvantaged</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Minority Group Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Supplementary Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Grainger, Michael J.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:keywords_law>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</eric:keywords_law>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Under the mandates of No Child Left Behind, supplemental educational services (SES) in the form of tutoring are provided to eligible students who attend schools in the 3rd year of program improvement status. A local suburban school district in the southern California currently uses a 3rd party tutoring model to provide tutoring services in both mathematics and language arts. State approved tutors are reimbursed by the school district using Title 1 funding up to a per-student revenue allocation that is determined by the amount of Federal funding each school district receives. A review of archival student data reflects that the current model is ineffective in increasing student test scores in mathematics and language arts on the California Standardized Test. An improvement-oriented formative program evaluation was proposed to investigate the current 3rd party tutoring model and to formulate revisions to the current SES tutoring program. The study was based on the constructivist theories of Vygotsky and Kolb, which emphasized the active role of learners in building understanding and making sense of information. A thematic analysis of data obtained from 10 interviews with state-approved tutors provided insight into the impact of the current 3rd party model on current stakeholders. Program evaluation findings outlined in the executive summary will include recommendations on how the current tutoring program may be augmented to improve learning outcomes for eligible students. The implementation of these recommendations for program improvement will serve as a catalyst for positive social change as student learning outcomes improve and schools emerge from under the academic sanctions of No Child Left Behind. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563677</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Utilization-Focused Program Evaluation of a Supplemental Educational Services Third-Party Tutoring Model</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4246-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>183</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602338</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>High School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Career Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High School Graduates</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Certification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Preparation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Requirements</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Education Work Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Price-Wright, Demetress LaGale</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>There is a growing demand by our society and legislature to educate all students equitably in an inclusive general education setting. Societal trends vary as time progresses, but this does not eliminate the growing debate regarding diploma options, exit requirements and future career planning for high school graduates. What does a future look like for a special education student who graduates without a recommended diploma? Who is responsible for career planning? How do we ensure that transition plans are developed and implemented? Post-secondary opportunities require advanced preparation from grade school throughout high school. College and career readiness is a growing theme among the field of education. Does this inadvertently impact decisions regarding career planning for special education students who graduate with a non-college preparatory high school diploma? How is the availability of post-secondary opportunities impacted by diploma status upon completion of high school? [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563678</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Career Planning without a Regular Diploma: A Study of High School Students Who Received &amp;quot;Special&amp;quot; Diplomas</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3612-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>164</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601891</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Borrowing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Spanish Speaking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immigrants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Middle Class</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Attainment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Puerto Ricans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vocabulary</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Working Class</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Metalinguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Fluency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Code Switching (Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Bilingualism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Speech Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic Americans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Variation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Varra, Rachel Marie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation investigates lexical borrowing in Spanish in New York. English-origin lexical material was extracted from a stratified sample of 146 Spanish-speaking informants of different ages, national origins, classes, etc., living in New York City. ANOVAs and Pearson correlations determined whether lexical borrowing frequency and the type of vocabulary used (i.e. idiosyncratic and shared) were correlated with speaker traits. Results show that all speakers, regardless of their English proficiency or how long they have been in the U.S., borrow. However, borrowing frequency is best predicted by immigrant generation. Furthermore, borrowing rate may play a distinct role for first and second generation Spanish speakers. In the first generation, the middle class, those with more education, better proficiency in English and more Spanish confidence borrow most often. In the second generation, Puerto Ricans and those with more English confidence borrow most. Results for borrowing vocabulary suggest that the middle class is more responsible for introducing novel vocabulary to the Spanish-speaking community than the working class. Overall, though, both novel and shared vocabulary are integral components of speakers&apos; borrowing inventories. Finally, this dissertation examines flagging (e.g. pauses, fillers, metalinguistic commentary) near other-language strings to determine whether flagging is indicative of language awareness or linguistic disfluency. Results showed no support for the latter; but evidence for the former interpretation suggests that a simultaneous, albeit slight, process of deborrowing accompanies lexical borrowing in New York. The findings and the methodology of this dissertation contribute to several fields of language study. First, the definition of lexical borrowing used makes it germane to studying borrowing in situations of on-going, face-to-face contact in multidialectal communities. Furthermore, a corpus-based approach to differentiating between two types of bilingual speech phenomena, lexical borrowing and codeswitching, is offered. Second, findings show that borrowing in New York is not a &amp;quot;deficit&amp;quot; behavior and that some aspects of identity (such as arrival age and class) cross-cut traditional (i.e. regional) characterizations of U.S. Latinos. Finally, findings for bilingual speech partially corroborate models describing the long-term outcomes of contact that predict that the quantity of contact features observable in a language is a function of the intensity of contact. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563679</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Social Correlates of Lexical Borrowing in Spanish in New York City</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3620-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>302</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601898</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scripts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Competence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Change</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cues</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stimuli</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Young Children</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Generalization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Siblings</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Family Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sibling Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wichnick, Alison Marie</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>A critical component of teaching social skills to people with autism is the generalization of behavior change across a variety of untrained situations during which social skills are appropriate. The script-fading procedure is an effective technology for teaching social skills to people with autism, but few researchers have established cues in the natural environment as the discriminative stimuli for social initiations. The purpose of this study was to use a script-fading procedure to teach young children with autism to initiate to one another across various activities in the school setting, and to program for generalization across untrained stimuli in the school setting and in the untrained home setting with a sibling. The three participants, ages 7 to 10 years, demonstrated deficits in social initiations with their peers. During the baseline condition, the participants did emit initiations to one another, although this behavior was variable and did not endure over time. With the introduction of the script-fading procedure, however, social initiations increased systematically for all participants. Moreover, the data demonstrated that the effects of the script-fading procedure generalized across untrained stimuli, responses, and to an untrained setting with an untrained conversation partner. Overall, this study demonstrated the effectiveness of the script-fading procedure in teaching children with autism to initiate to their peers. This study has expanded upon previous research by demonstrating generalization from school with peers to the home setting with siblings, and by providing social validity data obtained through outside observers that support the effectiveness of the script-fading procedure in producing an important behavior change. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563680</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Script Fading for Children with Autism: Generalization of Social Initiation Skills from School to Home</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3621-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>176</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601899</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Service Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Engagement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learning Activities</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Integrated Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Arnaud, Velda</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Community college graduation rates are low, and community colleges have been tasked with producing more graduates to meet workforce needs. Research has determined that engaged students remain at their institutions and complete their degrees. Service learning has been identified as a high-impact practice that engages students with their learning and builds connections between students and campus personnel. The majority of service-learning research, having been conducted with 4-year colleges and universities, may have limited applicability to the community college population. This qualitative descriptive case study describes how institutionalized service learning on 1 community college campus is structured, supported, and operated. The study used the framework of student success, service learning, and institutionalization to determine how the college provided resources and opportunities for service learning. Participants for the study were selected using mixed purposeful sampling to identify individuals recently involved with service learning at the college; data came from document reviews, campus and Internet observations, college staff interviews, and student group online discussions. Data were collected and analyzed using a spiraling technique. Findings indicated that the college&apos;s curricular and cocurricular service-learning activities were integrated throughout the campus in many departments and with different groups. While the service-learning coordinators made distinctions between curricular and cocurricular service learning, student participants did not make such distinctions. Students in this study were engaged with their service learning. These findings have applicability for all community college educators, demonstrating that institutionalized community college service learning might lead to greater retention through graduation. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563681</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Institutionalized Community College Service Learning to Promote Engagement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3629-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>195</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601905</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>At Risk Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropouts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduation Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dropout Rate</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transfer Rates (College)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Transfer Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attrition</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attendance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Withdrawal (Education)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictive Validity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Failure</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Bachler, Paul T.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>New York</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>New York</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Community colleges have been criticized for having lower graduation rates than four year colleges, but few studies have looked at non-graduation transfer, in which a student leaves the community college for a four-year college without taking an associate degree. The current study utilizes institutional data and a discrete-time event history model to predict non-transfer attrition in community colleges. The data utilized include five years of institutional data from 21,724 first-time freshmen from the six community colleges of the City University of New York. The study includes students who resided in New York City and its two adjacent suburban counties and who matriculated in the fall of the 2004 and 2005 academic years. Multinomial logistic regression was employed in an event history model of student absence and transfer; models were developed for both the first and second spells. Data on students who transferred were obtained from the National Student Loan Clearinghouse (NSLC). Continuation or type of leaving following each semester constituted the dependent variable. Many of the risk factors for leaving were related to academic performance. Students who were writing proficient and who had higher GPAs and more credit completion were more likely to remain enrolled or to transfer; students who failed were more likely to leave. Notably, course withdrawal was a greater risk factor for leaving than course failure. Financial aid in the form of grants and loans was associated with a decreased risk for attrition, and weekly travel was associated with an increased risk for leaving as well as an increased risk for transfer. Smaller class size and time spent on campus and especially in class was associated with lower risks for attrition. Three models were employed, two of these modeled transfer as separate form of leaving; one included transfer together with graduation and continuation as a successful semester outcome. Parameters obtained from the 2004 cohort were applied to the 2005 cohort to assess each model&apos;s predictive validity in a naive dataset. The most successful model for the first spell correctly identified 34.6 percent of the leavers in the semester in which they left, with a 35 percent false positive rate. The most successful model for the second spell identified 49.6 percent of leavers with a 30.8 percent false positive rate. If a false positive rate of 50 percent is allowed, about 60 percent of leavers in the first spell and about 80 percent of the leavers in second spell can be detected. Remedial study does not present a risk, but the data suggest that remedial education may be using too much of a student&apos;s grant money. It is suggested that additional study may be needed to determine how to effectively remediate students in math and writing, and that a model for course withdrawal and failure using interim grades be developed. Since withdrawal and failure present acute risks, it is suggested that a student&apos;s fitness and prerequisite skills for courses be assessed prior to course enrollment. Since many of the risk factors are interrelated, it is suggested that a structural model may be needed to assess each predictor&apos;s relevance. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563682</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Using Institutional Data to Identify Students at Risk for Leaving Community College: An Event History Approach</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3646-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>223</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3601911</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Technology Uses in Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Models</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questionnaires</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Graduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Higher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Carmo, Monica Cristina</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This case study developed an instructional technology assessment process for the Gevirtz Graduate School of Education (GGSE). The theoretical framework of Adelman and Taylor (2001) guided the development of this instructional technology assessment process and the tools to aid in its facilitation. GGSE faculty, staff, and graduate students responded to a technology questionnaire that sought to gather data about their current satisfaction with the School&apos;s technology infrastructure, their preferences for future training and technology investments, and their understanding and use of current classroom, research, and administrative technologies. With an overall participation rate of 65% faculty, 64% staff, and 22% of students the questionnaire strategy of assessment seems to be a viable method of collecting technology related data. Findings from the questionnaire revealed that most faculty, staff, and graduate student respondents were highly satisfied with the GGSE&apos;s Information Technology Group (ITG) as their main resource for technology help and guidance, however, Academic Technology Specialists (ATS) had the lowest use for faculty, 0% use by staff, and lowest use for student respondents. All three stakeholder groups have the strongest priority for spending technology monies for technology within &amp;quot;support&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;research software training.&amp;quot; Some stakeholders expressed an overall desire for definitions of technology tools and services listed on the questionnaire to provide clarification for their responses. The frequent need for clarification shows that some stakeholders are not taking full advantage of some technologies and services available to them because they do not know they exist or how to access them. This institutional study is considered a case study for a future longitudinal study to investigate the effectiveness of the GGSE assessment process as a method of sustaining innovations and the satisfaction levels of stakeholders. The intended audience for this assessment development project is college technology leaders interested in creating their own technology assessment process. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563683</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Sustaining Innovation: Developing an Instructional Technology Assessment Process</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3786-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>165</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602015</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Persistence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Institutional Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Aspiration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Phenomenology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nontraditional Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Language Learners</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Arbelo Marrero, Floralba</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined the academic persistence of 10 undergraduate Hispanic nontraditional students enrolled at a public and a private not for profit Hispanic Serving Institution in the southeastern region of the United States, each in their last year of a bachelor degree program. Using a phenomenological research design and an ecological and sociocultural framework the findings indicated that family context, personal aspirations, campus environment within Hispanic Serving Institutions, life challenges, and English language learning each play a vital role in the persistence behaviors of this population. These factors interact at the student and institutional levels to provide students with internal and external resources and motivators that influence their academic persistence at Hispanic Serving Institutions. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563684</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Exploring Factors That Contribute to Academic Persistence for Undergraduate Hispanic Nontraditional Students at Hispanic Serving Institutions in the Southeast</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Liberty University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4169-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>169</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602283</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Community Colleges</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Presidents</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Role</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Responsibility</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Governance</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Stakeholders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Opinions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Facilitators (Individuals)</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Darin, Joseph</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study sought to bring clarity to the discussion regarding various recommendations over the past 25 years to strengthen the California Community Colleges Chancellor&apos;s Office. Using a review of historical documents and administrating a survey and using follow-up interviews, the study attempted to establish a general sense of community college stakeholders&apos; responses to these recommendations in an attempt to identify areas of agreement and disagreement, classify perceived obstacles, potential benefits, negative impacts, and actions necessary for implementation. The study found that most respondents were interested in a Chancellor&apos;s Office whose primary role was to support the community colleges as they provide their services, do so as a facilitator instead of a regulator, and with as little interference from the Chancellor&apos;s Office, legislature and governor&apos;s office as possible. The study also reinforced a commonly understood idea that the community colleges are extremely protective of their local control. The researcher hoped to assist future policy makers in understanding the issues relating to modifying the governance of the California community college, including promoting sensitivity to the language being used to describe those modifications. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563685</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Examination of the Persistent Recommendation to Grant the California Community Colleges Chancellor&apos;s Office Greater Authority and the Reactions of Stakeholders to This Recommendation</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3814-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>146</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602037</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Chemistry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Methods</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Laboratories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Classroom Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Instructional Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Kalainoff, Melinda Zapata</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Studio classrooms, designed such that laboratory and lecture functions can occur in the same physical space, have been recognized as a promising contributing factor in promoting collaborative learning in the sciences (NRC, 2011). Moreover, in designing for instruction, a critical goal, especially in the sciences and engineering, is to foster an environment where students have opportunities for learning problem solving practices (NRC, 2012a). However, few studies show how this type of innovative learning environment shapes opportunities for learning in the sciences, which is critical to informing future curricular and instructional designs for these environments. Even fewer studies show how studio environments shape opportunities to develop problem solving practices specifically. In order to make visible how the learning environment promotes problem solving practices, this study explores problem solving phenomena in the daily life of an undergraduate General Chemistry studio class using an ethnographic perspective. By exploring problem solving as a sociocultural process, this study shows how the instructor and students co-construct opportunities for learning in whole class and small group interactional spaces afforded in this studio environment and how the differential demands on students in doing problems requires re-conceptualizing what it means to &amp;quot;apply a concept&amp;quot;. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563686</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Making Visible the Complexities of Problem Solving: An Ethnographic Study of a General Chemistry Course in a Studio Learning Environment</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3910-7</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>300</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602111</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Place Based Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outreach Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lesson Plans</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Field Trips</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Outdoor Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College School Cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Nilsen, Katherine Joy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explores how university students (i.e., undergraduate and graduate students) participating in a place-based outreach program practiced teaching strategies on four field trips. The outreach program, Learning in Place-Based Environments (LPBE), provided opportunities for the university students to teach fifth grade students about place, including through focusing on the natural attributes of a place, promoting sustainable living in a place, and integrating the diverse meanings that a place holds (see Semken, 2005). This research is informed by the literature on science teacher effectiveness, science outreach programs that provide teaching opportunities, learning to teach through apprenticeship, and place-based education. The intended and enacted curricula of the LPBE program were studied. The field trip station lesson plans were reviewed for evidence of place-based teaching strategies. Videotapes of the university students teaching fifth grade students in different outdoor locations were analyzed according to the types of teaching strategies that they practiced. In addition, the frequency and co-occurrence of various teaching strategies were examined. Overall, the university students practiced relatively few place-based teaching strategies. Also, challenges that the university students faced while teaching fifth grade students on the field trips are outlined. This study has implications for developing training opportunities for educators to learn about how to incorporate place into their educational programs. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563687</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Graduate and Undergraduate Students&apos; Teaching Practices in a Place-Based Outreach Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3997-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>248</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602176</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Adult Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Immigrants</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Second Language Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Sanchez, Karen Renee</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explores the self-efficacy of students learning English as a Second Language on the computer-based Rosetta Stone program. The research uses a qualitative approach to explore how a readily available computer-based learning program, Rosetta Stone, can help adult immigrant students gain some English competence and so acquire a greater self-efficacy in their working lives. There is literature on self-efficacy and computer-based learning but not on how erudition on computers encourages learning in adult ESL students. This ethnographic research explores how teacher&apos;s classroom practice takes into account the varied educational and language competence backgrounds of adult students in an ESL setting and how using a computer program, Rosetta Stone, encourages these students achieve self-efficacy in language learning. I make use of my ethnographic observation notes as a teacher ethnographer, the student computer and language experience surveys, as well as the adult school demographic data available to the teacher. The survey responses are coded and grouped into two groups those with high and low computer experience and high and low English skills. A subset of students was interviewed by selecting the samples from the high and low groups. The morning classes are activity based and the evening classes are computer based leading to differing types of efficacy. The course was effective in different ways given these differences between morning and evening classes. The main finding describes how the majority of the adult students&apos; perceived self-efficacy tended to increase when students gained a more varied language learning experience in a routine program. Considering the problem of computer-based learning efficacy in schools, the research regarding self-efficacy and computer-based learning technology is limited. The research presented here demonstrates only a small aspect of future research focused on ESL classroom structure. Finally, a last implication addresses the ways teachers in ESL adult classes adapt, transform, redesign, and teach their classes, which constitutes further development and exploration utilizing an empirical approach as to how studying English as a Second Language advances self-efficacy and adult ESL student employability while leading the students toward their vision of living the American Dream. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563688</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Adult Learning in a Computer-Based ESL Acquisition Program</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4049-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>189</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602208</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Language Planning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Refugees</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ideology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Land Settlement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Welfare Recipients</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Needs Assessment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum Design</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English (Second Language)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Proficiency</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Poverty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnography</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Feuerherm, Emily</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>Iraq</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>Iraq</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation explores the creation and development of a community based language and health program for Iraqi refugees. The need for the program is contextualized by international, national and local policies of refugee resettlement, policies for language and education, and the interpretation of these policies on the ground. Ideologies evident in these policies stressing early self-sufficiency are contrasted to the lived experiences of refugees and the limited supportive resources available to them. The dissertation shows that a paradox exists between the discourses in policies and education, and the lived realities of refugee resettlement: refugees are viewed by policymakers as burdens on the state, yet the policies and programs as they are instituted ensure that most will rely on welfare rather than become self-sufficient. Additionally, Iraqi refugees&apos; life history narratives are explored regarding emergent identities and positionings related to resettlement, which are then compared to the underlying ideologies of resettlement policies. The research on policies and identities is tied into the local development of the Refugee Health and Employment Attainment Program, and the building of its participatory curriculum. The dissertation outlines methods regarding participatory adult language program and curriculum building, and provides sample lessons for multiple levels of English proficiency. The research includes: critical discourse analysis of media articles, policies and educational resources; a critical interpretive approach to keywords in life history narratives; interviews regarding the linguistic and educational needs of newly arrived Iraqi refugees; and ethnographic field notes of the community-based language and health education program. The gap between refugees&apos; needs, the resources available to them and the policies which maintain the status quo of poverty and disenfranchisement are challenged by a participatory orientation to program development. This research demonstrates that a participatory program can help bridge this gap and address the diverse and changing needs of refugees. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563689</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Language Policies, Identities, and Education in Refugee Resettlement</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3845-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>222</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602059</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Questioning Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discussion (Teaching Technique)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Video Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reflection</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Gaspard, Cathy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined four high school mathematics student teachers&apos; questions and responses in whole class discussion for eight weeks. Throughout the eight weeks, student teachers were teaching full time. With the use of video, interviews and written reflections the results make visible that student teachers attempted to ask questions that required students to explain their thinking. Early in the eight weeks, student teachers attempted to ask more questions that required students to explain their thinking, but over time, student teachers asked fewer of these questions. Results make visible that negative student responses to student teachers&apos; questions influenced the decisions they made about the questions they asked. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563690</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Secondary Mathematics Student Teachers&apos; Questions and Responses in Whole Class Discussion: Influences on Instructional Decisions</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3860-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>180</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602070</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Personal Autonomy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Undergraduate Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Experience</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Interests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Science</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Controlled Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Hall, Nicholas Ron</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The role of autonomy in the student experience in a large-enrollment undergraduate introductory physics course was studied from a Self-Determination Theory perspective with two studies. Study I, a correlational study, investigated whether certain aspects of the student experience correlated with how autonomy supportive (vs. controlling) students perceived their instructors to be. An autonomy supportive instructor acknowledges students&apos; perspectives, feelings, and perceptions and provides students with information and opportunities for choice, while minimizing external pressures. It was found that the degree to which students perceived their instructors as autonomy supportive was positively correlated with student interest and enjoyment in learning physics (beta = 0.31***) and negatively correlated with student anxiety about taking physics (beta = -0.23**). It was also positively correlated with how autonomous (vs. controlled) students&apos; reasons for studying physics became over the duration of the course (i.e., studying physics more because they wanted to vs. had to; beta = 0.24***). This change in autonomous reasons for studying physics was in turn positively correlated with student performance in the course (beta = 0.17*). Additionally, the degree to which students perceived their instructors as autonomy supportive was directly correlated with performance for those students entering the course with relatively autonomous reasons for studying physics (beta = 0.25**). In summary, students who perceived their instructors as more autonomy supportive tended to have a more favorable experience in the course. If greater autonomy support was in fact the cause of a more favorable student experience, as suggested by Self-determination Theory and experimental studies in other contexts, these results would have implications for instruction and instructor professional development in similar contexts. I discuss these implications. Study II, an experimental study, investigated the effect, on the student experience, of the number of opportunities for choice built into the course format. This was done by comparing two sets of classes. In one set of classes, students spent each class period working through a required series of activities. In the other set of classes, with additional choice, students were free to choose what to work on during nearly half of each class. It was found that the effect of additional choice on student interest and enjoyment in learning physics was significantly different for men vs. women, with a Cohen&apos;s d of 0.62 (0.16-1.08; 95% CI). Men became somewhat more interested with additional choice and women became less interested. This gender difference in interest and enjoyment as a result of additional choice could not be accounted for by differences in performance. It was also found that only in classes with additional choice did performance in the course correlate with the degree to which students reasons for studying physics became more autonomous during the quarter (beta = 0.30*). I discuss the implications that these effects of additional choice have for instruction and course design in similar contexts. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563691</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Autonomy and the Student Experience in Introductory Physics</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3872-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>132</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602079</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Visual Perception</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Attention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visualization</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Brain</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Psychology</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Haroz, Steve</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This work examines how a better understanding of visual perception and attention can impact visualization design. In a collection of studies, I explore how different levels of the visual system can measurably affect a variety of visualization metrics. The results show that expert preference, user performance, and even computational performance are all related to how our eyes and brain work to see the world. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563692</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Perception and Attention for Visualization</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3878-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>70</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602084</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Processing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Systems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Markov Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prediction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Storage</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scientific Concepts</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Computation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>James, Ryan Gregory</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>How much information do natural systems store and process? In this work we attempt to answer this question in multiple ways. We first establish a mathematical framework where natural systems are represented by a canonical form of edge-labeled hidden fc models called e-machines. Then, utilizing this framework, a variety of measures are defined and algorithms for computing them from an e-machine are described. The first two measures defined are related to the length of time a system remembers. The first, the Markov order, is a well-known measure of the time one must observe a system in order to make accurate predictions. Despite its statistical nature, it is shown to be a topological property of the process&apos;s e-machine. The second, the recently defined cryptic order, quantifies the ability to retrodict a system&apos;s internal dynamics. It is also shown to be a topological property of the e-machine, and efficient algorithms for computing both quantities are given. The second batch of metrics quantify information generation and storage in a system by partitioning the observations. By considering the role of both the past and the future behavior of a system, a semantic understanding of information generation emerges, labeling some information generation as &amp;quot;ephemeral,&amp;quot; having no lasting effects on the system, and the rest as &amp;quot;bound,&amp;quot; playing a role temporal structure. Following through with this decomposition, other quantities of less straight-forward interpretation are also defined. This is followed by a thorough discussion of these quantities and other derived quantities. Lastly the decomposition of the entropy rate into ephemeral and bound components is applied to several standard chaotic systems through a duality between the entropy rate and the Lyapunov exponent. This exposes new structural behaviors hitherto unknown in these systems. These revolutions hint at a method for tuning natural or engineered systems so as to maximize the ability to harness their intrinsic computing abilities. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563693</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Measures and Metrics of Information Processing in Complex Systems: A Rope of Sand</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3900-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>91</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602104</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Visual Aids</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Science</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liao, Wenjing</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This dissertation is composed of two parts. In the first part techniques of band exclusion(BE) and local optimization(LO) are proposed to solve linear continuum inverse problems independently of the grid spacing. The second part is devoted to the Fourier phase retrieval problem. Many situations in optics, medical imaging and signal processing call for solutions of linear continuum inverse problems. Spectral estimation is an example among those. A commonly used method is to seek a discrete, approximate solution for the continuum problem by discretizing the problem on a finite grid, but meanwhile, a gridding error, roughly proportional to the grid spacing, arises in the discretization process. When the grid spacing is above the Rayleigh length, the gridding error can be as large as the data themselves, creating an unfavorable signal to noise ratio. To reduce the gridding error, one has to refine the grid. However, when the grid spacing is reduced below the Rayleigh length, sensing matrices become underdetermined and highly coherent, resulting in the failure of many existing compressive sensing(CS) algorithms. In order to fill the gap, we propose the techniques of BE and LO to deal with coherent sensing matrices on a fine grid. These techniques are embedded in the existing CS algorithms, such as Orthogonal Matching Pursuit(OMP) and Basis Pursuit(BP), and give rise to the modified algorithms, such as BLO-based OMP (also called BLOOMP) and BLO-based BP (also called BP-BLOT) respectively. We have proved that, under certain conditions, BLO-based OMP is capable of reconstructing sparse, widely separated objects within one Rayleigh length in bottleneck distance independent of the grid spacing. Detailed numerical comparisons with other algorithms designed for the same purpose, such as the Spectral Iterative Hard Thresholding (SIHT) and the analysis-based BP, demonstrate the superiority of BLO-based algorithms. The second part of this dissertation is mainly concerned with the Fourier phase retrieval problem: reconstructing an unknown image from its Fourier magnitude measurements. This problem arises frequently in a number of different imaging modalities including X-ray crystallography, coherent light microscopy, astronomy, etc. It is well known that traditional phasing methods have stagnation problems of outputting an image that is not fully reconstructed, due to non-convexity as well as non-absolute-uniqueness, with absolute uniqueness being referred to as uniqueness up to a constant global phase. In the phasing literature a lot of emphasis has been put on the algorithm designs or the utilization of a priori information in order to avoid stagnation. Instead, we attack the Fourier phase retrieval problem using well-designed illuminations. Specifically we explore a phasing method based on a random phase mask(RPM) that randomly modifies the phases of the original image. We demonstrate that the use of RPM in Fourier phasing not only results in an absolute uniqueness but also leads to superior numerical performances, including rapid convergence, much reduced data and noise stability. More importantly, Fourier phasing with RPM does not rely on accurate information of the phase mask. We show that nearly perfect recovery can be achieved in the case of phase-uncertain mask where one&apos;s estimates on the mask phases differ from the true mask phases within certain level. Absolute uniqueness results are generalized to the case of phase-uncertain mask, stating that under certain conditions both the image and the mask within the image support are uniquely determined up to a constant global phase with high probability. A numerical scheme alternating between the image update and the mask update is proposed to recover the image and the mask simultaneously. Our numerical simulations demonstrate that nearly perfect recovery can be achieved by RPM with high uncertainty in mask phases. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563694</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Grid-Independent Compressive Imaging and Fourier Phase Retrieval</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3944-2</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>149</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602136</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Dormitories</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Hispanic American Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cultural Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Characteristics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preferences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Mann, Danny Stephen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study explored the relationship between students&apos; residence hall preference and ethnic identity. The study explored differences in ethnic identity development among first-year Chicano/Latino college students who actively requested to live on a culturally themed living learning community and were placed there; Chicano/Latino students who actively requested the culturally themed community and were not placed there; and those who actively requested to live in a non-culturally themed community. The sample of 116 students all resided in University owned housing of similar size, resources, and staff. Overall, results reflected students that requested and lived on the cultural floor differed only from the students that requested a traditional residence hall on scores of &amp;quot;exploration&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;resolution,&amp;quot; but not for &amp;quot;affirmation.&amp;quot; Students who requested the cultural floor but did not live there did not significantly differ from either group on any three of the subscales (&amp;quot;exploration,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;resolution,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;affirmation&amp;quot;). [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563695</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>The Relationship between Ethnic Identity and Residence Hall Preference</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3959-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>65</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602147</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mathematics Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Knowledge Base for Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Longitudinal Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Transfer of Training</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Algebra</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Moon, Kyunghee</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study examined how preservice secondary mathematics teachers developed mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) around representations and big ideas through mathematics and mathematics education courses. The importance of big ideas and representations in mathematics has been emphasized in national standards as well as in literature. Yet, many studies suggested that teachers&apos; conceptions or understandings of representations and big ideas are problematic. Nonetheless, there is a lack of attention from the mathematics education community regarding how and in what ways teachers develop knowledge in these areas. This is a longitudinal study focusing on three preservice secondary teachers who had taken mathematics and mathematics education courses for two years, one year as undergraduates and the other year as graduates in a teacher education program. The courses emphasized representations and big ideas and were designed to help preservice teachers develop MKT through problem solving and analysis of student thinking. As such, it was expected that preservice teachers would develop beliefs/conceptions and knowledge that were oriented around representations and big ideas. This study used qualitative methods to analyze classroom data, two individual interviews, and teacher assessment portfolios from student teaching. Three areas of knowledge were examined: ability in problem solving, knowledge of tasks, and knowledge of student thinking. The results showed that the participants improved knowledge and beliefs/conceptions with regard to representations and big ideas within the courses. However, they had difficulties transferring their knowledge to their practice. In the area of problem solving, they were able to successfully solve problems at the grade 5-8 level with which they were familiar through the courses, when they were prompted to use non-algebraic approaches. Yet, they had difficulties solving many high school level Cartesian representation-related problems even with prompts. They also showed tendencies to use algebraic approaches in problem solving for both grade 5-8 and high school level problems when they were not prompted. In the areas of knowledge of task and knowledge of student thinking, they were able to design tasks and analyze student thinking with an eye on representations and big ideas, when they were familiar with them through the courses. However, they had an eye mostly on procedural skills and students&apos; errors rather than on big ideas and students difficulties with big ideas, when they had to design their own tasks and analyze their students&apos; mathematical thinking during student teaching. Their lack of profound content knowledge in the topics they taught was one of the major contributing factors for those phenomena. It is advisable that secondary teacher educators pay extra attention to developing teachers&apos; content knowledge as well as knowledge of student thinking. Without knowledge in these areas, it is unlikely that secondary teachers could help students understand critical mathematical ideas. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563696</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Preservice Secondary Mathematics Teachers&apos; Development of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching and Their Use of Knowledge in Their Instruction</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-3980-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>219</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602166</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pragmatics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Linguistic Theory</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ambiguity (Semantics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Sentences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Language Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Context Effect</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Generalization</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Spewak, David Charles, Jr.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The primary concern of this dissertation is determining the distinction between semantics and pragmatics and how context sensitivity should be accommodated within a semantic theory. I approach the question over how to distinguish semantics from pragmatics from a new angle by investigating what the objects of a semantic theory are, namely expressions or utterances. In Chapter 1, I investigate the preceding question. I am approaching the question of how to draw the line between semantics and pragmatics by first considering what the objects of a semantic theory are. This is an under-appreciated point in this discussion. By beginning with this question I am approaching this from a new and important angle. For if we are interested in what literal meanings are assigned to, it is a necessary step to consider what the objects of a semantic theory are. This dissertation proceeds in answering this question over what the objects of a semantic theory are by arguing that they are expression types relativized to contexts, or expressions-in-context, by relying on arguments presented by David Kaplan. In addition it is argued that the way we approach language is expression based in that we often assign semantic content to sentences that are not a part of any obvious utterances. Moreover, it is then argued that semantics based on expressions-in-context provide a clear account of examples of the historical present without positing additional ambiguity. In Chapter 2, I approach a powerful objection to an expression based approach to semantics, that of true demonstratives, i.e. expressions the use of which require an actual demonstration. If semantics proceeds by assigning content to expressions-in-context, how can it assign different contents to &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; occurring more than once in the same sentence while maintaining that it has the same linguistic meaning? Stefano Predelli defends the view that by representing the linguistic meaning, i.e. character, of &apos;that&apos; as a function from the context and an integer, representing the location of &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; in the sentence, to the demonstratum in that context, we can maintain a single meaning for all demonstrative occurrences of &amp;quot;that&amp;quot;. I develop this idea further and compare it with Nathan Salmon&apos;s approach to demonstratives whereby the relevant demonstration is in the formal context rather than the demonstratum. I conclude by arguing that by taking expressions-in-context as the objects of a semantic theory, rather than utterances, we can still formally account for true demonstratives, and as a result show that the approach developed in the first chapter can handle this objection. In Chapter 3, I approach the question of how we might determine if apparent contextual influence on communication is semantically required or pragmatically influencing the communicated content. If we approach semantics as expressions rather than utterances, we must find a method for determining whether contextual features are triggered by the linguistic meaning of expressions. In the hopes of getting clearer on when context is semantically relevant I consider numerous tests that have been presented in the literature, but find them all wanting. These have been put forward by Cappelen and Lepore, Cappelen and Hawthorne, and Jason Stanley. I evaluate each in turn and conclude that although someone may be able to develop tests to provide some evidence for when an expression is context sensitive, no test is immediately forthcoming. As a result of this conclusion, the best that we can do is evaluate complete theories based on coherency and explanatory power. In Chapter 4, my final chapter, I apply the results set out in earlier chapters to a particularly problematic case study: negative existentials. Negative existentials present a pressing case because any purely semantic approach will find a problem with them. So, any solution to this problem will rest on the distinction between semantics and pragmatics. I develop a theory of negative existentials based on Gricean generalized conversational implicatures within the framework provided by the distinction made in Chapter 1, where semantics assigns contents to expressions while pragmatics to utterances as well as the results of Chapter 3, namely that if we cannot test an expression for context sensitivity we must evaluate a more overarching theory for coherency. I argue that building on the discussion of an expression-based approach to semantics we have a better formula for explaining intuitions regarding negative existentials. To do this, I argue that names originating in fiction refer to genuinely existing abstract artifacts allowing negative existentials to have truth-values. This results in an elegant semantics and the intuition that the negative existential is true is handled by the Gricean theory of conversational implicatures. (Abstract shortened by UMI.). [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563697</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Nature of Semantic Theories</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4072-1</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>216</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602222</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Interpersonal Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cooperative Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Discourse Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Abstract Reasoning</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Process Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Science Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Physics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Peer Teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Thinking Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Problem Solving</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Cognitive Processes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Evidence</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comprehension</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Measurement Techniques</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Coding</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Stone, Antoinette</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>California</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>California</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The use of science classroom discourse analysis as a way to gain a better understanding of various student cognitive outcomes has a rich history in Science Education in general and Physics Education Research (PER) in particular. When students talk to each other in a collaborative peer instruction environment, such as in the CLASP classes (Collaborative Learning and Sense-making in Physics) at UC Davis, they get to practice and enhance their reasoning and sense-making skills, develop collaborative approaches to problem solving, and participate in co-construction of knowledge and shared thinking. To better understand these important cognitive processes, an analysis tool for monitoring, assessing and categorizing the peer talk arising in this environment is needed as a first step in teasing out evidence for these processes inherent in such talk. In order to meaningfully contribute to the extensive body of knowledge that currently exists, deeper, more insightful answers to the question of what happens linguistically when students struggle to &amp;quot;make sense&amp;quot; and how students use language to mediate these important cognitive outcomes is needed. To this end, a new tool for interpreting particularly qualitative linguistic data is needed, and the first part of the dissertation expounds on the development of a discourse analysis tool that has as its underpinnings a framework for coding borrowed extensively from Systemic Functional Linguistics Theory (SFL). The second part of this dissertation illustrates multiple ways in which the tool is used and how it can be utilized to address many current research questions. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563698</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Assessing Student Peer Dialogue in Collaborative Settings: A Window into Student Reasoning</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4080-6</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>178</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602228</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Secondary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Accountability</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>English Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Componential Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Inservice Teacher Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Professional Development</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Wahleithner, Juliet Michelsen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Secondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>High Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Knowing how to write is critical to students&apos; post-secondary success, yet concerns with students&apos; writing have persisted for nearly four decades. Few reports, however, document high school English teachers&apos; lack of preparation to teach writing or the pressures they face as they negotiate accountability policies and diverse student need. This negotiation directly impacts teachers&apos; instructional decisions and, ultimately, the conditions in which students learn to write. Using a two-phase, mixed methods approach, this dissertation study examines three factors related to high school English teachers&apos; instruction of writing: teachers&apos; perceived knowledge of writing instruction, their students&apos; diverse needs related to writing, and the pressures of high stakes accountability policies. Specifically, within this study I examine the tensions that arise as teachers negotiate these three factors and the ways in which the tensions teachers experience vary depending on teachers&apos; knowledge of writing instruction, the diverse needs of their students, and local accountability pressures. The first phase of the study included a 40-item survey administered to 171 high school English teachers who taught a representative sample of California high school students. Survey results were analyzed first using descriptive statistics and then using Principal Components Analysis. Preliminary findings from the survey informed participant selection for phase two, case studies of eight teachers. Data collected from each case study teacher included beginning and end-of-year interviews, one to two-day observations at four points in the school year, and collection of instructional documents related to writing. Together, the two phases yield nuanced understandings of the interplay of teacher knowledge, student need, and accountability policies on writing instruction. Findings from the survey illustrated that teachers in all but the highest performing schools (according to Academic Performance Index score) faced pressures from various accountability policies that impacted their instruction of writing. These findings were further substantiated by data collected from the case study teachers. Additionally, although survey respondents overall reported that they had the necessary knowledge to teach writing to their students, case study findings illustrated that most teachers receive little formal preparation to teach writing. Ultimately, accountability policies had the biggest impact on what writing was taught. Taken together, the results of this study demonstrate the need for more attention to writing in both teachers&apos; pre-service teacher preparation and in-service professional development. Additionally, the results illustrate the impact of the current high stakes accountability assessment on high school teachers&apos; instruction of writing. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563699</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>High School Teachers&apos; Instruction of Writing: Negotiating Knowledge, Student Need, and Policy</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Davis</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-4101-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>304</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602243</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Oral Reading</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Predictor Variables</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>High Stakes Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 2</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Standardized Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Devena, Sarah</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southwest)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 1</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 2</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Current emphasis on adequate academic progress monitored by standardized assessments has increased focus on student acquisition of required skills. Reading ability can be assessed through student achievement on Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) measures. This study investigated the effectiveness of using ORF measures to predict achievement on high stakes tests. Study participants included 312 students across four Title 1 elementary schools in a Southwestern United States school district utilizing the Response to Intervention (RTI) model. Participants&apos; ORF scores from first through third grade years and their third grade standardized achievement test scores were collected. In addition, information regarding reading interventions was obtained. Pearson product-moment correlations were used to determine how ORF scores and specific reading skills were related. Correlations were also used to assess whether the ORF scores from the fall, winter, or spring were most related to high stakes test scores. Additionally, the difference between computer-based versus instructor-led interventions on predicting high stakes test scores was assessed. Results indicated that correlation coefficients were larger between ORF and reading comprehension scores than between ORF and basic reading skills. ORF scores from spring were more highly related to high stakes tests than other times of the year. Students&apos; ORF scores were more strongly related to high stakes tests when in computer-based interventions compared to instructor-led interventions. In predicting third grade high stakes test scores, first grade ORF scores had the most variance for the non-intervention sample, while third grade ORF scores had the most variance for the intervention sample. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563700</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Relationship of Oral Reading Fluency Probes on Students&apos; Reading Achievement Test Scores</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6318-8</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>101</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602853</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Socioeconomic Influences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Low Income Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Academic Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Positive Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Negative Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 3</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Reading Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scores</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Fenske, Mark S.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 3</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Primary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 4</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The correlation between income level and achievement has led some educators to believe that low-income students cannot learn at the same level as can middle-class and affluent peers. This problem is significant because as more families become impoverished, more students may be at risk for failure. Many studies have identified challenges facing low-income students, but few have quantified the relationship between teachers&apos; perceptions of low-income students and achievement. This study investigated the impact of perception on the achievement of low-income elementary students. In the 1st phase, 55 educators were surveyed with the Low Income Student Belief Inventory (LISBI). The median score identified teachers with a positive and negative attitude toward low-income students. The 2nd phase examined the correlation between perceptions of each group and reading achievement of 522 low-income students in Grades 3-5. Reading scores from the Illinois Standards Assessment Test (ISAT) were collected. Sample means were compared via an independent t test. Results indicated that the positive group had a higher percentage of low-income students meet or exceed standards. However, achievement was not statistically higher among low-income students taught by educators with a positive attitude compared to those with a negative attitude. The study demonstrated a relationship between positive perceptions and reading achievement, and further identified that effective pedagogy adjusts instruction to accommodate for differences found in the experiences of low-income students. These findings suggest that effective pedagogy also builds positive relationships with students and provides for the unique academic needs that low-income students bring to the classroom. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563701</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Educator Perceptions of Low-Income Elementary Students and Their Effects on Reading</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Walden University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6319-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>124</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602854</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Skills</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Grade 5</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Prompting</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Comparative Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Gender Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Scoring Rubrics</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Writing Assignments</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Electronic Publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Elementary School Students</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Heath, Vickie L.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Grade 5</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Intermediate Grades</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Middle Schools</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Elementary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This quantitative study explored if significant differences exist between how fifth-grade students produce a written response to a narrative prompt using online versus offline writing platforms. The cultural and social trend of instructional and assessment writing paradigms in education is shifting to online writing platforms (National Assessment Governing Board, 2011; National Writing Project, 2010). A mixed between-within subjects with repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) and counter balance design was conducted to assess the effects of online versus offline writing platforms in the areas of topic/idea, convention, and gender. The Pennsylvania System of School Assessment Writing Rubric was used to rank students&apos; written responses to a narrative prompt. The findings suggest that a significant difference in students&apos; writing performance is positively affected when students&apos; blog. Evidence suggests blogging encourages students&apos; awareness of audience and social interaction. Further studies are needed in the area of online versus offline writing platforms with elementary children. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563702</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Elementary Writing Assessment Platforms: A Quantitative Examination of Online versus Offline Writing Performance of Fifth-Grade Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6324-9</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>243</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602856</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Self Efficacy</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Preschool Teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Early Childhood Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Mixed Methods Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vignettes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Behavior Problems</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Antisocial Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Semi Structured Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Shelton, Tricia H.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Preschool Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Early Childhood Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>The purpose of this research was to explore the teacher self-efficacy beliefs of early childhood preservice educators and their preparedness to teach students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Phase One of this mixed-methods approach asked preservice early childhood educators (N = 34) to complete the short form of the &amp;quot;Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale&amp;quot; (Tschannen-Moran &amp;amp; Woolfolk Hoy, 2001) as well as an open-ended vignette survey which described common academic, behavioral, and social challenges of students with ASD. Respondents were assigned the task of identifying goals, resources, and strategies to address each scenario. In Phase Two of this research, participants from the larger population (N = 6) discussed their perceived preparedness to teach students with ASD in semi-structured interviews. Results indicated preservice educators have moderately high levels of self-efficacy in instructional practices, student engagement, and classroom management. However, reported goals, resources, and strategies for students were broadly defined and lacked ASD specificity. Further, interviewees recognized the positive influence of experience with students with ASD on their preparedness to teach this population of students, but were cognizant of deficits in their knowledge and skills. Consequently, respondents expressed plans to pursue ASD-specific professional development. This study demonstrated that early childhood educators complete teacher training with high self-efficacy, but are underprepared to address some of the challenges of teaching students with ASD. Implications of this research suggested several modifications in teacher preparation. First, preservice educators should have greater experience with ASD embedded into course assignments, discussions, and fieldwork. Second, novice educators need to learn to seek teacher-centered resources, such as collaboration with colleagues and families, to help address gaps in ASD understanding. Third, beginning teachers must commit to ongoing ASD professional development. The combination of these experiences encourages the reflective practices that foster mature teaching repertories. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563703</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Exploring Preservice Early Childhood Educators&apos; Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Preparedness to Teach Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Inclusive Classrooms</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>D.Ed. Dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6332-4</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>266</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602860</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Outsourcing</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Correlation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Information Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Administrator Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Online Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Regression (Statistics)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Statistical Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Eichman, Bruce W.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Organizational executives are concerned with the insufficient alignment of Information Technology (IT) investments to achieve computed based information systems effectiveness. Survey results of senior executives determined that in spite of applying enormous amounts of resources and energy attempting to prioritize and effectively align these investments with the most urgent business objectives, less than 20% of these executives believed they were successful. Public and private sector executives across multiple industries were surveyed to examine the IT correlative effects of outsourcing with agility, strategic alignment, and effectiveness. One hundred eighty-six people responded to an online survey representing approximately 3% of the targeted sample population. The research design used a quantitative research strategy with correlation and regression analysis techniques to examine construct relationships. Correlation analysis showed information technology outsourcing was not significantly correlated with effectiveness (p = 0.113). There was a significant relationship between outsourcing and agility (p &amp;lt; 0.001) and with strategic alignment (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Information technology strategic alignment and agility showed a positive and significant correlation (p &amp;lt; 0.001) with effectiveness. Four levels of information technology outsourcing were examined using a reduced regression model that revealed significant relationships between outsourcing and agility (p &amp;lt; 0.01) when 1%-24% of the IT budget was allocated to outsourcing. The strongest regression coefficient existed between outsourcing and strategic alignment (p &amp;lt; 0.05) with 25%-74% of the IT budget allocation. This study provided empirical research results supporting IT outsourcing as a viable means for competitive advantage. There was a 57% agreement among the respondents that outsourcing improved the control of expenses, improved firm performance, and allowed a refocusing on strategic and business plans. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563704</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>An Examination of the Correlative Effects of IT Outsourcing with IT Agility, IT Strategic Alignment and IT Effectiveness</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6348-5</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>204</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602871</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Action Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Special Schools</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Autism</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pervasive Developmental Disorders</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Foreign Countries</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Qualitative Research</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Program Effectiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Parent Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Practices</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Competencies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Barriers</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Development</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Play</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Curriculum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Individualized Education Programs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Educational Environment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teaching Conditions</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Liu, Jerry</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>China (Shanghai)</eric:keywords>
<eric:keywords_geo>China (Shanghai)</eric:keywords_geo>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel></dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This action research started in year 2009 at LIU Shanghai, a private school for children with autism spectrum disorder, to serve the needs of challenged students. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify the strengths and challenges of the program, plus solicit recommendations from the parents and teachers for making improvements. The parents&apos; identified several strengths: teachers&apos; care and patience with students and the ability to encourage engagement, the assessment tool and process, individualized learning plans, and noticeable results. They identified the challenges as not enough education about the LIU curriculum, inability to continue training at home, long distance from home, limited space at the training facility, safety during physical activities, poor air circulation, and the distance between the classroom and the bathroom. Their main recommendations were to incorporate social and play elements into the curriculum, provide learning sessions for better understanding the LIU curriculum, and getting a larger teaching facility. The teachers&apos; perception of the strengths included assessment of students, individualized learning plans, systematic approach for student development, support for teachers with the curriculum, stimulating and challenging environment, encouragement from leadership, and opportunities for career development. Teachers reported the challenges as preparation time for the curriculum, teaching multiple children in one session, parental concerns about the curriculum, teacher turnover, personal safety, classroom design, organization and cleanliness of the space, and children&apos;s safety and protection. The teachers recommended having learning sessions for parents, more teacher development training, and increasing safety. As the Director of LIU Shanghai, I added some plans for the next cycle of this action research: incorporating more social interaction and play in the curriculum, providing more learning sessions for parents, including parents in student training sessions, expanding teacher development, increasing safety, conducting exit surveys, and informing practice with more data. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563705</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>Serving the Needs of Challenged Students at a Private Shanghai School: An Action Research Approach</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ed.D. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6355-3</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>139</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602877</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Student Motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Surveys</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Two Year College Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Enrollment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Ethnic Groups</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Achievement</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Racial Differences</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Lynch, Ebony D.</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:keywords>United States (Southeast)</eric:keywords>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Two Year Colleges</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>Achievement motivation has played an integral part in the psychology and educational fields. Since achievement motivation made its debut in education and psychology fields, there continues to be some discrepancy in the studies that focused on achievement motivation based on traditional students and adult students. This study investigated the discrepancies or inconsistencies within those studies by examining the potential trends among these students. A survey was used to examine the differences in achievement motivation of traditional and adult students while focusing on enrollment status, ethnicity, and motives for enrolling in college as the key variables of the study. The sample was taken from the community college population located in the southeastern region of the United States. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]</dc:description>
<dc:identifier scheme='eric_accno'>ED563706</dc:identifier>
<dc:title>A Survey Study of Achievement Motivation, Enrollment Status, and Ethnicity on Traditional and Adult Students</dc:title>
<dc:source>ProQuest LLC</dc:source>
<eric:citation>Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University</eric:citation>
<dc:date>2013-00-00</dc:date>
<eric:sponsor></eric:sponsor>
<eric:isbn>978-1-3035-6356-0</eric:isbn>
<dcterms:audience></dcterms:audience>
<eric:pageCount>95</eric:pageCount>
<dc:publisher>ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml</dc:publisher>
<eric:peer_reviewed>N/A</eric:peer_reviewed>
<dc:identifier scheme='dcterms:URI'>http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&amp;res_dat=xri:pqm&amp;rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3602878</dc:identifier>
<eric:dateAdded>2016</eric:dateAdded>
<eric:referenceCount></eric:referenceCount>
<eric:abstractor>As Provided</eric:abstractor>
<eric:issue>JAN2020</eric:issue>
<eric:ies_funded></eric:ies_funded>
<eric:contract_number></eric:contract_number>
<eric:wwcguide_link></eric:wwcguide_link>
<eric:ies_publication_link></eric:ies_publication_link>
<eric:note></eric:note>
</metadata>
</record>
<record>
<header>
<action>New</action>
</header>
<metadata>
<dcterms:accessRights>No</dcterms:accessRights>
<dc:subject>Nursing Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nursing Education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Student Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>College Faculty</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Attitudes</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Case Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Observation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Documentation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Content Analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Teacher Student Relationship</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Interaction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Learner Controlled Instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Nontraditional Students</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Adult Learning</dc:subject>
<dc:creator scheme='personal author'>Rogers, Carmen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations</dc:type>
<eric:issn></eric:issn>
<dc:creator scheme='institution'></dc:creator>
<dc:language>English</dc:language>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Higher Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Postsecondary Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dcterms:educationLevel>Adult Education</dcterms:educationLevel>
<dc:description>This study was designed to identify and investigate nursing faculty and student perspectives of self-directed learning in a practical nursing program. It also explored the degree to which student&apos;s perceptions of self-directed learning exhibited factors consistent with that of critical thinking. This study is important because self-directed learning and its critical thinking elements are essential in providing safe, competent, effective, and efficient nursing care within practice and education. Using an explanatory case study design the practice of self-directed learning within a practical nursing program was examined through the use of: classroom observations, interviews with nursing faculty, nur